Dear all, In the telco of 28/7 about the coordination of FIWARE Backlog related activities, as leaders of Task 2.1, we proposed a procedure and a supporting tool (to be set up, hosted and supported by Atos) for the requirements gathering process, as an entry point for the backlog entries to be passed into AgileFant. The idea behind our proposed tool and procedure is that requirement contributors can directly provide their input into the system, requiring it to be assigned to a relevant WP representative (no 'dangling', un-owned requirements allowed). It allows for a decentralized way of handling the requirements and for a one-to-one dialog between those providing the requirements and the technical leaders responsible for fulfilling them. In our opinion, there is a risk involved when one single point of contact (whether that's Atos or anyone else), is responsible for evaluating, assigning, discussing and coordinating all the requirements between all contributors and all WP representatives. The amount of requirements that will be generated will be of a too significant amount to be realistically dealt with that way. The proposed tool supports topics (for a division between WPs), visibility/access levels for different staff, transfer of tickets, both private and public discussion threads for the tickets (to facilitate mentioned one-to-one dialogs), access without required registration, as well as the usual features such as email notifications, attachments, etc. Meanwhile, it is becoming apparent that the proposal is being disregarded in favor of Forge Tracker and a different process (more centralized). Let's be clear upfront that we have no problem with any tool that does the job right. However, we would like to emphasize that Atos will not assume the role of a central requirement handler. Atos will contribute to this task by providing end user and technical requirements and is still open to contribute with any further coordination activities required by the WP leader, as far as they reasonably fit within our assigned efforts. Best regards, Maarten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Bohnert, Thomas Michael Sent: martes, 16 de agosto de 2011 10:45 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] FI-WARE Backlog Management Dear all, We are getting closer to a final concept for maintaining the FI-WARE backlog. As you may recall, the system we will use to manage requests and actual backlog entries is a combination of the FORGE tracker, AgileFant, and a media wiki. Based on my own experience AgileFant in particular requires some effort to get acquainted with. Since the FI-WARE internal backlog will be managed by WP-Leads/-Architect I enclose the demo presentation provided by the AgileFant providers. Please make yourself familiar with it. In the near future we'll go through an some examples on how to use AgileFant within FI-WARE and familiarity with AgileFant terminology and concepts will be a prerequisite. I'll also put additional documentation on FORGE, under "WP2 - Global Technical Activities". In case of questions drop me mail. Best - Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy