[Fiware-wpl] I NEED YOUR QUICK INPUT: Doodle poll for first year evaluation of FI-WARE

[stefano de panfilis]

dear juanjo and all,

i think your approach is rather dangerous as this way we will be easily 100
people or so ... :-)

for what i understood from the previous review is that they would like to
see the impact of our choices. so it is important that we are able to issue
such message, and this will somehoe simple as it can be derived from the
educational weeks, justifying the choiches behind the ges (at least why,
what, to whom).

if we have just a technical review, not only it is boring (but this could
be a good way to have the reviwers sleeping), but also we could miss the
point that is already in the remarks: i.e. showing the impact of our
choices. of course we have to show our choices but not in the detail that
we need strong experts for each ge.

of course i think we need to devote a pcc meeting and wlp/wpa meetings to
carefully design the review agenda.

ciao,
stefano


2012/4/24 Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>

>  Hi,
>
>   Thanks for raising the question.
>
>   I understand that the review will be focused on the presentation of the
> Architecture.   And there will be technical presentations on each
> chapter.
>
>   The way I would deal with them, in case a given WPL/WPA is not able to
> cover all details of a chapter, is that he invites those in his team he
> believes it is important that they attend as to address any detailed
> question.
>
>
>   Best regards,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
> -------------
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
> website: www.tid.es
> email: jhierro at tid.es
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>   website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>   twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
>
> On 24/04/12 12:19, Matteo Melideo wrote:
>
> Dear Juanjo,
> I am currently on holiday but I have just a trivial issue to raise on the
> review.
> I do not know how the review will be organized and what the P.O.\reviewers
> will expect to see, however I think that at the review the responsible of
> each GE or tool should participate as I do not think the WPL or the WPA can
> enter into the details of each specification or tool in case of questions.
>
> My two cents
>
> Best,
>
> M.
>
> Il 24/04/2012 11:28, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto:
>
> Hi all,
>
>   One of my Action Points was to send an email to Arian asking for the
> dates of the first year review of FI-WARE.
>
>   I have found that it may make more sense to even come with a proposal to
> him about weeks that are more suitable for us.   For that purpose, I have
> setup the following doodle poll where you can cast your preferences:
>
> http://www.doodle.com/2umpvpu8taizri4s
>
>
>   Since we have to react quickly, and formulate a proposal before Arian
> comes to us with a decision already, I would like that you fill the doodle
> poll no later than tomorrow 16:00.    With the preferences cast by then, I
> will formulate the question to Arian, accompanying it with a proposal about
> a week.    I may close the poll earlier than tomorrow 16:00 if votes that
> have been cast clearly points to a given week.
>
>   Regarding any of the weeks, I would go for Wednesday and Thursday, so
> that we can use Monday and Tuesday for rehearsal.
>
>   Attendance of at least the WPL or the WPA per each of the FI-WARE
> chapters is mandatory.   It would be rather nice that both attend.
> Besides, it is expected that Miguel and Axel will attend, plus of course
> Jose and me.
>
>   Note that I have gone for proposing weeks after our second educational
> session, scheduled for the week of June 4th.   I have then keep a week at
> least in between, that we may use for finishing all the presentations we
> should prepare.
>
>   Please cast your vote as soon as possible.
>
>   Best regards,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
> -------------
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
> website: www.tid.es
> email: jhierro at tid.es
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>   website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>   twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
> situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpl mailing listFiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.euhttp://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
> situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpl mailing list
> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
>
>


-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20120424/6298a2ea/attachment.html>