From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Sat Mar 1 11:11:33 2014 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 12:11:33 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A7AA4@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A7AA4@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Sorry, I would need further clarification to understand the voting options. 1. What is the time period considered 'old'? 2. What is the meaning of "components which are no longer maintain"? Can you provide the specific list? 3. Again, what items are envisioned to be in the proposed category? 4. Can you provide a list of affected items? Thanks, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 28/02/2014 12:09 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Management Board, Let me remind you of this vote being available for your participation. Deadline is today. Thanks for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [ mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: lunes, 24 de febrero de 2014 13:34 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog - Open Vote on Proposals to change backlog governing rules - Deadline: 28.February. Dear Management Board, Please, find below the proposal to modify backlog-governing rules by SAP 1. Proposal: Ignore all ?old? tracker-items (closed and dismissed) in the backlog-hierarchy computation in order to focus our work the relevant state-of-play and upcoming tasks Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/3teumpm2fwdzetqd 2. Proposal: exclude components which are no longer maintain from forcing external representation of their features/epics in public facing channels (e.g. the fi-ware wiki) and within the internal metrics providing the link ? Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/ec6kmrwy5cynifyi 3. Proposal: Allow a set of items in the backlog which is governed by the WPL and is NOT checked against external representations (in particularly not counted as errors towards the EC). Please, submit your vote at http://doodle.com/giiumbt2eyczuxrg 4. Proposal: improving the backlog-calculation-mechanism in relation to the ?&? sign-problem. It should not be counted as ?issue? any more with negative effects for the chapters. (SAP proposed at least 4 distinct and possible solutions to circumvent this). Please, submit your vote at: http://doodle.com/is2ev2us44q579ym I understand it is a decision to be taken by the management board, therefore, all their members have the right to vote. The poll will be open during the week. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Mar 3 08:07:52 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:07:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DB743D@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DB743D@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <53142A48.5080709@tid.es> Dear Thorsten, Carlos Ralli and Nuria de Lama are dealing with all aspects regarding organization of the event. The last consolidated agenda for the event can be seen at the following google docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 I have added a session which I have preliminary titled as "FI-WARE Business Framework" where the presentation on FI-WARE Business Framework capabilities can be made. Please add name and contact details of the presenter and follow-up with Carlos/Nuria. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 21/02/14 16:59, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Dear colleagues, I didn't receive any feedback - please reiterate this: who is currently working on the cloud hosting session and the cebit-presentation? Thanks for letting me know! /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 14:41 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Subject: apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session Dear colleagues, from a WP3 perspective we would like to join (like on the campus party) iff possible the "Cloud Hosting" session/table and elaborate on the business ecosystem perspective behind FI-WARE. As the google doc does not expose a specific contact for this session, I have to ask in this rather "large" round: Who is currently preparing this slot or the demo shown here? Please contact me or Markus Heller with details and to clarify on how to contribute the apps perspective. Thanks a lot, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Philipp Slusallek Sent: Montag, 17. Februar 2014 07:00 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Cc: Javier Lopez Fernandez; Roger Torrenti; Luis L?pez URJC -; Hugo Vivier Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Info about CeBIT event Hi, Thanks a lot for the feedback. This looks pretty good, even though it would be good to have a separate table for the WP13 activities, as there is a lot hapenning (that is already in products). Details will be known on Wednesday. Maybe it even makes sense to ask for another table (if space permits). Best, Philipp Am 17.02.2014 06:51, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: > Hi Philipp, > > I asked Christof to confirm attendance from team working on web-based > advanced UI GEs. They have already been assigned a speech slot titled: > "Creating Interactive 3D Applications and Shared Virtual Worlds in > HTML-5 with FI-WARE" so I hope they will be able to cover it but we need > confirmation ASAP. > > The Kurento team (real-time media stream processing) are planning to > attend the event and they would cover the speech slot titled: "Building > Streaming Media Applications with FI-WARE" in the agenda of speeches. > > However, both should share the same demo table and flat screen. I > hope they will be able to organize themselves. > > The reason for that is that we have introduce some little changes in > the agenda of speeches, as well as demo tables (see updated google doc > of the agenda and demo tables), as to incorporate testimonies from some > of the winners of the FI-WARE challenges. They have to still confirm > they could attend but I hope they will. It will actually be nice to > have. Please note that we are inviting those who actually show > applications that were rather professional. When they confirm, we > should update a bit the agenda that is currently published on the CeBIT > website. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 16/02/14 23:30, Philipp Slusallek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do we have confirmation yet about the speakers and demos from FI-WARE? >> I am asking since there are no entries in the Google Doc yet and there >> is little time left to organize travel and such. >> >> I have informed the WP13 partners and we will discuss details in our >> meeting this Wednesday. But there will certainly be someone for the >> presentations and the demos. >> >> From a FI-C2 perspective I find the Streaming GE particularly >> important for the event. I very much hope we will have some of the key >> people at CeBIT as its a perfect match. >> >> >> BTW, the event is also a perfect chance to have some cross-project >> discussion about key topics from the FI-PPP (e.g. Cloud deployment of >> SEs, use of streaming and IoT in FI-Content, joint topics between WP13 >> and FI-C2, etc.). >> >> >> Best, >> >> Philipp >> >> Am 13.02.2014 06:15, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at >>> CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. >>> >>> As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the >>> FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. >>> >>> Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space >>> labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, >>> particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe >>> also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal >>> with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. >>> "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an >>> "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live >>> presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing >>> an outstanding overview of current research findings and the >>> technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. >>> >>> "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You >>> can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an >>> auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. >>> >>> Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I >>> believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, >>> which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about >>> CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens >>> and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special >>> prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT >>> that organizers wish to promote. >>> >>> The event will take place on*Wednesday, March 12th*. The agenda of >>> the event is already published at CeBIT's website: >>> >>> http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 >>> >>> (You have to scroll down and then select the date) >>> >>> The event will be organized as: >>> >>> * A program of speeches given at the stage >>> * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations >>> with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into >>> further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): >>> o one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, >>> FI-Lab and FI-Content2 >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 >>> >>> There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to >>> find: >>> >>> * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been >>> published by CeBIT on the website) >>> * Description of topics per table >>> >>> You can find it at: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 >>> >>> You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables >>> still as drafts. However: >>> >>> * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition >>> area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in >>> particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing >>> and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is >>> mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the >>> links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. >>> * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges >>> came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm >>> currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of >>> speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the >>> SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message >>> that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On >>> the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to >>> promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of >>> them to cover this. >>> >>> Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the >>> necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). >>> >>> Some APs: >>> >>> * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be >>> available to provide support during the event (tables on the >>> exhibition area) >>> * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are >>> welcome but we will need to close this quickly >>> * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based >>> advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with >>> some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already >>> reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next >>> WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time >>> media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal >>> regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the >>> exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time >>> media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and >>> AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on >>> the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is >>> produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't >>> accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. >>> This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting >>> it within the overall context. >>> >>> >>> I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs >>> confcall. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >>> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >>> situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >>> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Mon Mar 3 08:17:24 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:17:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session In-Reply-To: <53142A48.5080709@tid.es> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DB743D@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <53142A48.5080709@tid.es> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DBF924@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Thanks a lot! Best, /Thorsten From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Montag, 3. M?rz 2014 08:08 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session Dear Thorsten, Carlos Ralli and Nuria de Lama are dealing with all aspects regarding organization of the event. The last consolidated agenda for the event can be seen at the following google docs: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 I have added a session which I have preliminary titled as "FI-WARE Business Framework" where the presentation on FI-WARE Business Framework capabilities can be made. Please add name and contact details of the presenter and follow-up with Carlos/Nuria. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 21/02/14 16:59, Sandfuchs, Thorsten wrote: Dear colleagues, I didn't receive any feedback - please reiterate this: who is currently working on the cloud hosting session and the cebit-presentation? Thanks for letting me know! /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 14:41 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Subject: apps contribution to CeBit on cloud hosting session Dear colleagues, from a WP3 perspective we would like to join (like on the campus party) iff possible the "Cloud Hosting" session/table and elaborate on the business ecosystem perspective behind FI-WARE. As the google doc does not expose a specific contact for this session, I have to ask in this rather "large" round: Who is currently preparing this slot or the demo shown here? Please contact me or Markus Heller with details and to clarify on how to contribute the apps perspective. Thanks a lot, /Thorsten -----Original Message----- From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Philipp Slusallek Sent: Montag, 17. Februar 2014 07:00 To: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Cc: Javier Lopez Fernandez; Roger Torrenti; Luis L?pez URJC -; Hugo Vivier Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Info about CeBIT event Hi, Thanks a lot for the feedback. This looks pretty good, even though it would be good to have a separate table for the WP13 activities, as there is a lot hapenning (that is already in products). Details will be known on Wednesday. Maybe it even makes sense to ask for another table (if space permits). Best, Philipp Am 17.02.2014 06:51, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: > Hi Philipp, > > I asked Christof to confirm attendance from team working on web-based > advanced UI GEs. They have already been assigned a speech slot titled: > "Creating Interactive 3D Applications and Shared Virtual Worlds in > HTML-5 with FI-WARE" so I hope they will be able to cover it but we need > confirmation ASAP. > > The Kurento team (real-time media stream processing) are planning to > attend the event and they would cover the speech slot titled: "Building > Streaming Media Applications with FI-WARE" in the agenda of speeches. > > However, both should share the same demo table and flat screen. I > hope they will be able to organize themselves. > > The reason for that is that we have introduce some little changes in > the agenda of speeches, as well as demo tables (see updated google doc > of the agenda and demo tables), as to incorporate testimonies from some > of the winners of the FI-WARE challenges. They have to still confirm > they could attend but I hope they will. It will actually be nice to > have. Please note that we are inviting those who actually show > applications that were rather professional. When they confirm, we > should update a bit the agenda that is currently published on the CeBIT > website. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 16/02/14 23:30, Philipp Slusallek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do we have confirmation yet about the speakers and demos from FI-WARE? >> I am asking since there are no entries in the Google Doc yet and there >> is little time left to organize travel and such. >> >> I have informed the WP13 partners and we will discuss details in our >> meeting this Wednesday. But there will certainly be someone for the >> presentations and the demos. >> >> From a FI-C2 perspective I find the Streaming GE particularly >> important for the event. I very much hope we will have some of the key >> people at CeBIT as its a perfect match. >> >> >> BTW, the event is also a perfect chance to have some cross-project >> discussion about key topics from the FI-PPP (e.g. Cloud deployment of >> SEs, use of streaming and IoT in FI-Content, joint topics between WP13 >> and FI-C2, etc.). >> >> >> Best, >> >> Philipp >> >> Am 13.02.2014 06:15, schrieb Juanjo Hierro: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at >>> CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. >>> >>> As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the >>> FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. >>> >>> Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space >>> labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, >>> particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe >>> also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal >>> with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. >>> "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an >>> "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live >>> presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing >>> an outstanding overview of current research findings and the >>> technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. >>> >>> "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You >>> can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an >>> auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. >>> >>> Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I >>> believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, >>> which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about >>> CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens >>> and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special >>> prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT >>> that organizers wish to promote. >>> >>> The event will take place on*Wednesday, March 12th*. The agenda of >>> the event is already published at CeBIT's website: >>> >>> http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 >>> >>> (You have to scroll down and then select the date) >>> >>> The event will be organized as: >>> >>> * A program of speeches given at the stage >>> * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations >>> with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into >>> further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): >>> o one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, >>> FI-Lab and FI-Content2 >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE >>> o 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 >>> >>> There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to >>> find: >>> >>> * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been >>> published by CeBIT on the website) >>> * Description of topics per table >>> >>> You can find it at: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 >>> >>> You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables >>> still as drafts. However: >>> >>> * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition >>> area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in >>> particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing >>> and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is >>> mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the >>> links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. >>> * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges >>> came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm >>> currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of >>> speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the >>> SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message >>> that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On >>> the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to >>> promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of >>> them to cover this. >>> >>> Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the >>> necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). >>> >>> Some APs: >>> >>> * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be >>> available to provide support during the event (tables on the >>> exhibition area) >>> * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are >>> welcome but we will need to close this quickly >>> * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based >>> advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with >>> some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already >>> reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next >>> WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time >>> media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal >>> regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the >>> exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. >>> * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time >>> media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and >>> AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on >>> the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is >>> produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't >>> accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. >>> This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting >>> it within the overall context. >>> >>> >>> I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs >>> confcall. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >>> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >>> situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >>> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-wpa mailing list >>> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 3 08:50:42 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:50:42 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Sprint 3.3.2 - Close report Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A901B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, As you know on Friday Sprint 3.3.2 was finished, find below data collected from the close: Please, be aware Release 3.3 will be finished with Sprint 3.3.3, which starts this month. Apps: [cid:image001.png at 01CF36BC.CFC9E3A0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3476/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Cloud: [cid:image002.png at 01CF36BC.CFC9E3A0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3477/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140228.xlsx IoT: [cid:image003.png at 01CF36BD.48DD3850] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3480/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Data: [cid:image004.png at 01CF36BD.48DD3850] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3478/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140228.xlsx I2ND: [cid:image005.png at 01CF36BD.48DD3850] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3479/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Security: [cid:image006.png at 01CF36BD.48DD3850] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3482/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140228.xlsx MiWi: [cid:image007.png at 01CF36BD.A5992630] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3481/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140228.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13418 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 13337 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 13862 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 14081 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 14233 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 14156 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13833 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 3 09:18:27 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:18:27 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile Dynamic - Sprint 3.3.3 planning - deadline 7.March (Friday) Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A906A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, We're reaching sprint 3.3.3 scheduled on the LAST MONTH available for development activities according to current work plan. When planning this sprint take into consideration that Release 3.3 is also finishing this month. So it's expected both features belonging to R3.3 and Stories, Work Item and Bugs belonging to S3.3.3 to be finished. Please, find below updated dashboards for your own awareness and organisation. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3484/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140303.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3485/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140303.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3488/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140303.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3486/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140303.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3487/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140303.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3490/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140303.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3489/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140303.xlsx If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Mar 3 09:49:29 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:49:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 In-Reply-To: <5310C35C.5040403@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077A7ACF@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> <5310C35C.5040403@tid.es> Message-ID: <53144219.3060805@tid.es> Amendment: the deadline for sending the observations is, according to Arian, one month since we receive the notification, i.e., one month since February 17, i.e., March 17. I made a mistake when I wrote February 17 as deadline for sending the observations. It should read March 17. The email from Arian, which I attached to my mail, was clear in this respect. I also made a mistake when referring to the date at which we should have the consolidated drafts of the sections linked to the document with observations. It should be March 10 and not April 17 (don't know how I came with that date :-) in an afternoon session of our weekly WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls. So in summary: * All caretakers should bring a consolidated draft by March 10 * We will submit the consolidated document with agreed observations during the week of March 10, prior the deadline of March 17. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/02/14 18:11, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, Based on the response by our PO below, any observation to the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 has to be submitted before February 17. Following the plans we agreed during our confcall last week, we now have to deal with producing a coordinated letter/document comprising observations from the consortia. The letter/document will be structured as a summary section plus a number of sections, each dealing with one of the items in the following list (people who has to take care of writing each section is also listed): * Rejection of costs linked to deliverables D.4.5, D.4.1 and D.5.1, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to deliverable D.8.1.2, caretaker Pascal * Rejection of costs linked to Tools chapter, caretaker Davide * Rejection of costs linked to Testbed/FI-Lab chapter, caretaker Stefano * Rejection of costs linked to WP2/Overall Technical Coordination, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to Exploitation, caretaker Juan Bare?o We have to come up with a consolidated draft of these sections by end of next week that we can approve in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall (afternoon session) that we will have on April 17th. As it was also agreed, we will not produce a consortium response regarding rejection of costs that are not in the above list. They can, of course, go for sending their own observations. However, Telef?nica would like to be copied in any communication sent to the EC regarding this matter. If someone considers I have forgotten any item in the list we had agreed to integrate in the consortium response, please let us know. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:11:37 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Juanjo, I guess your comments will not be about the actual payment but about the assessment that can be considered part of the review and therefore article II.23.8 applies, so 1 month after date of receipt 17 Feb 2014. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03 AM To: CNECT-ICT-285248 Cc: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Dear Jes?s, Arian, Stephane, We would like to know whether there is any deadline for sending observations to the financial assessment received for Reporting Period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We certainly would like to make some observations. However, we haven't seen any deadline described in the accompanying letter nor any documentation. We would rather appreciate it if you can clarify. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/02/14 11:39, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: ? According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. ? According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Mar 3 11:04:13 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 11:04:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Bringing info about packaging into the technical roadmap Message-ID: <5314539D.1070609@tid.es> Hi all, During our last WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall, Pascal raised the issue about whether info about packaging should be reflected on the Technical Roadmap deliverable. It was agreed that I would send an email to the list elaborating on why I believe doing so would be wrong. This is the email. The reasons why I believe it would be wrong to incorporate this info in the Technical Roadmap is the following: * First and somehow practical: we have already submitted the Technical Roadmap deliverable accompanying Release 3 of FI-WARE, so it would be a bit contradictory that we come now with changes in the Technical Roadmap (to be reflected in the website I guess) that were not captured in the written deliverable. * The technical roadmap is about planning of functional features in GEis. It elaborates on how features/epics in the backlog are planned over time. However, It doesn't need to reflect all the info about technical activities that are carried out (which are intended to be captured also in the backlog but as different entries, i.e., work items). * It leads to management of complexity (structuring the Technical Roadmap so that info about packages and their planning is captured), with little value. Unless there are good reasons, we definitively would avoid capturing info about packaging in the Technical Roadmap. If no issues are raised against the rationale above, we will assume that we will keep the Technical Roadmap without capturing info about packaging. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Mon Mar 3 13:55:16 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:55:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] potentially solved => Moved Permanently message when generating documents in document tool Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DC05A3@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Hi Christof and colleagues, As anticipated this morning I briefly looked into the "issue" with deliverable generation and tried to restore functionality... I'm very happy to let you know: it seems I succeeded with a minimal change - although no guarantee!! The "moved temporary" error does not come any more at least not for me, testing with the url: - https://130.206.80.126/deliverables/admin/run.rb?program=fiware_forge_generate_book.rb&argv1=-c&argv2=-h&argv3=fi-ware-private&argv4=D.13.1.2_FI-WARE_GE_Open_Specifications_front_page Please test it again. As for the other: please carefully test the system firstly before using it again with full steam (e.g. if you start to copy pages from private back to the public wiki - I would firstly do this with toy examples and keep everybody updated with "bad" results or "unwanted" behavior, before doing mass-changes) Best, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Mar 3 14:36:34 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:36:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] potentially solved => Moved Permanently message when generating documents in document tool In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DC05A3@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DC05A3@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <53148562.3090600@tid.es> Dear Thorsten, Thanks a lot for a proactive and efficient reaction. As we spoke in the morning I sent an urgent e-mail to the admin person to deactivate the redirect. We were lucky, he has reacted already. So either way we do not have a problem. The deletion of the redirect could be masking problems in the wiki generation tool - we will know when we re-activate the redirect.In summary: * The redirect is down. This should be working now * Thorsten has found a quick way of solving this and we will be able to fully test it once the CeBIT passes. Thanks again Miguel El 03/03/2014 13:55, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: Hi Christof and colleagues, As anticipated this morning I briefly looked into the "issue" with deliverable generation and tried to restore functionality... I'm very happy to let you know: it seems I succeeded with a minimal change - although no guarantee!! The "moved temporary" error does not come any more at least not for me, testing with the url: - https://130.206.80.126/deliverables/admin/run.rb?program=fiware_forge_generate_book.rb&argv1=-c&argv2=-h&argv3=fi-ware-private&argv4=D.13.1.2_FI-WARE_GE_Open_Specifications_front_page Please test it again. As for the other: please carefully test the system firstly before using it again with full steam (e.g. if you start to copy pages from private back to the public wiki - I would firstly do this with toy examples and keep everybody updated with "bad" results or "unwanted" behavior, before doing mass-changes) Best, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Mar 4 15:09:26 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:09:26 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, Let me share with you the backlog reviews. Please, get them from the links at the end. Current reports have been expanded to point out the action to be taken to overcome the issue: example below [cid:image001.png at 01CF37B9.FE163760] I hope you find it helpful. There's been an adjustment to the rule caring for the synchronization of items' presence in the different sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing. - Short term items (Stories, Work items and Bugs) aren't public => Only present in Tracker - Long term (Epics) and mid-term (Features) items are public depending on their status: o Dismissed items aren't public => Only present in Tracker o Closed items are present in Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing o Other status (Open, Scheduled, etc) are present in Roadmap and Tracker but NOT in Materializing. Then, if you have epics and features defined that cannot be finished or haven't started yet they can live on the Roadmap under 'Future Releases', being its status Open in the tracker. This adjustment may cause some trouble to you if you had already matched Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing, with items you're working on. Be aware than when you close those items they'll match again and the issues will disappear. I'll try to bring the last criteria missing, which is about the open descriptions next week. I'm also missing a tab with all items, which I'll try to provide next week as well. Please, be aware this is the last sprint and release, whose backlog will be reported to the EC. The report will include information about the number of issues existing. Therefore, I need to ask for your cooperation to overcome as many issues as possible. If you needed any support, please, let me know. I can help by email, chat (skype:ManuelEscriche) or hold a phone call. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3499/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140304.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3500/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140304.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3503/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140304.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3501/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140304.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3502/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140304.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3505/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140304.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3504/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140304.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7402 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Tue Mar 4 17:49:56 2014 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 17:49:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Manuel, I want to point out one issue which appears by managing the rules as you proposed in your mail below, please find my text in red below. Moreover, you commented in the doodle page that the '&' removal is nothing more than a 5 second action unless we do something wrong: I completely disagree, because as I explained you several times, for the I2ND team at least, this implies not only modifying a wiki page title (which really costs 5 seconds time), but also updating *all* the other pages and documents (e.g. the catalogue) which link that modified page. It is absolutely not as simple as you said, and I thought that a change of filtering actions would be easier to implement. Can you explain why is including '&' as permitted char so difficult? BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 15:09 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear GEI Owners, Let me share with you the backlog reviews. Please, get them from the links at the end. Current reports have been expanded to point out the action to be taken to overcome the issue: example below [cid:image001.png at 01CF37D1.2981AAD0] I hope you find it helpful. There's been an adjustment to the rule caring for the synchronization of items' presence in the different sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing. - Short term items (Stories, Work items and Bugs) aren't public => Only present in Tracker - Long term (Epics) and mid-term (Features) items are public depending on their status: o Dismissed items aren't public => Only present in Tracker o Closed items are present in Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing o Other status (Open, Scheduled, etc) are present in Roadmap and Tracker but NOT in Materializing. [PG]: I believe this rule is not to be applied (and I believe it should be at least discussed during a WPL/WPA call before deciding to apply it): Materialising page, since the beginning of FI-WARE in my view represents *what* will be done, while the Technical Roadmap represents *when* this will be done. Therefore, for me the Materialising page must always contain all the items (I refer to Features particularly), at least those open and/or scheduled (for dismissed ones I agree they are present in Tracker only). By introducing this rule, I don't see real advantages, but lot of disadvantages as we need modifying again stable pages. Moreover, where should we keep the removed Feature pages? We would need a further place to 'store' all the links removed (so additional burden...) from the materialising page, otherwise we would leave pages and pages not linked anywhere within the wiki. Then, if you have epics and features defined that cannot be finished or haven't started yet they can live on the Roadmap under 'Future Releases', being its status Open in the tracker. This adjustment may cause some trouble to you if you had already matched Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing, with items you're working on. Be aware than when you close those items they'll match again and the issues will disappear. I'll try to bring the last criteria missing, which is about the open descriptions next week. I'm also missing a tab with all items, which I'll try to provide next week as well. Please, be aware this is the last sprint and release, whose backlog will be reported to the EC. The report will include information about the number of issues existing. Therefore, I need to ask for your cooperation to overcome as many issues as possible. If you needed any support, please, let me know. I can help by email, chat (skype:ManuelEscriche) or hold a phone call. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3499/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140304.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3500/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140304.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3503/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140304.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3501/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140304.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3502/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140304.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3505/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140304.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3504/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140304.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7402 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Mar 4 18:37:53 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:37:53 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action In-Reply-To: References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC13C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Pier, Let me comment it step by step: [PG]: I believe this rule is not to be applied (and I believe it should be at least discussed during a WPL/WPA call before deciding to apply it): Materialising page, since the beginning of FI-WARE in my view represents *what* will be done, [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose while the Technical Roadmap represents *when* this will be done. [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose Therefore, for me the Materialising page must always contain all the items (I refer to Features particularly), [MEV] OK -> it just points out ALL ITEMS FINISHED AND AVAILABLE IN THE GEIs at least those open and/or scheduled (for dismissed ones I agree they are present in Tracker only). By introducing this rule, I don't see real advantages, but lot of disadvantages as we need modifying again stable pages. Moreover, where should we keep the removed Feature pages? We would need a further place to 'store' all the links removed (so additional burden...) from the materialising page, otherwise we would leave pages and pages not linked anywhere within the wiki. [MEV] The advantage is to allow items defined in the roadmap and that will not be implement to exist as well. We cannot include them in materializing since that would lead to think they are available on the GEI's when they are NOT. I'd like to understand what you mean by where should we keep the removed Feature Pages - they are reachable first from the roadmap, and if finished from materializing as well. Kind regards, Manuel Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 15:09 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear GEI Owners, Let me share with you the backlog reviews. Please, get them from the links at the end. Current reports have been expanded to point out the action to be taken to overcome the issue: example below [cid:image001.png at 01CF37D8.DC9F8860] I hope you find it helpful. There's been an adjustment to the rule caring for the synchronization of items' presence in the different sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing. - Short term items (Stories, Work items and Bugs) aren't public => Only present in Tracker - Long term (Epics) and mid-term (Features) items are public depending on their status: o Dismissed items aren't public => Only present in Tracker o Closed items are present in Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing o Other status (Open, Scheduled, etc) are present in Roadmap and Tracker but NOT in Materializing. Then, if you have epics and features defined that cannot be finished or haven't started yet they can live on the Roadmap under 'Future Releases', being its status Open in the tracker. This adjustment may cause some trouble to you if you had already matched Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing, with items you're working on. Be aware than when you close those items they'll match again and the issues will disappear. I'll try to bring the last criteria missing, which is about the open descriptions next week. I'm also missing a tab with all items, which I'll try to provide next week as well. Please, be aware this is the last sprint and release, whose backlog will be reported to the EC. The report will include information about the number of issues existing. Therefore, I need to ask for your cooperation to overcome as many issues as possible. If you needed any support, please, let me know. I can help by email, chat (skype:ManuelEscriche) or hold a phone call. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3499/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140304.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3500/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140304.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3503/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140304.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3501/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140304.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3502/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140304.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3505/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140304.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3504/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140304.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7402 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Wed Mar 5 09:13:41 2014 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:13:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC13C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC13C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Manuel and All, my further comments are in light blue below. BR Pier Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 18:38 A: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear Pier, Let me comment it step by step: [PG]: I believe this rule is not to be applied (and I believe it should be at least discussed during a WPL/WPA call before deciding to apply it): Materialising page, since the beginning of FI-WARE in my view represents *what* will be done, [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: I would point out the tense I used: *what will be done* (not *what already done*). This implies that the Materialising page contains all Features that are or will be implemented, even in the future. This is what we did since the beginning of the project. while the Technical Roadmap represents *when* this will be done. [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: of course OK Therefore, for me the Materialising page must always contain all the items (I refer to Features particularly), [MEV] OK -> it just points out ALL ITEMS FINISHED AND AVAILABLE IN THE GEIs [PG]: See my first comment above. at least those open and/or scheduled (for dismissed ones I agree they are present in Tracker only). By introducing this rule, I don't see real advantages, but lot of disadvantages as we need modifying again stable pages. Moreover, where should we keep the removed Feature pages? We would need a further place to 'store' all the links removed (so additional burden...) from the materialising page, otherwise we would leave pages and pages not linked anywhere within the wiki. [MEV] The advantage is to allow items defined in the roadmap and that will not be implement to exist as well. We cannot include them in materializing since that would lead to think they are available on the GEI's when they are NOT. I'd like to understand what you mean by where should we keep the removed Feature Pages - they are reachable first from the roadmap, and if finished from materializing as well. [PG]: This assumption in my view reverts the way we have usually worked so far: as said in my first comment above, at least in I2ND chapter we described first the Features and placed them in the Materialising page, then we populated the Roadmap page according to the development plans. Hence the Materialising always contained the list of *all* Features of a GE, independent of when they have been of will be implemented. Are the other chapters working differently? Kind regards, Manuel Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 15:09 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear GEI Owners, Let me share with you the backlog reviews. Please, get them from the links at the end. Current reports have been expanded to point out the action to be taken to overcome the issue: example below [cid:image001.png at 01CF3852.2D288E20] I hope you find it helpful. There's been an adjustment to the rule caring for the synchronization of items' presence in the different sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing. - Short term items (Stories, Work items and Bugs) aren't public => Only present in Tracker - Long term (Epics) and mid-term (Features) items are public depending on their status: o Dismissed items aren't public => Only present in Tracker o Closed items are present in Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing o Other status (Open, Scheduled, etc) are present in Roadmap and Tracker but NOT in Materializing. Then, if you have epics and features defined that cannot be finished or haven't started yet they can live on the Roadmap under 'Future Releases', being its status Open in the tracker. This adjustment may cause some trouble to you if you had already matched Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing, with items you're working on. Be aware than when you close those items they'll match again and the issues will disappear. I'll try to bring the last criteria missing, which is about the open descriptions next week. I'm also missing a tab with all items, which I'll try to provide next week as well. Please, be aware this is the last sprint and release, whose backlog will be reported to the EC. The report will include information about the number of issues existing. Therefore, I need to ask for your cooperation to overcome as many issues as possible. If you needed any support, please, let me know. I can help by email, chat (skype:ManuelEscriche) or hold a phone call. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3499/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140304.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3500/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140304.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3503/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140304.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3501/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140304.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3502/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140304.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3505/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140304.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3504/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140304.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:image002.gif at 01CF3852.2D288E20]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7402 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 5 09:30:56 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:30:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action In-Reply-To: References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC13C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC2E0@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Let me emphasize and the core issue: As we're approaching the end of the project we're facing limit conditions not considered before; so in my opinion there's need to adapt the scheme a bit. As I said, if we leave it that way, the materializing page is holding features or epics NOT implemented and NOT available in the GEIs - which in my opinion is misleading. In the roadmap you can insert a heading for "Future Releases" and include them. Regarding synchronization of sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing doesn't require changes for those backlog items that will be closed and finished, only temporary existence and tolerance of them that will disappear when those items are effectively closed. Kind regards, Manuel From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: mi?rcoles, 05 de marzo de 2014 9:14 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear Manuel and All, my further comments are in light blue below. BR Pier Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 18:38 A: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear Pier, Let me comment it step by step: [PG]: I believe this rule is not to be applied (and I believe it should be at least discussed during a WPL/WPA call before deciding to apply it): Materialising page, since the beginning of FI-WARE in my view represents *what* will be done, [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: I would point out the tense I used: *what will be done* (not *what already done*). This implies that the Materialising page contains all Features that are or will be implemented, even in the future. This is what we did since the beginning of the project. while the Technical Roadmap represents *when* this will be done. [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: of course OK Therefore, for me the Materialising page must always contain all the items (I refer to Features particularly), [MEV] OK -> it just points out ALL ITEMS FINISHED AND AVAILABLE IN THE GEIs [PG]: See my first comment above. at least those open and/or scheduled (for dismissed ones I agree they are present in Tracker only). By introducing this rule, I don't see real advantages, but lot of disadvantages as we need modifying again stable pages. Moreover, where should we keep the removed Feature pages? We would need a further place to 'store' all the links removed (so additional burden...) from the materialising page, otherwise we would leave pages and pages not linked anywhere within the wiki. [MEV] The advantage is to allow items defined in the roadmap and that will not be implement to exist as well. We cannot include them in materializing since that would lead to think they are available on the GEI's when they are NOT. I'd like to understand what you mean by where should we keep the removed Feature Pages - they are reachable first from the roadmap, and if finished from materializing as well. [PG]: This assumption in my view reverts the way we have usually worked so far: as said in my first comment above, at least in I2ND chapter we described first the Features and placed them in the Materialising page, then we populated the Roadmap page according to the development plans. Hence the Materialising always contained the list of *all* Features of a GE, independent of when they have been of will be implemented. Are the other chapters working differently? Kind regards, Manuel Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 15:09 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear GEI Owners, Let me share with you the backlog reviews. Please, get them from the links at the end. Current reports have been expanded to point out the action to be taken to overcome the issue: example below [cid:image001.png at 01CF3855.9F4923E0] I hope you find it helpful. There's been an adjustment to the rule caring for the synchronization of items' presence in the different sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing. - Short term items (Stories, Work items and Bugs) aren't public => Only present in Tracker - Long term (Epics) and mid-term (Features) items are public depending on their status: o Dismissed items aren't public => Only present in Tracker o Closed items are present in Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing o Other status (Open, Scheduled, etc) are present in Roadmap and Tracker but NOT in Materializing. Then, if you have epics and features defined that cannot be finished or haven't started yet they can live on the Roadmap under 'Future Releases', being its status Open in the tracker. This adjustment may cause some trouble to you if you had already matched Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing, with items you're working on. Be aware than when you close those items they'll match again and the issues will disappear. I'll try to bring the last criteria missing, which is about the open descriptions next week. I'm also missing a tab with all items, which I'll try to provide next week as well. Please, be aware this is the last sprint and release, whose backlog will be reported to the EC. The report will include information about the number of issues existing. Therefore, I need to ask for your cooperation to overcome as many issues as possible. If you needed any support, please, let me know. I can help by email, chat (skype:ManuelEscriche) or hold a phone call. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3499/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140304.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3500/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140304.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3503/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140304.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3501/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140304.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3502/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140304.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3505/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140304.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3504/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140304.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7402 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed Mar 5 09:55:25 2014 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:55:25 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action In-Reply-To: References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC13C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <13219_1394009725_5316E67D_13219_17714_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1A60CE@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi all Just one comment regarding materializing the Vision : at the beginning before we have the roadmap we put everything in this place but after the first version of the roadmap we deliver what will be done in the roadmap and transfer new items in the Materializing section while we update the UTP, IAG and UPG on the public wiki. This is when we synchronize Tech Roadmap with The Materializing the Vision and we have to update the roadmap with the new features for next releases. BR Thierry De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Garino Pierangelo Envoy? : mercredi 5 mars 2014 09:14 ? : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear Manuel and All, my further comments are in light blue below. BR Pier Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 18:38 A: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear Pier, Let me comment it step by step: [PG]: I believe this rule is not to be applied (and I believe it should be at least discussed during a WPL/WPA call before deciding to apply it): Materialising page, since the beginning of FI-WARE in my view represents *what* will be done, [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: I would point out the tense I used: *what will be done* (not *what already done*). This implies that the Materialising page contains all Features that are or will be implemented, even in the future. This is what we did since the beginning of the project. while the Technical Roadmap represents *when* this will be done. [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: of course OK Therefore, for me the Materialising page must always contain all the items (I refer to Features particularly), [MEV] OK -> it just points out ALL ITEMS FINISHED AND AVAILABLE IN THE GEIs [PG]: See my first comment above. at least those open and/or scheduled (for dismissed ones I agree they are present in Tracker only). By introducing this rule, I don't see real advantages, but lot of disadvantages as we need modifying again stable pages. Moreover, where should we keep the removed Feature pages? We would need a further place to 'store' all the links removed (so additional burden...) from the materialising page, otherwise we would leave pages and pages not linked anywhere within the wiki. [MEV] The advantage is to allow items defined in the roadmap and that will not be implement to exist as well. We cannot include them in materializing since that would lead to think they are available on the GEI's when they are NOT. I'd like to understand what you mean by where should we keep the removed Feature Pages - they are reachable first from the roadmap, and if finished from materializing as well. [PG]: This assumption in my view reverts the way we have usually worked so far: as said in my first comment above, at least in I2ND chapter we described first the Features and placed them in the Materialising page, then we populated the Roadmap page according to the development plans. Hence the Materialising always contained the list of *all* Features of a GE, independent of when they have been of will be implemented. Are the other chapters working differently? Kind regards, Manuel Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 15:09 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear GEI Owners, Let me share with you the backlog reviews. Please, get them from the links at the end. Current reports have been expanded to point out the action to be taken to overcome the issue: example below [cid:image001.png at 01CF3859.078F2460] I hope you find it helpful. There's been an adjustment to the rule caring for the synchronization of items' presence in the different sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing. - Short term items (Stories, Work items and Bugs) aren't public => Only present in Tracker - Long term (Epics) and mid-term (Features) items are public depending on their status: o Dismissed items aren't public => Only present in Tracker o Closed items are present in Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing o Other status (Open, Scheduled, etc) are present in Roadmap and Tracker but NOT in Materializing. Then, if you have epics and features defined that cannot be finished or haven't started yet they can live on the Roadmap under 'Future Releases', being its status Open in the tracker. This adjustment may cause some trouble to you if you had already matched Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing, with items you're working on. Be aware than when you close those items they'll match again and the issues will disappear. I'll try to bring the last criteria missing, which is about the open descriptions next week. I'm also missing a tab with all items, which I'll try to provide next week as well. Please, be aware this is the last sprint and release, whose backlog will be reported to the EC. The report will include information about the number of issues existing. Therefore, I need to ask for your cooperation to overcome as many issues as possible. If you needed any support, please, let me know. I can help by email, chat (skype:ManuelEscriche) or hold a phone call. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3499/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140304.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3500/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140304.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3503/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140304.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3501/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140304.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3502/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140304.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3505/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140304.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3504/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140304.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7402 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Wed Mar 5 16:43:02 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:43:02 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Invitation FI-LAB/XIFI to speak in The Creative Ring Pre-FIA session Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB04E18C@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Hi all, I have just received this offer to be present in one of the workshops of the next FIA event in Athens. The session refers to creative industries; therefore I thought it would be nice to have someone familiar to this topic or at least with knowledge on the GE that have more potential for such industry. The other condition is attending FIA Athens, of course. Let me know if there is willingness to be present in this workshop and who would be available for that. Thanks in advance for your collaboration!!! Nuria From: Ana Garcia [mailto:ana.garcia at enoll.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 4:34 PM To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; Federico Michele Facca Cc: Fabio Antonelli; Simon Delaere; Paolo Aversano; Sergi Fernandez Subject: Invitation FI-LAB/XIFI to speak in The Creative Ring Pre-FIA session Dear Nuria, and Federico (already informed through Fabio Antonelli), SPECIFI project in collaboration with the Visionair project organises a pre-FIA session on Athens on Tuesday 18th morning for what we call the the Creative Ring. The name of the session is: Future Internet boosting Creativity in Europe: Scaling platforms, data, tools, services and communities. We are inviting other initiatives that we consider could contribute to the Creative Ring, to present their platforms, tools, services (etc, depending on the initiave) and in particular to link it to the tools and/or services that can be offered to Creative Industries. We would like to invite FI-LAB/XIFI to join us in the discussion. This session is also connected with one of the FI-PPP phase 3 new projects (CreatiFI) reason why we think it is particularly important to have your/FI-WARE/XIFI presence. Nuria, Federico, could you please let us know whether someone from FI-WARE and/or XIFI could join the session? Ideally we would like to have both views but a single person can cover everything is fine. In particular we would like to explore how FI-LAB could be eventually exploited by communities of Creative Industries built around the Creative Hubs. Developers and Creative Industry are not the same thing, but artists/hackers are merging and creating this combined profile for certain type of creative industries (gaming, media, etc). We are also interested in having the view of XIFI, that will provide the federated infrastructures were FI-WARE components are instantiated, as the creative hubs/creative communities will have to use that infrastructure in particular if we are talking about scaling in the future. In practical terms we are asking you to present FI-LAB/XIFI 10-15 minutes (depending on whether is 1 or 2 speakers) with a reflexion towards the end to the session objectives and focus, and to participate in the discussion. I attach for your convenience the session description and latest agenda (working on it still). FI-CONTENT has confirmed his participation. Your input would be appreciated asap. We apologies for the short notice. In CC are some of the SPECIFI project colleagues, including the coordinator (Simon Delaere). Best regards, Ana Garcia European Network of Living Labs ENoLL Office | Pleinlaan 9 | B 1050 Brussels | Belgium Tel: +32 2 629 16 13 Fax: +32 2 629 17 00 www.openlivinglabs.eu Follow us on twitter @openlivinglabs and Like us on Facebook. www.slideshare.net/openlivinglabs vimeo.com/openlivinglabs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CreativeRing session pre-FIA Athens draft V7 5.3.doc Type: application/msword Size: 201216 bytes Desc: CreativeRing session pre-FIA Athens draft V7 5.3.doc URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 5 17:09:39 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:09:39 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC2E0@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ABF49@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC13C@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC2E0@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AC643@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners: In order to help this part: "Regarding synchronization of sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing doesn't require changes for those backlog items that will be closed and finished, only temporary existence and tolerance of them that will disappear when those items are effectively closed." I've inserted a different message on those items so that they can be easily identified, and action not taken on them: (<-- Reference in materializing will be fine when the item is closed) [cid:image003.png at 01CF3894.5B9B1880] Find below updated reports: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3509/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140305.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3510/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140305.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3513/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140305.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3511/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140305.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3512/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140305.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3515/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140305.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3514/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140305.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: mi?rcoles, 05 de marzo de 2014 9:31 To: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Let me emphasize and the core issue: As we're approaching the end of the project we're facing limit conditions not considered before; so in my opinion there's need to adapt the scheme a bit. As I said, if we leave it that way, the materializing page is holding features or epics NOT implemented and NOT available in the GEIs - which in my opinion is misleading. In the roadmap you can insert a heading for "Future Releases" and include them. Kind regards, Manuel From: Garino Pierangelo [mailto:pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it] Sent: mi?rcoles, 05 de marzo de 2014 9:14 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear Manuel and All, my further comments are in light blue below. BR Pier Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 18:38 A: Garino Pierangelo Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear Pier, Let me comment it step by step: [PG]: I believe this rule is not to be applied (and I believe it should be at least discussed during a WPL/WPA call before deciding to apply it): Materialising page, since the beginning of FI-WARE in my view represents *what* will be done, [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: I would point out the tense I used: *what will be done* (not *what already done*). This implies that the Materialising page contains all Features that are or will be implemented, even in the future. This is what we did since the beginning of the project. while the Technical Roadmap represents *when* this will be done. [MEV] OK -> this is the purpose [PG]: of course OK Therefore, for me the Materialising page must always contain all the items (I refer to Features particularly), [MEV] OK -> it just points out ALL ITEMS FINISHED AND AVAILABLE IN THE GEIs [PG]: See my first comment above. at least those open and/or scheduled (for dismissed ones I agree they are present in Tracker only). By introducing this rule, I don't see real advantages, but lot of disadvantages as we need modifying again stable pages. Moreover, where should we keep the removed Feature pages? We would need a further place to 'store' all the links removed (so additional burden...) from the materialising page, otherwise we would leave pages and pages not linked anywhere within the wiki. [MEV] The advantage is to allow items defined in the roadmap and that will not be implement to exist as well. We cannot include them in materializing since that would lead to think they are available on the GEI's when they are NOT. I'd like to understand what you mean by where should we keep the removed Feature Pages - they are reachable first from the roadmap, and if finished from materializing as well. [PG]: This assumption in my view reverts the way we have usually worked so far: as said in my first comment above, at least in I2ND chapter we described first the Features and placed them in the Materialising page, then we populated the Roadmap page according to the development plans. Hence the Materialising always contained the list of *all* Features of a GE, independent of when they have been of will be implemented. Are the other chapters working differently? Kind regards, Manuel Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 4 marzo 2014 15:09 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews available - request for action Dear GEI Owners, Let me share with you the backlog reviews. Please, get them from the links at the end. Current reports have been expanded to point out the action to be taken to overcome the issue: example below [cid:image004.png at 01CF3894.5B9B1880] I hope you find it helpful. There's been an adjustment to the rule caring for the synchronization of items' presence in the different sources: Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing. - Short term items (Stories, Work items and Bugs) aren't public => Only present in Tracker - Long term (Epics) and mid-term (Features) items are public depending on their status: o Dismissed items aren't public => Only present in Tracker o Closed items are present in Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing o Other status (Open, Scheduled, etc) are present in Roadmap and Tracker but NOT in Materializing. Then, if you have epics and features defined that cannot be finished or haven't started yet they can live on the Roadmap under 'Future Releases', being its status Open in the tracker. This adjustment may cause some trouble to you if you had already matched Roadmap, Tracker and Materializing, with items you're working on. Be aware than when you close those items they'll match again and the issues will disappear. I'll try to bring the last criteria missing, which is about the open descriptions next week. I'm also missing a tab with all items, which I'll try to provide next week as well. Please, be aware this is the last sprint and release, whose backlog will be reported to the EC. The report will include information about the number of issues existing. Therefore, I need to ask for your cooperation to overcome as many issues as possible. If you needed any support, please, let me know. I can help by email, chat (skype:ManuelEscriche) or hold a phone call. Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3499/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140304.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3500/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140304.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3503/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140304.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3501/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140304.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3502/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140304.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3505/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140304.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3504/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140304.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 16139 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 7402 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image005.gif URL: From juan.bareno at atos.net Thu Mar 6 20:20:20 2014 From: juan.bareno at atos.net (Bareno Guerenabarrena, Juan) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:20:20 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2- D11.2.2 Message-ID: <08F06C5778F5DE41AD2ACEF1BBD8EC9304CD97@DEFTHW99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Dear Colleagues After submitting up to 3 individual exploitation plans for the same deliverable, D11.2.2, once public in June, one more in July and a new one in October, the last ones on confidential basis , "50% of the costs associated with this deliverable are rejected, except for ATOS, Thales, Telefonica, and France Telecom". - "Unfortunately, despite the repeated comments by the reviewers on this very subject, the specific company exploitation plans are still generic and in some cases bordering on being a "wish list". They all say positive things but lack specificity in themes, markets, applications, timeline, budget and resources dedicated to the success of FI-WARE. With a few exceptions such as those supplied by ATOS and Thales and to some extent Telefonica and France Telecom, the individual exploitation plans are largely a collection of wishes, expectations and high level aims. In all cases, there are surprisingly very few references to specific GEs (or GE combinations) even by the owners concerned. In addition, they are a collation of single plans without any attempt to explain which type of synchronisation or coordination will happen among them and how this concerted effort will be coordinated, if any. There is not a single reference in the individual plans to the OIL, which is positioned in the generic part of the document as a key vehicle to "pave the way for a successful exploitation and sustainability of its [the FI-WARE project] results Although in the review report R5, it seems "crystal clear" , see paragraphs above and below, why they reject the individual exploitation plans, they seem to maintain the same opinion after the M30 Review but we have not received any particular assessment on M30 individual exploitation plans submitted on a confidential basis. Accordingly, together with SAP I have prepared this paragraph to include into the "Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2" Please feel free to suggest any modification to the following paragraph, and add whatever individual comment from your side regarding your exploitation plan. Before 14:00 of Monday 10 th In relation to the definite cost-cuttings of efforts in D11.2.2, the partners affected (*) would like to kindly ask for some feedback regarding the new M30 individual exploitation plans resubmitted and presented on a confidential basis. The main purpose is to be able of reassessing the situation in the next round, M36, and resubmit the costs accordingly (if accepted). Therefore the partners affected (*) would ask for changing the "definite" reduction towards a "cost acceptance" or at least a "temporary" reduction. (*) SAP, IBM-IL, DT, TI, ENG, INTEL, SIEMENS, NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORK, ALCATEL, TECHNICOLOR, NEC Br Juan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Initial Feedback form review report; 1) Few references to specific GEs (or GE combinations) by the owners concerned, 2) No single reference about the FI LAB. The individual exploitation plans are largely a collection of wishes, expectations and high level aims. - "The exploitation planning of FI-WARE key results at the partner level is still highly general and patchy in depth and scope, and in many cases unclear, uncertain, unconvincing, or a combination of these" - "The (lack of) substance and concreteness for the vast majority of the individual exploitation plans, at Month 24, is totally inappropriate for the ambition of FI-WARE and incommensurate with the claimed business commitment to project results by the main partners, even to Vice-President Kroes" - "The reviewers are exceedingly concerned about the dearth of concrete evidence of the business commitment of GE implementation owners, and the corresponding lack of concrete information and traceability of GE implementations in the exploitation plans of these owners". - "The current exploitation plans are mainly statements of aims, expectations and desires, which all go broadly in the right direction, but without the priority and thrust needed to achieve a real change". - "The lack of examples and paucity of concrete details necessary to create a real following within and around the various participants is, at Month 24 and one year before the project ends, exceedingly alarming". Juan Bare?o Research & Innovation T. +34 912 148 859 M. +34 625 598 216 juan.bareno at atos.net Albarrac?n, 25 28037 Madrid - Spain atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CF21D2.D8BA98F0] From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:12 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 Dear all, Based on the response by our PO below, any observation to the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 has to be submitted before February 17. Following the plans we agreed during our confcall last week, we now have to deal with producing a coordinated letter/document comprising observations from the consortia. The letter/document will be structured as a summary section plus a number of sections, each dealing with one of the items in the following list (people who has to take care of writing each section is also listed): * Rejection of costs linked to deliverables D.4.5, D.4.1 and D.5.1, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to deliverable D.8.1.2, caretaker Pascal * Rejection of costs linked to Tools chapter, caretaker Davide * Rejection of costs linked to Testbed/FI-Lab chapter, caretaker Stefano * Rejection of costs linked to WP2/Overall Technical Coordination, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to Exploitation, caretaker Juan Bare?o We have to come up with a consolidated draft of these sections by end of next week that we can approve in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall (afternoon session) that we will have on April 17th. As it was also agreed, we will not produce a consortium response regarding rejection of costs that are not in the above list. They can, of course, go for sending their own observations. However, Telef?nica would like to be copied in any communication sent to the EC regarding this matter. If someone considers I have forgotten any item in the list we had agreed to integrate in the consortium response, please let us know. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:11:37 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Juanjo, I guess your comments will not be about the actual payment but about the assessment that can be considered part of the review and therefore article II.23.8 applies, so 1 month after date of receipt 17 Feb 2014. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03 AM To: CNECT-ICT-285248 Cc: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Dear Jes?s, Arian, Stephane, We would like to know whether there is any deadline for sending observations to the financial assessment received for Reporting Period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We certainly would like to make some observations. However, we haven't seen any deadline described in the accompanying letter nor any documentation. We would rather appreciate it if you can clarify. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/02/14 11:39, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer [X] Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx [X] Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4645 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Mar 7 10:25:50 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:25:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile Dynamic: Sprint 3.3.3 Planning CLOSE : LAST CALL - deadline today Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ACC1E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Please, find below updated dashboard for you to close the sprint planning properly. https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3517/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3518/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3521/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3519/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3520/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3523/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3522/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140307.xlsx For those progressing in the backlog reviews, find them updated: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3524/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3525/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3521/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3519/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3520/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3523/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3529/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140307.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Mar 7 10:35:33 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:35:33 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Reviews - Good Links NOW Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ACC52@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Sorry!! Find right links below: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3524/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3525/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3528/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3526/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3527/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3530/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140307.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3529/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140307.xlsx Kind Regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Mar 7 12:10:47 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:10:47 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 In-Reply-To: <53144219.3060805@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077A7ACF@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> <5310C35C.5040403@tid.es> <53144219.3060805@tid.es> Message-ID: <5319A937.1090009@tid.es> Dear all, Due to conflicts in the agenda I wouldn't be able to overcome ... the WPLs/WPAs follow-up session on which we will review the writing of observations to the financial assesment will be in the morning, from 11:00 to 12:30. The regular WPLs/WPAs follow-up morning session will take place in the afternoon this time, from 14:30 to 16:00. Apologies for the inconveniences. I hope this will not be too much problematic because caretakers of the several sections within the common observation letter should already have booked the 11:00-12:30 slot anyways. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 03/03/14 09:49, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Amendment: the deadline for sending the observations is, according to Arian, one month since we receive the notification, i.e., one month since February 17, i.e., March 17. I made a mistake when I wrote February 17 as deadline for sending the observations. It should read March 17. The email from Arian, which I attached to my mail, was clear in this respect. I also made a mistake when referring to the date at which we should have the consolidated drafts of the sections linked to the document with observations. It should be March 10 and not April 17 (don't know how I came with that date :-) in an afternoon session of our weekly WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls. So in summary: * All caretakers should bring a consolidated draft by March 10 * We will submit the consolidated document with agreed observations during the week of March 10, prior the deadline of March 17. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/02/14 18:11, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, Based on the response by our PO below, any observation to the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 has to be submitted before February 17. Following the plans we agreed during our confcall last week, we now have to deal with producing a coordinated letter/document comprising observations from the consortia. The letter/document will be structured as a summary section plus a number of sections, each dealing with one of the items in the following list (people who has to take care of writing each section is also listed): * Rejection of costs linked to deliverables D.4.5, D.4.1 and D.5.1, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to deliverable D.8.1.2, caretaker Pascal * Rejection of costs linked to Tools chapter, caretaker Davide * Rejection of costs linked to Testbed/FI-Lab chapter, caretaker Stefano * Rejection of costs linked to WP2/Overall Technical Coordination, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to Exploitation, caretaker Juan Bare?o We have to come up with a consolidated draft of these sections by end of next week that we can approve in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall (afternoon session) that we will have on April 17th. As it was also agreed, we will not produce a consortium response regarding rejection of costs that are not in the above list. They can, of course, go for sending their own observations. However, Telef?nica would like to be copied in any communication sent to the EC regarding this matter. If someone considers I have forgotten any item in the list we had agreed to integrate in the consortium response, please let us know. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:11:37 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Juanjo, I guess your comments will not be about the actual payment but about the assessment that can be considered part of the review and therefore article II.23.8 applies, so 1 month after date of receipt 17 Feb 2014. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03 AM To: CNECT-ICT-285248 Cc: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Dear Jes?s, Arian, Stephane, We would like to know whether there is any deadline for sending observations to the financial assessment received for Reporting Period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We certainly would like to make some observations. However, we haven't seen any deadline described in the accompanying letter nor any documentation. We would rather appreciate it if you can clarify. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/02/14 11:39, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: ? According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. ? According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Mar 7 12:46:10 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:46:10 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Update - Please, do it today Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ACE03@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, Please, update the Open Specs status - don't wait until Monday. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Mar 7 17:13:51 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:13:51 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] 3rd party innovation - last iteration! Message-ID: <5319F03F.2000900@tid.es> Dear all, I prioritized this one a bit down on my to do list. Now and thanks to the support of Markus and Pier (thanks so much for that!) we have a new version that has not so many changes. Unfortunately I needed to do a little bit of surgery because all looked too heterogeneous. I hope that you can live with it. Now, I ask you to look into two things: * The table "GE uptake/enablement of third parties" have experienced changes in the headers and part of the data may not be valid any more. Now it says "as of 16.12.2013" in two columns . Please review carefully this detail. * Please fill in the section "Support planned for contributions" for each WP, it is just the data in the new table If we manage it quickly, we should be able to deliver in the coming week. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.2.5.2 Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 318248 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Mar 10 08:13:44 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:13:44 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment Message-ID: <531D6628.7030500@tid.es> Dear all, I have created a shared document in Google docs where to compile the draft version we were going to review in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall of today (morning session starting at 11:00am): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing Please add the input to the section you were taking care of prior to the confcall. Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de Mon Mar 10 09:24:38 2014 From: Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de (Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:24:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment In-Reply-To: <531D6628.7030500@tid.es> References: <531D6628.7030500@tid.es> Message-ID: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2DD557940F@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> Hi Juanjo, Please rename section 2 : "Rejection of costs linked to Security chapter" because it is not only related to D.8.1.2 but also to the IDM of DT and NSN. Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Viele Gr??e / Best Regards Matthias Baumgart DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG T-Labs (Research & Innovation) Dr. Matthias Baumgart Winterfeldtstr. 21, 10781 Berlin +4930835358125 (Tel.) +4952192109471 (Fax) E-Mail: matthias.baumgart at telekom.de www.telekom.com Erleben, was verbindet. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Ren? Obermann (Vorsitzender), Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme, Timotheus H?ttges, Dr. Thomas Kremer, Claudia Nemat, Prof. Dr. Marion Schick Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn Grosse Ver?nderungen fangen klein an - Ressourcen schonen und nicht jede E-Mail drucken. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 10. M?rz 2014 08:14 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment Dear all, I have created a shared document in Google docs where to compile the draft version we were going to review in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall of today (morning session starting at 11:00am): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing Please add the input to the section you were taking care of prior to the confcall. Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Mar 10 09:48:42 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:48:42 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment In-Reply-To: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2DD557940F@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: <531D6628.7030500@tid.es> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2DD557940F@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> Message-ID: <531D7C6A.3000907@tid.es> Dear Matthias, The current table of sections refer to observations we agreed to produce jointly as a consortia (i.e. to be signed and submitted by the coordinator on behalf fo the whole consortia). If there are additional points you want to incorporate on the observations letter, please create separate sections for them in the shared google docs so that we can determine whether they can/should be included in the jointly produced observations letter or, if not, you will be have to send a separate observations letter (copying us as coordinators). Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 10/03/14 09:24, Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de wrote: Hi Juanjo, Please rename section 2 : "Rejection of costs linked to Security chapter" because it is not only related to D.8.1.2 but also to the IDM of DT and NSN. Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Viele Gr??e / Best Regards Matthias Baumgart DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG T-Labs (Research & Innovation) Dr. Matthias Baumgart Winterfeldtstr. 21, 10781 Berlin +4930835358125 (Tel.) +4952192109471 (Fax) E-Mail: matthias.baumgart at telekom.de www.telekom.com Erleben, was verbindet. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Ren? Obermann (Vorsitzender), Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme, Timotheus H?ttges, Dr. Thomas Kremer, Claudia Nemat, Prof. Dr. Marion Schick Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn Grosse Ver?nderungen fangen klein an - Ressourcen schonen und nicht jede E-Mail drucken. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 10. M?rz 2014 08:14 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment Dear all, I have created a shared document in Google docs where to compile the draft version we were going to review in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall of today (morning session starting at 11:00am): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing Please add the input to the section you were taking care of prior to the confcall. Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de Mon Mar 10 10:02:41 2014 From: Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de (Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:02:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment In-Reply-To: <531D7C6A.3000907@tid.es> References: <531D6628.7030500@tid.es> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2DD557940F@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <531D7C6A.3000907@tid.es> Message-ID: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2DD55794CE@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> Dear Juanjo, I remember that we discussed this. I asked you explicitly in phone call we had on the financial assessment how to proceed with the IDM subject and understood you in that way that it should be included in the WP8 response. That is why I proposed to correct the section title. We could treat is separately, but I do not think that this would leave a good impression as most others sections are considered as chapter wise replies. Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Viele Gr??e / Best Regards Matthias Baumgart DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG T-Labs (Research & Innovation) Dr. Matthias Baumgart Winterfeldtstr. 21, 10781 Berlin +4930835358125 (Tel.) +4952192109471 (Fax) E-Mail: matthias.baumgart at telekom.de www.telekom.com Erleben, was verbindet. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Ren? Obermann (Vorsitzender), Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme, Timotheus H?ttges, Dr. Thomas Kremer, Claudia Nemat, Prof. Dr. Marion Schick Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn Grosse Ver?nderungen fangen klein an - Ressourcen schonen und nicht jede E-Mail drucken. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Montag, 10. M?rz 2014 09:49 To: Baumgart, Matthias; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment Dear Matthias, The current table of sections refer to observations we agreed to produce jointly as a consortia (i.e. to be signed and submitted by the coordinator on behalf fo the whole consortia). If there are additional points you want to incorporate on the observations letter, please create separate sections for them in the shared google docs so that we can determine whether they can/should be included in the jointly produced observations letter or, if not, you will be have to send a separate observations letter (copying us as coordinators). Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 10/03/14 09:24, Matthias.Baumgart at telekom.de wrote: Hi Juanjo, Please rename section 2 : "Rejection of costs linked to Security chapter" because it is not only related to D.8.1.2 but also to the IDM of DT and NSN. Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Viele Gr??e / Best Regards Matthias Baumgart DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG T-Labs (Research & Innovation) Dr. Matthias Baumgart Winterfeldtstr. 21, 10781 Berlin +4930835358125 (Tel.) +4952192109471 (Fax) E-Mail: matthias.baumgart at telekom.de www.telekom.com Erleben, was verbindet. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Lehner (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Ren? Obermann (Vorsitzender), Reinhard Clemens, Niek Jan van Damme, Timotheus H?ttges, Dr. Thomas Kremer, Claudia Nemat, Prof. Dr. Marion Schick Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn HRB 6794 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bonn Grosse Ver?nderungen fangen klein an - Ressourcen schonen und nicht jede E-Mail drucken. From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 10. M?rz 2014 08:14 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Document with draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment Dear all, I have created a shared document in Google docs where to compile the draft version we were going to review in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall of today (morning session starting at 11:00am): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing Please add the input to the section you were taking care of prior to the confcall. Thanks, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Mar 10 11:02:22 2014 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:02:22 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-pcc] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 In-Reply-To: <5319A937.1090009@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077A7ACF@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> <5310C35C.5040403@tid.es> <53144219.3060805@tid.es> <5319A937.1090009@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, I assume you won?t be available in the afternoon session, so I anticipate a question concerning the Amendment 6, as I believe it needs your comment: in order for the entities connected to the city of Torino to proceed with their administrative set up, they assumed to receive a ?formal? acceptance of their participation to the project. I expect that for other cities the situation might be similar. I already raised this point in past calls and mails, however so far no document has been officially produced (amendment still in draft), nor other actions undertaken to this extent, and they contacted me because now they are in trouble to manage the admin procedures. If they delay these procedures, it could result in issues (delays) for the project activities they have to do. How can it be quickly ensured (at least indirectly) they will be part of the project? BR Pier Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: venerd? 7 marzo 2014 12:11 A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-pcc] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 Dear all, Due to conflicts in the agenda I wouldn't be able to overcome ... the WPLs/WPAs follow-up session on which we will review the writing of observations to the financial assesment will be in the morning, from 11:00 to 12:30. The regular WPLs/WPAs follow-up morning session will take place in the afternoon this time, from 14:30 to 16:00. Apologies for the inconveniences. I hope this will not be too much problematic because caretakers of the several sections within the common observation letter should already have booked the 11:00-12:30 slot anyways. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 03/03/14 09:49, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Amendment: the deadline for sending the observations is, according to Arian, one month since we receive the notification, i.e., one month since February 17, i.e., March 17. I made a mistake when I wrote February 17 as deadline for sending the observations. It should read March 17. The email from Arian, which I attached to my mail, was clear in this respect. I also made a mistake when referring to the date at which we should have the consolidated drafts of the sections linked to the document with observations. It should be March 10 and not April 17 (don't know how I came with that date :-) in an afternoon session of our weekly WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcalls. So in summary: * All caretakers should bring a consolidated draft by March 10 * We will submit the consolidated document with agreed observations during the week of March 10, prior the deadline of March 17. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/02/14 18:11, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, Based on the response by our PO below, any observation to the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 has to be submitted before February 17. Following the plans we agreed during our confcall last week, we now have to deal with producing a coordinated letter/document comprising observations from the consortia. The letter/document will be structured as a summary section plus a number of sections, each dealing with one of the items in the following list (people who has to take care of writing each section is also listed): * Rejection of costs linked to deliverables D.4.5, D.4.1 and D.5.1, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to deliverable D.8.1.2, caretaker Pascal * Rejection of costs linked to Tools chapter, caretaker Davide * Rejection of costs linked to Testbed/FI-Lab chapter, caretaker Stefano * Rejection of costs linked to WP2/Overall Technical Coordination, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to Exploitation, caretaker Juan Bare?o We have to come up with a consolidated draft of these sections by end of next week that we can approve in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall (afternoon session) that we will have on April 17th. As it was also agreed, we will not produce a consortium response regarding rejection of costs that are not in the above list. They can, of course, go for sending their own observations. However, Telef?nica would like to be copied in any communication sent to the EC regarding this matter. If someone considers I have forgotten any item in the list we had agreed to integrate in the consortium response, please let us know. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:11:37 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Juanjo, I guess your comments will not be about the actual payment but about the assessment that can be considered part of the review and therefore article II.23.8 applies, so 1 month after date of receipt 17 Feb 2014. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03 AM To: CNECT-ICT-285248 Cc: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Dear Jes?s, Arian, Stephane, We would like to know whether there is any deadline for sending observations to the financial assessment received for Reporting Period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We certainly would like to make some observations. However, we haven't seen any deadline described in the accompanying letter nor any documentation. We would rather appreciate it if you can clarify. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/02/14 11:39, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: ? According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. ? According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 10 11:10:37 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:10:37 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile Dynamic: Dashboards from Sprint 3.3.3 planning Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AD20A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, The general overview of the sprint planning is good although there're specific GEIs with no content. I'd appreciate it would be either provided or justified by sending an email to the corresponding WP Leader, and cc'd to me. Please, find below the outcome from the sprint planning: Apps: [cid:image001.png at 01CF3C4F.B9D794F0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3534/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140310.xlsx Cloud: [cid:image002.png at 01CF3C4F.B9D794F0] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3535/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140310.xlsx IoT: [cid:image003.png at 01CF3C50.6D75F150] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3538/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140310.xlsx Data: [cid:image004.png at 01CF3C50.6D75F150] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3536/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140310.xlsx I2ND: [cid:image005.png at 01CF3C50.6D75F150] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3537/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140310.xlsx Security: [cid:image006.png at 01CF3C50.6D75F150] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3540/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140310.xlsx MiWi: [cid:image007.png at 01CF3C50.6D75F150] https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3539/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140310.xlsx If anything please don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13791 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 13918 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 13853 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 13492 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 13430 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 13579 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13877 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Mar 10 11:27:25 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:27:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] State of the art (D2.6.3) Message-ID: <531D938D.6060701@tid.es> Dear all, A reminder. State of the art (D2.6.3) * Deadline to send contributions from WPL to the coordinator: March,14 * Only change needed: executive summary per chapter * We allow other changes if strictly necessary In principle, this can be done by the WPL/WPA directly (no need to ask for contributions to the partners) This has to be directly on word, not on the wiki. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 10 11:38:52 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:38:52 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backog content: Updated reviews - available Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AD266@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Find links to updated backlog reviews: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3541/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140310.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3542/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140310.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3545/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140310.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3543/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140310.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3544/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140310.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3547/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140310.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3546/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140310.xlsx If anything please don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juan.bareno at atos.net Mon Mar 10 13:28:39 2014 From: juan.bareno at atos.net (Bareno Guerenabarrena, Juan) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:28:39 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2- D11.2.2 Message-ID: <08F06C5778F5DE41AD2ACEF1BBD8EC93052896@DEFTHW99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Dear Colleagues Please find here attached the google docs link with the draft version of sections defined for the letter on observations to the Financial Assessment https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing As you can check, in the - Rejection of costs linked to Exploitation- section we will follow this approach: - Initial statement, General approach regarding the definite cost-cuttings of efforts in D11.2.2 - Individual observations per partner, see SAP example Please feel free to add what you consider in an individual basis before tomorrow EOB Br Juan Juan Bare?o Research & Innovation T. +34 912 148 859 M. +34 625 598 216 juan.bareno at atos.net Albarrac?n, 25 28037 Madrid - Spain atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CF21D2.D8BA98F0] _____________________________________________ From: Bareno Guerenabarrena, Juan Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:20 PM To: 'fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu'; 'Amon, Peter'; 'laura pucci'; 'Andrea Manieri'; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare'; 'Bettina.Lehmann at telekom.de'; 'Hans.Einsiedler at telekom.de'; 'GLIKSON at il.ibm.com'; 'Yaron Wolfsthal'; 'pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it'; 'Banniza, Thomas-Rolf (Thomas-Rolf'; 'Wuenstel, Klaus (Klaus'; 'Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich'; 'Heijnen Henk'; 'carmen mac williams' (Carmen at grassroots-arts.eu); 'Ernoe.Kovacs at neclab.eu'; 'carmen mac williams' (Carmen at grassroots-arts.eu); 'Sandfuchs, Thorsten'; Heller, Markus (markus.heller at sap.com) Cc: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; mcp at tid.es Subject: IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2- D11.2.2 Dear Colleagues After submitting up to 3 individual exploitation plans for the same deliverable, D11.2.2, once public in June, one more in July and a new one in October, the last ones on confidential basis , "50% of the costs associated with this deliverable are rejected, except for ATOS, Thales, Telefonica, and France Telecom". - "Unfortunately, despite the repeated comments by the reviewers on this very subject, the specific company exploitation plans are still generic and in some cases bordering on being a "wish list". They all say positive things but lack specificity in themes, markets, applications, timeline, budget and resources dedicated to the success of FI-WARE. With a few exceptions such as those supplied by ATOS and Thales and to some extent Telefonica and France Telecom, the individual exploitation plans are largely a collection of wishes, expectations and high level aims. In all cases, there are surprisingly very few references to specific GEs (or GE combinations) even by the owners concerned. In addition, they are a collation of single plans without any attempt to explain which type of synchronisation or coordination will happen among them and how this concerted effort will be coordinated, if any. There is not a single reference in the individual plans to the OIL, which is positioned in the generic part of the document as a key vehicle to "pave the way for a successful exploitation and sustainability of its [the FI-WARE project] results Although in the review report R5, it seems "crystal clear" , see paragraphs above and below, why they reject the individual exploitation plans, they seem to maintain the same opinion after the M30 Review but we have not received any particular assessment on M30 individual exploitation plans submitted on a confidential basis. Accordingly, together with SAP I have prepared this paragraph to include into the "Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2" Please feel free to suggest any modification to the following paragraph, and add whatever individual comment from your side regarding your exploitation plan. Before 14:00 of Monday 10 th In relation to the definite cost-cuttings of efforts in D11.2.2, the partners affected (*) would like to kindly ask for some feedback regarding the new M30 individual exploitation plans resubmitted and presented on a confidential basis. The main purpose is to be able of reassessing the situation in the next round, M36, and resubmit the costs accordingly (if accepted). Therefore the partners affected (*) would ask for changing the "definite" reduction towards a "cost acceptance" or at least a "temporary" reduction. (*) SAP, IBM-IL, DT, TI, ENG, INTEL, SIEMENS, NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORK, ALCATEL, TECHNICOLOR, NEC Br Juan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Initial Feedback form review report; 1) Few references to specific GEs (or GE combinations) by the owners concerned, 2) No single reference about the FI LAB. The individual exploitation plans are largely a collection of wishes, expectations and high level aims. - "The exploitation planning of FI-WARE key results at the partner level is still highly general and patchy in depth and scope, and in many cases unclear, uncertain, unconvincing, or a combination of these" - "The (lack of) substance and concreteness for the vast majority of the individual exploitation plans, at Month 24, is totally inappropriate for the ambition of FI-WARE and incommensurate with the claimed business commitment to project results by the main partners, even to Vice-President Kroes" - "The reviewers are exceedingly concerned about the dearth of concrete evidence of the business commitment of GE implementation owners, and the corresponding lack of concrete information and traceability of GE implementations in the exploitation plans of these owners". - "The current exploitation plans are mainly statements of aims, expectations and desires, which all go broadly in the right direction, but without the priority and thrust needed to achieve a real change". - "The lack of examples and paucity of concrete details necessary to create a real following within and around the various participants is, at Month 24 and one year before the project ends, exceedingly alarming". Juan Bare?o Research & Innovation T. +34 912 148 859 M. +34 625 598 216 juan.bareno at atos.net Albarrac?n, 25 28037 Madrid - Spain atos.net << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> [cid:image002.png at 01CF21D2.D8BA98F0] From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:12 PM To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Observations to Financial assessment for reporting period P2 Dear all, Based on the response by our PO below, any observation to the Financial assessment for reporting period P2 has to be submitted before February 17. Following the plans we agreed during our confcall last week, we now have to deal with producing a coordinated letter/document comprising observations from the consortia. The letter/document will be structured as a summary section plus a number of sections, each dealing with one of the items in the following list (people who has to take care of writing each section is also listed): * Rejection of costs linked to deliverables D.4.5, D.4.1 and D.5.1, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to deliverable D.8.1.2, caretaker Pascal * Rejection of costs linked to Tools chapter, caretaker Davide * Rejection of costs linked to Testbed/FI-Lab chapter, caretaker Stefano * Rejection of costs linked to WP2/Overall Technical Coordination, caretaker Juanjo * Rejection of costs linked to Exploitation, caretaker Juan Bare?o We have to come up with a consolidated draft of these sections by end of next week that we can approve in the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall (afternoon session) that we will have on April 17th. As it was also agreed, we will not produce a consortium response regarding rejection of costs that are not in the above list. They can, of course, go for sending their own observations. However, Telef?nica would like to be copied in any communication sent to the EC regarding this matter. If someone considers I have forgotten any item in the list we had agreed to integrate in the consortium response, please let us know. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:11:37 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Juanjo, I guess your comments will not be about the actual payment but about the assessment that can be considered part of the review and therefore article II.23.8 applies, so 1 month after date of receipt 17 Feb 2014. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:03 AM To: CNECT-ICT-285248 Cc: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Dear Jes?s, Arian, Stephane, We would like to know whether there is any deadline for sending observations to the financial assessment received for Reporting Period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We certainly would like to make some observations. However, we haven't seen any deadline described in the accompanying letter nor any documentation. We would rather appreciate it if you can clarify. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 14/02/14 11:39, CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer [X] Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx [X] Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4657 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 10 18:40:41 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:40:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Synchronising Roadmap and Tracker: query Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AD5E4@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, While holding a meeting with Pier and Gianmario, it appeared the following issue related to synchronization of the roadmap and the tracker, which I need to query you about. It seems some chapters include Epics in the columns "Supported Features" in the roadmap unlike others. It arises the following question: Whether epics belong to the roadmap or not. I always assumed they belonged, so I checked them against the tracker and requested their presence when they were not found there. I would appreciate having your input here. Kind regards Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Mar 11 11:02:21 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:02:21 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content: updated reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AD76B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, For those progressing on improving the backlog content, please, find links to updated reviews below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3552/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140311.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3553/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140311.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3556/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140311.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3554/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140311.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3555/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140311.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3558/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140311.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3557/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140311.xlsx If any support were needed, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Mar 11 11:42:23 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:42:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT AND URGENT: Second payment to beneficiaries incoporated to FI-WARE consortia through 3rd Open Call In-Reply-To: <531EBB96.2000902@tid.es> References: <531EBB96.2000902@tid.es> Message-ID: <531EE88F.6030208@tid.es> Dear partners, We would like to proceed with a second payment to beneficiaries that joined the FI-WARE consortia as a result of their selection as a result of Open Call 3. Unfortunately, our payment formula setup in our Consortium Agreement didn't cover well the scenario where beneficiaries of an Open Call join after beginning of the last reporting period. This was because it was (wrongly) assumed that beneficiaries of any Open Call would join before the end of the second reporting period. As a result, following the formula established in the Consortium Agreement, beneficiaries of the Open Call 3 would only receive a first pre-financing payment at the beginning of the project and they would not get any additional payment before the very end of the project. This situation collocates these beneficiaries in a very odd and unfair situation compared to the rest of beneficiaries, who are getting paid as soon as the EC pays after each reporting period based on results of that period review so they have enough cash-flow to afford the activities of any period including the last period. On the other hand, we believe we should only proceed with a second payment to beneficiaries of Open Call 3 if there is evidence that their work so far will be accepted and consequently the declared costs will be likely accepted as well. Because of that, we asked our Project Officer to provide us with an official email in which he may report on the status regarding acceptance of deliverables submitted by the new beneficiaries in Open Call 3 in month 29 (deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1). Please find attached below the mail sent by our Project Officer anticipating acceptance of these deliverables. This wasn't a surprise to us since we all know that beneficiaries of Open Call 3 are the ones dealing with branding, communication and dissemination activities and their performance so far can be very much positively evaluated. Based on the acceptance of these deliverables, we believe that we, as a consortia, are safe to proceed with a payment that covers the funding of declared costs from the date at which new beneficiaries joined the consortia and month 29, provided this doesn't exceed the 85% of the overall funding per partner, which is a rule that we must follow in all cases. Therefore, we will proceed with this payment unless we hear about any objection by any of the partners before Thursday March 13, 12:00pm. Please note that we cannot follow a similar approach with beneficiaries of Open Call 2 due to the fact that they didn't submit any deliverable for review in the last month 30 review. Thus, the project officer could not send any message confirming acceptance of deliverables. If we proceed to give a second payment to these other beneficiaries we would be incurring in risks since it may happen that their deliverables get rejected in the final review and such rejection may include some definite rejections. Don't hesitate to ask Javier de Pedro (in copy of this email) and myself any further questions you may have. Again, I would like to stress the deadline for objection on Thursday March 13, 12:00pm. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:43:15 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Raul, Juanjo, Just to let you know that I have just received the first review report draft. In that draft, deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1 were accepted. Probably, these deliverables will be accepted in the final review report as well. I have no reason to believe otherwise. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Mar 12 05:19:00 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 05:19:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT AND URGENT: Second payment to beneficiaries incoporated to FI-WARE consortia through 3rd Open Call In-Reply-To: <531EE88F.6030208@tid.es> References: <531EBB96.2000902@tid.es> <531EE88F.6030208@tid.es> Message-ID: <531FE034.9070009@tid.es> Dear all, Some partners have asked and I believe it is worth clarifying this to all: a second payment to new beneficiaries selected through Open Call 3 will NOT affect AT ALL how the second interim payment to initial FI-WARE partners (and partners who joined after Open Call 1) will be calculated. Calculation of the second interim payment to initial FI-WARE partners (and partners who joined after Open Call 1) and calculation of a second interim payment to new beneficiaries selected through Open Call 3 are totally unrelated matters. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 11/03/14 11:42, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear partners, We would like to proceed with a second payment to beneficiaries that joined the FI-WARE consortia as a result of their selection as a result of Open Call 3. Unfortunately, our payment formula setup in our Consortium Agreement didn't cover well the scenario where beneficiaries of an Open Call join after beginning of the last reporting period. This was because it was (wrongly) assumed that beneficiaries of any Open Call would join before the end of the second reporting period. As a result, following the formula established in the Consortium Agreement, beneficiaries of the Open Call 3 would only receive a first pre-financing payment at the beginning of the project and they would not get any additional payment before the very end of the project. This situation collocates these beneficiaries in a very odd and unfair situation compared to the rest of beneficiaries, who are getting paid as soon as the EC pays after each reporting period based on results of that period review so they have enough cash-flow to afford the activities of any period including the last period. On the other hand, we believe we should only proceed with a second payment to beneficiaries of Open Call 3 if there is evidence that their work so far will be accepted and consequently the declared costs will be likely accepted as well. Because of that, we asked our Project Officer to provide us with an official email in which he may report on the status regarding acceptance of deliverables submitted by the new beneficiaries in Open Call 3 in month 29 (deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1). Please find attached below the mail sent by our Project Officer anticipating acceptance of these deliverables. This wasn't a surprise to us since we all know that beneficiaries of Open Call 3 are the ones dealing with branding, communication and dissemination activities and their performance so far can be very much positively evaluated. Based on the acceptance of these deliverables, we believe that we, as a consortia, are safe to proceed with a payment that covers the funding of declared costs from the date at which new beneficiaries joined the consortia and month 29, provided this doesn't exceed the 85% of the overall funding per partner, which is a rule that we must follow in all cases. Therefore, we will proceed with this payment unless we hear about any objection by any of the partners before Thursday March 13, 12:00pm. Please note that we cannot follow a similar approach with beneficiaries of Open Call 2 due to the fact that they didn't submit any deliverable for review in the last month 30 review. Thus, the project officer could not send any message confirming acceptance of deliverables. If we proceed to give a second payment to these other beneficiaries we would be incurring in risks since it may happen that their deliverables get rejected in the final review and such rejection may include some definite rejections. Don't hesitate to ask Javier de Pedro (in copy of this email) and myself any further questions you may have. Again, I would like to stress the deadline for objection on Thursday March 13, 12:00pm. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:43:15 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Raul, Juanjo, Just to let you know that I have just received the first review report draft. In that draft, deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1 were accepted. Probably, these deliverables will be accepted in the final review report as well. I have no reason to believe otherwise. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 12 12:26:14 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:26:14 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content - updated reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31ADAF0@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, For those progressing on fixing issues in the backlog, please, find updated reports below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3562/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140312.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3563/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140312.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3566/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140312.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3564/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140312.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3565/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140312.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3568/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140312.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3567/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140312.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 13 10:52:40 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:52:40 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu Mar 13 11:06:56 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:06:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Hi Manuel, does this mean that "we" as in "Apps" can now copy the pages to the public wiki? Thanks for clarifying /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 10:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 13 11:40:03 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:40:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEFAC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Thanks Thorsten, Let me remind you of the outlined timeline and process: 24/Jan/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review - edition in PRIVATE WIKI - WPL to generate word doc for review 27/Jan/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready 03/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) 07/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator From 7 to 17, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. 17/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC 24/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents I understand we would be approaching step: 07/February -> ready for the review of the coordinator Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 11:07 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, does this mean that "we" as in "Apps" can now copy the pages to the public wiki? Thanks for clarifying /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 10:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 13 12:54:11 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:54:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content: updated reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AF318@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GE Owners: For those progressing on fixing backlog issues, find updated reviews below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3571/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140313.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3572/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140313.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3575/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140313.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3573/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140313.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3574/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140313.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3577/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140313.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3576/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140313.xlsx If anything, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu Mar 13 14:45:04 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:45:04 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEFAC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEFAC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBCC9@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Hi Manuel, thanks for clarifying - would you kindly update the time plan, in order to know until when we are currently planning to update the public wiki and delivery to the EC? I interpreted the green "ready" with the date 17/Feb which might be as this is as well already passed - sorry for that. Thanks again, /Thorsten From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 11:40 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Thanks Thorsten, Let me remind you of the outlined timeline and process: 24/Jan/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review - edition in PRIVATE WIKI - WPL to generate word doc for review 27/Jan/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready 03/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) 07/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator From 7 to 17, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. 17/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC 24/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents I understand we would be approaching step: 07/February -> ready for the review of the coordinator Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 11:07 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, does this mean that "we" as in "Apps" can now copy the pages to the public wiki? Thanks for clarifying /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 10:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 13 15:08:56 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:08:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBCC9@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEFAC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBCC9@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AF39E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Thorsten, You mean planning the delay? - Sorry, it doesn't make sense to me! To me - we're in ASAP mode. Ready in apps chapter meant as clarified before, matching the step in the process planned for 07.Feb. From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 14:45 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, thanks for clarifying - would you kindly update the time plan, in order to know until when we are currently planning to update the public wiki and delivery to the EC? I interpreted the green "ready" with the date 17/Feb which might be as this is as well already passed - sorry for that. Thanks again, /Thorsten From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 11:40 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Thanks Thorsten, Let me remind you of the outlined timeline and process: 24/Jan/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review - edition in PRIVATE WIKI - WPL to generate word doc for review 27/Jan/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready 03/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) 07/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator From 7 to 17, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. 17/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC 24/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents I understand we would be approaching step: 07/February -> ready for the review of the coordinator Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 11:07 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, does this mean that "we" as in "Apps" can now copy the pages to the public wiki? Thanks for clarifying /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 10:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Mar 13 15:24:53 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:24:53 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AF39E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEFAC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBCC9@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AF39E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <5321BFB5.2010505@tid.es> Dear all, This is a general question as it applies to the Architecture as well. In any case, I would ask Juanjo next time you talk to him on the WPL/WPA call, he's a the one personally taking charge and he is the one who knows his actual availability. Best regards, Miguel El 13/03/2014 15:08, MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE escribi?: Hi Thorsten, You mean planning the delay? - Sorry, it doesn't make sense to me! To me - we're in ASAP mode. Ready in apps chapter meant as clarified before, matching the step in the process planned for 07.Feb. From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 14:45 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, thanks for clarifying - would you kindly update the time plan, in order to know until when we are currently planning to update the public wiki and delivery to the EC? I interpreted the green "ready" with the date 17/Feb which might be as this is as well already passed - sorry for that. Thanks again, /Thorsten From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 11:40 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Thanks Thorsten, Let me remind you of the outlined timeline and process: 24/Jan/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review - edition in PRIVATE WIKI - WPL to generate word doc for review 27/Jan/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready 03/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) 07/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator From 7 to 17, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. 17/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC 24/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents I understand we would be approaching step: 07/February -> ready for the review of the coordinator Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 11:07 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, does this mean that "we" as in "Apps" can now copy the pages to the public wiki? Thanks for clarifying /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 10:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Thu Mar 13 15:27:16 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:27:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AF39E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEFAC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBCC9@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AF39E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBDE0@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Hi Manuel, Do I really have to explain that it might make sense that TID indicates until when to finalize the review in order for partners to book some time in their calendars to quickly work on the reviewed document and towards a defined point in time until when it will be finally submitted to the EC? If yes, then this is the reason why I would kindly ask for such a planning: in order for our WP3 partners to anticipate the work ahead and plan accordingly for a given delivery date (in the future) to the EC. If you think this does not make sense, I anyway would like to encourage you to do it, despite that you personally think it is not needed. Thanks for your support, /Thorsten From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 15:09 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Thorsten, You mean planning the delay? - Sorry, it doesn't make sense to me! To me - we're in ASAP mode. Ready in apps chapter meant as clarified before, matching the step in the process planned for 07.Feb. From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 14:45 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, thanks for clarifying - would you kindly update the time plan, in order to know until when we are currently planning to update the public wiki and delivery to the EC? I interpreted the green "ready" with the date 17/Feb which might be as this is as well already passed - sorry for that. Thanks again, /Thorsten From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 11:40 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Thanks Thorsten, Let me remind you of the outlined timeline and process: 24/Jan/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review - edition in PRIVATE WIKI - WPL to generate word doc for review 27/Jan/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready 03/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) 07/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator From 7 to 17, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. 17/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC 24/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents I understand we would be approaching step: 07/February -> ready for the review of the coordinator Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 11:07 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, does this mean that "we" as in "Apps" can now copy the pages to the public wiki? Thanks for clarifying /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 10:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Mar 13 15:52:53 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:52:53 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBDE0@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEF72@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCB6B1@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AEFAC@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBCC9@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31AF39E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66487DCBDE0@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5321C645.5070208@tid.es> Dear Thorsten, This answer applies for all the reviews pending on Juanjo. We have "booked time in our calendars" many times to no avail. For instance, when Miguel hardly took 2 days of Christmas holidays to do the R3 reviews (no one delivered until mid January). The contribution to the Architecture came rather late in many cases, not allowing any planning on our side. All the Open Specs contributions are extremely late (the 1st one came today, 4 weeks late). In this context of general lack of commitment with the deadlines, any planning effort seems futile. Now Juanjo will apply the priority he can. This week he was in Hannover if I am right and the next one he's in Seville at least for one or two days, don't ask me exactly when. You have his phone number and his email address if you cannot wait until the coordination call. As you can imagine, delivering asap is in our best interest. Best regards, Miguel & Manuel El 13/03/2014 15:27, Sandfuchs, Thorsten escribi?: Hi Manuel, Do I really have to explain that it might make sense that TID indicates until when to finalize the review in order for partners to book some time in their calendars to quickly work on the reviewed document and towards a defined point in time until when it will be finally submitted to the EC? If yes, then this is the reason why I would kindly ask for such a planning: in order for our WP3 partners to anticipate the work ahead and plan accordingly for a given delivery date (in the future) to the EC. If you think this does not make sense, I anyway would like to encourage you to do it, despite that you personally think it is not needed. Thanks for your support, /Thorsten From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 15:09 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Thorsten, You mean planning the delay? - Sorry, it doesn't make sense to me! To me - we're in ASAP mode. Ready in apps chapter meant as clarified before, matching the step in the process planned for 07.Feb. From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 14:45 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, thanks for clarifying - would you kindly update the time plan, in order to know until when we are currently planning to update the public wiki and delivery to the EC? I interpreted the green "ready" with the date 17/Feb which might be as this is as well already passed - sorry for that. Thanks again, /Thorsten From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 11:40 To: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Thanks Thorsten, Let me remind you of the outlined timeline and process: 24/Jan/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review - edition in PRIVATE WIKI - WPL to generate word doc for review 27/Jan/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready 03/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) 07/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator From 7 to 17, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. 17/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC 24/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents I understand we would be approaching step: 07/February -> ready for the review of the coordinator Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: jueves, 13 de marzo de 2014 11:07 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Hi Manuel, does this mean that "we" as in "Apps" can now copy the pages to the public wiki? Thanks for clarifying /Thorsten From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2014 10:53 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Open Specs - request for updating the dashboard Dear Partners, Having a look at the Open Specs dashboard, I get the following picture for 1st Wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Apps (Markus/Thorsten) - Available - Reviewed - Ready Cloud (Alex) - (not link) - (No link) - updating review? IoT (Thierry) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? Data (Sergio) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? I2ND (Pier) - Available - Reviewed? - updating review? Security (Pascal) - Available - Reviewed - updating review? MiWi (Christof) - Not Available - X - X On this situation, may I ask for a quick update of the dashboard? Perhaps some of they are already finished (Thierry, Sergio, Pier, Pascal). We want to make them available for Juanjo's final review. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Thu Mar 13 18:15:09 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:15:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Resources that could be useful at some point in time Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB069956@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Hi all, The EC (the FI PPP Unit) has recruited a new guy to take care of the website, promotion, etc. He contacted me to get information about FI-WARE, especially media material, main messages, etc. I started to draft a couple of e-mails with main messages, links to challenges, material, videos that could be used for the purpose of creating awareness around FI-WARE. The thing is that in the end it is a good compilation for whoever. Therefore, I attach the two mails in case you want to keep them for yourself (for further use). ? First one --> you do not need it; basic concepts that you know by heart but sometimes it is good to have them ready for copy & paste and not reinvent the wheel. ? Second one --> more focused on dissemination material and resources At this stage let me point out that I get many things through the interaction with Ogilvy, telefonica and Futura, but this has to be intensified by other partners too. I do not have a clue about what you are doing in your countries: ? Is there an option to coordinate with others to jointly organize additional hackathons? ? Are your national authorities fully aware of FI-LAB? Is there any kind of institutional support? ? Can I use examples from cities others than the ones in Spain or Trento that I always mention? ? Please, help to spread the word!!! For example, next week in Athens I will present FI-WARE to MS in the Future Internet Forum. It would be useful to know to which extend your countries are active and aware about all this... I hope it helps. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission M +34 680645692 T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atos.net Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CF3EE7.A5699000] IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 159 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 958 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria" Subject: FI-WARE (promotion and awareness 2) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:48:07 +0000 Size: 24206 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria" Subject: FI-WARE (promotion and awareness 1) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:49:07 +0000 Size: 71634 URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Mar 17 06:21:37 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 06:21:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 to be sent to the EC Message-ID: <53268661.1020203@tid.es> Folks, The letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 is ready to be sent to the EC. You can find it ready at the shared google docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing Please take some time to perform a very last review and, overall, a review of the cover letter and Introduction section that I have completed. There were also a little set of comments remaining, please make sure they get fixed. I won't be able to attend the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall this morning because I'm participating as speaker in a FI-WARE event in Sevilla (inaguration of datacenter expanding FI-Lab capacity as well as coaching of SMEs and entrepreneurs aiming to participate in FI-PPP fase 3). However, Miguel will take care of everything and will be in charge of submitting the final letter to the PO this day (right after the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall). He will forward it to you and the consortia once it has been done. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Mar 17 09:46:40 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:46:40 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 to be sent to the EC In-Reply-To: <53268661.1020203@tid.es> References: <53268661.1020203@tid.es> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1DC16@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Juanjo, Miguel Being back from vacation just this morning, we from SAP want to add a missing separate entry into the summary table and a dedicated paragraph for our WP3 topics (Pricing Simulator). We are in the process currently and will create our contribution directly in the Google Doc online, but we have not been able to finish until now. @Miguel: can you please mail a deadline to us until when we can deliver to you ( best if we can go to lunch first after WPL/WPA meeting has ended around noon). Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 17. M?rz 2014 06:22 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 to be sent to the EC Folks, The letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 is ready to be sent to the EC. You can find it ready at the shared google docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing Please take some time to perform a very last review and, overall, a review of the cover letter and Introduction section that I have completed. There were also a little set of comments remaining, please make sure they get fixed. I won't be able to attend the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall this morning because I'm participating as speaker in a FI-WARE event in Sevilla (inaguration of datacenter expanding FI-Lab capacity as well as coaching of SMEs and entrepreneurs aiming to participate in FI-PPP fase 3). However, Miguel will take care of everything and will be in charge of submitting the final letter to the PO this day (right after the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall). He will forward it to you and the consortia once it has been done. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Mar 17 09:58:09 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:58:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 to be sent to the EC In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1DC16@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <53268661.1020203@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1DC16@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5326B921.7000609@tid.es> Hi, My orders are a bit strict: send it right after the WPL/WPA call. Can't you have it ready by 11? We can discuss it later in the call if yuo cannot have it by then. BR Miguel El 17/03/2014 9:46, Heller, Markus escribi?: Hi Juanjo, Miguel Being back from vacation just this morning, we from SAP want to add a missing separate entry into the summary table and a dedicated paragraph for our WP3 topics (Pricing Simulator). We are in the process currently and will create our contribution directly in the Google Doc online, but we have not been able to finish until now. @Miguel: can you please mail a deadline to us until when we can deliver to you ( best if we can go to lunch first after WPL/WPA meeting has ended around noon). Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 17. M?rz 2014 06:22 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 to be sent to the EC Folks, The letter on observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE reporting period 2 is ready to be sent to the EC. You can find it ready at the shared google docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QWdRYJ-MobkvksFbO1jqpbUKsKhBNzhlJTVOFGaeR4/edit?usp=sharing Please take some time to perform a very last review and, overall, a review of the cover letter and Introduction section that I have completed. There were also a little set of comments remaining, please make sure they get fixed. I won't be able to attend the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall this morning because I'm participating as speaker in a FI-WARE event in Sevilla (inaguration of datacenter expanding FI-Lab capacity as well as coaching of SMEs and entrepreneurs aiming to participate in FI-PPP fase 3). However, Miguel will take care of everything and will be in charge of submitting the final letter to the PO this day (right after the WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall). He will forward it to you and the consortia once it has been done. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Mar 17 16:31:09 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:31:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project In-Reply-To: <532714E3.7080004@tid.es> References: <532714E3.7080004@tid.es> Message-ID: <5327153D.9020007@tid.es> Dear all, Alea iacta est Best regards, Miguel -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Fecha: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:29:39 +0100 De: Miguel Carrillo Para: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu, "Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu" CC: Juanjo Hierro , Stephane.ANDRIES at ec.europa.eu, Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu Dear Arian and members of the EC, This message is sent on behalf of Mr. Hierro. Please find enclosed a document gathering a number of observations that the FI-WARE partners wish to perform to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We are ready to meet you (in a conference call or face to face meeting) to further elaborate on these observations. We look forward the positive consideration of these observations as to amend part of the Financial Assessment that were communicated to us. We were considering whether to send this to the reviewers directly as well. We have realised that the most sensible approach is to reply to your original message and let you decide yourself how you want to handle it. We would kindly ask you to acknowledge receipt of this letter. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro FI-WARE project Coordinator and Chief Architect -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:27 +0100 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE project for reporting period 2.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 41079 bytes Desc: not available URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Mon Mar 17 16:35:36 2014 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:35:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project In-Reply-To: <5327153D.9020007@tid.es> References: <532714E3.7080004@tid.es> <5327153D.9020007@tid.es> Message-ID: Well done! Thanks for driving this. Let's hope this will achieve the desired outcome.. Regards, Alex From: Miguel Carrillo To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 17/03/2014 05:31 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear all, Alea iacta est Best regards, Miguel -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Fecha: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:29:39 +0100 De: Miguel Carrillo Para: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu, "Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu" CC: Juanjo Hierro , Stephane.ANDRIES at ec.europa.eu, Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu Dear Arian and members of the EC, This message is sent on behalf of Mr. Hierro. Please find enclosed a document gathering a number of observations that the FI-WARE partners wish to perform to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We are ready to meet you (in a conference call or face to face meeting) to further elaborate on these observations. We look forward the positive consideration of these observations as to amend part of the Financial Assessment that were communicated to us. We were considering whether to send this to the reviewers directly as well. We have realised that the most sensible approach is to reply to your original message and let you decide yourself how you want to handle it. We would kindly ask you to acknowledge receipt of this letter. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro FI-WARE project Coordinator and Chief Architect -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:27 +0100 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx[attachment "Observations on Financial Assessment of FI-WARE project for reporting period 2.docx" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Mar 17 16:48:17 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:48:17 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077D72F3@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077D72F3@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <53271941.6080800@tid.es> -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Fecha: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:43:16 +0000 De: Para: , CC: , , Dear Miguel, Acknowledged receipt. Arian From: Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:30 PM To: CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: Juanjo Hierro; ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Dear Arian and members of the EC, This message is sent on behalf of Mr. Hierro. Please find enclosed a document gathering a number of observations that the FI-WARE partners wish to perform to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We are ready to meet you (in a conference call or face to face meeting) to further elaborate on these observations. We look forward the positive consideration of these observations as to amend part of the Financial Assessment that were communicated to us. We were considering whether to send this to the reviewers directly as well. We have realised that the most sensible approach is to reply to your original message and let you decide yourself how you want to handle it. We would kindly ask you to acknowledge receipt of this letter. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro FI-WARE project Coordinator and Chief Architect -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:27 +0100 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: ? According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. ? According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jdps at tid.es Tue Mar 18 14:57:07 2014 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:57:07 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT AND URGENT: Second payment to beneficiaries incoporated to FI-WARE consortia through 3rd Open Call Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E28053@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, This e-mail is to inform you that, regarding the e-mail below, we have not received any objection from the consortia so far. So, we are going to order the Second Interim Payment to the beneficiaries incorporated to FI-WARE consortia through 3rd Open Call as follows: [cid:image001.jpg at 01CF42BA.018C5CC0] Note: The accumulative payment cannot exceed the 85% of the overall funding per partner. BR Javier. De: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Enviado el: martes, 11 de marzo de 2014 11:42 Para: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu'; fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: IMPORTANT AND URGENT: Second payment to beneficiaries incoporated to FI-WARE consortia through 3rd Open Call Dear partners, We would like to proceed with a second payment to beneficiaries that joined the FI-WARE consortia as a result of their selection as a result of Open Call 3. Unfortunately, our payment formula setup in our Consortium Agreement didn't cover well the scenario where beneficiaries of an Open Call join after beginning of the last reporting period. This was because it was (wrongly) assumed that beneficiaries of any Open Call would join before the end of the second reporting period. As a result, following the formula established in the Consortium Agreement, beneficiaries of the Open Call 3 would only receive a first pre-financing payment at the beginning of the project and they would not get any additional payment before the very end of the project. This situation collocates these beneficiaries in a very odd and unfair situation compared to the rest of beneficiaries, who are getting paid as soon as the EC pays after each reporting period based on results of that period review so they have enough cash-flow to afford the activities of any period including the last period. On the other hand, we believe we should only proceed with a second payment to beneficiaries of Open Call 3 if there is evidence that their work so far will be accepted and consequently the declared costs will be likely accepted as well. Because of that, we asked our Project Officer to provide us with an official email in which he may report on the status regarding acceptance of deliverables submitted by the new beneficiaries in Open Call 3 in month 29 (deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1). Please find attached below the mail sent by our Project Officer anticipating acceptance of these deliverables. This wasn't a surprise to us since we all know that beneficiaries of Open Call 3 are the ones dealing with branding, communication and dissemination activities and their performance so far can be very much positively evaluated. Based on the acceptance of these deliverables, we believe that we, as a consortia, are safe to proceed with a payment that covers the funding of declared costs from the date at which new beneficiaries joined the consortia and month 29, provided this doesn't exceed the 85% of the overall funding per partner, which is a rule that we must follow in all cases. Therefore, we will proceed with this payment unless we hear about any objection by any of the partners before Thursday March 13, 12:00pm. Please note that we cannot follow a similar approach with beneficiaries of Open Call 2 due to the fact that they didn't submit any deliverable for review in the last month 30 review. Thus, the project officer could not send any message confirming acceptance of deliverables. If we proceed to give a second payment to these other beneficiaries we would be incurring in risks since it may happen that their deliverables get rejected in the final review and such rejection may include some definite rejections. Don't hesitate to ask Javier de Pedro (in copy of this email) and myself any further questions you may have. Again, I would like to stress the deadline for objection on Thursday March 13, 12:00pm. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:43:15 +0000 From: To: , CC: , Dear Raul, Juanjo, Just to let you know that I have just received the first review report draft. In that draft, deliverables D11.5.1, D12.2.4 and D12.4.1 were accepted. Probably, these deliverables will be accepted in the final review report as well. I have no reason to believe otherwise. Best regards, Arian. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 29673 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Mar 18 15:39:50 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:39:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Distribution of Templates for the "Packages" Entries in FI-WARE Catalog Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1E6F9@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Stefano, hi Juanjo, We from our side are now ready to start creating the catalog pages for our 3 packages from apps chapter. @Stefano: As agreed in WPL call, can you please send around the template for the packages for the catalog soon? If I should have missed it during my vacation, can you please resend to me? Can we have them at the end of this week, please? Afterall it would allow us all to proceed for the packaging activities - since some of us need to have everything ready and approved and online prior to M36. We can alternatively go ahead and create our own package entries first, if you do not mind. Best wishes Markus - There was an AP on Engineering to come up with a template for publication of information about packages of related GEis in the FI-WARE Catalogue. Maybe also with a dedicated category. * Dedicated entry in the Catalogue from the top level menu (packages may be composed by GEis from different chapters) * The structure for the package entry can be the same one as for GEis entries * the only doubt is for Download tab * if one T&C for the entire package, pay attention to avoid conflicts between the package components. The T&C should link to the composing GEIs T&C. Juanjo: Status? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Mar 18 15:56:36 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:56:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6B5A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, As I progress on the criteria to identify issues on backlog items' open descriptions, I need to query you in order to propose modifying previous criteria used. As backlog items' open descriptions, I refer to the descriptions provided in the wiki openly, an example: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Data.MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation Currently the get views showing the outlook of descriptions based on the number of words. As an example you can see FI-WARE project and Cloud chapter below: [cid:image001.png at 01CF42A4.3208EFF0] The link above is an example of average open description with 73 words used. [cid:image005.jpg at 01CF42C2.A0EED8D0] I think there's need to improve the upper and lower extremes. Therefore, I need to query you on objections to limiting the number of words used to describe open backlog items' descriptions: In my opinion there's need to limit them to a window of about 60-250 words. The lowest limit would be implemented with the following individual limits: ? goal (>=10 words), description (>=30 words), rational (>= 20 words) ? total record (<=250 words) Would you have any objections to it? I think these limits would help identify cases like this below: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CE.MGT.PlatformFeatures [cid:image002.png at 01CF42B4.5EA4AA30] Or the opposite. The longest description belongs to MiWi with 560 words: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AdvWebUI.DataflowProcessing There aren't many items with more than 250 words. Apps(0), Cloud(5), IoT(0), Data(5), I2ND(4), Security(0), MiWi(3) The previous rules for the fields Goal, Description and Rationale only checked fields had content. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 19485 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 11912 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 27772 bytes Desc: image005.jpg URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Tue Mar 18 18:00:24 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:00:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] ECFI Brussels - Registration fee removed / registration deadline extended to 28 March In-Reply-To: <4B6E11F294A50F4F8F2FE338F9ED667252FCD695@exchange.eurescom.eu> References: <4B6E11F294A50F4F8F2FE338F9ED667252FCD695@exchange.eurescom.eu> Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06B6D7@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Spread the word. Apparently the registration fees for ECFI have been removed!!! From: Milon Gupta [mailto:gupta at eurescom.eu] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 5:40 PM To: dwg at fi-ppp.eu Subject: [FI-PPP DWG] ECFI Brussels - Registration fee removed / registration deadline extended to 28 March Dear all, As indicated at the last DWG call and agreed by the organising committee, the participation fee for ECFI Brussels has now been removed. Paid fees will be returned. Registration is still required. The registration deadline has been extended to 28 March. Please use the fact that there is no fee anymore in promoting the event to target audiences. In the remaining two weeks we should make an effort to attract the level of audience participation that this event and the FI-PPP deserve. Best regards, Milon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com Tue Mar 18 18:09:31 2014 From: thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com (Sandfuchs, Thorsten) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:09:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Message-ID: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> Hi manuel, How many real fiware users or even the reviewers complaint about missing text on these pages? How much work would you like to impose to the consortium in which we couldn't focus on packaging or use case support or other tasks related to real deliverables at hand? How vital for the project is this proposal in M34 of the project? Thanks for you comments -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG Sent from a mobile device, please excuse the brevity. Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx -------- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht -------- Von: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Datum:18.03.2014 15:56 (GMT+01:00) An: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Betreff: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Dear WP Leaders, As I progress on the criteria to identify issues on backlog items? open descriptions, I need to query you in order to propose modifying previous criteria used. As backlog items? open descriptions, I refer to the descriptions provided in the wiki openly, an example: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Data.MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation Currently the get views showing the outlook of descriptions based on the number of words. As an example you can see FI-WARE project and Cloud chapter below: [cid:_com_android_email_attachmentprovider_5_27653_RAW at sec.galaxytab] The link above is an example of average open description with 73 words used. [cid:_com_android_email_attachmentprovider_5_27655_RAW at sec.galaxytab] I think there?s need to improve the upper and lower extremes. Therefore, I need to query you on objections to limiting the number of words used to describe open backlog items? descriptions: In my opinion there?s need to limit them to a window of about 60-250 words. The lowest limit would be implemented with the following individual limits: ? goal (>=10 words), description (>=30 words), rational (>= 20 words) ? total record (<=250 words) Would you have any objections to it? I think these limits would help identify cases like this below: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CE.MGT.PlatformFeatures [cid:_com_android_email_attachmentprovider_5_27654_RAW at sec.galaxytab] Or the opposite. The longest description belongs to MiWi with 560 words: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AdvWebUI.DataflowProcessing There aren?t many items with more than 250 words. Apps(0), Cloud(5), IoT(0), Data(5), I2ND(4), Security(0), MiWi(3) The previous rules for the fields Goal, Description and Rationale only checked fields had content. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 19485 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 27772 bytes Desc: image005.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 11912 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Mar 18 18:27:47 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:27:47 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions In-Reply-To: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> References: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6CE8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Thorsten, I know it doesn?t make sense to do any effort from a local short-term perspective as yours. Those who believe that FI-WARE is a platform wanting to become something bigger and bigger, those who think improving quality here and there may help, may have a different perspective. So, please, allow the partners who want to improve, do it!! Thanks for your cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: martes, 18 de marzo de 2014 18:10 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: AW: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Hi manuel, How many real fiware users or even the reviewers complaint about missing text on these pages? How much work would you like to impose to the consortium in which we couldn't focus on packaging or use case support or other tasks related to real deliverables at hand? How vital for the project is this proposal in M34 of the project? Thanks for you comments -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG Sent from a mobile device, please excuse the brevity. Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx -------- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht -------- Von: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Datum:18.03.2014 15:56 (GMT+01:00) An: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Betreff: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Dear WP Leaders, As I progress on the criteria to identify issues on backlog items? open descriptions, I need to query you in order to propose modifying previous criteria used. As backlog items? open descriptions, I refer to the descriptions provided in the wiki openly, an example: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Data.MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation Currently the get views showing the outlook of descriptions based on the number of words. As an example you can see FI-WARE project and Cloud chapter below: [cid:image001.png at 01CF42D7.BF194560] The link above is an example of average open description with 73 words used. [cid:image002.jpg at 01CF42D7.BF194560] I think there?s need to improve the upper and lower extremes. Therefore, I need to query you on objections to limiting the number of words used to describe open backlog items? descriptions: In my opinion there?s need to limit them to a window of about 60-250 words. The lowest limit would be implemented with the following individual limits: ? goal (>=10 words), description (>=30 words), rational (>= 20 words) ? total record (<=250 words) Would you have any objections to it? I think these limits would help identify cases like this below: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CE.MGT.PlatformFeatures [cid:image003.png at 01CF42D7.BF194560] Or the opposite. The longest description belongs to MiWi with 560 words: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AdvWebUI.DataflowProcessing There aren?t many items with more than 250 words. Apps(0), Cloud(5), IoT(0), Data(5), I2ND(4), Security(0), MiWi(3) The previous rules for the fields Goal, Description and Rationale only checked fields had content. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 19485 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 27772 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 11912 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: From gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it Wed Mar 19 10:35:47 2014 From: gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it (Bollano Gianmario) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:35:47 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6CE8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6CE8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBA2E@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> Hi Manuel, I don?t see any real improvement in changing ? again ? rules for the backlog & wiki review. This is especially important now because all FI-WARE partners have huge amount of work now that the final release 3.3 is closing: finalizing and delivering SW and tests, preparing documentation wikis and courses, aligning the backlog tickets status and Materializing/Tech Roadmap pages. It even happens that some of us are still waiting a review of SW wiki release 3.2 when we should deliver release 3.3 in few weeks. Consider we can say the same thing using 7 or 17 or even 100 words, without any real improvement in quality. Let me show you an example from your example: MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation: Actual, 17 words: ?The enabler receives metadata encoded in one representation and outputs the same metadata represented in another representation.? Using 7 words: ?Translates input metadata into a different representation? Using 42 words: ?This enablers is designed to receive input metadata encoded in one specific representation, and to apply them a translation of their representation, with the purpose of providing to the output the same metadata received in input, encoded using a different output representation.? As you see, a description with 42 words don?t say anything more and may be less clear than one using 17, as well as the description with 7 words exactly tells the same thing of the other sentences, probably even in a more clear way (not to mention 42 should even contain the ?meaning of Life, the universe and everything?). Even more useless to set an upper limit to the words used; apart from censorship I don?t see any practical usefulness in considering a long description as a forbidden text. If you still think that your proposal may be helpful to someone, my suggestion is to set those limits in a way that they may be commonly agreed to be useful ? especially not again to increase the number of ?rules infringement? in the backlog report. Best, Gianmario Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 18 marzo 2014 18:28 A: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Hi Thorsten, I know it doesn?t make sense to do any effort from a local short-term perspective as yours. Those who believe that FI-WARE is a platform wanting to become something bigger and bigger, those who think improving quality here and there may help, may have a different perspective. So, please, allow the partners who want to improve, do it!! Thanks for your cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: martes, 18 de marzo de 2014 18:10 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: AW: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Hi manuel, How many real fiware users or even the reviewers complaint about missing text on these pages? How much work would you like to impose to the consortium in which we couldn't focus on packaging or use case support or other tasks related to real deliverables at hand? How vital for the project is this proposal in M34 of the project? Thanks for you comments -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG Sent from a mobile device, please excuse the brevity. Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx -------- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht -------- Von: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Datum:18.03.2014 15:56 (GMT+01:00) An: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Betreff: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Dear WP Leaders, As I progress on the criteria to identify issues on backlog items? open descriptions, I need to query you in order to propose modifying previous criteria used. As backlog items? open descriptions, I refer to the descriptions provided in the wiki openly, an example: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Data.MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation Currently the get views showing the outlook of descriptions based on the number of words. As an example you can see FI-WARE project and Cloud chapter below: [cid:image001.png at 01CF4353.21C52AF0] The link above is an example of average open description with 73 words used. [cid:image002.jpg at 01CF4353.21C52AF0] I think there?s need to improve the upper and lower extremes. Therefore, I need to query you on objections to limiting the number of words used to describe open backlog items? descriptions: In my opinion there?s need to limit them to a window of about 60-250 words. The lowest limit would be implemented with the following individual limits: ? goal (>=10 words), description (>=30 words), rational (>= 20 words) ? total record (<=250 words) Would you have any objections to it? I think these limits would help identify cases like this below: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CE.MGT.PlatformFeatures [cid:image003.png at 01CF4353.21C52AF0] Or the opposite. The longest description belongs to MiWi with 560 words: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AdvWebUI.DataflowProcessing There aren?t many items with more than 250 words. Apps(0), Cloud(5), IoT(0), Data(5), I2ND(4), Security(0), MiWi(3) The previous rules for the fields Goal, Description and Rationale only checked fields had content. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 19485 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 27772 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 11912 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 19 11:07:01 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:07:01 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions In-Reply-To: <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBA2E@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> References: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6CE8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBA2E@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E5E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Gianmario, Thanks for your email! I know there?s nothing able to substitute actual professionalism and willingness to improve quality. As you very well point out. I only want to set up a frame where we can express it in a way it can be perceived. I think it would be important to reduce variability, otherwise, the perception anybody can get from those descriptions is lack of criteria. (As it actually occurs). My proposal comes from observing actual distributions for GEI enablers. But I?m willing to take other limits/definitions to the frame. Censorship is out of context in my opinion. (Having rules is something organizations use daily for their benefit). So, if requested by your WP Leader, I can follow the official procedure to submit the proposal for vote, and to request alternatives to this proposal. Kind regards, Manuel From: Bollano Gianmario [mailto:gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it] Sent: mi?rcoles, 19 de marzo de 2014 10:36 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Hi Manuel, I don?t see any real improvement in changing ? again ? rules for the backlog & wiki review. This is especially important now because all FI-WARE partners have huge amount of work now that the final release 3.3 is closing: finalizing and delivering SW and tests, preparing documentation wikis and courses, aligning the backlog tickets status and Materializing/Tech Roadmap pages. It even happens that some of us are still waiting a review of SW wiki release 3.2 when we should deliver release 3.3 in few weeks. Consider we can say the same thing using 7 or 17 or even 100 words, without any real improvement in quality. Let me show you an example from your example: MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation: Actual, 17 words: ?The enabler receives metadata encoded in one representation and outputs the same metadata represented in another representation.? Using 7 words: ?Translates input metadata into a different representation? Using 42 words: ?This enablers is designed to receive input metadata encoded in one specific representation, and to apply them a translation of their representation, with the purpose of providing to the output the same metadata received in input, encoded using a different output representation.? As you see, a description with 42 words don?t say anything more and may be less clear than one using 17, as well as the description with 7 words exactly tells the same thing of the other sentences, probably even in a more clear way (not to mention 42 should even contain the ?meaning of Life, the universe and everything?). Even more useless to set an upper limit to the words used; apart from censorship I don?t see any practical usefulness in considering a long description as a forbidden text. If you still think that your proposal may be helpful to someone, my suggestion is to set those limits in a way that they may be commonly agreed to be useful ? especially not again to increase the number of ?rules infringement? in the backlog report. Best, Gianmario Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: marted? 18 marzo 2014 18:28 A: Sandfuchs, Thorsten; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Hi Thorsten, I know it doesn?t make sense to do any effort from a local short-term perspective as yours. Those who believe that FI-WARE is a platform wanting to become something bigger and bigger, those who think improving quality here and there may help, may have a different perspective. So, please, allow the partners who want to improve, do it!! Thanks for your cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com] Sent: martes, 18 de marzo de 2014 18:10 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: AW: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Hi manuel, How many real fiware users or even the reviewers complaint about missing text on these pages? How much work would you like to impose to the consortium in which we couldn't focus on packaging or use case support or other tasks related to real deliverables at hand? How vital for the project is this proposal in M34 of the project? Thanks for you comments -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG Sent from a mobile device, please excuse the brevity. Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx -------- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht -------- Von: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Datum:18.03.2014 15:56 (GMT+01:00) An: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Betreff: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Dear WP Leaders, As I progress on the criteria to identify issues on backlog items? open descriptions, I need to query you in order to propose modifying previous criteria used. As backlog items? open descriptions, I refer to the descriptions provided in the wiki openly, an example: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Data.MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation Currently the get views showing the outlook of descriptions based on the number of words. As an example you can see FI-WARE project and Cloud chapter below: [cid:image001.png at 01CF435F.CF02B910] The link above is an example of average open description with 73 words used. [cid:image002.jpg at 01CF435F.CF02B910] I think there?s need to improve the upper and lower extremes. Therefore, I need to query you on objections to limiting the number of words used to describe open backlog items? descriptions: In my opinion there?s need to limit them to a window of about 60-250 words. The lowest limit would be implemented with the following individual limits: ? goal (>=10 words), description (>=30 words), rational (>= 20 words) ? total record (<=250 words) Would you have any objections to it? I think these limits would help identify cases like this below: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CE.MGT.PlatformFeatures [cid:image003.png at 01CF435F.CF02B910] Or the opposite. The longest description belongs to MiWi with 560 words: http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AdvWebUI.DataflowProcessing There aren?t many items with more than 250 words. Apps(0), Cloud(5), IoT(0), Data(5), I2ND(4), Security(0), MiWi(3) The previous rules for the fields Goal, Description and Rationale only checked fields had content. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 19485 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 27772 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 11912 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image004.gif URL: From depa at eng.it Wed Mar 19 11:53:28 2014 From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:53:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E5E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6CE8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBA2E@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E5E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <840389946-1395226410-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1543258785-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Manuel, First of all let me thank you for your continuous effort in pushing us in improving the quality of our results. I'd like to remind all that we are not improving the quality of mere project results, that as we are explaining also here at fia, are ment to be BRANDS (fi-ware, fi-lab, fi-ops) lasting outside and far beyond the life of the project. So any single drop in this direction is a big barril towards a quite interesting future! @Gianmario: thank you for your example, but it only shows, at least to me, that the 42 words text is poorly provided as it does not add any additional detail. What i'm saying that length is not a quality per se. anyhow rule for overall consistency allow the readers to easily navigate between the many pages of docs we do have, so adehering to such rules becomes per se quality! Thank you again Manuel for your effort which i fully support! Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:07:01 To: Bollano Gianmario; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 19 12:04:31 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:04:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions In-Reply-To: <840389946-1395226410-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1543258785-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6CE8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBA2E@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E5E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <840389946-1395226410-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1543258785-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E97@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Thanks Stefano!! I do really appreciate your email!! Manuel -----Original Message----- From: depa at eng.it [mailto:depa at eng.it] Sent: mi?rcoles, 19 de marzo de 2014 11:53 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Bollano Gianmario; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Dear Manuel, First of all let me thank you for your continuous effort in pushing us in improving the quality of our results. I'd like to remind all that we are not improving the quality of mere project results, that as we are explaining also here at fia, are ment to be BRANDS (fi-ware, fi-lab, fi-ops) lasting outside and far beyond the life of the project. So any single drop in this direction is a big barril towards a quite interesting future! @Gianmario: thank you for your example, but it only shows, at least to me, that the 42 words text is poorly provided as it does not add any additional detail. What i'm saying that length is not a quality per se. anyhow rule for overall consistency allow the readers to easily navigate between the many pages of docs we do have, so adehering to such rules becomes per se quality! Thank you again Manuel for your effort which i fully support! Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:07:01 To: Bollano Gianmario; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Wed Mar 19 16:14:09 2014 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:14:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E97@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <6teekf6kqxvs4uqpik1ab893.1395162562107@email.android.com> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6CE8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBA2E@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E5E@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <840389946-1395226410-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1543258785-@b2.c14.bise7.blackberry> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B6E97@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: I fully agree with Stefano on appreciation of Manuel's effort, overall. I think the (perceived) quality and predictability improved dramatically following introduction of better agile tooling. On the matter itself -- if I understand correctly, the suggestion refers to backlog items. I don't see much value preserving the backlog beyond the end of the project. People interested in the end result will refer to the guides -- not the backlog. Backlog should be of interest primarily for the development team, as well as immediate stakeholders (e.g., the coordinator, the reviewers, etc). Hence, I don't see value retroactively "improving" the backlog at this stage of the project. I seriously doubt that anyone cares what was the description of a work items implemented (and forgotten) in February 2012. Regards, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE To: "depa at eng.it" , Bollano Gianmario , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Cc: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 19/03/2014 01:04 PM Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Thanks Stefano!! I do really appreciate your email!! Manuel -----Original Message----- From: depa at eng.it [mailto:depa at eng.it] Sent: mi?rcoles, 19 de marzo de 2014 11:53 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Bollano Gianmario; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions Dear Manuel, First of all let me thank you for your continuous effort in pushing us in improving the quality of our results. I'd like to remind all that we are not improving the quality of mere project results, that as we are explaining also here at fia, are ment to be BRANDS (fi-ware, fi-lab, fi-ops) lasting outside and far beyond the life of the project. So any single drop in this direction is a big barril towards a quite interesting future! @Gianmario: thank you for your example, but it only shows, at least to me, that the 42 words text is poorly provided as it does not add any additional detail. What i'm saying that length is not a quality per se. anyhow rule for overall consistency allow the readers to easily navigate between the many pages of docs we do have, so adehering to such rules becomes per se quality! Thank you again Manuel for your effort which i fully support! Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:07:01 To: Bollano Gianmario; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 19 19:54:28 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:54:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B70AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GE Owners, I??ve just finished to implement the last criteria missing in the backlogs reviews: C7 ?C It cares about the open descriptions of backlog items provided in the wiki. The main realization is the great variability of our descriptions (#words): Min = 0; Max = 560; Mean = 73.4; Std Dev(??) = 51.4 [cid:image001.png at 01CF43AB.11EF2E70] In order to overcome this situation I??ve defined a frame to reduce this variability, which encourages descriptions in the frame 60-250 words. Obviously actual quality of descriptions can only come from you by providing meaningful and informative paragraphs. The inferior limit of the frame for the description window is implemented as follows: ?? Goal field (>= 10 words) ?? Description field (>= 30 words) ?? Rationale field (>= 20 words) I hope you find it sensible!! Current reports also provide views for each individual GEI??s distribution, a good example shown below: [cid:image002.png at 01CF43AD.060D6CA0] Find updated reports at the links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3598/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140319.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3599/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140319.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3602/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140319.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3600/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140319.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3601/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140319.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3604/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140319.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3603/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140319.xlsx If anything, please, don??t hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef??nica Digital Parque Tecnol??gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 15357 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 24102 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 20 10:43:01 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:43:01 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - Updated dashboard and reminder on 2nd wave timeline Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B7268@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, Find updated the Open Specs' dashboard to accommodate links coming from 2nd wave: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing Let me remind you of the 2nd wave of the open specs' timeline. [cid:image001.png at 01CF4429.26E2CF20] According to it, peer reviews should be taken place during this week. Please, don't forget to update it for next Monday's weekly meeting. Thanks for cooperation! If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 23433 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it Thu Mar 20 12:51:20 2014 From: gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it (Bollano Gianmario) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:51:20 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B70AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B70AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBD3C@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> Hi Manuel, The change in upper/lower limits in the number of words you??ve proposed has this immediate effects: ?? Apps chapter: 272 rules violations ?? Cloud chapter: 197 rules violations ?? IoT chapter: 181 rules violations ?? Data chapter: 282 rules violations ?? I2ND chapter: 192 rules violations ?? Security chapter: 196 rules violations ?? MiWi chapter: 252 rules violations Huge numbers indeed??. I??ve got the data from your reports. The rules you propose are: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) ==> Overall fields (<= 250 words) I??ve seen you??ve done lot of statistics. I??m sure that the number of rules violation, and the overall editing work to do, can be drastically reduced by changing a little the numbers above. For instance, when setting Description field (>= 20 words), instead of 30, the number of rules violations significantly decreases. And having 20 words instead of 30 does not really affect the value of the description. The same may apply to Rationale field (>= 15 words), instead of 20 words. Considering you are doing lot of statistics, don??t you think it would better to analyse the effect of changing a little these numbers to minimize the total numbers of rules violations? In this way we??ll have a meaningful common rule that also will help anyone to make these changes as quick as possible. Gianmario Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: mercoled?? 19 marzo 2014 19:54 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Dear GE Owners, I??ve just finished to implement the last criteria missing in the backlogs reviews: C7 ?C It cares about the open descriptions of backlog items provided in the wiki. The main realization is the great variability of our descriptions (#words): Min = 0; Max = 560; Mean = 73.4; Std Dev(??) = 51.4 [cid:image001.png at 01CF4438.1554A580] In order to overcome this situation I??ve defined a frame to reduce this variability, which encourages descriptions in the frame 60-250 words. Obviously actual quality of descriptions can only come from you by providing meaningful and informative paragraphs. The inferior limit of the frame for the description window is implemented as follows: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) I hope you find it sensible!! Current reports also provide views for each individual GEI??s distribution, a good example shown below: [cid:image002.png at 01CF4438.1554A580] Find updated reports at the links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3598/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140319.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3599/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140319.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3602/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140319.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3600/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140319.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3601/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140319.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3604/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140319.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3603/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140319.xlsx If anything, please, don??t hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef??nica Digital Parque Tecnol??gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ?? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 15357 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 24102 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 20 14:47:10 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:47:10 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included In-Reply-To: <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBD3C@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B70AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBD3C@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B7506@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi Gianmario, I haven??t counted how many words we have to add. The purpose is to increase quality. I believe it??s worth doing it! I think Quality should be important for us!! I already informed you yesterday on my flexibility to adapt the scheme to increase quality and the procedure to follow!! The scheme may also consider differences between Epics and Features. Epics normally have wider scope, and include several features ?C so somehow better or wider descriptions could be provided. We could also easy navigation among related items: for example, epics could include links to their features, and features include links to it epic parent. Kind regards, Manuel From: Bollano Gianmario [mailto:gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it] Sent: jueves, 20 de marzo de 2014 12:51 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Hi Manuel, The change in upper/lower limits in the number of words you??ve proposed has this immediate effects: ?? Apps chapter: 272 rules violations ?? Cloud chapter: 197 rules violations ?? IoT chapter: 181 rules violations ?? Data chapter: 282 rules violations ?? I2ND chapter: 192 rules violations ?? Security chapter: 196 rules violations ?? MiWi chapter: 252 rules violations Huge numbers indeed??. I??ve got the data from your reports. The rules you propose are: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) ==> Overall fields (<= 250 words) I??ve seen you??ve done lot of statistics. I??m sure that the number of rules violation, and the overall editing work to do, can be drastically reduced by changing a little the numbers above. For instance, when setting Description field (>= 20 words), instead of 30, the number of rules violations significantly decreases. And having 20 words instead of 30 does not really affect the value of the description. The same may apply to Rationale field (>= 15 words), instead of 20 words. Considering you are doing lot of statistics, don??t you think it would better to analyse the effect of changing a little these numbers to minimize the total numbers of rules violations? In this way we??ll have a meaningful common rule that also will help anyone to make these changes as quick as possible. Gianmario Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: mercoled?? 19 marzo 2014 19:54 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Dear GE Owners, I??ve just finished to implement the last criteria missing in the backlogs reviews: C7 ?C It cares about the open descriptions of backlog items provided in the wiki. The main realization is the great variability of our descriptions (#words): Min = 0; Max = 560; Mean = 73.4; Std Dev(??) = 51.4 [cid:image001.png at 01CF444A.BAFC7690] In order to overcome this situation I??ve defined a frame to reduce this variability, which encourages descriptions in the frame 60-250 words. Obviously actual quality of descriptions can only come from you by providing meaningful and informative paragraphs. The inferior limit of the frame for the description window is implemented as follows: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) I hope you find it sensible!! Current reports also provide views for each individual GEI??s distribution, a good example shown below: [cid:image002.png at 01CF444A.BAFC7690] Find updated reports at the links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3598/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140319.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3599/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140319.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3602/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140319.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3600/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140319.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3601/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140319.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3604/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140319.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3603/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140319.xlsx If anything, please, don??t hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef??nica Digital Parque Tecnol??gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ?? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 15357 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 24102 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image003.gif URL: From gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it Thu Mar 20 15:10:10 2014 From: gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it (Bollano Gianmario) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:10:10 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B7506@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B70AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBD3C@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B7506@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <7E649CBD84A947498203DAF8F098B1F61B2EBD84@TELMBA001BA020.telecomitalia.local> Hi Manual, I haven??t counted how many words we have to add, too. I??ve just used the numbers from your reports. Counting the Number of ??Rules Violations?? tells how many editing we have to do. Trying to reduce those editing make simply possible to do them in time (we have 10 days). I repeat, these are the editing (sections of texts to edit, not words, to match rules) required in the wiki pages: * Apps chapter: 272 * Cloud chapter: 197 * IoT chapter: 181 * Data chapter: 282 * I2ND chapter: 192 * Security chapter: 196 * MiWi chapter: 252 Total: 1572 editing actions required in the FIWARE Forge wiki. Being able to practically make all these editing (we have 10 days, don??t we?) means quality, believe me. I would ask you to use statistics to find a better set of meaningful rules, because I??m sure the number of editing actions can be reduced, for instance in this way: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 20 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 15 words) ==> Overall fields (<= 250 words) Please, the statistic in your reports to do this analysis, in a way that prove to be really useful to make these changes. We want to be able to apply these editing in such a short time. We strive for quality. Gianmario Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: gioved?? 20 marzo 2014 14:47 A: Bollano Gianmario; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Hi Gianmario, I haven??t counted how many words we have to add. The purpose is to increase quality. I believe it??s worth doing it! I think Quality should be important for us!! I already informed you yesterday on my flexibility to adapt the scheme to increase quality and the procedure to follow!! The scheme may also consider differences between Epics and Features. Epics normally have wider scope, and include several features ?C so somehow better or wider descriptions could be provided. We could also easy navigation among related items: for example, epics could include links to their features, and features include links to it epic parent. Kind regards, Manuel From: Bollano Gianmario [mailto:gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it] Sent: jueves, 20 de marzo de 2014 12:51 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Hi Manuel, The change in upper/lower limits in the number of words you??ve proposed has this immediate effects: * Apps chapter: 272 rules violations * Cloud chapter: 197 rules violations * IoT chapter: 181 rules violations * Data chapter: 282 rules violations * I2ND chapter: 192 rules violations * Security chapter: 196 rules violations * MiWi chapter: 252 rules violations Huge numbers indeed??. I??ve got the data from your reports. The rules you propose are: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) ==> Overall fields (<= 250 words) I??ve seen you??ve done lot of statistics. I??m sure that the number of rules violation, and the overall editing work to do, can be drastically reduced by changing a little the numbers above. For instance, when setting Description field (>= 20 words), instead of 30, the number of rules violations significantly decreases. And having 20 words instead of 30 does not really affect the value of the description. The same may apply to Rationale field (>= 15 words), instead of 20 words. Considering you are doing lot of statistics, don??t you think it would better to analyse the effect of changing a little these numbers to minimize the total numbers of rules violations? In this way we??ll have a meaningful common rule that also will help anyone to make these changes as quick as possible. Gianmario Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: mercoled?? 19 marzo 2014 19:54 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Dear GE Owners, I??ve just finished to implement the last criteria missing in the backlogs reviews: C7 ?C It cares about the open descriptions of backlog items provided in the wiki. The main realization is the great variability of our descriptions (#words): Min = 0; Max = 560; Mean = 73.4; Std Dev(??) = 51.4 [cid:image001.png at 01CF444D.63EE0EB0] In order to overcome this situation I??ve defined a frame to reduce this variability, which encourages descriptions in the frame 60-250 words. Obviously actual quality of descriptions can only come from you by providing meaningful and informative paragraphs. The inferior limit of the frame for the description window is implemented as follows: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) I hope you find it sensible!! Current reports also provide views for each individual GEI??s distribution, a good example shown below: [cid:image002.png at 01CF444D.63EE0EB0] Find updated reports at the links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3598/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140319.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3599/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140319.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3602/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140319.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3600/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140319.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3601/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140319.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3604/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140319.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3603/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140319.xlsx If anything, please, don??t hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef??nica Digital Parque Tecnol??gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ?? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol??tica de env??o y recepci??n de correo electr??nico en el enlace situado m??s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ?? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 15357 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 24102 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image003.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Mar 20 18:54:05 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:54:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] next WPLs/WPAs follow-up (March 24th) confcall cancelled Message-ID: <532B2B3D.1040903@tid.es> Hi all, Neither me nor Miguel will be available this monday so I propose to cancel our regular WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall. Let's iterate this time over the email for global coordination if needed. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 20 21:23:51 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:23:51 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content: Updated reviews and dashboards Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B76B6@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, For those progressing on fixing issues, please, find below the links to updated backlog and reviews. Reviews: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3607/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3608/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3611/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3609/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3610/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3613/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3612/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140320.xlsx Congratulations to: Slim Trabelsi - SAP - Data Handling - PPL - 0 issues Francisco Di Cerbo - SAP - DB Anonymizer - 0 issues And Susana G. Zarzosa - Atos - SM - Service Level SIEM (SLS ) - just 1 issue Dashboards: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3614/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3615/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3618/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3616/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3617/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3620/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140320.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3619/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140320.xlsx Dashboards include an additional bit of information in Presence showing the description status: [cid:image001.png at 01CF4482.AC3D27C0] If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 2699 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Mar 21 11:46:20 2014 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:46:20 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project In-Reply-To: <53271941.6080800@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077D72F3@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <53271941.6080800@tid.es> Message-ID: <16597_1395398784_532C187F_16597_384_2_2190b1a9-87a0-49dc-b83a-22cdf859de2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Dear Miguel, Thanks for the forward but I'm missing here the enclosed document/attachment. So could you please send us it ? (i.e. final version of the letter which was sent to the EC). Thanks in advance. Regards, Pascal [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : lundi 17 mars 2014 16:48 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Fecha: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:43:16 +0000 De: Para: , CC: , , Dear Miguel, Acknowledged receipt. Arian From: Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:30 PM To: CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: Juanjo Hierro; ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Dear Arian and members of the EC, This message is sent on behalf of Mr. Hierro. Please find enclosed a document gathering a number of observations that the FI-WARE partners wish to perform to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We are ready to meet you (in a conference call or face to face meeting) to further elaborate on these observations. We look forward the positive consideration of these observations as to amend part of the Financial Assessment that were communicated to us. We were considering whether to send this to the reviewers directly as well. We have realised that the most sensible approach is to reply to your original message and let you decide yourself how you want to handle it. We would kindly ask you to acknowledge receipt of this letter. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro FI-WARE project Coordinator and Chief Architect -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:27 +0100 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Mar 21 12:16:17 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:16:17 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project In-Reply-To: <16597_1395398784_532C187F_16597_384_2_2190b1a9-87a0-49dc-b83a-22cdf859de2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077D72F3@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <53271941.6080800@tid.es> <16597_1395398784_532C187F_16597_384_2_2190b1a9-87a0-49dc-b83a-22cdf859de2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Message-ID: <532C1F81.4080103@tid.es> Dear Pascal, This was duly sent to these lists when I sent it to the EC. I have forwarded it to you in private once again. Best regards, Miguel El 21/03/2014 11:46, BISSON Pascal escribi?: Dear Miguel, Thanks for the forward but I'm missing here the enclosed document/attachment. So could you please send us it ? (i.e. final version of the letter which was sent to the EC). Thanks in advance. Regards, Pascal [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : lundi 17 mars 2014 16:48 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Fecha: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:43:16 +0000 De: Para: , CC: , , Dear Miguel, Acknowledged receipt. Arian From: Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:30 PM To: CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: Juanjo Hierro; ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Dear Arian and members of the EC, This message is sent on behalf of Mr. Hierro. Please find enclosed a document gathering a number of observations that the FI-WARE partners wish to perform to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We are ready to meet you (in a conference call or face to face meeting) to further elaborate on these observations. We look forward the positive consideration of these observations as to amend part of the Financial Assessment that were communicated to us. We were considering whether to send this to the reviewers directly as well. We have realised that the most sensible approach is to reply to your original message and let you decide yourself how you want to handle it. We would kindly ask you to acknowledge receipt of this letter. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro FI-WARE project Coordinator and Chief Architect -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:27 +0100 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Mar 21 12:19:05 2014 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:19:05 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project In-Reply-To: <532C1F81.4080103@tid.es> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D077D72F3@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <53271941.6080800@tid.es> <16597_1395398784_532C187F_16597_384_2_2190b1a9-87a0-49dc-b83a-22cdf859de2b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> <532C1F81.4080103@tid.es> Message-ID: <3890_1395400747_532C202B_3890_3446_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E020857AAC850@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Ok thanks and apologize since I was probably not looking at the proper email. Regards, Pascal [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] De : Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 21 mars 2014 12:16 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : pascal.bisson at noos.fr Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Dear Pascal, This was duly sent to these lists when I sent it to the EC. I have forwarded it to you in private once again. Best regards, Miguel El 21/03/2014 11:46, BISSON Pascal escribi?: Dear Miguel, Thanks for the forward but I'm missing here the enclosed document/attachment. So could you please send us it ? (i.e. final version of the letter which was sent to the EC). Thanks in advance. Regards, Pascal [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : lundi 17 mars 2014 16:48 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: RE: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Fecha: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:43:16 +0000 De: Para: , CC: , , Dear Miguel, Acknowledged receipt. Arian From: Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:30 PM To: CNECT-ICT-285248; ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: Juanjo Hierro; ANDRIES Stephane (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: Observations to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project Dear Arian and members of the EC, This message is sent on behalf of Mr. Hierro. Please find enclosed a document gathering a number of observations that the FI-WARE partners wish to perform to the Financial Assessment of reporting period 2 of the FI-WARE project. We are ready to meet you (in a conference call or face to face meeting) to further elaborate on these observations. We look forward the positive consideration of these observations as to amend part of the Financial Assessment that were communicated to us. We were considering whether to send this to the reviewers directly as well. We have realised that the most sensible approach is to reply to your original message and let you decide yourself how you want to handle it. We would kindly ask you to acknowledge receipt of this letter. Best regards, Juanjo Hierro FI-WARE project Coordinator and Chief Architect -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Grant Agreement No. 285248 FI-WARE - Financial assessment for reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:39:27 +0100 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Mr. Hierro Sureda, I wish to advise you that the reports mentioned in Article 4 of Annex II to the grant agreement in reference, and submitted to the Commission on 26/09/2013, for the reporting period P2 from 01/05/2012 to 30/04/2013 have been examined. The results of the analysis of the financial statement are detailed in the attached financial statement acceptance forms. In summary a payment of 11.981.989 EUR will be made. We wish to draw your attention to the following: * According to Article II.22 of the grant agreement, the Commission may, at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project, arrange for financial audits to be carried out, by external auditors, or by the Commission services themselves including OLAF. * According to Article II.23 of the grant agreement, the Commission may initiate a technical audit or review at any time during the implementation of the project and up to five years after the end of the project. The payment of the Union financial contribution to the coordinator discharges the Commission from its obligation on payments to the other beneficiaries. Therefore, you shall ensure that all the appropriate payments are made to them without unjustified delay (see Articles II.2 and II.3). Furthermore note that according to the provisions of the Financial Regulation and of the grant agreement, sums due to the Union by a beneficiary may be recovered by offsetting them against any sums it owes to the beneficiary concerned, after informing the latter accordingly. Please inform the other beneficiaries of the results of the financial assessment for this reporting period. Yours sincerely, ZWEGERS Arian email Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Project Officer ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Mar 21 15:16:44 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:16:44 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content: Updated reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B7991@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, For those progressing on fixing issues, please find updated reviews: Congratulations to: ? Javier Cervi?o - UPM - Cloud Portal - 0 issues ? Sami Jylkka - Cyberlightning - GIS Data Provider - 0 issues ? Antti Kokko - Adminotech - 2D-UI - 1 issue ? Javier Lucio - TID - RSSS - 2 issues https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3629/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140321.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3630/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140321.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3633/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140321.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3631/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140321.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3632/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140321.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3635/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140321.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3634/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140321.xlsx Have a nice weekend!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Mar 24 15:09:29 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:09:29 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Public Global instances? Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD212F8@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi all, Henar, Stefano, Juanjo, For clarification, during an internal discussion a question surfaced where I would like to ask you all: A "FI-LAB-run "_not_ provided by the testbed as a service "Global instance with public access - is this foreseen/possible or not? Example: For WP3 Apps Chapter: For our 3 SAP GE's (Marketplace, Repository, Registry) we want to achieve (after M36) this final situation: 1) per GE (MP, Repos, Reg) each one is run as "global instance" and each is (already) installed on FI-WARE testbed): only consortium-wide access allowed under CA - no public access allowed 2) per GE (MP, Repos, Reg) only images (configured images) are put into FI-Lab - public access after successful login - User has to manually creates his own instance of such an image (image provided by SAP) 3) We do _not_ want to have global instances run on FI-LAB Cloud of our GEs is run on FI-LAB with public access. To implement this plan, for each GE (MP, Repos, Reg) we need to enter into the "cockpit" https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V3_Implementation_Cockpit two entries: one in "global instance (testbed)" (filled in by us already) and one in "configured image" (missing by us as of today). So comes my question as above: A "FI-Lab-run (not through testbed) Global instance with public access - is this foreseen or not? Can a partner have at the same time "two" global instances run for one of his GE's: (1) one global instance (run on Testbed) and (2) another one global instance (run on FI-LAB cloud) - yes or no? ? If yes: how would a team write this situation (2 Global instances) into the cockpit implementation table - since the existing "GE Global instance" column seems only reserved for test-bed realized global instances...as I see here (yellow marking)... ? If no: I guess that the different access right models (testbed=consortium only and fi-lab=public) would bring with it that such a public access Global Instance with public access and run in FI-LAB can make sense for some partners (IMHO which is _not_ identical to the consortium-restricted Testbed). Not relevant for us from SAP, but maybe for others. Note: I guess this discussion topic is basically a matter of branding "FI-Lab" etc. The case that a Testbed-installed global instance is alive - do we in FI-WARE lingo say then that it is part of "FI-LAB" as of today....This would be confusing since (at least I) always connect to "FI-LAB" a certain access model (public, not only consortium-restricted) but how is this seen by you all? What is your clarification/opinion? Can someone please help me and clarify the current picture as of today? Best Markus Generic Enabler Instances Cockpit [edit] How to read the cockpit There are three pairs of progress columns: one for the Global Instance status, the second for the Receipes and the latter for the Configured Image status. The progress values are as follows: * A GEI global instance means provided by the Testbed as a service. It is going to be a GE instance which is going to be shared by all the UCs, and whose service endpoint is going to appear in the catalogue. For Global instances, we have the following progress status: * 40%: VM deploy: You should deploy a VM in the testbed to install your GE software. For installing a VM in the testbed, please have a look at the wiki [2]. * 60%: GE installed. You have installed the GE software in the VM * 65%: The Chapter Leader guarantees the correctness of the GEI * 70%: Sanity Checks passed. The Testbed Team has passed the sanity checks of your GEI * 75%: The GE is correct in the Catalogue, but no Sanity Check performed (this status can only follow the 65%) * 80%: The GE is correct in the Catalogue * 100%: Integration test (if defined) succesfully passed. * A GE Dedicated Instance can be made available either through a receipe or configured image. It is an instance which can be installed in the UC environment by UC project teams. To allow this, you should create an image of your dedicated instance, using the Cloud capabilities or creating recipes. A webminar on such process is available at [....]. For these instances, the progress values are: * 20%: image generated: You have created the GE image by using the Cloud capabilities. * 30%: image ok: Testbed people check that this image is ok, deploy a VM from this image and passing sanity checks * 40%: recipes generated: You have to create the specific recipe * 50%: recipes ok: Testbed people check that the recipes are ok. * 60%: Information in the catalogue. The information is stored in the catalogue. Once installed, the GEI owner puts 60%. ONLY THE TESTBED TEAM CAN ASSIGNS VALUES ABOVE 60% * The "Actual Date" has the following meaning (updated only by the testbed team): * Date at which the "Global Instance" progress up to 100% (real availability of the Global Instance) * Date at which the recipes for creating "Dedicated Instances" progress up to 100% (real availability of the recipes) * Date at which images containing a "Dedicated Instances" progress up to 100% (real availability of the images) * The note should capture (when applicable): * the service end point of the Global Instance * the URL from which to download the recipes * the name of the configured image in the Cloud image catalogue -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 24 18:44:36 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:44:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Updated reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B7DCD@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, Let me show my appreciation to all of you improving their backlogs. I've seen many improvements today. Well Done!!! Find below updated reviews: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3640/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140324.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3641/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140324.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3644/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140324.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3642/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140324.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3643/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140324.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3646/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140324.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3645/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140324.xlsx This updates carry a time view of the items holding issues. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jdps at tid.es Tue Mar 25 17:50:17 2014 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:50:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) In-Reply-To: <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E393AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E39AA1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, I need your contributions as WPL in order to deliver the Periodic Report of M36. This time we are going to use Google Docs to manage it. Each partner will be able to access it any time to assess the current status. Only the respective WPL of each WP and the TID Coordination will be able to edit it. I kindly ask you to respect the template because the Commission has asked us to keep consistency and they want to have the information broken down per partner. Please note that, as in previous reports, the first section is about the WP as a team, and each task is evaluated per partner. Please do not erase any partner and fill in all of them. These are the list of the links to each WP: WP1 & WP2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dsUqYVUMuttPygNYa_T2ygTWsO0R8xup2zTuPGI_Q08/edit?usp=sharing WP3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RhHiLV1aaTh_e_4D3EK1OyFQbS5HvlODoRk-ad9syLo/edit?usp=sharing WP4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKr1FZpa0xyPNETB7gEkdiyT_8V-8ccJBTVRuKo98Yc/edit?usp=sharing WP5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B17lOH9Ty959jc_zvWcAKVGM4pfHBv5AYxsb0izgVxM/edit?usp=sharing WP6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FDeL960k5m53SJPDnMtL_0bhvawCHrVCD5tzvWgIrG8/edit?usp=sharing WP7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yLLR5sDxR4BrzST7QsKHMUHN68Wg_AZhxc3LIkWNLQQ/edit?usp=sharing WP8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2QVAGnEVkfhjZUmli2PS4i8051b8fPMoCAs5BFrEYg/edit?usp=sharing WP9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IgoVQXtQiJ-8FrAdupOBnAwZx7mUXAiuBh_RpEwc-Ts/edit?usp=sharing WP10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUUTtpWkEFnz_3j-S63k6TVjLHqOvf_Gwc5PRBy4WXs/edit?usp=sharing WP11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10llFWWZsZXCc61uZVb_1U_P2ZwHWtimWxmlC1IBydGc/edit?usp=sharing WP12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbEpS7gc2r7JIQa8jGDOAE6tqqSJYYChDqbTn_N5oDY/edit?usp=sharing WP13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K9WngtdMsLH9Rz1ciB0jLdUQXeNilB49tlmjGyk8604/edit?usp=sharing Note: xxx= Missing information in the document. Please ask to each involved partner for their contribution, share these links with them and complete your WP report. As soon as I have the consumption of PM of each partner in M25-M36, I?ll tell you. We have it until M33 at the moment. Deadline: April 22nd 2014. We will probably need a new iteration after this deadline to assess the consolidated effort of each partner. We?ll basically need you to evaluate each declaration of effort. Thank you in advance. Please confirm that you have access to your WP document and can edit it. Kind regards, Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Mar 25 18:40:44 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:40:44 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content: updated reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B828D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Let me thank you again for your contributions!! I've seen more GEIs getting the position to cleanly close the release and sprint by the end of the month!! https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3647/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140325.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3648/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140325.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3651/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140325.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3649/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140325.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3650/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140325.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3653/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140325.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3652/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140325.xlsx There're two new tabs for WP Leaders: General and Unclassified: General gives visibility to items identified as such - this way WP Leaders can fix their issues. Unclassified gives visibility of items that could NOT be mapped to any of the declared GEIs. Many of them correspond to items collected from the roadmap and materializing with mismatching on the GE-GEI keyword. When possible it would be important to channel them to their right GEI so that the corresponding GEI owner can fix related issues. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Tue Mar 25 18:54:32 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:54:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Your support to the future of FI-WARE_Help identifying Funding Agencies Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06DFEE@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Hi Juanjo, all, If you have read my previous e-mail, then you have the context to understand this e-mail, which I consider very important for the future of FI-WARE deployment and usage. As you know, besides the ongoing discussions with Brazil and Mexico, the EC really wants to push other Member States to invest seriously on this and ensure that SME and other players get access to the FI-WARE technologies and FI-LAB. In order to create some demand the idea is to provide incentives at national level, for example, by providing funding to those proposals that include FI-LAB. Check the e-mail below and come back to me with the list of funding agencies in your countries that could be contacted for this purpose. The invitation will be made by the EC, of course. But let's help in speeding up the process. Your answers by Thursday next week. On Friday I will come back to the EC. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or doubts. Best regards, Nuria From: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:36 PM To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Cc: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu Subject: Help identifying Funding Agencies Importance: High Dear Nuria, It was a pleasure to meet you in Athens. Your presentation at the FIF meeting was quite interesting and the delivery quite enthusiastic! Really appreciated! Following up our conversation on the way back to Brussels, I would greatly appreciate if you could help identifying ALL potential Funding Agencies in the Member/Associated States - at least in those where you (FI-WARE/FI-CORE) have partners. The idea is to organize a meeting with them to inform them about FI-WARE/FI-LAB/FI-OPS - you will be certainly invited! - so that they can consider, even recommend, their use in their calls. Would you be able to have a preliminary list by end of next week, 4 April? Looking forward to hearing from you, Best Regards, Jorge _____________________________________________________ Dr. Jorge Pereira Principal Scientific Officer European Commission DG CONNECT Net Futures Experimental Platforms Future Internet Research and Experimentation Future Internet Forum IPv6 Office BU25 05/116 B-1149 Brussels Belgium Tel +32 2 296 1547 Fax +32 2 299 4353 Email: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu Website: cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire _________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue Mar 25 19:40:37 2014 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:40:37 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E39AA1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E393AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E39AA1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Javier, all, Confirm for WP4. Aren't we deferring this deliverable to M40, as per last amendment? Thanks, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Cc: "subsidies at tid.es" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 25/03/2014 06:50 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org Dear all, I need your contributions as WPL in order to deliver the Periodic Report of M36. This time we are going to use Google Docs to manage it. Each partner will be able to access it any time to assess the current status. Only the respective WPL of each WP and the TID Coordination will be able to edit it. I kindly ask you to respect the template because the Commission has asked us to keep consistency and they want to have the information broken down per partner. Please note that, as in previous reports, the first section is about the WP as a team, and each task is evaluated per partner. Please do not erase any partner and fill in all of them. These are the list of the links to each WP: WP1 & WP2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dsUqYVUMuttPygNYa_T2ygTWsO0R8xup2zTuPGI_Q08/edit?usp=sharing WP3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RhHiLV1aaTh_e_4D3EK1OyFQbS5HvlODoRk-ad9syLo/edit?usp=sharing WP4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKr1FZpa0xyPNETB7gEkdiyT_8V-8ccJBTVRuKo98Yc/edit?usp=sharing WP5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B17lOH9Ty959jc_zvWcAKVGM4pfHBv5AYxsb0izgVxM/edit?usp=sharing WP6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FDeL960k5m53SJPDnMtL_0bhvawCHrVCD5tzvWgIrG8/edit?usp=sharing WP7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yLLR5sDxR4BrzST7QsKHMUHN68Wg_AZhxc3LIkWNLQQ/edit?usp=sharing WP8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2QVAGnEVkfhjZUmli2PS4i8051b8fPMoCAs5BFrEYg/edit?usp=sharing WP9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IgoVQXtQiJ-8FrAdupOBnAwZx7mUXAiuBh_RpEwc-Ts/edit?usp=sharing WP10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUUTtpWkEFnz_3j-S63k6TVjLHqOvf_Gwc5PRBy4WXs/edit?usp=sharing WP11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10llFWWZsZXCc61uZVb_1U_P2ZwHWtimWxmlC1IBydGc/edit?usp=sharing WP12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbEpS7gc2r7JIQa8jGDOAE6tqqSJYYChDqbTn_N5oDY/edit?usp=sharing WP13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K9WngtdMsLH9Rz1ciB0jLdUQXeNilB49tlmjGyk8604/edit?usp=sharing Note: xxx= Missing information in the document. Please ask to each involved partner for their contribution, share these links with them and complete your WP report. As soon as I have the consumption of PM of each partner in M25-M36, I?ll tell you. We have it until M33 at the moment. Deadline: April 22nd 2014. We will probably need a new iteration after this deadline to assess the consolidated effort of each partner. We?ll basically need you to evaluate each declaration of effort. Thank you in advance. Please confirm that you have access to your WP document and can edit it. Kind regards, Javier. Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Tue Mar 25 19:41:11 2014 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:41:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Your support to the future of FI-WARE_Help identifying Funding Agencies In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06DFEE@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06DFEE@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: <5331CDC7.2090800@dfki.de> Hi, For Germany these are primarily: -- BMBF, Federal Ministry of Education and Research Main funding agency, mainly for application-oriented research -- BMWi, Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy Other main funding agency, more industry oriented There is also the DFG (aka National Science Foundation) but they are solely focused on academic research and do not seem relevant for FI-WARE. There are a few others, but BMBF and BMWI are the most important ones for FI-WARE. The commission should know the right people to contact there, but let me know if you need concrete names and addresses. Best, Philipp Am 25.03.2014 18:54, schrieb De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria: > Hi Juanjo, all, > > If you have read my previous e-mail, then you have the context to > understand this e-mail, which I consider *very important for the future > of FI-WARE deployment and usage.* > > As you know, besides the ongoing discussions with Brazil and Mexico, the > EC really wants to push other Member States to invest seriously on this > and ensure that SME and other players get access to the FI-WARE > technologies and FI-LAB. > > *_In order to create some demand the idea is to provide incentives at > national level, for example, by providing funding to those proposals > that include FI-LAB._* > > Check the e-mail below and come back to me with the *_list of funding > agencies in your countries that could be contacted for this purpose._* > > The invitation will be made by the EC, of course. But let?s help in > speeding up the process. > > Your answers by Thursday next week. On Friday I will come back to the EC. > > Do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or doubts. Best regards, > > Nuria > > *From:*Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:36 PM > *To:* De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria > *Cc:* Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu > *Subject:* Help identifying Funding Agencies > *Importance:* High > > Dear Nuria, > > It was a pleasure to meet you in Athens. > > Your presentation at the FIF meeting was quite interesting and the > delivery quite enthusiastic! Really appreciated! > > Following up our conversation on the way back to Brussels, I would > greatly appreciate if you could help identifying ALL _potential Funding > Agencies in the Member/Associated States_ ? at least in those where you > (FI-WARE/FI-CORE) have partners. > > The idea is to organize a meeting with them to inform them about > FI-WARE/FI-LAB/FI-OPS ? you will be certainly invited! - so that they > can consider, even recommend, their use in their calls. > > Would you be able to have a preliminary list by end of next week, 4 April? > > Looking forward to hearing from you, > > Best Regards, > > Jorge _____________________________________________________ > /Dr. Jorge Pereira > /Principal Scientific Officer > *European Commission* > *DG CONNECT* > Net Futures > *Experimental Platforms* > / Future Internet Research and Experimentation// > // Future Internet Forum > /*IPv6* > > Office BU25 05/116 > B-1149 Brussels > Belgium > > Tel +32 2 296 1547 > Fax +32 2 299 4353 > > Email: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu > > Website: cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire > > _________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpa > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Tue Mar 25 19:47:58 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:47:58 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Your support to the future of FI-WARE_Help identifying Funding Agencies In-Reply-To: <5331CDC7.2090800@dfki.de> References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06DFEE@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> <5331CDC7.2090800@dfki.de> Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06E181@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Thanks a lot for the quick reaction on this. All the others, please, do the same. Thanks! Nuria -----Original Message----- From: Philipp Slusallek [mailto:Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 7:41 PM To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; fiware-pcc; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpa] Your support to the future of FI-WARE_Help identifying Funding Agencies Hi, For Germany these are primarily: -- BMBF, Federal Ministry of Education and Research Main funding agency, mainly for application-oriented research -- BMWi, Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy Other main funding agency, more industry oriented There is also the DFG (aka National Science Foundation) but they are solely focused on academic research and do not seem relevant for FI-WARE. There are a few others, but BMBF and BMWI are the most important ones for FI-WARE. The commission should know the right people to contact there, but let me know if you need concrete names and addresses. Best, Philipp Am 25.03.2014 18:54, schrieb De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria: > Hi Juanjo, all, > > If you have read my previous e-mail, then you have the context to > understand this e-mail, which I consider *very important for the > future of FI-WARE deployment and usage.* > > As you know, besides the ongoing discussions with Brazil and Mexico, > the EC really wants to push other Member States to invest seriously on > this and ensure that SME and other players get access to the FI-WARE > technologies and FI-LAB. > > *_In order to create some demand the idea is to provide incentives at > national level, for example, by providing funding to those proposals > that include FI-LAB._* > > Check the e-mail below and come back to me with the *_list of funding > agencies in your countries that could be contacted for this purpose._* > > The invitation will be made by the EC, of course. But let's help in > speeding up the process. > > Your answers by Thursday next week. On Friday I will come back to the EC. > > Do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or doubts. Best > regards, > > Nuria > > *From:*Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:36 PM > *To:* De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria > *Cc:* Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu > *Subject:* Help identifying Funding Agencies > *Importance:* High > > Dear Nuria, > > It was a pleasure to meet you in Athens. > > Your presentation at the FIF meeting was quite interesting and the > delivery quite enthusiastic! Really appreciated! > > Following up our conversation on the way back to Brussels, I would > greatly appreciate if you could help identifying ALL _potential > Funding Agencies in the Member/Associated States_ - at least in those > where you > (FI-WARE/FI-CORE) have partners. > > The idea is to organize a meeting with them to inform them about > FI-WARE/FI-LAB/FI-OPS - you will be certainly invited! - so that they > can consider, even recommend, their use in their calls. > > Would you be able to have a preliminary list by end of next week, 4 April? > > Looking forward to hearing from you, > > Best Regards, > > Jorge _____________________________________________________ > /Dr. Jorge Pereira > /Principal Scientific Officer > *European Commission* > *DG CONNECT* > Net Futures > *Experimental Platforms* > / Future Internet Research and Experimentation// > // Future Internet Forum > /*IPv6* > > Office BU25 05/116 > B-1149 Brussels > Belgium > > Tel +32 2 296 1547 > Fax +32 2 299 4353 > > Email: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu > > Website: cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fire > > _________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpa mailing list > Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpa > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Mar 26 09:18:39 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:18:39 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) In-Reply-To: References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E393AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E39AA1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD21C29@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Alex, A possible advantage BTW when it is set up now because some partner leave in M36 and their contributiosn can be filled in early and each leaving partner sees where and into which context he contributes I appreciate that the setup is done now, but at the same time think delivery to EC is to be moved to M40. Best Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of Alex Glikson Sent: Dienstag, 25. M?rz 2014 19:41 To: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Cc: subsidies at tid.es; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Dear Javier, all, Confirm for WP4. Aren't we deferring this deliverable to M40, as per last amendment? Thanks, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" >, Cc: "subsidies at tid.es" >, "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" > Date: 25/03/2014 06:50 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org ________________________________ Dear all, I need your contributions as WPL in order to deliver the Periodic Report of M36. This time we are going to use Google Docs to manage it. Each partner will be able to access it any time to assess the current status. Only the respective WPL of each WP and the TID Coordination will be able to edit it. I kindly ask you to respect the template because the Commission has asked us to keep consistency and they want to have the information broken down per partner. Please note that, as in previous reports, the first section is about the WP as a team, and each task is evaluated per partner. Please do not erase any partner and fill in all of them. These are the list of the links to each WP: WP1 & WP2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dsUqYVUMuttPygNYa_T2ygTWsO0R8xup2zTuPGI_Q08/edit?usp=sharing WP3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RhHiLV1aaTh_e_4D3EK1OyFQbS5HvlODoRk-ad9syLo/edit?usp=sharing WP4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKr1FZpa0xyPNETB7gEkdiyT_8V-8ccJBTVRuKo98Yc/edit?usp=sharing WP5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B17lOH9Ty959jc_zvWcAKVGM4pfHBv5AYxsb0izgVxM/edit?usp=sharing WP6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FDeL960k5m53SJPDnMtL_0bhvawCHrVCD5tzvWgIrG8/edit?usp=sharing WP7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yLLR5sDxR4BrzST7QsKHMUHN68Wg_AZhxc3LIkWNLQQ/edit?usp=sharing WP8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2QVAGnEVkfhjZUmli2PS4i8051b8fPMoCAs5BFrEYg/edit?usp=sharing WP9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IgoVQXtQiJ-8FrAdupOBnAwZx7mUXAiuBh_RpEwc-Ts/edit?usp=sharing WP10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUUTtpWkEFnz_3j-S63k6TVjLHqOvf_Gwc5PRBy4WXs/edit?usp=sharing WP11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10llFWWZsZXCc61uZVb_1U_P2ZwHWtimWxmlC1IBydGc/edit?usp=sharing WP12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbEpS7gc2r7JIQa8jGDOAE6tqqSJYYChDqbTn_N5oDY/edit?usp=sharing WP13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K9WngtdMsLH9Rz1ciB0jLdUQXeNilB49tlmjGyk8604/edit?usp=sharing Note: xxx= Missing information in the document. Please ask to each involved partner for their contribution, share these links with them and complete your WP report. As soon as I have the consumption of PM of each partner in M25-M36, I'll tell you. We have it until M33 at the moment. Deadline: April 22nd 2014. We will probably need a new iteration after this deadline to assess the consolidated effort of each partner. We'll basically need you to evaluate each declaration of effort. Thank you in advance. Please confirm that you have access to your WP document and can edit it. Kind regards, Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx_______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Wed Mar 26 09:23:06 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:23:06 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) In-Reply-To: References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E393AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E39AA1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <53328E6A.5070903@tid.es> Dear all, We are waiting for a confirmation from Arian. The DoW valid today if amendment 5 (report in M36) and we are creating amendment 6 (report in M40). In any case, I guess that those leaving on M36 will have to fill in their part now... Best regards, Miguel El 25/03/2014 19:40, Alex Glikson escribi?: Dear Javier, all, Confirm for WP4. Aren't we deferring this deliverable to M40, as per last amendment? Thanks, Alex ==================================================================================================== Alex Glikson Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Cc: "subsidies at tid.es" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" Date: 25/03/2014 06:50 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org ________________________________ Dear all, I need your contributions as WPL in order to deliver the Periodic Report of M36. This time we are going to use Google Docs to manage it. Each partner will be able to access it any time to assess the current status. Only the respective WPL of each WP and the TID Coordination will be able to edit it. I kindly ask you to respect the template because the Commission has asked us to keep consistency and they want to have the information broken down per partner. Please note that, as in previous reports, the first section is about the WP as a team, and each task is evaluated per partner. Please do not erase any partner and fill in all of them. These are the list of the links to each WP: WP1 & WP2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dsUqYVUMuttPygNYa_T2ygTWsO0R8xup2zTuPGI_Q08/edit?usp=sharing WP3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RhHiLV1aaTh_e_4D3EK1OyFQbS5HvlODoRk-ad9syLo/edit?usp=sharing WP4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKr1FZpa0xyPNETB7gEkdiyT_8V-8ccJBTVRuKo98Yc/edit?usp=sharing WP5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B17lOH9Ty959jc_zvWcAKVGM4pfHBv5AYxsb0izgVxM/edit?usp=sharing WP6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FDeL960k5m53SJPDnMtL_0bhvawCHrVCD5tzvWgIrG8/edit?usp=sharing WP7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yLLR5sDxR4BrzST7QsKHMUHN68Wg_AZhxc3LIkWNLQQ/edit?usp=sharing WP8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2QVAGnEVkfhjZUmli2PS4i8051b8fPMoCAs5BFrEYg/edit?usp=sharing WP9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IgoVQXtQiJ-8FrAdupOBnAwZx7mUXAiuBh_RpEwc-Ts/edit?usp=sharing WP10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUUTtpWkEFnz_3j-S63k6TVjLHqOvf_Gwc5PRBy4WXs/edit?usp=sharing WP11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10llFWWZsZXCc61uZVb_1U_P2ZwHWtimWxmlC1IBydGc/edit?usp=sharing WP12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbEpS7gc2r7JIQa8jGDOAE6tqqSJYYChDqbTn_N5oDY/edit?usp=sharing WP13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K9WngtdMsLH9Rz1ciB0jLdUQXeNilB49tlmjGyk8604/edit?usp=sharing Note: xxx= Missing information in the document. Please ask to each involved partner for their contribution, share these links with them and complete your WP report. As soon as I have the consumption of PM of each partner in M25-M36, I'll tell you. We have it until M33 at the moment. Deadline: April 22nd 2014. We will probably need a new iteration after this deadline to assess the consolidated effort of each partner. We'll basically need you to evaluate each declaration of effort. Thank you in advance. Please confirm that you have access to your WP document and can edit it. Kind regards, Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx_______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 26 10:17:41 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:17:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] SotA - Missing contributions Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B83E9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, Please, find attached the SoTA integrated with contributions received. I?d appreciate receiving clarifications or missing contributions ASAP: WP3 - @Markus ? Executive Summary: Good ? Done; But I?ve seen two subsections within 2.4.2 which seem the same. Please, confirm I can remove one of them. Which one? WP4 - @Alex ? missing contribution ? executive summary WP5 - @Thierry ? the executive summary is half size WP3 and WP7 ? would you make it stronger? ? Is it fine? WP6 - @Sergio ? missing contribution ? executive summary WP7 - @Pier ? Executive Summary: Good ? Done WP8 - @Pascal ? missing contribution - executive Summary WP13 - @Christof ? missing contribution ? executive summary @Philipp ? endorse WP13 contribution to SoTA? Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D.2.6.2 State of the Art Analysis ? Emerging Technologies_20140325.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 3270543 bytes Desc: D.2.6.2 State of the Art Analysis ? Emerging Technologies_20140325.docx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Mar 26 12:21:29 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:21:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE 6th Review meeting - Outcome Letter & Review report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5332B839.5090701@tid.es> Dear all, Please find enclosed the month 30 review report. I haven't had time to analyze it. I'm just forwarding it to you once it got in my Inbox. It will be a topic for our next WPLs/WPAs follow-up confcall. Please forward to your WPL any comment you wish to bring for discussion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE 6th Review meeting - Outcome Letter & Review report Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:54:06 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , , , , , Dear Mr Hierro, Please find attached acopy of the outcome letter and review report of project 285248 FI-WARE. Please acknowledge receipt of this letter. Many thanks in advance Best regards, Vanessa Vanhumbeeck European Commission DG CONNECT Unit E3 ? Net Innovation Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39 Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Review 6 Report.docx.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1183360 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outcome FI-WARE review 6 report.docx.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 188838 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 26 13:11:35 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:11:35 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dynamic: CLOSING Release 3.3 and Sprint 3.3.3 Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B84E8@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, As you know we're approaching the end of the last release and sprint where development of new features and stories was still possible for some partners. Please, proceed to close the backlog items finished. Please, have updated dashboards below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3654/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140326.xlsx [cid:image001.png at 01CF48F3.9B44BDA0] Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3655/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140326.xlsx [cid:image002.png at 01CF48F3.BB6672E0] IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3658/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140326.xlsx [cid:image003.png at 01CF48F4.3CFA7220] Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3656/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140326.xlsx [cid:image004.png at 01CF48F4.3CFA7220] I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3657/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140326.xlsx [cid:image005.png at 01CF48F4.3CFA7220] Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3660/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140326.xlsx [cid:image007.png at 01CF48F4.BC775130] MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3659/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140326.xlsx [cid:image006.png at 01CF48F4.3CFA7220] If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13689 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 14344 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 13523 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 14245 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 13528 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 13560 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13649 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Wed Mar 26 14:21:22 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:21:22 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] SUMMARY OF PARTICIPATION OF FI-WARE in ECFI and organization Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06EA75@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Hi all, Following my previous e-mails from FIA, let's try to organize now our next presence in ECFI (2-3 April, Brussels): As you know, no fee applies anymore. I hope that thanks to this you already registered and FI-WARE can count on a good representation for the booth and discussions. ? Please, come back to me informing about who is attending on behalf of your organizations and teams before next Friday so that we can organize the presence in the FI-WARE booth and demos. FI-WARE will have a plenary presentation on the 2nd in the morning and will organize, together with XIFI, a session where the technology offering will be explained and we will bring "ambassadors" of our technology to share their experiences. This will happen in the morning of the 3rd of April. You can find the programme in http://www.ecfi.eu/programme-brussels2014/. Details about the FIWARE-FI-LAB, FI-OPS session in http://www.ecfi.eu/programme-brussels2014/session-09/. Let me attach for your convenience: ? The plan where you can see the location of the FI-WARE stand in the exhibition area as well as some pictures of the place ? An overall description of ECFI with associated coordinates Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission M +34 680645692 T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atos.net Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CF48FE.8B65C770] IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 159 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 958 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ECFI-Brussels-2014-Stand-Plan.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 209375 bytes Desc: ECFI-Brussels-2014-Stand-Plan.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Egg-Restaurant-Exhibition-area.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 134273 bytes Desc: Egg-Restaurant-Exhibition-area.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: European-Conference-on-the-Future-Internet-April-2014_Description.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 147661 bytes Desc: European-Conference-on-the-Future-Internet-April-2014_Description.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Image-Exhibition-Stand-Setup.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 160412 bytes Desc: Image-Exhibition-Stand-Setup.pdf URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: The_Egg_Restaurant_3.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 91678 bytes Desc: The_Egg_Restaurant_3.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: The_Egg_Restaurant_7.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 146604 bytes Desc: The_Egg_Restaurant_7.jpg URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Mar 26 14:52:33 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:52:33 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] SUMMARY OF PARTICIPATION OF FI-WARE in ECFI and organization In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06EA75@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06EA75@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: dear nuria, from engineering will attend mauro isaja (but on behalf of fit-man) and myself. i can support the set-up of the stand after we (you are supposed to be there as well) finish the nessi sc meeting on 1st. ciao, stefano 2014-03-26 14:21 GMT+01:00 De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria : > Hi all, > > > > Following my previous e-mails from FIA, let's try to organize now our *next > presence in ECFI (2-3 April, Brussels):* > > > > As you know, no fee applies anymore. I hope that thanks to this you > already registered and FI-WARE can count on a good representation for the > booth and discussions. > > ? Please, come back to me informing about who is attending on > behalf of your organizations and teams before next Friday so that we can > organize the presence in the FI-WARE booth and demos. > > > > FI-WARE will have a plenary presentation on the 2nd in the morning and > will organize, together with XIFI, a session where the technology offering > will be explained and we will bring "ambassadors" of our technology to > share their experiences. This will happen in the morning of the 3rd of > April. > > > > You can find the programme in http://www.ecfi.eu/programme-brussels2014/. > > Details about the FIWARE-FI-LAB, FI-OPS session in > http://www.ecfi.eu/programme-brussels2014/session-09/. > > > > Let me attach for your convenience: > > ? The plan where you can see the location of the FI-WARE stand in > the exhibition area as well as some pictures of the place > > ? An overall description of ECFI with associated coordinates > > > > Best regards, > > > > *Nuria de Lama* > > > > Research & Innovation > > Representative to the European Commission > > > > M +34 680645692 > > T +34 91214 9321 > > F +34 91754 3252 > > nuria.delama at atos.net > > Albarrac?n 25 > > 28037 Madrid > > Spain > > www.atosresearch.eu > > es.atos.net > > > > > > *IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail > address nuria.delama at atos.net * > > *The former @atosresearch.eu address will be > cancelled soon* > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 159 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 958 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jdps at tid.es Wed Mar 26 15:00:34 2014 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:00:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Ending date (M36 vs M40) Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E3C061@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, in order to prepare the D1.2.6 Periodic Report, we are taking account the following information about the ending date of each partner. [cid:image002.png at 01CF4903.AD5322B0] ? Partners ending on M36 will send their contributions and deviations to WPL in the next days (WPL will ask you in the next days). Periodic report covers M25-M36. ? Partners ending on M40 will send their contributions and deviations to WPL later around M39. (WPL will ask you around M39). Periodic report will cover M25-M40. Please check if the data above is correct and please warn us if there is any mistake. No answer will mean that there are no mistakes. Thank you in advance. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 24590 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed Mar 26 15:24:45 2014 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:24:45 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] SUMMARY OF PARTICIPATION OF FI-WARE in ECFI and organization In-Reply-To: References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06EA75@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: <16673_1395843887_5332E32F_16673_604_2_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1AA566@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Nuria, all, I will also attend the conference for the 2 days. BR Thierry De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : mercredi 26 mars 2014 14:53 ? : De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria Cc : fiware-pcc; angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-pcc] SUMMARY OF PARTICIPATION OF FI-WARE in ECFI and organization dear nuria, from engineering will attend mauro isaja (but on behalf of fit-man) and myself. i can support the set-up of the stand after we (you are supposed to be there as well) finish the nessi sc meeting on 1st. ciao, stefano 2014-03-26 14:21 GMT+01:00 De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria >: Hi all, Following my previous e-mails from FIA, let's try to organize now our next presence in ECFI (2-3 April, Brussels): As you know, no fee applies anymore. I hope that thanks to this you already registered and FI-WARE can count on a good representation for the booth and discussions. * Please, come back to me informing about who is attending on behalf of your organizations and teams before next Friday so that we can organize the presence in the FI-WARE booth and demos. FI-WARE will have a plenary presentation on the 2nd in the morning and will organize, together with XIFI, a session where the technology offering will be explained and we will bring "ambassadors" of our technology to share their experiences. This will happen in the morning of the 3rd of April. You can find the programme in http://www.ecfi.eu/programme-brussels2014/. Details about the FIWARE-FI-LAB, FI-OPS session in http://www.ecfi.eu/programme-brussels2014/session-09/. Let me attach for your convenience: * The plan where you can see the location of the FI-WARE stand in the exhibition area as well as some pictures of the place * An overall description of ECFI with associated coordinates Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission M +34 680645692 T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atos.net Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CF4907.84972390] IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 159 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 958 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From Morgane.Lionnais at technicolor.com Wed Mar 26 16:28:54 2014 From: Morgane.Lionnais at technicolor.com (Lionnais Morgane) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:28:54 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Ending date (M36 vs M40) In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E3C061@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E3C061@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Javier, Following the last months changes , Technicolor is requesting to have the ending date at M36. Thanks to confirm, Best, Morgane From: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:01 PM To: 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-administrative] FI-WARE: Ending date (M36 vs M40) Importance: High Dear all, in order to prepare the D1.2.6 Periodic Report, we are taking account the following information about the ending date of each partner. [cid:image001.png at 01CF4910.7A9C6D10] ? Partners ending on M36 will send their contributions and deviations to WPL in the next days (WPL will ask you in the next days). Periodic report covers M25-M36. ? Partners ending on M40 will send their contributions and deviations to WPL later around M39. (WPL will ask you around M39). Periodic report will cover M25-M40. Please check if the data above is correct and please warn us if there is any mistake. No answer will mean that there are no mistakes. Thank you in advance. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 24590 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Mar 26 18:54:56 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:54:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content: Updated Reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B8969@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Thanks for your contributions!! Let me remind you that a simpler version of the reviews, holding mainly statistics, will join the dashboards when delivering the backlog report. It will likely be next week when we'll have finished Release 3.3 Therefore, I'd appreciate your contributions and effort to overcome remaining issues. Please, find below updated reviews of backlog content. https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3661/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140326.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3662/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140326.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3665/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140326.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3663/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140326.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3664/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140326.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3667/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140326.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3666/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140326.xlsx If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 27 09:18:24 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:18:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Ending date (M36 vs M40) In-Reply-To: References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E3C061@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B8B27@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Morgane, With this modification it?s very important that Technicolor reacts quickly to provide all remaining contributions. Contributions were scheduled according to when partners were finishing. Since Technicolor belonged to M40, there was more time for them to be provided. This sudden change requires that Technicolor adjust their timing to M36 group, who finishes their contributions this month. I hope you find it reasonable!! Thanks for collaboration!! Kind regards, Manuel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of Lionnais Morgane Sent: mi?rcoles, 26 de marzo de 2014 16:29 To: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ; 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: Heijnen Henk; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Ending date (M36 vs M40) Importance: High Dear Javier, Following the last months changes , Technicolor is requesting to have the ending date at M36. Thanks to confirm, Best, Morgane From: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:01 PM To: 'fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-administrative] FI-WARE: Ending date (M36 vs M40) Importance: High Dear all, in order to prepare the D1.2.6 Periodic Report, we are taking account the following information about the ending date of each partner. [cid:image001.png at 01CF499D.80135F00] ? Partners ending on M36 will send their contributions and deviations to WPL in the next days (WPL will ask you in the next days). Periodic report covers M25-M36. ? Partners ending on M40 will send their contributions and deviations to WPL later around M39. (WPL will ask you around M39). Periodic report will cover M25-M40. Please check if the data above is correct and please warn us if there is any mistake. No answer will mean that there are no mistakes. Thank you in advance. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 24590 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Mar 27 12:06:28 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:06:28 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: FI-WARE webinars next week In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53340634.6080406@tid.es> Dear all, As you know, we have recently launched two additional FI-WARE challenges, targeted to promote FI-WARE technologies. FI-WARE challenges are more targeted to SMEs/startups as compared to hackathoners. Teams that are aiming to develop a rather complete application (or migrate an existing one) based on FI-WARE technologies and explore the opportunities to make something out of it. With this purpose, we are going to organize a number of webinars starting next week. Be aware that these webinars will be open to the general public, as opposed to previous webinars which were limited to FI-PPP partners. Below you can find whole details about the 1st series of webinars. We have focused on those GEis that were the most widely used in previous FI-WARE Challenges and hackathons: * Schedule: * Monday 31th March * 10:00 - 10:55 - Identity Management and Access Control - KeyRock * 11:00 - 11:55 - Advanced Cloud capabilities * 12:00 - 12:55 - Mashup technologies - Wirecloud * Tuesday 1st April * 12:00 - 12:55 - Real-time Multimedia Stream Processing - Kurento * 15:30 - 16:25 - Connection to the Internet of Things - DCA and Figway * 16:30 - 17:25 - Context Awareness: Orion Context Broker * 17:30 - 18:25 - Map/Reduce - Cosmos Big Data * Videoconference platform: * MashMe.tv * "FI-WARE-A" virtual room: * https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO (attendants) * https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO?mode=0 (speakers) * Tutorial: * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NBcIazLm-E * We are trying to arrange a testing slot on the platform: * http://doodle.com/2ypsdw5zg7vz2zik Please contact Davide Dalle Carbonare and Francisco Romero if you wish to plan a webinar either next week or sometime later. Regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atos.net Thu Mar 27 12:14:28 2014 From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:14:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: FI-WARE webinars next week In-Reply-To: <53340634.6080406@tid.es> References: <53340634.6080406@tid.es> Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06F535@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Can this be distributed outside the project? From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:06 PM To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: FI-WARE webinars next week Dear all, As you know, we have recently launched two additional FI-WARE challenges, targeted to promote FI-WARE technologies. FI-WARE challenges are more targeted to SMEs/startups as compared to hackathoners. Teams that are aiming to develop a rather complete application (or migrate an existing one) based on FI-WARE technologies and explore the opportunities to make something out of it. With this purpose, we are going to organize a number of webinars starting next week. Be aware that these webinars will be open to the general public, as opposed to previous webinars which were limited to FI-PPP partners. Below you can find whole details about the 1st series of webinars. We have focused on those GEis that were the most widely used in previous FI-WARE Challenges and hackathons: * Schedule: * Monday 31th March * 10:00 - 10:55 - Identity Management and Access Control - KeyRock * 11:00 - 11:55 - Advanced Cloud capabilities * 12:00 - 12:55 - Mashup technologies - Wirecloud * Tuesday 1st April * 12:00 - 12:55 - Real-time Multimedia Stream Processing - Kurento * 15:30 - 16:25 - Connection to the Internet of Things - DCA and Figway * 16:30 - 17:25 - Context Awareness: Orion Context Broker * 17:30 - 18:25 - Map/Reduce - Cosmos Big Data * Videoconference platform: * MashMe.tv * "FI-WARE-A" virtual room: * https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO (attendants) * https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO?mode=0 (speakers) * Tutorial: * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NBcIazLm-E * We are trying to arrange a testing slot on the platform: * http://doodle.com/2ypsdw5zg7vz2zik Please contact Davide Dalle Carbonare and Francisco Romero if you wish to plan a webinar either next week or sometime later. Regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Mar 27 12:30:07 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:30:07 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: FI-WARE webinars next week In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06F535@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> References: <53340634.6080406@tid.es> <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06F535@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: <53340BBF.4060003@tid.es> Of course. I have already sent it to the whole FI-PPP and asked partners there to spread the word not only within their projects but beyond the FI-PPP. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 27/03/14 12:14, De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria wrote: Can this be distributed outside the project? From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:06 PM To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: FI-WARE webinars next week Dear all, As you know, we have recently launched two additional FI-WARE challenges, targeted to promote FI-WARE technologies. FI-WARE challenges are more targeted to SMEs/startups as compared to hackathoners. Teams that are aiming to develop a rather complete application (or migrate an existing one) based on FI-WARE technologies and explore the opportunities to make something out of it. With this purpose, we are going to organize a number of webinars starting next week. Be aware that these webinars will be open to the general public, as opposed to previous webinars which were limited to FI-PPP partners. Below you can find whole details about the 1st series of webinars. We have focused on those GEis that were the most widely used in previous FI-WARE Challenges and hackathons: * Schedule: * Monday 31th March * 10:00 - 10:55 - Identity Management and Access Control - KeyRock * 11:00 - 11:55 - Advanced Cloud capabilities * 12:00 - 12:55 - Mashup technologies - Wirecloud * Tuesday 1st April * 12:00 - 12:55 - Real-time Multimedia Stream Processing - Kurento * 15:30 - 16:25 - Connection to the Internet of Things - DCA and Figway * 16:30 - 17:25 - Context Awareness: Orion Context Broker * 17:30 - 18:25 - Map/Reduce - Cosmos Big Data * Videoconference platform: * MashMe.tv * "FI-WARE-A" virtual room: * https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO (attendants) * https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO?mode=0 (speakers) * Tutorial: * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NBcIazLm-E * We are trying to arrange a testing slot on the platform: * http://doodle.com/2ypsdw5zg7vz2zik Please contact Davide Dalle Carbonare and Francisco Romero if you wish to plan a webinar either next week or sometime later. Regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From margarita.tremblay at ogilvy.com Thu Mar 27 14:05:58 2014 From: margarita.tremblay at ogilvy.com (Margarita Tremblay) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:05:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware] IMPORTANT: FI-WARE webinars next week In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06F535@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> References: <53340634.6080406@tid.es> <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB06F535@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: Hi everyone, As far as I understand, Nuria - yes! I believe it is open to anyone who wants to learn about the Generic Enablers. Here is the blog post I just published about the webinars: http://www.fi-ware.org/2014/03/27/attend-our-webinars-next-week/ You can also find the announcement regarding the *deadline extension for participating in the FI-WARE Challenges to April 24th* http://www.fi-ware.org/2014/03/27/attend-our-webinars-next-week/ Thank you! Margarita On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria < nuria.delama at atos.net> wrote: > Can this be distributed outside the project? > > > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *Juanjo Hierro > *Sent:* Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:06 PM > *To:* fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; > fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: FI-WARE webinars next week > > > > > > Dear all, > > As you know, we have recently launched two additional FI-WARE > challenges, targeted to promote FI-WARE technologies. FI-WARE challenges > are more targeted to SMEs/startups as compared to hackathoners. Teams > that are aiming to develop a rather complete application (or migrate an > existing one) based on FI-WARE technologies and explore the opportunities > to make something out of it. > > With this purpose, we are going to organize a number of webinars > starting next week. Be aware that these webinars will be open to the > general public, as opposed to previous webinars which were limited to > FI-PPP partners. > > Below you can find whole details about the 1st series of webinars. We > have focused on those GEis that were the most widely used in previous > FI-WARE Challenges and hackathons: > > - Schedule: > > > - Monday 31th March > > > - 10:00 - 10:55 - Identity Management and Access Control - KeyRock > - 11:00 - 11:55 - Advanced Cloud capabilities > - 12:00 - 12:55 - Mashup technologies - Wirecloud > > > - Tuesday 1st April > > > - 12:00 - 12:55 - Real-time Multimedia Stream Processing - Kurento > - 15:30 - 16:25 - Connection to the Internet of Things - DCA and > Figway > - 16:30 - 17:25 - Context Awareness: Orion Context Broker > - 17:30 - 18:25 - Map/Reduce - Cosmos Big Data > > > - Videoconference platform: > > > - MashMe.tv > - "FI-WARE-A" virtual room: > > > - https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO (attendants) > - https://www.mashme.tv/M/2qvRiO?mode=0 (speakers) > > > - Tutorial: > > > - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NBcIazLm-E > > > - We are trying to arrange a testing slot on the platform: > > > - http://doodle.com/2ypsdw5zg7vz2zik > > > > Please contact Davide Dalle Carbonare and Francisco Romero > if you wish to plan a webinar either next week > or sometime later. > > Regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware mailing list > Fiware at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware > > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you should destroy this message. For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and corporate responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 27 14:06:16 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:06:16 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile Calendar updated for the project extension Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B8DA9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Let me this awareness action on the agile calendar - updated for the project extension. [cid:image001.png at 01CF49C5.BDC8C470] http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering,_with_mapping_to_calendar_dates If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 8934 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From lucio at tid.es Thu Mar 27 15:15:21 2014 From: lucio at tid.es (JAVIER LUCIO RUIZ-ANDINO) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:15:21 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile Calendar updated for the project extension In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B8DA9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B8DA9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <47E859DB20D4CD4281639C75E324CD8F694F3E19@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hola Manuel: Tengo alg?n work ?tem para la 3.3.3 que no nos dar? tiempo a terminar para ma?ana relacionados con la documentaci?n para la plataforma de elearning y para el cat?logo ya que estamos apurando a terminar los ?ltimos desarrollos y necesitamos tenerlo terminado para documentar todo con respecto a la versi?n 3.3.3 Entiendo que lo que debo hacer es retrasarlos al sprint 3.4.1 ?no? Muchas gracias, Javier De: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] En nombre de MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Enviado el: jueves, 27 de marzo de 2014 14:06 Para: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org CC: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org Asunto: [Fiware-ge-owners] Agile Calendar updated for the project extension Dear Partners, Let me this awareness action on the agile calendar - updated for the project extension. [cid:image001.png at 01CF49CF.603E3060] http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering,_with_mapping_to_calendar_dates If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 8934 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From mev at tid.es Thu Mar 27 18:26:58 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:26:58 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content: updated reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B8F99@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Partners, Thanks for effort and contributions!!! Current status: I2ND leads, closely followed by CLOUD, but MIWI has similar amount to I2ND. By analysing DATA, it 's easy to see they can quickly jump ahead. I'll send as a personal present a bottle of excellent wine to the chapter cleaning up their backlog first!!! [cid:image015.jpg at 01CF49EA.222DDE40] APPS [cid:image016.jpg at 01CF49EA.222DDE40] ClOUD [cid:image017.jpg at 01CF49EA.222DDE40]IOT [cid:image018.jpg at 01CF49EA.222DDE40] DATA [cid:image019.jpg at 01CF49EA.222DDE40] I2ND [cid:image020.jpg at 01CF49EA.222DDE40] SECURITY [cid:image021.jpg at 01CF49EA.222DDE40] MIWI https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3672/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140327.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3673/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140327.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3676/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140327.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3674/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140327.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3675/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140327.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3678/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140327.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3677/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140327.xlsx If anything please don't hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image015.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5614 bytes Desc: image015.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image016.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5276 bytes Desc: image016.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image017.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5433 bytes Desc: image017.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image018.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5196 bytes Desc: image018.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image019.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5257 bytes Desc: image019.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image020.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5295 bytes Desc: image020.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image021.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5157 bytes Desc: image021.jpg URL: From jdps at tid.es Fri Mar 28 10:01:25 2014 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:01:25 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E393AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E41394@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all We are going to deliver the D1.2.6 Periodic Report in two phases: IMPORTANT: Each WP has a specific google doc link below (so, the consortium will be able to check it whenever they want). We?ll no accept other kind of document. Please, use them. PHASE 1: 1.- Deadline: April 22nd, 2014. 2.- Each WPL will fill out the contributions, deviations and evaluation of partners ending on M36: [cid:image001.png at 01CF4A6A.F81A5DA0] 3.- WPL of WP3 will fill out the general contribution, deviation and evaluation of WP3. (due to WPL will end on M36). The rest of the WPL will fill out the general information of each WP during the second phase. PHASE 2: 1.- Deadline: August 22nd, 2014. 2.- Each WPL will fill out the contributions, deviations and evaluation of partners ending on M40: [cid:image002.png at 01CF4A6A.F81A5DA0] 3.- Each WPL will fill out the general contribution, deviation and evaluation of their WP. Thank you very much for your contribution. Alex, thank you for your question. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: martes, 25 de marzo de 2014 17:48 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'subsidies at tid.es' Asunto: FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Importancia: Alta Dear all, I need your contributions as WPL in order to deliver the Periodic Report of M36. This time we are going to use Google Docs to manage it. Each partner will be able to access it any time to assess the current status. Only the respective WPL of each WP and the TID Coordination will be able to edit it. I kindly ask you to respect the template because the Commission has asked us to keep consistency and they want to have the information broken down per partner. Please note that, as in previous reports, the first section is about the WP as a team, and each task is evaluated per partner. Please do not erase any partner and fill in all of them. These are the list of the links to each WP: WP1 & WP2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dsUqYVUMuttPygNYa_T2ygTWsO0R8xup2zTuPGI_Q08/edit?usp=sharing WP3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RhHiLV1aaTh_e_4D3EK1OyFQbS5HvlODoRk-ad9syLo/edit?usp=sharing WP4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKr1FZpa0xyPNETB7gEkdiyT_8V-8ccJBTVRuKo98Yc/edit?usp=sharing WP5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B17lOH9Ty959jc_zvWcAKVGM4pfHBv5AYxsb0izgVxM/edit?usp=sharing WP6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FDeL960k5m53SJPDnMtL_0bhvawCHrVCD5tzvWgIrG8/edit?usp=sharing WP7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yLLR5sDxR4BrzST7QsKHMUHN68Wg_AZhxc3LIkWNLQQ/edit?usp=sharing WP8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2QVAGnEVkfhjZUmli2PS4i8051b8fPMoCAs5BFrEYg/edit?usp=sharing WP9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IgoVQXtQiJ-8FrAdupOBnAwZx7mUXAiuBh_RpEwc-Ts/edit?usp=sharing WP10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUUTtpWkEFnz_3j-S63k6TVjLHqOvf_Gwc5PRBy4WXs/edit?usp=sharing WP11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10llFWWZsZXCc61uZVb_1U_P2ZwHWtimWxmlC1IBydGc/edit?usp=sharing WP12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbEpS7gc2r7JIQa8jGDOAE6tqqSJYYChDqbTn_N5oDY/edit?usp=sharing WP13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K9WngtdMsLH9Rz1ciB0jLdUQXeNilB49tlmjGyk8604/edit?usp=sharing Note: xxx= Missing information in the document. Please ask to each involved partner for their contribution, share these links with them and complete your WP report. As soon as I have the consumption of PM of each partner in M25-M36, I?ll tell you. We have it until M33 at the moment. Deadline: April 22nd 2014. We will probably need a new iteration after this deadline to assess the consolidated effort of each partner. We?ll basically need you to evaluate each declaration of effort. Thank you in advance. Please confirm that you have access to your WP document and can edit it. Kind regards, Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7643 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 16358 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From jdps at tid.es Fri Mar 28 10:36:17 2014 From: jdps at tid.es (JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:36:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E393AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> Message-ID: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E4149A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear all, to avoid misunderstanding, please let me clarify that we are going to deliver the D1.2.6 Periodic Report internally in two phases. Final delivery to the EC is a single one at the end of the process. Thank you. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 28 de marzo de 2014 9:59 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'subsidies at tid.es' Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Importancia: Alta Dear all We are going to deliver the D1.2.6 Periodic Report in two phases: IMPORTANT: Each WP has a specific google doc link below (so, the consortium will be able to check it whenever they want). We?ll no accept other kind of document. Please, use them. PHASE 1: 1.- Deadline: April 22nd, 2014. 2.- Each WPL will fill out the contributions, deviations and evaluation of partners ending on M36: [cid:image001.png at 01CF4A71.2D60EB40] 3.- WPL of WP3 will fill out the general contribution, deviation and evaluation of WP3. (due to WPL will end on M36). The rest of the WPL will fill out the general information of each WP during the second phase. PHASE 2: 1.- Deadline: August 22nd, 2014. 2.- Each WPL will fill out the contributions, deviations and evaluation of partners ending on M40: [cid:image002.png at 01CF4A71.2D60EB40] 3.- Each WPL will fill out the general contribution, deviation and evaluation of their WP. Thank you very much for your contribution. Alex, thank you for your question. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: martes, 25 de marzo de 2014 17:48 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'subsidies at tid.es' Asunto: FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Importancia: Alta Dear all, I need your contributions as WPL in order to deliver the Periodic Report of M36. This time we are going to use Google Docs to manage it. Each partner will be able to access it any time to assess the current status. Only the respective WPL of each WP and the TID Coordination will be able to edit it. I kindly ask you to respect the template because the Commission has asked us to keep consistency and they want to have the information broken down per partner. Please note that, as in previous reports, the first section is about the WP as a team, and each task is evaluated per partner. Please do not erase any partner and fill in all of them. These are the list of the links to each WP: WP1 & WP2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dsUqYVUMuttPygNYa_T2ygTWsO0R8xup2zTuPGI_Q08/edit?usp=sharing WP3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RhHiLV1aaTh_e_4D3EK1OyFQbS5HvlODoRk-ad9syLo/edit?usp=sharing WP4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKr1FZpa0xyPNETB7gEkdiyT_8V-8ccJBTVRuKo98Yc/edit?usp=sharing WP5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B17lOH9Ty959jc_zvWcAKVGM4pfHBv5AYxsb0izgVxM/edit?usp=sharing WP6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FDeL960k5m53SJPDnMtL_0bhvawCHrVCD5tzvWgIrG8/edit?usp=sharing WP7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yLLR5sDxR4BrzST7QsKHMUHN68Wg_AZhxc3LIkWNLQQ/edit?usp=sharing WP8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2QVAGnEVkfhjZUmli2PS4i8051b8fPMoCAs5BFrEYg/edit?usp=sharing WP9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IgoVQXtQiJ-8FrAdupOBnAwZx7mUXAiuBh_RpEwc-Ts/edit?usp=sharing WP10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUUTtpWkEFnz_3j-S63k6TVjLHqOvf_Gwc5PRBy4WXs/edit?usp=sharing WP11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10llFWWZsZXCc61uZVb_1U_P2ZwHWtimWxmlC1IBydGc/edit?usp=sharing WP12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbEpS7gc2r7JIQa8jGDOAE6tqqSJYYChDqbTn_N5oDY/edit?usp=sharing WP13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K9WngtdMsLH9Rz1ciB0jLdUQXeNilB49tlmjGyk8604/edit?usp=sharing Note: xxx= Missing information in the document. Please ask to each involved partner for their contribution, share these links with them and complete your WP report. As soon as I have the consumption of PM of each partner in M25-M36, I?ll tell you. We have it until M33 at the moment. Deadline: April 22nd 2014. We will probably need a new iteration after this deadline to assess the consolidated effort of each partner. We?ll basically need you to evaluate each declaration of effort. Thank you in advance. Please confirm that you have access to your WP document and can edit it. Kind regards, Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7643 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 16358 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Fri Mar 28 12:47:41 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:47:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E4149A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E393AF@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <5331B079.4090500@tid.es> <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C768E4149A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD22B11@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Javier, ok, I agree to the process. Let me add to avoid misunderstandings for the WP3 comments? >3.- WPL of WP3 will fill out the general contribution, deviation and evaluation of WP3. (due to WPL will end on M36). For these texts, two WPL?s will be edtiors: - I will fill in some useful text there (which is alswys the same more or less) and add recent developments in WPL. When I quit, theses texts will not be final therefore (but in reality almost complete?.). I try best to make the useful also in phase 1?. - After I have quit as WP3 WPL, later the new WPL for WP3 (yet to be nominated by TID) takes these half-complete texts and adds/finishes the developments by the partners who have not contributed in phase 1. But basically I agree here as well.. Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Sent: Freitag, 28. M?rz 2014 10:36 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: subsidies at tid.es; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Importance: High Dear all, to avoid misunderstanding, please let me clarify that we are going to deliver the D1.2.6 Periodic Report internally in two phases. Final delivery to the EC is a single one at the end of the process. Thank you. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 28 de marzo de 2014 9:59 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'subsidies at tid.es' Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Importancia: Alta Dear all We are going to deliver the D1.2.6 Periodic Report in two phases: IMPORTANT: Each WP has a specific google doc link below (so, the consortium will be able to check it whenever they want). We?ll no accept other kind of document. Please, use them. PHASE 1: 1.- Deadline: April 22nd, 2014. 2.- Each WPL will fill out the contributions, deviations and evaluation of partners ending on M36: [cid:image001.png at 01CF4A83.E7C19B30] 3.- WPL of WP3 will fill out the general contribution, deviation and evaluation of WP3. (due to WPL will end on M36). The rest of the WPL will fill out the general information of each WP during the second phase. PHASE 2: 1.- Deadline: August 22nd, 2014. 2.- Each WPL will fill out the contributions, deviations and evaluation of partners ending on M40: [cid:image002.png at 01CF4A83.E7C19B30] 3.- Each WPL will fill out the general contribution, deviation and evaluation of their WP. Thank you very much for your contribution. Alex, thank you for your question. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: martes, 25 de marzo de 2014 17:48 Para: 'fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu' CC: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; 'subsidies at tid.es' Asunto: FI-WARE: Periodic Report M36 (D.1.2.6) Importancia: Alta Dear all, I need your contributions as WPL in order to deliver the Periodic Report of M36. This time we are going to use Google Docs to manage it. Each partner will be able to access it any time to assess the current status. Only the respective WPL of each WP and the TID Coordination will be able to edit it. I kindly ask you to respect the template because the Commission has asked us to keep consistency and they want to have the information broken down per partner. Please note that, as in previous reports, the first section is about the WP as a team, and each task is evaluated per partner. Please do not erase any partner and fill in all of them. These are the list of the links to each WP: WP1 & WP2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dsUqYVUMuttPygNYa_T2ygTWsO0R8xup2zTuPGI_Q08/edit?usp=sharing WP3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RhHiLV1aaTh_e_4D3EK1OyFQbS5HvlODoRk-ad9syLo/edit?usp=sharing WP4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BKr1FZpa0xyPNETB7gEkdiyT_8V-8ccJBTVRuKo98Yc/edit?usp=sharing WP5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B17lOH9Ty959jc_zvWcAKVGM4pfHBv5AYxsb0izgVxM/edit?usp=sharing WP6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FDeL960k5m53SJPDnMtL_0bhvawCHrVCD5tzvWgIrG8/edit?usp=sharing WP7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yLLR5sDxR4BrzST7QsKHMUHN68Wg_AZhxc3LIkWNLQQ/edit?usp=sharing WP8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D2QVAGnEVkfhjZUmli2PS4i8051b8fPMoCAs5BFrEYg/edit?usp=sharing WP9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IgoVQXtQiJ-8FrAdupOBnAwZx7mUXAiuBh_RpEwc-Ts/edit?usp=sharing WP10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUUTtpWkEFnz_3j-S63k6TVjLHqOvf_Gwc5PRBy4WXs/edit?usp=sharing WP11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10llFWWZsZXCc61uZVb_1U_P2ZwHWtimWxmlC1IBydGc/edit?usp=sharing WP12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TbEpS7gc2r7JIQa8jGDOAE6tqqSJYYChDqbTn_N5oDY/edit?usp=sharing WP13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K9WngtdMsLH9Rz1ciB0jLdUQXeNilB49tlmjGyk8604/edit?usp=sharing Note: xxx= Missing information in the document. Please ask to each involved partner for their contribution, share these links with them and complete your WP report. As soon as I have the consumption of PM of each partner in M25-M36, I?ll tell you. We have it until M33 at the moment. Deadline: April 22nd 2014. We will probably need a new iteration after this deadline to assess the consolidated effort of each partner. We?ll basically need you to evaluate each declaration of effort. Thank you in advance. Please confirm that you have access to your WP document and can edit it. Kind regards, Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 7643 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 16358 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From mev at tid.es Fri Mar 28 14:06:17 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:06:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs - reminder for update Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B9253@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear WP Leaders, Let me remind you of the open specs. Would you please update any progress on the spreadsheet linked below? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing According to the time line, 1st wave should be finished and 2nd wave would be approaching the time to having chapters' ready for Juanjo's review. [cid:image001.png at 01CF4A8E.E2C1B1F0] Please, take into account two request from 2 partners received this week: Technicolor is leaving on M36, which moves them from 2nd Wave to 1st Wave. I understand it affects WP4-Cloud and WP7-I2ND. Adminotech is extending its contribution until M40, which moves them from 1st Wave to 2nd Wave. It leaves WP13 with all partners' contribution to the 2nd Wave. Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 21889 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Fri Mar 28 16:12:50 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:12:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Templates for the "Packages" Entries in FI-WARE Catalog and other manual material for packages Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD23425@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Stefano, I was approached in WP3 again as they would like to proceed with their packaging activities. Packaged SW partially nears completion, so the paperwork for it is on stake now. We need to urgently decide on this and distribute instructions since many colleagues rely on this prep work and they do not need to be blocked here. Again, M36 leaving partners (not only SAP as I learned :)) need to deliver until 4 weeks !! @Stefano: Can you please asap send the templates for catalog entries for packages? Afterall, its only a brief template, I guess. @ALL: For the packages, what kind of documentation do we deliver (review report 6 elaborates a bit on this) now finally: For example, 1 page flyer only, full user/admin guide etc. (as if it would be an additional GE), .... We had discussed this already (only as less paper as possible) - does it prevail or does the 6th review report change something here? --> For next Monday WPL Telco I would propose that we finalize the decision in WPL and that during next week all necessary templates and instructions are distributed among us. Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 18. M?rz 2014 15:40 To: Stefano de Panfilis (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Distribution of Templates for the "Packages" Entries in FI-WARE Catalog Hi Stefano, hi Juanjo, We from our side are now ready to start creating the catalog pages for our 3 packages from apps chapter. @Stefano: As agreed in WPL call, can you please send around the template for the packages for the catalog soon? If I should have missed it during my vacation, can you please resend to me? Can we have them at the end of this week, please? Afterall it would allow us all to proceed for the packaging activities - since some of us need to have everything ready and approved and online prior to M36. We can alternatively go ahead and create our own package entries first, if you do not mind. Best wishes Markus - There was an AP on Engineering to come up with a template for publication of information about packages of related GEis in the FI-WARE Catalogue. Maybe also with a dedicated category. * Dedicated entry in the Catalogue from the top level menu (packages may be composed by GEis from different chapters) * The structure for the package entry can be the same one as for GEis entries * the only doubt is for Download tab * if one T&C for the entire package, pay attention to avoid conflicts between the package components. The T&C should link to the composing GEIs T&C. Juanjo: Status? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Mar 28 16:31:31 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:31:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Templates for the "Packages" Entries in FI-WARE Catalog and other manual material for packages In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD23425@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD23425@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: dear markus and all, monday morning before the wpl/wpa call the package template will be on your desks. it is not just as simple as you migth guess, but also not rocket-science ;-) ciao, stefano 2014-03-28 16:12 GMT+01:00 Heller, Markus : > Hi Stefano, > > > > I was approached in WP3 again as they would like to proceed with their > packaging activities. Packaged SW partially nears completion, so the > paperwork for it is on stake now. > > We need to urgently decide on this and distribute instructions since many > colleagues rely on this prep work and they do not need to be blocked here. > Again, M36 leaving partners (not only SAP as I learned J) need to deliver > until 4 weeks !! > > > > *@Stefano:* Can you please asap send the templates for catalog entries > for packages? Afterall, its only a brief template, I guess. > > > > *@ALL:* For the packages, what kind of documentation do we deliver > (review report 6 elaborates a bit on this) now finally: For example, 1 page > flyer only, full user/admin guide etc. (as if it would be an additional > GE), .... > We had discussed this already (only as less paper as possible) - does it > prevail or does the 6th review report change something here? > > > > > > > > ? For next Monday WPL Telco I would propose that we finalize the decision > in WPL and that during next week all necessary templates and instructions > are distributed among us. > > > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* Heller, Markus > *Sent:* Dienstag, 18. M?rz 2014 15:40 > *To:* Stefano de Panfilis (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); Juanjo Hierro > *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Distribution of Templates for the "Packages" Entries in > FI-WARE Catalog > > > > Hi Stefano, hi Juanjo, > > > > We from our side are now ready to start creating the catalog pages for our > 3 packages from apps chapter. > > > > @Stefano: As agreed in WPL call, can you please send around the template > for the packages for the catalog soon? If I should have missed it during my > vacation, can you please resend to me? > > > > Can we have them at the end of this week, please? Afterall it would allow > us all to proceed for the packaging activities - since some of us need to > have everything ready and approved and online prior to M36. > > > > We can alternatively go ahead and create our own package entries first, if > you do not mind. > > > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > > - > > > > There was an AP on Engineering to come up with a template for publication > of information about packages of related GEis in the FI-WARE Catalogue. Maybe > also with a dedicated category. > > > > - Dedicated entry in the Catalogue from the top level menu (packages > may be composed by GEis from different chapters) > - The structure for the package entry can be the same one as for GEis > entries > - the only doubt is for Download tab > - if one T&C for the entire package, pay attention to avoid > conflicts between the package components. The T&C should link to the > composing GEIs T&C. > > > Juanjo: Status? > > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Fri Mar 28 16:39:52 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:39:52 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Templates for the "Packages" Entries in FI-WARE Catalog and other manual material for packages In-Reply-To: References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD23425@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD234BD@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Stefano, ok, good news then... Have a nice weekend Markus From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: Freitag, 28. M?rz 2014 16:32 To: Heller, Markus Cc: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: Templates for the "Packages" Entries in FI-WARE Catalog and other manual material for packages dear markus and all, monday morning before the wpl/wpa call the package template will be on your desks. it is not just as simple as you migth guess, but also not rocket-science ;-) ciao, stefano 2014-03-28 16:12 GMT+01:00 Heller, Markus >: Hi Stefano, I was approached in WP3 again as they would like to proceed with their packaging activities. Packaged SW partially nears completion, so the paperwork for it is on stake now. We need to urgently decide on this and distribute instructions since many colleagues rely on this prep work and they do not need to be blocked here. Again, M36 leaving partners (not only SAP as I learned :)) need to deliver until 4 weeks !! @Stefano: Can you please asap send the templates for catalog entries for packages? Afterall, its only a brief template, I guess. @ALL: For the packages, what kind of documentation do we deliver (review report 6 elaborates a bit on this) now finally: For example, 1 page flyer only, full user/admin guide etc. (as if it would be an additional GE), .... We had discussed this already (only as less paper as possible) - does it prevail or does the 6th review report change something here? --> For next Monday WPL Telco I would propose that we finalize the decision in WPL and that during next week all necessary templates and instructions are distributed among us. Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 18. M?rz 2014 15:40 To: Stefano de Panfilis (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it); Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Distribution of Templates for the "Packages" Entries in FI-WARE Catalog Hi Stefano, hi Juanjo, We from our side are now ready to start creating the catalog pages for our 3 packages from apps chapter. @Stefano: As agreed in WPL call, can you please send around the template for the packages for the catalog soon? If I should have missed it during my vacation, can you please resend to me? Can we have them at the end of this week, please? Afterall it would allow us all to proceed for the packaging activities - since some of us need to have everything ready and approved and online prior to M36. We can alternatively go ahead and create our own package entries first, if you do not mind. Best wishes Markus - There was an AP on Engineering to come up with a template for publication of information about packages of related GEis in the FI-WARE Catalogue. Maybe also with a dedicated category. * Dedicated entry in the Catalogue from the top level menu (packages may be composed by GEis from different chapters) * The structure for the package entry can be the same one as for GEis entries * the only doubt is for Download tab * if one T&C for the entire package, pay attention to avoid conflicts between the package components. The T&C should link to the composing GEIs T&C. Juanjo: Status? -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Mar 31 08:57:15 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:57:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template Message-ID: dear all, please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PackagesTemplate_v1.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 379362 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Mar 31 11:22:14 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:22:14 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Discussion on M24 review report Message-ID: <533933C6.2040806@tid.es> Dear all, As you are aware, the report is here. We have agreed it in the confcall this morning but let us put it in written. We will discuss it: * today at 14:30 CET in the afternoon session * and then tomorrow at 9am CET Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Mar 31 11:36:56 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:36:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Stefano, all, thanks for sending the template so far: 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic Enablers So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for each package? - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, own user/prog, own ...) - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a deadline schedule, if any? Maybe we have decided such already? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 08:57 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear all, please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 31 13:24:19 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:24:19 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dynamic: Release 3.3 and Sprint 3.3.3 Close - LAST CALL Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B97E7@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, Please, proceed to close the backlog items, if not done yet, finished during Release 3.3 and Sprint 3.3.3. Deadline for this action is TODAY. The backlog snapshot will be taken today at 18:00 CET. This snapshot is meant to be delivered to the EC. Please find below updated dashboard and reviews if needed: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3683/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140331.xlsx [cid:image001.png at 01CF4CE3.4BF79E40] Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3684/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140331.xlsx [cid:image002.png at 01CF4CE3.F53656E0] IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3687/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140331.xlsx [cid:image003.png at 01CF4CE3.F53656E0] Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3685/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140331.xlsx [cid:image004.png at 01CF4CE3.F53656E0] I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3686/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140331.xlsx [cid:image005.png at 01CF4CE3.F53656E0] Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3689/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140331.xlsx [cid:image006.png at 01CF4CE3.F53656E0] MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3688/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140331.xlsx [cid:image007.png at 01CF4CE4.8ACF2740] Thanks for cooperation!! Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13644 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 13735 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 13570 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 14028 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 13475 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 13679 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.png Type: image/png Size: 13194 bytes Desc: image007.png URL: From mev at tid.es Mon Mar 31 13:29:58 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:29:58 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog content: updated Reviews Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31B9820@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear GEI Owners, Find below links to updated reviews of the backlog. Reviews: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3690/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140331.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3691/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140331.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3694/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140331.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3692/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140331.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3693/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140331.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3696/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140331.xlsx https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3695/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140331.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Mar 31 13:57:31 2014 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:57:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] A little bit of delay ... Message-ID: <5339582B.6010401@tid.es> Hi all, I'm running a meeting with a external visit and I'm afraid I may run a bit late ... I would suggest that we delay start of our afternoon session 30 minutes so we start at 15:00 until 16:00 Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Mar 31 14:21:49 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:21:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: dear markus and all, in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings. having said that i suggest for the documentation page: - links to the package installation manual - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for submission to me 15 april. ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus : > Hi Stefano, all, > > > > thanks for sending the template so far: > 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic > Enablers > > So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. > > > > > > > > @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: > > > > > > What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for > each package? > > - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the > GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, > own user/prog, own ...) > > - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to > prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? > > - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a > deadline schedule, if any? > > > > Maybe we have decided such already? > > > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 08:57 > *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear all, > > > > please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. > > Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Mar 31 14:51:20 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:51:20 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Communication Plan for the planned Extension of FI-WARE-1 for M36-leaving partners and M40-staying partners Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD257F0@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Juanjo, all, Some of us are leaving at the originally planned project end for FI-WARE-1. The consortium falls then into a group leaving in M36 and another group extending until M40 which may need explanation to stakeholders. The extension of the project will not go unnoticed and may cause confusion ("have they failed and need more time...") and may cause some bad image in the public and shade bad light on EC maybe as well for organization / cost management. in M36, while others have chosen to go into an extension period on their own decision. For example, it must be ensured that public can get a positive opinion about this extension (cost neutral...) and that leaving partners are not seen negatively because of leaving at M36, and other way round it must be ensured that longer staying partners are not seen negatively for staying longer. For both we must transmit that the different end dates are not a failure or such but a planned approach towards the projects success either for M36 and M40. I am sure that we are currently already talking about the extension of FI-WARE-1 in the dissemination activities/events, but I have not seen any written communication on this - as it is only in planning with DOW amendment 6 currently, of course. But after the dow amendment 6 is signed, the extension is in force. But we do not need to wait until then to have the communication for this ready. As I am not fully aware of the current communication plan for announcing the extension, so I would like to ask for an update here: I guess, you are planning for this. Nevertheless to be sure on this, I would like to propose an official communication to happen on our usual channels (e.g. on blogs, website, press, etc. stating some core messages to position the extension with a positive perception in the public on our own initiative. - FI-WARE-1 project was planned in 2010 or so originally to run until M36. Impressive results so far reached until M36 like X, Y,Z. Results can be seen by anyone (FI-lab, GEs open source, ....) - With the end of FI-WARE-1 nearing o Some partners are leaving after having fulfilled their commitments and with considerable results (e.g. in GEs, in use cases, in backlogs, in fi-lab, ...) "with success and as planned". o Some would like to go on after M40. Reasons are: X, y, outreach, prepare the activities of such partners who are in FI-WARE-1 and will become members of FII-WARE-2 - EC is satisfied with both decisions by partners. - Important? Cost-wise EC / Tax payer: Extension is cost-neutral so tax-payer does not pay extra....(optional?) - Having some partners leave and some partners stay is the consortiums approach to either fulfill the project goals with results until the original end of M36 and giving the ability for partners who additionally want to go beyond. - We should mention some exemplary success examples of the whole team that acted until M36 (FI-LAB, branding, results, catalog, GE collection impressive,...) - We should mention the new plans for extension period as stated for EC (using new opportunities that have become possible during project, dissemination more than expected, further outreach, ... - We can explain in a sentence how is work planned between FI-WARE-1 and Fi-WARE-2? Handover is perfectly planned and e.g. use cases and third parties will never be let alone... - Other messages.... Important: Can we be supported here by High key personnel (EC) for such announcement. For example, who can communicate on this extension to support a positive image here. I remind us for the blog article where even prominent EC members (Mario Campolargo?) answered as a reaction to a critical blog and in this extension case maybe we can plan for a prominent supporter upfront that could explain the extension to the public if needed? What are our current plans on such communication, when and how do we want to rollout the extension? Afterall the extension is beyond the original project and any uncommented extension may be perceived negative / as a delay for delivery in the public or in our stakeholders views. What is the planned timeline for this? When is the first announcement going to happen? How can e.g. Ogilvy support such activity to publish our own statement for the extension that will happen. Again, I guess you already plan for this, can you please update us on this topic? Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Mar 31 15:03:36 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:03:36 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template In-Reply-To: References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD2583F@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Stefano, all, Thank you for your answer. Afterall, Stefano, this does not need to rely fully on your desk alone only because you took over the task to distribute the templates... I enclose my comments: > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: - links to the package installation manual - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) OK, from me. What about the other's opinions? I suggest strongly to create templates WORD documents because would be easier for all to handle "just-fill-in-mode". It can be dead-simple but at least we are sort of homogeneous in layout / content then) - like we do for the other official documents. This would support that we should make a homogenous appearance to our readers. Can you distribute them? > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. Basically Ok, but as we do for all "internal deliverables", we shall have a fixed deadline for until when the publication process is completed successfully and results being public, proposal: one month after the M36 that is M37. As with all other deliverables, the leaving partners cannot follow until long after M36, so all their contributions must be reviewed "enough" and rolled out if possible very early after they left - for fairness reasons as you can understand. Which limit would be ok for you - meaning the deadline after M36 when all M36-eaving partners have their results really online/public. If improvements need to be made, the review/improvement cycle is only 1 iteration plus the following escalation management by Juanjo as project coordinator within a gioven time limit. We are currently writing this internal deliverable process into the DOW amendment 6 (Miguel and I are finalizing on word level). We can share this as an example - but I guess my point is rather clear. Proposal: If needed, you must be supported by someone else for performing the reviews for M36 leaving partners then. What would be your and the other WPL/WPA opinion? > for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for submission to me 15 april. >From my side OK, what do the other chapters say? Best Wishes Markus From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 14:22 To: Heller, Markus Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear markus and all, in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings. having said that i suggest for the documentation page: - links to the package installation manual - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus >: Hi Stefano, all, thanks for sending the template so far: 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic Enablers So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for each package? - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, own user/prog, own ...) - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a deadline schedule, if any? Maybe we have decided such already? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 08:57 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear all, please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Mar 31 15:58:47 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:58:47 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD2583F@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD2583F@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: dear markus, may be i'm wrong, but i think the packages just to be delivered on-line in the catalogue with the current formatting rules. so no msword template to be provided. i guess we need also the agreement of juanjo here. ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 15:03 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus : > Hi Stefano, all, > > > > Thank you for your answer. Afterall, Stefano, this does not need to rely > fully on your desk alone only because you took over the task to distribute > the templates... > > > > I enclose my comments: > > > > > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: > > - links to the package installation manual > > - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package > > - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is > becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) > > > > OK, from me. What about the other's opinions? > > > > I suggest strongly to create templates WORD documents because would be > easier for all to handle "just-fill-in-mode". It can be dead-simple but at > least we are sort of homogeneous in layout / content then) - like we do for > the other official documents. This would support that we should make a > homogenous appearance to our readers. Can you distribute them? > > > > > > > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, > i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. > > > > Basically Ok, but as we do for all "internal deliverables", we shall have > a fixed deadline for until when the publication process is completed > successfully and results being public, proposal: one month after the M36 > that is M37. > > As with all other deliverables, the leaving partners cannot follow until > long after M36, so all their contributions must be reviewed "enough" and > rolled out if possible very early after they left - for fairness reasons as > you can understand. > > > > Which limit would be ok for you - meaning the deadline after M36 when all > M36-eaving partners have their results really online/public. If > improvements need to be made, the review/improvement cycle is only 1 > iteration plus the following escalation management by Juanjo as project > coordinator within a gioven time limit. We are currently writing this > internal deliverable process into the DOW amendment 6 (Miguel and I are > finalizing on word level). We can share this as an example - but I guess my > point is rather clear. > > > > Proposal: If needed, you must be supported by someone else for performing > the reviews for M36 leaving partners then. > > > > What would be your and the other WPL/WPA opinion? > > > > > > > for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for > submission to me 15 april. > > > > From my side OK, what do the other chapters say? > > > > > > Best Wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] > *Sent:* Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 14:22 > *To:* Heller, Markus > *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear markus and all, > > > > in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as > redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings. > > > > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: > > - links to the package installation manual > > - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package > > - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is > becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) > > > > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. > me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. > > > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > > > > > > > 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus : > > Hi Stefano, all, > > > > thanks for sending the template so far: > 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic > Enablers > > So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. > > > > > > > > @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: > > > > > > What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for > each package? > > - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the > GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, > own user/prog, own ...) > > - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to > prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? > > - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a > deadline schedule, if any? > > > > Maybe we have decided such already? > > > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 08:57 > *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear all, > > > > please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. > > Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > > > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Mar 31 16:18:34 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:18:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template In-Reply-To: References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD2583F@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD258D3@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Stefano, > may be i'm wrong, but i think the packages just to be delivered on-line in the catalogue with the current formatting rules. so no msword template to be provided. Yes, that would be ok to deliver simply on catalog pages and comply with our formatting rules. WORD is not needed, if we all agree. Afterall it was only meant as an example so ok. Contentwise - what do we define as sections in such a TOC for these several proposed catalog areas (the "what to write"). My point is that we may need to standardize a bit more to a deeper level of detail so that the degree of freedom for each package owner team is reduced and that they can simply fill in details and be sure that this is all that the consortiums needs to publish for each package. Such TOC agreements would make life easier for all sides since each package owner team can fill it in and the overall appearance ist heterogeneous. > i guess we need also the agreement of juanjo here. Yes, I agree, but we would need to decide/define such TOC (if we do it) until say end of this week in order to give time for the teams (which leave at M36) to deliver and for you to review it until then. Best wishes Markus From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 15:59 To: Heller, Markus Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear markus, may be i'm wrong, but i think the packages just to be delivered on-line in the catalogue with the current formatting rules. so no msword template to be provided. i guess we need also the agreement of juanjo here. ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 15:03 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus >: Hi Stefano, all, Thank you for your answer. Afterall, Stefano, this does not need to rely fully on your desk alone only because you took over the task to distribute the templates... I enclose my comments: > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: - links to the package installation manual - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) OK, from me. What about the other's opinions? I suggest strongly to create templates WORD documents because would be easier for all to handle "just-fill-in-mode". It can be dead-simple but at least we are sort of homogeneous in layout / content then) - like we do for the other official documents. This would support that we should make a homogenous appearance to our readers. Can you distribute them? > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. Basically Ok, but as we do for all "internal deliverables", we shall have a fixed deadline for until when the publication process is completed successfully and results being public, proposal: one month after the M36 that is M37. As with all other deliverables, the leaving partners cannot follow until long after M36, so all their contributions must be reviewed "enough" and rolled out if possible very early after they left - for fairness reasons as you can understand. Which limit would be ok for you - meaning the deadline after M36 when all M36-eaving partners have their results really online/public. If improvements need to be made, the review/improvement cycle is only 1 iteration plus the following escalation management by Juanjo as project coordinator within a gioven time limit. We are currently writing this internal deliverable process into the DOW amendment 6 (Miguel and I are finalizing on word level). We can share this as an example - but I guess my point is rather clear. Proposal: If needed, you must be supported by someone else for performing the reviews for M36 leaving partners then. What would be your and the other WPL/WPA opinion? > for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for submission to me 15 april. >From my side OK, what do the other chapters say? Best Wishes Markus From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 14:22 To: Heller, Markus Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear markus and all, in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings. having said that i suggest for the documentation page: - links to the package installation manual - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus >: Hi Stefano, all, thanks for sending the template so far: 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic Enablers So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for each package? - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, own user/prog, own ...) - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a deadline schedule, if any? Maybe we have decided such already? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 08:57 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear all, please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergg at tid.es Mon Mar 31 16:18:58 2014 From: sergg at tid.es (SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:18:58 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template In-Reply-To: References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD2583F@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54D0102DF4BF3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Hi all, At least in WP6 we have identified the need to provide an additional document for the GEs package. This document might well be an special wiki page containing: ? Special installation, configuration and administration instructions (in addition to the information already provided by each GE in the package). Not everything can be automated from the recipes and there might be some customization options. ? Usage patterns. In our case, how to model entities and attributes, subscriptions, event processing rules, data storage, etc. This are "additional aspects" because we are using various GEs together. So I propose to create one or more pages for that content. I guess that the content would be pretty much ad-hoc, but it could be interesting to have a base line for all the packages. This page would be then referred from the catalogue. Best Regards, Sergio. From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 15:59 To: Heller, Markus Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear markus, may be i'm wrong, but i think the packages just to be delivered on-line in the catalogue with the current formatting rules. so no msword template to be provided. i guess we need also the agreement of juanjo here. ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 15:03 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus >: Hi Stefano, all, Thank you for your answer. Afterall, Stefano, this does not need to rely fully on your desk alone only because you took over the task to distribute the templates... I enclose my comments: > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: - links to the package installation manual - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) OK, from me. What about the other's opinions? I suggest strongly to create templates WORD documents because would be easier for all to handle "just-fill-in-mode". It can be dead-simple but at least we are sort of homogeneous in layout / content then) - like we do for the other official documents. This would support that we should make a homogenous appearance to our readers. Can you distribute them? > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. Basically Ok, but as we do for all "internal deliverables", we shall have a fixed deadline for until when the publication process is completed successfully and results being public, proposal: one month after the M36 that is M37. As with all other deliverables, the leaving partners cannot follow until long after M36, so all their contributions must be reviewed "enough" and rolled out if possible very early after they left - for fairness reasons as you can understand. Which limit would be ok for you - meaning the deadline after M36 when all M36-eaving partners have their results really online/public. If improvements need to be made, the review/improvement cycle is only 1 iteration plus the following escalation management by Juanjo as project coordinator within a gioven time limit. We are currently writing this internal deliverable process into the DOW amendment 6 (Miguel and I are finalizing on word level). We can share this as an example - but I guess my point is rather clear. Proposal: If needed, you must be supported by someone else for performing the reviews for M36 leaving partners then. What would be your and the other WPL/WPA opinion? > for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for submission to me 15 april. >From my side OK, what do the other chapters say? Best Wishes Markus From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 14:22 To: Heller, Markus Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear markus and all, in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings. having said that i suggest for the documentation page: - links to the package installation manual - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus >: Hi Stefano, all, thanks for sending the template so far: 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic Enablers So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for each package? - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, own user/prog, own ...) - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a deadline schedule, if any? Maybe we have decided such already? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 08:57 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template dear all, please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Mar 31 17:45:22 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:45:22 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template In-Reply-To: <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54D0102DF4BF3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD251C7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD2583F@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <03BE306058976141B4883174DF62D54D0102DF4BF3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: dear sergio, these are exactly the aspects i thougth to be in the "Package deployment" page which will replace the "createing instance" page. perhaps i was not very much clear in the doc, but this was exactly what i do expect to have there. thank you for your contribution. later this evening i'll create a new version to be circulated with all the thougths you guys are riseng today! ciao, stefano 2014-03-31 16:18 GMT+02:00 SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ : > Hi all, > > At least in WP6 we have identified the need to provide an additional > document for the GEs package. This document might well be an special wiki > page containing: > > ? Special installation, configuration and administration > instructions (in addition to the information already provided by each GE in > the package). Not everything can be automated from the recipes and there > might be some customization options. > > ? Usage patterns. In our case, how to model entities and > attributes, subscriptions, event processing rules, data storage, etc. This > are "additional aspects" because we are using various GEs together. > > > > So I propose to create one or more pages for that content. I guess that > the content would be pretty much ad-hoc, but it could be interesting to > have a base line for all the packages. This page would be then referred > from the catalogue. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Sergio. > > > > > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Monday, March 31, 2014 15:59 > > *To:* Heller, Markus > *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear markus, > > > > may be i'm wrong, but i think the packages just to be delivered on-line in > the catalogue with the current formatting rules. > > so no msword template to be provided. > > > > i guess we need also the agreement of juanjo here. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > > > 2014-03-31 15:03 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus : > > Hi Stefano, all, > > > > Thank you for your answer. Afterall, Stefano, this does not need to rely > fully on your desk alone only because you took over the task to distribute > the templates... > > > > I enclose my comments: > > > > > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: > > - links to the package installation manual > > - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package > > - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is > becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) > > > > OK, from me. What about the other's opinions? > > > > I suggest strongly to create templates WORD documents because would be > easier for all to handle "just-fill-in-mode". It can be dead-simple but at > least we are sort of homogeneous in layout / content then) - like we do for > the other official documents. This would support that we should make a > homogenous appearance to our readers. Can you distribute them? > > > > > > > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, > i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. > > > > Basically Ok, but as we do for all "internal deliverables", we shall have > a fixed deadline for until when the publication process is completed > successfully and results being public, proposal: one month after the M36 > that is M37. > > As with all other deliverables, the leaving partners cannot follow until > long after M36, so all their contributions must be reviewed "enough" and > rolled out if possible very early after they left - for fairness reasons as > you can understand. > > > > Which limit would be ok for you - meaning the deadline after M36 when all > M36-eaving partners have their results really online/public. If > improvements need to be made, the review/improvement cycle is only 1 > iteration plus the following escalation management by Juanjo as project > coordinator within a gioven time limit. We are currently writing this > internal deliverable process into the DOW amendment 6 (Miguel and I are > finalizing on word level). We can share this as an example - but I guess my > point is rather clear. > > > > Proposal: If needed, you must be supported by someone else for performing > the reviews for M36 leaving partners then. > > > > What would be your and the other WPL/WPA opinion? > > > > > > > for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for > submission to me 15 april. > > > > From my side OK, what do the other chapters say? > > > > > > Best Wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] > *Sent:* Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 14:22 > *To:* Heller, Markus > *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear markus and all, > > > > in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as > redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings. > > > > having said that i suggest for the documentation page: > > - links to the package installation manual > > - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package > > - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is > becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such) > > > > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e. > me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis. > > > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > > > > > > > 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus : > > Hi Stefano, all, > > > > thanks for sending the template so far: > 1.1 Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic > Enablers > > So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok. > > > > > > > > @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us: > > > > > > What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for > each package? > > - For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the > GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual, > own user/prog, own ...) > > - Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to > prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes? > > - Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a > deadline schedule, if any? > > > > Maybe we have decided such already? > > > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > > > > *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis > *Sent:* Montag, 31. M?rz 2014 08:57 > *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Packages template > > > > dear all, > > > > please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion. > > Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > > > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > > > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Mar 31 18:58:44 2014 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:58:44 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Tomorrows call Message-ID: <53399EC4.5080808@tid.es> Hi Markus was asking how long this is going to take. 1 hour at most. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.org Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx