[Fiware-wpa] Fwd: Re: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables

Juanjo Hierro jhierro at tid.es
Mon Apr 8 09:19:52 CEST 2013


  FYI,

-- Juanjo

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables
Date:   Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:19:21 +0200
From:   Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
To:     Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>
CC:     subsidies at tid.es<mailto:subsidies at tid.es>, mcp at tid.es<mailto:mcp at tid.es>, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu<mailto:CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu>, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>



On 20/03/13 11:51, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu> wrote:
> Dear Juanjo,
>
> Acceptance / rejection decisions about costs will only be made when financial and effort figures are present, so in this case at M24.
>
> Regarding (temporarily) rejected costs in reporting period 1, and associated deliverables accepted in the M18 review report, such costs would under normal circumstances be accepted. Circumstances would not be normal if e.g. 3x the amount of efforts were spent on a deliverable than planned, without proper justification. Again, that will only be assessed at M24.

  What about deliverables that have been rejected (although not asked
for resubmission) ?   In your response, you only refer to deliverables
accepted in the M18 review report.

  Best regards,

-- Juanjo

>
> Best regards,
> Arian.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT)
> Cc: subsidies at tid.es<mailto:subsidies at tid.es>; Miguel Carrillo; CNECT-ICT-285248
> Subject: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables
>
> Dear Arian,
>
>     Partners also want to know what are the implications, regarding
> assessment of costs, of the rejection of re-submitted deliverables,
> overall when no re-submission is requested (e.g., re-submission of
> deliverable D.2.4.1)
>
>     Thanks in advance,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
> -------------
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
> website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
> email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
> and Chief Architect
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>     website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>     facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>     twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>     linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
> On 19/03/13 07:34, Juanjo Hierro wrote:
>> Dear Arian,
>>
>>    Several partners are asking whether it can be assumed that costs
>> rejected in the 1st reporting period (M12) review report matching
>> deliverables that have been re-submitted and accepted in the M18
>> review will be then accepted in the 2nd reporting period.
>>
>>    Could you elaborate on what the official rules of FP7 projects state
>> in this respect ?
>>
>>    Thanks in advance,
>>
>> -- Juanjo
>>
>> -------------
>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
>> website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
>> email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>>
>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
>> and Chief Architect
>>
>> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>>    website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>>    facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>>    twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>>    linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
> .
>





________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpa/attachments/20130408/0e7a8800/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-wpa mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy