As can count my opinion, I think Nuria is right. Regards, Matteo Nella citazione in data mar 15 nov 2011 07:54:09 CET, Nuria De-Lama Sanchez ha scritto: > Hi Juanjo, > > Is the agenda for the review already closed? > > Find here few comments that could help to improve it: > > ·Intro extremely long (90 minutes). It’s not a very “agile” > introduction. It sounds too long and too focused on internal project > management. > > ·At some point in the agenda, we think it is necessary to include a > presentation about how all the different WPs are working together, and > how they are interrelated (possibly after the “Developer Community and > Tools WP” slot). Currently it sounds like a collection of WPs, with no > connection among them. > > ·Too many sessions: risk of running overtime. > > Did you discuss with Arian about it? I know my colleague Juan Bareño, > as leader of WP11, contacted you to include a slot on business aspects > at least to show the progress made in that WP since this one has been > running from the very beginning of the project and reviewers may want > to know what work has been done there. > > It would be useful to know your discussions with the Commission to > check their expectations in some of these areas. > > Best regards, > > cid:349045816 at 01072011-3195 > > *Nuria de Lama* > > Atos Research & Innovation > > Representative to the European Commission > > T +34 91214 9321 > > F +34 91754 3252 > > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu <mailto:nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu> > > Albarracín 25 > > 28037 Madrid > > Spain > > www.atosresearch.eu <http://www.atosresearch.eu> > > es.atos.net > > cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *Juanjo Hierro > *Sent:* domingo, 13 de noviembre de 2011 23:39 > *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Draft agenda for the review > > Hi all, > > Please find enclosed the draft agenda of the first official review > meeting that will take place on November 22nd in Brussels. > > As you see, we have booked a 30 mins presentation for each of the WPs > linked to FI-WARE chapters. I would recommend that you prepare a > maximum of 10-12 slides. I already provide some hints about how to > structure these presentations last Friday. Don't hesitate to make any > question or share any doubt you may have. A first complete draft of > the presentation for your chapter is expected by EOB this Wednesday. > > Again, following is the index you should develop in your presentations > (please follow the titles): > > * "<name-of-chapter> Vision (<x>/<y>)" (follow the convention 1/3, > 2/3, 3/3 on the title to distinguish among the several slides). > These should be 3 slides to elaborate on the vision and the > description of the most important GEs. > * "Focus for the first release". This is one, maximum two slides > elaborating on what you expect FI-WARE to deliver for the first > major release (planned to be delivered by end of April 2012 and > available on the FI-WARE testbed by end of July 2012. > * "Response to comments by reviewers". These should be slides > addressing reviewers' comments to their revision of the first > release of the FI-WARE Product Vision deliverable (check my email > also sent last Friday) > > > Thomas: I would ask you to prepare a presentation about FI-WARE in the > context of the FI-PPP (part of introduction timeslot at the beginning > of the review). There, you have to elaborate on the relationship > between UC projects in FI-WARE, how we are approaching the interaction > with them, etc. > > Nuria: You have to prepare a few slides (3-4) on collaboration > activities. They should align with contents of the report on > Collaboration activities that Miguel has already asked you to complete > on the Wiki (note there was a report on Collaboration activities > deliverable that was due end of October) > > Matteo/Stephano: the presentation on developers tools will not contain > a "response to comments by reviewers", therefore you may not need the > 30 mins. > > Miguel: the slides reporting on resources consumption and whatever > else may be relevant about the management report will go in the last > timeslot. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > *Subject: * > > > > Draft agenda for the review > > *Date: * > > > > Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:09:46 +0100 > > *From: * > > > > Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> > > *To: * > > > > Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu <mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu> > <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu> <mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu> > > *CC: * > > > > Jose Jimenez <jimenez at tid.es> <mailto:jimenez at tid.es>, Miguel Carrillo > <mcp at tid.es> <mailto:mcp at tid.es>, CARLOS RALLI UCENDO <ralli at tid.es> > <mailto:ralli at tid.es>, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" > <jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> > > Hi Arian, > > Please find a proposed agenda for the review meeting on November 22nd > > Comments/feedback is welcome. Don't hesitate to ask any question > you may have. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico > en el enlace situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy > it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye > ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el > emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de > cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 368 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20111115/0e419b43/attachment.vcf>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy