From jhierro at tid.es Thu May 26 07:59:42 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 07:59:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Mailing lists for WPLs Message-ID: <4DDDEC4E.60904@tid.es> Hi all, We have just created a list for all WPLs in FI-WARE. Currently, this list includes the following people. Please let me know if you want somebody else to be registered as "deputy" WPL. Note that the deputy should not necessarily be the same as the Working Package Architect (WPA). That indeed is a different role for which a separate mailing list will be created. Best Regards, -- Juanjo [cid:part1.09040003.00010903 at tid.es] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: moz-screenshot-20.png Type: image/png Size: 110543 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhierro.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 429 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu May 26 08:14:30 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:14:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Message-ID: <4DDDEFC6.7010105@tid.es> Dear WPLs, WPAs, members of the PCC, Our PO, Arian Zwegers, has forwarded to us his proposal on reviewers for the FI-WARE project. I would kindly ask you to review their CVs. You know that selection of reviewers is key. A bad reviewer may become a true "pain in the ass", as some of you know from experience in other projects. Arian mentioned that he wants them to focus on industrial relevance of results. I interpret this as much more attention on the "what" rather than the "how". He also mentions that he wants reviewers to check progress of the project (remotely and may be supported by some phone conferences with us) every 3 months or so. This would be setup trying to prevent major deviations asap. Be aware of that. In case you have any feedback, please let me know. Overall if you have some objection regarding the proposed reviewers. Besides, I guess we may suggest alternative ones if we know about some good candidate (who should not be part of any partner participating in the PPP). Feel free to send your comments in reply-all or just to me and Jos? Jimenez if you prefer to do so. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:46:29 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu , Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, As discussed in Budapest, please find enclosed for your approval the CVs of 3 experts that I would like to suggest as FI-WARE reviewers. As mentioned, I would like to come to a way-of-working based on fast feedback / suggestion cycles. This will be largely realised using remote reviews, possibly complemented by phone conferences with some key FI-WARE people, if deemed useful or necessary. In case of remote reviews, feedback will be rather informal. The main (only?) point of attention for the reviewers will be industrial relevance of the project outcomes. I might want to suggest a fourth name with expertise in IoT and software development in a later stage. Best regards, Arian. PS. During my absence, starting now, please send emails to me with Annalisa and Federica in cc. <> <> <> <> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Greenwood.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 11029 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Li.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 26494 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Di Francesco freeform.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 13648 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Di Francesco.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 14156 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhierro.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 429 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu May 26 10:01:16 2011 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:01:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers In-Reply-To: <4DDDEFC6.7010105@tid.es> References: <4DDDEFC6.7010105@tid.es> Message-ID: <30363_1306396877_4DDE08CD_30363_61_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0200F03291E9@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Hi Juanjo, An alternative could also be to have this hot topic discussed through a short audio conf. This would also have the advantage to share and align our views. Let me/us know if you can support. Hearing from you. Regards, Pascal De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : jeudi 26 mai 2011 08:15 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Dear WPLs, WPAs, members of the PCC, Our PO, Arian Zwegers, has forwarded to us his proposal on reviewers for the FI-WARE project. I would kindly ask you to review their CVs. You know that selection of reviewers is key. A bad reviewer may become a true "pain in the ass", as some of you know from experience in other projects. Arian mentioned that he wants them to focus on industrial relevance of results. I interpret this as much more attention on the "what" rather than the "how". He also mentions that he wants reviewers to check progress of the project (remotely and may be supported by some phone conferences with us) every 3 months or so. This would be setup trying to prevent major deviations asap. Be aware of that. In case you have any feedback, please let me know. Overall if you have some objection regarding the proposed reviewers. Besides, I guess we may suggest alternative ones if we know about some good candidate (who should not be part of any partner participating in the PPP). Feel free to send your comments in reply-all or just to me and Jos? Jimenez if you prefer to do so. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:46:29 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu , Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, As discussed in Budapest, please find enclosed for your approval the CVs of 3 experts that I would like to suggest as FI-WARE reviewers. As mentioned, I would like to come to a way-of-working based on fast feedback / suggestion cycles. This will be largely realised using remote reviews, possibly complemented by phone conferences with some key FI-WARE people, if deemed useful or necessary. In case of remote reviews, feedback will be rather informal. The main (only?) point of attention for the reviewers will be industrial relevance of the project outcomes. I might want to suggest a fourth name with expertise in IoT and software development in a later stage. Best regards, Arian. PS. During my absence, starting now, please send emails to me with Annalisa and Federica in cc. <> <> <> <> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu May 26 16:59:14 2011 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:59:14 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers In-Reply-To: <4DDDEFC6.7010105@tid.es> References: <4DDDEFC6.7010105@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, no formal objections from engineering. my personal perplexity is if those people, but man-sze, have enough broad vision on what should be a fi platform, system and app. i do agree with the proposal of pascal as i guess we should define a good strategy for the project. indeed, my fear is that with this three months model we are going to work for the reviews (and reviewers ...) instead of for an outstanding fi-ware result in the context of the fi-pp as whole and of our companies business as well. ciao, stefano 2011/5/26 Juanjo Hierro > Dear WPLs, WPAs, members of the PCC, > > Our PO, Arian Zwegers, has forwarded to us his proposal on reviewers for > the FI-WARE project. > > I would kindly ask you to review their CVs. You know that selection of > reviewers is key. A bad reviewer may become a true "pain in the ass", as > some of you know from experience in other projects. > > Arian mentioned that he wants them to focus on industrial relevance of > results. I interpret this as much more attention on the "what" rather than > the "how". He also mentions that he wants reviewers to check progress of > the project (remotely and may be supported by some phone conferences with > us) every 3 months or so. This would be setup trying to prevent major > deviations asap. Be aware of that. > > In case you have any feedback, please let me know. Overall if you have > some objection regarding the proposed reviewers. Besides, I guess we may > suggest alternative ones if we know about some good candidate (who should > not be part of any partner participating in the PPP). > > Feel free to send your comments in reply-all or just to me and Jos? > Jimenez if you prefer to do so. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested > reviewers Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:46:29 +0200 From: > Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: > JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO > SUREDA CC: > Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu , > Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu > > Dear Jose, Juanjo, > > As discussed in Budapest, please find enclosed for your approval the CVs of > 3 experts that I would like to suggest as FI-WARE reviewers. > > As mentioned, I would like to come to a way-of-working based on fast > feedback / suggestion cycles. This will be largely realised using remote > reviews, possibly complemented by phone conferences with some key FI-WARE > people, if deemed useful or necessary. > > In case of remote reviews, feedback will be rather informal. > The main (only?) point of attention for the reviewers will be industrial > relevance of the project outcomes. > > I might want to suggest a fourth name with expertise in IoT and software > development in a later stage. > > Best regards, > Arian. > > PS. During my absence, starting now, please send emails to me with Annalisa > and Federica in cc. > > <> <> <> < Francesco.pdf>> > > ------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Research and Development Laboratories Department Director Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu May 26 17:57:46 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:57:46 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers In-Reply-To: References: <4DDDEFC6.7010105@tid.es> Message-ID: <4DDE787A.7000303@tid.es> On 26/05/11 16:59, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear juanjo, no formal objections from engineering. my personal perplexity is if those people, but man-sze, have enough broad vision on what should be a fi platform, system and app. Question is ... do you have better candidates ? If so, please don't hesitate to tell, because I would go for putting them on the table. It will definitively go for the benefit of all of us in the long run. i do agree with the proposal of pascal as i guess we should define a good strategy for the project. I'll try to schedule a confcall soon (next week or the one afterwards) but let's collect some thoughts first via email. indeed, my fear is that with this three months model we are going to work for the reviews (and reviewers ...) instead of for an outstanding fi-ware result in the context of the fi-pp as whole and of our companies business as well. This will not be allowed by Telef?nica I+D at all, I'll tell you. Better if backed by rest of partners. Best regards, -- Juanjo ciao, stefano 2011/5/26 Juanjo Hierro > Dear WPLs, WPAs, members of the PCC, Our PO, Arian Zwegers, has forwarded to us his proposal on reviewers for the FI-WARE project. I would kindly ask you to review their CVs. You know that selection of reviewers is key. A bad reviewer may become a true "pain in the ass", as some of you know from experience in other projects. Arian mentioned that he wants them to focus on industrial relevance of results. I interpret this as much more attention on the "what" rather than the "how". He also mentions that he wants reviewers to check progress of the project (remotely and may be supported by some phone conferences with us) every 3 months or so. This would be setup trying to prevent major deviations asap. Be aware of that. In case you have any feedback, please let me know. Overall if you have some objection regarding the proposed reviewers. Besides, I guess we may suggest alternative ones if we know about some good candidate (who should not be part of any partner participating in the PPP). Feel free to send your comments in reply-all or just to me and Jos? Jimenez if you prefer to do so. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:46:29 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu , Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, As discussed in Budapest, please find enclosed for your approval the CVs of 3 experts that I would like to suggest as FI-WARE reviewers. As mentioned, I would like to come to a way-of-working based on fast feedback / suggestion cycles. This will be largely realised using remote reviews, possibly complemented by phone conferences with some key FI-WARE people, if deemed useful or necessary. In case of remote reviews, feedback will be rather informal. The main (only?) point of attention for the reviewers will be industrial relevance of the project outcomes. I might want to suggest a fourth name with expertise in IoT and software development in a later stage. Best regards, Arian. PS. During my absence, starting now, please send emails to me with Annalisa and Federica in cc. <> <> <> <> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- Stefano De Panfilis Research and Development Laboratories Department Director Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhierro.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 429 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu May 26 18:03:37 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:03:37 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Message-ID: <4DDE79D9.9040002@tid.es> FYI. As already commented to Stefano (all of you in copy), don't hesitate to bring proposals on alternative reviewers that you believe can do a good job. -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:02:02 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu" , "Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu" , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian, Annaliza and Federica, Please don't close the reviewers selection first. On one hand, we would like to analyze the candidates you propose carefully. On the other hand, we may come with some candidates you may also agree could be better (not yet identified, but is a point I have asked other partners to think about). We believe that selection of the right reviewers in this project is crucial. Let's keep in touch on the matter. Of course, we should be able to close a decision soon, preferably before end of June. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 23/05/11 21:46, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Jose, Juanjo, As discussed in Budapest, please find enclosed for your approval the CVs of 3 experts that I would like to suggest as FI-WARE reviewers. As mentioned, I would like to come to a way-of-working based on fast feedback / suggestion cycles. This will be largely realised using remote reviews, possibly complemented by phone conferences with some key FI-WARE people, if deemed useful or necessary. In case of remote reviews, feedback will be rather informal. The main (only?) point of attention for the reviewers will be industrial relevance of the project outcomes. I might want to suggest a fourth name with expertise in IoT and software development in a later stage. Best regards, Arian. PS. During my absence, starting now, please send emails to me with Annalisa and Federica in cc. <> <> <> <> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhierro.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 429 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu May 26 20:35:06 2011 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:35:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers In-Reply-To: <4DDE79D9.9040002@tid.es> References: <4DDE79D9.9040002@tid.es> Message-ID: for instance as a very first attempt - mike fisher (bt) - frederic gittler or nick wainwrigth (hp) - cezary mazurek (psnc) - paul strong (ebay) others can be suggested as well, just le me know. ciao, stefano 2011/5/26 Juanjo Hierro > > FYI. > > As already commented to Stefano (all of you in copy), don't hesitate to > bring proposals on alternative reviewers that you believe can do a good job. > > -- Juanjo > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested > reviewers Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:02:02 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro > To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu > CC: JOSE > JIMENEZ DELGADO , > "Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu" > , > "Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu" > , > "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" > > Dear Arian, Annaliza and Federica, > > Please don't close the reviewers selection first. On one hand, we would > like to analyze the candidates you propose carefully. On the other hand, > we may come with some candidates you may also agree could be better (not yet > identified, but is a point I have asked other partners to think about). > > We believe that selection of the right reviewers in this project is > crucial. > > Let's keep in touch on the matter. Of course, we should be able to > close a decision soon, preferably before end of June. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > On 23/05/11 21:46, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: > > Dear Jose, Juanjo, > > As discussed in Budapest, please find enclosed for your approval the CVs of > 3 experts that I would like to suggest as FI-WARE reviewers. > > As mentioned, I would like to come to a way-of-working based on fast > feedback / suggestion cycles. This will be largely realised using remote > reviews, possibly complemented by phone conferences with some key FI-WARE > people, if deemed useful or necessary. > > In case of remote reviews, feedback will be rather informal. > The main (only?) point of attention for the reviewers will be industrial > relevance of the project outcomes. > > I might want to suggest a fourth name with expertise in IoT and software > development in a later stage. > > Best regards, > Arian. > > PS. During my absence, starting now, please send emails to me with Annalisa > and Federica in cc. > > <> <> <> < Francesco.pdf>> > > > ------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Research and Development Laboratories Department Director Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Mon May 30 12:24:56 2011 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:24:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Contents of Fi_ware page Message-ID: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A423A664@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Dear Work package leaders We are now completing the contents of www.fi-ware.eu (we have also .org and .com still inoperative) We need now Workpackage leaders provide content for their specific part. Instructions If you visit the page, you'll see there is a preliminary introduction for every work package. So for example Cloud is http://cloud.fi-ware.eu/, etc We plan to introduce a figure, explaining the general content of the WP. This figure, if you agree, can be taken from the presentation we plan to make in Luxembourg. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/77/luxembourg.pptx So all you need to do is 1) Go to the presentation and check you agree with the figure (i.e. Cloud should check slide 11, IoT slide 12,....) 2) Provide a SHORT text explaining the objective and the figure. This should be 20 lines maximum. It will be included in the header part of the blog of your subproject 3) Send that information to Juanjo We need that before June 2 (it is not too much, please keep the date!!) Also we would need 4) Make the first post to the blog part (saying something about the WP and your approach, for example) 5) If you have some general comments about the page This should be ready before June 6 Best regards ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon May 30 13:06:18 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:06:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Contents of Fi_ware page In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A423A664@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A423A664@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: <4DE37A2A.2050008@tid.es> On 30/05/11 12:24, JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO wrote: Also we would need 4) Make the first post to the blog part (saying something about the WP and your approach, for example) 5) If you have some general comments about the page This should be ready before June 6 Guidelines for this very first posts will be send to you by this wednesday. Wait until that. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhierro.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 429 bytes Desc: not available URL: