Dear Matteo, all, Per the CA (Section 4.2.7.1 (c)): "...no Party shall be obliged to grant Access Rights to Source Code. All Access Rights to Software that is Foreground, whether for execution of the Project or for Use, shall be in the form of Limited Source Code Access." The definition of "Limited Source Code Access" is (Section 1.2): Limited Source Code Access means: (a) access to Object Code; or, where normal use of such Object Code requires an API, access to such Object Code and such API;or (b), if (a) is not available, access to Source Code if the requesting Party can demonstrate such access is Needed and in any case strictly limited to the extent Needed. To summarize, the "default" is to share binaries and APIs -- for both foreground and background. Only if there is a clear justification (e.g., integration can not be done otherwise), portions of the actual source code can be shared. In fact, this makes a lot of sense to me, because we start the project from existing assets, some of which are proprietary. And the "foreground" work is often about enhancing those assets. So, it doesn't make sense to share the "delta" if you don't share the original code base. Regards, Alex From: Matteo Melideo <matteo.melideo at eng.it> To: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL Cc: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>, "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>, "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> Date: 29/02/2012 11:44 AM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] code deliverables Dear Alex, thank you for this mail, it is extremely important to be clarified. I raised the issue during the Wp9 conference call but I just want to clarify that when I talked about source code of the Prototype deliverables I meant only the foreground knowledge (i.e. software code developed under the FI-WARE Grant) and not background one (i.e. pre-existing code). In addition to this, I did not mean to provide the software code in a public repository market as Public (PU) but in the private area of our portal marked Restricted (RE) or Confidential (CO) according to the licence and Consortium Agreement agreed policies. Best Matteo Il 28/02/2012 22:16, Alex Glikson ha scritto: Dear all, I've been asked by one of my colleagues whether partners are supposed to provide source code of deliverables. To avoid confusion and legal issues in the future, it is important to clarify that per the Consortium agreement, partners are *NOT* obliged to provide any proprietary source code. I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that exceptions are possible (when there is a clear need) -- but might require some legal formalities. Juanjo/Jose -- please, confirm/clarify. Thanks, Alex P.S. Consortium agreement can be found at https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/688/IPCA_FI-WARE_final_12th_sept_2011.pdf _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl [attachment "matteo_melideo.vcf" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20120229/c9ee4056/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy