Hi Thorsten, You're welcome!! Let me say I essentially disagree with the 'excluding' approach SAP proposes, and I'm in favour of the 'explaining' approach, which I think it's the right approach. Under the explaining approach we could add views by partners, then it would become evident that those belonging to Ericsson couldn't be fixed, or time views, to identify where the items with issues are placed, and explaining why they aren't fixed. Anyway, it's up to the management board to decide. Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: viernes, 29 de noviembre de 2013 15:20 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: WPL/WPA agenda - SAP's issue on the backlog Hi Manuel, thanks for driving this forward, although I like to emphasize that we do not have "issues on the backlog" - we brought forward "proposals which are tailored to improve the quality of the backlog and related backlog-quality insurance processes" and that this is not "SAP" alone, as there are already positive reactions from other work packages, concerning the proposals. And I'm sure that you will as well consider bringing forward the last proposal that we brought forward: Proposal: improving the backlog-calculation-mechanism in relation to the "&" sign-problem. It should not be counted as "issue" any more with negative effects for the chapters. (SAP proposed at least 4 distinct and possible solutions to circumvent this) Thanks and best regards, /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Freitag, 29. November 2013 14:52 To: MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> Subject: [Fiware-wpa] WPL/WPA agenda - SAP's issue on the backlog Hi Miguel, I'd appreciate you made a time slot on Monday's agenda for SAP to explain their issues on the backlog, and votes could be taken on their proposals. I'll prepare the corresponding doodle pages. The proposals are the following: 1. Not to fix issues on 'old' items. Concretely belonging to R1 and R2 2. Exclude backlog tests on items from partners withdrawn from the project 3. Exclude backlog tests on arbitrary items according to WP Leader criteria If the agenda allows including this issue, SAP will be explaining them on detail on Monday. On my side I understand the context demands focussing attention on others matters, however I have no other option but to send you this request. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telefónica Digital Parque Tecnológico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20131202/5985ae61/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy