[Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review

[Juanjo Hierro]

On 08/11/12 21:16, Garino Pierangelo wrote:
> Dear Juanjo, dear All,
>
>   the draft looks fine to me, I want just mention two points which might be relevant for the meeting (the first one being the most important):
>
> 1) There was a discussion at the last review meeting about the lack of a consistent risk management plan. We had a long discussion between first and second review day, then we had put this point in the agenda of WPL/WPA calls since this summer, but since then we never moved forward. Although this is not one of the checkpoints, I would expect this issue will come out again during the discussions at the review, therefore we should be prepared to answer properly.

   Good point, we will prepare a risk plan where we will incorporate a
description of a) some measurements that we have taken and b)
measurements that we plan to put in place
>
> 2) The second FI-WARE Open Call closed officially yesterday. Obviously this is to be verified (maybe no proposal was submitted!), but if we find out there is a good participation level, it would be worth mentioning this fact as well in the achievements session.

   I was planning to provide a quick report on Open Calls during the
first slot of the Agenda (Summary of Status).   Just two slides, one per
Open Call.   However, thanks for reminding us that we shouldn't forget
this point.   You are absolutely right.
>
> Finally, I remember that some of the reviewers, offline, expressed the pity of not having one representative per partner at the review, to talk to them about the project.
> Maybe it will be necessary having more partner representatives in any case due to the demo setup, and on the other hand sometimes having all the partners might create more troubles than not having them (e.g. provide contradictory answers), however I would suggest we take also this possible aspect into account.

   I will send an email to Arian regarding this point and let's see how
he reacts.    I'm a bit worried that this would mean little reaction
from other partners since we would be ask them to attend a little bit
late, but it's true that, on the other hand, traveling would not be so
difficult/expensive for some of them coming from countries that have a
reasonable train or car connection.

   Best regards,

-- Juanjo



>
>
> BR
> Pier
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro [jhierro at tid.es]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:01 PM
> To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
> Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Draft agenda proposal for the FI-WARE Project Review
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
>    Please find enclosed a first draft agenda for our FI-WARE Project Review meeint on Nov 28-29.   I have structured it according to the following rationale
>
>   *   First day:
>      *   First we start providing a summary of the status, underlying major achievements (availability of the Testbed, FI-WARE Catalogue, selection of beneficiaries from 1st Open Call ...) and activities we have carried out to recover.  The message to bring is that we have made quite a hughe effort to bring the project to a state where we have recover from major issues.   We will also give a glimpse
> on what comes next: evolution of FI-WARE GEs and further integration of FI-WARE GEs, everything targeted to deliver the second Release and the launch of the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab
>      *   Second we will directly go to the demo to show that it's not just about words, but software that works, also to illustrate that we have a vision on how FI-WARE GEs together fit the needs of the different stakeholders: developers, application providers and end users.
>      *   Third we will elaborate, one by one, on the different checkpoints, to show that we have covered them or have made good progress addressing them.
>      *   What comes next during the first day is relatively auxiliary.  The previous points are the ones which will determine whether we will succeed or not :-)
>   *   Second day:
>      *   Despite we have addressed checkpoint 11 in the first day (as one of the checkpoints), it would be worth to elaborate on exploitation plans further and report on what has been done in that WP.   Since reviewers and the EC have always pointed out this is a critical point, I believe it was worth resuming the second day covering the business and exploitation related aspects again.   We may even refine some of the messages delivered in the previous day.
>      *   Rest of the day is more or less standard ... probably highlight that during the presentation of the collaboration, communication and dissemination we will elaborate on new processes established with UC projects
>
>    Your comments are welcome.   Our plan is to send it by EOB tomorrow, so please react quickly.
>
>    Cheers,
>
>
> -- Juanjo
>
> -------------
> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
> website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
> email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
>
> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect
>
> You can follow FI-WARE at:
>    website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
>    facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>    twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
>    linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
>
> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
>
> .
>


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx