[Fiware-wpl] Slide with proposal about resubmission

[BISSON Pascal]

Juanjo,

So I would turn things differently for the second bullet and refer to the white paper we promise to deliver to UC Projects to figure what means using our encompassing GEs and architect their stuff on the basis of one example (e.g. Smart City). No more than that and even collect additional reqts they may expressed towards it.

But this should be something done collectively and reported that way and that would not require any  change to the way Architecture of each of the chapter has been described. What was not clear in the way you presented so my reaction and why I'm asking you to change .

BR
Pascal

De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es]
Envoyé : vendredi 22 juin 2012 10:37
À : BISSON Pascal
Objet : Re: Slide with proposal about resubmission

Pascal,

  I believe this is something we definitively have to go for.   I indeed I believe is needed and is to some extend what many people was asking for when asking about some kind of "overall architecture" description.

  Be aware that this would address one of the most critical comments that the reviewers had made ("encompassing architecture").

  We don't need to cover everything in this paper.   Regarding Security, we just need to focus on describing:

 *   How OAuth will fit in the overall picture and will be used with APIs of the different GEs.   This shouldn't be much more difficult than what would mean describing how usage of REST APIs with OAuth means
 *   How the Security Monitoring GEs could play a role in order to detect security problems

  Eng, Orange, TI, IBM have told me they are Ok with the Slide

  Cheers,

-- Juanjo

-------------

Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital

website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>

email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>

twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro



FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect



You can follow FI-WARE at:

  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu

  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242

  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware

  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
On 22/06/12 10:25, BISSON Pascal wrote:
The bullet I'm referring to here is the one starting with ... enhancing the architecture with section that help ...

De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es]
Envoyé : vendredi 22 juin 2012 10:21
À : BISSON Pascal
Objet : Re: Slide with proposal about resubmission


  What is the second bullet you are referring to ?   There are too many bullets ...

  If you are reffering to the traceability issue, you saw yesterday that this was clearly something critical for reviewers' point of view and the clear way to fix it is by means of the Features, which BTW is an exercise we are already dealing with to be able to cope with the deliverable on the Unit Testing Plan.

  Cheers,

-- Juanjo

-------------

Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital

website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>

email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>

twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro



FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect



You can follow FI-WARE at:

  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu

  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242

  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware

  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
On 22/06/12 10:09, BISSON Pascal wrote:
Juanjo,

My personal viewpoint on this:

Not sure we have to go for the second bullet (also to not put too much work on us).

I will only go for things which have been already announced through comments we received and got from reviewers. And would go for only things on which we can collectively agree on (not only us and but also us with UC projects) and that we know would be achievable.
This just because apart of what they told us already they would obviously add some more.

Hope it helps you.

Best Regards,
Pascal

De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA
Envoyé : vendredi 22 juin 2012 09:58
À : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Slide with proposal about resubmission

Hi,

  I have prepared the following slide I would like to present after presentations of the pending slides on technical WPs.

  Any comment feedback is welcome:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1uNfDqP2yZ459DRsorMic5b5DbIoL0Kg0fuu2gaCtLtU/edit#slide=id.ge17ad04_1_29

  Cheers,

-- Juanjo

________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20120622/9de7361b/attachment.html>