dear sergio, these are exactly the aspects i thougth to be in the "Package deployment" page which will replace the "createing instance" page. perhaps i was not very much clear in the doc, but this was exactly what i do expect to have there. thank you for your contribution. later this evening i'll create a new version to be circulated with all the thougths you guys are riseng today! ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 16:18 GMT+02:00 SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ <sergg at tid.es>: > Hi all, > > At least in WP6 we have identified the need to provide an additional > document for the GEs package. This document might well be an special wiki > page containing: > > · Special installation, configuration and administration > instructions (in addition to the information already provided by each GE in > the package). Not everything can be automated from the recipes and there > might be some customization options. > > · Usage patterns. In our case, how to model entities and > attributes, subscriptions, event processing rules, data storage, etc. This > are "additional aspects" because we are using various GEs together. > > > > So I propose to create one or more pages for that content. I guess that > the content would be pretty much ad-hoc, but it could be interesting to > have a base line for all the packages. This page would be then referred > from the catalogue. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Sergio. > > > > > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Monday, March 31, 2014 15:59 > > *To:* Heller, Markus > *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear markus, > > > > may be i'm wrong, but i think the packages just to be delivered on-line in > the catalogue with the current formatting rules. > > so no msword template to be provided. > > > > i guess we need also the agreement of juanjo here. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > > > 2014-03-31 15:03 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus <markus.heller at sap.com>: > > Hi Stefano, all, > > > > Thank you for your answer. Afterall, Stefano, this does not need to rely > fully on your desk alone only because you took over the task to distribute > the templates... > > > > I enclose my comments: > > > > > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: > > - links to the package installation manual > > - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package > > - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is > becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) > > > > OK, from me. What about the other's opinions? > > > > I suggest strongly to create templates WORD documents because would be > easier for all to handle "just-fill-in-mode". It can be dead-simple but at > least we are sort of homogeneous in layout / content then) - like we do for > the other official documents. This would support that we should make a > homogenous appearance to our readers. Can you distribute them? > > > > > > > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, > i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. > > > > Basically Ok, but as we do for all "internal deliverables", we shall have > a fixed deadline for until when the publication process is completed > successfully and results being public, proposal: one month after the M36 > that is M37. > > As with all other deliverables, the leaving partners cannot follow until > long after M36, so all their contributions must be reviewed "enough" and > rolled out if possible very early after they left - for fairness reasons as > you can understand. > > > > Which limit would be ok for you - meaning the deadline after M36 when all > M36-eaving partners have their results really online/public. If > improvements need to be made, the review/improvement cycle is only 1 > iteration plus the following escalation management by Juanjo as project > coordinator within a gioven time limit. We are currently writing this > internal deliverable process into the DOW amendment 6 (Miguel and I are > finalizing on word level). We can share this as an example - but I guess my > point is rather clear. > > > > Proposal: If needed, you must be supported by someone else for performing > the reviews for M36 leaving partners then. > > > > What would be your and the other WPL/WPA opinion? > > > > > > > for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for > submission to me 15 april. > > > > From my side OK, what do the other chapters say? > > > > > > Best Wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] > *Sent:* Montag, 31. März 2014 14:22 > *To:* Heller, Markus > *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear markus and all, > > > > in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as > redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings. > > > > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: > > - links to the package installation manual > > - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package > > - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is > becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) > > > > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. > me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. > > > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > > > > > > > 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus <markus.heller at sap.com>: > > Hi Stefano, all, > > > > thanks for sending the template so far: > 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic > Enablers > > So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. > > > > > > > > @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: > > > > > > What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for > each package? > > - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the > GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, > own user/prog, own ...) > > - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to > prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? > > - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a > deadline schedule, if any? > > > > Maybe we have decided such already? > > > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Montag, 31. März 2014 08:57 > *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear all, > > > > please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. > > Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > > > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > > > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpa/attachments/20140331/465ca8fe/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy