[Fiware-wpa] [Fiware-wpl] R: R: Raw notes from the review

[Davide Dalle Carbonare]

Absolutely in line with the others,
well done!

BR
Davide


On 23/06/2012 17:02, matteo melideo wrote:
> + 1
>
> Well done
>
> Best
>
> M.
> Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry® from Vodafone!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com
> Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:40:12
> To: Juanjo Hierro<jhierro at tid.es>; <fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>
> Reply-to: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com
> Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R:  Raw notes from the review
>
> Dear Juanjo,
>
> Many thanks for the notes.
> Overall it was a great success of the whole team and yours as leader.
>
> See you soon!
> Stefano
>
> Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry® from Vodafone!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>
> Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:00:10
> To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>
> Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Raw notes from the review
>
> Hi,
>
>     Please find below the raw notes that I got during the report made by
> Arian right after the review meeting.
>
>     Cheers,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
> ===
>
> Positive points:
>
>     you appear as a team and relaxed.   Project positive vision.  You
> believe in what are you doing and we believe it is real.
>     effort in collaboration, communication and dissemination sounds
> pretty good but strategic plan should be pretty
>     Engineering contribution is pretty good.   DevCommE, should name is
> still a disaster :-)
>     Technical work is better that the way is presented.
>     People are serious and show
>     High enphasis on software that works.  That is minimum should
>     I2ND: has progressed significantly
>     Security: good progress, example to the rest
>     FI-WARE still a normal FP7 project but the PPP
>     Testbed: good progress, like matrix on usage by UC usage
>
> No so positive:
>
>     Thinking "good technology" sells itself alone and this is native
>     Too many times "this will come later" ("mañana")
>     Difficult to distinguish
>
>     Discrepancies in the backlog that have to be fixed
>     Discrepancies in the management reports (e.g. Zigbee according to
>     Relaxed attitude wrt delay
>
>     To improve regarding impact.   Example is the Website.
>     Economic model behind (business case) has to be considered more and
> earlier.   Should be clear.
>     Nice that you mention that you are starting to involve the Business
> but has to be visible.
>
>     Lack of justification and accountability in deliverables.  It's not
> only about
>
>     White paper regarding encompassing of GEs will be important
>
>     Distinction between GEs and SEs
>
>     Management has improved.   Workload has been distributed.
>
>     Some partners are not that visible.   In the reporting it should be
> visible what each is doing, overall academia partners.
>
>     Architectural weeks very positive and we encourage to continue this
> in the future.
>
>
> Recommendations:
>
>     Like to see evidence of using the FI-WARE Testbed from UC projects.
> They assume that they will start right after
>
>     Measure point sometime mid September / October regarding usage of
> FI-WARE Testbed
>
>     Some of the GEs might seem not to be critical then and therefore it
> might be then a point at which it would be sensible to reconsider what
> is being done.
>
>     Should be a plan for justification and accountability.
>
>     They need to check how recommendations have been
>
>     Different templates being used regarding the Open Specifications.
>
>     Clean up backlog and continues correct.
>
>     Restricted GEs (SAP) should be publicly available by end of July.
>
>     Business Model WG at FI-PPP should be a useful tool as a vehicle to
> discuss the Business aspects.
>
>     Next review in FI-WARE Testbed location (Sevilla ?) in month 18. They
> want to see people from the Business Units: Telefonica, SAP, Telecom
> Italia and Orange.
>
>     Would like to see planning regarding training of DevCommE
>
>
> Deliverables:
>
>     They will not comment on that now.  We'll see in the report.
>
>
> ===
>
> --
>
> -------------
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
> website: www.tid.es
> email: jhierro at tid.es
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>     website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>     facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>     twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>     linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpl mailing list
> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpl mailing list
> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpl mailing list
> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
>
>