[Fiware-wpa] [Fiware-wpl] You have some WRONG names assigned to some of the FI-WARE CE RIs in the FI-WARE Catalogue

[stefano de panfilis]

dear juanjo,

exactly becouse of your email, it also misleading calling the
implementations of gi "reference implelemtation" even if it is coming from
fi-ware. indeed there is more than an example where we do have already
multiple implemenattions for the same ge.

please come back to the traditional terminology taking out "reference" from
"implementation".

ciao,
stefano



2012/11/12 Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>

>  Dear colleagues,
>
>   The following entries in the FI-WARE Catalogue do NOT yet comply with
> the convention referring to naming/title for the entry (<name-of-GE> -
> <name-of-implementation-product>):
>
>    - Service Mashup - Mashup Factory (currently, only "Mashup Factory"
>    alone)
>    - Publish/Subscribe - Context Awareness Platform (currently, only
>    "Publish/Subscribe".   BTW, should change "Publish/Subscribe" to
>    "Publish/Subscribe Context Broker")
>    - Marketplace (remains without name for the GE RI)
>    - Service Description Repository (remains without name for the GE RI)
>    - IaaS Data Center Resource Management (remains without name for the
>    GE RI)
>    - Object Storage (remains without name for the GE RI)
>    - Identity Management GCP (just need to add a '-' between "Identity
>    Management" and "GCP" to keep consistent with the convention, already
>    adopted by the other Identity Management GE RI)
>    - DB Anonymizer (remains without name for the GE RI)
>    - Security Monitoring (remains without name for the GE RI)
>    - Semantic Annotation (remains without name for the GE RI)
>    - Semantic Application Support GE (remains without name for the GE RI
>    and you should drop "GE" from the title)
>    - Cloud Edge (remains without name for the GE RI)
>
>   You may consider this is minor but are the kind of things that lead to
> misunderstandings and also deliver contradictory messages.   FI-WARE GE
> Open Specifications would allow implementations of the specs by third
> parties and we would allow them to be publishd on the FI-WARE Catalogue ...
> How would them be going to be named in the Catalogue ?   Why should an
> implementation by FI-WARE be the only one to have the rights to use only
> the name of the GE ?
>
>   Please try to implement it by Wednesday Nov 14 EOB.
>
>   Cheers,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
> -------------
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
> website: www.tid.es
> email: jhierro at tid.es
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>   website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>   twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
> situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpl mailing list
> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
>
>


-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpa/attachments/20121112/3d42b9c5/attachment.html>