[Fiware-wpl] Packages template

[stefano de panfilis]

dear sergio,

these are exactly the aspects i thougth to be in the "Package deployment"
page which will replace the "createing instance" page.

perhaps i was not very much clear in the doc, but this was exactly what i
do expect to have there.

thank you for your contribution.

later this evening i'll create a new version to be circulated with all the
thougths you guys are riseng today!

ciao,
stefano


2014-03-31 16:18 GMT+02:00 SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ <sergg at tid.es>:

>  Hi all,
>
> At least in WP6 we have identified the need to provide an additional
> document for the GEs package. This document might well be an special wiki
> page containing:
>
> ·         Special installation, configuration and administration
> instructions (in addition to the information already provided by each GE in
> the package). Not everything can be automated from the recipes and there
> might be some customization options.
>
> ·         Usage patterns. In our case, how to model entities and
> attributes, subscriptions, event processing rules, data storage, etc. This
> are "additional aspects" because we are using various GEs together.
>
>
>
> So I propose to create one or more pages for that content. I guess that
> the content would be pretty much ad-hoc, but it could be interesting to
> have a base line for all the packages. This page would be then referred
> from the catalogue.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
>                 Sergio.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:
> fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis
> *Sent:* Monday, March 31, 2014 15:59
>
> *To:* Heller, Markus
> *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template
>
>
>
> dear markus,
>
>
>
> may be i'm wrong, but i think the packages just to be delivered on-line in
> the catalogue with the current formatting rules.
>
> so no msword template to be provided.
>
>
>
> i guess we need also the agreement of juanjo here.
>
>
>
> ciao,
>
> stefano
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-03-31 15:03 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus <markus.heller at sap.com>:
>
>  Hi Stefano, all,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your answer. Afterall, Stefano, this does not need to rely
> fully on your desk alone only because you took over the task to distribute
> the templates...
>
>
>
> I enclose my comments:
>
>
>
> > having said that i suggest for the documentation page:
>
> - links to the package installation manual
>
> - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package
>
> - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is
> becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such)
>
>
>
> OK, from me. What about the other's opinions?
>
>
>
> I suggest strongly to create templates WORD documents because would be
> easier for all to handle "just-fill-in-mode". It can be dead-simple but at
> least we are sort of homogeneous in layout / content then) - like we do for
> the other official documents. This would support that we should make a
> homogenous appearance to our readers. Can you distribute them?
>
>
>
>
>
> > for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach,
> i.e. me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis.
>
>
>
> Basically Ok, but as we do for all "internal deliverables", we shall have
> a fixed deadline for until when the publication process is completed
> successfully and results being public, proposal: one month after the M36
> that is M37.
>
> As with all other deliverables, the leaving partners cannot  follow until
> long after M36, so all their contributions must be reviewed "enough" and
> rolled out if possible very early after they left - for fairness reasons as
> you can understand.
>
>
>
> Which limit would be ok for you - meaning the deadline after M36 when all
> M36-eaving partners have their results really online/public. If
> improvements need to be made, the review/improvement cycle is only 1
> iteration plus the following escalation management by Juanjo as project
> coordinator within a gioven time limit. We are currently writing this
> internal deliverable process into the DOW amendment 6 (Miguel and I are
> finalizing on word level). We can share this as an example - but I guess my
> point is rather clear.
>
>
>
> Proposal: If needed, you must be supported by someone else for performing
> the reviews for M36 leaving partners then.
>
>
>
> What would be your and the other WPL/WPA opinion?
>
>
>
>
>
> > for you guys leaving the project on 30 april, i'd say deadline for
> submission to me 15 april.
>
>
>
> From my side OK, what do the other chapters say?
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Wishes
>
> Markus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it]
> *Sent:* Montag, 31. März 2014 14:22
> *To:* Heller, Markus
> *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] Packages template
>
>
>
> dear markus and all,
>
>
>
> in general i'm not happy in repeting information in different pages as
> redoundancy, often not well controlloed, is cause of measleadings.
>
>
>
> having said that i suggest for the documentation page:
>
> - links to the package installation manual
>
> - links to the documentation pages of the geis composing the package
>
> - example on the use/demo of the package (indeed if there is a package is
> becouse there is a need for it, so more possible use of it as such)
>
>
>
> for what concern the pubblication i'd stay with the oevral approach, i.e.
> me governing the publication process as it is now for the geis.
>
>
>
>
>
> ciao,
>
> stefano
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-03-31 11:36 GMT+02:00 Heller, Markus <markus.heller at sap.com>:
>
> Hi Stefano, all,
>
>
>
> thanks for sending the template so far:
> 1.1                      Documentation Page: Same as per the Generic
> Enablers
>
> So we can put doc on this tab/entry then, ok.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> @ALL: My question goes not only to Stefano, but ALL of us:
>
>
>
>
>
> What exactly do we want to provide/require as docu on document level for
> each package?
>
> -          For example, only a "flyer" pointing to manuals etc of the
> GE's vs. a full own package-specific docu package (own installation manual,
> own user/prog, own ...)
>
> -          Can we prescribe this in a bullet list what is needed to
> prepare and in which formats each ? Who does it, if yes?
>
> -          Do they get own review processes or not? What would be a
> deadline schedule, if any?
>
>
>
> Maybe we have decided such already?
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> Markus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:
> fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of *stefano de panfilis
> *Sent:* Montag, 31. März 2014 08:57
> *To:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
> *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Packages template
>
>
>
> dear all,
>
>
>
> please find attached the Packages template for the today discussion.
>
> Unfortunately i cannot attend, Davide will represent Engineering.
>
>
>
> ciao,
>
> stefano
>
>
>
> --
>
> Stefano De Panfilis
> Chief Innovation Officer
> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
> via Riccardo Morandi 32
> 00148 Roma
> Italy
>
> tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
> fax: +39-068307-4200
> cell: +39-335-7542-567
>
> skype: depa01
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Stefano De Panfilis
> Chief Innovation Officer
> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
> via Riccardo Morandi 32
> 00148 Roma
> Italy
>
> tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
> fax: +39-068307-4200
> cell: +39-335-7542-567
>
> skype: depa01
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Stefano De Panfilis
> Chief Innovation Officer
> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
> via Riccardo Morandi 32
> 00148 Roma
> Italy
>
> tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
> fax: +39-068307-4200
> cell: +39-335-7542-567
>
> skype: depa01
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
> situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>



-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20140331/465ca8fe/attachment.html>