[Fiware-wpl] Portal GE?

[Juanjo Hierro]

Hi Alex,

  Answers below.  I copy the rest of WPLs and WPAs because I believe that answers are relevant to others.

On 10/02/12 08:23, Alex Glikson wrote:
Dear Juanjo,

During our last weekly call this week, a question was raised whether the Portal that we are developing for Cloud is really a Generic Enabler, in the FI-WARE sense.. In particular, do we need an open specification for it?
My initial opinion is that it is not.
For example, I'm not sure whether we really need to have a specification now that outlines the interactions between the user and the portal -- we don't want to limit ourselves to a specifc WebUI design. More importantly, such a specification would be of low interest for application developer.
Would appreciate your view on this, as this affects the upcoming M9 deliverable.


a) We don't need an open specification for a portal, you are right
b) We don't need an Architecture Description for the portal either, although I presume there will be description of Main interactions in some of the Generic Enablers where it is useful to describe how interaction with a portal would take place
c) The portal should be part of the software release delivered and should be accompanied by the corresponding guides

  Hope it helps,

-- Juanjo

Thanks,
Alex

________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20120210/dadf09a5/attachment.html>