From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Apr 3 03:24:49 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 03:24:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] New shared usage table for phase 2 now is on-line Message-ID: dear all, as agreed during the first day of the architect week the table for the usage of the ges from the uc project phase 2 is now on-line at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdEd6bGhLQWtNai1jeGN5UnJMeEdxZ0E#gid=6 please all wpl/wpa to check ges and dates and complete with actual names of geis. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 3 10:29:48 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:29:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template for presentations during the Architects Week Message-ID: <515BE87C.6020200@tid.es> Hi all, I have found that some of you were not using the latest version of the template for the presentations. Here you have a link from which you can download the presentation I made yesterday. Please use it use theme for your presentations: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/2018/FI-WARE+Overview+13-04-02.pptx Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From mcp at tid.es Wed Apr 3 10:33:57 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:33:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Template for presentations during the Architects Week In-Reply-To: <515BE87C.6020200@tid.es> References: <515BE87C.6020200@tid.es> Message-ID: <515BE975.10403@tid.es> Hi Before you ask. Yes, we need to add the logos of the partners. Asked them to complete the partners page on the wiki and we will take the logos from there. If this has not been updated it is simply because we are waiting for their reaction. Best regards, Miguel El 03/04/2013 10:29, Juanjo Hierro escribi?: Hi all, I have found that some of you were not using the latest version of the template for the presentations. Here you have a link from which you can download the presentation I made yesterday. Please use it use theme for your presentations: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/2018/FI-WARE+Overview+13-04-02.pptx Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 3 11:04:38 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:04:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Folder for uploading presentations during FI-PPP Architects Week Message-ID: <515BF0A6.5050707@tid.es> Dear all, Please upload the presentations used during this FI-PPP Architects Week within the folder "FI-WARE" inside the "FI-PPP Phase II - April 2013 Architects week materials" folder in the docman system of the FI-WARE project in FusionForge: [cid:part1.07080107.01050509 at tid.es] Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jgecgaac.png Type: image/png Size: 64659 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 3 12:20:13 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:20:13 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Adding link to presentations in the Agenda document In-Reply-To: <515BF0A6.5050707@tid.es> References: <515BF0A6.5050707@tid.es> Message-ID: <515C025D.8060906@tid.es> Hi all, Once you have uploaded your presentation in the defined folder, please copy the link into the "Link to presentation" column I have added in the agenda shared document in Google docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdE4teWs4UEpZa29zd0FRUmNTaFdxT2c#gid=2 Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 03/04/13 11:04, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, Please upload the presentations used during this FI-PPP Architects Week within the folder "FI-WARE" inside the "FI-PPP Phase II - April 2013 Architects week materials" folder in the docman system of the FI-WARE project in FusionForge: [cid:part1.08000000.09040201 at tid.es] Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 64659 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 3 12:37:08 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:37:08 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Adding link to presentations in the Agenda document In-Reply-To: <515C025D.8060906@tid.es> References: <515BF0A6.5050707@tid.es> <515C025D.8060906@tid.es> Message-ID: <515C0654.8000704@tid.es> I guess that for the presentations on FI-WARE GEs, we don't need to mark the documents as private. We only need to mark as private those documents that are somehow internal to the FI-PPP (e.g., the one that elaborated on AB activities or the one elaborating on the validation process) Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 03/04/13 12:20, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, Once you have uploaded your presentation in the defined folder, please copy the link into the "Link to presentation" column I have added in the agenda shared document in Google docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdE4teWs4UEpZa29zd0FRUmNTaFdxT2c#gid=2 Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 03/04/13 11:04, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, Please upload the presentations used during this FI-PPP Architects Week within the folder "FI-WARE" inside the "FI-PPP Phase II - April 2013 Architects week materials" folder in the docman system of the FI-WARE project in FusionForge: [cid:part8.05040709.08060606 at tid.es] Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 64659 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jdps at tid.es Wed Apr 3 16:48:00 2013 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:48:00 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Amenmdnet 4 (DRAFT of new GPF) Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0AEB04@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, please find enclosed the last version of the spreadsheet with the changes of the amendment 4. (Thank you very much for all the received comments) I have updated these data on NEF, so I've attached the draft of the new GPF to be reviewed for all of you. Please don't sign it until we have delivered the final version. Please confirm you agree with both documents. Note: We are receiving the latest modifications of the DoW from the WPL, as soon as I have received all of them, I'll send you the updated DoW to be reviewed. I hope it will be tomorrow. Thank you very much for your contribution and support. BR Javier. [firma correo jdps] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE effort-budget-funding - Amendment 4 v29.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 298270 bytes Desc: FI-WARE effort-budget-funding - Amendment 4 v29.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GPF FI-WARE (285248) 2013-04-03 (DRAFT version - amendment 4).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1409946 bytes Desc: GPF FI-WARE (285248) 2013-04-03 (DRAFT version - amendment 4).pdf URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed Apr 3 16:59:53 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:59:53 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Amenmdnet 4 (DRAFT of new GPF) In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0AEB04@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0AEB04@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <17722_1365001195_515C43EB_17722_1875_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0CBC85@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Javier I do not agree with the 15PM for UPM (transfer from NSN lines 53 & 54. UPM will use these PMs for look and feel of the Fi-Ware portal so it is not an activity for IoT chapter. These 15PMs are transferred to another WP. 53 NSNG1 6 214,24 ? -93 213,63 ? -15,00 WP5 54 UPM 15,00 BR Thierry De : fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Envoy? : mercredi 3 avril 2013 16:48 ? : fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-administrative] FI-WARE: Amenmdnet 4 (DRAFT of new GPF) Importance : Haute Dear all, please find enclosed the last version of the spreadsheet with the changes of the amendment 4. (Thank you very much for all the received comments) I have updated these data on NEF, so I?ve attached the draft of the new GPF to be reviewed for all of you. Please don?t sign it until we have delivered the final version. Please confirm you agree with both documents. Note: We are receiving the latest modifications of the DoW from the WPL, as soon as I have received all of them, I?ll send you the updated DoW to be reviewed. I hope it will be tomorrow. Thank you very much for your contribution and support. BR Javier. [firma correo jdps] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From manieri at eng.it Wed Apr 3 16:59:58 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:59:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-administrative] FI-WARE: Amenmdnet 4 (DRAFT of new GPF) In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0AEB04@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C71C0AEB04@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <515C43EE.9080103@eng.it> Dear Javier, please find enclosed the final version of WP10, including the new task about OIL and a different redistribution of EAB funding left in this WP. I will appreciate if you can consider to include also this changes in the current amendment. Best A. Il 03/04/2013 16:48, JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ ha scritto: > > Dear all, please find enclosed the last version of the spreadsheet > with the changes of the amendment 4. (Thank you very much for all the > received comments) > > I have updated these data on NEF, so I've attached the draft of the > new GPF to be reviewed for all of you. Please don't sign it until we > have delivered the final version. > > _Please confirm you agree with both documents._ > > Note: We are receiving the latest modifications of the DoW from the > WPL, as soon as I have received all of them, I'll send you the updated > DoW to be reviewed. I hope it will be tomorrow. > > Thank you very much for your contribution and support. > > BR > > Javier. > > firma correo jdps > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-administrative mailing list > Fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-administrative -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE effort - WP10 candidate final.xls Type: application/vnd.ms-excel Size: 11264 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4 - WP10 candidate final.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 86011 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Apr 5 16:18:28 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:18:28 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: [Fiware-testbed] Availability of Cloud Proxy boxes In-Reply-To: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002C79462AC@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> References: <189C15C1ADF61544BD5A11DCE7D5C50002C79462AC@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> Message-ID: <515EDD34.4020001@tid.es> Dear all, Sorry for the cross posting, some of you have already received this. This is of general interest. It is very good that Technicolor has offered their boxes and maybe somewhere in your chapters you can make good use of it. Cloud, IoT and I2ND are the first ones that spring to mind and I know that they are already looking into it but maybe others would like to use the cloud proxy boxes. I reckon there is room for using this in the Live Demo... Please contact Henk directly if you are interested or need further info. Best regards, Miguel -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: [Fiware-testbed] Availability of Cloud Proxy boxes Fecha: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:54:15 +0200 De: Heijnen Henk Para: fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear partners, I'm glad to announce that the Cloud Proxy boxes will be available at the end of April (Beta version). Could you let me know if we need boxes for the testbed infrastructure ? The boxes are modified commercial products (based on the TI CuboVision boxes actually ;-)) and will include the last version of our IaaS Cloud Proxy SW. They will be updatable (for Release 2.3.3 and Release 3.x) and can be installed in "normal" users premises (CE-certified). We can deliver the boxes for free to selected FI-WARE partners (assuming they have a real usage). We can also lend some boxes for the partners that only want to do some experimentations. I have only ~15 available boxes. If we need more, I'll have to sell them at a cost. Regards Henk Henk HEIJNEN Manager, Cooperative Projects [cid:image003.jpg at 01CAA051.86578C00] [cid:part2.04010504.01080401 at tid.es] Research & Innovation Funded & Cooperative Programs 975 avenue des champs blancs - CS 17616 35576 Cesson-S?vign? cedex - FRANCE T?l: +33 2 99 27 33 08 - GSM: +33 6 72 39 26 24 - BU4/114 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 16662 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 2226 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-testbed mailing list Fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-testbed From jhierro at tid.es Sat Apr 6 14:52:40 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:52:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D9E445@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D9E445@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <51601A98.4000408@tid.es> Dear all, For the avoidance of doubt, our PO has sent us the attached mail (with copy to the official mailbox of the project) indicating that he agrees with the PMs reallocation to be implemented in the next amendment of the DoW (amendment 4). Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 12:38:51 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , Dear all, The re-allocation of PMs is fine to me. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 4:52 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248; subsidies at tid.es; mcp at tid.es; jdps at tid.es Subject: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Dear Arian, Could you clarify ? Thanks in advance, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/03/13 19:26, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Juanjo, The overview of changes presented is very well done and clear, and I don't have any issues with them, except for the points below. I don't care that much about shifting PMs and who gets what. Here the consortium has apparently bound itself to all kind of weird pre-existing agreements anyway, not using the flexibility offered by the grant agreement. Having said that, the thing to avoid is that industry withdraws and academia gets more funding. That is the trend here, with industry reducing its involvement with 640k and academia/research institutes increasing with 640k. I understand there is no choice because industry is not willing/able to do more, but it is against the spirit of the industry leadership in FI-WARE/FI-PPP. And frankly, it looks very bad on EU industry. Please note that I care more about changes in the DoW wrt tasks/activities to be carried out. Large changes in efforts without any change in the task description (e.g. the iMinds addition in WP3) cannot be correct. Then, what is most important is what happens with the contributions from the withdrawing partners, NSN-FI and EAB. What happens with Ericsson's Service Composition - Ericsson Composition Engine (ECE) What happens with Ericsson's Gateway Device Management GE - Ericsson IoT Gateway In a previous email (19 Nov 2012), you concluded (for the ECE): "So the problem here is not about sustainability beyond the FI-PPP (which Ericsson states would be provided) but inside the FI-PPP ..." Will they remain available to FI-WARE? Under what conditions? If nothing remains available, what does that mean for their contribution to FI-WARE? Will these be replaced? Same questions for NSN-FI. I understand they were in charge of the GE "Backend Device Management"?? And they contributed an asset called "Cumulocity". So same questions as above. Specific questions: 1) What does the underlined text mean in the sentence "Withdrawal of Ericsson from WP5. EAB has 20 PM in DoW and it has declared 3,34 PM until M18, so it transfers 16 PM to FRAUNHOFER because they have to assume Advanced Connectivity GEs with ETSI-M2M interface and will be involeved in the project at the beginning of April 2013!" 2) What does the following sentence mean? "TRDF-P finished at 31-12-2012. People moved to TRDF." TRDP is no longer a third party? Finally, are you going to ask an amendment for the Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C (see attachment)? Best regards, Arian. PS. I am kind-of allergic to statements like your "No early response...", knowing that the only deadlines I'm bound to are the ones in the grant agreement? -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:06 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248; subsidies at tid.es; Miguel Carrillo; Javier de Pedro Sanchez Subject: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Dear Arian, Once we have finalized amendment 3 of our DoW, we should open a new amendment dealing with fixing all PMs reallocation that were pending (some of which pending since July last year). As already announced in our mail on January 20th this year, the situation is critical regarding some of these PMs reallocation, particularly dealing with the ability to handle withdrawal of several partners. All this PMs reallocation have been agreed among the partners at PCC (Project Coordination Committee), WPLs/WPAs and General Assembly level. We believe that is is critical to close this amendment 4 before end of April as to allow a reporting of costs for the 2nd period that is aligned with an approved DoW. Please find enclosed a spreadsheet which summarizes the changes already implemented in amendment 3 as well as changes proposed in amendment 4. Changes being proposed for amendment 4 are summarized in the sheet titled "Changes (amendment 4)". There is a final picture of PMs allocation to tasks for each WP as well as impact in figures (overall funding is kept the same). Consumption of allocated PMs have taken place since start of the 2nd reporting period and, in the case of partners withdrawing the consortium, since a decision was taken regarding what partner was going to take over their responsibilities. We will soon send you a draft of the DoW that will incorporate the changes summarized here. We will kindly ask you to send a response to this mail with your agreement to the proposed PMs reallocation in advance to approval of the DoW amendment itself which may take more time. That would give the existing partners, overall those taking the responsibility to take over the tasks from withdrawing partners, the necessary security to keep their investments they have been making so far. No early response will be taken as acknowledge and acceptance of this proposed PMs reallocation. We will rather appreciate your help in moving this forward. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jdps at tid.es Mon Apr 8 01:15:53 2013 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 23:15:53 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72F9FD349@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, Thank you very much for your contributions, especially to all the WPL. Please find enclosed the first version of the updated DoW of the amendment 4. Updated DoW:http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2066/FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4+-+v1+%28version+date-11-04-13%29.docx (Note: WP4 is still under revision.) Excel changes-effort-budget-funding: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2059/FI-WARE+effort-budget-funding+-+Amendment+4+v30.xlsx New GPF: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2068/GPF+FI-WARE+%28285248%29+2013-04-07+%28DRAFT+version+-+amendment+4%29.pdf Please, I kindly ask you to review them and send to us (subsidies at tid.es) and WPL relevant comments if needed, by April 11th, 2013 12:00h. I suggest avoiding spam for the rest. Please only errors or very relevant comments. The DoW has been modified accordingly with the attached spreadsheet of the changes (version 30) that has been modified with the received comments from you so far today. Thank you. NEF has been updated too, so, please find enclosed a new version of GPF (don't sign it until we have delivered the final version) The DoW, spreadsheet of changes, and GPF will be sent to Project Officer on April 11th, 2013. (As you know, we are working hard in order to approval the amendment 4 before reporting period, that begins May 1st, 2013. Thank you for your contribution and support. BR Javier. [firma correo jdps] ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 8 09:19:52 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:19:52 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables In-Reply-To: <51626F79.8020605@tid.es> References: <51626F79.8020605@tid.es> Message-ID: <51626F98.7010706@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:19:21 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: subsidies at tid.es, mcp at tid.es, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" On 20/03/13 11:51, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: > Dear Juanjo, > > Acceptance / rejection decisions about costs will only be made when financial and effort figures are present, so in this case at M24. > > Regarding (temporarily) rejected costs in reporting period 1, and associated deliverables accepted in the M18 review report, such costs would under normal circumstances be accepted. Circumstances would not be normal if e.g. 3x the amount of efforts were spent on a deliverable than planned, without proper justification. Again, that will only be assessed at M24. What about deliverables that have been rejected (although not asked for resubmission) ? In your response, you only refer to deliverables accepted in the M18 review report. Best regards, -- Juanjo > > Best regards, > Arian. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:23 AM > To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Miguel Carrillo; CNECT-ICT-285248 > Subject: More on: Question on acceptance of cost as a result of accepting re-submission of rejected deliverables > > Dear Arian, > > Partners also want to know what are the implications, regarding > assessment of costs, of the rejection of re-submitted deliverables, > overall when no re-submission is requested (e.g., re-submission of > deliverable D.2.4.1) > > Thanks in advance, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 19/03/13 07:34, Juanjo Hierro wrote: >> Dear Arian, >> >> Several partners are asking whether it can be assumed that costs >> rejected in the 1st reporting period (M12) review report matching >> deliverables that have been re-submitted and accepted in the M18 >> review will be then accepted in the 2nd reporting period. >> >> Could you elaborate on what the official rules of FP7 projects state >> in this respect ? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website: www.tid.es >> email: jhierro at tid.es >> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >> and Chief Architect >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website: http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > . > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 8 10:38:31 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:38:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shared minutes for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall today Message-ID: <51628207.3050107@tid.es> Hi all, Please find the link to the shared minutes we will use during our confcalls today: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WYIOYhV7QnRZ4p9kRb7Rc7Z6c7s82XVl7d87R4K-_0Y/edit# Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Andrea.manieri at eng.it Mon Apr 8 11:00:08 2013 From: Andrea.manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:00:08 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Shared minutes for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall today In-Reply-To: <51628207.3050107@tid.es> References: <51628207.3050107@tid.es> Message-ID: <591118346-1365411606-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1627491719-@b15.c6.bise7.blackberry> Pls, apologise myself, but an urgent internal issue impede me to join the call this morning. Best, A Andrea Manieri -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:38:31 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shared minutes for our joint WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall today _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 8 16:38:09 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:38:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v2.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 919170 bytes Desc: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v2.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v2.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1496023 bytes Desc: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v2.pptx URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Apr 9 10:01:18 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:01:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] AP from yesterday: putting the links on the private wiki Message-ID: <5163CACE.2030002@tid.es> Dear all, I see very little activity in the WP lists and we have little time. Yesterday we urged you to make the wiki links of 3 deliverables point at the place where they will edit them. Please instruct your teams to go to * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverablesR2 and make them point their links to : * the place where they are editing the 3 documents (in principle, the private wiki) * or alternatively ... if they have not started, point at the place where they will edit the 3 documents If the page is blank because they have not started, put a note there with an "ongoing work" or someting. If we point at a blank page I will never know if it is intentional and this is the future space for the page or that the partner did not update the link! If there are particular circumstances why the doc is not going to be edited on the wiki (very exceptional case), the page must not remain blank. We need an explanatory note there to save us a check with the GE owner. The reason is that there are 40 GEs approximately, and 3 manuals. So 120 checks is too much for anyone if not properly organized. Tomorrow Manuel and myself will start our review of this and will assess it chapter by chapter. I enclose the general guidelines as a reminder. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Miguel Carrillo Subject: [Fiware] Guidelines for Release 2 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 02:24:26 +0100 Size: 12960 URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Tue Apr 9 11:48:30 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:48:30 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66460FD5292@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66460FB3B57@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <15438_1363678684_514815DC_15438_13773_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0BC08C@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66460FC3D0F@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <514AB78C.4030102@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66460FD31DF@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66460FD5292@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <17718_1365500911_5163E3EF_17718_1569_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0CE788@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Thorsten Here is the new picture (v6) with an update for IoT based on our last F2F meeting. BR Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Sandfuchs, Thorsten Envoy? : jeudi 28 mars 2013 21:33 ? : fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" Dear colleagues thanks all your input - I integrated everything in a v5 (attached) and stored it as fiware-citymap.jpg (93% quality) and uploaded it to the wiki. Now it comes to the foreseen changes, which I thought I prepare them on a "V2"-version of the Architecture prior to "release". Find them on: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture_V2 Please review the text I put on your chapter on this page - I basically compiled it out of your texts on your chapter-specific pages, but there might be errors now or you would subsume your chapter differently? I guess we move the page from "V2" to the main page within the next week. Happy Easter holidays, /Thorsten From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Mittwoch, 27. M?rz 2013 18:25 To: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" Dear colleagues, I updated the new "FI-WARE citymap" as good as I could with relevant GEs, that I could gather from all over the places (quite a hassle to get them together). Please find the yEd files attached and a screenshot down below. Please update your content if I made some mistakes by yourself. I as well integrated the I2ND chapter, hopefully as envisioned. Any more comments? Now it should be ready to be uploaded to the fi-ware architecture page at https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture I think we should try to improve this page respectively - my proposal is: - Take some of the role descriptions (basically covering the roles on the diagram) out of the 3rd party innovation guide and copy & paste them to the architecture page https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1257/Third+Party+Innovation+Enablement+in+FI-WARE+12-08-30.pdf - Have at least one decent paragraph covering every chapter and this together with "short"-version on how it _really_ interrelates to other chapters (referencing the boxes on this city map) I know this information is partially "there" in the product vision, but there it is quite old and does not cover the things that we currently "see" evolving - so I think it is our "duty" to open the eyes of others :)) What do you think? Best, /Thorsten [cid:image001.png at 01CE3518.27442E30] From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: Donnerstag, 21. M?rz 2013 08:58 To: Juanjo Hierro; Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" Dear All, I share the opinion by Juanjo concerning the inclusion of I2ND GEs in the diagram: although I was not very active so far on this topic due to absolute lack of time, I started investigating how the GEs of this chapter could be inserted in the overall picture, which is not always easy if the result needs to be 'clear and compact'. The distinction between backend and local GEs, as well as the access devices, would be also an important 'message' to be conveyed through the diagram. I'll try as well to make some proposal with an I2ND update on the diagram, hopefully by today EOB, but most probably tomorrow morning. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: gioved? 21 marzo 2013 08:32 A: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" Dear Thorsten, We didn't address this during our WPL/WPA confcall because we run out of time and this is an issue that can be handle off-line through active discussion in the mailing list. I'm happy to incorporate this kind of picture in the introduction of the Architecture document but I believe there are still some improvements we have to make in the picture if we don't want it to be a mere collection of boxes clustered in chapters ... inmho that would be a source of criticism. There are at least two enhancements I would like to implement in the picture and would go on this direction: * It would be nice to distinguish between backend and Local (cloud edge or however we want to call it). This distinction applies to infrastructure and the FI-WARE software running on top of that infrastructure. Besides, this will allow to position also the network and therefore the places where I2ND GEs will fit (otherwise completely missed in the proposed picture). It would even be nice to incorporate access devices (the devices -PC, laptops, tablets, mobiles- from which enduser access to applications) * It is nice to incorporate existing backend systems with which integration of FI-WARE GEs will typically be performed (to be implemented by each FI-WARE Instance Provider). However, I wouldn't position them in the picture "below" FI-WARE GEs and at the same level as the infrastructure. Besides this, I miss some of the FI-WARE GEs in the Data Chapter (e.g., Semantic Application support) and the ones listed for the IoT chapter are wrong. I can make a proposal but only later this evening. If Thorsten may come with an alternative based on the above comments, it would be nice. I don't believe "we have literally no time". I believe we have already agreed that the Architecture deliverable will be submitted April 10th so there is still some time ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 21/03/13 07:56, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Hi Thierry, Alex, It seems that this was not discussed in the WPL/WPA meeting (at least judging by the minutes), therefore I will fwup offline: - yes chapters _should_ anyway use FMC - but the "new" citymap is not enfocing this more than before - currently I would foresee the citymap just on the subsuming pages - Thierry: the dark grey boxes were supposed to depict 2nd level, like you proposed - when we compiled this diagram, we only knew of the apps-specific ones - please add yours to the diagram directly - Alex: coming up with reasonable connections between the chapters might still work, but a real complete picture probably is not "consumable" any more. I would opt for depicting "Autobahn" like connections between the chapters, but no footpath (if I stay in the citymap context :)). Please add the required "autobahn" lanes, where you think they are needed. If I got Juanjo right he opted to not have any connections depicted on this particular diagram as it as well blurs the picture and might lead to more questions than answers... So how should we go forward: - I will start to edit the fiware-wiki and add the current picture and some words around (but most probably this would be more apps specific) o I would go for the fiware wiki directly as we really have literally no time to finalized this - send objections if you think this is not - I could additionally upload the yed-files to the private wiki or a forge - or do you think it is better to "share" them via one of the source control systems? - I basically count on your contributions to the yed diagrams & the wiki text Anything else? Best, /Thorsten From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com] Sent: Dienstag, 19. M?rz 2013 08:38 To: Alex Glikson; Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" I am completely aligned with the need of this big picture but do we have to introduce the FMC diagram for each technical chapter? But not all chapters have the FMC diagram... And if we try to show the interactions between GEs from one chapter, the reader should also expect the interactions between chapters and I think we miss information for that Regarding GE in release 1 and release 2 we should use colors or dotted lines for the shapes to show what is already running and what we would deliver in release 2. BR Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Alex Glikson Envoy? : lundi 18 mars 2013 20:16 ? : Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" Good idea. Maybe we can also add the main relationships between GEs typically reflected on architecture diagrams of the individual chapters (maybe omitting some of the details). Regarding #2 -- new Cloud GEs are certainly missing. Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: "Sandfuchs, Thorsten" > To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" >, "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" >, Date: 18/03/2013 03:27 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ Dear colleagues, Given our current assumptions to deliver the next FI-WARE architecture by beginning of April, we would like to propose to enhance the description on the main Cross-chapter wiki page with the picture "citymap" below. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture What do you think on how to proceed: 1. Should we do it at all? (upload this picture and enhance the page with a small description in relation to the picture) 2. What is missing in terms of your chapter (most v2-GEs are most probably missing from other chapters than "apps") 3. Should we prepare this move in the fiware-private wiki? Or can we do the changes directly? If I got it correctly the changes would be needed to be implemented by the 22. March. So this week. Right? Thanks for any feedback & best regards, /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013 13:48 To: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] FIWARE Cross-chapter "Diagram" Dear colleagues, we at SAP had the idea to at least try to come up with some new diagrams which potentially helps us and our stakeholders to better understand and talk about the capabilities provided. The attached file uses yEd format and all the grey boxes point to v2-GEs that were "known" while introducing the diagram. It might very well be that for your chapter there are missing components. It would be nice if you could validate the picture taking "your" chapter as the view point and/or contribute to the diagram directly. It would even be good if we could have visual connections between the given chapters and GEs - currently this is more like a "city map" than like an architecture. Any feedback appreciated. There is a second yed-file attached, where the involved components for the live-demonstrator are depicted. This is currently only an example on how to exploit the given diagram. Best, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs Enterprise Platform Fabric SAP Next Business and Technology SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! [attachment "fiware-cross-chapter_v3_demo_app.graphml" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "fiware-cross-chapter_v3.graphml" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "ATT00001.txt" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 119048 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fiware-cross-chapter_v6.graphml Type: application/octet-stream Size: 78715 bytes Desc: fiware-cross-chapter_v6.graphml URL: From SUZANNE at il.ibm.com Tue Apr 9 12:25:57 2013 From: SUZANNE at il.ibm.com (Suzanne Erez) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:25:57 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-legal] FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72F9FD349@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72F9FD349@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Javier, I can not get into the DOW, I get an error, Could you please send me a copy of the updated DOW. We need to see this to approve. Suzanne Suzanne Erez Counsel, IPLaw, Israel Associate PPM, PPM 150, 160 IBM Haifa, Israel suzanne at il.ibm.com Tel:? 972-4-829-6069? Fax:? 972-4-829-6521 You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it." --Margaret Thatcher PREPARED BY IBM ATTORNEY / PRIVILEGE REVIEW REQUIRED This e-mail and its attachments, if any, may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected by attorney-client, solicitor-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify me of the misdirection by reply e-mail. From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ To: "'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu'" , "fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Cc: "subsidies at tid.es" Date: 08/04/2013 02:15 AM Subject: [Fiware-legal] FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed Sent by: fiware-legal-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear all, Thank you very much for your contributions, especially to all the WPL. Please find enclosed the first version of the updated DoW of the amendment 4. Updated DoW: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2066/FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4 +-+v1+%28version+date-11-04-13%29.docx (Note: WP4 is still under revision.) Excel changes-effort-budget-funding: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2059/FI-WARE +effort-budget-funding+-+Amendment+4+v30.xlsx New GPF: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2068/GPF+FI-WARE +%28285248%29+2013-04-07+%28DRAFT+version+-+amendment+4%29.pdf Please, I kindly ask you to review them and send to us (subsidies at tid.es) and WPL relevant comments if needed, by April 11th, 2013 12:00h. I suggest avoiding spam for the rest. Please only errors or very relevant comments. The DoW has been modified accordingly with the attached spreadsheet of the changes (version 30) that has been modified with the received comments from you so far today. Thank you. NEF has been updated too, so, please find enclosed a new version of GPF (don?t sign it until we have delivered the final version) The DoW, spreadsheet of changes, and GPF will be sent to Project Officer on April 11th, 2013. (As you know, we are working hard in order to approval the amendment 4 before reporting period, that begins May 1st, 2013. Thank you for your contribution and support. BR Javier. Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx(See attached file: image001.jpg)_______________________________________________ Fiware-legal mailing list Fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-legal -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19427 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Apr 12 10:28:34 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:28:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Apr 12 11:25:07 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:25:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3-FI-WARE speakers!!!!!!!!!!!!! Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E8F86B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, This e-mail is very important and we have to take decisions ASAP. As you know, the EC is organizing different workshops to promote the PPP and the use of FI-WARE together with Member States. In the coming months/weeks there will be many workshops where they expect speakers from our project. No one from FI-WARE attended the workshop in Istanbul that I circulated some time ago. But there is another short-term workshop we have to decide upon. Date and place are: 22 April, Porto, Portugal I attach the agenda. Is there anyone from the WPL group available and willing to attend? Juanjo, if no one volunteers today I would like you to include this point in the periodic teleconferences of WPL/WPA so that this can be decided by next Monday and I can transmit our decision to the EC. They expect a quite generic presentation of 30 minutes on how to use the GE. Send your answers to me and Juanjo and including the PCC in CC- Thanks! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PT FIF Chapter Workshop v4.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 533011 bytes Desc: PT FIF Chapter Workshop v4.pdf URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Apr 12 11:36:32 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:36:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Other FIF National workshops-FI-WARE speakers!!! Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E8F882@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, Let me come back again with complementary information to the previous e-mail. Besides the workshops of Istanbul and Porto there will be a series of additional events in different countries. I think the attendance by FI-WARE representatives should be shared between members based on your availability. Some of them already have concrete information in terms of place and month. Find this information below and please, when you tell me your potential availability for the Porto one, tell me if you can make any of the following ones: * Belgium - May-June (TBD) * Hungary - 5 June, Budapest (TBD) * Germany - 13 June, Dresden (TBD) Once again, your preliminary answers as soon as possible and always keeping in CC Juanjo, Carlos and of course myself. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Fri Apr 12 11:50:03 2013 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:50:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Manuel, thank you very much for your proposal, the new approach might help to improve our agile development approach. Because of this I will agree. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Freitag, 12. April 2013 10:29 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Apr 12 12:19:34 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:19:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Manuel, Please find below some comments (including questions which might sound silly, apologise for them but I'm still not familiar with a number of things concerning the wiki) from my side concerning the proposals you sent us. 1. In slides 6 and 7 it is said to 'take advantage of categories': is there a specific reason for this, and are some of those category pages automatically generated (I found e.g. that AppsFeature is automatically generated, while the I2NDFeatures is still empty, should we trigger something to generate them)? 2. Tracker view: in slide 9 are shown the pop up controls for three fields, i.e. Backlog Entry Type, Release ID and Sprint Id. I was and still am one of the most convinced supporters of this improvement (particularly for release and Sprint ID), because the current implementation results in an error prone procedure. However, when trying to modify the I2ND tracker I couldn't find a way to 'promote' the Release ID and Sprint ID fields from 'text box' to 'pop up' list. Do you know how this can be addressed? 3. Slide 10: backlog item status. Although additional status items allow a more detailed control of ticket evolution and possible critical situations, they might add complexity (and time devoted) to ticket management. I would vote for having them, but without mandatory constraints to use all of the possibilities (i.e. if we find comfortable with current open-under execution-close states only, we should be allowed to continue using them as we did in the past). 4. Slide 11: In I2ND I have introduced the extra item 'I2ND - General' as 'FI-WARE Generic Enabler' option, to be adopted for all those tickets which are not relevant to a single GE, but rather to the entire chapter. Therefore, I would be in favour of adopting the same for all chapters. However, since we don't have yet many tickets using this, if the majority of WPL/WPAs prefers to use 'none' I'll switch back to it as well. 5. Slides 12-13: Are the graphical views created by you (or Miguel), or Is their creation under responsibility of WPL/WPAs? BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: venerd? 12 aprile 2013 10:29 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Apr 12 13:30:55 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:30:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) In-Reply-To: References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041901@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Pier, Thanks for your feedback. Find answers below: 1. Yes, if you're interested we need to request SAP support. I think Thorsten can teach us how to do it. Please, Thorsten, will you please be willing to help partners interested? 2. Good! I still need to find out how to implement it. 3. I tend to disagree. The first week of the sprint is important for me to know items are scheduled. Impeded state allows me to focus my effort to remove obstacles, to ask for effort to corresponding partners, etc. I think it's a key tool for managing the backlog. Many times we are not aware of actual dependencies. Blocking states allows us driving effort. 4. General /None. It's fine, Ok 5. It will be me who provides them for you to know and we all to take corresponding action upon evident deviations I hope I've clarified your concerns. Otherwise, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:20 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Dear Manuel, Please find below some comments (including questions which might sound silly, apologise for them but I'm still not familiar with a number of things concerning the wiki) from my side concerning the proposals you sent us. 1. In slides 6 and 7 it is said to 'take advantage of categories': is there a specific reason for this, and are some of those category pages automatically generated (I found e.g. that AppsFeature is automatically generated, while the I2NDFeatures is still empty, should we trigger something to generate them)? 2. Tracker view: in slide 9 are shown the pop up controls for three fields, i.e. Backlog Entry Type, Release ID and Sprint Id. I was and still am one of the most convinced supporters of this improvement (particularly for release and Sprint ID), because the current implementation results in an error prone procedure. However, when trying to modify the I2ND tracker I couldn't find a way to 'promote' the Release ID and Sprint ID fields from 'text box' to 'pop up' list. Do you know how this can be addressed? 3. Slide 10: backlog item status. Although additional status items allow a more detailed control of ticket evolution and possible critical situations, they might add complexity (and time devoted) to ticket management. I would vote for having them, but without mandatory constraints to use all of the possibilities (i.e. if we find comfortable with current open-under execution-close states only, we should be allowed to continue using them as we did in the past). 4. Slide 11: In I2ND I have introduced the extra item 'I2ND - General' as 'FI-WARE Generic Enabler' option, to be adopted for all those tickets which are not relevant to a single GE, but rather to the entire chapter. Therefore, I would be in favour of adopting the same for all chapters. However, since we don't have yet many tickets using this, if the majority of WPL/WPAs prefers to use 'none' I'll switch back to it as well. 5. Slides 12-13: Are the graphical views created by you (or Miguel), or Is their creation under responsibility of WPL/WPAs? BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: venerd? 12 aprile 2013 10:29 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Apr 12 13:32:00 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:32:00 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) In-Reply-To: References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041919@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Thanks Axel! I do appreciate your support to the proposal!! Kind regards, Manuel From: Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 11:50 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; Heller, Markus Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Dear Manuel, thank you very much for your proposal, the new approach might help to improve our agile development approach. Because of this I will agree. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Freitag, 12. April 2013 10:29 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergg at tid.es Fri Apr 12 15:05:31 2013 From: sergg at tid.es (SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:05:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracke+wiki) Message-ID: <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54D865830B0@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Manuel, According to your proposal, I understand that features should only have release, and workitems/user stories only sprint. Is it correct? Regarding the GEs to which the ticket applies, if there are more than one involved (typically an integration feature), which should be the pattern for the name FIWARE.Feature. Chapter...? Well, I'm giving for granted that I'm allowed to select more than one in tracker. I would only suggest to have, if it's feasible, a tool to check consistency between Tracker and Wiki (back and forth). That's always a mess. Apart from that, thanks for clarifying and simplifying the process. Best Regards, Sergio. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 4:38 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Apr 12 15:38:20 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:38:20 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracke+wiki) In-Reply-To: <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54D865830B0@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54D865830B0@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041A66@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Sergio, Thanks for feedback. Answers: 1. Yes. In agile, which is obsessed with delivery, user story is defined as functionality lasting a sprint, and feature, a release (3 sprints). Therefore, release is enough for a feature. 2. When developing an integration feature, I don't recommend stating the name of the enablers in the name of the backlog item, perhaps it's feasible for two GE, but the schema will fall when using 4 or 5 GE. Therefore, I recommend using a concept or functional identification. Fermin is already using a backlog for the live-demo where the items follow this approach. Anyway, if you wish we can explore any specific case, let me know. 3. I agree. My view is that the wiki is a partial external view of the tracker, therefore the tracker should be prevalent to the wiki. However, some fields belonging to the wiki, as rational, etc are only defined there. It could be done differently but I didn't want to propose other procedures at this stage. Well, thanks again, if any other concern or doubt, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:06 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracke+wiki) Hi Manuel, According to your proposal, I understand that features should only have release, and workitems/user stories only sprint. Is it correct? Regarding the GEs to which the ticket applies, if there are more than one involved (typically an integration feature), which should be the pattern for the name FIWARE.Feature. Chapter...? Well, I'm giving for granted that I'm allowed to select more than one in tracker. I would only suggest to have, if it's feasible, a tool to check consistency between Tracker and Wiki (back and forth). That's always a mess. Apart from that, thanks for clarifying and simplifying the process. Best Regards, Sergio. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 4:38 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Apr 12 16:12:31 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:12:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041901@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041901@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Manuel, thanks for the reply, overall I'm fine with the proposed improvements. Concerning item 3 I understand your point, which means however sometimes additional effort to be put in the ticket management; on the other hand this is the role as WPL/WPAs we have to play ;-) BR Pier Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: venerd? 12 aprile 2013 13:31 A: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Dear Pier, Thanks for your feedback. Find answers below: 1. Yes, if you're interested we need to request SAP support. I think Thorsten can teach us how to do it. Please, Thorsten, will you please be willing to help partners interested? 2. Good! I still need to find out how to implement it. 3. I tend to disagree. The first week of the sprint is important for me to know items are scheduled. Impeded state allows me to focus my effort to remove obstacles, to ask for effort to corresponding partners, etc. I think it's a key tool for managing the backlog. Many times we are not aware of actual dependencies. Blocking states allows us driving effort. 4. General /None. It's fine, Ok 5. It will be me who provides them for you to know and we all to take corresponding action upon evident deviations I hope I've clarified your concerns. Otherwise, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:20 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Dear Manuel, Please find below some comments (including questions which might sound silly, apologise for them but I'm still not familiar with a number of things concerning the wiki) from my side concerning the proposals you sent us. 1. In slides 6 and 7 it is said to 'take advantage of categories': is there a specific reason for this, and are some of those category pages automatically generated (I found e.g. that AppsFeature is automatically generated, while the I2NDFeatures is still empty, should we trigger something to generate them)? 2. Tracker view: in slide 9 are shown the pop up controls for three fields, i.e. Backlog Entry Type, Release ID and Sprint Id. I was and still am one of the most convinced supporters of this improvement (particularly for release and Sprint ID), because the current implementation results in an error prone procedure. However, when trying to modify the I2ND tracker I couldn't find a way to 'promote' the Release ID and Sprint ID fields from 'text box' to 'pop up' list. Do you know how this can be addressed? 3. Slide 10: backlog item status. Although additional status items allow a more detailed control of ticket evolution and possible critical situations, they might add complexity (and time devoted) to ticket management. I would vote for having them, but without mandatory constraints to use all of the possibilities (i.e. if we find comfortable with current open-under execution-close states only, we should be allowed to continue using them as we did in the past). 4. Slide 11: In I2ND I have introduced the extra item 'I2ND - General' as 'FI-WARE Generic Enabler' option, to be adopted for all those tickets which are not relevant to a single GE, but rather to the entire chapter. Therefore, I would be in favour of adopting the same for all chapters. However, since we don't have yet many tickets using this, if the majority of WPL/WPAs prefers to use 'none' I'll switch back to it as well. 5. Slides 12-13: Are the graphical views created by you (or Miguel), or Is their creation under responsibility of WPL/WPAs? BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: venerd? 12 aprile 2013 10:29 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:image001.gif at 01CE3798.88CF0B70]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Apr 12 16:39:26 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:39:26 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) In-Reply-To: References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041901@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041B34@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Thanks Pier! I appreciate your understanding! - In the end this update of backlog items state should mean little effort and great benefit, at least for reducing risks and identifying issues - which is the main responsibility of work package and project managers. So, thanks!! Have a nice weekend! Manuel From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 16:13 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Dear Manuel, thanks for the reply, overall I'm fine with the proposed improvements. Concerning item 3 I understand your point, which means however sometimes additional effort to be put in the ticket management; on the other hand this is the role as WPL/WPAs we have to play ;-) BR Pier Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: venerd? 12 aprile 2013 13:31 A: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Dear Pier, Thanks for your feedback. Find answers below: 1. Yes, if you're interested we need to request SAP support. I think Thorsten can teach us how to do it. Please, Thorsten, will you please be willing to help partners interested? 2. Good! I still need to find out how to implement it. 3. I tend to disagree. The first week of the sprint is important for me to know items are scheduled. Impeded state allows me to focus my effort to remove obstacles, to ask for effort to corresponding partners, etc. I think it's a key tool for managing the backlog. Many times we are not aware of actual dependencies. Blocking states allows us driving effort. 4. General /None. It's fine, Ok 5. It will be me who provides them for you to know and we all to take corresponding action upon evident deviations I hope I've clarified your concerns. Otherwise, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:20 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Dear Manuel, Please find below some comments (including questions which might sound silly, apologise for them but I'm still not familiar with a number of things concerning the wiki) from my side concerning the proposals you sent us. 1. In slides 6 and 7 it is said to 'take advantage of categories': is there a specific reason for this, and are some of those category pages automatically generated (I found e.g. that AppsFeature is automatically generated, while the I2NDFeatures is still empty, should we trigger something to generate them)? 2. Tracker view: in slide 9 are shown the pop up controls for three fields, i.e. Backlog Entry Type, Release ID and Sprint Id. I was and still am one of the most convinced supporters of this improvement (particularly for release and Sprint ID), because the current implementation results in an error prone procedure. However, when trying to modify the I2ND tracker I couldn't find a way to 'promote' the Release ID and Sprint ID fields from 'text box' to 'pop up' list. Do you know how this can be addressed? 3. Slide 10: backlog item status. Although additional status items allow a more detailed control of ticket evolution and possible critical situations, they might add complexity (and time devoted) to ticket management. I would vote for having them, but without mandatory constraints to use all of the possibilities (i.e. if we find comfortable with current open-under execution-close states only, we should be allowed to continue using them as we did in the past). 4. Slide 11: In I2ND I have introduced the extra item 'I2ND - General' as 'FI-WARE Generic Enabler' option, to be adopted for all those tickets which are not relevant to a single GE, but rather to the entire chapter. Therefore, I would be in favour of adopting the same for all chapters. However, since we don't have yet many tickets using this, if the majority of WPL/WPAs prefers to use 'none' I'll switch back to it as well. 5. Slides 12-13: Are the graphical views created by you (or Miguel), or Is their creation under responsibility of WPL/WPAs? BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: venerd? 12 aprile 2013 10:29 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Apr 12 17:31:14 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:31:14 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89040243@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89041BD8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Thierry/Carlos and Pascal, I would appreciate receiving your feedback before Mondays' weekly meeting! Thanks in advance! Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 10:29 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker + wiki) Thanks Alex for your feedback! Dear Partners, I know you all are very busy preparing the deliverables but I need to progress on improving the backlog. I understand this progress will be more consistent with good consensus level, therefore I would appreciate having your feedback. Please, Axel - WP3, Thierry/Carlos - WP5, Sergio - WP6, Pierangelo - WP7 and Pascal - WP8, share your feedback and let me know whether there's need for me to ask Miguel for a timeslot on Monday for explaining it, or discussing specific point you may consider more interesting. Thanks in advance for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Apr 12 18:04:17 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:04:17 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <27401_1365782660_51683084_27401_1467_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E4EB53E7@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Dear Manuel, I did perform a quick check you proposal through slideset provided and I must say it sounds good. So I would suggest to go for a quick presentation from your side regarding this proposal at next WPL/WPA and to discuss questions it can raise. For me it is something that would have been worth to have right from the start but now coming on Y2 we should consider to make it apply for the last year of the project (meaning I see no point trying to look at the past) after a brief period of adaptation (...). Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Envoy? : lundi 8 avril 2013 16:38 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 15 01:45:58 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Dear colleagues, To our suprise, Ericsson is claiming costs during the period until March 2013 ... From Telefonica's perspective, efforts spent by Ericsson during the period from November 2012 (when they announced their withdrawal) until March 2013 should be considered as to compensate/minimize the impact of their withdrawal, therefore, should not go to reduce the funding to be spent to overcome the situation ... We would rather appreciate to get your feedback on how we should react ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:52:25 +0000 From: Henrik Abramowicz To: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es , Alen Jusufbasic , Magnus Karlsson E , Anders Casp?r , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , thierry.nagellen at orange.com , Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it) , 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Again This is until March 31 2013 from November 1 2012 BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From depa at eng.it Mon Apr 15 08:16:55 2013 From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:16:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Message-ID: <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 15 09:28:26 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:28:26 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) In-Reply-To: <27401_1365782660_51683084_27401_1467_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E4EB53E7@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <27401_1365782660_51683084_27401_1467_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E4EB53E7@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89042DA7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Pascal, Thanks for your support to the proposal! Ok, I request Miguel 10 minutes to have a quick overview to the key specific points during Today's meeting. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 18:04 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Importance: High Dear Manuel, I did perform a quick check you proposal through slideset provided and I must say it sounds good. So I would suggest to go for a quick presentation from your side regarding this proposal at next WPL/WPA and to discuss questions it can raise. For me it is something that would have been worth to have right from the start but now coming on Y2 we should consider to make it apply for the last year of the project (meaning I see no point trying to look at the past) after a brief period of adaptation (...). Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Envoy? : lundi 8 avril 2013 16:38 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Apr 15 09:50:34 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:50:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy??: lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ??: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From torsten.leidig at sap.com Mon Apr 15 09:59:41 2013 From: torsten.leidig at sap.com (Leidig, Torsten) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:59:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <703F4EB81B2AD0428360BFE55A82DFBC4CF9D195@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Dear Manuel, I truly believe we should minimize the duplication the information in the Wiki and the Tracker. We know that duplication will lead to inconsistencies sooner or later. Therefore I would strongly suggest to only keep User Stories (and Work Items) in the Tracker. They could have a link to the Feature/Epic in the Wiki. User Stories are a special kind of Work Items, there is not much difference besides the fact they are formulated a bit different. My wish is: please make things as simple as possible and avoid any kind of duplicated information. Best, Torsten Dr. Torsten Leidig SAP Research Center CEC Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Prie?nitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe T +49 6227 7 52535 F +49 6227 78 29753 E torsten.leidig at sap.com http://www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Montag, 8. April 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From depa at eng.it Mon Apr 15 10:00:44 2013 From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:00:44 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: RE: R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <959013641-1366012707-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-488800624-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Thierry, This is exactly the approach i indicated in my previous email. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:50:34 To: depa at eng.it; Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy??: lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ??: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Apr 15 10:30:41 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:30:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo and All, As suggested by comments already circulated, I believe too that costs claimed should be accepted only when they are fully verified as actual work done (e.g. documented additional work performed, etc). As for WP10, also in WP7/I2ND chapter no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no effort could be recognized to them. BR Pier Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: luned? 15 aprile 2013 01:46 A: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: Javier de Pedro Sanchez Oggetto: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear colleagues, To our suprise, Ericsson is claiming costs during the period until March 2013 ... From Telefonica's perspective, efforts spent by Ericsson during the period from November 2012 (when they announced their withdrawal) until March 2013 should be considered as to compensate/minimize the impact of their withdrawal, therefore, should not go to reduce the funding to be spent to overcome the situation ... We would rather appreciate to get your feedback on how we should react ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:52:25 +0000 From: Henrik Abramowicz To: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es , Alen Jusufbasic , Magnus Karlsson E , Anders Casp?r , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , thierry.nagellen at orange.com , Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it) , 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Again This is until March 31 2013 from November 1 2012 BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From manieri at eng.it Mon Apr 15 10:39:41 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:39:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Message-ID: <516BBCCD.7040407@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, Stefano already expressed the ENG position. Wrt the WP9 activities I do confirm that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Best, A. Il 15/04/2013 10:30, Garino Pierangelo ha scritto: > > Dear Juanjo and All, > > As suggested by comments already circulated, I believe too that costs > claimed should be accepted only when they are fully verified as actual > work done (e.g. documented additional work performed, etc). > > As for WP10, also in WP7/I2ND chapter no activities were performed by > Ericsson in the concerned period, so no effort could be recognized to > them. > > BR > > Pier > > *Da:*fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *Per conto di *Juanjo Hierro > *Inviato:* luned? 15 aprile 2013 01:46 > *A:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; > fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Cc:* Javier de Pedro Sanchez > *Oggetto:* [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** > VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) > > Dear colleagues, > > To our suprise, Ericsson is claiming costs during the period until > March 2013 ... > > From Telefonica's perspective, efforts spent by Ericsson during the > period from November 2012 (when they announced their withdrawal) until > March 2013 should be considered as to compensate/minimize the impact > of their withdrawal, therefore, should not go to reduce the funding to > be spent to overcome the situation ... > > We would rather appreciate to get your feedback on how we should > react ... > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > *Subject: * > > > > RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) > > *Date: * > > > > Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:52:25 +0000 > > *From: * > > > > Henrik Abramowicz > > > *To: * > > > > JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > > *CC: * > > > > subsidies at tid.es > , Alen Jusufbasic > , > Magnus Karlsson E > , Anders Casp?r > , JUAN > JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , > thierry.nagellen at orange.com > , > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ) > , 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it > ' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it > ) > > > Again > > This is *until March 31 2013* from November 1 2012 > > BR > > Henrik > > *From:*JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:50 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; > thierry.nagellen at orange.com ; > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ); > 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ' > (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and > that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. > > If not, please let me know. > > Please provide justifications of this effort. > > BR > > Javier. > > *De:*Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 > *Para:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; > thierry.nagellen at orange.com ; > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ); > 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ' > (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ) > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > Dear Javier et al > > I got these figures from our controller below > > Hope this helps > > BR > > Henrik > > > > > > WP 5 > > > > WP 9 > > > > WP 10 > > > > > > TOTAL > > *Henrik Abramowicz Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 0 > > > > 0 > > > > > 0,0 > > *Jakob Saros Total* > > > > > 2,7 > > > > 0 > > > > > > 2,7 > > *Jan H?ller Total* > > > > > 0,1 > > > > 0 > > > > > > 0,1 > > *John Sandberg Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 1,2 > > > > > > 1,2 > > *Marika St?lnacke Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 0,2 > > > > 0,4 > > > > > 0,5 > > *Torgny Johansson Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 0,5 > > > > > > 0,5 > > *Vlasios Tsiatsis Total* > > > > > 1,5 > > > > 0 > > > > > > 1,5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Total* > > > > > 4,2 > > > > 1,8 > > > > 0,4 > > > > > 6,4 > > *From:*JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:36 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; > thierry.nagellen at orange.com ; > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ); > 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ' > (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > *Importance:* High > > *_Dear Henrik_*, we need to close this by Monday because it is > blocking the amendment 4. > > Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to > get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. > > WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen > > WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. > > As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its > contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. > > *_Dear WPL_*, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to > FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: > > WP 5 440 hours > > Wp 9 131,75 hours > > Wp 10 97 hours > > I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been > provided the requested information in attached e-mail. > > BR > > Javier. > > *De:*JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 > *Para:* 'Henrik Abramowicz' > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) > *Importancia:* Alta > > Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since > November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. > > It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. > > This is very urgent. > > BR > > Javier. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente > alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione > derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente > vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete > cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di > provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > /This e-mail and any attachments//is //confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. > Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is > unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete > this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return > e-mail, Thanks./ > > *rispetta l'ambienteRispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se > non ? necessario.* > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 15 10:55:38 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:55:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] WPL/WPA Confcall Message-ID: <516BC08A.7020402@tid.es> Dear all , In the absence of Juanjo we have decided not to cancel the call. We may skip a few points and just focus on the forthcoming deliverables plus a few more things. Here is the usual link: * https://docs.google.com/document/d/109J1AAwmZjoAO0xcS0xif8GuZ8ox6omFh0s2wYhuTZM/edit#heading=h.xb31kfbjtgyl Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 15 11:37:41 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:37:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v3.pptx Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89043E71@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Please, have v3 presentation with 2 additional slides: * 1 - objectives - requested by Alex * 12 - Trazability - no considered previously. Kind regards, Manuel ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v3.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1581750 bytes Desc: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v3.pptx URL: From manieri at eng.it Mon Apr 15 12:02:38 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:02:38 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] WPL/WPA Confcall In-Reply-To: <516BC08A.7020402@tid.es> References: <516BC08A.7020402@tid.es> Message-ID: <516BD03E.8030301@eng.it> Dear MIguel, All, Apologise for the late advice but Davide and myself cannot join the call due to the overlapping with the XiFi kick-off. Should you have any specific request, do not hesitate to contact us. Best, A Il 15/04/2013 10:55, Miguel Carrillo ha scritto: > Dear all , > > In the absence of Juanjo we have decided not to cancel the call. We > may skip a few points and just focus on the forthcoming deliverables > plus a few more things. > > Here is the usual link: > > * https://docs.google.com/document/d/109J1AAwmZjoAO0xcS0xif8GuZ8ox6omFh0s2wYhuTZM/edit#heading=h.xb31kfbjtgyl > > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail:mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter:http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 15 14:50:10 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <516BF782.6060304@tid.es> Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 15 14:50:34 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 14:56:51 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:56:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear All Regarding WP11: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted. Pending to confirm with NEC the contribution to the Standardization task, as soon as Lindsay answer my mail Br Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 14:51 To: thierry.nagellen at orange.com Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 15 15:06:16 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:06:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) In-Reply-To: <703F4EB81B2AD0428360BFE55A82DFBC4CF9D195@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <703F4EB81B2AD0428360BFE55A82DFBC4CF9D195@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89043F59@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Torsten, I appreciate your answer. I knew your proposal from the previous email received when we did the tracker review. What I see is the tracker give me fields to express time and states, needed for backlog management, which I don't have in the wiki. I understand the wiki as a "marketing" tool for the project. I am also sorry for disagreeing to your view on considerations for User Story and WorkItem. User Story is for functionality and intrinsically identified for a timeframe - the sprint. It additionally needs to be scheduled in the backlog at the beginning of a sprint. WorkItem is not about functionality, they are not necessarily attached to an Enabler (General/None), and can be added to the backlog anytime, even at the end of the sprint. Torsten, I'm sorry for not taken on board your propositions for this proposal. If you still want to push them, it would need a formal and different proposal to be discussed and voted in the Management board (perhaps Juanjo or Miguel can comment on the right procedure) . Overall, please, consider I appreciate having your input. Kind regards, Manuel From: Leidig, Torsten [mailto:torsten.leidig at sap.com] Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 10:00 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Manuel, I truly believe we should minimize the duplication the information in the Wiki and the Tracker. We know that duplication will lead to inconsistencies sooner or later. Therefore I would strongly suggest to only keep User Stories (and Work Items) in the Tracker. They could have a link to the Feature/Epic in the Wiki. User Stories are a special kind of Work Items, there is not much difference besides the fact they are formulated a bit different. My wish is: please make things as simple as possible and avoid any kind of duplicated information. Best, Torsten Dr. Torsten Leidig SAP Research Center CEC Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Prie?nitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe T +49 6227 7 52535 F +49 6227 78 29753 E torsten.leidig at sap.com http://www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Montag, 8. April 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Apr 15 15:13:54 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:13:54 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516BF782.6060304@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <516BF782.6060304@tid.es> Message-ID: <24078_1366031636_516BFD14_24078_1227_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D0A2E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi all, Based on what Ericsson claimed before and what they have to achieve in November and December, they should not claim more than 2 weeks for IoT. Attending IoT weekly meeting was to find a solution to reduce the impact of their withdrawal so should not be relevant to claim costs. BR Thierry De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 14:50 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS Cc : depa at eng.it; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 15 15:18:17 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:18:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - proposal for improvements- fixed traceability Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89043F7D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Please, find updated proposal v4, which fixes doubts on how traceability is implemented by using backlog item's names. The update goes on slide 12, which mainly introduces optionality in names for themes and epics, when they are not parents, but obviously when the parents were refined into children, the parents' name don't disappear. I think it might be interesting to write it somewhere in the wiki so that your teams can check it from time to time. As agreed this morning, please, check with your teams what is the current state of traceability in your corresponding chapters - I would appreciate having your feedback. Next review of the tracker I'll try to check traceability on backlog items. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v4.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1582145 bytes Desc: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v4.pptx URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 15:35:05 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:35:05 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear All I just confirmed with NEC that regarding Standardization, task 11.4, no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period Br Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 14:57 To: 'Juanjo Hierro'; thierry.nagellen at orange.com Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear All Regarding WP11: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted. Pending to confirm with NEC the contribution to the Standardization task, as soon as Lindsay answer my mail Br Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 14:51 To: thierry.nagellen at orange.com Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 15 16:44:23 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:44:23 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Placeholders for sw-releated deliverables Message-ID: <516C1247.6080706@tid.es> Dear all, Further to the request from our last call I have added a section for June per manual. If you go to the guidelines: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverablesR2 and follow the links [cid:part1.01020209.02000104 at tid.es] Now you get placeholders for both April and July. For instance, if we go to the Install and admin manual now you get: [cid:part2.05030408.07020006 at tid.es] You can start filling in the new one if needed. Up to you, the one we need is April. I do not care that much about June at this point in time. However, if there are GEis for July in the first block (very few but some, as I recall) please move them to the right block. Thanks Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jaecchid.png Type: image/png Size: 16999 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jgeeaggf.png Type: image/png Size: 25332 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 15 16:44:52 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:44:52 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890381CF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <703F4EB81B2AD0428360BFE55A82DFBC4CF9D195@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89044083@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Torsten, I might have been not clear enough in my previous email so I came back to you to comment about this idea of avoiding information duplicity, which is important and I didn't comment, but that in general we agree upon. I've checked the content provided in the tracker and that provided in the wiki for the public backlog items (themes, epics, features) - and I don't actually see much duplicity because the fields provided in the wiki are not in the tracker. The only one could be the detailed description in the tracker, which currently I don't know how it maps to the wiki, and which I would agree on not providing input there. I wonder if you had in mind other fields when you mention this idea of information duplication. If so, please, let me know so that I can explore it in detail. Kind regards, Manuel From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 15:06 To: 'Leidig, Torsten'; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Torsten, I appreciate your answer. I knew your proposal from the previous email received when we did the tracker review. What I see is the tracker give me fields to express time and states, needed for backlog management, which I don't have in the wiki. I understand the wiki as a "marketing" tool for the project. I am also sorry for disagreeing to your view on considerations for User Story and WorkItem. User Story is for functionality and intrinsically identified for a timeframe - the sprint. It additionally needs to be scheduled in the backlog at the beginning of a sprint. WorkItem is not about functionality, they are not necessarily attached to an Enabler (General/None), and can be added to the backlog anytime, even at the end of the sprint. Torsten, I'm sorry for not taken on board your propositions for this proposal. If you still want to push them, it would need a formal and different proposal to be discussed and voted in the Management board (perhaps Juanjo or Miguel can comment on the right procedure) . Overall, please, consider I appreciate having your input. Kind regards, Manuel From: Leidig, Torsten [mailto:torsten.leidig at sap.com] Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 10:00 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Manuel, I truly believe we should minimize the duplication the information in the Wiki and the Tracker. We know that duplication will lead to inconsistencies sooner or later. Therefore I would strongly suggest to only keep User Stories (and Work Items) in the Tracker. They could have a link to the Feature/Epic in the Wiki. User Stories are a special kind of Work Items, there is not much difference besides the fact they are formulated a bit different. My wish is: please make things as simple as possible and avoid any kind of duplicated information. Best, Torsten Dr. Torsten Leidig SAP Research Center CEC Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Prie?nitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe T +49 6227 7 52535 F +49 6227 78 29753 E torsten.leidig at sap.com http://www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Montag, 8. April 2013 16:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Proposal for improvements in the backlog (tracker +wiki) Dear Partners, I'd like to share this proposal for improving the backlog with you. Some aspects comes from your emails and phone calls held with you last month. I've already added some items. Some steps are already undertaken, as the simplification of the wiki view. Some others I'm already working on. I wonder whether you would require a presentation/discussion where the proposal could be explained/clarified/enriched, meanwhile you can also send additional comments. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From WOLFSTAL at il.ibm.com Mon Apr 15 17:46:29 2013 From: WOLFSTAL at il.ibm.com (Yaron Wolfsthal) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:46:29 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: Well said. Fully agree (and IBM does not have any interaction with Ericsson to report). Reg-Yaron From: depa at eng.it To: Juanjo Hierro , fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu, "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 15/04/2013 05:57 PM Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Sent by: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 15 18:45:49 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:45:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Presentations from Architectural week in Madrid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <516C2EBD.7030204@tid.es> Dear all, One more Action Point from today. A lot of homework for me! :) I did a check with Thomas and it looks like they are taking care of the presentations from Madrid. So hopefully they will be all in FI-WARE's forge soon. In fact, there are a few already: * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdE4teWs4UEpZa29zd0FRUmNTaFdxT2c&usp=sharing Best regards, Miguel El 15/04/2013 18:32, Thomas Michael Bohnert escribi?: Miguel. We are already handling this as a program level activity and thus via CONCORD. Cheers Thomas ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 19:44:45 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:44:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT FI-WARE Representative for Porto (April 22)_FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC11@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, As a follow up of the last e-mails I have circulated about the FIF National Workshops find below a reporting of the results from the event held in Turkey last week (where Jorge Pereira from the EC made the FI-WARE presentation in our absence) and the urgent reminder of confirming the speaker for the Porto workshop. The Porto event will be on April 22 and Jorge needs and answer ASAP. Remember, it will be a 30 minutes presentation more or less telling how to use FI-WARE GEs. You can take advantage of the presentations and material already prepared for the purpose of the FI-WARE Architecture Week of Madrid. Since I have to report the EC I would like to get the availability of each of the PCC members for the Porto event as well as the others so that we can assign the different FI-WARE members to the events. Please, do this ASAP (you only have to check the dates!!!!). I would be grateful if you could come back to me with an answer by this evening or tomorrow morning the latest and your confirmation (if possible) for the Porto event. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu] Sent: domingo, 14 de abril de 2013 22:26 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; jhierro at tid.es Cc: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu Subject: RE: FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Importance: High Hi Nuria, I would really appreciate a name for Porto, to finalize the programme. The only other event I can precise is the one in Hungary, 13 June in Budapest. Details will follow. The event in Dresden, Germany, was taken out of the list, as another event in Germany was already scheduled for the end of June in Berlin. You will get information on the other events form Arian. As for the Turkish event, there were over 40 participants in person, and the session was broadcast across the country. FI-WARE's presentation was well received. The discussions after the presentations were in Turkish, but the feedback I got was very positive. People are very interested. Best Regards, Jorge ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 15 19:44:39 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:44:39 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture: final iteration Message-ID: <516C3C87.8080909@tid.es> Dear all, The final check must start now. The idea is that each one of the two reviewers of each part of the Architecture should take a look at the reviewed doc and complain if there is a serious objection. Note that a given GE owner can refuse to address a comment becuse he disagrees. If there is a conflict and the reviewer insists that there is a serious thing to change, he can write an e-mail to the WPL in charge of the WP putting me in CC and we will see what to do. For instance, if there is a conflic in the part of Data, the e-mail would go to Sergio. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhTmk3UgJVcbdFFLVmJtcC03NWU3LVdtN0VSNl96a2c#gid=0 -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 19:52:45 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:52:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC1C@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html. Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on that we will share efforts. Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and please, be generous. This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 15 19:53:31 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:53:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture: final iteration Message-ID: <516C3E9B.1030900@tid.es> Dear all, Sorry, the previous message came out a bit too early in the middle of the edition! This is the one I was willing to send =================== The final check must start now. The idea is that each one of the two reviewers of each part of the Architecture should take a look at the final doc and complain if there is a serious objection not taken into account (they are welcome to discuss it privately with the GE owner first if they like). Note that a given GE owner can refuse to address a comment becuse he disagrees. If there is a conflict and the reviewer insists that there is a serious thing to change, he can write an e-mail to the WPL in charge of the WP putting me in CC and we will see what to do. For instance, if there is a conflic in the part of Data, the e-mail would go to Sergio. We will only take into account serious things, not details. Note that the quality of each part is the responsibility of the editor and the corresponding reviewers... * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhTmk3UgJVcbdFFLVmJtcC03NWU3LVdtN0VSNl96a2c#gid=0 Schedule * We have until Wednesday EOB to address this. * On Thursday I will check with you one by one and you will confirm that your teams have performed the check - please be ready by then, a "I will look into it today EOB" is not meeting the deadline I see the contributions from I2ND and IoT. I miss the final version of Apss, Cloud, Data and Security. Can you please finish this today EOB? Please send this urgently to all your teams. Best regards Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Apr 15 22:18:07 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:18:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: URGENT FI-WARE Representative for Porto (April 22)_FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC11@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC11@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: Dear Nuria, unfortunately attending events with a short notice becomes impossible to me, due to restrictive company travel policies. Based on the workshop list, I could be available for the Belgian Workshop (16 May) and the Italian one (assuming it is organized mid-to-end June, i.e. not during the review meeting week). BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Inviato: luned? 15 aprile 2013 19:45 A: fiware-pcc Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT FI-WARE Representative for Porto (April 22)_FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Priorit?: Alta Hi all, As a follow up of the last e-mails I have circulated about the FIF National Workshops find below a reporting of the results from the event held in Turkey last week (where Jorge Pereira from the EC made the FI-WARE presentation in our absence) and the urgent reminder of confirming the speaker for the Porto workshop. The Porto event will be on April 22 and Jorge needs and answer ASAP. Remember, it will be a 30 minutes presentation more or less telling how to use FI-WARE GEs. You can take advantage of the presentations and material already prepared for the purpose of the FI-WARE Architecture Week of Madrid. Since I have to report the EC I would like to get the availability of each of the PCC members for the Porto event as well as the others so that we can assign the different FI-WARE members to the events. Please, do this ASAP (you only have to check the dates!!!!). I would be grateful if you could come back to me with an answer by this evening or tomorrow morning the latest and your confirmation (if possible) for the Porto event. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.gif at 01CE3A26.62B15480] From: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu] Sent: domingo, 14 de abril de 2013 22:26 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; jhierro at tid.es Cc: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu Subject: RE: FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Importance: High Hi Nuria, I would really appreciate a name for Porto, to finalize the programme. The only other event I can precise is the one in Hungary, 13 June in Budapest. Details will follow. The event in Dresden, Germany, was taken out of the list, as another event in Germany was already scheduled for the end of June in Berlin. You will get information on the other events form Arian. As for the Turkish event, there were over 40 participants in person, and the session was broadcast across the country. FI-WARE's presentation was well received. The discussions after the presentations were in Turkish, but the feedback I got was very positive. People are very interested. Best Regards, Jorge ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jdps at tid.es Mon Apr 15 23:06:32 2013 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:06:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report - M13 - M24 Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72FA07950@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all As you know we have to deliver the Periodic Report which has to give an overview of the second year of the project (months from M13 (May12) to M24 (Apr13)). I will kindly ask you in another particularized e-mail to update as WPL the information about your WP. The schedule is the following: 1. First request of information to WPL with estimated effort per partner: April 15th, 2013 2. Period to request each WPL to each involved partner its contribution to WP: April 16th, 2013 - Apr 19th, 2013 3. Integration of received information from by each WPL: April 22nd, 2013 - May 5th, 2013 4. WPL send first version of his updated report to Coordinator (subsidies at tid.es): May 6th, 2013 5. Coordinator asks to each partner to update its current effort: April 30th, 2013 6. Each partner sends its current effort according FORM-C 2: May 1st, 2013 - May 10th, 2013 7. Coordinator sends updated data of effort to each WPL: May 15th, 2013 8. Updating of the second version of each report by each WPL: May 16th, 2013 - May 17th, 2013 9. WPL sends final version of his updated report to Coordinator (subsidies at tid.es): May 17th, 2013 10. Integrating and revision by Coordinator: May 20th, 2013 - May 24th, 2013 11. Coordinator sends the Periodic Report to Project Officer: May 28th, 2013 12. Review: June 10th, 2013 At last but not least, please, I kindly ask you to follow the template in order to have a homogeneous report as a team. In the last review report they said: [cid:image002.jpg at 01CE3A2B.021C7FF0] Thank you in advance. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 39114 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From sergg at tid.es Mon Apr 15 23:35:06 2013 From: sergg at tid.es (SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:35:06 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Architecture: final iteration In-Reply-To: <516C3E9B.1030900@tid.es> References: <516C3E9B.1030900@tid.es> Message-ID: <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54D865840ED@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Miguel, Data document is available now. Best Regards, Sergio. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:54 PM To: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Architecture: final iteration Dear all, Sorry, the previous message came out a bit too early in the middle of the edition! This is the one I was willing to send =================== The final check must start now. The idea is that each one of the two reviewers of each part of the Architecture should take a look at the final doc and complain if there is a serious objection not taken into account (they are welcome to discuss it privately with the GE owner first if they like). Note that a given GE owner can refuse to address a comment becuse he disagrees. If there is a conflict and the reviewer insists that there is a serious thing to change, he can write an e-mail to the WPL in charge of the WP putting me in CC and we will see what to do. For instance, if there is a conflic in the part of Data, the e-mail would go to Sergio. We will only take into account serious things, not details. Note that the quality of each part is the responsibility of the editor and the corresponding reviewers... * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhTmk3UgJVcbdFFLVmJtcC03NWU3LVdtN0VSNl96a2c#gid=0 Schedule * We have until Wednesday EOB to address this. * On Thursday I will check with you one by one and you will confirm that your teams have performed the check - please be ready by then, a "I will look into it today EOB" is not meeting the deadline I see the contributions from I2ND and IoT. I miss the final version of Apss, Cloud, Data and Security. Can you please finish this today EOB? Please send this urgently to all your teams. Best regards Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue Apr 16 08:07:57 2013 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:07:57 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC1C@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC1C@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: I will attend the event in Israel. Regards, Alex P.S. we can ask someone from Intel to cover the event in Dublin From: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez To: fiware-pcc , Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: 15/04/2013 08:52 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html. Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on that we will share efforts. Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and please, be generous. This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl [attachment "image001.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "image002.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Apr 16 10:35:37 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:35:37 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - naming convention updated - Themes to be removed? Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89044395@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, I have updated the wiki page with the clarifications about the naming conventions so that traceability is possible. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 [cid:image001.png at 01CE3A8C.E9073840] (if you had any comment, please, let me know) Let me remind you about next issue as well. Please, during this week make your mind about the need of having "Themes" as backlog items. I see IoT (Tierry) and Security (Pascal) are the chapters using themes, would you please consider whether it is feasible to remove Themes, I guess other partners would not have objections to it. This way we will advance towards Torsten principle of simplification, which I also agree on. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13198 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Tue Apr 16 10:46:03 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 08:46:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - naming convention updated - Themes to be removed? In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89044395@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89044395@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100D005@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Hi Manuel, Currently we have 937 FEATUES - will you change them according to the new structure? What is the timeline you would see for the migration? Migration of e.g. these wiki pages with non-admin rights would reside in double the amount of pages (each redirecting to the new page). Is this effort really worth the "benefit"? Do you think we already reached an consensus to implement this on the WPL/WPA meeting? Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Dienstag, 16. April 2013 10:36 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - naming convention updated - Themes to be removed? Dear Partners, I have updated the wiki page with the clarifications about the naming conventions so that traceability is possible. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 [cid:image001.png at 01CE3A8F.97069B50] (if you had any comment, please, let me know) Let me remind you about next issue as well. Please, during this week make your mind about the need of having "Themes" as backlog items. I see IoT (Tierry) and Security (Pascal) are the chapters using themes, would you please consider whether it is feasible to remove Themes, I guess other partners would not have objections to it. This way we will advance towards Torsten principle of simplification, which I also agree on. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13198 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Apr 16 11:00:03 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:00:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - naming convention updated - Themes to be removed? In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100D005@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89044395@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100D005@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B890443D1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Thorsten, Thanks for the warning!!! Let me say it is NOT new structure but the original one. I've done an effort to clarify it since I have input suggesting it might be not being followed. Yesterday we agreed the partners would explore how chapters are following it so that we assess current situation. Obviously if the situation is very bad, as you suggest, we need to assess the situation. But let me emphasize it's NOT new, but the ORIGINAL. I hope I've clarified it properly. Otherwise, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 10:46 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - naming convention updated - Themes to be removed? Hi Manuel, Currently we have 937 FEATUES - will you change them according to the new structure? What is the timeline you would see for the migration? Migration of e.g. these wiki pages with non-admin rights would reside in double the amount of pages (each redirecting to the new page). Is this effort really worth the "benefit"? Do you think we already reached an consensus to implement this on the WPL/WPA meeting? Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Dienstag, 16. April 2013 10:36 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - naming convention updated - Themes to be removed? Dear Partners, I have updated the wiki page with the clarifications about the naming conventions so that traceability is possible. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 [cid:image001.png at 01CE3A91.889ECAE0] (if you had any comment, please, let me know) Let me remind you about next issue as well. Please, during this week make your mind about the need of having "Themes" as backlog items. I see IoT (Tierry) and Security (Pascal) are the chapters using themes, would you please consider whether it is feasible to remove Themes, I guess other partners would not have objections to it. This way we will advance towards Torsten principle of simplification, which I also agree on. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13198 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Apr 16 15:14:56 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:14:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Confirmation of FI-WARE speakers for FIF National Workshops Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FEF5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Thanks Alex, Pier, Based on your suggestions I confirm that IBM will be in the Israel workshop as well as in Dublin. Telecom Italia will take the leadership in Italy (may be supported by Engineering) and possibly Brussels. In the absence of more answers I have assigned partners to other workshops following the criterion of proximity (in general). For those workshops that have a date confirmed I would like you to provide me the concrete name of the speaker so that I can inform the EC for the agendas. If you are not happy with your assignment, please, come to me. Thierry, I would like France Telecom to attend the one in Porto. It is very much short term, but no one in Telef?nica can make it and I think you could play a very good role there. It is in one week (Monday of the following week); can you confirm? if any other colleague can make it, please, inform me as I already requested (SAP, Engineering...). 22 April, Portuguese Workshop, Porto PT (TBD) ? FT? 10 May, Future Internet Assembly, Dublin IE ? IBM 16 May, FIF Belgium Workshop, Brussels BE (TBA) ?Telecom Italia 30 May, FIF Spain Workshop, Madrid ES (TBA) ? Telef?nica (Atos supports if needed) 05 June, FIF Israel Workshop, Tel Aviv IL (TBA) ? IBM 13 June, FIF Hungary Workshop, Budapest HU (TBA) ? SAP ? 22 June, FIF Germany Workshop, Dresden DE (TBA) ? SAP, DT June, FIF Italy Workshop, IT (TBD) ? Telecom Italia, Engineering June, FIF Greece Workshop, GR (TBD) June, Dutch workshop, NL (TBD) June, FIF Poland Workshop (TBD) Thanks! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: Alex Glikson [mailto:GLIKSON at il.ibm.com] Sent: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 8:08 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiware-pcc; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker I will attend the event in Israel. Regards, Alex P.S. we can ask someone from Intel to cover the event in Dublin From: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez To: fiware-pcc , Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: 15/04/2013 08:52 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html . Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on that we will share efforts. Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and please, be generous. This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl [attachment "image001.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "image002.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 16 15:26:46 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:26:46 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Confirmation of FI-WARE speakers for FIF National Workshops In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FEF5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FEF5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: dear nuria, porto for me is impossible as i have to be in brussels the following day (nessi sc). apologises ciao, stefano 2013/4/16 Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > Thanks Alex, Pier,**** > > ** ** > > Based on your suggestions I confirm that IBM will be in the Israel > workshop as well as in Dublin.**** > > Telecom Italia will take the leadership in Italy (may be supported by > Engineering) and possibly Brussels.**** > > ** ** > > In the absence of more answers *I have assigned partners to other > workshops* following the criterion of proximity (in general). For those > workshops that have a date confirmed I would like you to provide me the > concrete name of the speaker so that I can inform the EC for the agendas. > If you are not happy with your assignment, please, come to me.**** > > ** ** > > *Thierry, I would like France Telecom to attend the one in Porto. *It is > very much short term, but no one in Telef?nica can make it and I think you > could play a very good role there. It is in one week (Monday of the > following week); can you confirm?**** > > if any other colleague can make it, please, inform me as I already > requested (SAP, Engineering?).**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > 22 April, Portuguese Workshop, Porto PT (TBD) ? *FT?* > > 10 May, Future Internet Assembly, Dublin IE ? *IBM* > > 16 May, FIF Belgium Workshop, Brussels BE (TBA) ?*Telecom Italia* > > 30 May, FIF Spain Workshop, Madrid ES (TBA) ? *Telef?nica (Atos supports > if needed)* > > 05 June, FIF Israel Workshop, Tel Aviv IL (TBA) ? *IBM* > > 13 June, FIF Hungary Workshop, Budapest HU (TBA) ? *SAP ?* > > 22 June, FIF Germany Workshop, Dresden DE (TBA) ? *SAP, DT* > > June, FIF Italy Workshop, IT (TBD) ? *Telecom Italia, Engineering* > > June, FIF Greece Workshop, GR (TBD)**** > > June, Dutch workshop, NL (TBD) **** > > June, FIF Poland Workshop (TBD)**** > > ** ** > > Thanks!**** > > ** ** > > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-3195]**** > > *Nuria de Lama***** > > ** ** > > Research & Innovation **** > > Representative to the European Commission**** > > **** > > T +34 91214 9321**** > > F +34 91754 3252 **** > > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu**** > > Albarrac?n 25**** > > 28037 Madrid**** > > Spain**** > > www.atosresearch.eu**** > > es.atos.net **** > > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C]**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Alex Glikson [mailto:GLIKSON at il.ibm.com] > *Sent:* martes, 16 de abril de 2013 8:08 > *To:* Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > *Cc:* fiware-pcc; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your > availability as FI-WARE speaker**** > > ** ** > > I will attend the event in Israel. > > Regards, > Alex > > P.S. we can ask someone from Intel to cover the event in Dublin > > > > From: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > To: fiware-pcc , > Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > Date: 15/04/2013 08:52 PM > Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your > availability as FI-WARE speaker > Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu **** > ------------------------------ > > > > > The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: > http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html. > > Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to > update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on > that we will share efforts. > Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give > an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and > please, be generous. > > This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-3195] > *Nuria de Lama* > > Research & Innovation > Representative to the European Commission > > T +34 91214 9321 > F +34 91754 3252 > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu > Albarrac?n 25 > 28037 Madrid > Spain > www.atosresearch.eu > es.atos.net > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C] > **** > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > [attachment "image001.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment > "image002.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] **** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 16 17:08:02 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:08:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed. In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72FA08B77@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72FA08B77@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <516D6952.4070204@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed. Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:35:01 +0200 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , "subsidies at tid.es" Dear Arian, please find enclosed the DRAFT version of the DoW. We are closing the split of the budget of NSN Germany yet. Please find enclosed a new version of excel file with the changes. It is a DRAFT version too due to same issue. DoW: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/25/2109/FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4+-+v1+%28version+date-16-04-13%29+%28DRAFT%29.docx Excel: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/25/2111/FI-WARE+effort-budget-funding+-+Amendment+4+v31+%28DRAFT%29.xlsx Thank you for your contribution. BR Javier. De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 16:10 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Asunto: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. If you can send me the Word DoW already, then please do so. Arian ________________________________ From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:09 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Importance: High Dear Arian. It was closed and ready to send to you but yesterday NSN-G told me that they need to study again the split of their budget between NSN-G and NSNG1. As you know, they changed its legal name and now they are a new partner. If you prefer, I can send it right now for your review, taking in account that this point could be changed. Please, let me know. BR Javier. De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 16:04 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Asunto: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Dear Javier, OK, thanks for informing us. Could you please let us know the status of the amendment? When do you plan to send me the updated DoW? Thanks, Arian ________________________________ From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 3:26 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Importance: High Dear Arian. Regretfully, I?ve checked the consortium and there is no consensus for Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and on methodology. BR Javier. De: CNECT-R3-COMMUNICATION at ec.europa.eu [mailto:CNECT-R3-COMMUNICATION at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 07 de enero de 2013 12:05 Para: jimenez at tid.es CC: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Asunto: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. [cid:part15.00000101.06060904 at tid.es] Dear Coordinator, This is to inform you that the Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. 1. Entry into force of the new Financial Regulation Further to the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation (Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002) the following new rules will be applicable to this grant agreement as of 1 January 2013, with no need to amend the grant agreement (i.e no action is needed from the consortium): ? time-to-pay: the time limit allowed for making payments to beneficiaries is reduced to 30 days for the pre-financing and to 90 days for the interim and final payments; ? interest on pre-financing: the beneficiaries of EU funds will no longer be obliged to deposit pre-financing on interest-bearing bank accounts and to declare the interest yielded by these accounts. However please note that until 31/12/2012 the provisions regarding interest on pre-financing mentioned in the grant agreement will continue to apply. For example for an on-going project if the reporting period covers 1.6.2012 to 31.5.2013, only the interest on pre-financing which has been generated from 1.6.2012 to 31.12.2012 should be declared, no interest from 1.1.2013 to 31.5.2013. 2. Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and on methodology The Commission also decided to allow consortia of ongoig projects to opt for the application of the electronic-only signature and transmission of financial statements (Form C), and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and certificates on the methodology (Forms D and E). To this end beneficiaries must introduce a request for an amendment via the coordinator. Instructions on how to request such an amendment and the template amendment letter to be sent by the coordinator to the Commission are enclosed to the present email. Please note that before requesting such an amendment, you should make sure that all beneficiaries have nominated a LEAR empowered to assign the person(s) authorised to act as signatory/signatories of financial statements (forms C). Once the grant agreement is amended, the consortium shall transmit the reports and other deliverables through the coordinator to the Commission using the electronic exchange system set up by the Commission. In particular: ? Form C must be electronically signed and transmitted through the electronic exchange system by the authorised person(s) within the beneficiary's organisation. ? The certificates on the financial statements and the certificates on the methodology must be hand-signed by an authorised person of the auditing entity on paper and a scanned copy of the certificates shall be transmitted through the electronic exchange system. More information on these changes is included in the enclosed guidance note "FP7 Quick Information letter on the electronic-only transmission and signature of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates (Forms D and E)". Should you have any question regarding the present email please do not hesitate to contact the FP7 helpdesk at https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/contactus. Please inform the other benficiaries of this grant agreement about these changes. Enclosures - Instructions on how to request an amendment to your FP7 grant agreement in order to benefit from the abolition of paper-signed Forms C - Template amendment letter to be send by the coordinator to the Commission in order to request the application of the electronic-only signature and transmission of financial statements (Form C), and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and certificates on the methodology (Forms D and E) - FP7 Quick Information letter on the electronic-only transmission and signature of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates (Forms D and E) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 16638 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Apr 17 08:38:35 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 06:38:35 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture deliverable cross chapter aspects - quick review possibility Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100E044@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, obviously nobody did really take care of this, therefore I did it: finalizing and "docifying" the Architecture deliverable cross chapter parts and introducing the "real" cover of this deliverable. Find a document attached which is generated. Please take a close look at it will be the front part of the final deliverable and the reviewers will start reading this chapter. If you think you can improve the text, please do so directly on the wiki at http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture I will monitor the page and regenerate the document iff needed. I as well updated the deliverable cockpit: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/D.2.3.2.submission_cockpit#Progress_Tracking_and_Links_D.2.3.2_FI-WARE_Architecture Document name official Deadline Planned submission Deliverable Front Page Link Link to generated .zip related docx 2.3.2 FI-WARE Architecture M21 05.04.2013 D.2.3.2 FI-WARE Architecture front page generated: cover & cross chapter - will be consolidated by hand submitted: Best, /Thorsten -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D232_WP2_v2_generated.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 471899 bytes Desc: D232_WP2_v2_generated.docx URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Wed Apr 17 10:27:27 2013 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:27:27 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Organizational Announcement Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, Markus Heller (markus.heller at sap.com) has joined the FI-WARE team now and he will take over my responsibilities in FI-WARE to coordinate SAP-activities in the project and to act as WP3 Lead from 22.04.2013 on. Could you please take care that Markus is added to the WPL/WPA mailing list since I do not have the privileges to do so. You can remove my name from the related mailing lists effective beginning of May, e.g. 01.05.2013. I'd like to thank all of you for the excellent collaboration, the interesting discussions and the great support over the past months and I would like to ask you all to welcome Markus in his new role in the FI-WARE project. Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Next Business and Technology SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Apr 17 10:47:35 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:47:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Architecture deliverable cross chapter aspects - quick review possibility In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100E044@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100E044@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: Dear Thorsten, I apologise I'm late to provide you an update proposal for the 'citymap' diagram in this section of the document (I was too much focused on the completion of specific peer reviews and other deliverable preparation, and I didn't properly manage this long standing item). Would you just have a check to the modified diagram attached, where the modifications are as follows, and decide whether they can be adopted or not: - Modification of blocks in the 'Infrastructure' dotted box (lower side of the diagram) - Introduced the 'network Infrastructure Provider' actor - Aligned Cloud Proxy blocks in I2ND and Cloud modules (we would also be in favour of having a single Cloud Proxy block crossing I2ND and Cloud boxes, but this implies that also Alex has to agree before doing it). Thanks and BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Sandfuchs, Thorsten Inviato: mercoled? 17 aprile 2013 08:39 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture deliverable cross chapter aspects - quick review possibility Dear colleagues, obviously nobody did really take care of this, therefore I did it: finalizing and "docifying" the Architecture deliverable cross chapter parts and introducing the "real" cover of this deliverable. Find a document attached which is generated. Please take a close look at it will be the front part of the final deliverable and the reviewers will start reading this chapter. If you think you can improve the text, please do so directly on the wiki at http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture I will monitor the page and regenerate the document iff needed. I as well updated the deliverable cockpit: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/D.2.3.2.submission_cockpit#Progress_Tracking_and_Links_D.2.3.2_FI-WARE_Architecture Document name official Deadline Planned submission Deliverable Front Page Link Link to generated .zip related docx 2.3.2 FI-WARE Architecture M21 05.04.2013 D.2.3.2 FI-WARE Architecture front page generated: cover & cross chapter - will be consolidated by hand submitted: Best, /Thorsten Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fiware-cross-chapter_v7-2.graphml Type: application/octet-stream Size: 83902 bytes Desc: fiware-cross-chapter_v7-2.graphml URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Apr 17 11:43:25 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:43:25 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture deliverable cross chapter aspects - quick review possibility In-Reply-To: References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100E044@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646100E5F2@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> HI pier, no Problemo - still in time and thank you a lot for the contribution. :) I updated the diagram and could integrate it I would not be in favour of one of the boxes to cross the chapters - I think this would draw too much attention to this box - I think the layout of the box in your chapter, aligned with the layout of the box in the cloud chapter should be enough. Attached the final document in an v8 version - I will upload it accordingly until EOB tonight - so if anybody still wants to contribute... or can spot an error... feel free to step in. Best, /Thorsten [cid:image001.jpg at 01CE3B60.C4A37930] From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 10:48 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture deliverable cross chapter aspects - quick review possibility Dear Thorsten, I apologise I'm late to provide you an update proposal for the 'citymap' diagram in this section of the document (I was too much focused on the completion of specific peer reviews and other deliverable preparation, and I didn't properly manage this long standing item). Would you just have a check to the modified diagram attached, where the modifications are as follows, and decide whether they can be adopted or not: - Modification of blocks in the 'Infrastructure' dotted box (lower side of the diagram) - Introduced the 'network Infrastructure Provider' actor - Aligned Cloud Proxy blocks in I2ND and Cloud modules (we would also be in favour of having a single Cloud Proxy block crossing I2ND and Cloud boxes, but this implies that also Alex has to agree before doing it). Thanks and BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Sandfuchs, Thorsten Inviato: mercoled? 17 aprile 2013 08:39 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture deliverable cross chapter aspects - quick review possibility Dear colleagues, obviously nobody did really take care of this, therefore I did it: finalizing and "docifying" the Architecture deliverable cross chapter parts and introducing the "real" cover of this deliverable. Find a document attached which is generated. Please take a close look at it will be the front part of the final deliverable and the reviewers will start reading this chapter. If you think you can improve the text, please do so directly on the wiki at http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE_Architecture I will monitor the page and regenerate the document iff needed. I as well updated the deliverable cockpit: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/D.2.3.2.submission_cockpit#Progress_Tracking_and_Links_D.2.3.2_FI-WARE_Architecture Document name official Deadline Planned submission Deliverable Front Page Link Link to generated .zip related docx 2.3.2 FI-WARE Architecture M21 05.04.2013 D.2.3.2 FI-WARE Architecture front page generated: cover & cross chapter - will be consolidated by hand submitted: Best, /Thorsten Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 108725 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fiware-cross-chapter_v8.graphml Type: application/octet-stream Size: 81235 bytes Desc: fiware-cross-chapter_v8.graphml URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 17 12:09:43 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:09:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call Message-ID: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> Dear partners, First of all, let me point out that contents of this email should be handled confidentially. As many of you know, FI-WARE launched the 3rd Open Call targeted to design and implement an ambitious plan for the promotion and dissemination of FI-WARE (see http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) I'm glad to say that the evaluation of proposals has finalized with the selection of a proposal submitted by a rather strong consortia formed by Futura Networks and Asociaci?n E3 Futura (organizers of the huge Campus Party event), Startup Weekend (who have developed a huge network of startups events around the world), OgilvyOne (one of the major Publicity and Marketing companies in the World and Europe), NLnet (who helped introduce internet in Europe and holds a high quality network of involved innovators and active developers) and the Chambers of Spain offering their to SME networks in Latin America and the EU. Please find attached the corresponding Evaluation Summary Report. Following open call procedures, the evaluation has been carried out by independent evaluators. Also following Open Call procedures, we have now to ask you if you have any objection to the incorporation of any of the mentioned companies/organizations as new beneficiaries in FI-WARE. Note that we are not asking your opinion about the result of the evaluation itself. That has been carried out by the independent evaluators. We are just asking you whether you have any objection regarding any of the selected beneficiaries. Deadline for raising objections is this Friday EOB. If you are interested in getting a private copy of the proposal, please let me know. We will distribute it to the whole consortia as soon as we officially communicate the final result and call the selected beneficiaries for negotiations (next Monday). In the meantime, we want to have distribution of the proposal under control. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Consensus Evaluation Form - EDE_final.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 14018 bytes Desc: not available URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Apr 17 19:07:36 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:07:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Following with the submission of Exploitation Deliverables on M24, I enclosed you the following roadmap and the inputs needed to include in each deliverable according to the last comments and recommendations from the last review on M18. Please feel free to suggest some indications or solutions to address the issues identified in each deliverable, based on the recommendations provided by the reviewers. For this work, we are going to leverage on the following draft documents: - 11.1.2- Market Analysis o Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) o The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? o The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) o The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers o European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) - First Draft of the Whitepaper about Product Vision for identify main use case scenarios and demonstrate the main advantages offered by FI WARE in each domain and identify the main and more potential instances or combinations of GE (PaaS+Big Data, IoT+Big Data.....)- Any advance on this whitepaper? ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? - Exploitation and business modeling position paper prepared together with CONCORD and that will be finished on April this month - Assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the emerging FI-PPP Phase 1- Feedback from UC questionnaire sent by FI WARE - Exploring Policy and Regulatory Challenges paper prepared together with CONCORD- Finished - Open Innovation Lab o Terms and Conditions- Status? o Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab- Any advance on this side? - Third party developers' feedback to the available GEs - Third party Enablement deliverable new version- Is there a new version available? - European Patent System- The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the matter Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 15th May - Monday 22nd April- I will send you an initial and significant completed draft of the following three deliverables trying to address the following recommendations provided by reviewers on M18: o D11.1.2 Market and Competition Analysis (M24) ? The consortium is urged to keep the parallel segment of Smart Business in dual focus with Smart Cities ? Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically ? The challenge for future versions is to apply the new insights to broaden and deepen the analysis of FI-WARE's own business ecosystem, and relate the present high level view of this ecosystem to the more specific analysis within the GE chapters ? Additionally, it would be useful to provide assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the FI-PPP Use Case projects ? From the conclusion of this document, it is clear that third party innovation enablement will be critical, and it is also intimately linked to building a critical mass for FI-WARE results. ? This theme should be further developed from a market and competitive perspective, in close synergy with and inputting directly to the forthcoming deliverables D2.5.2 and D2.5.3 regarding third party uptake o D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management (M24) ? Providing usage scenarios, potential usage patterns (including the 'typical' combined use of GEs), an overview of the status of available GEs including level of Use Case interest, a clear schedule of future GE Releases ? Give due and sufficient business consideration to the competitiveness of the GEs with respect to their market benchmarking, innovation potential and attractiveness) for both business and development communities. ? Focus on applying 'promising' technologies such as USDL and high impact areas such as IoT. ? Provide additional analysis and target promising business ecosystems for GE uptake, beyond Smart Cities. ? Provide clear evidence of business planning in the targeted areas through (combined) implementation of GEs. ? As a specific suggestion, the market potential of the individual GEs or groupings of GEs could be even more sharply indicated, and possibly even contrasted and prioritized ? OIL description ? A significant number of critical issues have to be addressed that will ultimately respond to the third party question "Why and how FI-WARE is going to help me to innovate?" o From a practical standpoint more detail is required relating to access, licensing and utilization rights. o Also not yet appropriately addressed is the topic of packaging in terms of what the application developer can access to build FI solutions, such as a starter-kit. ? The concrete offering and strategy towards attracting relevant communities remains unclear. ? Fostering developer communities fall within the scope of Open Call 3 (launched in December 2012). This however does not mean that present partners can derogate all responsibilities of involving potential users and stakeholders to the future Open Call 3 partners ? IPR Management: Regarding a possible integration strategy, the Month 15 Whitepaper about common usage scenarios (and potential usage patterns) for the GEs is long overdue. The issue was also raised by some of the new Phase 2 projects: ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? ? Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab, in collaboration and synergy with the upcoming FIPPP Phase 2 Capability Building project. o D11.3.2 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness Report (M24) ? Further development of the issues and themes in Section 4.2 from 11.3.1.b is expected, among others, for the next version. ? The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the European Patent System, would deserve greater attention in the next version ? It is also encouraging to see more consideration of the platform issues from a regulatory perspective, which should be deepened in the next version o 11.4.3 Standardization (M27) ? Please provide feedback to the NEC requirements as an oral update has to be provided in the next review meeting (M24) - Wednesday 30th April- o To Review or complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback about the three before mentioned deliverables 11.1.2, 11.2.2 and 11.3.2 o To Update of the individual exploitation plans into the wiki: ? Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy ? Also welcomed is the emphasis given on "open model", "open solution", "open services", "open innovation", "open ecosystem" etc. How to start an ecosystem or leverage existing ones remains to be answered though. Equally, what does 'openness' mean beyond marketing, and concretely how it is to be applied in corporate strategy such as on the FI-WARE instances, need to be clarified. ? One good example in this respect is the very specific description provided in the Orange presentation in Seville, which clearly explains how usage of several sets of FI-WARE results is linked to its corporate strategy in engaging with the evolution of the services market. ? In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project. - Friday 10th May- I will consolidate all the outputs and feedback received - Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th - Final review and validation will take place - Wednesday 15th May - We will send the final deliverables Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Fri Apr 19 15:02:41 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:02:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call In-Reply-To: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> References: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> Message-ID: <31620_1366376562_51714072_31620_1904_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0DD995@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all, Orange has no specific concern with these new partners, so we agree to involve them in Fi-Ware. BR Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mercredi 17 avril 2013 12:10 ? : fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call Dear partners, First of all, let me point out that contents of this email should be handled confidentially. As many of you know, FI-WARE launched the 3rd Open Call targeted to design and implement an ambitious plan for the promotion and dissemination of FI-WARE (see http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) I'm glad to say that the evaluation of proposals has finalized with the selection of a proposal submitted by a rather strong consortia formed by Futura Networks and Asociaci?n E3 Futura (organizers of the huge Campus Party event), Startup Weekend (who have developed a huge network of startups events around the world), OgilvyOne (one of the major Publicity and Marketing companies in the World and Europe), NLnet (who helped introduce internet in Europe and holds a high quality network of involved innovators and active developers) and the Chambers of Spain offering their to SME networks in Latin America and the EU. Please find attached the corresponding Evaluation Summary Report. Following open call procedures, the evaluation has been carried out by independent evaluators. Also following Open Call procedures, we have now to ask you if you have any objection to the incorporation of any of the mentioned companies/organizations as new beneficiaries in FI-WARE. Note that we are not asking your opinion about the result of the evaluation itself. That has been carried out by the independent evaluators. We are just asking you whether you have any objection regarding any of the selected beneficiaries. Deadline for raising objections is this Friday EOB. If you are interested in getting a private copy of the proposal, please let me know. We will distribute it to the whole consortia as soon as we officially communicate the final result and call the selected beneficiaries for negotiations (next Monday). In the meantime, we want to have distribution of the proposal under control. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 00:50:15 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:50:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> References: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> Message-ID: <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> Dear colleagues, For your info, please find enclosed our response to the mail sent by Herink Abramowicz from Ericsson regarding their request to report PMs beyond the limits that we had decided to accept (very generously in my opinon, I have to say, as explained to Henrik in the attached mail). If you believe there was something wrong or not accurate in our message, I happy to hear your opinion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:46:46 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Henrik Abramowicz CC: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ , LUIS GARCIA GARCIA , "subsidies at tid.es" , Anders Casp?r , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Henrik, It was Ericsson's unilateral decision to withdraw the project. You were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making you impossible to stay in. On the contrary, Ericsson's decision put the project into real trouble. After double-checking with all the WP leaders where Ericsson was involved, our position doesn't change: the 2,6 PMs we had planned to assign to Ericsson in addition to the PMs declared by Ericsson at month 18 are considered fair to cover your involvement until your withdrawal was officially communicated. Of course, you may report more PMs for that period but, following our obligation as coordinators, we will report to the EC whether we agree with the declared figures or not and certainly we won't agree with any declared costs beyond those we have already tell you. It will then be up to the EC to accept or reject your declared costs and we will adjust the planning of costs accordingly. Indeed, I remind you that some of the deliverables rejected in the 1st reporting period (which justified the rejection of costs reported for that period) were also rejected in the month 18 review. These included the Open Specifications of the IoT chapter (where Ericsson played a major role) and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap which was made up from the contributions by all the partners (including Ericsson). Acceptance of PMs declared not only during the 2nd reporting period (months 13-24) but also the 1st reporting period (month 1-12) depends now on the extra efforts for recovering that are currently being made by rest of the partners regarding rejected deliverables. Reported costs linked to development of deliverables rejected in month 18 will be finally accepted only if those deliverables get accepted in the 2nd year review and this will be because of the merits of rest of the partners who had recovered without the help of Ericsson. Acceptance of costs declared by Ericsson until month 18 plus the additional 2,6 PMs would therefore be rather generous indeed. Regarding your comment on consent of any amendment, note that you are not considered a member of the consortium since you notified Ericsson's withdrawal, therefore we don't need to get Ericsson's consent for any amendment we are implementing after Ericsson has withdrawn from the project. It's up to us to decide how planning of PMs can be realistically declared based on input from the WP leaders and taking into account the status of the project after the month 12 and month 18 project reviews. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 19:51, Henrik Abramowicz wrote: Dear Javier et al, We have been checking the time reporting and you were right that it did not reflect the actual work done in that month due to that our time reporting system certain months can come up with higher pms than planned. This is because it covers the last Quarter and there is lagging in time reporting which sometime means that the previous time reporting shows up later and adds up to the current month . This is actually true for most of our activities that the time reporting is lagging. I don?t think this is unusual. We announced the withdrawal in January For WP 5 Thierry should I have been told by our people that we have not really reported so much time as we could have in general. I believe Thierry is aware of it. End of last year there quite a lot of support of Telecom Italia for a demo and integration on the cloud infrastructure. For WP 9 we had further development and bug-fixing of the catalogue but also a lot of support to users, preparations of webinars and actual execution of them Documentation and competence transfer to UPM . For WP 10 we contributed on some of the deployment. I don't believe we are blocking anything but you need to have explicit consent by us for any amendment. I hope this answers the questions BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 15 april 2013 11:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; LUIS GARCIA GARCIA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, as Coordinator we cannot accept your proposal, and for last time, I would ask you again to reconsider your situation to avoid sending this information to Commission in order to solve the blocking of the amendment 4. 1.- Coordinator and Chief Architect, and WPLs knows that Ericsson withdraws the project after review M18. 2.- It is no legal to declare 1,7 PM of Jakob Saros on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 3.- It is no legal to declare 1,5 PM of Vlasios Tsiatsis on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Again, please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 4.- We have checked WPL and they don't agree with the Ericsson's contribution from November 12 you said. * FT says as coordinator of WP5 that "They cannot validate around 3 months without any contribution to a deliverable and no new software release." * E-IIS says as coordinator of WP9 that "I do confirm that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM". * E-IIs says as coordinator of WP10 that "No effort provided in the concerned period". 5.- You have been receiving all the e-mail about the complex amendments where is implicit the withdrawal of Ericsson an you have no said nothing against. 6.- Regarding your current declared effort: [cid:part9.05030804.07080402 at tid.es] That means that there could be up to 2,6 PM to compensate/minimize the impact of your unilateral withdrawal from the project and could be explained because Ericsson has been involved in some minor tasks too, so if this is true, you could claim these costs. Although I and WPL have asked you, you have no provided any information about the carried out work since November 2012 to December 2012, so, I think these costs will be rejected by Commission. 7.- Last by not least, as you know (it is stated in the documentation provided in the amendment), there are other partners who are going to receive the remaining budget in order to carry out the work. The project will have a big problem if the new committed budget has to be negotiated again. Please, let me know if you agree. Please, I would like you to answer us today. Note: If you agree, I kindly ask you again to provide the requested withdrawal letter by tomorrow. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 16:53 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear all, Please also find the breakdown of Person Months per month as requested which means that no work was performed in 2013 BR Henrik PM/WP WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 Nov 12 Dec 12 Jan 13 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 2,7 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 1,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0,1 Dec 12 0,1 John Sandberg Total 1,2 1,2 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 0,3 Marika St?lnacke Total 0,2 0,4 0,5 Nov 12 0,2 0,3 Dec 12 0,1 Torgny Johansson Total 0,5 0,5 Nov 12 0,3 Dec 12 0,2 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 1,5 Dec 12 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 28078 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ralli at tid.es Mon Apr 22 09:58:57 2013 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:58:57 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] On-line document to collect FIA attendance & list of projects to meet Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B25089052E74@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Colleagues, In the past Wpl conference call we established April 18th as the deadline to send who from your WPs is attending Dublin FIA. We also requested for the same deadline a list of potential projects to meet in the FIA (those projects you are already cooperating with or you expect that we contact because they may use our results or vice-versa). As I did not see contributions so far, I have created a googledoc sheet for this purpose. I expect Wpl/Wpa to complete it before today noon as later I'll circulate to the whole project list so partners can update it too. The googledoc is located at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdFJlSE5jQ1dmNzU0al9DLWN2dXdCcWc#gid=0 Let me remind as well that we are expecting a description of your dissemination actions in the last period before April 25th, as described in the Wpl conf.call minutes. Thanks in advance for your collaboration. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli IPv6 Blog: http://the-internet6.blogspot.com.es Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 10:01:16 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:01:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Business Framework Architecture for the afternoon session of the joint WPLs/WPAs confcall today Message-ID: <5174EE4C.6060504@tid.es> Dear all, This afternoon, SAP will present us the Business Framework Architecture finally outlined in the Apps Chapter. I believe this is an interesting piece to share and discuss together. However, due to some limitations, the presentation has to take place from 14:30 until 15:00, starting at 14:30 sharp. Please don't miss the starting time. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 10:03:07 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:03:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Shared minutes for our joint WPLs/WPAs confcall today Message-ID: <5174EEBB.5060801@tid.es> Hi, Still working on the pre-writting, but here it goes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-iZUCwC-VxziqecpO5w68ry64-6xSeqlkV0oR-ZYdQU/edit# Bestt regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Apr 22 10:50:21 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:50:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] On-line document to collect FIA attendance & list of projects to meet In-Reply-To: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B25089052E74@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B25089052E74@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <306_1366620622_5174F9CE_306_10788_1_6955b57e-13ff-40bc-845c-693f28113c84@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Hi Carlos, I left to Juanjo and you a message on your mobile regarding a workshop organized by Choreos Project (leaded) by Thales that FI-WARE was invited to join. So please urgently get it discussed with Juanjo just because so far we haven't heard from you whereas we were expecting you to confirm your participation. And Yes it is urgent since Choreos is awaiting for a while ... Hearing from you and Juanjo on the topic. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : lundi 22 avril 2013 09:59 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] On-line document to collect FIA attendance & list of projects to meet Dear Colleagues, In the past Wpl conference call we established April 18th as the deadline to send who from your WPs is attending Dublin FIA. We also requested for the same deadline a list of potential projects to meet in the FIA (those projects you are already cooperating with or you expect that we contact because they may use our results or vice-versa). As I did not see contributions so far, I have created a googledoc sheet for this purpose. I expect Wpl/Wpa to complete it before today noon as later I'll circulate to the whole project list so partners can update it too. The googledoc is located at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdFJlSE5jQ1dmNzU0al9DLWN2dXdCcWc#gid=0 Let me remind as well that we are expecting a description of your dissemination actions in the last period before April 25th, as described in the Wpl conf.call minutes. Thanks in advance for your collaboration. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli IPv6 Blog: http://the-internet6.blogspot.com.es Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 10:53:12 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:53:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Delaying confcall 15 mins Message-ID: <5174FA78.8030100@tid.es> Dear colleagues, The room we have booked for the confcall at Telefonica doesn't exist any more :-) Consequences of the recent facility changes here at Telefonica :-) Therefore, we have to delay start of the confcall 15 minutes. Apologies for the inconvenience. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From torsten.leidig at sap.com Mon Apr 22 14:46:32 2013 From: torsten.leidig at sap.com (Leidig, Torsten) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:46:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] slides Message-ID: <703F4EB81B2AD0428360BFE55A82DFBC4CFAACC0@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Dr. Torsten Leidig SAP Research Center CEC Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Prie?nitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe T +49 6227 7 52535 F +49 6227 78 29753 E torsten.leidig at sap.com http://www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2013-04-22_WP3_business_framework.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 792221 bytes Desc: 2013-04-22_WP3_business_framework.pptx URL: From ralli at tid.es Mon Apr 22 14:49:55 2013 From: ralli at tid.es (CARLOS RALLI UCENDO) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:49:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] On-line document to collect FIA attendance & list of projects to meet In-Reply-To: <306_1366620622_5174F9CE_306_10788_1_6955b57e-13ff-40bc-845c-693f28113c84@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Message-ID: <1971FF81B8E01C45991F6F92B9E3B25089053A5F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Pascal, Can you provide some details to me over the e-mail? BR -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli IPv6 Blog: http://the-internet6.blogspot.com.es Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ De: BISSON Pascal > Fecha: lunes, 22 de abril de 2013 10:50 Para: Carlos Ralli Ucendo >, "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" >, "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" > CC: BISSON Pascal > Asunto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] On-line document to collect FIA attendance & list of projects to meet Hi Carlos, I left to Juanjo and you a message on your mobile regarding a workshop organized by Choreos Project (leaded) by Thales that FI-WARE was invited to join. So please urgently get it discussed with Juanjo just because so far we haven?t heard from you whereas we were expecting you to confirm your participation. And Yes it is urgent since Choreos is awaiting for a while ? Hearing from you and Juanjo on the topic. Best Regards, Pascal De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de CARLOS RALLI UCENDO Envoy? : lundi 22 avril 2013 09:59 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] On-line document to collect FIA attendance & list of projects to meet Dear Colleagues, In the past Wpl conference call we established April 18th as the deadline to send who from your WPs is attending Dublin FIA. We also requested for the same deadline a list of potential projects to meet in the FIA (those projects you are already cooperating with or you expect that we contact because they may use our results or vice-versa). As I did not see contributions so far, I have created a googledoc sheet for this purpose. I expect Wpl/Wpa to complete it before today noon as later I'll circulate to the whole project list so partners can update it too. The googledoc is located at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArcymbqnpOfkdFJlSE5jQ1dmNzU0al9DLWN2dXdCcWc#gid=0 Let me remind as well that we are expecting a description of your dissemination actions in the last period before April 25th, as described in the Wpl conf.call minutes. Thanks in advance for your collaboration. Best regards, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Carlos Ralli Ucendo (ralli at tid.es) Cell: +34696923588 Twitter: @carlosralli IPv6 Blog: http://the-internet6.blogspot.com.es Product Development & Innovation (Telef?nica Digital) Telef?nica I+D SAU Madrid, Spain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Follow FI-WARE project (Future Internet Services Core Platform): Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: @fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 22 16:06:18 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:06:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Extended deliverable cockpit Message-ID: <517543DA.8060707@tid.es> Hi This is the one I was referring to in the call (dashboard with all the coming deliverables, even those from WP11!): Go tho the private wiki home page: [cid:part1.09040700.07070909 at tid.es] Clicking "Deliverables cockpit" you get to : * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Deliverables_cockpit I see that SAP have proactively done a big share of their part even before announcing it! Thanks for that The software deliverables need a report always (direct request from Arian), I will provide a template for this shortly (this is not extremely urgent, anyway) Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ahhchcjd.png Type: image/png Size: 6704 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Apr 22 16:22:14 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:22:14 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Extended deliverable cockpit In-Reply-To: <517543DA.8060707@tid.es> References: <517543DA.8060707@tid.es> Message-ID: Hi Miguel, what I intended in my comment is that there is the cockpit n the wiki which is extremely useful and concentrating all the links to the deliverables under preparation, but for example there the link to the shared spreadsheet used for keeping track of the progresses in the document preparation/peer review is not present (the latest created being the link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdHYxYTVOZ3FrNEprZXRBZk80TGRLMGc#gid=0 for Open Specs). I would suggest to add a section in the wiki with these links as well, so that all the relevant 'pointers' are easily found in one single place. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Miguel Carrillo Inviato: luned? 22 aprile 2013 16:06 A: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: FERMIN GALAN MARQUEZ Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Extended deliverable cockpit Hi This is the one I was referring to in the call (dashboard with all the coming deliverables, even those from WP11!): Go tho the private wiki home page: [cid:image001.png at 01CE3F75.8CB85FE0] Clicking "Deliverables cockpit" you get to : * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Deliverables_cockpit I see that SAP have proactively done a big share of their part even before announcing it! Thanks for that The software deliverables need a report always (direct request from Arian), I will provide a template for this shortly (this is not extremely urgent, anyway) Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 6704 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 22 17:10:22 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:10:22 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Extended deliverable cockpit In-Reply-To: References: <517543DA.8060707@tid.es> Message-ID: <517552DE.5040408@tid.es> Hi, Yes, I perfectly understood and I added an AP reflecting this on the minutes. This will be done hopefully today. BR Miguel El 22/04/2013 16:22, Garino Pierangelo escribi?: Hi Miguel, what I intended in my comment is that there is the cockpit n the wiki which is extremely useful and concentrating all the links to the deliverables under preparation, but for example there the link to the shared spreadsheet used for keeping track of the progresses in the document preparation/peer review is not present (the latest created being the link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdHYxYTVOZ3FrNEprZXRBZk80TGRLMGc#gid=0 for Open Specs). I would suggest to add a section in the wiki with these links as well, so that all the relevant 'pointers' are easily found in one single place. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Miguel Carrillo Inviato: luned? 22 aprile 2013 16:06 A: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: FERMIN GALAN MARQUEZ Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Extended deliverable cockpit Hi This is the one I was referring to in the call (dashboard with all the coming deliverables, even those from WP11!): Go tho the private wiki home page: [cid:part2.07060500.07030908 at tid.es] Clicking "Deliverables cockpit" you get to : * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Deliverables_cockpit I see that SAP have proactively done a big share of their part even before announcing it! Thanks for that The software deliverables need a report always (direct request from Arian), I will provide a template for this shortly (this is not extremely urgent, anyway) Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 6704 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 22 17:30:16 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:30:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] R: Extended deliverable cockpit In-Reply-To: <517552DE.5040408@tid.es> References: <517543DA.8060707@tid.es> <517552DE.5040408@tid.es> Message-ID: <51755788.703@tid.es> done https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Links_to_individual_deliverable_cockpits With an entry on the private wiki homepage: [cid:part1.07060407.00090002 at tid.es] Just two lines for the live deliverables at the moment (Architecture and Open Specs) Br miguel El 22/04/2013 17:10, Miguel Carrillo escribi?: Hi, Yes, I perfectly understood and I added an AP reflecting this on the minutes. This will be done hopefully today. BR Miguel El 22/04/2013 16:22, Garino Pierangelo escribi?: Hi Miguel, what I intended in my comment is that there is the cockpit n the wiki which is extremely useful and concentrating all the links to the deliverables under preparation, but for example there the link to the shared spreadsheet used for keeping track of the progresses in the document preparation/peer review is not present (the latest created being the link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdHYxYTVOZ3FrNEprZXRBZk80TGRLMGc#gid=0 for Open Specs). I would suggest to add a section in the wiki with these links as well, so that all the relevant 'pointers' are easily found in one single place. BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Miguel Carrillo Inviato: luned? 22 aprile 2013 16:06 A: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: FERMIN GALAN MARQUEZ Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Extended deliverable cockpit Hi This is the one I was referring to in the call (dashboard with all the coming deliverables, even those from WP11!): Go tho the private wiki home page: [cid:part7.09080600.09050306 at tid.es] Clicking "Deliverables cockpit" you get to : * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Deliverables_cockpit I see that SAP have proactively done a big share of their part even before announcing it! Thanks for that The software deliverables need a report always (direct request from Arian), I will provide a template for this shortly (this is not extremely urgent, anyway) Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: aghgijih.png Type: image/png Size: 14531 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 6704 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 16:19:41 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:19:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed. In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06DA3C86@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06DA3C86@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <517546FD.6090105@tid.es> Dear colleagues, Please find enclosed Arian's response to the version of the amended DoW we had sent to him. I'm forwarding it to you without further analysis. Javier de Pedro will come to you with some requests for information if needed. Of course, proactive feedback on your side is welcome. Don't hesitate to share with members of your teams if you believe it is appropriate. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed. Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:51:30 +0000 From: To: CC: , , Dear Javier, The Excel sheet with the changes and the comments in the DoW referring to the changes was really helpful. Some open points: - Page 17, Milestone list: contains some obsolete milestones - Page 117-118, WP list: I think you forgot some Excel references for WP4 and WP5. For WP10, TID should have the 11 PMs of EAB (Excel ref 26); this should not be in budget only, but also in PMs. - Page 119, deliverable list: D1.3. I think we have only received D1.3a/b/d, so no planning report D1.3c, e. I also don't need them. - Page 133: watered down. Why? FI-WARE should not be the next project praising USDL and not using it. - Page 137: WP6 deleted from the list. Why? - Page 201: documentation and training to UCs was deleted and a comment says that it is in T10.4??? - Page 202: see above. 11 PMs should be allocated to Telefonica. - Page 217-218: requests to UCs for requirements? - Page 308: nowadays, only real subcontracting costs should be put in the 'subcontracting' category. So, no open calls. Please change budget for open calls from subcontracting to "other direct costs" - Page 314: see above. No spare budgets. There are some partners who withdrew from WPs and whose effort for these WPs was put to 0. Could you please confirm that these partners did not claim efforts in RP1 and will not claim efforts in RP2? Please use the attached version. Best regards, Arian From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:35 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed. Importance: High Dear Arian, please find enclosed the DRAFT version of the DoW. We are closing the split of the budget of NSN Germany yet. Please find enclosed a new version of excel file with the changes. It is a DRAFT version too due to same issue. DoW: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/25/2109/FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4+-+v1+%28version+date-16-04-13%29+%28DRAFT%29.docx Excel: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/25/2111/FI-WARE+effort-budget-funding+-+Amendment+4+v31+%28DRAFT%29.xlsx Thank you for your contribution. BR Javier. De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 16:10 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Asunto: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. If you can send me the Word DoW already, then please do so. Arian ________________________________ From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:09 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Importance: High Dear Arian. It was closed and ready to send to you but yesterday NSN-G told me that they need to study again the split of their budget between NSN-G and NSNG1. As you know, they changed its legal name and now they are a new partner. If you prefer, I can send it right now for your review, taking in account that this point could be changed. Please, let me know. BR Javier. De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 16:04 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Asunto: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Dear Javier, OK, thanks for informing us. Could you please let us know the status of the amendment? When do you plan to send me the updated DoW? Thanks, Arian ________________________________ From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 3:26 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Importance: High Dear Arian. Regretfully, I?ve checked the consortium and there is no consensus for Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and on methodology. BR Javier. De: CNECT-R3-COMMUNICATION at ec.europa.eu [mailto:CNECT-R3-COMMUNICATION at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 07 de enero de 2013 12:05 Para: jimenez at tid.es CC: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Asunto: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. [mailbox:///Users/jhierro/Mail/correo.tid.es/Inbox?number=1966165314&part=1.1.2&filename=image001.png] Dear Coordinator, This is to inform you that the Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. 1. Entry into force of the new Financial Regulation Further to the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation (Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002) the following new rules will be applicable to this grant agreement as of 1 January 2013, with no need to amend the grant agreement (i.e no action is needed from the consortium): ? time-to-pay: the time limit allowed for making payments to beneficiaries is reduced to 30 days for the pre-financing and to 90 days for the interim and final payments; ? interest on pre-financing: the beneficiaries of EU funds will no longer be obliged to deposit pre-financing on interest-bearing bank accounts and to declare the interest yielded by these accounts. However please note that until 31/12/2012 the provisions regarding interest on pre-financing mentioned in the grant agreement will continue to apply. For example for an on-going project if the reporting period covers 1.6.2012 to 31.5.2013, only the interest on pre-financing which has been generated from 1.6.2012 to 31.12.2012 should be declared, no interest from 1.1.2013 to 31.5.2013. 2. Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and on methodology The Commission also decided to allow consortia of ongoig projects to opt for the application of the electronic-only signature and transmission of financial statements (Form C), and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and certificates on the methodology (Forms D and E). To this end beneficiaries must introduce a request for an amendment via the coordinator. Instructions on how to request such an amendment and the template amendment letter to be sent by the coordinator to the Commission are enclosed to the present email. Please note that before requesting such an amendment, you should make sure that all beneficiaries have nominated a LEAR empowered to assign the person(s) authorised to act as signatory/signatories of financial statements (forms C). Once the grant agreement is amended, the consortium shall transmit the reports and other deliverables through the coordinator to the Commission using the electronic exchange system set up by the Commission. In particular: ? Form C must be electronically signed and transmitted through the electronic exchange system by the authorised person(s) within the beneficiary's organisation. ? The certificates on the financial statements and the certificates on the methodology must be hand-signed by an authorised person of the auditing entity on paper and a scanned copy of the certificates shall be transmitted through the electronic exchange system. More information on these changes is included in the enclosed guidance note "FP7 Quick Information letter on the electronic-only transmission and signature of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates (Forms D and E)". Should you have any question regarding the present email please do not hesitate to contact the FP7 helpdesk at https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/contactus. Please inform the other benficiaries of this grant agreement about these changes. Enclosures - Instructions on how to request an amendment to your FP7 grant agreement in order to benefit from the abolition of paper-signed Forms C - Template amendment letter to be send by the coordinator to the Commission in order to request the application of the electronic-only signature and transmission of financial statements (Form C), and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and certificates on the methodology (Forms D and E) - FP7 Quick Information letter on the electronic-only transmission and signature of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates (Forms D and E) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 16638 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: az FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4_-_v1_(version_date-16-04-13)_(DRAFT).zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 11601221 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 20:59:06 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:59:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Message-ID: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:part2.05040003.02040500 at tid.es] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:part3.02060001.06070304 at tid.es] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dajhgbfb.png Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: djdjdhbb.png Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 23 11:14:30 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:14:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> References: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, ok for us. ciao, stefano 2013/4/22 Juanjo Hierro > Dear colleagues, > > For your info, please find enclosed our response to the mail sent by > Herink Abramowicz from Ericsson regarding their request to report PMs > beyond the limits that we had decided to accept (very generously in my > opinon, I have to say, as explained to Henrik in the attached mail). > > If you believe there was something wrong or not accurate in our message, > I happy to hear your opinion. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of > Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 > 00:46:46 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: > Henrik Abramowicz CC: > JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ , LUIS GARCIA GARCIA > , "subsidies at tid.es" > , Anders Casp?r > , "jhierro >> > \"Juan J. Hierro\"" > > Dear Henrik, > > It was Ericsson's unilateral decision to withdraw the project. You were > not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or > way of working thus making you impossible to stay in. > > On the contrary, Ericsson's decision put the project into real trouble. > > After double-checking with all the WP leaders where Ericsson was > involved, our position doesn't change: the 2,6 PMs we had planned to assign > to Ericsson in addition to the PMs declared by Ericsson at month 18 are > considered fair to cover your involvement until your withdrawal was > officially communicated. > > Of course, you may report more PMs for that period but, following our > obligation as coordinators, we will report to the EC whether we agree with > the declared figures or not and certainly we won't agree with any declared > costs beyond those we have already tell you. It will then be up to the EC > to accept or reject your declared costs and we will adjust the planning of > costs accordingly. > > Indeed, I remind you that some of the deliverables rejected in the 1st > reporting period (which justified the rejection of costs reported for that > period) were also rejected in the month 18 review. These included the > Open Specifications of the IoT chapter (where Ericsson played a major role) > and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap which was made up from the contributions > by all the partners (including Ericsson). Acceptance of PMs declared not > only during the 2nd reporting period (months 13-24) but also the 1st > reporting period (month 1-12) depends now on the extra efforts for > recovering that are currently being made by rest of the partners regarding > rejected deliverables. Reported costs linked to development of > deliverables rejected in month 18 will be finally accepted only if those > deliverables get accepted in the 2nd year review and this will be because > of the merits of rest of the partners who had recovered without the help of > Ericsson. Acceptance of costs declared by Ericsson until month 18 plus > the additional 2,6 PMs would therefore be rather generous indeed. > > Regarding your comment on consent of any amendment, note that you are > not considered a member of the consortium since you notified Ericsson's > withdrawal, therefore we don't need to get Ericsson's consent for any > amendment we are implementing after Ericsson has withdrawn from the > project. It's up to us to decide how planning of PMs can be realistically > declared based on input from the WP leaders and taking into account the > status of the project after the month 12 and month 18 project reviews. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 15/04/13 19:51, Henrik Abramowicz wrote: > > Dear Javier et al, > > > > We have been checking the time reporting and you were right that it did > not reflect the actual work done in that month due to that our time > reporting system certain months can come up with higher pms than planned. > This is because it covers the last Quarter and there is lagging in time > reporting which sometime means that the previous time reporting shows up > later and adds up to the current month . This is actually true for most of > our activities that the time reporting is lagging. I don?t think this is > unusual. > > We announced the withdrawal in January > > For WP 5 Thierry should I have been told by our people that we have not > really reported so much time as we could have in general. I believe Thierry > is aware of it. End of last year there quite a lot of support of Telecom > Italia for a demo and integration on the cloud infrastructure. > > For WP 9 we had further development and bug-fixing of the catalogue but > also a lot of support to users, preparations of webinars and actual > execution of them Documentation and competence transfer to UPM . > > For WP 10 we contributed on some of the deployment. > > I don?t believe we are blocking anything but you need to have explicit > consent by us for any amendment. > > I hope this answers the questions > > BR > Henrik > > *From:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es ] > *Sent:* den 15 april 2013 11:36 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; LUIS GARCIA GARCIA; subsidies at tid.es > *Subject:* FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT > ***) > *Importance:* High > > > > Dear Henrik, as Coordinator we cannot accept your proposal, and for last > time, I would ask you again to reconsider your situation to avoid sending > this information to Commission in order to solve the blocking of the > amendment 4. > > > > 1.- Coordinator and Chief Architect, and WPLs knows that Ericsson withdraws the project after review M18. > > 2.- It is no legal to declare 1,7 PM of Jakob Saros on Dec 12. If he has > worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Please check your recording systems > because this is a fatal error in an audit. > > 3.- It is no legal to declare 1,5 PM of Vlasios Tsiatsis on Dec 12. If he > has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Again, please check your recording > systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. > > 4.- We have checked WPL and they don?t agree with the Ericsson?s > contribution from November 12 you said. > > ? FT says as coordinator of WP5 that ?They cannot validate around > 3 months without any contribution to a deliverable and no new software > release.? > > ? E-IIS says as coordinator of WP9 that ?I do confirm that since > Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by > UPM?. > > ? E-IIs says as coordinator of WP10 that ?No effort provided in > the concerned period?. > > 5.- You have been receiving all the e-mail about the complex amendments > where is implicit the withdrawal of Ericsson an you have no said nothing > against. > > 6.- Regarding your current declared effort: > > > > > > That means that there could be up to 2,6 PM to compensate/minimize the > impact of your unilateral withdrawal from the project and could be > explained because Ericsson has been involved in some minor tasks too, so if > this is true, you could claim these costs. > > Although I and WPL have asked you, you have no provided any information > about the carried out work since November 2012 to December 2012, so, I > think these costs will be rejected by Commission. > > > > 7.- Last by not least, as you know (it is stated in the documentation > provided in the amendment), there are other partners who are going to > receive the remaining budget in order to carry out the work. The project > will have a big problem if the new committed budget has to be negotiated > again. > > > > Please, let me know if you agree. Please, I would like you to answer us > today. > > > > Note: If you agree, I kindly ask you again to provide the requested > withdrawal letter by tomorrow. > > > > BR > > Javier. > > > > *De:* Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] > > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 16:53 > > *Para:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > > > Dear all, > > Please also find the breakdown of Person Months per month as requested > which means that no work was performed in 2013 > > BR > > Henrik > > > > > PM/WP > > > > > WP 5 > > WP 9 > > WP 10 > > > > TOTAL > > *Henrik Abramowicz Total* > > *0,0* > > *0,0* > > *0,0* > > *0,0* > > Nov 12 > > > > > > > Dec 12 > > > > > > > Jan 13 > > > > > > > *Jakob Saros Total* > > *2,7* > > > > *2,7* > > Nov 12 > > 0,9 > > > > > Dec 12 > > 1,7 > > > > > *Jan H?ller Total* > > *0,1* > > > > *0,1* > > Dec 12 > > 0,1 > > > > > *John Sandberg Total* > > > *1,2* > > > *1,2* > > Nov 12 > > > 0,9 > > > > Dec 12 > > > 0,3 > > > > *Marika St?lnacke Total* > > > *0,2* > > *0,4* > > *0,5* > > Nov 12 > > > 0,2 > > 0,3 > > > Dec 12 > > > > 0,1 > > > *Torgny Johansson Total* > > > *0,5* > > > *0,5* > > Nov 12 > > > 0,3 > > > > Dec 12 > > > 0,2 > > > > *Vlasios Tsiatsis Total* > > *1,5* > > > > *1,5* > > Dec 12 > > 1,5 > > > > > *Total* > > *4,2* > > *1,8* > > *0,4* > > *6,4* > > > > > > *From:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es ] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:50 > > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > > > Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that > means that you didn?t work later in FI-WARE project. > > If not, please let me know. > > > > Please provide justifications of this effort. > > > > BR > > Javier. > > > > > > *De:* Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] > > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 > *Para:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > > > Dear Javier et al > > I got these figures from our controller below > > Hope this helps > > BR > > Henrik > > > > > WP 5 > > WP 9 > > WP 10 > > > > TOTAL > > *Henrik Abramowicz Total* > > 0 > > 0 > > 0 > > 0,0 > > *Jakob Saros Total* > > 2,7 > > 0 > > > 2,7 > > *Jan H?ller Total* > > 0,1 > > 0 > > > 0,1 > > *John Sandberg Total* > > 0 > > 1,2 > > > 1,2 > > *Marika St?lnacke Total* > > 0 > > 0,2 > > 0,4 > > 0,5 > > *Torgny Johansson Total* > > 0 > > 0,5 > > > 0,5 > > *Vlasios Tsiatsis Total* > > 1,5 > > 0 > > > 1,5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Total* > > 4,2 > > 1,8 > > 0,4 > > 6,4 > > > > > > *From:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es ] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:36 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > *Importance:* High > > > > *Dear Henrik*, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the > amendment 4. > > > > Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a > consensus with each WPL, in CC. > > > > WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen > > WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. > > > > As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its > contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. > > > > *Dear WPL*, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE > project since November 2012 as follows: > > WP 5 440 hours > > Wp 9 131,75 hours > > Wp 10 97 hours > > > > I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been > provided the requested information in attached e-mail. > > > > BR > > Javier. > > > > > > *De:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 > *Para:* 'Henrik Abramowicz' > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) > *Importancia:* Alta > > > > Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since > November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. > > It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. > > This is very urgent. > > BR > > Javier. > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 28078 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Apr 23 11:34:11 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:34:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: References: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F6C7E5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> OK on behalf of Atos. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: martes, 23 de abril de 2013 11:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) dear juanjo, ok for us. ciao, stefano 2013/4/22 Juanjo Hierro Dear colleagues, For your info, please find enclosed our response to the mail sent by Herink Abramowicz from Ericsson regarding their request to report PMs beyond the limits that we had decided to accept (very generously in my opinon, I have to say, as explained to Henrik in the attached mail). If you believe there was something wrong or not accurate in our message, I happy to hear your opinion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:46:46 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Henrik Abramowicz CC: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ , LUIS GARCIA GARCIA , "subsidies at tid.es" , Anders Casp?r , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Henrik, It was Ericsson's unilateral decision to withdraw the project. You were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making you impossible to stay in. On the contrary, Ericsson's decision put the project into real trouble. After double-checking with all the WP leaders where Ericsson was involved, our position doesn't change: the 2,6 PMs we had planned to assign to Ericsson in addition to the PMs declared by Ericsson at month 18 are considered fair to cover your involvement until your withdrawal was officially communicated. Of course, you may report more PMs for that period but, following our obligation as coordinators, we will report to the EC whether we agree with the declared figures or not and certainly we won't agree with any declared costs beyond those we have already tell you. It will then be up to the EC to accept or reject your declared costs and we will adjust the planning of costs accordingly. Indeed, I remind you that some of the deliverables rejected in the 1st reporting period (which justified the rejection of costs reported for that period) were also rejected in the month 18 review. These included the Open Specifications of the IoT chapter (where Ericsson played a major role) and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap which was made up from the contributions by all the partners (including Ericsson). Acceptance of PMs declared not only during the 2nd reporting period (months 13-24) but also the 1st reporting period (month 1-12) depends now on the extra efforts for recovering that are currently being made by rest of the partners regarding rejected deliverables. Reported costs linked to development of deliverables rejected in month 18 will be finally accepted only if those deliverables get accepted in the 2nd year review and this will be because of the merits of rest of the partners who had recovered without the help of Ericsson. Acceptance of costs declared by Ericsson until month 18 plus the additional 2,6 PMs would therefore be rather generous indeed. Regarding your comment on consent of any amendment, note that you are not considered a member of the consortium since you notified Ericsson's withdrawal, therefore we don't need to get Ericsson's consent for any amendment we are implementing after Ericsson has withdrawn from the project. It's up to us to decide how planning of PMs can be realistically declared based on input from the WP leaders and taking into account the status of the project after the month 12 and month 18 project reviews. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 19:51, Henrik Abramowicz wrote: Dear Javier et al, We have been checking the time reporting and you were right that it did not reflect the actual work done in that month due to that our time reporting system certain months can come up with higher pms than planned. This is because it covers the last Quarter and there is lagging in time reporting which sometime means that the previous time reporting shows up later and adds up to the current month . This is actually true for most of our activities that the time reporting is lagging. I don?t think this is unusual. We announced the withdrawal in January For WP 5 Thierry should I have been told by our people that we have not really reported so much time as we could have in general. I believe Thierry is aware of it. End of last year there quite a lot of support of Telecom Italia for a demo and integration on the cloud infrastructure. For WP 9 we had further development and bug-fixing of the catalogue but also a lot of support to users, preparations of webinars and actual execution of them Documentation and competence transfer to UPM . For WP 10 we contributed on some of the deployment. I don't believe we are blocking anything but you need to have explicit consent by us for any amendment. I hope this answers the questions BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 15 april 2013 11:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; LUIS GARCIA GARCIA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, as Coordinator we cannot accept your proposal, and for last time, I would ask you again to reconsider your situation to avoid sending this information to Commission in order to solve the blocking of the amendment 4. 1.- Coordinator and Chief Architect, and WPLs knows that Ericsson withdraws the project after review M18. 2.- It is no legal to declare 1,7 PM of Jakob Saros on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 3.- It is no legal to declare 1,5 PM of Vlasios Tsiatsis on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Again, please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 4.- We have checked WPL and they don't agree with the Ericsson's contribution from November 12 you said. ? FT says as coordinator of WP5 that "They cannot validate around 3 months without any contribution to a deliverable and no new software release." ? E-IIS says as coordinator of WP9 that "I do confirm that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM". ? E-IIs says as coordinator of WP10 that "No effort provided in the concerned period". 5.- You have been receiving all the e-mail about the complex amendments where is implicit the withdrawal of Ericsson an you have no said nothing against. 6.- Regarding your current declared effort: That means that there could be up to 2,6 PM to compensate/minimize the impact of your unilateral withdrawal from the project and could be explained because Ericsson has been involved in some minor tasks too, so if this is true, you could claim these costs. Although I and WPL have asked you, you have no provided any information about the carried out work since November 2012 to December 2012, so, I think these costs will be rejected by Commission. 7.- Last by not least, as you know (it is stated in the documentation provided in the amendment), there are other partners who are going to receive the remaining budget in order to carry out the work. The project will have a big problem if the new committed budget has to be negotiated again. Please, let me know if you agree. Please, I would like you to answer us today. Note: If you agree, I kindly ask you again to provide the requested withdrawal letter by tomorrow. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com ] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 16:53 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear all, Please also find the breakdown of Person Months per month as requested which means that no work was performed in 2013 BR Henrik PM/WP WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 Nov 12 Dec 12 Jan 13 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 2,7 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 1,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0,1 Dec 12 0,1 John Sandberg Total 1,2 1,2 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 0,3 Marika St?lnacke Total 0,2 0,4 0,5 Nov 12 0,2 0,3 Dec 12 0,1 Torgny Johansson Total 0,5 0,5 Nov 12 0,3 Dec 12 0,2 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 1,5 Dec 12 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 28078 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Apr 24 01:05:36 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:05:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] =?windows-1252?q?State_of_the_Art_Analysis_=96_Emerg?= =?windows-1252?q?ing_Technologies?= Message-ID: <517713C0.2040104@tid.es> Dear all, As you are aware, we agreed in the last WPL/WPA call to create a skeleton based on the State of the Art in the DoW. I am sending you this skeleton that you can start filling in now. This needs to be heavily edited by each WP. The one who drives the process is the WPL and the WPA. The main actor here should be the academia, as expressed in the DoW. I encourage the WPL/WPA to primarily rely on them for this work. Note that we do not want a section per GE, try to group in sections like the ones we have now, not GE per GE. This will be edited directly on the Word document as the result will not go to the wiki. Each WP will deliver their section by the 7th of May. I remind you the schedule (the one on the minutes of meeting) * April, 23 - Skeleton ready * May, 7 - Contributions from chapters to be sent by email (consolidated in a single doc per WP) * May, 10 - Peer Review ready (academia partners) * May, 17 - Feedback incorporated * May, 20 - Delivery I will consolidate all the inputs and will put a brief text in the introductory sections. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.2.6.2 State of the Art Analysis ? Emerging Technologies.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 426976 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Apr 24 14:38:27 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:38:27 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog improvement - proposal - v5 Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89046EC7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Please, find attached the presentation about backlog improvements, it has been updated according to comments received and decisions taken during last Monday weekly meeting. Changes: ? Updated 3,4 - conceptual model where themes are removed, and epics modified ? Updated 5 - user stories and themes to be removed ? Updated 6 - themes removed, specified fields to report and fields to be removed ? Updated 12 - traceability according to conceptual model If possible and there are no additional aspects to be discussed, I would appreciate having it formally approved and closed during next weekly meeting. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v5.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1548621 bytes Desc: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v5.pptx URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Apr 24 16:22:30 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:22:30 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog improvement - proposal - v6 Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89046F5C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Please, find the proposal v6 updated with a new slide number 10, which has been required by Thorsten, after having reviewed it on a bilateral meeting on-line. Following the non-duplicity of information principle, the description field which is common to both the tracker and the wiki will only be reported in the wiki. Thanks Thorsten for all your comments and having taken the time!!! If anything, please, don't hesitate to let know. Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: mi?rcoles, 24 de abril de 2013 14:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog improvement - proposal - v5 Dear Partners, Please, find attached the presentation about backlog improvements, it has been updated according to comments received and decisions taken during last Monday weekly meeting. Changes: * Updated 3,4 - conceptual model where themes are removed, and epics modified * Updated 5 - user stories and themes to be removed * Updated 6 - themes removed, specified fields to report and fields to be removed * Updated 12 - traceability according to conceptual model If possible and there are no additional aspects to be discussed, I would appreciate having it formally approved and closed during next weekly meeting. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v6.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1551004 bytes Desc: FI-WARE-Proposal for backlog improvements v6.pptx URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Apr 24 19:40:09 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:40:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed in the following link https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 and within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" the following first draft deliverables, pending to complete and fine-tuning: - D11.1.2-Market and Competition Analysis _M24v2404 o The document describe the following: ? Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) ? The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? ? The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) ? The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers ? European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) o ACTION1: Please review Business Opportunities by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May - D11.2.2 Exploitation_Plan,_including_IPR_Managementv_M24v2404 o The document describe the following ? FI-WARE Product Vision by domain: Identify the main Generic Enablers+ FI-WARE Instances with most market potential ? FI WARE Market Positioning: GE Development Prioritization Matrix ? FI WARE IPR Management ? FI WARE Ecosystem Strategy and Business Model ? Individual Exploitation Plans o ACTION 2: Please review it Product Vision by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs (Use Case Scenarios and Business Canvas) and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May o ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, into the document or into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual- Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 17 de abril de 2013 19:08 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Following with the submission of Exploitation Deliverables on M24, I enclosed you the following roadmap and the inputs needed to include in each deliverable according to the last comments and recommendations from the last review on M18. Please feel free to suggest some indications or solutions to address the issues identified in each deliverable, based on the recommendations provided by the reviewers. For this work, we are going to leverage on the following draft documents: - 11.1.2- Market Analysis o Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) o The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? o The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) o The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers o European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) - First Draft of the Whitepaper about Product Vision for identify main use case scenarios and demonstrate the main advantages offered by FI WARE in each domain and identify the main and more potential instances or combinations of GE (PaaS+Big Data, IoT+Big Data.....)- Any advance on this whitepaper? ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? - Exploitation and business modeling position paper prepared together with CONCORD and that will be finished on April this month - Assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the emerging FI-PPP Phase 1- Feedback from UC questionnaire sent by FI WARE - Exploring Policy and Regulatory Challenges paper prepared together with CONCORD- Finished - Open Innovation Lab o Terms and Conditions- Status? o Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab- Any advance on this side? - Third party developers' feedback to the available GEs - Third party Enablement deliverable new version- Is there a new version available? - European Patent System- The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the matter Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 15th May - Monday 22nd April- I will send you an initial and significant completed draft of the following three deliverables trying to address the following recommendations provided by reviewers on M18: o D11.1.2 Market and Competition Analysis (M24) ? The consortium is urged to keep the parallel segment of Smart Business in dual focus with Smart Cities ? Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically ? The challenge for future versions is to apply the new insights to broaden and deepen the analysis of FI-WARE's own business ecosystem, and relate the present high level view of this ecosystem to the more specific analysis within the GE chapters ? Additionally, it would be useful to provide assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the FI-PPP Use Case projects ? From the conclusion of this document, it is clear that third party innovation enablement will be critical, and it is also intimately linked to building a critical mass for FI-WARE results. ? This theme should be further developed from a market and competitive perspective, in close synergy with and inputting directly to the forthcoming deliverables D2.5.2 and D2.5.3 regarding third party uptake o D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management (M24) ? Providing usage scenarios, potential usage patterns (including the 'typical' combined use of GEs), an overview of the status of available GEs including level of Use Case interest, a clear schedule of future GE Releases ? Give due and sufficient business consideration to the competitiveness of the GEs with respect to their market benchmarking, innovation potential and attractiveness) for both business and development communities. ? Focus on applying 'promising' technologies such as USDL and high impact areas such as IoT. ? Provide additional analysis and target promising business ecosystems for GE uptake, beyond Smart Cities. ? Provide clear evidence of business planning in the targeted areas through (combined) implementation of GEs. ? As a specific suggestion, the market potential of the individual GEs or groupings of GEs could be even more sharply indicated, and possibly even contrasted and prioritized ? OIL description ? A significant number of critical issues have to be addressed that will ultimately respond to the third party question "Why and how FI-WARE is going to help me to innovate?" o From a practical standpoint more detail is required relating to access, licensing and utilization rights. o Also not yet appropriately addressed is the topic of packaging in terms of what the application developer can access to build FI solutions, such as a starter-kit. ? The concrete offering and strategy towards attracting relevant communities remains unclear. ? Fostering developer communities fall within the scope of Open Call 3 (launched in December 2012). This however does not mean that present partners can derogate all responsibilities of involving potential users and stakeholders to the future Open Call 3 partners ? IPR Management: Regarding a possible integration strategy, the Month 15 Whitepaper about common usage scenarios (and potential usage patterns) for the GEs is long overdue. The issue was also raised by some of the new Phase 2 projects: ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? ? Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab, in collaboration and synergy with the upcoming FIPPP Phase 2 Capability Building project. o D11.3.2 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness Report (M24) ? Further development of the issues and themes in Section 4.2 from 11.3.1.b is expected, among others, for the next version. ? The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the European Patent System, would deserve greater attention in the next version ? It is also encouraging to see more consideration of the platform issues from a regulatory perspective, which should be deepened in the next version o 11.4.3 Standardization (M27) ? Please provide feedback to the NEC requirements as an oral update has to be provided in the next review meeting (M24) - Wednesday 30th April- o To Review or complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback about the three before mentioned deliverables 11.1.2, 11.2.2 and 11.3.2 o To Update of the individual exploitation plans into the wiki: ? Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy ? Also welcomed is the emphasis given on "open model", "open solution", "open services", "open innovation", "open ecosystem" etc. How to start an ecosystem or leverage existing ones remains to be answered though. Equally, what does 'openness' mean beyond marketing, and concretely how it is to be applied in corporate strategy such as on the FI-WARE instances, need to be clarified. ? One good example in this respect is the very specific description provided in the Orange presentation in Seville, which clearly explains how usage of several sets of FI-WARE results is linked to its corporate strategy in engaging with the evolution of the services market. ? In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project. - Friday 10th May- I will consolidate all the outputs and feedback received - Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th - Final review and validation will take place - Wednesday 15th May - We will send the final deliverables Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT437543.txt URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Wed Apr 24 20:11:42 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:11:42 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog improvement - proposal - v6 In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89046F5C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89046F5C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646101C67F@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Hi Manuel, Thanks for the presentation and update The two questions that we didn't manage to clarify on our own were: - How does this effort tie into the effort planned for providing jira-based trackers on GE-basis. Will with the jira-based trackers the chapter backlog vanish? When do we have the jira instance up and running? How will this process be implemented then? - As for the naming schema the proposal implies to incorporate a (mandatory) hierarchy: introducing epic-names in the nameing. This implies changes to many feature defined in the wiki (closed and open ones). For the apps chapter e.g. this would alone mean 152 page to be moved. The proposed naming schema is even longer than the currently used one (as the epic-named-description is part of implying this hierarchy). I would vote not do these proposed changes to the items already present in the wiki on a mandatory basis. The current set of features is reasonably "small" per GE that epics can be implied by a human being and the added value to given user is almost nothing (the mere improvement would be to improve traceability on the trackers, but this traceability is not even visible to the outside world). So if we need to decide if we take the time to move the 152 items (and more for the complete project) or introducing content which improves the readability of our website/wiki/GE-descriptions, work on the livedemonstrator or something else, I think the choice is easy. Any comments? Best regards, /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 16:23 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog improvement - proposal - v6 Dear Partners, Please, find the proposal v6 updated with a new slide number 10, which has been required by Thorsten, after having reviewed it on a bilateral meeting on-line. Following the non-duplicity of information principle, the description field which is common to both the tracker and the wiki will only be reported in the wiki. Thanks Thorsten for all your comments and having taken the time!!! If anything, please, don't hesitate to let know. Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: mi?rcoles, 24 de abril de 2013 14:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog improvement - proposal - v5 Dear Partners, Please, find attached the presentation about backlog improvements, it has been updated according to comments received and decisions taken during last Monday weekly meeting. Changes: * Updated 3,4 - conceptual model where themes are removed, and epics modified * Updated 5 - user stories and themes to be removed * Updated 6 - themes removed, specified fields to report and fields to be removed * Updated 12 - traceability according to conceptual model If possible and there are no additional aspects to be discussed, I would appreciate having it formally approved and closed during next weekly meeting. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Apr 25 10:06:36 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:06:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog improvement - proposal - v6 In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646101C67F@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B89046F5C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646101C67F@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B8904725B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Thorsten, Let me add a clarification for the second question: I need to make a distinction between the modification introduced by removing themes, which goes in the proposal, and means little work to be implemented, and the issue arisen for not having followed the original naming rules, which I think is the main aspect of your question, and would suppose greater work. Having done this difference, I propose to deal with them differently. I mean first to keep and vote the proposal for improvement of the backlog on Monday, and second to identify an action plan to quantify and fix the issue arisen. As first step, for fixing the issue, I would extract all backlog items names to a spreadsheet and would ask you to order them according to their actual hierarchy; I would analyse the output and would determine the magnitude of changes. Afterwards, the management board could assess whether additional action would be affordable. I have pending a task to fix some items on the tracker database directly, if needed I could consider including this additional change within this pending task, anyway, first there's need to quantify the issue. I hope I clarified it properly, it's acceptable and we can go for approving the proposal. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 24 de abril de 2013 20:12 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog improvement - proposal - v6 Hi Manuel, Thanks for the presentation and update The two questions that we didn't manage to clarify on our own were: - How does this effort tie into the effort planned for providing jira-based trackers on GE-basis. Will with the jira-based trackers the chapter backlog vanish? When do we have the jira instance up and running? How will this process be implemented then? - As for the naming schema the proposal implies to incorporate a (mandatory) hierarchy: introducing epic-names in the nameing. This implies changes to many feature defined in the wiki (closed and open ones). For the apps chapter e.g. this would alone mean 152 page to be moved. The proposed naming schema is even longer than the currently used one (as the epic-named-description is part of implying this hierarchy). I would vote not do these proposed changes to the items already present in the wiki on a mandatory basis. The current set of features is reasonably "small" per GE that epics can be implied by a human being and the added value to given user is almost nothing (the mere improvement would be to improve traceability on the trackers, but this traceability is not even visible to the outside world). So if we need to decide if we take the time to move the 152 items (and more for the complete project) or introducing content which improves the readability of our website/wiki/GE-descriptions, work on the livedemonstrator or something else, I think the choice is easy. Any comments? Best regards, /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 16:23 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog improvement - proposal - v6 Dear Partners, Please, find the proposal v6 updated with a new slide number 10, which has been required by Thorsten, after having reviewed it on a bilateral meeting on-line. Following the non-duplicity of information principle, the description field which is common to both the tracker and the wiki will only be reported in the wiki. Thanks Thorsten for all your comments and having taken the time!!! If anything, please, don't hesitate to let know. Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: mi?rcoles, 24 de abril de 2013 14:38 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog improvement - proposal - v5 Dear Partners, Please, find attached the presentation about backlog improvements, it has been updated according to comments received and decisions taken during last Monday weekly meeting. Changes: * Updated 3,4 - conceptual model where themes are removed, and epics modified * Updated 5 - user stories and themes to be removed * Updated 6 - themes removed, specified fields to report and fields to be removed * Updated 12 - traceability according to conceptual model If possible and there are no additional aspects to be discussed, I would appreciate having it formally approved and closed during next weekly meeting. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Apr 25 11:38:53 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:38:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] =?windows-1252?q?State_of_the_Art_Analysis_=96_Emerg?= =?windows-1252?q?ing_Technologies?= In-Reply-To: <517713C0.2040104@tid.es> References: <517713C0.2040104@tid.es> Message-ID: <5178F9AD.8070307@tid.es> Dear all, I assume that each WPL has discussed with his team the breakdown of their own part of the doc and they have started the editing. If not, please activate this quickly. We have collected all the DoWs from the new Use Cases except from FITMAN, who are not willing to provide it until the PPP CA is signed by them. The info in their "State of the art" sections may give ideas. There are located on the FI-WARE private project [cid:part1.06030601.08090108 at tid.es] Just in case, I remind you that if someone in your teams has no access to the private project, it is the WPL/WPA who has to grant access there. You all are admins here if I am right. Best regards, Miguel El 24/04/2013 1:05, Miguel Carrillo escribi?: Dear all, As you are aware, we agreed in the last WPL/WPA call to create a skeleton based on the State of the Art in the DoW. I am sending you this skeleton that you can start filling in now. This needs to be heavily edited by each WP. The one who drives the process is the WPL and the WPA. The main actor here should be the academia, as expressed in the DoW. I encourage the WPL/WPA to primarily rely on them for this work. Note that we do not want a section per GE, try to group in sections like the ones we have now, not GE per GE. This will be edited directly on the Word document as the result will not go to the wiki. Each WP will deliver their section by the 7th of May. I remind you the schedule (the one on the minutes of meeting) * April, 23 - Skeleton ready * May, 7 - Contributions from chapters to be sent by email (consolidated in a single doc per WP) * May, 10 - Peer Review ready (academia partners) * May, 17 - Feedback incorporated * May, 20 - Delivery I will consolidate all the inputs and will put a brief text in the introductory sections. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: iahcfhhg.png Type: image/png Size: 13197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Thu Apr 25 12:35:11 2013 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:35:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 In-Reply-To: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> References: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B06A2D4@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, We would like to add to Juanjo's remarks the following in order to clarify some misunderstanding that may have arisen: SAP's suggestion to delete the entire Section about Access Rights to Foreground and Background to FI PPP Partners does not contradict the 'spirit' of the FI PPP because the Access to Background is regulated in the Collaboration Agreement in the perfect differentiation for the specific needs of the technological FI PPP Platform Fi-Ware and the FI PPP Use Cases. The regulations in the Collaboration Agreement has finer regulations in order to fit the needs of the Use Cases and the special needs of Fi-Ware as Technology Platform. The regulations are as such: For Complementary Background, which is Background from another FI PPP Project, the Access is subject to another Agreement and upon discretion of the Background IP owner. Exception to this general rule is Background included in the so-called Fi-Ware Generic Enabler. This Background is accessible for FI PPP Partners upon royalty-free terms. Please see the exact wording of the Collaboration Agreement here: 4.2.3.4 Access Rights to Generic Enablers and Generic Enabler Specifications Notwithstanding the Sections 4.2.3.1 to 4.2.3.3 above, - Access Rights to Complementary Foreground and Complementary Background included in Generic Enabler Specifications for the execution of any Complementary Grant Agreement and for Use and - Access Rights to Complementary Background included in Generic Enablers which is Needed for the execution of the Complementary Grant Agreement are hereby requested in writing and are deemed granted on a royalty free basis to all Parties and by all Parties. We believe that this Section fits perfectly to the spirit of the FI PPP. Therefore, SAP believes, that we do not need any specific language in the DOW regarding the Access Rights. In parallel to the doodle polling according to the change procedures outlined in the mail below, we would like to share what is SAP's opinion on this matter. With best wishes, Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe / Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 22. April 2013 20:59 To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:image002.png at 01CE41B0.967B36F0] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:image003.png at 01CE41B0.967B36F0] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 25 14:26:06 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:26:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B06A2D4@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B06A2D4@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <517920DE.70704@tid.es> Dear all, Thanks for SAP about their remarks, but I'm afraid that SAP is missing an important point. SAP's summary about how the Collaboration Agreement treats background is correct. Precisely, Telefonica's proposal is trying to amend both clause 41 and the text in Annex I (DoW) of the Grant Agreement to precisely align the Grant Agreement with the Collaboration Agreement. On the other hand, the EC, as they have stated multiple times, is not a party in any Agreement, neither the Collaboration nor the Consortium Agreement. Therefore, they want to keep in the Grant Agreement clear statements about how IP Access Rights will be treated. That way, among other things, would keep them safe in the case that FI-PPP partners change their agreements on matters the EC don't agree to. That's why the paragraph that SAP now intends to suppress is there in our DoW. That's also the reason why we feel pretty sure that the EC will never agree to drop that paragraph. If we drop the paragraph in question from the DoW, as SAP suggests, then the EC would be accepting, contractually, that FI-WARE partners would have the right to charge for background associated to FI-WARE GEs. It cannot be argued that the Collaboration Agreement fixes that issue because the EC has always stated that the Collaboration Agreement doesn't bind the EC nor bind us with the EC. They wouldn't rely the treatment of Last but not least, the whole point is that the issue is being treated. We have asked SAP whether SAP would retire their veto on amendment 4 and limit issuance of any veto on how this IPR issue is solved. We are waiting for their response. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/04/13 12:35, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear all, We would like to add to Juanjo's remarks the following in order to clarify some misunderstanding that may have arisen: SAP's suggestion to delete the entire Section about Access Rights to Foreground and Background to FI PPP Partners does not contradict the 'spirit' of the FI PPP because the Access to Background is regulated in the Collaboration Agreement in the perfect differentiation for the specific needs of the technological FI PPP Platform Fi-Ware and the FI PPP Use Cases. The regulations in the Collaboration Agreement has finer regulations in order to fit the needs of the Use Cases and the special needs of Fi-Ware as Technology Platform. The regulations are as such: For Complementary Background, which is Background from another FI PPP Project, the Access is subject to another Agreement and upon discretion of the Background IP owner. Exception to this general rule is Background included in the so-called Fi-Ware Generic Enabler. This Background is accessible for FI PPP Partners upon royalty-free terms. Please see the exact wording of the Collaboration Agreement here: 4.2.3.4 Access Rights to Generic Enablers and Generic Enabler Specifications Notwithstanding the Sections 4.2.3.1 to 4.2.3.3 above, - Access Rights to Complementary Foreground and Complementary Background included in Generic Enabler Specifications for the execution of any Complementary Grant Agreement and for Use and - Access Rights to Complementary Background included in Generic Enablers which is Needed for the execution of the Complementary Grant Agreement are hereby requested in writing and are deemed granted on a royalty free basis to all Parties and by all Parties. We believe that this Section fits perfectly to the spirit of the FI PPP. Therefore, SAP believes, that we do not need any specific language in the DOW regarding the Access Rights. In parallel to the doodle polling according to the change procedures outlined in the mail below, we would like to share what is SAP's opinion on this matter. With best wishes, Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe / Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 22. April 2013 20:59 To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:part3.03020403.00000100 at tid.es] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:part4.05040302.05050409 at tid.es] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Thu Apr 25 18:12:58 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:12:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0200A56B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Dear all and thanks both Markus and Juanjo for the remarks, The position of Atos is simple: it was stated from the very beginning of the programme that access to background and foreground (that is needed for the purpose of executing the programme, which involves -of course-the FI-WARE GE and baseline works) would be given on a royalty-free basis. By the way, FI-WARE as project has publicity declared it in front of all audiences. In order to be coherent and explicit about it, it is good that this is clearly reflected in all the agreements, including the DoW, which in the end is the contract signed between FI-WARE partners and the EC (where we make clear our commitments). This is also a marketing tool. Be aware that as soon as other stakeholders feel (and see) they cannot get access to necessary background for free in the context of the FI PPP they will not be interested in our solutions anymore. Opening a door for charging them (or making them believe they they could be charged for the use of some background SW) may not be illegal (I am not sure), but would go not only against the spirit of the FI PPP, but also against business opportunities for FI-WARE. In the end, all partners are free to define the terms and conditions for their GE in a potential commercial context after the FI PPP, and this should be enough to be clear on the charging aspects in the future. As said, the present (execution of the FI PPP) is non-negotiable for our own benefit and interest. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: fiware-ga-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ga-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: jueves, 25 de abril de 2013 14:26 To: Heller, Markus Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-ga] [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear all, Thanks for SAP about their remarks, but I'm afraid that SAP is missing an important point. SAP's summary about how the Collaboration Agreement treats background is correct. Precisely, Telefonica's proposal is trying to amend both clause 41 and the text in Annex I (DoW) of the Grant Agreement to precisely align the Grant Agreement with the Collaboration Agreement. On the other hand, the EC, as they have stated multiple times, is not a party in any Agreement, neither the Collaboration nor the Consortium Agreement. Therefore, they want to keep in the Grant Agreement clear statements about how IP Access Rights will be treated. That way, among other things, would keep them safe in the case that FI-PPP partners change their agreements on matters the EC don't agree to. That's why the paragraph that SAP now intends to suppress is there in our DoW. That's also the reason why we feel pretty sure that the EC will never agree to drop that paragraph. If we drop the paragraph in question from the DoW, as SAP suggests, then the EC would be accepting, contractually, that FI-WARE partners would have the right to charge for background associated to FI-WARE GEs. It cannot be argued that the Collaboration Agreement fixes that issue because the EC has always stated that the Collaboration Agreement doesn't bind the EC nor bind us with the EC. They wouldn't rely the treatment of Last but not least, the whole point is that the issue is being treated. We have asked SAP whether SAP would retire their veto on amendment 4 and limit issuance of any veto on how this IPR issue is solved. We are waiting for their response. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/04/13 12:35, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear all, We would like to add to Juanjo's remarks the following in order to clarify some misunderstanding that may have arisen: SAP's suggestion to delete the entire Section about Access Rights to Foreground and Background to FI PPP Partners does not contradict the 'spirit' of the FI PPP because the Access to Background is regulated in the Collaboration Agreement in the perfect differentiation for the specific needs of the technological FI PPP Platform Fi-Ware and the FI PPP Use Cases. The regulations in the Collaboration Agreement has finer regulations in order to fit the needs of the Use Cases and the special needs of Fi-Ware as Technology Platform. The regulations are as such: For Complementary Background, which is Background from another FI PPP Project, the Access is subject to another Agreement and upon discretion of the Background IP owner. Exception to this general rule is Background included in the so-called Fi-Ware Generic Enabler. This Background is accessible for FI PPP Partners upon royalty-free terms. Please see the exact wording of the Collaboration Agreement here: 4.2.3.4 Access Rights to Generic Enablers and Generic Enabler Specifications Notwithstanding the Sections 4.2.3.1 to 4.2.3.3 above, - Access Rights to Complementary Foreground and Complementary Background included in Generic Enabler Specifications for the execution of any Complementary Grant Agreement and for Use and - Access Rights to Complementary Background included in Generic Enablers which is Needed for the execution of the Complementary Grant Agreement are hereby requested in writing and are deemed granted on a royalty free basis to all Parties and by all Parties. We believe that this Section fits perfectly to the spirit of the FI PPP. Therefore, SAP believes, that we do not need any specific language in the DOW regarding the Access Rights. In parallel to the doodle polling according to the change procedures outlined in the mail below, we would like to share what is SAP's opinion on this matter. With best wishes, Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe / Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 22. April 2013 20:59 To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 25 19:44:20 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:44:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Incorporation of beneficiaries of the FI-WARE 3rd Open Call In-Reply-To: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> References: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> Message-ID: <51796B74.9070307@tid.es> Dear members of the FI-WARE PCC, Given the fact that no FI-WARE partner objected, we have just communicated to the EC that the beneficiaries of the 3rd FI-WARE Open Call have been selected and negotiation with them has started. You can download the proposal that won the 3rd Open Call from here: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2130/130227+FIWARE.3rdcall.EDE.V.DEF.pdf Attached, for your convenience, you have the Evaluation Summary Report (Consensus Evaluation Form). We have to say that we feel that the proposal is rather strong and brings a rather ambitious plan. One of its very first big milestones would be the official launch of the FI-WARE OIL in the Campus Party London that will take place in London, from September 3 until 8. This is a huge event, with large media coverage. FI-WARE will become highly visible in that event, with a series of specific FI-WARE actions within the event such as workshops, hackatons, slots for keynote speeches and announcements on main stage, etc. You can take a look and learn some about the Campus Party at http://www.campus-party.org/home-en.html. I found a rather complete and interesting video from the BBC there that gives a good vision of how the event looks like. Searching for images about the Campus Party in Google may also help you to get a feeling. Announcement of the FI-WARE OIL in the Campus Party London will subsequently be followed by aprox. 50 startup weekend events across the whole Europe where FI-WARE will be advertized. All this accompanied by an ambitious marketing campaign driven by the world-wide recognized Ogilvy company. The EC is very excited and happy about these results of the 3rd FI-WARE Open Call. Most probably, Mrs Neelie Kroes, who attended the last Campus Party in Berlin and liked it a lot, will attend the Campus Party London. We will work to achieve that she does not only attend the event but becomes who makes the public announcement of the FI-WARE OIL. The several developer contests (up to 700KEUR in awards) will also be announced there. One of the proposals that we would like to make to the whole FI-WARE consortia is that we organize a General Assembly meeting of FI-WARE that same week in the Campus Party. We may find rooms to run internal meetings while at the same time take the opportunity that we are there to run live training sessions on specific GEis targeted to developers on a dedicated stage we would have, attend/assists hackatons, attend the plenary events, chat with developers, etc. My proposal would be also that we order a set of t-shirts prior to the event, so that FI-WARE team members attending can wear them and thus maximize visibility of FI-WARE. Prior to making this proposal to the whole consortia, of course, I would like to hear your opinions. I hope you agree this is a great opportunity. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:09:43 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear partners, First of all, let me point out that contents of this email should be handled confidentially. As many of you know, FI-WARE launched the 3rd Open Call targeted to design and implement an ambitious plan for the promotion and dissemination of FI-WARE (see http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) I'm glad to say that the evaluation of proposals has finalized with the selection of a proposal submitted by a rather strong consortia formed by Futura Networks and Asociaci?n E3 Futura (organizers of the huge Campus Party event), Startup Weekend (who have developed a huge network of startups events around the world), OgilvyOne (one of the major Publicity and Marketing companies in the World and Europe), NLnet (who helped introduce internet in Europe and holds a high quality network of involved innovators and active developers) and the Chambers of Spain offering their to SME networks in Latin America and the EU. Please find attached the corresponding Evaluation Summary Report. Following open call procedures, the evaluation has been carried out by independent evaluators. Also following Open Call procedures, we have now to ask you if you have any objection to the incorporation of any of the mentioned companies/organizations as new beneficiaries in FI-WARE. Note that we are not asking your opinion about the result of the evaluation itself. That has been carried out by the independent evaluators. We are just asking you whether you have any objection regarding any of the selected beneficiaries. Deadline for raising objections is this Friday EOB. If you are interested in getting a private copy of the proposal, please let me know. We will distribute it to the whole consortia as soon as we officially communicate the final result and call the selected beneficiaries for negotiations (next Monday). In the meantime, we want to have distribution of the proposal under control. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Consensus Evaluation Form - EDE_final.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 14018 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Fri Apr 26 08:00:35 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:00:35 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] =?windows-1252?q?=5BFiware-wpa=5D_State_of_the_Art_A?= =?windows-1252?q?nalysis_=96_Emerging_Technologies?= In-Reply-To: <5178F9AD.8070307@tid.es> References: <517713C0.2040104@tid.es> <5178F9AD.8070307@tid.es> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646102032B@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Hi Miguel and colleauges, Thanks for the initial version of the TOC of this upcoming deliverable. As for WP3 we have to report that the major part of our academic partners are currently swamped with high priority work on the live demonstrator to be ready by the next review. We are WP3 internally trying to find another solution, but for the proposed time line we can already anticipate that this is going to be a problem, unless we shift resources and priorities away from the live demonstrator (what we wouldn?t propose). Can the situation be further assesst and the timeline be potentially shifted? Thanks for letting us know. /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Donnerstag, 25. April 2013 11:39 To: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] State of the Art Analysis ? Emerging Technologies Dear all, I assume that each WPL has discussed with his team the breakdown of their own part of the doc and they have started the editing. If not, please activate this quickly. We have collected all the DoWs from the new Use Cases except from FITMAN, who are not willing to provide it until the PPP CA is signed by them. The info in their "State of the art" sections may give ideas. There are located on the FI-WARE private project Just in case, I remind you that if someone in your teams has no access to the private project, it is the WPL/WPA who has to grant access there. You all are admins here if I am right. Best regards, Miguel El 24/04/2013 1:05, Miguel Carrillo escribi?: Dear all, As you are aware, we agreed in the last WPL/WPA call to create a skeleton based on the State of the Art in the DoW. I am sending you this skeleton that you can start filling in now. This needs to be heavily edited by each WP. The one who drives the process is the WPL and the WPA. The main actor here should be the academia, as expressed in the DoW. I encourage the WPL/WPA to primarily rely on them for this work. Note that we do not want a section per GE, try to group in sections like the ones we have now, not GE per GE. This will be edited directly on the Word document as the result will not go to the wiki. Each WP will deliver their section by the 7th of May. I remind you the schedule (the one on the minutes of meeting) ? April, 23 - Skeleton ready ? May, 7 - Contributions from chapters to be sent by email (consolidated in a single doc per WP) ? May, 10 - Peer Review ready (academia partners) ? May, 17 - Feedback incorporated * May, 20 - Delivery I will consolidate all the inputs and will put a brief text in the introductory sections. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _____ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13197 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From torsten.leidig at sap.com Fri Apr 26 15:12:23 2013 From: torsten.leidig at sap.com (Leidig, Torsten) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:12:23 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] OpenSpec Doc of Apps chapter available for review Message-ID: <703F4EB81B2AD0428360BFE55A82DFBC4CFBD402@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> We generated the OpenSpec document for review and uploaded it to the forge and cockpit respectively. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdHYxYTVOZ3FrNEprZXRBZk80TGRLMGc#gid=0 It can now be reviewed by the Data chapter Best, Torsten Dr. Torsten Leidig SAP Research Center CEC Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Prie?nitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe T +49 6227 7 52535 F +49 6227 78 29753 E torsten.leidig at sap.com http://www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Apr 26 16:11:45 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:11:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] =?windows-1252?q?=5BFiware-wpa=5D_State_of_the_Art_A?= =?windows-1252?q?nalysis_=96_Emerging_Technologies?= In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646102032B@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> References: <517713C0.2040104@tid.es> <5178F9AD.8070307@tid.es> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646102032B@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <517A8B21.40401@tid.es> hi, Ok. Please raise it in the call on monday regards, Miguel El 26/04/2013 8:00, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: Hi Miguel and colleauges, Thanks for the initial version of the TOC of this upcoming deliverable. As for WP3 we have to report that the major part of our academic partners are currently swamped with high priority work on the live demonstrator to be ready by the next review. We are WP3 internally trying to find another solution, but for the proposed time line we can already anticipate that this is going to be a problem, unless we shift resources and priorities away from the live demonstrator (what we wouldn?t propose). Can the situation be further assesst and the timeline be potentially shifted? Thanks for letting us know. /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Donnerstag, 25. April 2013 11:39 To: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] State of the Art Analysis ? Emerging Technologies Dear all, I assume that each WPL has discussed with his team the breakdown of their own part of the doc and they have started the editing. If not, please activate this quickly. We have collected all the DoWs from the new Use Cases except from FITMAN, who are not willing to provide it until the PPP CA is signed by them. The info in their "State of the art" sections may give ideas. There are located on the FI-WARE private project [cid:part1.04060202.02060305 at tid.es] Just in case, I remind you that if someone in your teams has no access to the private project, it is the WPL/WPA who has to grant access there. You all are admins here if I am right. Best regards, Miguel El 24/04/2013 1:05, Miguel Carrillo escribi?: Dear all, As you are aware, we agreed in the last WPL/WPA call to create a skeleton based on the State of the Art in the DoW. I am sending you this skeleton that you can start filling in now. This needs to be heavily edited by each WP. The one who drives the process is the WPL and the WPA. The main actor here should be the academia, as expressed in the DoW. I encourage the WPL/WPA to primarily rely on them for this work. Note that we do not want a section per GE, try to group in sections like the ones we have now, not GE per GE. This will be edited directly on the Word document as the result will not go to the wiki. Each WP will deliver their section by the 7th of May. I remind you the schedule (the one on the minutes of meeting) ? April, 23 - Skeleton ready ? May, 7 - Contributions from chapters to be sent by email (consolidated in a single doc per WP) ? May, 10 - Peer Review ready (academia partners) ? May, 17 - Feedback incorporated * May, 20 - Delivery I will consolidate all the inputs and will put a brief text in the introductory sections. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 13197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 29 09:31:56 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:31:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Sprint transition: from S2.3.1-M24 to S2.3.2-M25 Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B8904821C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Let me remind you that we are finishing sprint S2.3.1-M24 and about to start S2.3.2-M25, which places us in the last two months before closing the Second Major Release. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering,_with_mapping_to_calendar_dates Please, update your backlog items accordingly: 1. Close the backlog items finished during M24 (if not already done) 2. Update items under execution not finished to belong to S2.3.2 3. Proceed to identify the backlog items to be delivered during S2.3.2. This task should be finished the first week of S2.3.2-M25 Let me inform you that I'm about to get a snapshot of the backlog to produce the corresponding deliverable today. I assume you didn't miss my previous messages about sprint transitions, so there shouldn't be major concern about the tracker containing the actual state of the backlog!! To WPLeaders, please, distribute the message to your teams!! Thanks for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 09:39:50 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:39:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 In-Reply-To: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> References: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> Message-ID: <517E23C6.6060809@tid.es> Dear FI-WARE partners, You can find below the capture of the doodle vote regarding the raised issue on management of IPRs linked to background FI-WARE GEs rely on. Please double-check that your vote was properly captured. There was an additional vote by one partner who wanted to remain anonymus on doodle (therefore, it was referred as Partner 1). We have finally dropped the doodle poll as planned. Thanks to all of you who have voted. Fortunately, SAP has communicated to us that they withdraw their veto on amendment 4, as far as the issue is addressed in the next amendment (amendment 5). I believe that all of us share the need for solving the issue, so let's go for that and work together in the best proposal. I would like to give thanks to SAP for withdrawing their veto. Cheers, -- Juanjo Hierro [cid:part1.05030105.00030308 at tid.es] ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 22/04/13 20:59, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:part3.00020808.09050901 at tid.es] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:part4.01060106.00000402 at tid.es] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jigiedfg.png Type: image/png Size: 70535 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 11:03:46 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:03:46 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Link to shared minutes Message-ID: <517E3772.3010105@tid.es> Hi, Due to miscommunication problems, we hadn't sent the link before. Apologies for that. Here it goes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nOIg4OjN3Zk-nb0ThOLwhBCU6AF3q0EgjMAJruB1etI/edit# Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 29 11:07:37 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:07:37 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Link to the minutes Message-ID: <517E3859.9070902@tid.es> Hi all, This is the link for today * https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nOIg4OjN3Zk-nb0ThOLwhBCU6AF3q0EgjMAJruB1etI/edit# See you in a sec Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Apr 29 11:44:06 2013 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:44:06 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog (update) - Snapshot - deadline: tomorrow 30/04 at 4:00 CET PM Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B8904835B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Please, be aware of the time the backlog snapshot will be get tomorrow: at 4:00 CET PM This time has been agreed on today's board meeting. Please, do your update before that time. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Mon Apr 29 15:59:26 2013 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:59:26 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: Initial version of 10.5.2 validation report Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD6646106365A@DEWDFEMB11A.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, find attached the doc version of the D.10.5.2 deliverable which is due in M24. You can enter comments and text in the doc-version and I will integrate it later to the wiki and the final deliverable. I would say, the document currently provides the mere basis of this report - e.g. in chapter 6 there is a really really small initial analysis more touching on how the general process of analysis and provisioning of answers did work and not providing a deep analysis of the answers given by the use case projects. The reviewers might expect that this deliverable really assesses the complete validation process and summarizes the validation answers for each of the use cases and/or for each of the GEs. introduced. As discussed in the WPL/WPA meeting, we will target to submit it - with your corrections - in time, and not doing a deep analysis. It might be needed that we have the rationale behind this in-time-submission in the executive summary - so that reviewers can touch on this. Rational I heard were (not phrasing it like this, just a summary for further : - Timing problems (rather go for development, than more papers) - Feedback from the UC projects was not very verbose, therefore there is not much to comment on - Feedback and all of the answers provided until "today" could be part of the review (in plain) - delaying the deliverable might lead to non of the answers being there "in time". I'm as well attaching the excel table, which allows a more deeper analysis of the answers (With the help of "pivot"-tables there are quite nice things to do in order to analyse the resuts). You can play around with these tables on your own. Our discussion was as well to have another relevant/potential chapter that - Every WPL gives a statement on "his" evaluation touching on o What got validated o Summarizes the validation answers for each of the use cases and/or for each of the GEs o Major actions the WP take o General assumption about the validation in relation to each of the use cases - Another chapter: e.g. could explain to a given reader of the document how to use these pivot tables in order to enable somebody to do this kind of "analysis" on his own. Thanks for your support in any case & best regards, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D1052_WP10_generated.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 1795982 bytes Desc: D1052_WP10_generated.docx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: reporting_star_replaced.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 93706 bytes Desc: reporting_star_replaced.xlsx URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 29 16:30:39 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:30:39 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18- directly into the ANNEX I from D11.2.2 Document Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Regarding ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, please do that directly into the document within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" WP11.2.2 Exploitation Plan ANNEX I https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 - Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May. Not use the wiki links as the last version do not content the initial questions answered into the M12 Review "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" For the new comers eprosima and red.es please follow the same structure and answer the following questions: * Organization Profile * FI-WARE relevance in your current business model * Identification of main project outcomes * How are you going to exploit the project results in distinct environments? * Which customers do we want to serve? * Which channels will be used to reach the various customer segments? * Which benefits are the participants going to take to the market thanks to FIWARE? * How are the benefits going to be sold? * How will the sales process work? * Globalisation of the exploitation plan * How will make money from FIWARE Platform? Thanks Juan From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 24 de abril de 2013 19:40 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu); fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: FW: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed in the following link https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 and within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" the following first draft deliverables, pending to complete and fine-tuning: - D11.1.2-Market and Competition Analysis _M24v2404 o The document describe the following: ? Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) ? The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? ? The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) ? The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers ? European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) o ACTION1: Please review Business Opportunities by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May - D11.2.2 Exploitation_Plan,_including_IPR_Managementv_M24v2404 o The document describe the following ? FI-WARE Product Vision by domain: Identify the main Generic Enablers+ FI-WARE Instances with most market potential ? FI WARE Market Positioning: GE Development Prioritization Matrix ? FI WARE IPR Management ? FI WARE Ecosystem Strategy and Business Model ? Individual Exploitation Plans o ACTION 2: Please review it Product Vision by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs (Use Case Scenarios and Business Canvas) and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May o ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, into the document or into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual- Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 17 de abril de 2013 19:08 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Following with the submission of Exploitation Deliverables on M24, I enclosed you the following roadmap and the inputs needed to include in each deliverable according to the last comments and recommendations from the last review on M18. Please feel free to suggest some indications or solutions to address the issues identified in each deliverable, based on the recommendations provided by the reviewers. For this work, we are going to leverage on the following draft documents: - 11.1.2- Market Analysis o Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) o The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? o The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) o The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers o European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) - First Draft of the Whitepaper about Product Vision for identify main use case scenarios and demonstrate the main advantages offered by FI WARE in each domain and identify the main and more potential instances or combinations of GE (PaaS+Big Data, IoT+Big Data.....)- Any advance on this whitepaper? ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? - Exploitation and business modeling position paper prepared together with CONCORD and that will be finished on April this month - Assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the emerging FI-PPP Phase 1- Feedback from UC questionnaire sent by FI WARE - Exploring Policy and Regulatory Challenges paper prepared together with CONCORD- Finished - Open Innovation Lab o Terms and Conditions- Status? o Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab- Any advance on this side? - Third party developers' feedback to the available GEs - Third party Enablement deliverable new version- Is there a new version available? - European Patent System- The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the matter Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 15th May - Monday 22nd April- I will send you an initial and significant completed draft of the following three deliverables trying to address the following recommendations provided by reviewers on M18: o D11.1.2 Market and Competition Analysis (M24) ? The consortium is urged to keep the parallel segment of Smart Business in dual focus with Smart Cities ? Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically ? The challenge for future versions is to apply the new insights to broaden and deepen the analysis of FI-WARE's own business ecosystem, and relate the present high level view of this ecosystem to the more specific analysis within the GE chapters ? Additionally, it would be useful to provide assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the FI-PPP Use Case projects ? From the conclusion of this document, it is clear that third party innovation enablement will be critical, and it is also intimately linked to building a critical mass for FI-WARE results. ? This theme should be further developed from a market and competitive perspective, in close synergy with and inputting directly to the forthcoming deliverables D2.5.2 and D2.5.3 regarding third party uptake o D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management (M24) ? Providing usage scenarios, potential usage patterns (including the 'typical' combined use of GEs), an overview of the status of available GEs including level of Use Case interest, a clear schedule of future GE Releases ? Give due and sufficient business consideration to the competitiveness of the GEs with respect to their market benchmarking, innovation potential and attractiveness) for both business and development communities. ? Focus on applying 'promising' technologies such as USDL and high impact areas such as IoT. ? Provide additional analysis and target promising business ecosystems for GE uptake, beyond Smart Cities. ? Provide clear evidence of business planning in the targeted areas through (combined) implementation of GEs. ? As a specific suggestion, the market potential of the individual GEs or groupings of GEs could be even more sharply indicated, and possibly even contrasted and prioritized ? OIL description ? A significant number of critical issues have to be addressed that will ultimately respond to the third party question "Why and how FI-WARE is going to help me to innovate?" o From a practical standpoint more detail is required relating to access, licensing and utilization rights. o Also not yet appropriately addressed is the topic of packaging in terms of what the application developer can access to build FI solutions, such as a starter-kit. ? The concrete offering and strategy towards attracting relevant communities remains unclear. ? Fostering developer communities fall within the scope of Open Call 3 (launched in December 2012). This however does not mean that present partners can derogate all responsibilities of involving potential users and stakeholders to the future Open Call 3 partners ? IPR Management: Regarding a possible integration strategy, the Month 15 Whitepaper about common usage scenarios (and potential usage patterns) for the GEs is long overdue. The issue was also raised by some of the new Phase 2 projects: ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? ? Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab, in collaboration and synergy with the upcoming FIPPP Phase 2 Capability Building project. o D11.3.2 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness Report (M24) ? Further development of the issues and themes in Section 4.2 from 11.3.1.b is expected, among others, for the next version. ? The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the European Patent System, would deserve greater attention in the next version ? It is also encouraging to see more consideration of the platform issues from a regulatory perspective, which should be deepened in the next version o 11.4.3 Standardization (M27) ? Please provide feedback to the NEC requirements as an oral update has to be provided in the next review meeting (M24) - Wednesday 30th April- o To Review or complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback about the three before mentioned deliverables 11.1.2, 11.2.2 and 11.3.2 o To Update of the individual exploitation plans into the wiki: ? Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy ? Also welcomed is the emphasis given on "open model", "open solution", "open services", "open innovation", "open ecosystem" etc. How to start an ecosystem or leverage existing ones remains to be answered though. Equally, what does 'openness' mean beyond marketing, and concretely how it is to be applied in corporate strategy such as on the FI-WARE instances, need to be clarified. ? One good example in this respect is the very specific description provided in the Orange presentation in Seville, which clearly explains how usage of several sets of FI-WARE results is linked to its corporate strategy in engaging with the evolution of the services market. ? In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project. - Friday 10th May- I will consolidate all the outputs and feedback received - Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th - Final review and validation will take place - Wednesday 15th May - We will send the final deliverables Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT437543.txt URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 29 16:32:18 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:32:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18- directly into the ANNEX I from D11.2.2 Document Message-ID: Important for this purpose use the "Track Changes" function... Tx Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: lunes, 29 de abril de 2013 16:31 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu); 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'jaimemartin at eprosima.com'; 'antonio.fuentes at rediris.es'; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Subject: ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18- directly into the ANNEX I from D11.2.2 Document Dear Colleagues Regarding ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, please do that directly into the document within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" WP11.2.2 Exploitation Plan ANNEX I https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 - Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May. Not use the wiki links as the last version do not content the initial questions answered into the M12 Review "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" For the new comers eprosima and red.es please follow the same structure and answer the following questions: * Organization Profile * FI-WARE relevance in your current business model * Identification of main project outcomes * How are you going to exploit the project results in distinct environments? * Which customers do we want to serve? * Which channels will be used to reach the various customer segments? * Which benefits are the participants going to take to the market thanks to FIWARE? * How are the benefits going to be sold? * How will the sales process work? * Globalisation of the exploitation plan * How will make money from FIWARE Platform? Thanks Juan From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 24 de abril de 2013 19:40 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu); fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: FW: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed in the following link https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 and within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" the following first draft deliverables, pending to complete and fine-tuning: - D11.1.2-Market and Competition Analysis _M24v2404 o The document describe the following: ? Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) ? The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? ? The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) ? The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers ? European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) o ACTION1: Please review Business Opportunities by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May - D11.2.2 Exploitation_Plan,_including_IPR_Managementv_M24v2404 o The document describe the following ? FI-WARE Product Vision by domain: Identify the main Generic Enablers+ FI-WARE Instances with most market potential ? FI WARE Market Positioning: GE Development Prioritization Matrix ? FI WARE IPR Management ? FI WARE Ecosystem Strategy and Business Model ? Individual Exploitation Plans o ACTION 2: Please review it Product Vision by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs (Use Case Scenarios and Business Canvas) and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May o ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, into the document or into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual- Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 17 de abril de 2013 19:08 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Following with the submission of Exploitation Deliverables on M24, I enclosed you the following roadmap and the inputs needed to include in each deliverable according to the last comments and recommendations from the last review on M18. Please feel free to suggest some indications or solutions to address the issues identified in each deliverable, based on the recommendations provided by the reviewers. For this work, we are going to leverage on the following draft documents: - 11.1.2- Market Analysis o Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) o The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? o The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) o The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers o European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) - First Draft of the Whitepaper about Product Vision for identify main use case scenarios and demonstrate the main advantages offered by FI WARE in each domain and identify the main and more potential instances or combinations of GE (PaaS+Big Data, IoT+Big Data.....)- Any advance on this whitepaper? ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? - Exploitation and business modeling position paper prepared together with CONCORD and that will be finished on April this month - Assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the emerging FI-PPP Phase 1- Feedback from UC questionnaire sent by FI WARE - Exploring Policy and Regulatory Challenges paper prepared together with CONCORD- Finished - Open Innovation Lab o Terms and Conditions- Status? o Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab- Any advance on this side? - Third party developers' feedback to the available GEs - Third party Enablement deliverable new version- Is there a new version available? - European Patent System- The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the matter Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 15th May - Monday 22nd April- I will send you an initial and significant completed draft of the following three deliverables trying to address the following recommendations provided by reviewers on M18: o D11.1.2 Market and Competition Analysis (M24) ? The consortium is urged to keep the parallel segment of Smart Business in dual focus with Smart Cities ? Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically ? The challenge for future versions is to apply the new insights to broaden and deepen the analysis of FI-WARE's own business ecosystem, and relate the present high level view of this ecosystem to the more specific analysis within the GE chapters ? Additionally, it would be useful to provide assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the FI-PPP Use Case projects ? From the conclusion of this document, it is clear that third party innovation enablement will be critical, and it is also intimately linked to building a critical mass for FI-WARE results. ? This theme should be further developed from a market and competitive perspective, in close synergy with and inputting directly to the forthcoming deliverables D2.5.2 and D2.5.3 regarding third party uptake o D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management (M24) ? Providing usage scenarios, potential usage patterns (including the 'typical' combined use of GEs), an overview of the status of available GEs including level of Use Case interest, a clear schedule of future GE Releases ? Give due and sufficient business consideration to the competitiveness of the GEs with respect to their market benchmarking, innovation potential and attractiveness) for both business and development communities. ? Focus on applying 'promising' technologies such as USDL and high impact areas such as IoT. ? Provide additional analysis and target promising business ecosystems for GE uptake, beyond Smart Cities. ? Provide clear evidence of business planning in the targeted areas through (combined) implementation of GEs. ? As a specific suggestion, the market potential of the individual GEs or groupings of GEs could be even more sharply indicated, and possibly even contrasted and prioritized ? OIL description ? A significant number of critical issues have to be addressed that will ultimately respond to the third party question "Why and how FI-WARE is going to help me to innovate?" o From a practical standpoint more detail is required relating to access, licensing and utilization rights. o Also not yet appropriately addressed is the topic of packaging in terms of what the application developer can access to build FI solutions, such as a starter-kit. ? The concrete offering and strategy towards attracting relevant communities remains unclear. ? Fostering developer communities fall within the scope of Open Call 3 (launched in December 2012). This however does not mean that present partners can derogate all responsibilities of involving potential users and stakeholders to the future Open Call 3 partners ? IPR Management: Regarding a possible integration strategy, the Month 15 Whitepaper about common usage scenarios (and potential usage patterns) for the GEs is long overdue. The issue was also raised by some of the new Phase 2 projects: ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? ? Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab, in collaboration and synergy with the upcoming FIPPP Phase 2 Capability Building project. o D11.3.2 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness Report (M24) ? Further development of the issues and themes in Section 4.2 from 11.3.1.b is expected, among others, for the next version. ? The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the European Patent System, would deserve greater attention in the next version ? It is also encouraging to see more consideration of the platform issues from a regulatory perspective, which should be deepened in the next version o 11.4.3 Standardization (M27) ? Please provide feedback to the NEC requirements as an oral update has to be provided in the next review meeting (M24) - Wednesday 30th April- o To Review or complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback about the three before mentioned deliverables 11.1.2, 11.2.2 and 11.3.2 o To Update of the individual exploitation plans into the wiki: ? Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy ? Also welcomed is the emphasis given on "open model", "open solution", "open services", "open innovation", "open ecosystem" etc. How to start an ecosystem or leverage existing ones remains to be answered though. Equally, what does 'openness' mean beyond marketing, and concretely how it is to be applied in corporate strategy such as on the FI-WARE instances, need to be clarified. ? One good example in this respect is the very specific description provided in the Orange presentation in Seville, which clearly explains how usage of several sets of FI-WARE results is linked to its corporate strategy in engaging with the evolution of the services market. ? In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project. - Friday 10th May- I will consolidate all the outputs and feedback received - Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th - Final review and validation will take place - Wednesday 15th May - We will send the final deliverables Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 29 17:04:06 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:04:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Link to shared minutes In-Reply-To: <517E3772.3010105@tid.es> References: <517E3772.3010105@tid.es> Message-ID: <517E8BE6.8060409@tid.es> Just an amendment. I said that the installation & admin manual of WP8 was pending a review. This is wrong, I sent it last wednesday. So all the reviews of D.x.3 have been sent last week and are awaiting your feedback. Still, I owe an answer to WP3. BR Miguel El 29/04/2013 11:03, Juanjo Hierro escribi?: Hi, Due to miscommunication problems, we hadn't sent the link before. Apologies for that. Here it goes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nOIg4OjN3Zk-nb0ThOLwhBCU6AF3q0EgjMAJruB1etI/edit# Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Apr 29 19:34:09 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:34:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.1.1.3 Project Management Handbook In-Reply-To: <517EAE98.5060904@tid.es> References: <517EAE98.5060904@tid.es> Message-ID: <517EAF11.7070508@tid.es> FYI -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Submission of FI-WARE Deliverable D.1.1.3 Project Management Handbook Fecha: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:32:08 +0200 De: Miguel Carrillo Para: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , Dominic Greenwood , msli at icfocus.co.uk, renaud.difrancesco at eu.sony.com, irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com, INFSO-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , "Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu" , MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Dear Arian, dear FI-WARE reviewers, This is the official submission of FI-WARE deliverable D.1.1.3 Project Management Handbook. The Project Management Handbook is a live document available on the FI-WARE wiki. The attached document is a snapshot of the contents available on the wiki using the new tools that FI-WARE developed to respond to the need for an improvement in the format of the documents. I enclose the pdf version for your convenience. You can also download it from: * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/2147/FI-WARE+D.1.1.c+Project+Management+Handbook.pdf As mentioned, this deliverable is a live document, constantly updated on the public Wiki of the FI-WARE project (http://wiki.fi-ware.eu). You can always get access to the latest online version at: * http://wiki.fi-ware.eu/Main_Page#FI-WARE_Project_Handbook Best regards, Miguel Carrillo -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE D.1.1.c Project Management Handbook.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 3863518 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 21:50:07 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:50:07 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Rehearsal FI-WARE 2nd year review Message-ID: <936DECD07EB54B4BAA44E7B823EC894184E3362F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> When: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:00 AM-8:30 PM. (UTC+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris Where: Brussels *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2082 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 21:52:17 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:52:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Rehearsal FI-WARE 2nd year review Message-ID: <936DECD07EB54B4BAA44E7B823EC894184E33657@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> When: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:30 AM-8:00 PM. (UTC+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris Where: Brussels *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2082 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 21:53:16 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:53:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE 2nd year review Message-ID: <936DECD07EB54B4BAA44E7B823EC894184E3367B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> When: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:30 AM-7:00 PM. (UTC+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris Where: Brussels - European Commission offices *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2134 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 21:53:59 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:53:59 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE 2nd year review Message-ID: <936DECD07EB54B4BAA44E7B823EC894184E3369E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> When: Thursday, June 13, 2013 8:30 AM-6:00 PM. (UTC+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris Where: Brussels - European Commission premises *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2135 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 21:54:07 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:54:07 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE 2nd year review Message-ID: <936DECD07EB54B4BAA44E7B823EC894184E336B7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> When: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:30 AM-7:00 PM. (UTC+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris Where: Brussels - European Commission premises *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2132 bytes Desc: not available URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Tue Apr 30 13:07:31 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:07:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18- directly into the ANNEX I from D11.2.2 Document Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Please update into the Forge, as a separated document, named XXXX Exploitation plan M24 with all the track changes and I will include it into the deliverable Thanks Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: lunes, 29 de abril de 2013 16:31 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu); 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'jaimemartin at eprosima.com'; 'antonio.fuentes at rediris.es'; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Subject: ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18- directly into the ANNEX I from D11.2.2 Document Dear Colleagues Regarding ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, please do that directly into the document within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" WP11.2.2 Exploitation Plan ANNEX I https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 - Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May. Not use the wiki links as the last version do not content the initial questions answered into the M12 Review "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" For the new comers eprosima and red.es please follow the same structure and answer the following questions: * Organization Profile * FI-WARE relevance in your current business model * Identification of main project outcomes * How are you going to exploit the project results in distinct environments? * Which customers do we want to serve? * Which channels will be used to reach the various customer segments? * Which benefits are the participants going to take to the market thanks to FIWARE? * How are the benefits going to be sold? * How will the sales process work? * Globalisation of the exploitation plan * How will make money from FIWARE Platform? Thanks Juan From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 24 de abril de 2013 19:40 To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu) Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu); fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: FW: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed in the following link https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 and within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" the following first draft deliverables, pending to complete and fine-tuning: - D11.1.2-Market and Competition Analysis _M24v2404 o The document describe the following: ? Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) ? The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? ? The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) ? The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers ? European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) o ACTION1: Please review Business Opportunities by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May - D11.2.2 Exploitation_Plan,_including_IPR_Managementv_M24v2404 o The document describe the following ? FI-WARE Product Vision by domain: Identify the main Generic Enablers+ FI-WARE Instances with most market potential ? FI WARE Market Positioning: GE Development Prioritization Matrix ? FI WARE IPR Management ? FI WARE Ecosystem Strategy and Business Model ? Individual Exploitation Plans o ACTION 2: Please review it Product Vision by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs (Use Case Scenarios and Business Canvas) and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May o ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, into the document or into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual- Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 17 de abril de 2013 19:08 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Following with the submission of Exploitation Deliverables on M24, I enclosed you the following roadmap and the inputs needed to include in each deliverable according to the last comments and recommendations from the last review on M18. Please feel free to suggest some indications or solutions to address the issues identified in each deliverable, based on the recommendations provided by the reviewers. For this work, we are going to leverage on the following draft documents: - 11.1.2- Market Analysis o Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) o The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? o The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) o The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers o European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) - First Draft of the Whitepaper about Product Vision for identify main use case scenarios and demonstrate the main advantages offered by FI WARE in each domain and identify the main and more potential instances or combinations of GE (PaaS+Big Data, IoT+Big Data.....)- Any advance on this whitepaper? ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? - Exploitation and business modeling position paper prepared together with CONCORD and that will be finished on April this month - Assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the emerging FI-PPP Phase 1- Feedback from UC questionnaire sent by FI WARE - Exploring Policy and Regulatory Challenges paper prepared together with CONCORD- Finished - Open Innovation Lab o Terms and Conditions- Status? o Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab- Any advance on this side? - Third party developers' feedback to the available GEs - Third party Enablement deliverable new version- Is there a new version available? - European Patent System- The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the matter Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 15th May - Monday 22nd April- I will send you an initial and significant completed draft of the following three deliverables trying to address the following recommendations provided by reviewers on M18: o D11.1.2 Market and Competition Analysis (M24) ? The consortium is urged to keep the parallel segment of Smart Business in dual focus with Smart Cities ? Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically ? The challenge for future versions is to apply the new insights to broaden and deepen the analysis of FI-WARE's own business ecosystem, and relate the present high level view of this ecosystem to the more specific analysis within the GE chapters ? Additionally, it would be useful to provide assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the FI-PPP Use Case projects ? From the conclusion of this document, it is clear that third party innovation enablement will be critical, and it is also intimately linked to building a critical mass for FI-WARE results. ? This theme should be further developed from a market and competitive perspective, in close synergy with and inputting directly to the forthcoming deliverables D2.5.2 and D2.5.3 regarding third party uptake o D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management (M24) ? Providing usage scenarios, potential usage patterns (including the 'typical' combined use of GEs), an overview of the status of available GEs including level of Use Case interest, a clear schedule of future GE Releases ? Give due and sufficient business consideration to the competitiveness of the GEs with respect to their market benchmarking, innovation potential and attractiveness) for both business and development communities. ? Focus on applying 'promising' technologies such as USDL and high impact areas such as IoT. ? Provide additional analysis and target promising business ecosystems for GE uptake, beyond Smart Cities. ? Provide clear evidence of business planning in the targeted areas through (combined) implementation of GEs. ? As a specific suggestion, the market potential of the individual GEs or groupings of GEs could be even more sharply indicated, and possibly even contrasted and prioritized ? OIL description ? A significant number of critical issues have to be addressed that will ultimately respond to the third party question "Why and how FI-WARE is going to help me to innovate?" o From a practical standpoint more detail is required relating to access, licensing and utilization rights. o Also not yet appropriately addressed is the topic of packaging in terms of what the application developer can access to build FI solutions, such as a starter-kit. ? The concrete offering and strategy towards attracting relevant communities remains unclear. ? Fostering developer communities fall within the scope of Open Call 3 (launched in December 2012). This however does not mean that present partners can derogate all responsibilities of involving potential users and stakeholders to the future Open Call 3 partners ? IPR Management: Regarding a possible integration strategy, the Month 15 Whitepaper about common usage scenarios (and potential usage patterns) for the GEs is long overdue. The issue was also raised by some of the new Phase 2 projects: ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? ? Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab, in collaboration and synergy with the upcoming FIPPP Phase 2 Capability Building project. o D11.3.2 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness Report (M24) ? Further development of the issues and themes in Section 4.2 from 11.3.1.b is expected, among others, for the next version. ? The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the European Patent System, would deserve greater attention in the next version ? It is also encouraging to see more consideration of the platform issues from a regulatory perspective, which should be deepened in the next version o 11.4.3 Standardization (M27) ? Please provide feedback to the NEC requirements as an oral update has to be provided in the next review meeting (M24) - Wednesday 30th April- o To Review or complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback about the three before mentioned deliverables 11.1.2, 11.2.2 and 11.3.2 o To Update of the individual exploitation plans into the wiki: ? Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy ? Also welcomed is the emphasis given on "open model", "open solution", "open services", "open innovation", "open ecosystem" etc. How to start an ecosystem or leverage existing ones remains to be answered though. Equally, what does 'openness' mean beyond marketing, and concretely how it is to be applied in corporate strategy such as on the FI-WARE instances, need to be clarified. ? One good example in this respect is the very specific description provided in the Orange presentation in Seville, which clearly explains how usage of several sets of FI-WARE results is linked to its corporate strategy in engaging with the evolution of the services market. ? In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project. - Friday 10th May- I will consolidate all the outputs and feedback received - Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th - Final review and validation will take place - Wednesday 15th May - We will send the final deliverables Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jdps at tid.es Tue Apr 30 14:54:17 2013 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:54:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Amendment 4. Final GPF Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72FA1AEE4@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, After a long time working on it, there are no pending comments/objections about changes of amendment 4. So, please find enclosed the final version of GPF. It is recorded on NEF already. Only the new partner NSNG1 has to sign it. Please find enclosed the last version of the spreadsheet with the final modifications too. Excel changes-effort-budget-funding: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2152/FI-WARE+effort-budget-funding+-+Amendment+4+v32+%28FINAL%29.xlsx New GPF: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2151/GPF+FI-WARE+%28285248%29+2013-04-30.pdf The final version of DoW will be sent to you as soon as Project Officer has approved it. We are answering his comments yet. Thank you very much to all of you, for your help, contribution and time. BR Javier. De: subsidies-bounces at tid.es [mailto:subsidies-bounces at tid.es] En nombre de JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: lunes, 08 de abril de 2013 1:16 Para: 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu'; fiware-legal at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: subsidies at tid.es Asunto: [Subsidies] FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed Importancia: Alta Dear all, Thank you very much for your contributions, especially to all the WPL. Please find enclosed the first version of the updated DoW of the amendment 4. Updated DoW:http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2066/FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4+-+v1+%28version+date-11-04-13%29.docx (Note: WP4 is still under revision.) Excel changes-effort-budget-funding: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2059/FI-WARE+effort-budget-funding+-+Amendment+4+v30.xlsx New GPF: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2068/GPF+FI-WARE+%28285248%29+2013-04-07+%28DRAFT+version+-+amendment+4%29.pdf Please, I kindly ask you to review them and send to us (subsidies at tid.es) and WPL relevant comments if needed, by April 11th, 2013 12:00h. I suggest avoiding spam for the rest. Please only errors or very relevant comments. The DoW has been modified accordingly with the attached spreadsheet of the changes (version 30) that has been modified with the received comments from you so far today. Thank you. NEF has been updated too, so, please find enclosed a new version of GPF (don't sign it until we have delivered the final version) The DoW, spreadsheet of changes, and GPF will be sent to Project Officer on April 11th, 2013. (As you know, we are working hard in order to approval the amendment 4 before reporting period, that begins May 1st, 2013. Thank you for your contribution and support. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: