From mcp at tid.es Mon Feb 3 09:14:57 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 09:14:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Confcall cancelled Message-ID: <52EF5001.8010007@tid.es> Dear all, I have to cancel today's call. Any urgent matter you may want to deal with can by discussed by email. I remind you that you must have organized the reviews of the architecture in your WPs and that the Open specs of the 1st wave are due. Please use the time allocated to this call to review the status of the remaining deliverables. I would encourage to talk to your partners directly if needed (this means using the phone in the case of those failing to deliver on time): * 3r party innovation * Architecture * Open Specs * Release 3 + manuals Best, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 3 09:15:36 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:15:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dinamic : Sprint 3.3.1 Close - Congratulations!! Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA3017268@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, In general, most chapters show good activity level and performance. CONGRATULATIONS!!! Find below reports of the sprint closing. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3339/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140131.xlsx [cid:image001.png at 01CF20BE.A19A6900] Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3340/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140131.xlsx [cid:image002.png at 01CF20BE.A19A6900] IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3343/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140131.xlsx [cid:image003.png at 01CF20BE.E9DACF20] Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3341/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140131.xlsx [cid:image004.png at 01CF20BF.54E30440] I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3342/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140131.xlsx [cid:image005.png at 01CF20BF.54E30440] Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3345/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140131.xlsx [cid:image006.png at 01CF20BF.9769CF10] MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3344/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140131.xlsx [cid:image007.png at 01CF20C0.7DC89220] If anything, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13536 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 14147 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 13710 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 14132 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 14219 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 13553 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13369 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 3 11:30:09 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:30:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dynamic - Sprint 3.3.2 Planning - deadline 7.Feb. Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301772F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, As you know we start Sprint 3.3.2, which is the second sprint of Release 3.3. [cid:image001.jpg at 01CF20D3.32C7B1D0] On this stage it's important to estimate and fix the targets to work on during the month, I mean for Sprint 3.3.2. Please, don't forget features last three months and correspond to the Release 3.3 time frame - it means they are expected to be finished at the end of 3.3, at the same time as Sprint 3.3.3. Therefore, coming back to Sprint 3.3.2, during this week we create new tickets or we schedule existing tickets appropriately by modifying its time frame. Find attached files in case you want to check how your GEI dashboards looks like today. Remember, this planning period finishes on day 7.Feb, when we will check it out. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19703 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140203.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 390288 bytes Desc: FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140203.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140203.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 259757 bytes Desc: FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140203.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140203.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 364766 bytes Desc: FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140203.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140203.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 385113 bytes Desc: FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140203.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140203.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 366544 bytes Desc: FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140203.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140203.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 504036 bytes Desc: FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140203.xlsx URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140203.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 373090 bytes Desc: FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140203.xlsx URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 3 16:32:56 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:32:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Distribution of the planned DOW Amendment with new deliverable / work package content? Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7B6F0@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear Juanjo, all, I have a question w.r.t the planned DOW amendment(s): Can you please distribute the current draft of the DOW amendment so that we can be aware of current change proposed there? More specifically I refer to the upcoming DOW amendment which would contain the "new" deliverable tables and work package changes with its new proposed submission deadlines per deliverable (e.g. when proposing a move from M36 to M40 for a given deliverable). The last draft version that I have at hand here seems to be outdated at least I am not sure about it. When can we receive this draft, if it is currently still not possible? Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 3 17:04:26 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:04:26 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA30189F3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI owners, Since we're on sprint time period, and there are requests from Reviewers for us to do software packaging, I've created a basic pattern, which you can find below linked, for this purpose. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Backlog_items_patterns#Packaging Obviously, many of you have better understanding of the process to follow, therefore, I'd appreciate receiving input to improve it so that it accommodates well to your planning needs. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 4 17:48:02 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:48:02 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs In-Reply-To: <52E6AE42.1020307@tid.es> References: <52E6AE42.1020307@tid.es> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D849@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear Miguel, all, I can say that we have uploaded our WP3 contribution to "OpenSpecsM36" folder (with contributions from UPM, SAP, ATOS, TID, iMinds) . https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3350/D313_WP3_v1_generated.docx Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2014 20:07 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Dear all, I have just created a couple of folders for the internal reviews of both docs under the FI-WARE Private project. We will send a submission cockpit shortly and we will proceed as usual. You can see the exact location of the folder here: [cid:image001.png at 01CF21D1.40243570] Best regards, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 14060 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 4 18:02:34 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:02:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA30189F3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA30189F3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D8C6@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi all, Manuel's mail triggered this question here: Do we have an aligned understanding what we will understand under "software packaging". I mean what our concrete (common) actions are for this - across all WPs/GEs. I am sorry, but I only remember that we were seeking clarification e.g. from Arian, but I do not remember if we now know more here. If it is clarified, can you please forward it or tell what we will understand / do to address this reviewer wish? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Montag, 3. Februar 2014 17:04 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems Dear GEI owners, Since we're on sprint time period, and there are requests from Reviewers for us to do software packaging, I've created a basic pattern, which you can find below linked, for this purpose. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Backlog_items_patterns#Packaging Obviously, many of you have better understanding of the process to follow, therefore, I'd appreciate receiving input to improve it so that it accommodates well to your planning needs. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001.txt URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 4 18:03:56 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:03:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA30189F3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D8E3@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> ... I forgot to CC Manuel.. From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 18:03 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: FW: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems Hi all, Manuel's mail triggered this question here: Do we have an aligned understanding what we will understand under "software packaging". I mean what our concrete (common) actions are for this - across all WPs/GEs. I am sorry, but I only remember that we were seeking clarification e.g. from Arian, but I do not remember if we now know more here. If it is clarified, can you please forward it or tell what we will understand / do to address this reviewer wish? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Montag, 3. Februar 2014 17:04 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems Dear GEI owners, Since we're on sprint time period, and there are requests from Reviewers for us to do software packaging, I've created a basic pattern, which you can find below linked, for this purpose. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Backlog_items_patterns#Packaging Obviously, many of you have better understanding of the process to follow, therefore, I'd appreciate receiving input to improve it so that it accommodates well to your planning needs. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergg at tid.es Tue Feb 4 18:09:25 2014 From: sergg at tid.es (SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ) Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:09:25 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D849@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <52E6AE42.1020307@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D849@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54DF2C875D6@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Miguel, all, I have generated the D6.1.3 for peer review with the contributions of Siemens and Thales A.S., which have to deliver in M36. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3351/D613_WP6_FIWARE_GE_OpenSpecs_M36.docx Best Regards, Sergio From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Heller, Markus Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 17:48 To: MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Dear Miguel, all, I can say that we have uploaded our WP3 contribution to ?OpenSpecsM36? folder (with contributions from UPM, SAP, ATOS, TID, iMinds) . https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3350/D313_WP3_v1_generated.docx Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2014 20:07 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Dear all, I have just created a couple of folders for the internal reviews of both docs under the FI-WARE Private project. We will send a submission cockpit shortly and we will proceed as usual. You can see the exact location of the folder here: [cid:image001.png at 01CF21D4.3C256220] Best regards, ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 14060 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Feb 4 18:41:06 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:41:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D8C6@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA30189F3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D8C6@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <52F12632.9@tid.es> Dear Markus, I was in CC of the e-mail sent to Arian and I have not received any answers at all. I presume that Arian has not sent a private answer to Juanjo - he tends to keep people in CC as far as I know him. I also assume that Juanjo has been able to talk to him on the matter as they spoke days ago if I am right. But I have not talked to Juanjo for ages now, he has been abroad all the time. So we are in the dark, same as you are. Juanjo, any news? Best regards, Miguel El 04/02/2014 18:02, Heller, Markus escribi?: Hi all, Manuel's mail triggered this question here: Do we have an aligned understanding what we will understand under "software packaging". I mean what our concrete (common) actions are for this - across all WPs/GEs. I am sorry, but I only remember that we were seeking clarification e.g. from Arian, but I do not remember if we now know more here. If it is clarified, can you please forward it or tell what we will understand / do to address this reviewer wish? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Montag, 3. Februar 2014 17:04 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems Dear GEI owners, Since we're on sprint time period, and there are requests from Reviewers for us to do software packaging, I've created a basic pattern, which you can find below linked, for this purpose. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Backlog_items_patterns#Packaging Obviously, many of you have better understanding of the process to follow, therefore, I'd appreciate receiving input to improve it so that it accommodates well to your planning needs. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Feb 5 11:21:27 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:21:27 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA30189F3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA30189F3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA3018F3A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI owners, I've just talked to Fermin (Orion GEI's leader and workmate), who has kindly shared how they deal with packaging at their GEI. Packaging makes sense as a previous and necessary step to delivering the software. Consequently, I've added it as an action for Software. I wonder whether any of these, let's say, alternatives: a) action within software b) main subject by itself makes sense for others GEI as well. [cid:image001.png at 01CF2264.672F2290] Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 03 de febrero de 2014 17:04 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog Content: Pattern for Packaging WorkItems Dear GEI owners, Since we're on sprint time period, and there are requests from Reviewers for us to do software packaging, I've created a basic pattern, which you can find below linked, for this purpose. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Backlog_items_patterns#Packaging Obviously, many of you have better understanding of the process to follow, therefore, I'd appreciate receiving input to improve it so that it accommodates well to your planning needs. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 20384 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Feb 5 15:41:27 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:41:27 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-ge-owners] Agile dynamic - Sprint 3.3.2 Planning - deadline 7.Feb -> 10.Feb Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301948B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, Given the fact that FI-WARE web site will be down on Friday as Miguel has just reported. The deadline for sprint planning is moved to Monday 10th. Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 03 de febrero de 2014 11:30 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Agile dynamic - Sprint 3.3.2 Planning - deadline 7.Feb. Dear Partners, As you know we start Sprint 3.3.2, which is the second sprint of Release 3.3. [cid:image001.jpg at 01CF2288.639C2D70] On this stage it's important to estimate and fix the targets to work on during the month, I mean for Sprint 3.3.2. Please, don't forget features last three months and correspond to the Release 3.3 time frame - it means they are expected to be finished at the end of 3.3, at the same time as Sprint 3.3.3. Therefore, coming back to Sprint 3.3.2, during this week we create new tickets or we schedule existing tickets appropriately by modifying its time frame. Find attached files in case you want to check how your GEI dashboards looks like today. Remember, this planning period finishes on day 7.Feb, when we will check it out. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 19703 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Thu Feb 6 11:25:31 2014 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:25:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Release 3 - Public folders for deliverables Message-ID: <52F3631B.2090102@eng.it> Dear Miguel, the D9.3.3 is ready to be delivered to the EC but it seems that the folder, into the public Docs of the forge (into "FI-WARE deliverables"), is missing. Following the same pattern adopted for "Release 1" and "Release 2", can I create the folders "Release 3" and Tools (inside Release 3) and upload there our deliverables? thank you, Davide From mcp at tid.es Thu Feb 6 15:34:25 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:34:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Release 3 - Public folders for deliverables In-Reply-To: <52F3631B.2090102@eng.it> References: <52F3631B.2090102@eng.it> Message-ID: <52F39D71.4000009@tid.es> yes, please El 06/02/2014 11:25, Davide Dalle Carbonare escribi?: > Dear Miguel, > the D9.3.3 is ready to be delivered to the EC but it seems that > the folder, into > the public Docs of the forge (into "FI-WARE deliverables"), is missing. > > Following the same pattern adopted for "Release 1" and "Release 2", > can I create the folders "Release 3" and Tools (inside Release 3) and > upload > there our deliverables? > > thank you, > Davide > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From mcp at tid.es Thu Feb 6 15:42:28 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 15:42:28 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [IMPORTANT]Mistake in Architecture Message-ID: <52F39F54.9020304@tid.es> Dear all, As you are aware, we generate a first word document for the Architecture and then we will not come back to the wiki until the end of the process, after it is delivered to the EC. This means that the doc has to be near final. This means: * Adding a footer * Adding a header * Adding the TOC I have realised that some of you are adding this to the list of pages that go to the Architecture: FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(essential_patents_license) FI-WARE_Open_Specification_Legal_Notice_(implicit_patents_license) This, to the best of my knowledge, applies to the Open Specs only. So please remove it from the Architecture document in your respective chapters at the same time that you incorporate the comments from the WP that reviews your contributions. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Feb 7 10:02:32 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:02:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dynamic - Spring 3.3.2 - Backlog planning status - Deadline: 10.Feb - request for action Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301A2F8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, Let me share the status of the backlog for Sprint 3.3.2. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3357/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140207.xlsx [cid:image001.png at 01CF23E5.A4C79560] Business Calculator - Koen, you've got nothing scheduled for current sprint Business Modeller - Camille, nothing scheduled for current sprint Compel - Joaquin, nothing scheduled for current sprint Marketplace - Andreas, should the GEI's status be changed to on-hold or closed? Mediator - Marco, nothing scheduled for current sprint Registry - Torsten, the existing item for the release has been closed, nothing is left, nothing scheduled for the sprint. Should GEI's status be changed on-hold or closed? Repository - Andreas and USDL - Markus are on-hold. Is it right? Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3358/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140207.xlsx [cid:image002.png at 01CF23E6.37E8FD20] Cloud Proxy - Henk, nothing scheduled for current sprint Pegasus - Henar, nothing scheduled for current sprint Cloud Job Scheduled - Denis, Any change of status? IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3361/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140207.xlsx [cid:image003.png at 01CF23E6.F6A32150] Backend Template Handler - Carsten, everything is closed for the release, nothing scheduled for the sprint. Should the GEI status be changed to on-hold, closed? OpenMTC - Konrad - nothing scheduled for the current sprint. GPA - COAP - Carsten, everything is closed for the release, nothing scheduled for the sprint. Should the GEI status be changed to on-hold, closed? GPA - EPCGE - Thierry, nothing for the release, nothing for the current sprint. Should the GEI status be changed to on-hold, closed? GPA - ZPA - Sabrina, nothing scheduled for the current sprint. GDH - Sol/CEP - Fernando, current status is on-hold. Does it continue? Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3359/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140207.xlsx [cid:image004.png at 01CF23E8.0C605B60] Codoan - Markus, everything closed for the release. Please, confirm it is right LOCS - Alain, nothing for the release. Please, confirm it is right MetadataProcessor - Peter, everything closed for the release. Please, confirm it is right Context Awareness Platform - Boris, nothing for the sprint Middleware - Sergio, I guess we can close this enabler in this chapter. Semantic Annotation - Boris, this GEI is on-hold. Does it continue? Semantic Application Support - Iv?n, this GEI is on-hold. Does it continue? I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3360/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140207.xlsx [cid:image005.png at 01CF23E8.DA54D050] Cloud Edge - Henk, nothing scheduled for the sprint NetIC - Altoclient - Thomas-Rolf, nothing scheduled for the release. NetIC - OFNIC - Federico, nothing scheduled for the release NetIC - VNEIC - Lorenzo, nothing scheduled for the release NetIC - VNP - J?zsef, nothing scheduled for the release. Is NetIC finishing? S3C - Mathias and Philippe, everything closed or dismissed. Should this GEI's status be changed to on-hold or closed? Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3363/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140207.xlsx [cid:image006.png at 01CF23EA.26ACEC20] Data Handling - Slim, nothing for the sprint IDM - GCP - Wolfgang, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? IDM - KeyRock - Carolina, nothing for the sprint IDM - One-IDM - Robert, nothing for the release. Please, confirm it is right OSE -CBS - Richard, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? OSE-DB Anonymizer - Francesco, nothing scheduled for the sprint OSE-Flowoid - Guillaume/Fabrice/Remi, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? SM - 6 Low Fuzzer - Guillaume/Fabrice/Remi, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? SM - Attack Paths Engine - Daniel, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? SM - Multi Attack Paths Engine - Daniel, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? SM - Ovaldroid - Guillaume/Fabrice/Remi, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? SM - Remediation App - Daniel, nothing scheduled for the sprint. SM - Scored Attack Paths - Daniel, nothing scheduled for the sprint. SM - Visualization Framework - Richard, nothing for the release, nothing for the sprint. Should this GEI's status be changed to closed? OSE - Morphus, Guillaume, does it continue on-hold? OSE - Secure Storage Service, Lucie, does it continue on-hold? MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3362/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140207.xlsx [cid:image007.png at 01CF23EA.F2C91EA0] Cloud Rendering - Jonne, nothing scheduled for the sprint DaaS - Torsten, nothing scheduled for the sprint GIS Data Provider, Sami, nothing scheduled for the release. Is this correct? Interface Designer, Cvetan, nothing scheduled for the sprint. Synchronization - Lasse, nothing scheduled for the sprint. Virtual Characters - Lasse, nothing scheduled for the sprint. I'd appreciate your would provide due content to the backlog or to clarify their status. Let me remind you that I'll be checking backlog content against resources reported. Thanks for cooperation!! If you needed any support, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13170 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 13206 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 12982 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 13503 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 13868 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 13075 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13048 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Feb 7 11:45:07 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 10:45:07 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - Peer Review Cockpit available > request for action Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301A3AC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Miguel has recently handed over this task to me. Therefore, I'll be coordinating it. Please, find the Peer Review cockpit below: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=drive_web#gid=0 I'm working on applying the criteria given to know when each enabler should have their content ready but not finished yet. I expect to have it ready early next week. The spreadsheet is similar to the one used in architecture. So not surprises on how to use it. I've added however a timeline sheet where you can remind yourself anytime. I'll be updating status for each chapter as the time pass. If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 10 07:20:24 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:20:24 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packaging activities In-Reply-To: <52DC4BCD.2030703@tid.es> References: <52DC4BCD.2030703@tid.es> Message-ID: <52F86FA8.7070806@tid.es> Hi all, Mid last month I send an official email to our PO, Arian Zwegers, asking for clarification about the mean of "packaging" activities. I forwarded him my interpretation of what "packaging" means and I asked whether he had the same interpretation. Unfortunately, I didn't receive any written response by our PO and he is now on holidays. I had the opportunity to meet with him while at the Campus Party and I again shared my interpretation. It seems like it was fine for him but, again unfortunately, this wasn't a written response so it cannot grant anything. At this point, I believe we should proceed and go ahead with the proposed interpretation. I'll communicate this decision to our PO because the absence of his or reviewers' response. After all, I believe this is a meaningful interpretation of what we should do regarding "packaging" so there shouldn't be major issues. Please note that "packaging" is NOT an activity required for GEis that are not planned to be delivered as open source (as stated in the catalogue and confirmed in the month 30 review) with the exception of GEis provided by Thales (whose exploitation plans were considered convincing by reviewers). This was confirmed by Arian during my conversations with him. They were asked to stop development/packaging activities with the end of release 3.2, planned by end of December, so they are supposed to have delivered the final version of GEi software and documentation by end of January (as planned in the original DoW, btw) Please also note that GEis whose owners declared their intention to go open source only at the month 30 review (and not previously in the catalogue) are requested to work only on packaging activities until end of Release 3 (planned by end of March, to be officially delivered by end of April). GEis that were declared to be open source by end of November, plus those provided by Thales, have to deal with packaging in parallel to development activities in their roadmap. Regarding the interpretation of packaging we will adopt, here it is the interpretation I shared with our PO. Basically, "packaging" comprises two kind of activities: * Improving "packaging" of each GEi standalone: * Making sure that the GEi can be easily be deployed on FI-Lab using FI-WARE Cloud deployment functionalities. This means setting up VM images with the GEi configured, the definition of Blueprint templates and, eventually, some deployment recipes. This applies for GEis for which it can be expected that FI-Lab users (developers) wish to have a dedicated instance running on the Cloud. It won't apply for other GEis for which dedicated instances do not make so much sense (e.g., GEis in the Cloud, I2ND or Security chapters, GEis linked to the Business Framework or Store in the Apps chapter, GEis linked to the IoT gateway or the KIARA middleware GEi). * Making sure that we end with a high-quality documentation including not just developers' guides but administration guidelines easing deployment and configuration on local premises. * Developing the concept of "package of related GEis", which should mean: * Defining a dedicated entry in the FI-WARE Catalogue. * Developing the means for automated deployment on FI-Lab using Cloud deployment functionalities. This means setting up VM images with the GEis of the package properly configured, Blueprint templates coping with automated deployment of all GEis in the package and, eventually, some deployment recipes. Again, as with individual GEis, this applies for packages of GEis for which it can be expected that FI-Lab users (developers) wish to have a dedicated instance running on the Cloud. * Developing good guides enabling easing deployment and configuration of the packages. Note that definition of a "package of related GEis" is not always meaningful/useful. Chapter leaders/architects have to come with a list of packages that could make sense in their chapter. Following is a list of packages I see as candidates in a first approach: * combining several GEis in the IoT Backend: a package combining the IoT Broker GEi by NEC, the Orion Configuration Manager and the DCA Device Management GEis * combining several GEis of the Data/Context Chapter: a package combining the Orion Context Broker, Cosmos (BigData) and Proton (CEP) Again, this is my own take on the matter. Chapter leaders/architects are welcome to suggest other packages of related GEis. A package combining several GEis in the Cloud chapter or the Apps chapter (linked to the business framework, for example), also enabling to setup a portal similar to the one at lab.fi-ware.eu could be useful for potential FI-WARE Instance providers but not so much for users of FI-WARE instances (app developers). I would argue that creation of such packages is mostly a task for the XiFi project but I'm happy to hear other opinions. Hope it helps. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 10 07:33:37 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:33:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Support to UC projects until end of the FI-WARE project In-Reply-To: <52DC4BCD.2030703@tid.es> References: <52DC4BCD.2030703@tid.es> Message-ID: <52F872C1.8030308@tid.es> Hi all, Another question forwarded to our PO, Arian Zwegers, for clarification has to do with how to handle requests from UC projects in phase 2. Again, mid last month I send an official email to our PO, Arian Zwegers, asking for clarification about how to handle requests from UC projects, overall given the fact that activities in many GEis will be limited to "packaging" and also activities in many other GEis have been stopped. I forwarded him my interpretation on how to deal with requests from UC projects and I asked whether he had the same interpretation. Unfortunately, I didn't receive any written response by our PO and he is now on holidays nor I got any clear response during my conversations at the Campus Party. Therefore, at this point, I believe we should proceed and go ahead with the proposed interpretation. I'll communicate this decision to our PO because the absence of his or reviewers' response. I will also share this interpretation with the UC projects. After all, I believe this is a meaningful interpretation of what we should do regarding requests by UC projects so there shouldn't be major issues. We have to distinguish three cases: * Problem diagnosis and bug fixing. My understanding is that all GEi owners have to continue providing support to problem diagnosis and bug fixing. This not only until the project ends but also beyond, until end of the FI-PPP program, no matter if we are referring to GEis for which the owner is planning to cease activities at month 36 or not. The FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement would be the agreement that backs this interpretation. No Service Level is granted by the Collaboration Agreement, so it would not be a surprise if, in practice, that maps into a higher/better support for those GEis linked to GEi owners who will continue in the Technology Foundation continuation project. UC projects have to be realistic here. * Advising/training activities. UC projects may require some degree of support while using the GEis, including advise and training on local deployment and configuration. My understanding is that the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement doesn't cover this though. My vision here is that this can only be taken for granted until month 36 (end of April) for those GEis where the GEi owner plans to cease activities at that month. After that, nothing can be taken for granted. On the other hand, advising/training can be warranted until end of the FI-WARE project for the rest of GEis (obviously up to certain extend) since the corresponding GEi owners have not objected to continue their activities. * Development of features required by the UC projects (either new or planned in the roadmap). I understand that this is only allowed for the GEis for which availability as open source was stated before end of November or were closed source but their owners presented a convincing exploitation plan (Thales). Note that development of new features in those GEis will be planned only until end of March, matching delivery of release 3.3 of FI-WARE. The Technology Foundation continuation project is the project that is expected to deal with next releases of FI-WARE starting from release 4. However, no development of features is allowed for GEis for which availability as open source was announced during the month 30 review but it was not stated before end of November 2013 in the Catalogue. UC projects will have to live with this fact and wait for the Technology Foundation project which, on the other hand, may not continue development of some of the GEis (particularly those that are not open source or for which it is determined that it is not worth continuing evolution and support). Your comments are welcome. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 10 07:53:43 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:53:43 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Reminder: continuation of activities linked to GEis In-Reply-To: <52E8D24C.2070005@tid.es> References: <52E8D24C.2070005@tid.es> Message-ID: <52F87777.80509@tid.es> Hi all, I already sent an email summarizing the criteria for continuation/discontinuation of activities linked to FI-WARE GEis but, nevertheless, let me summarize it again here for your convenience. * GEis that won't be delivered as open source excluding those delivered by Thales: * development/packaging activities had to stop with end of release 3.2 * it is expected that the software and accompanying documentation for these GEis was delivered by end of January * GEis for which it was not stated they would be delivered as open source by end of November 2013 in the FI-WARE catalogue but for which it was confirmed they were going to be delivered as open source by the end of the project at the month 30 review: * they had to stop development of new features with the end of release 3.2 * they can only devote effort to "packaging" activities, as well as preparation of code to be released as open source, during release 3.3 (planned to close end of March and be delivered by end of April) * GEis for which it was stated that they will be delivered as open source by end of November 2013 in the FI-WARE catalogue, or closed source GEis delivered by Thales: * they can develop planned features during release 3.3 (planned to close end of March and be delivered by end of April) * they also have to work on "packaging", as well as preparation of code to be released as open source if not yet released, during release 3.3 I hope it helps. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 10 09:26:16 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:26:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Delivery Awareness - Update Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301A6BC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Let me share last update of Delivery Awareness with you. D9.3.3 and D9.4.3 were delivered last Friday!! [cid:image003.png at 01CF2642.21487F10] Complete report is available at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3370/FIWARE.DeliveryAwareness.20140210.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 77590 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 10 17:28:11 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:28:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301B8E9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, In order to try applying the criteria to identify when GEI's are finishing their activities, I've created this spreadsheet with the evidence collected. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lixgg8HuqeSrgOTh-n72zHPx0c8inlnQaH6_FBivmpo/edit?usp=sharing Since I may well have made mistakes on collecting and organising the evidence or when interpreting the criteria given, before going step forward to concluding when, I'd appreciate having feedback to consolidate evidence and interpretation. At first I appreciated three criteria to be relevant, although from last email by Juanjo, I'd say criteria 2 and 3 are the key ones. However, I share all three bellow: Criteria #1: Vote on project extension. ? There're a few partners who marked option 1 and 2, since prevalence is unknown to me - they are marked as unknown. Fraunhofer and Siemens's enablers have "unknown" entries for that reason Criteria #2: Open Source ? I've collected the input from Column O in the spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdEd6bGhLQWtNai1jeGN5UnJMeEdxZ0E&usp=drive_web#gid=8. Then, I understood from Juanjo's email that Proprietary GEI's finish their development and packaging on R3.2, except Thales. Additionally, GEIs to be delivered as Open Source can finish their contribution on R3.3; Be aware that there're some differences on the kind of activities GEI's can do according to whether they were declared already as Open Source by the end of November 2013 or just they were planned to be Open Source. Criteria #3 : EC directions ? Applies to Thales whose developments continue. Then, as an example, applying the evidence collected on Summary sheet to Apps chapter, it seems to me that Mediator, Service Mashup, Business Calculator and Business Modeler should have finished their activities on R3.2 I hope it's useful. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Feb 11 10:30:22 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:30:22 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dynamic : Sprint 3.3.2 Planning - Closed Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301BA62@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, As you know yesterday we met the deadline to close the sprint planning for S3.3.2. Find below the corresponding dashboards. Although some GEI owners reacted to complete their backlogs, or provide a comment, others have not reacted. I'm sending email to those partners. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3377/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140211.xlsx [cid:image001.png at 01CF2713.4C2E5340] Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3378/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140211.xlsx [cid:image002.png at 01CF2713.4C2E5340] IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3381/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140211.xlsx [cid:image003.png at 01CF2713.4C2E5340] Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3379/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140211.xlsx [cid:image004.png at 01CF2713.4C2E5340] I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3380/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140211.xlsx [cid:image005.png at 01CF2713.4C2E5340] Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3383/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140211.xlsx [cid:image006.png at 01CF2713.4C2E5340] MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3382/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140211.xlsx [cid:image007.png at 01CF2714.148A9790] If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13001 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 12975 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 13011 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 13265 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 13290 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 13364 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13345 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Feb 11 17:37:11 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:37:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - Update - Request for contributions Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301BFB1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, Let me address you to refresh info on this deliverable: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=drive_web#gid=0 It's clarified when each GEI should deliver, according to the output I get from the vote on project extension. I'd appreciate input were provided. Only Sergio has made the link available. Markus I understood yesterday Apps chapter was already available for review. Additionally, Christof, so I understood from you. I'd appreciate having your cooperation to update the spreadsheet. Obviously if other WP Leaders had input, it's more than welcome. You know we're delayed. Thanks again!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 12 09:26:39 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:26:39 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] test Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD106AA@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 11 19:36:23 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:36:23 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: CEBIT 2014 Planning Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1004E@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> (Repeated, this mail was listed as not delivered to the WPL list.) From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 15:01 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: CEBIT 2014 Planning Dear Juanjo, Can we please proceed with CEBIT planning this week, since hotels need to be booked etc. We have briefly talked about CEBIT in WPL/WPA Meeting, that we would need to start planning now... Maybe we can do this per mail exchanges in order to be able to do it this week and bring planning to a state where we decide who attends / what is done there? I understand that 1 full day Fi-PPP together with others is planned and that details need to be decided. Do you have an idea , who from the consortium will attend and what we will do there? Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 11 11:10:43 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:10:43 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Architecture Deliverable: Review 1 of cloud chapter done Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD0F4FD@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Alex, all, I have finished/uploaded my review of the cloud contribution to architecture deliverable and stored the link into the Google docs "FI-WARE - Architecture R3 - Peer Review Cockpit". You can find it under: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3384/D233_WP4_v1_generated.ReviewFromApps11022014.docx best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 11 15:00:35 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:00:35 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] CEBIT 2014 Planning Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD0FDC6@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear Juanjo, Can we please proceed with CEBIT planning this week, since hotels need to be booked etc. We have briefly talked about CEBIT in WPL/WPA Meeting, that we would need to start planning now... Maybe we can do this per mail exchanges in order to be able to do it this week and bring planning to a state where we decide who attends / what is done there? I understand that 1 full day Fi-PPP together with others is planned and that details need to be decided. Do you have an idea , who from the consortium will attend and what we will do there? Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Feb 12 11:51:36 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:51:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation (II) - request for feedback. Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301C2FD@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, Yesterday I had feedback from Markus (thanks!) and so we amended a couple of entries. As a result I've consolidated the spreadsheet and made evident the mapping to Juanjo's categories on Criteria 2-Open Source sheet. I've also include a distinction on GEI's finishing on R3.3 adding an asterisk for those which cannot develop new features, but devote effort to packaging and open-soucification. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lixgg8HuqeSrgOTh-n72zHPx0c8inlnQaH6_FBivmpo/edit?usp=sharing While I approach some specific partners to fix some existing unknowns, I'd appreciate receiving your feedback. I mean, do you find anything wrong there? Or not matching your knowledge or input? - at least for your own entity/company. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Wed Feb 12 22:33:54 2014 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:33:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Veneto Region In-Reply-To: <52F9027B.60106@eng.it> References: <52F9027B.60106@eng.it> Message-ID: <52FBE8C2.7070107@eng.it> Dear partners, I send this message again to the list as far as it seems not be correctly delivered. BR Davide On 10/02/2014 17:46, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear Juanjo, > today I talked with the contact person for Veneto Region and he > told me that > due to internal issues they cannot join the FI-WARE project. > > I'm sorry about that. > > BR > Davide From jhierro at tid.es Thu Feb 13 06:15:09 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:15:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Info about CeBIT event In-Reply-To: <3B6D242F-EC4A-4452-9C65-1C751A101F71@dfki.de> References: <3B6D242F-EC4A-4452-9C65-1C751A101F71@dfki.de> Message-ID: <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> Dear all, This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing an outstanding overview of current research findings and the technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT that organizers wish to promote. The event will take place on Wednesday, March 12th. The agenda of the event is already published at CeBIT's website: http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 (You have to scroll down and then select the date) The event will be organized as: * A program of speeches given at the stage * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): * one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, FI-Lab and FI-Content2 * 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE * 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to find: * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been published by CeBIT on the website) * Description of topics per table You can find it at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables still as drafts. However: * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of them to cover this. Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). Some APs: * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be available to provide support during the event (tables on the exhibition area) * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are welcome but we will need to close this quickly * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting it within the overall context. I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DMAG - CeBIT 2014 - Future Talk - H9 F44 - Ansicht B?hnenwand.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 135697 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DMAG - CeBIT 2014 - Future Talk - H9 F44 - Grundriss.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 127934 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DMAG - CeBIT 2014 - Future Talk - H9 F44 - Perspektive.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 244031 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Feb 13 06:20:11 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:20:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Info about CeBIT event In-Reply-To: <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> References: <3B6D242F-EC4A-4452-9C65-1C751A101F71@dfki.de> <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> Message-ID: <52FC560B.3010003@tid.es> Please don't hesitate to share the info provided in my previous mail to partners in your chapters/WPs. On 13/02/14 06:15, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing an outstanding overview of current research findings and the technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT that organizers wish to promote. The event will take place on Wednesday, March 12th. The agenda of the event is already published at CeBIT's website: http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 (You have to scroll down and then select the date) The event will be organized as: * A program of speeches given at the stage * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): * one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, FI-Lab and FI-Content2 * 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE * 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to find: * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been published by CeBIT on the website) * Description of topics per table You can find it at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables still as drafts. However: * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of them to cover this. Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). Some APs: * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be available to provide support during the event (tables on the exhibition area) * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are welcome but we will need to close this quickly * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting it within the overall context. I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Thu Feb 13 08:31:50 2014 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:31:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Veneto Region In-Reply-To: <52FBE8C2.7070107@eng.it> References: <52F9027B.60106@eng.it> <52FBE8C2.7070107@eng.it> Message-ID: <4117_1392276711_52FC74E7_4117_201_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C18DB53@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Davide, Thanks for your input. Personnaly I have a call with the Open Data Project Manager of Nice city on Monday morning. I hope this time we could link this initiative to Fi-Ware. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Davide Dalle Carbonare Envoy??: mercredi 12 f?vrier 2014 22:34 ??: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Veneto Region Dear partners, I send this message again to the list as far as it seems not be correctly delivered. BR Davide On 10/02/2014 17:46, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote: > Dear Juanjo, > today I talked with the contact person for Veneto Region and he > told me that due to internal issues they cannot join the FI-WARE > project. > > I'm sorry about that. > > BR > Davide _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From mev at tid.es Thu Feb 13 09:49:15 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:49:15 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Let me share the backlog reviews with you again. Last couple of months works were focused on upgrading the backlog dashboards first and then the reviews lately. The approach followed for the reviews is similar to the dashboards: product-owner focused Backlog reviews aren't finished yet since I'm still working on re-implementing some criteria. However, some others criteria are available and able to identify some errors/issues, which I though you may well want to fix. Find links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3401/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140213.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3402/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140213.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3405/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140213.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3403/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140213.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3404/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140213.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3407/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140213.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3406/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140213.xlsx If you required clarifications or some additional support, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com Thu Feb 13 10:58:24 2014 From: francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com (DI CERBO, Francesco) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:58:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E6232A6B85@DEWDFEMB19C.global.corp.sap> Dear Manuel, Thanks once again for your helpful reports. I have a question on an issue which is shared by a number of GEs. Some tickets report their closing date to "1970-01-01 00:00", and they are marked in red within your spreadsheet. This could perhaps be connected to the technical issues we had with servers hosting the fi-ware collaboration infrastructure. The question is: what is the recommended way to address this problem? If we reopen and close them, will this act be reported as erroneous by the next backlog report? Thanks for your support Francesco ___ Francesco Di Cerbo, PhD Product Security Research SAP P&I ACES - Architecture, Communication, Education, and Security SAP Labs France 805 Avenue du Dr. Maurice Donat, BP1216 F-06254 Mougins Cedex T +33/492286445 F +33/492286201 mailto:francesco.dicerbo at sap.com http://www.sap.com From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: jeudi 13 f?vrier 2014 09:49 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Partners, Let me share the backlog reviews with you again. Last couple of months works were focused on upgrading the backlog dashboards first and then the reviews lately. The approach followed for the reviews is similar to the dashboards: product-owner focused Backlog reviews aren't finished yet since I'm still working on re-implementing some criteria. However, some others criteria are available and able to identify some errors/issues, which I though you may well want to fix. Find links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3401/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140213.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3402/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140213.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3405/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140213.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3403/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140213.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3404/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140213.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3407/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140213.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3406/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140213.xlsx If you required clarifications or some additional support, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Feb 13 11:03:56 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:03:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) In-Reply-To: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E6232A6B85@DEWDFEMB19C.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E6232A6B85@DEWDFEMB19C.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CDED8@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Thanks Francesco!! I'll collect those errors and will report them to our forge support. As GE owners you can try closing it, let's say a couple of times, if first close went wrong, but nothing else. So please don't get much concern for that error. No, reopening, and closing doesn't produce any error. Kind regards, Manuel From: DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de febrero de 2014 10:58 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Manuel, Thanks once again for your helpful reports. I have a question on an issue which is shared by a number of GEs. Some tickets report their closing date to "1970-01-01 00:00", and they are marked in red within your spreadsheet. This could perhaps be connected to the technical issues we had with servers hosting the fi-ware collaboration infrastructure. The question is: what is the recommended way to address this problem? If we reopen and close them, will this act be reported as erroneous by the next backlog report? Thanks for your support Francesco ___ Francesco Di Cerbo, PhD Product Security Research SAP P&I ACES - Architecture, Communication, Education, and Security SAP Labs France 805 Avenue du Dr. Maurice Donat, BP1216 F-06254 Mougins Cedex T +33/492286445 F +33/492286201 mailto:francesco.dicerbo at sap.com http://www.sap.com From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: jeudi 13 f?vrier 2014 09:49 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Partners, Let me share the backlog reviews with you again. Last couple of months works were focused on upgrading the backlog dashboards first and then the reviews lately. The approach followed for the reviews is similar to the dashboards: product-owner focused Backlog reviews aren't finished yet since I'm still working on re-implementing some criteria. However, some others criteria are available and able to identify some errors/issues, which I though you may well want to fix. Find links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3401/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140213.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3402/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140213.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3405/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140213.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3403/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140213.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3404/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140213.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3407/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140213.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3406/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140213.xlsx If you required clarifications or some additional support, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Feb 13 11:07:20 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:07:20 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) In-Reply-To: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E6232A6B85@DEWDFEMB19C.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E6232A6B85@DEWDFEMB19C.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <52FC9958.5020406@tid.es> sorry to break in. Just a small piece of info. El 13/02/2014 10:58, DI CERBO, Francesco escribi?: Dear Manuel, Thanks once again for your helpful reports. I have a question on an issue which is shared by a number of GEs. Some tickets report their closing date to "1970-01-01 00:00", and they are marked in red within your spreadsheet. This could perhaps be connected to the technical issues we had with servers hosting the fi-ware collaboration infrastructure. I doubt it. Unless you changed data exactly on the date when the changes got lost - and nearly everyone was on holidays. The question is: what is the recommended way to address this problem? If we reopen and close them, will this act be reported as erroneous by the next backlog report? Thanks for your support Francesco ___ Francesco Di Cerbo, PhD Product Security Research SAP P&I ACES - Architecture, Communication, Education, and Security SAP Labs France 805 Avenue du Dr. Maurice Donat, BP1216 F-06254 Mougins Cedex T +33/492286445 F +33/492286201 mailto:francesco.dicerbo at sap.com http://www.sap.com From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: jeudi 13 f?vrier 2014 09:49 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Partners, Let me share the backlog reviews with you again. Last couple of months works were focused on upgrading the backlog dashboards first and then the reviews lately. The approach followed for the reviews is similar to the dashboards: product-owner focused Backlog reviews aren't finished yet since I'm still working on re-implementing some criteria. However, some others criteria are available and able to identify some errors/issues, which I though you may well want to fix. Find links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3401/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140213.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3402/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140213.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3405/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140213.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3403/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140213.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3404/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140213.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3407/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140213.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3406/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140213.xlsx If you required clarifications or some additional support, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Feb 13 11:08:14 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:08:14 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Finishing contributions - getting aligned Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CDEF3@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GE Owners, In order to get our understanding aligned on when to finish and therefore when to expect contributions of the different activities in all GEI, I dared produce the spreadsheet below where I collect input about partners votes on project extension, and about open source, and when it was declared as such, and additionally I interpret Juanjo's email with rules to identify when each GEI finishes their contribution for the different activities. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lixgg8HuqeSrgOTh-n72zHPx0c8inlnQaH6_FBivmpo/edit?usp=sharing It has already been validated with some partners. So now I share it with you all for complete validation. I think it's important to get same understanding, otherwise activities may run longer than due or the opposite as well, or managers may well be expecting contributions, which don't happen in time, or the opposite as well. I mean the spreadsheet purpose is to clarify interpretations and get same understanding. Please, if you noticed anything wrong, either in data or interpretation, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Feb 13 12:06:41 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:06:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CDED8@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E6232A6B85@DEWDFEMB19C.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CDED8@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CF393@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> All of them have been collected and a ticket created at the forge support tracker. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6914&group_id=28&atid=199 Manuel From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: jueves, 13 de febrero de 2014 11:04 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Thanks Francesco!! I'll collect those errors and will report them to our forge support. As GE owners you can try closing it, let's say a couple of times, if first close went wrong, but nothing else. So please don't get much concern for that error. No, reopening, and closing doesn't produce any error. Kind regards, Manuel From: DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de febrero de 2014 10:58 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Manuel, Thanks once again for your helpful reports. I have a question on an issue which is shared by a number of GEs. Some tickets report their closing date to "1970-01-01 00:00", and they are marked in red within your spreadsheet. This could perhaps be connected to the technical issues we had with servers hosting the fi-ware collaboration infrastructure. The question is: what is the recommended way to address this problem? If we reopen and close them, will this act be reported as erroneous by the next backlog report? Thanks for your support Francesco ___ Francesco Di Cerbo, PhD Product Security Research SAP P&I ACES - Architecture, Communication, Education, and Security SAP Labs France 805 Avenue du Dr. Maurice Donat, BP1216 F-06254 Mougins Cedex T +33/492286445 F +33/492286201 mailto:francesco.dicerbo at sap.com http://www.sap.com From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: jeudi 13 f?vrier 2014 09:49 To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Partners, Let me share the backlog reviews with you again. Last couple of months works were focused on upgrading the backlog dashboards first and then the reviews lately. The approach followed for the reviews is similar to the dashboards: product-owner focused Backlog reviews aren't finished yet since I'm still working on re-implementing some criteria. However, some others criteria are available and able to identify some errors/issues, which I though you may well want to fix. Find links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3401/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140213.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3402/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140213.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3405/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140213.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3403/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140213.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3404/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140213.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3407/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140213.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3406/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140213.xlsx If you required clarifications or some additional support, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Denis.Caromel at inria.fr Thu Feb 13 18:13:10 2014 From: Denis.Caromel at inria.fr (Denis Caromel) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:13:10 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT Project extension In-Reply-To: <52AEF232.2040709@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D07713571@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <52AEF232.2040709@tid.es> Message-ID: <52FCFD26.8050804@inria.fr> Dear Juanjo, What is the current status of the extension ? - Is it formally validated until the end of August 2014 ? - Can we have an official document stating this ? Thanks very much in advance, Best regards, Denis On 16/12/2013 13:29, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hi all, > > We need to carry out a final voting about whether to extend or not > the FI-WARE project. For this purpose, I have setup the following > doodle poll. You have to cast what of the different statements in > the columns better reflect your position *before Wed**nesday EOB*: > > http://doodle.com/3qk3rn5afh6vne39 > > > Essentially you can choose between three options: > > * OPTION 1: I can live with the extension provided that deliverables > are delayed 4 months. > * OPTION 2: I can live with the extension provided that I can finish > my contributions to deliverables as originally planned so no > significant contributions are expected from us after month 36 > other than the support described in the FI-PPP Collaboration > Agreement. My coordination role will be taken over by other after > month 36. > * I object to any kind of extension > > > > Note that extension of the duration of the project will not be > accompanied by any extension of the funding. > > We have discussed this issue extensively, so we believe that the > deadline is not so tight. > > Attached below, you can find the email that our PO, Arian Zweggers, > regarding responses to a number of considerations about extension of > the project. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: FI-WARE Project extension > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:46:50 +0000 > From: > To: > CC: > > > > Dear Juanjo, > > 1)This will depend largely on the outcome of the Dec 18 review. The > whole purpose is to direct efforts to parts which will/do contribute > to the ultimate success of the PPP, and to move FI-WARE into FI-PPP > phase 3 mode. I'm not a fortune teller, but -- based on the previous > review report and other indications -- I could imagine the following: > > ?Support, dissemination, and training will indeed be essential, as > well as cooperation with XIFI, expansion, sustainability, and > hand-over to the TFE project. > > ?Certain GEi developments will be stopped. Some of them might be > started again, but in a different fashion and with a different owner, > or using a competition approach. > > ?GERIs/GEis should be properly packaged and made publicly available, > including documentation, manuals, videos, tutorials, etc. Focus on > supportive materials, focus on making GE implementations usable. > > ?GE REFERENCE implementations, and not just GEis, should be developed. > We need to move towards true _reference_ implementations of _open_ > specifications. Appropriate processes need to be put in place for > third parties to comment on and influence the specifications, and for > third parties to cross-reference a GERI and its GE specification. The > GERIs should document how the specification was interpreted via > implementation decisions. > > ?Related to the point above, GE validation, including redress, by > third parties (incl phase 2 projects) need proper processes and > mechanisms (see page 4, review report). > > ?In addition, mechanisms need to be put in place for truly OPEN (and > not just public) specifications (see page 5 review report) > > ?Prioritisation of GEs (see review report page 5) and consequences. > This should be presented at the review meeting on Dec 18. > > ?Clarity on status: cockpit, Catalogue Testbed, FI-LAB, GE + GEi > status and planning was and is still unclear. The cockpit is not > up-to-date, partners start developing "components", "optional > extensions" (what are those?), etc. It is impossible to get a good > overview. > > ?Continuation of exploitation activities including clarification of T&Cs. > > ?Increased focus in year 3 on dissemination, contests, Startup > Weekends, etc. This should be presented in the review meeting. > > ?Expansion towards smart cities and internationally: what is planned > and what can be achieved at the end of the project? Also to be > presented at the review meeting. > > ?Increasing support to phase 2 projects and third parties, where needed > > 2)For the majority of the work in a specific GE, yes. But I understand > GE specifications and implementations are living artefacts. Therefore, > it would seem logical to me that support, modifications based on > feedback, etc continue until the end of the project. It cannot be that > feedback from use case projects is ignored because it came at month 34. > > 3)That does not make sense to me. It should be month 40. Of course, if > partners think they can have their contribution at month 36, they can > obviously send it to the WP leader at month 36. > > 4)Yes > > 5)Yes > > Best regards, > > Arian. > > *From:*Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] > *Sent:* Saturday, November 02, 2013 1:39 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" > *Subject:* FI-WARE Project extension > > Dear Arian, > > As already commented to Jesus and you, we have opened a thread of > discussion within FI-WARE about an extension of 4 months to the > project in line with the recommendation given in the last review report. > > In order to give a definitive answer, some partners are asking for > some elaborated answer to the following questions: > > 1.What kind of activities are foreseen during the extended period ? > Would they only be related to support, dissemination and training ? > > 2.Will a given FI-WARE GEi owner be able to chose between a) closing > its contribution to FI-WARE GE Open Specifications and its FI-WARE GEi > development activities as already planned in the DoW (i.e., delivering > updated GE Open Specifications as well as GEi software, testing plans > and related documentation in month 33, that is end of January) or b) > delay them to be in month 36 ? Ability to choose would be certainly > useful, because some GEi owners can adapt to the extension provided > that a delay in deliverables is approved, while others can live with > the extension but provided that they can close their activities in the > dates originally planned in the DoW. Telefonica, as coordinator, > doesn't see any problem allowing a partner to close its activities as > planned in the DoW. Just to avoid any burden we most probably would > submit all the mentioned deliverables in month 36 (despite some > partners would submit them internally at month 33) > > 3.Could month 36 be preserved as the date for submission of > deliverables in WP11 (exploitation) ? > > 4.Could month 40 be defined as the date for submission of deliverables > linked to WP12 (communication, collaboration and dissemination) ? > > 5.Can partners assuming a WPL or WPA role discontinue that role in > month 36 if another partner is ready to take over their role until the > end of the project ? > > > Could you please answer these questions ? This and any other > information that may be helpful to understand what the extension will > mean in terms of workload would be certainly helpful to reach an > agreement within the consortia as we would love to during this > upcoming week. > > Best regards, > > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware mailing list > Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware -- Denis Caromel mailto:caromel at unice.fr Tel.: +33 49 238 7631 Fax: 7644 Professor http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/caromel IUF, Institut universitaire de France Univ. de Nice Sophia Antipolis INRIA, 2004 Rt. des Lucioles,BP93 OASIS, INRIA - I3S CNRS - UNSA F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Feb 13 19:01:51 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:01:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT Project extension In-Reply-To: <52FCFD26.8050804@inria.fr> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D07713571@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <52AEF232.2040709@tid.es> <52FCFD26.8050804@inria.fr> Message-ID: <52FD088F.4070205@tid.es> Extension to month 40 (end of August) is one of the points covered in the current amendment of the DoW under way ... However, this amendment has not been approved yet (our PO, Arian Zwegers is on holidays). However, the point has been extensively discussed with Arian and he agrees with that extension. I don't foreseen any risk that the project will not be extended. Hope this answer helps, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 13/02/14 18:13, Denis Caromel wrote: Dear Juanjo, What is the current status of the extension ? - Is it formally validated until the end of August 2014 ? - Can we have an official document stating this ? Thanks very much in advance, Best regards, Denis On 16/12/2013 13:29, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, We need to carry out a final voting about whether to extend or not the FI-WARE project. For this purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll. You have to cast what of the different statements in the columns better reflect your position before Wednesday EOB: http://doodle.com/3qk3rn5afh6vne39 Essentially you can choose between three options: * OPTION 1: I can live with the extension provided that deliverables are delayed 4 months. * OPTION 2: I can live with the extension provided that I can finish my contributions to deliverables as originally planned so no significant contributions are expected from us after month 36 other than the support described in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. My coordination role will be taken over by other after month 36. * I object to any kind of extension Note that extension of the duration of the project will not be accompanied by any extension of the funding. We have discussed this issue extensively, so we believe that the deadline is not so tight. Attached below, you can find the email that our PO, Arian Zweggers, regarding responses to a number of considerations about extension of the project. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE Project extension Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:46:50 +0000 From: To: CC: Dear Juanjo, 1) This will depend largely on the outcome of the Dec 18 review. The whole purpose is to direct efforts to parts which will/do contribute to the ultimate success of the PPP, and to move FI-WARE into FI-PPP phase 3 mode. I'm not a fortune teller, but - based on the previous review report and other indications - I could imagine the following: ? Support, dissemination, and training will indeed be essential, as well as cooperation with XIFI, expansion, sustainability, and hand-over to the TFE project. ? Certain GEi developments will be stopped. Some of them might be started again, but in a different fashion and with a different owner, or using a competition approach. ? GERIs/GEis should be properly packaged and made publicly available, including documentation, manuals, videos, tutorials, etc. Focus on supportive materials, focus on making GE implementations usable. ? GE REFERENCE implementations, and not just GEis, should be developed. We need to move towards true reference implementations of open specifications. Appropriate processes need to be put in place for third parties to comment on and influence the specifications, and for third parties to cross-reference a GERI and its GE specification. The GERIs should document how the specification was interpreted via implementation decisions. ? Related to the point above, GE validation, including redress, by third parties (incl phase 2 projects) need proper processes and mechanisms (see page 4, review report). ? In addition, mechanisms need to be put in place for truly OPEN (and not just public) specifications (see page 5 review report) ? Prioritisation of GEs (see review report page 5) and consequences. This should be presented at the review meeting on Dec 18. ? Clarity on status: cockpit, Catalogue Testbed, FI-LAB, GE + GEi status and planning was and is still unclear. The cockpit is not up-to-date, partners start developing "components", "optional extensions" (what are those?), etc. It is impossible to get a good overview. ? Continuation of exploitation activities including clarification of T&Cs. ? Increased focus in year 3 on dissemination, contests, Startup Weekends, etc. This should be presented in the review meeting. ? Expansion towards smart cities and internationally: what is planned and what can be achieved at the end of the project? Also to be presented at the review meeting. ? Increasing support to phase 2 projects and third parties, where needed 2) For the majority of the work in a specific GE, yes. But I understand GE specifications and implementations are living artefacts. Therefore, it would seem logical to me that support, modifications based on feedback, etc continue until the end of the project. It cannot be that feedback from use case projects is ignored because it came at month 34. 3) That does not make sense to me. It should be month 40. Of course, if partners think they can have their contribution at month 36, they can obviously send it to the WP leader at month 36. 4) Yes 5) Yes Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 1:39 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: FI-WARE Project extension Dear Arian, As already commented to Jesus and you, we have opened a thread of discussion within FI-WARE about an extension of 4 months to the project in line with the recommendation given in the last review report. In order to give a definitive answer, some partners are asking for some elaborated answer to the following questions: 1. What kind of activities are foreseen during the extended period ? Would they only be related to support, dissemination and training ? 2. Will a given FI-WARE GEi owner be able to chose between a) closing its contribution to FI-WARE GE Open Specifications and its FI-WARE GEi development activities as already planned in the DoW (i.e., delivering updated GE Open Specifications as well as GEi software, testing plans and related documentation in month 33, that is end of January) or b) delay them to be in month 36 ? Ability to choose would be certainly useful, because some GEi owners can adapt to the extension provided that a delay in deliverables is approved, while others can live with the extension but provided that they can close their activities in the dates originally planned in the DoW. Telefonica, as coordinator, doesn't see any problem allowing a partner to close its activities as planned in the DoW. Just to avoid any burden we most probably would submit all the mentioned deliverables in month 36 (despite some partners would submit them internally at month 33) 3. Could month 36 be preserved as the date for submission of deliverables in WP11 (exploitation) ? 4. Could month 40 be defined as the date for submission of deliverables linked to WP12 (communication, collaboration and dissemination) ? 5. Can partners assuming a WPL or WPA role discontinue that role in month 36 if another partner is ready to take over their role until the end of the project ? Could you please answer these questions ? This and any other information that may be helpful to understand what the extension will mean in terms of workload would be certainly helpful to reach an agreement within the consortia as we would love to during this upcoming week. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware mailing list Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware -- Denis Caromel mailto:caromel at unice.fr Tel.: +33 49 238 7631 Fax: 7644 Professor http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/caromel IUF, Institut universitaire de France Univ. de Nice Sophia Antipolis INRIA, 2004 Rt. des Lucioles,BP93 OASIS, INRIA - I3S CNRS - UNSA F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Feb 14 11:37:52 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:37:52 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - update? Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21D1F7A@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, I'd appreciate your update on Open Specs, at least to have it ready for Monday's meeting. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Only Link from Sergio is available. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Sun Feb 16 23:30:56 2014 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:30:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Info about CeBIT event In-Reply-To: <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> References: <3B6D242F-EC4A-4452-9C65-1C751A101F71@dfki.de> <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> Message-ID: <53013C20.8050506@dfki.de> Hi, Do we have confirmation yet about the speakers and demos from FI-WARE? I am asking since there are no entries in the Google Doc yet and there is little time left to organize travel and such. I have informed the WP13 partners and we will discuss details in our meeting this Wednesday. But there will certainly be someone for the presentations and the demos. From a FI-C2 perspective I find the Streaming GE particularly important for the event. I very much hope we will have some of the key people at CeBIT as its a perfect match. BTW, the event is also a perfect chance to have some cross-project discussion about key topics from the FI-PPP (e.g. Cloud deployment of SEs, use of streaming and IoT in FI-Content, joint topics between WP13 and FI-C2, etc.). Best, Philipp Am 13.02.2014 06:15, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: > Dear all, > > This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at > CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. > > As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the > FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. > > Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space > labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, > particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe > also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal > with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. > "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an > "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live > presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing > an outstanding overview of current research findings and the > technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. > > "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You > can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an > auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. > > Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I > believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, > which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about > CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens > and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special > prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT > that organizers wish to promote. > > The event will take place on*Wednesday, March 12th*. The agenda of > the event is already published at CeBIT's website: > > http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 > > (You have to scroll down and then select the date) > > The event will be organized as: > > * A program of speeches given at the stage > * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations > with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into > further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): > o one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, > FI-Lab and FI-Content2 > o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE > o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 > > There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to find: > > * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been > published by CeBIT on the website) > * Description of topics per table > > You can find it at: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 > > You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables > still as drafts. However: > > * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition > area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in > particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing > and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is > mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the > links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. > * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges > came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm > currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of > speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the > SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message > that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On > the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to > promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of > them to cover this. > > Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the > necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). > > Some APs: > > * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be > available to provide support during the event (tables on the > exhibition area) > * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are > welcome but we will need to close this quickly > * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based > advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with > some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already > reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next > WPLs/WPAs confcall. > * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time > media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal > regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the > exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. > * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time > media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and > AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on > the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is > produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't > accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. > This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting > it within the overall context. > > > I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs > confcall. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 17 06:51:14 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:51:14 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Info about CeBIT event In-Reply-To: <53013C20.8050506@dfki.de> References: <3B6D242F-EC4A-4452-9C65-1C751A101F71@dfki.de> <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> <53013C20.8050506@dfki.de> Message-ID: <5301A352.2080908@tid.es> Hi Philipp, I asked Christof to confirm attendance from team working on web-based advanced UI GEs. They have already been assigned a speech slot titled: "Creating Interactive 3D Applications and Shared Virtual Worlds in HTML-5 with FI-WARE" so I hope they will be able to cover it but we need confirmation ASAP. The Kurento team (real-time media stream processing) are planning to attend the event and they would cover the speech slot titled: "Building Streaming Media Applications with FI-WARE" in the agenda of speeches. However, both should share the same demo table and flat screen. I hope they will be able to organize themselves. The reason for that is that we have introduce some little changes in the agenda of speeches, as well as demo tables (see updated google doc of the agenda and demo tables), as to incorporate testimonies from some of the winners of the FI-WARE challenges. They have to still confirm they could attend but I hope they will. It will actually be nice to have. Please note that we are inviting those who actually show applications that were rather professional. When they confirm, we should update a bit the agenda that is currently published on the CeBIT website. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 16/02/14 23:30, Philipp Slusallek wrote: Hi, Do we have confirmation yet about the speakers and demos from FI-WARE? I am asking since there are no entries in the Google Doc yet and there is little time left to organize travel and such. I have informed the WP13 partners and we will discuss details in our meeting this Wednesday. But there will certainly be someone for the presentations and the demos. >From a FI-C2 perspective I find the Streaming GE particularly important for the event. I very much hope we will have some of the key people at CeBIT as its a perfect match. BTW, the event is also a perfect chance to have some cross-project discussion about key topics from the FI-PPP (e.g. Cloud deployment of SEs, use of streaming and IoT in FI-Content, joint topics between WP13 and FI-C2, etc.). Best, Philipp Am 13.02.2014 06:15, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: Dear all, This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing an outstanding overview of current research findings and the technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT that organizers wish to promote. The event will take place on*Wednesday, March 12th*. The agenda of the event is already published at CeBIT's website: http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 (You have to scroll down and then select the date) The event will be organized as: * A program of speeches given at the stage * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): o one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, FI-Lab and FI-Content2 o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to find: * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been published by CeBIT on the website) * Description of topics per table You can find it at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables still as drafts. However: * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of them to cover this. Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). Some APs: * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be available to provide support during the event (tables on the exhibition area) * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are welcome but we will need to close this quickly * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting it within the overall context. I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website:www.tid.es email:jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website:http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Mon Feb 17 07:00:23 2014 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:00:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Info about CeBIT event In-Reply-To: <5301A352.2080908@tid.es> References: <3B6D242F-EC4A-4452-9C65-1C751A101F71@dfki.de> <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> <53013C20.8050506@dfki.de> <5301A352.2080908@tid.es> Message-ID: <5301A577.6060102@dfki.de> Hi, Thanks a lot for the feedback. This looks pretty good, even though it would be good to have a separate table for the WP13 activities, as there is a lot hapenning (that is already in products). Details will be known on Wednesday. Maybe it even makes sense to ask for another table (if space permits). Best, Philipp Am 17.02.2014 06:51, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: > Hi Philipp, > > I asked Christof to confirm attendance from team working on web-based > advanced UI GEs. They have already been assigned a speech slot titled: > "Creating Interactive 3D Applications and Shared Virtual Worlds in > HTML-5 with FI-WARE" so I hope they will be able to cover it but we need > confirmation ASAP. > > The Kurento team (real-time media stream processing) are planning to > attend the event and they would cover the speech slot titled: "Building > Streaming Media Applications with FI-WARE" in the agenda of speeches. > > However, both should share the same demo table and flat screen. I > hope they will be able to organize themselves. > > The reason for that is that we have introduce some little changes in > the agenda of speeches, as well as demo tables (see updated google doc > of the agenda and demo tables), as to incorporate testimonies from some > of the winners of the FI-WARE challenges. They have to still confirm > they could attend but I hope they will. It will actually be nice to > have. Please note that we are inviting those who actually show > applications that were rather professional. When they confirm, we > should update a bit the agenda that is currently published on the CeBIT > website. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 16/02/14 23:30, Philipp Slusallek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do we have confirmation yet about the speakers and demos from FI-WARE? >> I am asking since there are no entries in the Google Doc yet and there >> is little time left to organize travel and such. >> >> I have informed the WP13 partners and we will discuss details in our >> meeting this Wednesday. But there will certainly be someone for the >> presentations and the demos. >> >> From a FI-C2 perspective I find the Streaming GE particularly >> important for the event. I very much hope we will have some of the key >> people at CeBIT as its a perfect match. >> >> >> BTW, the event is also a perfect chance to have some cross-project >> discussion about key topics from the FI-PPP (e.g. Cloud deployment of >> SEs, use of streaming and IoT in FI-Content, joint topics between WP13 >> and FI-C2, etc.). >> >> >> Best, >> >> Philipp >> >> Am 13.02.2014 06:15, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at >>> CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. >>> >>> As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the >>> FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. >>> >>> Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space >>> labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, >>> particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe >>> also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal >>> with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. >>> "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an >>> "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live >>> presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing >>> an outstanding overview of current research findings and the >>> technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. >>> >>> "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You >>> can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an >>> auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. >>> >>> Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I >>> believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, >>> which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about >>> CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens >>> and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special >>> prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT >>> that organizers wish to promote. >>> >>> The event will take place on*Wednesday, March 12th*. The agenda of >>> the event is already published at CeBIT's website: >>> >>> http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 >>> >>> (You have to scroll down and then select the date) >>> >>> The event will be organized as: >>> >>> * A program of speeches given at the stage >>> * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations >>> with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into >>> further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): >>> o one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, >>> FI-Lab and FI-Content2 >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 >>> >>> There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to >>> find: >>> >>> * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been >>> published by CeBIT on the website) >>> * Description of topics per table >>> >>> You can find it at: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 >>> >>> You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables >>> still as drafts. However: >>> >>> * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition >>> area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in >>> particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing >>> and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is >>> mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the >>> links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. >>> * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges >>> came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm >>> currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of >>> speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the >>> SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message >>> that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On >>> the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to >>> promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of >>> them to cover this. >>> >>> Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the >>> necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). >>> >>> Some APs: >>> >>> * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be >>> available to provide support during the event (tables on the >>> exhibition area) >>> * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are >>> welcome but we will need to close this quickly >>> * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based >>> advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with >>> some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already >>> reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next >>> WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time >>> media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal >>> regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the >>> exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time >>> media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and >>> AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on >>> the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is >>> produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't >>> accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. >>> This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting >>> it within the overall context. >>> >>> >>> I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs >>> confcall. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >>> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >>> situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >>> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 456 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Feb 17 09:38:17 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:38:17 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] "Surprising" links in the wiki-generated docs Message-ID: <5301CA79.50901@tid.es> Dear all, In response to private questions. As it is of general interest, I send it to you all. The links in the documents you generate normally go to the right place. However, you sometimes will find that they point at : * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FI-WARE.Deliverables.Typographical.Conventions This happens when there is a link to the private wiki. The private wiki "does not exist" and we avoid links to it at all costs. The wiki-generation tool replaces the link with this one and this is a feature, not a bug. It did surprise me as well weeks ago - and I was the one who asked for this a long time ago! :) Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 17 16:56:46 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:56:46 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 In-Reply-To: <15355345.59151392374367173.JavaMail.infso-prodintra@S-INFSO-WEB2> References: <15355345.59151392374367173.JavaMail.infso-prodintra@S-INFSO-WEB2> Message-ID: <5302313E.4070902@tid.es> Hi all, I forward this info as soon as I have detected it in my inbox. I haven't had time to analyze it. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:27 +0100 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 1408914.PDF Type: application/octet-stream Size: 46692 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 1408912.PDF Type: application/octet-stream Size: 776551 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 1408915.PDF Type: application/octet-stream Size: 30556 bytes Desc: not available URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Feb 17 17:45:42 2014 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:45:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] eLearning platform not available Message-ID: <53023CB6.1060507@eng.it> Dear partners, due to an infrastructure issue the eLearning platform is not available. We're are working on this, in order to restore the situation as soon as possible. I apologize for the inconvenience, and I notify you once everything is back to normal. Kind Regards, Davide From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 17 19:34:13 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:34:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0779B031@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0779B031@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <53025625.2070007@tid.es> Hi all, Some of you are asking for a copy of the "outcome letter" that uses to be referred in file 1408912.PDF of the assessment of reported costs ... Please bear in mind that this assessment of costs by the EC correspond to the second reporting period, thus is matches the month 24 review and not the month 30 review. Consequently, you all should have the outcome letter and detailed review report of month 24. Nevertheless, I have attached both documents to this email. Besides this, our PO has just sent to me a file which should help to establish the link between review reports and the assessment of reported costs for the second reporting period. Please find it also attached. Hope it helps to analyze/understand the rejection of costs. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:03:11 +0000 From: To: , , CC: , Dear Juanjo, Attached is the missing link between review reports and Excel sheet. Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:47 PM To: ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); jdps at tid.es Cc: subsidies at tid.es; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Dear Stephane/Arian, The Finantial Assessment has arrived but we look for the rationale of some costs rejection, references to a "outcome letter of the review" are provided. As an example, the justification of rejection of some costs reported by Telef?nica I+D refer to this outcome letter of the review (literally it is said "see outcome letter of the review", please check page 1/87 of file 1408912.PDF). This applies to many other partners. However we haven't found the outcome letter of the review at any time. Or at least we haven't found it sent by the EC. As a consequence, it is difficult for us to understand the rationale behind rejection of some costs. We would rather appreciate if you can forward this information as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Rejection of costs RP2.doc Type: application/msword Size: 82944 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Review 5 Report (month 24).pdf Type: application/forcedownload Size: 714317 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outcome FI-WARE review 5 report (month 24).docx.pdf Type: application/forcedownload Size: 183517 bytes Desc: not available URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon Feb 17 22:25:27 2014 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:25:27 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] eLearning platform not available In-Reply-To: <53023CB6.1060507@eng.it> References: <53023CB6.1060507@eng.it> Message-ID: Dear partners, the eLearning platform is now available. BR Davide 2014-02-17 17:45 GMT+01:00 Davide Dalle Carbonare < davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it>: > Dear partners, > due to an infrastructure issue the eLearning platform is not available. > We're are working on this, in order to restore the situation as soon as > possible. > > I apologize for the inconvenience, and I notify you once everything is > back to normal. > > Kind Regards, > Davide > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 18 09:49:13 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:49:13 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-administrative] Fwd: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 In-Reply-To: <53025625.2070007@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0779B031@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <53025625.2070007@tid.es> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14134@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Daer all, I would like to discuss per mail some questions and the consortium overall response - but I guess not the whole FI-WORL world needs to be involved in this follow-up. Personally I assume, not all mailing list need to be involved here (Fiware-all?). Is it possible, that we rather please just name a few mailing list (not all possible) and move the follow-up discussion on this mailing list? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 17. Februar 2014 19:34 To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: [Fiware-administrative] Fwd: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Hi all, Some of you are asking for a copy of the "outcome letter" that uses to be referred in file 1408912.PDF of the assessment of reported costs ... Please bear in mind that this assessment of costs by the EC correspond to the second reporting period, thus is matches the month 24 review and not the month 30 review. Consequently, you all should have the outcome letter and detailed review report of month 24. Nevertheless, I have attached both documents to this email. Besides this, our PO has just sent to me a file which should help to establish the link between review reports and the assessment of reported costs for the second reporting period. Please find it also attached. Hope it helps to analyze/understand the rejection of costs. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:03:11 +0000 From: To: , , CC: , Dear Juanjo, Attached is the missing link between review reports and Excel sheet. Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:47 PM To: ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); jdps at tid.es Cc: subsidies at tid.es; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Dear Stephane/Arian, The Finantial Assessment has arrived but we look for the rationale of some costs rejection, references to a "outcome letter of the review" are provided. As an example, the justification of rejection of some costs reported by Telef?nica I+D refer to this outcome letter of the review (literally it is said "see outcome letter of the review", please check page 1/87 of file 1408912.PDF). This applies to many other partners. However we haven't found the outcome letter of the review at any time. Or at least we haven't found it sent by the EC. As a consequence, it is difficult for us to understand the rationale behind rejection of some costs. We would rather appreciate if you can forward this information as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Tue Feb 18 14:41:18 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:41:18 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DB171A@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, from a WP3 perspective we would like to join (like on the campus party) iff possible the "Cloud Hosting" session/table and elaborate on the business ecosystem perspective behind FI-WARE. As the google doc does not expose a specific contact for this session, I have to ask in this rather "large" round: Who is currently preparing this slot or the demo shown here? Please contact me or Markus Heller with details and to clarify on how to contribute the apps perspective. Thanks a lot, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Philipp Slusallek Sent: Montag, 17. Februar 2014 07:00 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Cc: Javier Lopez Fernandez; Roger Torrenti; Luis L?pez URJC -; Hugo Vivier Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Info about CeBIT event Hi, Thanks a lot for the feedback. This looks pretty good, even though it would be good to have a separate table for the WP13 activities, as there is a lot hapenning (that is already in products). Details will be known on Wednesday. Maybe it even makes sense to ask for another table (if space permits). Best, Philipp Am 17.02.2014 06:51, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: > Hi Philipp, > > I asked Christof to confirm attendance from team working on web-based > advanced UI GEs. They have already been assigned a speech slot titled: > "Creating Interactive 3D Applications and Shared Virtual Worlds in > HTML-5 with FI-WARE" so I hope they will be able to cover it but we need > confirmation ASAP. > > The Kurento team (real-time media stream processing) are planning to > attend the event and they would cover the speech slot titled: "Building > Streaming Media Applications with FI-WARE" in the agenda of speeches. > > However, both should share the same demo table and flat screen. I > hope they will be able to organize themselves. > > The reason for that is that we have introduce some little changes in > the agenda of speeches, as well as demo tables (see updated google doc > of the agenda and demo tables), as to incorporate testimonies from some > of the winners of the FI-WARE challenges. They have to still confirm > they could attend but I hope they will. It will actually be nice to > have. Please note that we are inviting those who actually show > applications that were rather professional. When they confirm, we > should update a bit the agenda that is currently published on the CeBIT > website. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 16/02/14 23:30, Philipp Slusallek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do we have confirmation yet about the speakers and demos from FI-WARE? >> I am asking since there are no entries in the Google Doc yet and there >> is little time left to organize travel and such. >> >> I have informed the WP13 partners and we will discuss details in our >> meeting this Wednesday. But there will certainly be someone for the >> presentations and the demos. >> >> From a FI-C2 perspective I find the Streaming GE particularly >> important for the event. I very much hope we will have some of the key >> people at CeBIT as its a perfect match. >> >> >> BTW, the event is also a perfect chance to have some cross-project >> discussion about key topics from the FI-PPP (e.g. Cloud deployment of >> SEs, use of streaming and IoT in FI-Content, joint topics between WP13 >> and FI-C2, etc.). >> >> >> Best, >> >> Philipp >> >> Am 13.02.2014 06:15, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at >>> CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. >>> >>> As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the >>> FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. >>> >>> Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space >>> labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, >>> particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe >>> also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal >>> with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. >>> "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an >>> "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live >>> presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing >>> an outstanding overview of current research findings and the >>> technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. >>> >>> "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You >>> can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an >>> auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. >>> >>> Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I >>> believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, >>> which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about >>> CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens >>> and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special >>> prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT >>> that organizers wish to promote. >>> >>> The event will take place on*Wednesday, March 12th*. The agenda of >>> the event is already published at CeBIT's website: >>> >>> http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 >>> >>> (You have to scroll down and then select the date) >>> >>> The event will be organized as: >>> >>> * A program of speeches given at the stage >>> * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations >>> with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into >>> further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): >>> o one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, >>> FI-Lab and FI-Content2 >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 >>> >>> There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to >>> find: >>> >>> * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been >>> published by CeBIT on the website) >>> * Description of topics per table >>> >>> You can find it at: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 >>> >>> You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables >>> still as drafts. However: >>> >>> * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition >>> area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in >>> particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing >>> and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is >>> mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the >>> links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. >>> * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges >>> came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm >>> currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of >>> speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the >>> SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message >>> that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On >>> the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to >>> promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of >>> them to cover this. >>> >>> Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the >>> necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). >>> >>> Some APs: >>> >>> * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be >>> available to provide support during the event (tables on the >>> exhibition area) >>> * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are >>> welcome but we will need to close this quickly >>> * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based >>> advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with >>> some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already >>> reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next >>> WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time >>> media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal >>> regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the >>> exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time >>> media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and >>> AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on >>> the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is >>> produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't >>> accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. >>> This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting >>> it within the overall context. >>> >>> >>> I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs >>> confcall. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >>> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >>> situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >>> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From jdps at tid.es Tue Feb 18 14:41:56 2014 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:41:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-administrative] Fwd: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 In-Reply-To: <53025625.2070007@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0779B031@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <53025625.2070007@tid.es> Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768DEF0A3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, please find additional information provided by the Commission regarding accepted and rejected costs. We hope it helps to understand the calculation of the rejections. BR Javier. De: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] En nombre de Juanjo Hierro Enviado el: lunes, 17 de febrero de 2014 19:34 Para: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu' Asunto: [Fiware-administrative] Fwd: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Hi all, Some of you are asking for a copy of the "outcome letter" that uses to be referred in file 1408912.PDF of the assessment of reported costs ... Please bear in mind that this assessment of costs by the EC correspond to the second reporting period, thus is matches the month 24 review and not the month 30 review. Consequently, you all should have the outcome letter and detailed review report of month 24. Nevertheless, I have attached both documents to this email. Besides this, our PO has just sent to me a file which should help to establish the link between review reports and the assessment of reported costs for the second reporting period. Please find it also attached. Hope it helps to analyze/understand the rejection of costs. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:03:11 +0000 From: To: , , CC: , Dear Juanjo, Attached is the missing link between review reports and Excel sheet. Best regards, Arian From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:47 PM To: ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); jdps at tid.es Cc: subsidies at tid.es; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Ares(2014)204452 - FI-WARE Clarifications regarding RP2 ARES(2014) 347150 Dear Stephane/Arian, The Finantial Assessment has arrived but we look for the rationale of some costs rejection, references to a "outcome letter of the review" are provided. As an example, the justification of rejection of some costs reported by Telef?nica I+D refer to this outcome letter of the review (literally it is said "see outcome letter of the review", please check page 1/87 of file 1408912.PDF). This applies to many other partners. However we haven't found the outcome letter of the review at any time. Or at least we haven't found it sent by the EC. As a consequence, it is difficult for us to understand the rationale behind rejection of some costs. We would rather appreciate if you can forward this information as soon as possible. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 20131106 FI-WARE rejections RP1+2.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 522294 bytes Desc: 20131106 FI-WARE rejections RP1+2.xlsx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Feb 18 20:04:34 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:04:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] About Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC Message-ID: <5303AEC2.80703@tid.es> Hi all, I would like to activate the afternoon session (from 14:30 to 16:00) of our weekly WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls next monday February 24th to discuss the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC and analyze further actions. Please pencil this into your agendas. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 19 09:35:32 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:35:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Deliverable owners for Delivrables moved to M40: You might have M36 partners who only contribute until M36. Please act now. Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD158B5@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, This is a request for action for all deliverable leads (WPLs please forward accordingly so that all are reached. I for now wanted to avoid mailing to fi-ware-all and see if we can get along with it since its internal organization maybe on WPL level enough). As you know, some deliverables are to be moved from M36 until later M40 within the 6th DOW amendment. I refer to the "cross-chapter" deliverables here most (e.g. WP1, WP2, WP11, WP12) but not restricted to it. Also in the same amendment, some partners will announce that they stop any / some activities at the end of M36 while they still need to contribute to deliverables moved to M40 according to their DOW commitments until before 6th amendment. This causes need for very careful organization of deliverable generation in my opinion. According to my understanding, no separate deliverables at M36 followed by new line of deliverables at M40 are planned by coordinator at this moment. Instead, as discussed in WPL/WPA telcos, my conclusion is that each deliverable owner is advised to make sure by on his own that "his" deliverable is completed by both partners (a) stopping in M36 and (b) partners extending until 40. I encourage us to make sure that organization of each deliverable starts now (at least to plan M36 stopping partner contributions) since only 2.5 months are left. Here my proposal how we can do this, comments and improvements as always needed: In my current understanding, this problem needs to be addressed by each deliverable lead and by the leaving partners. For example, we in SAP plan to stop activities at M36 and cannot contribute after M36 to your deliverable. According to my understanding, it is the duty of the deliverable lead to organize that each leaving/stopping partners has successfully delivered a valid contribution to his deliverable. For this to be possible, the deliverable lead may need to organize your Table of contents (TOC) now and allow the stopping partners to contribute accordingly. You as deliverable lead are responsible that pieces fit together and are well integrated when your final integrated version of your deliverable is submitted to EC around M40. @Each deliverable lead: - I ask each deliverable lead to please check ASAP if he has FI-WARE partners who leave at M36 in the list of his contributors (SAP with all contributions is one example, similar partners not known by me). - If yes, please approach these companies on your initiative and assign a task ASAP to deliver a contribution to your deliverable until M36 - say 1.April latest as example. - Each deliverable owner needs to review these earlier contributions and either accept the contribution or reject with review results to the contributor - say 15.April latest. - You as deliverable lead _and_ each M36 stopping partners have to together achieve a valid / accepted contribution within end of April 2014 prior to their stopping. Please if needed comment to mailing list if ok or how we can better organize this. If needed. Please contact me from your side while at the same time I try to find you as contact and approach you directly. Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Feb 19 11:18:42 2014 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:18:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Open Specs - update? In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21D1F7A@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21D1F7A@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Alex, The I2ND Open Specs doc is now ready for review, you can find it in the shared table, or directly at link https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3430/D713_WP7_v2_generated-2.docx Please note that the API of CDI and S3C enablers are described in several separate wiki pages, for each of them you'll therefore find a separate section to review in the doc (in case of any doubt please let me know). I had to face a couple of 'annoying' issues I was able to get rid of only now (heading numbering disappeared when the document was re-opened, links wrongly formatted, ...). BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: venerd? 14 febbraio 2014 11:38 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - update? Dear WP Leaders, I'd appreciate your update on Open Specs, at least to have it ready for Monday's meeting. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Only Link from Sergio is available. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 19 12:58:55 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:58:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] About Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC In-Reply-To: <5303AEC2.80703@tid.es> References: <5303AEC2.80703@tid.es> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15A23@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Juanjo, A question: How can the other companies join this telco (currently only restricted to WPL/A level)? Can you also invite whoever wants to attend from consortium so that they can hear firsthand. I guess this is ver important for them to know not only filtered my WPLs etc. Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 20:05 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] About Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC Hi all, I would like to activate the afternoon session (from 14:30 to 16:00) of our weekly WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls next monday February 24th to discuss the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC and analyze further actions. Please pencil this into your agendas. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Wed Feb 19 18:58:19 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:58:19 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FW: SME Lab proposal In-Reply-To: <51508CA9C4AE774DAC3FC6B8F0E5A538473BF739F0@GRFMBX707BA020.griffon.local> References: <51508CA9C4AE774DAC3FC6B8F0E5A538473BF739F0@GRFMBX707BA020.griffon.local> Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB036AF0@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Hi all, I have just received through the XIFI mailing list this e-mail with a document that explains what SME b-Lab is. I am not against the idea as such, but I think that the name is not very appropriate taking into account that we have FI-LAB, which is a totally different thing. The quite similar names could create confusion and misunderstanding in my opinion. However, this may be only my views on the subject. I did not follow those discussions (I include Juan in CC since he is the one who attends these meetings). Maybe it is worth to have a look at it in case someone has some feedback to provide to the EBM WG. Best regards, Nuria From: Gavazzi Roberto [mailto:roberto.gavazzi at telecomitalia.it] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:35 PM To: all at fi-xifi.eu Subject: [XIFI-All] SME Lab proposal Dear all, in the framework of EBM WG, Concord is proposing a SME Lab as described in the attached document. The main objective of SME Lab is to collect feedbacks from SMEs regarding FI PPP Program strengths and weaknesses. If look at the attached document you have more details. Every FI PPP Project shall provide SME candidates (SMEs currently involved in FI PPP phase 2 as partners) to be actively involved in SME Lab activities. This means basically filling a questionnaire and participate to a workshop (likely within ECFI-2 event). Please provide me feedbacks about the SME Lab document attached (so I can report them in the EBM WG meetings) and let me know your interest in participating to the event. The document and the information has to be considered Confidential to FI PPP. The deadline is: 28/2/2014. Thank you very much for your support. Roberto ------------------------------------------------------------------ Telecom Italia Roberto Gavazzi TILAB (Telecom Italia Lab), Via Reiss Romoli, 274 10148 Torino 011 2288520 3357669704 roberto.gavazzi at telecomitalia.it Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SMEs b-Lab_CONCORD-final.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 168321 bytes Desc: SMEs b-Lab_CONCORD-final.pdf URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Feb 19 22:11:23 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:11:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] FW: SME Lab proposal In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB036AF0@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> References: <51508CA9C4AE774DAC3FC6B8F0E5A538473BF739F0@GRFMBX707BA020.griffon.local> <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB036AF0@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: <53051DFB.6040501@tid.es> I believe we should strongly oppose to the use of the term "Lab" in "SME Lab" because it may create confusion and bring issues to the FI-Lab brand. It's ok to create a working group for SMEs but then it should be called "SME Forum" or similar, to make it clear the distinction with FI-Lab. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 19/02/14 18:58, De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria wrote: Hi all, I have just received through the XIFI mailing list this e-mail with a document that explains what SME b-Lab is. I am not against the idea as such, but I think that the name is not very appropriate taking into account that we have FI-LAB, which is a totally different thing. The quite similar names could create confusion and misunderstanding in my opinion. However, this may be only my views on the subject. I did not follow those discussions (I include Juan in CC since he is the one who attends these meetings). Maybe it is worth to have a look at it in case someone has some feedback to provide to the EBM WG. Best regards, Nuria From: Gavazzi Roberto [mailto:roberto.gavazzi at telecomitalia.it] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:35 PM To: all at fi-xifi.eu Subject: [XIFI-All] SME Lab proposal Dear all, in the framework of EBM WG, Concord is proposing a SME Lab as described in the attached document. The main objective of SME Lab is to collect feedbacks from SMEs regarding FI PPP Program strengths and weaknesses. If look at the attached document you have more details. Every FI PPP Project shall provide SME candidates (SMEs currently involved in FI PPP phase 2 as partners) to be actively involved in SME Lab activities. This means basically filling a questionnaire and participate to a workshop (likely within ECFI-2 event). Please provide me feedbacks about the SME Lab document attached (so I can report them in the EBM WG meetings) and let me know your interest in participating to the event. The document and the information has to be considered Confidential to FI PPP. The deadline is: 28/2/2014. Thank you very much for your support. Roberto ------------------------------------------------------------------ Telecom Italia Roberto Gavazzi TILAB (Telecom Italia Lab), Via Reiss Romoli, 274 10148 Torino 011 2288520 3357669704 roberto.gavazzi at telecomitalia.it Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Feb 20 09:45:59 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:45:59 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content - updated reviews available - request for action Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A152F@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Find linked updated reviews of the backlog content. The number of criteria applied has reached the same level before Christmas, except wiki descriptions. Before implementing descriptions I'm trying to reach synchronization with Technical Roadmap and Unit Tests. CONGRATULATIONS TO the following GE Owners for having ERROR-FREE reviews Javier Lucio for Apps - RSSS Markus Laumer for Data - Codoan Susana G. Zarzosa for Security - PRRS Although reviewers aren't complete, I think it's possible to take advantage of current reviewers. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3431/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140219.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3432/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140219.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3435/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140219.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3433/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140219.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3434/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140219.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3437/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140219.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3436/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140219.xlsx If any explanation or support were needed, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Feb 20 18:54:23 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:54:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] About Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15A23@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <5303AEC2.80703@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15A23@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5306414F.2000100@tid.es> Dear all, I would like to make you aware that we are going to discuss the Financial Assessment in the afternoon session of our weekly coordination call. This call takes place on Mondays and it is normally restricted to WPLs and WPAs. In this particular case it is important to extend the invitation to all the partners . Expected attendees: * Coordination (compulsory) * WPLs and WPAs (compulsory) * One representative per company (voluntarily but advisable) - just one, please These are the details: * Date and Time: Monday 24, from 14:30 till 16:00 CET (sharp, we will not be able to extend it) * Number: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf * PIN: 050662 Best regards, Miguel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 20:05 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] About Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC Hi all, I would like to activate the afternoon session (from 14:30 to 16:00) of our weekly WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls next monday February 24th to discuss the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 by the EC and analyze further actions. Please pencil this into your agendas. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Fri Feb 21 16:59:37 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:59:37 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DB743D@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Dear colleagues, I didn't receive any feedback - please reiterate this: who is currently working on the cloud hosting session and the cebit-presentation? Thanks for letting me know! /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 14:41 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Subject: apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session Dear colleagues, from a WP3 perspective we would like to join (like on the campus party) iff possible the "Cloud Hosting" session/table and elaborate on the business ecosystem perspective behind FI-WARE. As the google doc does not expose a specific contact for this session, I have to ask in this rather "large" round: Who is currently preparing this slot or the demo shown here? Please contact me or Markus Heller with details and to clarify on how to contribute the apps perspective. Thanks a lot, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Philipp Slusallek Sent: Montag, 17. Februar 2014 07:00 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Cc: Javier Lopez Fernandez; Roger Torrenti; Luis L?pez URJC -; Hugo Vivier Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Info about CeBIT event Hi, Thanks a lot for the feedback. This looks pretty good, even though it would be good to have a separate table for the WP13 activities, as there is a lot hapenning (that is already in products). Details will be known on Wednesday. Maybe it even makes sense to ask for another table (if space permits). Best, Philipp Am 17.02.2014 06:51, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: > Hi Philipp, > > I asked Christof to confirm attendance from team working on web-based > advanced UI GEs. They have already been assigned a speech slot titled: > "Creating Interactive 3D Applications and Shared Virtual Worlds in > HTML-5 with FI-WARE" so I hope they will be able to cover it but we need > confirmation ASAP. > > The Kurento team (real-time media stream processing) are planning to > attend the event and they would cover the speech slot titled: "Building > Streaming Media Applications with FI-WARE" in the agenda of speeches. > > However, both should share the same demo table and flat screen. I > hope they will be able to organize themselves. > > The reason for that is that we have introduce some little changes in > the agenda of speeches, as well as demo tables (see updated google doc > of the agenda and demo tables), as to incorporate testimonies from some > of the winners of the FI-WARE challenges. They have to still confirm > they could attend but I hope they will. It will actually be nice to > have. Please note that we are inviting those who actually show > applications that were rather professional. When they confirm, we > should update a bit the agenda that is currently published on the CeBIT > website. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 16/02/14 23:30, Philipp Slusallek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do we have confirmation yet about the speakers and demos from FI-WARE? >> I am asking since there are no entries in the Google Doc yet and there >> is little time left to organize travel and such. >> >> I have informed the WP13 partners and we will discuss details in our >> meeting this Wednesday. But there will certainly be someone for the >> presentations and the demos. >> >> From a FI-C2 perspective I find the Streaming GE particularly >> important for the event. I very much hope we will have some of the key >> people at CeBIT as its a perfect match. >> >> >> BTW, the event is also a perfect chance to have some cross-project >> discussion about key topics from the FI-PPP (e.g. Cloud deployment of >> SEs, use of streaming and IoT in FI-Content, joint topics between WP13 >> and FI-C2, etc.). >> >> >> Best, >> >> Philipp >> >> Am 13.02.2014 06:15, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at >>> CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. >>> >>> As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the >>> FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. >>> >>> Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space >>> labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, >>> particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe >>> also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal >>> with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. >>> "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an >>> "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live >>> presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing >>> an outstanding overview of current research findings and the >>> technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. >>> >>> "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You >>> can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an >>> auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. >>> >>> Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I >>> believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, >>> which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about >>> CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens >>> and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special >>> prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT >>> that organizers wish to promote. >>> >>> The event will take place on*Wednesday, March 12th*. The agenda of >>> the event is already published at CeBIT's website: >>> >>> http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 >>> >>> (You have to scroll down and then select the date) >>> >>> The event will be organized as: >>> >>> * A program of speeches given at the stage >>> * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations >>> with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into >>> further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): >>> o one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, >>> FI-Lab and FI-Content2 >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 >>> >>> There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to >>> find: >>> >>> * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been >>> published by CeBIT on the website) >>> * Description of topics per table >>> >>> You can find it at: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 >>> >>> You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables >>> still as drafts. However: >>> >>> * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition >>> area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in >>> particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing >>> and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is >>> mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the >>> links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. >>> * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges >>> came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm >>> currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of >>> speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the >>> SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message >>> that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On >>> the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to >>> promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of >>> them to cover this. >>> >>> Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the >>> necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). >>> >>> Some APs: >>> >>> * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be >>> available to provide support during the event (tables on the >>> exhibition area) >>> * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are >>> welcome but we will need to close this quickly >>> * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based >>> advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with >>> some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already >>> reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next >>> WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time >>> media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal >>> regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the >>> exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time >>> media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and >>> AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on >>> the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is >>> produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't >>> accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. >>> This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting >>> it within the overall context. >>> >>> >>> I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs >>> confcall. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >>> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >>> situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >>> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Feb 21 17:15:06 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:15:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Status of 3rd party innovation Message-ID: <53077B8A.3050105@tid.es> Hi, This is the 3rd party innovation as it is now. I will add the TOC at the end. I quite frankly do not know what to do with it. As no one volunteered to do it, I am just putting all your contributions together (but by no means I am the "lead editor"). There are parts that are rather heterogeneous: leaving them will result in a rejection (different WPs look different) and removing the different ones would have the same result (it would look too similar to the previous one). I am not opening a debate via e-mail, just reporting on the status. Something for our weekly call on Monday. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.2.5.2 Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 310995 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Feb 23 18:51:29 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:51:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] R: FI-WARE @FIA_decision on panellists for our session In-Reply-To: References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB03452E@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: <530A3521.3010109@tid.es> Dear all, I'm afraid I will only be able to be present at the FIA for the AB f2f meeting, that is, arriving on March 19 evening. Therefore, not really so able to help neither regarding the sessions nor presence in the booths this time. I forward the original request from Nuria to the WPLs/WPAs mailing list so that other partners leading the several chapters (and not the usual suspects) can volunteer. I rather appreciate in this case that Pier actually volunteered but I hope others can. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 17/02/14 08:32, Garino Pierangelo wrote: Dear Nuria, I confirm I'll attend the FIA event, from 18th evening to 20th March up to about 17:00. During that period I can help at booth as well as attend our session (I could e.g. present the quick guide to FI-Lab if there's nobody else doing it). I'm aware that another representative of I2ND chapter, Klaus Wuenstel from ALU-D, will attend FIA: I'll ask him if he can support us for booth and session. Concerning the speakers to involve, I'll try to provide some name in the next couple of days. BR Pier Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Inviato: venerd? 14 febbraio 2014 18:40 A: fiware-pcc Oggetto: [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE @FIA_decision on panellists for our session Priorit?: Alta HI all (forward to your teams if needed) As you know, the next edition of FIA Athens is approaching and FI-WARE will be present through a session (the merging between the FI-WARE session and the one originally proposed by the DWG of the FI PPP); the proposal was distributed to the PCC. We will also have a booth. I have kicked off the preparation of the session (see the two e-mails sent to the DWG for this purpose) and I would like to agree and coordinate with you regarding the messages and panelists for the first panel that I coordinate- It was originally based on FI-LAB, but I think it should now focus on the offering FI-WARE, FI-LABS, FI-OPS. The session will be held on the 19th of March from 14:30 to 16:30. There will be two panels (55 minutes each), ours and a second one that will count on use case projects. Interventions in the current agenda for this panel include: Value Proposition: a quick guide to FI-LAB Experience by a developer (one of the winners of the contests/hackathons) Access to data and physical infrastructures (representative of one of the smart cities connected to FI-LAB) Pan-European infrastructure for FI Experimentation (XIFI representative) Research, educational, Business and entrepreneurial support (KIC ICT Labs representative) Interaction with the panel and open discussion 1. Tell me if you are finally attending FIA (we need support for the booth and the session) 2. Tell me your suggestions for speakers. I need to close agenda and panelist by the end of next week. Thanks for your involvement in this. At this stage of the project, every public intervention counts!!! Nuria Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thomas.bohnert at zhaw.ch Mon Feb 24 09:02:54 2014 From: thomas.bohnert at zhaw.ch (Thomas Michael Bohnert) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:02:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] R: FI-WARE @FIA_decision on panellists for our session In-Reply-To: <530A3521.3010109@tid.es> References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB03452E@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> <530A3521.3010109@tid.es> Message-ID: <530AFCAE.8090603@zhaw.ch> Nuria, I can represent FI-WARE on the panels. Best - Thomas On 02/23/2014 06:51 PM, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm afraid I will only be able to be present at the FIA for the AB > f2f meeting, that is, arriving on March 19 evening. Therefore, not > really so able to help neither regarding the sessions nor presence in > the booths this time. > > I forward the original request from Nuria to the WPLs/WPAs mailing > list so that other partners leading the several chapters (and not the > usual suspects) can volunteer. I rather appreciate in this case that > Pier actually volunteered but I hope others can. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 17/02/14 08:32, Garino Pierangelo wrote: >> >> Dear Nuria, >> >> I confirm I?ll attend the FIA event, from 18^th evening to 20^th March >> up to about 17:00. During that period I can help at booth as well as >> attend our session (I could e.g. present the quick guide to FI-Lab if >> there?s nobody else doing it). >> >> I?m aware that another representative of I2ND chapter, Klaus Wuenstel >> from ALU-D, will attend FIA: I?ll ask him if he can support us for >> booth and session. >> >> Concerning the speakers to involve, I?ll try to provide some name in >> the next couple of days. >> >> BR >> >> Pier >> >> *Da:*fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu >> [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *Per conto di *De-Lama >> Sanchez, Nuria >> *Inviato:* venerd? 14 febbraio 2014 18:40 >> *A:* fiware-pcc >> *Oggetto:* [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE @FIA_decision on panellists for our >> session >> *Priorit?:* Alta >> >> HI all (forward to your teams if needed) >> >> As you know, the *next edition of FIA Athens* is approaching and >> FI-WARE will be present through a session (the merging between the >> FI-WARE session and the one originally proposed by the DWG of the FI >> PPP); the proposal was distributed to the PCC. We will also have a booth. >> >> I have *kicked off the preparation of the session* (see the two >> e-mails sent to the DWG for this purpose) and I would like to agree >> and coordinate with you regarding the messages and panelists for the >> first panel that I coordinate- It was originally based on FI-LAB, but >> I think it should now focus on the offering FI-WARE, FI-LABS, FI-OPS. >> >> The session will be held on the *19^th of March from 14:30 to 16:30. >> *There will be two panels (55 minutes each), ours and a second one >> that will count on use case projects. >> >> Interventions in the current agenda for this panel include: >> >> Value Proposition: a quick guide to FI-LAB >> >> Experience by a developer (one of the winners of the contests/hackathons) >> >> Access to data and physical infrastructures (representative of one of >> the smart cities connected to FI-LAB) >> >> Pan-European infrastructure for FI Experimentation (XIFI representative) >> >> Research, educational, Business and entrepreneurial support (KIC ICT >> Labs representative) >> >> Interaction with the panel and open discussion >> >> 1.Tell me if you are finally attending FIA (we need support for the >> booth and the session) >> >> 2.Tell me your suggestions for speakers. I need to close agenda and >> panelist by the end of next week. >> >> Thanks for your involvement in this. At this stage of the project, >> every public intervention counts!!! >> >> Nuria >> >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente >> alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione >> derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente >> vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete >> cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di >> provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. >> >> /This e-mail and any attachments//is //confidential and may contain >> privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. >> Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is >> unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete >> this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return >> e-mail, Thanks./ >> >> *rispetta l'ambienteRispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se >> non ? necessario.* >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-pcc mailing list >> Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > -- Thomas Michael Bohnert, PhD Head of Service Engineering (ICCLab, SPLab) Zurich University of Applied Sciences eMail: thomas.bohnert at zhaw.ch mobile: +41791758136 web: www.cloudcomp.ch, tmb.nginet.de twitter: tmbohnert skype: tbohnert From bothom at gmail.com Mon Feb 24 09:02:20 2014 From: bothom at gmail.com (Thomas Michael Bohnert) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:02:20 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] R: FI-WARE @FIA_decision on panellists for our session In-Reply-To: <530A3521.3010109@tid.es> References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB03452E@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> <530A3521.3010109@tid.es> Message-ID: <530AFC8C.50106@gmail.com> Nuria, I can represent FI-WARE on the panels. Best - Thomas On 02/23/2014 06:51 PM, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm afraid I will only be able to be present at the FIA for the AB > f2f meeting, that is, arriving on March 19 evening. Therefore, not > really so able to help neither regarding the sessions nor presence in > the booths this time. > > I forward the original request from Nuria to the WPLs/WPAs mailing > list so that other partners leading the several chapters (and not the > usual suspects) can volunteer. I rather appreciate in this case that > Pier actually volunteered but I hope others can. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 17/02/14 08:32, Garino Pierangelo wrote: >> >> Dear Nuria, >> >> I confirm I?ll attend the FIA event, from 18^th evening to 20^th March >> up to about 17:00. During that period I can help at booth as well as >> attend our session (I could e.g. present the quick guide to FI-Lab if >> there?s nobody else doing it). >> >> I?m aware that another representative of I2ND chapter, Klaus Wuenstel >> from ALU-D, will attend FIA: I?ll ask him if he can support us for >> booth and session. >> >> Concerning the speakers to involve, I?ll try to provide some name in >> the next couple of days. >> >> BR >> >> Pier >> >> *Da:*fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu >> [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *Per conto di *De-Lama >> Sanchez, Nuria >> *Inviato:* venerd? 14 febbraio 2014 18:40 >> *A:* fiware-pcc >> *Oggetto:* [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE @FIA_decision on panellists for our >> session >> *Priorit?:* Alta >> >> HI all (forward to your teams if needed) >> >> As you know, the *next edition of FIA Athens* is approaching and >> FI-WARE will be present through a session (the merging between the >> FI-WARE session and the one originally proposed by the DWG of the FI >> PPP); the proposal was distributed to the PCC. We will also have a booth. >> >> I have *kicked off the preparation of the session* (see the two >> e-mails sent to the DWG for this purpose) and I would like to agree >> and coordinate with you regarding the messages and panelists for the >> first panel that I coordinate- It was originally based on FI-LAB, but >> I think it should now focus on the offering FI-WARE, FI-LABS, FI-OPS. >> >> The session will be held on the *19^th of March from 14:30 to 16:30. >> *There will be two panels (55 minutes each), ours and a second one >> that will count on use case projects. >> >> Interventions in the current agenda for this panel include: >> >> Value Proposition: a quick guide to FI-LAB >> >> Experience by a developer (one of the winners of the contests/hackathons) >> >> Access to data and physical infrastructures (representative of one of >> the smart cities connected to FI-LAB) >> >> Pan-European infrastructure for FI Experimentation (XIFI representative) >> >> Research, educational, Business and entrepreneurial support (KIC ICT >> Labs representative) >> >> Interaction with the panel and open discussion >> >> 1.Tell me if you are finally attending FIA (we need support for the >> booth and the session) >> >> 2.Tell me your suggestions for speakers. I need to close agenda and >> panelist by the end of next week. >> >> Thanks for your involvement in this. At this stage of the project, >> every public intervention counts!!! >> >> Nuria >> >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente >> alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione >> derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente >> vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete >> cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di >> provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. >> >> /This e-mail and any attachments//is //confidential and may contain >> privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. >> Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is >> unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete >> this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return >> e-mail, Thanks./ >> >> *rispetta l'ambienteRispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se >> non ? necessario.* >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-pcc mailing list >> Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > -- Thomas Michael Bohnert, PhD Head of Service Engineering (ICCLab, SPLab) Zurich University of Applied Sciences eMail: thomas.bohnert at zhaw.ch mobile: +41791758136 web: www.cloudcomp.ch, tmb.nginet.de twitter: tmbohnert skype: tbohnert From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 24 10:03:56 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:03:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Deliverable owners for Delivrables moved to M40: You might have M36 partners who only contribute until M36. Please act now. In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD158B5@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD158B5@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <530B0AFC.7020401@tid.es> Dear WPLs, This is actually a rather important question: WPLs have to make sure that all partners who are planning to stop contributing to the project by end of month M36 deliver their contributions to any deliverable now re-planned for month 40 well in advance. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 19/02/14 09:35, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear all, This is a request for action for all deliverable leads (WPLs please forward accordingly so that all are reached. I for now wanted to avoid mailing to fi-ware-all and see if we can get along with it since its internal organization maybe on WPL level enough). As you know, some deliverables are to be moved from M36 until later M40 within the 6th DOW amendment. I refer to the "cross-chapter" deliverables here most (e.g. WP1, WP2, WP11, WP12) but not restricted to it. Also in the same amendment, some partners will announce that they stop any / some activities at the end of M36 while they still need to contribute to deliverables moved to M40 according to their DOW commitments until before 6th amendment. This causes need for very careful organization of deliverable generation in my opinion. According to my understanding, no separate deliverables at M36 followed by new line of deliverables at M40 are planned by coordinator at this moment. Instead, as discussed in WPL/WPA telcos, my conclusion is that each deliverable owner is advised to make sure by on his own that "his" deliverable is completed by both partners (a) stopping in M36 and (b) partners extending until 40. I encourage us to make sure that organization of each deliverable starts now (at least to plan M36 stopping partner contributions) since only 2.5 months are left. Here my proposal how we can do this, comments and improvements as always needed: In my current understanding, this problem needs to be addressed by each deliverable lead and by the leaving partners. For example, we in SAP plan to stop activities at M36 and cannot contribute after M36 to your deliverable. According to my understanding, it is the duty of the deliverable lead to organize that each leaving/stopping partners has successfully delivered a valid contribution to his deliverable. For this to be possible, the deliverable lead may need to organize your Table of contents (TOC) now and allow the stopping partners to contribute accordingly. You as deliverable lead are responsible that pieces fit together and are well integrated when your final integrated version of your deliverable is submitted to EC around M40. @Each deliverable lead: - I ask each deliverable lead to please check ASAP if he has FI-WARE partners who leave at M36 in the list of his contributors (SAP with all contributions is one example, similar partners not known by me). - If yes, please approach these companies on your initiative and assign a task ASAP to deliver a contribution to your deliverable until M36 - say 1.April latest as example. - Each deliverable owner needs to review these earlier contributions and either accept the contribution or reject with review results to the contributor - say 15.April latest. - You as deliverable lead _and_ each M36 stopping partners have to together achieve a valid / accepted contribution within end of April 2014 prior to their stopping. Please if needed comment to mailing list if ok or how we can better organize this. If needed. Please contact me from your side while at the same time I try to find you as contact and approach you directly. Best wishes Markus _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 24 10:18:28 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:18:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - vote of proposals to modify backlog testing rules Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A4C6B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Let me inform you that I've prepared doodle polls to vote on these proposals by SAP to modify rules governing backlog items inclusion and testing. If the meeting agenda timeline allows it, we'll address these issues pending. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Feb 24 11:26:09 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:26:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: A QUICK RESPONSE IS RATHER APPRECIATED: some questions regarding decisions on GEis In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0779E7A8@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0779E7A8@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <530B1E41.1020808@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: A QUICK RESPONSE IS RATHER APPRECIATED: some questions regarding decisions on GEis Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:39:59 +0000 From: To: , CC: I'm waiting for the review report. I want to be in line with that report. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 9:50 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Cc: Miguel Carrillo; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Fwd: A QUICK RESPONSE IS RATHER APPRECIATED: some questions regarding decisions on GEis Dear Arian, Please note that this email was sent more than one month ago and we didn't receive any response. I only received your input for the second question in the direction that FI-WARE GEis for which any further activities were asked to be stopped (all closed source GEis with the exception of those from Thales) would not even have to deal with packaging. Consequently, we are assuming that what was stated there was right and we have setup plans accordingly. We will come with a proposal of packages of related GEis we can commit to deliver as part of FI-WARE Release 3 along this week. Some of them are already on the go, but we have been discussing a final list that will get consolidated this week. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: A QUICK RESPONSE IS RATHER APPRECIATED: some questions regarding decisions on GEis Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:03:57 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: Miguel Carrillo , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Arian, Sorry for the long mail, but it covers rather important points for which we need clear detailed elaboration. Some partners, and now some UC projects, have formulated a number of questions regarding decisions on GEis. I have provided my interpretation about what is the right answer but since I am not 100% sure it is actually the right one I would like to double check answers with you to confirm we are on the same page here. The formal project review report may arrive late and I wish to avoid that we have carried out activities that then we find that were not allowed because a different interpretation. On the other hand, there is a SB meeting this Tuesday where presumably many of the questions I raise in this email will be discussed. Therefore, it would be great if you can confirm whether we are on the same page here or not. First questions has to do with support to UC projects. Here we have to distinguish three cases. Please confirm whether you agree with the interpretation I make to each case: ? Problem diagnosis and bug fixing. My understanding is that all GEi owners have to continue providing support to problem diagnosis and bug fixing. This not only until the project ends but also beyond, until end of the FI-PPP program, no matter if we are referring to GEis for which the owner is planning to cease activities at month 36 (please refer to my previous mail on extension of the duration of the project) or not. The FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement would be the agreement that backs this interpretation. No Service Level is granted by the Collaboration Agreement, so it would not be a surprise if, in practice, that maps into a higher/better support for those GEis linked to GEi owners who will continue in the Technology Foundation continuation project. We have to be realistic here. ? Advising/training activities. UC projects may require some degree of support while using the GEis, including advise and training on local deployment and configuration. My understanding is that the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement doesn't cover this though. My vision here is that this can only be taken for granted until month 36 for those GEis where the GEi owner plans to cease activities at that month. After that, it will be more a mater of willingness in their case. On the other hand, advising/training can be warranted until end of the FI-WARE project for the rest of GEis (obviously up to certain extend) since the corresponding GEi owners have not objected to continue their activities. ? Development of features required by the UC projects (either new or planned in the roadmap). I understand that this is only allowed for the GEis for which availability as open source was stated before end of November. Note that development of new features in those GEis will be planned only until month 36, matching release 3.3 of FI-WARE. The Technology Foundation continuation project is the project that is expected to deal with next releases of FI-WARE starting from release 4. However, no development of features is allowed for GEis for which availability as open source was not stated before end of November. UC projects will have to live with this fact and wait for the Technology Foundation project which, on the other hand, may not continue development of some of the GEis (particularly those that are not open source or for which it is determined that it is not worth continuing evolution and support). Second question has to do with "packaging". My understanding is that ALL GEis have to carry out "packaging" activities until end of release 3 (this means closing those activities by end of March and deliver the results by end of April, which is month 36). However, I may be wrong and packaging will indeed not be required for those GEis for which it has been stated that they won't be delivered as open source. Please confirm what is the correct interpretation. A third question related to the previous is ... what do we mean by "packaging" ? I believe that it would be worth coming with an accurate description of what "packaging" means so that we can forward to the partners clear instructions about what is expected. My interpretation is that this includes all what has to do with: ? Improving "packaging" of each GEi standalone: o Making sure that the GEi can be easily be deployed on FI-Lab using FI-WARE Cloud deployment functionalities. This means setting up VM images with the GEi configured, Blueprint templates and, eventually, some deployment recipes. This applies for GEis for which it can be expected that FI-Lab users (developers) wish to have a dedicated instance running on the Cloud. It won't apply for other GEis for which dedicated instances do not make so much sense (e.g., GEis in the Cloud, I2ND or Security chapter, GEis linked to the Business Framework or WireCloud in the Apps chapter, GEis linked to the IoT gateway, the KIARA middleware GEi). o Making sure that we end with a high-quality documentation including not just developers' guides but administration guidelines easing deployment and configuration. ? Developing the concept of "package of related GEis", which should mean: o Defining a dedicated entry in the FI-WARE Catalogue. o Developing the means for automated deployment on FI-Lab using Cloud deployment functionalities. This means setting up VM images with the GEis of the package properly configured, Blueprint templates coping with automated deployment of all GEis in the package and, eventually, some deployment recipes. Again, as with individual GEis, this applies for packages of GEis for which it can be expected that FI-Lab users (developers) wish to have a dedicated instance running on the Cloud. o Developing good guides enabling easing deployment and configuration of the packages. Note that definition of a "package of related GEis" is not always meaningful/useful. We will come with a list of packages that could make sense, but it won't be too long, actually. Again, please confirm so that we can properly communicate things to the FI-WARE partners. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Feb 24 12:14:25 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:14:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packaging and backlog/roadmap Message-ID: <530B2991.4020106@tid.es> Dear all, Further to a request from the coordination call, let us summarise how to deal with the packaging in our agile practice. More precisely, how this impacts the roadmap and the backlog. Roadmap Packaging should not motivate any changes in the roadmap. It would bring extra complexity that would make the roadmap more difficult to understand. In any case, this should be expressed in terms of workitems that should be on the backlog but that do not appear on the roadmap. As regards the ongoing amendment and the official deliverables, there is not an official one in the future. At least not a committed one. We may decide to submit an optional one in the future depending on the amount of changes. But let us make it clear: we keep the wiki up to date with or without deliverables, we do not work just to produce deliverables but to have a set of products up to date and perfectly documented always. Backlog Packaging is part of the work we do and it should be duly reflected in terms of workitems in each chapter with packaging activities. Deliverables: same situation as for the roadmap. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 24 12:39:16 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:39:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packaging and backlog/roadmap - patterns available as Work Items Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A4D66@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Let me remind there're available two backlog name patterns for this purpose: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Backlog_items_patterns#Packaging Both of them are identified as Work Items, which aren't reported on the Technical Roadmap. We report them in the backlog deliverables. [cid:image001.png at 01CF315D.6CD5E370] Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: lunes, 24 de febrero de 2014 12:14 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packaging and backlog/roadmap Dear all, Further to a request from the coordination call, let us summarise how to deal with the packaging in our agile practice. More precisely, how this impacts the roadmap and the backlog. Roadmap Packaging should not motivate any changes in the roadmap. It would bring extra complexity that would make the roadmap more difficult to understand. In any case, this should be expressed in terms of workitems that should be on the backlog but that do not appear on the roadmap. As regards the ongoing amendment and the official deliverables, there is not an official one in the future. At least not a committed one. We may decide to submit an optional one in the future depending on the amount of changes. But let us make it clear: we keep the wiki up to date with or without deliverables, we do not work just to produce deliverables but to have a set of products up to date and perfectly documented always. Backlog Packaging is part of the work we do and it should be duly reflected in terms of workitems in each chapter with packaging activities. Deliverables: same situation as for the roadmap. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 19955 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Feb 24 13:33:36 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:33:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A4E16@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Work Package Leaders, Please, find below the proposal to modify backlog-governing rules by SAP 1. Proposal: Ignore all "old" tracker-items (closed and dismissed) in the backlog-hierarchy computation in order to focus our work the relevant state-of-play and upcoming tasks Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/3teumpm2fwdzetqd 2. Proposal: exclude components which are no longer maintain from forcing external representation of their features/epics in public facing channels (e.g. the fi-ware wiki) and within the internal metrics providing the link - Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/ec6kmrwy5cynifyi 3. Proposal: Allow a set of items in the backlog which is governed by the WPL and is NOT checked against external representations (in particularly not counted as errors towards the EC). Please, submit your vote at http://doodle.com/giiumbt2eyczuxrg 4. Proposal: improving the backlog-calculation-mechanism in relation to the "&" sign-problem. It should not be counted as "issue" any more with negative effects for the chapters. (SAP proposed at least 4 distinct and possible solutions to circumvent this). Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/is2ev2us44q579ym I understand it is a decision to be taken by the management board, therefore, all their members have the right to vote. The poll will be open during the week. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Feb 25 06:53:25 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:53:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Reminder: continuation of activities linked to GEis In-Reply-To: <52F87777.80509@tid.es> References: <52E8D24C.2070005@tid.es> <52F87777.80509@tid.es> Message-ID: <530C2FD5.5010406@tid.es> Dear partners, Following a clarification sent by our PO yesterday, a little amendment to the described formula for continuation of activities linked to GEis: "The review did not look at GEis that were part of the open calls, as explicitly announced before. They are exempt from all decisions." This mostly affected iMinds, as far as I understand, since the rest of the GEis being developed by beneficiaries who joined FI-WARE through the Open Calls already committed to deliver their implementations of GEis as open source in response to the Open Calls (therefore they were under the third of the scenarios I was enumerated in my previous mail attached below for your convenience). Best regards, -- Juanjo On 10/02/14 07:53, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, I already sent an email summarizing the criteria for continuation/discontinuation of activities linked to FI-WARE GEis but, nevertheless, let me summarize it again here for your convenience. * GEis that won't be delivered as open source excluding those delivered by Thales: * development/packaging activities had to stop with end of release 3.2 * it is expected that the software and accompanying documentation for these GEis was delivered by end of January * GEis for which it was not stated they would be delivered as open source by end of November 2013 in the FI-WARE catalogue but for which it was confirmed they were going to be delivered as open source by the end of the project at the month 30 review: * they had to stop development of new features with the end of release 3.2 * they can only devote effort to "packaging" activities, as well as preparation of code to be released as open source, during release 3.3 (planned to close end of March and be delivered by end of April) * GEis for which it was stated that they will be delivered as open source by end of November 2013 in the FI-WARE catalogue, or closed source GEis delivered by Thales: * they can develop planned features during release 3.3 (planned to close end of March and be delivered by end of April) * they also have to work on "packaging", as well as preparation of code to be released as open source if not yet released, during release 3.3 I hope it helps. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Feb 26 08:09:33 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:09:33 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Input for letter of support by smart cities connecting to FI-Lab In-Reply-To: <530D926A.4020609@tid.es> References: <530D926A.4020609@tid.es> Message-ID: <530D932D.8010806@tid.es> Dear all, Please find enclosed the template of the letter we propose to use so that it gets signed by authorities of cities connecting to FI-Lab. The first and last paragraph (overall last paragraph) should be kept as much as possible as they are written. The last paragraph has to do with the statements that our PO required. Second and Third paragraph are mostly informative. They are there to explain the city that a) FI-WARE specifications are open (public and royalty-free) so they shouldn't have any concern about that and b) the opportunities that FI-Lab may bring to local entrepreneurs. You can of course accomodate the writing a little bit but the spirit and mostly the statements in the last paragraph should be there. Of course, the letter should come with some logo or stamp from the municipality as well as signature so that our PO can consider it valid. Please note that we need the letters signed for Amendment 6 to be approved with the inclusion of cities. I copy the whole list of WPLs for their info. Hope it helps. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SmartCities-FI-Lab-SupportLetter.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 17922 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Feb 27 08:53:37 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:53:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 In-Reply-To: <530EE330.1080000@tid.es> References: <530EE330.1080000@tid.es> Message-ID: <530EEF01.9060103@tid.es> ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:03:12 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu CC: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu, Stephane.ANDRIES at ec.europa.eu, Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu, "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Jes?s, Arian, Stephane, We would like to know whether there is any deadline for sending observations to the financial assessment received for Reporting Period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We certainly would like to make some observations. However, we haven't seen any deadline described in the accompanying letter nor any documentation. We would rather appreciate it if you can clarify. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/02/14 11:39, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Feb 28 10:56:28 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:56:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dynamic - Closing Sprint 3.3.2 - LAST CALL ->Request for action Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A7A6B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GE Owners, Let me remind you of our Sprint3.3.2 closing. Please, proceed to close stories, work items and bugs finished this month until 18:00 CET when I'll get the backlog snapshot. Please, find below the links to currents dashboards, where it's evident this month performance is really low. I hope it's only about reporting and you can fix it quickly today. Apps: [cid:image001.png at 01CF3472.5B000DC0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3462/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Cloud: [cid:image002.png at 01CF3472.5B000DC0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3463/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140228.xlsx IoT: [cid:image003.png at 01CF3472.5B000DC0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3466/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Data: [cid:image004.png at 01CF3472.5B000DC0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3464/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140228.xlsx I2ND: [cid:image005.png at 01CF3472.FDD785F0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3465/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Security: [cid:image006.png at 01CF3472.FDD785F0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3468/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140228.xlsx MiWi: [cid:image007.png at 01CF3472.FDD785F0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3467/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Thanks for cooperation!! Have a nice weekend! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 14353 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 14151 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 13526 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 14569 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 13607 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 14023 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13852 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Feb 28 11:09:42 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:09:42 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A7AA4@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Management Board, Let me remind you of this vote being available for your participation. Deadline is today. Thanks for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 24 de febrero de 2014 13:34 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. Dear Management Board, Please, find below the proposal to modify backlog-governing rules by SAP 1. Proposal: Ignore all "old" tracker-items (closed and dismissed) in the backlog-hierarchy computation in order to focus our work the relevant state-of-play and upcoming tasks Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/3teumpm2fwdzetqd 2. Proposal: exclude components which are no longer maintain from forcing external representation of their features/epics in public facing channels (e.g. the fi-ware wiki) and within the internal metrics providing the link - Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/ec6kmrwy5cynifyi 3. Proposal: Allow a set of items in the backlog which is governed by the WPL and is NOT checked against external representations (in particularly not counted as errors towards the EC). Please, submit your vote at http://doodle.com/giiumbt2eyczuxrg 4. Proposal: improving the backlog-calculation-mechanism in relation to the "&" sign-problem. It should not be counted as "issue" any more with negative effects for the chapters. (SAP proposed at least 4 distinct and possible solutions to circumvent this). Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/is2ev2us44q579ym I understand it is a decision to be taken by the management board, therefore, all their members have the right to vote. The poll will be open during the week. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Fri Feb 28 17:50:46 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:50:46 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A7AA4@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A7AA4@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <760BEC36-9143-432D-9D10-190839B01D4C@sap.com> Dear all i have voted for sap now (I voted with yes 4 times). btw who is member of this Management Board sorry if I forgot. is this wpl members or extended ? can someone please help me? my impression according to the nature of the voted content, I would assume that all votes are decisions for wpl round, aren't they? so is this a wpl-only vote, right? best wishes Markus Am 28.02.2014 um 11:10 schrieb "MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE" >: Dear Management Board, Let me remind you of this vote being available for your participation. Deadline is today. Thanks for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 24 de febrero de 2014 13:34 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. Dear Management Board, Please, find below the proposal to modify backlog-governing rules by SAP 1. Proposal: Ignore all ?old? tracker-items (closed and dismissed) in the backlog-hierarchy computation in order to focus our work the relevant state-of-play and upcoming tasks Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/3teumpm2fwdzetqd 2. Proposal: exclude components which are no longer maintain from forcing external representation of their features/epics in public facing channels (e.g. the fi-ware wiki) and within the internal metrics providing the link ? Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/ec6kmrwy5cynifyi 3. Proposal: Allow a set of items in the backlog which is governed by the WPL and is NOT checked against external representations (in particularly not counted as errors towards the EC). Please, submit your vote at http://doodle.com/giiumbt2eyczuxrg 4. Proposal: improving the backlog-calculation-mechanism in relation to the ?&? sign-problem. It should not be counted as ?issue? any more with negative effects for the chapters. (SAP proposed at least 4 distinct and possible solutions to circumvent this). Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/is2ev2us44q579ym I understand it is a decision to be taken by the management board, therefore, all their members have the right to vote. The poll will be open during the week. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Feb 28 18:11:56 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:11:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077A7ACF@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077A7ACF@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <5310C35C.5040403@tid.es> Dear all, Based on the response by our PO below, any observation to the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 has to be submitted before February 17. Following the plans we agreed during our confcall last week, we now have to deal with producing a coordinated letter/document comprising observations from the consortia. The letter/document will be structured as a summary section plus a number of sections, each dealing with one of the items in the following list (people who has to take care of writing each section is also listed): * Rejection of costs linked to deliverables D.4.5, D.4.1 and D.5.1, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to deliverable D.8.1.2, caretaker Pascal * Rejection of costs linked to Tools chapter, caretaker Davide * Rejection of costs linked to Testbed/FI-Lab chapter, caretaker Stefano * Rejection of costs linked to WP2/Overall Technical Coordination, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to Exploitation, caretaker Juan Bare?o We have to come up with a consolidated draft of these sections by end of next week that we can approve in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall (afternoon session) that we will have on April 17th. As it was also agreed, we will not produce a consortium response regarding rejection of costs that are not in the above list. They can, of course, go for sending their own observations. However, Telef?nica would like to be copied in any communication sent to the EC regarding this matter. If someone considers I have forgotten any item in the list we had agreed to integrate in the consortium response, please let us know. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:11:37 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Juanjo, I guess your comments will not be about the actual payment but about the assessment that can be considered part of the review and therefore article II.23.8 applies, so 1 month after date of receipt 17 Feb 2014. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03 AM To: CNECT-ICT-285248 Cc: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Dear Jes?s, Arian, Stephane, We would like to know whether there is any deadline for sending observations to the financial assessment received for Reporting Period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We certainly would like to make some observations. However, we haven't seen any deadline described in the accompanying letter nor any documentation. We would rather appreciate it if you can clarify. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/02/14 11:39, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: ? According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. ? According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Fri Feb 28 19:36:28 2014 From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:36:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 In-Reply-To: <5310C35C.5040403@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077A7ACF@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> <5310C35C.5040403@tid.es> Message-ID: <2103827594-1393612581-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1900373849-@b16.c4.bise7.blackberry> Dear Juanjo, thank you for your message, I think that a shared document can be useful for preparing the letter. If you agree, I kindly ask you if you can set it up and circulate the link. Thank you and have a nice week end Davide Mail sent from BlackBerry? Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:11:56 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 _______________________________________________ Fiware mailing list Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware