[Fiware-wpa] Fwd: FI-WARE: report by Lutz Schubert

[Juanjo Hierro]

Hi all,

  Please find enclosed the technical report produced by Lutz Schubert regarding FI-WARE GEs.

  I haven't had time to review it carefully although in a very quick review I found several statements that suprised me and, mostly, it seems like a lot of the testing was made over versions of GEs which where not the ones delivered in release 2.2 or 2.3.

  Nevertheless, I pass the report to you.

  I have prepared a copy of the report at the following Google document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FVDmcUqamhfMhCDundzcrGwrLBYWF8xePUyic5Axr6A/edit

  I would kindly ask you to review the report and, in cooperation with GEi owners in your chapter, add a response (please add text in Blue after commented paragraphs) to the report.   This way, we can quickly get a response to this report.   Afterwards, we can discuss whether it is suitable to send such response back to the EC.

  Cheers,

-- Juanjo


-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
and Chief Architect

FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        FI-WARE: report by Lutz Schubert
Date:   Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:37:43 +0000
From:   <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu><mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>
To:     <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>, <subsidies at tid.es><mailto:subsidies at tid.es>, <mcp at tid.es><mailto:mcp at tid.es>
CC:     <CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu><mailto:CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu>, <lutz.schubert at uni-ulm.de><mailto:lutz.schubert at uni-ulm.de>


Dear Juanjo,

As indicated before, the assessment of prototypes during FI-WARE reviews is mostly based on the demos. I would like to have a better assessment of the prototypes, independent from the normal FI-WARE reviews. Therefore, Lutz Schubert from the University of Ulm (formerly with HLRS Stuttgart) has carried out this task.

His report is attached.

The report is the status as of 10 days ago, and might not be fully complete/consistent related to the Catalogue, the specifications of the wiki, etc. However, it does not make a lot of sense to try to perfect the assessment right now, as the report is clear of its main conclusions. A similar, second exercise could be done in (say) 6 months from now.

Best regards,
Arian




________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpa/attachments/20131004/ee06b648/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FiWare_PPP_Evaluation v02.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 985876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpa/attachments/20131004/ee06b648/attachment.pdf>