Dear All We can summary the previous mail with the Recommendation 12, see below, so it is clear that they demand new confidential individual exploitation plans, but we have to confirm that this replaces the 11.2.2 resubmission, as they mentioned before in the Outcome document. Recommendation 12 (Page 12- FI WARE Review 5 Report) Provide a credible and precise exploitation plan for each partner who provides a GE implementation. Such information was orally requested by the European Commission Project Officer at the end of the Month 24 Review Meeting. The information must be submitted before the end of October 2013. It may be submitted by the partner concerned on a confidential basis to the European Commission Project Officer. It is expected that the exploitation plans will cover all GE implementations to a sufficient degree demonstrating business commitment. Juan Bareño Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarracín 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net <http://www.atos.net/> IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address juan.bareno at atos.net .The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bareño Guerenabarrena Sent: lunes, 30 de septiembre de 2013 15:26 To: jhierro at tid.es Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: Fwd: FI-WARE - Outcome Letter & Review report-EXPLOITATION SIDE Hi Juanjo Please find here enclosed the main comments on the exploitation side by the reviewers. In the first document about the Outcome, I have doubts about what exactly we have to provide (see paragraph in red), exploitation plans by GE implementation of each owner?? In each individual exploitation plan define the exploitation plans by GE implementation??...notes that they said that the resubmission of D11.2.2 is replaced by this request for confidential plans, so resubmission for D11.2.2 is not necessary??.........but for sure we all have to work in a new and agreed version for next year review or we have to resubmit D11.2.2, right now, with the strategic vision we shared in the review properly included? I enclosed you also the feedback on the individual exploitation plans form the FI WARE Review Report, I will come back with additional comments regarding exploitation an Action Plan needed, but first it is important to Know what exactly we have to provide by 31 October 2013, regarding exploitation Thanks for your support Juan - 1_ Outcome FI WARE Review: (Page 3): Therefore, the Commission requests exploitation plans: o For all GE implementations except the 16 above-mentioned GE implementations with open source software licenses, so for the 32 and other GE implementations that are not (yet) in the Catalogue. The cockpit contains several of those. o To be provided by the GE implementation owner, irrespective of the type of organization, so commercial or not. Organizations that joined the consortium as a result of a competitive call for additional beneficiaries and their GE implementations are excluded. o To be sent directly to the Commission. o To be provided before 31 October 2013. In case no document is received by that date, the latest available version will be used, i.e. deliverable D11.2.2 or individual exploitation plans sent to the Commission after the last review meeting (the confidential ones). o To be provided instead of the requested resubmission of deliverable D11.2.2. The review report requests a resubmission of D11.2.2 for month 30 . This is replaced by this request for confidential, individual exploitation plans. The received or latest exploitation plans will be evaluated. Use of the respective GE implementations by the phase 2 use case projects will also be considered. The result of this evaluation is that the prospects for future use of GE implementations will be assessed. It may lead to decisions to stop funding certain activities and allocate scarce funds to more promising areas for the remainder of the project. - 2_ FI WARE Review 5 Report: o Pag 4. In line with the above requested: Exploitation of project results by FI-WARE partners § The (lack of) substance and concreteness for the vast majority of the individual exploitation plans, at Month 24, is totally inappropriate for the ambition of FI-WARE and incommensurate with the claimed business commitment to project results by the main partners, even to Vice-President Kroes. As for the previous period, there is no visible attempt to echo - let alone apply - the well-elaborated business and ecosystem analysis to the individual partners' own approach and planning regarding project results. The reviewers are exceedingly concerned about the dearth of concrete evidence of the business commitment of GE implementation owners, and the corresponding lack of concrete information and traceability of GE implementations in the exploitation plans of these owners. - (Page 50)- Feedback regarding Individual Exploitation plans: D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management o Unfortunately, despite the repeated comments by the reviewers on this very subject, the specific company exploitation plans are still generic and in some cases bordering on being a "wish list". They all say positive things but lack specificity in themes, markets, applications, timeline, budget and resources dedicated to the success of FI-WARE. With a few exceptions such as those supplied by ATOS and Thales and to some extent Telefonica and France Telecom, the individual exploitation plans are largely a collection of wishes, expectations and high level aims o In all cases, there are surprisingly very few references to specific GEs (or GE combinations) even by the owners concerned. In addition, they are a collation of single plans without any attempt to explain which type of synchronisation or coordination will happen among them and how this concerted effort will be coordinated, if any. There is not a single reference in the individual plans to the OIL, which is positioned in the generic part of the document as a key vehicle to "pave the way for a successful exploitation and sustainability of its [the FI-WARE project] results". Juan Bareño Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarracín 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net <http://www.atos.net/> IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address juan.bareno at atos.net .The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: jueves, 26 de septiembre de 2013 15:33 To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE - Outcome Letter & Review report Dear FI-WARE partners, Please find enclosed the report of the last review meeting. I haven't had time to review it in detail, just a very quick reading of the summary sections. Overall, I'm satisfied with the results and I tend to agree with some of the points about which the review establish we should implement remedies: * Improvement of the backlog management (this has led to rejection of the backlog deliverables and, most probably, the rejection of the Technical Roadmap deliverable). * Deep and carefully revision of contents in the FI-WARE Catalogue, overall regarding the all which has to do with terms and conditions of usage beyond the FI-PPP * Re-submission of Security Open Specifications. Apparently (at least considering those pieces I have read) this has to do with the IdM GE Open Specifications, so the good news is that we are already working to solve this issue. More kind of a surprise to me is the rejection of the following deliverables: * Deliverables linked the Tools chapter. * Report on validation by Use Case projects. * Exploitation Plan (given the fact that the consortium deliverable may be not satisfactory enough, but I was hoping that the individual exploitation plans shared in confidentiality with the EC had been more convincing ...) We will need to read the review more carefully to understand the reasons why those deliverables have been rejected. On the other hand, I'm happy to see that most of the chapter technical deliverables have been accepted. Unfortunately, the review could not incorporate results of the successful launch of FI-LAB at the Campus Party Europe event, because this took place after the review meeting. If so, I'm pretty sure that the analysis had been more favorable. This is a very raw analysis. Please don't consider it complete. We need more time to digest the whole report. Let's make a more close analysis and come back with a detailed action plan. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE - Outcome Letter & Review report Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:56:19 +0000 From: <Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu> <mailto:Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu> To: <jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> CC: <CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu> <mailto:CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu> , <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu> <mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu> , <mcp at tid.es> <mailto:mcp at tid.es> , <msli at icfocus.co.uk> <mailto:msli at icfocus.co.uk> , <irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com> <mailto:irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com> , <dgr at whitestein.com> <mailto:dgr at whitestein.com> , <rdifrancesco at ymail.com> <mailto:rdifrancesco at ymail.com> , <michele.marzola at dnplc.net> <mailto:michele.marzola at dnplc.net> Dear Mr Hierro, Please find attached a copy of the outcome letter and review report of project 285248 FI-WARE. Please acknowledge receipt of this letter. Many thanks in advance Best regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 - Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu <mailto:vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20130930/3ae8ff40/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20130930/3ae8ff40/attachment.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20130930/3ae8ff40/attachment.gif>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy