To: WPLs Attached: Background information in email 09.04.2014 "RE: WP11 Tasks for partners leaving on M36.msg" Dear Work Package Leaders, The final Standardization Report D11.4d is due to be submitted in M41 with an internal deadline of 15th September and your input is needed in two ways. As editors, NEC wants to make sure that your WP efforts are put in the best possible light. You received some emails about this in March, and it was discussed at a WPL meeting (see attached email). We expect FI-WARE will be heavily criticized for insufficient impact on standardization, but we should at least show that FIWARE Partners achieved much more than could be expected with the resources available! FI-WARE partners should in this way protect their good reputations (also for the sake of your future EU project applications). For the final standardization deliverable we need your action for (A) and (B): A) Please update the FI-WARE activity page of "your" chapter at · https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Standardization_Activities · and send an email to Lindsay.Frost at neclab.eu<mailto:Lindsay.Frost at neclab.eu> and Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu<mailto:Tobias.Jacobs at neclab.eu> when done. B) Please additionally send 1 or 2 pages of text from each of your WPs: · What standards/specifications did your WP use significantly? (Give the list of important specs used in FI-WARE software or in the develoment of it) · Which SDOs or open-source communities have been supported / encouraged by Partners, in connection with FI-WARE work? (Give any specific examples, not just a list of SDOs) · Explain which advances (contributions, work items, use cases, topics, specifications ...) were made in SDOs, based on FI-WARE-related work... (Warning WPs with absolutely zero examples are not likely to look good to the EU) · Any positive remarks about yourf standardization work ... · Include, if there were only little activities, why was that ? (no time, no synergy with projects which had resource, used only existing standards, ...) In conclusion: We suggest that you you FIRST update "your" chapter on the FI-WARE activity page as in (A) above and THEN use that summary to remind you of the positive highlights to put in the requested 1-2 pages in (B) above. This will ensure consistency and allow us also to reference the Wiki as part of the report. As usual, you can expect more emails from NEC, pointing to the good responses from some members and the lack of input from others. If you have improvements for the content, please speak up early! /Lindsay and Tobias ________________________________________ Dr. Lindsay Frost, Chief Standardization Eng. frost at neclab.eu<mailto:frost at neclab.eu> Mobile +49.163.275.1734 NEC Laboratories Europe, Kurfürsten-Anlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany. Reg. Headoffice: NEC Europe Ltd, VAT DE161569151 Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End Road, London HA4 6QE, Reg. in England 2832014 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20140730/e72df242/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Bareno Guerenabarrena, Juan" <juan.bareno at atos.net> Subject: RE: WP11 Tasks for partners leaving on M36 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:27:58 +0000 Size: 93830 URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20140730/e72df242/attachment.mht>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy