From mcp at tid.es Wed Nov 2 16:24:51 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:24:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Dissemination/Collaboration/Communication efforts Message-ID: <4EB160C3.4050601@tid.es> Dear all, The first review is upon us and we are gathering all the info for the reporting. As part of this work, we need to put together all that we have done so far on the communication/dissemination front. Those who have given talks, produced papers, articles, press releases, etc. should reflect it on the wiki pages we have created for this purpose, the main page is called Communication, Collaboration and Dissemination . You will see that this page links sections that could serve to this purpose: * Communication activities: you can put interviews or press releases here (we already have a few) * Collaboration activities: you can use this if you have collaborated with other ICT projects, Other initiatives on Future Internetor other projects under the PPP umbrella * Dissemination activities: papers, articles, book chapters and participation in events (Presentations, round tables, keynotes...) Please make sure that you do not delete someone else's entries, it is something that happens with wikis if we are not quite careful. Hint: to edit the wiki you need to log on the forge first (http://forge.fi-ware.eu) and use the link from the FI-WARE project to mediawiki. Deadline: Friday, 2 EOB. Please note that those efforts not recorded here will not go to the reporting and it would be a shame to lose this work. Kind regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Nov 2 16:32:03 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:32:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Dissemination/Collaboration/Communication efforts Message-ID: <4EB16273.3090806@tid.es> Dear WP leaders, Please push this and make sure that no efforts go wasted. You are surely aware of all the events where something relevant was contributed by the teams involved in your WPs in FI-WARE (presentations, papers, launches... ) and are able to remind the ones involved that they have to edit the corresponding entries on the wiki. Please be aware that an item not reported could result in the loss of funding for the related expenses and, even worse, it is very silly to make a effort and then not to be able to sell it to the EC! Note that the deadline is Friday. Thanks in advance for your help Miguel -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: [Fiware-wpa] Dissemination/Collaboration/Communication efforts Fecha: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:24:51 +0100 De: Miguel Carrillo A: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear all, The first review is upon us and we are gathering all the info for the reporting. As part of this work, we need to put together all that we have done so far on the communication/dissemination front. Those who have given talks, produced papers, articles, press releases, etc. should reflect it on the wiki pages we have created for this purpose, the main page is called Communication, Collaboration and Dissemination . You will see that this page links sections that could serve to this purpose: * Communication activities: you can put interviews or press releases here (we already have a few) * Collaboration activities: you can use this if you have collaborated with other ICT projects, Other initiatives on Future Internetor other projects under the PPP umbrella * Dissemination activities: papers, articles, book chapters and participation in events (Presentations, round tables, keynotes...) Please make sure that you do not delete someone else's entries, it is something that happens with wikis if we are not quite careful. Hint: to edit the wiki you need to log on the forge first (http://forge.fi-ware.eu) and use the link from the FI-WARE project to mediawiki. Deadline: Friday, 2 EOB. Please note that those efforts not recorded here will not go to the reporting and it would be a shame to lose this work. Kind regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001..txt URL: From lorant.farkas at nsn.com Thu Nov 3 15:21:44 2011 From: lorant.farkas at nsn.com (Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:21:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Identification of Open Call objectives In-Reply-To: <4EA3C102.9070808@tid.es> References: <4EA3C102.9070808@tid.es> Message-ID: <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2028DA29A@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> Dear All, Will this meeting take place? Thanks & Br, Lorant ________________________________ From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext Juanjo Hierro Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 9:24 AM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Identification of Open Call objectives Dear colleagues, According to the project planning, we should identify the topics around which the first Open Call will be issued by mid November. This mail is to setup an AP on all WPLs to prepare a first list of topics on behalf of their respective WPs and submit it to me no later than November 1st, EOB. This list should be derived relatively easily from the current exercise we are closing regarding selection of baseline assets, since obviously a criteria would be to include calls for those GEs, or components in a GE, for which baseline assets have not been identified. We will celebrate a confcall dedicated to review the received input and plan the necessary steps on November 3, starting at 16:30. Please pencil this date/time on your agendas. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro Chief Technologist on Software Technologies Telefonica R&D Labs email: jhierro at tid.es phone: +34 91 48 32932 www.tid.es twitter.com/JuanjoHierro Oeste 1, Planta 5. Distrito C Ronda de la Comunicacion s/n Madrid 28050 Spain ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 3 15:47:59 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:47:59 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Identification of Open Call objectives In-Reply-To: <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2028DA29A@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> References: <4EA3C102.9070808@tid.es> <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2028DA29A@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> Message-ID: <4EB2A99F.9050909@tid.es> I canceled this in the agenda ... I assumed you had received an email announcing the cancelation ... Apologize if that hasn't been the case ... My idea is that we address planning of this in our joint follow-up confcall on monday. Cheers, -- Juanjo On 03/11/11 15:21, Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest) wrote: Dear All, Will this meeting take place? Thanks & Br, Lorant ________________________________ From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext Juanjo Hierro Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 9:24 AM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Identification of Open Call objectives Dear colleagues, According to the project planning, we should identify the topics around which the first Open Call will be issued by mid November. This mail is to setup an AP on all WPLs to prepare a first list of topics on behalf of their respective WPs and submit it to me no later than November 1st, EOB. This list should be derived relatively easily from the current exercise we are closing regarding selection of baseline assets, since obviously a criteria would be to include calls for those GEs, or components in a GE, for which baseline assets have not been identified. We will celebrate a confcall dedicated to review the received input and plan the necessary steps on November 3, starting at 16:30. Please pencil this date/time on your agendas. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro Chief Technologist on Software Technologies Telefonica R&D Labs email: jhierro at tid.es phone: +34 91 48 32932 www.tid.es twitter.com/JuanjoHierro Oeste 1, Planta 5. Distrito C Ronda de la Comunicacion s/n Madrid 28050 Spain ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 3 15:51:49 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:51:49 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] REMINDER Fwd: Workshop YOU SHOULD ATTEND on FI-WARE Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management Architecture In-Reply-To: <4EA3BF5D.50602@tid.es> References: <4EA3BF5D.50602@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EB2AA85.3070806@tid.es> Hi all, This is a reminder that you should cast your vote on the doodle poll that we had setup for the virtual workshop devoted to description of the solution for Identity/Access-Control/Privacy Management. I will definitively close the poll by EOB today and announce the final date tonight. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Workshop YOU SHOULD ATTEND on FI-WARE Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management Architecture Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:16:45 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear colleagues, As you my remember, one of the APs from our last joint follow-up confcall was to setup a workshop with UC projects regarding description of the soluction we have defined for the core Security GEs dealing with Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management in FI-WARE. After some discussion, we have decided that we will first celebrate a internal workshop, involving only FI-WARE partners, and then afterwards and once we compile the internal feedback, celebrate the final workshop with the UC projects. The internal FI-WARE workshop will be virtual, i.e., a combination of confcall and webex. Regarding the internal FI-WARE workshop, we need to accomodate it in the week starting November 7th. A number of dates/times have been selected that week and recorded in the following doodle: http://www.doodle.com/5mkp668qtc43hwwz Please cast your vote so that we can close the date for the virtual workshop. Note that voting a starting time means agreement to stay for 3 hours starting at that time, since 3 hours would be the estimated duration for this workshop. You are welcome to invite any member of your team that you believe is relevant. Note that Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management are three crucial aspects we definitively need to resolve the best way in FI-WARE. Deadline for voting is Wednesday Oct 26th. We will then announce the final date/time on Thursday Oct 27. Cheers, -- Juanjo Hierro Chief Technologist on Software Technologies Telefonica R&D Labs email: jhierro at tid.es phone: +34 91 48 32932 www.tid.es twitter.com/JuanjoHierro Oeste 1, Planta 5. Distrito C Ronda de la Comunicacion s/n Madrid 28050 Spain Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 4 14:02:51 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 14:02:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT UPDATE/HINTS on Selection of Features for the 1st Minor Release and planning of 1st Sprint Message-ID: <4EB3E27B.5070906@tid.es> Hi all, We definitively need to close the selection of Features for the 1st Minor Release of FI-WARE as well as the planning of the 1st Sprint. We should have closed it by end of October but unfortunately we are delayed. Therefore, we have to take the necessary corrective actions. This mail is intended to put this actions in place so that we can recover these few days of delay and get back on track. Everything should be fixed by Nov 10th at the latest. We will do this at the price of making the first sprint a bit shorter, still planning it to finish by end of November. On Nov 10th, it should be clear what are the Features selected for the 1st Minor Release of FI-WARE and what are the backlog entries to be addressed in the 1st Sprint. That information should be visible on your tracker. Note that November 10th is the date at which we have told our PO that everything should be available on the Wiki and FusionForge environment. Now, following the actions/recommendations to implement/follow (some have already been tackled by some of you, but I'm summarizing them here for the convenience of all). Don't hesitate to raise any question or doubt that you may have. Please share them with your teams. Regarding Selection of Features for a given GE: Features may be considered just as a kind of Epic you believe you understand enough (i.e., you own enough detailed info describing the functionality of the Epic) as to feel confident that can be addressed in the duration of a release (duration of releases, also named as minor releases, are three months, don't confuse with usage of the term "release" in the DoW that comprises several releases and we have started to name as "major release"). You may hay identified a number of Features following the above criteria. However, some of you have only identified entries that you have labeled as Epic so far. If so, the first exercise I would ask you to do is to review the list of Epics you have and try to ask yourself the following question ... "Is this a functionality I really understand and have enough information about as to feel confident that could be addressed in 3 months ?" If your answer is "yes", then simply label the Epic as Feature and change the entry both at the Wiki and the tracker accordingly. It may happen that the Epics you have identified are still at a very high-level though. Therefore, you cannot guarantee that you will be able to address them in any. Thus, you need to refine them and this will be work to be done. Those Epics cannot be selected as Features, of course. I would suggest that you try to make some progress refining them until November 10th and try to find out whether you can derive more detailed entries from them and check whether some of them can be labeled as Features. But those entries you believe cannot qualify as Feature because they are still too high-level should be kept as Epics. The first minor release is scheduled to finish by end of January. I know that we have considered finishing it by end of February but after feedback from some of you, let's keep it to finish by end of January. Once you identify a number of Features, it's a matter of deciding whether you feel confident enough to assign it to a particular minor release within the first major release. If so, you should assign it a ReleaseId to the ticket associated to the Feature on the tracker. We will adopt the following convention for identifying minor releases in FI-WARE (i.e., for the values of ReleasesId fields on the tracker): FIWARE.Release.. Where is the number of the major release the minor release is associated to Where is the number of the minor release, within the major release Note that you may not yet feel confident about what release will be the release in which you will address a particular Feature. If so, simply don't assign a ReleaseId to the corresponding ticket. Anyway, bear in mind that, when referring to Features in releases other than the current minor release, you are just setting up an expectation. Expectations may change a bit and we may decide to update the list of Features we plan to address in the second minor release while developing the first minor release. Adapting the planning over time is what Agile is all about. If by November 10th you haven't identified any Feature and you still only have Epics, don't panic. See next section. Regarding planning of 1st Sprint: Some people have shared the feedback that they feel like they are not still in the position to identify a relevant list of User Stories or even Features. They still need to work on the set of Epics they had currently identified. How can we show we are doing some work in the course of the first sprint and be able to follow-up progress ? After thinking a bit on the matter, I have decided to introduce the concept of "Work Item". Work items refer to work to be done in the course of a sprint, trying to meet a concrete goal. It may relate to work to be done in order to refine an Epic (or a feature) and derive actual Features (or User-stories) derived from it. In general, any work you need to address to progress development but may be difficult to express in terms of "functionality supported by the product". This I hope will help you to declare things to be addressed in the first sprint (and subsequent sprints) in a more natural/intuitive way. "Work Items" is not something I had invented myself. It was already identified as a special kind of backlog entries by some Agile authors. Indeed was identified by Dean Leffingwell in the paper I had already sent to you some time ago. The reason why I feel reluctant to introduce these kind of entries in our definition of Backlog was that I was afraid about the explosion of entries in the Wiki. Besides, some of these work items may relate to activities that we may wish to keep at confidential level, just shared among FI-WARE partners. At the end of the day, users (application developers in our case) should just need to know about functionality we plan to develop in GEs. Now I see the advantages that introducing these "Work Items" will bring to some chapters, and definitively they will help us to move things forward and monitor progress. So let's go for their introduction. However, trying to minimize overhead what I believe we can adopt as a formula is that these Work Items just need to be registered on the tracker and we don't need to create a detailed entry on the Wiki. I feel like this is a good compromise and have the following advantages: * We will keep on the public Wiki only that information that is relevant in terms of description of the functionality to be supported by GEs. At the end of the day, this is what is relevant from an user (app developer) perspective, so there is no need to overflown the Wiki with additional, so fine-grained info. * Work Items would exist on the trackers (which is the place where you can get the complete view of a backlog) and trackers linked to chapters are private to chapter members. This will be helpful Given said the above, the task to be done until Nov 10th is to get a good list of User-Stories and Work Items that help to describe what you will do during the first sprint (ending Nov 30th). Hope that this will mean a more clear goal and then you will be able to provide some "meat to eat" by then. We will adopt the following convention for identifying Sprints in FI-WARE (i.e., for the values of SprintId fields on the tracker): FIWARE.Sprint... Where is the number of the major release where the sprint is planned Where is the number of the minor release, within the major release, where the sprint is planned Where is the number of the sprint ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: a-lean-and-scalable-requirements-information-model-for-agile-enterprises.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1463988 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com Fri Nov 4 15:41:34 2011 From: thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com (Bohnert, Thomas Michael) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:41:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [FI-PPP DWG] Map of pilot sites available on the Infinity web site In-Reply-To: <4EB3E224.9010201@interinnov.com> References: <4EB3E224.9010201@interinnov.com> Message-ID: <771C9B001456D64783596DDC3801C6EA282A297587@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> Hi FI-WARE Chapter Leads, Here goes a first Map of Pilot Sites compiled by Infinity. Mind that this is not the final list (see email attached). Best - Thomas From: Jacques Magen (InterInnov) [mailto:jmagen at interinnov.com] Sent: Freitag, 4. November 2011 14:01 To: dwg at fi-ppp.eu Subject: [FI-PPP DWG] Map of pilot sites available on the Infinity web site Dear all, I am pleased to inform you that the map of the FI-PPP pilot sites is available for download at the Infinity web site. We have also designed an interactive map accessible directly from your screen! Have a look at http://www.fi-infinity.eu/portal/news/2011/11/03/map-fi-ppp-pilot-sites-released-already-great-success; the interactive map is available at http://www.fi-infinity.eu/portal/dashboard/site-map: you can filter the sites per project and zoom. Enjoy! Best regards, Jacques -- Jacques Magen jmagen at interinnov.com Tel.: +33 9 81 03 98 49 / +33 6 28 98 05 41 InterInnov - www.interinnov.eu International Innovation At Your Service 16 rue Paul Bourget - 92160 Antony - France -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Bohnert, Thomas Michael" Subject: Re: [FI-PPP DWG] Fwd: Map of FI-PPP pilot sites for FIA Poznan -please check Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:01:02 +0200 Size: 31368 URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 7 09:24:35 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:24:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] REMINDER: Joint WPL/WPA follow-up confcall Message-ID: <4EB795C3.4080101@tid.es> Hi all, This is a reminder that we will have our bi-weekly joint WPL/WPA follow-up confcall today, starting at 11:00am and duration of 1h30m, most probably 2 hours. We will use powwownow and I hope this time the quality of the line be better. We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Agenda: * Follow-up on definition of "Materializing the FI-WARE Vision" * Description of baseline assets on the Wiki * Definition of FI-WARE backlog (contents distributed on the Wiki and the tracker) * Selection of Features and planning of Work-Items/User-Stories for the first sprint * Reminder: check last email sent to the WPL/WPA lists * Internal Security workshop on Identity/Access-Control/Privacy Management * Preparation of 1st official review on November 22nd * Management of tickets issued by UC projects * Topics to start discussion: * Approach/formatting for Architecture Specifications * Approach/formatting for GE Specifications * AOB ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 7 09:18:01 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:18:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Joint FI-WARE WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Message-ID: <4FE737A7257DB84C8CB36B7DFAFCC1CB7F162609F8@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> When: Monday, November 07, 2011 11:00 AM-12:30 PM. Central European Standard Time *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3469 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 7 10:27:09 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:27:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Security workshop FI-WARE Message-ID: <4FE737A7257DB84C8CB36B7DFAFCC1CB7F162609FA@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> When: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:30 AM-12:30 PM. Central European Standard Time Where: Virtual (confcall bridge and webex) *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2239 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 7 10:32:04 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:32:04 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Final Date and time for the Workshop YOU SHOULD ATTEND on FI-WARE Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management Architecture In-Reply-To: <4EB2AA85.3070806@tid.es> References: <4EA3BF5D.50602@tid.es> <4EB2AA85.3070806@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EB7A594.6060002@tid.es> Hi all, Based on results of the poll in doodle, the workshop/tutorial on Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management will take place on November 10th, starting at 09:30am. This tutorial is internal to FI-WARE. Only FI-WARE members can attend. Note that the expected duration of the workshop is 3 hours. It will be based on a detailed presentation by the team in the Security Chapter leading the definition of the Architecture for this core set of Security Generic Enablers, followed by questions, brainstorming, etc. I encourage all WPLs/WPAs to attend this workshop/tutorial given the core and cross-chapter nature of these Generic Enablers. Details about call and webex bridges will follow. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 03/11/11 15:51, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, This is a reminder that you should cast your vote on the doodle poll that we had setup for the virtual workshop devoted to description of the solution for Identity/Access-Control/Privacy Management. I will definitively close the poll by EOB today and announce the final date tonight. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Workshop YOU SHOULD ATTEND on FI-WARE Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management Architecture Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:16:45 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear colleagues, As you my remember, one of the APs from our last joint follow-up confcall was to setup a workshop with UC projects regarding description of the soluction we have defined for the core Security GEs dealing with Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management in FI-WARE. After some discussion, we have decided that we will first celebrate a internal workshop, involving only FI-WARE partners, and then afterwards and once we compile the internal feedback, celebrate the final workshop with the UC projects. The internal FI-WARE workshop will be virtual, i.e., a combination of confcall and webex. Regarding the internal FI-WARE workshop, we need to accomodate it in the week starting November 7th. A number of dates/times have been selected that week and recorded in the following doodle: http://www.doodle.com/5mkp668qtc43hwwz Please cast your vote so that we can close the date for the virtual workshop. Note that voting a starting time means agreement to stay for 3 hours starting at that time, since 3 hours would be the estimated duration for this workshop. You are welcome to invite any member of your team that you believe is relevant. Note that Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management are three crucial aspects we definitively need to resolve the best way in FI-WARE. Deadline for voting is Wednesday Oct 26th. We will then announce the final date/time on Thursday Oct 27. Cheers, -- Juanjo Hierro Chief Technologist on Software Technologies Telefonica R&D Labs email: jhierro at tid.es phone: +34 91 48 32932 www.tid.es twitter.com/JuanjoHierro Oeste 1, Planta 5. Distrito C Ronda de la Comunicacion s/n Madrid 28050 Spain Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 7 10:33:00 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:33:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall In-Reply-To: <226835839.1320658233675.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl012.webex.com> References: <226835839.1320658233675.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl012.webex.com> Message-ID: <4EB7A5CC.8080109@tid.es> Hi all, Webex details for our joint WPL/WPA confcall. Talk to you, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:30:33 +0100 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex9100 Reply-To: Webex9100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex9100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Monday, November 7, 2011 Time: 11:00 am, Europe Time (Paris, GMT+01:00) Meeting Number: 969 351 392 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187850067&UID=1258430007&PW=NMzIwMjM2MjY0&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187850067&UID=1258430007&PW=NMzIwMjM2MjY0&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex9100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187850067&UID=1258430007&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=AvRr102L-kSKOxUjHsOy1WQnT7TEhctO3GyTMneDNRQ=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com Mon Nov 7 11:04:32 2011 From: thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com (Bohnert, Thomas Michael) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:04:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] MEETING WILL START 20MIN LATE In-Reply-To: <4EB7A5CC.8080109@tid.es> References: <226835839.1320658233675.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl012.webex.com> <4EB7A5CC.8080109@tid.es> Message-ID: <771C9B001456D64783596DDC3801C6EA282A297ED1@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 7. November 2011 10:33 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Hi all, Webex details for our joint WPL/WPA confcall. Talk to you, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:30:33 +0100 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex9100 Reply-To: Webex9100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex9100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Monday, November 7, 2011 Time: 11:00 am, Europe Time (Paris, GMT+01:00) Meeting Number: 969 351 392 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187850067&UID=1258430007&PW=NMzIwMjM2MjY0&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187850067&UID=1258430007&PW=NMzIwMjM2MjY0&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex9100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187850067&UID=1258430007&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=AvRr102L-kSKOxUjHsOy1WQnT7TEhctO3GyTMneDNRQ=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 7 18:08:28 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:08:28 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] General disruption in platform Message-ID: <4EB8108C.10409@tid.es> Dear all, Several partners have approached me informing that the platform is not usable at the moment. I have checked personally that the wiki does not allow modifications and I also could't use the tracker. I will issue an urgente request to the admin people and will keep you informed. Regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 7 19:10:14 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:10:14 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Minutes of our last joint WPL/WPA follow-up confcall (11-11-07) Message-ID: <4EB81F06.5020407@tid.es> Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed the minutes of our confcall today. If you have any doubt or find there is something missing, please let me know. Thanks to Carlos and Miguel for their help preparing these minutes. Cheers, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20111107_WPL_WPA_Meeting_Notes.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 23651 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 7 19:10:48 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:10:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Mailing list maintenance Message-ID: <4EB81F28.20705@tid.es> Dear all, This is just a kind reminder. Each WPL is in charge of: * Adding newcomers to the WP's mailing list * Add newcomers to the general fiware mailing list (fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu) I am sure that all of you know this but just in case any of you is not synchronised. Make sure that all your team members are included in both. Take into account that I will increasingly use the general mailing list to communicate info of common interest for all WPs. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Tue Nov 8 11:48:14 2011 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:48:14 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Standards management Message-ID: Dear Colleagues We have two topics regarding standardization: (1) Assets >From the standardization aspect, we would like to add 2 columns to the excel sheet about IPRs that we created previously in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/16/256/IPR+control.xlsx but finally, this IPR?s table was not used and IPR?s were included as an additional chapter in the General Document in the wi-ki and all the WP have been working on this chapter as well as in the Product Vision, part of this table also as you can see below in the contents proposed: Component Description Innovation, added value Target Market Exploited License (1)Most Relevant SDO (2) FI WARE partner/Contact Name of the component,asset that could generate benefits for the market Brief description Please explain briefly what innovation is given by the component. What problems will the component solve? extra features the component provides Identify the target market Separately, partly alone, bundle, etc Regarding Standardization we will need to obtain the following feedback: 1. Most Relevant SDO (i.e. If the component would benefit from standardization, where should it be done? If the component depends on existing standards, where are those standards maintained/updated? If more than one SDO is important, list by approximate order of relevance.) 2. FI-Ware Partner/Contact which is active in that SDO (i.e. which organization and contact person could monitor dependencies and perhaps be involved in any agreed pro-active standardization? If more than one SDO is important, try to include one contact for each) So in order to avoid duplicate efforts, as in the case of IPRs (excelsheet + wi-ki), I propose to create an additional chapter (4) in the wiki within the General Document to deal with this issue. Is it ok with you? or you prefer to deal it separately from the General Document in a excel sheet?. In case of working in the wi- ki who could create this additional chapter? [hide ] * 1 Brief Description * 2 Technologies used * 2.1 Known software requirements * 3 IPR * 4 Standardization * 5 Publically Available Documentation We are in the M7 and we have a deliverable for the M9, so it is urgent to start to gather all of this information about the assets which could leverage on existing standards or on new ones. So your opinion about how to deal this issue in the more agile way will be very helpful (2) Standardisation Attached is an xls document, created by NEC to begin a gap analysis for standardization * 1st worksheet "Introduction" showing the planned usage of the document * 2nd worksheet "SDO" with a list of relevant Standardisation Organisations and including "promised" contribution areas from you (extracted from the final Fi-Ware Agreement). Your actions: Would you please be so kind as to edit the document worksheet "SDO" to a) show any additional SDOs you consider relevant to FI-ware b) show (or change) information about where your company plans to contribute (Note that not all partners are yet included. Please add an extra row where ever needed.) c) show email addresses of contact persons in your organization who are delegates to the organizations (NO DELEGATE WILL BE CONTACTED AT THIS TIME! The FI-Ware Plenary will later define/agree how to co-ordinate work and disseminate information to interested delegates) d) please mark all cells you change using yellow highlighting, because EXCEL has no change-tracking Any additional improvements are most welcome. Would you please reply to Lindsay.Frost at neclab.eu (administrator for this part of WP11). He will combine all answers into a draft summary document for review (and prioritization/trimming !) Kind regards Ern? & Lindsay & Juan ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-Ware_Standardization_List_20110926_CONFIDENTIAL.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 23034 bytes Desc: FI-Ware_Standardization_List_20110926_CONFIDENTIAL.xlsx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 9 17:00:00 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:00:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] REMINDER: Internal virtual workshop on Security (Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management) Message-ID: <4EBAA380.6000500@tid.es> Hi all, This is a reminder that tomorrow we will have the virtual workshop in which the Security team will present us the solution/architecture sketched for managing Identity, Access Control and Privacy in FI-WARE. This is a key functionality that affect all chapters. We have to understand it well to be able to integrate it into the reference architecture of the different chapters, so I believe that attendance of you or someone from your team is key. Best regards, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From matteo.melideo at eng.it Wed Nov 9 17:22:05 2011 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:22:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] REMINDER: Internal virtual workshop on Security (Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management) In-Reply-To: <4EBAA380.6000500@tid.es> References: <4EBAA380.6000500@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EBAA8AD.5040703@eng.it> How do we connect? Thanks, Matteo Nella citazione in data mer 09 nov 2011 17:00:00 CET, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi all, > > This is a reminder that tomorrow we will have the virtual workshop in > which the Security team will present us the solution/architecture > sketched for managing Identity, Access Control and Privacy in FI-WARE. > > This is a key functionality that affect all chapters. We have to > understand it well to be able to integrate it into the reference > architecture of the different chapters, so I believe that attendance of > you or someone from your team is key. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 368 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 10 06:36:16 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:36:16 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Dial-in and webex details for the FI-WARE Security workshop on Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management Message-ID: <4EBB62D0.3080009@tid.es> Hi all, We'll use powwownow for our virtual workshop on Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management. Details: * PIN: 050662. * Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf I'll send the webex info as soon as I get it. Cheers, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 10 07:24:57 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:24:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] On priority field in backlog entries (YOUR INPUT IS NEEDED before 17:00) Message-ID: <4EBB6E39.2060603@tid.es> Hi all, During our last confcall, Pier raised the issue about value of the "Relative Priority" field of entries in the backlog. I have checked the template as well as what is currently on the Wiki tutorials (which was based on the template). It is clear that this field should have the form of a two-digit number of which the first digit has to map to the MoSCoW priority while the second is used as relative priority. Note that we are talking about a two-digit number. Not anything with a colon in between like it could be .. However, I have found that there are two things that are unfortunately ambiguous and we should clarify: * first, whether higher priorities should have a lower digit or not, i.e., does priority1=15 and priority2=21 means that priority1 is higher than priority2 ? This relates to the question about whether the correct mapping for the first digit should be (MUST=0, SHOULD=1, COULD=2, WONT=3) or (MUST=3, SHOULD=2,COULD=1, WONT=0) and whether the digit for the relative priority should be assigned a higher value for a lower priority. * sencond, whether each digit should start at 0 or 1 I would go for assigning lower numbers to higher priorities and start with 0, thus mapping MoSCoW priorities as (MUST=0, SHOULD=1, COULD=2, WONT=3) and then assign relative priorities from 0 to 9 being 0 the highest. For me, it's kind of more intuitive saying that something that has been assigned priority "01" has a higher priority than something that has priority "21" (because means it is first in my "todo" list) but I would go for what the majority has interpreted so far ... Question mark is ... what interpretation have you followed in your chapter ? (in case you haven't passed specific instructions and you believe this field has not been filled, please let us know) Please send your response by 17:00 CET today and we'll take the decision that imply less changes on what has already been set on the Wiki. I will send an email with the definitive convention to follow based on your responses by EOB today and will add whatever is needed to the tutorials. If I don't receive a response from you, I will assume you haven't filled this value so far and, therefore, you can live with what gets decided. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 10 07:47:35 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:47:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] On empty sections associated to Themes/Epics/Features/User-Stories on the Wiki Message-ID: <4EBB7387.2000606@tid.es> Hi, There may be GEs for which some of the sections linked to Themes, Epics, Features or User-Stories may be empty. This is fine because our development in FI-WARE didn't start from the scratch but relies on the selection of a number of baseline assets. Thus, the FI-WARE backlog will contain Theme/Epic/Feature/User-Story entries that match "functionality to be supported but is not yet fully supported in its full extend" in the reference implementation we want to build based on selected assets (in other words, requires some development to be done on the assets). If we had gone for building a complete backlog that includes all "functionality to be supported" in the reference implementation of GEs, it would be a huge task since it had meant trying to perform a reverse engineering of many of the functionalities already supported in the baseline assets, many of which had taken years of development. We may had finished with a very nice and complete backlog, where just selecting the features we would get a detailed description of all GEs, but this would not provide so much added value to the development teams, who want to plan what they have to do rather that document what they already did, overall when at the end of the day we will produce a complete set of GE specifications where the complete functionality of GEs will be detailed documented for the sake of application programmers (and they will not want to check backlogs) Since having sections with empty bullets may lead to a wrong interpretation ("there is work pending"), you should review all the sections dealing with description of backlog entries on the Wiki and remove those "Themes", "Epics", "Features" or "User-Stories" sections that are empty. Please try to get this done for this milestone. It simply takes a few minutes. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 10 08:33:16 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:33:16 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE virtual workshop on Security In-Reply-To: <190553045.1320910137309.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl012.webex.com> References: <190553045.1320910137309.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl012.webex.com> Message-ID: <4EBB7E3C.5030907@tid.es> Hi all, Those who want to connect to virtual workshop where members of the Security chapter will elaborate on the Identity, Access Control, Privacy Management schema and GEs that FI-WARE will support, are welcome to join the workshop by using the webex bridge below. Regarding voice confcall, we will use powwownow. Details: * PIN: 050662. * Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Talk to you later. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE virtual workshop on Security Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:28:57 +0100 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 Reply-To: Webex6100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE virtual workshop on Security Date: Thursday, November 10, 2011 Time: 9:30 am, Europe Time (Paris, GMT+01:00) Meeting Number: 964 034 199 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187985367&UID=1259036327&PW=NYzU4NmI2MTNh&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187985367&UID=1259036327&PW=NYzU4NmI2MTNh&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex6100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187985367&UID=1259036327&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=9PRrcbMLB5dFrC71EUwiMZk723g--j0OGoJ9NRbOWgI=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 10 08:33:28 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:33:28 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE virtual workshop on Security In-Reply-To: <190553045.1320910137309.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl012.webex.com> References: <190553045.1320910137309.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl012.webex.com> Message-ID: <4EBB7E48.7010808@tid.es> Hi all, Those who want to connect to the virtual workshop where members of the Security chapter will elaborate on the Identity, Access Control, Privacy Management schema and GEs that FI-WARE will support, are welcome to join the workshop by using the webex bridge below. Regarding voice confcall, we will use powwownow. Details: * PIN: 050662. * Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Talk to you later. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE virtual workshop on Security Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:28:57 +0100 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 Reply-To: Webex6100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE virtual workshop on Security Date: Thursday, November 10, 2011 Time: 9:30 am, Europe Time (Paris, GMT+01:00) Meeting Number: 964 034 199 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187985367&UID=1259036327&PW=NYzU4NmI2MTNh&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187985367&UID=1259036327&PW=NYzU4NmI2MTNh&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex6100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=187985367&UID=1259036327&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=9PRrcbMLB5dFrC71EUwiMZk723g--j0OGoJ9NRbOWgI=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Nov 10 09:06:34 2011 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:06:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Dial-in and webex details for the FI-WARE Security workshop on Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management In-Reply-To: <4EBB62D0.3080009@tid.es> References: <4EBB62D0.3080009@tid.es> Message-ID: <8429_1320912404_4EBB8613_8429_17426_1_bad0d3d7-0e01-456c-b2ae-22724545e67d@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Dear All, Find attached the slides prepared by me and Robert for our todays virtual workshop. Please upload them on the repository. Slides to be used in our Webex session Regards, Pascal PS: These slides were prepared for the two virtual workshops we had planned. The first that we will have today with other ATs and the second one with UC Projects (please confirm me/us the date of this second virtual workshop - let me suppose it is known by now !). De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : jeudi 10 novembre 2011 06:36 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Dial-in and webex details for the FI-WARE Security workshop on Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management Hi all, We'll use powwownow for our virtual workshop on Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management. Details: * PIN: 050662. * Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf I'll send the webex info as soon as I get it. Cheers, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Meeting_WP8-Use_Case_Projects_v05.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 2433024 bytes Desc: Meeting_WP8-Use_Case_Projects_v05.ppt URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 10 09:41:53 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:41:53 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Slides to be used in the internal FI-WARE workshop on Security Identity, Access Control and Privacy Management GEs Message-ID: <4EBB8E51.5030604@tid.es> Hi all, Slides that will be used in the workshop this morning have been uploaded to FusionForge and is available at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/584/Meeting_WP8-Use_Case_Projects_v05.ppt Best regards, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Nov 10 11:35:59 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:35:59 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: On priority field in backlog entries (YOUR INPUT IS NEEDED before 17:00) In-Reply-To: <4EBB6E39.2060603@tid.es> References: <4EBB6E39.2060603@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo, for those I2ND wiki pages (i.e. epics) having already a priority defined we used the rule: 1=lowest priority, n=Highest priority (n equals to 4 for MoSCoW, and 5 for relative priority). So for us priority 34 means 'Should' (3) and nearly highest relative priority (4) for e.g. and Epic. On the other hand, currently the 'Priority' field in the Forge backlog tickets can take the values: 1=lowest to 5=highest, so I would follow the same coding to avoid mixing rules. Hence my feedback is: - I would avoid using '0' (unless we have to manage this value in sw code...) - I would support using 1=lowest to 5=highest priority - I would support using the MosSCoW coding: MUST=4, SHOULD=3,COULD=2, WONT=1 BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: gioved? 10 novembre 2011 07:25 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] On priority field in backlog entries (YOUR INPUT IS NEEDED before 17:00) Hi all, During our last confcall, Pier raised the issue about value of the "Relative Priority" field of entries in the backlog. I have checked the template as well as what is currently on the Wiki tutorials (which was based on the template). It is clear that this field should have the form of a two-digit number of which the first digit has to map to the MoSCoW priority while the second is used as relative priority. Note that we are talking about a two-digit number. Not anything with a colon in between like it could be .. However, I have found that there are two things that are unfortunately ambiguous and we should clarify: * first, whether higher priorities should have a lower digit or not, i.e., does priority1=15 and priority2=21 means that priority1 is higher than priority2 ? This relates to the question about whether the correct mapping for the first digit should be (MUST=0, SHOULD=1, COULD=2, WONT=3) or (MUST=3, SHOULD=2,COULD=1, WONT=0) and whether the digit for the relative priority should be assigned a higher value for a lower priority. * sencond, whether each digit should start at 0 or 1 I would go for assigning lower numbers to higher priorities and start with 0, thus mapping MoSCoW priorities as (MUST=0, SHOULD=1, COULD=2, WONT=3) and then assign relative priorities from 0 to 9 being 0 the highest. For me, it's kind of more intuitive saying that something that has been assigned priority "01" has a higher priority than something that has priority "21" (because means it is first in my "todo" list) but I would go for what the majority has interpreted so far ... Question mark is ... what interpretation have you followed in your chapter ? (in case you haven't passed specific instructions and you believe this field has not been filled, please let us know) Please send your response by 17:00 CET today and we'll take the decision that imply less changes on what has already been set on the Wiki. I will send an email with the definitive convention to follow based on your responses by EOB today and will add whatever is needed to the tutorials. If I don't receive a response from you, I will assume you haven't filled this value so far and, therefore, you can live with what gets decided. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000001 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 11 09:22:29 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:22:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Selection of features for 1st minor release and planning of 1st sprint Message-ID: <4EBCDB45.9060904@tid.es> Hi, We will devote the whole day to review that everything is Ok and you have actually finished your work regarding selection of features for the first minor release (scheduled to finish by end of January) and planning of 1st sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November). Please stay tunned and react promptly to any request we may ask. Thanks, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 11 09:24:40 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:24:40 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Second release of the FI-WARE Product Vision Message-ID: <4EBCDBC8.4000108@tid.es> Hi, We have been able to install a MediaWiki extension that allows us to generate .pdf books based on contents of the Wiki. This will allow us to close the hot discussion we were having with the EC regarding formatting of deliverables. Given the fact that a book for the new FI-WARE Future Vision release will not be just generated with a single click, I have managed to agree with our PO that the we will produce such a book and will send it to reviewers by end of Monday Nov 14th. This will give us time to fix any issue we detect during our revision today regarding description of entries in the Backlog. Please book resources to handle any request mostly on Monday because probably there will short time to react (we will try to minimize the set of requests though) Cheers, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From mcp at tid.es Fri Nov 11 11:46:08 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:46:08 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Templates Message-ID: <4EBCFCF0.9060903@tid.es> Dear all, I just wanted to make sure that you are aware that there's a section with the templates on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Useful_document_templates Here you can find this: * Minutes of meeting template * Power Point template * General Word template BR Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 11 12:52:59 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:52:59 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template for slides you have to elaborate for the review meeting Message-ID: <4EBD0C9B.1050505@tid.es> Hi all, Despite we haven't still closed the agenda for our first review with our PO, it is foreseen that each chapter/WP will have a dedicated slot to report on status of activities linked to its chapter/WP. You can find the template you should use for your presentation at: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Useful_document_templates We still don't know how much time will be assigned to the presentations from each WP, but won't be longer than 30 mins. Following is the index you should develop in your presentations (please follow the titles): * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the description of the most important GEs. * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check email that comes next) You should provide a first take of your presentation no later than Wednesday Nov 16th EOB. Any comments/suggestions are welcome. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 11 14:26:55 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:26:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Addressing the comments of reviewers on FI-WARE Product Vision document In-Reply-To: <5FDA25A6-7503-403E-941E-35C608D2E971@tid.es> References: <5FDA25A6-7503-403E-941E-35C608D2E971@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EBD229F.2040703@tid.es> Hi all, We have made an analysis of the comments that reviewers made on our first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision (referred in the Dow as "FI-WARE High-level Description". Results of this analysis is provided below. Please find enclosed the comments they sent to us and I forwarded to you at that time. This email has to do with a number of action points you should implement in order to cover most of the comments and show it in our review. We have categorized them into: * Changes to implement in contents linked to the FI-WARE Product Vision on the Wiki. The suggested changes are quite straightforward and easy to implement, so it should be feasible to address them before Monday Nov 14th EOB. * Points to highlight/explain in your presentation for the review. You should have a few of slides (better if just one) ellaborating on these points (check my previous mail) This is kind of the minimum we should try to tackle. Of course, feel free to add any more enhancements in the Vision description of your chapter to address the specific comments that reviewers have made on your chapter (again, the document with the comments from reviewers is attached for your convenience). However, take into account that we will close and produce the .pdf book deliverable by Monday Nov 14th night. Thanks for your effort, -- Juanjo ******************************************************* Comments from reviewer follow the convention A. where A designates the numbering of the section in the document gathering reviewers' comments and designate the paragraph within that section. 1) Cloud WP -> Issues to update on the Wiki A4.2 Fig9 (section 3.2.5.1 D2.2): Game console could be considerd for the function of cloud proxy along the ISP/Telco classical CPE. (Note: It should be enough to mention this possibility of using other devices in terms/definition section) A4.3 Resource Monitoring. Try to enhance the description a bit. -> Points to highlight/explain in the presentation for the review - Areas demanding clear innovation: cloudbursting, federation, edge proxies/caches & mitigatin dependency risks. - Approach regarding metering/billing - Clarify that it's too early to describe in detail what users will have available regarding functionality of self-service portal (check if it would be feasible to enhance the current description on the Wiki, though). 2) Data/Context WP -> Issues to update in the Wiki A5.2 Unstructured data analysis: more detailed description. A5.4 Change the text within section 4.3.1.2 "The Social Network Analytical capabilities..." -> Points to highlight/explain in the presentation for the review - Preference given to OMA's framework has to be justified. - Unclear why GEs Implementin Intelligent Services are sub-classified. Are they so specific that should be tackled by U-C? - Opinion mining (section 4.3.5) is addressing marketing and sales. What is the borderline between a real-field implementation project and interference with market functionalities. - Internal GE communication (section 4.4.2) raises a concern that inter-GE communication may not be uniform across FIWARE infrastructure. Must be addressed at the level of a framework architecture identifying relationships between GEs. 3) Application & Services -> Issues to update in the Wiki A6.1 Should services and applications be considered as synonyms for the same functional entity type. Probably a small change (adding some sort of statement) in the current description helps to close this comment. A6.2 Add sentence where appropriate updating on status of endorsement of USDL by W3C/industry A6.3 Federation should be considered in the descriptions of repository, registry and marketplace. Try to add some wording on the matter (at least mentioning that this will be evaluated) A6.5 Add definition of "Aggregator Repository" and "Model repository". Try to fix the issue referred regarding red question marks in initial figure and inconsistency with issues mentioned in section about issues -> Points to highlight/explain in the presentation for the review - Clarify that the concrete proposals on Composition/Mashup technologies has been address once we have started with the Materialization of the FI-WARE vision - Explain positioning regarding BPMN/BPEL - Explain why some of the GEs are not detailed described 4) IoT -> Issues to update in the Wiki A7.2 Standardization is generally well described but some more details are missing on surveillance cameras (ONVIF forum and formal stds at IEC and ISO). A7.3 Better describe relation of IoT and I2ND GEs beyond clear association. Note: Just list which GEs/GEs-functions might be used by IoT components. -> Points to highlight/explain in presentation for the review - What we think on reviewer's recommendation: Use UDDI if compliant with GEs provided by Apps/Serv Ecosystem and Delivery GE. 5) IN2D -> Issues to update in the Wiki A8.3 For short range radio maybe consider NFC? (note: Don't know if this comment is suitable, otherwise explain in presentation for the review) A8.4 check if some easy explanation with a short paragraph can be provided to deal with the question: In the list of functionalities under Media Services, does "Graphics rendering" relate to those specific examples or Video in general? -> Points to highlight in the presentation for the review - Explain how this arch is suitable for small, embedded devices (limited regarding resources and connectivity). 6) Security Privacy and Trust -> Issues to update in the Wiki No further changes are foreseen. Of course, further detail will be required but this will be addressed in the architecture specifications -> Points to highlight in the review - Address Identity and privacy, content rights protection/management, network integrity and service operation protections for network providers, traceability as requested by government authorities and regulator requests. - Elaborate an end-to-end overall strategy. - explain approach about identification of Epics related to Security in the different chapters. ******************************************************* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE progress review 1 report.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 50994 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Nov 11 16:16:22 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:16:22 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for the review meeting In-Reply-To: <4EBD0C9B.1050505@tid.es> References: <4EBD0C9B.1050505@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A162B90@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi Juanjo, Even though it is not closed yet, can you circulate the current agenda for the FI-WARE rehearsal and review? I have been outside the office in the last days and may have missed some e-mails with respect to this (difficult to follow the huge amount of FI-WARE e-mails these days). Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: viernes, 11 de noviembre de 2011 12:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template for slides you have to elaborate for the review meeting Hi all, Despite we haven't still closed the agenda for our first review with our PO, it is foreseen that each chapter/WP will have a dedicated slot to report on status of activities linked to its chapter/WP. You can find the template you should use for your presentation at: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Useful_document_templates We still don't know how much time will be assigned to the presentations from each WP, but won't be longer than 30 mins. Following is the index you should develop in your presentations (please follow the titles): * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the description of the most important GEs. * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check email that comes next) You should provide a first take of your presentation no later than Wednesday Nov 16th EOB. Any comments/suggestions are welcome. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Nov 13 23:38:30 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:38:30 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Draft agenda for the review In-Reply-To: <4EBBB0FA.3020007@tid.es> References: <4EBBB0FA.3020007@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC046E6.6020408@tid.es> Hi all, Please find enclosed the draft agenda of the first official review meeting that will take place on November 22nd in Brussels. As you see, we have booked a 30 mins presentation for each of the WPs linked to FI-WARE chapters. I would recommend that you prepare a maximum of 10-12 slides. I already provide some hints about how to structure these presentations last Friday. Don't hesitate to make any question or share any doubt you may have. A first complete draft of the presentation for your chapter is expected by EOB this Wednesday. Again, following is the index you should develop in your presentations (please follow the titles): * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the description of the most important GEs. * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check my email also sent last Friday) Thomas: I would ask you to prepare a presentation about FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP (part of introduction timeslot at the beginning of the review). There, you have to elaborate on the relationship between UC projects in FI-WARE, how we are approaching the interaction with them, etc. Nuria: You have to prepare a few slides (3-4) on collaboration activities. They should align with contents of the report on Collaboration activities that Miguel has already asked you to complete on the Wiki (note there was a report on Collaboration activities deliverable that was due end of October) Matteo/Stephano: the presentation on developers tools will not contain a "response to comments by reviewers", therefore you may not need the 30 mins. Miguel: the slides reporting on resources consumption and whatever else may be relevant about the management report will go in the last timeslot. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Draft agenda for the review Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:09:46 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo , CARLOS RALLI UCENDO , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Hi Arian, Please find a proposed agenda for the review meeting on November 22nd Comments/feedback is welcome. Don't hesitate to ask any question you may have. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE 1st official review M6 Agenda.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 24860 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 14 07:00:45 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:00:45 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Comments on the Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker In-Reply-To: <4EC0AD12.7060204@tid.es> References: <4EC0AD12.7060204@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC0AE8D.4040809@tid.es> Hi all, Please find enclosed the email I have just sent to the FI-WARE Apps team regarding issues I have found after a more detailed analysis of the info about backlog entries both on the Wiki and the tracker. I forward it to all of you because there may be some issues that might be also present in your backlog. While I'm elaborating the detailed comments for each and every chapter and I will forward them to you asap, I'm dealing with each chapter in sequence, so that it is worth that you give it some time to review the ones that I have sent to other chapters and try to extract those that may apply to yours. In the meantime, you may also take care of the comments I forwarded to you last Friday. Overall, those dealing with updates on the FI-WARE Product Vision (High-level Description) needed to address comments by reviewers, since we are going to generate a .pdf book for the official submission of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable tonight, based on contents of the Wiki at that time. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-apps] Detailed comments on the Apps Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:54:26 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: andreas.friesen at sap.com , Leidig, Torsten CC: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Andreas, Torsten, Markus, Here it is a list of issues you have to review regarding backlog entries both on the Wiki and the tracker. Despite I have marked the most critical ones in red, all of them are relevant and shall be addressed. Many of the issues are rather easy to address. With the exception of that market in blue, the rest of them might be solved before EOB today if responsibility to fix them is properly distributed and changes are implemented in parallel. I remind you that sections on the Wiki should be edited in parallel (never clicking on the edit tab at the top of the page but clicking on the edit link at the right side of each section). I copy the FI-WARE Apps team so that they receive the comments as soon as possible and start to analyze them. They should wait for your further instructions regarding those issues for which they find that the action to be done is not that clear or too hard to implement. Best regards, -- Juanjo Apps/Services Ecosystem and Delivery: * General comments: * There are some tickets on the tracker that may need to be deleted ... apparently they do not match any entry on the Wiki (e.g., one with summary="Service Assembly" issued by Nazila Gol mohammadi) * The language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed in many cases. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions. Such conventions try to emphasize what the users will get in terms of functionality. * You refer to "Model Repository" and on the tracker, while talking about "Service Repository" and "Registry" on the Wiki. Please fix this and keep one single vocabulary. BTW, whatever terms you finally decide to go should also be used accordingly in the FI-WARE Product Vision. * Are you sure that you are going to get all what you have labeled as "STORY" finished by end of the first Sprint (i.e., end of November) ? When planning a Story like FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Repository.UploadServiceDescription in the first Sprint ... Are you considering not just the specification of the final interfaces to be supported by the baseline asset or even its implementation? If it was just the specification, probably you need to translate Stories into Features and then define a work-item linked to creating the interface specifications that you can address in the first Sprint. * The "Description" field of some backlog entries on the Wiki is empty. This is not acceptable. * There are some tickets on the tracker that have assigned an Id which doesn't map the convention "FIWARE..Apps.." ... are they deprecated entries that were created long time ago as some kind of test of the tracker ? If so, please delete. * All entries that have been planned for the first Sprint, should have "FIWARE.Release.1.1" as value of the "FI-WARE Release Id" in the tracker. * You have capitalized all letters of the field in backlog entry Ids, that is, (EPIC, FEATURE, STORY) instead of (Epic, Feature, Story). While not super-critical it leaves a bad impression and it would be better to fix it. The issue here is that you would need to implement three changes: 1) rename the Wiki page each entry points to (this can be done using the "move" operation in the Wiki page) 2) change the name in the list of backlog entries in the "Materializing ..." page and 3) update the URL in the corresponding tickets in the tracker. Not so hard if the task is distributed, otherwise is a bit painful. * USDL: * There is one entry that is labeled as to be address in Sprint FIWARE.Sprint.1.1.2. This would not be consistent with Agile principles: you can only plan what user-stories/work-items will come in the current (or about to start) sprint. You never plan what will go in following sprints. Maybe it's a typo ... * Regarding the only feature that has been identified ... it sounds like a bit strange that you declare as goal "The feature will provide basic description elements for services including general information, composition, simple pricing and service level agreements." ... saying "USDL will provide basic description elements ..." instead, sounds a bit more appropriate. * Model Repository: * There is a ticket for which I haven't found a correspondence on the Wiki: FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Registry.RegisterStore * A typo in ticket "FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Repository.RetrieveServiceDescription". You have FIWARE.1.1.1 instead of FIWARE.Sprint.1.1.1 as Sprint Id. * The goals in some tickets are defined as "TBD". You just need to copy&paste the goal of the corresponding entry on the Wiki. * There is an backlog entry described on the Wiki but without ticket on the tracker * Registry: * I miss a ticket on the tracker linked to the FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Registry.RegisterStore entry on the Wiki * I'm afraid there is a typo and should read "has" when you say: "Provider information will also be described using a Linked Data vocabulary, which have to be defined." in FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Registry.LDProviderSpecification * What's the difference between the FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Registry.LDProviderSpecification and the FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Registry.RegisterProvider ? Reading the goal is hard to say. * Marketplace: * The goal in some tickets is defined as "TBD". You just need to copy&paste the goal of the corresponding entry on the Wiki. * I believe that comprising all functions to be supported by the Marketplace in a single "Feature" is too much. It had been more elegant to have a separate feature per each function (Offering, Storing, Rating, Review, Search, Discovery, Comparison, Analytics, Monitoring). As highlighted as general comment, It is not clear whether each Story identified as FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Marketplace.API refers to just specification of the API or even the implementation of such API. Are you going to complete both the specification and implementation within the 1st Sprint (i.e., end of November) ? If it was just trying to cover the specification of the API, it had been better to turn each Story identified as FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Marketplace.API into a Feature identified as FIWARE.Feature.Apps.Marketplace. planned for the first minor release (note that we have dropped the "API" in the last part of the Id) and then create a Work-item (you just need to create the ticket, not the description on the Wiki) identified as FIWARE.WorkItem.Apps.Marketplace.API planned for the first Sprint. * The ticket linked to the FIWARE.STORY.Apps.Marketplace.OfferingAPI entry seems to be repeated, please delete one. * Store: * Where are the tickets on the tracker linked to these entries ? Apparently, the Store is not listed among the set of FI-WARE Generic Enablers (see set of valid values of this field in the tracker) * BM&BE Provisioning System: * Where are the tickets on the tracker linked to these entries ? Apparently, the Store is not listed among the set of FI-WARE Generic Enablers (see set of valid values of this field in the tracker) * Revenue Settlement and Share System: * For a matter of consistency across all entries in the backlog, you should drop the term "Goal" in the Description within the tracker. * Comment general above (similar to the one given for the markeplace) also applies here: please confirm that those stories planned for 1st Sprint do not just deal with definition of interface specifications * Composition: * Apparently, lots of entries whose description is available on the Wiki do not have a corresponding ticket on the tracker. * This is more fundamental: there are several Composition technologies considered here. I rather believe each should have been categorized as an independent Generic Enabler, with its own backlog. Why should we mix the backlog linked to the Ericsson Common Composition Engine with the backlog linked to the WireCloud Mashup Platform ? Maybe it's too late to get this fixed for the official review but deserves discussion. If agreed with the change, I can live without updating the contents of the FI-WARE Vision (Apps/Services Ecosystem and Delivery chapter) but establishing the distinction between the different GEs within the "Materializing Applications/Services Ecosystem and Delivery in FI-WARE" page on the Wiki. * Mediation: * Where are the tickets on the tracker linked to these entries ? Apparently, the Store is not listed among the set of FI-WARE Generic Enablers (see set of valid values of this field in the tracker) * SLA Management: * Where are the tickets on the tracker linked to these entries ? Apparently, the Store is not listed among the set of FI-WARE Generic Enablers (see set of valid values of this field in the tracker) * Multi-channel/Multi-device Access System: * Where are the tickets on the tracker linked to these entries ? Apparently, the Store is not listed among the set of FI-WARE Generic Enablers (see set of valid values of this field in the tracker) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001..txt URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 14 07:31:33 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:31:33 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Adding Work-Items as FI-WARE Backlog Entry Type in the trackers Message-ID: <4EC0B5C5.5090809@tid.es> Hi, To make sure that we follow the same convention, please use "WorkItem" as new option for the "FI-WARE Backlog Entry Type" field in the trackers. Regarding the Id for these backlog entries, you should follow the convention: FIWARE.WorkItem... It is recommended that the follows a format like [.]. so that the original Epic/Feature the WorkItem relates to can be easily traced. I remind you that Work Items do not need to have a full detailed description on the Wiki. Just a ticket on the tracker, with all fields properly filled. Cheers, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 14 08:18:46 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:18:46 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Detailed comments on the I2ND Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker In-Reply-To: <4EC0AD12.7060204@tid.es> References: <4EC0AD12.7060204@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC0C0D6.6030603@tid.es> Dear Pier and Hans, Here it is a list of issues I have identified in a more detailed revision of backlog entries, both on the Wiki and the tracker, linked to your chapter. You have to review them and take the necessary corrective measure. Despite I have marked the most critical ones in red, all of them are relevant and shall be addressed. Many of the issues are rather easy to address. With the exception of those market in blue, the rest of them might be solved before EOB today if responsibility to fix them is properly distributed and changes are implemented in parallel. I remind you that sections on the Wiki should be edited in parallel (never clicking on the edit tab at the top of the page but clicking on the edit link at the right side of each section). Please forward them to members of your team as soon as possible. I copy the rest of the WPLs and WPAs because I haven't sent my detailed comments to all of them and it might be worth that they review your comments to find out what may apply to them as well. This may help them to anticipate any issue on their respective chapters. Best regards, -- Juanjo I2ND: * General comments: * Regarding entries linked to Features, you should verify that the "FI-WARE Release Id" field on the tracker is properly filled for all Features you plan to address in the 1st minor release. This field should also be filled in Features you believe will be addressed in the second minor release. * You have used "User-Stories" in the Id of entries linked to some of the User-Stories instead of "Story" as suggested in the template and tutorial. Since it only applies to two entries, I would encourage you to fix it. Unfortunately, you would need to implement three changes: 1) rename the Wiki page each entry points to (this can be done using the "move" operation in the Wiki page that corresponds to the backlog entry description) 2) change the name in the list of backlog entries in the "Materializing ..." page and 3) update the URL in the corresponding tickets in the tracker. * Connected Device Interfacing: * I miss the tickets linked to the FIWARE.Feature.I2ND.CDI.Phone.* functionalities as well as * The FIWARE.User-Stories.I2ND.CDI.DeviceFeatures.CommonDeviceInterface.FrameWorkAndPlatform User-story may probably map better as a WorkItem but you may keep it as a User-Story ... However, I sincerely have some doubts that you can address it during the course of the first sprint (i.e., get it finished by end of November) ... I would go for replacing it by a set of Work-Items that you can tackle in subsequent Sprints ... Similar comment applies to some other User Stories ... * Cloud Edge: * Is the FIWARE.Feature.I2ND.CE.HomeResourceAbstractionLayer Feature planned for the first minor release ? If so, please add the Release Id in the corresponding ticket on the tracker * What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... * Network Information & Control: * You should replace "EPIC" by "Epic" in the Id of the FIWARE.EPIC.I2ND.NetIC.NetworkResourceControl entry. Unfortunately, you would need to implement three changes: 1) rename the Wiki page each entry points to (this can be done using the "move" operation in the Wiki page that corresponds to the backlog entry description) 2) change the name in the list of backlog entries in the "Materializing ..." page and 3) update the URL in the corresponding tickets in the tracker. * There are some tickets on the tracker (537, 795, 907, 908) which don't map any entry description on the Wiki and are not linked to Work Items ... Check if you have to delete them. * I miss the tickets linked to the two features listed on the Wiki. Apparently, one of them maps to a ticket on the tracker but that ticket doesn't follow the convention of using the entry id as the "summary" field of the ticket. Once you fix this and get the features, don't forget to declare what release they are planned for. * What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001..txt URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 14 12:36:01 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:36:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Detailed comments on the IoT Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker In-Reply-To: <4EC0C0D6.6030603@tid.es> References: <4EC0C0D6.6030603@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC0FD21.6070406@tid.es> Dear Thierry and Lorant, Here it is a list of issues I have identified in a more detailed revision of backlog entries, both on the Wiki and the tracker, linked to your chapter. You have to review them and take the necessary corrective measure. Despite I have marked the most critical ones in red, all of them are relevant and shall be addressed. Many of the issues are rather easy to address. With the exception of those market in blue, the rest of them might be solved before EOB today if responsibility to fix them is properly distributed and changes are implemented in parallel. I remind you that sections on the Wiki should be edited in parallel (never clicking on the edit tab at the top of the page but clicking on the edit link at the right side of each section). Please forward them to members of your team as soon as possible. I copy the rest of the WPLs and WPAs because I haven't sent my detailed comments to all of them and it might be worth that they review your comments to find out what may apply to them as well. This may help them to anticipate any issue on their respective chapters. Best regards, -- Juanjo IoT Service Enablement: * General comments: * It seems like there are contents on the Wiki that are replicated !!! Please avoid duplication * You have capitalized all letters of the field in backlog entry Ids, that is, (EPIC, FEATURE, STORY) instead of (Epic, Feature, Story). While not super-critical it leaves a bad impression and it would be better to fix it. The issue here is that you would need to implement three changes: 1) rename the Wiki page each entry points to (this can be done using the "move" operation in the Wiki page) 2) change the name in the list of backlog entries in the "Materializing ..." page and 3) update the URL in the corresponding tickets in the tracker. Not so hard if the task is distributed, otherwise is a bit painful. * Some entries linked to Features have a value assigned to the "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field which doesn't make sense. The "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field should only be filled for user-stories or WorkItems. * IoT Communication/Connectivity Management: * Something strange happens with the entry identified as FIWARE.EPIC.IoT.ConnectivityManagement.DiscontinuousConnectivityManagement: It exists in the tracker but not on the Wiki ... The URL that is provided in the ticket works but navigates to a Wiki page that is not the one that you would expect. * What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... Note that in the case of WorkItems you won't need to create an entry on the Wiki. * IoT Communication/Service Control: * Something strange happens with the entry identified as FIWARE.EPIC.IoT.ServiceControl.NameResolution: It exists in the tracker but not on the Wiki ... The URL that is provided in the ticket works but navigates to a Wiki page that is not the one that you would expect. * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Communication/Device FrontEnd: * The language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed in some of the backlog entries linked to this GE. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions. Such conventions try to emphasize what the users will get in terms of functionality. * There is a ticket on the tracker linked to a backlog entry with Id = FIWARE.EPIC.IoT.DevicesFrontEnd.NativeProtocol but I guess it should refer to FIWARE.Epic.IoT.DevicesFrontEnd.NativeProtocolAdapter. The URL should also be fixed accordingly. * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Resource Management/Services and Resources Interaction: * There are some tickets on the tracker that do not follow the convention defined for the Id of the entry. You have, for example, FIWARE.Userstory.IoT.ResourcesAndServicesDiscovery.DiscoverResource.Definition and "UserStory" should be "Story". It is correct on the Wiki but not the tracker. * The language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed in some of the backlog entries linked to this GE. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions. Such conventions try to emphasize what the users will get in terms of functionality. * There are some inconsistencies between backlog entries on the tracker and on the Wiki. Please align. * There is a value of "3" associated to the field "FI-WARE Sprint Id" for some entries linked to Features ... has no sense. * Are you sure that you are going to get all what you have labeled as "Story" and planned for the first FI-WARE Sprint finished by end of November ? When planning a Story in the first Sprint ... Are you considering not just the specification of the final interfaces to be supported by the baseline asset or even its implementation? If it was just the specification, probably you need to translate Stories into Features and then define a work-item linked to design/definition of the interface specifications that you can address in the first Sprint. * IoT Resource Management/Discovery and Resolution of Things: * The language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed in some of the backlog entries linked to this GE. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions. Such conventions try to emphasize what the users will get in terms of functionality. * There is a value of "3" associated to the field "FI-WARE Sprint Id" for some entries linked to Features ... has no sense. * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Process Automation/Template Handler * There is a ticket linked to a backlog entry referred as FIWARE.Epic.IoT.Exposure.ProcessRemoteExecution which doesn't have correspondence with anything on the Wiki * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Process Automation/Semantic * There is a ticket linked to a backlog entry referred as FIWARE.EPIC.IoT.Semantic.SemanticMediator which doesn't have correspondence with anything on the Wiki. Apparently, it links to one Feature listed on the Wiki so seems like it's just a matter of labeling the entry as linked to a feature rather than an Epic. * There is a value of "3" associated to the field "FI-WARE Sprint Id" for some entries linked to Features ... has no sense. * The language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed in some of the backlog entries linked to this GE. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions. Such conventions try to emphasize what the users will get in terms of functionality. * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Process Automation/Exposure * There is a value of "3" associated to the field "FI-WARE Sprint Id" for some entries linked to Features ... has no sense. * Don't see ticket on the tracker linked to entry FIWARE.Epic.IoT.Exposure.ProcessRemoteExecution * Don't see ticket on the tracker linked to entry FIWARE.Feature.IoT.Exposure.ThingBasedQuery * Don't see ticket on the tracker linked to entry FIWARE.Feature.IoT.Exposure.AsynchronousThingBasedInteraction * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Data Handling/Local Storage * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Data Handling/Data Pooling * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Data Handling/Data Access Policy * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). * IoT Data Handling/Data Handling * There is a value of "3" associated to the field "FI-WARE Sprint Id" for some entries linked to Features ... has no sense. * Don't see ticket on the tracker linked to entry FIWARE.Feature.IoT.DataHandling.EventsGenerator.M2mPlanet, FIWARE.Feature.IoT.DataHandling.EventsGenerator.Isis, FIWARE.Feature.IoT.DataHandling.EventsGenerator.Ngsi or FIWARE.Feature.IoT.DataHandling.EventsGenerator.EventTemplate. * The ticket linked to entry FIWARE.FEATURE.IoT.DataHandling.IoTSubscribe.Device seems to be duplicated on the tracker ... Maybe one should be linked to IoTPublish.Device ? * No User-Story or WorkItem has been identified ... What do you plan to do in the first Sprint (scheduled to finish by end of November) ? Need to see some User-Stories or WorkItems planned ... I remind you that WorkItems do not require to create contents on the Wiki, only the tracker (this simplifies things a bit). ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001..txt URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 14 16:27:56 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:27:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Addressing the comments of reviewers on FI-WARE Product Vision document In-Reply-To: <4EBD229F.2040703@tid.es> References: <4EBD229F.2040703@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC1337C.8090909@tid.es> Hi all, As already announced, I will generate a .pdf book tonight with the contents available on the Wiki and will produce the second release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable that I will forward to reviewers and our PO. Please send me an email EOB today with a report on what you have been able to address and leaded to an update of the Wiki contents. Thanks for your help, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Addressing the comments of reviewers on FI-WARE Product Vision document Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:26:55 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, We have made an analysis of the comments that reviewers made on our first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision (referred in the Dow as "FI-WARE High-level Description". Results of this analysis is provided below. Please find enclosed the comments they sent to us and I forwarded to you at that time. This email has to do with a number of action points you should implement in order to cover most of the comments and show it in our review. We have categorized them into: * Changes to implement in contents linked to the FI-WARE Product Vision on the Wiki. The suggested changes are quite straightforward and easy to implement, so it should be feasible to address them before Monday Nov 14th EOB. * Points to highlight/explain in your presentation for the review. You should have a few of slides (better if just one) ellaborating on these points (check my previous mail) This is kind of the minimum we should try to tackle. Of course, feel free to add any more enhancements in the Vision description of your chapter to address the specific comments that reviewers have made on your chapter (again, the document with the comments from reviewers is attached for your convenience). However, take into account that we will close and produce the .pdf book deliverable by Monday Nov 14th night. Thanks for your effort, -- Juanjo ******************************************************* Comments from reviewer follow the convention A. where A designates the numbering of the section in the document gathering reviewers' comments and designate the paragraph within that section. 1) Cloud WP -> Issues to update on the Wiki A4.2 Fig9 (section 3.2.5.1 D2.2): Game console could be considerd for the function of cloud proxy along the ISP/Telco classical CPE. (Note: It should be enough to mention this possibility of using other devices in terms/definition section) A4.3 Resource Monitoring. Try to enhance the description a bit. -> Points to highlight/explain in the presentation for the review - Areas demanding clear innovation: cloudbursting, federation, edge proxies/caches & mitigatin dependency risks. - Approach regarding metering/billing - Clarify that it's too early to describe in detail what users will have available regarding functionality of self-service portal (check if it would be feasible to enhance the current description on the Wiki, though). 2) Data/Context WP -> Issues to update in the Wiki A5.2 Unstructured data analysis: more detailed description. A5.4 Change the text within section 4.3.1.2 "The Social Network Analytical capabilities..." -> Points to highlight/explain in the presentation for the review - Preference given to OMA's framework has to be justified. - Unclear why GEs Implementin Intelligent Services are sub-classified. Are they so specific that should be tackled by U-C? - Opinion mining (section 4.3.5) is addressing marketing and sales. What is the borderline between a real-field implementation project and interference with market functionalities. - Internal GE communication (section 4.4.2) raises a concern that inter-GE communication may not be uniform across FIWARE infrastructure. Must be addressed at the level of a framework architecture identifying relationships between GEs. 3) Application & Services -> Issues to update in the Wiki A6.1 Should services and applications be considered as synonyms for the same functional entity type. Probably a small change (adding some sort of statement) in the current description helps to close this comment. A6.2 Add sentence where appropriate updating on status of endorsement of USDL by W3C/industry A6.3 Federation should be considered in the descriptions of repository, registry and marketplace. Try to add some wording on the matter (at least mentioning that this will be evaluated) A6.5 Add definition of "Aggregator Repository" and "Model repository". Try to fix the issue referred regarding red question marks in initial figure and inconsistency with issues mentioned in section about issues -> Points to highlight/explain in the presentation for the review - Clarify that the concrete proposals on Composition/Mashup technologies has been address once we have started with the Materialization of the FI-WARE vision - Explain positioning regarding BPMN/BPEL - Explain why some of the GEs are not detailed described 4) IoT -> Issues to update in the Wiki A7.2 Standardization is generally well described but some more details are missing on surveillance cameras (ONVIF forum and formal stds at IEC and ISO). A7.3 Better describe relation of IoT and I2ND GEs beyond clear association. Note: Just list which GEs/GEs-functions might be used by IoT components. -> Points to highlight/explain in presentation for the review - What we think on reviewer's recommendation: Use UDDI if compliant with GEs provided by Apps/Serv Ecosystem and Delivery GE. 5) IN2D -> Issues to update in the Wiki A8.3 For short range radio maybe consider NFC? (note: Don't know if this comment is suitable, otherwise explain in presentation for the review) A8.4 check if some easy explanation with a short paragraph can be provided to deal with the question: In the list of functionalities under Media Services, does "Graphics rendering" relate to those specific examples or Video in general? -> Points to highlight in the presentation for the review - Explain how this arch is suitable for small, embedded devices (limited regarding resources and connectivity). 6) Security Privacy and Trust -> Issues to update in the Wiki No further changes are foreseen. Of course, further detail will be required but this will be addressed in the architecture specifications -> Points to highlight in the review - Address Identity and privacy, content rights protection/management, network integrity and service operation protections for network providers, traceability as requested by government authorities and regulator requests. - Elaborate an end-to-end overall strategy. - explain approach about identification of Epics related to Security in the different chapters. ******************************************************* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE progress review 1 report.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 50994 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 14 19:54:05 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:54:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Detailed comments on the Cloud Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker In-Reply-To: <4EC0FD21.6070406@tid.es> References: <4EC0FD21.6070406@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC163CD.9080209@tid.es> Dear Alex and rest of the Cloud Hosting team, Here it is a list of issues I have identified in a more detailed revision of backlog entries, both on the Wiki and the tracker, linked to your chapter. You have to review them and take the necessary corrective measure. Despite I have marked the most critical ones in red, all of them are relevant and shall be addressed. Many of the issues are rather easy to address. With the exception of those market in blue, the rest of them might be solved before EOB tomorrow (none of them affect the Wiki contents so that they won't affect generation of the .pdf book linked to second release of the FI-WARE Product Vision Deliverable). Despite the short time I'm giving you to react, I believe this is feasible because they are rather few and responsibility to fix them can be properly distributed so that changes are implemented in parallel. I remind you that sections on the Wiki should be edited in parallel (never clicking on the edit tab at the top of the page but clicking on the edit link at the right side of each section). I copy the rest of WPLs and WPAs so that they can monitor comments to the different WPs. Best regards, -- Juanjo Cloud Hosting: * General comments: * Despite the language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed for some entries, it's true that Goals linked to Cloud Hosting GEs do not adapt so well to that formula, so we will keep things as they are. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions but we'll see. * You have defined FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis as two WorkItems that you will carry out in order to refine the General Architecture and conduct a gap analysis. Both being linked to all GEs. That's pretty fine (and good practice). However ... Do you plan to carry out these WorkItems during Sprint 1.1.1 ? If so, you should assign the "FIWARE.Sprint.1.1.1" value to the "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field in the corresponding ticket. * Resource Manager: * You haven't followed the defined convention for values of the "FI-WARE Release Id" and "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field * You have identified a WorkItem named as FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.ResourceManager.SvcMgrIntegration.InitialDesign ... Are you going to carry out this item during Sprint 1.1.1 ? The WorkItem may have been just identified but be still pending of planning ... that would be fine but wanted to double-check) * There are some Stories that have been assigned a value of 1.1.2 to the Sprint Id. However, you should not plan Stories or Work Items in Sprints after the current/about-to-start sprint. This would be against Agile Principles. While we will try to "plan" Features linked to releases, this "planning" will not apply to User Story and Work Items. This is a simple change because you just need to delete value of the "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field for those User Stories or Work Items that won't fit in FI-WARE.Sprint.1.1.1 * There are several Stories that are not assigned to Sprint 1.1.1. This is fine (you have identified the Stories but you have decided not to address them in Sprint 1.1.1). However, I want to double-check that you didn't simply forget to assign a value to the FI-WARE Sprint Id field. * Service Manager: * It has no sense to assign a User Story or a Work Item to another Sprint different that the current/about-to-start Sprint, as mentioned for the Resource Manager GE. * There are Epics and Features listed in the User Stories section on the Wiki. Just place the entries in the right section. * I see Epics that are assigned to a Sprint (e.g., FIWARE.Epic.Cloud.ServiceManager.AggregateAPI.OCCIClient) ... this doesn't make sense (only User-Stories or WorkItems are carried out in a Sprint). Please fix ... * I see Features that are assigned to a Sprint (e.g., FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.ServiceManager.ServiceAutoScalling.ElastRules). Features are just assigned to releases. * Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? * PaaS Management: * Work Items do not need to be declared linked to a minor release. What is relevant to declare linked to releases are Features. On the other hand ... Shouldn't the ones being identified be linked to sprint 1.1.1 ? * Object Storage: * What type of entry is FIWARE.Epic.Cloud.ObjectStorage.Security.SSO. Apparently an Epic but has not been labeled as such on the tracker. * Wouldn't any of the identified Features be linked to the 1st minor release ? Couldn't you plan them ? * Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? * Cloud Edge: * Don't see the ticket on the tracker that should be linked to the FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CloudProxy.APIFirstRelease entry. * Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? * Monitoring: * Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? * Wouldn't any of the identified Features be linked to the 1st minor release ? Couldn't you plan them ? * Self-Service Interface: * Tickets linked to entries declared on the Wiki haven't been created ! ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001..txt URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Nov 14 21:59:23 2011 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:59:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Presentation for AAL Community Message-ID: Dear all, You can find here the presentation I intend to do this Wednesday at the AAL workshop. Feel free to comment it. The target is a potential MoU between AAL Community and the Future Internet PPP to collaborate, to avoid that this community try to build its own platform... and maybe add new requirements (but the MoU should define how we could intregrate and prioritize them) https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/591/FI-WARE+Overview+and+Open +Calls-AAL+Community-Nov2011.pptx BR Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 New email address: thierry.nagellen at orange.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Nov 15 07:54:09 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:54:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda for the review_comments In-Reply-To: <4EC046E6.6020408@tid.es> References: <4EBBB0FA.3020007@tid.es> <4EC046E6.6020408@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1B1501@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi Juanjo, Is the agenda for the review already closed? Find here few comments that could help to improve it: ? Intro extremely long (90 minutes). It's not a very "agile" introduction. It sounds too long and too focused on internal project management. ? At some point in the agenda, we think it is necessary to include a presentation about how all the different WPs are working together, and how they are interrelated (possibly after the "Developer Community and Tools WP" slot). Currently it sounds like a collection of WPs, with no connection among them. ? Too many sessions: risk of running overtime. Did you discuss with Arian about it? I know my colleague Juan Bare?o, as leader of WP11, contacted you to include a slot on business aspects at least to show the progress made in that WP since this one has been running from the very beginning of the project and reviewers may want to know what work has been done there. It would be useful to know your discussions with the Commission to check their expectations in some of these areas. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: domingo, 13 de noviembre de 2011 23:39 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Draft agenda for the review Hi all, Please find enclosed the draft agenda of the first official review meeting that will take place on November 22nd in Brussels. As you see, we have booked a 30 mins presentation for each of the WPs linked to FI-WARE chapters. I would recommend that you prepare a maximum of 10-12 slides. I already provide some hints about how to structure these presentations last Friday. Don't hesitate to make any question or share any doubt you may have. A first complete draft of the presentation for your chapter is expected by EOB this Wednesday. Again, following is the index you should develop in your presentations (please follow the titles): * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the description of the most important GEs. * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check my email also sent last Friday) Thomas: I would ask you to prepare a presentation about FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP (part of introduction timeslot at the beginning of the review). There, you have to elaborate on the relationship between UC projects in FI-WARE, how we are approaching the interaction with them, etc. Nuria: You have to prepare a few slides (3-4) on collaboration activities. They should align with contents of the report on Collaboration activities that Miguel has already asked you to complete on the Wiki (note there was a report on Collaboration activities deliverable that was due end of October) Matteo/Stephano: the presentation on developers tools will not contain a "response to comments by reviewers", therefore you may not need the 30 mins. Miguel: the slides reporting on resources consumption and whatever else may be relevant about the management report will go in the last timeslot. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Draft agenda for the review Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:09:46 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo , CARLOS RALLI UCENDO , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Hi Arian, Please find a proposed agenda for the review meeting on November 22nd Comments/feedback is welcome. Don't hesitate to ask any question you may have. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 15 09:30:38 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:30:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Report on actions on the Wiki (FI-WARE Product Vision) Message-ID: <4EC2232E.70701@tid.es> Hi all, We expect you have dealt with a number of APs we had identified regarding contents of the FI-WARE Product Vision in your respective chapters. Attached you will find the comments from reviewers in Word format. I have marked in red those paragraphs that should lead to some enhancement of the FI-WARE Product Vision on the Wiki. I assume that the rest may be handled through responses on your presentations during the review. As I told you yesterday, I need to know whether you have actually dealt with the APs to know when I can close and produce a .pdf book with the contents of the Wiki. I EXPECT that you return to me a response to this email ASAP (deadline 14:30) elaborating on the points in red and confirming you have made the necessary changes on the Wiki. Thanks for your effort. Best regards, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Comments on FI-WARE Vision by Reviewers.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 169679 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lorant.farkas at nsn.com Tue Nov 15 09:50:45 2011 From: lorant.farkas at nsn.com (Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:50:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Report on actions on the Wiki (FI-WARE ProductVision) In-Reply-To: <4EC2232E.70701@tid.es> References: <4EC2232E.70701@tid.es> Message-ID: <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2029A513D@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> Dear Juanjo, The standardisation is generally well described, but some details may be missing, such as the standardisation in surveillance cameras (ONVIF forum, and formal standards at IEC and ISO). (AP-Wiki: try to add references) - DONE The description of IoT Communications (section 6.2.1) makes no concrete assessment of the relationship with the Interface to Networks and Devices GEs; this is an oversight given the very clear association. (AP-Wiki: try to add some wording highlighting the intend to assess this relationship)- DONE Mention of UDDI is made in section 6.2.2.1. The consortium is recommended to consider that UDDI only be used if compliant with GEs provided by the Applications/Services Ecosystem & Delivery GE. (AP-Wiki: clarify that we will use a single UDDI across FI-WARE and even that usage of UDDI is under evaluation) - NOT DONE, but maybe this is not IoT topic after all Br, Lorant -----Original Message----- From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext Juanjo Hierro Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:31 AM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Report on actions on the Wiki (FI-WARE ProductVision) Hi all, We expect you have dealt with a number of APs we had identified regarding contents of the FI-WARE Product Vision in your respective chapters. Attached you will find the comments from reviewers in Word format. I have marked in red those paragraphs that should lead to some enhancement of the FI-WARE Product Vision on the Wiki. I assume that the rest may be handled through responses on your presentations during the review. As I told you yesterday, I need to know whether you have actually dealt with the APs to know when I can close and produce a .pdf book with the contents of the Wiki. I EXPECT that you return to me a response to this email ASAP (deadline 14:30) elaborating on the points in red and confirming you have made the necessary changes on the Wiki. Thanks for your effort. Best regards, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 14 16:38:45 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:38:45 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M6 Review Meeting In-Reply-To: <2BCCBBA42ABB89468A85608C4B293028257CE1@S-DC-EXM12.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <2BCCBBA42ABB89468A85608C4B293028257CE1@S-DC-EXM12.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <4EC13605.4070405@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M6 Review Meeting Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:31:19 +0100 From: Bertine.BOS at ec.europa.eu To: LUIS LOPEZ DE AYALA HIDALGO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu , Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , msli at icfocus.co.uk , dgr at whitestein.com , rdifrancesco at ymail.com , bel.piet1 at gmail.com , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Dear Mr. L?pez de Ayala Hidalgo, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 22 November 2011. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission at 25 avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels (meeting room 0/S4).For directions please click here: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/brussels-beaulieu_en.html. As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Mr. Piet Bel - Dr. Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms. Man-Sze Li The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: * the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; * the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; * the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; * the management procedures and methods of the project; * the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; * the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. Please find the draft agenda in the attachment. Please find the documents and deliverables for this review period (months 1 to 6) specified in the current DoW (attached). If you have not send these documents and deliverables to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Wednesday 16 November 2011. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. <> <> Best regards on behalf of Arian Zwegers, Bertine Bos European Commission - DG INFSO/D3 Software & Service Architectures and Infrastructures BU25 3/142, B-1049 Brussels Tel: 32-02-2967335 Fax: 32-02-2967018 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DOW_FI-WARE_(285248)_2011-09-09[1].pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 7648003 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Draft Agenda M6 FI-WARE review meeting.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 40194 bytes Desc: not available URL: From DAVIDBR at il.ibm.com Tue Nov 15 10:38:04 2011 From: DAVIDBR at il.ibm.com (David Breitgand) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:38:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-cloud] Detailed comments on the Cloud Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker In-Reply-To: <4EC163CD.9080209@tid.es> References: <4EC0FD21.6070406@tid.es> <4EC163CD.9080209@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, You require multiple changes to be made in a very short period of time. As you might know Alex is on the leave till Thursday. I would like to help, but I won't be able to lead this activity today and I cannot commit to completing it by the end of the day today. Does anybody of the task leaders wish to step in and lead this activity? Best. -- david ======================================= David Breitgand, Ph. D. Research Staff Member System/Service Performance Management IBM Research Laboratory in Haifa Tel: 972-3-7689-465 Fax: 972-3-768-9545 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, "fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu" Cc: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 14/11/2011 08:54 PM Subject: [Fiware-cloud] Detailed comments on the Cloud Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker Sent by: fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Alex and rest of the Cloud Hosting team, Here it is a list of issues I have identified in a more detailed revision of backlog entries, both on the Wiki and the tracker, linked to your chapter. You have to review them and take the necessary corrective measure. Despite I have marked the most critical ones in red, all of them are relevant and shall be addressed. Many of the issues are rather easy to address. With the exception of those market in blue, the rest of them might be solved before EOB tomorrow (none of them affect the Wiki contents so that they won't affect generation of the .pdf book linked to second release of the FI-WARE Product Vision Deliverable). Despite the short time I'm giving you to react, I believe this is feasible because they are rather few and responsibility to fix them can be properly distributed so that changes are implemented in parallel. I remind you that sections on the Wiki should be edited in parallel (never clicking on the edit tab at the top of the page but clicking on the edit link at the right side of each section). I copy the rest of WPLs and WPAs so that they can monitor comments to the different WPs. Best regards, -- Juanjo Cloud Hosting: General comments: Despite the language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed for some entries, it's true that Goals linked to Cloud Hosting GEs do not adapt so well to that formula, so we will keep things as they are. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions but we'll see. You have defined FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis as two WorkItems that you will carry out in order to refine the General Architecture and conduct a gap analysis. Both being linked to all GEs. That's pretty fine (and good practice). However ... Do you plan to carry out these WorkItems during Sprint 1.1.1 ? If so, you should assign the "FIWARE.Sprint.1.1.1" value to the "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field in the corresponding ticket. Resource Manager: You haven't followed the defined convention for values of the "FI-WARE Release Id" and "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field You have identified a WorkItem named as FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.ResourceManager.SvcMgrIntegration.InitialDesign ... Are you going to carry out this item during Sprint 1.1.1 ? The WorkItem may have been just identified but be still pending of planning ... that would be fine but wanted to double-check) There are some Stories that have been assigned a value of 1.1.2 to the Sprint Id. However, you should not plan Stories or Work Items in Sprints after the current/about-to-start sprint. This would be against Agile Principles. While we will try to "plan" Features linked to releases, this "planning" will not apply to User Story and Work Items. This is a simple change because you just need to delete value of the "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field for those User Stories or Work Items that won't fit in FI-WARE.Sprint.1.1.1 There are several Stories that are not assigned to Sprint 1.1.1. This is fine (you have identified the Stories but you have decided not to address them in Sprint 1.1.1). However, I want to double-check that you didn't simply forget to assign a value to the FI-WARE Sprint Id field. Service Manager: It has no sense to assign a User Story or a Work Item to another Sprint different that the current/about-to-start Sprint, as mentioned for the Resource Manager GE. There are Epics and Features listed in the User Stories section on the Wiki. Just place the entries in the right section. I see Epics that are assigned to a Sprint (e.g., FIWARE.Epic.Cloud.ServiceManager.AggregateAPI.OCCIClient) ... this doesn't make sense (only User-Stories or WorkItems are carried out in a Sprint). Please fix ... I see Features that are assigned to a Sprint (e.g., FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.ServiceManager.ServiceAutoScalling.ElastRules). Features are just assigned to releases. Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? PaaS Management: Work Items do not need to be declared linked to a minor release. What is relevant to declare linked to releases are Features. On the other hand ... Shouldn't the ones being identified be linked to sprint 1.1.1 ? Object Storage: What type of entry is FIWARE.Epic.Cloud.ObjectStorage.Security.SSO. Apparently an Epic but has not been labeled as such on the tracker. Wouldn't any of the identified Features be linked to the 1st minor release ? Couldn't you plan them ? Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? Cloud Edge: Don't see the ticket on the tracker that should be linked to the FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CloudProxy.APIFirstRelease entry. Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? Monitoring: Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? Wouldn't any of the identified Features be linked to the 1st minor release ? Couldn't you plan them ? Self-Service Interface: Tickets linked to entries declared on the Wiki haven't been created ! Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx[attachment "ATT00001..txt" deleted by David Breitgand/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-cloud mailing list Fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-cloud -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From DAVIDBR at il.ibm.com Tue Nov 15 11:02:01 2011 From: DAVIDBR at il.ibm.com (David Breitgand) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:02:01 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-cloud] Detailed comments on the Cloud Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker In-Reply-To: <4EC163CD.9080209@tid.es> References: <4EC0FD21.6070406@tid.es> <4EC163CD.9080209@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi All, Sorry if you receive this message multiple times. I had a glitch with my mail tool, so I am not sure whether you received my previous mail. Alex, is on the leave till Thursday. I will not be able to lead this activity today and cannot commit to completing these tasks by the end of the day today. Does anybody of the task leaders whish to step in and lead this? I will be happy to help to the extent possible given my constraints today. Thank you. -- david ======================================= David Breitgand, Ph. D. Research Staff Member System/Service Performance Management IBM Research Laboratory in Haifa Tel: 972-3-7689-465 Fax: 972-3-768-9545 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, "fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu" Cc: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 14/11/2011 08:54 PM Subject: [Fiware-cloud] Detailed comments on the Cloud Backlog information available on the Wiki/Tracker Sent by: fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Alex and rest of the Cloud Hosting team, Here it is a list of issues I have identified in a more detailed revision of backlog entries, both on the Wiki and the tracker, linked to your chapter. You have to review them and take the necessary corrective measure. Despite I have marked the most critical ones in red, all of them are relevant and shall be addressed. Many of the issues are rather easy to address. With the exception of those market in blue, the rest of them might be solved before EOB tomorrow (none of them affect the Wiki contents so that they won't affect generation of the .pdf book linked to second release of the FI-WARE Product Vision Deliverable). Despite the short time I'm giving you to react, I believe this is feasible because they are rather few and responsibility to fix them can be properly distributed so that changes are implemented in parallel. I remind you that sections on the Wiki should be edited in parallel (never clicking on the edit tab at the top of the page but clicking on the edit link at the right side of each section). I copy the rest of WPLs and WPAs so that they can monitor comments to the different WPs. Best regards, -- Juanjo Cloud Hosting: General comments: Despite the language used for describing goals in the template defined in August for backlog entries has not been followed for some entries, it's true that Goals linked to Cloud Hosting GEs do not adapt so well to that formula, so we will keep things as they are. Some people may argue that description of goals doesn't follow the standard Agile conventions but we'll see. You have defined FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis as two WorkItems that you will carry out in order to refine the General Architecture and conduct a gap analysis. Both being linked to all GEs. That's pretty fine (and good practice). However ... Do you plan to carry out these WorkItems during Sprint 1.1.1 ? If so, you should assign the "FIWARE.Sprint.1.1.1" value to the "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field in the corresponding ticket. Resource Manager: You haven't followed the defined convention for values of the "FI-WARE Release Id" and "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field You have identified a WorkItem named as FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.ResourceManager.SvcMgrIntegration.InitialDesign ... Are you going to carry out this item during Sprint 1.1.1 ? The WorkItem may have been just identified but be still pending of planning ... that would be fine but wanted to double-check) There are some Stories that have been assigned a value of 1.1.2 to the Sprint Id. However, you should not plan Stories or Work Items in Sprints after the current/about-to-start sprint. This would be against Agile Principles. While we will try to "plan" Features linked to releases, this "planning" will not apply to User Story and Work Items. This is a simple change because you just need to delete value of the "FI-WARE Sprint Id" field for those User Stories or Work Items that won't fit in FI-WARE.Sprint.1.1.1 There are several Stories that are not assigned to Sprint 1.1.1. This is fine (you have identified the Stories but you have decided not to address them in Sprint 1.1.1). However, I want to double-check that you didn't simply forget to assign a value to the FI-WARE Sprint Id field. Service Manager: It has no sense to assign a User Story or a Work Item to another Sprint different that the current/about-to-start Sprint, as mentioned for the Resource Manager GE. There are Epics and Features listed in the User Stories section on the Wiki. Just place the entries in the right section. I see Epics that are assigned to a Sprint (e.g., FIWARE.Epic.Cloud.ServiceManager.AggregateAPI.OCCIClient) ... this doesn't make sense (only User-Stories or WorkItems are carried out in a Sprint). Please fix ... I see Features that are assigned to a Sprint (e.g., FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.ServiceManager.ServiceAutoScalling.ElastRules). Features are just assigned to releases. Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? PaaS Management: Work Items do not need to be declared linked to a minor release. What is relevant to declare linked to releases are Features. On the other hand ... Shouldn't the ones being identified be linked to sprint 1.1.1 ? Object Storage: What type of entry is FIWARE.Epic.Cloud.ObjectStorage.Security.SSO. Apparently an Epic but has not been labeled as such on the tracker. Wouldn't any of the identified Features be linked to the 1st minor release ? Couldn't you plan them ? Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? Cloud Edge: Don't see the ticket on the tracker that should be linked to the FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CloudProxy.APIFirstRelease entry. Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? Monitoring: Do you plan only to carry out the FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.Architecture and FIWARE.WorkItem.Cloud.General.GapAnalysis Work Items during sprint 1.1.1 ? Wouldn't any of the identified Features be linked to the 1st minor release ? Couldn't you plan them ? Self-Service Interface: Tickets linked to entries declared on the Wiki haven't been created ! Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx[attachment "ATT00001..txt" deleted by David Breitgand/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-cloud mailing list Fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-cloud -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Tue Nov 15 11:14:31 2011 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:14:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Draft agenda for the review_comments In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1B1501@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <4EBBB0FA.3020007@tid.es> <4EC046E6.6020408@tid.es> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1B1501@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <4EC23B87.6080001@eng.it> As can count my opinion, I think Nuria is right. Regards, Matteo Nella citazione in data mar 15 nov 2011 07:54:09 CET, Nuria De-Lama Sanchez ha scritto: > Hi Juanjo, > > Is the agenda for the review already closed? > > Find here few comments that could help to improve it: > > ?Intro extremely long (90 minutes). It?s not a very ?agile? > introduction. It sounds too long and too focused on internal project > management. > > ?At some point in the agenda, we think it is necessary to include a > presentation about how all the different WPs are working together, and > how they are interrelated (possibly after the ?Developer Community and > Tools WP? slot). Currently it sounds like a collection of WPs, with no > connection among them. > > ?Too many sessions: risk of running overtime. > > Did you discuss with Arian about it? I know my colleague Juan Bare?o, > as leader of WP11, contacted you to include a slot on business aspects > at least to show the progress made in that WP since this one has been > running from the very beginning of the project and reviewers may want > to know what work has been done there. > > It would be useful to know your discussions with the Commission to > check their expectations in some of these areas. > > Best regards, > > cid:349045816 at 01072011-3195 > > *Nuria de Lama* > > Atos Research & Innovation > > Representative to the European Commission > > T +34 91214 9321 > > F +34 91754 3252 > > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu > > Albarrac?n 25 > > 28037 Madrid > > Spain > > www.atosresearch.eu > > es.atos.net > > cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *Juanjo Hierro > *Sent:* domingo, 13 de noviembre de 2011 23:39 > *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Draft agenda for the review > > Hi all, > > Please find enclosed the draft agenda of the first official review > meeting that will take place on November 22nd in Brussels. > > As you see, we have booked a 30 mins presentation for each of the WPs > linked to FI-WARE chapters. I would recommend that you prepare a > maximum of 10-12 slides. I already provide some hints about how to > structure these presentations last Friday. Don't hesitate to make any > question or share any doubt you may have. A first complete draft of > the presentation for your chapter is expected by EOB this Wednesday. > > Again, following is the index you should develop in your presentations > (please follow the titles): > > * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, > 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). > These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the > description of the most important GEs. > * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides > elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first > major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and > available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. > * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides > addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first > release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check my email > also sent last Friday) > > > Thomas: I would ask you to prepare a presentation about FI-WARE in the > context of the FI-PPP (part of introduction timeslot at the beginning > of the review). There, you have to elaborate on the relationship > between UC projects in FI-WARE, how we are approaching the interaction > with them, etc. > > Nuria: You have to prepare a few slides (3-4) on collaboration > activities. They should align with contents of the report on > Collaboration activities that Miguel has already asked you to complete > on the Wiki (note there was a report on Collaboration activities > deliverable that was due end of October) > > Matteo/Stephano: the presentation on developers tools will not contain > a "response to comments by reviewers", therefore you may not need the > 30 mins. > > Miguel: the slides reporting on resources consumption and whatever > else may be relevant about the management report will go in the last > timeslot. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > *Subject: * > > > > Draft agenda for the review > > *Date: * > > > > Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:09:46 +0100 > > *From: * > > > > Juanjo Hierro > > *To: * > > > > Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu > > > *CC: * > > > > Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo > , CARLOS RALLI UCENDO > , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" > > > Hi Arian, > > Please find a proposed agenda for the review meeting on November 22nd > > Comments/feedback is welcome. Don't hesitate to ask any question > you may have. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy > it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye > ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el > emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de > cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 368 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Nov 15 13:06:03 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:06:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] List of ICT projects you are collaborating with_REQUESTED TO ALL WPL Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1B1764@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, As you know, we are updating the wiki for the review, and that includes dissemination and collaboration activities. You already got some instructions from Miguel. One of the aspects that we pointed out in the DoW was the collaboration with other projects. I have personally established some links with the communities of 1.1 and 1.2 but that is more generic and prospective than pure technical collaboration so far. However, already at the proposal stage we mentioned many projects that are the baseline of our work (in fact, this is obvious taking into account that many GE come from existing projects, some of them still ongoing). Being that the case we need from ALL WP leaders that: ? You send to me a paragraph with a brief description of those projects you are collaborating with (I mean, the describe the nature of such collaboration); it is especially important if FI-WARE is contributing to CSAs that may be defining roadmaps or having an impact either at technical or political level ? Please, send the list of projects (at least with acronym, topic and link to the website) Better short than nothing, so I would appreciate at least a quick answer from ALL the WPs by TODAY EOB (but the earlier the better). Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Nov 16 08:56:14 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:56:14 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: URGENT: Report on actions on the Wiki (FI-WARE Product Vision) In-Reply-To: <4EC2232E.70701@tid.es> References: <4EC2232E.70701@tid.es> Message-ID: HI Juanjo, we addressed in the past days nearly all the points mentioned in the comments, more precisely: One point of concern is whether the proposed connection architecture is suited for small, embedded devices with strictly limited processing capabilities, resources and connectivity. --> Addressed in Slides for review Under section 7.2.1.2, for short range radio, maybe contactless technology like Near Field Communication could be added for consideration. (AP-Wiki: clarify this aspect) In the list of functionalities under Media Services, does "Graphics rendering" relate to those specific examples or Video in general? This may need some additional words of explanation. (AP-Wiki: explain in the proper section) --> Addressed both with modifications to product vision page Under section 7.2.2.1 as in Cloud Hosting, the cloud proxy function could be performed by the game console (computing power, storage, and networking capabilities). This could be evaluated in parallel with the Broadband Boxes of operators. (AP-Wiki: add reference to game consoles) --> not addressed yet, we can consider after discussion (we are at the I2ND meeting) for comment to be put in review slides BR Pier -----Messaggio originale----- Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: marted? 15 novembre 2011 09:31 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Report on actions on the Wiki (FI-WARE Product Vision) Hi all, We expect you have dealt with a number of APs we had identified regarding contents of the FI-WARE Product Vision in your respective chapters. Attached you will find the comments from reviewers in Word format. I have marked in red those paragraphs that should lead to some enhancement of the FI-WARE Product Vision on the Wiki. I assume that the rest may be handled through responses on your presentations during the review. As I told you yesterday, I need to know whether you have actually dealt with the APs to know when I can close and produce a .pdf book with the contents of the Wiki. I EXPECT that you return to me a response to this email ASAP (deadline 14:30) elaborating on the points in red and confirming you have made the necessary changes on the Wiki. Thanks for your effort. Best regards, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Nov 16 08:56:17 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:56:17 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: List of ICT projects you are collaborating with_REQUESTED TO ALL WPL In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1B1764@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1B1764@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: Dear Nuria, although not yet formalised as collaboration, here is a list of projects which we are taking contacts with in I2ND, for possible (and probably succeeding) cooperation: - webinos - Task 7.1 Connected Device Interfacing - http://webinos.org - ETICS - Task 7.4 Service Capability, Connectivity and Control - https://www.ict-etics.eu/ - OFELIA - Task 7.3 Network Information and Control - http://www.fp7-ofelia.eu/ Beside this, there are of course those projects linked to the assets, which we mentioned already several times in past actions to collect such information. Best Regards Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Inviato: marted? 15 novembre 2011 13:06 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] List of ICT projects you are collaborating with_REQUESTED TO ALL WPL Priorit?: Alta Hi all, As you know, we are updating the wiki for the review, and that includes dissemination and collaboration activities. You already got some instructions from Miguel. One of the aspects that we pointed out in the DoW was the collaboration with other projects. I have personally established some links with the communities of 1.1 and 1.2 but that is more generic and prospective than pure technical collaboration so far. However, already at the proposal stage we mentioned many projects that are the baseline of our work (in fact, this is obvious taking into account that many GE come from existing projects, some of them still ongoing). Being that the case we need from ALL WP leaders that: ? You send to me a paragraph with a brief description of those projects you are collaborating with (I mean, the describe the nature of such collaboration); it is especially important if FI-WARE is contributing to CSAs that may be defining roadmaps or having an impact either at technical or political level ? Please, send the list of projects (at least with acronym, topic and link to the website) Better short than nothing, so I would appreciate at least a quick answer from ALL the WPs by TODAY EOB (but the earlier the better). Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.gif at 01CCA3E4.79252450] ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000001 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Nov 16 10:00:05 2011 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:00:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Standards management Message-ID: Dear WPL Could you please provide some feedback relating the Standards management in each domain and could you complete with some inputs the xls document, created by NEC to begin a gap analysis for standardization Up to now, we have just received some inputs from I2nd domain and we need additional inputs for each domain by EOB today, as our coordinator ask us for the review meeting on the 22nd Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Atos Research and Innovation T +34 912148859 juan.bareno at atos.net Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atos.net www.atosresearch.eu From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: martes, 08 de noviembre de 2011 11:48 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; 'Ernoe Kovacs'; Lindsay Frost; Carmen Perea Escribano; Andrea Rossi Subject: Standards management Importance: High Dear Colleagues We have two topics regarding standardization: (1) Assets >From the standardization aspect, we would like to add 2 columns to the excel sheet about IPRs that we created previously in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/16/256/IPR+control.xlsx but finally, this IPR?s table was not used and IPR?s were included as an additional chapter in the General Document in the wi-ki and all the WP have been working on this chapter as well as in the Product Vision, part of this table also as you can see below in the contents proposed: Component Description Innovation, added value Target Market Exploited License (1)Most Relevant SDO (2) FI WARE partner/Contact Name of the component,asset that could generate benefits for the market Brief description Please explain briefly what innovation is given by the component. What problems will the component solve? extra features the component provides Identify the target market Separately, partly alone, bundle, etc Regarding Standardization we will need to obtain the following feedback: 1. Most Relevant SDO (i.e. If the component would benefit from standardization, where should it be done? If the component depends on existing standards, where are those standards maintained/updated? If more than one SDO is important, list by approximate order of relevance.) 2. FI-Ware Partner/Contact which is active in that SDO (i.e. which organization and contact person could monitor dependencies and perhaps be involved in any agreed pro-active standardization? If more than one SDO is important, try to include one contact for each) So in order to avoid duplicate efforts, as in the case of IPRs (excelsheet + wi-ki), I propose to create an additional chapter (4) in the wiki within the General Document to deal with this issue. Is it ok with you? or you prefer to deal it separately from the General Document in a excel sheet?. In case of working in the wi- ki who could create this additional chapter? [hide ] * 1 Brief Description * 2 Technologies used * 2.1 Known software requirements * 3 IPR * 4 Standardization * 5 Publically Available Documentation We are in the M7 and we have a deliverable for the M9, so it is urgent to start to gather all of this information about the assets which could leverage on existing standards or on new ones. So your opinion about how to deal this issue in the more agile way will be very helpful (2) Standardisation Attached is an xls document, created by NEC to begin a gap analysis for standardization * 1st worksheet "Introduction" showing the planned usage of the document * 2nd worksheet "SDO" with a list of relevant Standardisation Organisations and including "promised" contribution areas from you (extracted from the final Fi-Ware Agreement). Your actions: Would you please be so kind as to edit the document worksheet "SDO" to a) show any additional SDOs you consider relevant to FI-ware b) show (or change) information about where your company plans to contribute (Note that not all partners are yet included. Please add an extra row where ever needed.) c) show email addresses of contact persons in your organization who are delegates to the organizations (NO DELEGATE WILL BE CONTACTED AT THIS TIME! The FI-Ware Plenary will later define/agree how to co-ordinate work and disseminate information to interested delegates) d) please mark all cells you change using yellow highlighting, because EXCEL has no change-tracking Any additional improvements are most welcome. Would you please reply to Lindsay.Frost at neclab.eu (administrator for this part of WP11). He will combine all answers into a draft summary document for review (and prioritization/trimming !) Kind regards Ern? & Lindsay & Juan ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-Ware_Standardization_List_20110926_CONFIDENTIAL.xlsx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 23034 bytes Desc: FI-Ware_Standardization_List_20110926_CONFIDENTIAL.xlsx URL: From ralli at tid.es Wed Nov 16 11:21:33 2011 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:21:33 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Twitter FI-WARE account usage to be enhanced. We need your help. In-Reply-To: <4EBCFCF0.9060903@tid.es> References: <4EBCFCF0.9060903@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear All, As it's widely known, one of the most agile and popular tools nowadays to increase our presence in social networks is Twitter. Therefore we would like to truly take off its usage at this point, so we may benefit of its large-scale viral marketing opportunities for our early results and dissemination actions too. The project twitter account is "@fireware" and right today has already 51 followers and has published 11 tweets. The impact and influence of a Twitter account is commonly measured by the plain number of followers but it is also relevant to get as followers accounts/people who are significantly followed by others. For those not yet familiar with Twitter, all tweets (Twitter entries) and public details of our account are openly available at http://twitter.com/#!/FIware (No twitter account is needed) Developing a specific individuality for a corporative account is far from easy and thus we just plan to kick-off with announces of Consortium/WPs results/goals as well as retweets of positive or challenging mentions seen in Twitter. What we need from you all is: 1. All project participants: - Follow @fiware from your personal account. Please, take this as an opportunity to create yours and follow, in the event you're not still in Twitter sphere. Besides the WEB access, there exist specific clients for computers, smartphones and tablets. I personally use WEB in my computer and "Echofon" client for iphone/ipad. but there are plenty of articles with clients comparison charts. - Feel free to mention from your accounts @fiware when you are on a brainstorming/task/event related to @fiware and feel it worth to be published. Just bear in mind twitter can potentially be seen by the whole Internet community, including European Commission staff. Be aware that only "Direct messages" are private within two users in twitter, all other communications are available to anyone (even not in twitter). "Reply" somebody means it will be seen by anyone browsing both users in the WEB, although in the Twitter timeline view only origin and destination users see it. - When you think something should be published from @fiware account just send a DM (Direct Message) to @fiware with the message you want to be published. 2. WP Leaders: - Please, provide us with your twitter accounts so we may ask over DM from @fiware whenever a doubt on a potential publication on your topic arises. - Provide us with accounts to be followed that are relevant to your specific WP. This is useful to get interesting followers on your topics and also to have an interesting timeline to read when accessing http://twitter.com/#!/FIware - Provide us with tweets (DM to @fiware or just publish yourself mentioning "@fiware" in the tweet) whenever a relevant dissemination action or public event is done. Should you have more doubts/comments on this, just reply to this mail. Thanks in advance for your kind cooperation! Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------- Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Wed Nov 16 13:30:58 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:30:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Report on Collaboration activities and some issues about the wiki Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1B1C77@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Dear Juanjo, all, I have done my best with the Collaboration section of the wiki, which at least shows that a lot of work has been done in 6 months in terms of establishing collaboration channels with other projects and initiatives. ? I have completed information that was missing (wrt the version we had yesterday evening) ? I have added ICT projects sent by some WPL ? other WPL should send, when possible, even if this will not be reported in the deliverables their problems to avoid a clear unbalance between WPs ? I have completed many dissemination events (in the corresponding page of the wiki), including many presentations made by Atos, but also some others that I had in my mind (like the ones of Thierry, from Orange in the Third Usage Area Workshop in Brussels or the ones he is doing today in the AAL workshop in Amsterdam) -> still I am sure many partners have not updated their part because it seems that only 4-5 partners of a BIG consortium have been disseminating and promoting results, which is not acceptable. o I also warn you that from a technical point of view not all WPs have a good performance in terms of dissemination: security, services and IoT have been the most active ones (mainly security) ? apologies if I have not mentioned you and it happens that you have carried out a dissemination action, but this is the general perception ? I have added some descriptions on prospects regarding EIT ICT Labs or Smart Cities to name a couple of examples, but you can see the full list of initiatives in the wiki page. In case you want to modify something let us know. I have tried to modify mistakes of orthographical nature and I have read several times the whole section, but it would be nice to get a native speaker to check everything (at least before the review). Finally, and sorry to go into sections that are not my responsibility, many descriptions of partners are not complete and many logos are missing. This is not at all a good image for the review!!!!! ? ALL partners should do this if they did not do yet Best regards, Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Wed Nov 16 15:50:40 2011 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:50:40 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Template for slides you have to elaborate for the review meeting In-Reply-To: <4EBD0C9B.1050505@tid.es> References: <4EBD0C9B.1050505@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC3CDC0.3050001@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, please find enclosed Wp9 presentation for the review. I hope this is fine but obviously comments and suggestions are more than welcome. Thanks and regards, Matteo P.S. What about the Wp9 document? At the right moment it seems to be in the private wiki so that note visible for the reviewers? Do we want this? On 11/11/2011 12:52, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hi all, > > Despite we haven't still closed the agenda for our first review with > our PO, it is foreseen that each chapter/WP will have a dedicated slot > to report on status of activities linked to its chapter/WP. > > You can find the template you should use for your presentation at: > > http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Useful_document_templates > > We still don't know how much time will be assigned to the > presentations from each WP, but won't be longer than 30 mins. > > Following is the index you should develop in your presentations > (please follow the titles): > > * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, > 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). > These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the > description of the most important GEs. > * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides > elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first > major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and > available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. > * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides > addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first > release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check email > that comes next) > > You should provide a first take of your presentation no later than > Wednesday Nov 16th EOB. > > Any comments/suggestions are welcome. > > Best regards, > > > -- Juanjo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_Wp9 presentation (22112011).pdf Type: application/applefile Size: 259825 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_Wp9 presentation (22112011).odp Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.presentation Size: 347487 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 368 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Nov 16 23:30:14 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:30:14 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: Draft agenda for the review In-Reply-To: <4EC046E6.6020408@tid.es> References: <4EBBB0FA.3020007@tid.es> <4EC046E6.6020408@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, please find attached the draft presentation for I2ND chapter. Best Regards Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: domenica 13 novembre 2011 23:39 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Draft agenda for the review Hi all, Please find enclosed the draft agenda of the first official review meeting that will take place on November 22nd in Brussels. As you see, we have booked a 30 mins presentation for each of the WPs linked to FI-WARE chapters. I would recommend that you prepare a maximum of 10-12 slides. I already provide some hints about how to structure these presentations last Friday. Don't hesitate to make any question or share any doubt you may have. A first complete draft of the presentation for your chapter is expected by EOB this Wednesday. Again, following is the index you should develop in your presentations (please follow the titles): * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the description of the most important GEs. * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check my email also sent last Friday) Thomas: I would ask you to prepare a presentation about FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP (part of introduction timeslot at the beginning of the review). There, you have to elaborate on the relationship between UC projects in FI-WARE, how we are approaching the interaction with them, etc. Nuria: You have to prepare a few slides (3-4) on collaboration activities. They should align with contents of the report on Collaboration activities that Miguel has already asked you to complete on the Wiki (note there was a report on Collaboration activities deliverable that was due end of October) Matteo/Stephano: the presentation on developers tools will not contain a "response to comments by reviewers", therefore you may not need the 30 mins. Miguel: the slides reporting on resources consumption and whatever else may be relevant about the management report will go in the last timeslot. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Draft agenda for the review Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:09:46 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo , CARLOS RALLI UCENDO , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Hi Arian, Please find a proposed agenda for the review meeting on November 22nd Comments/feedback is welcome. Don't hesitate to ask any question you may have. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000001 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_review_WP7-v3.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 581378 bytes Desc: FI-WARE_review_WP7-v3.pptx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 17 03:08:41 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:08:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Submission of deliverable D.2.2.b FI-WARE High-level Description (Product Vision) In-Reply-To: <4EC466D2.5080102@tid.es> References: <4EC466D2.5080102@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC46CA9.8010207@tid.es> FYI. Feel free to share with your teams. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Submission of deliverable D.2.2.b FI-WARE High-level Description (Product Vision) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:43:46 +0100 From: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , dgr at whitestein.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk , rdifrancesco at ymail.com , bel.piet1 at gmail.com CC: FI-WARE project EC mailbox , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Dear PO and FI-WARE project reviewers, This is the official submission of deliverable D.2.2.b FI-WARE High-level Description (Product Vision) deliverable of the FI-WARE project. You can download a .pdf version of this deliverable at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/624/FI-WARE+High-level+Description+Product+Vision+11-11-16.pdf The FI-WARE High-level Description (Product Vision) is a living document, constantly updated on the public Wiki of the FI-WARE project (http://wiki.fi-ware.eu). You can always get access it on line at: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Product_Vision The submitted D.2.2.b deliverable indeed correspond to a snapshot of the contents of the FI-WARE High-level Description (Product Vision) available on the Wiki. This snapshot has been produced using standard extensions of MediaWiki enabling to generate .pdf books from MediaWiki-based Wiki contents. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro Chief Architect & Technical Manager FI-WARE project www.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 17 03:09:01 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:09:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.12.2.a Report on Communication and Dissemination activities In-Reply-To: <4EC46A1A.8060100@tid.es> References: <4EC46A1A.8060100@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC46CBD.7090908@tid.es> FYI. Feel free to share with your teams. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.12.2.a Report on Communication and Dissemination activities Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:57:46 +0100 From: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , dgr at whitestein.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk , rdifrancesco at ymail.com , bel.piet1 at gmail.com CC: FI-WARE project EC mailbox , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Dear PO and FI-WARE project reviewers, This is the official submission of FI-WARE deliverable D.12.2.a Report on Communication and Dissemination activities. You can download a .pdf version of this deliverable at: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/625/D.12.2.a+Communication_Dissemination_Report.pdf This deliverable is a living document, constantly updated on the public Wiki of the FI-WARE project (http://wiki.fi-ware.eu). You can always get access it on line at: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Communication_activities * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Dissemination_activities The submitted D.12.2.a deliverable indeed correspond to a snapshot of the contents of the contents available on the Wiki. This snapshot has been produced using standard extensions of MediaWiki enabling to generate .pdf books from MediaWiki-based Wiki contents. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro Chief Architect & Technical Manager FI-WARE project www.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 17 03:09:36 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:09:36 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.12.3.a Report on Collaboration activities In-Reply-To: <4EC46BE7.30002@tid.es> References: <4EC46BE7.30002@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC46CE0.8070702@tid.es> FYI. Feel free to share with your teams. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.12.3.a Report on Collaboration activities Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:05:27 +0100 From: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , dgr at whitestein.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk , rdifrancesco at ymail.com , bel.piet1 at gmail.com CC: FI-WARE project EC mailbox , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Dear PO and FI-WARE project reviewers, This is the official submission of FI-WARE deliverable D.12.3.a Report on Collaboration activities. You can download a .pdf version of this deliverable at: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/626/D.12.3.a+Collaboration+Report.pdf This deliverable is a living document, constantly updated on the public Wiki of the FI-WARE project (http://wiki.fi-ware.eu). You can always get access it on line at: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Collaboration_activities The submitted D.12.3.a deliverable indeed corresponds to a snapshot of the contents available on the Wiki. This snapshot has been produced using standard extensions of MediaWiki enabling to generate .pdf books from MediaWiki-based Wiki contents. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro Chief Architect & Technical Manager FI-WARE project www.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sedano at tid.es Thu Nov 17 11:59:11 2011 From: sedano at tid.es (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jose_Luis_Pe=F1a_Sedano?=) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:59:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT: FI-WARE review: list of attendants Message-ID: <4EC4E8FF.4000906@tid.es> Dear all, the Commission has asked us to provide a list of attendants for the review (for security reasons). For all of you attending the review, we need: name, company, ID card/passport number As you can imagine they need this now. So please, forward the information before 14.00 UTC. regards -- [cid:part1.06070609.01040808 at tid.es] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: firma correo.gif Type: image/gif Size: 6578 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Nov 17 12:11:38 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:11:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT: FI-WARE review: list of attendants In-Reply-To: <4EC4E8FF.4000906@tid.es> References: <4EC4E8FF.4000906@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC4EBEA.6040407@tid.es> Hi @WPLs: Please make sure that you provide this info for your respective WPs. @WPAs: if your respective WPL does not react quickly for whatever reason (they may see this message too late), please make sure to do this for them BR Miguel El 17/11/2011 11:59, JOSE LUIS PE?A SEDANO escribi?: Dear all, the Commission has asked us to provide a list of attendants for the review (for security reasons). For all of you attending the review, we need: name, company, ID card/passport number As you can imagine they need this now. So please, forward the information before 14.00 UTC. regards -- [cid:part1.04030207.06020504 at tid.es] -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 6578 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Nov 17 13:07:16 2011 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:07:16 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT: FI-WARE review: list of attendants In-Reply-To: <4EC4E8FF.4000906@tid.es> References: <4EC4E8FF.4000906@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear all, For WP5 Internet of Things, I will attend the review : Mr Thierry Nagellen - Orange Id Card n?: 110806102901 My WPA (Lorant Farkas) will not attend the review. ( travel costs management at WP level) BR Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 New email address: thierry.nagellen at orange.com De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Jose Luis Pe?a Sedano Envoy? : jeudi 17 novembre 2011 11:59 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : MARIA ISABEL ALONSO MEDIAVILLA; Javier de Pedro Sanchez Objet : [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT: FI-WARE review: list of attendants Dear all, the Commission has asked us to provide a list of attendants for the review (for security reasons). For all of you attending the review, we need: name, company, ID card/passport number As you can imagine they need this now. So please, forward the information before 14.00 UTC. regards -- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 6578 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Nov 17 13:10:13 2011 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:10:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: Draft agenda for the review In-Reply-To: References: <4EBBB0FA.3020007@tid.es> <4EC046E6.6020408@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo Please find a first version for the review presentation for IoT BR Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Garino Pierangelo Envoy? : mercredi 16 novembre 2011 23:30 ? : Juanjo Hierro Cc : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: Draft agenda for the review Dear Juanjo, please find attached the draft presentation for I2ND chapter. Best Regards Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: domenica 13 novembre 2011 23:39 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Draft agenda for the review Hi all, Please find enclosed the draft agenda of the first official review meeting that will take place on November 22nd in Brussels. As you see, we have booked a 30 mins presentation for each of the WPs linked to FI-WARE chapters. I would recommend that you prepare a maximum of 10-12 slides. I already provide some hints about how to structure these presentations last Friday. Don't hesitate to make any question or share any doubt you may have. A first complete draft of the presentation for your chapter is expected by EOB this Wednesday. Again, following is the index you should develop in your presentations (please follow the titles): * " Vision (/)" (follow the convention 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the description of the most important GEs. * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check my email also sent last Friday) Thomas: I would ask you to prepare a presentation about FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP (part of introduction timeslot at the beginning of the review). There, you have to elaborate on the relationship between UC projects in FI-WARE, how we are approaching the interaction with them, etc. Nuria: You have to prepare a few slides (3-4) on collaboration activities. They should align with contents of the report on Collaboration activities that Miguel has already asked you to complete on the Wiki (note there was a report on Collaboration activities deliverable that was due end of October) Matteo/Stephano: the presentation on developers tools will not contain a "response to comments by reviewers", therefore you may not need the 30 mins. Miguel: the slides reporting on resources consumption and whatever else may be relevant about the management report will go in the last timeslot. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Draft agenda for the review Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:09:46 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo , CARLOS RALLI UCENDO , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Hi Arian, Please find a proposed agenda for the review meeting on November 22nd Comments/feedback is welcome. Don't hesitate to ask any question you may have. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE WP5 IoTSE Review-22Nov2011.pptx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 937183 bytes Desc: FI-WARE WP5 IoTSE Review-22Nov2011.pptx URL: From sedano at tid.es Thu Nov 17 13:12:38 2011 From: sedano at tid.es (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jose_Luis_Pe=F1a_Sedano?=) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:12:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT: FI-WARE review: list of attendants In-Reply-To: References: <4EC4E8FF.4000906@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC4FA36.2070004@tid.es> thanks jose El 17/11/2011 13:07, thierry.nagellen at orange.com escribi?: Dear all, For WP5 Internet of Things, I will attend the review : Mr Thierry Nagellen - Orange Id Card n?: 110806102901 My WPA (Lorant Farkas) will not attend the review. ( travel costs management at WP level) BR Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 New email address: thierry.nagellen at orange.com De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Jose Luis Pe?a Sedano Envoy? : jeudi 17 novembre 2011 11:59 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : MARIA ISABEL ALONSO MEDIAVILLA; Javier de Pedro Sanchez Objet : [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT: FI-WARE review: list of attendants Dear all, the Commission has asked us to provide a list of attendants for the review (for security reasons). For all of you attending the review, we need: name, company, ID card/passport number As you can imagine they need this now. So please, forward the information before 14.00 UTC. regards -- [cid:part1.07020402.05020007 at tid.es] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- [cid:part2.06030708.08070800 at tid.es] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 6578 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: firma correo.gif Type: image/gif Size: 6578 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Nov 17 14:57:48 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:57:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Details for the rehearsal & review Message-ID: <4EC512DC.6050505@tid.es> Dear all, This is just to inform you of the times & venues for the rehearsal on Monday and the review on Tuesday. Monday - Rehearsal ======================= Telefonica Brussels Office Rue de la Loi, 28 Box 8 1040 Brussels Belgium T. +3222309555 Start time: 9:30 (not orientative, it's the actual start. Please be prompt) Tuesday - Review ======================== European Commission 25 avenue de Beaulieu 1160 Brussels (meeting room 0/S4) Start time: 8:30 am (we'll discuss when to meet up on Monday) Please make sure that all attendees are properly informed. Kind regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 17 19:19:19 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:19:19 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) Message-ID: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review chapter-template 11-11-17.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 701952 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Thu Nov 17 19:33:39 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:33:39 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) In-Reply-To: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1F9C28@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> You should have the presentation made by Pepe for WP12. Yesterday he sent to me the preliminary version of his slides, which I have complemented today with few slides on collaboration with other projects and initiatives. He has asked me to reduce to 1-2 slides, so I will send tomorrow a new version. Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2011 19:19 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 17 20:20:51 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:20:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1F9C28@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1F9C28@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <741022C3-E592-419E-9205-97170D420AAD@tid.es> I want to clarify that the proposed template only applies to reporting of WP3-WP9. Just WP9 (Dev tools) may adopt a slightly different set of slides. WP11 & WP12 do not have to comply with this template. Enviado desde mi iPad El 17/11/2011, a las 19:33, "Nuria De-Lama Sanchez" > escribi?: You should have the presentation made by Pepe for WP12. Yesterday he sent to me the preliminary version of his slides, which I have complemented today with few slides on collaboration with other projects and initiatives. He has asked me to reduce to 1-2 slides, so I will send tomorrow a new version. Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2011 19:19 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Thu Nov 17 22:29:00 2011 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:29:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) In-Reply-To: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC57C9C.4050102@eng.it> I will try to change my slides by tomorrow accordingly. Regards, M. On 17/11/2011 19:19, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hi all, > > Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for > the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take > the necessary actions. > > A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that > you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look > coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like > such coordination indeed took place. > > Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so > therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides > with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you > MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who > sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe > now we will have something rather complete. > > Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel > would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me > know and we will discuss it. > > I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by > EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: > > * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review > 11-11-.ppt" > * In Re: to this email > > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 18 07:13:57 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:13:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE Activity Report - Deliverable 1.2.a In-Reply-To: <4EC518EE.4000904@tid.es> References: <4EC518EE.4000904@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC5F7A5.1000403@tid.es> Hi all, Yesterday we sent the Activity Report to the EC. Unfortunately, we were in a rush because delay from some partners giving their input to this report so, since we thought it was not going to be saleable to send it without giving POs and the reviewers at least two working days to read it, we decided to send it to them with a disclaimer about the report in resources consumption (see message below) I believe that description of Activity itself is fine. However, we would like you to check the resources consumption allocated by partners in your respective chapter teams. You can find a table on page 64 which summarizes the PMs declared by each partner in your respective WP. The "Real PM" is the amount of PMs each partner has reported to us they have consumed. This is the data we would like you to check and then report to us whether you agree with it or not. Note that we are reporting for the 6 first months of the project. It's true that you should not consider just the people you interact with, there might be a development team behind of course. But you know better than us, based on actual contribution from every partner within your chapter, whether the amount of PMs being reported is fair or not. The "Planned PM" in that spreadsheet is not a target value you should compare reported ("Real PM") against. The values there correspond to values reported by the partners and we have found that some of them seem to have calculated them wrong. Probably, you remember that we reached an agreement during proposal preparation regarding distribution of resources in technical WPs (WP3-WP10) along duration of the project. That agreement meant that if a partner plans to allocate a stable team of X people to a particular WP, on average he will devote 50% of that team for the 9 first months (this typically in a rump, but 50% on average after all). This means that, typically, partners should not have spent more than 10% of the PMs allocated to them in each WP, for the whole duration of the project (you can get the PMs allocated to each partner in your WP from the DoW). Of course, smalls deviation from that parameter may be reasonable, but relevant deviations worth taking a look. Note that if some partners continue consuming PMs at the rate they have reported in this period, it may mean they plan to leave the project in the middle of it because they will run out of resources. Miguel has already sent to some partners an email asking for rationale in those case where a significant deviation has been detected. The WPL is copied in those cases. Therefore, they are the cases that requires particular attention from you. Of course, it would be nice that you review all the figures reported for your WP and tell us whether they sound reasonable or not. It would be nice to get the most critical cases detected and solved for the review on Tuesday, so that we can present revised figures at the review. Thanks and best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE Activity Report - Deliverable 1.2.a Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:23:42 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , dgr at whitestein.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk , rdifrancesco at ymail.com , bel.piet1 at gmail.com CC: FI-WARE project EC mailbox , Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear PO and project reviewers, Please find enclosed the Activity Report (deliverable 1.2.a) of the FI-WARE Project. We are still reviewing some of the resources/costs figures so that information in that respect may change. We intend to submit a new version of this deliverable, with more accurate figures, before the review. However, you may rely on the rest of the report and review the reporting of activities done. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro Chief Architect & Technical Manager FI-WARE Project ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D_1_2_1_FI-WARE_Project Report_v1.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1638656 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Nov 18 07:56:35 2011 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:56:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE Activity Report - Deliverable 1.2.a In-Reply-To: <4EC5F7A5.1000403@tid.es> References: <4EC518EE.4000904@tid.es> <4EC5F7A5.1000403@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, fine for wp10. matteo will provide the due answer for wp 9 shortly. see you in brussels, stefano 2011/11/18 Juanjo Hierro > Hi all, > > Yesterday we sent the Activity Report to the EC. Unfortunately, we > were in a rush because delay from some partners giving their input to this > report so, since we thought it was not going to be saleable to send it > without giving POs and the reviewers at least two working days to read it, > we decided to send it to them with a disclaimer about the report in > resources consumption (see message below) > > I believe that description of Activity itself is fine. However, we > would like you to check the resources consumption allocated by partners in > your respective chapter teams. > > You can find a table on page 64 which summarizes the PMs declared by > each partner in your respective WP. The "Real PM" is the amount of PMs > each partner has reported to us they have consumed. This is the data we > would like you to check and then report to us whether you agree with it or > not. Note that we are reporting for the 6 first months of the project. > It's true that you should not consider just the people you interact with, > there might be a development team behind of course. But you know better > than us, based on actual contribution from every partner within your > chapter, whether the amount of PMs being reported is fair or not. > > The "Planned PM" in that spreadsheet is not a target value you should > compare reported ("Real PM") against. The values there correspond to > values reported by the partners and we have found that some of them seem to > have calculated them wrong. Probably, you remember that we reached an > agreement during proposal preparation regarding distribution of resources > in technical WPs (WP3-WP10) along duration of the project. That agreement > meant that if a partner plans to allocate a stable team of X people to a > particular WP, on average he will devote 50% of that team for the 9 first > months (this typically in a rump, but 50% on average after all). This > means that, typically, partners should not have spent more than 10% of the > PMs allocated to them in each WP, for the whole duration of the project > (you can get the PMs allocated to each partner in your WP from the DoW). > Of course, smalls deviation from that parameter may be reasonable, but > relevant deviations worth taking a look. Note that if some partners > continue consuming PMs at the rate they have reported in this period, it > may mean they plan to leave the project in the middle of it because they > will run out of resources. > > Miguel has already sent to some partners an email asking for rationale > in those case where a significant deviation has been detected. The WPL is > copied in those cases. Therefore, they are the cases that requires > particular attention from you. Of course, it would be nice that you > review all the figures reported for your WP and tell us whether they sound > reasonable or not. > > It would be nice to get the most critical cases detected and solved for > the review on Tuesday, so that we can present revised figures at the > review. > > Thanks and best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE Activity Report - > Deliverable 1.2.a Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:23:42 +0100 From: Juanjo > Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu > , > dgr at whitestein.com , > msli at icfocus.co.uk , > rdifrancesco at ymail.com , > bel.piet1 at gmail.com CC: FI-WARE > project EC mailbox , > Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo > , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" > > > Dear PO and project reviewers, > > Please find enclosed the Activity Report (deliverable 1.2.a) of the > FI-WARE Project. > > We are still reviewing some of the resources/costs figures so that > information in that respect may change. We intend to submit a new > version of this deliverable, with more accurate figures, before the > review. However, you may rely on the rest of the report and review the > reporting of activities done. > > Best regards, > > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Architect & Technical Manager FI-WARE Project > > > > ------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Nov 18 08:43:11 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:43:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE Activity Report - Deliverable 1.2.a In-Reply-To: <4EC5F7A5.1000403@tid.es> References: <4EC518EE.4000904@tid.es> <4EC5F7A5.1000403@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo, PMs concerning WP7 are ok. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: venerd? 18 novembre 2011 07:14 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT AND VERY IMPORTANT Fwd: FI-WARE Activity Report - Deliverable 1.2.a Hi all, Yesterday we sent the Activity Report to the EC. Unfortunately, we were in a rush because delay from some partners giving their input to this report so, since we thought it was not going to be saleable to send it without giving POs and the reviewers at least two working days to read it, we decided to send it to them with a disclaimer about the report in resources consumption (see message below) I believe that description of Activity itself is fine. However, we would like you to check the resources consumption allocated by partners in your respective chapter teams. You can find a table on page 64 which summarizes the PMs declared by each partner in your respective WP. The "Real PM" is the amount of PMs each partner has reported to us they have consumed. This is the data we would like you to check and then report to us whether you agree with it or not. Note that we are reporting for the 6 first months of the project. It's true that you should not consider just the people you interact with, there might be a development team behind of course. But you know better than us, based on actual contribution from every partner within your chapter, whether the amount of PMs being reported is fair or not. The "Planned PM" in that spreadsheet is not a target value you should compare reported ("Real PM") against. The values there correspond to values reported by the partners and we have found that some of them seem to have calculated them wrong. Probably, you remember that we reached an agreement during proposal preparation regarding distribution of resources in technical WPs (WP3-WP10) along duration of the project. That agreement meant that if a partner plans to allocate a stable team of X people to a particular WP, on average he will devote 50% of that team for the 9 first months (this typically in a rump, but 50% on average after all). This means that, typically, partners should not have spent more than 10% of the PMs allocated to them in each WP, for the whole duration of the project (you can get the PMs allocated to each partner in your WP from the DoW). Of course, smalls deviation from that parameter may be reasonable, but relevant deviations worth taking a look. Note that if some partners continue consuming PMs at the rate they have reported in this period, it may mean they plan to leave the project in the middle of it because they will run out of resources. Miguel has already sent to some partners an email asking for rationale in those case where a significant deviation has been detected. The WPL is copied in those cases. Therefore, they are the cases that requires particular attention from you. Of course, it would be nice that you review all the figures reported for your WP and tell us whether they sound reasonable or not. It would be nice to get the most critical cases detected and solved for the review on Tuesday, so that we can present revised figures at the review. Thanks and best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE Activity Report - Deliverable 1.2.a Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:23:42 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , dgr at whitestein.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk , rdifrancesco at ymail.com , bel.piet1 at gmail.com CC: FI-WARE project EC mailbox , Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear PO and project reviewers, Please find enclosed the Activity Report (deliverable 1.2.a) of the FI-WARE Project. We are still reviewing some of the resources/costs figures so that information in that respect may change. We intend to submit a new version of this deliverable, with more accurate figures, before the review. However, you may rely on the rest of the report and review the reporting of activities done. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro Chief Architect & Technical Manager FI-WARE Project ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000001 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 18 14:54:50 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:54:50 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) In-Reply-To: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC663AA.5070508@tid.es> This is a kindly reminder. Please send your slides. Thanks, -- Juanjo On 17/11/11 19:19, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Fri Nov 18 15:12:12 2011 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:12:12 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and moredetailed template) In-Reply-To: <4EC663AA.5070508@tid.es> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> <4EC663AA.5070508@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear all Some minor modifications. I have to refine one picture. I will do it for Monday. BR Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : vendredi 18 novembre 2011 14:55 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and moredetailed template) This is a kindly reminder. Please send your slides. Thanks, -- Juanjo On 17/11/11 19:19, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE WP5 IoTSE Review-22Nov2011.pptx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 937481 bytes Desc: FI-WARE WP5 IoTSE Review-22Nov2011.pptx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 18 15:20:56 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:20:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and moredetailed template) In-Reply-To: References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> <4EC663AA.5070508@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC669C8.7050804@tid.es> The following points are clearly missing: * Table of assets (unless you want to highlight that not decision has been closed yet for many parts of the architecture) * Topics for the Open Call (may not be any) * Response to comments by reviewers * Highs/Lows/Challenges/Lessons-learned Cheers, -- Juanjo On 18/11/11 15:12, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all Some minor modifications. I have to refine one picture. I will do it for Monday. BR Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : vendredi 18 novembre 2011 14:55 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and moredetailed template) This is a kindly reminder. Please send your slides. Thanks, -- Juanjo On 17/11/11 19:19, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Fri Nov 18 15:30:49 2011 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:30:49 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) --> Contribution WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework Message-ID: <6D060AB6A4766E479645B7782D729F350A886D9C7C@DEWDFECCR05.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Juanho, I have attached the review ppt contribution for the WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework (second draft version). Please contact me or my colleagues with any questions. With best wishes Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP RESEARCH Karlsruhe, Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1, 76131 Karlsruhe , Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 07:19 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review Apps and Services Ecosystem and Framework 11-11-18_v0.2.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 669184 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review Apps and Services Ecosystem and Framework 11-11-18_v0.2.ppt URL: From torsten.leidig at sap.com Fri Nov 18 15:35:06 2011 From: torsten.leidig at sap.com (Leidig, Torsten) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:35:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) --> Contribution WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework Message-ID: FYI From: Heller, Markus Sent: Freitag, 18. November 2011 15:31 To: jhierro at tid.es Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; Bohnert, Thomas Michael; Leidig, Torsten; Fasse, Axel Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) --> Contribution WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework Dear Juanho, I have attached the review ppt contribution for the WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework (second draft version). Please contact me or my colleagues with any questions. With best wishes Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP RESEARCH Karlsruhe, Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1, 76131 Karlsruhe , Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 07:19 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review Apps and Services Ecosystem and Framework 11-11-18_v0.2.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 669184 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review Apps and Services Ecosystem and Framework 11-11-18_v0.2.ppt URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Nov 18 16:13:47 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:13:47 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) In-Reply-To: <4EC663AA.5070508@tid.es> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> <4EC663AA.5070508@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, here is the updated set of slides concerning I2ND. As I already mentioned in the past, the open calls is a concern at the moment, so we are considering if we can safely report something which is not just rough information (that might be dangerous for the project, as it could be used against us in the future). This would be available by Monday morning at the latest. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: venerd? 18 novembre 2011 14:55 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) This is a kindly reminder. Please send your slides. Thanks, -- Juanjo On 17/11/11 19:19, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000001 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review I2ND 11-11-18.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 601227 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review I2ND 11-11-18.pptx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 18 16:19:25 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:19:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] FW: URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) --> Contribution WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EC6777D.7050502@tid.es> Hi Torsten, Sounds like in a good shape for a first approach (minor things pending). Some comments: * Text missing in the slides dealing with zoom in of the architecture (Vision 2/3 and Vision 3/3). Maybe you need develop four slides where you have now two (two slides covering a fragment of current Vision 2/3 and two other covering a fragment of current Vision 3/3). I have tried to illustrate what I mean in the attached version ... * One thing I would like to doublecheck ... In the slide titled "Target features for the first release" we intend to mean "major release" ... was this your interpretation when you develop the slide ? Does it summarizes what UC projects will found in the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012 ? Just wanted to be sure ... Cheers, -- Juanjo On 18/11/11 15:35, Leidig, Torsten wrote: FYI From: Heller, Markus Sent: Freitag, 18. November 2011 15:31 To: jhierro at tid.es Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; Bohnert, Thomas Michael; Leidig, Torsten; Fasse, Axel Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) --> Contribution WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework Dear Juanho, I have attached the review ppt contribution for the WP3 Apps and Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework (second draft version). Please contact me or my colleagues with any questions. With best wishes Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP RESEARCH Karlsruhe, Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1, 76131 Karlsruhe , Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 07:19 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review Apps and Services Ecosystem and Framework 11-11-18_v0.3.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 663552 bytes Desc: not available URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Sat Nov 19 22:15:11 2011 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:15:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Cloud chapter slides for the review Message-ID: Juanjo, all, Please, find attached the current draft of the Cloud chapter slides for the project review. Comments are welcome. Thanks, Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Sat Nov 19 23:14:25 2011 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:14:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Cloud chapter slides for the review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ... and now with the attachment. Regards, Alex From: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu, "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 19/11/2011 11:15 PM Subject: [Fiware-cloud] Cloud chapter slides for the review Sent by: fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Juanjo, all, Please, find attached the current draft of the Cloud chapter slides for the project review. Comments are welcome. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Fiware-cloud mailing list Fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-cloud -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review Cloud 11-11-22 v1.ppt Type: application/octet-stream Size: 762880 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Sun Nov 20 06:26:53 2011 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 06:26:53 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE- WP8 Slides for the review Message-ID: <6373_1321766890_4EC88FEA_6373_6913_1_18fa27fd-a4d6-4dc1-b1f6-8277ce02e302@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Dear All, Please, find attached the current draft of the Security chapter slides for the project review. Comments are welcome. Thanks, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review WP8 11-11-20.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 2314752 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review WP8 11-11-20.ppt URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Sun Nov 20 10:14:50 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:14:50 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE- Slides for the review In-Reply-To: <6373_1321766890_4EC88FEA_6373_6913_1_18fa27fd-a4d6-4dc1-b1f6-8277ce02e302@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> References: <6373_1321766890_4EC88FEA_6373_6913_1_18fa27fd-a4d6-4dc1-b1f6-8277ce02e302@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1FA09B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, Thanks for the presentations circulated so far. Is it possible that the colleagues from Telefonica circulate their technical presentations too? I am not sure if I have missed those files (in that case I apologize and I would kindly ask you to resend them). It would be good to have a look at them so that all people can provide comments so that some initial work is done before the rehearsal. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: domingo, 20 de noviembre de 2011 6:27 To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Cc: GIDOIN Daniel; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE- WP8 Slides for the review Dear Juanjo, Dear All, Please, find attached the current draft of the Security chapter slides for the project review. Comments are welcome. Thanks, Pascal ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Nov 20 11:22:06 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 11:22:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.1.1.a Project Management Handbook In-Reply-To: <4EC833BB.6080600@tid.es> References: <4EC833BB.6080600@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC8D4CE.5080605@tid.es> Hi all, I found that the description available on the Wiki about how we were using the Agile Methodology in FI-WARE was rather out of date. I have spent part of my time during the last three days to fix it so that it now captures main concepts on how we are using Agile principles. It gathers many of the answers and hints that I had shared with you along the last weeks while we were building the FI-WARE Backlog. This way, the information exchanged over the email is not lost and can be used as term of reference. Yesterday night I managed to finish this work and submitted Deliverable D.1.1.a Project Management Handbook. Please find below the formal mail sent to reviewers. Please share it with members of your teams. Overall, the fact that the section on the description about how we are using Agile principles is now updated on the Wiki and they can refer to it trying to answer doubts they may have (if still some doubts, don't hesitate to ask and this way we'll enrich the current contents) Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.1.1.a Project Management Handbook Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:54:51 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , dgr at whitestein.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk , rdifrancesco at ymail.com , bel.piet1 at gmail.com CC: FI-WARE project EC mailbox , Jose Jimenez , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear PO and FI-WARE project reviewers, This is the official submission of the .pdf format version of FI-WARE deliverable D.1.1.a Project Management Handbook. The Project Management Handbook is a living document available on the Wiki since month 3 of the project. The submitted D.1.1.a deliverable indeed corresponds to a snapshot of the contents available on the Wiki. This snapshot has been produced using standard extensions of MediaWiki enabling to generate .pdf books from MediaWiki-based Wiki contents. You can download the .pdf format version from: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/627/D_1_1_1_FI-WARE_Management_HandBook.pdf As mentioned, this deliverable is a living document, constantly updated on the public Wiki of the FI-WARE project (http://wiki.fi-ware.eu). You can always get access to it on line at: * http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Main_Page#FI-WARE_Project_Handbook Best regards, Juanjo Hierro Chief Architect & Technical Manager FI-WARE project www.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Nov 20 14:31:09 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:31:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Cloud chapter slides for the review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EC9011D.3000407@tid.es> Hi Alex, Thanks. I see it rather close to final. Some comments: * Saying that "Cloud Infrastructure is the Foundation of the Core Platform" is a bit too much ... In the "FI-WARE Overall Vision" of the FI-WARE Product Vision we say that Cloud Hosting is "the fundamental layer which provides the computation, storage and network resources, upon which services are provisioned and managed" ... sounds like a bit more fair ... don't you think so ? * I believe you should skip on "Innovation Areas" because was not part of the template. However, I feel like much of its contents could go into the "Target features for the 1st Release" (note that I changed a bit the title in the last template I distributed) * Contents of the High/Lows slide may need further discussion but we can leave this for the rehearsal meeting Cheers, -- Juanjo On 19/11/11 23:14, Alex Glikson wrote: ... and now with the attachment. Regards, Alex From: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu, "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 19/11/2011 11:15 PM Subject: [Fiware-cloud] Cloud chapter slides for the review Sent by: fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ Juanjo, all, Please, find attached the current draft of the Cloud chapter slides for the project review. Comments are welcome. Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Fiware-cloud mailing list Fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-cloud ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Nov 20 14:35:08 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:35:08 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and more detailed template) In-Reply-To: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> Message-ID: <4EC9020C.40008@tid.es> Hi all, In the first slide following the template, I asked you to include an overall picture plus a "motto" statement. I want to remind you that we developed a number of mottos per chapter that were enumerated in the "Overall FI-WARE Vision" section of the FI-WARE Product Vision [1]. Maybe they can be helpful: * Cloud Hosting - the fundamental layer which provides the computation, storage and network resources, upon which services are provisioned and managed. * Data/Context Management - the facilities for effective accessing, processing, and analyzing massive streams of data, and semantically classifying them into valuable knowledge. * Applications/Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework - the infrastructure to create, publish, manage and consume FI services across their life cycle, addressing all technical and business aspects. * Internet of Things (IoT) Services Enablement - the bridge whereby FI services interface and leverage the ubiquity of heterogeneous, resource-constrained devices in the Internet of Things. * Interface to Networks and Devices (I2ND) - open interfaces to networks and devices, providing the connectivity needs of services delivered across the platform. * Security - the mechanisms which ensure that the delivery and usage of services is trustworthy and meets security and privacy requirements. Hope it helps, -- Juanjo [1] - http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Overall_FI-WARE_Vision#Vision_and_Goals On 17/11/11 19:19, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sun Nov 20 16:19:11 2011 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:19:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and moredetailed template) In-Reply-To: <4EC9020C.40008@tid.es> References: <4EC55027.5050704@tid.es> <4EC9020C.40008@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi All, Here is a new version for IoT with the motto, some vocabulary and all requested slides. BR Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : dimanche 20 novembre 2011 14:35 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Slides for the review (status and moredetailed template) Hi all, In the first slide following the template, I asked you to include an overall picture plus a "motto" statement. I want to remind you that we developed a number of mottos per chapter that were enumerated in the "Overall FI-WARE Vision" section of the FI-WARE Product Vision [1]. Maybe they can be helpful: * Cloud Hosting - the fundamental layer which provides the computation, storage and network resources, upon which services are provisioned and managed. * Data/Context Management - the facilities for effective accessing, processing, and analyzing massive streams of data, and semantically classifying them into valuable knowledge. * Applications/Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework - the infrastructure to create, publish, manage and consume FI services across their life cycle, addressing all technical and business aspects. * Internet of Things (IoT) Services Enablement - the bridge whereby FI services interface and leverage the ubiquity of heterogeneous, resource-constrained devices in the Internet of Things. * Interface to Networks and Devices (I2ND) - open interfaces to networks and devices, providing the connectivity needs of services delivered across the platform. * Security - the mechanisms which ensure that the delivery and usage of services is trustworthy and meets security and privacy requirements. Hope it helps, -- Juanjo [1] - http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Overall_FI-WARE_Vision#Vision_and_Goals On 17/11/11 19:19, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, Only 3 of you (as far as I know) have sent to me their slides for the review. This scares me a bit and I would kindly ask you to take the necessary actions. A concern, once I have reviewed the presentations you sent is that you didn't follow that much my guidelines. We should try to look coordinated, and nothing better than showing slides that look like such coordination indeed took place. Probably I didn't give too much details in a first shot, so therefore I have prepared a revised version of the template slides with more detailed guidelines (including notes for each slide) you MUST follow. I have added a few bits of what some of the WPLs who sent to me a first draft added to the script I provided. I believe now we will have something rather complete. Please follow the template and, if there is something that you feel would be hard to develop for your particular chapter, please let me know and we will discuss it. I expect to see a rather elaborated draft version of your slides by EOB tomorrow. Please send your presentation: * Using a file name for your .ppt with the form: "FI-WARE M6 Review 11-11-.ppt" * In Re: to this email Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review IoT Service Enablement 11-11-20.pptx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 970961 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review IoT Service Enablement 11-11-20.pptx URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Nov 21 12:37:46 2011 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:37:46 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE review - Security slideset Message-ID: <9381_1321875483_4ECA381B_9381_9662_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E02063EFA7384@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Dear All, Attached, slight update of the Security Presentation Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review WP8 11-11-20-rev1.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 2013696 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review WP8 11-11-20-rev1.ppt URL: From irenatr at gmail.com Mon Nov 21 14:51:25 2011 From: irenatr at gmail.com (Irena Trajkovska) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:51:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-cloud] Cloud chapter slides for the review In-Reply-To: <4EC9011D.3000407@tid.es> References: <4EC9011D.3000407@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Aleks, we have a doubt why in the following response for the reviewers, it is written that no partner has been identified for the portal and toolkit. "Some description of what consumers of the self-service interfaces should expect within the portals/APIs/toolkit is expected, but missing. APIs are described in sections describing the corresponding GEs providing the corresponding functions (IaaS, Object Storage, etc). Regarding portal/toolkit ? no partner has been identified who will provide this capability, as already mentioned in the DoW, and hence this is a candidate for an Open Call, and is not likely to be available in the 1 st release. Therefore, less focus has been made on this in the product vision. However, some capabilities should be considered to be made available for the application developer through Developer Tools." Regards, Irena On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thanks. I see it rather close to final. Some comments: > > - Saying that "Cloud Infrastructure is the Foundation of the Core > Platform" is a bit too much ... In the "FI-WARE Overall Vision" of the > FI-WARE Product Vision we say that Cloud Hosting is "the fundamental layer > which provides the computation, storage and network resources, upon which > services are provisioned and managed" ... sounds like a bit more fair ... > don't you think so ? > - I believe you should skip on "Innovation Areas" because was not part > of the template. However, I feel like much of its contents could go into > the "Target features for the 1st Release" (note that I changed a bit the > title in the last template I distributed) > - Contents of the High/Lows slide may need further discussion but we > can leave this for the rehearsal meeting > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > On 19/11/11 23:14, Alex Glikson wrote: > > ... and now with the attachment. > > Regards, > Alex > > > > > > From: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL > To: Juanjo Hierro > Cc: fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu, "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" > > Date: 19/11/2011 11:15 PM > Subject: [Fiware-cloud] Cloud chapter slides for the review > Sent by: fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > ------------------------------ > > > > Juanjo, all, > > Please, find attached the current draft of the Cloud chapter slides for > the project review. > > Comments are welcome. > > Thanks, > Alex _______________________________________________ > Fiware-cloud mailing list > Fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-cloud > > > ------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-cloud mailing list > Fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-cloud > > -- Irena -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Nov 21 16:13:51 2011 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:13:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Review: last version for IoT Message-ID: Dear all, Here is the last version for IoT chapter, including comments from the rehearsal. BR Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 New email address: thierry.nagellen at orange.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review IoT Service Enablement 11-11-22.pptx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 960064 bytes Desc: not available URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Mon Nov 21 16:44:11 2011 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:44:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] M6 review: updated Cloud slides Message-ID: Comments are welcome. Regards, Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review Cloud 11-11-22 v4.ppt Type: application/octet-stream Size: 532992 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Nov 21 16:57:41 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:57:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Review: Slides for I2ND chapter after rehearsal Message-ID: Dear All, here are the I2ND slides revised during the rehearsal, including the slide about Open Calls (to be checked/agreed). BR Pier ------------------------------------------------------------------ Telecom Italia Pierangelo Garino Innovation & Industry Relations - Research & Prototyping Via G. Reiss Romoli 274, I-10148 TORINO Tel: +39 011 228 7142 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000001 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review I2ND 11-11-21.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 592485 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review I2ND 11-11-21.pptx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Nov 21 17:41:06 2011 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:41:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE - Security Chapter slideset for the review Message-ID: <19476_1321893691_4ECA7F3B_19476_4256_1_29540550-ebe8-4414-9507-78656b3d79fb@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Dear All, Attached the Security Chapter slides revised during the rehearsal. Best Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M6 Review WP8 11-11-22.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 1890816 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M6 Review WP8 11-11-22.ppt URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Mon Nov 21 17:59:11 2011 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:59:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Presentation of WP9 final + deliverable Message-ID: <4ECA835F.5010202@eng.it> The final presentation for the review. Ciao, M. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_Wp9 presentation (22112011) v1.pdf Type: application/applefile Size: 206793 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE DevComE Technical description.pdf Type: application/applefile Size: 866690 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ralli at tid.es Mon Nov 21 18:23:27 2011 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:23:27 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Twitter FI-WARE account usage to be enhanced. We need your help. In-Reply-To: References: <4EBCFCF0.9060903@tid.es> Message-ID: <3EE126E3-099E-41DD-B288-B19205837851@tid.es> Dear All, Please, do encourage your teams to follow @fiware account ASAP as explained in the below enclosed mail. Right now we just have 55 followers. It will be very difficult to speak confident about our intention to use twitter to reach and influence developers community when we do not eat our own dog food ;-) Please, give us a chance to improve this as a project communication tool. Thanks in advance for your actions on this! Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------- Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------- El 16/11/2011, a las 11:21, CARLOS RALLI UCENDO escribi?: > Dear All, > > As it's widely known, one of the most agile and popular tools nowadays to increase our presence in social networks is Twitter. Therefore we would like to truly take off its usage at this point, so we may benefit of its large-scale viral marketing opportunities for our early results and dissemination actions too. > > The project twitter account is "@fireware" and right today has already 51 followers and has published 11 tweets. > > The impact and influence of a Twitter account is commonly measured by the plain number of followers but it is also relevant to get as followers accounts/people who are significantly followed by others. > For those not yet familiar with Twitter, all tweets (Twitter entries) and public details of our account are openly available at http://twitter.com/#!/FIware (No twitter account is needed) > > Developing a specific individuality for a corporative account is far from easy and thus we just plan to kick-off with announces of Consortium/WPs results/goals as well as retweets of positive or challenging mentions seen in Twitter. > > What we need from you all is: > 1. All project participants: > - Follow @fiware from your personal account. > Please, take this as an opportunity to create yours and follow, in the event you're not still in Twitter sphere. > Besides the WEB access, there exist specific clients for computers, smartphones and tablets. > I personally use WEB in my computer and "Echofon" client for iphone/ipad. but there are plenty of articles with clients comparison charts. > > - Feel free to mention from your accounts @fiware when you are on a brainstorming/task/event related to @fiware and feel it worth to be published. > Just bear in mind twitter can potentially be seen by the whole Internet community, including European Commission staff. > Be aware that only "Direct messages" are private within two users in twitter, all other communications are available to anyone (even not in twitter). > "Reply" somebody means it will be seen by anyone browsing both users in the WEB, although in the Twitter timeline view only origin and destination users see it. > > - When you think something should be published from @fiware account just send a DM (Direct Message) to @fiware with the message you want to be published. > > 2. WP Leaders: > > - Please, provide us with your twitter accounts so we may ask over DM from @fiware whenever a doubt on a potential publication on your topic arises. > - Provide us with accounts to be followed that are relevant to your specific WP. > This is useful to get interesting followers on your topics and also to have an interesting timeline to read when accessing http://twitter.com/#!/FIware > - Provide us with tweets (DM to @fiware or just publish yourself mentioning "@fiware" in the tweet) whenever a relevant dissemination action or public event is done. > > Should you have more doubts/comments on this, just reply to this mail. > > Thanks in advance for your kind cooperation! > Best regards, > -- > ------------------------------------------------------- > Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) > Cell: +34696923588 > Twitter: @carlosralli > Telef?nica I+D SAU > Madrid, Spain > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Mon Nov 21 18:57:52 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:57:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] WP11 presentation-short version of actions in this WP Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A1FA5A7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi Juanjo, all, I have prepared a reduced version of the work related to WP11 in case you want to include some slides on this WP for the presentation on "Briefing on status of remaining WPs". Find below the explanations of the slides to understand the content: ? Slide 1: organizational view of WP11 focusing on deliverables that will be submitted in the short term o Important statement that all the current versions of the deliverables have been uploaded to the forge ? Slide 2: A list of the topics that have been the focus of our work in the first 6 months of the project ? From slides 3 to 6 I give examples of some of the activities we have been carrying out (for reviewers to see that we are not talking about theory, but o Slide 3 Task 11.1 Market and competition analysis ? ? definition of business ecosystem and position of each chapter in such an ecosystem ? identification and description of added value of each technical area (left side) ? (Business) Added value FI-WARE as a platform (center of the slide) ? FI-WARE in the context of the use cases and other sectors/domains not included initially in the PPP (right side) ? Analysis of business models behind competitors: pachube, google, apple, amazon WS (below) o Slide 4 Task 11.1 Market and competition analysis ? Starting point to measure the business impact of each technical area with respect to the different use cases ? do not take into account specific statements wrt the relevance. The idea of the slide is to show that there is an analysis of this that will be refined with use case projects and representatives of different markets so that we can detect the ebst exploitation strategies at sectorial level o Slide 5 Task 11.2 IPR Management ? we are analyzing license schemes of all the assets together with incompatibilities (same model applied by the SOA4All project). This slide provides an snapshot of a specific example, the one related to assets in Cloud. o Slide 6. Task 11.3 Market and policy regulation ? snapshot of the tool we are using to evaluate actions with respect to the Digital Agenda implementation Use them as back up. In case they ask I will specify that there was no presentation expected for WP11 but that I have elaborated a summarized version of some of our activities in that WP. Comments are welcomed. nuria Nuria de Lama Atos Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Status of WP11.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 1315328 bytes Desc: Status of WP11.ppt URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 22 19:12:54 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:12:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Initial the feedback Message-ID: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed the notes I took regarding the early feedback by our PO and the reviewers. Thanks all of you for the great effort preparing this review. Overall, I believe the results are pretty positive and encouraging, -- Juanjo General comments: One of the reviewers: This is a good FP7 project. This is not the special thing we would wait. Clear sign of commitment. Focused on pragmatism, getting something useful. Something they subscribe and could make a difference compared to regular projects. Pretty solid. Dialog with PPP UC project seems to be happening. But will see with deliverables. Quite encouraging the effort in aligning the GEs. Risk is not so much what the project does but whether it is relevant in the market. Still a little bit technology pushed. What you should you focus on first. Most difficult parts first should be the approach ? Not so much about creating the technology but how can be used and how useful could be. In exploitation plan in month 12 they expect to see actual facts regarding adoption by partners rather People clearly committed ... but what about companies ? They expect companies to be behind for a project like this. Doesn't see the same level of commitment by all partners. (later a reviewer mentioned): Is the people of Marketing calling you eager to hear you explain what you have to tell them ? Results have to be useful, usable and used. Cannot be made only by technology oriented. We have here a shorter time to the market in the project. Following the Agile principles, we should seek for having something the soon the best. Even if it is not perfect. Third party innovation: who should be the prime users ? What kind of developers ? Developers in a garage ? Developers in a big company ? Who are you comparing with ? Apparently Google and Apple. But then what do we bring that is different ? IoT maybe one thing. Distinction between GE and SE ... not sure whether a definition are not needed. Such guidance may be needed on this respects for Open Call. Open Calls: we should be open to topics that submitters may surprise us Take into account that 30% Spread tasks and responsibilities more within the consortia. Now, it sounds like just a few people (the "Santa Claus" they said) are doing most of the work and if they fail (accident), there is a real issue. Deliverables: Detailed comments will come once the reviewers finalize their review, but overall their initial feedback is that all will be accepted. They consider that the first release of DevCommE was not formally submitted but they understand why (here we have the issue about what has to be submitted linked to a deliverable like this) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Nov 23 00:53:34 2011 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:53:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Initial the feedback In-Reply-To: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> References: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, thank you very much for your great continuous effort! keeping a project of 280 persons under control is a tremendous task which you are carring out in an outstanding manner. nevertheless, due to the outcomes of the review, which impose immediate reactions even before receiving the review report (one moth at least ...), i think a pcc meeting (either f2f or virtual) urges in order to put the project where it is expected not by the fi community as these people know, but for the wider audience where we are completely unknown. ciao, stefano 2011/11/22 Juanjo Hierro : > Dear colleagues, > > ? Please find enclosed the notes I took regarding the early feedback by our > PO and the reviewers. > > ? Thanks all of you for the great effort preparing this review.?? Overall, I > believe the results are pretty positive and encouraging, > > -- Juanjo > > > General comments: > > One of the reviewers: This is a good FP7 project.?? This is not the special > thing we would wait. > > Clear sign of commitment. > > Focused on pragmatism, getting something useful.?? Something they subscribe > and could make a difference compared to regular projects. > > Pretty solid. > > Dialog with PPP UC project seems to be happening.?? But will see with > deliverables. > > Quite encouraging the effort in aligning the GEs.?? Risk is not so much what > the project does but whether it is relevant in the market. > > Still a little bit technology pushed. > > What you should you focus on first.?? Most difficult parts first should be > the approach ? > > Not so much about creating the technology but how can be used and how useful > could be. > > In exploitation plan in month 12 they expect to see actual facts regarding > adoption by partners rather > > People clearly committed ... but what about companies ??? They expect > companies to be behind for a project like this.?? Doesn't see the same level > of commitment by all partners.? (later a reviewer mentioned):? Is the people > of Marketing calling you eager to hear you explain what you have to tell > them ? > > Results have to be useful, usable and used.?? Cannot be made only by > technology oriented. > > We have here a shorter time to the market in the project.?? Following the > Agile principles, we should seek for having something the soon the best. > Even if it is not perfect. > > Third party innovation: who should be the prime users ?? What kind of > developers ??? Developers in a garage ??? Developers in a big company ?? Who > are you comparing with ?? Apparently Google and Apple.?? But then what do we > bring that is different ??? IoT maybe one thing. > > Distinction between GE and SE ... not sure whether a definition are not > needed.?? Such guidance may be needed on this respects for Open Call. > > Open Calls: we should be open to topics that submitters may surprise us > > Take into account that 30% > > Spread tasks and responsibilities more within the consortia.?? Now, it > sounds like just a few people (the "Santa Claus" they said) are doing most > of the work and if they fail (accident), there is a real issue. > > > Deliverables: > > Detailed comments will come once the reviewers finalize their review, but > overall their initial feedback is that all will be accepted.?? They consider > that the first release of DevCommE was not formally submitted but they > understand why (here we have the issue about what has to be submitted linked > to a deliverable like this) > > ________________________________ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 23 08:48:34 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:48:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Initial the feedback In-Reply-To: References: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> Message-ID: <6BD1BF50-0972-46C5-A66E-686A6AEDF212@tid.es> If it was not clear from my notes (I sent them in raw mode, without reviewing, that's why I labeled them as "initial"): - Highs: Project well organized. Good and documented processes supported by tools. Conversations with UC projects established. But early to judge if it is fruitful. Deliverables acepted (we'll see how 9.1.1 will be managed) Clear commitment by people. - Lows: This project is special: they expect more than just good execution. Expect impact once results are delivered but huge noise (awareness, politically, in tech circles, business media) should be already happening and it's not. Nobody knows us beyond the circle of EU FP7. Not sure about commitment of companies. Want to see facts which demostrate that: in the short term getting more involved in awareness, in the medium term (and before the project ends) adopting part of the results. Seem that a few people are doing a lot, but we are an Army of 200+ people who wake up every day to work in a project like this. More involvement of all would help to deliver more. How are we going to gain awareness and get adopted by the wider community of developers to compite with the Googles and Apples? Need to work hard in exploitation. The FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab has to be carefully designed. I agree that the PCC should be called. Don't know how long will it take for the reviewers to send their evaluation report. Would be nice to have it soon at the PCC meeting but wouldn't delay meeting too much waiting for it. Cheers, Juanjo Enviado desde mi iPad El 23/11/2011, a las 00:53, "stefano de panfilis" escribi?: > dear juanjo, > > thank you very much for your great continuous effort! keeping a > project of 280 persons under control is a tremendous task which you > are carring out in an outstanding manner. > > nevertheless, due to the outcomes of the review, which impose > immediate reactions even before receiving the review report (one moth > at least ...), i think a pcc meeting (either f2f or virtual) urges in > order to put the project where it is expected not by the fi community > as these people know, but for the wider audience where we are > completely unknown. > > ciao, > stefano > > 2011/11/22 Juanjo Hierro : >> Dear colleagues, >> >> Please find enclosed the notes I took regarding the early feedback by our >> PO and the reviewers. >> >> Thanks all of you for the great effort preparing this review. Overall, I >> believe the results are pretty positive and encouraging, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> >> General comments: >> >> One of the reviewers: This is a good FP7 project. This is not the special >> thing we would wait. >> >> Clear sign of commitment. >> >> Focused on pragmatism, getting something useful. Something they subscribe >> and could make a difference compared to regular projects. >> >> Pretty solid. >> >> Dialog with PPP UC project seems to be happening. But will see with >> deliverables. >> >> Quite encouraging the effort in aligning the GEs. Risk is not so much what >> the project does but whether it is relevant in the market. >> >> Still a little bit technology pushed. >> >> What you should you focus on first. Most difficult parts first should be >> the approach ? >> >> Not so much about creating the technology but how can be used and how useful >> could be. >> >> In exploitation plan in month 12 they expect to see actual facts regarding >> adoption by partners rather >> >> People clearly committed ... but what about companies ? They expect >> companies to be behind for a project like this. Doesn't see the same level >> of commitment by all partners. (later a reviewer mentioned): Is the people >> of Marketing calling you eager to hear you explain what you have to tell >> them ? >> >> Results have to be useful, usable and used. Cannot be made only by >> technology oriented. >> >> We have here a shorter time to the market in the project. Following the >> Agile principles, we should seek for having something the soon the best. >> Even if it is not perfect. >> >> Third party innovation: who should be the prime users ? What kind of >> developers ? Developers in a garage ? Developers in a big company ? Who >> are you comparing with ? Apparently Google and Apple. But then what do we >> bring that is different ? IoT maybe one thing. >> >> Distinction between GE and SE ... not sure whether a definition are not >> needed. Such guidance may be needed on this respects for Open Call. >> >> Open Calls: we should be open to topics that submitters may surprise us >> >> Take into account that 30% >> >> Spread tasks and responsibilities more within the consortia. Now, it >> sounds like just a few people (the "Santa Claus" they said) are doing most >> of the work and if they fail (accident), there is a real issue. >> >> >> Deliverables: >> >> Detailed comments will come once the reviewers finalize their review, but >> overall their initial feedback is that all will be accepted. They consider >> that the first release of DevCommE was not formally submitted but they >> understand why (here we have the issue about what has to be submitted linked >> to a deliverable like this) >> >> ________________________________ >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >> situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpl mailing list >> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Nov 23 08:44:03 2011 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:44:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Initial the feedback In-Reply-To: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> References: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo and All, that's a great result, I wish to thank you and all the people working to really make such a large group acting as a project and not separate entities. I've got the impression that the presentations by you and Thomas have been able to 'drive' towards the right direction the entire review, and this has been fundamental for its success in my opinion. Nonetheless the effort to make the project progressing in that same right direction will be huge and, as substantially pointed out by the reviewers, we ALL have to continue and do our part and even more. Best Regards Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: marted? 22 novembre 2011 19:13 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Initial the feedback Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed the notes I took regarding the early feedback by our PO and the reviewers. Thanks all of you for the great effort preparing this review. Overall, I believe the results are pretty positive and encouraging, -- Juanjo General comments: One of the reviewers: This is a good FP7 project. This is not the special thing we would wait. Clear sign of commitment. Focused on pragmatism, getting something useful. Something they subscribe and could make a difference compared to regular projects. Pretty solid. Dialog with PPP UC project seems to be happening. But will see with deliverables. Quite encouraging the effort in aligning the GEs. Risk is not so much what the project does but whether it is relevant in the market. Still a little bit technology pushed. What you should you focus on first. Most difficult parts first should be the approach ? Not so much about creating the technology but how can be used and how useful could be. In exploitation plan in month 12 they expect to see actual facts regarding adoption by partners rather People clearly committed ... but what about companies ? They expect companies to be behind for a project like this. Doesn't see the same level of commitment by all partners. (later a reviewer mentioned): Is the people of Marketing calling you eager to hear you explain what you have to tell them ? Results have to be useful, usable and used. Cannot be made only by technology oriented. We have here a shorter time to the market in the project. Following the Agile principles, we should seek for having something the soon the best. Even if it is not perfect. Third party innovation: who should be the prime users ? What kind of developers ? Developers in a garage ? Developers in a big company ? Who are you comparing with ? Apparently Google and Apple. But then what do we bring that is different ? IoT maybe one thing. Distinction between GE and SE ... not sure whether a definition are not needed. Such guidance may be needed on this respects for Open Call. Open Calls: we should be open to topics that submitters may surprise us Take into account that 30% Spread tasks and responsibilities more within the consortia. Now, it sounds like just a few people (the "Santa Claus" they said) are doing most of the work and if they fail (accident), there is a real issue. Deliverables: Detailed comments will come once the reviewers finalize their review, but overall their initial feedback is that all will be accepted. They consider that the first release of DevCommE was not formally submitted but they understand why (here we have the issue about what has to be submitted linked to a deliverable like this) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000001 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 23 08:51:48 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:51:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Initial the feedback In-Reply-To: <6BD1BF50-0972-46C5-A66E-686A6AEDF212@tid.es> References: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> <6BD1BF50-0972-46C5-A66E-686A6AEDF212@tid.es> Message-ID: <9A842DAC-DA5F-4BD3-A603-9FECCCD63B73@tid.es> And I woul add that they warned us that we should do it pretty well in the Open Calls. Many eyes on it. In addition, we should use it as a marketing vehicle. Enviado desde mi iPad El 23/11/2011, a las 08:43, "JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA" escribi?: > > If it was not clear from my notes (I sent them in raw mode, without reviewing, that's why I labeled them as "initial"): > > - Highs: > Project well organized. Good and documented processes supported by tools. > Conversations with UC projects established. But early to judge if it is fruitful. > Deliverables acepted (we'll see how 9.1.1 will be managed) > Clear commitment by people. > > - Lows: > This project is special: they expect more than just good execution. Expect impact once results are delivered but huge noise (awareness, politically, in tech circles, business media) should be already happening and it's not. Nobody knows us beyond the circle of EU FP7. > Not sure about commitment of companies. Want to see facts which demostrate that: in the short term getting more involved in awareness, in the medium term (and before the project ends) adopting part of the results. > Seem that a few people are doing a lot, but we are an Army of 200+ people who wake up every day to work in a project like this. More involvement of all would help to deliver more. > How are we going to gain awareness and get adopted by the wider community of developers to compite with the Googles and Apples? Need to work hard in exploitation. The FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab has to be carefully designed. > > I agree that the PCC should be called. Don't know how long will it take for the reviewers to send their evaluation report. Would be nice to have it soon at the PCC meeting but wouldn't delay meeting too much waiting for it. > > Cheers, > > Juanjo > > > Enviado desde mi iPad > > El 23/11/2011, a las 00:53, "stefano de panfilis" escribi?: > >> dear juanjo, >> >> thank you very much for your great continuous effort! keeping a >> project of 280 persons under control is a tremendous task which you >> are carring out in an outstanding manner. >> >> nevertheless, due to the outcomes of the review, which impose >> immediate reactions even before receiving the review report (one moth >> at least ...), i think a pcc meeting (either f2f or virtual) urges in >> order to put the project where it is expected not by the fi community >> as these people know, but for the wider audience where we are >> completely unknown. >> >> ciao, >> stefano >> >> 2011/11/22 Juanjo Hierro : >>> Dear colleagues, >>> >>> Please find enclosed the notes I took regarding the early feedback by our >>> PO and the reviewers. >>> >>> Thanks all of you for the great effort preparing this review. Overall, I >>> believe the results are pretty positive and encouraging, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> >>> General comments: >>> >>> One of the reviewers: This is a good FP7 project. This is not the special >>> thing we would wait. >>> >>> Clear sign of commitment. >>> >>> Focused on pragmatism, getting something useful. Something they subscribe >>> and could make a difference compared to regular projects. >>> >>> Pretty solid. >>> >>> Dialog with PPP UC project seems to be happening. But will see with >>> deliverables. >>> >>> Quite encouraging the effort in aligning the GEs. Risk is not so much what >>> the project does but whether it is relevant in the market. >>> >>> Still a little bit technology pushed. >>> >>> What you should you focus on first. Most difficult parts first should be >>> the approach ? >>> >>> Not so much about creating the technology but how can be used and how useful >>> could be. >>> >>> In exploitation plan in month 12 they expect to see actual facts regarding >>> adoption by partners rather >>> >>> People clearly committed ... but what about companies ? They expect >>> companies to be behind for a project like this. Doesn't see the same level >>> of commitment by all partners. (later a reviewer mentioned): Is the people >>> of Marketing calling you eager to hear you explain what you have to tell >>> them ? >>> >>> Results have to be useful, usable and used. Cannot be made only by >>> technology oriented. >>> >>> We have here a shorter time to the market in the project. Following the >>> Agile principles, we should seek for having something the soon the best. >>> Even if it is not perfect. >>> >>> Third party innovation: who should be the prime users ? What kind of >>> developers ? Developers in a garage ? Developers in a big company ? Who >>> are you comparing with ? Apparently Google and Apple. But then what do we >>> bring that is different ? IoT maybe one thing. >>> >>> Distinction between GE and SE ... not sure whether a definition are not >>> needed. Such guidance may be needed on this respects for Open Call. >>> >>> Open Calls: we should be open to topics that submitters may surprise us >>> >>> Take into account that 30% >>> >>> Spread tasks and responsibilities more within the consortia. Now, it >>> sounds like just a few people (the "Santa Claus" they said) are doing most >>> of the work and if they fail (accident), there is a real issue. >>> >>> >>> Deliverables: >>> >>> Detailed comments will come once the reviewers finalize their review, but >>> overall their initial feedback is that all will be accepted. They consider >>> that the first release of DevCommE was not formally submitted but they >>> understand why (here we have the issue about what has to be submitted linked >>> to a deliverable like this) >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >>> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >>> situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >>> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpl mailing list >>> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Stefano De Panfilis >> Chief Innovation Officer >> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. >> via Riccardo Morandi 32 >> 00148 Roma >> Italy >> >> tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 >> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 >> fax: +39-068307-4200 >> cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Nov 23 09:59:29 2011 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:59:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Initial the feedback In-Reply-To: <6BD1BF50-0972-46C5-A66E-686A6AEDF212@tid.es> References: <4ECBE626.6070303@tid.es> <6BD1BF50-0972-46C5-A66E-686A6AEDF212@tid.es> Message-ID: <25618_1322038775_4ECCB5F7_25618_9361_1_49d2eae8-eea5-4ffe-86e7-49830328fd2e@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Thanks for your notes. I'd like to thank you, Jose and Thomas (special thanks to you three!) and all the presenters and people who contributed to prepare this review. I think the result is there since it went well and we demonstrated our capacity to answer properly each of the comments from the reviewers. Hope the review report would be delivered promptly to us. In the meantime I do agree we don't have to wait to work on some of the recommendations we got (the most urgent ones to address e.g. 1st Open Call) and also structure and organize the work on M9 deliverable (which is key to be produced and delivered on time with the expect level of quality and that they plan to review remotely - Worth to remind here that M9 is end of January 2012! - so each of the teams should go full speed on this according to instructions provided to them by CA/WP2 lead to work in coherent & consistent manner on the topic ).This even more than for M12 with have a number of deliverables to also produce (first wave of deliverables from each of the chapters!). Last but not least I fully support the proposal of Stefano to have a PCC meeting asap to discuss a number of hot topics (already there as per previous PCC meeting and/or resulting from this review meeting) in order to discuss & align on decisions to be taken. When preparing the Agenda for this PCC I would request you to add the withdrawal of TID of WP8 as one of the topics to be discussed there. I would also call for virtual PCC meeting to be organized on a regular basis since for some topics we can't wait GA where physical PCC meetings are attached. Best Regards, Pascal -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Envoy??: mercredi 23 novembre 2011 08:49 ??: stefano de panfilis Cc?: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Initial the feedback If it was not clear from my notes (I sent them in raw mode, without reviewing, that's why I labeled them as "initial"): - Highs: Project well organized. Good and documented processes supported by tools. Conversations with UC projects established. But early to judge if it is fruitful. Deliverables acepted (we'll see how 9.1.1 will be managed) Clear commitment by people. - Lows: This project is special: they expect more than just good execution. Expect impact once results are delivered but huge noise (awareness, politically, in tech circles, business media) should be already happening and it's not. Nobody knows us beyond the circle of EU FP7. Not sure about commitment of companies. Want to see facts which demostrate that: in the short term getting more involved in awareness, in the medium term (and before the project ends) adopting part of the results. Seem that a few people are doing a lot, but we are an Army of 200+ people who wake up every day to work in a project like this. More involvement of all would help to deliver more. How are we going to gain awareness and get adopted by the wider community of developers to compite with the Googles and Apples? Need to work hard in exploitation. The FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab has to be carefully designed. I agree that the PCC should be called. Don't know how long will it take for the reviewers to send their evaluation report. Would be nice to have it soon at the PCC meeting but wouldn't delay meeting too much waiting for it. Cheers, Juanjo Enviado desde mi iPad El 23/11/2011, a las 00:53, "stefano de panfilis" escribi?: > dear juanjo, > > thank you very much for your great continuous effort! keeping a > project of 280 persons under control is a tremendous task which you > are carring out in an outstanding manner. > > nevertheless, due to the outcomes of the review, which impose > immediate reactions even before receiving the review report (one moth > at least ...), i think a pcc meeting (either f2f or virtual) urges in > order to put the project where it is expected not by the fi community > as these people know, but for the wider audience where we are > completely unknown. > > ciao, > stefano > > 2011/11/22 Juanjo Hierro : >> Dear colleagues, >> >> Please find enclosed the notes I took regarding the early feedback by our >> PO and the reviewers. >> >> Thanks all of you for the great effort preparing this review. Overall, I >> believe the results are pretty positive and encouraging, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> >> General comments: >> >> One of the reviewers: This is a good FP7 project. This is not the special >> thing we would wait. >> >> Clear sign of commitment. >> >> Focused on pragmatism, getting something useful. Something they subscribe >> and could make a difference compared to regular projects. >> >> Pretty solid. >> >> Dialog with PPP UC project seems to be happening. But will see with >> deliverables. >> >> Quite encouraging the effort in aligning the GEs. Risk is not so much what >> the project does but whether it is relevant in the market. >> >> Still a little bit technology pushed. >> >> What you should you focus on first. Most difficult parts first should be >> the approach ? >> >> Not so much about creating the technology but how can be used and how useful >> could be. >> >> In exploitation plan in month 12 they expect to see actual facts regarding >> adoption by partners rather >> >> People clearly committed ... but what about companies ? They expect >> companies to be behind for a project like this. Doesn't see the same level >> of commitment by all partners. (later a reviewer mentioned): Is the people >> of Marketing calling you eager to hear you explain what you have to tell >> them ? >> >> Results have to be useful, usable and used. Cannot be made only by >> technology oriented. >> >> We have here a shorter time to the market in the project. Following the >> Agile principles, we should seek for having something the soon the best. >> Even if it is not perfect. >> >> Third party innovation: who should be the prime users ? What kind of >> developers ? Developers in a garage ? Developers in a big company ? Who >> are you comparing with ? Apparently Google and Apple. But then what do we >> bring that is different ? IoT maybe one thing. >> >> Distinction between GE and SE ... not sure whether a definition are not >> needed. Such guidance may be needed on this respects for Open Call. >> >> Open Calls: we should be open to topics that submitters may surprise us >> >> Take into account that 30% >> >> Spread tasks and responsibilities more within the consortia. Now, it >> sounds like just a few people (the "Santa Claus" they said) are doing most >> of the work and if they fail (accident), there is a real issue. >> >> >> Deliverables: >> >> Detailed comments will come once the reviewers finalize their review, but >> overall their initial feedback is that all will be accepted. They consider >> that the first release of DevCommE was not formally submitted but they >> understand why (here we have the issue about what has to be submitted linked >> to a deliverable like this) >> >> ________________________________ >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >> situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpl mailing list >> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 23 18:06:36 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:06:36 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Review report In-Reply-To: <7BACCBA4EE7D3946BF23FB79D9FD2E6101246771@S-DC-EXM11.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <7BACCBA4EE7D3946BF23FB79D9FD2E6101246771@S-DC-EXM11.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <4ECD281C.6010505@tid.es> Dear all, I asked Arian to send us at least a brief summary of the informal feedback given after the review meeting. Please find it below. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Review report Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:26:23 +0100 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Dear Juanjo, As requested, see some points of the informal feedback given after the review meeting below. About deliverables: 1) the reviewers did not indicate that any deliverable would be rejected. This does not mean that all deliverables will be accepted. 2) regarding the prototype deliverables D9.1.1 and D12.1, there is the additional issue about the submission. I plan to address this only in 2012. Best regards, Arian. ======================================================== Informal feedback after FI-WARE first review * "This is a good FP7 project" * Commitment, focus on pragmatism. * The dialogue between the UCs and FI-WARE seems to be happening. * There is a focus on low-hanging fruits. Focus should be on tackling the difficult parts first. * Technology identified is OK. Technology is the easy part though. The softer issues (third party innovation enablement) are much more difficult and much more important. The success of the PPP is not so much dependent on the partners, but more on third party innovation. * The overall risk is not so much that the project does not do what it plans but that it does not do what is industrially and market-wise relevant. It is common for many projects to deliver technology, put it on the shelf, and deliver more technology. * How to make sure that the companies involved are solidly behind the work in the project? How to prevent that the work is carried out by a number of people in an organisation, without anybody else in the organisation knowing about it? The consortium should bring in other departments of the partners concerned in the project. * There was a slide with the project objective and the 'real objective', which focused on generating money. This is the correct starting point. The exploitation plan in month 12 should not only be about plans, but also about the actual activities within the partners, and also how different user communities are targeted. We expect to see such activities in that report. If FI-WARE is really one of the flagship projects, the companies should get behind the project. Now you have the UCs and the technology together in the PPP, the industries have to get squarely behind it. We don't want an exploitation plan like we see in a normal IP. We state again and again that results have to be useful. This can not be done by only research and technology people. * Results should get to the market quickly, within 3-5 years after the start of the project. The agile approach should result in having something available soon. Nowadays, software is in continuous beta-mode. It's a kind of direct marketing by the technologists, rapid and direct. IPR conditions are essential. This should not be blocking the fast provision of results. * It is also largely a matter of fud, fear/uncertainty/doubt: "trust us, we will deliver in a few months". It is also a marketing story. * Who is FI-WARE focusing on? The guys in the garage? Then compare with Apple and Google, but that is a maturing market, even though there is a lot of dynamism. As a new entrant, new unique selling points must be provided. Where is the selling point in FI-WARE? An opportunity might be in apps that can work together in a larger whole, services. Furthermore, apps are mostly for consumers, but businesses need something more, e.g. spanning the company boundary (which involves dealing with security issues, etc). These are perhaps not the traditional apps we are talking about now. * The distinction between Generic and Specific Enablers will be decided case by case. But you need rules, guidelines. This distinction has also an IPR dimension, and touches upon standardisation. GEs should be prime candidates for standardisation. The distinction is also relevant for the Open Call. Proposers need such kind of information. A 3-page document will not be enough. * It is not clear to us to what extent UCs have a voice in what is in the open call? Furthermore, Jose's comments about the very limited set of potential proposers are absolutely dangerous. There is more outside. Don't benchmark yourself with e.g. Bonfire. It's also a great opportunity to disseminate. Besides, half of the efforts in year 3 will be by partners that are not there at the moment. In short, take it more seriously. * At the moment, there is a lot of efforts on the leaders. Control and work should be spread a bit. If JJH hits a tree, the project stops. Peter Fatelnig: 150 people go to work for the PPP each day. 75 people go to work on FI-WARE every day. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Nov 24 17:45:29 2011 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:45:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Review report In-Reply-To: <4ECD281C.6010505@tid.es> References: <7BACCBA4EE7D3946BF23FB79D9FD2E6101246771@S-DC-EXM11.net1.cec.eu.int> <4ECD281C.6010505@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, thak you for sharing the arian's feedback from the review. the impression is still what i expressed earlier yesterday, great project(!!!), but it needs to be "sold" outside the traditional fi circle: this is huge a challenge about which we have to think and act seriously. the given message is clear: fi-ware will be measured against such challenge... still, again, congratulations for review!!! ciao, stefano 2011/11/23 Juanjo Hierro > Dear all, > > I asked Arian to send us at least a brief summary of the informal > feedback given after the review meeting. > > Please find it below. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Review report Date: Wed, > 23 Nov 2011 16:26:23 +0100 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu > To: JUAN JOSE > HIERRO SUREDA CC: > INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu > > Dear Juanjo, > > As requested, see some points of the informal feedback given after the review meeting below. > > About deliverables: > 1) the reviewers did not indicate that any deliverable would be rejected. This does not mean that all deliverables will be accepted. > 2) regarding the prototype deliverables D9.1.1 and D12.1, there is the additional issue about the submission. I plan to address this only in 2012. > > Best regards, > Arian. > > > ======================================================== > > Informal feedback after FI-WARE first review > > > * "This is a good FP7 project" > * Commitment, focus on pragmatism. > * The dialogue between the UCs and FI-WARE seems to be happening. > * There is a focus on low-hanging fruits. Focus should be on tackling the difficult parts first. > * Technology identified is OK. Technology is the easy part though. The softer issues (third party innovation enablement) are much more difficult and much more important. The success of the PPP is not so much dependent on the partners, but more on third party innovation. > * The overall risk is not so much that the project does not do what it plans but that it does not do what is industrially and market-wise relevant. It is common for many projects to deliver technology, put it on the shelf, and deliver more technology. > * How to make sure that the companies involved are solidly behind the work in the project? How to prevent that the work is carried out by a number of people in an organisation, without anybody else in the organisation knowing about it? The consortium should bring in other departments of the partners concerned in the project. > * There was a slide with the project objective and the 'real objective', which focused on generating money. This is the correct starting point. The exploitation plan in month 12 should not only be about plans, but also about the actual activities within the partners, and also how different user communities are targeted. We expect to see such activities in that report. If FI-WARE is really one of the flagship projects, the companies should get behind the project. Now you have the UCs and the technology together in the PPP, the industries have to get squarely behind it. We don't want an exploitation plan like we see in a normal IP. We state again and again that results have to be useful. This can not be done by only research and technology people. > * Results should get to the market quickly, within 3-5 years after the start of the project. The agile approach should result in having something available soon. Nowadays, software is in continuous beta-mode. It's a kind of direct marketing by the technologists, rapid and direct. IPR conditions are essential. This should not be blocking the fast provision of results. > * It is also largely a matter of fud, fear/uncertainty/doubt: "trust us, we will deliver in a few months". It is also a marketing story. > * Who is FI-WARE focusing on? The guys in the garage? Then compare with Apple and Google, but that is a maturing market, even though there is a lot of dynamism. As a new entrant, new unique selling points must be provided. Where is the selling point in FI-WARE? An opportunity might be in apps that can work together in a larger whole, services. Furthermore, apps are mostly for consumers, but businesses need something more, e.g. spanning the company boundary (which involves dealing with security issues, etc). These are perhaps not the traditional apps we are talking about now. > * The distinction between Generic and Specific Enablers will be decided case by case. But you need rules, guidelines. This distinction has also an IPR dimension, and touches upon standardisation. GEs should be prime candidates for standardisation. The distinction is also relevant for the Open Call. Proposers need such kind of information. A 3-page document will not be enough. > * It is not clear to us to what extent UCs have a voice in what is in the open call? Furthermore, Jose's comments about the very limited set of potential proposers are absolutely dangerous. There is more outside. Don't benchmark yourself with e.g. Bonfire. It's also a great opportunity to disseminate. Besides, half of the efforts in year 3 will be by partners that are not there at the moment. In short, take it more seriously. > * At the moment, there is a lot of efforts on the leaders. Control and work should be spread a bit. If JJH hits a tree, the project stops. Peter Fatelnig: 150 people go to work for the PPP each day. 75 people go to work on FI-WARE every day. > > > > ------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 25 16:15:57 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:15:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Next steps Message-ID: <4ECFB12D.1050304@tid.es> Hi, We shouldn't get relaxed right after our official review. We had to work hard during last days to succeed in the review but now that we have overcome this milestone, we have to proceed with what comes next: a) Review of results of the first Sprint and planning of second Sprint. b) Deal with requests from UC projects. We will definitively push this in the next weeks and a number of agreements have been reached in the FI-PPP AB meeting that has just closed in Munich. c) Based on results of b) and our own analysis, come up with a first list of topics for the first Open Call d) Start activities regarding our next deliverable (Architecture Specifications) Along the weekend and Monday, I will forward you more concrete info about how to deal with these matters. Best regards, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 29 17:07:05 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:07:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Handling tickets issued by the UC projects Message-ID: <4ED50329.4050600@tid.es> Hi all, We have agreed with UC projects on a process to follow to handle the tickets they have issued regarding Theme/Epic/Feature requests they have issued. I have developed a short but detailed tutorial elaborating on the workflow we will follow to handle these tickets. It is now part of the Project Handbook at the following location: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_handle_FI-WARE_Theme/Epic/Feature_requests_issued_by_UC_projects Soon you will start getting some tickets assigned. Please proceed as it is explained in the tutorial. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any doubt. We will update the tutorial when needed. We will try to process as many tickets as possible before the next FI-PPP AB meeting, scheduled for December 15. Based on the analysis, we should be able to identify topics for the first Open Call. I will be off during the next three-four hours but will connect later to answer any question you may have and start assigning the first tickets. I will also send an email with description of the approach we will follow for deliverable on "Architecture Specifications" due on month 9. Cheers, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Nov 30 13:34:15 2011 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:34:15 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Need your help: vote for a submission from FI-WARE Message-ID: <4ED622C7.4030905@tid.es> Dear all, Acting on behalf of FI-WARE, Thierry Nagellen has just submitted a topic for workshop in the Future Internet Assembly to be celebrated in Aalborg. This topic could have the FI PPP as sponsor and we should have technical presentations (from FI-Ware partners but also from other contributors as Smart Santander or IoT-A projects) and some new Use Cases to improve the requirements picture We need your support to get there and there is very little time left. We would appreciate it if you could go to this link, login with a gmail user and vote if you like it: http://www.future-internet.eu/home/shape-fia.html?modSeries=111dab&modTopic=40&modSubmission=5c4fe7 Thanks for your cooperation Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito C _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 5 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ Madrid 28050 (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 30 15:38:42 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:38:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Approach for Architecture Specification Deliverable Message-ID: <4ED63FF2.6020400@tid.es> Hi all, As you know, we have to start working on the Architecture Specifications, which is one of the deliverables that is due in month 9, that is, end of January. My intention is to adopt a pragmatic approach, trying to generate something that can be integrated as part of the GE Open Specifications that we have to produce by month 12. My vision is that all GE Open Specifications should start with a chapter where an overview of the envisioned Architecture for the GE is described. While style would be narrative, the description should be enough concrete, i.e., formulated over actual data type, interface and operation names and elaborating on the base interaction scenarios involving the different entities exporting the defined interfaces. Then, after that chapter, the detailed specification of all data types and interfaces with their operations, are provided (this including signature of operations and accurate description of expected behaviour linked to operations) Then, the Architecture Specification deliverable would be just the result of developing this overview chapter. But nothing better than an example, so let me use one taken from OMG's set of CORBA Services Specifications. Along my many years involved in different standardization efforts, I have found that OMG CORBA Service specs are rather comprehensive and close to what programmers (our ultimate customers!) love to see. Please find enclosed the CORBA Event Service Specifications. What I would then select as the Architecture description are the contents of the following sections: * The whole chapter 1 * Section 2.2 and 2.4 (which some people may have argued should have been included in chapter 1 :-) Note that anyone who reads the mentioned sections would get a CLEAR picture of what is the Architecture of the service and what are going to be the entities and interfaces/operations that will be supported in a compliant implementation. The conceptual and programming model would be also rather clear from a programmer's perspective. Therefore, rather valuable information for an application developer perspective which is what really should matter to us. A side benefit is that what will remain as pending regarding GE Open Specifications will be less, that is, the detailed specification of data types and interfaces/operations. One thing that we will have to define is the set of conventions that we should all follow whenever we need to draw any figure, like figures 1-x or 2-x. For this, Thomas and me will come soon to you with a proposal in short time. Please take your time to analyze this carefully and formulate any question you may have. From now on, I assume that you will start planning activities in Sprint 2 and 3 dealing with development of these specifications within each of your chapters. This may well take the form of Work Items in the tracker. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Event Service Specification 04-10-02.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 515254 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 30 16:45:40 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:45:40 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Handling of UC project tickets Message-ID: <4ED64FA4.2050509@tid.es> Hi all, We should try to accelerate as much as possible the handling of tickets coming from the UC projects. But first we had to agreed with UC projects about the concrete workflow to follow. Based on lessons learned so far, we also didn't want to start this activity without a detailed tutorial explaining how to proceed. Now that we have this settled, let's start with the stuff, handling tickets as much in parallel as possible. For this, we have assigned to you, as Chapter Leads, the rights to assign yourself (or to another member of your team) any of the existing tickets. We suggest then that we work as follows: * You should take care of tickets that are only assigned to your chapter. Start transitioning them to the "Under Evaluation by FI-WARE" state in a first step (try also to assign them to either you or someone from your team at that moment) * There are several tickets that are not linked to any chapter or linked to more than one: Thomas and me will take care of them and figure out how to handle them (may be deriving new tickets per chapter, or we'll see) It will be nice that you try to accompany the transition to the initial "Under Evaluation by FI-WARE" state with some message that provides an early feedback to the UC projects on whether the requested functionality most probably is already in the roadmap or not (of course, subject to a more detailed and careful evaluation). Again, please don't hesitate to ask any question you may have. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: