[Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions

MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE mev at tid.es
Tue Mar 18 18:27:47 CET 2014


Hi Thorsten,

I know it doesn’t make sense to do any effort from a local short-term perspective as yours.

Those who believe that FI-WARE is a platform wanting to become something bigger and bigger, those who think improving quality here and there may help, may have a different perspective.
So, please, allow the partners who want to improve, do it!!

Thanks for your cooperation!!

Kind regards,
Manuel

From: Sandfuchs, Thorsten [mailto:thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com]
Sent: martes, 18 de marzo de 2014 18:10
To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: AW: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions

Hi manuel,
How many real fiware users or even the reviewers complaint about missing text on these pages?
How much work would you like to impose to the consortium in which we couldn't focus on packaging or use case support or other tasks related to real deliverables at hand?
How vital for the project is this proposal in M34 of the project?

Thanks for you comments


--

Thorsten Sandfuchs

SAP AG

Sent from a mobile device, please excuse the brevity.

Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx


-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Datum:18.03.2014 15:56 (GMT+01:00)
An: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Betreff: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog Content - Reviews : Criteria for open descriptions

Dear WP Leaders,

As I progress on the criteria to identify issues on backlog items’ open descriptions, I need to query you in order to propose modifying previous criteria used.

As backlog items’ open descriptions, I refer to the descriptions provided in the wiki openly, an example:
http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.Data.MetadataPreprocessing.FormatTransformation


Currently the get views showing the outlook of descriptions based on the number of words.
As an example you can see FI-WARE project and Cloud chapter below:
[cid:image001.png at 01CF42D7.BF194560]
The link above is an example of average open description with 73 words used.
[cid:image002.jpg at 01CF42D7.BF194560]

I think there’s need to improve the upper and lower extremes.
Therefore, I need to query you on objections to limiting the number of words used to describe open backlog items’ descriptions:

In my opinion there’s need to limit them to a window of about 60-250 words.
The lowest limit would be implemented with the following individual limits:

•         goal (>=10 words), description (>=30 words), rational (>= 20 words)

•         total record (<=250 words)

Would you have any objections to it?

I think these limits would help identify cases like this below:
http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Feature.Cloud.CE.MGT.PlatformFeatures

[cid:image003.png at 01CF42D7.BF194560]

Or the opposite. The longest description belongs to MiWi with 560 words:
http://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.MiWi.AdvWebUI.DataflowProcessing

There aren’t many items with more than 250 words.
Apps(0), Cloud(5), IoT(0), Data(5), I2ND(4), Security(0), MiWi(3)

The previous rules for the fields Goal, Description and Rationale only checked fields had content.

Thanks for cooperation!!

Kind regards,
Manuel

----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telefónica Digital
Parque Tecnológico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/>


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20140318/8b0bdd72/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19485 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20140318/8b0bdd72/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 27772 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20140318/8b0bdd72/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11912 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20140318/8b0bdd72/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Fiware-wpl mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy