From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 2 12:54:52 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:54:52 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template/guidelines for the FI-WARE GE Open API Specifications (RESTful specifications) Message-ID: <4F79857C.7040002@tid.es> Hi all, You will be able to find the guidelines/templates and placeholders you should follow for development of the FI-WARE GE Open API specifications at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 While we are still working to refine it a bit, we believe it is already rather complete. We look forward any specific comments you or your teams may have that we may take into consideration as to provide a final version of the guidelines/templates by EOB tomorrow. We are also happy to answer any doubt or question you may have regarding implementation/usage of this guidelines/templates. Cheers, -- Juanjo -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Apr 2 16:52:38 2012 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:52:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template/guidelines for the FI-WARE GE Open API Specifications (RESTful specifications) In-Reply-To: <4F79857C.7040002@tid.es> References: <4F79857C.7040002@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F79BD36.1050005@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, I would propose to add an "Examples" section under the elements where to provide some REST examples of requests and responses (URL, headers, body). BR Davide On 02/04/2012 12:54, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hi all, > > You will be able to find the guidelines/templates and placeholders you > should follow for development of the FI-WARE GE Open API > specifications at: > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 > > > While we are still working to refine it a bit, we believe it is > already rather complete. We look forward any specific comments you or > your teams may have that we may take into consideration as to provide a > final version of the guidelines/templates by EOB tomorrow. We are also > happy to answer any doubt or question you may have regarding > implementation/usage of this guidelines/templates. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > -- > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Apr 3 17:59:23 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:59:23 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template/guidelines for the FI-WARE GE Open API Specifications (RESTful specifications) In-Reply-To: <4F79857C.7040002@tid.es> References: <4F79857C.7040002@tid.es> Message-ID: <23398_1333468769_4F7B1E61_23398_14141_1_14292438-6abd-49c3-a9b4-9d0605714d61@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Find attached to these emails a couple of slides I used at the WP8 plenary meeting of today. Slides 2 & 3 introduced M12 deliverables (as per what has been stated in the DoW), Slide 4 are referring to Wikipedia definition of Open specifications (also open standards) Slides 6 to 11 are related to slides I prepared over the WE since at that time I had no input (guidelines) from your side. They are related to two examples I consider as particularly relevant in the context of deliverables we have to produce for M12 (D8.1 open specifications and others D8.2 till D8.5) and as such wanted to be discussed and promoted at the level of my team. These two examples are not specific to Security Team and as such could also apply to other Chapters. one example (slides 6 to 9) is coming from Microsoft (related to what they did for U-Prove) the other one is coming from Open Stack (slides 10-11) and refers to the way identity service is described (including accompanying APIs). Slide 12 is the proposal you provided us with on Monday (12:55). Now putting things back into perspective I do see in your proposal a certain level of complexity (also the general feeling of my team) which in my view could be solved by getting inspired of above examples (I found here Open Stack example especially relevant to consider) to keep things simple (not to the detriment of the content we have to deliver) and compatible with resources and time constraints which are ours to have things delivered on due time to targeted community. Hope this feedback is valuable to you. Of course opinions of WPL/WPA on this proposal would also be very much appreciated being said we have all to share and agree on how to address Open specifications ... So hearing from you and colleagues viewpoints to align asap. Best Regards, Pascal -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy??: lundi 2 avril 2012 12:55 ??: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: [Fiware-wpl] Template/guidelines for the FI-WARE GE Open API Specifications (RESTful specifications) Hi all, You will be able to find the guidelines/templates and placeholders you should follow for development of the FI-WARE GE Open API specifications at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3-8.1 While we are still working to refine it a bit, we believe it is already rather complete. We look forward any specific comments you or your teams may have that we may take into consideration as to provide a final version of the guidelines/templates by EOB tomorrow. We are also happy to answer any doubt or question you may have regarding implementation/usage of this guidelines/templates. Cheers, -- Juanjo -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Security AT Viewpoint on M12 deliverables.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 952832 bytes Desc: FI-WARE Security AT Viewpoint on M12 deliverables.ppt URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Apr 4 13:26:48 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:26:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check Message-ID: dear all, in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we should have the same ge .... actually it is not completely the case! i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which will be deplyed M12. In particular i need: 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) and "Composition & Mashups" 2. cloud - mistmaches identified: 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info? 4. Data - mistmatches identified: 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is the same, correct? 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the same, correct? 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. correct? 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-) in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GEs_Check_20120327.doc Type: application/msword Size: 165888 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Apr 4 14:41:02 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:41:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Stefano, concerning I2ND I confirm that the first release will include the Cloud Edge GE only. The list we provided earlier for completion of the testbed deliverable has been revised, according to the agreement with Juanjo to limit the GEs in this release to those strictly able to be integrated in the testbed. As some of the I2ND ones, although available in their preliminary implementation, would be stand-alone only, then they were not inserted in the technical roadmap. Happy Easter to you all too! BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di stefano de panfilis Inviato: mercoled? 4 aprile 2012 13:27 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check dear all, in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we should have the same ge .... actually it is not completely the case! i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which will be deplyed M12. In particular i need: 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) and "Composition & Mashups" 2. cloud - mistmaches identified: 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info? 4. Data - mistmatches identified: 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is the same, correct? 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the same, correct? 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. correct? 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-) in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Apr 4 14:45:31 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:45:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] TR: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check Message-ID: <2346_1333543535_4F7C426F_2346_14324_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206464B5362@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> FYI De : BISSON Pascal Envoy? : mercredi 4 avril 2012 14:31 ? : stefano de panfilis Cc : GIDOIN Daniel; BISSON Pascal Objet : RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check Importance : Haute Dear Stefano, First thanks the check you performed. I confirm that up to date information related to Security GEs release are the ones in D2.4a (Technology Roadmap). Information we provided for D10.1a was information we were available to provide at the time you requested these information (GA in Madrid). In the meantime D10.1a was supposed to be released before D2.4a (that's also why D2.4a as updated information). As such I confirm that: Privacy GE also Malware Detection System were decided to be moved to second Major Release. The Secure Storage Service one optional security service would be part of the First Major Release. BTW it was already identified since part of the excel file we discuss in Madrid and on which we exchange emails. In the meantime it is also true that at the time of the GA in Madrid I had no information regarding HW & SW requirements for that GE. But I asked for them and provided them to you and the mailing list in my email of ven. 10/02/2012 14:52. For your convenience here are the reqts for the Secure Storage Service: - Linux - Apache 2 - Tomcat 6 - Java So if you manage please use this information to update accordingly D10.1 and align it to was as been stated it D2.4a Hope I have answered your demand please confirm. Hearing from you Regards, Pascal De : fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : mercredi 4 avril 2012 13:27 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check dear all, in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we should have the same ge .... actually it is not completely the case! i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which will be deplyed M12. In particular i need: 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) and "Composition & Mashups" 2. cloud - mistmaches identified: 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info? 4. Data - mistmatches identified: 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is the same, correct? 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the same, correct? 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. correct? 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-) in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!! ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Apr 4 17:44:44 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:44:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-testbed] TR: URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check In-Reply-To: <2346_1333543535_4F7C426F_2346_14324_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206464B5362@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> References: <2346_1333543535_4F7C426F_2346_14324_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206464B5362@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Message-ID: dear pascal and pier, thank you very much for your valuable answers! i hope you understood my email was not a complain, not at all, as i completely understand and agree that things evolve, and must evolve i'd say. it was only to fix, at least for this moment as much as possible, the info we do have in order to plan the testbed set-up and integration. with this respect i do suggest to juanjo to put in all deliverbales a disclaimer statement that says that the deliverable provides information as is and valid at the moment of publication and that more accurate and up-to-date info can be found in the project portal. ciao, stefano 2012/4/4 BISSON Pascal > FYI**** > > ** ** > > *De :* BISSON Pascal > *Envoy? :* mercredi 4 avril 2012 14:31 > *? :* stefano de panfilis > *Cc :* GIDOIN Daniel; BISSON Pascal > *Objet :* RE: [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check > *Importance :* Haute**** > > ** ** > > Dear Stefano,**** > > ** ** > > First thanks the check you performed. **** > > ** ** > > I confirm that up to date information related to Security GEs release are > the ones in D2.4a (Technology Roadmap).**** > > ** ** > > Information we provided for D10.1a was information we were available to > provide at the time you requested these information (GA in Madrid). In the > meantime D10.1a was supposed to be released before D2.4a (that?s also why > D2.4a as updated information).**** > > ** ** > > As such I confirm that:**** > > Privacy GE also Malware Detection System were decided to be moved to > second Major Release. **** > > The Secure Storage Service one optional security service would be part of > the First Major Release. BTW it was already identified since part of the > excel file we discuss in Madrid and on which we exchange emails. In the > meantime it is also true that at the time of the GA in Madrid I had no > information regarding HW & SW requirements for that GE. But I asked for > them and provided them to you and the mailing list in my email of ven. > 10/02/2012 14:52.**** > > ** ** > > For your convenience here are the reqts for the Secure Storage Service:*** > * > > - Linux **** > > - Apache 2**** > > - Tomcat 6**** > > - Java**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > So if you manage please use this information to update accordingly D10.1 > and align it to was as been stated it D2.4a **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Hope I have answered your demand please confirm.**** > > ** ** > > Hearing from you**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Pascal**** > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *De :* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *De la part de* stefano de > panfilis > > *Envoy? :* mercredi 4 avril 2012 13:27 > *? :* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Cc :* Juanjo Hierro; fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Objet :* [Fiware-testbed] URGENT: TestBed Integration Plan Check**** > > ** ** > > dear all,**** > > ** ** > > in order to set-up th eplan for the deplyment of the various ge > implementations (to start on 1st may 2012) we made a check between our > d10.1.a built interviewing all the chapters from the madrid meeting on > (list og GE based on the "Fi-WARE Architecture" deliverbale) and the > "FIWARE Technical Roadmap" recently delivered where, in principle, we > should have the same ge ....**** > > ** ** > > actually it is not completely the case!**** > > ** ** > > i kindly ask each chapter leader to verify the correspondences telling us > which are the generic enablers implementations which still exist and which > will be deplyed M12.**** > > ** ** > > In particular i need:**** > > ** ** > > 1. apps&sevices - mistmatch identified: "Composition Editor" (original) > and "Composition & Mashups"**** > > ** ** > > 2. cloud - mistmaches identified:**** > > 2.1 - Monitoring GE is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements > **** > > 2.2 - Identity Management is a new one or it comes from the Security > chapter? if it is a new one please provide HW-SW requirements **** > > ** ** > > 3. IoT - mistmatch identified: ALL GEs have different names, can you > please provide a corespondence with "old" names, or provide new info?**** > > ** ** > > 4. Data - mistmatches identified:**** > > 4.1 - "Multimedia Analysis" (original) and "Multimedia Query Broker", is > the same, correct?**** > > 4.2 - "Localization Platform" (original) and "Localization Server", is the > same, correct?**** > > 4.3 - "Meta-data Annotation" is a new one? if yes, please provide HW-SW > requirements**** > > ** ** > > 5. I2ND - mistmatch identified: only Cloud Edge will be delivered at M12. > correct?**** > > ** ** > > 6. Security - mistmatch identified: "Secure Storage Service" is a new > one? if yes, please provide HW-SW requirements**** > > ** ** > > I need this by the next wpl/wpa call ....... :-)**** > > ** ** > > in the mean time Happy Easter to you and your beloved!!!**** > > ** ** > > ciao,**** > > stefano**** > > ** ** > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567**** > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-testbed mailing list > Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel.gidoin at thalesgroup.com Fri Apr 6 15:25:11 2012 From: daniel.gidoin at thalesgroup.com (GIDOIN Daniel) Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:25:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Template/guidelines for the FI-WARE GE Open API Specifications (RESTful specifications) Message-ID: <12582_1333718717_4F7EEEBD_12582_3752_1_29432c30-e2b2-4084-92f4-72edecfbb639@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Concerning the format of Open Specifications proposed, our firm position on this matter is that several important modifications are indispensables. We strongly advocate that these modifications will considerably ease the task of providing Open Specifications for future and current APIs. The idea behind the recommendations and additional guidelines included here, is to account for the feedback from the developers, as well as keep track of their point of view. Experience has shown that verbose APIs specifications tend to be considered as hardly accessible from the users of a given API, who therefore prefer to simply discard the given API. This does not underestimate the crucial role of the documentation and specs of an API, but more precisely formulate the need for concision and efficiency in such documents. Our recommendations are as follow: - "Intended audience" can be reduced to a concise description, maybe the provided example is not intended to be taken verbatim, but this is only to give a definitive version. -"API Change History" may in some cases be useful for developers that use versioning, but the common practice (and a simpler one) is to provide these changes, showing the evolution of the API, at a separate notice, so that informed users may consult it if so required. - It is strongly recommended to define a unique set of instructions on "How to Read This Document" for all the APIs involved or developed in the project. This will be therefore located in a separate part of the repository containing all the APIs, so that redundancy, if not avoided, is at least kept at the lowest possible level. - The "Resources summary" as a diagram may be optional. We propose instead a simple listing in textual form of the nearest hierarchy, in the inheritance sense of the term. An example might be the beginning of each class' spec in the Java SDK. "Authentication", and "Representation Format" are to be filled according to the requirements of a given API (which may eventually include none). As for "Representation Format", since the indicated text on the Wiki must be included, and apparently is not subject to change, there is no obvious need to include it in each particular API, but in a separate section common to all the APIs. It is our firm belief that some of the fields mentioned in the proposal are superfluous, and do not answer to a precise need (such as "Resource identification"). Other fields are intuitively used where necessary, so explicitly listing them in the general form proposal may be avoided, and the choice left to the editor of the Open spec him(her)self (for ex. the "Optional" sections). The "Limits" section and subsections do not seem to offer a particular help in the task of informing users and the developers using the API. Maybe the advantage of having this should be provided? As examples to follow during the writing process of Open Specifications, and of our previous suggestions, the reader can refer to the JAVA API Specification (available at http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/ ), another example being the API Specifications provided by the Apache Foundation (such as Mojo, available at http://maven.apache.org/developers/mojo-api-specification.html ). These are of course only illustrations of what we are convinced to be very good examples of good practices to follow when providing the Open Specs, but remain nevertheless the blueprints of what to be expected as a result for an Open Specification. Best regards Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 10 06:57:58 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:57:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT REMINDER: Joint WPLs/WPAs confcall today Message-ID: <4F83BDD6.9010307@tid.es> Hi all, I hope you had enjoined nice Eastern holidays ! This is a reminder that today we will have our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall starting at 11:00am. Bridge details are as always. I'll pass you a link to Webex and shared minutes before the confcall. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 10 10:23:19 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:23:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall In-Reply-To: <236873008.1334039061230.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl011.webex.com> References: <236873008.1334039061230.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl011.webex.com> Message-ID: <4F83EDF7.7080009@tid.es> Hi all, The shared minutes will be available on https://docs.google.com/document/d/19-5Z8g5mQxbQostfDuUd_V5YvemtPFBb8rus--6ti-w/edit Please find also the webex details below. Talk to you at 11:00am Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:24:21 +0200 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex9100 Reply-To: Webex9100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex9100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 Time: 11:00 am, Europe Summer Time (Paris, GMT+02:00) Meeting Number: 968 636 750 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192682922&UID=1279546802&PW=NNTIwMTkyYjM2&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192682922&UID=1279546802&PW=NNTIwMTkyYjM2&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex9100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192682922&UID=1279546802&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=kA-Janz46rxgu1O67DI-3EY2QugCO198EoRmD6VHaKg=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 10 13:55:46 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:55:46 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] SafeCity PoC presentation In-Reply-To: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A898320D36CAA5@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> References: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A898320D36CAA5@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> Message-ID: <4F841FC2.1020804@tid.es> Hi, This is the presentation that the Safecity project made during the last FI-PPP AB meeting on March 29th. Unfortunately, only Safecity prepared a presentation like this. One of the APs from the AB was that every UC project has to produce a similar presentation. It would include: * sketched architecture description (like slides 1-3) * feedback on Architecture and Technical Roadmap (like slides 5-12) Besides, all UC projects were requested to use the "FI-WARE General Support" tracker in the FI-WARE project to start submitting their feedback/questions on the Architecture and Technical Roadmap deliverables. Regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [FI-PPP AB] SafeCity PoC presentation Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:20:26 +0200 From: Peretz Gurel To: ab at fi-ppp.eu Best regards, Peretz Gurel European Projects Manager Athena security implementations Ltd Office: +972-3-5572548 Mobile: +972-54-4734045 Email: peretz at athenaiss.com www.athenaiss.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SafeCity PoC architecture and challenges V1.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 310959 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Ab mailing list Ab at fi-ppp.eu http://lists.fi-ppp.eu/mailman/listinfo/ab From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 10 19:11:10 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:11:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Notes from our confcall In-Reply-To: <4F8466F6.2020606@tid.es> References: <4F8466F6.2020606@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8469AE.3090403@tid.es> Hi all, Please find enclosed the quick notes of our confcall with Arian this afternoon. Unfortunately, we didn't get a definitive response regarding replanning of deliverables due in month 12. Arian essentially argued that he has to agree on a decision with the rest of POs of the UC projects. Given said this, I have the feeling that there wouldn't be so much trouble on his side. So we will depend very much on the POs of UC projects (and I guess they will check with their respective UC projects). This except for one deliverable (D.2.5.a "Third Party Innovation Enablement in FI-WARE") which he wants to get delivered on due time, so we need to face how to address it. He argues that he may accept something rather preliminary, which could be enhanced in following releases, but something reviewers can take a look at and comment in month 12. I plan to send an email to members of the FI-PPP AB regarding this proposal and our suggestion to go for the re-planning. I will forward a copy of this message. I would rather encourage those of you who are involved in UC projects (or have some contacts in them within your company) to lobby for accepting the suggested re-planning. You will see the results of some other discussions in these notes. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Notes from our confcall Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:59:34 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , FI-WARE project EC mailbox CC: Jose Jimenez , "subsidies at tid.es" , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian, Following are my quick notes on our conversation today: * Proposal on replanning of deliverables due in month 12 and 15 (mail sent by Juanjo on April 4th, 06:52am): * Replanning of deliverables may be acceptable under the argument we need to focus on improving communication/interaction with UC projects, and for this, two full-week educational sessions have been proposed at the last FI-PPP AB meeting: one taken place the week of May 21st and another one the week of June 4th. However the decision would impact the whole programme and therefore Arian has to check with rest of POs. Formal response to be given by the EC early next week. * Juanjo points out that the replanning will not affect the overall duration of projects which may still remain the same (though flexibility should be given to UC projects so that they could extend their duration about three months if necessary) * Decision on two deliverables (D.2.5.a "Third Party Innovation Enablement in FI-WARE" and D.2.6.a "State of the Art Analysis") may be taken independently from the UC projects because it will not impact them. Despite Arian doesn't have so much problem to accept delaying D.2.6.a to month 21 as suggested, he would not accept the same treatment with D.2.5.a which should be kept closer to month 12 as initially scheduled. Arian to come with a decision on final date that would work for both deliverables. * FI-WARE Amendment 2: * About subcontracting of TU Berlin by DT: not acceptable from Arian's point of view because it breaks the rules for subcontracting defined in guidelines defined by the EC. On the other hand, Telefonica (endorsed by the FI-WARE PCC) wishes DT to exercise control and become responsible about what TU Berlin will do, which is something you wouldn't achieve by allowing TU Berlin to become full beneficiaries. Telefonica will explore whether bringing them as Third Party may work * Subcontracting of Red.es under OTHER instead of RTD: It was finally agreed that part of the activity of Red.es can be justified under OTHER since a significant part of the infrastructure provided by Red.es, for which their services will be hired, is going to be there just for collaboration/networking purposes: allocate the necessary infrastructure that would allow the FI-WARE Testbed to scale and give service not only to UC and trial projects within the program but third parties through the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. All this beyond what is actually needed for testing/validating the software. Juanjo to write an email to Arian elaborating on this justification and providing a rationale on what % of the amount subcontracted to Red.es should be under OTHER vs RTD * Availability of infrastructure put in place by Red.es beyond duration of the FI-WARE project: We should include text in the DoW explaining how the infrastructure can be used for purposes of the program beyond duration of the FI-WARE project. Telefonica will come with a proposed text agreed with Red.es * Structure of the Scientific and Market Advisory Councils: we don't know why the number of members of both councils were reduced. Telefonica will check what was the rationale behind and update Arian. Names of final members of the Scientific Council should be incorporated in the DoW. * Selection of reviewers for the first FI-WARE Open Call: * We will send a initial list to Arian tomorrow morning and he will get back to us adding some new candidates or suggesting dropping some of the ones originally proposed. * We will use the list produced by Arian to send an email where we will check availability of candidate evaluators during the week when evaluation of proposals was planned. * Based on received responses, we together with Arian will make the final selection of evaluators If you believe I haven't captured something properly or have missed some point, just let me know. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 10 20:09:57 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:09:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] QUITE IMPORTANT: Gathering input for educational sessions In-Reply-To: <4F84769F.5010004@tid.es> References: <4F84769F.5010004@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F847775.4070701@tid.es> Hi, You will be able to monitor UC projects' expressions of interest by taking a look at the shared google docs spreadsheet. Please also take some time to review whether the proposed spreadsheet is complete in terms of list of GEs. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [FI-PPP AB] QUITE IMPORTANT: Gathering input for educational sessions Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:06:23 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: ab at fi-ppp.eu Hi all, First of all, I have prepared as agreed a shared google docs spreadsheet that would help to collect the expression of interest from you (UC projects) on the educational sessions planned the week starting May 21st and the week starting June 4th. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c I have gone for a slightly different structured compared to the one initially proposed by Peretz. On one hand, we need the rating per project, not just individual partners within a project. Regarding SafeCity's input, I would therefore take the highest rating. On the other hand, we don't just need how many attendees are expected from each partner for the week but how many partners are expected in each of the individual sessions to be defined per chapter. This would allow us to plan size of rooms needed for each of the parallel sessions we would run (one per chapter). Some chapters may last 2-3 days (most likely the Data/Context Management Chapter) while others may last just one day. That's why you have to fill two columns for your project: one on "Interest Score" (1-3, 3 being higher) were we ask you not only to rate each chapter but GEs on an individual basis, and another one on "Attendees" where you just need to provide the number of expected attendees per chapter. I have also added lines to cover a potential session devoted to FI-WARE Development Environment and IDE. According to the draft minutes, we agreed to get this spreadsheet filled by April 10th (today) but I guess since I have been late delivering this and due to the Easter holidays, we can extend the deadline for end of this week, but this would be the very last date. Good news are that I have shared the dates with the FI-WARE chapter leaders and it doesn't seem that there will be any problem with the proposed dates (of course, we need to find the place and hosts :-) Looking forward your input. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Ab mailing list Ab at fi-ppp.eu http://lists.fi-ppp.eu/mailman/listinfo/ab . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 11 15:10:38 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:10:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FW: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies Program In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01CE15@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01CE15@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <4F8582CE.8090205@tid.es> Hi, Do you think this is worth ? If so, please let me know. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FW: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies Program Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:58:06 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu FYI ________________________________ From: FATELNIG Peter (INFSO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO) Subject: FW: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies Program Arian, Perhaps to be brought up to FI-WARE attention? Seem pertinent? Many thanks, P ________________________________ From: BARANI Bernard (INFSO) Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 8:32 AM To: FATELNIG Peter (INFSO); VILLASANTE Jesus (INFSO) Subject: FW: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies Program fyi, bb ________________________________ From: Herv? Panetto [mailto:Herve.Panetto at univ-lorraine.fr] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:49 PM To: SANTUCCI Gerald (INFSO) Cc: robert.meersman at vub.ac.be; BARANI Bernard (INFSO); FREDERIX Florent (INFSO); FRIESS Peter (INFSO); MARTINEZ GONZALEZ Cristina (INFSO); INFSO /D4; IASI_mishikoff Subject: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies Program Dear Gerald and all, For your information, OTM 2012 (September 10-14, Rome) will organise the 2nd Industry Case Studies Program on "Industry Applications and Standard initiatives for Cooperative Information Systems for Interoperable Infrastructures". The objective of this industry session is to present case studies coming from industry and EC projects together with standardisation initiatives. Feel free to advertise on this session to the FinES cluster and to any of your other interested contacts. Best regards Herv? -- __________________________________________________________ [Research Centre for Automatic Control] Prof. Dr. Herv? PANETTO Professor at ESIAL - University of Lorraine Deputy Director of ESIAL School of Engineering in Information Technology Associate school of Institut Telecom Chair of the IFAC TC 5.3 on Enterprise Integration and Networking Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy Research Centre For Automatic Control Ecole Sup?rieure d'Informatique et Applications de Lorraine University of Lorraine CRAN - UMR 7039, Universit? de Lorraine, CNRS Campus Scientifique BP 70239 - F54506 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy Cedex - France Phone: +33 (0) 3836 84426 - Fax: +33 (0) 3836 84459 Mobile: +33 (0) 661626175 - E-mail: Herve.Panetto at cran.uhp-nancy.fr Web: http://www.cran.uhp-nancy.fr - http://www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr Homepage: http://www.panetto.fr __________________________________________________________ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 4542 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OTM'2012 Industry CS Program Draft.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 279714 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Apr 11 15:32:42 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:32:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FW: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies Program In-Reply-To: <4F8582CE.8090205@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01CE15@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F8582CE.8090205@tid.es> Message-ID: i think more of the interest of infinity. ciao, stefano 2012/4/11 Juanjo Hierro > Hi, > > Do you think this is worth ? If so, please let me know. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FW: Call for Contributions: > 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies Program Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 > 13:58:06 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu > To: JUAN JOSE > HIERRO SUREDA , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu > > > FYI > > ------------------------------ > *From:* FATELNIG Peter (INFSO) > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:04 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO) > *Subject:* FW: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies > Program > > Arian, Perhaps to be brought up to FI-WARE attention? Seem pertinent? > > Many thanks, P > > ------------------------------ > *From:* BARANI Bernard (INFSO) > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 11, 2012 8:32 AM > *To:* FATELNIG Peter (INFSO); VILLASANTE Jesus (INFSO) > *Subject:* FW: Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies > Program > > > fyi, bb > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Herv? Panetto [mailto:Herve.Panetto at univ-lorraine.fr] > > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:49 PM > *To:* SANTUCCI Gerald (INFSO) > *Cc:* robert.meersman at vub.ac.be; BARANI Bernard (INFSO); FREDERIX Florent > (INFSO); FRIESS Peter (INFSO); MARTINEZ GONZALEZ Cristina (INFSO); INFSO > /D4; IASI_mishikoff > *Subject:* Call for Contributions: 2nd OTM'2012 Industry Case Studies > Program > > Dear Gerald and all, > > For your information, OTM 2012 (September 10-14, Rome) will organise the > 2nd Industry Case Studies Program on "Industry Applications and Standard > initiatives for Cooperative Information Systems for Interoperable > Infrastructures". > The objective of this industry session is to present case studies coming > from industry and EC projects together with standardisation initiatives. > > Feel free to advertise on this session to the FinES cluster and to any of > your other interested contacts. > > Best regards > Herv? > -- > > __________________________________________________________* > * > *[image: Research Centre for Automatic Control] > * > > *Prof. Dr. Herv? PANETTO* > Professor at ESIAL - University of Lorraine > Deputy Director of ESIAL School of Engineering in Information Technology > Associate school of Institut Telecom > Chair of the IFAC TC 5.3 on Enterprise Integration and Networking > > Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy > Research Centre For Automatic Control > Ecole Sup?rieure d'Informatique et Applications de Lorraine > University of Lorraine > > CRAN - UMR 7039, Universit? de Lorraine, CNRS > Campus Scientifique > BP 70239 - F54506 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy Cedex - France > Phone: +33 (0) 3836 84426 - Fax: +33 (0) 3836 84459 > Mobile: +33 (0) 661626175 - E-mail: Herve.Panetto at cran.uhp-nancy.fr > Web: http://www.cran.uhp-nancy.fr - http://www.esial.uhp-nancy.fr > Homepage: http://www.panetto.fr > __________________________________________________________ > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 4542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 11 18:45:40 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:45:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01BA51@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01BA51@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> Hi all, Our PO has announced us his intention to add a new reviewer to the project whose CV is attached. Unless I hear any objection from you before EOB tomorrow, I will confirm my Ok. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:08:41 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, I would like to add Ms Irena Pavlova to the FI-WARE review team. Please find her CV attached. I would like her to start with the M9 review, so please let me have your agreement soon. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Pavlova_cv.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 15917 bytes Desc: not available URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Wed Apr 11 18:53:07 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:53:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer In-Reply-To: <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01BA51@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F85B6F3.7030505@eng.it> Hi, I know her as I worked with her in a project in the past. No objections from my side. Does she reply another one or one more? Regards, Matteo Il 11/04/2012 18:45, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Our PO has announced us his intention to add a new reviewer to the > project whose CV is attached. > > Unless I hear any objection from you before EOB tomorrow, I will > confirm my Ok. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: FI-WARE: additional reviewer > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:08:41 +0200 > From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu > To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > > CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu > > > > Dear Jose, Juanjo, > I would like to add Ms Irena Pavlova to the FI-WARE review team. > Please find her CV attached. > I would like her to start with the M9 review, so please let me have > your agreement soon. > Best regards, > Arian. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 11 19:13:38 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:13:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Template/guidelines for the FI-WARE GE Open API Specifications (RESTful specifications) In-Reply-To: <12582_1333718717_4F7EEEBD_12582_3752_1_29432c30-e2b2-4084-92f4-72edecfbb639@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> References: <12582_1333718717_4F7EEEBD_12582_3752_1_29432c30-e2b2-4084-92f4-72edecfbb639@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Message-ID: <4F85BBC2.4090403@tid.es> Hi Daniel, Please find my comments between lines of your mail. I would also like to hear others' opinions. I haven't included the fiware-security mailing list in the discussion to limit the discussion. I guess that we should be able to reach an agreement among involving just the Working Package Architects (of course, they may consult things internally in their teams) We should close the discusion by tomorrow EOB at the latest. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 06/04/12 15:25, GIDOIN Daniel wrote: Dear Juanjo, Concerning the format of Open Specifications proposed, our firm position on this matter is that several important modifications are indispensables. We strongly advocate that these modifications will considerably ease the task of providing Open Specifications for future and current APIs. The idea behind the recommendations and additional guidelines included here, is to account for the feedback from the developers, as well as keep track of their point of view. Experience has shown that verbose APIs specifications tend to be considered as hardly accessible from the users of a given API, who therefore prefer to simply discard the given API. This does not underestimate the crucial role of the documentation and specs of an API, but more precisely formulate the need for concision and efficiency in such documents. Our recommendations are as follow: - "Intended audience" can be reduced to a concise description, maybe the provided example is not intended to be taken verbatim, but this is only to give a definitive version. My idea is to create a single wiki page from which all FI-WARE REST API specifications can be located. Something like a directory. I believe I had explained this but probably it's worth explaining it in the guidelines we had published (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Where_and_how_to_publish_Open_Specifications) Assuming that "directory" wiki page is created, we may include there some sections like this one whose contents may be written as to work with all API specifications. -"API Change History" may in some cases be useful for developers that use versioning, but the common practice (and a simpler one) is to provide these changes, showing the evolution of the API, at a separate notice, so that informed users may consult it if so required. If you want to have this info "as a separate notice", let's just make this section a link to a dedicated wiki page where the history is shown. However, the history is necessary. It's not just about API versioning. You may realize at a given point in time, as an example, that you have to clarify some specific point about the behavior because there might be different interpretations. Then you update the specification, but you need to highlight you have made such update for the sake of programmers. It's good that you raise the comment about API versioning because we haven't addressed it and we need to be able to handle it. Maybe it is not an urgent issue right now but we need to think about it. Comments are welcome, otherwise we will come with a proposal (nevertheless, we can go without a solution on how to deal with versioning for the FI-WARE first release) - It is strongly recommended to define a unique set of instructions on "How to Read This Document" for all the APIs involved or developed in the project. This will be therefore located in a separate part of the repository containing all the APIs, so that redundancy, if not avoided, is at least kept at the lowest possible level. I would treat this section as the one on "Intended Audience". - The "Resources summary" as a diagram may be optional. We propose instead a simple listing in textual form of the nearest hierarchy, in the inheritance sense of the term. An example might be the beginning of each class' spec in the Java SDK. Let's allow using different forms including the one you suggested. It would be up to the editor to choose one. However, I guess we all agree this section is mandatory. "Authentication", and "Representation Format" are to be filled according to the requirements of a given API (which may eventually include none). As for "Representation Format", since the indicated text on the Wiki must be included, and apparently is not subject to change, there is no obvious need to include it in each particular API, but in a separate section common to all the APIs. Let's make this be part of the common page we were talking about before. It is our firm belief that some of the fields mentioned in the proposal are superfluous, and do not answer to a precise need (such as "Resource identification"). Other fields are intuitively used where necessary, so explicitly listing them in the general form proposal may be avoided, and the choice left to the editor of the Open spec him(her)self (for ex. the "Optional" sections). We are not sure about this. What may be "obvious" for you may not be "obvious" for some developers. The "Limits" section and subsections do not seem to offer a particular help in the task of informing users and the developers using the API. Maybe the advantage of having this should be provided? We think that a well-designed REST API should take into account the definition of the mentioned "limits". On one hand, if such limits are not present, APIs would be vulnerable to attacks (e.g., "denial of service" attacks). On the other hand, developers should take into account such limits when programming applications. If APIs defined in your chapter do not plan to incorporate this functionality in the implementation delivered for the first release, they should plan to implement them soon. As examples to follow during the writing process of Open Specifications, and of our previous suggestions, the reader can refer to the JAVA API Specification (available at http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/ ), another example being the API Specifications provided by the Apache Foundation (such as Mojo, available at http://maven.apache.org/developers/mojo-api-specification.html ). These are of course only illustrations of what we are convinced to be very good examples of good practices to follow when providing the Open Specs, but remain nevertheless the blueprints of what to be expected as a result for an Open Specification. It's not that easy to extrapolate from API specifications that correspond to Java APIs. We are trying to cover what would be needed to provide a complete specification of a REST API. The proposed template is inspired on well-known REST API specifications like the OpenStack API. Best regards, -- Juanjo Best regards Daniel ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Apr 12 08:01:16 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:01:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer In-Reply-To: <4F85B6F3.7030505@eng.it> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01BA51@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> <4F85B6F3.7030505@eng.it> Message-ID: Hi All No objection for Orange. BR THierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Matteo Melideo Envoy? : mercredi 11 avril 2012 18:53 ? : Juanjo Hierro Cc : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Hi, I know her as I worked with her in a project in the past. No objections from my side. Does she reply another one or one more? Regards, Matteo Il 11/04/2012 18:45, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: Hi all, Our PO has announced us his intention to add a new reviewer to the project whose CV is attached. Unless I hear any objection from you before EOB tomorrow, I will confirm my Ok. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:08:41 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, I would like to add Ms Irena Pavlova to the FI-WARE review team. Please find her CV attached. I would like her to start with the M9 review, so please let me have your agreement soon. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Apr 12 09:09:41 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:09:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer In-Reply-To: <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01BA51@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A635FB7123EFD@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear all, no objection from SAP. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 18:46 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Hi all, Our PO has announced us his intention to add a new reviewer to the project whose CV is attached. Unless I hear any objection from you before EOB tomorrow, I will confirm my Ok. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:08:41 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, I would like to add Ms Irena Pavlova to the FI-WARE review team. Please find her CV attached. I would like her to start with the M9 review, so please let me have your agreement soon. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Thu Apr 12 11:47:38 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:47:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A635FB7123EFD@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01BA51@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A635FB7123EFD@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA10B6B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Dear all, No problem from the side of Atos either. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Fasse, Axel Sent: jueves, 12 de abril de 2012 9:10 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Dear all, no objection from SAP. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 18:46 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Hi all, Our PO has announced us his intention to add a new reviewer to the project whose CV is attached. Unless I hear any objection from you before EOB tomorrow, I will confirm my Ok. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:08:41 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, I would like to add Ms Irena Pavlova to the FI-WARE review team. Please find her CV attached. I would like her to start with the M9 review, so please let me have your agreement soon. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 12 13:59:20 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:59:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA10B6B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01BA51@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F85B534.1070807@tid.es> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A635FB7123EFD@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA10B6B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: Dear All, no objections from Telecom Italia as well. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Inviato: gioved? 12 aprile 2012 11:48 A: Fasse, Axel; Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Dear all, No problem from the side of Atos either. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.gif at 01CD18B4.75154300] ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Fasse, Axel Sent: jueves, 12 de abril de 2012 9:10 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Dear all, no objection from SAP. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 18:46 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Hi all, Our PO has announced us his intention to add a new reviewer to the project whose CV is attached. Unless I hear any objection from you before EOB tomorrow, I will confirm my Ok. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: additional reviewer Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:08:41 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Dear Jose, Juanjo, I would like to add Ms Irena Pavlova to the FI-WARE review team. Please find her CV attached. I would like her to start with the M9 review, so please let me have your agreement soon. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Apr 13 07:02:22 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:02:22 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE replanning proposal In-Reply-To: <4F8798AD.2050500@tid.es> References: <4F8798AD.2050500@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F87B35E.1040105@tid.es> Hi all, Yesterday, a virtual meeting of the FI-PPP AB took place and I took the opportunity to explain the UC projects that we have proposed our PO to perform an adjustment of the planning of several of the short-term milestones linked to FI-WARE. My intention was to gain their support in approval of this re-planning so it can be seen as something that would go for the sake of the programme (exactly as I see it). Gaining the support from the UC projects was a target goal in this movement as highlighted during our last joint WPLs/WPAs confcall. Despite I explained this to them during the virtual meeting, we agreed that I was going to send them an email elaborating on the matter. Below, you will find that email. Please devote the necessary time read it carefully. Also, as per agreement in our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall, I have modified our proposal for re-planning so that we keep the target goal of delivering a first take of the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. We would just split the first release into one first deployment to be delivered by end of July and then an upgrade to happen by end of September. Personally, I rather doubt that UC projects are going to work hard in the FI-WARE testbed during August-September due to the summer holidays and the fact that they will be pretty much devoted to development of their proposals to phase 2. However, I can live with keeping the milestone end of July and, of course, this should be helpful in selling the re-planning because, overall, UC projects are not affected (they will receive the FI-WARE API specifications and will be able to play with the FI-WARE Testbed more or less on the initially planned dates). I have also informed Arian that we would keep the milestone for delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. Note that, besides the educational sessions programmed in May 21st and June 4th, I have proposed to setup a dedicated team that will be devoted to follow-up and push progress on tickets issued by UC projects. Note that they will issue tickets regarding doubts/questions/clarifications on the FI-WARE Architecture, Roadmap or Open Specifications deliverables using the "FI-WARE General Support" tracker that was setup in the FI-WARE project in FusionForge. It's true that devoting time to handle interaction with UC projects around the trackers means devoting the necessary resources, so that is another good argument to ask for the re-planning. Comments, feedback are welcome. Be aware that I'm trying to move fast in getting a final decision on the re-planning and the implementation of the action points to improve overall communication with the UC projects. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE replanning proposal Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:08:29 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: ab at fi-ppp.eu Hi all, In this mail, I will try to summarize what I explained to you during our confcall yesterday. Within FI-WARE, we feel that is rather important to improve communication with UC projects, leading to a better overall understanding of FI-WARE by UC projects. In order to achieve this goal, we have identified two first action points: * Improving overall response to tickets issued by UC projects (both regarding the "FI-WARE Theme/Feature/Epic Request" and the "FI-WARE General Support" trackers) by means of setting up a dedicated team to follow-up and push progress on tickets. * Setting up two full-week f2f "educational sessions" where UC projects' and FI-WARE's teams can meet together so that: * Architects and potentially members of the different FI-WARE Chapter development teams will have the opportunity to meet developers from the UC projects, elaborate on the architecture and functionality of the different FI-WARE GEs and answer their technical questions * UC project architects can present the architecture of use case scenarios, elaborating on how they plan to use FI-WARE, as to collect feedback from FI-WARE members. Despite we have put in place a well defined process, supported by tools, to handle the interaction between UC projects and FI-WARE, the usefulness of them has been limited, leading to a sentiment of frustration both on the side of UC projects and FI-WARE. This in my view is a consequence of starting the UC projects at the same time as FI-WARE, which has been proven not to be the best idea. Actually, UC projects have produced a lot of tickets, but they are too much generic or high-level so it takes too much time to interact until being able to provide accurate answers. On the other hand, UC projects can argue that they couldn't be more concrete until there is no more detailed information about FI-WARE. We have the opportunity to recover from this situation because we are now able to discuss about more concrete stuff, namely the FI-WARE Architecture description (already available now) and the FI-WARE API specifications (to be delivered soon.) The above mentioned action points would help to make sure that the communication between UC projects and FI-WARE around this more concrete stuff is put at the right level. However, despite we see this is a the right thing to do at this moment, it is also a fact that implementing the above mentioned action points would keep architects and development teams in FI-WARE apart from their current development activities at a critical point in the development, very close to a number of relevant milestones according to the FI-WARE DoW. Because of that, FI-WARE has made a proposal to its PO about a re-planning of some of its short-term milestones. This would allow FI-WARE to allocate the necessary resources that would be demanded by the action points mentioned above and ensure success of that action points. This re-planning, however, has been designed in order to minimize overall impact on UC projects. It is also worth noticing that it would lead to adjustment of dates for deliverables due in month 12 and 15, but the rest of dates can be kept so dates linked to delivery of the FI-WARE second release would not be affected. The proposed re-planning can be summarized as follows: * Keep delivery of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications (i.e., REST API specifications) due in month 12 since they seem to be in the critical path of UC projects and there shouldn't be so much problems delivering them on that date. Some of them may arrive sometime mid May but not later and, in any case, would be available for the educational sessions. * Delay those M12 deliverables dealing with delivery of FI-WARE GE software, accompanying guides and unit testing plan 2 months, so they are delivered on month 14 (end of June). This would also apply to deliverables linked to FI-WARE Development Support Tools also due in month 12. * Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. * Delay or drop some deliverables due in month 12 whose delivery is not so critical for the programme at this moment from FI-WARE's point of view: * Drop deliverable on "System/software Engineering Method for FI-WARE" due by month 12, since the FI-WARE consortia considers that working on this deliverable rather makes more sense once the first release of FI-WARE has been delivered. We have proposed to drop the first release of this deliverable, (keeping just two releases on months 24 and 33) * Delay deliverables about "Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE" and "State of the Art Analysis" due by month 12 so they are post-poned to month 21 or at least month 18. Hope this helps to explain the point. As you see, the two points that may impact UC projects are the first and third and, there, we essentially don't change what we initially planned. The other points may be considered indeed internal to FI-WARE. However, our understanding is that our PO, Arian Zwegers, wants to verify whether UC projects agree that the measurements we intend to put in place to improve communication with UC projects, mostly preparing and carrying out the educational sessions, are rather important and would benefit the programme. In other words, he wants to see whether delaying deliverables in FI-WARE can be justified for the sake of the programme. From my point of view, approval of this re-planning is required to be able to support the educational sessions and also push management of the interaction with the UC projects at the right level. So the right thing to do would be to tell the EC that "yes, we need to have these educational sessions and to improve the management of the interaction through the tracker systems". If you agree that this is actually the right thing to do, our request would be that you inform your PO ASAP that this proposal is on the table and give them a positive feedback. It may happen that they were planning to contact you soon, because our PO was going to ask them. That was also why I wanted you to be informed. As per agreement in our confcall yesterday, let's have a continuation confcall on Monday afternoon to wrap up on this important matter. In the meantime, don't hesitate to ask any question you may have so that I can answer over the email. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Apr 13 07:03:53 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:03:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE replanning proposal In-Reply-To: <4F8798AD.2050500@tid.es> References: <4F8798AD.2050500@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F87B3B9.9010107@tid.es> Hi all, Yesterday, a virtual meeting of the FI-PPP AB took place and I took the opportunity to explain the UC projects that we have proposed our PO to perform an adjustment of the planning of several of the short-term milestones linked to FI-WARE. My intention was to gain their support in approval of this re-planning so it can be seen as something that would go for the sake of the programme (exactly as I see it). Gaining the support from the UC projects was a target goal in this movement as highlighted during our last joint WPLs/WPAs confcall. Despite I explained this to them during the virtual meeting, we agreed that I was going to send them an email elaborating on the matter. Below, you will find that email. Please devote the necessary time read it carefully. Also, as per agreement in our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall, I have modified our proposal for re-planning so that we keep the target goal of delivering a first take of the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. We would just split the first release into one first deployment to be delivered by end of July and then an upgrade to happen by end of September. Personally, I rather doubt that UC projects are going to work hard in the FI-WARE testbed during August-September due to the summer holidays and the fact that they will be pretty much devoted to development of their proposals to phase 2. However, I can live with keeping the milestone end of July and, of course, this should be helpful in selling the re-planning because, overall, UC projects are not affected (they will receive the FI-WARE API specifications and will be able to play with the FI-WARE Testbed more or less on the initially planned dates). I have also informed Arian that we would keep the milestone for delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. Note that, besides the educational sessions programmed in May 21st and June 4th, I have proposed to setup a dedicated team that will be devoted to follow-up and push progress on tickets issued by UC projects. Note that they will issue tickets regarding doubts/questions/clarifications on the FI-WARE Architecture, Roadmap or Open Specifications deliverables using the "FI-WARE General Support" tracker that was setup in the FI-WARE project in FusionForge. It's true that devoting time to handle interaction with UC projects around the trackers means devoting the necessary resources, so that is another good argument to ask for the re-planning. Comments, feedback are welcome. Be aware that I'm trying to move fast in getting a final decision on the re-planning and the implementation of the action points to improve overall communication with the UC projects. In order to sync and be able to discuss/resolve further questions, I suggest we schedule a joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall on Monday, starting at 11:00am. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE replanning proposal Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:08:29 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: ab at fi-ppp.eu Hi all, In this mail, I will try to summarize what I explained to you during our confcall yesterday. Within FI-WARE, we feel that is rather important to improve communication with UC projects, leading to a better overall understanding of FI-WARE by UC projects. In order to achieve this goal, we have identified two first action points: * Improving overall response to tickets issued by UC projects (both regarding the "FI-WARE Theme/Feature/Epic Request" and the "FI-WARE General Support" trackers) by means of setting up a dedicated team to follow-up and push progress on tickets. * Setting up two full-week f2f "educational sessions" where UC projects' and FI-WARE's teams can meet together so that: * Architects and potentially members of the different FI-WARE Chapter development teams will have the opportunity to meet developers from the UC projects, elaborate on the architecture and functionality of the different FI-WARE GEs and answer their technical questions * UC project architects can present the architecture of use case scenarios, elaborating on how they plan to use FI-WARE, as to collect feedback from FI-WARE members. Despite we have put in place a well defined process, supported by tools, to handle the interaction between UC projects and FI-WARE, the usefulness of them has been limited, leading to a sentiment of frustration both on the side of UC projects and FI-WARE. This in my view is a consequence of starting the UC projects at the same time as FI-WARE, which has been proven not to be the best idea. Actually, UC projects have produced a lot of tickets, but they are too much generic or high-level so it takes too much time to interact until being able to provide accurate answers. On the other hand, UC projects can argue that they couldn't be more concrete until there is no more detailed information about FI-WARE. We have the opportunity to recover from this situation because we are now able to discuss about more concrete stuff, namely the FI-WARE Architecture description (already available now) and the FI-WARE API specifications (to be delivered soon.) The above mentioned action points would help to make sure that the communication between UC projects and FI-WARE around this more concrete stuff is put at the right level. However, despite we see this is a the right thing to do at this moment, it is also a fact that implementing the above mentioned action points would keep architects and development teams in FI-WARE apart from their current development activities at a critical point in the development, very close to a number of relevant milestones according to the FI-WARE DoW. Because of that, FI-WARE has made a proposal to its PO about a re-planning of some of its short-term milestones. This would allow FI-WARE to allocate the necessary resources that would be demanded by the action points mentioned above and ensure success of that action points. This re-planning, however, has been designed in order to minimize overall impact on UC projects. It is also worth noticing that it would lead to adjustment of dates for deliverables due in month 12 and 15, but the rest of dates can be kept so dates linked to delivery of the FI-WARE second release would not be affected. The proposed re-planning can be summarized as follows: * Keep delivery of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications (i.e., REST API specifications) due in month 12 since they seem to be in the critical path of UC projects and there shouldn't be so much problems delivering them on that date. Some of them may arrive sometime mid May but not later and, in any case, would be available for the educational sessions. * Delay those M12 deliverables dealing with delivery of FI-WARE GE software, accompanying guides and unit testing plan 2 months, so they are delivered on month 14 (end of June). This would also apply to deliverables linked to FI-WARE Development Support Tools also due in month 12. * Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. * Delay or drop some deliverables due in month 12 whose delivery is not so critical for the programme at this moment from FI-WARE's point of view: * Drop deliverable on "System/software Engineering Method for FI-WARE" due by month 12, since the FI-WARE consortia considers that working on this deliverable rather makes more sense once the first release of FI-WARE has been delivered. We have proposed to drop the first release of this deliverable, (keeping just two releases on months 24 and 33) * Delay deliverables about "Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE" and "State of the Art Analysis" due by month 12 so they are post-poned to month 21 or at least month 18. Hope this helps to explain the point. As you see, the two points that may impact UC projects are the first and third and, there, we essentially don't change what we initially planned. The other points may be considered indeed internal to FI-WARE. However, our understanding is that our PO, Arian Zwegers, wants to verify whether UC projects agree that the measurements we intend to put in place to improve communication with UC projects, mostly preparing and carrying out the educational sessions, are rather important and would benefit the programme. In other words, he wants to see whether delaying deliverables in FI-WARE can be justified for the sake of the programme. From my point of view, approval of this re-planning is required to be able to support the educational sessions and also push management of the interaction with the UC projects at the right level. So the right thing to do would be to tell the EC that "yes, we need to have these educational sessions and to improve the management of the interaction through the tracker systems". If you agree that this is actually the right thing to do, our request would be that you inform your PO ASAP that this proposal is on the table and give them a positive feedback. It may happen that they were planning to contact you soon, because our PO was going to ask them. That was also why I wanted you to be informed. As per agreement in our confcall yesterday, let's have a continuation confcall on Monday afternoon to wrap up on this important matter. In the meantime, don't hesitate to ask any question you may have so that I can answer over the email. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Apr 13 10:15:15 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:15:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE replanning proposal In-Reply-To: <4F87B3B9.9010107@tid.es> References: <4F8798AD.2050500@tid.es> <4F87B3B9.9010107@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, as testbed team coordinator, i'd like from you a bit more elaboration on the matter. on one side i think this mixed approach (from a complete delay to a trialed delay) is much better than to announce a delay of three months impacting on the whole fi-ppp programme, on the other, however, as testbed team we have to replan again our work. at the last phc you said that red.es is not able to provide the infrastructure in the due time for many very well understandable reasons. which is now the plan? at least the three following main questions, but many other are there as well, need to be addressed: 1. shall we engineering ingegneria informatica provide a trial infrastructure, as i suggested many times, for the time being, i.e. till when red.es had made the promised investments and set-up a reliable fi-ware dedicated infrastructure? 2. how to select the first set of "ready" ge implementations? as you well know several of them are mutual dependent. is this aspect well taken into account? 3. which uc projct has planned to use the testbed? under which conditions and scenarios? i guess answers to the above questions are now extremely important as time is passing and end of july is quickly coming. thank you for your view on the matter. ciao, stefano 2012/4/13 Juanjo Hierro > Hi all, > > Yesterday, a virtual meeting of the FI-PPP AB took place and I took the > opportunity to explain the UC projects that we have proposed our PO to > perform an adjustment of the planning of several of the short-term > milestones linked to FI-WARE. My intention was to gain their support in > approval of this re-planning so it can be seen as something that would go > for the sake of the programme (exactly as I see it). Gaining the support > from the UC projects was a target goal in this movement as highlighted > during our last joint WPLs/WPAs confcall. > > Despite I explained this to them during the virtual meeting, we agreed > that I was going to send them an email elaborating on the matter. Below, > you will find that email. Please devote the necessary time read it > carefully. > > Also, as per agreement in our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall, I have modified > our proposal for re-planning so that we keep the target goal of delivering > a first take of the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. We would just split > the first release into one first deployment to be delivered by end of July > and then an upgrade to happen by end of September. > > Personally, I rather doubt that UC projects are going to work hard in > the FI-WARE testbed during August-September due to the summer holidays and > the fact that they will be pretty much devoted to development of their > proposals to phase 2. However, I can live with keeping the milestone end > of July and, of course, this should be helpful in selling the re-planning > because, overall, UC projects are not affected (they will receive the > FI-WARE API specifications and will be able to play with the FI-WARE > Testbed more or less on the initially planned dates). I have also > informed Arian that we would keep the milestone for delivery of the FI-WARE > Testbed by end of July. > > Note that, besides the educational sessions programmed in May 21st and > June 4th, I have proposed to setup a dedicated team that will be devoted to > follow-up and push progress on tickets issued by UC projects. Note that > they will issue tickets regarding doubts/questions/clarifications on the > FI-WARE Architecture, Roadmap or Open Specifications deliverables using the > "FI-WARE General Support" tracker that was setup in the FI-WARE project in > FusionForge. It's true that devoting time to handle interaction with UC > projects around the trackers means devoting the necessary resources, so > that is another good argument to ask for the re-planning. > > Comments, feedback are welcome. Be aware that I'm trying to move fast > in getting a final decision on the re-planning and the implementation of > the action points to improve overall communication with the UC projects. > > In order to sync and be able to discuss/resolve further questions, I > suggest we schedule a joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall on Monday, > starting at 11:00am. > > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE replanning proposal Date: > Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:08:29 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: > ab at fi-ppp.eu > > Hi all, > > In this mail, I will try to summarize what I explained to you during our > confcall yesterday. > > Within FI-WARE, we feel that is rather important to improve > communication with UC projects, leading to a better overall understanding > of FI-WARE by UC projects. In order to achieve this goal, we have > identified two first action points: > > - Improving overall response to tickets issued by UC projects (both > regarding the "FI-WARE Theme/Feature/Epic Request" and the "FI-WARE General > Support" trackers) by means of setting up a dedicated team to follow-up and > push progress on tickets. > - Setting up two full-week f2f "educational sessions" where UC > projects' and FI-WARE's teams can meet together so that: > - Architects and potentially members of the different FI-WARE > Chapter development teams will have the opportunity to meet developers from > the UC projects, elaborate on the architecture and functionality of the > different FI-WARE GEs and answer their technical questions > - UC project architects can present the architecture of use case > scenarios, elaborating on how they plan to use FI-WARE, as to collect > feedback from FI-WARE members. > > > Despite we have put in place a well defined process, supported by tools, > to handle the interaction between UC projects and FI-WARE, the usefulness > of them has been limited, leading to a sentiment of frustration both on the > side of UC projects and FI-WARE. This in my view is a consequence of > starting the UC projects at the same time as FI-WARE, which has been proven > not to be the best idea. Actually, UC projects have produced a lot of > tickets, but they are too much generic or high-level so it takes too much > time to interact until being able to provide accurate answers. On the > other hand, UC projects can argue that they couldn't be more concrete until > there is no more detailed information about FI-WARE. We have the > opportunity to recover from this situation because we are now able to > discuss about more concrete stuff, namely the FI-WARE Architecture > description (already available now) and the FI-WARE API specifications (to > be delivered soon.) The above mentioned action points would help to make > sure that the communication between UC projects and FI-WARE around this > more concrete stuff is put at the right level. > > > > However, despite we see this is a the right thing to do at this moment, > it is also a fact that implementing the above mentioned action points would > keep architects and development teams in FI-WARE apart from their current > development activities at a critical point in the development, very close > to a number of relevant milestones according to the FI-WARE DoW. > > > Because of that, FI-WARE has made a proposal to its PO about a > re-planning of some of its short-term milestones. This would allow > FI-WARE to allocate the necessary resources that would be demanded by the > action points mentioned above and ensure success of that action points. > This re-planning, however, has been designed in order to minimize overall > impact on UC projects. It is also worth noticing that it would lead to > adjustment of dates for deliverables due in month 12 and 15, but the rest > of dates can be kept so dates linked to delivery of the FI-WARE second > release would not be affected. The proposed re-planning can be summarized > as follows: > > - Keep delivery of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications (i.e., REST API > specifications) due in month 12 since they seem to be in the critical path > of UC projects and there shouldn't be so much problems delivering them on > that date. Some of them may arrive sometime mid May but not later and, > in any case, would be available for the educational sessions. > - Delay those M12 deliverables dealing with delivery of FI-WARE GE > software, accompanying guides and unit testing plan 2 months, so they are > delivered on month 14 (end of June). This would also apply to > deliverables linked to FI-WARE Development Support Tools also due in month > 12. > - Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but > split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a > first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of > GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end > of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three > months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE > Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July > instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap ( > http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). > Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If > no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means > that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be > available by end of July. > - Delay or drop some deliverables due in month 12 whose delivery is > not so critical for the programme at this moment from FI-WARE's point of > view: > - Drop deliverable on "System/software Engineering Method for > FI-WARE" due by month 12, since the FI-WARE consortia considers that > working on this deliverable rather makes more sense once the first release > of FI-WARE has been delivered. We have proposed to drop the first release > of this deliverable, (keeping just two releases on months 24 and 33) > - Delay deliverables about "Third party innovation enablement in > FI-WARE" and "State of the Art Analysis" due by month 12 so they are > post-poned to month 21 or at least month 18. > > > Hope this helps to explain the point. As you see, the two points that > may impact UC projects are the first and third and, there, we essentially > don't change what we initially planned. The other points may be > considered indeed internal to FI-WARE. However, our understanding is > that our PO, Arian Zwegers, wants to verify whether UC projects agree that > the measurements we intend to put in place to improve communication with UC > projects, mostly preparing and carrying out the educational sessions, are > rather important and would benefit the programme. In other words, he > wants to see whether delaying deliverables in FI-WARE can be justified for > the sake of the programme. > > From my point of view, approval of this re-planning is required to be > able to support the educational sessions and also push management of the > interaction with the UC projects at the right level. So the right thing > to do would be to tell the EC that "yes, we need to have these educational > sessions and to improve the management of the interaction through the > tracker systems". > > If you agree that this is actually the right thing to do, our request > would be that you inform your PO ASAP that this proposal is on the table > and give them a positive feedback. It may happen that they were planning > to contact you soon, because our PO was going to ask them. That was also > why I wanted you to be informed. > > As per agreement in our confcall yesterday, let's have a continuation > confcall on Monday afternoon to wrap up on this important matter. In the > meantime, don't hesitate to ask any question you may have so that I can > answer over the email. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Apr 13 17:22:19 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:22:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Feedback by I2ND Chapter on Unit Testing Plan and Report deliverable proposal Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, In the WPL/WPA confcall last Monday you asked for a feedback about the proposed format of Deliverable 'Unit Testing Plan and Report'. Here is the original text, where I have inserted the proposals provided by I2ND chapter: We should use the chapter backlogs for this purpose. After carefully thinking we propose to adopt the following approach: ? Create a comprehensive set of Features entries in the backlog describing all the features of the GE. Some of these Features should already be there, but others would map to features already supported in baseline assets. --> OK ? Each Feature to include a description on how the feature will be tested (how-to-test). This would mean filling a standard field of the backlog. --> In order to avoid duplicating descriptions, I2ND suggests that the 'how-to-test' should not be inserted in the ticket backlog, but rather in a wiki page (see next bullet) ? Note that since they would be features, they should have an entry on the public wiki referred from a ticket on the backlog. However, we need to discuss whether to make it part of the standard template on the wiki entry or just create a field in the ticket. --> I2ND suggests that the how-to-test description of a complete GE be inserted in a unique (and separate) 'how-to-test the GE' wiki page, where each section describes the test procedures for a specific Feature of that GE. This is in our view an advantage, as an initial section(s) can be used to describe only once for the overall GE (or for large portions of the GE's functionality/Features) the common testing environment, as well as tools adopted. Each public wiki page describing a Feature can be updated, to host the link to the section of the test wiki page which describes the test for that Feature, and if the reader wants to get the global information on the test environment can take a look at the whole page. ? It would be rather useful that the how-to-test field includes a reference to tools or testing clients that automate the testing of the feature. --> OK (see also above proposal) ? In theory, it may be argued that description on how-to-test should also be available for Use Case stories but this would be hard to cover in the first release, overall for features already supported in baseline assets. --> It is strongly suggested to keep as minimum 'unit' for test description the Feature level, more granular descriptions would be useless (e.g. no possibility to test separately in many cases). BR Pier ------------------------------------------------------------------ Telecom Italia Pierangelo Garino Innovation & Industry Relations - Research & Prototyping Via G. Reiss Romoli 274, I-10148 TORINO Tel: +39 011 228 7142 Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 16 10:19:11 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:19:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Wep portal designs from UPM In-Reply-To: <3D4C9390-E51A-43E6-AD60-2DD7FA5190F6@dit.upm.es> References: <3D4C9390-E51A-43E6-AD60-2DD7FA5190F6@dit.upm.es> Message-ID: <4F8BD5FF.7090908@tid.es> Hi all, One of the APs from our confcall last week was to distribute some examples of the work that the UPM team has made regarding web portal designs. The target goal was to make sure that they could do a nice job here. I asked them for some brochure providing examples of what they have done in the past and they have sent to me the attached portfolio. Their work look pretty fine to me so, once I have taken a look at this portfolio, I confirm my opinion that they would be the right path to go. BTW, they are already maintaining the look&feel of the current FI-WARE website (coping with the limitations that usage of wordpress may indeed imply, since it limits your freedom with respect to the design of the look&feel of your web pages). Therefore, this may lead to some synergies that may be worth to exploit. Another point in favor of the decision that has just came to my mind but may be relevant together with the fact that they are the ones who will implement the Cloud Service Portal in FI-WARE. Unless we hear about any objection during this week (please, accompanied by a counter proposal) or we will consolidate this decision and inform the UPM about that. Cheers, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PORTAFOLIO.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 7183898 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 16 10:31:25 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:31:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall: Webex details In-Reply-To: <242958622.1334561422082.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl013.webex.com> References: <242958622.1334561422082.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl013.webex.com> Message-ID: <4F8BD8DD.3050007@tid.es> Hi all, Please find below the Webex details for our confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:30:22 +0200 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 Reply-To: Webex6100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Monday, April 16, 2012 Time: 11:00 am, Europe Summer Time (Paris, GMT+02:00) Meeting Number: 968 952 162 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&PW=NNzlhNGY0NGY3&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&PW=NNzlhNGY0NGY3&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex6100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=QWop9IzVWlRs9gxzV3q6bi8/MyprCNwiC7lPTTDqcFs=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 16 10:51:21 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:51:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shared minutes Message-ID: <4F8BDD89.6060004@tid.es> We'll use the following link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lERzrWmVhiR5lvLGX2xhbvQX-3yvgFEjvDYAKDbBOMc/edit Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Apr 16 11:01:45 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:01:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall: Webex details In-Reply-To: <4F8BD8DD.3050007@tid.es> References: <242958622.1334561422082.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl013.webex.com> <4F8BD8DD.3050007@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo What is the phone number for the WPL/WPA meeting ? Thanks Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : lundi 16 avril 2012 10:31 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall: Webex details Hi all, Please find below the Webex details for our confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:30:22 +0200 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 Reply-To: Webex6100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Monday, April 16, 2012 Time: 11:00 am, Europe Summer Time (Paris, GMT+02:00) Meeting Number: 968 952 162 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&PW=NNzlhNGY0NGY3&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&PW=NNzlhNGY0NGY3&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex6100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=QWop9IzVWlRs9gxzV3q6bi8/MyprCNwiC7lPTTDqcFs=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 16 11:07:37 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:07:37 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall: Webex details In-Reply-To: References: <242958622.1334561422082.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl013.webex.com> <4F8BD8DD.3050007@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8BE159.7050909@tid.es> Same a usual PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf El 16/04/2012 11:01, thierry.nagellen at orange.com escribi?: Hi Juanjo What is the phone number for the WPL/WPA meeting ? Thanks Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : lundi 16 avril 2012 10:31 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall: Webex details Hi all, Please find below the Webex details for our confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:30:22 +0200 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 Reply-To: Webex6100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Monday, April 16, 2012 Time: 11:00 am, Europe Summer Time (Paris, GMT+02:00) Meeting Number: 968 952 162 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&PW=NNzlhNGY0NGY3&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&PW=NNzlhNGY0NGY3&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex6100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=192891772&UID=1280596987&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=QWop9IzVWlRs9gxzV3q6bi8/MyprCNwiC7lPTTDqcFs=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 16 13:02:55 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:02:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preliminary analysis of Use Case tickets Message-ID: <4F8BFC5F.2050805@tid.es> Dear all, As mentioned today in our confcall, I prepared a report based on the status of the tickets on https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/?atid=163&group_id=7&func=browse Please take a look at it, we will further elaborate on this and will try to give it a go to ensure that these tickets are properly cared for. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Tickets_UC_20120412.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 145200 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 16 16:07:55 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:07:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] EXPERTS WORKSHOP 3rd -4th May 2012_Critical Infrastructures@Net!Works Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA11520@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Dear PCC members and WPL/WPA, I have received the following invitation from University of Surrey to give FI-WARE views on Critical infrastructures in a workshop organized by the Net!Works Technology Platform. Find details below. The issue is that first of all I do not think I am the most appropriate person to give the presentation, but furthermore I am not available on the 3rd and 4th of May to travel to Stuttgart. The idea is to explain some of the concepts supported by FI-WARE and their impact at both technical and economic levels. Besides that, the talk should lead to the identification of research priorities, especially aligned with the areas covered by this ETP. It may be good to present some contents related to the FI-WARE testbed and future deployment plans and get some feedback from the Net!Works community. Stefano, could it be interesting for WP10? Would you be available to give a talk here? Maybe SAP since it will be held in Germany? Pepe, I suggest we include a slot in the PCC telco to discuss next Dissemination opportunities for FI-WARE. Like that we can take a quick decision on the event for members of the Parliament I have just circulated and this workshop. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: R.Tafazolli at surrey.ac.uk [mailto:R.Tafazolli at surrey.ac.uk] Sent: viernes, 13 de abril de 2012 14:38 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiona.williams at ericsson.com; werner.mohr at nsn.com Subject: FW: EXPERTS WORKSHOP 3rd -4th May 2012 Importance: High Dear Nuria, I would like to invite you as a speaker to Net!Works next Expert Group workshop on above dates in ALU Stuttgart/Germany. We have two broad topics for the workshop: 1- Capacity and Spectrum Crunch a. Is there need for more spectrum, why and where from, and what are opportunities with Digital Dividends, ..... 2- National Critical Infrastructures a. How does Internet and Communications networks figure in critical infrastructures, how important, .... Being heavily involved in FiWare , I thought a talk on "ICT as National Critical Infrastructures" and what FIWARE plans are in this regard would be highly appropriate. Please let me know if you can accept the invitation. Best Regards Rahim Professor Rahim Tafazolli CCSR Director University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH UK Tel: +44 (0) 1483 689834 Fax: +44 (0) 1483 686011 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 16 18:40:38 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:40:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] TOC for 2 sections of the Installation and Admin Guide Message-ID: <4F8C4B86.7080304@tid.es> Dear all, As agreed on the WPL/WPA confcall, the installation and admin manual does not have a fixed TOC and it will be decided internally in each WP. However, there are two sections that will appear in each installation and admin manual from each chapter. These sections will have the same TOC always. I refer to the sanity check procedures and the diagnosis procedures. The TOCs for these sections can be found on the private Wiki: * Private wiki -> FI-WARE Project Deliverables Placeholders for common edition -> FI-WARE Deliverable "D2.3-8.3 FIWARE Installation and Administration Guide" Please disseminate this within your Work Packages. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 16 20:03:51 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:03:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September Message-ID: <4F8C5F07.4050600@tid.es> Hi all, During the FI-PPP AB confcall today, UC projects' representatives have asked us to confirm that the contents of the Technical Roadmap available on the public wiki rather reflect what we will make available on the FI-WARE Testbed after considering the impact of our proposed FI-WARE overall re-planning. As indicated in the official email I sent to UC projects regarding FI-WARE replanning (was subject "FI-WARE replanning proposal" sent on April 13th), our proposal is that FI-WARE will: Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. I have agreed with UC projects that I will send you this mail with a request to confirm contents of the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap on your side. Also that unless no flag is raised by Wednesday EOB, contents for a given chapter will be considered final by Thursday. Please take this request seriously ... changes will be hard to justify afterwards !! Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From torsten.leidig at sap.com Tue Apr 17 09:23:44 2012 From: torsten.leidig at sap.com (Leidig, Torsten) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:23:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September In-Reply-To: <4F8C5F07.4050600@tid.es> References: <4F8C5F07.4050600@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo, we will address this in our confcall today. However, my feeling is that we will stay with the plan. Again I would like to ask for reciprocity. Is there an overview of which GE will be used by the UC projects after they are deployed in the testbed? Which are the most wanted? Having this information we could put more emphasis on the GE that seem most important and provide a better picture. Regards, Torsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 16. April 2012 20:04 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September Hi all, During the FI-PPP AB confcall today, UC projects' representatives have asked us to confirm that the contents of the Technical Roadmap available on the public wiki rather reflect what we will make available on the FI-WARE Testbed after considering the impact of our proposed FI-WARE overall re-planning. As indicated in the official email I sent to UC projects regarding FI-WARE replanning (was subject "FI-WARE replanning proposal" sent on April 13th), our proposal is that FI-WARE will: Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. I have agreed with UC projects that I will send you this mail with a request to confirm contents of the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap on your side. Also that unless no flag is raised by Wednesday EOB, contents for a given chapter will be considered final by Thursday. Please take this request seriously ... changes will be hard to justify afterwards !! Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 17 09:51:17 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:51:17 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Quick briefing on points discussed during short confcall of the FI-PPP AB yesterday In-Reply-To: <4F8D0134.5080605@tid.es> References: <4F8D0134.5080605@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8D20F5.9090305@tid.es> Hi all, As per the agenda for the educational seasons, a quick summary of what we agreed yesterday during the FI-PPP AB virtual meeting continuation confcall: * Sessions from Tuesday to Thursday of a given week will be structured in two parts: * one dealing with parallel session on chapters (a session per chapter) where FI-WARE will present and will answer questions from UC projects * one dealing with presentations by UC projects typically on the afternoon (say it, from 15:00 to 18:00 or from 14:30 to 15:30). We will structure the agenda of this part during a given week depending on the number of UC projects attending that week, typically a UC project presenting during one day, maybe two projects the same day. Ideally, we should cover four projects within Tuesday and Wednesday, therefore the eight within the two weeks * UC projects put emphasis in that most of the time should be devoted to the FI-WARE sessions (the above proposed timetable seems to look fine with them but they wouldn't buy making the UC sessions larger) * In order to prepare FI-WARE sessions, FI-WARE will run a dedicated virtual meeting with each UC projects before the educational sessions. During those virtual meetings, UC projects will elaborate on their architecture and requirements. The FI-WARE project will agree with each UC project on what date this virtual meeting will take place. This will allow us to prepare contents of the FI-WARE sessions better. To some extend, this can help to address the issues raised by Torsten during our joint WPLs/WPAs sessions We didn't talk about this yesterday, but I would assume Monday would be most probably devoted to FI-WARE, maybe including some general introduction slot. I have sent an email to members of the FI-PPP AB announcing that the initial plan would be to start about 14:00. People should arrange trips to leave on Friday (at least people from FI-WARE and the UC projects who will present on Thursday). Regarding endorsement of the proposed FI-WARE replanning, all UC projects have expressed their overall agreement, thought they would like to make it clear what will go in the July delivery of the testbed and what will go by end of September (see my previous mail on the matter). Some UC projects will act proactively and will inform their POs that they are aware of this replanning proposal and they support it. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 16/04/12 23:07, Eger, Kolja wrote: Dear Juanjo and All, somehow this is a chicken egg problem: A number of partners need further information (agenda, location, ..) to make a decision. Hence, the numbers of attendees in the spreadsheet for FINSENY include some degree of uncertainty. I am confident that these numbers will help you to prepare the workshops but maybe you should include some free seats in your overall planning! Best regards, Kolja Mit freundlichen Gr??en Dr. Kolja Eger Siemens AG Corporate Technology Corporate Research and Technologies CT T DE IT3 Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 81739 M?nchen, Deutschland Tel.: +49 89 636-42215 Fax: +49 89 636-41423 Mobil: +49 1525 7965430 mailto:kolja.eger at siemens.com Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard Cromme; Vorstand: Peter L?scher, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Brigitte Ederer, Klaus Helmrich, Joe Kaeser, Barbara Kux, Hermann Requardt, Siegfried Russwurm, Peter Y. Solmssen, Michael S??; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und M?nchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, M?nchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 ________________________________ Von: ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu [mailto:ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu] Im Auftrag von Peretz Gurel Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2012 15:57 An: ab at fi-ppp.eu Betreff: [FI-PPP AB] Please fill the attendance Google spreadsheet ASAP!! Dear FI-PPP AB members, The Google spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 is still far from complete!! These education sessions are for our own (UC projects) benefit. Please provide the information in this Google spreadsheet ASAP (original deadline was end of day today). This is mandatory so that FIWARE can plan the sessions, find a suitable location etc. There is a lot of planning to do and the least we can do is provide them with our attendance requirements on time. In our conference call today we also agreed that each UC project will take some time during the education session and present to FIWARE its planned architecture (also getting some immediate feedback from FIWARE persons). This will be better achieved if all the partners of each UC will attend the education session on the same week. It is not mandatory (as it may not be possible) but would certainly make planning of the education sessions easier. Best regards, Peretz Gurel European Projects Manager Athena security implementations Ltd Office: +972-3-5572548 Mobile: +972-54-4734045 Email: peretz at athenaiss.com www.athenaiss.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Tue Apr 17 14:27:56 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:27:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Quick briefing on points discussed during short confcall of the FI-PPP AB yesterday In-Reply-To: <4F8D20F5.9090305@tid.es> References: <4F8D0134.5080605@tid.es> <4F8D20F5.9090305@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8D61CC.1040208@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, I noticed that the link to the spreadsheet where each UC project may declare what educational sessions on what GEs it wishes to attend provided in the minutes of our PhC (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdDYwV1gwZDZFdE5 ) is empty while the one you provided 10th of April is full of preferences. (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c) Which is the correct one? I guess the one on the 10th of April. Did we decided in the end to have this educational sessions from Tue to Fri? Thanks and regards, Matteo Il 17/04/2012 09:51, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi all, > > As per the agenda for the educational seasons, a quick summary of > what we agreed yesterday during the FI-PPP AB virtual meeting > continuation confcall: > > * Sessions from Tuesday to Thursday of a given week will be > structured in two parts: > o one dealing with parallel session on chapters (a session per > chapter) where FI-WARE will present and will answer questions > from UC projects > o one dealing with presentations by UC projects typically on the > afternoon (say it, from 15:00 to 18:00 or from 14:30 to > 15:30). We will structure the agenda of this part during a > given week depending on the number of UC projects attending > that week, typically a UC project presenting during one day, > maybe two projects the same day. Ideally, we should cover > four projects within Tuesday and Wednesday, therefore the > eight within the two weeks > o UC projects put emphasis in that most of the time should be > devoted to the FI-WARE sessions (the above proposed timetable > seems to look fine with them but they wouldn't buy making the > UC sessions larger) > * In order to prepare FI-WARE sessions, FI-WARE will run a dedicated > virtual meeting with each UC projects before the educational > sessions. During those virtual meetings, UC projects will > elaborate on their architecture and requirements. The FI-WARE > project will agree with each UC project on what date this virtual > meeting will take place. This will allow us to prepare contents > of the FI-WARE sessions better. To some extend, this can help to > address the issues raised by Torsten during our joint WPLs/WPAs > sessions > > > We didn't talk about this yesterday, but I would assume Monday would > be most probably devoted to FI-WARE, maybe including some general > introduction slot. I have sent an email to members of the FI-PPP AB > announcing that the initial plan would be to start about 14:00. > People should arrange trips to leave on Friday (at least people from > FI-WARE and the UC projects who will present on Thursday). > > Regarding endorsement of the proposed FI-WARE replanning, all UC > projects have expressed their overall agreement, thought they would > like to make it clear what will go in the July delivery of the testbed > and what will go by end of September (see my previous mail on the > matter). Some UC projects will act proactively and will inform > their POs that they are aware of this replanning proposal and they > support it. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 16/04/12 23:07, Eger, Kolja wrote: >> Dear Juanjo and All, >> somehow this is a chicken egg problem: A number of partners >> need further information (agenda, location, ..) to make a decision. >> Hence, the numbers of attendees in the spreadsheet for FINSENY >> include some degree of uncertainty. >> I am confident that these numbers will help you to prepare the >> workshops but maybe you should include some free seats in your >> overall planning! >> Best regards, >> Kolja >> >> Mit freundlichen Gr??en >> Dr. Kolja Eger >> >> Siemens AG >> Corporate Technology >> Corporate Research and Technologies >> CT T DE IT3 >> Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 >> 81739 M?nchen, Deutschland >> Tel.: +49 89 636-42215 >> Fax: +49 89 636-41423 >> Mobil: +49 1525 7965430 >> mailto:kolja.eger at siemens.com >> >> Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard >> Cromme; Vorstand: Peter L?scher, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Brigitte >> Ederer, Klaus Helmrich, Joe Kaeser, Barbara Kux, Hermann Requardt, >> Siegfried Russwurm, Peter Y. Solmssen, Michael S??; Sitz der >> Gesellschaft: Berlin und M?nchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: >> Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, M?nchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE >> 23691322 >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *Von:* ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu [mailto:ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu] *Im Auftrag >> von *Peretz Gurel >> *Gesendet:* Montag, 16. April 2012 15:57 >> *An:* ab at fi-ppp.eu >> *Betreff:* [FI-PPP AB] Please fill the attendance Google spreadsheet >> ASAP!! >> >> Dear FI-PPP AB members, >> >> The Google spreadsheet at: >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 >> *_is still far from complete!!_* >> >> These education sessions are for our own (UC projects) benefit. >> >> *_Please provide the information in this Google spreadsheet ASAP >> _**_(_**_original deadline was end of day today_**_)._* >> >> This is mandatory so that FIWARE can plan the sessions, find a >> suitable location etc. There is a lot of planning to do and the least >> we can do is provide them with our attendance requirements on time. >> >> In our conference call today we also agreed that each UC project will >> take some time during the education session and present to FIWARE its >> planned architecture (also getting some immediate feedback from >> FIWARE persons). This will be better achieved if all the partners of >> each UC will attend the education session on the same week. It is not >> mandatory (as it may not be possible) but would certainly make >> planning of the education sessions easier. >> >> Best regards, >> >> */Peretz Gurel/* >> >> European Projects Manager >> >> Athena security implementations Ltd >> >> Office: +972-3-5572548 >> >> Mobile: +972-54-4734045 >> >> Email: peretz at athenaiss.com >> >> www.athenaiss.com >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Tue Apr 17 16:48:40 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:48:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Quick briefing on points discussed during short confcall of the FI-PPP AB yesterday In-Reply-To: <4F8D20F5.9090305@tid.es> References: <4F8D0134.5080605@tid.es> <4F8D20F5.9090305@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, it's still not clear to me the meaning of 'parallel session on chapters (a session per chapter)', since we assumed that all UCP project participants will attend (together) a chapter session. Did I wrongly understand this latter point? On the other hand, if we run parallel sessions (i.e. one per chapter), are the plans to repeat them more than once over the central days of the week? Thanks for clarifying this point. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: marted? 17 aprile 2012 09:51 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Quick briefing on points discussed during short confcall of the FI-PPP AB yesterday Hi all, As per the agenda for the educational seasons, a quick summary of what we agreed yesterday during the FI-PPP AB virtual meeting continuation confcall: * Sessions from Tuesday to Thursday of a given week will be structured in two parts: * one dealing with parallel session on chapters (a session per chapter) where FI-WARE will present and will answer questions from UC projects * one dealing with presentations by UC projects typically on the afternoon (say it, from 15:00 to 18:00 or from 14:30 to 15:30). We will structure the agenda of this part during a given week depending on the number of UC projects attending that week, typically a UC project presenting during one day, maybe two projects the same day. Ideally, we should cover four projects within Tuesday and Wednesday, therefore the eight within the two weeks * UC projects put emphasis in that most of the time should be devoted to the FI-WARE sessions (the above proposed timetable seems to look fine with them but they wouldn't buy making the UC sessions larger) * In order to prepare FI-WARE sessions, FI-WARE will run a dedicated virtual meeting with each UC projects before the educational sessions. During those virtual meetings, UC projects will elaborate on their architecture and requirements. The FI-WARE project will agree with each UC project on what date this virtual meeting will take place. This will allow us to prepare contents of the FI-WARE sessions better. To some extend, this can help to address the issues raised by Torsten during our joint WPLs/WPAs sessions We didn't talk about this yesterday, but I would assume Monday would be most probably devoted to FI-WARE, maybe including some general introduction slot. I have sent an email to members of the FI-PPP AB announcing that the initial plan would be to start about 14:00. People should arrange trips to leave on Friday (at least people from FI-WARE and the UC projects who will present on Thursday). Regarding endorsement of the proposed FI-WARE replanning, all UC projects have expressed their overall agreement, thought they would like to make it clear what will go in the July delivery of the testbed and what will go by end of September (see my previous mail on the matter). Some UC projects will act proactively and will inform their POs that they are aware of this replanning proposal and they support it. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 16/04/12 23:07, Eger, Kolja wrote: Dear Juanjo and All, somehow this is a chicken egg problem: A number of partners need further information (agenda, location, ..) to make a decision. Hence, the numbers of attendees in the spreadsheet for FINSENY include some degree of uncertainty. I am confident that these numbers will help you to prepare the workshops but maybe you should include some free seats in your overall planning! Best regards, Kolja Mit freundlichen Gr??en Dr. Kolja Eger Siemens AG Corporate Technology Corporate Research and Technologies CT T DE IT3 Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 81739 M?nchen, Deutschland Tel.: +49 89 636-42215 Fax: +49 89 636-41423 Mobil: +49 1525 7965430 mailto:kolja.eger at siemens.com Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard Cromme; Vorstand: Peter L?scher, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Brigitte Ederer, Klaus Helmrich, Joe Kaeser, Barbara Kux, Hermann Requardt, Siegfried Russwurm, Peter Y. Solmssen, Michael S??; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und M?nchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, M?nchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 ________________________________ Von: ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu [mailto:ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu] Im Auftrag von Peretz Gurel Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2012 15:57 An: ab at fi-ppp.eu Betreff: [FI-PPP AB] Please fill the attendance Google spreadsheet ASAP!! Dear FI-PPP AB members, The Google spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 is still far from complete!! These education sessions are for our own (UC projects) benefit. Please provide the information in this Google spreadsheet ASAP (original deadline was end of day today). This is mandatory so that FIWARE can plan the sessions, find a suitable location etc. There is a lot of planning to do and the least we can do is provide them with our attendance requirements on time. In our conference call today we also agreed that each UC project will take some time during the education session and present to FIWARE its planned architecture (also getting some immediate feedback from FIWARE persons). This will be better achieved if all the partners of each UC will attend the education session on the same week. It is not mandatory (as it may not be possible) but would certainly make planning of the education sessions easier. Best regards, Peretz Gurel European Projects Manager Athena security implementations Ltd Office: +972-3-5572548 Mobile: +972-54-4734045 Email: peretz at athenaiss.com www.athenaiss.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 17 17:23:12 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:23:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Quick briefing on points discussed during short confcall of the FI-PPP AB yesterday In-Reply-To: References: <4F8D0134.5080605@tid.es> <4F8D20F5.9090305@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8D8AE0.7000708@tid.es> Hi Pier, Thanks to raise any question. Things should be clear and it's always better to ask. You are right: all UCP projects attending a given week and interested in the I2ND chapter, for example, will attend the single session for that chapter that we will define every day from Monday to Thursday (maybe the I2ND chapter will not require the four days, but if not just consider those days that would be necessary). Therefore, there will NOT be several sessions on the I2ND chapter running the same day, attending the different UC projects. However, there may be several sessions in parallel, each dealing with a different chapter, running the same day. So, there may be parallel sessions one on Cloud, one on I2ND, one on Apps, one on Data, one on IoT, one on Security and one on Tools during Tuesday but just one per chapter. This means that people attending on behalf of a given UC project will typically split into the several FI-WARE sessions running in parallel each day, dealing with each chapter. It is not the intention to repeat contents of FI-WARE chapter sessions within the same week, i.e., have the same contents in Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, for example. One thing you should think about is how many days you really need to use for "educating" about your chapter, answering all potential questions that UC projecs may formulate, for a given week. You may argue that you think that two days are enough for your chapter, then we will see where to place them within the week based on room availability. However, I'm pretty sure that a chapter like the Data/Context Management Chapter will require at least from Monday until Thursday. Hope it is clear. Indeed, it is nice that you make this question because this will be an information that would be nice to collect from each chapter ... how many days do you believe that would be required to provide the necessary "education" about your chapter, answering all questions that UC projects may bring ? I will send an email to all WPLs/WPAs asking for this info which would for sure be useful in setting up the final agenda for the educational weeks. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 17/04/12 16:48, Garino Pierangelo wrote: Dear Juanjo, it?s still not clear to me the meaning of ?parallel session on chapters (a session per chapter)?, since we assumed that all UCP project participants will attend (together) a chapter session. Did I wrongly understand this latter point? On the other hand, if we run parallel sessions (i.e. one per chapter), are the plans to repeat them more than once over the central days of the week? Thanks for clarifying this point. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: marted? 17 aprile 2012 09:51 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Quick briefing on points discussed during short confcall of the FI-PPP AB yesterday Hi all, As per the agenda for the educational seasons, a quick summary of what we agreed yesterday during the FI-PPP AB virtual meeting continuation confcall: * Sessions from Tuesday to Thursday of a given week will be structured in two parts: * one dealing with parallel session on chapters (a session per chapter) where FI-WARE will present and will answer questions from UC projects * one dealing with presentations by UC projects typically on the afternoon (say it, from 15:00 to 18:00 or from 14:30 to 15:30). We will structure the agenda of this part during a given week depending on the number of UC projects attending that week, typically a UC project presenting during one day, maybe two projects the same day. Ideally, we should cover four projects within Tuesday and Wednesday, therefore the eight within the two weeks * UC projects put emphasis in that most of the time should be devoted to the FI-WARE sessions (the above proposed timetable seems to look fine with them but they wouldn't buy making the UC sessions larger) * In order to prepare FI-WARE sessions, FI-WARE will run a dedicated virtual meeting with each UC projects before the educational sessions. During those virtual meetings, UC projects will elaborate on their architecture and requirements. The FI-WARE project will agree with each UC project on what date this virtual meeting will take place. This will allow us to prepare contents of the FI-WARE sessions better. To some extend, this can help to address the issues raised by Torsten during our joint WPLs/WPAs sessions We didn't talk about this yesterday, but I would assume Monday would be most probably devoted to FI-WARE, maybe including some general introduction slot. I have sent an email to members of the FI-PPP AB announcing that the initial plan would be to start about 14:00. People should arrange trips to leave on Friday (at least people from FI-WARE and the UC projects who will present on Thursday). Regarding endorsement of the proposed FI-WARE replanning, all UC projects have expressed their overall agreement, thought they would like to make it clear what will go in the July delivery of the testbed and what will go by end of September (see my previous mail on the matter). Some UC projects will act proactively and will inform their POs that they are aware of this replanning proposal and they support it. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 16/04/12 23:07, Eger, Kolja wrote: Dear Juanjo and All, somehow this is a chicken egg problem: A number of partners need further information (agenda, location, ..) to make a decision. Hence, the numbers of attendees in the spreadsheet for FINSENY include some degree of uncertainty. I am confident that these numbers will help you to prepare the workshops but maybe you should include some free seats in your overall planning! Best regards, Kolja Mit freundlichen Gr??en Dr. Kolja Eger Siemens AG Corporate Technology Corporate Research and Technologies CT T DE IT3 Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 81739 M?nchen, Deutschland Tel.: +49 89 636-42215 Fax: +49 89 636-41423 Mobil: +49 1525 7965430 mailto:kolja.eger at siemens.com Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard Cromme; Vorstand: Peter L?scher, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Brigitte Ederer, Klaus Helmrich, Joe Kaeser, Barbara Kux, Hermann Requardt, Siegfried Russwurm, Peter Y. Solmssen, Michael S??; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und M?nchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, M?nchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 ________________________________ Von: ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu [mailto:ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu] Im Auftrag von Peretz Gurel Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2012 15:57 An: ab at fi-ppp.eu Betreff: [FI-PPP AB] Please fill the attendance Google spreadsheet ASAP!! Dear FI-PPP AB members, The Google spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 is still far from complete!! These education sessions are for our own (UC projects) benefit. Please provide the information in this Google spreadsheet ASAP (original deadline was end of day today). This is mandatory so that FIWARE can plan the sessions, find a suitable location etc. There is a lot of planning to do and the least we can do is provide them with our attendance requirements on time. In our conference call today we also agreed that each UC project will take some time during the education session and present to FIWARE its planned architecture (also getting some immediate feedback from FIWARE persons). This will be better achieved if all the partners of each UC will attend the education session on the same week. It is not mandatory (as it may not be possible) but would certainly make planning of the education sessions easier. Best regards, Peretz Gurel European Projects Manager Athena security implementations Ltd Office: +972-3-5572548 Mobile: +972-54-4734045 Email: peretz at athenaiss.com www.athenaiss.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 17 17:45:22 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:45:22 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Quick briefing on points discussed during short confcall of the FI-PPP AB yesterday In-Reply-To: <4F8D61CC.1040208@eng.it> References: <4F8D0134.5080605@tid.es> <4F8D20F5.9090305@tid.es> <4F8D61CC.1040208@eng.it> Message-ID: <4F8D9012.8030107@tid.es> True .. the one on April 10th ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 17/04/12 14:27, Matteo Melideo wrote: Dear Juanjo, I noticed that the link to the spreadsheet where each UC project may declare what educational sessions on what GEs it wishes to attend provided in the minutes of our PhC (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdDYwV1gwZDZFdE5 ) is empty while the one you provided 10th of April is full of preferences. (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c) Which is the correct one? I guess the one on the 10th of April. Did we decided in the end to have this educational sessions from Tue to Fri? Thanks and regards, Matteo Il 17/04/2012 09:51, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: Hi all, As per the agenda for the educational seasons, a quick summary of what we agreed yesterday during the FI-PPP AB virtual meeting continuation confcall: * Sessions from Tuesday to Thursday of a given week will be structured in two parts: * one dealing with parallel session on chapters (a session per chapter) where FI-WARE will present and will answer questions from UC projects * one dealing with presentations by UC projects typically on the afternoon (say it, from 15:00 to 18:00 or from 14:30 to 15:30). We will structure the agenda of this part during a given week depending on the number of UC projects attending that week, typically a UC project presenting during one day, maybe two projects the same day. Ideally, we should cover four projects within Tuesday and Wednesday, therefore the eight within the two weeks * UC projects put emphasis in that most of the time should be devoted to the FI-WARE sessions (the above proposed timetable seems to look fine with them but they wouldn't buy making the UC sessions larger) * In order to prepare FI-WARE sessions, FI-WARE will run a dedicated virtual meeting with each UC projects before the educational sessions. During those virtual meetings, UC projects will elaborate on their architecture and requirements. The FI-WARE project will agree with each UC project on what date this virtual meeting will take place. This will allow us to prepare contents of the FI-WARE sessions better. To some extend, this can help to address the issues raised by Torsten during our joint WPLs/WPAs sessions We didn't talk about this yesterday, but I would assume Monday would be most probably devoted to FI-WARE, maybe including some general introduction slot. I have sent an email to members of the FI-PPP AB announcing that the initial plan would be to start about 14:00. People should arrange trips to leave on Friday (at least people from FI-WARE and the UC projects who will present on Thursday). Regarding endorsement of the proposed FI-WARE replanning, all UC projects have expressed their overall agreement, thought they would like to make it clear what will go in the July delivery of the testbed and what will go by end of September (see my previous mail on the matter). Some UC projects will act proactively and will inform their POs that they are aware of this replanning proposal and they support it. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 16/04/12 23:07, Eger, Kolja wrote: Dear Juanjo and All, somehow this is a chicken egg problem: A number of partners need further information (agenda, location, ..) to make a decision. Hence, the numbers of attendees in the spreadsheet for FINSENY include some degree of uncertainty. I am confident that these numbers will help you to prepare the workshops but maybe you should include some free seats in your overall planning! Best regards, Kolja Mit freundlichen Gr??en Dr. Kolja Eger Siemens AG Corporate Technology Corporate Research and Technologies CT T DE IT3 Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 81739 M?nchen, Deutschland Tel.: +49 89 636-42215 Fax: +49 89 636-41423 Mobil: +49 1525 7965430 mailto:kolja.eger at siemens.com Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard Cromme; Vorstand: Peter L?scher, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Brigitte Ederer, Klaus Helmrich, Joe Kaeser, Barbara Kux, Hermann Requardt, Siegfried Russwurm, Peter Y. Solmssen, Michael S??; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und M?nchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, M?nchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 ________________________________ Von: ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu [mailto:ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu] Im Auftrag von Peretz Gurel Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2012 15:57 An: ab at fi-ppp.eu Betreff: [FI-PPP AB] Please fill the attendance Google spreadsheet ASAP!! Dear FI-PPP AB members, The Google spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 is still far from complete!! These education sessions are for our own (UC projects) benefit. Please provide the information in this Google spreadsheet ASAP (original deadline was end of day today). This is mandatory so that FIWARE can plan the sessions, find a suitable location etc. There is a lot of planning to do and the least we can do is provide them with our attendance requirements on time. In our conference call today we also agreed that each UC project will take some time during the education session and present to FIWARE its planned architecture (also getting some immediate feedback from FIWARE persons). This will be better achieved if all the partners of each UC will attend the education session on the same week. It is not mandatory (as it may not be possible) but would certainly make planning of the education sessions easier. Best regards, Peretz Gurel European Projects Manager Athena security implementations Ltd Office: +972-3-5572548 Mobile: +972-54-4734045 Email: peretz at athenaiss.com www.athenaiss.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Tue Apr 17 18:29:27 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:29:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] EXPERTS WORKSHOP 3rd -4th May 2012_Critical Infrastructures@Net!Works In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA11520@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA11520@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <41D3CEE2-2FD8-415C-8FE1-EEE351841F5B@tid.es> Hi Nuria No problem. I do not recall anything about members of parliament. Can you circulate it again please? Br -- Jose Jimenez El 16/04/2012, a las 16:08, "Nuria De-Lama Sanchez" > escribi?: Dear PCC members and WPL/WPA, I have received the following invitation from University of Surrey to give FI-WARE views on Critical infrastructures in a workshop organized by the Net!Works Technology Platform. Find details below. The issue is that first of all I do not think I am the most appropriate person to give the presentation, but furthermore I am not available on the 3rd and 4th of May to travel to Stuttgart. The idea is to explain some of the concepts supported by FI-WARE and their impact at both technical and economic levels. Besides that, the talk should lead to the identification of research priorities, especially aligned with the areas covered by this ETP. It may be good to present some contents related to the FI-WARE testbed and future deployment plans and get some feedback from the Net!Works community. Stefano, could it be interesting for WP10? Would you be available to give a talk here? Maybe SAP since it will be held in Germany? Pepe, I suggest we include a slot in the PCC telco to discuss next Dissemination opportunities for FI-WARE. Like that we can take a quick decision on the event for members of the Parliament I have just circulated and this workshop. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: R.Tafazolli at surrey.ac.uk [mailto:R.Tafazolli at surrey.ac.uk] Sent: viernes, 13 de abril de 2012 14:38 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiona.williams at ericsson.com; werner.mohr at nsn.com Subject: FW: EXPERTS WORKSHOP 3rd -4th May 2012 Importance: High Dear Nuria, I would like to invite you as a speaker to Net!Works next Expert Group workshop on above dates in ALU Stuttgart/Germany. We have two broad topics for the workshop: 1- Capacity and Spectrum Crunch a. Is there need for more spectrum, why and where from, and what are opportunities with Digital Dividends, ?.. 2- National Critical Infrastructures a. How does Internet and Communications networks figure in critical infrastructures, how important, ?. Being heavily involved in FiWare , I thought a talk on ?ICT as National Critical Infrastructures? and what FIWARE plans are in this regard would be highly appropriate. Please let me know if you can accept the invitation. Best Regards Rahim Professor Rahim Tafazolli CCSR Director University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH UK Tel: +44 (0) 1483 689834 Fax: +44 (0) 1483 686011 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Apr 17 18:33:43 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:33:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] EXPERTS WORKSHOP 3rd -4th May 2012_CriticalInfrastructures@Net!Works In-Reply-To: <41D3CEE2-2FD8-415C-8FE1-EEE351841F5B@tid.es> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA11520@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> <41D3CEE2-2FD8-415C-8FE1-EEE351841F5B@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9AA5A049@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> I copy & paste the same text I sent to the FI PPP DWG (that I forwarded to the PCC). Tell me if you have any other doubt: Hi all, I forward this opportunity for dissemination that could be useful for the PPP in general in terms of impact, also at political level. Made in Europe ? ICT building blocks tackling societal challenges http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=7965 The idea is to show results of ICT projects that have an impact on mobility, health or sustainability. I think it would be a perfect combination to show some Future Internet technologies provided by FI-WARE and some specific enablers from Use Case projects on top of that. Maybe it is too ambitious but I suppose we should manage to prepare something tangible, solid and attractive by October (at least I hope so). I believe that combining core platform + use case projects we would behave as a programme showing joint commitment. I am happy to help if you find this opportunity interesting. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: martes, 17 de abril de 2012 18:29 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] EXPERTS WORKSHOP 3rd -4th May 2012_CriticalInfrastructures at Net!Works Hi Nuria No problem. I do not recall anything about members of parliament. Can you circulate it again please? Br -- Jose Jimenez El 16/04/2012, a las 16:08, "Nuria De-Lama Sanchez" escribi?: Dear PCC members and WPL/WPA, I have received the following invitation from University of Surrey to give FI-WARE views on Critical infrastructures in a workshop organized by the Net!Works Technology Platform. Find details below. The issue is that first of all I do not think I am the most appropriate person to give the presentation, but furthermore I am not available on the 3rd and 4th of May to travel to Stuttgart. The idea is to explain some of the concepts supported by FI-WARE and their impact at both technical and economic levels. Besides that, the talk should lead to the identification of research priorities, especially aligned with the areas covered by this ETP. It may be good to present some contents related to the FI-WARE testbed and future deployment plans and get some feedback from the Net!Works community. Stefano, could it be interesting for WP10? Would you be available to give a talk here? Maybe SAP since it will be held in Germany? Pepe, I suggest we include a slot in the PCC telco to discuss next Dissemination opportunities for FI-WARE. Like that we can take a quick decision on the event for members of the Parliament I have just circulated and this workshop. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: R.Tafazolli at surrey.ac.uk [mailto:R.Tafazolli at surrey.ac.uk] Sent: viernes, 13 de abril de 2012 14:38 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiona.williams at ericsson.com; werner.mohr at nsn.com Subject: FW: EXPERTS WORKSHOP 3rd -4th May 2012 Importance: High Dear Nuria, I would like to invite you as a speaker to Net!Works next Expert Group workshop on above dates in ALU Stuttgart/Germany. We have two broad topics for the workshop: 1- Capacity and Spectrum Crunch a. Is there need for more spectrum, why and where from, and what are opportunities with Digital Dividends, ?.. 2- National Critical Infrastructures a. How does Internet and Communications networks figure in critical infrastructures, how important, ?. Being heavily involved in FiWare , I thought a talk on ?ICT as National Critical Infrastructures? and what FIWARE plans are in this regard would be highly appropriate. Please let me know if you can accept the invitation. Best Regards Rahim Professor Rahim Tafazolli CCSR Director University of Surrey Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH UK Tel: +44 (0) 1483 689834 Fax: +44 (0) 1483 686011 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 17 19:14:19 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:14:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Testbed Team (WP10) responsibilities Message-ID: dear all, thank you all for the thread of emails coming from my email of yesterday evening with the minutes of our last weekly phc. the thread gives me the opportunity to clarify once again (hopefully the last time ...???) that wp10 and in particular t10.2 has been designed, at proposal writing and confirmed at dow production, in such a way that all the generic enabler implementation (gei) owners must be operational in wp10 and, in particular, in the t10.2. the reason is simple: no integration can be done without who really knows the "piece of software" that is going to be integrated. for this reason for each organisation in the project developing geis a 10% of development effort has been budgeted for this task. so, for me, there are not "wp responsible" and each organisation is responsible for providing promptly reliable information and contributions concerning their own geis. of course i understand that some specific chapters migth organise themselves with persons acting as reference contact (and this is apparently the case of wp6 and wp7), still, i believe, having the specific gei responsibility left to the gei owner. i clarified this an additional time becouse we are coming to the most critical days where we are going to set-up the testbed, and i clearly felt the need to provide such clarification! in this context i have again to emphasise that the participation to the activities of wp10 is scarse in terms of organisations (about half of whom should attend). nevertheless we are taking day-by-day decisions which will affect the work of everybody and which of course will not be discussed again and again. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 18 11:35:15 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:35:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? Message-ID: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> Hi all, In order to identify the needs for rooms, etc. We would like you to estimate how many days do you believe that the educational sessions on your chapter may require. Sessions per day and chapter would last about 5 net hours (with may be two breaks of about 20 mins in between). Note that the final agenda is up to you, but I guess that a pretty reasonable approach would mean having both time slots where you present Architecture and APIs and time slots where you spend time answering questions (you may bring some of them based on the tickets that we will ask UC projects to issue regarding questions on the FI-WARE Architecture) My first guess would be at least going for the following numbers: * Cloud: 2 days * Data/Context: 3-4 days * IoT: 2-3 days (closer to 3) * Apps: 2-3 days * I2ND: 2 days * Security: 2 days * Tools: 1-2 days I believe that IoT and Data/Context should agree in having one joint day just devoted to FI-WARE NGSI. I would recommend this being the first day (Monday). Please get back to me by EOB today ... otherwise, I will assume that you are fine with the numbers above. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Apr 18 12:46:04 2012 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:46:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] =?iso-8859-1?q?GE=B4s_Business_Description?= Message-ID: Dear All After the first review of what have been fulfilled on the deliverable WP11.2.1 Deliverable - Exploitation Strategy, Sustainability and IPR Management, deliverable restricted and that can be found on the private web here , regarding GE?s business description and Exploitation Plans for each partner within each chapter. The deliverable is composed of 4 main sections. 1 FI-WARE Exploitation (GE?s Business Description) 2 IPR Management 3 Sustainability 4 Individual Exploitation Plans The purpose of this email is to review the status of every section and to assign the pending contributions to the responsible partner, so we kindly remind you to complete the following pending contributions before end of this month, 30th April. 1 FI-WARE Exploitation (GE?s Business Description) ? Cloud: Responsible IBM The following G.E.s need to be reviewed: 1 Business Description IaaS DataCenter Resource Management There is a pending comment, should we delete it? Andy: we should note that all operations are exposed via a standardised API and ensures interoperability 5 Business Description IaaS Cloud-edge Resource Management More detail is needed, please review it. ? Data : Responsible Telefonica The following G.E. s need to be reviewed: 1.1 Business description Publish/Subscribe Broker 1.2 Business description Complex Event Processing 1.5 Business description Unstructured data analysis 1.7 Business description Location Platform 1.9 Business description Semantic Annotation 1.10 Business description Semantic Application Support ? Iot Responsible France Telecom The Iot team is working now in the forge. We will review it when they finish ? Applications/Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework Responsible SAP The Registry GE, in the business description section indicates that time to market is M15 (First release of test bed ), nevertheless the G.E. does not appear in the roadmap First Major Release (3Q 2012), please check. The following G.E.s need to be reviewed: 1.5 Business Elements & Business Models 1.6 Business description Revenue Settlement & Sharing System 3.1 Business description Mediation 4.1 Multi Channel and Multi device access ? Security Responsible Thales The following G.E.s need to be reviewed: 1 Business Description Security monitoring The information in the cells is not correctly placed. In the case of Optional security enablers, please provide more information about each one. ? Interface to the Networks Responsible Telecom Italy The following G.E.s need to be reviewed: 2 Business description Cloud Edge 2 IPR Management IPR MANAGEMENT Responsible WP leaders We have considered that at this stage of the project we should provide IPR information about every generic enabler implementation G.E.i. to be deployed in the first release of the test bed. Due to the fact that a G.E. could have several implementations, we need to identify the IPR of every G.E. implementation and only for implementations which will be available in the Test bed first release We have extracted the list of G.E.i., but we need you to review it. The link can be found here Bear in mind, that a table by G.E.i. should be provided and we have not been able to find out how many implementations are possible for each G.E. - If a Generic enabler has two or more implementations the information should be provided as the following example here - If you need create a new table for a generic enabler implementation, you can use the template here 3 Sustainability Description of Test Bed and Open innovation Lab Meeting on the 18th April TID-Atos to develop this chapter 4 Individual Exploitation Plans Responsible ALL Partners We have decided to move the individual exploitation plans located in every chapter to a new section in order to obtain a comprehensive overview of company interests in the project. You can find the section here . Every partner should explain its strategy with regard to the project. The plan should be divided into the following sections. Organization Profile - Brief description of your organization - Explanation of your current organization business model FI WARE relevance in your current business model - Explanation about how FI WARE fits with your current business model? o In which priority areas (verticals) are you interested? o What is the FI WARE alignment with the strategy of your company? - How are you going to add FI-WARE to your company?s portfolio? o Since my core business is telecommunications ,the G.Es developed in the area of Cloud are extremely important for my business - How is FIWARE going to boost your business? o Our organization is going to incorporate the knowledge in the Future Internet to our portfolio due to the fact nowadays we are testing a new platform to attract large corporations such as banks. o Outcomes related to requirements of the Usage Areas and coverage of those by FI-WARE enablers will be transferred to our divisions working in Energy, Telecom & Media, eHealth, Transport, Cloud, Service Ecosystems and Data management & storage. If your organization does not have a business model, please explain how the organization will transfer the acquired knowledge during the project. Identification of main project outcomes The following exploitation paths are specially worth highlighting - Cloud o Our organization is planning to use the research in the field of cloud computing in our offer of cloud, .... - Apps o The company is studying the deployment of this solution in the centre x which will provide a showcase. How are you going to exploit the project results in distinct environments? - How are you planning to address the potential users ? o Users/Developers Communities, o Events, workshops - How will your organization transfer/deliver the FI WARE technology? - What business model are you going to use? Thanks for your contribution Juan From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: martes, 13 de marzo de 2012 19:46 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO'; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; 'Stefano de Panfilis'; Carmen Perea Escribano Subject: GE?s Business Description Dear All For the WP11 purposes (WP11.2.1 Deliverable - Exploitation Strategy, Sustainability and IPR Management), and according to the plan we agreed in the exploitation meeting at our last f2f meeting in Madrid, we need your contribution as WPLs, experts on each domain and as a members of the WP11, to review what Atos prepared for each G E in terms of business description to attract the business departments, the public at large and the technical departments with no advanced expertise and to position FI WARE in the market according to each GE?s market potential and time to market We have filled in some of the cells with the information we had, but we need your revision and support. It would be very useful if you could show some applicability examples https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Main_Page After the Generic Enabler tables you can find a section for every partner who is participating in this chapter. In this section every partner should explain their plans with regard to this chapter exploitation. Please check the instructions below and complete each GE template and your exploitation plans before end of this month Thanks for your collaboration and for any doubt not hesitate to contact us Br Juan How to fill in the wiki? Every G.E. has a specific table in the Exploitation wiki media as can be seen below: * Description and added value: In this cell we have added simple information about the G.E., please feel free to change the description and to add information, the objective is to provide the reader with a clear and simple vision about the G.E. Added value: In this subsection we want to answer the following questions: * What is the main advantage you are promising your customer through this result/solution? * What kind of beneficial impact will your solutions have on the target customers business? * What are the main problems, needs and expectations perceived by the customers? Mainly, we have obtained this information of the section Critical product attributes, probably you could extend it and identify more problems. It would be really useful if you could provide some examples of applicability of the solutions. * Main Competitors Please identify the main competitors of the G.E, if any. You should indicate the name of the competitor and the competitor's product. Some companies are named, please feel free to delete the companies you think are not correct and add new ones. * Target Market We should answer the question: What FI-WARE roles are going to use the G.E. ? Some examples: FI-WARE GE Provider FI-WARE Instance Provider FI-WARE Application/Service Provider * Market Potential The information for this section has been obtained from: * The Tracker: we have filtered the column "FI-WARE Generic Enablers " and we have obtained the user cases that have applied information about the G.E. * The TestBed section: "Testbed_Fact_Finding_Investigation" * Sectors: What sectors are most likely to use the G.E. ? We have tried to answer these questions but your review is required. * Potential business models What commercialization methods are more commonly used with this kind of G.E. or what kind of commercialization methods are you thinking of using? For example: * Fixed term yearly * Fixed term monthly * Subscription plus pay per use * Pay per use only(hourly) * Pay per use only(monthly) * Delivery Description G.E. delivery: how is the G.E. going to be available for use, e.g.: * Web page * As a service * An API * Time to market We have used the information available on the "Testbed_Fact_Finding_Investigation" testbed version 1 (M15) testbed version 2 (M27) testbed version 3 (M36) You need to check this information. * IPR situation The information for this section has been extracted from the Materializing the FI-WARE Vision. Further information should be provided here, especially if you are planning to use this G.E. together with other FIWARE G.E. with incompatible license. * Standardization issues Please provide us with this G.E. standardization plan * Legal barriers Have you found any national or international legal barrier for the correct deployment of the G.E? Do you think that some rules should be changed in order to promote the adoption of the G.E.? * Individual Chapter Exploitation Plan After the Generic Enabler tables you can find a section for every partner who is participating in this chapter. In this section every partner should explain their plans with regard to this chapter exploitation. * What are your plans about the G.E.?. * Are you planning to introduce the G.E. into your portfolio? * Are you introducing the G.E. in any developer community? E.g. Bluevia,etc. * What role are you going to play with regard to the G.E? Will you be an integrator? Or Will you be a consultant? ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 30820 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 21030 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From lorant.farkas at nsn.com Wed Apr 18 13:28:10 2012 From: lorant.farkas at nsn.com (Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:28:10 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? In-Reply-To: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> References: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> Message-ID: <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2035EB0E9@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> Hi Juanjo, IoT is 1 - 1.5 days, closer to 1.5. It was discussed today with the partners. Thanks & Br, Lorant From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext Juanjo Hierro Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:35 AM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? Hi all, In order to identify the needs for rooms, etc. We would like you to estimate how many days do you believe that the educational sessions on your chapter may require. Sessions per day and chapter would last about 5 net hours (with may be two breaks of about 20 mins in between). Note that the final agenda is up to you, but I guess that a pretty reasonable approach would mean having both time slots where you present Architecture and APIs and time slots where you spend time answering questions (you may bring some of them based on the tickets that we will ask UC projects to issue regarding questions on the FI-WARE Architecture) My first guess would be at least going for the following numbers: * Cloud: 2 days * Data/Context: 3-4 days * IoT: 2-3 days (closer to 3) * Apps: 2-3 days * I2ND: 2 days * Security: 2 days * Tools: 1-2 days I believe that IoT and Data/Context should agree in having one joint day just devoted to FI-WARE NGSI. I would recommend this being the first day (Monday). Please get back to me by EOB today ... otherwise, I will assume that you are fine with the numbers above. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Apr 18 13:33:18 2012 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:33:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] =?iso-8859-1?q?FW=3A_FI_WARE=B4s_Brochure-_draft_ver?= =?iso-8859-1?q?sion-_Approve_it_before_next_Monday_23rd_April_EOB!?= =?iso-8859-1?q?!!?= Message-ID: Dear Collegues Please find enclosed the first draft version of the FI WARE?s Brochure, pending to introduce the logos and some sectorial applications. Please review it and approve it or provide feedback to build up a final version that we can bring to Aalborg. So we want from you, each WPL leader before next Monday 23rd April EOB: - Each WPL: To send an OK or to propose some modifications - Each partner: To review your logos and include the appropriate one which should be printed in the brochure, in the following link, https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Partners In principle we miss the high definition version of the following links, please provide them ASAP TRDF https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/File:TRDF-Logo.png Engineering https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/ENG UPM https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/UPM FRAUNHOFER fokus https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/File:FRAUNHOFER-Logo.png Br Juan ? -----Original Message----- From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: martes, 27 de marzo de 2012 19:28 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: 'Miguel Carrillo'; 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO'; Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; Carmen Perea Escribano; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: FI WARE?s Brochure- draft version Dear Colleagues from WP11 Please find enclosed the first draft version of the FI WARE?s Brochure Please review it and provide feedback that will be very welcome to build up a final version that we can send around in April Best Regards Juan ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Fiware diptico.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 2176423 bytes Desc: Fiware diptico.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Fiware triptico.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 3544444 bytes Desc: Fiware triptico.pdf URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Apr 18 16:33:15 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:33:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? In-Reply-To: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> References: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo, I confirm that as I2ND chapter we require max 2 days (ideally they could fit also in 1.5 days) for our sessions. By looking at the requests from UCPs, I2ND is having attendants both weeks, however we should keep into account a few constraints when allocating the session slots: - In week 21-25 May I'm unavailable on Friday (company's closure I cannot 'skip') - In week 4-8 June, the 7th is a holiday in Germany (and perhaps 8), which means most of experts about NetIC and S3C GEs might have troubles attending Our suggestion would be to have the I2ND sessions on Tue-Wed in each of the two weeks. Best Regards Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: mercoled? 18 aprile 2012 11:35 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? Hi all, In order to identify the needs for rooms, etc. We would like you to estimate how many days do you believe that the educational sessions on your chapter may require. Sessions per day and chapter would last about 5 net hours (with may be two breaks of about 20 mins in between). Note that the final agenda is up to you, but I guess that a pretty reasonable approach would mean having both time slots where you present Architecture and APIs and time slots where you spend time answering questions (you may bring some of them based on the tickets that we will ask UC projects to issue regarding questions on the FI-WARE Architecture) My first guess would be at least going for the following numbers: * Cloud: 2 days * Data/Context: 3-4 days * IoT: 2-3 days (closer to 3) * Apps: 2-3 days * I2ND: 2 days * Security: 2 days * Tools: 1-2 days I believe that IoT and Data/Context should agree in having one joint day just devoted to FI-WARE NGSI. I would recommend this being the first day (Monday). Please get back to me by EOB today ... otherwise, I will assume that you are fine with the numbers above. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Wed Apr 18 18:17:35 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:17:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? In-Reply-To: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> References: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8EE91F.7010601@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, I think that for Tools 1 day can be enough possibly not on Monday. Thanks and regards, Matteo Il 18/04/2012 11:35, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi all, > > In order to identify the needs for rooms, etc. We would like you > to estimate how many days do you believe that the educational sessions > on your chapter may require. > > Sessions per day and chapter would last about 5 net hours (with may > be two breaks of about 20 mins in between). Note that the final > agenda is up to you, but I guess that a pretty reasonable approach > would mean having both time slots where you present Architecture and > APIs and time slots where you spend time answering questions (you may > bring some of them based on the tickets that we will ask UC projects > to issue regarding questions on the FI-WARE Architecture) > > My first guess would be at least going for the following numbers: > > * Cloud: 2 days > * Data/Context: 3-4 days > * IoT: 2-3 days (closer to 3) > * Apps: 2-3 days > * I2ND: 2 days > * Security: 2 days > * Tools: 1-2 days > > I believe that IoT and Data/Context should agree in having one joint > day just devoted to FI-WARE NGSI. I would recommend this being the > first day (Monday). > > Please get back to me by EOB today ... otherwise, I will assume that > you are fine with the numbers above. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 19 10:27:29 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:27:29 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September In-Reply-To: References: <4F8C5F07.4050600@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8FCC71.4050301@tid.es> On 17/04/12 09:23, Leidig, Torsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, we will address this in our confcall today. However, my feeling is that we will stay with the plan. Again I would like to ask for reciprocity. Is there an overview of which GE will be used by the UC projects after they are deployed in the testbed? Which are the most wanted? Having this information we could put more emphasis on the GE that seem most important and provide a better picture. You can check the expression of interests regarding the GEs in the shared spreadsheet that UC projects are fulfilling ... This is the most accurate and updated information we have on our hands as per today. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 Best regards, -- Juanjo Regards, Torsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 16. April 2012 20:04 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September Hi all, During the FI-PPP AB confcall today, UC projects' representatives have asked us to confirm that the contents of the Technical Roadmap available on the public wiki rather reflect what we will make available on the FI-WARE Testbed after considering the impact of our proposed FI-WARE overall re-planning. As indicated in the official email I sent to UC projects regarding FI-WARE replanning (was subject "FI-WARE replanning proposal" sent on April 13th), our proposal is that FI-WARE will: Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. I have agreed with UC projects that I will send you this mail with a request to confirm contents of the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap on your side. Also that unless no flag is raised by Wednesday EOB, contents for a given chapter will be considered final by Thursday. Please take this request seriously ... changes will be hard to justify afterwards !! Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 19 10:41:33 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:41:33 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September In-Reply-To: <4F8FCC71.4050301@tid.es> References: <4F8C5F07.4050600@tid.es> <4F8FCC71.4050301@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo, it would be nice if the UCPs are 'encouraged' to fill the table in 'ordered' manner and once per project, so that it would be easy to check the number of expected attendees per session/GE. So far, they have introduced 'strings' and even added columns, so if I want to know e.g. how many people would attend the I2ND/NetIC sessions I have to extract manually all the data... Isn't this a spreadsheet which should do that automatically ;-) BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: gioved? 19 aprile 2012 10:27 A: Leidig, Torsten Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September On 17/04/12 09:23, Leidig, Torsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, we will address this in our confcall today. However, my feeling is that we will stay with the plan. Again I would like to ask for reciprocity. Is there an overview of which GE will be used by the UC projects after they are deployed in the testbed? Which are the most wanted? Having this information we could put more emphasis on the GE that seem most important and provide a better picture. You can check the expression of interests regarding the GEs in the shared spreadsheet that UC projects are fulfilling ... This is the most accurate and updated information we have on our hands as per today. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 Best regards, -- Juanjo Regards, Torsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 16. April 2012 20:04 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September Hi all, During the FI-PPP AB confcall today, UC projects' representatives have asked us to confirm that the contents of the Technical Roadmap available on the public wiki rather reflect what we will make available on the FI-WARE Testbed after considering the impact of our proposed FI-WARE overall re-planning. As indicated in the official email I sent to UC projects regarding FI-WARE replanning (was subject "FI-WARE replanning proposal" sent on April 13th), our proposal is that FI-WARE will: Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. I have agreed with UC projects that I will send you this mail with a request to confirm contents of the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap on your side. Also that unless no flag is raised by Wednesday EOB, contents for a given chapter will be considered final by Thursday. Please take this request seriously ... changes will be hard to justify afterwards !! Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 19 10:45:41 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:45:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT Fwd: Technical roadmap In-Reply-To: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A8983216C12252@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> References: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A8983216C12252@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> Message-ID: <4F8FD0B5.5080009@tid.es> Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed an email from one of the UC projects' representative in the FI-PPP AB. He is asking for a confirmation that the Technical Roadmap can be final. I REMIND you that I put yesterday EOB as deadline to confirm whether you would keep the existing plan (meaning that all that goes to 2Q32012 means end of July) or you would refine the contents of the Technical Roadmap and distinguish between end of july and the planned upgrade by end of September. So far, only the IoT chapter has declared so. In order to make sure that you are taking care of this critical question, I will ask you that you add the following sentence, at the beginning of the description of the functionality that you will deliver for the first release, in case that you agree that what you commit to deliver by 2Q32012 is actually planned by end of July. Following is a description of the major features that will be supported in the first major release of FI-WARE. These features will be implemented by a number of FI-WARE GEs implementing the Reference Architecture of the Cloud Chapter. It is planned that they will be available on the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July. Note that the FI-WARE testbed infrastructure where GEs will be deployed will be ready be beginning of July. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Technical roadmap Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:57:27 +0200 From: Peretz Gurel To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: ab at fi-ppp.eu Dear Juanjo, I have checked the FIWARE technical roadmap wiki this morning. I do not see yet any reference to the update we discussed (Specifically saying what will be available on the test bed in July and what will be delayed to September). The only Chapter referencing these dates is the IOT. The other chapters do not reference these dates. This is important for us. We were contacted by our PO in order to get our opinion on these delays. As I said in the last meeting we would like to support the education sessions but our coordinator will not send a letter of support to our PO before we can understand what will be delayed and the risk to our (SafeCity) DoW commitments. Please make sure this wiki page is updated as soon as possible as agreed in the last FI-PPP AB virtual call on Monday. Best regards, Peretz Gurel European Projects Manager Athena security implementations Ltd Office: +972-3-5572548 Mobile: +972-54-4734045 Email: peretz at athenaiss.com www.athenaiss.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 19 12:02:23 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:02:23 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September In-Reply-To: References: <4F8C5F07.4050600@tid.es> <4F8FCC71.4050301@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F8FE2AF.2050008@tid.es> Hi, It was me who asked them to label their figures. Don't try to use the spreadsheet for what was not defined. We wanted to use it to basically dimension the space that would be needed for rooms as well as the number of people that may attend each day, for logistic reasons (space in the cantine, etc). If a project writes down that it would bring 4 people to the session of a given GE.X and then 3 people to the session of another GE.Y in the same chapter, we would not be able to determine whether they are 7 in total or just 3 of the 4 attending the session on GE.X are going also to go to the session on GE.Y. By tagging the numbers, we will get answers to those types of questions. Calculating how many people may attend a simple session one of the weeks is not that difficult. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 19/04/12 10:41, Garino Pierangelo wrote: Hi Juanjo, it would be nice if the UCPs are ?encouraged? to fill the table in ?ordered? manner and once per project, so that it would be easy to check the number of expected attendees per session/GE. So far, they have introduced ?strings? and even added columns, so if I want to know e.g. how many people would attend the I2ND/NetIC sessions I have to extract manually all the data? Isn?t this a spreadsheet which should do that automatically ;-) BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: gioved? 19 aprile 2012 10:27 A: Leidig, Torsten Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September On 17/04/12 09:23, Leidig, Torsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, we will address this in our confcall today. However, my feeling is that we will stay with the plan. Again I would like to ask for reciprocity. Is there an overview of which GE will be used by the UC projects after they are deployed in the testbed? Which are the most wanted? Having this information we could put more emphasis on the GE that seem most important and provide a better picture. You can check the expression of interests regarding the GEs in the shared spreadsheet that UC projects are fulfilling ... This is the most accurate and updated information we have on our hands as per today. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 Best regards, -- Juanjo Regards, Torsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 16. April 2012 20:04 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September Hi all, During the FI-PPP AB confcall today, UC projects' representatives have asked us to confirm that the contents of the Technical Roadmap available on the public wiki rather reflect what we will make available on the FI-WARE Testbed after considering the impact of our proposed FI-WARE overall re-planning. As indicated in the official email I sent to UC projects regarding FI-WARE replanning (was subject "FI-WARE replanning proposal" sent on April 13th), our proposal is that FI-WARE will: Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. I have agreed with UC projects that I will send you this mail with a request to confirm contents of the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap on your side. Also that unless no flag is raised by Wednesday EOB, contents for a given chapter will be considered final by Thursday. Please take this request seriously ... changes will be hard to justify afterwards !! Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 19 12:05:47 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:05:47 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: R: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September In-Reply-To: <4F8FE2AF.2050008@tid.es> References: <4F8C5F07.4050600@tid.es> <4F8FCC71.4050301@tid.es> <4F8FE2AF.2050008@tid.es> Message-ID: Ok, I see the point, thanks for the answer. BR Pier Da: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Inviato: gioved? 19 aprile 2012 12:02 A: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: R: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September Hi, It was me who asked them to label their figures. Don't try to use the spreadsheet for what was not defined. We wanted to use it to basically dimension the space that would be needed for rooms as well as the number of people that may attend each day, for logistic reasons (space in the cantine, etc). If a project writes down that it would bring 4 people to the session of a given GE.X and then 3 people to the session of another GE.Y in the same chapter, we would not be able to determine whether they are 7 in total or just 3 of the 4 attending the session on GE.X are going also to go to the session on GE.Y. By tagging the numbers, we will get answers to those types of questions. Calculating how many people may attend a simple session one of the weeks is not that difficult. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 19/04/12 10:41, Garino Pierangelo wrote: Hi Juanjo, it would be nice if the UCPs are 'encouraged' to fill the table in 'ordered' manner and once per project, so that it would be easy to check the number of expected attendees per session/GE. So far, they have introduced 'strings' and even added columns, so if I want to know e.g. how many people would attend the I2ND/NetIC sessions I have to extract manually all the data... Isn't this a spreadsheet which should do that automatically ;-) BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: gioved? 19 aprile 2012 10:27 A: Leidig, Torsten Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September On 17/04/12 09:23, Leidig, Torsten wrote: Hi Juanjo, we will address this in our confcall today. However, my feeling is that we will stay with the plan. Again I would like to ask for reciprocity. Is there an overview of which GE will be used by the UC projects after they are deployed in the testbed? Which are the most wanted? Having this information we could put more emphasis on the GE that seem most important and provide a better picture. You can check the expression of interests regarding the GEs in the shared spreadsheet that UC projects are fulfilling ... This is the most accurate and updated information we have on our hands as per today. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 Best regards, -- Juanjo Regards, Torsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 16. April 2012 20:04 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] VERY URGENT AND IMPORTANT: Confirming what in the FI-WARE First Release goes in the testbed by end of July vs end of September Hi all, During the FI-PPP AB confcall today, UC projects' representatives have asked us to confirm that the contents of the Technical Roadmap available on the public wiki rather reflect what we will make available on the FI-WARE Testbed after considering the impact of our proposed FI-WARE overall re-planning. As indicated in the official email I sent to UC projects regarding FI-WARE replanning (was subject "FI-WARE replanning proposal" sent on April 13th), our proposal is that FI-WARE will: Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September is described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps would not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. I have agreed with UC projects that I will send you this mail with a request to confirm contents of the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap on your side. Also that unless no flag is raised by Wednesday EOB, contents for a given chapter will be considered final by Thursday. Please take this request seriously ... changes will be hard to justify afterwards !! Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:image001.gif at 01CD1E24.C19AB550]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 19 19:17:41 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:17:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Improving handling of tickets issued by UC projects Message-ID: <4F9048B5.1010003@tid.es> Hi all, As you already know, one of the measures that we will take to improve overall communication with the UC projects will be that of creating a dedicated team to handle the tickets issued by the UC projects. We will have to tracker systems to handle communication with UC projects, so that we will setup two dedicated teams for them: * The "FI-WARE Theme/Epic/Feature request" tracker, through which Users (including UC projects in the first phase but extended to third parties in the future) will forward proposals on functionality to be supported by FI-WARE. Miguel Carrillo and Axel Fassel will follow-up and push progress on tickets for this tracker. * The "FI-WARE General Support" tracker, through which Users will formulate requests for solving doubts or problems, about FI-WARE documentation as well as software. Carlos Ralli and Axel Fassel will follow-up and push progress on tickets for this tracker. Besides, Miguel Carrillo will monitor overall progress of backlog trackers in the different chapters. I'm sure you will hear about them soon. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Apr 20 13:17:58 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:17:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? In-Reply-To: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> References: <4F8E8AD3.3070607@tid.es> Message-ID: <8694_1334920680_4F9145E8_8694_16660_1_d9afebc0-193e-43bf-aa27-9049dba7a2ce@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Sorry for the delay. This just to confirm that I agree with the 2 days you proposed for the Security Chapter in the context of the planned educational sessions. 2 days to be planned between Tuesday and Thursday of each of the weeks. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 11:35 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] URGENT INPUT for educational sessions: how many days would your chapter require ? Hi all, In order to identify the needs for rooms, etc. We would like you to estimate how many days do you believe that the educational sessions on your chapter may require. Sessions per day and chapter would last about 5 net hours (with may be two breaks of about 20 mins in between). Note that the final agenda is up to you, but I guess that a pretty reasonable approach would mean having both time slots where you present Architecture and APIs and time slots where you spend time answering questions (you may bring some of them based on the tickets that we will ask UC projects to issue regarding questions on the FI-WARE Architecture) My first guess would be at least going for the following numbers: * Cloud: 2 days * Data/Context: 3-4 days * IoT: 2-3 days (closer to 3) * Apps: 2-3 days * I2ND: 2 days * Security: 2 days * Tools: 1-2 days I believe that IoT and Data/Context should agree in having one joint day just devoted to FI-WARE NGSI. I would recommend this being the first day (Monday). Please get back to me by EOB today ... otherwise, I will assume that you are fine with the numbers above. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Apr 22 08:23:10 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 08:23:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] RESPONSE FROM THE EC: Fwd: FI-WARE replanning and amendment 2 In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01E64E@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01E64E@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <4F93A3CE.6060708@tid.es> Hi all, Please find enclosed the response of our PO to the FI-WARE replanning. Besides, he responds another issue about qualification of the subcontracting of Red.es in activities linked to the Testbed. Regarding delay of the deliverables in month 12 linked to the software (deliverables Dx.2.a, D9.1.b and D9.3.a) ... the statement is that "... there is no real rescheduling. Deliverables will be submitted as they become available. There is no need to update the DoW for these points." ... so I wonder what does this means ... I guess we can stick to the plan for delivering them by end of June, though we have to rather be very strict and not allow any additional delay ... any insight ? I have sometimes heard about a rule that states that delaying delivery in 45 days is not actually considered a failure to meet a milestone from a contract point of view, but I have to confess that I have never found such a rule written anywhere ... In any case, we shall start working with the new approved schedule for the rest of the deliverables). This and other points will be addressed during the joint WPL/WPA follow-up confcall that we will have this Monday at 11:00am, so it is highly important that you attend. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE replanning and amendment 2 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:39:16 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu , Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu Dear all, Please find below my response to the proposed replanning. As is clear from the text below, this replanning may be partly due to the desire to improve communication between FI-WARE and the use case projects, and it is largely due to slippage in the schedule. The desire to improve communication between FI-WARE and the use cases is manifested in two ways: - improving overall response to tickets issued by UC projects. This issue has been discussed in the Architecture Board for a long time already. A possible bottleneck in this was already flagged in August. - setting up two full-week educational sessions. Again, this issue has been discussed in the Architecture Board for a long time already; a first request for a FI-WARE organised workshop for UC projects dates from September. The replanning has been discussed internally in the unit, with the reviewers, with other POs, and (indirectly) some of the use case projects. The problem -- as often is the case -- is to get a full overview of the situation. For instance, regarding the main point of the whole replanning, namely the delivery of the testbed, the initial proposal (April 4) was to "delay availability of the FI-WARE Testbed to month 19 (end of October) or at least month 18 (end of September)". By the way, FI-WARE month 19 is end of November, use case project month 19 is end of October. In a later email (10 April), it was mentioned that FI-WARE "may try to still keep the deadline for the FI-WARE Testbed by end of July." That sounded like an attempt could be made to keep the originally agreed delivery date, but it was very likely to fail, also taking into consideration FI-WARE's track record of adhering to delivery schedules. Again in a later email (email below of April 17), it was mentioned that the first FI-WARE release would be split in two steps, with a first set of GEs to become available by end of July, and a second set of GEs to become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. According to the Roadmap, all chapters will deliver by the end of July, except the IoT chapter. So, according to the latest information, the first major release of the FI-WARE testbed is (still) planned for end of July. Only the IoT chapter will complete the first major release at the end of September. The first major release contains features (i.e. GEs) that may or may not be needed by use case projects. Use case projects may or may not need GEs that are planned for the second major release or future releases of the FI-WARE testbed. It is not clear on what exactly the distinction first/second/future major release in the roadmap is based. In other words, why are certain GEs in the first release and others in the second? It can only be assumed that the use case projects are aware of this and that they agree with this. Anyway, it is assumed that the use cases agree with the Roadmap, also because the Architecture Board is mandated to review and sign off releases of the FI-WARE Architecture and Technical Roadmap as well as releases of the FI-WARE testbed. Also, it is assumed that FI-WARE will be able to keep its promised delivery schedule, which is a major assumption, since so far none of the FI-WARE deliverables was submitted in time. It is also assumed that the use cases have no real, immediate need for the GE software outside their implementation in the Testbed. Based on the above, it is concluded that only a small part of the FI-WARE Testbed is delayed. Therefore, the impact on the use cases is small. Thus, the whole replanning is largely an internal FI-WARE affair. So, the decision for each of the points is as follows: 1) FI-WARE GE Open Specifications (D.x.1.a), currently due in month 12, proposal: stay at month 12. Some of the specs will probably be delivered sometime in May (but always prior to educational sessions) No change. 2) GE software (Dx.2.a), accompanying Installation and Administration Guides (Dx.3.a), accompanying User and Programmers Guide (Dx.4.a), and Unit Testing Plan (D.x.5.a), currently due in month 12, proposal: delay with 2 months to month 14 (end of June). The consortium uses the argument that these deliverables should be synchronized with the availability of the physical infrastructure where they have to be deployed. In other words, delay of one implies (permissible) delay of the other. I have the feeling there is no real decision point here. It is already month 12 and these deliverables will not be submitted before the end of the month, and probably can not be submitted before the end of next month. They will come after the month 12 review, with all accompanying consequences. 3) DevComE Basic Framework (D9.1.b), API IDE Support (D9.3.a), and Application Testing and Deployment Support Tools (D9.4.a), currently due in month 12, proposal: delay with 2 months to month 14 (end of June). Again, I have the feeling there is no real option here. This means that WP9 will have delivered no official deliverables in the first year. 4) System/software engineering method for FI-WARE (D9.2.a), currently due in month 12, proposal: cancel the deliverable. The consortium argues that working on this deliverable rather makes more sense once the first release of FI-WARE has been delivered. The deliverable is rescheduled to month 18. 5) Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE (D2.5.a), currently due in month 12, proposals: cancel the deliverable (April 4 email), postpone at least to month 21 (April 4 email), postpone at least to month 18 (April 17 email). Again, keeping the original date is not a real option anymore, since work had not started 3 weeks before the deadline. The deliverable is rescheduled to month 15. 6) State of the Art Analysis ? Emerging Technologies (D2.6.a), currently due in month 12, proposals: cancel the deliverable (April 4 email), postpone at least to month 21 (April 4 email), postpone at least to month 18 (April 17 email). The deliverable is rescheduled to month 18. Related to points 1-3, there is no real rescheduling. Deliverables will be submitted as they become available. There is no need to update the DoW for these points. Points 4-6 are real changes to the schedule and must be addressed in the ongoing amendment. Related to the amendment, I have also looked into the Red.es subcontracting issue. Considering that: - Telefonica argues that these costs should be classified as OTH. The initial argument was that the Testbed will be used for dissemination. The later argument was that the Testbed will be used for collaboration with other projects and outside organisations, also via the Open Innovation Laboratory - WP10 has main objectives to "identify, describe, design, implement and operate a test-bed for FI-WARE", "to support the usage of the test-bed by the use-case projects", "to support and enrich the FI-WARE dissemination and exploitation activities through the test-bed site", and "to open up the testbed to third parties as an Open Innovation Lab from the second release of the testbed onwards, and to help, through the test-bed site, Programme Facilitation and Support in engaging SMEs and maximising their involvement in phases 2 and 3 of FI-PPP Work Programme". Therefore, the proposed subcontracting falls under WP10, which has activity type RTD. - for the record, the Open Innovation Lab falls under WP11, which has activity type RTD - expenditure not foreseen in the DoW must not by definition largely/fully be at the expense of the EU contribution - different organisations have different funding rules. Using such differences for the sole purpose to artificially inflate EU contribution must be discouraged, I have decided that two-thirds of the subcontracting amount or 127.000 Euros, whichever is lowest, is the maximum amount of EU contribution that may be spent on this subcontracting for the Testbed. All decisions are final. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:31 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO) Cc: INFSO-ICT-285248; Jose Jimenez; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Friendly reminder: FI-WARE replanning proposal Dear Arian, Just a reminder that we are awaiting for your green/red flag on the replanning of FI-WARE milestones. Our understanding is that you haven't still confirmed with all the rest of POs whether delaying deliverables in FI-WARE can be justified for the sake of the UC projects. Main justification for the replanning was the need to implement a number of measurements to improve overall communication between FI-WARE and the UC projects. Namely, these measurements being: * Improving overall response to tickets issued by UC projects (both regarding the "FI-WARE Theme/Feature/Epic Request" and the "FI-WARE General Support" trackers) by means of setting up a dedicated team to follow-up and push progress on tickets. * Setting up two full-week f2f "educational sessions" where UC projects' and FI-WARE's teams can meet together so that: * Architects and potentially members of the different FI-WARE Chapter development teams will have the opportunity to meet developers from the UC projects, elaborate on the architecture and functionality of the different FI-WARE GEs and answer their technical questions * UC project architects can present the architecture of use case scenarios, elaborating on how they plan to use FI-WARE, as to collect feedback from FI-WARE members. With this, we believe that we would be address some of the recommendations identified during the overall FI-PPP Program Review (e.g., R7 and R16). Some of the UC projects have committed to contact their POs to let them know they believe that implementation of these measurements is important, and therefore they support the proposed replanning of FI-WARE milestones. The two educational sessions have been initially programmed for the week of May 21st and the week of June 4th. An important part of the proposal is that we'll minimize the impact on milestones that are key for the UC projects, namely the delivery of FI-WARE API Open Specifications and the delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed: * regarding specifications we will keep the milestone as it was, thought some of the specs will probably be delivered sometime in May (but always prior to educational sessions) * regarding the FI-WARE Testbed, we will still keep a first delivery of the FI-WARE testbed by end of July, which will be followed by an upgrade by end of September. Despite we have already shared this with you , let me summarize the proposed re-planning as follows: * Keep delivery of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications (i.e., REST API specifications) due in month 12 since they seem to be in the critical path of UC projects and there shouldn't be so much problems delivering them on that date. Some of them may arrive sometime mid May but not later and, in any case, would be available for the educational sessions. * Delay those M12 deliverables dealing with delivery of FI-WARE GE software, accompanying guides and unit testing plan 2 months, so they are delivered on month 14 (end of June). This would also apply to deliverables linked to FI-WARE Development Support Tools also due in month 12. * Keep delivery of the FI-WARE Testbed in month 15 (end of July) but split deployment of the first FI-WARE Release into two steps, so that a first set of GEs will become available by end of July, but a second set of GEs will become available in an upgrade of the testbed to take place by end of September. Indeed, subsequent upgrades will be planned every three months after end of September, or even more frequently after each FI-WARE Sprint, following an Agile approach. What would come by end of July instead of end of September will be described in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap). Note that this split into two steps may not apply to all chapters. If no split is declared in the Technical Roadmap for a given Chapter, it means that all GEs in the first release for that chapter are planned to be available by end of July. * Delay or drop some deliverables due in month 12 whose delivery is not so critical for the programme at this moment from FI-WARE's point of view. Here our proposal was: * Dropping deliverable on "System/software Engineering Method for FI-WARE" due by month 12, since the FI-WARE consortia considers that working on this deliverable rather makes more sense once the first release of FI-WARE has been delivered. We have proposed to drop the first release of this deliverable, (keeping just two releases on months 24 and 33) * Delaying deliverables about "Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE" and "State of the Art Analysis" due by month 12 so they are post-poned to end of month 21 or at least end of month 18. Rest of deliverables due in month 12 would be kept, as well as deliverables due in any other month after month 15. Looking forward your response. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 23 11:03:19 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:03:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Webex details and powwonow In-Reply-To: <251856099.1335168177242.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl011.webex.com> References: <251856099.1335168177242.JavaMail.nobody@jsj2wl011.webex.com> Message-ID: <4F951AD7.9070008@tid.es> Hi all, Find enclosed the webex details. Powwownow is as always: PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Meeting invitation: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:02:57 +0200 From: Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 Reply-To: Webex6100 at tid.es To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Hello , Gestor i-Reunion webex6100 invites you to attend this online meeting. Topic: FI-WARE Joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Date: Monday, April 23, 2012 Time: 11:00 am, Europe Summer Time (Paris, GMT+02:00) Meeting Number: 964 319 508 Meeting Password: 1234abcD ------------------------------------------------------- To join the online meeting (Now from iPhones too!) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=193160362&UID=1281908162&PW=NYTY5M2Y2ZDAw&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D 2. Enter your name and email address. 3. Enter the meeting password: 1234abcD 4. Click "Join Now". To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=193160362&UID=1281908162&PW=NYTY5M2Y2ZDAw&ORT=MiMyMw%3D%3D ------------------------------------------------------- For assistance ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Go to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/mc 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". You can contact me at: Webex6100 at tid.es To add this meeting to your calendar program (for example Microsoft Outlook), click this link: https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/j.php?ED=193160362&UID=1281908162&ICS=MI&LD=1&RD=2&ST=1&SHA2=AO9SsKssYAMt-oZ/LjzabYaf8VUvYWbEAnG018HKtcg=&RT=MiMyMw%3D%3D The playback of UCF (Universal Communications Format) rich media files requires appropriate players. To view this type of rich media files in the meeting, please check whether you have the players installed on your computer by going to https://telefonica.webex.com/telefonica-en/systemdiagnosis.php Sign up for a free trial of WebEx http://www.webex.com/go/mcemfreetrial http://www.webex.com IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, do not join the session. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 23 11:11:57 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:11:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shared minutes for the joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Message-ID: <4F951CDD.9060508@tid.es> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H0ZSkrOPYfBF88jGf-dkM48iehw0eQsqVSF8VVVdRAY/edit -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ralli at tid.es Mon Apr 23 17:57:35 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:57:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) Message-ID: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> Dear Colleagues, Find hereby enclosed a link to the Agenda of these sessions as discussed in our conference call this morning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 File is attached too, in case you are not able to access this googledoc resources. For its preparation we have considered each chapter requested slots (#days), your preferences regarding the dates as much as possible and the number of attendees as communicated by the use-case projects so far. Please, share this link with your teams (GE owners) and let us know before tomorrow EoB any issue regarding your specific chapter sessions. In the absence of issues, this file will be shared with the use-case projects at the end of the day tomorrow. Ps. I will be subscribing WPl and WPa to the 'fiware-training' list before today EoB. Please, **be aware use-case project members are also members of that list** Thanks for your cooperation. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_Educational_Sessions.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 20788 bytes Desc: FI-WARE_Educational_Sessions.xlsx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 23 20:04:59 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:04:59 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: <22958_1335201536_4F958F00_22958_4578_1_d49a489d-ceac-467b-bb7d-17fc2b4d27ae@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> References: <22958_1335201536_4F958F00_22958_4578_1_d49a489d-ceac-467b-bb7d-17fc2b4d27ae@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> Message-ID: <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> Hi all, I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some more background. In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to the planned f2f educational sessions because: * This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping from the request of one UC project to another * During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a better synchronization with UC projects. Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be used, is provided. However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER Patrick To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers? interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [cid:part1.01070303.05040505 at tid.es] De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [cid:part8.06020109.08090906 at tid.es] De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es? Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [Instant_Mobility_logo_colored_small.png] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 4773 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Apr 23 20:52:21 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:52:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> References: <22958_1335201536_4F958F00_22958_4578_1_d49a489d-ceac-467b-bb7d-17fc2b4d27ae@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, as testbed team we are eager for info from the uc projects!!! info on how they will use the testbed as this is crucial for us to: - size the testbed, and - plan the validation phase to this extent we are planning a questionnaire to be briefly shown at each session of the educational week so that info can be gathered (basically the same we did fi-ware internally in the january week in madrid). having said that, i think, if the meeting is only to highligth scenarios it could be fine, if it is to provide or discuss more requirements over specific ge, of course not (i agree with you) as this requires different engagements and, above all, has already its support being the backlog tool. ciao, stefano 2012/4/23 Juanjo Hierro > Hi all, > > I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the > fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some > more background. > > In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to > the planned f2f educational sessions because: > > - This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping > from the request of one UC project to another > - During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that > UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to > achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to > accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that > meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who > has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a > better synchronization with UC projects. > > Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if > necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... > > Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios > during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an > introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would > definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with > us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be > used, is provided. > > However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter > teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & > FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER > Patrick To: > JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE > JIMENEZ DELGADO , > "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" > , MARGUERITE > Julie , > CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , > "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , > "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" > > > Dear Juanjo, > > > > We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during > the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers? > interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is > possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed > agenda which target a five hours session. > > Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant > Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this > is fully *complementary* to the technical sessions we expect. > > > > In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks > what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, > the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than > our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session > early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications > deliverables deadline: the end of June. > > > > Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our > proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly > profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no > more than a one day meeting. > > > > > > Best Regards > > Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE > > Instant Mobility Project Coordinators > > [image: cid:part1.01070303.05040505 at tid.es] > > > > *De :* Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es ] > *Envoy? :* mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 > *? :* GATELLIER Patrick > *Cc :* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE > Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; > Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" > *Objet :* Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting > > > > Dear Patrick, > > Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email > didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that > I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members > of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. > > It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project > apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and > June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having > a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it > was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. > We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an > obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present > to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some > questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we > are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not > only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer > questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their > envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. > Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for > the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. > > If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these > virtual meeting could take place. > > As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about > replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we > wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the > right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of > the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would > like to get your support in that respect. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > > > ------------- > > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > > website: www.tid.es > > email: jhierro at tid.es > > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: > > Dear FI-Ware colleagues, > > > > We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. > > You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB > meeting. > > To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a > tentative agenda. > > > > Could you please give us a feedback by return ? > > Many thanks > > > > Best Regards > > Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE > > Instant Mobility Project Coordinators > > > > *De :* GATELLIER Patrick > *Envoy? :* vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 > *? :* 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es? > *Cc :* 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A > ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud > *Objet :* Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting > > > > Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, > > > > During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed > between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP > technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial > for all of us. > > In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to > share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities > with respect to IM technical expectations* *as it was also explained > during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). > > > > We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the > global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services > platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and > much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. > > > > We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the > expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional > characteristics. > > > > The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in > our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of > work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the > Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) > > > > Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible > within the next month ? > > > > Many thanks, best regards > > Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE > > Instant Mobility Project Coordinators > > [image: Instant_Mobility_logo_colored_small.png] > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue Apr 24 07:32:16 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:32:16 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: References: <22958_1335201536_4F958F00_22958_4578_1_d49a489d-ceac-467b-bb7d-17fc2b4d27ae@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> Message-ID: At least from my perspective, one of the main goals of the 2 interlock sessions which have been scheduled is to conduct exactly the kind of technical discussion proposed by IM -- explain what we plan to deliver, let each UC outline their expectations from our GEs and how they would fit there architecture. So, assuming they come ready, we just might need to align the agenda accordingly. Frankly, I don't see a reason for any other kind of F2F session with them. Am I missing anything? Regards, Alex From: stefano de panfilis To: Juanjo Hierro , Cc: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 23/04/2012 09:52 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu dear juanjo, as testbed team we are eager for info from the uc projects!!! info on how they will use the testbed as this is crucial for us to: - size the testbed, and - plan the validation phase to this extent we are planning a questionnaire to be briefly shown at each session of the educational week so that info can be gathered (basically the same we did fi-ware internally in the january week in madrid). having said that, i think, if the meeting is only to highligth scenarios it could be fine, if it is to provide or discuss more requirements over specific ge, of course not (i agree with you) as this requires different engagements and, above all, has already its support being the backlog tool. ciao, stefano 2012/4/23 Juanjo Hierro Hi all, I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some more background. In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to the planned f2f educational sessions because: This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping from the request of one UC project to another During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a better synchronization with UC projects. Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be used, is provided. However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER Patrick To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers? interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es? Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue Apr 24 08:23:36 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:23:36 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) In-Reply-To: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> References: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> Message-ID: Related to this, and following up on the other thread related to IM.. I would like to suggest the following agenda for Cloud -- not sure whether other chapter might want to adopt a similar approach: 1. Overview of our GEs, general Q&A -- 4 hours 2. Each attending UC to present their expected usage of our GEs, and how they fit their end-to-end scenarios -- 2-4 hours per UC (depending on their expected usage) Thoughts? Regards, Alex From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 23/04/2012 06:57 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Colleagues, Find hereby enclosed a link to the Agenda of these sessions as discussed in our conference call this morning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 File is attached too, in case you are not able to access this googledoc resources. For its preparation we have considered each chapter requested slots (#days), your preferences regarding the dates as much as possible and the number of attendees as communicated by the use-case projects so far. Please, share this link with your teams (GE owners) and let us know before tomorrow EoB any issue regarding your specific chapter sessions. In the absence of issues, this file will be shared with the use-case projects at the end of the day tomorrow. Ps. I will be subscribing WPl and WPa to the 'fiware-training' list before today EoB. Please, **be aware use-case project members are also members of that list** Thanks for your cooperation. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx [attachment "FI-WARE_Educational_Sessions.xlsx" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Tue Apr 24 09:18:59 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:18:59 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Re: Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) In-Reply-To: References: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> Message-ID: <196264745-1335251817-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1458220139-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Alex, I definitively support your agenda. As said in another email, as Testbed Team we are building a questionnaire to support the second part of the agenda. A draft of such questionnaire to be ready on next 9 May. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Alex Glikson Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:23:36 To: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 24 11:28:30 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:28:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE Message-ID: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> Hi all, One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that have been cast clearly points to a given week. Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course Jose and me. Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we should prepare. Please cast your vote as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Tue Apr 24 12:19:48 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:19:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE In-Reply-To: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> References: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the review. I do not know how the review will be organized and what the P.O.\reviewers will expect to see, however I think that at the review the responsible of each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL or the WPA can enter into the details of each specification or tool in case of questions. My two cents Best, M. Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi all, > > One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the > dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. > > I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a > proposal to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that > purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast > your preferences: > > http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s > > > Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before > Arian comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill > the doodle poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences > cast by then, I will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it > with a proposal about a week. I may close the poll earlier than > tomorrow 16:00 if votes that have been cast clearly points to a given > week. > > Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, > so that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. > > Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE > chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. > Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of > course Jose and me. > > Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second > educational session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then > keep a week at least in between, that we may use for finishing all the > presentations we should prepare. > > Please cast your vote as soon as possible. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue Apr 24 12:26:55 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:26:55 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE In-Reply-To: <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> References: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> Message-ID: I doubt the reviewer will want details about 40+ GEs delivered in the first release, across chapters.. I definitely support the need to understand the expectations for this review (this might also influence timing). Alex From: Matteo Melideo To: Juanjo Hierro , Cc: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 24/04/2012 01:19 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Juanjo, I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the review. I do not know how the review will be organized and what the P.O.\reviewers will expect to see, however I think that at the review the responsible of each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL or the WPA can enter into the details of each specification or tool in case of questions. My two cents Best, M. Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: Hi all, One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that have been cast clearly points to a given week. Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course Jose and me. Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we should prepare. Please cast your vote as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl [attachment "matteo_melideo.vcf" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 24 12:47:04 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:47:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE In-Reply-To: <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> References: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> Message-ID: <4F9684A8.7070706@tid.es> Hi, Thanks for raising the question. I understand that the review will be focused on the presentation of the Architecture. And there will be technical presentations on each chapter. The way I would deal with them, in case a given WPL/WPA is not able to cover all details of a chapter, is that he invites those in his team he believes it is important that they attend as to address any detailed question. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 24/04/12 12:19, Matteo Melideo wrote: Dear Juanjo, I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the review. I do not know how the review will be organized and what the P.O.\reviewers will expect to see, however I think that at the review the responsible of each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL or the WPA can enter into the details of each specification or tool in case of questions. My two cents Best, M. Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: Hi all, One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that have been cast clearly points to a given week. Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course Jose and me. Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we should prepare. Please cast your vote as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 24 12:57:58 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:57:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE In-Reply-To: <4F9684A8.7070706@tid.es> References: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> <4F9684A8.7070706@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo and all, i think your approach is rather dangerous as this way we will be easily 100 people or so ... :-) for what i understood from the previous review is that they would like to see the impact of our choices. so it is important that we are able to issue such message, and this will somehoe simple as it can be derived from the educational weeks, justifying the choiches behind the ges (at least why, what, to whom). if we have just a technical review, not only it is boring (but this could be a good way to have the reviwers sleeping), but also we could miss the point that is already in the remarks: i.e. showing the impact of our choices. of course we have to show our choices but not in the detail that we need strong experts for each ge. of course i think we need to devote a pcc meeting and wlp/wpa meetings to carefully design the review agenda. ciao, stefano 2012/4/24 Juanjo Hierro > Hi, > > Thanks for raising the question. > > I understand that the review will be focused on the presentation of the > Architecture. And there will be technical presentations on each > chapter. > > The way I would deal with them, in case a given WPL/WPA is not able to > cover all details of a chapter, is that he invites those in his team he > believes it is important that they attend as to address any detailed > question. > > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > On 24/04/12 12:19, Matteo Melideo wrote: > > Dear Juanjo, > I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the > review. > I do not know how the review will be organized and what the P.O.\reviewers > will expect to see, however I think that at the review the responsible of > each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL or the WPA can > enter into the details of each specification or tool in case of questions. > > My two cents > > Best, > > M. > > Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the > dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. > > I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal to > him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I have > setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: > > http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s > > > Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian > comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle > poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I > will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about > a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that > have been cast clearly points to a given week. > > Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so > that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. > > Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE > chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. > Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course > Jose and me. > > Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational > session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at > least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we > should prepare. > > Please cast your vote as soon as possible. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing listFiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.euhttp://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 24 13:06:23 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:06:23 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Suspected Spam] Re: I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE In-Reply-To: References: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> <4F9684A8.7070706@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F96892F.30900@tid.es> On 24/04/12 12:57, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear juanjo and all, i think your approach is rather dangerous as this way we will be easily 100 people or so ... :-) Well ... come on :-) I believe this would be needed in just a few cases ... Of course, by no means, we should invite more than one additional people, let's say, by chapter. for what i understood from the previous review is that they would like to see the impact of our choices. so it is important that we are able to issue such message, and this will somehoe simple as it can be derived from the educational weeks, justifying the choiches behind the ges (at least why, what, to whom). I agree this is an important piece of what we will present there. Would be part of the technical presentations I was referring to. I agree that we may gather some input from the educational sessions, but not just them. As an example, we would have to elaborate on why we decided to go for FI-WARE NGSI and the impact we expect to achieve. if we have just a technical review, not only it is boring (but this could be a good way to have the reviwers sleeping), but also we could miss the point that is already in the remarks: i.e. showing the impact of our choices. of course we have to show our choices but not in the detail that we need strong experts for each ge. of course i think we need to devote a pcc meeting and wlp/wpa meetings to carefully design the review agenda. I guess this is more a matter of a meeting among the WPLs/WPAs rather than the PCC. We of course have to work on it as soon as we close a date for the review. Cheers, -- Juanjo ciao, stefano 2012/4/24 Juanjo Hierro > Hi, Thanks for raising the question. I understand that the review will be focused on the presentation of the Architecture. And there will be technical presentations on each chapter. The way I would deal with them, in case a given WPL/WPA is not able to cover all details of a chapter, is that he invites those in his team he believes it is important that they attend as to address any detailed question. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 24/04/12 12:19, Matteo Melideo wrote: Dear Juanjo, I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the review. I do not know how the review will be organized and what the P.O.\reviewers will expect to see, however I think that at the review the responsible of each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL or the WPA can enter into the details of each specification or tool in case of questions. My two cents Best, M. Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: Hi all, One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that have been cast clearly points to a given week. Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course Jose and me. Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we should prepare. Please cast your vote as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 24 13:16:12 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:16:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Suspected Spam] Re: I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE In-Reply-To: <4F96892F.30900@tid.es> References: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> <4F967E44.8000905@eng.it> <4F9684A8.7070706@tid.es> <4F96892F.30900@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, > Well ... come on :-) I believe this would be needed in just a few > cases ... Of course, by no means, we should invite more than one > additional people, let's say, by chapter. > :-) > > for what i understood from the previous review is that they would like > to see the impact of our choices. so it is important that we are able to > issue such message, and this will somehoe simple as it can be derived from > the educational weeks, justifying the choiches behind the ges (at least > why, what, to whom). > > > I agree this is an important piece of what we will present there. > Would be part of the technical presentations I was referring to. I agree > that we may gather some input from the educational sessions, but not just > them. As an example, we would have to elaborate on why we decided to go > for FI-WARE NGSI and the impact we expect to achieve. > agree, in fact there migth be other choices too that for sure the uc migth not be fully conscious about. in the end we are a project and a consortium with its own strategy too, isn't it? if we have just a technical review, not only it is boring (but this could > be a good way to have the reviwers sleeping), but also we could miss the > point that is already in the remarks: i.e. showing the impact of our > choices. of course we have to show our choices but not in the detail that > we need strong experts for each ge. > > of course i think we need to devote a pcc meeting and wlp/wpa meetings > to carefully design the review agenda. > > > I guess this is more a matter of a meeting among the WPLs/WPAs rather > than the PCC. We of course have to work on it as soon as we close a date > for the review. > well ... strategies should come from the pcc while wpl/wpa should implement them ... but of course what matters is that we have an agreed story to tell well before the review! ciao, stefano > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ciao, > stefano > > > 2012/4/24 Juanjo Hierro > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for raising the question. >> >> I understand that the review will be focused on the presentation of the >> Architecture. And there will be technical presentations on each >> chapter. >> >> The way I would deal with them, in case a given WPL/WPA is not able to >> cover all details of a chapter, is that he invites those in his team he >> believes it is important that they attend as to address any detailed >> question. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website: www.tid.es >> email: jhierro at tid.es >> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website: http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> On 24/04/12 12:19, Matteo Melideo wrote: >> >> Dear Juanjo, >> I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the >> review. >> I do not know how the review will be organized and what the >> P.O.\reviewers will expect to see, however I think that at the review the >> responsible of each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL >> or the WPA can enter into the details of each specification or tool in case >> of questions. >> >> My two cents >> >> Best, >> >> M. >> >> Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: >> >> Hi all, >> >> One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the >> dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. >> >> I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal >> to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I >> have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: >> >> http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s >> >> >> Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian >> comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle >> poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I >> will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about >> a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that >> have been cast clearly points to a given week. >> >> Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so >> that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. >> >> Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE >> chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. >> Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course >> Jose and me. >> >> Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational >> session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at >> least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we >> should prepare. >> >> Please cast your vote as soon as possible. >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website: www.tid.es >> email: jhierro at tid.es >> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website: http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >> situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpl mailing listFiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.euhttp://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >> situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpl mailing list >> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> >> > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 24 13:30:44 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:30:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) In-Reply-To: <196264745-1335251817-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1458220139-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <529D26AC-7CD7-428B-966D-EF692B9707E1@tid.es> <196264745-1335251817-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1458220139-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: 2012/4/24 Subject: R: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) To: Alex Glikson , fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu, "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , " fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" Dear Alex, I definitively support your agenda. As said in another email, as Testbed Team we are building a questionnaire to support the second part of the agenda. A draft of such questionnaire to be ready on next 9 May. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Alex Glikson Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:23:36 To: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Agenda for 'FI-WARE Educational Sessions' (Weeks May 21st & June 4th) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ralli at tid.es Tue Apr 24 18:00:36 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:00:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal References: Message-ID: <38F54371-EAD6-4DD2-8AD7-28E8AA4D44A0@tid.es> Dear WPl/WPa, Please, do not forget to share today this e-mail with your chapter teams. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO > Fecha: 24 de abril de 2012 17:47:32 GMT+02:00 Para: "fiware-training at lists.fi-ware.eu" > Asunto: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal Dear colleagues, Find enclosed a proposal for the above mentioned event based on all FI-PPP Use-case projects plus FI-WARE team inputs. The same event will be repeated in two different weeks or editions: May 21st-24th & June 4th-7th. The event actually comprises two threads: 'FI-WARE Architecture Educational Sessions' and 'Use-case projects Selected Scenarios'. The first edition (May 21st- 24th) will be kindly hosted by the Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW, http://www.zhaw.ch/en/zurich-university-of-applied-sciences.html). - The host is providing 3 rooms with 30 people capacity and 1 room for 45 people. - We are currently negotiating with the host a reduced attendance-fee (less than 200 euro) covering 7 Coffee-breaks service, 3 (Tue+Wed+Thu) lunches and Wifi access. Tentative agendas for both weekly events are available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 (The excel file is also attached to this mail for your convenience). The agenda shows FI-WARE chapters to be presented and, at the end of each day, there are 1.5/2h slots available for use-case projects presentations to the FI-WARE team. Requested feedback at this point: 1) All attendees are expected to add an entry to the following registration form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=2 (Sheet 'Attendees_1st Week' in the same excel file). Deadline for registration is end of next week (May 4th). 2) Each UC project available in the first week edition is expected to send an e-mail back to me with their availability for the Scenarios presentation slot. For instance, "use-case project XX is able to make its presentation at slot UC1 or UC2 etc.". I believe Envirofi, Finseny, Instant Mobility, Outsmart and SmartAgriFood UC projects will be available for both the first and second weeks edition. On the other hand, Ficontent, Finest and Safecity projects will only be available in the second edition, AFAIK. Deadline for each UC project to communicate this is end of the present week (April 27th). The second edition (June 4th - 7th) will be most probably held in Madrid (TBC). Further details are still to be confirmed and will be posted here during the present week. Thanks for your participation. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-PPP_Software_Architects_Week_20120424_v1.xls Type: application/octet-stream Size: 34304 bytes Desc: FI-PPP_Software_Architects_Week_20120424_v1.xls URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lorant.farkas at nsn.com Wed Apr 25 08:41:09 2012 From: lorant.farkas at nsn.com (Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:41:09 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal In-Reply-To: <38F54371-EAD6-4DD2-8AD7-28E8AA4D44A0@tid.es> References: <38F54371-EAD6-4DD2-8AD7-28E8AA4D44A0@tid.es> Message-ID: <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2036783ED@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> Dear Carlos, I might have found an error in the planning: I suppose either the last session to be scheduled 17:45 - 19:15, or alternatively the last 2 sessions scheduled 15:30 - 17:00 and 17:15 - 18:45. Maybe the second one is better, to give equal opportunities for the UC projects to present. Thanks & Br, Lorant From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:01 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal Dear WPl/WPa, Please, do not forget to share today this e-mail with your chapter teams. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Fecha: 24 de abril de 2012 17:47:32 GMT+02:00 Para: "fiware-training at lists.fi-ware.eu" Asunto: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal Dear colleagues, Find enclosed a proposal for the above mentioned event based on all FI-PPP Use-case projects plus FI-WARE team inputs. The same event will be repeated in two different weeks or editions: May 21st-24th & June 4th-7th. The event actually comprises two threads: 'FI-WARE Architecture Educational Sessions' and 'Use-case projects Selected Scenarios'. The first edition (May 21st- 24th) will be kindly hosted by the Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW, http://www.zhaw.ch/en/zurich-university-of-applied-sciences.html). - The host is providing 3 rooms with 30 people capacity and 1 room for 45 people. - We are currently negotiating with the host a reduced attendance-fee (less than 200 euro) covering 7 Coffee-breaks service, 3 (Tue+Wed+Thu) lunches and Wifi access. Tentative agendas for both weekly events are available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 (The excel file is also attached to this mail for your convenience). The agenda shows FI-WARE chapters to be presented and, at the end of each day, there are 1.5/2h slots available for use-case projects presentations to the FI-WARE team. Requested feedback at this point: 1) All attendees are expected to add an entry to the following registration form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=2 (Sheet 'Attendees_1st Week' in the same excel file). Deadline for registration is end of next week (May 4th). 2) Each UC project available in the first week edition is expected to send an e-mail back to me with their availability for the Scenarios presentation slot. For instance, "use-case project XX is able to make its presentation at slot UC1 or UC2 etc.". I believe Envirofi, Finseny, Instant Mobility, Outsmart and SmartAgriFood UC projects will be available for both the first and second weeks edition. On the other hand, Ficontent, Finest and Safecity projects will only be available in the second edition, AFAIK. Deadline for each UC project to communicate this is end of the present week (April 27th). The second edition (June 4th - 7th) will be most probably held in Madrid (TBC). Further details are still to be confirmed and will be posted here during the present week. Thanks for your participation. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 25 08:41:33 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:41:33 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] REMINDER: I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE In-Reply-To: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> References: <4F96723E.7080407@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F979C9D.1080804@tid.es> This is a reminder for you to cast your vote on preferred week to have the FI-WARE first year review. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:28:30 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the dates of the first year review of FI-WARE. I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal to him about weeks that are more suitable for us. For that purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences: http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle poll no later than tomorrow 16:00. With the preferences cast by then, I will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about a week. I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that have been cast clearly points to a given week. Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal. Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE chapters is mandatory. It would be rather nice that both attend. Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course Jose and me. Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational session, scheduled for the week of June 4th. I have then keep a week at least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we should prepare. Please cast your vote as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 25 08:59:28 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:59:28 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] PLEASE, REMINDER: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> References: <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F97A0D0.1010507@tid.es> I definitively need more feedback from the rest. We need to send a response to the InstantMobility project by EOB today. One further question ... Who is going to attend the FI Week and FIA in Aalborg (maybe not just you but someone who may represent you from your chapter team) ? It is true that if many of you are going to be there, it makes sense to arrange the f2f meeting they proposed there ... Question is that I'm afraid there will not be so many ... Personally, I won't be there. I also attach the .pptx with the Agenda that the InstantMobility project proposed for that f2f meeting. Looking at it, I wonder whether participation of people from any chapter other that the IoT and Data/Context Management Chapter is really needed (this may help to find a place where we can meet f2f ...) May be just the team working on apps/services composition within the Apps chapter ... I would also say that it would be interesting that someone from Security attends, but I guess it is not absolutely a must since those attending may gather security requirements and then it would be a matter of setting up a dedicated virtual session on Security ... Definitively, I don't see presence of the rest of the Apps chapter, the Cloud Chapter of the I2ND chapter as an absolute must ... Looking forward your feedback, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:04:59 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some more background. In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to the planned f2f educational sessions because: * This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping from the request of one UC project to another * During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a better synchronization with UC projects. Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be used, is provided. However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER Patrick To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers? interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [cid:part1.01070303.05040505 at tid.es] De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [cid:part29.06040304.01030806 at tid.es] De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es? Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [Instant_Mobility_logo_colored_small.png] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 4773 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Agenda-InstantMobility-FiWare-April2012.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 294791 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lorant.farkas at nsn.com Wed Apr 25 09:09:04 2012 From: lorant.farkas at nsn.com (Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:09:04 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] PLEASE, REMINDER: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: <4F97A0D0.1010507@tid.es> References: <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> <4F97A0D0.1010507@tid.es> Message-ID: <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A20367841B@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> Hi Juanjo, Thierry is on holiday, I cannot comment on his side. From the WPA perspective we also agree that we should not have f2f meetings now before the educational sessions, we simply don't have resources/time and travel budget is also a problem. For the participation in FIA from the IoT chapter side I will give you feedback later on today, WPA will not participate for sure. Thanks & Br, Lorant From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext Juanjo Hierro Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 8:59 AM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] PLEASE, REMINDER: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting I definitively need more feedback from the rest. We need to send a response to the InstantMobility project by EOB today. One further question ... Who is going to attend the FI Week and FIA in Aalborg (maybe not just you but someone who may represent you from your chapter team) ? It is true that if many of you are going to be there, it makes sense to arrange the f2f meeting they proposed there ... Question is that I'm afraid there will not be so many ... Personally, I won't be there. I also attach the .pptx with the Agenda that the InstantMobility project proposed for that f2f meeting. Looking at it, I wonder whether participation of people from any chapter other that the IoT and Data/Context Management Chapter is really needed (this may help to find a place where we can meet f2f ...) May be just the team working on apps/services composition within the Apps chapter ... I would also say that it would be interesting that someone from Security attends, but I guess it is not absolutely a must since those attending may gather security requirements and then it would be a matter of setting up a dedicated virtual session on Security ... Definitively, I don't see presence of the rest of the Apps chapter, the Cloud Chapter of the I2ND chapter as an absolute must ... Looking forward your feedback, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:04:59 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some more background. In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to the planned f2f educational sessions because: * This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping from the request of one UC project to another * During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a better synchronization with UC projects. Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be used, is provided. However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER Patrick To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers' interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es' Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators Instant_Mobility_logo_colored_small.png ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 4773 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 25 09:13:43 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:13:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: References: <22958_1335201536_4F958F00_22958_4578_1_d49a489d-ceac-467b-bb7d-17fc2b4d27ae@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F97A427.4020206@tid.es> I honestly believe that the agenda for the the educational session weeks could perfectly be arranged to meet their needs ... to me the issue simply seems to be that none of the proposed dates work for them ... From my perspective, this can only be solved by means of arranging a virtual meeting where most of us can attend, plan a f2f meeting if we find a date and venue where those from the IoT/Data/Apps-composition chapters plus maybe me or Carlos can attend OR just rearrange InstantMobility's milestones so that they can get in better sync with FI-WARE ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 24/04/12 07:32, Alex Glikson wrote: At least from my perspective, one of the main goals of the 2 interlock sessions which have been scheduled is to conduct exactly the kind of technical discussion proposed by IM -- explain what we plan to deliver, let each UC outline their expectations from our GEs and how they would fit there architecture. So, assuming they come ready, we just might need to align the agenda accordingly. Frankly, I don't see a reason for any other kind of F2F session with them. Am I missing anything? Regards, Alex From: stefano de panfilis To: Juanjo Hierro , Cc: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 23/04/2012 09:52 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ dear juanjo, as testbed team we are eager for info from the uc projects!!! info on how they will use the testbed as this is crucial for us to: - size the testbed, and - plan the validation phase to this extent we are planning a questionnaire to be briefly shown at each session of the educational week so that info can be gathered (basically the same we did fi-ware internally in the january week in madrid). having said that, i think, if the meeting is only to highligth scenarios it could be fine, if it is to provide or discuss more requirements over specific ge, of course not (i agree with you) as this requires different engagements and, above all, has already its support being the backlog tool. ciao, stefano 2012/4/23 Juanjo Hierro > Hi all, I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some more background. In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to the planned f2f educational sessions because: * This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping from the request of one UC project to another * During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a better synchronization with UC projects. Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be used, is provided. However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER Patrick To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers? interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es? Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Wed Apr 25 09:20:49 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:20:49 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] PLEASE, REMINDER: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: <4F97A0D0.1010507@tid.es> References: <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> <4F97A0D0.1010507@tid.es> Message-ID: Looking at the agenda -- I definitely think that such a workshop would be highly beneficial, to understand the bigger picture of how each of the UC projects plans to use our GEs. This might help a lot to improve collaboration between FI-WARE and UC projects. We need a common "language" -- and such a workshop can be very efficient to achieve this. I would recommend building the education sessions around such workshops. We have already booked two weeks for exactly this purpose, and I am sure we don't need more, if we plan it efficiently. For example, if we allocate 4 hours for each of the UC projects (following an agenda similar to the one proposed by IM), then we can cover all the UC projects in 4 work days (one week). Regards, Alex From: Juanjo Hierro To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 25/04/2012 09:59 AM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] PLEASE, REMINDER: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu I definitively need more feedback from the rest. We need to send a response to the InstantMobility project by EOB today. One further question ... Who is going to attend the FI Week and FIA in Aalborg (maybe not just you but someone who may represent you from your chapter team) ? It is true that if many of you are going to be there, it makes sense to arrange the f2f meeting they proposed there ... Question is that I'm afraid there will not be so many ... Personally, I won't be there. I also attach the .pptx with the Agenda that the InstantMobility project proposed for that f2f meeting. Looking at it, I wonder whether participation of people from any chapter other that the IoT and Data/Context Management Chapter is really needed (this may help to find a place where we can meet f2f ...) May be just the team working on apps/services composition within the Apps chapter ... I would also say that it would be interesting that someone from Security attends, but I guess it is not absolutely a must since those attending may gather security requirements and then it would be a matter of setting up a dedicated virtual session on Security ... Definitively, I don't see presence of the rest of the Apps chapter, the Cloud Chapter of the I2ND chapter as an absolute must ... Looking forward your feedback, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:04:59 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Hi all, I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some more background. In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to the planned f2f educational sessions because: This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping from the request of one UC project to another During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a better synchronization with UC projects. Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be used, is provided. However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER Patrick To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers? interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es? Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx[attachment "Agenda-InstantMobility-FiWare-April2012.pptx" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 4773 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ralli at tid.es Wed Apr 25 10:31:22 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:31:22 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal In-Reply-To: <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2036783ED@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> References: <38F54371-EAD6-4DD2-8AD7-28E8AA4D44A0@tid.es> <93D28BDF64839C468B848D14227151A2036783ED@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net> Message-ID: Lorant, The second slot is 17:45 - 19:15. Thanks for the correction, I'm doing it now on the googledoc. Regarding the duration, the minimum slot agreed in the AB is 1.5h but I though some UC may request a bit more discussion. Otherwise, we may adjust the two last slots (to 1,5h both) from Tuesday to Friday. Let's see. Best regards -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ El 25/04/2012, a las 08:41, Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest) escribi?: Dear Carlos, I might have found an error in the planning: I suppose either the last session to be scheduled 17:45 ? 19:15, or alternatively the last 2 sessions scheduled 15:30 ? 17:00 and 17:15 ? 18:45. Maybe the second one is better, to give equal opportunities for the UC projects to present. Thanks & Br, Lorant From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:01 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal Dear WPl/WPa, Please, do not forget to share today this e-mail with your chapter teams. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO > Fecha: 24 de abril de 2012 17:47:32 GMT+02:00 Para: "fiware-training at lists.fi-ware.eu" > Asunto: 'FI-PPP Software Architects Week' Event proposal Dear colleagues, Find enclosed a proposal for the above mentioned event based on all FI-PPP Use-case projects plus FI-WARE team inputs. The same event will be repeated in two different weeks or editions: May 21st-24th & June 4th-7th. The event actually comprises two threads: 'FI-WARE Architecture Educational Sessions' and 'Use-case projects Selected Scenarios'. The first edition (May 21st- 24th) will be kindly hosted by the Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW, http://www.zhaw.ch/en/zurich-university-of-applied-sciences.html). - The host is providing 3 rooms with 30 people capacity and 1 room for 45 people. - We are currently negotiating with the host a reduced attendance-fee (less than 200 euro) covering 7 Coffee-breaks service, 3 (Tue+Wed+Thu) lunches and Wifi access. Tentative agendas for both weekly events are available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 (The excel file is also attached to this mail for your convenience). The agenda shows FI-WARE chapters to be presented and, at the end of each day, there are 1.5/2h slots available for use-case projects presentations to the FI-WARE team. Requested feedback at this point: 1) All attendees are expected to add an entry to the following registration form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=2 (Sheet 'Attendees_1st Week' in the same excel file). Deadline for registration is end of next week (May 4th). 2) Each UC project available in the first week edition is expected to send an e-mail back to me with their availability for the Scenarios presentation slot. For instance, "use-case project XX is able to make its presentation at slot UC1 or UC2 etc.". I believe Envirofi, Finseny, Instant Mobility, Outsmart and SmartAgriFood UC projects will be available for both the first and second weeks edition. On the other hand, Ficontent, Finest and Safecity projects will only be available in the second edition, AFAIK. Deadline for each UC project to communicate this is end of the present week (April 27th). The second edition (June 4th - 7th) will be most probably held in Madrid (TBC). Further details are still to be confirmed and will be posted here during the present week. Thanks for your participation. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Apr 26 09:40:35 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:40:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: <4F97A427.4020206@tid.es> References: <22958_1335201536_4F958F00_22958_4578_1_d49a489d-ceac-467b-bb7d-17fc2b4d27ae@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <4F9599CB.9090704@tid.es> <4F97A427.4020206@tid.es> Message-ID: I share the opinion that UCP sessions in the educational week could be arranged to host the kind of workshop as proposed by Instant Mobility, as they can give more insights on their activities and how these could be better synchronized with FI-WARE. I would wait until the two educational weeks are done before planning specific f2f meetings: at that time we should have a clearer idea of what is required to further refine the interaction between FI-WARE and the UCPs. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: mercoled? 25 aprile 2012 09:14 A: Alex Glikson Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting I honestly believe that the agenda for the the educational session weeks could perfectly be arranged to meet their needs ... to me the issue simply seems to be that none of the proposed dates work for them ... From my perspective, this can only be solved by means of arranging a virtual meeting where most of us can attend, plan a f2f meeting if we find a date and venue where those from the IoT/Data/Apps-composition chapters plus maybe me or Carlos can attend OR just rearrange InstantMobility's milestones so that they can get in better sync with FI-WARE ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 24/04/12 07:32, Alex Glikson wrote: At least from my perspective, one of the main goals of the 2 interlock sessions which have been scheduled is to conduct exactly the kind of technical discussion proposed by IM -- explain what we plan to deliver, let each UC outline their expectations from our GEs and how they would fit there architecture. So, assuming they come ready, we just might need to align the agenda accordingly. Frankly, I don't see a reason for any other kind of F2F session with them. Am I missing anything? Regards, Alex From: stefano de panfilis To: Juanjo Hierro , Cc: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 23/04/2012 09:52 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ dear juanjo, as testbed team we are eager for info from the uc projects!!! info on how they will use the testbed as this is crucial for us to: - size the testbed, and - plan the validation phase to this extent we are planning a questionnaire to be briefly shown at each session of the educational week so that info can be gathered (basically the same we did fi-ware internally in the january week in madrid). having said that, i think, if the meeting is only to highligth scenarios it could be fine, if it is to provide or discuss more requirements over specific ge, of course not (i agree with you) as this requires different engagements and, above all, has already its support being the backlog tool. ciao, stefano 2012/4/23 Juanjo Hierro > Hi all, I would like to hear other's opinion. Particularly Thierry, given the fact that he is involved in the InstantMobility project and he may add some more background. In a first approach, I feel reluctant to organize a f2f meeting prior to the planned f2f educational sessions because: * This may open a "Pandora box" where we start continuously jumping from the request of one UC project to another * During a FI-PPP SB meeting in January, it was already discussed that UC projects could slightly fine-tune their scheduling if that helps to achieve a better synchronization with FI-WARE. The EC should be willing to accept it (indeed, Peter Fatelnig and Andrian Zwegers were present at that meeting and didn't object to that). After all, it is not only FI-WARE who has to be the only one fighting for re-planning in order to achieve a better synchronization with UC projects. Besides, I don't understand why one virtual meeting (or even two if necessary) couldn't work if well prepared ... Last but not least, I believe that the presentation made on scenarios during the last Architecture Board should be considered just an introduction (BTW, I have to ask for a copy of the presentation). We would definitively need that the UC projects share more elaborated scenarios with us, where a detailed description about how they envision FI-WARE could be used, is provided. However, I would like to hear other's opinions. May be your chapter teams don't have problems attending the demanded f2f meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:18:53 +0200 From: GATELLIER Patrick To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers' interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es' Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Thu Apr 26 16:37:15 2012 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:37:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] WP11 Deliverables- Action Plan Message-ID: Dear All Please find enclosed the action plan for the fulfillment of the WP11 Deliverables for the M12. First, we send you together the " 11.2 Pending tasks and tutorials" for its complementation. Be aware that for 11.2 and 11.3 most of your contributions are required to be fulfilled in the wiki (private) so in the table below you can find the appropriate direct links for that Thanks for your collaboration Juan Deliverable Section Activity Please follow the Private Link Who When 11.1 Market Analysis Market Analysis We will send around along this week the Market analysis with review tasks for each chapter regarding with their domain (Cloud, Data....) Private Document Atos 26/04/2012 All WPL review its chapter (Cloud, Data...) and maim conclusions Private Document All WP leaders 09/05/2012 D11.2 Exploitation Strategy, IPR Management and Sustainability FIWARE Exploitation Review the e-mail we sent previously with the first review of GE Business description on the 18th here All WP leaders 30/04/2012 IPR management Fill in the forge IPR section here All WP leaders fill in 30/04/2012 Sustainability Fill in. We include a first approach but we need the contribution from Test Bed part here Engineering 09/05/2012 Individual exploitation plans Review the new section here All partners 30/04/2012 D11.3 Market and Policy Awareness Market awareness We will send around along this week the first draft with review tasks for relevant partners Private Document Atos 26/04/2012 Indicated partners will review the deliverable and the main conclusions Private Document All WP leaders 09/05/2012 Identification of potential cities here All partners 09/05/2012 Identification of business associations and other bodies here All partners 09/05/2012 Commitment to host a national event here Thales 09/05/2012 Commitment to host a national event here Engineering &Telecom Italy 09/05/2012 Commitment to host a national event here SAP & DT in Germany 09/05/2012 Commitment to host a national event here Atos & Telefonica Spain 09/05/2012 Policy Awareness To fill the table Identification of relevance barriers here WP leaders 09/05/2012 Juan Bare?o Global Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation T +34 912148859 juan.bareno at atos.net Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atos.net www.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Deliverable D11.2 Pending Actions and Tutorial.docx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 56977 bytes Desc: Deliverable D11.2 Pending Actions and Tutorial.docx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 26 18:56:55 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:56:55 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Dates for the first year review In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01F732@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01F732@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <4F997E57.5080306@tid.es> FYI. From the response of Arian, I guess we should plan for the week starting June 25th. Cheers, ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Dates for the first year review Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:23:18 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Quick answer: in the last 3 weeks of June -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:22 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO) Cc: INFSO-ICT-285248; Jose Jimenez; Miguel Carrillo; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Dates for the first year review Dear Arian, We would like to know when do you plan to have the FI-WARE first-year review. This would help us to arrange trips enough in advance and also prepare for it. Based on availability of FI-WARE WPLs and WPAs, we believe that the best week for it would be the week starting June 25th. Second options could be three following weeks, starting on July 2nd, 9th and 16th. Definitively, we believe that it should be programmed after the educational sessions programmed with the UC projects (the second one will be celebrated the week of June 4th, as you may know) so that we present some insights from them. I would suggest that it starts on a Wednesday. I guess we should plan it for two days (or one and a half), then it would go Wednesday and Thursday. We guess it would take place in Brussels. Please let us know when you believe the review should be planned. In the meantime, we will work on a tentative agenda that we will send to you as soon as we have produced a draft. Of course, any input you may provide for the preparation of the agenda is more than welcome. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Apr 26 19:04:44 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:04:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Dates for the first year review In-Reply-To: <4F997E57.5080306@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01F732@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F997E57.5080306@tid.es> Message-ID: week booked! ciao, stefano 2012/4/26 Juanjo Hierro > > FYI. From the response of Arian, I guess we should plan for the week > starting June 25th. > > Cheers, > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Dates for the first year > review Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:23:18 +0200 From: > Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: > JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: > INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu , > JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , MIGUEL CARRILLO > PACHECO > > Quick answer: in the last 3 weeks of June > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es ] > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:22 AM > To: ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO) > Cc: INFSO-ICT-285248; Jose Jimenez; Miguel Carrillo; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" > Subject: Dates for the first year review > > Dear Arian, > > We would like to know when do you plan to have the FI-WARE first-year > review. This would help us to arrange trips enough in advance and also > prepare for it. > > Based on availability of FI-WARE WPLs and WPAs, we believe that the > best week for it would be the week starting June 25th. Second options > could be three following weeks, starting on July 2nd, 9th and 16th. > Definitively, we believe that it should be programmed after the > educational sessions programmed with the UC projects (the second one > will be celebrated the week of June 4th, as you may know) so that we > present some insights from them. I would suggest that it starts on a > Wednesday. I guess we should plan it for two days (or one and a half), > then it would go Wednesday and Thursday. > > We guess it would take place in Brussels. > > Please let us know when you believe the review should be planned. > In the meantime, we will work on a tentative agenda that we will send to > you as soon as we have produced a draft. Of course, any input you may > provide for the preparation of the agenda is more than welcome. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > . > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Apr 27 08:59:39 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:59:39 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: Dates for the first year review In-Reply-To: <4F997E57.5080306@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D01F732@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <4F997E57.5080306@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Juanjo, in my response to the doodle I said 'Yesifneeded' for the week you propose because I have another meeting on 27-28. So either I'll attend if the review is at the beginning of the week, or we find a different solution for I2ND chapter delegate. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: gioved? 26 aprile 2012 18:57 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Dates for the first year review FYI. From the response of Arian, I guess we should plan for the week starting June 25th. Cheers, ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Dates for the first year review Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:23:18 +0200 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Quick answer: in the last 3 weeks of June -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:22 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO) Cc: INFSO-ICT-285248; Jose Jimenez; Miguel Carrillo; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Dates for the first year review Dear Arian, We would like to know when do you plan to have the FI-WARE first-year review. This would help us to arrange trips enough in advance and also prepare for it. Based on availability of FI-WARE WPLs and WPAs, we believe that the best week for it would be the week starting June 25th. Second options could be three following weeks, starting on July 2nd, 9th and 16th. Definitively, we believe that it should be programmed after the educational sessions programmed with the UC projects (the second one will be celebrated the week of June 4th, as you may know) so that we present some insights from them. I would suggest that it starts on a Wednesday. I guess we should plan it for two days (or one and a half), then it would go Wednesday and Thursday. We guess it would take place in Brussels. Please let us know when you believe the review should be planned. In the meantime, we will work on a tentative agenda that we will send to you as soon as we have produced a draft. Of course, any input you may provide for the preparation of the agenda is more than welcome. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Apr 27 20:52:58 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:52:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting In-Reply-To: <4F9AEAB0.9070707@tid.es> References: <4F9AEAB0.9070707@tid.es> Message-ID: <4F9AEB0A.1050300@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:51:28 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: GATELLIER Patrick CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" , MARGUERITE Julie , CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA , "Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de" , "Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu" , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Patrick, Now, after discussing this internally with the different FI-WARE chapter leaders and architects, it turns out that the requested f2f meeting is not feasible. The kind of workshop you want to setup is precisely the kind of workshop that we wish to have during the educational sessions planned during the week of May 21st and the week of June 4th. As you already know, the dates for those the educational sessions were agreed at overall FI-PPP level. We in FI-WARE agreed to have two different weeks, one kind of repetition of the other, to maximize the changes that UC projects could find a suitable date. We cannot setup 8 different workshops, one per UC project. There are travel budget restrictions on one hand. Note that each of the workshops impact on the work being carried out, since chapter leads/architects as well as leaders of the different GEs will be pretty busy during the workshops, away from development activities. We have offered to have a virtual meeting that still I don't see why could not work if absolutely necessary before the programmed educational sessions. Early in January, on the other hand, FI-WARE raised during a FI-PPP SB meeting that some UC projects may need to adjust their planning to better synchronize with FI-WARE. Therefore, we thought that the EC should be flexible and allow those adjustments for the sake of the program. Peter Fatelning and Arian Zwegers were present at that SB meeting and they provided the feedback that the EC would be open and flexible to these kind of fine-tune adjustment on the planning of UC projects ... why don't you just apply that ? At the end of the day, we are just talking about a couple of weeks. If we finally go for the virtual meeting, I suggest that you setup a doodle with several dates/timeslots that are suitable on your side and we'll try to find the dates/timeslots at which we can maximize the number of attendees from FI-WARE. I would suggest to setup the doodle so that options map to times at which we can start a session of 2h30m. Therefore, we would agree on two sessions to deal with the agenda you proposed. Thanks and best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 23/04/12 19:18, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear Juanjo, We do not want to elaborate a lot on our scenarios already shown during the last Architecture Board but to exchange in details on enablers? interfaces. This technical meeting requires more interactions that it is possible to manage with a virtual meeting, especially with the proposed agenda which target a five hours session. Of course the educational sessions are relevant to improve Instant Mobility consortium knowledge on FI-Ware architecture and enablers and this is fully complementary to the technical sessions we expect. In Instant Mobility work plan, we have to define in the following weeks what can be achieved for a relevant prototype and as you are fully aware, the first week you booked for the educational session is the same one than our review so Instant Mobility partners will attend the second session early in June. This is too late regarding our technical specifications deliverables deadline: the end of June. Based on these elements, we expect that you will take into account our proposal for a face to face technical meeting which will be highly profitable for both projects and for future trials. Overall, this is no more than a one day meeting. Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [cid:part1.01070303.05040505 at tid.es] De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 18 avril 2012 20:01 ? : GATELLIER Patrick Cc : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Objet : Re: Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear Patrick, Sorry for the delay in my response. Unfortunately, the original email didn't reach me because apparently you used a wrong email address, so that I learned about its existence during the confcall with the rest of members of the FI-PPP AB that we had on Monday afternoon. It will be very difficult to arrange f2f meetings with each UC project apart from the ones we are currently planning, the weeks of May 21st and June 4th, as you are perfectly are aware of. However, the idea of having a meeting in advance was tackled during our last FI-PPP AB confcall and it was agreed to have them in the form of a virtual meeting per UC project. We can program it as long as it is needed so this should not be an obstacle. The dialogue around concrete scenarios that you would present to us during such a virtual meeting would help not only to solve some questions at that point in time, but to help preparing the f2f meetings we are planning. I remind you that during the f2f meetings, there will not only be sessions where FI-WARE will present chapters and answer questions/doubts, but also sessions where UC projects will present their envisioned architecture, around concrete and well-defined scenarios. Therefore, the proposed virtual meeting would help to prepare contents for the f2f meeting at both sides, helping to make it more effective. If you agree, we can setup a doodle with tentative dates at which these virtual meeting could take place. As you know, all this will work provided that the current proposal about replanning some milestones in FI-WARE gets accepted. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to spend the necessary resources. We believe this is the right thing to do at this moment, and this will be able to answer some of the recommendations from the overall FI-PPP Program reviewers, and we would like to get your support in that respect. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 18/04/12 15:53, GATELLIER Patrick wrote: Dear FI-Ware colleagues, We remind you of the last week mail below, still not answered. You were also informed of this request by Thierry Nagellen at the last AB meeting. To help you organizing this one day meeting, please find attached a tentative agenda. Could you please give us a feedback by return ? Many thanks Best Regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [cid:part18.05050703.09080504 at tid.es] De : GATELLIER Patrick Envoy? : vendredi 13 avril 2012 17:12 ? : 'jimenez at tid.es'; ' jhierro at tid.es? Cc : 'thierry.nagellen at orange.com'; MARGUERITE Julie; CRISTINA PE?A ALCEGA; 'Dirk.Beckmann at dlr.de'; DAUTELLE Jean-Marie; GUIMONT Arnaud Objet : Instant Mobility & FI-Ware F2F Meeting Dear FI-Ware Colleagues, During the last use case meeting, on the 26th of march, it was agreed between the UA representatives that direct F2F meetings between WP technical representatives and each UA project would be extremely beneficial for all of us. In the case of Instant Mobility, the purpose of this F2F meeting is to share with FI-Ware a common detailed understanding of the GE capabilities with respect to IM technical expectations as it was also explained during the last face to face Architecture Board in Zurich (March 29th). We are currently in the process of incorporating FI-Ware enablers in the global modeling of the Instant Mobility use cases and mobility services platform. This will of course result in the definition of a set of new and much more precise EPICS to be provided to FI-Ware. We in particular wish to have a free form dialog about these EPICS, the expected interfaces and the GE modules functional and non-functional characteristics. The FIA at Aalborg could be a good place to have such a meeting which in our view should go over most of the GE and therefore need two half days of work. We will be able to send you an architecture description of the Instant Mobility system within ten days (end of april) Can you please tell us where and when such a meeting will be possible within the next month ? Many thanks, best regards Patrick GATELLIER/Julie MARGUERITE Instant Mobility Project Coordinators [Instant_Mobility_logo_colored_small.png] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 4773 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ralli at tid.es Mon Apr 30 16:48:03 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:48:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Important: Update on the FI-PPP SW Architects event agenda. Your input is needed. Message-ID: <3B23131D-BA35-4EA1-9699-7E50B40F885B@tid.es> Dear Fi-WARE Colleagues, We have just updated the agenda combining all inputs. It is available at the same place: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdGJqeEFlblNEUkdxdkl2NW1sM0FWUUE#gid=0 Basically, we have made an overall reduction of FI-WARE slots, while increasing the presentation time for UCs. Each WPl/WPa is now expected to list the GEs to be explained at each slot and delete slots if not needed (Please, do this before Wed EoB). We suggest to prioritize those GEs that have been rated with a higher score by the UCs at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdC1zSUdlVjJ2WldESHZmZU13bTdjT3c#gid=0 Normally, we should be presenting Release1 GEs, although for some chapters delivering key functionalities afterwards other releases GEs should be included (again, those rated with a higher score by UCs in the previous link). Some specific comments: - I2ND: Now there are 5h30' available. If you are thinking to reduce hours, we suggest to cut the first slot of Tuesday, avoiding the overlap with the NGSI intro. - Cloud: Now 9h are available. Similarly, If you are thinking to reduce hours, we suggest to cut the first slot(s) of Tuesday, avoiding the overlap with the NGSI intro. You may also reduce sessions on wednesday if you prefer to save one day there. - Apps: if you want to prevent an overlap with the NGSI intro you may cut the first slot on Tuesday Note: all these modifications do not impact on the chapters daily distribution and thus does not affect your expected travel dates. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ralli at tid.es Mon Apr 30 17:15:24 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:15:24 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Guidelines for FI-WARE presentations in the 'FI-PPP SW Architectecs Week' Message-ID: <6043AC70-3CC5-4C30-BA94-905099F6E3CD@tid.es> Dear Fi-WARE colleagues, Obviously, you are completely free to present concepts or tools in any other way, such as an introduction to the chapter, etc. For instance, IoT and Data have defined a combined slot for Wednesday where NGSI will be presented before any specific GE. For the GEs presentation, find hereby a suggestion for the structure and a reference presentation duration (that may significantly change anyway): x) GE presentation (40') x.1) Overview and reference architecture (5') 1-2 slides explaining the 'Overview' and 'Reference Architecture' sections of the GE in the "D2.2 FI-WARE architecture deliverable. x.2) Basic concepts & Main Interactions (25') Slides based on 'Basic concepts' and 'Main interaction sections' of D2.2 x.3) REST APIs & tools for developers (10') Basically, list and give an overview of the functions Also, tools for developers, such as a WEB UI to configure the GE should be explained here. Note that FI-WARE D2.2 is publicly available at: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture --> FYI, we are going to propose the following input to the UC projects in their respective slots: 1 Description of Scenarios (x*20) 1.x.1 Story-line (5') 1.x.2 High level description of the architecture (15') - Diagram with all the components (& which ones are provided by the UC or not) involved in the scenario. - Role of each component and basic interactions. 2 Individual components description (technical approach, expectations, constraints) (60') 2.1 For the components to be developed by the UC: why they are domain specific & functionality in detail. 2.2 For FI-WARE components, expectations & constraints. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx