From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 2 14:05:54 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:05:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Suspected Spam] IMPORTANT: D.2.3.1b FI-WARE architecture resubmission In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5093C532.40101@tid.es> Dear WPLs/WPAs, As announced during our last joint WPL/WPA confcall, our plan is that we will generate the deliverables linked to the FI-WARE Architecture (a single one for the whole project) and the FI-WARE Open Specifications (one deliverable per chapter) starting Tuesday November 6th early morning. Regarding the FI-WARE Architecture deliverable, we have the automated process already prepared so you can check how this deliverable may look like. Despite you have the links on the deliverables cockpit, here you are the links for your convenience: 2.3 M15 N.N. D.2.3.1b FI-WARE Architecture generated: D231b_v1_generated.zip related doc: D231b_v1_generated.docx/pdf It would be nice if you can check the actual contents being generated as to make sure that the contents of your chapter look as you expect. If not, please raise a flag. Note that you will still be able to modify the contents of the wiki pages linked to the Architecture Descriptions of Chapters and FI-WARE GEs until Monday EOB, but the contents of the final deliverable will be based on what is there on Tuesday by 08:00am. Future changes won't be captured. Best regards, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Fri Nov 2 14:30:41 2012 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 14:30:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: [Fiware-exploitation] FW: FI WARE Platform StrategyValidation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Regarding Individual exploitation plans to answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual , most of you have already completed (TID, Intel, Engineering, Technicolor, NEC, Deutsche Telekom, Alcatel, Siemens), SAP and Atos are on construction and will be uploaded during the weekend, but we miss the ones from France Telecom, Telecom Italia, IBM, Thales and Ericsson, please provide ASAP as next week we will deliver the final version of the deliverable Thanks for your collaboration Juan From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 26 de octubre de 2012 11:56 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] FW: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform StrategyValidation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I remind you to review or complete the following missing inputs and provide feedback: - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis 2410 including in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy 24 10 document, including the questions from the review , see document, one with SAP comments, in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 o Additionally please review the FI WARE Platform Value Proposition and Business Canvas in the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Overall o IPRs section has been modified by SAP and will be completed by them according to the current discussion in the review report and the ongoing discussion between the legal departments. Review key principles into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/IPR_Management o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2012 12:47 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; antonio.cimmino at alcatel-lucent.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed the following draft documents in which we are going to leverage to complete the exploitation deliverables resubmission: - Platform Strategy Market Analysis, including main regulatory concerns for 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - FI WARE Platform Strategy, based on the previous analysis and on 3rd party and Vision deliverables for 11.2 Exploitation Strategy, pending to include some inputs from Product Vision deliverable in which 2-3 examples on how FI-WARE is applied in a specific domain (take existing UC projects) will be included Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 8th November - 11.1 and 11.3 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - We will include some inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis before 29th October and we will circulate them to be validated before 5th November to deliver final versions - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy - We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy, including the questions from the review and initial Pro Forma Business Plan, with all your support and contributions on the 5th November and we will send it around to validate the final version to properly deliver on the 8th November. Actions required: Please review FI WARE Platform Strategy, initial draft version for discussion, preferably involving your business departments, leveraging on the previous Platform Strategy Analysis and on the questions from the review, and please add/modify what you consider in the document with "Track Changes" option and answer to the main questions from the review individually on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - , each industrial partner has a slot: o The objective is validate a common Platform Strategy as a whole and not as a loose collation of GEs- Agree on the value proposition o Identify the key segments, to avoid entering in the untenable situation of "FI-WARE is good for everyone and for every task"- "Two sided market"- End Users and Developers o Identify the main channels will be used to reach the various customer segments (Developers and End Users) and the marketing tools should be designed to be usable by the internal sales force. o Identify the right strategy to ecosystem management and consequently attract as much developers as we can o How , Telecom service provider, Network equipment and mobile terminal manufacturers, Software vendors, IT Providers and IT solution integrators will make money individually from FIWARE Platform? Licensing, advertising, selling apps, hosting service, increase data traffic, data storage o Provide some inputs for a pro forma analysis about potential market estimation and about initial cost estimates based on Test bed configuration - All your contributions for FI WARE Strategy definition document have to be received before next 1st November to prepare a final version to deliver before the 8th November Thanks for your contribution Juan Juan Bare?o Global Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT7164699.txt URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 5 20:03:22 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:03:22 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Delivery of SW releases - DEADLINE: Thursday Message-ID: <50980D7A.2070405@tid.es> Dear all, We need to deliver the final & complete version of Release 1. This means: * Software on SVN (or alternative methods as per the guidelines on the private wiki) * Unit Testing Plan * Admin & Install guides * User & Progrs. Manual This involves ALL WPL/WPA. We are going to give all the deliverables in the new format devised by SAP, including the GEs that were delivered months ago and not planned on the roadmap for this time. The idea is not to give increments to the reviewers but just a whole doc per WP and deliverable, containing the consolidated results of the two deliveries (the one from mid summer and the coming one). This was requested by the PO so unfortunately it is not open to discussion. This has two parts that can be addressed in parallel. * Creating the deliverable structure (I will send a separate email with details) * Creating the wiki pages with the contents of the manuals (theoretically finished) * I will re-review everything tomorrow (which means that I will completely ignore my email) * We have to see if we need to move pages from the pivate to the public wiki etc. But this is minor and can be done in minutes. The first part is basically creating the skeleton of the deliverable. It can be done in parallel, with the wiki pages we have for the manuals now. Once we have the lists of wiki pages linked here, we can generate the deliverables as many times as needed. This means that you do this work once, then no matter if you update an Installation manual, this will not change. In summary: we will put together all the work we have done so far and we have 3 days (theoretically it is already there so there is a lot of margin) , including delivery generation. Yuo can start now creating the deliverable structure following the guidelines from Thorsten that I will send in a few minutes. We will deliver chapter by chapter separately. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 5 20:13:54 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:13:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Deliverable generation for software related deliverables In-Reply-To: <50980D7A.2070405@tid.es> References: <50980D7A.2070405@tid.es> Message-ID: <50980FF2.6020302@tid.es> Dear all, Following my previous message, I send you separately the guidelines to understand and do the delivery using the new appliance created by SAP. Please work on the direct link https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/D.X.3-5.1b.submission_cockpit We are aiming at the deliverables under the table "Progress Tracking and Links D.X.3-5.1b GE Software Deliverables Cockpit " The relevant "to do list" is displayed in the beginning. It outlines every step to take in writing. Additionally Thorsten made up a recording on the process to follow, as this one is a little bit more tricky than with the open specs and introduces new things in the process (Blueprints & how to come up with "front pages"). The recording can be found here: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1526/FI-WARE_software_deliverable_front_pages.flv It will only take up 10 minutes of everybody's time, it does not intend to be formal. He briefly outlines the relevant steps & explains some of the background behind. Something useful and cosy. As regards the support you may need, you can contact Thorsten (thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com) until Thursday this week (7.11.2012) . Once he's on holidays Andreas ( Andreas.Klein at sap.com ) will be standing in for him. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 6 06:12:54 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 06:12:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: webinars on FI-WARE GE RIs Message-ID: <50989C56.3030608@tid.es> Hi all, There is a checkpoint of the project review we pretend to solve by means of announcing the series of webinars on FI-WARE GE RIs (Reference Implementations) I haven't sent the shared spreadsheet [1] to the UC projects because there were still too many rows in blank. However, I will definitively communicate this by 17:00 today, no matter if some chapters haven't provided webinar dates or not. Besides, I'm planning to send an email tomorrow to our PO and reviewers regarding status of the different checkpoints, so be aware of that. Bottom line: you have until today EOB to improve the situation of your chapter if it looks bad. One issue that was derived from not sending the spreadsheet yet is that some of you provided dates for this week (some of the webinars are announced to take place today or tomorrow :-) ... would you be so kind to provide new dates next week (i.e., starting November 12) and apologize for this change ? It basically affects the webinars on Object Storage and the ones related to the Tools chapter ... I hope you can react quickly. Best regards, -- Juanjo [1] - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDRKeUpILUxzTjNNUFZBQUhfM0U4aFE#gid=0 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ralli at tid.es Tue Nov 6 11:02:45 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:02:45 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: webinars on FI-WARE GE RIs In-Reply-To: <50989C56.3030608@tid.es> References: <50989C56.3030608@tid.es> Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F00C8D6@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Juanjo, Just updated Data/Context with the final confirmations I've got during the last days. All rows are completed for the first edition and only 3 TBC for the second edition, so I hope it is ok at this point. In our specific case, we do not have any Webinar scheduled for this week so no re-scheudule is needed. Best regards, -- ________________________________________ De: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] en nombre de Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] Enviado el: martes, 06 de noviembre de 2012 6:12 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-wpa] URGENT: webinars on FI-WARE GE RIs Hi all, There is a checkpoint of the project review we pretend to solve by means of announcing the series of webinars on FI-WARE GE RIs (Reference Implementations) I haven't sent the shared spreadsheet [1] to the UC projects because there were still too many rows in blank. However, I will definitively communicate this by 17:00 today, no matter if some chapters haven't provided webinar dates or not. Besides, I'm planning to send an email tomorrow to our PO and reviewers regarding status of the different checkpoints, so be aware of that. Bottom line: you have until today EOB to improve the situation of your chapter if it looks bad. One issue that was derived from not sending the spreadsheet yet is that some of you provided dates for this week (some of the webinars are announced to take place today or tomorrow :-) ... would you be so kind to provide new dates next week (i.e., starting November 12) and apologize for this change ? It basically affects the webinars on Object Storage and the ones related to the Tools chapter ... I hope you can react quickly. Best regards, -- Juanjo [1] - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDRKeUpILUxzTjNNUFZBQUhfM0U4aFE#gid=0 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From mcp at tid.es Tue Nov 6 12:16:11 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:16:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Effort in reporting Message-ID: <5098F17B.9030605@tid.es> Dear WPLs, Javier is circulating the draft reports asking you to fill in the details. I do not know to what extent this is clear but just in case: * The numbers we sent you are for M12-M17 (we are asking for the period M12-M18 now. But we do not have it yet) * Apart from adding the text to the report, we expect that you will complain if any of the numbers are not reasonable/justifiable and we would contact the partner to explain why they reported so much (or so little). If the deviations are reasonable, you just explain why after the figure (effort bar chart) and you do not need to contact us. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jdps at tid.es Tue Nov 6 21:54:31 2012 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:54:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Effort in reporting In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705EFB11F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <5098F17B.9030605@tid.es> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705EFB11F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705EFB810@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> According with Miguel words, please find enclosed a detail of the effort I have received from each partner. (except THALES who didn't send anything after M12) For each WP, I have included the following figures: 1.- Declared effort from M1 to M12 (First period). 2.- Received effort from M13 to M17 (third semester excluding M18, pending to be received). 3.- Received effort so far today (except M18) (whole life all the project -> M1 - M17). Effort from M1 to M12 is on NEF already. It's frozen. Effort from M13 to M17 is still in draft version. If any partner needs/wants to update its effort, it's a golden opportunity to update them with my current request about effort at M18. In order to avoid rejected effort from Commission, I suggest declare effort according with the achieved goals and the carried out work. Each WPL has to evaluate the achievements and deviations and also assess if they are reasonable. BR Javier. De: MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Enviado el: martes, 06 de noviembre de 2012 12:16 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: Effort in reporting Dear WPLs, Javier is circulating the draft reports asking you to fill in the details. I do not know to what extent this is clear but just in case: * The numbers we sent you are for M12-M17 (we are asking for the period M12-M18 now. But we do not have it yet) * Apart from adding the text to the report, we expect that you will complain if any of the numbers are not reasonable/justifiable and we would contact the partner to explain why they reported so much (or so little). If the deviations are reasonable, you just explain why after the figure (effort bar chart) and you do not need to contact us. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE - EFFORT - FOLLOW-UP -M1-M17 (WP) - DRAFT VERSION.doc.doc Type: application/msword Size: 1521664 bytes Desc: FI-WARE - EFFORT - FOLLOW-UP -M1-M17 (WP) - DRAFT VERSION.doc.doc URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Nov 7 01:01:03 2012 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 01:01:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9th November-Last Call for contributions Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I enclosed you the last draft version to review and provide some feedback or modify/include what you consider and the missing contents before this Friday 9th November EOB. In the meantime, we will continue working in the fine tuning of the deliverables during this week. Please find here attached the 3 deliverables in the Resubmission M18 folder and the missing contributions in the description below in RED https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual o FT, TI, NOKIA and THALES still pending - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o DATA and IoT still missing: Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned (TI and ENG) as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 26 de octubre de 2012 11:56 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu); 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' (jimenez at tid.es); JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA (jhierro at tid.es); Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); Nuria De-Lama Sanchez (nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu); Carmen Perea Escribano (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Sandfuchs, Thorsten (thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com); matteo.melideo at eng.it; 'Stefano de Panfilis' (Stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); Amon, Peter (p.amon at siemens.com) Subject: FW: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I remind you to review or complete the following missing inputs and provide feedback: - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis 2410 including in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy 24 10 document, including the questions from the review , see document, one with SAP comments, in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 o Additionally please review the FI WARE Platform Value Proposition and Business Canvas in the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Overall o IPRs section has been modified by SAP and will be completed by them according to the current discussion in the review report and the ongoing discussion between the legal departments. Review key principles into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/IPR_Management o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2012 12:47 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; antonio.cimmino at alcatel-lucent.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed the following draft documents in which we are going to leverage to complete the exploitation deliverables resubmission: - Platform Strategy Market Analysis, including main regulatory concerns for 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - FI WARE Platform Strategy, based on the previous analysis and on 3rd party and Vision deliverables for 11.2 Exploitation Strategy, pending to include some inputs from Product Vision deliverable in which 2-3 examples on how FI-WARE is applied in a specific domain (take existing UC projects) will be included Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 8th November - 11.1 and 11.3 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - We will include some inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis before 29th October and we will circulate them to be validated before 5th November to deliver final versions - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy - We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy, including the questions from the review and initial Pro Forma Business Plan, with all your support and contributions on the 5th November and we will send it around to validate the final version to properly deliver on the 8th November. Actions required: Please review FI WARE Platform Strategy, initial draft version for discussion, preferably involving your business departments, leveraging on the previous Platform Strategy Analysis and on the questions from the review, and please add/modify what you consider in the document with "Track Changes" option and answer to the main questions from the review individually on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - , each industrial partner has a slot: o The objective is validate a common Platform Strategy as a whole and not as a loose collation of GEs- Agree on the value proposition o Identify the key segments, to avoid entering in the untenable situation of "FI-WARE is good for everyone and for every task"- "Two sided market"- End Users and Developers o Identify the main channels will be used to reach the various customer segments (Developers and End Users) and the marketing tools should be designed to be usable by the internal sales force. o Identify the right strategy to ecosystem management and consequently attract as much developers as we can o How , Telecom service provider, Network equipment and mobile terminal manufacturers, Software vendors, IT Providers and IT solution integrators will make money individually from FIWARE Platform? Licensing, advertising, selling apps, hosting service, increase data traffic, data storage o Provide some inputs for a pro forma analysis about potential market estimation and about initial cost estimates based on Test bed configuration - All your contributions for FI WARE Strategy definition document have to be received before next 1st November to prepare a final version to deliver before the 8th November Thanks for your contribution Juan Juan Bare?o Global Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From uwe.riss at sap.com Wed Nov 7 06:43:19 2012 From: uwe.riss at sap.com (Riss, Uwe) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:43:19 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning Message-ID: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> Dear all, After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is running. I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and put up for discussion. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 7 07:54:48 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:54:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Message to UC projects regarding webinars focused on FI-WARE GEs In-Reply-To: <509A057C.20206@tid.es> References: <509A057C.20206@tid.es> Message-ID: <509A05B8.6080702@tid.es> FYI. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: IMPORTANT (AND RELATIVELY URGENT): webinars focused on FI-WARE GEs devoted to UC projects Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:53:48 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: ab at fi-ppp.eu Dear colleagues, As we already agreed during our FI-PPP AB meeting in September, it would be now the right time to plan a number of sessions, each focus on one of the available FI-WARE GE Reference Implementation (RI) products, where developers can receive a more detailed and technical tutorial about the FI-WARE GE RI product. Therefore, the FI-WARE team has planned a number of webinars that we hope the UC projects can join. You can find the dates and times scheduled for these seminars at the following shared spreadsheet in Google Docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDRKeUpILUxzTjNNUFZBQUhfM0U4aFE#gid=0 As you can imagine, agreeing on dates and times would be virtually impossible in a short time frame, so what we have adopted as an approach is to propose two dates per webinar so that you have more choices. Hopefully, one of the two dates× we propose will be suitable to you (nothing prevents you to repeat and attend both dates× if you haven't had enough :-) Contents of the two webinars would be exactly the same (so the second is not the continuation of the first). What we would need is that you fill the column associated to your project and declare how many people plan to attend the webinar at each of the proposed date×. If we found that nobody is planning to attend a given date&time and the date is approaching, we may cancel that and propose a new date. The goal is to celebrate at least two webinars per FI-WARE GE RI by end of this year. The date&time for the two webinars is already programmed for all the FI-WARE GE RIs with the exception of those in the IoT Chapter, but we plan to get the dates for FI-WARE GE RIs of this chapter along this week so please stay tuned. Now the AP to you :-) Could you please complete the information about attendance on the side of your project by EOB this Friday ? That would be rather great. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 7 08:01:56 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:01:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: announcement about the availability of final set of FI-WARE GEs Message-ID: <509A0764.2080901@tid.es> Dear colleagues, There were a number of FI-WARE GE RIs for which availability was planned this week and I would like to get a confirmation about status to see if we can finally announce their availability to UC projects. Could you please update me on their status ? * Publish/Subscribe Context Broker (implementation by TID): * IoT Gateway Protocol Adapter GE (implementation of ZigBee adapter by TI) * Secure Storage (implementation by Thales) Besides this, it is unclear to me what the status of the FI-WARE GE RI referred as "Mediator - SETHA2" from Thales is ... if this is not planned for the first release, better we drop it from the spreadsheet with are sharing with the UC projects. Please SAP (as leader of WP3) or Thales (as owner of this FI-WARE GE RI) report on status. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Wed Nov 7 09:13:12 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:13:12 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> Dear Uwe, in addition to this I was wondering if it is not the case to have a short report on the outcome of this event in Seville. BR M. P.S. Any idea when the review will be? Sorry if for any reason I missed the mail with dates. Il 07/11/2012 06:43, Riss, Uwe ha scritto: > > Dear all, > > After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should > present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of > the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since > time is running. > > I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise > and put up for discussion. > > Best regards, > > Uwe > > *Dr. Uwe Riss** > *Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP > Research Karlsruhe > > *SAP AG* | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | > Germany > > T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 > 16810936 | mailto:uwe.riss at sap.com > > www.sap.com > > > Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure > Statements:__http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx > > Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige > vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail > irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, > eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich > untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die > empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. > > This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or > otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail > in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or > distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us > immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your > cooperation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Nov 7 10:02:50 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:02:50 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> Message-ID: <509A23BA.8050306@tid.es> Dear Matteo, dear all, The review will take place on Nov 28-29 ( Beaulieu 25, Brussels, room 0/S10) It was announced by Juanjo, if I remember well. Monday, 26 and Tuesday, 27 will be the rehearsal. Best regards, Miguel El 07/11/2012 9:13, Matteo Melideo escribi?: Dear Uwe, in addition to this I was wondering if it is not the case to have a short report on the outcome of this event in Seville. BR M. P.S. Any idea when the review will be? Sorry if for any reason I missed the mail with dates. Il 07/11/2012 06:43, Riss, Uwe ha scritto: Dear all, After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is running. I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and put up for discussion. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Wed Nov 7 10:30:55 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:30:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <509A23BA.8050306@tid.es> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> <509A23BA.8050306@tid.es> Message-ID: <509A2A4F.4010902@eng.it> Dear Miguel, to whom has this been communicated? I personally cannot find any official communication about this and, in any case, it is crazy to communicate such important dates three weeks before the event!!! Despite all, in those days they have been also planned some webinars!!! BR, M. Il 07/11/2012 10:02, Miguel Carrillo ha scritto: > Dear Matteo, dear all, > > The review will take place on Nov 28-29 ( Beaulieu 25, Brussels, room > 0/S10) > > It was announced by Juanjo, if I remember well. Monday, 26 and > Tuesday, 27 will be the rehearsal. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > El 07/11/2012 9:13, Matteo Melideo escribi?: >> Dear Uwe, >> in addition to this I was wondering if it is not the case to have a >> short report on the outcome of this event in Seville. >> >> BR >> >> M. >> >> P.S. >> Any idea when the review will be? Sorry if for any reason I missed >> the mail with dates. >> >> Il 07/11/2012 06:43, Riss, Uwe ha scritto: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we >>> should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the >>> planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next >>> WPL/WPA call since time is running. >>> >>> I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may >>> revise and put up for discussion. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> *Dr. Uwe Riss** >>> *Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | >>> SAP Research Karlsruhe >>> >>> *SAP AG* | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany >>> >>> T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 >>> 16810936 | mailto:uwe.riss at sap.com >>> >>> www.sap.com >>> >>> >>> Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure >>> Statements:__http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx >>> >>> Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige >>> vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail >>> irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des >>> Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail >>> ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und >>> vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. >>> >>> This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or >>> otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail >>> in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or >>> distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us >>> immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your >>> cooperation. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpl mailing list >>> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpa mailing list >> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail:mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter:http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Nov 7 10:39:03 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:39:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware] Message to UC projects regarding webinars focused on FI-WARE GEs In-Reply-To: <509A05B8.6080702@tid.es> References: <509A057C.20206@tid.es> <509A05B8.6080702@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, very good! btw, i wonder about this term (also used during the sevilla meeting) "ge reference implementation" (GE-RI). hiomestly i think, given the definition and the current status completely misleading with respect to the original "generic enabler implementation". in fact, by definition we allow multiple implementations of the same ge and thus is which is the true ge? for instance consider the "composition editor" ge, we have already 4 different implementations of it, do you consider only one of those to be the reference? or you mean that only all the implementations coming from the fi-ware project are ge-ri. both cases i'd avopid to use such term and be back to the original naming. ciao, stefano 2012/11/7 Juanjo Hierro > > FYI. Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: IMPORTANT (AND RELATIVELY > URGENT): webinars focused on FI-WARE GEs devoted to UC projects Date: Wed, > 07 Nov 2012 07:53:48 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: > ab at fi-ppp.eu > > Dear colleagues, > > As we already agreed during our FI-PPP AB meeting in September, it would > be now the right time to plan a number of sessions, each focus on one of > the available FI-WARE GE Reference Implementation (RI) products, where > developers can receive a more detailed and technical tutorial about the > FI-WARE GE RI product. > > Therefore, the FI-WARE team has planned a number of webinars that we > hope the UC projects can join. You can find the dates and times scheduled > for these seminars at the following shared spreadsheet in Google Docs: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDRKeUpILUxzTjNNUFZBQUhfM0U4aFE#gid=0 > > > As you can imagine, agreeing on dates and times would be virtually > impossible in a short time frame, so what we have adopted as an approach is > to propose two dates per webinar so that you have more choices. Hopefully, > one of the two dates× we propose will be suitable to you (nothing > prevents you to repeat and attend both dates× if you haven't had > enough :-) Contents of the two webinars would be exactly the same (so > the second is not the continuation of the first). What we would need is > that you fill the column associated to your project and declare how many > people plan to attend the webinar at each of the proposed date×. If > we found that nobody is planning to attend a given date&time and the date > is approaching, we may cancel that and propose a new date. The goal is to > celebrate at least two webinars per FI-WARE GE RI by end of this year. > > The date&time for the two webinars is already programmed for all the > FI-WARE GE RIs with the exception of those in the IoT Chapter, but we plan > to get the dates for FI-WARE GE RIs of this chapter along this week so > please stay tuned. > > Now the AP to you :-) Could you please complete the information about > attendance on the side of your project by EOB this Friday ? That would be > rather great. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware mailing list > Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Nov 7 11:46:45 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:46:45 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <20720_1352285207_509A3C17_20720_14450_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D92B5551@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Thanks Uwe for your proposal that I can only fully support. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Riss, Uwe Envoy? : mercredi 7 novembre 2012 06:43 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning Dear all, After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is running. I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and put up for discussion. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Wed Nov 7 11:54:50 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:54:50 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <20720_1352285207_509A3C17_20720_14450_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D92B5551@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <20720_1352285207_509A3C17_20720_14450_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D92B5551@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636174B8B634@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Pascal, especially with respect to the discussions during the meeting in Seville, it would be indispensable to prepare the next review-meeting (much) better than the last one. Because of the, I am not sure that the two days for the preparation of the meeting are enough. There should be some calls before this rehearsal to clarify the key-messages before the rehearsal meeting, so that we have the two days for the fine-tuning of the details in the storyline and the presentations. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 11:47 To: Riss, Uwe; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning Thanks Uwe for your proposal that I can only fully support. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Riss, Uwe Envoy? : mercredi 7 novembre 2012 06:43 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning Dear all, After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is running. I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and put up for discussion. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Nov 7 12:34:23 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:34:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636174B8B634@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <20720_1352285207_509A3C17_20720_14450_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D92B5551@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636174B8B634@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: dear axel, full support! ciao, stefano 2012/11/7 Fasse, Axel > Dear Pascal,**** > > ** ** > > especially with respect to the discussions during the meeting in Seville, > it would be indispensable to prepare the next review-meeting (much) better > than the last one. Because of the, I am not sure that the two days for the > preparation of the meeting are enough.**** > > ** ** > > There should be some calls before this rehearsal to clarify the > key-messages before the rehearsal meeting, so that we have the two days for > the fine-tuning of the details in the storyline and the presentations.**** > > **** > > Best regards,**** > > Axel**** > > ** ** > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *BISSON Pascal > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 11:47 > *To:* Riss, Uwe; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Cc:* fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning**** > > ** ** > > Thanks Uwe for your proposal that I can only fully support. **** > > ** ** > > BR**** > > Pascal**** > > ** ** > > *De :* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *De la part de* Riss, Uwe > *Envoy? :* mercredi 7 novembre 2012 06:43 > *? :* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Cc :* fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Objet :* [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning**** > > ** ** > > Dear all,**** > > ** ** > > After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should > present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the > review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is > running.**** > > ** ** > > I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and > put up for discussion.**** > > ** ** > > Best regards,**** > > Uwe**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Dr. Uwe Riss** > *Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP > Research Karlsruhe**** > > *SAP AG* | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | > Germany**** > > ** ** > > T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 > | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com **** > > www.sap.com**** > > > Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements:* * > http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx > > Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige > vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich > erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine > Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte > benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen > Dank. > > This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or > otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in > error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of > it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the > original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 7 14:33:30 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:33:30 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <20720_1352285207_509A3C17_20720_14450_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D92B5551@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636174B8B634@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <509A632A.6020401@tid.es> Indeed annotated as item in the agenda. I plan to circulate an initial suggestion sometime tomorrow. This would allow to gather some feedback even before to the scheduled confcall so that discussion is more fruitful. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 07/11/12 12:34, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear axel, full support! ciao, stefano 2012/11/7 Fasse, Axel > Dear Pascal, especially with respect to the discussions during the meeting in Seville, it would be indispensable to prepare the next review-meeting (much) better than the last one. Because of the, I am not sure that the two days for the preparation of the meeting are enough. There should be some calls before this rehearsal to clarify the key-messages before the rehearsal meeting, so that we have the two days for the fine-tuning of the details in the storyline and the presentations. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 11:47 To: Riss, Uwe; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning Thanks Uwe for your proposal that I can only fully support. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Riss, Uwe Envoy? : mercredi 7 novembre 2012 06:43 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning Dear all, After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is running. I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and put up for discussion. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ralli at tid.es Wed Nov 7 19:15:17 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:15:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9th November-Last Call for contributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F00F11E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Juan, As we agreed in the beginning of this week I have completed the missing fields with regards to Data/Context. However, as we discussed the directives under "Security/Data" also apply. If my colleagues do send me more info I'll update the table before Friday 9th EoB as you say, otherwise consider it closed from our side. Best regards, -- ________________________________ De: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] en nombre de Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena [juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu] Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 1:01 Para: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9th November-Last Call for contributions Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I enclosed you the last draft version to review and provide some feedback or modify/include what you consider and the missing contents before this Friday 9th November EOB. In the meantime, we will continue working in the fine tuning of the deliverables during this week. Please find here attached the 3 deliverables in the Resubmission M18 folder and the missing contributions in the description below in RED https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual o FT, TI, NOKIA and THALES still pending - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o DATA and IoT still missing: Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned (TI and ENG) as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC3A4E.0D917B80] Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net [Description: Atos_Olympic_Games_Logo[1]] From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 26 de octubre de 2012 11:56 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu); 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' (jimenez at tid.es); JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA (jhierro at tid.es); Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); Nuria De-Lama Sanchez (nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu); Carmen Perea Escribano (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Sandfuchs, Thorsten (thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com); matteo.melideo at eng.it; 'Stefano de Panfilis' (Stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); Amon, Peter (p.amon at siemens.com) Subject: FW: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I remind you to review or complete the following missing inputs and provide feedback: - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis 2410 including in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy 24 10 document, including the questions from the review , see document, one with SAP comments, in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 o Additionally please review the FI WARE Platform Value Proposition and Business Canvas in the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Overall o IPRs section has been modified by SAP and will be completed by them according to the current discussion in the review report and the ongoing discussion between the legal departments. Review key principles into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/IPR_Management o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2012 12:47 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; antonio.cimmino at alcatel-lucent.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed the following draft documents in which we are going to leverage to complete the exploitation deliverables resubmission: - Platform Strategy Market Analysis, including main regulatory concerns for 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - FI WARE Platform Strategy, based on the previous analysis and on 3rd party and Vision deliverables for 11.2 Exploitation Strategy, pending to include some inputs from Product Vision deliverable in which 2-3 examples on how FI-WARE is applied in a specific domain (take existing UC projects) will be included Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 8th November - 11.1 and 11.3 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - We will include some inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis before 29th October and we will circulate them to be validated before 5th November to deliver final versions - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy - We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy, including the questions from the review and initial Pro Forma Business Plan, with all your support and contributions on the 5th November and we will send it around to validate the final version to properly deliver on the 8th November. Actions required: Please review FI WARE Platform Strategy, initial draft version for discussion, preferably involving your business departments, leveraging on the previous Platform Strategy Analysis and on the questions from the review, and please add/modify what you consider in the document with ?Track Changes? option and answer to the main questions from the review individually on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - , each industrial partner has a slot: o The objective is validate a common Platform Strategy as a whole and not as a loose collation of GEs- Agree on the value proposition o Identify the key segments, to avoid entering in the untenable situation of ?FI-WARE is good for everyone and for every task?- ?Two sided market?- End Users and Developers o Identify the main channels will be used to reach the various customer segments (Developers and End Users) and the marketing tools should be designed to be usable by the internal sales force. o Identify the right strategy to ecosystem management and consequently attract as much developers as we can o How , Telecom service provider, Network equipment and mobile terminal manufacturers, Software vendors, IT Providers and IT solution integrators will make money individually from FIWARE Platform? Licensing, advertising, selling apps, hosting service, increase data traffic, data storage o Provide some inputs for a pro forma analysis about potential market estimation and about initial cost estimates based on Test bed configuration - All your contributions for FI WARE Strategy definition document have to be received before next 1st November to prepare a final version to deliver before the 8th November Thanks for your contribution Juan [Description: Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC3A4E.0D917B80] Juan Bare?o Global Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net [Description: Description: Atos_Olympic_Games_Logo[1]] ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Nov 7 19:19:32 2012 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 19:19:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9thNovember-Last Call for contributions In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F00F11E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F00F11E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Many thanks Carlos Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO [mailto:ralli at tid.es] Sent: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 19:15 To: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9thNovember-Last Call for contributions Hi Juan, As we agreed in the beginning of this week I have completed the missing fields with regards to Data/Context. However, as we discussed the directives under "Security/Data" also apply. If my colleagues do send me more info I'll update the table before Friday 9th EoB as you say, otherwise consider it closed from our side. Best regards, -- ________________________________ De: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] en nombre de Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena [juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu] Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 1:01 Para: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9th November-Last Call for contributions Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I enclosed you the last draft version to review and provide some feedback or modify/include what you consider and the missing contents before this Friday 9th November EOB. In the meantime, we will continue working in the fine tuning of the deliverables during this week. Please find here attached the 3 deliverables in the Resubmission M18 folder and the missing contributions in the description below in RED https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual o FT, TI, NOKIA and THALES still pending - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o DATA and IoT still missing: Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned (TI and ENG) as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 26 de octubre de 2012 11:56 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu); 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' (jimenez at tid.es); JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA (jhierro at tid.es); Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); Nuria De-Lama Sanchez (nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu); Carmen Perea Escribano (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Sandfuchs, Thorsten (thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com); matteo.melideo at eng.it; 'Stefano de Panfilis' (Stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); Amon, Peter (p.amon at siemens.com) Subject: FW: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I remind you to review or complete the following missing inputs and provide feedback: - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis 2410 including in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy 24 10 document, including the questions from the review , see document, one with SAP comments, in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 o Additionally please review the FI WARE Platform Value Proposition and Business Canvas in the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Overall o IPRs section has been modified by SAP and will be completed by them according to the current discussion in the review report and the ongoing discussion between the legal departments. Review key principles into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/IPR_Management o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2012 12:47 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; antonio.cimmino at alcatel-lucent.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed the following draft documents in which we are going to leverage to complete the exploitation deliverables resubmission: - Platform Strategy Market Analysis, including main regulatory concerns for 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - FI WARE Platform Strategy, based on the previous analysis and on 3rd party and Vision deliverables for 11.2 Exploitation Strategy, pending to include some inputs from Product Vision deliverable in which 2-3 examples on how FI-WARE is applied in a specific domain (take existing UC projects) will be included Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 8th November - 11.1 and 11.3 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - We will include some inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis before 29th October and we will circulate them to be validated before 5th November to deliver final versions - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy - We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy, including the questions from the review and initial Pro Forma Business Plan, with all your support and contributions on the 5th November and we will send it around to validate the final version to properly deliver on the 8th November. Actions required: Please review FI WARE Platform Strategy, initial draft version for discussion, preferably involving your business departments, leveraging on the previous Platform Strategy Analysis and on the questions from the review, and please add/modify what you consider in the document with "Track Changes" option and answer to the main questions from the review individually on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - , each industrial partner has a slot: o The objective is validate a common Platform Strategy as a whole and not as a loose collation of GEs- Agree on the value proposition o Identify the key segments, to avoid entering in the untenable situation of "FI-WARE is good for everyone and for every task"- "Two sided market"- End Users and Developers o Identify the main channels will be used to reach the various customer segments (Developers and End Users) and the marketing tools should be designed to be usable by the internal sales force. o Identify the right strategy to ecosystem management and consequently attract as much developers as we can o How , Telecom service provider, Network equipment and mobile terminal manufacturers, Software vendors, IT Providers and IT solution integrators will make money individually from FIWARE Platform? Licensing, advertising, selling apps, hosting service, increase data traffic, data storage o Provide some inputs for a pro forma analysis about potential market estimation and about initial cost estimates based on Test bed configuration - All your contributions for FI WARE Strategy definition document have to be received before next 1st November to prepare a final version to deliver before the 8th November Thanks for your contribution Juan Juan Bare?o Global Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From ralli at tid.es Wed Nov 7 20:15:48 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:15:48 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] IMPORTANT: announcement about the availability of final set of FI-WARE GEs In-Reply-To: <509A0764.2080901@tid.es> References: <509A0764.2080901@tid.es> Message-ID: <5722AE28-1F5E-4C89-BB37-CD3D0C5554A6@tid.es> Juanjo, TID PubSub has all documents in place , the catalogue entry and has passed sanity checks. Therefore it can be announced. Best regards, El 07/11/2012, a las 08:02, "Juanjo Hierro" > escribi?: Dear colleagues, There were a number of FI-WARE GE RIs for which availability was planned this week and I would like to get a confirmation about status to see if we can finally announce their availability to UC projects. Could you please update me on their status ? * Publish/Subscribe Context Broker (implementation by TID): * IoT Gateway Protocol Adapter GE (implementation of ZigBee adapter by TI) * Secure Storage (implementation by Thales) Besides this, it is unclear to me what the status of the FI-WARE GE RI referred as "Mediator - SETHA2" from Thales is ... if this is not planned for the first release, better we drop it from the spreadsheet with are sharing with the UC projects. Please SAP (as leader of WP3) or Thales (as owner of this FI-WARE GE RI) report on status. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Nov 7 20:22:23 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 20:22:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <509A632A.6020401@tid.es> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <20720_1352285207_509A3C17_20720_14450_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D92B5551@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636174B8B634@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> <509A632A.6020401@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, thank you very important. may i suggest to circulate the review around concrete facts. one of these is the safe city poc (on 28 nigth from 1 to 4 in a freezing railway tunnel). around this we can show in a storyboard: - the catalogue, - the ge specifications (which are they, how they are improved satisfiyng the recommendations), - the way people use our technologies, - the fi-ware committment (the ibm team in israel, the tid and red.es teams in madrid and sevilla, myself in stockholm) - the exploitation routes - ... what i mean we should create attention and a have a sort of fil-rouge for the review going beyond the traditional sequence... ciao, stefano 2012/11/7 Juanjo Hierro > > Indeed annotated as item in the agenda. > > I plan to circulate an initial suggestion sometime tomorrow. This > would allow to gather some feedback even before to the scheduled confcall > so that discussion is more fruitful. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 07/11/12 12:34, stefano de panfilis wrote: > > dear axel, > > full support! > > ciao, > stefano > > > 2012/11/7 Fasse, Axel > >> Dear Pascal, >> >> >> >> especially with respect to the discussions during the meeting in >> Seville, it would be indispensable to prepare the next review-meeting >> (much) better than the last one. Because of the, I am not sure that the two >> days for the preparation of the meeting are enough. >> >> >> >> There should be some calls before this rehearsal to clarify the >> key-messages before the rehearsal meeting, so that we have the two days for >> the fine-tuning of the details in the storyline and the presentations. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Axel >> >> >> >> *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: >> fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *BISSON Pascal >> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 11:47 >> *To:* Riss, Uwe; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >> *Cc:* fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning >> >> >> >> Thanks Uwe for your proposal that I can only fully support. >> >> >> >> BR >> >> Pascal >> >> >> >> *De :* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto: >> fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *De la part de* Riss, Uwe >> *Envoy? :* mercredi 7 novembre 2012 06:43 >> *? :* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >> *Cc :* fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >> *Objet :* [Fiware-wpl] Review Agenda Planning >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should >> present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the >> review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is >> running. >> >> >> >> I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise >> and put up for discussion. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> >> >> *Dr. Uwe Riss** >> *Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP >> Research Karlsruhe >> >> *SAP AG* | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | >> Germany >> >> >> >> T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 >> | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com >> >> www.sap.com >> >> >> Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements:* * >> http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx >> >> Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige >> vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich >> erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine >> Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte >> benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen >> Dank. >> >> This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or >> otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in >> error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of >> it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the >> original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpl mailing list >> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >> >> > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing listFiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.euhttp://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Nov 7 20:26:12 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:26:12 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <509A2A4F.4010902@eng.it> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> <509A23BA.8050306@tid.es> <509A2A4F.4010902@eng.it> Message-ID: <509AB5D4.1040100@tid.es> Dear Matteo, I finally managed to get hold of Juanjo. He's telling me that it has been mentioned in WPL/WPA follow up confcalls. I knew that this was initially sent to the PCC list (attached) where Engineering is represented. I regret to hear that this did not get to you. I hope there are no more cases. The idea is a two day rehearsal (mon-tu) and a two day review (wed-thu). Best regards, Miguel El 07/11/2012 10:30, Matteo Melideo escribi?: Dear Miguel, to whom has this been communicated? I personally cannot find any official communication about this and, in any case, it is crazy to communicate such important dates three weeks before the event!!! Despite all, in those days they have been also planned some webinars!!! BR, M. Il 07/11/2012 10:02, Miguel Carrillo ha scritto: Dear Matteo, dear all, The review will take place on Nov 28-29 ( Beaulieu 25, Brussels, room 0/S10) It was announced by Juanjo, if I remember well. Monday, 26 and Tuesday, 27 will be the rehearsal. Best regards, Miguel El 07/11/2012 9:13, Matteo Melideo escribi?: Dear Uwe, in addition to this I was wondering if it is not the case to have a short report on the outcome of this event in Seville. BR M. P.S. Any idea when the review will be? Sorry if for any reason I missed the mail with dates. Il 07/11/2012 06:43, Riss, Uwe ha scritto: Dear all, After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is running. I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and put up for discussion. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE: M18 review on Nov 28-29 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:59:55 +0000 Size: 66922 URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 8 05:28:48 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:28:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting and info reharsal meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <509B3500.2070700@tid.es> Dear all, Please find enclosed the offical invitation by the EC to the M18 Review Meeting. A number of points that are relevant on the matter: * As already agreed, we will have the reharsal meeting during November 26th and November 27 in Brussels (Telefonica premises). We will start at 09:30am since there are many things to prepare. We know this will mean that many of you will have to travel on Sunday but we guess you agree is important to devote two full days to the reharsal (besides any previous confcalls preparing specific topics) * Attendance of all WPLs is mandatory both to the reharsal and the review. It is important that people that are key for the live demo we are planning to show also attend the review meeting and the rehearsal meeting at least the day before. As requested by the EC, names of people attending should be provided before November 23rd. Please let us know the list of people who, in addition to WPLs, are planning to attend the review and the reharsal meeting by November 19th. * As you see, they are asking for a draft agenda of the review this Friday 9th. We have asked for an extension to this so that we can send it by Monday EOB, given the fact that Friday is holiday in Spain and for also holiday for some of the partners (IBM - IL). Let's discuss about it off-line and get it approved during the scheduled follow-up confcall on Monday. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:43:49 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , , , , , Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: * the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; * the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; * the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; * the management procedures and methods of the project; * the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; * the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 8 06:22:22 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:22:22 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <509A2A4F.4010902@eng.it> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> <509A23BA.8050306@tid.es> <509A2A4F.4010902@eng.it> Message-ID: <509B418E.5030403@tid.es> Dear Matteo, The dates of the review meeting were decided weeks ago ... Checking previous emails it's true that the official communication by the EC seems to have been circulated only through the fiware-pcc mailing list. Despite the fiware-pcc includes representatives of companies that lead some WP, and Jose asked in the email where the dates for the review were communicated that all WPLs should attend, it's true that we should have sent an email to the fiware-wpl and fiware-wpa mailing lists. This was our fault and we apologize for that ... However, I rather believe the dates has also been commented a couple of times during the joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls ... maybe in some confcall you were not present, I don't know. Regarding conflicts with the webinars, we thought there were no particular conflicts having them in parallel to the review but, of course, there may be special cases. I believe you are on time to change this but you have to react quickly because we have asked the UC projects to provide their input by end of this week (although I'm afraid we may need to extend the deadline). Note that what is critical is that the two webinars are scheduled before the end of the year, the first during November (preferably before the review). Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 07/11/12 10:30, Matteo Melideo wrote: Dear Miguel, to whom has this been communicated? I personally cannot find any official communication about this and, in any case, it is crazy to communicate such important dates three weeks before the event!!! Despite all, in those days they have been also planned some webinars!!! BR, M. Il 07/11/2012 10:02, Miguel Carrillo ha scritto: Dear Matteo, dear all, The review will take place on Nov 28-29 ( Beaulieu 25, Brussels, room 0/S10) It was announced by Juanjo, if I remember well. Monday, 26 and Tuesday, 27 will be the rehearsal. Best regards, Miguel El 07/11/2012 9:13, Matteo Melideo escribi?: Dear Uwe, in addition to this I was wondering if it is not the case to have a short report on the outcome of this event in Seville. BR M. P.S. Any idea when the review will be? Sorry if for any reason I missed the mail with dates. Il 07/11/2012 06:43, Riss, Uwe ha scritto: Dear all, After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next WPL/WPA call since time is running. I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may revise and put up for discussion. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Thu Nov 8 09:32:13 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:32:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <509B418E.5030403@tid.es> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> <509A23BA.8050306@tid.es> <509A2A4F.4010902@eng.it> <509B418E.5030403@tid.es> Message-ID: <509B6E0D.5080107@eng.it> Nothing to say as it seems that everyone in the consortium but me and my colleagues, Davide and Paolo, know about these dates. It is definitely our fault ... BR M. P.S. I hope I will be able to move all my previous meeting\appointments fixed during the review week and be able to attend. Il 08/11/2012 06:22, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear Matteo, > > The dates of the review meeting were decided weeks ago ... > > Checking previous emails it's true that the official communication > by the EC seems to have been circulated only through the fiware-pcc > mailing list. Despite the fiware-pcc includes representatives of > companies that lead some WP, and Jose asked in the email where the > dates for the review were communicated that all WPLs should attend, > it's true that we should have sent an email to the fiware-wpl and > fiware-wpa mailing lists. This was our fault and we apologize for > that ... However, I rather believe the dates has also been commented a > couple of times during the joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls ... > maybe in some confcall you were not present, I don't know. > > Regarding conflicts with the webinars, we thought there were no > particular conflicts having them in parallel to the review but, of > course, there may be special cases. I believe you are on time to > change this but you have to react quickly because we have asked the UC > projects to provide their input by end of this week (although I'm > afraid we may need to extend the deadline). Note that what is critical > is that the two webinars are scheduled before the end of the year, the > first during November (preferably before the review). > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > On 07/11/12 10:30, Matteo Melideo wrote: >> Dear Miguel, >> to whom has this been communicated? >> >> I personally cannot find any official communication about this and, >> in any case, it is crazy to communicate such important dates three >> weeks before the event!!! >> >> Despite all, in those days they have been also planned some webinars!!! >> >> BR, >> >> M. >> >> Il 07/11/2012 10:02, Miguel Carrillo ha scritto: >>> Dear Matteo, dear all, >>> >>> The review will take place on Nov 28-29 ( Beaulieu 25, Brussels, >>> room 0/S10) >>> >>> It was announced by Juanjo, if I remember well. Monday, 26 and >>> Tuesday, 27 will be the rehearsal. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Miguel >>> El 07/11/2012 9:13, Matteo Melideo escribi?: >>>> Dear Uwe, >>>> in addition to this I was wondering if it is not the case to have a >>>> short report on the outcome of this event in Seville. >>>> >>>> BR >>>> >>>> M. >>>> >>>> P.S. >>>> Any idea when the review will be? Sorry if for any reason I missed >>>> the mail with dates. >>>> >>>> Il 07/11/2012 06:43, Riss, Uwe ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we >>>>> should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the >>>>> planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next >>>>> WPL/WPA call since time is running. >>>>> >>>>> I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may >>>>> revise and put up for discussion. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Uwe >>>>> >>>>> *Dr. Uwe Riss** >>>>> *Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | >>>>> SAP Research Karlsruhe >>>>> >>>>> *SAP AG* | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | >>>>> Germany >>>>> >>>>> T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 >>>>> 16810936 | mailto:uwe.riss at sap.com >>>>> >>>>> www.sap.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure >>>>> Statements:__http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx >>>>> >>>>> Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder >>>>> sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese >>>>> E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme >>>>> des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail >>>>> ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und >>>>> vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. >>>>> >>>>> This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, >>>>> or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this >>>>> e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, >>>>> or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us >>>>> immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for >>>>> your cooperation. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Fiware-wpl mailing list >>>>> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >>> >>> -- >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco >>> _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica >>> _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 >>> _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N >>> _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) >>> Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 >>> >>> e-mail:mcp at tid.es >>> >>> Follow FI-WARE on the net >>> >>> Website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> Twitter:http://twitter.com/Fiware >>> LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-wpa mailing list >> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 8 09:40:52 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:40:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting and info reharsal meeting In-Reply-To: <509B3500.2070700@tid.es> References: <509B3500.2070700@tid.es> Message-ID: <509B7014.4090209@tid.es> Hi, Please note that we have been told by our Travel Agencies that there may be some issues booking hotel rooms in the dates for the reharsal/review, so please try to book as soon as possible. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 08/11/12 05:28, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, Please find enclosed the offical invitation by the EC to the M18 Review Meeting. A number of points that are relevant on the matter: * As already agreed, we will have the reharsal meeting during November 26th and November 27 in Brussels (Telefonica premises). We will start at 09:30am since there are many things to prepare. We know this will mean that many of you will have to travel on Sunday but we guess you agree is important to devote two full days to the reharsal (besides any previous confcalls preparing specific topics) * Attendance of all WPLs is mandatory both to the reharsal and the review. It is important that people that are key for the live demo we are planning to show also attend the review meeting and the rehearsal meeting at least the day before. As requested by the EC, names of people attending should be provided before November 23rd. Please let us know the list of people who, in addition to WPLs, are planning to attend the review and the reharsal meeting by November 19th. * As you see, they are asking for a draft agenda of the review this Friday 9th. We have asked for an extension to this so that we can send it by Monday EOB, given the fact that Friday is holiday in Spain and for also holiday for some of the partners (IBM - IL). Let's discuss about it off-line and get it approved during the scheduled follow-up confcall on Monday. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:43:49 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , , , , , Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: * the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; * the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; * the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; * the management procedures and methods of the project; * the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; * the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Nov 8 10:01:13 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:01:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] VERY IMPORTANT - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting and info reharsal meeting In-Reply-To: <509B3500.2070700@tid.es> References: <509B3500.2070700@tid.es> Message-ID: <24335_1352365276_509B74DC_24335_588_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206D92E79FD@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Thanks for your email. Regarding live demo could you please update us and provide us with all the last details (textual description and key people to attend - they should be known by now ...). This for all to share the same ground on today status and plans. Many thanks in advance. Hearing from you. Regards, Pascal De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : jeudi 8 novembre 2012 05:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] VERY IMPORTANT - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting and info reharsal meeting Dear all, Please find enclosed the offical invitation by the EC to the M18 Review Meeting. A number of points that are relevant on the matter: * As already agreed, we will have the reharsal meeting during November 26th and November 27 in Brussels (Telefonica premises). We will start at 09:30am since there are many things to prepare. We know this will mean that many of you will have to travel on Sunday but we guess you agree is important to devote two full days to the reharsal (besides any previous confcalls preparing specific topics) * Attendance of all WPLs is mandatory both to the reharsal and the review. It is important that people that are key for the live demo we are planning to show also attend the review meeting and the rehearsal meeting at least the day before. As requested by the EC, names of people attending should be provided before November 23rd. Please let us know the list of people who, in addition to WPLs, are planning to attend the review and the reharsal meeting by November 19th. * As you see, they are asking for a draft agenda of the review this Friday 9th. We have asked for an extension to this so that we can send it by Monday EOB, given the fact that Friday is holiday in Spain and for also holiday for some of the partners (IBM - IL). Let's discuss about it off-line and get it approved during the scheduled follow-up confcall on Monday. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:43:49 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , , , , , Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; ? the management procedures and methods of the project; ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Nov 8 10:46:07 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:46:07 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [VERY IMPORTANT] Generation of Architecture and Open Specs deliverables Message-ID: <509B7F5F.5050100@tid.es> Dear all, At 15:30 we will run a final execution of the automated process for the generation of the sources (.zip) of the following deliverables: * Architecture document * Open Specs Changes after 15:30 will not be part of the deliverables. Telef?nica and SAP will take care of the generation the final .doc version of the FI-WARE Architecture document. And you will take care of the Open Specs. Each WPL must: * Upload in the cokcpit the .doc version of the Open Spec deliverable of his chapter to be submitted - DEADLINE: 17:30 * Some of you have already uploaded a doc from a previous execution of the automated generation process. It is up to you to produce and upload a new .doc version based on the .zip that will be generated at 15:30 (as you can infer, DEADLINE: 17:30) * If you have any concerns with the deadlines, send Juanjo and myself an urgent e-mail before 13:00 Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Nov 8 17:20:42 2012 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:20:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Review Agenda Planning In-Reply-To: <509B6E0D.5080107@eng.it> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C9202B0A@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <509A1818.4040008@eng.it> <509A23BA.8050306@tid.es> <509A2A4F.4010902@eng.it> <509B418E.5030403@tid.es> <509B6E0D.5080107@eng.it> Message-ID: <509BDBDA.7020306@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, I'll do my best to free these dates as well. BR Davide On 08/11/2012 09:32, Matteo Melideo wrote: > Nothing to say as it seems that everyone in the consortium but me and > my colleagues, Davide and Paolo, know about these dates. It is > definitely our fault ... > > BR > > M. > > P.S. > I hope I will be able to move all my previous meeting\appointments > fixed during the review week and be able to attend. > > > Il 08/11/2012 06:22, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: >> Dear Matteo, >> >> The dates of the review meeting were decided weeks ago ... >> >> Checking previous emails it's true that the official communication >> by the EC seems to have been circulated only through the fiware-pcc >> mailing list. Despite the fiware-pcc includes representatives of >> companies that lead some WP, and Jose asked in the email where the >> dates for the review were communicated that all WPLs should attend, >> it's true that we should have sent an email to the fiware-wpl and >> fiware-wpa mailing lists. This was our fault and we apologize for >> that ... However, I rather believe the dates has also been commented >> a couple of times during the joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls ... >> maybe in some confcall you were not present, I don't know. >> >> Regarding conflicts with the webinars, we thought there were no >> particular conflicts having them in parallel to the review but, of >> course, there may be special cases. I believe you are on time to >> change this but you have to react quickly because we have asked the >> UC projects to provide their input by end of this week (although I'm >> afraid we may need to extend the deadline). Note that what is >> critical is that the two webinars are scheduled before the end of the >> year, the first during November (preferably before the review). >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website:www.tid.es >> email:jhierro at tid.es >> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> On 07/11/12 10:30, Matteo Melideo wrote: >>> Dear Miguel, >>> to whom has this been communicated? >>> >>> I personally cannot find any official communication about this and, >>> in any case, it is crazy to communicate such important dates three >>> weeks before the event!!! >>> >>> Despite all, in those days they have been also planned some webinars!!! >>> >>> BR, >>> >>> M. >>> >>> Il 07/11/2012 10:02, Miguel Carrillo ha scritto: >>>> Dear Matteo, dear all, >>>> >>>> The review will take place on Nov 28-29 ( Beaulieu 25, Brussels, >>>> room 0/S10) >>>> >>>> It was announced by Juanjo, if I remember well. Monday, 26 and >>>> Tuesday, 27 will be the rehearsal. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Miguel >>>> El 07/11/2012 9:13, Matteo Melideo escribi?: >>>>> Dear Uwe, >>>>> in addition to this I was wondering if it is not the case to have >>>>> a short report on the outcome of this event in Seville. >>>>> >>>>> BR >>>>> >>>>> M. >>>>> >>>>> P.S. >>>>> Any idea when the review will be? Sorry if for any reason I missed >>>>> the mail with dates. >>>>> >>>>> Il 07/11/2012 06:43, Riss, Uwe ha scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> After the event in Seville should not have a clear view what we >>>>>> should present in Brussels. Therefore I suggest that we put the >>>>>> planning of the review agenda on top of the agenda of the next >>>>>> WPL/WPA call since time is running. >>>>>> >>>>>> I already sent a suggestion for an agenda to Juanjo that he may >>>>>> revise and put up for discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe >>>>>> >>>>>> *Dr. Uwe Riss** >>>>>> *Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | >>>>>> SAP Research Karlsruhe >>>>>> >>>>>> *SAP AG* | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | >>>>>> Germany >>>>>> >>>>>> T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 >>>>>> 16810936 | mailto:uwe.riss at sap.com >>>>>> >>>>>> www.sap.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure >>>>>> Statements:__http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx >>>>>> >>>>>> Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder >>>>>> sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese >>>>>> E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme >>>>>> des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail >>>>>> ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und >>>>>> vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. >>>>>> >>>>>> This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, >>>>>> or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this >>>>>> e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, >>>>>> copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please >>>>>> inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank >>>>>> you for your cooperation. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Fiware-wpl mailing list >>>>>> Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>>>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>>>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco >>>> _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica >>>> _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 >>>> _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N >>>> _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) >>>> Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 >>>> >>>> e-mail:mcp at tid.es >>>> >>>> Follow FI-WARE on the net >>>> >>>> Website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>>> Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>>> Twitter:http://twitter.com/Fiware >>>> LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>>> electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only >>>> send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico >> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send >> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 8 20:01:01 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:01:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review Message-ID: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale * First day: * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) * Second day: * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_Review_Agenda_Draft_2012-11-08.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 17627 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Nov 8 21:16:58 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 21:16:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, dear All, the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important): 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared to answer properly. 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this fact as well in the achievements session. Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to them about the project. Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible aspect into account. BR Pier ________________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale * First day: * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) * Second day: * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. From matteo.melideo at eng.it Thu Nov 8 22:02:11 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:02:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Message-ID: <509C1DD3.9080904@eng.it> I agree with all the points raised by Pier. M. Il 08/11/2012 21:16, Garino Pierangelo ha scritto: > Dear Juanjo, dear All, > > the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important): > > 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared to answer properly. > > 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this fact as well in the achievements session. > > Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to them about the project. > Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible aspect into account. > > > BR > Pier > > > > ________________________________________ > From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM > To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review > > Dear colleagues, > > Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale > > * First day: > * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse > on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab > * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. > * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. > * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) > * Second day: > * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. > * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects > > Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. > > Cheers, > > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Nov 8 22:04:06 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 22:04:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo and all, in addition to the points of pier which i fully buy (although not completely sure we should have the full consortium perhaps juanjo and jose must verify this with arian) i have the following minor points: 1. i realise there is no "official" presentation of the testbed this migth be fine, but requires some serious slides in others presentations (yours?). in this context it is important to show the current usage and effort we are doing. 2. the live demo must have a common story to tell otherwise they are difficult and boring to follow. my suggestion is to create a simple story around smart city as it was the core topic of the day in seville. 3 the exploitation day, crtically important given the questions and the push they gave in seville, should be well characterised as such. i suggest also for this day all the presentations to share the same structure and be very much conving statements instead of inspiring thougths ... ciao, stefano 2012/11/8 Garino Pierangelo > Dear Juanjo, dear All, > > the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be > relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important): > > 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a > consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and > second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA > calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although > this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out > again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared > to answer properly. > > 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously > this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find > out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this > fact as well in the achievements session. > > Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the > pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to > them about the project. > Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case > due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the > partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide > contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible > aspect into account. > > > BR > Pier > > > > ________________________________________ > From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [ > jhierro at tid.es] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM > To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; > fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review > > Dear colleagues, > > Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review > meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following > rationale > > * First day: > * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major > achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of > beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to > recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to > bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We > will also give a glimpse > on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of > FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the > launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab > * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just > about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a > vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different > stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. > * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, > to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing > them. > * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The > previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed > or not :-) > * Second day: > * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one > of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans > further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and > the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was > worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation > related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered > in the previous day. > * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight > that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and > dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC > projects > > Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so > please react quickly. > > Cheers, > > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle > persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante > dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora > abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di > darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua > distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged > information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, > printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the > intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and > advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Nov 8 22:11:33 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 21:11:33 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Message-ID: <26550_1352409094_509C2006_26550_4852_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C076708@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear Juanjo and all, I agree with Stefano that we should introduce the demo by a testbed presentation at least to introduce what we will use during the demo. For the story-board of the demo, I think we have it but it is not fully align with Smart Cities but as we have to support many UC projects I do not think this is a major point which could take lots of time. As explained before the review in Seville, we will not do the same speech during the review in Brussels especially for the exploitation part so what is really expected. Going through all individual exploitation plans would take hours and could push reviewers to ask new questions if all the exploitations plans are not aligned. Could you clarify what are your expectations regarding this point? BR Thierry De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : jeudi 8 novembre 2012 22:04 ? : Garino Pierangelo Cc : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review dear juanjo and all, in addition to the points of pier which i fully buy (although not completely sure we should have the full consortium perhaps juanjo and jose must verify this with arian) i have the following minor points: 1. i realise there is no "official" presentation of the testbed this migth be fine, but requires some serious slides in others presentations (yours?). in this context it is important to show the current usage and effort we are doing. 2. the live demo must have a common story to tell otherwise they are difficult and boring to follow. my suggestion is to create a simple story around smart city as it was the core topic of the day in seville. 3 the exploitation day, crtically important given the questions and the push they gave in seville, should be well characterised as such. i suggest also for this day all the presentations to share the same structure and be very much conving statements instead of inspiring thougths ... ciao, stefano 2012/11/8 Garino Pierangelo > Dear Juanjo, dear All, the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important): 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared to answer properly. 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this fact as well in the achievements session. Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to them about the project. Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible aspect into account. BR Pier ________________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale * First day: * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) * Second day: * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Fri Nov 9 00:13:10 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:13:10 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Message-ID: <509C3C86.40203@eng.it> Juanjo hi, in addition to Wp10, I do not see any presentation planned also for the Wp9 and this is a very good news. Concerning my presence at the review, it is most likely I will be able to be there on Monday early afternoon, not early. I cannot move previous family commitments. BR, M. Il 08/11/2012 20:01, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Dear colleagues, > > Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project > Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the > following rationale > > * First day: > o First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying > major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE > Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) > and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to > bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the > project to a state where we have recover from major issues. > We will also give a glimpse > on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further > integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the > second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab > o Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not > just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate > that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the > needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application > providers and end users. > o Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different > checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made > good progress addressing them. > o What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. > The previous points are the ones which will determine whether > we will succeed or not :-) > * Second day: > o Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as > one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on > exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in > that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out > this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the > second day covering the business and exploitation related > aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages > delivered in the previous day. > o Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably > highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, > communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new > processes established with UC projects > > > Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, > so please react quickly. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 06:37:41 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:37:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Message-ID: <509C96A5.5060305@tid.es> On 08/11/12 21:16, Garino Pierangelo wrote: > Dear Juanjo, dear All, > > the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important): > > 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared to answer properly. Good point, we will prepare a risk plan where we will incorporate a description of a) some measurements that we have taken and b) measurements that we plan to put in place > > 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this fact as well in the achievements session. I was planning to provide a quick report on Open Calls during the first slot of the Agenda (Summary of Status). Just two slides, one per Open Call. However, thanks for reminding us that we shouldn't forget this point. You are absolutely right. > > Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to them about the project. > Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible aspect into account. I will send an email to Arian regarding this point and let's see how he reacts. I'm a bit worried that this would mean little reaction from other partners since we would be ask them to attend a little bit late, but it's true that, on the other hand, traveling would not be so difficult/expensive for some of them coming from countries that have a reasonable train or car connection. Best regards, -- Juanjo > > > BR > Pier > > > > ________________________________________ > From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM > To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review > > Dear colleagues, > > Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale > > * First day: > * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse > on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab > * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. > * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. > * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) > * Second day: > * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. > * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects > > Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. > > Cheers, > > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > > . > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 06:39:08 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:39:08 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Holiday in Madrid Message-ID: <509C96FC.10105@tid.es> Dear colleagues, Please note that today is holiday in Madrid so neither Miguel, nor Carlos nor me will react so quickly to any message. However, Miguel and me will be relatively online and connect from time to time because we are working in finalizing the official submission of some of the deliverables. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 07:28:38 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:28:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> Message-ID: <509CA296.5040408@tid.es> On 08/11/12 22:04, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear juanjo and all, in addition to the points of pier which i fully buy (although not completely sure we should have the full consortium perhaps juanjo and jose must verify this with arian) i have the following minor points: 1. i realise there is no "official" presentation of the testbed this migth be fine, but requires some serious slides in others presentations (yours?). in this context it is important to show the current usage and effort we are doing. Note that there is a checkpoint (checkpoint 5) where we should address a full presentation of what has been made regarding the FI-WARE Testbed. An URL with the whole set of checkpoints is available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/179ZoOb14Jcv7UQ2w7TGIvQHXfmVPi8GCHuGljQ80HWM/edit My plan was to discuss on our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall who may take care of producing the slides linked to each check point. They should plan to present those slides during the first slot of the agenda (that way, it would be more dynamic and not just Jose or me talking during 45 mins). I can anticipate to you (Stefano) that I would kindly ask you to work on the set of slides regarding checkpoint 5. 2. the live demo must have a common story to tell otherwise they are difficult and boring to follow. my suggestion is to create a simple story around smart city as it was the core topic of the day in seville. We have already designed such story. It will incorporate the ability to show the integration of GEs coming from the Cloud, Apps, Data and IoT chapters. We have been working on the matter and several confcalls have taken place on the matter (besides working meeting involving the teams that are actually developing the application-specific aspects of the demo) The demo is about a multi-tenant application, provided as a Service, that manages maintenance of vending machines distributed in several locations across a city. It is a workforce management system to some extend. We show how: * The application provider can rely on Cloud capabilities can be used to host the VMs and the Object Storage (e.g., photos of vending machines taken in the field as to ease location or report on any damage) that the application requires * The application provider can rely on capabilities of the Apps Business framework to deal with publication of the application supporting the ambitioned business model * Developers can build the application using mashup technologies so that part of its UI is configurable and can be enriched with services coming from third application providers. * The application can be acquired and configured by a customer (typically the company dealing with maintenance of a given network of vending machines) * The application will rely at runtime on FI-WARE GEs coming from different chapters, and we will demo their interaction at runtime: * We will be able to show how contextual information (status of vending machines, status of technicians in the field, etc) is gathered at runtime through an application-specific instance of the Pub/Sub Context Broker GE and offered to the application using the FI-WARE NGSI Restful API. Of course, interaction with the IoT world will be mostly simulated (with the exception of the last bullet of this list) but we will illustrate the feasibility. * We will show how the application connects to two global services (i.e., services being offered globally to multiple applications not just the one of the demo), one based on an instance of the FI-WARE Mediator GE that enables to send SMS, and another one based on the FI-WARE Location GE to locate technicians and/or their vans (despite we are not sure yet whether we will be able to show this last one working in the demo). * We will show how technicians can actuate on some real devices (located in Telecom Italia labs in Turin) using services provided by IoT Gateway GEs. Those technicians would be able to switch on or turn off of a vending machine which will be simulated by the switch on and switch off of a real device in Turin. * A customer will be able to enrich the application with services coming out from other applications using WireCloud mashup capabilities * If we have time, we will show how a technician would be able to upload photos of a given vending machine to the application's Object Storage. We wondered whether we could show something on Security Monitoring, but we are waiting for feedback from Thales in this respect. We will also elaborate on how other GEs could be incorporated to enrich the application (this to be shown as plans from the developer or application provider to enrich its offering): * use of the CEP GE to detect some scenarios and perform some action (i.e., reboot a vending machine or display some advertising in the vending machine) * use of the Compressed Domain Video Analysis GE to capture and process video of customers in front of a vending machine to display context-aware advertising (e.g., if the customer is female or he is fat) * use of the BigData Analysis GE to be able to gather statistical data and analyze it to find out what are the most suitable products to be placed in the vending machines. Also to combine statistics about actual consumption of vending machines and mobility of people in the city. * demo how future Security Access Control GE can be used to ensure only proper access is allowed. It is true that the demoscript is not about SmartCities, but it would be easy to extrapolate how it would map into similar applications relevant to the Smart Cities (e.g,, maintenance of urban furniture or buildings, or cleaning services). In this respect, I believe it is not bad to show that FI-WARE is not just tailored to smart cities (we are maybe over emphasizing this when we talk about exploitation plans) We have been working on a demoscript document (with screenshots and messages) since several weeks now and we plan to distribute it among reviewers during the project review. We plan to have a first but rather complete draft of the demoscript ready for distribution by monday. 3 the exploitation day, crtically important given the questions and the push they gave in seville, should be well characterised as such. i suggest also for this day all the presentations to share the same structure and be very much conving statements instead of inspiring thougths ... Do you believe that we should address checkpoint 10 once again ? What certainly needs to cover is checkpoint 11 and there we should prepare well the answer. Let's discuss than during our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo ciao, stefano 2012/11/8 Garino Pierangelo > Dear Juanjo, dear All, the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important): 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared to answer properly. 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this fact as well in the achievements session. Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to them about the project. Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible aspect into account. BR Pier ________________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale * First day: * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) * Second day: * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 07:37:39 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:37:39 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509CA296.5040408@tid.es> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> <509CA296.5040408@tid.es> Message-ID: <509CA4B3.1080108@tid.es> On 09/11/12 07:28, Juanjo Hierro wrote: We will also elaborate on how other GEs could be incorporated to enrich the application (this to be shown as plans from the developer or application provider to enrich its offering): * use of the CEP GE to detect some scenarios and perform some action (i.e., reboot a vending machine or display some advertising in the vending machine) * use of the Compressed Domain Video Analysis GE to capture and process video of customers in front of a vending machine to display context-aware advertising (e.g., if the customer is female or he is fat) * use of the BigData Analysis GE to be able to gather statistical data and analyze it to find out what are the most suitable products to be placed in the vending machines. Also to combine statistics about actual consumption of vending machines and mobility of people in the city. * demo how future Security Access Control GE can be used to ensure only proper access is allowed. We will also elaborate on the application provider/developer plans to: * optimize traffing in its application, taking advantage of IoT Gateway Data Handling GEs as to ensure that some Complex Event Processing takes place closer to the devices. (other ideas about what we could incorporate to this application provider's plan, by means of adding some other FI-WARE GEs is welcome. Cheers, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 07:37:54 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:37:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509CA296.5040408@tid.es> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> <509CA296.5040408@tid.es> Message-ID: <509CA4C2.2040206@tid.es> On 09/11/12 07:28, Juanjo Hierro wrote: We will also elaborate on how other GEs could be incorporated to enrich the application (this to be shown as plans from the developer or application provider to enrich its offering): * use of the CEP GE to detect some scenarios and perform some action (i.e., reboot a vending machine or display some advertising in the vending machine) * use of the Compressed Domain Video Analysis GE to capture and process video of customers in front of a vending machine to display context-aware advertising (e.g., if the customer is female or he is fat) * use of the BigData Analysis GE to be able to gather statistical data and analyze it to find out what are the most suitable products to be placed in the vending machines. Also to combine statistics about actual consumption of vending machines and mobility of people in the city. * demo how future Security Access Control GE can be used to ensure only proper access is allowed. We will also elaborate on the application provider/developer plans to: * optimize data traffic in its application, taking advantage of IoT Gateway Data Handling GEs as to ensure that some Complex Event Processing takes place closer to the devices. (other ideas about what we could incorporate to this application provider's plan, by means of adding some other FI-WARE GEs is welcome. Cheers, -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 07:44:03 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:44:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509C3C86.40203@eng.it> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> <509C3C86.40203@eng.it> Message-ID: <509CA633.4010702@tid.es> On 09/11/12 00:13, Matteo Melideo wrote: Juanjo hi, in addition to Wp10, I do not see any presentation planned also for the Wp9 and this is a very good news. I was planning it to be part of the timeslot "Brief on current activities/roadmap per technical WP" (note that I say "WP" instead of "Architecture chapter" and that I mentioned 7 slots, matching WP3-WP9 :-) So yes, you have one slot of 10 mins to elaborate on your current activities and plans regarding Developers' Community Support Tools (the same time as the rest of the partners) BESIDES this, I wanted to ask you to contribute to the presentation linked to checkpoint 7 (this I would say I would like you to present) and 8. Concerning my presence at the review, it is most likely I will be able to be there on Monday early afternoon, not early. I cannot move previous family commitments. Ok. Given the fact that you didn't receive early notice of our plans regarding the reaharsal and review meetings, I believe it's fair (not in the case of the other WPLs who are members of the fiware-pcc mailing list :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo BR, M. Il 08/11/2012 20:01, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale * First day: * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) * Second day: * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 07:49:13 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:49:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Assignment of presentations linked to each of the checkpoints for the review Message-ID: <509CA769.20200@tid.es> Hi all, I see all of you rather eager to contribute to the presentations to be planned for the review meeting, so I will send an email following this one elaborating on my proposal on who should take care of the preparation of the slides linked to each of the checkpoints (not only elaboration but also presentation at the review). I was planning to send this proposal along the weekend so that we could discuss it during our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall but seems like you cannot wait :-) Which is a rather good signal I actually welcome ! Stay tuned. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 08:43:03 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:43:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints Message-ID: <509CB407.9050007@tid.es> Hi all, Here you are a shared spreadsheet where I have tried to capture my proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdGdrV1dZX2ZPMi1pWDlJQVF5anJIalE#gid=0 For each of the checkpoints I have proposed: * A target duration of the presentation at the review. This is obviously a first take, i.e., something to discuss on Monday. * A proposal on who may present the slides elaborating on how we have covered the point * A proposal on the team I believe must work on the slides. Of course, additional volunteers are welcome. * Some comments regarding aspects to be takent into account during preparation of the slides. Feel free to add any additional comments that may be relevant. Hope you will find this useful as preparation for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall where this will be certainly one of the points addressed. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Nov 9 09:48:13 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:48:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints In-Reply-To: <509CB407.9050007@tid.es> References: <509CB407.9050007@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A014F695B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Thank you Juanjo for all this work. I think the agenda is good and I agree with all the comments distributed by the colleagues so far, which have been taken into consideration based on your answers. I would like to add few points to it: ? Regarding the attendance by more partners I think it could add value provided there is a role for some of these partners. Instead of bringing the whole consortium, which is obviously too big we could select some of the important partners (because of their industrial relevance, importance of work developed in FI-WARE or economic contribution to the project) and recommend their attendance to the meeting. Therefore I would go for a subset of organizations and not the whole group ? Regarding exploitation in the last review one of the first questions we got was: how much money you will invest to go to a production environment and which are your expectations in terms of ROI? The reviewer (this came from the business angel) said that no one gets engaged in such a big thing without making those calculations. The potential in the market with some estimation/figures should not be disregarded in this review based on the way they insisted in the previous one. ? Finally, but you have probably covered this in other presentations I would try to highlight the importance of the Use Case projects in the overall process (It is to say, that their inputs are valuable and are driving part of our work) The last point brings me to point out one issue for the risk management: FI-WARE has repeated several times that setting up the collaboration with the other projects took quite a lot of time until there was a common understanding. Since new Use Case projects will start in few months (and may be different from the ones we have now), is there a plan prepared by FI-WARE to address this ensuring the smooth transition between Phase I projects and Phase II projects? I hope it helps, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: viernes, 09 de noviembre de 2012 8:43 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints Hi all, Here you are a shared spreadsheet where I have tried to capture my proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdGdrV1dZX2ZPMi1pWDlJQVF5anJIalE#gid=0 For each of the checkpoints I have proposed: * A target duration of the presentation at the review. This is obviously a first take, i.e., something to discuss on Monday. * A proposal on who may present the slides elaborating on how we have covered the point * A proposal on the team I believe must work on the slides. Of course, additional volunteers are welcome. * Some comments regarding aspects to be takent into account during preparation of the slides. Feel free to add any additional comments that may be relevant. Hope you will find this useful as preparation for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall where this will be certainly one of the points addressed. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 9 09:54:42 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:54:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] [Fiware-pcc] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <26550_1352409094_509C2006_26550_4852_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C076708@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> <26550_1352409094_509C2006_26550_4852_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C076708@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <509CC4D2.2030408@tid.es> On 08/11/12 22:11, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear Juanjo and all, I agree with Stefano that we should introduce the demo by a testbed presentation at least to introduce what we will use during the demo. The testbed will introduced in the first slot as one of our major achievements. Further elaboration on the testbed would come in the slot dealing checkpoint 5. That is my proposed approach. Note that I believe that we should go for the Live Demo before the checkpoints because we want to show that we are delivering software that works. For the story-board of the demo, I think we have it but it is not fully align with Smart Cities but as we have to support many UC projects I do not think this is a major point which could take lots of time. Agree. See also my elaboration on this point in my response to Stefano's email. As explained before the review in Seville, we will not do the same speech during the review in Brussels especially for the exploitation part so what is really expected. Going through all individual exploitation plans would take hours and could push reviewers to ask new questions if all the exploitations plans are not aligned. Could you clarify what are your expectations regarding this point? I agree we shouldn't go for just reviewing individual exploitation plans. This is a point on which I would leave Jose the actual leadership. I will try to support but my throughput is limited. My vision on the matter is that we should elaborate more on the ideas about how to build an ecosystem leveraging on: * The FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab concept * The FI-WARE Catalogue * The active role that the Capacity Building project and the Trial projects should assume regarding support to deployment of applications being experimented in the Open Innovation Lab * A rather proactive plan, with enough resources assigned, to attract the wide community of developers. As you know, here the EC is willing to devote the budget booked for the 3rd Open Call on promotion activities. I believe that this is a great idea because certainly setting up and implementing the kind of ambitious plan you would need to put in place to boost awareness first, adoption later, by the wide community of developers, would need to invest resources and skills not foreseen initially in the FI-WARE proposal (that's why using Open Call funds would qualify, I guess) * Ability to connect to the ICT Labs (I rather believe this won't make the difference, but it may be worth to consider) * Push for allocation of funding regarding development of FI-WARE based applications in national R&D programs (this way trying to expand the number of SMEs that wold get funded because of experimenting with FI-WARE, going beyond was is planned in phase 3 of the FI-PPP) * Push the EC for adopting FI-WARE in some of its procurement processes (why not ? It's time also to ask the EC "ala JFK" "don't ask what FI-WARE can do for you but what you can do for FI-WARE", and certainly the EC can do more than just bring some funding, which is not the most critical/difficult part) * Push the EC for adopting FI-WARE in some other areas: * what about the Cloud infrastructure that the EC is planning to put in place as replacement/extension of the EDGEE grid ? * what about pushing for making regular FP7 projects to include clauses in their DoWs regarding collaboration with FI-WARE and carrying out their experiments on the Open Innovation Lab ? They "force" current FP7 projects (at least in the Software and Services Unit) to include statements about collaboration with other FP7 projects in the Communicaton, Collaboration and Dissemination WPs, so they can do this. We can sell this as joint expoitation plan. See the slides I present in Sevilla (second part) for reference. Just my two cents :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo BR Thierry De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : jeudi 8 novembre 2012 22:04 ? : Garino Pierangelo Cc : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review dear juanjo and all, in addition to the points of pier which i fully buy (although not completely sure we should have the full consortium perhaps juanjo and jose must verify this with arian) i have the following minor points: 1. i realise there is no "official" presentation of the testbed this migth be fine, but requires some serious slides in others presentations (yours?). in this context it is important to show the current usage and effort we are doing. 2. the live demo must have a common story to tell otherwise they are difficult and boring to follow. my suggestion is to create a simple story around smart city as it was the core topic of the day in seville. 3 the exploitation day, crtically important given the questions and the push they gave in seville, should be well characterised as such. i suggest also for this day all the presentations to share the same structure and be very much conving statements instead of inspiring thougths ... ciao, stefano 2012/11/8 Garino Pierangelo > Dear Juanjo, dear All, the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important): 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared to answer properly. 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this fact as well in the achievements session. Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to them about the project. Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible aspect into account. BR Pier ________________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the following rationale * First day: * First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues. We will also give a glimpse on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab * Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users. * Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them. * What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-) * Second day: * Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day. * Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Fri Nov 9 10:08:03 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:08:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509CA4C2.2040206@tid.es> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> <509CA296.5040408@tid.es> <509CA4C2.2040206@tid.es> Message-ID: Regarding the demo.. We are 2.5 weeks before the review, so it should be very clear by now what exactly the scope of the demo is, what are the exact tasks that need to be completed, by when, and who is responsible for what. Maybe this information already exists, so maybe someone could just share it. Also, since the demo involves a very complex environment, I would recommend having a recorded version (maybe even several iterations). We really don't want to fail in this. Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: Juanjo Hierro To: stefano de panfilis , Cc: "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 09/11/2012 08:38 AM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu On 09/11/12 07:28, Juanjo Hierro wrote: We will also elaborate on how other GEs could be incorporated to enrich the application (this to be shown as plans from the developer or application provider to enrich its offering): use of the CEP GE to detect some scenarios and perform some action (i.e., reboot a vending machine or display some advertising in the vending machine) use of the Compressed Domain Video Analysis GE to capture and process video of customers in front of a vending machine to display context-aware advertising (e.g., if the customer is female or he is fat) use of the BigData Analysis GE to be able to gather statistical data and analyze it to find out what are the most suitable products to be placed in the vending machines. Also to combine statistics about actual consumption of vending machines and mobility of people in the city. demo how future Security Access Control GE can be used to ensure only proper access is allowed. We will also elaborate on the application provider/developer plans to: optimize data traffic in its application, taking advantage of IoT Gateway Data Handling GEs as to ensure that some Complex Event Processing takes place closer to the devices. (other ideas about what we could incorporate to this application provider's plan, by means of adding some other FI-WARE GEs is welcome. Cheers, -- Juanjo Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Fri Nov 9 10:59:26 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:59:26 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509CA633.4010702@tid.es> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> <509C3C86.40203@eng.it> <509CA633.4010702@tid.es> Message-ID: <509CD3FE.1050607@eng.it> Ok, fine with me. BR M. Il 09/11/2012 07:44, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > On 09/11/12 00:13, Matteo Melideo wrote: >> Juanjo hi, >> in addition to Wp10, I do not see any presentation planned also for >> the Wp9 and this is a very good news. > > I was planning it to be part of the timeslot "Brief on current > activities/roadmap per technical WP" (note that I say "WP" instead of > "Architecture chapter" and that I mentioned 7 slots, matching WP3-WP9 :-) > > So yes, you have one slot of 10 mins to elaborate on your current > activities and plans regarding Developers' Community Support Tools > (the same time as the rest of the partners) > > BESIDES this, I wanted to ask you to contribute to the presentation > linked to checkpoint 7 (this I would say I would like you to present) > and 8. >> >> Concerning my presence at the review, it is most likely I will be >> able to be there on Monday early afternoon, not early. I cannot move >> previous family commitments. > > Ok. Given the fact that you didn't receive early notice of our > plans regarding the reaharsal and review meetings, I believe it's fair > (not in the case of the other WPLs who are members of the fiware-pcc > mailing list :-) > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > >> >> BR, >> >> M. >> Il 08/11/2012 20:01, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: >>> Dear colleagues, >>> >>> Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project >>> Review meeint on Nov 28-29. I have structured it according to the >>> following rationale >>> >>> * First day: >>> o First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying >>> major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE >>> Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call >>> ...) and activities we have carried out to recover. The >>> message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort >>> to bring the project to a state where we have recover from >>> major issues. We will also give a glimpse >>> on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further >>> integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver >>> the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open >>> Innovation Lab >>> o Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not >>> just about words, but software that works, also to >>> illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together >>> fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, >>> application providers and end users. >>> o Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different >>> checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made >>> good progress addressing them. >>> o What comes next during the first day is relatively >>> auxiliary. The previous points are the ones which will >>> determine whether we will succeed or not :-) >>> * Second day: >>> o Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as >>> one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on >>> exploitation plans further and report on what has been done >>> in that WP. Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed >>> out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth >>> resuming the second day covering the business and >>> exploitation related aspects again. We may even refine >>> some of the messages delivered in the previous day. >>> o Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably >>> highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, >>> communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new >>> processes established with UC projects >>> >>> >>> Your comments are welcome. Our plan is to send it by EOB >>> tomorrow, so please react quickly. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 368 bytes Desc: not available URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Fri Nov 9 11:06:40 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:06:40 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints In-Reply-To: <509CB407.9050007@tid.es> References: <509CB407.9050007@tid.es> Message-ID: <509CD5B0.2020700@eng.it> Juanio hi, please consider that one of the presentations up to me will be done by Davide. I will discuss with him which one in the next coming days. BR M. Il 09/11/2012 08:43, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Here you are a shared spreadsheet where I have tried to capture my > proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE > Project Review checkpoints: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdGdrV1dZX2ZPMi1pWDlJQVF5anJIalE#gid=0 > > For each of the checkpoints I have proposed: > > * A target duration of the presentation at the review. This is > obviously a first take, i.e., something to discuss on Monday. > * A proposal on who may present the slides elaborating on how we > have covered the point > * A proposal on the team I believe must work on the slides. Of > course, additional volunteers are welcome. > * Some comments regarding aspects to be takent into account during > preparation of the slides. Feel free to add any additional > comments that may be relevant. > > Hope you will find this useful as preparation for our joint > WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall where this will be certainly one of the > points addressed. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Fri Nov 9 11:10:00 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:10:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A014F695B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <509CB407.9050007@tid.es> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A014F695B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <509CD678.1060204@eng.it> Always concerning the exploitation, I also remember that the reviewers explicitly asked for Directors or Company decision makers from SAP, TID, TELECOM and FRANCETELECOM, and someone else. Has this problem been solved with the P.O.? BR M. Il 09/11/2012 09:48, Nuria De-Lama Sanchez ha scritto: > > Thank you Juanjo for all this work. > > I think the agenda is good and I agree with all the comments > distributed by the colleagues so far, which have been taken into > consideration based on your answers. I would like to add few points to it: > > ?Regarding the *attendance by more partners* I think it could add > value provided there is a role for some of these partners. Instead of > bringing the whole consortium, which is obviously too big we could > select some of the important partners (because of their industrial > relevance, importance of work developed in FI-WARE or economic > contribution to the project) and recommend their attendance to the > meeting. Therefore I would go for a subset of organizations and not > the whole group > > ?*Regarding exploitation*in the last review one of the first questions > we got was: how much money you will invest to go to a production > environment and which are your expectations in terms of ROI? The > reviewer (this came from the business angel) said that no one gets > engaged in such a big thing without making those calculations. The > potential in the market with some estimation/figures should not be > disregarded in this review based on the way they insisted in the > previous one. > > ?Finally, but you have probably covered this in other presentations I > would try to highlight the importance of the Use Case projects in the > overall process (It is to say, that their inputs are valuable and are > driving part of our work) > > The last point brings me to point out *one issue for the risk > management*: FI-WARE has repeated several times that setting up the > collaboration with the other projects took quite a lot of time until > there was a common understanding. Since new Use Case projects will > start in few months (and may be different from the ones we have now), > is there a plan prepared by FI-WARE to address this ensuring the > smooth transition between Phase I projects and Phase II projects? > > I hope it helps, > > cid:349045816 at 01072011-3195 > > *Nuria de Lama* > > Research & Innovation > > Representative to the European Commission > > T +34 91214 9321 > > F +34 91754 3252 > > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu > > Albarrac?n 25 > > 28037 Madrid > > Spain > > www.atosresearch.eu > > es.atos.net > > cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *Juanjo Hierro > *Sent:* viernes, 09 de noviembre de 2012 8:43 > *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of > presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints > > Hi all, > > Here you are a shared spreadsheet where I have tried to capture my > proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE > Project Review checkpoints: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdGdrV1dZX2ZPMi1pWDlJQVF5anJIalE#gid=0 > > For each of the checkpoints I have proposed: > > * A target duration of the presentation at the review. This is > obviously a first take, i.e., something to discuss on Monday. > * A proposal on who may present the slides elaborating on how we > have covered the point > * A proposal on the team I believe must work on the slides. Of > course, additional volunteers are welcome. > * Some comments regarding aspects to be takent into account during > preparation of the slides. Feel free to add any additional > comments that may be relevant. > > Hope you will find this useful as preparation for our joint > WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall where this will be certainly one of the > points addressed. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy > it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye > ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el > emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de > cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Nov 9 11:20:56 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:20:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints In-Reply-To: <509CD678.1060204@eng.it> References: <509CB407.9050007@tid.es> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A014F695B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> <509CD678.1060204@eng.it> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A014F69B1@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> In principle that is the point that was specifically addressed in the meeting we had last Monday in Seville. We will probably get some comments from them on that in the next review meeting. Unfortunately we did not get any assessment there. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: Matteo Melideo [mailto:matteo.melideo at eng.it] Sent: viernes, 09 de noviembre de 2012 11:10 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints Always concerning the exploitation, I also remember that the reviewers explicitly asked for Directors or Company decision makers from SAP, TID, TELECOM and FRANCETELECOM, and someone else. Has this problem been solved with the P.O.? BR M. Il 09/11/2012 09:48, Nuria De-Lama Sanchez ha scritto: Thank you Juanjo for all this work. I think the agenda is good and I agree with all the comments distributed by the colleagues so far, which have been taken into consideration based on your answers. I would like to add few points to it: ? Regarding the attendance by more partners I think it could add value provided there is a role for some of these partners. Instead of bringing the whole consortium, which is obviously too big we could select some of the important partners (because of their industrial relevance, importance of work developed in FI-WARE or economic contribution to the project) and recommend their attendance to the meeting. Therefore I would go for a subset of organizations and not the whole group ? Regarding exploitation in the last review one of the first questions we got was: how much money you will invest to go to a production environment and which are your expectations in terms of ROI? The reviewer (this came from the business angel) said that no one gets engaged in such a big thing without making those calculations. The potential in the market with some estimation/figures should not be disregarded in this review based on the way they insisted in the previous one. ? Finally, but you have probably covered this in other presentations I would try to highlight the importance of the Use Case projects in the overall process (It is to say, that their inputs are valuable and are driving part of our work) The last point brings me to point out one issue for the risk management: FI-WARE has repeated several times that setting up the collaboration with the other projects took quite a lot of time until there was a common understanding. Since new Use Case projects will start in few months (and may be different from the ones we have now), is there a plan prepared by FI-WARE to address this ensuring the smooth transition between Phase I projects and Phase II projects? I hope it helps, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: viernes, 09 de noviembre de 2012 8:43 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints Hi all, Here you are a shared spreadsheet where I have tried to capture my proposal on caretakers and duration of presentations covering FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdGdrV1dZX2ZPMi1pWDlJQVF5anJIalE#gid=0 For each of the checkpoints I have proposed: * A target duration of the presentation at the review. This is obviously a first take, i.e., something to discuss on Monday. * A proposal on who may present the slides elaborating on how we have covered the point * A proposal on the team I believe must work on the slides. Of course, additional volunteers are welcome. * Some comments regarding aspects to be takent into account during preparation of the slides. Feel free to add any additional comments that may be relevant. Hope you will find this useful as preparation for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall where this will be certainly one of the points addressed. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Nov 9 18:12:29 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:12:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] [Fiware-pcc] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review In-Reply-To: <509CC4D2.2030408@tid.es> References: <509C016D.4060909@tid.es> <26550_1352409094_509C2006_26550_4852_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C076708@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <509CC4D2.2030408@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, some additional points about exploitation. As explained before the review in Seville, we will not do the same speech > during the review in Brussels especially for the exploitation part so what > is really expected. Going through all individual exploitation plans would > take hours and could push reviewers to ask new questions if all the > exploitations plans are not aligned. Could you clarify what are your > expectations regarding this point? > > > I agree we shouldn't go for just reviewing individual exploitation > plans. This is a point on which I would leave Jose the actual leadership. > I will try to support but my throughput is limited. My vision on the > matter is that we should elaborate more on the ideas about how to build an > ecosystem leveraging on: > > - The FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab concept > - The FI-WARE Catalogue > - The active role that the Capacity Building project and the Trial > projects should assume regarding support to deployment of applications > being experimented in the Open Innovation Lab > - A rather proactive plan, with enough resources assigned, to attract > the wide community of developers. As you know, here the EC is willing to > devote the budget booked for the 3rd Open Call on promotion activities. I > believe that this is a great idea because certainly setting up and > implementing the kind of ambitious plan you would need to put in place to > boost awareness first, adoption later, by the wide community of developers, > would need to invest resources and skills not foreseen initially in the > FI-WARE proposal (that's why using Open Call funds would qualify, I guess) > - Ability to connect to the ICT Labs (I rather believe this won't make > the difference, but it may be worth to consider) > - Push for allocation of funding regarding development of FI-WARE > based applications in national R&D programs (this way trying to expand the > number of SMEs that wold get funded because of experimenting with FI-WARE, > going beyond was is planned in phase 3 of the FI-PPP) > - Push the EC for adopting FI-WARE in some of its procurement > processes (why not ? It's time also to ask the EC "ala JFK" "don't ask > what FI-WARE can do for you but what you can do for FI-WARE", and certainly > the EC can do more than just bring some funding, which is not the most > critical/difficult part) > - Push the EC for adopting FI-WARE in some other areas: > - what about the Cloud infrastructure that the EC is planning to > put in place as replacement/extension of the EDGEE grid ? > - what about pushing for making regular FP7 projects to include > clauses in their DoWs regarding collaboration with FI-WARE and carrying out > their experiments on the Open Innovation Lab ? They "force" current FP7 > projects (at least in the Software and Services Unit) to include statements > about collaboration with other FP7 projects in the Communicaton, > Collaboration and Dissemination WPs, so they can do this. > > > We can sell this as joint expoitation plan. See the slides I present > in Sevilla (second part) for reference. > somehow i do agree on all the above points, but this are credible only if there is real committment by the industrial fi-ware players, i.e. US! what i want to say here is that if the gei owners show a concrete plan based on a clear "terms and conditions of usage" of their gei than everything is concrete otherwise is the usual bla bla nice even interesting, but nothing more than bla bla from the seville pre-review it is clear that the ec this time really wants something more: they see the possibility that real technologies migth come out from an initiative initiated by them and certainly they do not want to loose this possibility. peter clearly stated we are discussing becouse this time we have something working!!! in fact, dear juanjo, how we can ask the ec to use and adopt fi-ware technologies if the companies who owns the implementation do not committ behind those technologies? this can only be achieved by stating clearly "terms and conditions of usage". so, i'm afraid, individual plans from gei owners not only are needed, but mandatory! for what concerns engineering this is very clear: provision of our assets as floss and professional rates for technical support. is that so complicated to ask all the others to elaborate their plans? ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ralli at tid.es Fri Nov 9 18:56:20 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:56:20 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9thNovember-Last Call for contributions In-Reply-To: References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F00F11E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F011733@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Juan, I have included more directives as provided by my colleagues from Bigdata and Video. With this we consider our contrib ready for today's deadline. Best regards, -- ________________________________ De: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena [juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu] Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 19:19 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9thNovember-Last Call for contributions Many thanks Carlos [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC3A4E.0D917B80] Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net [Description: Atos_Olympic_Games_Logo[1]] From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO [mailto:ralli at tid.es] Sent: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 19:15 To: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9thNovember-Last Call for contributions Hi Juan, As we agreed in the beginning of this week I have completed the missing fields with regards to Data/Context. However, as we discussed the directives under "Security/Data" also apply. If my colleagues do send me more info I'll update the table before Friday 9th EoB as you say, otherwise consider it closed from our side. Best regards, -- ________________________________ De: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] en nombre de Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena [juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu] Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 1:01 Para: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-wpl] Exploitation Deliverables Resubmission before 9th November-Last Call for contributions Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I enclosed you the last draft version to review and provide some feedback or modify/include what you consider and the missing contents before this Friday 9th November EOB. In the meantime, we will continue working in the fine tuning of the deliverables during this week. Please find here attached the 3 deliverables in the Resubmission M18 folder and the missing contributions in the description below in RED https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual o FT, TI, NOKIA and THALES still pending - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o DATA and IoT still missing: Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned (TI and ENG) as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC3A4E.0D917B80] Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net [Description: Atos_Olympic_Games_Logo[1]] From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 26 de octubre de 2012 11:56 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu); 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' (jimenez at tid.es); JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA (jhierro at tid.es); Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); Nuria De-Lama Sanchez (nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu); Carmen Perea Escribano (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Sandfuchs, Thorsten (thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com); matteo.melideo at eng.it; 'Stefano de Panfilis' (Stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); Amon, Peter (p.amon at siemens.com) Subject: FW: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Following with the Resubmission of Exploitation Deliverables I remind you to review or complete the following missing inputs and provide feedback: - 11.1 Market Analysis o We will include additional inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis 2410 including in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy o We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy 24 10 document, including the questions from the review , see document, one with SAP comments, in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=16 o Additionally please review the FI WARE Platform Value Proposition and Business Canvas in the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Overall o IPRs section has been modified by SAP and will be completed by them according to the current discussion in the review report and the ongoing discussion between the legal departments. Review key principles into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/IPR_Management o Answer to the main business questions from the review, individually by partner on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - 11.3 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness o Please provide some aanalysis relative to the prospective requirement specific to the developments of the future of the Internet, bearing in mind the project vision on the one hand, and dynamic market conditions on the other, which (may) pose regulatory challenges https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Policiy_and_Regulation_Awareness o Please complete more additional contacts with European cities to wide geographic extension, and intensification for concrete (multi-)localised achievements. o Preliminary contacts with cities (City of Malaga, Chamber of Commerce of Madrid) seem promising. However, a substantiated European dimension to this activity, with additional cities in other Member States, is missing. At the Month 12 project review, Trento was mentioned as a promising contact. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Market_and_Policy_Regulation_Awareness#Market_Awareness Thanks for your collaboration Juan From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2012 12:47 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com; antonio.cimmino at alcatel-lucent.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI WARE Platform Strategy Validation and ExploitationDeliverables Resubmission Roadmap before 8th November Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed the following draft documents in which we are going to leverage to complete the exploitation deliverables resubmission: - Platform Strategy Market Analysis, including main regulatory concerns for 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - FI WARE Platform Strategy, based on the previous analysis and on 3rd party and Vision deliverables for 11.2 Exploitation Strategy, pending to include some inputs from Product Vision deliverable in which 2-3 examples on how FI-WARE is applied in a specific domain (take existing UC projects) will be included Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 8th November - 11.1 and 11.3 11.1 Market Analysis and 11.3 Policy and Regulation issues - We will include some inputs from Platform Strategy Market Analysis before 29th October and we will circulate them to be validated before 5th November to deliver final versions - 11.2 Exploitation Strategy - We will include the FI WARE Platform Strategy, including the questions from the review and initial Pro Forma Business Plan, with all your support and contributions on the 5th November and we will send it around to validate the final version to properly deliver on the 8th November. Actions required: Please review FI WARE Platform Strategy, initial draft version for discussion, preferably involving your business departments, leveraging on the previous Platform Strategy Analysis and on the questions from the review, and please add/modify what you consider in the document with ?Track Changes? option and answer to the main questions from the review individually on the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual - , each industrial partner has a slot: o The objective is validate a common Platform Strategy as a whole and not as a loose collation of GEs- Agree on the value proposition o Identify the key segments, to avoid entering in the untenable situation of ?FI-WARE is good for everyone and for every task?- ?Two sided market?- End Users and Developers o Identify the main channels will be used to reach the various customer segments (Developers and End Users) and the marketing tools should be designed to be usable by the internal sales force. o Identify the right strategy to ecosystem management and consequently attract as much developers as we can o How , Telecom service provider, Network equipment and mobile terminal manufacturers, Software vendors, IT Providers and IT solution integrators will make money individually from FIWARE Platform? Licensing, advertising, selling apps, hosting service, increase data traffic, data storage o Provide some inputs for a pro forma analysis about potential market estimation and about initial cost estimates based on Test bed configuration - All your contributions for FI WARE Strategy definition document have to be received before next 1st November to prepare a final version to deliver before the 8th November Thanks for your contribution Juan [Description: Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC3A4E.0D917B80] Juan Bare?o Global Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net [Description: Description: Atos_Olympic_Games_Logo[1]] ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 12 06:19:37 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:19:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] You have some WRONG names assigned to some of the FI-WARE CE RIs in the FI-WARE Catalogue Message-ID: <50A086E9.1020005@tid.es> Dear colleagues, The following entries in the FI-WARE Catalogue do NOT yet comply with the convention referring to naming/title for the entry ( - ): * Service Mashup - Mashup Factory (currently, only "Mashup Factory" alone) * Publish/Subscribe - Context Awareness Platform (currently, only "Publish/Subscribe". BTW, should change "Publish/Subscribe" to "Publish/Subscribe Context Broker") * Marketplace (remains without name for the GE RI) * Service Description Repository (remains without name for the GE RI) * IaaS Data Center Resource Management (remains without name for the GE RI) * Object Storage (remains without name for the GE RI) * Identity Management GCP (just need to add a '-' between "Identity Management" and "GCP" to keep consistent with the convention, already adopted by the other Identity Management GE RI) * DB Anonymizer (remains without name for the GE RI) * Security Monitoring (remains without name for the GE RI) * Semantic Annotation (remains without name for the GE RI) * Semantic Application Support GE (remains without name for the GE RI and you should drop "GE" from the title) * Cloud Edge (remains without name for the GE RI) You may consider this is minor but are the kind of things that lead to misunderstandings and also deliver contradictory messages. FI-WARE GE Open Specifications would allow implementations of the specs by third parties and we would allow them to be publishd on the FI-WARE Catalogue ... How would them be going to be named in the Catalogue ? Why should an implementation by FI-WARE be the only one to have the rights to use only the name of the GE ? Please try to implement it by Wednesday Nov 14 EOB. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 12 07:20:52 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 07:20:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Webinars - Green flag to GO Message-ID: <50A09544.7010904@tid.es> Dear colleagues, This mail is mostly targeted to owners of FI-WARE GEs and the FI-WARE WPLs/WPAs. The UC projects have completed their input regarding intentions to attend the different webinars sessions being scheduled. I guess some of you know it already because you were monitoring progress of the shared spreadsheet we created for announcing dates of the webinars as well as gathering the interest of UC projects: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDRKeUpILUxzTjNNUFZBQUhfM0U4aFE#gid=0 Currently, the layout of the spreadsheet is a little bit caotic, because some UC projects decided to add some columns on their own that seem to ease them to gather inputs from their respective consortia .... but I guess the information is there and can be interpreted correctly. I'll try to reorganize the layout, adding the column linked to names of attendees for each webinar and UC project because this is something that seems like several of them liked. However, I will try to do this whenever I have time available, hopefully soon (if someone finds the time to do it early, don't hesitate to help :-) Don't get blocked for that because, as said before, the available information already allows you to know how many people is planning to attend each webinar. Please proceed with execution of the plan. Please also note that the EC yesterday announced that is thinking in asking some FI-WARE project reviewers to attend. Be aware of that. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Mon Nov 12 09:07:32 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:07:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] You have some WRONG names assigned to some of the FI-WARE CE RIs in the FI-WARE Catalogue In-Reply-To: <50A086E9.1020005@tid.es> References: <50A086E9.1020005@tid.es> Message-ID: Fixed for DCRM and Object Storage. Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: Juanjo Hierro To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 12/11/2012 07:19 AM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] You have some WRONG names assigned to some of the FI-WARE CE RIs in the FI-WARE Catalogue Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear colleagues, The following entries in the FI-WARE Catalogue do NOT yet comply with the convention referring to naming/title for the entry ( - ): Service Mashup - Mashup Factory (currently, only "Mashup Factory" alone) Publish/Subscribe - Context Awareness Platform (currently, only "Publish/Subscribe". BTW, should change "Publish/Subscribe" to "Publish/Subscribe Context Broker") Marketplace (remains without name for the GE RI) Service Description Repository (remains without name for the GE RI) IaaS Data Center Resource Management (remains without name for the GE RI) Object Storage (remains without name for the GE RI) Identity Management GCP (just need to add a '-' between "Identity Management" and "GCP" to keep consistent with the convention, already adopted by the other Identity Management GE RI) DB Anonymizer (remains without name for the GE RI) Security Monitoring (remains without name for the GE RI) Semantic Annotation (remains without name for the GE RI) Semantic Application Support GE (remains without name for the GE RI and you should drop "GE" from the title) Cloud Edge (remains without name for the GE RI) You may consider this is minor but are the kind of things that lead to misunderstandings and also deliver contradictory messages. FI-WARE GE Open Specifications would allow implementations of the specs by third parties and we would allow them to be publishd on the FI-WARE Catalogue ... How would them be going to be named in the Catalogue ? Why should an implementation by FI-WARE be the only one to have the rights to use only the name of the GE ? Please try to implement it by Wednesday Nov 14 EOB. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Nov 12 09:38:43 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:38:43 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] You have some WRONG names assigned to some of the FI-WARE CE RIs in the FI-WARE Catalogue In-Reply-To: <50A086E9.1020005@tid.es> References: <50A086E9.1020005@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, exactly becouse of your email, it also misleading calling the implementations of gi "reference implelemtation" even if it is coming from fi-ware. indeed there is more than an example where we do have already multiple implemenattions for the same ge. please come back to the traditional terminology taking out "reference" from "implementation". ciao, stefano 2012/11/12 Juanjo Hierro > Dear colleagues, > > The following entries in the FI-WARE Catalogue do NOT yet comply with > the convention referring to naming/title for the entry ( - > ): > > - Service Mashup - Mashup Factory (currently, only "Mashup Factory" > alone) > - Publish/Subscribe - Context Awareness Platform (currently, only > "Publish/Subscribe". BTW, should change "Publish/Subscribe" to > "Publish/Subscribe Context Broker") > - Marketplace (remains without name for the GE RI) > - Service Description Repository (remains without name for the GE RI) > - IaaS Data Center Resource Management (remains without name for the > GE RI) > - Object Storage (remains without name for the GE RI) > - Identity Management GCP (just need to add a '-' between "Identity > Management" and "GCP" to keep consistent with the convention, already > adopted by the other Identity Management GE RI) > - DB Anonymizer (remains without name for the GE RI) > - Security Monitoring (remains without name for the GE RI) > - Semantic Annotation (remains without name for the GE RI) > - Semantic Application Support GE (remains without name for the GE RI > and you should drop "GE" from the title) > - Cloud Edge (remains without name for the GE RI) > > You may consider this is minor but are the kind of things that lead to > misunderstandings and also deliver contradictory messages. FI-WARE GE > Open Specifications would allow implementations of the specs by third > parties and we would allow them to be publishd on the FI-WARE Catalogue ... > How would them be going to be named in the Catalogue ? Why should an > implementation by FI-WARE be the only one to have the rights to use only > the name of the GE ? > > Please try to implement it by Wednesday Nov 14 EOB. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 12 10:29:23 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:29:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shared minutes for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall Message-ID: <50A0C173.9060206@tid.es> Hi all, Here you are the shared minutes for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall today: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ktuSS6zU4J8LYooGMD5fxPnajA2JVoMnh4vmBoO1BAo/edit Talk to you in few minutes. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 12 16:47:15 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:47:15 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Presentation accompanying forward-looking discussion on take-up of FI-WARE results during the meeting in Sevilla Message-ID: <50A11A03.8060809@tid.es> Dear Arian and Peter, Please find enclosed a copy of a new version of the presentation I used during our forward-looking discussion on take-up of FI-WARE results during the meeting in Sevilla. The presentation is structured in two parts: * One focused on the discussion about Use Terms and Conditions of FI-WARE GE implementations beyond the FI-PPP and the lifetime of FI-WARE. We are further developing the proposed approach in order to address comments and recommendations given during the Seville meeting. Nevertheless we have tried to capture the current status of the discussion so far, which you will see described more concretely in the attached slides. * Another one focused on complementary actions we believe are required beyond commitment of the FI-WARE partners. We believe that they are rather important, so the EC should not minimize their impact in helping to the take-up of FI-WARE results Please feel free to share with projects reviewers if you feel it is suitable. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Review Seville Forward-looking Discussion 12-11-07.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 2135552 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jdps at tid.es Tue Nov 13 15:13:32 2012 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:13:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M18 (update of effort) Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F033A5@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all. Please find enclosed updated effort that I have received. They are no final. I'm still receiving updates and there are missing data of M18 of SAP, TECHNICOLOR & ATOS. If you need to update your periodic report, please do it during this week. Next week will be sent to Project Officer after it has been reviewed by Juanjo Hierro. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: martes, 30 de octubre de 2012 16:42 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: subsidies at tid.es Asunto: FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M18 Dear all As you know we have to deliver the Periodic Report which has to give an overview of the third semester of the project (only months from M13(May12) to M18(oct12)). I will kindly ask you in another particularized e-mail to update as WPL the information about your WP: 1. Progress in your WP (with a detailed evaluation) 2. Update of deliverables in your WP. (they should have a link to the forge) On it you'll find the updated current effort at M17 and the planning at M18. Please note that the amendment 2 is still not approved and the planning is according to the current DoW. (I'll attach the changes in your WP on your particularized e-mail) Please take in mind that I haven't received any data from THALES. No THALES' effort from M13 to M17. As soon as I receive them, I'll send you an update (as well as I have the M18 effort for the all the partners). I recommend you to ask to your involved partner for their contribution before updating the document. Thank you very much in advance. I'll appreciate if you send this information by November 9th. Note: It is important to keep in mind that this is a draft report, because we'll need to update it with our effort at M18 (including October). So, I'll ask to your administrative person your current effort of October by the first week of November. You can send me an updated report whenever you want. (In this case, please use the doc with activated changes control) At last but not least, please, I kindly ask you to follow the template in order to have a homogeneous report as a team. In the last review report they said: [cid:image002.jpg at 01CDC1B0.A47DB8C0] Thank you in advance. BR Javier. [firma correo jdps] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 39114 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE - EFFORT - FOLLOW-UP -M13-M18 (WP) - DRAFT VERSION.doc Type: application/msword Size: 602112 bytes Desc: FI-WARE - EFFORT - FOLLOW-UP -M13-M18 (WP) - DRAFT VERSION.doc URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 13 15:20:36 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:36 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT Fwd: Webinar access data is missing In-Reply-To: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A898323AD89D8F@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> References: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A898323AD89D8F@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> Message-ID: <50A25734.6080501@tid.es> Hi all, What has happened regarding the webinar on the Semantic Annotation GE (see below) is a good example of what we have to avoid by all means. Another one or two cases like this, and we are done regarding this point, and I REMIND YOU THIS WAS ONE OF THE CHECKPOINTs BY THE REVIEWERS. One I thought it was going to be rather eassy to cover, btw, but of course if we were going to pay the necessary attention. Please, take care and follow-up the planning of webinars in your chapter. Otherwise, this may become a total disaster. I also remind you that Arian told me he wanted the reviewers to attend some webinars. Can you imagine if they had decided to attend one webinar where FI-WARE GE owners do not attend ? Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Webinar access data is missing Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:33:44 +0200 From: Peretz Gurel To: Juanjo Hierro CC: ab at fi-ppp.eu Dear Juanjo, According to the Google spreadsheet now is the time for the Webinar about Semantic Annotation: A primer. Yet there is no information about how to access it. There is no date and time for a second webinar on this topic. What do we do? Regards, Peretz From: ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu [mailto:ab-bounces at fi-ppp.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 8:54 AM To: ab at fi-ppp.eu Subject: [FI-PPP AB] [Suspected Spam] IMPORTANT (AND RELATIVELY URGENT): webinars focused on FI-WARE GEs devoted to UC projects Dear colleagues, As we already agreed during our FI-PPP AB meeting in September, it would be now the right time to plan a number of sessions, each focus on one of the available FI-WARE GE Reference Implementation (RI) products, where developers can receive a more detailed and technical tutorial about the FI-WARE GE RI product. Therefore, the FI-WARE team has planned a number of webinars that we hope the UC projects can join. You can find the dates and times scheduled for these seminars at the following shared spreadsheet in Google Docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDRKeUpILUxzTjNNUFZBQUhfM0U4aFE#gid=0 As you can imagine, agreeing on dates and times would be virtually impossible in a short time frame, so what we have adopted as an approach is to propose two dates per webinar so that you have more choices. Hopefully, one of the two dates× we propose will be suitable to you (nothing prevents you to repeat and attend both dates× if you haven't had enough :-) Contents of the two webinars would be exactly the same (so the second is not the continuation of the first). What we would need is that you fill the column associated to your project and declare how many people plan to attend the webinar at each of the proposed date×. If we found that nobody is planning to attend a given date&time and the date is approaching, we may cancel that and propose a new date. The goal is to celebrate at least two webinars per FI-WARE GE RI by end of this year. The date&time for the two webinars is already programmed for all the FI-WARE GE RIs with the exception of those in the IoT Chapter, but we plan to get the dates for FI-WARE GE RIs of this chapter along this week so please stay tuned. Now the AP to you :-) Could you please complete the information about attendance on the side of your project by EOB this Friday ? That would be rather great. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jdps at tid.es Tue Nov 13 16:10:33 2012 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:10:33 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Effort to be included in the Periodic Report - M13 - M18 (*** IMPORTANT ***) Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F036CC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear colleagues, As you can read in my previous e-mails, I kindly ask you to tell to your technical teams that they have to send their technical contribution to each WPL in order to be delivered the integrated periodic report. Please, do it as soon as possible because we have to finish the periodic report this week. If the WPL has no asked it to you, please send your contribution to him. Don't wait to be asked. Thank you very much. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: lunes, 05 de noviembre de 2012 9:52 Para: 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: 'subsidies at tid.es' Asunto: FI-WARE: Effort to be included in the Periodic Report - M13 - M18 Dear All. As you can read in the attached e-mail below, we have to deliver the Periodic Report to the Commission. In this report, we have to specify our current effort until M18. So, in another particularized e-mail, I'm going to ask you your current effort at M18. I kindly ask you to answer me by next Friday, November 9th, 2012. Too, it will be used to update the information sent by WPL if needed. Thank you in advance for your collaboration. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: martes, 30 de octubre de 2012 16:42 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: subsidies at tid.es Asunto: FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M18 Dear all As you know we have to deliver the Periodic Report which has to give an overview of the third semester of the project (only months from M13(May12) to M18(oct12)). I will kindly ask you in another particularized e-mail to update as WPL the information about your WP: 1. Progress in your WP (with a detailed evaluation) 2. Update of deliverables in your WP. (they should have a link to the forge) On it you'll find the updated current effort at M17 and the planning at M18. Please note that the amendment 2 is still not approved and the planning is according to the current DoW. (I'll attach the changes in your WP on your particularized e-mail) Please take in mind that I haven't received any data from THALES. No THALES' effort from M13 to M17. As soon as I receive them, I'll send you an update (as well as I have the M18 effort for the all the partners). I recommend you to ask to your involved partner for their contribution before updating the document. Thank you very much in advance. I'll appreciate if you send this information by November 9th. Note: It is important to keep in mind that this is a draft report, because we'll need to update it with our effort at M18 (including October). So, I'll ask to your administrative person your current effort of October by the first week of November. You can send me an updated report whenever you want. (In this case, please use the doc with activated changes control) At last but not least, please, I kindly ask you to follow the template in order to have a homogeneous report as a team. In the last review report they said: [cid:image001.jpg at 01CDC1B9.265A1200] Thank you in advance. BR Javier. [firma correo jdps] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 39114 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 13 16:32:40 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:32:40 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Mailing list to exchange info, etc about webinars and information about training or even workshops on FI-WARE GEs In-Reply-To: <50A267A2.3030804@tid.es> References: <50A267A2.3030804@tid.es> Message-ID: <50A26818.3040305@tid.es> Hi all, From now own, we suggest that all information regarding webinars or FI-WARE GE training in general, will be exchanged through the fiware-training at lists.fi-ware.eu. We have asked members of the UC projects to subscribe to this list if they wish to have first hand information about anything related to training about FI-WARE GEs This was a list where many of you probably were already subscribed because it was used to exchange information about the FI-WARE Architects Weeks. Nevertheless, I will forward this exactly same message so, if you receive it twice, then you were actually subscribed :-) If not, just go to the admin page and subscribe yourself: http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-training Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From jimenez at tid.es Tue Nov 13 17:54:03 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:54:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Message-ID: Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 13 18:10:57 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:10:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Summary of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications Re-Submission In-Reply-To: <50A27DC6.7060204@tid.es> References: <50A27DC6.7060204@tid.es> Message-ID: <50A27F21.8040808@tid.es> Dear FI-WARE colleagues, This is to announce that we have just submitted all the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications associated to all of the FI-WARE Chapters. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you all who worked hard in reviewing the specs and improve it content-wise. Besides, those who have contributed in building the tools and work side by side to produce the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications deliverables in a very nice format (Thorsten Sandfuchs, Andreas Klein). I'm sure this will of great benefit. Congratulations ! Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Summary of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications Re-Submission Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:05:10 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , Dominic Greenwood , DiFrancesco, Renaud , irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk CC: Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu , INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , Miguel Carrillo , jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Dear Arian&Vanessa, dear reviewers, You should have already received the re-submission of all deliverables dealing with FI-WARE GE Open Specifications for each of the FI-WARE Chapters. This email gathers together all the links from which you may download the deliverables: * FI-WARE Apps GE Open Specifications: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1591/D.3.1.1b_FI-WARE_GE_Open_Specification.pdf * FI-WARE Cloud GE Open Specifications: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1592/D.4.1.1b+FI-WARE+GE+Open+Specifications.pdf * FI-WARE IoT GE Open Specifications: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1623/D.5.1.1b+FI-WARE+IoT+GE+Open+Specifications.pdf * FI-WARE Data GE Open Specifications: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1598/D.6.1.1b+FI-WARE+Data+GE+Open+Specifications.pdf * FI-WARE I2ND GE Open Specifications: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1597/D.7.1.1b+FI-WARE+I2ND+GE+Open+Specifications.pdf * FI-WARE Security GE Open Specifications: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1616/D.8.1.1b+FI-WARE+Security+GE+Open+Specifications.pdf You will notice that the consortium has made a big effort to harmonize and improve the format of the deliverables in general to comply with your requirements. Apart form this, the Open Specifications have undergone a deep review of the contents as well as a restructuring that has largely improved the usefulness and readability of the documents. Of course, you can also access FI-WARE Open Specifications in the public FI-WARE wiki: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Summary_of_FI-WARE_Open_Specifications Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From uwe.riss at sap.com Tue Nov 13 21:32:54 2012 From: uwe.riss at sap.com (Riss, Uwe) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:32:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Suggestions regarding the Review Agenda Message-ID: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C943A2B6@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> Hello, Following our Conf Call on Monday we looked at the review agenda again and decided to make the following remarks and suggestions: 1. The Presentation of Checkpoints is much too long. The current planning would mean that we concentrate for 3 hours on what went wrong in the past. From a psychological point of view this does not seem to be a good strategy even though we explain what we have changed. The issues that we treat in the planned Checkpoint session possess a value of their own and we should present them in the way. Therefore our suggestion would be to shortly go through the Checkpoints, based on a table that we present, report on the status and the point to that part of the review where we demonstrate how we have handled them. 2. The time that we save this way should be used for other purposes. One should be to point at our efforts in improving the collaboration with the Use Case projects. We haven't found this topic in the agenda explicitly even though aspects of this topic appear in the checkpoint Presentation. These points should be bundled and enhanced by reports on our other collaboration activities in this respect and presented as a separate point of the agenda. 3. Finally we would prefer to spend more time on the individual chapters. 10 minutes is very brief and we fear that we cannot present our chapter results in the limited timeframe. We see the problem that each extension of the timeslot means a sevenfold extension but nevertheless some extension would actually be necessary. Every feedback to these suggestions is welcome, please don't hesitate to give it. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 14 08:35:29 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:35:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Suggestions regarding the Review Agenda In-Reply-To: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C943A2B6@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C943A2B6@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <50A349C1.7060409@tid.es> Dear Uwe, My comments between lines: On 13/11/12 21:32, Riss, Uwe wrote: Hello, Following our Conf Call on Monday we looked at the review agenda again and decided to make the following remarks and suggestions: 1. The Presentation of Checkpoints is much too long. The current planning would mean that we concentrate for 3 hours on what went wrong in the past. From a psychological point of view this does not seem to be a good strategy even though we explain what we have changed. The issues that we treat in the planned Checkpoint session possess a value of their own and we should present them in the way. Therefore our suggestion would be to shortly go through the Checkpoints, based on a table that we present, report on the status and the point to that part of the review where we demonstrate how we have handled them. I believe this would be a rather wrong decision and I would strongly object to that. Covering the checkpoints doesn't mean we will concentrate on "what went wrong in the past". The right interpretation is "we are going to concentrate 3 hours demonstrating you that we actually care about your concerns, explaining how we have dealt with them". I believe that one of the problems we have to solve is that the reviewers have the impression that "this guys don't care about our comments, they just simply come here and tell what they have done no matter what we think they should do". Going in the direction of reducing this to save some time to elaborate on the Chapters, btw, would emphasize precisely that impression (we come here to tell you what we are doing, like it or not). It would almost clone the agenda of the previous review, and that would not be the best choice. We may reduce from other sides and give a little bit more to Chapters' presentations (I'll come to this later in response to point 3) Furthermore, many of the checkpoints were NOT about wrong things in the past. Some of them were indeed about points that couldn't be covered in the 1st year review (e.g., the Testbed is not available): checkpoints 2, 5, 7, 8 or 9 are good examples of that. So your proposal is based on a wrong analysis, sorry. Talking about timing, I rather believe we need the allocated time to present a credible response to checkpoints 1-8. Do you think that spending 10+20 mins elaborating on "Public availability of a matrix of Use Cases using the GEs" and "Testbed in operation, feedback from UC projects on using the Testbed, and potential integration with FIRE infrastructures." is too long ? By no means and there are A LOT of positive things we may talk about here, without anything that we have made particularly wrong in the past (BTW, here it is where we would elaborate on the FI-WARE Catalogue and how it has been used to communicate with UC projects and report on what is available on the Testbed). We may also bring positive messages regarding checkpoint 6 and this didn't have anything to do with things made wrong in the past. Checkpoint 11 may take less time, but I was assuming that most problably checkpoints 1-8 will go longer than the initially 90 minutes planned so I was managing some kind of cushion. 2. The time that we save this way should be used for other purposes. One should be to point at our efforts in improving the collaboration with the Use Case projects. We haven't found this topic in the agenda explicitly even though aspects of this topic appear in the checkpoint Presentation. These points should be bundled and enhanced by reports on our other collaboration activities in this respect and presented as a separate point of the agenda. Collaboration with the Use Case projects, despite being highlighted in the Summary of Status and somehow in several of the checkpoints, will have a dedicated slot during the presentation on "Communication, Collaboration and Dissemination" the second day (I would presume at least 20 mins). BTW, a lot of issues and WRONG things we have done in that respect (our performance with the tracker and responses to UC projects is rather poor). So, following your argument, nothing with respect to which we should spend too much time. I would highlight the "highs" during the first day, creating the necessary good momentum (checkpoints 2, 5 and 7 should allow us to do that) while how we are improving during the presentation the second day. 3. Finally we would prefer to spend more time on the individual chapters. 10 minutes is very brief and we fear that we cannot present our chapter results in the limited timeframe. We see the problem that each extension of the timeslot means a sevenfold extension but nevertheless some extension would actually be necessary. One thing we can do is reduce the presentation on "Summary of actions performed for deliverables resubmission", where we may reduce up to keep it 15 mins. And another 15 mins of the wrap-up. Therefore allocate aprox the 105 mins to presentations of Technical Chapters which would mean 15 mins for chapter. Going for more time on each chatper would simply go in the same direction of previous reviews. I feel like it would be the wrong direction. Best regards, -- Juanjo Every feedback to these suggestions is welcome, please don't hesitate to give it. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Nov 14 09:24:46 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:24:46 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Nov 14 12:15:51 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:15:51 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects References: Message-ID: Dear all I see no responses to my proposal of a short audio to review the strategy for the review. I have had a short audio with Juan preparing the review, You can see the main conclusions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# If you think we should have a audio discussion, please feel free to suggest the time ( I can do it this afternoon and tomorrow). Otherwise, please see the plan in the google docs and propose changes. We shall send you a new version of the presentations by Monday BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 9:22 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Asunto: RE: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Wed Nov 14 13:03:49 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:03:49 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004940@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Jose, thank you very much for the offer to have an alignment of the "key messages" . I have established a doodle-poll to find a timeslot for this discussion http://doodle.com/fgpt2565c5pdkn9i It would be very helpful if you can provide your answer until tomorrow 15:00. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 12:16 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all I see no responses to my proposal of a short audio to review the strategy for the review. I have had a short audio with Juan preparing the review, You can see the main conclusions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# If you think we should have a audio discussion, please feel free to suggest the time ( I can do it this afternoon and tomorrow). Otherwise, please see the plan in the google docs and propose changes. We shall send you a new version of the presentations by Monday BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 9:22 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Asunto: RE: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Nov 14 13:18:02 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:18:02 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004940@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004940@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: I have answered the doodle, but I am afraid I have a very crowded agenda for next week. I'd rather do it this afternoon or tomorrow afternoon BR De: Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 13:04 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear Jose, thank you very much for the offer to have an alignment of the "key messages" . I have established a doodle-poll to find a timeslot for this discussion http://doodle.com/fgpt2565c5pdkn9i It would be very helpful if you can provide your answer until tomorrow 15:00. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 12:16 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all I see no responses to my proposal of a short audio to review the strategy for the review. I have had a short audio with Juan preparing the review, You can see the main conclusions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# If you think we should have a audio discussion, please feel free to suggest the time ( I can do it this afternoon and tomorrow). Otherwise, please see the plan in the google docs and propose changes. We shall send you a new version of the presentations by Monday BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 9:22 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Asunto: RE: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Wed Nov 14 13:53:00 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:53:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004940@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004AA8@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Jose, thank you for the hint, I have already extended the poll accordingly. Hopefully one of the new timeslots fits better. Best regards, Axel From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 13:18 To: Fasse, Axel Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects I have answered the doodle, but I am afraid I have a very crowded agenda for next week. I'd rather do it this afternoon or tomorrow afternoon BR De: Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 13:04 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear Jose, thank you very much for the offer to have an alignment of the "key messages" . I have established a doodle-poll to find a timeslot for this discussion http://doodle.com/fgpt2565c5pdkn9i It would be very helpful if you can provide your answer until tomorrow 15:00. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 12:16 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all I see no responses to my proposal of a short audio to review the strategy for the review. I have had a short audio with Juan preparing the review, You can see the main conclusions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# If you think we should have a audio discussion, please feel free to suggest the time ( I can do it this afternoon and tomorrow). Otherwise, please see the plan in the google docs and propose changes. We shall send you a new version of the presentations by Monday BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 9:22 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Asunto: RE: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Wed Nov 14 14:48:58 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:48:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004BB6@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Jose, if this presentation is planned to be presented during our Review, I would suggest to add some links to the Seville presentations and/or the "related" information within the WIKI. This might be helpful for the reviewers to understand the "messages" of the companies. What do you think about this idea? Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 09:25 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Nov 14 15:50:11 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:50:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004BB6@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004BB6@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: Dear Axel The presentation is essentially a summary of the main messages of the deliverables. It is not intended to cover all the information (which is indeed included into the deliverables themselves). Certainly, we can add links, but this is somewhat redundant, since the presentation is not holding in itself We can debate whether we can really compress the main messages just in one or two slides, but a link in a presentation which is complementary of a presentation I think is not necessary BR De: Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 14:49 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear Jose, if this presentation is planned to be presented during our Review, I would suggest to add some links to the Seville presentations and/or the "related" information within the WIKI. This might be helpful for the reviewers to understand the "messages" of the companies. What do you think about this idea? Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 09:25 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Nov 15 00:25:54 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:25:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] SW Release deliverable Message-ID: <50A42882.5060006@tid.es> Dear all, We are requested to have a clear picture of the status of D.x.2.a (software release). It is very complex from outside to see where to find each GE so it it reasonalbe to provide this. Each WPL please coordinate internally and send me back the details of each of the GEs in your chapter. This does not seem complicated at all so please send it to me by Friday. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SWDelivery (D.x.2).docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 16513 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jimenez at tid.es Thu Nov 15 08:46:37 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:46:37 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004940@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004940@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: Dear all After having a quick look at Axel's doodle, I propose we talk today at 15.00. I know Pier may have difficulties, Really sorry, but it seems impossible to have everybody. Definitely we cannot miss Juan. Axel, can you provide the facilities?. Otherwise we use powwownow. Thank you From: Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 13:04 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear Jose, thank you very much for the offer to have an alignment of the "key messages" . I have established a doodle-poll to find a timeslot for this discussion http://doodle.com/fgpt2565c5pdkn9i It would be very helpful if you can provide your answer until tomorrow 15:00. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 12:16 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all I see no responses to my proposal of a short audio to review the strategy for the review. I have had a short audio with Juan preparing the review, You can see the main conclusions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# If you think we should have a audio discussion, please feel free to suggest the time ( I can do it this afternoon and tomorrow). Otherwise, please see the plan in the google docs and propose changes. We shall send you a new version of the presentations by Monday BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 9:22 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Asunto: RE: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Nov 15 08:58:37 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:58:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636175004940@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: Dear Jose, indeed I cannot attend the call today afternoon. However if you are available at around 11:30-12:00, I could call you for a short talk on the topics you'll discuss later. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Inviato: gioved? 15 novembre 2012 08:47 A: Fasse, Axel Cc: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all After having a quick look at Axel's doodle, I propose we talk today at 15.00. I know Pier may have difficulties, Really sorry, but it seems impossible to have everybody. Definitely we cannot miss Juan. Axel, can you provide the facilities?. Otherwise we use powwownow. Thank you From: Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 13:04 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear Jose, thank you very much for the offer to have an alignment of the "key messages" . I have established a doodle-poll to find a timeslot for this discussion http://doodle.com/fgpt2565c5pdkn9i It would be very helpful if you can provide your answer until tomorrow 15:00. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 12:16 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all I see no responses to my proposal of a short audio to review the strategy for the review. I have had a short audio with Juan preparing the review, You can see the main conclusions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# If you think we should have a audio discussion, please feel free to suggest the time ( I can do it this afternoon and tomorrow). Otherwise, please see the plan in the google docs and propose changes. We shall send you a new version of the presentations by Monday BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 9:22 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Asunto: RE: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday - attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Nov 15 09:25:29 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:25:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636174233E6D@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Jose, I will send a outlook meeting request that contains the SAP Connect details in the next 90 Minutes. Best regards and thank you for your support. Axel Von: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Gesendet: Thursday, November 15, 2012 08:46 AM W. Europe Standard Time An: Fasse, Axel Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' ; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' ; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO ; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu) ; Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Betreff: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all After having a quick look at Axel?s doodle, I propose we talk today at 15.00. I know Pier may have difficulties, Really sorry, but it seems impossible to have everybody. Definitely we cannot miss Juan. Axel, can you provide the facilities?. Otherwise we use powwownow. Thank you From: Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 13:04 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear Jose, thank you very much for the offer to have an alignment of the ?key messages? . I have established a doodle-poll to find a timeslot for this discussion http://doodle.com/fgpt2565c5pdkn9i It would be very helpful if you can provide your answer until tomorrow 15:00. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 12:16 To: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all I see no responses to my proposal of a short audio to review the strategy for the review. I have had a short audio with Juan preparing the review, You can see the main conclusions at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# If you think we should have a audio discussion, please feel free to suggest the time ( I can do it this afternoon and tomorrow). Otherwise, please see the plan in the google docs and propose changes. We shall send you a new version of the presentations by Monday BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 14 de noviembre de 2012 9:22 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Asunto: RE: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all Connected to this issue, I think it may be useful to present a summary of the exploitation plans of the different partners. We could go very briefly at the review through that I have created a short summary of what you have informed. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10KEKfhi4GjrMEXf_cC7n0KuGVl_zNSpurbXm0u6JBC8/edit#slide=id.g3a761385_2_46 1) Please review/change the data 2) Suggestions on the best way to present it Note: I am not sure if the current list is reaching all interested parties. Could you (Miguel, Juan) check that? Please do not forget about the mail I sent yesterday ? attached (regarding a possible audio today to review commercialization strategy) BR De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 17:54 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'Carmen Perea Escribano' (carmen.perea at atosresearch.eu); Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Preparation of review. Commercial aspects Dear all As agreed in the WPL meeting, we need to start preparing commercial part of the review. See link I have prepared an initial list of items to be considered. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JFov9d15HPZXw0WP3dBz8dKXpth-Ck-4Z34h8ph6A0Y/edit# As indicated, I think we need to have presentations of all relevant companies that were not present in Seville. (just a short overview) We could have a short meeting to discuss it Wednesday or Thursday afternoon if you have comments. Would it be possible tomorrow at 16.00? BR -- Jose Jimenez Telef?nica I+D Tf +34 914 832 660 jimenez at tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Nov 15 10:42:18 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:42:18 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Preparation of the Key-Messages for our M18 Review Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63617509CDAD@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear FI-WARE collegaues, with respect to the fact that Jose prefers this time, let us start the discussion today. Conference Passcode : 9525481261 SAP-Connect : https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/D055237 Switzerland, Geneva : +41 22 592 7995 BlackBerry: tel:+41225927995x9525481261 Switzerland, Zurich : +41 43 456 9248 BlackBerry: tel:+41434569248x9525481261 Italy, Milan : +39 02 3600 9839 BlackBerry: tel:+390236009839x9525481261# Italy, Rome : +39 06 4523 6623 BlackBerry: tel:+390645236623x9525481261# Finland, Helsinki : +358 9 2310 1631 BlackBerry: tel:+358923101631x9525481261# France, Paris : +33 1 70 70 17 77 BlackBerry: tel:+33170701777x9525481261# Germany, Frankfurt : +49 69 2222 10764 BlackBerry: tel:+4969222210764x9525481261# Germany, Munich : +49 89 7104 24682 Blackberry: tel:+4989710424682x9525481261# Portugal, Lisbon : +351 21 781 0275 Blackberry: tel:+351217810275x9525481261# Spain, Barcelona : +34 93 800 0782 Blackberry: tel:+34938000782x9525481261# Spain, Madrid : +34 91 769 9443 Blackberry: tel:+34917699443x9525481261# Sweden, Stockholm : +46 8 5033 6514 Blackberry: tel:+46850336514x9525481261# Best regards, Axel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 3965 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 15 16:08:57 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:08:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Follow-up on the agenda In-Reply-To: <50A349C1.7060409@tid.es> References: <1491C91A94302A448D73CD9C6B7A782046C943A2B6@DEWDFECCR02.wdf.sap.corp> <50A349C1.7060409@tid.es> Message-ID: <50A50589.1080602@tid.es> Hi all, SAP and us have a little bit discussion about the agenda and it came clear that a number of things should be clarified regarding the proposed agenda. Besides, we had time to discuss a couple of ideas that it's worth to put on the table and confirm it's ok for everyone, so we make sure that we are all on the same page. First of all, the proposed agenda we have shared with the EC and reviewers didn't elaborate on the ordering we should follow regarding presentation of the checkpoints. Therefore we can change the ordering a bit if we find is necessary. The fact that we start with the live demo is a true demonstration that this was originally intended. Maybe the fact that I had put all the checkpoints in the shared spreadsheet and put them in the same position as their numbers was a bit misleading. The main goal of that spreadsheet was to share information about duration of each presentation and also designate caretakers as well as share ideas/comments regarding the presentation linked to each point. Besides this, SAP and us agreed that it would be nice to introduce some key messages but do it leveraging on what we have achieved or planned regarding checkpoints. To some extend, checkpoints are the "facts" that reviewers want to see (as compared to vague promises or intentions) so we should try to combine these facts in support of some key messages we want to deliver. Following that approach, we believe that the following script would look nice. The idea would be to deal with each subset of checkpoints and close the presentation of those subset with some closing statement we may present in some slide: * checkpoints 9 (live demo), checkpoint 1 ==> FI-WARE is useful * checkpoints 2, 5 ==> FI-WARE is already working (testbed) and has started to be used * checkpoints 6-7-8 ==> FI-WARE will be able to attract the wider community of developers (because we have a plan for it) * checkpoint 11 ==> FI-WARE is sustainable * checkpoint 3-4 ==> FI-WARE is on track (again) We would end up with a single slide with all the messages. We may need to move the item on "Summary of actions performed for deliverables resubmission" right after revision of the checkpoints. We may also go for making it a bit shorter (15 mins) so that we try to have more time for presentations of the different chapters. Of course, your feedback is welcome. We can discuss it off-line and close the discussion during our next joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall on Monday, 11:00am. Best regards, -- juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/11/12 08:35, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear Uwe, My comments between lines: On 13/11/12 21:32, Riss, Uwe wrote: Hello, Following our Conf Call on Monday we looked at the review agenda again and decided to make the following remarks and suggestions: 1. The Presentation of Checkpoints is much too long. The current planning would mean that we concentrate for 3 hours on what went wrong in the past. From a psychological point of view this does not seem to be a good strategy even though we explain what we have changed. The issues that we treat in the planned Checkpoint session possess a value of their own and we should present them in the way. Therefore our suggestion would be to shortly go through the Checkpoints, based on a table that we present, report on the status and the point to that part of the review where we demonstrate how we have handled them. I believe this would be a rather wrong decision and I would strongly object to that. Covering the checkpoints doesn't mean we will concentrate on "what went wrong in the past". The right interpretation is "we are going to concentrate 3 hours demonstrating you that we actually care about your concerns, explaining how we have dealt with them". I believe that one of the problems we have to solve is that the reviewers have the impression that "this guys don't care about our comments, they just simply come here and tell what they have done no matter what we think they should do". Going in the direction of reducing this to save some time to elaborate on the Chapters, btw, would emphasize precisely that impression (we come here to tell you what we are doing, like it or not). It would almost clone the agenda of the previous review, and that would not be the best choice. We may reduce from other sides and give a little bit more to Chapters' presentations (I'll come to this later in response to point 3) Furthermore, many of the checkpoints were NOT about wrong things in the past. Some of them were indeed about points that couldn't be covered in the 1st year review (e.g., the Testbed is not available): checkpoints 2, 5, 7, 8 or 9 are good examples of that. So your proposal is based on a wrong analysis, sorry. Talking about timing, I rather believe we need the allocated time to present a credible response to checkpoints 1-8. Do you think that spending 10+20 mins elaborating on "Public availability of a matrix of Use Cases using the GEs" and "Testbed in operation, feedback from UC projects on using the Testbed, and potential integration with FIRE infrastructures." is too long ? By no means and there are A LOT of positive things we may talk about here, without anything that we have made particularly wrong in the past (BTW, here it is where we would elaborate on the FI-WARE Catalogue and how it has been used to communicate with UC projects and report on what is available on the Testbed). We may also bring positive messages regarding checkpoint 6 and this didn't have anything to do with things made wrong in the past. Checkpoint 11 may take less time, but I was assuming that most problably checkpoints 1-8 will go longer than the initially 90 minutes planned so I was managing some kind of cushion. 2. The time that we save this way should be used for other purposes. One should be to point at our efforts in improving the collaboration with the Use Case projects. We haven't found this topic in the agenda explicitly even though aspects of this topic appear in the checkpoint Presentation. These points should be bundled and enhanced by reports on our other collaboration activities in this respect and presented as a separate point of the agenda. Collaboration with the Use Case projects, despite being highlighted in the Summary of Status and somehow in several of the checkpoints, will have a dedicated slot during the presentation on "Communication, Collaboration and Dissemination" the second day (I would presume at least 20 mins). BTW, a lot of issues and WRONG things we have done in that respect (our performance with the tracker and responses to UC projects is rather poor). So, following your argument, nothing with respect to which we should spend too much time. I would highlight the "highs" during the first day, creating the necessary good momentum (checkpoints 2, 5 and 7 should allow us to do that) while how we are improving during the presentation the second day. 3. Finally we would prefer to spend more time on the individual chapters. 10 minutes is very brief and we fear that we cannot present our chapter results in the limited timeframe. We see the problem that each extension of the timeslot means a sevenfold extension but nevertheless some extension would actually be necessary. One thing we can do is reduce the presentation on "Summary of actions performed for deliverables resubmission", where we may reduce up to keep it 15 mins. And another 15 mins of the wrap-up. Therefore allocate aprox the 105 mins to presentations of Technical Chapters which would mean 15 mins for chapter. Going for more time on each chatper would simply go in the same direction of previous reviews. I feel like it would be the wrong direction. Best regards, -- Juanjo Every feedback to these suggestions is welcome, please don't hesitate to give it. Best regards, Uwe Dr. Uwe Riss Senior Researcher, New Assets & Bussiness Model Innovation | SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227 7-70212 | F +49 6227 78-26158 | M +49 151 16810936 | mailto: uwe.riss at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 16 16:00:49 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:00:49 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: Use Terms and Conditions of FI-WARE GE implementation products Message-ID: <50A65521.1000006@tid.es> Dear FI-WARE colleagues, This mail is mostly devoted to partners who are owner of some FI-WARE GE Implementation (GEi) product being contributed to FI-WARE. I guess this means most if not all of you :-) I'm sending it to the fiware mailing list rather than only to the FI-WARE WPLs and WPAs to make sure that it arrives you as soon as possible. As you may know, one of the key concerns raised by the EC regarding FI-WARE is the sustainability of FI-WARE GEs not only within the FI-PPP program but also external to the FI-PPP and beyond the lifetime of the FI-WARE project. Indeed, one of the checkpoints that the EC and reviewers have marked as critical for the project review specifies the following: For each GE reference implementation: documentation should be provided that states the conditions under which it will be made available to FI-PPP programme participants and third parties beyond the lifetime of FI-WARE In order to cope with this request we will implement a number of changes in the FI-WARE Catalogue targeted to provide a new tab where FI-WARE GEi owners will be able to state the "Use terms & conditions" that will apply to their FI-WARE GEis: * for Experimentation/testing within the scope of the FI-PPP * for use under the umbrella of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab (check description of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab in the DoW) * for any other use (External availability) Enclosed, you will find a presentation and accompanying document that provide a detailed description of the approach to follow. The target goal is that the structural changes in the catalogue will be ready early next week. Following to that, FI-WARE GEi owners are asked to provide contents for the new tab and also refine contents of the "Instances" and "Downloads" tab as soon as possible. It will be highly desirable that it will be before the FI-WARE M18 Project Review scheduled for November 28-29, 2012. Otherwise, be able to deliver at the meeting a target date at which use terms and conditions for external availability will be published. Note that "Use Terms and Conditions" should be clear before delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release on the FI-WARE Testbed, i.e., launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. You will find detailed guidelines that may help you in fulfilling this request in the attached .docx. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Approach on FI-WARE Terms and Conditions beyond the FI-PPP and lifetime of the project 12-11-15.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 2129920 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Use Terms and Conditions 12-11-15 clean.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 33844 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Nov 16 19:42:39 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:42:39 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE - Thales input for your WP reporting Message-ID: <4480_1353091455_50A6897F_4480_4990_1_8f6e72ec-4a28-4d85-8a1e-be43ed2661e7@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Dear WP Lead Colleagues, In order to support in your reporting concerning activities perform in the WP you are leading please find attached to this email a file I've prepared with our Thales reporting per WP. Please use in complement of information you may already received from my Thales colleagues involved in your WP (at least I asked them to do so). In any case do think it's worth for me to you send as it can only help you in your reporting about Thales activities we performed during the reported period. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Please notice I would travelling next week so in case you have questions/remarks on this reporting please contact my colleague in cc. PS: @Javier : Will send you in another email the reporting for WP8 (I'm just doing some final polish ...). In the meantime you now have the information you requested for WP2 ... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE - M12-M18 reporting per WP THALES.doc Type: application/msword Size: 259584 bytes Desc: FI-WARE - M12-M18 reporting per WP THALES.doc URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sat Nov 17 09:46:47 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:46:47 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: Use Terms and Conditions of FI-WARE GE implementation products In-Reply-To: <50A65521.1000006@tid.es> References: <50A65521.1000006@tid.es> Message-ID: <50A74EF7.1000803@tid.es> Dear colleagues, There were two minor typos (usage of 'two' rather than 'three' in first paragraph of General Remarks section and title of section 1.3) in the accompanying .docx file that I have fixed in the attached version. Please don't forget to first read the powerpoint slides which gives you an overall description of the approach before getting into the details explained in the doc Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 16/11/12 16:00, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear FI-WARE colleagues, This mail is mostly devoted to partners who are owner of some FI-WARE GE Implementation (GEi) product being contributed to FI-WARE. I guess this means most if not all of you :-) I'm sending it to the fiware mailing list rather than only to the FI-WARE WPLs and WPAs to make sure that it arrives you as soon as possible. As you may know, one of the key concerns raised by the EC regarding FI-WARE is the sustainability of FI-WARE GEs not only within the FI-PPP program but also external to the FI-PPP and beyond the lifetime of the FI-WARE project. Indeed, one of the checkpoints that the EC and reviewers have marked as critical for the project review specifies the following: For each GE reference implementation: documentation should be provided that states the conditions under which it will be made available to FI-PPP programme participants and third parties beyond the lifetime of FI-WARE In order to cope with this request we will implement a number of changes in the FI-WARE Catalogue targeted to provide a new tab where FI-WARE GEi owners will be able to state the "Use terms & conditions" that will apply to their FI-WARE GEis: * for Experimentation/testing within the scope of the FI-PPP * for use under the umbrella of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab (check description of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab in the DoW) * for any other use (External availability) Enclosed, you will find a presentation and accompanying document that provide a detailed description of the approach to follow. The target goal is that the structural changes in the catalogue will be ready early next week. Following to that, FI-WARE GEi owners are asked to provide contents for the new tab and also refine contents of the "Instances" and "Downloads" tab as soon as possible. It will be highly desirable that it will be before the FI-WARE M18 Project Review scheduled for November 28-29, 2012. Otherwise, be able to deliver at the meeting a target date at which use terms and conditions for external availability will be published. Note that "Use Terms and Conditions" should be clear before delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release on the FI-WARE Testbed, i.e., launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. You will find detailed guidelines that may help you in fulfilling this request in the attached .docx. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Use Terms and Conditions 12-11-15 clean fixed.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 33868 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 19 04:41:56 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:41:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Confirmation of dates for the review and rehearsal meetings In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4CD41@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4CD41@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <50A9AA84.1050509@tid.es> Hi all, Just wanted to comment that apparently we sent a draft agenda to the EC where we said that the days for the review where Thu/Fri, when indeed the days are Wed/Thu, i.e., November 28th-29th. I guess that this is not an issue because we have talked about the actual dates since long time. But just in case :-) The rehearsal meeting will take place on Nov 26th-27th at Telefonica's facilities, starting on Monday at 09:30am. Jose will send you the data about the location along this week. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Confcall this afternoon or tomorrow morning regarding agenda for the project review and other stuff Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:04:03 +0000 From: To: NB the review is Wed/Thu, not Thu/Fri ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 19 05:54:52 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:54:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: [Fiware-pcc] FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50A9BB9C.5070701@tid.es> Hi, A kindly reminder to send us the names of the people who will attend the review. Please reply to Jose, with cc/ me. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:22:49 +0000 From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO To: 'fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu) Dear all Please do not forget to send us the names and ID of the people attending the review!! BR From: Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu] Sent: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 10:44 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; ? the management procedures and methods of the project; ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 19 06:00:24 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:24 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: [Fiware-pcc] FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting In-Reply-To: <50A9BB9C.5070701@tid.es> References: <50A9BB9C.5070701@tid.es> Message-ID: <50A9BCE8.9030501@tid.es> To ease the exercise, please add your name in the new sheet "Atendees" that I have created in the Google docs spreadsheet we are sharing with details about the agenda and presentations: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdGdrV1dZX2ZPMi1pWDlJQVF5anJIalE#gid=2 Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 19/11/12 05:54, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi, A kindly reminder to send us the names of the people who will attend the review. Please reply to Jose, with cc/ me. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:22:49 +0000 From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO To: 'fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu) Dear all Please do not forget to send us the names and ID of the people attending the review!! BR From: Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu] Sent: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 10:44 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; ? the management procedures and methods of the project; ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 ? Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Mon Nov 19 09:28:59 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:28:59 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: [Fiware-pcc] FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting In-Reply-To: <50A9BB9C.5070701@tid.es> References: <50A9BB9C.5070701@tid.es> Message-ID: <50A9EDCB.3090403@eng.it> Matteo Melideo Davide Dalle Carbonare Il 19/11/2012 05:54, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi, > > A kindly reminder to send us the names of the people who will attend > the review. > > Please reply to Jose, with cc/ me. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official > Invitation to M18 Review Meeting > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:22:49 +0000 > From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > To: 'fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu) > > > > > Dear all > > Please do not forget to send us the names and ID of the people > attending the review!! > > BR > > *From:*Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu > [mailto:Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu] > *Sent:* mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 10:44 > *To:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > *Cc:* CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; > msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; > rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; > MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO > *Subject:* FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review > Meeting > > Dear Mr. Jimenez, > > In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with > you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to > hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in > Brussels, Belgium on 28^th and 29^th November 2012. > > The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission > in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels > > Meeting rooms: > > 28^th and 29^th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 > > As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following > independent experts: > > - Dr Renaud Di Francesco > > - Dr. Dominic Greenwood > > - Ms Man-Sze Li > > - Ms Irena Pavlova > > The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: > > ?the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant > period and of the related deliverables; > > ?the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential > with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; > > ?the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved > progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, > efficiency and effectiveness; > > ?the management procedures and methods of the project; > > ?the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; > > ?the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, > competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the > use and dissemination of results. > > If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months > 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as > possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. > > Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9^th > November 2012. > > Please send me the names of the people attending the review before > Friday 23^rd November 2012. > > Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not > hesitate to contact me. > > Thank you for your co-operation. > > Best Regards, > > Vanessa Vanhumbeeck > > *European Commission* > > DG CONNECT > > Unit E3 -- Net Innovation > > Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 > Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jimenez at tid.es Mon Nov 19 09:32:57 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:32:57 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Confirmation of dates for the review and rehearsal meetings In-Reply-To: <50A9AA84.1050509@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4CD41@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50A9AA84.1050509@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear All The address for the review meeting is Queda reservada la sala grande para los d?as 26 y 27/11. ART20 BUILDING Avenue des Arts, 20 - 1st Floor 1000 Brussels Los tel?fonos seguir?n siendo los mismos. Centralita T:+32 2 230 95 55 Un saludo, De: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de Juanjo Hierro Enviado el: lunes, 19 de noviembre de 2012 4:42 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-wpl] Confirmation of dates for the review and rehearsal meetings Hi all, Just wanted to comment that apparently we sent a draft agenda to the EC where we said that the days for the review where Thu/Fri, when indeed the days are Wed/Thu, i.e., November 28th-29th. I guess that this is not an issue because we have talked about the actual dates since long time. But just in case :-) The rehearsal meeting will take place on Nov 26th-27th at Telefonica's facilities, starting on Monday at 09:30am. Jose will send you the data about the location along this week. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Confcall this afternoon or tomorrow morning regarding agenda for the project review and other stuff Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:04:03 +0000 From: To: NB the review is Wed/Thu, not Thu/Fri ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Nov 19 09:52:53 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:52:53 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting In-Reply-To: <50A9BCE8.9030501@tid.es> References: <50A9BB9C.5070701@tid.es> <50A9BCE8.9030501@tid.es> Message-ID: <17544_1353315174_50A9F366_17544_2043_3_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0833D5@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi All, Juanjo I?ve just added the ID Card column because we have normally to provide this kind of detail. BR Thierry De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : lundi 19 novembre 2012 06:00 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting To ease the exercise, please add your name in the new sheet "Atendees" that I have created in the Google docs spreadsheet we are sharing with details about the agenda and presentations: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdGdrV1dZX2ZPMi1pWDlJQVF5anJIalE#gid=2 Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 19/11/12 05:54, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi, A kindly reminder to send us the names of the people who will attend the review. Please reply to Jose, with cc/ me. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FW: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:22:49 +0000 From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO To: 'fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu) Dear all Please do not forget to send us the names and ID of the people attending the review!! BR From: Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu] Sent: mi?rcoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 10:44 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Subject: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; ? the management procedures and methods of the project; ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 ? Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Nov 19 09:53:36 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:53:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Confirmation of dates for the review and rehearsal meetings In-Reply-To: References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4CD41@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50A9AA84.1050509@tid.es> Message-ID: <17544_1353315217_50A9F391_17544_2070_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0833EA@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Jose The address is for the rehearsal (26th & 27th) or for the review itself? BR THierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Envoy? : lundi 19 novembre 2012 09:33 ? : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] Confirmation of dates for the review and rehearsal meetings Dear All The address for the review meeting is Queda reservada la sala grande para los d?as 26 y 27/11. ART20 BUILDING Avenue des Arts, 20 - 1st Floor 1000 Brussels Los tel?fonos seguir?n siendo los mismos. Centralita T:+32 2 230 95 55 Un saludo, De: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de Juanjo Hierro Enviado el: lunes, 19 de noviembre de 2012 4:42 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-wpl] Confirmation of dates for the review and rehearsal meetings Hi all, Just wanted to comment that apparently we sent a draft agenda to the EC where we said that the days for the review where Thu/Fri, when indeed the days are Wed/Thu, i.e., November 28th-29th. I guess that this is not an issue because we have talked about the actual dates since long time. But just in case :-) The rehearsal meeting will take place on Nov 26th-27th at Telefonica's facilities, starting on Monday at 09:30am. Jose will send you the data about the location along this week. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Confcall this afternoon or tomorrow morning regarding agenda for the project review and other stuff Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:04:03 +0000 From: To: NB the review is Wed/Thu, not Thu/Fri ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 19 10:45:52 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:45:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shared minutes for our confcall today Message-ID: <50A9FFD0.4080707@tid.es> Hi all, Here you are: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wNOy_6z9fhLSbAEKO-1AUpwlvejL8hPVfvQz7a1TcGo/edit# Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 19 11:13:11 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:13:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Resubmission of D2.3.1 - FI-WARE Architecture In-Reply-To: <50A93871.8090509@tid.es> References: <50A93871.8090509@tid.es> Message-ID: <50AA0637.5050005@tid.es> FYI -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Resubmission of D2.3.1 - FI-WARE Architecture Fecha: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:35:13 +0100 De: Juanjo Hierro Para: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu , irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com , DiFrancesco, Renaud , , Dominic Greenwood CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, This is the official resubmission of D2.3.1 - FI-WARE Architecture. You can download it from: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1643/D.2.3.1b_FI-WARE_Architecture.pdf As you know, Open Specifications of each FI-WARE GEs comprises a description of the "Basic Concepts" underlying the definition of the FI-WARE GE and a high-level view of the "Main Interactions" of the FI-WARE GE using interfaces/operations exported by the GE that potential users (including other GEs) can invoke. Those are aspects related to the Architecture of each FI-WARE GE and, therefore, part of the overall FI-WARE Architecture. Therefore, a relevant % of the contents of this deliverable are contents you have had the opportunity to review in the deliverables linked to FI-WARE Chapter Open Specifications. Don't feel worried about having to review another new 571 pages in the last moment :-) Please also bear in mind that the FI-WARE Architecture deliverable was intended to help a potential application developer, FI-WARE GE implementer or FI-WARE Instance Provider to understand what FI-WARE GEs were going to provide, providing more details than those provided in the initial "FI-WARE Product Vision (High-level Description)" deliverable but without the need to get into the details of API specifications (i.e., signature of operations, etc.). The FI-WARE Architecture was also defined to allow UC projects to gain a relatively good understanding of what was going to be delivered in a given release of FI-WARE, without waiting to the final release of the complete specifications. Therefore, the approach taken is incremental: FI-WARE GE Open Specifications extend contents of the FI-WARE Architecture, adding the details of FI-WARE GE API specifications. Another relevant point to take into account is that the contents of the FI-WARE Architecture get updated whenever a new version of the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications is delivered. This is to ensure consistency. That's why we have delivered the FI-WARE Architecture now, right after review and re-submission of the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications and not before. Last but not least, we believe that it is worth to remind that our goal with the first release of FI-WARE was to bring an enough-complete set of FI-WARE GEs the UC projects could play with, also enabling to identify potential gaps that could be covered through Open Calls. While some level of integration has already been achieved, a more closer integration of FI-WARE GEs within each chapter and across chapters is rather the focus of the 2nd Release. Furthermore, we anticipate that several aspects about the right approach for integration will come with the experience trying to develop some concrete usage scenarios. It is important to situate expectations at the right level. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 19 14:40:07 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:40:07 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Resubmission of D2.3.1 - FI-WARE Architecture In-Reply-To: <50A93871.8090509@tid.es> References: <50A93871.8090509@tid.es> Message-ID: <50AA36B7.5090807@tid.es> Hi, I believe I hadn't forwarded this email to you. Just FYI. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Resubmission of D2.3.1 - FI-WARE Architecture Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:35:13 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu , irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com , DiFrancesco, Renaud , msli at icfocus.co.uk, Dominic Greenwood CC: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO , Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, This is the official resubmission of D2.3.1 - FI-WARE Architecture. You can download it from: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1643/D.2.3.1b_FI-WARE_Architecture.pdf As you know, Open Specifications of each FI-WARE GEs comprises a description of the "Basic Concepts" underlying the definition of the FI-WARE GE and a high-level view of the "Main Interactions" of the FI-WARE GE using interfaces/operations exported by the GE that potential users (including other GEs) can invoke. Those are aspects related to the Architecture of each FI-WARE GE and, therefore, part of the overall FI-WARE Architecture. Therefore, a relevant % of the contents of this deliverable are contents you have had the opportunity to review in the deliverables linked to FI-WARE Chapter Open Specifications. Don't feel worried about having to review another new 571 pages in the last moment :-) Please also bear in mind that the FI-WARE Architecture deliverable was intended to help a potential application developer, FI-WARE GE implementer or FI-WARE Instance Provider to understand what FI-WARE GEs were going to provide, providing more details than those provided in the initial "FI-WARE Product Vision (High-level Description)" deliverable but without the need to get into the details of API specifications (i.e., signature of operations, etc.). The FI-WARE Architecture was also defined to allow UC projects to gain a relatively good understanding of what was going to be delivered in a given release of FI-WARE, without waiting to the final release of the complete specifications. Therefore, the approach taken is incremental: FI-WARE GE Open Specifications extend contents of the FI-WARE Architecture, adding the details of FI-WARE GE API specifications. Another relevant point to take into account is that the contents of the FI-WARE Architecture get updated whenever a new version of the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications is delivered. This is to ensure consistency. That's why we have delivered the FI-WARE Architecture now, right after review and re-submission of the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications and not before. Last but not least, we believe that it is worth to remind that our goal with the first release of FI-WARE was to bring an enough-complete set of FI-WARE GEs the UC projects could play with, also enabling to identify potential gaps that could be covered through Open Calls. While some level of integration has already been achieved, a more closer integration of FI-WARE GEs within each chapter and across chapters is rather the focus of the 2nd Release. Furthermore, we anticipate that several aspects about the right approach for integration will come with the experience trying to develop some concrete usage scenarios. It is important to situate expectations at the right level. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Nov 19 18:03:42 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:03:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FuNeMS 2013 and FI-WARE Message-ID: <50AA666E.50108@tid.es> Dear All, We received this request from Antonio Cimmino weeks ago and I intended to discuss it in the context of the WPL/WPA meeting. For different reasons this has not been possible in the last ones and I do not want to put it off any longer. I ignore if FI-WARE belongs to EC E1 (new D1) and if this applies or not. In any case it looks like Antonio suggests to have Fi-WARE represented either way. Antonio volunteers if necessary but maybe any of you want to take part in this as well. Best regards, Miguel ================ Dear Javier, Nuria I am contacting you concerning the FuNeMS 2013 (03-05.07.13 - Lisbon) TPC. ALU, Didier is working within the Steering Committee on the FuNeMS preparation, one of the actions being related to the TPC. The idea is to have all EC E1 (E1 is the new D1 Unit (Network Technologies)). projects represented within the TPC. I do not know if FI PPP belongs to the E1 but probably FIWARE could appoint a delegate to the TPC as well. Do you have any preference? Eventually i'm available as representative of FIWARE within the activities of dissemintation let me know .antonio -- Antonio Cimmino Alcatel-Lucent Optics Eu Cooperation programs -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 20 08:27:08 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:27:08 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: VERY IMPORTANT TASK TO COMPLETE ASAP BY ALL FI-WARE GEi owners: Use Terms and Conditions linked to FI-WARE GE implementation products In-Reply-To: <50AB307B.60803@tid.es> References: <50AB307B.60803@tid.es> Message-ID: <50AB30CC.5070100@tid.es> Please push members of your WPs/Chapters to carry out this task force. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: VERY IMPORTANT TASK TO COMPLETE ASAP BY ALL FI-WARE GEi owners: Use Terms and Conditions linked to FI-WARE GE implementation products Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:25:47 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear colleagues, As announced last Friday, we have already created a new tab on "Terms and Conditions" for each entry in the FI-WARE Catalogue. We have developed a powerpoint presentation describing the overall approach to be followed to update FI-WARE Catalogue entries, plus a .docx guide containing paragraph templates you may use to complete the task. You cand download both from: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1649/Approach+on+FI-WARE+Terms+and+Conditions+beyond+the+FI-PPP+and+lifetime+of+the+project++12-11-15.pptx * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1650/FI-WARE+Use+Terms+and+Conditions+12-11-20.docx We need this task force to be completed before the FI-WARE Project Review scheduled for November 28-29. As already mentioned (see previous mail attached to this one), this task force is key to address one of the most critical requirements by the EC about sustainability of FI-WARE GE implementations (also probably the most relevant checkpoint that will be evaluated by the EC and the reviewer during our next review). FI-WARE GEi owners are asked to provide contents for the new "Terms and Conditions" tab and also update the contents of the "Instances" and "Downloads" tabs as soon as possible. Providing contents to the "Experimentation/testing within the scope of the FI-PPP" section under the "Terms and Conditions" tab would be mandatory prior the review meeting (this means just adding a standard text provided in the .docx guide above). You must also place the entries describing current instances that are listed under the "Instances" tab within a section titled "Experimental instances" which should start with the paragraph proposed in the .docx guide. Besides, you must add the paragraph proposed in the .docx guide to the "Downloads" tab. Last but not least, it will be highly desirable that you also incorporate a section on "External availability" under the "Terms and Conditions" tab before the review meeting. Check the .docx guide for suggested paragraph templates. If you cannot provide this on time for the review, you should inform us prior to the review meeting when you plan to publish the contents for such section on the FI-WARE Catalogue. We will share that info only to the EC and reviewers during the review. Please do so by means of completing the following spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDdGQnl1eTRSLXdRSHd5cHd4LUhnOFE If you believe the info in that spreadsheet is not accurate and needs to be updated (e.g., name of the FI-WARE GEi), don't hesitate to do so. Note that the complete contents of the "Use Terms and Conditions", including the section on "External availability", must be clear before delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release on the FI-WARE Testbed, i.e., launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. However, the EC has requested that the "Use Terms and Conditions" get published definitively earlier than the start date of the 2nd Phase of the FI-PPP, which is scheduled for April 2013. Concretely, the EC would like to see that the contents published in the "Use Terms and Conditions" tab for each FI-WARE GE implementation (GEi) brings enough information that express clear commitment by the corresponding FI-WARE owner on sustainability of the FI-WARE GEi outside the scope of the FI-PPP (External Availability) before a meeting with Mrs Neelie Kroes, scheduled to take place at the beginning of 2013 (no date is fixed yet). Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 16/11/12 16:00, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear FI-WARE colleagues, This mail is mostly devoted to partners who are owner of some FI-WARE GE Implementation (GEi) product being contributed to FI-WARE. I guess this means most if not all of you :-) I'm sending it to the fiware mailing list rather than only to the FI-WARE WPLs and WPAs to make sure that it arrives you as soon as possible. As you may know, one of the key concerns raised by the EC regarding FI-WARE is the sustainability of FI-WARE GEs not only within the FI-PPP program but also external to the FI-PPP and beyond the lifetime of the FI-WARE project. Indeed, one of the checkpoints that the EC and reviewers have marked as critical for the project review specifies the following: For each GE reference implementation: documentation should be provided that states the conditions under which it will be made available to FI-PPP programme participants and third parties beyond the lifetime of FI-WARE In order to cope with this request we will implement a number of changes in the FI-WARE Catalogue targeted to provide a new tab where FI-WARE GEi owners will be able to state the "Use terms & conditions" that will apply to their FI-WARE GEis: * for Experimentation/testing within the scope of the FI-PPP * for use under the umbrella of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab (check description of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab in the DoW) * for any other use (External availability) Enclosed, you will find a presentation and accompanying document that provide a detailed description of the approach to follow. The target goal is that the structural changes in the catalogue will be ready early next week. Following to that, FI-WARE GEi owners are asked to provide contents for the new tab and also refine contents of the "Instances" and "Downloads" tab as soon as possible. It will be highly desirable that it will be before the FI-WARE M18 Project Review scheduled for November 28-29, 2012. Otherwise, be able to deliver at the meeting a target date at which use terms and conditions for external availability will be published. Note that "Use Terms and Conditions" should be clear before delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release on the FI-WARE Testbed, i.e., launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. You will find detailed guidelines that may help you in fulfilling this request in the attached .docx. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Tue Nov 20 16:02:29 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:02:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: FI-WARE Demo Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636176986C23@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear FI-WARE colleagues, I have seen that there is a delay in the delivery of this mail. So please feel free block this timeslot and join this session. Best regards, Axel -----Original Appointment----- From: Fasse, Axel Sent: Dienstag, 20. November 2012 11:22 To: Juanjo Hierro (jhierro at tid.es); fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; Jose Jimenez (jimenez at tid.es); Klein, Andreas (andreas.klein at sap.com) Subject: FI-WARE Demo When: Donnerstag, 22. November 2012 16:30-18:30 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: SAP Connect Dear FI-WARE colleagues, As discussed during the WPL/WPA Call, we should have a ?realistic? trial run of the demo. I would suggest to follow the agenda and the timeline that Juanjo has proposed for the review-meeting. (5 min) Intro (Lead: Juanjo) (45 min) Live Demo ilustrating encompassing usage of GEs: 1st Part (Lead: TBD) (10 min) Review/Comments Demo 1 (45 min) Live Demo ilustrating encompassing usage of GEs: 2nd Part (Lead: TBD) (10 min) Review/Comments Demo 2 (5 min) Closing & Next Steps (Lead: Juanjo) Conference Passcode : 9525481261 SAP-Connect : https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/D055237 Switzerland, Geneva : +41 22 592 7995 BlackBerry: tel:+41225927995x9525481261 Switzerland, Zurich : +41 43 456 9248 BlackBerry: tel:+41434569248x9525481261 Italy, Milan : +39 02 3600 9839 BlackBerry: tel:+390236009839x9525481261# Italy, Rome : +39 06 4523 6623 BlackBerry: tel:+390645236623x9525481261# Finland, Helsinki : +358 9 2310 1631 BlackBerry: tel:+358923101631x9525481261# France, Paris : +33 1 70 70 17 77 BlackBerry: tel:+33170701777x9525481261# Germany, Frankfurt : +49 69 2222 10764 BlackBerry: tel:+4969222210764x9525481261# Germany, Munich : +49 89 7104 24682 Blackberry: tel:+4989710424682x9525481261# Portugal, Lisbon : +351 21 781 0275 Blackberry: tel:+351217810275x9525481261# Spain, Barcelona : +34 93 800 0782 Blackberry: tel:+34938000782x9525481261# Spain, Madrid : +34 91 769 9443 Blackberry: tel:+34917699443x9525481261# Sweden, Stockholm : +46 8 5033 6514 Blackberry: tel:+46850336514x9525481261# Best regards, Axel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 4754 bytes Desc: not available URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Tue Nov 20 11:22:05 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:22:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Demo Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A6361769866B5@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear FI-WARE colleagues, As discussed during the WPL/WPA Call, we should have a ?realistic? trial run of the demo. I would suggest to follow the agenda and the timeline that Juanjo has proposed for the review-meeting. (5 min) Intro (Lead: Juanjo) (45 min) Live Demo ilustrating encompassing usage of GEs: 1st Part (Lead: TBD) (10 min) Review/Comments Demo 1 (45 min) Live Demo ilustrating encompassing usage of GEs: 2nd Part (Lead: TBD) (10 min) Review/Comments Demo 2 (5 min) Closing & Next Steps (Lead: Juanjo) Conference Passcode : 9525481261 SAP-Connect : https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/D055237 Switzerland, Geneva : +41 22 592 7995 BlackBerry: tel:+41225927995x9525481261 Switzerland, Zurich : +41 43 456 9248 BlackBerry: tel:+41434569248x9525481261 Italy, Milan : +39 02 3600 9839 BlackBerry: tel:+390236009839x9525481261# Italy, Rome : +39 06 4523 6623 BlackBerry: tel:+390645236623x9525481261# Finland, Helsinki : +358 9 2310 1631 BlackBerry: tel:+358923101631x9525481261# France, Paris : +33 1 70 70 17 77 BlackBerry: tel:+33170701777x9525481261# Germany, Frankfurt : +49 69 2222 10764 BlackBerry: tel:+4969222210764x9525481261# Germany, Munich : +49 89 7104 24682 Blackberry: tel:+4989710424682x9525481261# Portugal, Lisbon : +351 21 781 0275 Blackberry: tel:+351217810275x9525481261# Spain, Barcelona : +34 93 800 0782 Blackberry: tel:+34938000782x9525481261# Spain, Madrid : +34 91 769 9443 Blackberry: tel:+34917699443x9525481261# Sweden, Stockholm : +46 8 5033 6514 Blackberry: tel:+46850336514x9525481261# Best regards, Axel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 4471 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 20 21:45:08 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:45:08 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4DB2C@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4DB2C@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> Hi, Please find below the comments and requests that Arian has just sent to us regarding the agenda for the review (only 5 days before :-) I have to confess that I got crazy in a first approach when I read it ... but then I calmed down and I believe we can face it in a constructive way :-): * Points 2), 4) and even 5) may be taken as part of we had to prepare as presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ... I don't see a particular issue with that ... It's true that some questions may be tough to respond but better to know them in advance than having to respond to them by surprise at the review. Actually, they are providing here valuable information that should help us to prepare better the part of the presentations that was covering those checkpoints. * I have to confess that point 3) was totally unexpected ... However, I believe it should fit pretty well within the presentation on FI-WARE Value Proposition. Indeed, there was valuable content that we generated in that deliverable that should have taken into account for that presentation (and may have even taken into account already) * Regarding the live demo, I believe that we should respond giving them more details about the planned demo, explaining Arian and reviewers that what we are trying to achieve with the demo is much more ambitious than going through isolated demos of FI-WARE GEs standalone "in a row" ... Our planned live demo explains how different GEs can be used for the same application and also elaborates on how different phases in the lifecycle of an application are supported (note that Cloud or marketplace aspects are just ignored) ... Probably they were not expecting such a complete demo but a sequence of demos of some of the GEs ... therefore they were just asking to choose which ones ... I guess that we may convince them that what we propose is better. Alternatively, we may program a short webinar of some of the GEs not presented in the demo they are asking for. I would bet for the Proton CEP. I wonder whether one on the Mobile CEP Engine is also feasible (I have checked and the webinar on the IoT Gateway Data Handling GE is not planned until Dec 4th ...) Honestly speaking, I believe it doesn't make sense to plan one for the Ericsson Composition Engine or the Mashup Factory given the fact that sustainability of both is currently in question. * Point 6) is probably the more tricky point ... what would you interpret that they are expecting when they refer to "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? Aren't we addressing this to some extend in the presentation regarding Explotation or also the one on "Value Proposition" ? Your response to the following questions is needed so that we can elaborate a response to Arian: * Stefano: do you think we can address well points 2, 4 and 5 asked by Arian and the reviewers within the presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ? I believe so but wanted to check your opinion. Of course, you can count on me for helping to develop the slides. If you agree, we may respond Arian that those points are going to be address there. * SAP and the team working in the presentation regarding the FI-WARE Value Proposition: may you integrate presentation of the "Third Party Innovation Deliverable" in that presentation ? If you agree, we may explain Arian that we were planning to address presentation of the results of this deliverable in that slot during the second day but we can elaborate more on it. * All: would you agree with explaining them what our live demo was about before hand ? I guess it doesn't harm. * Thierry: Is it feasible to prepare something about the Mobile CEP Engine with such a short notice ? * SAP: Does it make sense to prepare a demo regarding the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Engine ? I don't believe so but ... how would you justify it and explain that it would be better to use the Application Mashup GE ? I believe that they have just guided their decision based on input from UC projects regarding the planned usage of GEs (shared spreadsheet) but ... as far as I know, not only Finest have decided to go for using WireCloud but also Outsmart ... is this information correct ? I believe that if we explain that there are at least two UC projects who have already decided to use it in their design, we can justify to go for it instead of the ones they propose * IBM: would it be feasible that Guy makes a presentation on the Proton CEP, perhaps a webinar that matches some of the two days if attendance to the review is not feasible ? * All: wouldn't it make sense to invite Arian and the reviewers to attend the webinars regarding some of the GEs they refer to ... as alternative to cover them as part of the live demo ? * All: what is your feeling regarding the "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:39:12 +0000 From: To: , CC: , , , , , , Dear Juanjo, Thank you very much for the draft agenda. Some changes that we would like to see: 1) The live demos (day 1, 10.30 ? 12.15) need to go in detail with at least 3 GEs "in full", i.e. including the full set of documentation and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus relevant issues relating to implementation), in addition to the ?live demos? already scheduled. The three (or more) GEs should be drawn from the chapters 3, 5 & 6 and should be the ones which have generated the greatest interest so far. So, for chapter 3 it would be the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Editor, for ch 5 it would be the Things Mgt GE or the CEP Mobile Manager (as the Backend Device Mgt GE is not available), and for ch 6 it would be Proactive Technology Online, the Context Awareness Platform, the Samson broker, or the Query Broker. 2) Somewhere in the agenda the latest status of GE take-up by the Use Cases, the consortium members themselves, and potentially additional interests elsewhere needs to be presented. 3) Third Party Innovation Enablement is a key deliverable and needs to be presented. 4) Testbed and testing deliverables are also important and should be presented. It would be good to know how the Test bed actually supports some of the non-functional capabilities that are listed in the first release in the Technical Roadmap 5) A summary of the status of the validation of the GEs from the Use Cases and how this is checked back against the requirements needs to be presented. 6) The Closing Statements should include a presentation of Outlook for FI-WARE from the consortium?s viewpoint. 7) To accommodate the above items, Day 2 could end later and the 3 hours planned for Revision of checkpoints could be shorter. Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:21 AM To: VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) Cc: jimenez at tid.es; CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; mcp at tid.es; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, Please find enclosed a draft agenda for the project review. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 07/11/12 10:43, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; ? the management procedures and methods of the project; ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 ? Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Tue Nov 20 22:08:21 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:08:21 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting In-Reply-To: <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4DB2C@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> Message-ID: <30970_1353445703_50ABF147_30970_2128_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083C7B@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Juanjo Regarding Outlook for Fi-Ware, we can expect that exploitation plans is part of the answer but they are dissociated partners approach and one expectation from the Commission could be: do we agree to launch a Fi-Ware platform as a product by itself? Another understanding could also focus on the next steps of the project, at least last year as UC projects will stop and new ones will arrive: what have we planned to deliver? Which kind of support we expect to provide for new projects? Etc... And always a link with the 3rd parties: how Fi-Ware could be available for other companies or projects. As we have a formal request to use the 3rd Open Call for Communication and not to improve the functional scope of Fi-Ware the Commission changes a bit how we can understand FiWare delivery for the last year: more support and dissemination, less development. For the more specific point Mobile CEP engine, we had an internal demo 2 weeks ago so I'm checking tomorrow if it is feasible to use it for a short demo in Brussels. BR Thierry De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mardi 20 novembre 2012 21:45 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting Hi, Please find below the comments and requests that Arian has just sent to us regarding the agenda for the review (only 5 days before :-) I have to confess that I got crazy in a first approach when I read it ... but then I calmed down and I believe we can face it in a constructive way :-): * Points 2), 4) and even 5) may be taken as part of we had to prepare as presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ... I don't see a particular issue with that ... It's true that some questions may be tough to respond but better to know them in advance than having to respond to them by surprise at the review. Actually, they are providing here valuable information that should help us to prepare better the part of the presentations that was covering those checkpoints. * I have to confess that point 3) was totally unexpected ... However, I believe it should fit pretty well within the presentation on FI-WARE Value Proposition. Indeed, there was valuable content that we generated in that deliverable that should have taken into account for that presentation (and may have even taken into account already) * Regarding the live demo, I believe that we should respond giving them more details about the planned demo, explaining Arian and reviewers that what we are trying to achieve with the demo is much more ambitious than going through isolated demos of FI-WARE GEs standalone "in a row" ... Our planned live demo explains how different GEs can be used for the same application and also elaborates on how different phases in the lifecycle of an application are supported (note that Cloud or marketplace aspects are just ignored) ... Probably they were not expecting such a complete demo but a sequence of demos of some of the GEs ... therefore they were just asking to choose which ones ... I guess that we may convince them that what we propose is better. Alternatively, we may program a short webinar of some of the GEs not presented in the demo they are asking for. I would bet for the Proton CEP. I wonder whether one on the Mobile CEP Engine is also feasible (I have checked and the webinar on the IoT Gateway Data Handling GE is not planned until Dec 4th ...) Honestly speaking, I believe it doesn't make sense to plan one for the Ericsson Composition Engine or the Mashup Factory given the fact that sustainability of both is currently in question. * Point 6) is probably the more tricky point ... what would you interpret that they are expecting when they refer to "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? Aren't we addressing this to some extend in the presentation regarding Explotation or also the one on "Value Proposition" ? Your response to the following questions is needed so that we can elaborate a response to Arian: * Stefano: do you think we can address well points 2, 4 and 5 asked by Arian and the reviewers within the presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ? I believe so but wanted to check your opinion. Of course, you can count on me for helping to develop the slides. If you agree, we may respond Arian that those points are going to be address there. * SAP and the team working in the presentation regarding the FI-WARE Value Proposition: may you integrate presentation of the "Third Party Innovation Deliverable" in that presentation ? If you agree, we may explain Arian that we were planning to address presentation of the results of this deliverable in that slot during the second day but we can elaborate more on it. * All: would you agree with explaining them what our live demo was about before hand ? I guess it doesn't harm. * Thierry: Is it feasible to prepare something about the Mobile CEP Engine with such a short notice ? * SAP: Does it make sense to prepare a demo regarding the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Engine ? I don't believe so but ... how would you justify it and explain that it would be better to use the Application Mashup GE ? I believe that they have just guided their decision based on input from UC projects regarding the planned usage of GEs (shared spreadsheet) but ... as far as I know, not only Finest have decided to go for using WireCloud but also Outsmart ... is this information correct ? I believe that if we explain that there are at least two UC projects who have already decided to use it in their design, we can justify to go for it instead of the ones they propose * IBM: would it be feasible that Guy makes a presentation on the Proton CEP, perhaps a webinar that matches some of the two days if attendance to the review is not feasible ? * All: wouldn't it make sense to invite Arian and the reviewers to attend the webinars regarding some of the GEs they refer to ... as alternative to cover them as part of the live demo ? * All: what is your feeling regarding the "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:39:12 +0000 From: To: , CC: , , , , , , Dear Juanjo, Thank you very much for the draft agenda. Some changes that we would like to see: 1) The live demos (day 1, 10.30 - 12.15) need to go in detail with at least 3 GEs "in full", i.e. including the full set of documentation and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus relevant issues relating to implementation), in addition to the "live demos" already scheduled. The three (or more) GEs should be drawn from the chapters 3, 5 & 6 and should be the ones which have generated the greatest interest so far. So, for chapter 3 it would be the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Editor, for ch 5 it would be the Things Mgt GE or the CEP Mobile Manager (as the Backend Device Mgt GE is not available), and for ch 6 it would be Proactive Technology Online, the Context Awareness Platform, the Samson broker, or the Query Broker. 2) Somewhere in the agenda the latest status of GE take-up by the Use Cases, the consortium members themselves, and potentially additional interests elsewhere needs to be presented. 3) Third Party Innovation Enablement is a key deliverable and needs to be presented. 4) Testbed and testing deliverables are also important and should be presented. It would be good to know how the Test bed actually supports some of the non-functional capabilities that are listed in the first release in the Technical Roadmap 5) A summary of the status of the validation of the GEs from the Use Cases and how this is checked back against the requirements needs to be presented. 6) The Closing Statements should include a presentation of Outlook for FI-WARE from the consortium's viewpoint. 7) To accommodate the above items, Day 2 could end later and the 3 hours planned for Revision of checkpoints could be shorter. Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:21 AM To: VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) Cc: jimenez at tid.es; CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; mcp at tid.es; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, Please find enclosed a draft agenda for the project review. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 07/11/12 10:43, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: * the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; * the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; * the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; * the management procedures and methods of the project; * the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; * the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Nov 21 01:11:56 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:11:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting In-Reply-To: <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4DB2C@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, my answers in line ... Your response to the following questions is needed so that we can elaborate a response to Arian: > > - Stefano: do you think we can address well points 2, 4 and 5 asked by > Arian and the reviewers within the presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and > 5 ? I believe so but wanted to check your opinion. Of course, you can > count on me for helping to develop the slides. If you agree, we may > respond Arian that those points are going to be address there. > > agree, but i have to confess that the last aspect of point 4 we, testbed team, did not address it in a particular way. so i have to analyse and understand the implications of what expressed in the technical roadmap ... > > - > - SAP and the team working in the presentation regarding the FI-WARE > Value Proposition: may you integrate presentation of the "Third Party > Innovation Deliverable" in that presentation ? If you agree, we may > explain Arian that we were planning to address presentation of the results > of this deliverable in that slot during the second day but we can elaborate > more on it. > - All: would you agree with explaining them what our live demo was > about before hand ? I guess it doesn't harm. > > i think in our response, we must send our story-bord for the demo. perhaps this mgth convince them that it is much better and that it shows the consistency and the integration aspect thye asked, quite strongly i remember, during the last review. certainly we need also to "demo" the specifications and documentation associtaed to the ges. > > - > - Thierry: Is it feasible to prepare something about the Mobile CEP > Engine with such a short notice ? > - SAP: Does it make sense to prepare a demo regarding the Mashup > Factory or the Ericsson Composition Engine ? I don't believe so but ... > how would you justify it and explain that it would be better to use the > Application Mashup GE ? I believe that they have just guided their > decision based on input from UC projects regarding the planned usage of GEs > (shared spreadsheet) but ... as far as I know, not only Finest have decided > to go for using WireCloud but also Outsmart ... is this information correct > ? I believe that if we explain that there are at least two UC projects > who have already decided to use it in their design, we can justify to go > for it instead of the ones they propose > - IBM: would it be feasible that Guy makes a presentation on the > Proton CEP, perhaps a webinar that matches some of the two days if > attendance to the review is not feasible ? > - All: wouldn't it make sense to invite Arian and the reviewers to > attend the webinars regarding some of the GEs they refer to ... as > alternative to cover them as part of the live demo ? > > this makes very much sense, but i guess they will not delay their need to understand the ges till the webinars. this migth happen if and only if they agree to follow the demo through our storybord. > > - > - All: what is your feeling regarding the "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? > > this the value proposition of fi-ware!!!! ciao, stefano > > - > > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - > Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 > 17:39:12 +0000 From: To: > , CC: > , , > , > , > , , > > > Dear Juanjo, > > > > Thank you very much for the draft agenda. > > > > Some changes that we would like to see: > > 1) The live demos (day 1, 10.30 ? 12.15) need to go in detail with > at least 3 GEs "in full", i.e. including the full set of documentation > and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus > relevant issues relating to implementation), in addition to the ?live > demos? already scheduled. The three (or more) GEs should be drawn from the > chapters 3, 5 & 6 and should be the ones which have generated the greatest > interest so far. So, for chapter 3 it would be the Mashup Factory or the > Ericsson Composition Editor, for ch 5 it would be the Things Mgt GE or the > CEP Mobile Manager (as the Backend Device Mgt GE is not available), and for > ch 6 it would be Proactive Technology Online, the Context Awareness > Platform, the Samson broker, or the Query Broker. > > 2) Somewhere in the agenda the latest status of GE take-up by the > Use Cases, the consortium members themselves, and potentially additional > interests elsewhere needs to be presented. > > 3) Third Party Innovation Enablement is a key deliverable and needs > to be presented. > > 4) Testbed and testing deliverables are also important and should be > presented. It would be good to know how the Test bed actually supports some > of the non-functional capabilities that are listed in the first release in > the Technical Roadmap > > 5) A summary of the status of the validation of the GEs from the Use > Cases and how this is checked back against the requirements needs to be > presented. > > 6) The Closing Statements should include a presentation of Outlook > for FI-WARE from the consortium?s viewpoint. > > 7) To accommodate the above items, Day 2 could end later and the 3 > hours planned for Revision of checkpoints could be shorter. > > > > Best regards, > > Arian > > > > > > *From:* Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es ] > *Sent:* Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:21 AM > *To:* VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) > *Cc:* jimenez at tid.es; CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); > msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; > rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; mcp at tid.es; jhierro >> "Juan > J. Hierro" > *Subject:* Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review > Meeting > > > > Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, > > Please find enclosed a draft agenda for the project review. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > ------------- > > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > > website: www.tid.es > > email: jhierro at tid.es > > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 07/11/12 10:43, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu wrote: > > Dear Mr. Jimenez, > > In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you > recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a > review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium > on 28th and 29th November 2012. > > The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in > avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels > > > > Meeting rooms: > > 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 > > > > As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following > independent experts: > > > > - Dr Renaud Di Francesco > > - Dr. Dominic Greenwood > > - Ms Man-Sze Li > > - Ms Irena Pavlova > > > > The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: > > ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the > relevant period and of the related deliverables; > > ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough > potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; > > ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved > progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency > and effectiveness; > > ? the management procedures and methods of the project; > > ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the > project; > > ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, > economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for > the use and dissemination of results. > > > > If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to > 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and > put the experts (see cc) in copy. > > Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9thNovember 2012. > > Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday > 23rd November 2012. > > > > Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate > to contact me. > > Thank you for your co-operation. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Vanessa Vanhumbeeck > > *European Commission* > > DG CONNECT > > Unit E3 ? Net Innovation > > > > Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 > Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 21 06:51:34 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:51:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] POINTS TO COVER/CHECK PRIOR REVIEW of the FI-WARE Project Message-ID: <50AC6BE6.5050708@tid.es> Dear all, As you know, we face a quite critical project review next week so we have to do every effort to make it a success. We shouldn't leave any question properly addressed. Following is a list of points that every FI-WARE GE owner should review and make sure it is properly covered. Of course, WPLs/WPAs are asked to double-check that all are being actually reviewed: 1. Revision of the Technical Roadmap. We made a great effort several months ago to deliver a comprehensive Technical Roadmap which incorporated detailed references about what features of the different FI-WARE GEs were going to be covered when. Please make sure that the current contents are aligned with reality. Concretely, make sure that contents regarding FI-WARE GEs that have been updated or delivered during September/October and that description of what comes in the following releases is still accurate or whether more details can be added. 2. Very important: adding UC projects as stakeholders of features in your backlog. As per agreement with the UC projects reached at FI-PPP AB level, you are entitled to mention a given UC project as stakeholder of ALL the features linked to your FI-WARE GEi if that project has labeled your FI-WARE GEi as "U" or "D" in the spreadsheet we are sharing with UC projects regarding planned usage. This is very important because our PO and reviewers have already announced us that they will ask for mapping of features in the backlog with requirements from UC projects. 3. Revision of your FI-WARE GE backlog: Is there any Epic that have you already refined into more concrete Epics or even Features for the second Release of FI-WARE ? If so, please update your backlog and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap accordingly 4. Contents of the FI-WARE Catalogue. Besides carrying out the task already assigned to you yesterday regarding information about "Terms and Conditions", please take your time to review the contents of the entry of your FI-WARE GEi in the Catalogue, to make sure it aligns with provided templates. Particularly, the downloads tab should point to the places where the software is available (publicly or in a restricted area only accessible to the FI-PPP partners) unless you had declared that you wished to offer it "as a Service" either from the FI-WARE Testbed or your own facilities (this latter case was subject to prior agreement as you know) Please don't hesitate to formulate any question you may have. We are happy to assist you. We are sure that with your commitment, the review meeting will be a great success. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Nov 21 09:56:53 2012 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:56:53 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting In-Reply-To: <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4DB2C@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Regarding the point 3), ok that fit pretty well within the presentation on FI-WARE Value Proposition, and with the summarized presentation of "Third Party Innovation Deliverable", but I will also add the presentation regarding the Checkpoint 8 - Develop and publish a plan for fostering developer communities Regarding Outlook for FI-WARE, I agree with Thierry, one expectation from the Commission could be: do we agree to launch a Fi-Ware platform as a product by itself? And also focus on the next steps of the project, at least last year as UC projects will stop and new ones will arrive: what have we planned to deliver? Which kind of support we expect to provide for new projects? Etc... and how we can understand FI-WARE delivery for the last year: more support and dissemination, less development. Br Juan From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: martes, 20 de noviembre de 2012 21:45 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting Hi, Please find below the comments and requests that Arian has just sent to us regarding the agenda for the review (only 5 days before :-) I have to confess that I got crazy in a first approach when I read it ... but then I calmed down and I believe we can face it in a constructive way :-): * Points 2), 4) and even 5) may be taken as part of we had to prepare as presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ... I don't see a particular issue with that ... It's true that some questions may be tough to respond but better to know them in advance than having to respond to them by surprise at the review. Actually, they are providing here valuable information that should help us to prepare better the part of the presentations that was covering those checkpoints. * I have to confess that point 3) was totally unexpected ... However, I believe it should fit pretty well within the presentation on FI-WARE Value Proposition. Indeed, there was valuable content that we generated in that deliverable that should have taken into account for that presentation (and may have even taken into account already) * Regarding the live demo, I believe that we should respond giving them more details about the planned demo, explaining Arian and reviewers that what we are trying to achieve with the demo is much more ambitious than going through isolated demos of FI-WARE GEs standalone "in a row" ... Our planned live demo explains how different GEs can be used for the same application and also elaborates on how different phases in the lifecycle of an application are supported (note that Cloud or marketplace aspects are just ignored) ... Probably they were not expecting such a complete demo but a sequence of demos of some of the GEs ... therefore they were just asking to choose which ones ... I guess that we may convince them that what we propose is better. Alternatively, we may program a short webinar of some of the GEs not presented in the demo they are asking for. I would bet for the Proton CEP. I wonder whether one on the Mobile CEP Engine is also feasible (I have checked and the webinar on the IoT Gateway Data Handling GE is not planned until Dec 4th ...) Honestly speaking, I believe it doesn't make sense to plan one for the Ericsson Composition Engine or the Mashup Factory given the fact that sustainability of both is currently in question. * Point 6) is probably the more tricky point ... what would you interpret that they are expecting when they refer to "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? Aren't we addressing this to some extend in the presentation regarding Explotation or also the one on "Value Proposition" ? Your response to the following questions is needed so that we can elaborate a response to Arian: * Stefano: do you think we can address well points 2, 4 and 5 asked by Arian and the reviewers within the presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ? I believe so but wanted to check your opinion. Of course, you can count on me for helping to develop the slides. If you agree, we may respond Arian that those points are going to be address there. * SAP and the team working in the presentation regarding the FI-WARE Value Proposition: may you integrate presentation of the "Third Party Innovation Deliverable" in that presentation ? If you agree, we may explain Arian that we were planning to address presentation of the results of this deliverable in that slot during the second day but we can elaborate more on it. * All: would you agree with explaining them what our live demo was about before hand ? I guess it doesn't harm. * Thierry: Is it feasible to prepare something about the Mobile CEP Engine with such a short notice ? * SAP: Does it make sense to prepare a demo regarding the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Engine ? I don't believe so but ... how would you justify it and explain that it would be better to use the Application Mashup GE ? I believe that they have just guided their decision based on input from UC projects regarding the planned usage of GEs (shared spreadsheet) but ... as far as I know, not only Finest have decided to go for using WireCloud but also Outsmart ... is this information correct ? I believe that if we explain that there are at least two UC projects who have already decided to use it in their design, we can justify to go for it instead of the ones they propose * IBM: would it be feasible that Guy makes a presentation on the Proton CEP, perhaps a webinar that matches some of the two days if attendance to the review is not feasible ? * All: wouldn't it make sense to invite Arian and the reviewers to attend the webinars regarding some of the GEs they refer to ... as alternative to cover them as part of the live demo ? * All: what is your feeling regarding the "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:39:12 +0000 From: To: , CC: , , , , , , Dear Juanjo, Thank you very much for the draft agenda. Some changes that we would like to see: 1) The live demos (day 1, 10.30 - 12.15) need to go in detail with at least 3 GEs "in full", i.e. including the full set of documentation and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus relevant issues relating to implementation), in addition to the "live demos" already scheduled. The three (or more) GEs should be drawn from the chapters 3, 5 & 6 and should be the ones which have generated the greatest interest so far. So, for chapter 3 it would be the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Editor, for ch 5 it would be the Things Mgt GE or the CEP Mobile Manager (as the Backend Device Mgt GE is not available), and for ch 6 it would be Proactive Technology Online, the Context Awareness Platform, the Samson broker, or the Query Broker. 2) Somewhere in the agenda the latest status of GE take-up by the Use Cases, the consortium members themselves, and potentially additional interests elsewhere needs to be presented. 3) Third Party Innovation Enablement is a key deliverable and needs to be presented. 4) Testbed and testing deliverables are also important and should be presented. It would be good to know how the Test bed actually supports some of the non-functional capabilities that are listed in the first release in the Technical Roadmap 5) A summary of the status of the validation of the GEs from the Use Cases and how this is checked back against the requirements needs to be presented. 6) The Closing Statements should include a presentation of Outlook for FI-WARE from the consortium's viewpoint. 7) To accommodate the above items, Day 2 could end later and the 3 hours planned for Revision of checkpoints could be shorter. Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:21 AM To: VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) Cc: jimenez at tid.es; CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; mcp at tid.es; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, Please find enclosed a draft agenda for the project review. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 07/11/12 10:43, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; ? the management procedures and methods of the project; ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matteo.melideo at eng.it Wed Nov 21 10:00:49 2012 From: matteo.melideo at eng.it (Matteo Melideo) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:00:49 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting In-Reply-To: <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4DB2C@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> Message-ID: <50AC9841.20600@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, my two cents in lined ... Br, M. Il 20/11/2012 21:45, Juanjo Hierro ha scritto: > Hi, > > Please find below the comments and requests that Arian has just sent > to us regarding the agenda for the review (only 5 days before :-) > > I have to confess that I got crazy in a first approach when I read > it ... but then I calmed down and I believe we can face it in a > constructive way :-): > > * Points 2), 4) and even 5) may be taken as part of we had to > prepare as presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ... I > don't see a particular issue with that ... It's true that some > questions may be tough to respond but better to know them in > advance than having to respond to them by surprise at the > review. Actually, they are providing here valuable information > that should help us to prepare better the part of the > presentations that was covering those checkpoints. > * I have to confess that point 3) was totally unexpected ... > However, I believe it should fit pretty well within the > presentation on FI-WARE Value Proposition. Indeed, there was > valuable content that we generated in that deliverable that should > have taken into account for that presentation (and may have even > taken into account already) > * Regarding the live demo, I believe that we should respond giving > them more details about the planned demo, explaining Arian and > reviewers that what we are trying to achieve with the demo is much > more ambitious than going through isolated demos of FI-WARE GEs > standalone "in a row" ... Our planned live demo explains how > different GEs can be used for the same application and also > elaborates on how different phases in the lifecycle of an > application are supported (note that Cloud or marketplace aspects > are just ignored) ... Probably they were not expecting such a > complete demo but a sequence of demos of some of the GEs ... > therefore they were just asking to choose which ones ... I guess > that we may convince them that what we propose is better. > Alternatively, we may program a short webinar of some of the GEs > not presented in the demo they are asking for. I would bet for > the Proton CEP. I wonder whether one on the Mobile CEP Engine is > also feasible (I have checked and the webinar on the IoT Gateway > Data Handling GE is not planned until Dec 4th ...) Honestly > speaking, I believe it doesn't make sense to plan one for the > Ericsson Composition Engine or the Mashup Factory given the fact > that sustainability of both is currently in question. > * Point 6) is probably the more tricky point ... what would you > interpret that they are expecting when they refer to "Outlook for > FI-WARE" ? Aren't we addressing this to some extend in the > presentation regarding Explotation or also the one on "Value > Proposition" ? > > > Your response to the following questions is needed so that we can > elaborate a response to Arian: > > * Stefano: do you think we can address well points 2, 4 and 5 asked > by Arian and the reviewers within the presentation regarding > checkpoints 2 and 5 ? I believe so but wanted to check your > opinion. Of course, you can count on me for helping to develop > the slides. If you agree, we may respond Arian that those points > are going to be address there. > * SAP and the team working in the presentation regarding the FI-WARE > Value Proposition: may you integrate presentation of the "Third > Party Innovation Deliverable" in that presentation ? If you > agree, we may explain Arian that we were planning to address > presentation of the results of this deliverable in that slot > during the second day but we can elaborate more on it. > * All: would you agree with explaining them what our live demo was > about before hand ? I guess it doesn't harm. > Yes, despite they asked for very precise things to see "including the full set of documentation and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus relevant issues relating to implementation". Basically they want to have an idea of what a potential user today has in his\her hands to use a GEs. As I reported in my comments in the demoscript file, it is also important to explain why we decided to select those GEs and not others but it is most likely I missed this point. > > * Thierry: Is it feasible to prepare something about the Mobile CEP > Engine with such a short notice ? > * SAP: Does it make sense to prepare a demo regarding the Mashup > Factory or the Ericsson Composition Engine ? I don't believe so > but ... how would you justify it and explain that it would be > better to use the Application Mashup GE ? I believe that they > have just guided their decision based on input from UC projects > regarding the planned usage of GEs (shared spreadsheet) but ... as > far as I know, not only Finest have decided to go for using > WireCloud but also Outsmart ... is this information correct ? I > believe that if we explain that there are at least two UC projects > who have already decided to use it in their design, we can justify > to go for it instead of the ones they propose > * IBM: would it be feasible that Guy makes a presentation on the > Proton CEP, perhaps a webinar that matches some of the two days if > attendance to the review is not feasible ? > * All: wouldn't it make sense to invite Arian and the reviewers to > attend the webinars regarding some of the GEs they refer to ... as > alternative to cover them as part of the live demo ? > Yes, this is a very good idea but I do not think this should be done during the review. > > * All: what is your feeling regarding the "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? > I agree with what written by Thierry and my feeling is that if we will do all these things in the right way, as I believe, we have basically demonstrated that we have done all our homework to pass the review but this does not mean we have a clear outlook about what FI-WARE will be in the future. Even after the FI-PPP ... > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 > Review Meeting > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:39:12 +0000 > From: > To: , > CC: , , > , , > , , > > > > Dear Juanjo, > > Thank you very much for the draft agenda. > > Some changes that we would like to see: > > 1)The live demos (day 1, 10.30 -- 12.15) need to go in detail with at > least 3 GEs "in full", i.e. including the full set of documentation > and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus > relevant issues relating to implementation), in addition to the "live > demos" already scheduled. The three (or more) GEs should be drawn from > the chapters 3, 5 & 6 and should be the ones which have generated the > greatest interest so far. So, for chapter 3 it would be the Mashup > Factory or the Ericsson Composition Editor, for ch 5 it would be the > Things Mgt GE or the CEP Mobile Manager (as the Backend Device Mgt GE > is not available), and for ch 6 it would be Proactive Technology > Online, the Context Awareness Platform, the Samson broker, or the > Query Broker. > > 2)Somewhere in the agenda the latest status of GE take-up by the Use > Cases, the consortium members themselves, and potentially additional > interests elsewhere needs to be presented. > > 3)Third Party Innovation Enablement is a key deliverable and needs to > be presented. > > 4)Testbed and testing deliverables are also important and should be > presented. It would be good to know how the Test bed actually supports > some of the non-functional capabilities that are listed in the first > release in the Technical Roadmap > > 5)A summary of the status of the validation of the GEs from the Use > Cases and how this is checked back against the requirements needs to > be presented. > > 6)The Closing Statements should include a presentation of Outlook for > FI-WARE from the consortium's viewpoint. > > 7)To accommodate the above items, Day 2 could end later and the 3 > hours planned for Revision of checkpoints could be shorter. > > Best regards, > > Arian > > *From:*Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] > *Sent:* Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:21 AM > *To:* VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) > *Cc:* jimenez at tid.es; CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); > msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; > rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; mcp at tid.es; jhierro >> > "Juan J. Hierro" > *Subject:* Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 > Review Meeting > > Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, > > Please find enclosed a draft agenda for the project review. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 07/11/12 10:43, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu > wrote: > > Dear Mr. Jimenez, > > In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed > with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's > intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 > FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28^th and 29^th November 2012. > > The meeting will take place in the premises of the European > Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels > > Meeting rooms: > > 28^th and 29^th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 > > As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the > following independent experts: > > - Dr Renaud Di Francesco > > - Dr. Dominic Greenwood > > - Ms Man-Sze Li > > - Ms Irena Pavlova > > The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: > > ?the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the > relevant period and of the related deliverables; > > ?the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough > potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of > the art; > > ?the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved > progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, > efficiency and effectiveness; > > ?the management procedures and methods of the project; > > ?the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; > > ?the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, > economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the > plans for the use and dissemination of results. > > If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period > (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as > soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. > > Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9^th > November 2012. > > Please send me the names of the people attending the review before > Friday 23^rd November 2012. > > Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not > hesitate to contact me. > > Thank you for your co-operation. > > Best Regards, > > Vanessa Vanhumbeeck > > *European Commission* > > DG CONNECT > > Unit E3 -- Net Innovation > > Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 > Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: matteo_melideo.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 354 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed Nov 21 10:11:25 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:11:25 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Message-ID: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Nov 21 10:16:47 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:16:47 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-pcc] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting In-Reply-To: <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4DB2C@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <50ABEBD4.9090106@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, I fundamentally agree with your comments, and with the feedback sent by other WPL/PCC member. Few more comments from my side to your questions are inlined below. BR Pier Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: marted? 20 novembre 2012 21:45 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-pcc] VERY IMPORTANT: Comments/requests from Arian regarding the agenda of the review meeting Hi, Please find below the comments and requests that Arian has just sent to us regarding the agenda for the review (only 5 days before :-) I have to confess that I got crazy in a first approach when I read it ... but then I calmed down and I believe we can face it in a constructive way :-): * Points 2), 4) and even 5) may be taken as part of we had to prepare as presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ... I don't see a particular issue with that ... It's true that some questions may be tough to respond but better to know them in advance than having to respond to them by surprise at the review. Actually, they are providing here valuable information that should help us to prepare better the part of the presentations that was covering those checkpoints. * I have to confess that point 3) was totally unexpected ... However, I believe it should fit pretty well within the presentation on FI-WARE Value Proposition. Indeed, there was valuable content that we generated in that deliverable that should have taken into account for that presentation (and may have even taken into account already) * Regarding the live demo, I believe that we should respond giving them more details about the planned demo, explaining Arian and reviewers that what we are trying to achieve with the demo is much more ambitious than going through isolated demos of FI-WARE GEs standalone "in a row" ... Our planned live demo explains how different GEs can be used for the same application and also elaborates on how different phases in the lifecycle of an application are supported (note that Cloud or marketplace aspects are just ignored) ... Probably they were not expecting such a complete demo but a sequence of demos of some of the GEs ... therefore they were just asking to choose which ones ... I guess that we may convince them that what we propose is better. Alternatively, we may program a short webinar of some of the GEs not presented in the demo they are asking for. I would bet for the Proton CEP. I wonder whether one on the Mobile CEP Engine is also feasible (I have checked and the webinar on the IoT Gateway Data Handling GE is not planned until Dec 4th ...) Honestly speaking, I believe it doesn't make sense to plan one for the Ericsson Composition Engine or the Mashup Factory given the fact that sustainability of both is currently in question. * Point 6) is probably the more tricky point ... what would you interpret that they are expecting when they refer to "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? Aren't we addressing this to some extend in the presentation regarding Explotation or also the one on "Value Proposition" ? Your response to the following questions is needed so that we can elaborate a response to Arian: * Stefano: do you think we can address well points 2, 4 and 5 asked by Arian and the reviewers within the presentation regarding checkpoints 2 and 5 ? I believe so but wanted to check your opinion. Of course, you can count on me for helping to develop the slides. If you agree, we may respond Arian that those points are going to be address there. * SAP and the team working in the presentation regarding the FI-WARE Value Proposition: may you integrate presentation of the "Third Party Innovation Deliverable" in that presentation ? If you agree, we may explain Arian that we were planning to address presentation of the results of this deliverable in that slot during the second day but we can elaborate more on it. * All: would you agree with explaining them what our live demo was about before hand ? I guess it doesn't harm. [PG] Yes agreed. Concerning question 1 by Arian, I believe their expectation is to show that what we have produced in terms of deliverables accompanying a GE implementation can actually be used by a developer willing to use that GE. If this is one of the objectives during the live demo presentation then it should answer the question. Little more trickier would be if they want to deeply analyse the Open Specifications to capture how a third party developer could profitably use it to develop a compliant reference implementation. * Thierry: Is it feasible to prepare something about the Mobile CEP Engine with such a short notice ? * SAP: Does it make sense to prepare a demo regarding the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Engine ? I don't believe so but ... how would you justify it and explain that it would be better to use the Application Mashup GE ? I believe that they have just guided their decision based on input from UC projects regarding the planned usage of GEs (shared spreadsheet) but ... as far as I know, not only Finest have decided to go for using WireCloud but also Outsmart ... is this information correct ? I believe that if we explain that there are at least two UC projects who have already decided to use it in their design, we can justify to go for it instead of the ones they propose * IBM: would it be feasible that Guy makes a presentation on the Proton CEP, perhaps a webinar that matches some of the two days if attendance to the review is not feasible ? * All: wouldn't it make sense to invite Arian and the reviewers to attend the webinars regarding some of the GEs they refer to ... as alternative to cover them as part of the live demo ? [PG] agreed (maybe proposing this for the second round of webinars) * All: what is your feeling regarding the "Outlook for FI-WARE" ? [PG] It looks like asking us whether we believe in it or not ;-) Not sure the launching of a FI-WARE platform is what they really expect to hear from us, however the presentations on exploitation and value proposition should give some answer to this question. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:39:12 +0000 From: To: , CC: , , , , , , Dear Juanjo, Thank you very much for the draft agenda. Some changes that we would like to see: 1) The live demos (day 1, 10.30 - 12.15) need to go in detail with at least 3 GEs "in full", i.e. including the full set of documentation and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus relevant issues relating to implementation), in addition to the "live demos" already scheduled. The three (or more) GEs should be drawn from the chapters 3, 5 & 6 and should be the ones which have generated the greatest interest so far. So, for chapter 3 it would be the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Editor, for ch 5 it would be the Things Mgt GE or the CEP Mobile Manager (as the Backend Device Mgt GE is not available), and for ch 6 it would be Proactive Technology Online, the Context Awareness Platform, the Samson broker, or the Query Broker. 2) Somewhere in the agenda the latest status of GE take-up by the Use Cases, the consortium members themselves, and potentially additional interests elsewhere needs to be presented. 3) Third Party Innovation Enablement is a key deliverable and needs to be presented. 4) Testbed and testing deliverables are also important and should be presented. It would be good to know how the Test bed actually supports some of the non-functional capabilities that are listed in the first release in the Technical Roadmap 5) A summary of the status of the validation of the GEs from the Use Cases and how this is checked back against the requirements needs to be presented. 6) The Closing Statements should include a presentation of Outlook for FI-WARE from the consortium's viewpoint. 7) To accommodate the above items, Day 2 could end later and the 3 hours planned for Revision of checkpoints could be shorter. Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:21 AM To: VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) Cc: jimenez at tid.es; CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; mcp at tid.es; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, Please find enclosed a draft agenda for the project review. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 07/11/12 10:43, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: * the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; * the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; * the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; * the management procedures and methods of the project; * the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; * the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu Wed Nov 21 13:40:10 2012 From: Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu (Tobias Jacobs) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:40:10 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC's license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jdps at tid.es Thu Nov 22 01:50:44 2012 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:50:44 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Amendment 2 Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F11502@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, first I apologize for this huge e-mail but this second amendment has too many changes and we have spent a lot of time on it. Thank you very much for your contributions, without them, this would be impossible. Please find enclosed: 1.- The updated DoW (with version control on). 2.- An Excel file called "FI-WARE - Amendment 2" where you can find the following sheets: Funding Current DoW : The effort and funding in the current DoW. Changes - Amendment 2: Brief description of each change. PM Amendment 2: New effort. NEF before & after: Budget and Funding. How it was and how it will be on NEF. If you have any relevant comments or questions please do it to subsidies at tid.es as soon as possible. Our goal is to send it to Project Officer by November 24th, 2012. Note: In this amendment we (as coordinator) are going to inform to the Project Officer that our bank account has changed due to the fusion of two Spanish banks. BR Javier. [firma correo jdps] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE DoW - amendment 2 - DRAFT- v7.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 13322246 bytes Desc: FI-WARE DoW - amendment 2 - DRAFT- v7.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE - Amendment 2.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 532596 bytes Desc: FI-WARE - Amendment 2.xlsx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 22 08:42:11 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:42:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Section on coverage of checkpoints to make part of the Management Report Message-ID: <50ADD753.6070406@tid.es> Dear all, I was writing down a document that tries to summarize how we have addressed the different checkpoints formulated by the EC and reviewers. Our intention is to include it as part of the Project Management Report. This morning, I will be fully busy attending the FI-PPP AB meeting, so I would like to ask the help of some of you to make progress on it as well as to review what I have already written down. In some cases, what I'm asking you to contribute aligns with the presentation you are working on, so I guess the exercise will not be so difficult. Please try to send your contributions by EOB today: * @Miguel: please try to cover checkpoint 3 (Software Releases) * @Axel/Uwe: please deal with checkpoint 4 (availability of SAP GEs) and review 6 * @Stefano: please deal with checkpoint 5 * @Matteo: please deal with checkpoints 7-8 (I have provided some input on 7) and review 6 * @Jose: please deal with checkpoint 10 * @Axel: please review checkpoint 11 that I would consider covered, just in case (review of the rest of contents is, of course, also welcome) * @Uwe: I will take care of checkpoint 9, but if you can contribute some input in the meantime, it would be rather welcome * @All: review this draft and provide comments/inputs Our intention is to send a version of this document to the EC and reviewers by tomorrow. If possible, the complete Management Report but at least this one. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Management Report - checkpoints.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 204956 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ralli at tid.es Thu Nov 22 12:28:44 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:28:44 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Nov 22 12:29:38 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:29:38 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> Message-ID: <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners... Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC's license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Nov 22 12:59:57 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:59:57 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Neelie Kroes sppech in Italy (12/11/2012) Message-ID: <3011_1353585599_50AE13BF_3011_4882_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084294@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi all, Just some information that Future Internet is always in the scope of EC also for H2020, as Neelie Kroes explained quickly in Italy on the 12th of November BR Thierry --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neelie Kroes Vice-President of the European Commission responsible for the Digital Agenda Europe Going Digital [cid:image001.png at 01CDC8AF.D63F7F50] The Italy Summit: New routes for growth, Financial Times Conference, Milan 12 November 2012 In the doom and gloom of the economic crisis we shouldn't ignore the positive opportunities. Now, more than ever, we need to invest in both short term and long term economic growth. The topic of today does both. The digital revolution brings huge potential to improve lives, save public money and enhance enterprise, employment and wealth. Twenty years ago, few had heard of the Internet: today, between and 2 and 3 billion people use it. Already today, it's an 8 trillion dollar marketplace; and a platform for huge innovation. Today, on the fixed Internet alone, one day of traffic is equivalent to a whole year's worth back in 2000. And it's good for the economy. ICT already represents half of our productivity growth; an extra 10 percentage points of broadband penetration can be worth over 1% on GDP. But this is much bigger than just the Information and Communications Technology sector. It enables changes to how we buy and sell; how we interact and collaborate; how we govern and hold to account. This change and innovation are happening everywhere at a rapid pace. We see social media-based campaigns that unseat dictators; an online encyclopaedia written entirely by volunteers; patients empowered to take control of their health; networks of scientists collaborating globally; text-mining that permits lifesaving research; and much more. Unthinkable fifteen years ago, today these concepts are already 'part of the furniture'. And the innovations still to come are at least as revolutionary: like cloud computing, the internet of things and smart cities. Looking ahead, we don't know what the "next big thing" might be. But when it comes to internet innovation, we've only started scratching the surface. What we do know is that this innovation brings huge benefits for our economy and our society: making it greener, smarter, and more inclusive. And it brings huge benefits for governments, able to offer better services at lower cost: just what we need right now. e-Procurement alone could save 100 billion euros a year. To get there, to seize these benefits, first governments need to acknowledge this real potential. And second, they need the decisive vision to act, invest and implement. And in this context I'd like to congratulate Prime Minister Monti's government. You've taken a big first step, by making the digital agenda a clear priority of your growth strategy. The "Growth 2.0" decree made on 18 October is a bold, ambitious and welcome programme to make the Italian public sector more efficient. For example, introducing a digital citizen identity, so everyone can interact digitally with public administrations, meaning efficient services, at billions of euros less cost. And your vision on healthcare is also welcome. On current trends Italian public health care spending could increase to an unsustainable 10% of GDP in 2020. But going digital, going paperless, can help. Initiatives like e-prescriptions, digital health cards, and digital patient record management are bold: and set an example for the rest of Europe. All together, by 2020, e-health could save Italy 1% of GDP ? while improving quality of life for an ageing population. Of course, for these savings to become a reality they have to be supported by investments in infrastructure and services. So this should be a priority for the national budget. Work we are doing in the EU can help Italy a lot. Let me briefly present some of our priorities to you. First, Europe needs fast networks, to support tomorrow's high-bandwidth services. Imagine if broadband were linked to other essential services ? business, healthcare, banking, energy, education. Or imagine a world with pervasive cloud computing: a technology that could boost our economy by hundreds of billions of euros a year, but which needs fast broadband everywhere. In that world, data on our networks will rise exponentially. We can't afford to rely on legacy networks that become congested or unreliable. So we are proposing ways to boost investment in the next generation of networks. Like through a legal framework that delivers certainty, consistency and competition. And like through public funding to cut risk, build confidence and stimulate leverage. In fact, the digital "Connecting Europe Facility" we proposed could mean 45 million more households with fast broadband. Other parts of the world are seeing this opportunity, and making this investment. Japan already has over 20 million fibre connections; China is installing 35 million this year alone; high speed networks now pass more than 80% of US homes. Europe needs to keep up. A second priority will be to ensure that everyone is on board. Today, nearly 40% of Italian adults have never used the Internet at all. Those 40% are shut off from so much opportunity: shut off, for example, from the 90% of jobs that will soon require some level of digital skills. But it's not just about improving employment prospects. As the Internet supports and delivers more and more Government services, education, transport, healthcare, commerce: we cannot create a new digital divide. We need sustained action to get every Italian, and every European, digital: with the skills and the confidence to face the future, and to build a competitive continent. Third, we need the right frameworks to support and enable this digital revolution. Creating an online world that people feel safe to use ? protected from hacking or fraud, where they and their children can safely interact and transact. And we must ensure our rules don't put up barriers to innovation. Completing the single market in e-Communications alone could be worth ?110 billion euros a year. And fourth, we need sustained support into research and innovation. For the next generation of digital technologies: like photonics, micro- and nano-electronics, or the future internet. But also into the applications for our society ? for healthcare, for smarter urban living, for the environment. Already Italy sees the benefit of significant EU ICT funding: over half a billion euros funding nearly 1000 projects. Our proposal on Horizon 2020 would continue that investment, with around one euro in five of the 80 billion proposed set aside for ICT. Designed so it's easier to seek funding, easier to bring good ideas to market, and easier for Europe to invest in tomorrow's growth. All in all, we need to embrace and prepare for this digital revolution. Because this whole continent needs to stay globally competitive and attractive. Including here in Italy. I welcome the appointment of a Digital Champion for Italy ? because this is a great way to spearhead and lead this work and connect the Digital Agenda with the right constituencies. Your "Growth 2.0" action plan is a very good starting point: but now this government, and future governments, need to implement it. That extra effort is essential if Italy is to reach the Digital Agenda targets. As it stands, broadband penetration, computer literacy, and the number of companies online are all below the European average. In fact, coverage by next generation broadband in Italy is only around 10%: just one fifth of the EU level. In Italy, and across Europe, we need the right networks, the right legal frameworks, the right digital skills, and the right research and innovation. With all these ingredients we can ? NO we MUST - become a connected continent, competitive in the 21st century. Thank you. Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 34275 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Nov 22 14:29:47 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:29:47 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE53D4@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE53D4@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Message-ID: <7929_1353590987_50AE28CB_7929_346_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C08436C@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Henk, Regarding your concern the right approach in a first step could be just to put a deadline in the code to avoid managing licenses. People will have to download a new version when the first one ends up. Regarding the large number of instances you expect typically before the 2nd release, and then before the 3rd release? For the last 2 years of the program I think it could be completely different, of course. But anyway, I think that if some simple developers succeed to manage sharewares in this way, it should not be impossible for Fi-Ware and the companies involved to do it also. BR Thierry De : Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 13:45 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hello Thierry, all, I have some remarks indeed. The shareware model could be ok BUT it is not easily applicable to some of the GEs. Mainly for GEs that will be on the "terminal side" (IoT GEs, I2ND GEs ...). These GEs are expected to be instantiated in large volumes (they are parts of terminals) and having to manage licenses for such items will be a nightmare. Having to "control" that these items have been legitimately licensed will even be worse, we might have to develop code dedicated to checking that an item is properly licensed, this verification code would have to be developed using technologies found in content management (for example, video game copy protection) that might be so complex they actually will be more expensive to implement than the piece of code they will protect. Maybe this "shareware licensing scheme" might become a new GE by itself ?? (if the "terminal-side" SW is easy to port / implement) ... On top of that, we (partners) will have to commercially manage these licenses. This means we must have a dedicated team granting licenses numbers to others and collecting money out of that. Who amongst the partners have such a group in its company??? Kind regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00] [cid:image002.png at 01CDC8BC.F158D4F0] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:30 To: Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners... Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC's license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Thu Nov 22 13:44:45 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:44:45 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE53D4@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Hello Thierry, all, I have some remarks indeed. The shareware model could be ok BUT it is not easily applicable to some of the GEs. Mainly for GEs that will be on the "terminal side" (IoT GEs, I2ND GEs ...). These GEs are expected to be instantiated in large volumes (they are parts of terminals) and having to manage licenses for such items will be a nightmare. Having to "control" that these items have been legitimately licensed will even be worse, we might have to develop code dedicated to checking that an item is properly licensed, this verification code would have to be developed using technologies found in content management (for example, video game copy protection) that might be so complex they actually will be more expensive to implement than the piece of code they will protect. Maybe this "shareware licensing scheme" might become a new GE by itself ?? (if the "terminal-side" SW is easy to port / implement) ... On top of that, we (partners) will have to commercially manage these licenses. This means we must have a dedicated team granting licenses numbers to others and collecting money out of that. Who amongst the partners have such a group in its company??? Kind regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CDC8B7.2827A6B0] [cid:image002.png at 01CDC8B7.2827A6B0] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:30 To: Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners... Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC's license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From henk.heijnen at technicolor.com Thu Nov 22 14:39:18 2012 From: henk.heijnen at technicolor.com (Heijnen Henk) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:39:18 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <7929_1353590987_50AE28CB_7929_346_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C08436C@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE53D4@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <7929_1353590987_50AE28CB_7929_346_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C08436C@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE54DE@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Having large companies managing a shareware model will not be an easy task (I agree, it is simple for "simple developers" but do you know how to implement that inside Orange for example ???) On the tech side: what about small HW that do not have a local knowledge of time/date or on which, time/date can be user-modified??? Anyway, adding a duration limitation inside a GE you are giving the source code for is worthless (same for any protection scheme of course) and not giving 100% of the GE source code will be a violation of the GPL (or equivalent) licenses (I assume everybody is using open source inside its GE ???). Maybe a centralized license manage could help ? (assuming we can obfuscate the protection code in some way) Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CDC8BE.9FD74880] [cid:image002.png at 01CDC8BE.9FD74880] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com] Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 14:30 To: Heijnen Henk; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hi Henk, Regarding your concern the right approach in a first step could be just to put a deadline in the code to avoid managing licenses. People will have to download a new version when the first one ends up. Regarding the large number of instances you expect typically before the 2nd release, and then before the 3rd release? For the last 2 years of the program I think it could be completely different, of course. But anyway, I think that if some simple developers succeed to manage sharewares in this way, it should not be impossible for Fi-Ware and the companies involved to do it also. BR Thierry De : Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 13:45 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hello Thierry, all, I have some remarks indeed. The shareware model could be ok BUT it is not easily applicable to some of the GEs. Mainly for GEs that will be on the "terminal side" (IoT GEs, I2ND GEs ...). These GEs are expected to be instantiated in large volumes (they are parts of terminals) and having to manage licenses for such items will be a nightmare. Having to "control" that these items have been legitimately licensed will even be worse, we might have to develop code dedicated to checking that an item is properly licensed, this verification code would have to be developed using technologies found in content management (for example, video game copy protection) that might be so complex they actually will be more expensive to implement than the piece of code they will protect. Maybe this "shareware licensing scheme" might become a new GE by itself ?? (if the "terminal-side" SW is easy to port / implement) ... On top of that, we (partners) will have to commercially manage these licenses. This means we must have a dedicated team granting licenses numbers to others and collecting money out of that. Who amongst the partners have such a group in its company??? Kind regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image001.jpg at 01CDC8BE.9FD74880] [cid:image002.png at 01CDC8BE.9FD74880] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:30 To: Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners... Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC's license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Thu Nov 22 14:00:48 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:00:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: Dear Thierry, all, Personally, I think it is not feasible to come up with an agreed approach before the review (surely IP/legal must be involved), therefore this sounds like less urgent than other preparations for the review. Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com To: Tobias Jacobs , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 22/11/2012 01:29 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners? Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC?s license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu Thu Nov 22 16:19:34 2012 From: Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu (Tobias Jacobs) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:19:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE54DE@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE53D4@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <7929_1353590987_50AE28CB_7929_346_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C08436C@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE54DE@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Message-ID: <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED7573@Hydra.office.hd> Dear all, Thanks for discussing the topic. Not sure if I fully understand the discussion, but would it be possible to make the shareware model something like the minimum? In the sense that all GE implementations can be used at least until the that deadline? Allowing an extended usage period, implementing/not implementing the deadline in the code, open sourcing, etc., would still be a matter of the GE implementation? In that case projects using the GEs can be sure that at least until this and that time they can use whatever GE they are interested in. Best regards Tobias From: Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 22. November 2012 14:39 To: thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Having large companies managing a shareware model will not be an easy task (I agree, it is simple for "simple developers" but do you know how to implement that inside Orange for example ???) On the tech side: what about small HW that do not have a local knowledge of time/date or on which, time/date can be user-modified??? Anyway, adding a duration limitation inside a GE you are giving the source code for is worthless (same for any protection scheme of course) and not giving 100% of the GE source code will be a violation of the GPL (or equivalent) licenses (I assume everybody is using open source inside its GE ???). Maybe a centralized license manage could help ? (assuming we can obfuscate the protection code in some way) Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00] [cid:image002.png at 01CDC8CC.CAA90310] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com] Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 14:30 To: Heijnen Henk; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hi Henk, Regarding your concern the right approach in a first step could be just to put a deadline in the code to avoid managing licenses. People will have to download a new version when the first one ends up. Regarding the large number of instances you expect typically before the 2nd release, and then before the 3rd release? For the last 2 years of the program I think it could be completely different, of course. But anyway, I think that if some simple developers succeed to manage sharewares in this way, it should not be impossible for Fi-Ware and the companies involved to do it also. BR Thierry De : Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 13:45 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hello Thierry, all, I have some remarks indeed. The shareware model could be ok BUT it is not easily applicable to some of the GEs. Mainly for GEs that will be on the "terminal side" (IoT GEs, I2ND GEs ...). These GEs are expected to be instantiated in large volumes (they are parts of terminals) and having to manage licenses for such items will be a nightmare. Having to "control" that these items have been legitimately licensed will even be worse, we might have to develop code dedicated to checking that an item is properly licensed, this verification code would have to be developed using technologies found in content management (for example, video game copy protection) that might be so complex they actually will be more expensive to implement than the piece of code they will protect. Maybe this "shareware licensing scheme" might become a new GE by itself ?? (if the "terminal-side" SW is easy to port / implement) ... On top of that, we (partners) will have to commercially manage these licenses. This means we must have a dedicated team granting licenses numbers to others and collecting money out of that. Who amongst the partners have such a group in its company??? Kind regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00] [cid:image002.png at 01CDC8CC.CAA90310] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:30 To: Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners... Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC's license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Nov 22 16:53:48 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:53:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Summary of software deliverables In-Reply-To: <50AE4A6C.5040700@tid.es> References: <50AE4A6C.5040700@tid.es> Message-ID: <50AE4A8C.8060008@tid.es> FYI -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Summary of software deliverables Fecha: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:53:16 +0100 De: Miguel Carrillo Para: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu , irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com , msli at icfocus.co.uk, Dominic Greenwood , DiFrancesco, Renaud , INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Dear Arian& Vanessa, dear reviewers, We have realised that finding the software in a project so big is complex and time consuming. Therefore, we have prepared a very brief document listing the locations of the software of the implementations of Release1. The details of the components are described in depth in the associated deliverables, the idea of this is simply to provide a tidy list and save you a lot of time looking for and navigating in SVN repositories. The report is located on https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1663/D3-8.2.a_FI-WARE_SW+Release_1.pdf (restricted access) If you need any clarifications or additional details, please let us know. Best regards, Miguel P.S.: As it is a very light document, I am sure it will not cause any bounces so I attach it this time. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D3-8.2.a_FI-WARE_SW Release_1.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 513097 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Nov 22 19:17:39 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:17:39 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Carlos and All, I believe that the template proposed might expose to risks some of the GEs, at least for what concerns I2ND chapter, but I expect it could hit also other chapters. Indeed, highlighting the stakeholders in a specific column (slide 2, 3) means that for those GEs planned but not yet available, and for which the UPCs could not give a more precise feedback, the column would result empty. Moreover, listing the Features doesn't give visibility of other activities (typically coded as WorkItems), which might have been predominant in the period, compared to the implementation activities. So I wonder if we can agree on a different way to express the work done so far. I currently don't provide updates to the slides because I think this is a topic which needs comments by you and all the WPL/WPAs before proceeding. Then if a modification is agreed, the slides will be modified accordingly. As an example, I started collecting data for the I2ND presentation using basically text slides + slide(s) on the GE architecture, as we did for the past review. Probably this would not be the best template to use this time, but we could arrange to have a mixed set of slides based on the two. Thanks and BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Inviato: gioved? 22 novembre 2012 12:29 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From ralli at tid.es Thu Nov 22 20:08:55 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 19:08:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki In-Reply-To: References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <465743BF-0002-41BA-A2F5-595B17BE46A5@tid.es> Hi Pier, Just a minor comment, stakeholder = company developing the implementation + UCs that requested that feature and contributed somehow with specific details so in many cases will be also the GE owner only (never empty). Regarding workitems, i would include them in the same rows but obly when really relevant ... BR El 22/11/2012, a las 19:17, "Garino Pierangelo" > escribi?: Dear Carlos and All, I believe that the template proposed might expose to risks some of the GEs, at least for what concerns I2ND chapter, but I expect it could hit also other chapters. Indeed, highlighting the stakeholders in a specific column (slide 2, 3) means that for those GEs planned but not yet available, and for which the UPCs could not give a more precise feedback, the column would result empty. Moreover, listing the Features doesn?t give visibility of other activities (typically coded as WorkItems), which might have been predominant in the period, compared to the implementation activities. So I wonder if we can agree on a different way to express the work done so far. I currently don?t provide updates to the slides because I think this is a topic which needs comments by you and all the WPL/WPAs before proceeding. Then if a modification is agreed, the slides will be modified accordingly. As an example, I started collecting data for the I2ND presentation using basically text slides + slide(s) on the GE architecture, as we did for the past review. Probably this would not be the best template to use this time, but we could arrange to have a mixed set of slides based on the two. Thanks and BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Inviato: gioved? 22 novembre 2012 12:29 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 23 10:55:24 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:55:24 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] QUITE IMPORTANT Re: Section on coverage of checkpoints to make part of the Management Report In-Reply-To: <50ADD753.6070406@tid.es> References: <50ADD753.6070406@tid.es> Message-ID: <50AF480C.6000602@tid.es> Hi all, Please find attached the latest draft. Still there are some checkpoints not covered but I hope to get all finished while on my trip back to Madrid. Deadline for reception of comments is 17:30 (sharp) Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 22/11/12 08:42, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Dear all, > > I was writing down a document that tries to summarize how we have > addressed the different checkpoints formulated by the EC and > reviewers. Our intention is to include it as part of the Project > Management Report. > > This morning, I will be fully busy attending the FI-PPP AB meeting, > so I would like to ask the help of some of you to make progress on it > as well as to review what I have already written down. In some > cases, what I'm asking you to contribute aligns with the presentation > you are working on, so I guess the exercise will not be so difficult. > > Please try to send your contributions by EOB today: > > * @Miguel: please try to cover checkpoint 3 (Software Releases) > * @Axel/Uwe: please deal with checkpoint 4 (availability of SAP GEs) > and review 6 > * @Stefano: please deal with checkpoint 5 > * @Matteo: please deal with checkpoints 7-8 (I have provided some > input on 7) and review 6 > * @Jose: please deal with checkpoint 10 > * @Axel: please review checkpoint 11 that I would consider covered, > just in case (review of the rest of contents is, of course, also > welcome) > * @Uwe: I will take care of checkpoint 9, but if you can contribute > some input in the meantime, it would be rather welcome > * @All: review this draft and provide comments/inputs > > Our intention is to send a version of this document to the EC and > reviewers by tomorrow. If possible, the complete Management Report > but at least this one. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Management Report - checkpoints v2.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 207200 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 23 11:29:00 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:29:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] QUITE IMPORTANT Re: Section on coverage of checkpoints to make part of the Management Report In-Reply-To: <50AF480C.6000602@tid.es> References: <50ADD753.6070406@tid.es> <50AF480C.6000602@tid.es> Message-ID: <50AF4FEC.3010108@tid.es> Hi, Some of you have reported problems reading the document. You can download the document from: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1666/Management+Report+-+checkpoints+v2.docx I hope that way it will work for you. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 23/11/12 10:55, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find attached the latest draft. Still there are some > checkpoints not covered but I hope to get all finished while on my > trip back to Madrid. > > Deadline for reception of comments is 17:30 (sharp) > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > On 22/11/12 08:42, Juanjo Hierro wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I was writing down a document that tries to summarize how we have >> addressed the different checkpoints formulated by the EC and >> reviewers. Our intention is to include it as part of the Project >> Management Report. >> >> This morning, I will be fully busy attending the FI-PPP AB meeting, >> so I would like to ask the help of some of you to make progress on it >> as well as to review what I have already written down. In some >> cases, what I'm asking you to contribute aligns with the presentation >> you are working on, so I guess the exercise will not be so difficult. >> >> Please try to send your contributions by EOB today: >> >> * @Miguel: please try to cover checkpoint 3 (Software Releases) >> * @Axel/Uwe: please deal with checkpoint 4 (availability of SAP >> GEs) and review 6 >> * @Stefano: please deal with checkpoint 5 >> * @Matteo: please deal with checkpoints 7-8 (I have provided some >> input on 7) and review 6 >> * @Jose: please deal with checkpoint 10 >> * @Axel: please review checkpoint 11 that I would consider covered, >> just in case (review of the rest of contents is, of course, also >> welcome) >> * @Uwe: I will take care of checkpoint 9, but if you can contribute >> some input in the meantime, it would be rather welcome >> * @All: review this draft and provide comments/inputs >> >> Our intention is to send a version of this document to the EC and >> reviewers by tomorrow. If possible, the complete Management Report >> but at least this one. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website:www.tid.es >> email:jhierro at tid.es >> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Nov 23 11:49:29 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:49:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <1055_1353667873_50AF5521_1055_5225_1_c40a454e-b59e-4f38-bb0e-cb53a0878f2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Hi Carlos, One immediate comment from my side I think slide 4 should be about features roadmapping for not only GEs which have been delivered but also GE to come for second release .... With this respect I though we could reuse the template of slide 2 & 3 to report on this (roadmap for GEs features ...). But here we may request maybe one more slide to have it done. More comments will come. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ralli at tid.es Fri Nov 23 11:59:24 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:59:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki In-Reply-To: <1055_1353667873_50AF5521_1055_5225_1_c40a454e-b59e-4f38-bb0e-cb53a0878f2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <1055_1353667873_50AF5521_1055_5225_1_c40a454e-b59e-4f38-bb0e-cb53a0878f2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F0256F7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Ok, Just do it, upload then your .ppt to the same placeholder and we will harmonize in the review. Same message for Pierangelo. It is good to have a template, but some flexibility is needed too. However, I would try to keep the slides as minimun as necessary because there are 10min for each talk. IMHO, it is better now to focus on working the slides out based on the template so we do not create a bottleneck. Regards, ________________________________ De: BISSON Pascal [pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: viernes, 23 de noviembre de 2012 11:49 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Hi Carlos, One immediate comment from my side I think slide 4 should be about features roadmapping for not only GEs which have been delivered but also GE to come for second release ?. With this respect I though we could reuse the template of slide 2 & 3 to report on this (roadmap for GEs features ?). But here we may request maybe one more slide to have it done. More comments will come. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Nov 23 15:27:37 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:27:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft management report Message-ID: <50AF87D9.9000306@tid.es> Dear all, As you are aware, we are working very hard to put together the management report. We are lagging well behind schedule and we cannot put it off any longer. I send all the consortium the report in its current status. Apart from last minute minor changes, we still need to: * Complete WP2 (the parts in yellow come from the previous report and they will be edited) * Add the "checkpoints" (the WPL/WPA know what I am talking about) Unfortunately we have to send this urgently to the EC and we will do so at the weekend. This means that unfortunately we can only accept comments until Saturday EOB. If you send comments later, they may be not incorporated to the final version of the report. The draft version is located on the private project on: * http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1667/FI-WARE+-+D.1.2.3+-+Periodic_Peport+-+M13-M18+-+v7%28DRAFT%29.doc Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 23 18:45:22 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:45:22 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: CONCORD Communication to FI-PPP In-Reply-To: <017401cdc991$48dc9930$da95cb90$%schaffers@aalto.fi> References: <017401cdc991$48dc9930$da95cb90$%schaffers@aalto.fi> Message-ID: <50AFB632.6090507@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: CONCORD Communication to FI-PPP Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:43:25 +0100 From: Hans Schaffers To: 'JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA' Dear Juan Please find attached a communication from CONCORD addressed to FI-PPP project managers and chairs of Steering Board and Architecture Board, cc to the Commission. We are available for any questions. Kind regards, Petra Turkama and Hans Schaffers (CONCORD project coordination) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Communication from CONCORD to FI-PPP.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 39687 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sat Nov 24 11:49:35 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 11:49:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Final review of report on FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints Message-ID: <50B0A63F.6030404@tid.es> Hi all, I couldn't finalize the document where we will report on FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints yesterday so I haven't sent it to EC and reviewers yet. I rather arrived exhausted because of my trip back from Germany so I couldn't finish it yesterday despite I made good progress integrating the several inputs/comments that many of you provided to me (thanks again to those who have helped). Please find it attached what would be the first completed version with all the comments/inputs received so far. The plan we will follow is: 1. We will incorporate this stuff in the overall Management Report. 2. As you know, a draft of the Management Report has been distributed to you (as well as rest of FI-WARE partners) by Miguel Carrillo, setting up a deadline for comments by EOB today (let's say 18:00). 3. Then: * If the amount of comments received by that time (18:00) are enough easy to handle as to generate a final version that we may submit to the EC and reviewers in a reasonable time (let's say 20:00), we will incorporate them and submit the whole Management Report this evening (we would highlight the section about management of checkpoints in the body of the message to be sent to the EC) * if the amount of comments requires a significant integration effort, we will send the report on the checkpoint first this evening, announcing that it is an advance of the final Management Report deliverable that will be sent tomorrow. Hope you agree with this. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Management Report - checkpoints v6.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 210601 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sat Nov 24 20:40:51 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:40:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting In-Reply-To: <50B122A5.7030704@tid.es> References: <50B122A5.7030704@tid.es> Message-ID: <50B122C3.5090109@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:40:21 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu, jimenez at tid.es, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu, msli at icfocus.co.uk, irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com, rdifrancesco at ymail.com, dgr at whitestein.com, mcp at tid.es, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian, Please find between lines our response to your change requests: On 20/11/12 18:39, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Juanjo, Thank you very much for the draft agenda. Some changes that we would like to see: 1) The live demos (day 1, 10.30 ? 12.15) need to go in detail with at least 3 GEs "in full", i.e. including the full set of documentation and other contents associated with that GE available at Month 18 plus relevant issues relating to implementation), in addition to the ?live demos? already scheduled. The three (or more) GEs should be drawn from the chapters 3, 5 & 6 and should be the ones which have generated the greatest interest so far. So, for chapter 3 it would be the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Editor, for ch 5 it would be the Things Mgt GE or the CEP Mobile Manager (as the Backend Device Mgt GE is not available), and for ch 6 it would be Proactive Technology Online, the Context Awareness Platform, the Samson broker, or the Query Broker. The live demo we had planned was a demo in which we will explain how an example application can be designed based on the encompassing usage of several FI-WARE GEs coming from several chapters. That application makes extensive usage of GEs associated to the Apps, Data and IoT chapter at runtime and we will show it deployed on the FI-WARE Cloud and published/acquired through the FI-WARE Business Framework. It is a demo where we will walk through the several phases of the lifecycle of an application, covering the perspective of a developer, an application provider and, finally, target users. We will be able to show a number of FI-WARE GEs linked to the following chapters: * Cloud (the IaaS Cloud deployed on the FI-WARE Testbed will be presented and we will actually show the example demo application running on that Cloud) * Apps (Applications Mashup GE - WireCloud, Service Repository and Marketplace GEs) * Data (Publish/Subscribe Context Broker GE - Samson Broker) * IoT (IoT Gateway GEs illustrating interaction with actual devices) We honestly believe that the programmed demo provides much more value than standalone/separate demos of a series of FI-WARE GEs. Of course, we may explore available documentation, etc of each of the GEs shown in this demo. Besides, if you are still interested, we may book some timeslot for standalone demos on some of the GEs you propose. We have checked availability of owners of those GEis during these days but in such a short notice we only got confirmation regarding the CEP Mobile Manager and the PROactive Technology ONline (PROTON). Please note that regarding composition technologies covered in the Apps chapter, we wouldn't consider that the Mashup Factory or the Ericsson Composition Editor would qualify better than the Application Mashup GE - WireCloud. Actually, none of the UC projects have declared that they have already incorporated neither the Mashup Factory nor the Ericsson Composition Editor in their current design. They have just declared that they wish to experiment with the technology (which, to some extend, comes for free). On the other hand, we have got confirmation of one UC project (Finest), and a rather positive feedback from another one (Outsmart), regarding incorporation of the Applications Mashup GE - WireCloud in their design. Therefore, if we keep the live demo application we had programmed, and then add the demos on the CEP Mobile Manager and PROTON, the requirement to cover FI-WARE GEis in the Apps, Data and IoT chapters which have generated the greatest interest but also major commitment so far, would be met. See comments later on regarding timing adjustments that may help to accommodate the revision of the full set of documentation of FI-WARE GEis shown at the example application demo as well as to be able to incorporate the additional demos of the CEP Mobile Manager and PROTON. 2) Somewhere in the agenda the latest status of GE take-up by the Use Cases, the consortium members themselves, and potentially additional interests elsewhere needs to be presented. Latest status of GE take-up by the Use Cases is going to be covered in the presentation about status of checkpoint 2 (Public availability of a matrix of Use Cases using the GEs; continuous update of the matrix). We will also cover feedback on usage of the Testbed by UC projects in the presentation about status of checkpoint 6 (Testbed in operation, feedback from UC projects on using the Testbed, and potential integration with FIRE infrastructures) The rest is covered in the slot about Exploitation. Therefore, the current agenda doesn't need to be changed in this respect. 3) Third Party Innovation Enablement is a key deliverable and needs to be presented. This deliverable is covered in the presentation on Business Value of FI-WARE. Again, we feel that the current agenda doesn't need to be changed in this respect. 4) Testbed and testing deliverables are also important and should be presented. It would be good to know how the Test bed actually supports some of the non-functional capabilities that are listed in the first release in the Technical Roadmap 5) A summary of the status of the validation of the GEs from the Use Cases and how this is checked back against the requirements needs to be presented. These points are going to be covered in the presentation about status of checkpoint 6 (Testbed in operation, feedback from UC projects on using the Testbed, and potential integration with FIRE infrastructures) 6) The Closing Statements should include a presentation of Outlook for FI-WARE from the consortium?s viewpoint. Fine. 7) To accommodate the above items, Day 2 could end later and the 3 hours planned for Revision of checkpoints could be shorter. As you see, coverage of points 2-6 were already considered or can be accommodated in the proposed agenda. Indeed, the presentation on revision of checkpoints shouldn't be shorter to make sure some of the points you mention are properly covered. The only tricky point is about the live demos. We believe that the 1h30 mins allocated for the demo of the application showing the encompassed usage of several FI-WARE GEs was fairly calculated. On the other hand, I believe that the introductory presentation (summary of status) and the presentation on "Summary of actions performed for deliverables resubmission" can be merged keeping them in 20 mins total. That way, we save almost one hour that can be used for reviewing the documentation of some of the GEs being used in the demo application as well as to carry out the separated demos on the Data/Context Management CEP and the IoT Gateway Data Handling CEP. We may need more time to present the current activities/roadmap of technical WPs, but we could short/drop the wrap-up at the end of the first day. We may also plan to move slots of some WPs to beginning of the second day if we run out of time. If that is the case, we may actually end Day 2 later, but let's keep the agenda of Day 2 as proposed, for the time being. The enclosed spreadsheet incorporates the above described changes. Please confirm it is ok. Last but not least, please confirm that a bridge with speakers for the remote demos on the additional FI-WARE GEs will be available for use at the meeting room. Best regards, -- Juanjo Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 10:21 AM To: VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) Cc: jimenez at tid.es; CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); msli at icfocus.co.uk; irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com; rdifrancesco at ymail.com; dgr at whitestein.com; mcp at tid.es; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE - Official Invitation to M18 Review Meeting Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, Please find enclosed a draft agenda for the project review. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 07/11/12 10:43, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Jimenez, In accordance with Article II.23 of the contract, and as agreed with you recently, I hereby inform you of the Commission's intention to hold a review meeting of the project FP7-ICT-285248 FI-WARE in Brussels, Belgium on 28th and 29th November 2012. The meeting will take place in the premises of the European Commission in avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels Meeting rooms: 28th and 29th November avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S10 As agreed with you, the Commission will be assisted by the following independent experts: - Dr Renaud Di Francesco - Dr. Dominic Greenwood - Ms Man-Sze Li - Ms Irena Pavlova The objectives of the review are, in particular, to establish: ? the degree of fulfillment of the project work plan for the relevant period and of the related deliverables; ? the continued relevance of the objectives and breakthrough potential with respect to the scientific and industrial state of the art; ? the resources planned and utilized in relation to the achieved progress, in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness; ? the management procedures and methods of the project; ? the beneficiaries' contributions and integration within the project; ? the expected potential impact in scientific, technologic, economic, competitive and social terms (where relevant), and the plans for the use and dissemination of results. If you have not sent the deliverables for this review period (months 13 to 18) to the European Commission yet, please do so as soon as possible and put the experts (see cc) in copy. Please send us the draft agenda of this meeting before Friday 9th November 2012. Please send me the names of the people attending the review before Friday 23rd November 2012. Should you have any questions before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your co-operation. Best Regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 ? Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Project Review Agenda.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 10953 bytes Desc: not available URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Sat Nov 24 21:18:32 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 22:18:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F0256F7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <1055_1353667873_50AF5521_1055_5225_1_c40a454e-b59e-4f38-bb0e-cb53a0878f2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F0256F7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Few comments on the template. Slides 2-4: I totally agree that we need to cover major achievements during M13-M18, as well as main focus areas for M19-M24 (including goals for the second release). But I think a more free-form format would be more appropriate in many cases. We need to remember that target audience is mainly the reviewers, and they are interested in lots of things other than features of individual GEs. Different WPLs might want to put emphasis on different things, and having such a strict format is somewhat too restrictive. Mapping to epics/features/etc is important, but is just a tool, and not the goal. Suggestion: have 2-3 slides on "Achievements during M13-M18", and another 1-2 slides on "Focus Areas for M19-M24". Leave the format up to the WPL. Slide 5: "highs" should be part of "achievements" above, no need to duplicate. Moreover, I would recommend removing "lows" -- they are typically non-productive for the discussion. Suggestion: keep just "Issues" (in a way "lows" should be largely covered by "issues"), and make a table including also "Importance", "Status" (some WPLs may decide to include issues which already have been resolved) and "Resolution Approach". Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO To: BISSON Pascal , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Cc: GIDOIN Daniel Date: 23/11/2012 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Ok, Just do it, upload then your .ppt to the same placeholder and we will harmonize in the review. Same message for Pierangelo. It is good to have a template, but some flexibility is needed too. However, I would try to keep the slides as minimun as necessary because there are 10min for each talk. IMHO, it is better now to focus on working the slides out based on the template so we do not create a bottleneck. Regards, De: BISSON Pascal [pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: viernes, 23 de noviembre de 2012 11:49 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Hi Carlos, One immediate comment from my side I think slide 4 should be about features roadmapping for not only GEs which have been delivered but also GE to come for second release ?. With this respect I though we could reuse the template of slide 2 & 3 to report on this (roadmap for GEs features ?). But here we may request maybe one more slide to have it done. More comments will come. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Nov 25 00:13:37 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:13:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Summary of status regarding FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints In-Reply-To: <50B12DA1.3050300@tid.es> References: <50B12DA1.3050300@tid.es> Message-ID: <50B154A1.70008@tid.es> FYI -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Summary of status regarding FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:27:13 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu, msli at icfocus.co.uk, irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com, rdifrancesco at ymail.com, dgr at whitestein.com CC: jimenez at tid.es, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu, mcp at tid.es, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, We are about to send you the complete Project Management Report but we are still integrated some final input. As an advance, I believe it will be useful to send you the attached document which will become part of the Management Report and provides a summary of the status regarding the several FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints. We hope it brings valuable information for you. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Management Report - checkpoints vfinal.pdf Type: application/forcedownload Size: 387035 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Nov 25 10:23:11 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:23:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: POINTS TO COVER/CHECK PRIOR REVIEW of the FI-WARE Project In-Reply-To: <50AC6BE6.5050708@tid.es> References: <50AC6BE6.5050708@tid.es> Message-ID: <50B1E37F.4020603@tid.es> Hi all, I cannot do much more than overemphasize how critical is that every FI-WARE GEi owner takes full responsibility of implementing the action points that I summarized in the email I sent on November 21th (attached for your convenience). Please note that the reviewers have already announced their intention to pick a number of FI-WARE GEis during the review for which all the information will be reviewed (software documentation, backlog and rest of sections on the "Materializing the FI-WARE Vision" part of the wiki, related info in the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap, corresponding FI-WARE Open Specifications, traceability of features endorsed by UC projects, etc) The exercise linked to points 1 and 2 are pretty much simple. If failures in selected FI-WARE GEis are detected, it may jeopardize the whole review. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: POINTS TO COVER/CHECK PRIOR REVIEW of the FI-WARE Project Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:51:34 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear all, As you know, we face a quite critical project review next week so we have to do every effort to make it a success. We shouldn't leave any question properly addressed. Following is a list of points that every FI-WARE GE owner should review and make sure it is properly covered. Of course, WPLs/WPAs are asked to double-check that all are being actually reviewed: 1. Revision of the Technical Roadmap. We made a great effort several months ago to deliver a comprehensive Technical Roadmap which incorporated detailed references about what features of the different FI-WARE GEs were going to be covered when. Please make sure that the current contents are aligned with reality. Concretely, make sure that contents regarding FI-WARE GEs that have been updated or delivered during September/October and that description of what comes in the following releases is still accurate or whether more details can be added. 2. Very important: adding UC projects as stakeholders of features in your backlog. As per agreement with the UC projects reached at FI-PPP AB level, you are entitled to mention a given UC project as stakeholder of ALL the features linked to your FI-WARE GEi if that project has labeled your FI-WARE GEi as "U" or "D" in the spreadsheet we are sharing with UC projects regarding planned usage. This is very important because our PO and reviewers have already announced us that they will ask for mapping of features in the backlog with requirements from UC projects. 3. Revision of your FI-WARE GE backlog: Is there any Epic that have you already refined into more concrete Epics or even Features for the second Release of FI-WARE ? If so, please update your backlog and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap accordingly 4. Contents of the FI-WARE Catalogue. Besides carrying out the task already assigned to you yesterday regarding information about "Terms and Conditions", please take your time to review the contents of the entry of your FI-WARE GEi in the Catalogue, to make sure it aligns with provided templates. Particularly, the downloads tab should point to the places where the software is available (publicly or in a restricted area only accessible to the FI-PPP partners) unless you had declared that you wished to offer it "as a Service" either from the FI-WARE Testbed or your own facilities (this latter case was subject to prior agreement as you know) Please don't hesitate to formulate any question you may have. We are happy to assist you. We are sure that with your commitment, the review meeting will be a great success. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Sun Nov 25 11:25:21 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:25:21 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: Summary of status regarding FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints In-Reply-To: <50B154A1.70008@tid.es> References: <50B12DA1.3050300@tid.es> <50B154A1.70008@tid.es> Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A636176D7E525@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Juanjo, FI-WARE Team thank you very much. Great Job. Best regards, axel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Sonntag, 25. November 2012 00:14 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: Summary of status regarding FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints FYI -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Summary of status regarding FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:27:13 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu, msli at icfocus.co.uk, irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com, rdifrancesco at ymail.com, dgr at whitestein.com CC: jimenez at tid.es, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu, mcp at tid.es, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, We are about to send you the complete Project Management Report but we are still integrated some final input. As an advance, I believe it will be useful to send you the attached document which will become part of the Management Report and provides a summary of the status regarding the several FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints. We hope it brings valuable information for you. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Nov 25 18:23:55 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:23:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Submission of deliverable In-Reply-To: <50B253EA.9040506@tid.es> References: <50B253EA.9040506@tid.es> Message-ID: <50B2542B.40605@tid.es> FYI. I'll be offline in the following couple of hours on my way to Brussels. I'll connect later tonight and will check emails. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Submission of deliverable Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:22:50 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu, Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu, msli at icfocus.co.uk, irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com, rdifrancesco at ymail.com, dgr at whitestein.com CC: jimenez at tid.es, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu, mcp at tid.es, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, This is the submission of deliverable D.1.2.3 "FI-WARE Periodic Report". You can download it from: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/25/1675/D.1.2.3+-+FI-WARE_Periodic_Peport+-+M13-M18+-+vfinal.pdf There are some figures that are still pending of final check, please consider this version not definitive but rather close to final. Please take into account that you have to first have logged in your account FussionForge before clicking and downloading the file. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 24/11/12 21:27, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear Arian and Vanessa, dear reviewers, We are about to send you the complete Project Management Report but we are still integrated some final input. As an advance, I believe it will be useful to send you the attached document which will become part of the Management Report and provides a summary of the status regarding the several FI-WARE Project Review checkpoints. We hope it brings valuable information for you. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 26 09:59:48 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:59:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Info about baseline assets missing !! Message-ID: <50B32F84.6040608@tid.es> Hi, This message is targeting FI-WARE GEi owners. One of the checkpoints that will be evaluated during our Project Review on Wednesday have to do with explaining what are the Baseline assets behind each FI-WARE GEi (Generic Enabler Implementation). This shouldn't be an issue because, long time ago, we decided to add a section titled "Baseline assets" per FI-WARE GEi within the "Materializing the FI-WARE Vision" part of the wiki ... However, I got scared yesterday when I discover that the wiki page that should be there for some FI-WARE GEis (e.g., the Data/Context Management CEP) had dissapeared !! Please check there is no missing info and that everything regarding your FI-WARE GEi in the corresponding section within the "Materializing the FI-WARE Vision" part of the wiki is all set ... Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ralli at tid.es Mon Nov 26 10:02:29 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:02:29 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Important: Last call for updating Dissemination/Communication/Collaboration + 2012/2013 Planned events Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F027A96@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Colleagues, In order to correctly take into account all dissemination and collaboration efforts and draw an accurate plan in the review, we need the following actions from your side: 1. Updating the wiki-pages on dissemination, communication and collaboration with the latest actions within your chapters. Please, forward this to your partners so they do it before tomorrow 12h PM CET, when I'm getting the final numbers/statistics and key contributions. You will find the links to these pages at the main FI-WARE Communication actions page: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Communication_activities 2. Listing the key conferences and events that your chapter is planning to attend till the end of 2013. For each entry we need Conf/Event Name - Date - Location - Our role there (Just 1 line) - Expected impact (just 1 line) I just need WP leaders replying this e-mail with that information today. 3. Optionally, providing any relevant communication or collaboration planned actions that you know today and would make sense to mention during the review dissemination slot. Thanks in advance, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ralli at tid.es Mon Nov 26 12:06:59 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:06:59 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] New Template/Example - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F027E2D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi All, I took into account Alex and others proposals/suggestions so I come up with a first draft of WP6 slides that may work as new reference template for all. Find this at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1677/FI-WARE+WP6+Data-Context+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121125.pptx I let the symbols and remarks in yellow so the template info is available. At the same time most of the text for Data chapter is final and therefore an actual example. Alex, I generalized the achievements (from features to achievements/goals) and now we can describe not only results related to GEs but to any subject you want (including GEs too, in the way I did for Data). In the last slide I removed Highs/Lows/issues titles, I let only two and I hope the new names give a better sense of our work. Please, upload your contributions following the template in the same placeholder (Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 ). Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ De: Alex Glikson [GLIKSON at il.ibm.com] Enviado el: s?bado, 24 de noviembre de 2012 21:18 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Few comments on the template. * Slides 2-4: I totally agree that we need to cover major achievements during M13-M18, as well as main focus areas for M19-M24 (including goals for the second release). But I think a more free-form format would be more appropriate in many cases. We need to remember that target audience is mainly the reviewers, and they are interested in lots of things other than features of individual GEs. Different WPLs might want to put emphasis on different things, and having such a strict format is somewhat too restrictive. Mapping to epics/features/etc is important, but is just a tool, and not the goal. Suggestion: have 2-3 slides on "Achievements during M13-M18", and another 1-2 slides on "Focus Areas for M19-M24". Leave the format up to the WPL. * Slide 5: "highs" should be part of "achievements" above, no need to duplicate. Moreover, I would recommend removing "lows" -- they are typically non-productive for the discussion. Suggestion: keep just "Issues" (in a way "lows" should be largely covered by "issues"), and make a table including also "Importance", "Status" (some WPLs may decide to include issues which already have been resolved) and "Resolution Approach". * Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO To: BISSON Pascal , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Cc: GIDOIN Daniel Date: 23/11/2012 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ Ok, Just do it, upload then your .ppt to the same placeholder and we will harmonize in the review. Same message for Pierangelo. It is good to have a template, but some flexibility is needed too. However, I would try to keep the slides as minimun as necessary because there are 10min for each talk. IMHO, it is better now to focus on working the slides out based on the template so we do not create a bottleneck. Regards, ________________________________ De: BISSON Pascal [pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: viernes, 23 de noviembre de 2012 11:49 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Hi Carlos, One immediate comment from my side I think slide 4 should be about features roadmapping for not only GEs which have been delivered but also GE to come for second release ?. With this respect I though we could reuse the template of slide 2 & 3 to report on this (roadmap for GEs features ?). But here we may request maybe one more slide to have it done. More comments will come. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx_______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 26 15:30:50 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:30:50 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] 1st Draft of complete presentation covering checkpoints Message-ID: <50B37D1A.5000700@tid.es> Hi all, Find enclosed the template we should follow for the checkpoints slides. Please add the slides corresponding to the checkpoints assigned to you and send them back to me. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Checkpoints 12-11-26.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 3035088 bytes Desc: not available URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Mon Nov 26 15:31:40 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:31:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] New Template/Example - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F027E2D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F027E2D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Thanks, Carlos. Regarding Issues slide -- I wonder whether we should focus on things specific to each WP, and consolidate the general ones in the overview presentation, rather than repeating in each WP presentation. I think most if not all the issues you've mentioned are applicable to all the WPs. This way we can free up more time for WP-specific updates. Also, regarding slide $3.. I see that in most cases a raw refers either to a single GE (which is also mentioned in the row description), or to all the GEs. In both cases, I wonder whether having the columns adds any information (compared to just having bullets, for example). Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO To: Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Cc: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 26/11/2012 01:06 PM Subject: New Template/Example - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Hi All, I took into account Alex and others proposals/suggestions so I come up with a first draft of WP6 slides that may work as new reference template for all. Find this at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1677/FI-WARE+WP6+Data-Context+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121125.pptx I let the symbols and remarks in yellow so the template info is available. At the same time most of the text for Data chapter is final and therefore an actual example. Alex, I generalized the achievements (from features to achievements/goals) and now we can describe not only results related to GEs but to any subject you want (including GEs too, in the way I did for Data). In the last slide I removed Highs/Lows/issues titles, I let only two and I hope the new names give a better sense of our work. Please, upload your contributions following the template in the same placeholder (Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 ). Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ De: Alex Glikson [GLIKSON at il.ibm.com] Enviado el: s?bado, 24 de noviembre de 2012 21:18 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Few comments on the template. Slides 2-4: I totally agree that we need to cover major achievements during M13-M18, as well as main focus areas for M19-M24 (including goals for the second release). But I think a more free-form format would be more appropriate in many cases. We need to remember that target audience is mainly the reviewers, and they are interested in lots of things other than features of individual GEs. Different WPLs might want to put emphasis on different things, and having such a strict format is somewhat too restrictive. Mapping to epics/features/etc is important, but is just a tool, and not the goal. Suggestion: have 2-3 slides on "Achievements during M13-M18", and another 1-2 slides on "Focus Areas for M19-M24". Leave the format up to the WPL. Slide 5: "highs" should be part of "achievements" above, no need to duplicate. Moreover, I would recommend removing "lows" -- they are typically non-productive for the discussion. Suggestion: keep just "Issues" (in a way "lows" should be largely covered by "issues"), and make a table including also "Importance", "Status" (some WPLs may decide to include issues which already have been resolved) and "Resolution Approach". Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO To: BISSON Pascal , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Cc: GIDOIN Daniel Date: 23/11/2012 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Ok, Just do it, upload then your .ppt to the same placeholder and we will harmonize in the review. Same message for Pierangelo. It is good to have a template, but some flexibility is needed too. However, I would try to keep the slides as minimun as necessary because there are 10min for each talk. IMHO, it is better now to focus on working the slides out based on the template so we do not create a bottleneck. Regards, De: BISSON Pascal [pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: viernes, 23 de noviembre de 2012 11:49 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Hi Carlos, One immediate comment from my side I think slide 4 should be about features roadmapping for not only GEs which have been delivered but also GE to come for second release ?. With this respect I though we could reuse the template of slide 2 & 3 to report on this (roadmap for GEs features ?). But here we may request maybe one more slide to have it done. More comments will come. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Nov 26 18:26:35 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:26:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Action Points identified during rehearsal Message-ID: <50B3A64B.7070404@tid.es> Folks, Here you are a summary of the APs we have identified today AP - Every chapter leader to come with input to SWOT matrix we will present at the closing of the review (accompanying outlook) AP - Axel to bring slide elaborating on the Legal Notice (checkpoint 11.a) AP - Axel to refine slide elaborating on checkpoint 4 (delivery of SAP GEs) - put it in more positive terms AP - FI-WARE GEi owners to complete stakeholders field based on approach considering Usage Matrix as input AP - FI-WARE GEi owners to publish Terms and Conditions, otherwise complete spreadsheet at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDdGQnl1eTRSLXdRSHd5cHd4LUhnOFE#gid=0 AP - All caretakers of checkpoint presentations to send their slides by this evening. See you tomorrow at 09:00am -- Juanjo ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ralli at tid.es Mon Nov 26 23:07:09 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:07:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Dissemination - Fi-WARE video ready, please check it! Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F028B69@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Colleagues, The first Fi-WARE video is ready! Please send this link to your communication departments in case you need clearance for this. https://vimeo.com/54279671 (Password: tid) We will show the video during the review on Thursday and link it in the new testbed web, unless there are explicit objections. In the short future, we will generate shorter videos focussed on chapters that may require more analysis but I believe this one will be easy because it just presents the overall messages of the whole project and chapters. Your feedback is welcome too! Thanks, Best regards -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 27 04:53:43 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 04:53:43 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] CRITICAL: Availability of FI-WARE GEi Terms and Conditions Message-ID: <50B43947.1090009@tid.es> Folks, Again, rather important message for FI-WARE GEi owners. We have to provide information THIS WEDNESDAY about WHEN Terms and Conditions on "External availability" will be clarified regarding each of the FI-WARE GEi. This is CRITICAL. I remind you that f you are unable to complete the task before the review, you should provide a target date in the following shared spread sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdDdGQnl1eTRSLXdRSHd5cHd4LUhnOFE#gid=0 Of course, you may decide what date is more realistic, but I just want to make aware that the EC has already provided feedback that waiting for delivery of the 2nd Release would be waiting too long. Indeed, they believe that investing for the integration of a given FI-WARE GEi in the 2nd Release when its sustainability is uncertain, doesn't sound like too much reasonable. I personally believe that end of January/February is more aligned with expectations. These are actually dates at which we should be able to take the decisions about what definitively will come as part of the 2nd Release of FI-WARE. Those who have already been able to complete the Terms and Conditions on "External availability" should fill the corresponding cell writing "Done" in the provided spreadsheet. Thanks in advance, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Nov 27 09:10:17 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:10:17 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F0256F7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F023F23@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <1055_1353667873_50AF5521_1055_5225_1_c40a454e-b59e-4f38-bb0e-cb53a0878f2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F0256F7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <30632_1354003820_50B4756C_30632_9565_2_63b0e4e2-22ac-4d55-9956-d87f26cb7584@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Carlos, This just to let you know that I produced my slideset on WP8 using previous template. Overall I preferred the former one for what concerns the reporting on highs, lows and issues for which can go for specifics for each of the WPs. If we go for the new one we will simply end up with very general things that can be shared and as such reported elsewhere. But ok let's discuss and harmonize during the review. Best Regards, Pascal De : CARLOS RALLI UCENDO [mailto:ralli at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 23 novembre 2012 11:59 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Ok, Just do it, upload then your .ppt to the same placeholder and we will harmonize in the review. Same message for Pierangelo. It is good to have a template, but some flexibility is needed too. However, I would try to keep the slides as minimun as necessary because there are 10min for each talk. IMHO, it is better now to focus on working the slides out based on the template so we do not create a bottleneck. Regards, ________________________________ De: BISSON Pascal [pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: viernes, 23 de noviembre de 2012 11:49 Para: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Hi Carlos, One immediate comment from my side I think slide 4 should be about features roadmapping for not only GEs which have been delivered but also GE to come for second release .... With this respect I though we could reuse the template of slide 2 & 3 to report on this (roadmap for GEs features ...). But here we may request maybe one more slide to have it done. More comments will come. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Template - Chapter Review-presentations - Available in Fi-WARE (private) Wiki Dear Colleagues Find in the following link a template/example for the Chapter presentations in next week's review. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1662/FI-WARE+WPx+Data+Chapter_Draft_v1_20121122.pptx You comments/feedback are welcomed. As there's not so much time available, whenever you have a suggestion, please do change the template yourself and upload the new version in the same location. Thanks, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From john.m.kennedy at intel.com Tue Nov 27 08:25:12 2012 From: john.m.kennedy at intel.com (Kennedy, John M) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:25:12 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs In-Reply-To: <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED7573@Hydra.office.hd> References: <26558_1353489086_50AC9ABD_26558_524_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C083DC7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED721C@Hydra.office.hd> <2563_1353583779_50AE0CA3_2563_2568_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C084214@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE53D4@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <7929_1353590987_50AE28CB_7929_346_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C08436C@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C500027EEE54DE@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <8755F290097BD941865DC4245B335D2D38ED7573@Hydra.office.hd> Message-ID: <70851B256BA35449A5ADF81F0FADF88115D63164@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> Dear all, Just to share Intel's perspective, I confirm it would be very challenging to get internal business and legal approval and resources to support a shareware model for at least the Intel GE implementations. As you may know, our current intentions are to release our Intel GE implementations open source. Open sourcing procedures and implications are comprehended across our internal business processes and relevant business groups. I hope whatever solution we come up with - if for example it is shareware as a minimum - will not affect GE implementations that are being open-sourced. Kind regards, - John. From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Tobias Jacobs Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:20 PM To: Heijnen Henk; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Thanks for discussing the topic. Not sure if I fully understand the discussion, but would it be possible to make the shareware model something like the minimum? In the sense that all GE implementations can be used at least until the that deadline? Allowing an extended usage period, implementing/not implementing the deadline in the code, open sourcing, etc., would still be a matter of the GE implementation? In that case projects using the GEs can be sure that at least until this and that time they can use whatever GE they are interested in. Best regards Tobias From: Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 22. November 2012 14:39 To: thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Having large companies managing a shareware model will not be an easy task (I agree, it is simple for "simple developers" but do you know how to implement that inside Orange for example ???) On the tech side: what about small HW that do not have a local knowledge of time/date or on which, time/date can be user-modified??? Anyway, adding a duration limitation inside a GE you are giving the source code for is worthless (same for any protection scheme of course) and not giving 100% of the GE source code will be a violation of the GPL (or equivalent) licenses (I assume everybody is using open source inside its GE ???). Maybe a centralized license manage could help ? (assuming we can obfuscate the protection code in some way) Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00] [cid:image002.png at 01CDCBF6.7A2F83A0] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com] Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 14:30 To: Heijnen Henk; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hi Henk, Regarding your concern the right approach in a first step could be just to put a deadline in the code to avoid managing licenses. People will have to download a new version when the first one ends up. Regarding the large number of instances you expect typically before the 2nd release, and then before the 3rd release? For the last 2 years of the program I think it could be completely different, of course. But anyway, I think that if some simple developers succeed to manage sharewares in this way, it should not be impossible for Fi-Ware and the companies involved to do it also. BR Thierry De : Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 13:45 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hello Thierry, all, I have some remarks indeed. The shareware model could be ok BUT it is not easily applicable to some of the GEs. Mainly for GEs that will be on the "terminal side" (IoT GEs, I2ND GEs ...). These GEs are expected to be instantiated in large volumes (they are parts of terminals) and having to manage licenses for such items will be a nightmare. Having to "control" that these items have been legitimately licensed will even be worse, we might have to develop code dedicated to checking that an item is properly licensed, this verification code would have to be developed using technologies found in content management (for example, video game copy protection) that might be so complex they actually will be more expensive to implement than the piece of code they will protect. Maybe this "shareware licensing scheme" might become a new GE by itself ?? (if the "terminal-side" SW is easy to port / implement) ... On top of that, we (partners) will have to commercially manage these licenses. This means we must have a dedicated team granting licenses numbers to others and collecting money out of that. Who amongst the partners have such a group in its company??? Kind regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00] [cid:image002.png at 01CDCBF6.7A2F83A0] Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:30 To: Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners... Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC's license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) >From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Ireland Limited (Branch) Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland Registered Number: E902934 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From ralli at tid.es Tue Nov 27 10:45:36 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:45:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template for the chapter slides Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F02931F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear colleagues, Find it attached to this e-mail. It is also available in the Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 Please, upload your new presentations today before 18PM in this placeholder: Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 - > Chapter_Presentations->OLD_version All your previous presentations have been moved to: Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 - > Chapter_Presentations->OLD_versions Thanks for your cooperation, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE M18 Official Review CHAPTER_NAME.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1058227 bytes Desc: FI-WARE M18 Official Review CHAPTER_NAME.pptx URL: From ralli at tid.es Tue Nov 27 11:29:10 2012 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:29:10 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template for the chapter slides In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F02931F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F02931F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F029462@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Pascal, The private Wiki link is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=27 Then navigate to the right folder as indicated, Best regards, -- ________________________________ De: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Enviado el: martes, 27 de noviembre de 2012 10:45 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Template for the chapter slides Dear colleagues, Find it attached to this e-mail. It is also available in the Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 Please, upload your new presentations today before 18PM in this placeholder: Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 - > Chapter_Presentations->OLD_version All your previous presentations have been moved to: Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 - > Chapter_Presentations->OLD_versions Thanks for your cooperation, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Nov 27 12:55:48 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:55:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template for the chapter slides In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F029462@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F02931F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B2503F029462@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <21153_1354017457_50B4AAB1_21153_17266_1_7c3be73b-6ae3-4a42-9660-5bf0613e660f@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Dear Carlos, Dear All, This to let you know I've just uploaded on private wiki the final WP8 Security Chapter slideset for EC M18 review of tomorrow we reviewed this morning. Here is the link to access it. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1692/FI-WARE+WP8+Security+Chapter+M18+review+slideset.ppt Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : mardi 27 novembre 2012 11:29 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] Template for the chapter slides Pascal, The private Wiki link is: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=27 Then navigate to the right folder as indicated, Best regards, -- ________________________________ De: CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Enviado el: martes, 27 de noviembre de 2012 10:45 Para: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Template for the chapter slides Dear colleagues, Find it attached to this e-mail. It is also available in the Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 Please, upload your new presentations today before 18PM in this placeholder: Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 - > Chapter_Presentations->OLD_version All your previous presentations have been moved to: Private Wiki: Reviews-> 201211-Review-M18 - > Chapter_Presentations->OLD_versions Thanks for your cooperation, Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 27 12:58:19 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:58:19 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Presentations on checkpoints for the project review Message-ID: <50B4AADB.3020908@tid.es> Folks, I have created a folder where you should upload the latest version of the presentations on checkpoints. It is under the docman of the FI-WARE Private project in FusionForge: [cid:part1.01050803.08040407 at tid.es] Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bcihfhhh.png Type: image/png Size: 53143 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Nov 27 20:25:50 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:25:50 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Please upload presentations to FusionForge Message-ID: <50B513BE.9010905@tid.es> Hi all, Please upload presentations to the folders we created in the docman system of the "FI-WARE Private" project in FusionForge (see link and capture below): * presentations related to checkpoints: "Presentations on checkpoints" folder * presentations related to dissemination: "Dissemination" folder * presentations related to chapters: "Chapter_Presentations" Cheers, -- Juanjo https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=27 [cid:part1.02020802.09080607 at tid.es] -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dficbihg.png Type: image/png Size: 52103 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Nov 28 02:22:14 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:22:14 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Presentations on checkpoints for the project review In-Reply-To: <50B4AADB.3020908@tid.es> References: <50B4AADB.3020908@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, i have just uploaded the final version of the checkpoints 2 and 5 presentation. ciao, stefano 2012/11/27 Juanjo Hierro > Folks, > > I have created a folder where you should upload the latest version of > the presentations on checkpoints. > > It is under the docman of the FI-WARE Private project in FusionForge: > > > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bcihfhhh.png Type: image/png Size: 53143 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Nov 28 05:24:13 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:24:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Terms and Conditions linked to FI-WARE GEis in the FI-WARE Catalogue Message-ID: <50B591ED.3070209@tid.es> Dear Davide and Matteo, There are many FI-WARE GEi owners who have not even edit the "Terms and Conditions" to write down the very basic set of conditions that they should already provide (those defined within the FI-PPP, plus a reference to the Open Innovation Lab). As a consequence, we can see something as poor as: [cid:part1.04010304.09000200 at tid.es] Wouldn't it be feasible to upload the following contents (which we already provided as a template ? (the snapshot corresponds to the BigData Analysis GE - SAMSON): http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/terms-and-conditions-15 [cid:part2.05030005.00010107 at tid.es] I believe it looks more professional while, on the other hand, already structures the contents so that people doesn't forget to structure contents of this tab according to the provided template ... If this is feasible, please implement the change ... Be aware, not to overwrite entries for which the Terms and Conditions are already perfect. Just as an example: http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/application-mashup-wirecloud/terms-and-conditions [cid:part3.07020904.01030904 at tid.es] Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhhbijah.png Type: image/png Size: 17812 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bcjcjddg.png Type: image/png Size: 49051 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: aghfdijc.png Type: image/png Size: 118328 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Nov 28 08:13:09 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:13:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Please upload presentations to FusionForge In-Reply-To: <50B513BE.9010905@tid.es> References: <50B513BE.9010905@tid.es> Message-ID: <24689_1354086901_50B5B9F4_24689_2963_1_5d58fc74-27a2-4308-a0e2-3d5a4e9c9d3a@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> WP8 presentation was uploaded yesterday. So it is there already. BR Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mardi 27 novembre 2012 20:26 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Please upload presentations to FusionForge Hi all, Please upload presentations to the folders we created in the docman system of the "FI-WARE Private" project in FusionForge (see link and capture below): * presentations related to checkpoints: "Presentations on checkpoints" folder * presentations related to dissemination: "Dissemination" folder * presentations related to chapters: "Chapter_Presentations" Cheers, -- Juanjo https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=27 [cid:image001.png at 01CDCD40.337D40A0] -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 52103 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Nov 28 10:21:12 2012 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:21:12 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: Terms and Conditions linked to FI-WARE GEis in the FI-WARE Catalogue In-Reply-To: <50B591ED.3070209@tid.es> References: <50B591ED.3070209@tid.es> Message-ID: <50B5D788.3040207@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, I've updated all the entries with an empty Terms and Conditions page with the text you proposed. Here below the text I've used in order to remove the direct reference to the SAMSON ... all the involved entries can now go to their T&C page and update it with their GEI name. BR Davide. the text used is:

Experiments/Trials within the FI-PPP

Projects being part of the FI-PPP program can use this FI-WARE GE implementation under the conditions established in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement that they should have signed as beneficiaries of the program. Please create a ticket on the "FI-WARE General Support" tracker available at:     https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/?group_id=7 to report bugs on this FI-WARE GE, formulate questions or issue enhancement requests. Please record values of the "FI-WARE Chapter", "FI-WARE GE implementation product" and "Assigned to" fields in your ticket.

Open Innovation Lab

Development, testing and experimentation of applications using:
  • experimental instances deployed on the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab facilities (see section "Experimental Instances" under the "Instances" tab linked to this entry)
  • versions of the software downloaded from resources under the "downloads" tab linked to this entry
is subject to the terms and conditions established in the "FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab: Use Terms and Conditions". Any other use is not permitted.

External Availability

The Terms and Conditions for external availability have yet to be determined. On 28/11/2012 05:24, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Dear Davide and Matteo, > > There are many FI-WARE GEi owners who have not even edit the "Terms > and Conditions" to write down the very basic set of conditions that > they should already provide (those defined within the FI-PPP, plus a > reference to the Open Innovation Lab). > > As a consequence, we can see something as poor as: > > > > > Wouldn't it be feasible to upload the following contents (which we > already provided as a template ? (the snapshot corresponds to the > BigData Analysis GE - SAMSON): > > http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/terms-and-conditions-15 > > > I believe it looks more professional while, on the other hand, > already structures the contents so that people doesn't forget to > structure contents of this tab according to the provided template ... > > If this is feasible, please implement the change ... Be aware, not > to overwrite entries for which the Terms and Conditions are already > perfect. Just as an example: > > http://catalogue.fi-ware.eu/enablers/application-mashup-wirecloud/terms-and-conditions > > > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 17812 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 49051 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 118328 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jdps at tid.es Wed Nov 28 10:55:36 2012 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:55:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] RV: FI-WARE: Amendment 2 In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F11502@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F11502@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F16F53@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, Yesterday I received a message from a partner who told me he hadn't received my previous e-mail. It was due of the size of the DoW. In order to be sure that all of you receive this important e-mail, I send it again in a plain text with references to the docs in the forgefusion utility of the project and without attachments. I apologize if you receive this e-mail twice. Twice better than none. Please find the links to the documentation about amendment 2: Documentation: DoW (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1716/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+DoW+-+v2.docx Modified Dow with the requested modifications and the received comments. Description of the requested changes (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1717/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+Change+Details+-+v2.pdf It's a printed extract of the excel file Details of the changes in the budget (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1718/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+Budget+Details.pdf It's a printed extract of the excel file Excel file with the changes and calculations (Sent to you): http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1720/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+v2.xlsx It's a second version where I have changed the look&file of the "Changes - Amendment 2" sheet. Amendment's Schedule: To send to Consortium: November 22th, 2012 (Done) To receive comments: By November 24th, 2012 (Done) To update amendment with the comments: November 25th, 2012 (Done) To send to Project Officer to be evaluated: November 25th, 2012. (Done) To sign new GPF: After the approval of Commission and only by the partners which budget has been modified. (Pending) To sign FORM-B (GA) and the adherence to the CA: After the approval of Commission and only by the new partners in the Consortium. (Pending) Please, don't hesitate to ask me if you need any additional information. (Please, to avoid spam for others, send the e-mail to me, keeping subsidies at tid.es in the recipient list) We and you are spending a lot of time trying to close the final version and we think it is done, but if there is something important to change (a mistake or misunderstanding), please tell me it as soon as possible. We?ll try to manage it. Please don't request any additional change more not approved by Juanjo Hierro. More changes will have to wait to next amendments. As usual, I kindly ask you to send me and e-mail telling me that you agree with the changes. No news from you in a week will mean you agree. BR Javier. De: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: jueves, 22 de noviembre de 2012 1:51 Para: fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-administrative] FI-WARE: Amendment 2 Dear all, first I apologize for this huge e-mail but this second amendment has too many changes and we have spent a lot of time on it. Thank you very much for your contributions, without them, this would be impossible. Please find enclosed: 1.- The updated DoW (with version control on). 2.- An Excel file called "FI-WARE - Amendment 2" where you can find the following sheets: Funding Current DoW : The effort and funding in the current DoW. Changes - Amendment 2: Brief description of each change. PM Amendment 2: New effort. NEF before & after: Budget and Funding. How it was and how it will be on NEF. If you have any relevant comments or questions please do it to subsidies at tid.es as soon as possible. Our goal is to send it to Project Officer by November 24th, 2012. Note: In this amendment we (as coordinator) are going to inform to the Project Officer that our bank account has changed due to the fusion of two Spanish banks. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tanguy.Bourgault at thalesaleniaspace.com Wed Nov 28 18:04:35 2012 From: Tanguy.Bourgault at thalesaleniaspace.com (Tanguy.Bourgault at thalesaleniaspace.com) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:04:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] =?iso-8859-1?q?R=E9f=2E_=3A_Re=3A_=5BFiware-exploita?= =?iso-8859-1?q?tion=5D_Shareware_approach_ofr_3rd=09parties=09to=09use=09?= =?iso-8859-1?q?Fi-Ware_GEs?= In-Reply-To: <70851B256BA35449A5ADF81F0FADF88115D63164@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <13517_1354122264_50B64418_13517_9627_1_OF7A374831.171F3081-ONC1257AC4.005D00BA-C1257AC4.005DCDBD@thalesaleniaspace.com> Dear all, As Location GE owner (data chapter), I have to say that the shareware model will not work for us, since our plans for exploitation are either (as found in catalogue): - sell software licences for each platform being deployed or - establish bilateral agreements with companies interested to develop applications/services based on our asset. I understand that a global licensing model would be ideal, but I hope that there will be a place for other models like ours. Best regards, Tanguy Bourgault Location GE, Thales Alenia Space |---------+--------------------------------------------> | | "Kennedy, John M" | | | | | | Envoy? par : | | | fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists| | | .fi-ware.eu | | | | | | | | | 27/11/2012 08:25 | |---------+--------------------------------------------> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | Pour : Tobias Jacobs | | Heijnen Henk | | "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" | | "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" | | "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" | | "fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu" | | cc : | | Objet : Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs | >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Dear all, Just to share Intel?s perspective, I confirm it would be very challenging to get internal business and legal approval and resources to support a shareware model for at least the Intel GE implementations. As you may know, our current intentions are to release our Intel GE implementations open source. Open sourcing procedures and implications are comprehended across our internal business processes and relevant business groups. I hope whatever solution we come up with ? if for example it is shareware as a minimum - will not affect GE implementations that are being open-sourced. Kind regards, - John. From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Tobias Jacobs Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 3:20 PM To: Heijnen Henk; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Thanks for discussing the topic. Not sure if I fully understand the discussion, but would it be possible to make the shareware model something like the minimum? In the sense that all GE implementations can be used at least until the that deadline? Allowing an extended usage period, implementing/not implementing the deadline in the code, open sourcing, etc., would still be a matter of the GE implementation? In that case projects using the GEs can be sure that at least until this and that time they can use whatever GE they are interested in. Best regards Tobias From: Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 22. November 2012 14:39 To: thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Having large companies managing a shareware model will not be an easy task (I agree, it is simple for ?simple developers? but do you know how to implement that inside Orange for example ???) On the tech side: what about small HW that do not have a local knowledge of time/date or on which, time/date can be user-modified??? Anyway, adding a duration limitation inside a GE you are giving the source code for is worthless (same for any protection scheme of course) and not giving 100% of the GE source code will be a violation of the GPL (or equivalent) licenses (I assume everybody is using open source inside its GE ???). Maybe a centralized license manage could help ? (assuming we can obfuscate the protection code in some way) Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00 Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com] Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 14:30 To: Heijnen Henk; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hi Henk, Regarding your concern the right approach in a first step could be just to put a deadline in the code to avoid managing licenses. People will have to download a new version when the first one ends up. Regarding the large number of instances you expect typically before the 2nd release, and then before the 3rd release? For the last 2 years of the program I think it could be completely different, of course. But anyway, I think that if some simple developers succeed to manage sharewares in this way, it should not be impossible for Fi-Ware and the companies involved to do it also. BR Thierry De : Heijnen Henk [mailto:henk.heijnen at technicolor.com] Envoy? : jeudi 22 novembre 2012 13:45 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Hello Thierry, all, I have some remarks indeed. The shareware model could be ok BUT it is not easily applicable to some of the GEs. Mainly for GEs that will be on the ?terminal side? (IoT GEs, I2ND GEs ?). These GEs are expected to be instantiated in large volumes (they are parts of terminals) and having to manage licenses for such items will be a nightmare. Having to ?control? that these items have been legitimately licensed will even be worse, we might have to develop code dedicated to checking that an item is properly licensed, this verification code would have to be developed using technologies found in content management (for example, video game copy protection) that might be so complex they actually will be more expensive to implement than the piece of code they will protect. Maybe this ?shareware licensing scheme? might become a new GE by itself ?? (if the ?terminal-side? SW is easy to port / implement) ? On top of that, we (partners) will have to commercially manage these licenses. This means we must have a dedicated team granting licenses numbers to others and collecting money out of that. Who amongst the partners have such a group in its company??? Kind regards H Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00 Technology & Research Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: jeudi 22 novembre 2012 12:30 To: Tobias Jacobs; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, Except NEC answer, there is no other contribution. I could interpret that as it is not a crucial point or nobody would really try to implement a fi-ware instance for 3rd parties which are not involved in the FI PPP. Or maybe some of you prefer also spend lots of time with lawyers to solve the FRAND issues with all GE owners? Maybe I should an email requesting for an free open source from all GE owners to have more feedback. BR Thierry De : Tobias Jacobs [mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu] Envoy? : mercredi 21 novembre 2012 13:40 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear Thierry, Although we have to check with NEC?s license policy before making a final statement on this, I like to say already now that the shareware model sounds very attractive so us in comparison with both open sourcing and commercialization. The benefit for the GE users is indeed a strong argument for taking that road. As a statement on the license is due before the review next week, it would be good if a decision on this issue could be made as soon as possible. How was the resonance in Seville? Best regards Tobias From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of thierry.nagellen at orange.com Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 10:11 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] Shareware approach ofr 3rd parties to use Fi-Ware GEs Dear all, As I explained in Seville, but of course not all partners were there, to put in place a Fi-Ware instance should be a nightmare if a partner has to deal with all GE owners to know under which conditions it could use the GEs for 3rd parties involvement and to launch an ecosystem. This type of negotiation would first take lots of time and second does not support a business model approach for a Fi-Ware instance because you cannot define your price before to close all negotiations with each GE owner. The other approach is first to avoid any legal trouble trying to change FI PPP approach and opening GE use to 3rd parties which will not sign the Collaboration Agreement. I fully understand that our legal process are not the same in each company but I expect that what I propose could have the lower legal impact. What is a shareware approach? Two specific issues with a software: first you can limit the set of features till user who downloads your software pay for it, second you can put a deadline after which the software will not be available on your computer (another way is to ask for a license number, so as a registered member you can install the software and the licence give you a deadline) From a technical point of view, and because we propose innovative service for Future Internet (at least I expect so for all GEs ;-) ) it is not relevant to limit the features you can use when you download and use a GE. But it is very easy to put a deadline inside the code to be sure for example that an user will have to update the GE with a new release (typically release 2 end of April and then 3rd release). We can also follow how many times a GE Reference Instance is really downloaded and if it is successful. This approach could support for all GE owner a business model approach analyzing what is the concrete value users will be able to identify using the GE. In this approach we do not have to ask for money also, from my point of view, to avoid any financial process. In this approach, we do not have also to provide a commercial support from our companies for GE RI because we all know that it is very difficult to put in place and we have to demonstrate the ROI for each of them before. This shareware approach should not have a strong legal impact because each of us has not to provide some source code and will not decide any commercial support which could involve the company in legal matters. Your feedback is welcome and expected and at least Orange expects to deliver its own GE RI in this way to support a strong launch new ecosystems. Best regards Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Ireland Limited (Branch) Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland Registered Number: E902934 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ Fiware-exploitation mailing list Fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-exploitation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: graycol.gif Type: image/gif Size: 105 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ecblank.gif Type: image/gif Size: 45 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pic32662.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1255 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: C9686782.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: C0353862.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jdps at tid.es Thu Nov 29 10:04:30 2012 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:04:30 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Amendment 2 In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F16F53@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F11502@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F16F53@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F19EE3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, It's very important that the docs have been reviewed by all of you. If you have any problem downloading them please follow these two steps: 1.- You need an user account on FI-WARE Forge. If you have no one, please register yourself (It takes two minutes). https://forge.fi-ware.eu/account/register.php You'll need to confirmation your request of registration from your e-mail. 2.- If your user doesn't have access to the below documentation, please send me asap your username and I'll give it permissions. BR Javier. De: fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 28 de noviembre de 2012 10:56 Para: fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: subsidies at tid.es Asunto: [Fiware-legal] RV: FI-WARE: Amendment 2 Dear all, Yesterday I received a message from a partner who told me he hadn't received my previous e-mail. It was due of the size of the DoW. In order to be sure that all of you receive this important e-mail, I send it again in a plain text with references to the docs in the forgefusion utility of the project and without attachments. I apologize if you receive this e-mail twice. Twice better than none. Please find the links to the documentation about amendment 2: Documentation: DoW (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1716/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+DoW+-+v2.docx Modified Dow with the requested modifications and the received comments. Description of the requested changes (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1717/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+Change+Details+-+v2.pdf It's a printed extract of the excel file Details of the changes in the budget (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1718/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+Budget+Details.pdf It's a printed extract of the excel file Excel file with the changes and calculations (Sent to you): http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1720/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+v2.xlsx It's a second version where I have changed the look&file of the "Changes - Amendment 2" sheet. Amendment's Schedule: To send to Consortium: November 22th, 2012 (Done) To receive comments: By November 24th, 2012 (Done) To update amendment with the comments: November 25th, 2012 (Done) To send to Project Officer to be evaluated: November 25th, 2012. (Done) To sign new GPF: After the approval of Commission and only by the partners which budget has been modified. (Pending) To sign FORM-B (GA) and the adherence to the CA: After the approval of Commission and only by the new partners in the Consortium. (Pending) Please, don't hesitate to ask me if you need any additional information. (Please, to avoid spam for others, send the e-mail to me, keeping subsidies at tid.es in the recipient list) We and you are spending a lot of time trying to close the final version and we think it is done, but if there is something important to change (a mistake or misunderstanding), please tell me it as soon as possible. We?ll try to manage it. Please don't request any additional change more not approved by Juanjo Hierro. More changes will have to wait to next amendments. As usual, I kindly ask you to send me and e-mail telling me that you agree with the changes. No news from you in a week will mean you agree. BR Javier. De: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: jueves, 22 de noviembre de 2012 1:51 Para: fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-administrative] FI-WARE: Amendment 2 Dear all, first I apologize for this huge e-mail but this second amendment has too many changes and we have spent a lot of time on it. Thank you very much for your contributions, without them, this would be impossible. Please find enclosed: 1.- The updated DoW (with version control on). 2.- An Excel file called "FI-WARE - Amendment 2" where you can find the following sheets: Funding Current DoW : The effort and funding in the current DoW. Changes - Amendment 2: Brief description of each change. PM Amendment 2: New effort. NEF before & after: Budget and Funding. How it was and how it will be on NEF. If you have any relevant comments or questions please do it to subsidies at tid.es as soon as possible. Our goal is to send it to Project Officer by November 24th, 2012. Note: In this amendment we (as coordinator) are going to inform to the Project Officer that our bank account has changed due to the fusion of two Spanish banks. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathrin.schweppe at sap.com Thu Nov 29 10:06:48 2012 From: kathrin.schweppe at sap.com (Schweppe, Kathrin) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:06:48 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-legal] FI-WARE: Amendment 2 In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F19EE3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F11502@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F16F53@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C705F19EE3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <7ED7B27AF3542948BAB7BCD179A7677C25DA6DB848@DEWDFECCR03.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Javier, I am very sorry, however, I am not able to check those documents on such a short notice. Best regards, Kathrin From: fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2012 10:05 To: fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: subsidies at tid.es Subject: Re: [Fiware-legal] FI-WARE: Amendment 2 Dear all, It's very important that the docs have been reviewed by all of you. If you have any problem downloading them please follow these two steps: 1.- You need an user account on FI-WARE Forge. If you have no one, please register yourself (It takes two minutes). https://forge.fi-ware.eu/account/register.php You'll need to confirmation your request of registration from your e-mail. 2.- If your user doesn't have access to the below documentation, please send me asap your username and I'll give it permissions. BR Javier. De: fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 28 de noviembre de 2012 10:56 Para: fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: subsidies at tid.es Asunto: [Fiware-legal] RV: FI-WARE: Amendment 2 Dear all, Yesterday I received a message from a partner who told me he hadn't received my previous e-mail. It was due of the size of the DoW. In order to be sure that all of you receive this important e-mail, I send it again in a plain text with references to the docs in the forgefusion utility of the project and without attachments. I apologize if you receive this e-mail twice. Twice better than none. Please find the links to the documentation about amendment 2: Documentation: DoW (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1716/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+DoW+-+v2.docx Modified Dow with the requested modifications and the received comments. Description of the requested changes (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1717/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+Change+Details+-+v2.pdf It's a printed extract of the excel file Details of the changes in the budget (Sent to P.O.) -> http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1718/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+Budget+Details.pdf It's a printed extract of the excel file Excel file with the changes and calculations (Sent to you): http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/1720/FI-WARE+-+Amendment+2+-+v2.xlsx It's a second version where I have changed the look&file of the "Changes - Amendment 2" sheet. Amendment's Schedule: To send to Consortium: November 22th, 2012 (Done) To receive comments: By November 24th, 2012 (Done) To update amendment with the comments: November 25th, 2012 (Done) To send to Project Officer to be evaluated: November 25th, 2012. (Done) To sign new GPF: After the approval of Commission and only by the partners which budget has been modified. (Pending) To sign FORM-B (GA) and the adherence to the CA: After the approval of Commission and only by the new partners in the Consortium. (Pending) Please, don't hesitate to ask me if you need any additional information. (Please, to avoid spam for others, send the e-mail to me, keeping subsidies at tid.es in the recipient list) We and you are spending a lot of time trying to close the final version and we think it is done, but if there is something important to change (a mistake or misunderstanding), please tell me it as soon as possible. We?ll try to manage it. Please don't request any additional change more not approved by Juanjo Hierro. More changes will have to wait to next amendments. As usual, I kindly ask you to send me and e-mail telling me that you agree with the changes. No news from you in a week will mean you agree. BR Javier. De: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: jueves, 22 de noviembre de 2012 1:51 Para: fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: [Fiware-administrative] FI-WARE: Amendment 2 Dear all, first I apologize for this huge e-mail but this second amendment has too many changes and we have spent a lot of time on it. Thank you very much for your contributions, without them, this would be impossible. Please find enclosed: 1.- The updated DoW (with version control on). 2.- An Excel file called "FI-WARE - Amendment 2" where you can find the following sheets: Funding Current DoW : The effort and funding in the current DoW. Changes - Amendment 2: Brief description of each change. PM Amendment 2: New effort. NEF before & after: Budget and Funding. How it was and how it will be on NEF. If you have any relevant comments or questions please do it to subsidies at tid.es as soon as possible. Our goal is to send it to Project Officer by November 24th, 2012. Note: In this amendment we (as coordinator) are going to inform to the Project Officer that our bank account has changed due to the fusion of two Spanish banks. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 29 15:16:27 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:16:27 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: SWOT Analysis slide Message-ID: <50B76E3B.80209@tid.es> Dear all, Please find attached the draft SWOT analysis slide I have produced. If you send me comments on time, I will be able to incorporate them in the final SWOT to be presented :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE SWOT 12-11-29.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 137165 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu Nov 29 15:32:19 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:32:19 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: URGENT: SWOT Analysis slide In-Reply-To: <50B76E3B.80209@tid.es> References: <50B76E3B.80209@tid.es> Message-ID: My bit of contribution... BR Pier -----Messaggio originale----- Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: gioved? 29 novembre 2012 15:16 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: SWOT Analysis slide Dear all, Please find attached the draft SWOT analysis slide I have produced. If you send me comments on time, I will be able to incorporate them in the final SWOT to be presented :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE SWOT 12-11-29-pg.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 125716 bytes Desc: FI-WARE SWOT 12-11-29-pg.pptx URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Nov 29 15:38:21 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:38:21 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: SWOT Analysis slide In-Reply-To: <50B76E3B.80209@tid.es> References: <50B76E3B.80209@tid.es> Message-ID: <11108_1354200015_50B773CF_11108_241_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206DDC56D27@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> See my proposed changes/add-ons in red in your slide -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy??: jeudi 29 novembre 2012 15:16 ??: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: SWOT Analysis slide Dear all, Please find attached the draft SWOT analysis slide I have produced. If you send me comments on time, I will be able to incorporate them in the final SWOT to be presented :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE SWOT 12-11-29-PB.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 357376 bytes Desc: FI-WARE SWOT 12-11-29-PB.ppt URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Nov 29 16:17:35 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:17:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT: SWOT Analysis slide In-Reply-To: <50B76E3B.80209@tid.es> References: <50B76E3B.80209@tid.es> Message-ID: <50B77C8F.3010107@tid.es> Hi, Gathering all your quite good comments. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 29/11/12 15:16, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, Please find attached the draft SWOT analysis slide I have produced. If you send me comments on time, I will be able to incorporate them in the final SWOT to be presented :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE SWOT 12-11-29.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 137535 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 30 07:41:16 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:41:16 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: SafeCity Stockholm PoC - First PoC using FI-WARE technology - SUCCESS!! In-Reply-To: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A898323AF25087@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> References: <0CF527EE434D2E4BB398B0F67FB0A898323AF25087@xchg.mertree.mer.co.il> Message-ID: <50B8550C.3040402@tid.es> Dear all, Please find below the message from Peretz Gurel on the success of the Safecity PoC in Stockholm that has taken place this last night, from 01:00am to 03:00am. This was important because it has been the first FI-WARE PoC involving the FI-WARE Testbed, using several FI-WARE GEis and implying a true Proof of Concept "in the field" Thanks to all who helped this to be a success, the FI-WARE Testbed team and the people who offered support of the several FI-WARE GEis involved. Congratulations !! -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: SafeCity Stockholm PoC - First PoC using FI-WARE technology - SUCCESS!! Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:40:48 +0200 From: Peretz Gurel To: safecity at hi-research.eu , ab at fi-ppp.eu , Juanjo Hierro , stefano.depanfilis at eng.it CC: mcp at tid.es , e.cloud10 at tid.es , antonio.fuentes at rediris.es , TALI at il.ibm.com , KISIN at il.ibm.com , ivan.martinez at atosresearch.eu , marcus.laumer.ext at siemens.com Dear SafeCity partners, I am very happy to announce the successful completion of the SafeCity Stockholm PoC at Stockholm Arlanda airport. All the SafeCity applications worked as planned: 1. Applications running on the FI-WARE test bed in Seville, Spain: a. Rule Based Engine, using the CEP GE, processed incoming events b. Data Fusion, running on a Virtual Machine on the test bed and using the SAS GE, further stored and semantically processed the information c. Decision Suppot System, running on a Virtual Machine on the test bed delivered the User Interface over the internet to browsers in the command centers 2. Applications running locally in Stockholm: a. Sensors and Sensor Adapters collected environmental data b. Ad Hoc radio network tramitted the data to the Gatways c. Gateways collected the sensor data and made it available for processing on the FI-WARE test bed d. Security manager securely transferred the data from the Sensor Adapters to the Gateways. All sensor data was collected locally in Stockholm, processed by applications running on the FI-WARE test bed in Seville (Spain), using FI-WARE Generioc Enablers, and the results were presented back in Stockholm command ceters In addition to the PoC we have provided 3 IR thermal camera local video streaming and did some local testing of video analytics technology. The system worked as expected. The operation of the FI-WARE test bed and the FI-WARE Generic Enablers was flawless. I would lke to thank all SafeCity WP4 partners for the hard work and dedication to achieve this important milestone for SafeCity and also for FI-WARE, as this is the first PoC based on FI-WARE technology. I would also like to thank the FI-WARE test bed team and FI-WARE GE teams for their willingness to support us before the PoC and during the very late time of the PoC itself (1am - 3am). Best regards, Peretz Gurel European Projects Manager Athena security implementations Ltd Office: +972-3-5572548 Mobile: +972-54-4734045 Email: peretz at athenaiss.com www.athenaiss.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 30 09:44:24 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:44:24 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Details of the bridge for the review feedback In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4FBB7@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D4FBB7@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <50B871E8.4070400@tid.es> Hi, This is the data of the Arkadin bridge that Arian has setup for providing us first feedback about results of the review. In a separate mail, he has pointed out that the confcall will be at 12:30 CET. Feel free to share with members of your team if you believe it is worth that they attend the confcall. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: SafeCity Stockholm PoC - First PoC using FI-WARE technology - SUCCESS!! Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:55:27 +0000 From: To: CC: , , Feedback via Arkadin Tel. +32-2-4015454 Participant pin: 98383128# Weblogin: 105326998 (if used at all) Europeancommission.arkadin.com ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Nov 30 13:51:47 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:51:47 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Feedback from the EC and reviewers regarding the FI-WARE Review Message-ID: <50B8ABE3.1010101@tid.es> Dear all, Please find below my very raw notes of the feedback provided by Arian. I couldn't take note of everything, but I believe is 90% complete. I take the advantage of this mail to thank you for your great effort since July and the support given to the project by you and teams of your chapters/WPs. We are now "on track" (reviewers have agreed that progress can be now considered acceptable) thanks to all this effort. Talk to you on Monday, during our regular joint WPLs/WPAs confcall at 11:00am (yes, works have to continue :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo Introduction: The review report to be submitted in draft format just before Christmas. This feedback is prior to that. Highs: Appreciated very much the efforts. It is clear that efforts have indeed been made. Dealing with submission/resubmission, they recognized the so large number of deliverables that were submitted. It clearly should be considered an achievement in itself. More coherence between the partners. Acting as a team more than in previous reviews. Dissemination in some areas (Smart Cities) ongoing. They appreciate this. Technical support documentation has improved. Users' guide and unit testing plan are in the right direction Tools WP in the right direction. Concern here about the adoption of the IDE inside FI-WARE (eat your own dog food) Security area progressing well. Welcome initiatives regarding involvement of other projects in other units. They liked the Architecture Weeks and how they continued with the webinars. They hope we will continue with them for the second phase and record webinars, making them available to the general public. Lows: Not enough eating our own dog food. Example: FI-CoDE development environment within FI-WARE. Service Composition Area: didn't see the real need for so many composition technologies. This has now been clarified. However, the withdrawal of Ericsson and DT leads to the need to seriously consider how to move forward. SMART Cities is a good area to look but not the only one. Please take a broader approach. Exploitation: Good analysis but didn't see how this translates into the plan. They have seen slides in Sevilla about the plans, but they are not so clearly documented in the deliverables. Technical documentations has improved but still needs to be improved. Big need to have the whitepaper. This because it is clear the need to explain how FI-WARE GE can be used and the whitepaper can be a good instrument. Catalogue as published very helpful, but we have to go a step further and try to create entries related to what may correspond to packages of several FI-WARE GEs that support concrete usage patterns. Catalogue should also answer what can be done with GEs more clearly. Shouldn't only be targeted to developers but other audience who take decisions on technology adoption. You shouldn't wait to have things (website, catalogue, etc) until they are perfect. More "Agile" approach requested. Still complaining about traceability of stakeholders behind features. More strategic thinking to standardization is needed. They will come with more concrete recommendations in the review report draft. Recommendations: Focus should be moved into adoption and use. "Successful program" vs "Successful project". Define process to incorporate results from third projects. Usability aspects: packaging of FI-WARE GEs and how such "packages" support certain usage patterns. Explained through the whitepaper but also in the FI-WARE Catalogue. Convincing Use Cases / Showcases not just relying on what UC projects may develop. Try to define/develop ones. Live demo in the right direction. Don't wait until perfection but good enough. Be more "Agile" (this is also related to "eat your own dog") Capacity Building project and UC trials may run some support issues. More attention is needed to define how this can be solved. You should come with an approach about how to deal with support issues. Creation of trackers per GE in the right direction. Recommendations about standardization efforts in the BigData and Cloud area will come. Very draft ideas regarding 3rd Open Call. FI-WARE should come soon with a draft text for the Call they wish to review. Not sure whether it is realistic to use all the budget for the 3rd Open Call. Amendment: a lot of changes. We have to be flexible in resource allocation. If you need to reallocate, reallocate. List of GEs: need to extend the existing list with the complete list involving the GEs planned in Releases 2, so that everybody gets a clear picture on what is going on. They understand that this information was available in the FI-WARE Architecture document and the Technical Roadmap but they like the idea of having a list like the one that currently exists for Release 1 covering also Release 2. 4 specifications regarding composition technologies. However, the implementation of two of them will not be available because partners have withdrawn. It makes sense to allocate the effort that was allocated there to the other GEs so that they become more generic. Take up of previous recommendations: Some were addressed, some of them not completely addressed. Some others obsolete. They will review them but will highlight some: Architecture encompassing: should be addressed through explanation of usage patterns. 1.3.5 about Open Innovation Lab: clarification about relationship with Capacity Building project. Among other aspects, support issues. 1.3.6 developers communities. Ok to rely in 3rd Open Call but should do more. Not constrained about project allocation. From the point of view of the EC, efforts allocation described in the DoW should be considered tentative. Website. Some improvements already, but need more work. Clarification of GE vs Complementary Enabler should be clarified. GE documentation has improved but traceability have to be introduced. whitepaper urgently needed. FI-WARE Software Releases done SAP GEs delivery done FI-WARE Testbed delivered webinars very much appreciated and have to be broaden to third parties through videos and public webinars. Developers community Live demo was done and they will encourage to bring them also in next reviews. Point 11.e which was availability of GEs beyond FI-WARE has to be extended not only regarding the current list of GEs available but for those that will come Overall: Project will be marked acceptable. Q&A: Jose Jimenez elaborated on the fact that it is now a pity that some UC projects in phase 1 get discontinued because that means that a lot of know-how and background that was acquired (and indeed meant a significant investment by all) may be lost. He wondered whether mechanisms could be put in place to allow them to continue and find proper funding for the efforts that would require, maybe if not in this program, in others. Arian responded that there was nothing than may prevent them to use the Open Innovation Lab. A different issue is the funding, but that may come from another programs and definitively the FI-PPP should welcome projects funded by other programs to be able to join the FI-PPP and carry out their activities taking advantage of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab, for instance. Jose Jimenez asked whether the EC could take a more proactive role here and either incorporate recommendations in the calls of those programs or at least certain value this aspect in evaluation of proposals. Regarding that, Arian suggested that a letter is written and sent to the Head of Unit (Jesus Villasante). Juanjo asked about acceptance/rejection of deliverables: Answer: they cannot provide information about acceptance/rejection of deliverables because they didn't have time to discuss this in detail but that information will come in the draft review report before Christmas. Nevertheless, they can anticipate that judgement will take into account the more strategic and forward-looking approach they believe should be taken now. Also, considering the fact that some of the deliverables will anyway need to be evolved and submitted again accompanying Release 2. Juanjo commented his personal concern about traceability of features. This might be a very nice academic exercise but requires time, may imply re-structuring things and distract focus. Juanjo asked the PO and reviewers to be careful here. Arian welcome the feedback. -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Nov 30 15:42:17 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:42:17 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Feedback from the EC and reviewers regarding the FI-WARE Review In-Reply-To: <50B8ABE3.1010101@tid.es> References: <50B8ABE3.1010101@tid.es> Message-ID: <20814_1354286545_50B8C5D1_20814_6300_2_3bbd6caa-7e61-42f3-8fa6-11f32f370e7f@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Dear Juanjo, Thanks for your email and notes. Also thanks for your hard work on (also performance at)this review to you, Jos? and colleagues. And yes our efforts have paid and will continue to pay since we are all committed to FI-WARE success and now better in which directions to put our efforts (individually but most importantly collectively) Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : vendredi 30 novembre 2012 13:52 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] Feedback from the EC and reviewers regarding the FI-WARE Review Dear all, Please find below my very raw notes of the feedback provided by Arian. I couldn't take note of everything, but I believe is 90% complete. I take the advantage of this mail to thank you for your great effort since July and the support given to the project by you and teams of your chapters/WPs. We are now "on track" (reviewers have agreed that progress can be now considered acceptable) thanks to all this effort. Talk to you on Monday, during our regular joint WPLs/WPAs confcall at 11:00am (yes, works have to continue :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo Introduction: The review report to be submitted in draft format just before Christmas. This feedback is prior to that. Highs: Appreciated very much the efforts. It is clear that efforts have indeed been made. Dealing with submission/resubmission, they recognized the so large number of deliverables that were submitted. It clearly should be considered an achievement in itself. More coherence between the partners. Acting as a team more than in previous reviews. Dissemination in some areas (Smart Cities) ongoing. They appreciate this. Technical support documentation has improved. Users' guide and unit testing plan are in the right direction Tools WP in the right direction. Concern here about the adoption of the IDE inside FI-WARE (eat your own dog food) Security area progressing well. Welcome initiatives regarding involvement of other projects in other units. They liked the Architecture Weeks and how they continued with the webinars. They hope we will continue with them for the second phase and record webinars, making them available to the general public. Lows: Not enough eating our own dog food. Example: FI-CoDE development environment within FI-WARE. Service Composition Area: didn't see the real need for so many composition technologies. This has now been clarified. However, the withdrawal of Ericsson and DT leads to the need to seriously consider how to move forward. SMART Cities is a good area to look but not the only one. Please take a broader approach. Exploitation: Good analysis but didn't see how this translates into the plan. They have seen slides in Sevilla about the plans, but they are not so clearly documented in the deliverables. Technical documentations has improved but still needs to be improved. Big need to have the whitepaper. This because it is clear the need to explain how FI-WARE GE can be used and the whitepaper can be a good instrument. Catalogue as published very helpful, but we have to go a step further and try to create entries related to what may correspond to packages of several FI-WARE GEs that support concrete usage patterns. Catalogue should also answer what can be done with GEs more clearly. Shouldn't only be targeted to developers but other audience who take decisions on technology adoption. You shouldn't wait to have things (website, catalogue, etc) until they are perfect. More "Agile" approach requested. Still complaining about traceability of stakeholders behind features. More strategic thinking to standardization is needed. They will come with more concrete recommendations in the review report draft. Recommendations: Focus should be moved into adoption and use. "Successful program" vs "Successful project". Define process to incorporate results from third projects. Usability aspects: packaging of FI-WARE GEs and how such "packages" support certain usage patterns. Explained through the whitepaper but also in the FI-WARE Catalogue. Convincing Use Cases / Showcases not just relying on what UC projects may develop. Try to define/develop ones. Live demo in the right direction. Don't wait until perfection but good enough. Be more "Agile" (this is also related to "eat your own dog") Capacity Building project and UC trials may run some support issues. More attention is needed to define how this can be solved. You should come with an approach about how to deal with support issues. Creation of trackers per GE in the right direction. Recommendations about standardization efforts in the BigData and Cloud area will come. Very draft ideas regarding 3rd Open Call. FI-WARE should come soon with a draft text for the Call they wish to review. Not sure whether it is realistic to use all the budget for the 3rd Open Call. Amendment: a lot of changes. We have to be flexible in resource allocation. If you need to reallocate, reallocate. List of GEs: need to extend the existing list with the complete list involving the GEs planned in Releases 2, so that everybody gets a clear picture on what is going on. They understand that this information was available in the FI-WARE Architecture document and the Technical Roadmap but they like the idea of having a list like the one that currently exists for Release 1 covering also Release 2. 4 specifications regarding composition technologies. However, the implementation of two of them will not be available because partners have withdrawn. It makes sense to allocate the effort that was allocated there to the other GEs so that they become more generic. Take up of previous recommendations: Some were addressed, some of them not completely addressed. Some others obsolete. They will review them but will highlight some: Architecture encompassing: should be addressed through explanation of usage patterns. 1.3.5 about Open Innovation Lab: clarification about relationship with Capacity Building project. Among other aspects, support issues. 1.3.6 developers communities. Ok to rely in 3rd Open Call but should do more. Not constrained about project allocation. From the point of view of the EC, efforts allocation described in the DoW should be considered tentative. Website. Some improvements already, but need more work. Clarification of GE vs Complementary Enabler should be clarified. GE documentation has improved but traceability have to be introduced. whitepaper urgently needed. FI-WARE Software Releases done SAP GEs delivery done FI-WARE Testbed delivered webinars very much appreciated and have to be broaden to third parties through videos and public webinars. Developers community Live demo was done and they will encourage to bring them also in next reviews. Point 11.e which was availability of GEs beyond FI-WARE has to be extended not only regarding the current list of GEs available but for those that will come Overall: Project will be marked acceptable. Q&A: Jose Jimenez elaborated on the fact that it is now a pity that some UC projects in phase 1 get discontinued because that means that a lot of know-how and background that was acquired (and indeed meant a significant investment by all) may be lost. He wondered whether mechanisms could be put in place to allow them to continue and find proper funding for the efforts that would require, maybe if not in this program, in others. Arian responded that there was nothing than may prevent them to use the Open Innovation Lab. A different issue is the funding, but that may come from another programs and definitively the FI-PPP should welcome projects funded by other programs to be able to join the FI-PPP and carry out their activities taking advantage of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab, for instance. Jose Jimenez asked whether the EC could take a more proactive role here and either incorporate recommendations in the calls of those programs or at least certain value this aspect in evaluation of proposals. Regarding that, Arian suggested that a letter is written and sent to the Head of Unit (Jesus Villasante). Juanjo asked about acceptance/rejection of deliverables: Answer: they cannot provide information about acceptance/rejection of deliverables because they didn't have time to discuss this in detail but that information will come in the draft review report before Christmas. Nevertheless, they can anticipate that judgement will take into account the more strategic and forward-looking approach they believe should be taken now. Also, considering the fact that some of the deliverables will anyway need to be evolved and submitted again accompanying Release 2. Juanjo commented his personal concern about traceability of features. This might be a very nice academic exercise but requires time, may imply re-structuring things and distract focus. Juanjo asked the PO and reviewers to be careful here. Arian welcome the feedback. -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Nov 30 16:02:01 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:02:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Feedback from the EC and reviewers regarding the FI-WARE Review In-Reply-To: <50B8ABE3.1010101@tid.es> References: <50B8ABE3.1010101@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo and all, first of all congratulations to you and all for the successful review!!! this review demontrates that working as team and working with open mind towards the fi-ppp programme pays, and i had to say, aftyer the clear success of yesterday in the stockholm tunnel, pays a lot!!! thank you also for these notes that gave me the chance to understand the results as i was not able to attend the last part of the review and the phc of this morning due to the stockholm exercise (did you noticed i twitted it???) ciao, stefano 2012/11/30 Juanjo Hierro : > Dear all, > > Please find below my very raw notes of the feedback provided by Arian. I > couldn't take note of everything, but I believe is 90% complete. > > I take the advantage of this mail to thank you for your great effort since > July and the support given to the project by you and teams of your > chapters/WPs. We are now "on track" (reviewers have agreed that progress > can be now considered acceptable) thanks to all this effort. > > Talk to you on Monday, during our regular joint WPLs/WPAs confcall at > 11:00am (yes, works have to continue :-) > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > Introduction: > > The review report to be submitted in draft format just before Christmas. > This feedback is prior to that. > > > Highs: > > Appreciated very much the efforts. It is clear that efforts have indeed > been made. > > Dealing with submission/resubmission, they recognized the so large number of > deliverables that were submitted. It clearly should be considered an > achievement in itself. > > More coherence between the partners. Acting as a team more than in > previous reviews. > > Dissemination in some areas (Smart Cities) ongoing. They appreciate this. > > Technical support documentation has improved. > > Users' guide and unit testing plan are in the right direction > > Tools WP in the right direction. Concern here about the adoption of the > IDE inside FI-WARE (eat your own dog food) > > Security area progressing well. Welcome initiatives regarding involvement > of other projects in other units. > > They liked the Architecture Weeks and how they continued with the webinars. > They hope we will continue with them for the second phase and record > webinars, making them available to the general public. > > > Lows: > > Not enough eating our own dog food. Example: FI-CoDE development > environment within FI-WARE. > > Service Composition Area: didn't see the real need for so many composition > technologies. This has now been clarified. However, the withdrawal of > Ericsson and DT leads to the need to seriously consider how to move forward. > > SMART Cities is a good area to look but not the only one. Please take a > broader approach. > > Exploitation: Good analysis but didn't see how this translates into the > plan. They have seen slides in Sevilla about the plans, but they are not > so clearly documented in the deliverables. > > Technical documentations has improved but still needs to be improved. > > Big need to have the whitepaper. This because it is clear the need to > explain how FI-WARE GE can be used and the whitepaper can be a good > instrument. > > Catalogue as published very helpful, but we have to go a step further and > try to create entries related to what may correspond to packages of several > FI-WARE GEs that support concrete usage patterns. Catalogue should also > answer what can be done with GEs more clearly. Shouldn't only be targeted > to developers but other audience who take decisions on technology adoption. > > You shouldn't wait to have things (website, catalogue, etc) until they are > perfect. More "Agile" approach requested. > > Still complaining about traceability of stakeholders behind features. > > More strategic thinking to standardization is needed. They will come with > more concrete recommendations in the review report draft. > > > Recommendations: > > Focus should be moved into adoption and use. "Successful program" vs > "Successful project". Define process to incorporate results from third > projects. > > Usability aspects: packaging of FI-WARE GEs and how such "packages" support > certain usage patterns. Explained through the whitepaper but also in the > FI-WARE Catalogue. > > Convincing Use Cases / Showcases not just relying on what UC projects may > develop. Try to define/develop ones. Live demo in the right direction. > > Don't wait until perfection but good enough. Be more "Agile" (this is also > related to "eat your own dog") > > Capacity Building project and UC trials may run some support issues. More > attention is needed to define how this can be solved. You should come with > an approach about how to deal with support issues. Creation of trackers > per GE in the right direction. > > Recommendations about standardization efforts in the BigData and Cloud area > will come. > > Very draft ideas regarding 3rd Open Call. FI-WARE should come soon with a > draft text for the Call they wish to review. > > Not sure whether it is realistic to use all the budget for the 3rd Open > Call. > > Amendment: a lot of changes. We have to be flexible in resource > allocation. If you need to reallocate, reallocate. > > List of GEs: need to extend the existing list with the complete list > involving the GEs planned in Releases 2, so that everybody gets a clear > picture on what is going on. They understand that this information was > available in the FI-WARE Architecture document and the Technical Roadmap but > they like the idea of having a list like the one that currently exists for > Release 1 covering also Release 2. > > 4 specifications regarding composition technologies. However, the > implementation of two of them will not be available because partners have > withdrawn. It makes sense to allocate the effort that was allocated there > to the other GEs so that they become more generic. > > > Take up of previous recommendations: > > Some were addressed, some of them not completely addressed. Some others > obsolete. They will review them but will highlight some: > > Architecture encompassing: should be addressed through explanation of usage > patterns. > > > 1.3.5 about Open Innovation Lab: clarification about relationship with > Capacity Building project. Among other aspects, support issues. > > 1.3.6 developers communities. Ok to rely in 3rd Open Call but should do > more. > > Not constrained about project allocation. From the point of view of the > EC, efforts allocation described in the DoW should be considered tentative. > > Website. Some improvements already, but need more work. > > Clarification of GE vs Complementary Enabler should be clarified. > > GE documentation has improved but traceability have to be introduced. > > whitepaper urgently needed. > > FI-WARE Software Releases done > > SAP GEs delivery done > > FI-WARE Testbed delivered > > webinars very much appreciated and have to be broaden to third parties > through videos and public webinars. > > Developers community > > Live demo was done and they will encourage to bring them also in next > reviews. > > Point 11.e which was availability of GEs beyond FI-WARE has to be extended > not only regarding the current list of GEs available but for those that will > come > > > Overall: > > Project will be marked acceptable. > > > Q&A: > > Jose Jimenez elaborated on the fact that it is now a pity that some UC > projects in phase 1 get discontinued because that means that a lot of > know-how and background that was acquired (and indeed meant a significant > investment by all) may be lost. He wondered whether mechanisms could be > put in place to allow them to continue and find proper funding for the > efforts that would require, maybe if not in this program, in others. > Arian responded that there was nothing than may prevent them to use the Open > Innovation Lab. A different issue is the funding, but that may come from > another programs and definitively the FI-PPP should welcome projects funded > by other programs to be able to join the FI-PPP and carry out their > activities taking advantage of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab, for > instance. Jose Jimenez asked whether the EC could take a more proactive > role here and either incorporate recommendations in the calls of those > programs or at least certain value this aspect in evaluation of proposals. > Regarding that, Arian suggested that a letter is written and sent to the > Head of Unit (Jesus Villasante). > > Juanjo asked about acceptance/rejection of deliverables: Answer: they > cannot provide information about acceptance/rejection of deliverables > because they didn't have time to discuss this in detail but that information > will come in the draft review report before Christmas. Nevertheless, they > can anticipate that judgement will take into account the more strategic and > forward-looking approach they believe should be taken now. Also, > considering the fact that some of the deliverables will anyway need to be > evolved and submitted again accompanying Release 2. > > Juanjo commented his personal concern about traceability of features. > This might be a very nice academic exercise but requires time, may imply > re-structuring things and distract focus. Juanjo asked the PO and > reviewers to be careful here. Arian welcome the feedback. > > > -- > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Nov 30 18:07:02 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:07:02 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-pcc] Feedback from the EC and reviewers regarding the FI-WARE Review In-Reply-To: <50B8ABE3.1010101@tid.es> References: <50B8ABE3.1010101@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, Dear All, thanks a lot for the exhaustive report about the early feedback, and congratulations for the success of the review! I'm happy to hear we're now appearing more a team than in the past, I really feel *we are* a team now; I believe this comes as a result of the hard work done, in the past months, to make sure FI-WARE would not die under the 'pressure' of the previous review outcomes. Of course, we cannot relax (well, at least the week-end is allowed ;-) as there are lot of things to be completed and improved, although some of the remarks of the early feedback are to me little unfair and/or unjustified, but we can talk about them in the call on Monday. Have a nice week-end! Pier Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: venerd? 30 novembre 2012 13:52 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-pcc] Feedback from the EC and reviewers regarding the FI-WARE Review Dear all, Please find below my very raw notes of the feedback provided by Arian. I couldn't take note of everything, but I believe is 90% complete. I take the advantage of this mail to thank you for your great effort since July and the support given to the project by you and teams of your chapters/WPs. We are now "on track" (reviewers have agreed that progress can be now considered acceptable) thanks to all this effort. Talk to you on Monday, during our regular joint WPLs/WPAs confcall at 11:00am (yes, works have to continue :-) Cheers, -- Juanjo Introduction: The review report to be submitted in draft format just before Christmas. This feedback is prior to that. Highs: Appreciated very much the efforts. It is clear that efforts have indeed been made. Dealing with submission/resubmission, they recognized the so large number of deliverables that were submitted. It clearly should be considered an achievement in itself. More coherence between the partners. Acting as a team more than in previous reviews. Dissemination in some areas (Smart Cities) ongoing. They appreciate this. Technical support documentation has improved. Users' guide and unit testing plan are in the right direction Tools WP in the right direction. Concern here about the adoption of the IDE inside FI-WARE (eat your own dog food) Security area progressing well. Welcome initiatives regarding involvement of other projects in other units. They liked the Architecture Weeks and how they continued with the webinars. They hope we will continue with them for the second phase and record webinars, making them available to the general public. Lows: Not enough eating our own dog food. Example: FI-CoDE development environment within FI-WARE. Service Composition Area: didn't see the real need for so many composition technologies. This has now been clarified. However, the withdrawal of Ericsson and DT leads to the need to seriously consider how to move forward. SMART Cities is a good area to look but not the only one. Please take a broader approach. Exploitation: Good analysis but didn't see how this translates into the plan. They have seen slides in Sevilla about the plans, but they are not so clearly documented in the deliverables. Technical documentations has improved but still needs to be improved. Big need to have the whitepaper. This because it is clear the need to explain how FI-WARE GE can be used and the whitepaper can be a good instrument. Catalogue as published very helpful, but we have to go a step further and try to create entries related to what may correspond to packages of several FI-WARE GEs that support concrete usage patterns. Catalogue should also answer what can be done with GEs more clearly. Shouldn't only be targeted to developers but other audience who take decisions on technology adoption. You shouldn't wait to have things (website, catalogue, etc) until they are perfect. More "Agile" approach requested. Still complaining about traceability of stakeholders behind features. More strategic thinking to standardization is needed. They will come with more concrete recommendations in the review report draft. Recommendations: Focus should be moved into adoption and use. "Successful program" vs "Successful project". Define process to incorporate results from third projects. Usability aspects: packaging of FI-WARE GEs and how such "packages" support certain usage patterns. Explained through the whitepaper but also in the FI-WARE Catalogue. Convincing Use Cases / Showcases not just relying on what UC projects may develop. Try to define/develop ones. Live demo in the right direction. Don't wait until perfection but good enough. Be more "Agile" (this is also related to "eat your own dog") Capacity Building project and UC trials may run some support issues. More attention is needed to define how this can be solved. You should come with an approach about how to deal with support issues. Creation of trackers per GE in the right direction. Recommendations about standardization efforts in the BigData and Cloud area will come. Very draft ideas regarding 3rd Open Call. FI-WARE should come soon with a draft text for the Call they wish to review. Not sure whether it is realistic to use all the budget for the 3rd Open Call. Amendment: a lot of changes. We have to be flexible in resource allocation. If you need to reallocate, reallocate. List of GEs: need to extend the existing list with the complete list involving the GEs planned in Releases 2, so that everybody gets a clear picture on what is going on. They understand that this information was available in the FI-WARE Architecture document and the Technical Roadmap but they like the idea of having a list like the one that currently exists for Release 1 covering also Release 2. 4 specifications regarding composition technologies. However, the implementation of two of them will not be available because partners have withdrawn. It makes sense to allocate the effort that was allocated there to the other GEs so that they become more generic. Take up of previous recommendations: Some were addressed, some of them not completely addressed. Some others obsolete. They will review them but will highlight some: Architecture encompassing: should be addressed through explanation of usage patterns. 1.3.5 about Open Innovation Lab: clarification about relationship with Capacity Building project. Among other aspects, support issues. 1.3.6 developers communities. Ok to rely in 3rd Open Call but should do more. Not constrained about project allocation. From the point of view of the EC, efforts allocation described in the DoW should be considered tentative. Website. Some improvements already, but need more work. Clarification of GE vs Complementary Enabler should be clarified. GE documentation has improved but traceability have to be introduced. whitepaper urgently needed. FI-WARE Software Releases done SAP GEs delivery done FI-WARE Testbed delivered webinars very much appreciated and have to be broaden to third parties through videos and public webinars. Developers community Live demo was done and they will encourage to bring them also in next reviews. Point 11.e which was availability of GEs beyond FI-WARE has to be extended not only regarding the current list of GEs available but for those that will come Overall: Project will be marked acceptable. Q&A: Jose Jimenez elaborated on the fact that it is now a pity that some UC projects in phase 1 get discontinued because that means that a lot of know-how and background that was acquired (and indeed meant a significant investment by all) may be lost. He wondered whether mechanisms could be put in place to allow them to continue and find proper funding for the efforts that would require, maybe if not in this program, in others. Arian responded that there was nothing than may prevent them to use the Open Innovation Lab. A different issue is the funding, but that may come from another programs and definitively the FI-PPP should welcome projects funded by other programs to be able to join the FI-PPP and carry out their activities taking advantage of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab, for instance. Jose Jimenez asked whether the EC could take a more proactive role here and either incorporate recommendations in the calls of those programs or at least certain value this aspect in evaluation of proposals. Regarding that, Arian suggested that a letter is written and sent to the Head of Unit (Jesus Villasante). Juanjo asked about acceptance/rejection of deliverables: Answer: they cannot provide information about acceptance/rejection of deliverables because they didn't have time to discuss this in detail but that information will come in the draft review report before Christmas. Nevertheless, they can anticipate that judgement will take into account the more strategic and forward-looking approach they believe should be taken now. Also, considering the fact that some of the deliverables will anyway need to be evolved and submitted again accompanying Release 2. Juanjo commented his personal concern about traceability of features. This might be a very nice academic exercise but requires time, may imply re-structuring things and distract focus. Juanjo asked the PO and reviewers to be careful here. Arian welcome the feedback. -- ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: