Hi Philipp et al. I asked about this from colleagues in Oulu. They had considered FIWARE securityfor some other service, but were discouraged by the complexity. First I tried Facebook login for its general popularity, but Its behavior was cumbersome and/or unreliable. Google login seems simple, sensible, reliable, and working. I try to make the architecture for the user control such that it should be easy to introduce other identification systems. I'll consider the FIWARE security next. BR Ari On 2016-01-19 23:01, Philipp Slusallek wrote: > Hi Ari, > > I saw that you are starting to work on Access Control for POI > (https://jira.fiware.org/browse/WEB-799) but you seem to plan using a > Google service for that. > > FIWARE actually has its own Securiity chapter, which has a pretty good > (as far as I know and what I hear) access control enabler. I think it > would not be good if you do not at least strongly consider using this. > > You might even be able to use the service in FIWARE Lab without having > to set anything yourself. Does anyone have experience with that in the > group? I am adding Stefan, who might know some more from FI-Content. > > > This actually brings me to another point that it might be necessary to > eventually add such a component also to a few other of our services. So > it might be helpful to explore this also as a group. > > This could be a good topic for the call tomorrow. Unfortunately, I will > be traveling tomorrow and will not be able to join, sorry. > > > Best, > > Philipp -- Ari Okkonen CIE, University of Oulu
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy