From mev at tid.es Fri May 2 08:15:23 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 06:15:23 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile Dynamic: Closing Sprint 3.4.1 - OUTCOME
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE353DB@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
Find below the outcome of closing Sprint 3.4.1.
Main conclusion: very low activity.
Data seems the most active chapter - and MiWi the less active
I'll be moving some GEIs from active to on-hold status.
Apps
[cid:image001.png at 01CF65DC.B07A0170]
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3876/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140430.xlsx
Cloud
[cid:image002.png at 01CF65DC.B07A0170]
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3877/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140430.xlsx
IoT
[cid:image003.png at 01CF65DD.020F03F0]
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3878/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140430.xlsx
Data
[cid:image004.png at 01CF65DD.020F03F0]
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3879/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140430.xlsx
I2ND
[cid:image005.png at 01CF65DD.E6818760]
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3880/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140430.xlsx
Security
[cid:image006.png at 01CF65DD.E6818760]
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3881/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140430.xlsx
MiWi
[cid:image007.png at 01CF65DD.E6818760]
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3882/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140430.xlsx
Reviews
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3869/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140430.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3870/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140430.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3871/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140430.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3872/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140430.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3873/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140430.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3874/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140430.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3875/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140430.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15012 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14990 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13249 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13301 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14539 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12670 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13850 bytes
Desc: image007.png
URL:
From mev at tid.es Fri May 2 08:20:46 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 06:20:46 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content: progressing on backlog reviews
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE35407@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Alex, Thierry, Sergio and Pascal,
Let me some comments on improving reviews on your chapters backlogs:
Alex, you and Lionel could improve it significantly at this moment
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3870/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140430.xlsx
Thierry, do you need any help with this?
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3871/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140430.xlsx
Sergio, I recommend contacting Boris management.
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3872/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140430.xlsx
Pascal, I recommend contacting Daniel management.
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3874/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140430.xlsx
If anything please don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Fri May 2 09:29:08 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 07:29:08 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile dynamic: Planning Sprint 3.4.2 - deadline 7.May
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE35435@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
As you know we enter the period to plan sprint 3.4.2.
So please, define new backlog items if needed, and proceed to schedule them to Sprint 3.4.2
Find below new dashboards and reviews created with current time perspective
DASHBOARDS
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3883/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3884/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3885/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3886/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3887/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3888/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3889/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140502.xlsx
REVIEWS
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3890/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3891/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3892/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3893/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3894/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3895/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140502.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3896/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140502.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Mon May 5 09:10:07 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 07:10:07 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Weekly meeting - Canceled
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE357CE@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear WP Leaders and Architects,
Since Juanjo and Miguel don't seem to be able to attend today's meeting I'd cancel it unless you request not to.
For the topics I'm leading, have below my comments:
Topics:
Backlog: On my side I'd already sent information about it on Friday.
SoTA: I've got all contributions. It's pending on me to integrate them all.
Open Specs: Please, update weekly progress on the dashboard.
Deliveries:
? D10.1.3 should have been delivered last 30.May - Stefano?
? A great amount of deliverables should have been ready for delivery last Wednesday. It's important to deliver them as soon as possible. Have below report for delivery awareness.
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3900/FIWARE.DeliveryAwareness.20140505.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon May 5 15:44:12 2014
From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis)
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 15:44:12 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: [CFP] SeaClouds - First workshop on seamless
adaptive multi-cloud management of service-based applications
In-Reply-To: <2832be8444ac6ce2cad524d9e07698bf.squirrel@oldwww.di.unipi.it>
References: <2832be8444ac6ce2cad524d9e07698bf.squirrel@oldwww.di.unipi.it>
Message-ID:
dear all,
normally i do not do this, but i guess this ws is a good opportunity for
dissemintaion of fi-ware approach and technologies in an almost academic
ws: challenging but worth to submit there.
i guess tid and/or cloud chapter to lead.
ciao,
stefano
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: 2014-05-05 9:51 GMT+02:00
Subject: [CFP] SeaClouds - First workshop on seamless adaptive multi-cloud
management of service-based applications
To:
=========================================================================
SeaClouds - First workshop on seamless adaptive multi-cloud management of
service-based applications
Held in conjunction with ESOCC 2014
September 2, 2014
Manchester, UK
http://seaclouds.lcc.uma.es
Paper submission: May 30th, 2014
=========================================================================
Deploying and managing in an efficient and adaptive way complex
service-based applications across multiple heterogeneous clouds is one of
the problems that have emerged with the cloud revolution. The current lack
of universally accepted standards supporting cloud interoperability is
severely affecting the portability of cloud-based applications across
different platforms.
The objective of the workshop is to provide a forum to discuss problems,
solutions and perspectives of the ongoing research activities aimed at
enabling an efficient and adaptive management of service-based
applications across multiple clouds.
The workshop is promoted by the ongoing European research project
EC-FP7-ICT-610531 SeaClouds (http://www.seaclouds-project.eu/), whose
ultimate objective is to enable a seamless adaptive multi-cloud management
of complex applications by supporting the distribution, monitoring and
migration of application modules over multiple heterogeneous clouds.
------------------
Topics of interest
------------------
A non-exhaustive list of the topics of interest for the workshop is: -
Design of portable multi-cloud applications
- Analysis of multi-cloud application specifications
- Discovery of cloud services
- Adaptive deployment of multi-cloud applications
- Efficient monitoring of multi-cloud applications
- Adaptive reconfiguration of multi-cloud applications
- Controlled migration of application modules across multiple clouds -
Emerging standards supporting multi-cloud application management - Case
studies and best practices in multi-cloud applications
---------------------
Submission Guidelines
---------------------
Authors are invited to submit original, previously unpublished research
papers, position papers and papers describing work in progress. Regular
papers must not exceed 12 pages, whereas position papers and papers
describing work in progress must not exceed 8 pages. All contributions
should be written in English in the LNCS format. Contributions can be
submitted in PDF format through the EasyChair conference management tool
(EasyChair submission system,
https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=seaclouds2014).For formatting
instructions and templates please see the Information for LNCS authors in
Springer website
http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-6-793341-0.
The workshop proceedings will be published in the Springer's
Communications in Computer and Information Science series. Moreover,
subject to the number and quality of contributions, a journal special
issue with a selection of the best papers will be organised.
---------------
Important Dates
---------------
- Submission deadline: May 30th, 2014
- Notification deadline: June 30th, 2014
- Camera-ready due: July 15th, 2014
------------
Organization
------------
Program Chairs
- Antonio Brogi, University of Pisa, Italy
- Ernesto Pimentel, University of Malaga, Spain
Program Committee
- Marcos Almeida, Softeam, France
- Jorge Cardoso, University of Coimbra, Portugal
- Martin Chapman, Oracle, Ireland
- Javier Cubo, University of Malaga, Spain
- Tommaso Cucinotta, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent, Ireland
- Francesco D?ndria, ATOS, Spain
- Elisabetta Di Nitto, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
- Christoph Fehling, University of Stuttgart, Germany
- Nicolas Ferry, SINTEF, Norway
- Alex Heneveld, Cloudsoft, U.K.
- Simon Moser, IBM, Germany
- Dana Petcu, West University of Timisoara, Romania
- Achim Streit, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
- PengWei Wang, University of Pisa, Italy
Publicity chair
- Michela Fazzolari, University of Pisa, Italy
Webmaster
- Adrian Nieto, University of Malaga, Spain
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From nuria.delama at atos.net Mon May 5 19:20:42 2014
From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria)
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 17:20:42 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Updates on ECFI2_Concept,
programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE
NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Dear all,
I have sent this e-mail already two times.
I really need feedback from FI-WARE. In fact, the agenda was circulated to the SB of the FI PPP as it was because there was no answer from us to increase our visibility.
It is important that you provide your views on this, since FI-WARE will have to face another big payment to contribute to the organization of ECFI2. Furthermore it is expected that we have a stand, but they mentioned explicitly that they expect demos and more active participation from the colleagues, since it was clear that in the last edition we failed to send technical people to show "GE in practice". Still I think it was useful and some good connections were established, besides the fact that the EC and all the attendees got a good impression of us. This I very important to convince people, to get credibility in the community.
I agree that if we look at potential commercial customers, this is not our community, but we cannot forget that the immediate responsibility of FI-WARE and the follow up projects is based on supporting SMEs and accelerators.
Check the attachments I sent in my previous e-mails and please, read the e-mail below (already forwarded) and come back with answers to the important points.
One essential thing for me is knowing which resources we can count on for demos and stand, taking into consideration that the previous week there will be the Campus party.
There is a Steering Board tomorrow and a DWG teleconference in few days. No position from FI-WARE?
Thanks in advance, Nuria
From: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:55 PM
To: fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org)
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
Importance: High
Dear colleagues from PCC
CC: Comms
Following my previous e-mail let me update you on some discussions happening in the Organizing committee of ECFI2, the FI PPP event that will be organized in September 2014 in Munich.
I am part of this OC in order to represent FI-WARE in the discussions and help in the organization; today I had my first long teleconference with them and I can already share some information with you.
Let me attach:
? Concept of the event
? Current version of the programme
? Budget (please, keep it confidential)
All this was defined before I joined the OC. Now, I have "voice" in the group, and I would like to circulate some questions for which I would like to get a commonly agreed position:
? Are we in favor of having a fee? This will probably be defined depending on the typology of organization or may be related to the attendance to different parts to ensure that this is not a barrier for SMEs. IMHO there should be a not-too-high fee to ensure that we avoid the no-shows, as it happened in ECFI1
? As in ECFI1, FI-WARE is expected to contribute financially to the event. As you can see in the budget, the expected figure is 15.000 euro approx.
? Check the current agenda. In the discussion today we talked about the possibility of including a slot devoted to FI-WARE and FI-LAB (FI-OPS?) before the Phase 3 session. The programme is so compressed that it is difficult to figure out how to accommodate more contents, but of course it is important that FI-WARE increases its visibility. Think on how to link this with winners of the next Campus Party and practical examples on how to successfully use FI-LAB.
? It is also expected that FI-WARE sets up a booth, as in ECFI1, but we should focus on running demos
Please, send your comments and suggestions as soon as possible to me and not later than next week. I will inform the OC and will speed up the integration of our ideas into the process.
Best regards,
Nuria de Lama
Research & Innovation
Representative to the European Commission
M +34 680645692
T +34 91214 9321
F +34 91754 3252
nuria.delama at atos.net
Albarrac?n 25
28037 Madrid
Spain
www.atosresearch.eu
es.atos.net
[cid:image002.png at 01CF6896.F5E7DC70]
IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net
The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 159 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 958 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
From philipp.slusallek at dfki.de Mon May 5 21:12:05 2014
From: philipp.slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek)
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 21:12:05 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] Updates on ECFI2_Concept,
programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE
NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Message-ID: <5367E285.7080302@dfki.de>
Hi all ,
Nuria, since you insist, let me share my point of view that we should
really go to where our customers/developers already are!
We should present FI-PPP at well-established events instead of
organizing our own events where it is difficult to attract the relevant
customers/developers and we end up being largely among ourselves. Last
ECFI, we even started by asking them to pay for the privilege to talk to
us :-).
On the other hand, a positive example was our one-day booth during CeBIT
(full disclosure, I suggested and helped organize this event). Even
though it was a first time experiment and we had issues getting all
partners to plan their contribution in time, we have been able to
address many, many more people from the Real World (TM) than would ever
have been possible at ECFI. And the cost was rather low as well -- much,
much lower than what I have heard from ECFI.
For ECFI in Brussels, I could at least see the point of enabling direct
contact with commission and political people (which did work to some
degree, at least). But even that point is not relevant for other
locations. Maybe, I am missing something, but so far I have not seen a
convincing concept that would even get us close to the number of
developers and business people we have been able to meet in the one day
event at CeBIT.
I would suggest that with the experience from CeBIT it would be
significantly more useful to spend the money we have left on an extended
and better prepared presence at CeBIT next year. This could include more
technical content; more, better, and larger integrated demos of FI-PPP
functionality; developer seminars; hackathons; and others. The CeBIT
organizers would even be interested in supporting us in order to attract
even larger crowds of business related developers to CeBIT (BTW, DFKI
would certainly be willing to help organize the event again).
I am sure for other domains, similar events exist that we could target
in the mean time.
I should probably add that this view is consensus also in FIcontent.
Besides CeBIT as a developer event, FIcontent is now also focusing on
events that provide direct contact with end users and enable us to
perform large-scale experiments. This may not be as relevant for
FI-WARE/FI-Core, but then -- I could see a positive point there as well.
Best,
Philipp
Am 05.05.2014 19:20, schrieb De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria:
> Dear all,
>
> I have sent this e-mail already two times.
>
> *_I really need feedback from FI-WARE_*. In fact, the agenda was
> circulated to the SB of the FI PPP as it was because there was no answer
> from us to increase our visibility.
>
> It is important that you provide your views on this, since FI-WARE will
> have to face another big payment to contribute to the organization of
> ECFI2. Furthermore it is expected that we have a stand, but they
> mentioned explicitly that they expect demos and more active
> participation from the colleagues, since it was clear that in the last
> edition we failed to send technical people to show ?GE in practice?.
> Still I think it was useful and some good connections were established,
> besides the fact that the EC and all the attendees got a good impression
> of us. This I very important to convince people, to get credibility in
> the community.
>
> I agree that if we look at potential commercial customers, this is not
> our community, but we cannot forget that the immediate responsibility of
> FI-WARE and the follow up projects is based on supporting SMEs and
> accelerators.
>
> Check the attachments I sent in my previous e-mails and please, read the
> e-mail below (already forwarded) and come back with answers to the
> important points.
>
> *_One essential thing for me is knowing which resources we can count on
> for demos and stand, taking into consideration that the previous week
> there will be the Campus party_*.
>
> There is a Steering Board tomorrow and a DWG teleconference in few days.
> No position from FI-WARE?
>
> Thanks in advance, Nuria
>
> *From:*De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:55 PM
> *To:* fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org)
> *Cc:* fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
> *Subject:* Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
> *Importance:* High
>
> Dear colleagues from PCC
>
> CC: Comms
>
> Following my previous e-mail let me update you on some discussions
> happening in the Organizing committee of ECFI2, the FI PPP event that
> will be organized in September 2014 in Munich.
>
> I am part of this OC in order to represent FI-WARE in the discussions
> and help in the organization; today I had my first long teleconference
> with them and I can already share some information with you.
>
> Let me attach:
>
> ?Concept of the event
>
> ?Current version of the programme
>
> ?Budget (please, keep it confidential)
>
> All this was defined before I joined the OC. Now, I have ?voice? in the
> group, and I would like to circulate some questions for which I would
> like to get a commonly agreed position:
>
> ?Are we in favor of *having a fee?* This will probably be defined
> depending on the typology of organization or may be related to the
> attendance to different parts to ensure that this is not a barrier for
> SMEs. IMHO there should be a not-too-high fee to ensure that we avoid
> the no-shows, as it happened in ECFI1
>
> ?As in ECFI1, FI-WARE is expected to contribute financially to the
> event. As you can see in the budget*, the expected figure is 15.000 euro
> approx*.
>
> ?*Check the current agenda*. In the discussion today we talked about the
> possibility of including a slot devoted to FI-WARE and FI-LAB (FI-OPS?)
> before the Phase 3 session. The programme is so compressed that it is
> difficult to figure out how to accommodate more contents, but of course
> it is important that FI-WARE increases its visibility. Think on how to
> link this with winners of the next Campus Party and practical examples
> on how to successfully use FI-LAB.
>
> ?It is also expected that FI-WARE sets up a booth, as in ECFI1, but we
> should focus on running demos
>
> Please, send your comments and suggestions as soon as possible to me and
> not later than next week. I will inform the OC and will speed up the
> integration of our ideas into the process.
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Nuria de Lama*
>
> Research & Innovation
>
> Representative to the European Commission
>
> M +34 680645692
>
> T +34 91214 9321
>
> F +34 91754 3252
>
> nuria.delama at atos.net
>
> Albarrac?n 25
>
> 28037 Madrid
>
> Spain
>
> www.atosresearch.eu
>
> es.atos.net
>
> *IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail
> address nuria.delama at atos.net *
>
> *The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpa mailing list
> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpa
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
Gesch?ftsf?hrung:
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313)
USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: philipp_slusallek.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Tue May 6 09:53:59 2014
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 07:53:59 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept,
programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE
NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Message-ID: <24180_1399362840_53689518_24180_1044_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C5136@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Hi Nuria,
I have transferred your email to the IoT team pushing for a light demo showing IoT GEs. I am in favor of light demos, not a complete one as we used for reviews, more something demonstrating that we have something running well in the different technical chapters.
I also answer your email to launch the discussion between FI-WARE partners because we missed the point from your first alert.
BR
Thierry
De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Envoy? : lundi 5 mai 2014 19:21
? : fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc : fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Importance : Haute
Dear all,
I have sent this e-mail already two times.
I really need feedback from FI-WARE. In fact, the agenda was circulated to the SB of the FI PPP as it was because there was no answer from us to increase our visibility.
It is important that you provide your views on this, since FI-WARE will have to face another big payment to contribute to the organization of ECFI2. Furthermore it is expected that we have a stand, but they mentioned explicitly that they expect demos and more active participation from the colleagues, since it was clear that in the last edition we failed to send technical people to show "GE in practice". Still I think it was useful and some good connections were established, besides the fact that the EC and all the attendees got a good impression of us. This I very important to convince people, to get credibility in the community.
I agree that if we look at potential commercial customers, this is not our community, but we cannot forget that the immediate responsibility of FI-WARE and the follow up projects is based on supporting SMEs and accelerators.
Check the attachments I sent in my previous e-mails and please, read the e-mail below (already forwarded) and come back with answers to the important points.
One essential thing for me is knowing which resources we can count on for demos and stand, taking into consideration that the previous week there will be the Campus party.
There is a Steering Board tomorrow and a DWG teleconference in few days. No position from FI-WARE?
Thanks in advance, Nuria
From: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:55 PM
To: fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org)
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
Importance: High
Dear colleagues from PCC
CC: Comms
Following my previous e-mail let me update you on some discussions happening in the Organizing committee of ECFI2, the FI PPP event that will be organized in September 2014 in Munich.
I am part of this OC in order to represent FI-WARE in the discussions and help in the organization; today I had my first long teleconference with them and I can already share some information with you.
Let me attach:
? Concept of the event
? Current version of the programme
? Budget (please, keep it confidential)
All this was defined before I joined the OC. Now, I have "voice" in the group, and I would like to circulate some questions for which I would like to get a commonly agreed position:
? Are we in favor of having a fee? This will probably be defined depending on the typology of organization or may be related to the attendance to different parts to ensure that this is not a barrier for SMEs. IMHO there should be a not-too-high fee to ensure that we avoid the no-shows, as it happened in ECFI1
? As in ECFI1, FI-WARE is expected to contribute financially to the event. As you can see in the budget, the expected figure is 15.000 euro approx.
? Check the current agenda. In the discussion today we talked about the possibility of including a slot devoted to FI-WARE and FI-LAB (FI-OPS?) before the Phase 3 session. The programme is so compressed that it is difficult to figure out how to accommodate more contents, but of course it is important that FI-WARE increases its visibility. Think on how to link this with winners of the next Campus Party and practical examples on how to successfully use FI-LAB.
? It is also expected that FI-WARE sets up a booth, as in ECFI1, but we should focus on running demos
Please, send your comments and suggestions as soon as possible to me and not later than next week. I will inform the OC and will speed up the integration of our ideas into the process.
Best regards,
Nuria de Lama
Research & Innovation
Representative to the European Commission
M +34 680645692
T +34 91214 9321
F +34 91754 3252
nuria.delama at atos.net
Albarrac?n 25
28037 Madrid
Spain
www.atosresearch.eu
es.atos.net
[cid:image002.png at 01CF6911.19D4CA10]
IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net
The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 159 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 958 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
From nuria.delama at atos.net Tue May 6 13:03:38 2014
From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 11:03:38 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept,
programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE
NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
In-Reply-To: <24180_1399362840_53689518_24180_1044_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C5136@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
<24180_1399362840_53689518_24180_1044_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C5136@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098A45@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Thanks for your answer Thierry and thanks to Philipp for his comments.
CEBIT is clearly one of the major targets for 2015 and some info has been circulated already in the DWG about that.
However, those events that are targeting ?real potential customers? are compatible with the other ones. And I think there is no choice for us. Since it is a FI PPP event, FI-WARE has to be present and contribute, not only in terms of contents, but also financially (something stated by the EC too). There is no other way.
The problem I see is that no one in the project reacts early enough for us to have good visibility. I try for FI-WARE to be present everywhere but then, I cannot always propose sessions myself, a booth, demo whatever without the commitment of having people and resources to prepare it.
For this specific case FI-WARE appears in one of the speeches, since Juanjo was invited for that purpose. But it we are going t pay for it, the idea would be at least to maximize the opportunities for us and be more active. In this case I only said that FI-WARE would go for a booth, but could not provide specific elements since I know that there will be Campus Party just before ECFI2 and I do not want to commit to something I cannot guarantee.
Let me clarify that the idea is that this event is more industrial, targeting around 500 people max (not sure if this is feasible, but it will be the ambition) and will also involve SMEs as an opportunity for accelerators to communicate their calls.
This is what has been proposed to the Steering Board today:
The event would be organized in three parts: Core conference day 1
Networking session/dinner day 1 (evening), and
Techno Brunch in BMW day 2
The project contributions are towards the fixed costs. The networking session is expected to be self-financing and the Techno Brunch has some fixed costs (but sponsorship from BMW is being sought).
And based on the three financial scenarios suggested, most projects are in favor of this one:
500 paying participants, total budget: ?231k, participant registration fee as below,
FI-PPP project contributions: phase-2 projects (6x ?10k), phase-3 accelerator projects (16x ?2k), and CONCORD (?47k)
1. Participation fee for conference on day 1 (not incl. VAT): 96 ?
2. Participation fee for networking session/dinner on day 1 (not incl. VAT): 127 ?
3. Participation fee for Techno Brunch (not incl. VAT): 53 ?
Numbers will be worked out a bit more, but the scenario has such has just been approved by the FI PPP SB.
I hope it helps. Nuria
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:54 AM
To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: RE: [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Hi Nuria,
I have transferred your email to the IoT team pushing for a light demo showing IoT GEs. I am in favor of light demos, not a complete one as we used for reviews, more something demonstrating that we have something running well in the different technical chapters.
I also answer your email to launch the discussion between FI-WARE partners because we missed the point from your first alert.
BR
Thierry
De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Envoy? : lundi 5 mai 2014 19:21
? : fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc : fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Importance : Haute
Dear all,
I have sent this e-mail already two times.
I really need feedback from FI-WARE. In fact, the agenda was circulated to the SB of the FI PPP as it was because there was no answer from us to increase our visibility.
It is important that you provide your views on this, since FI-WARE will have to face another big payment to contribute to the organization of ECFI2. Furthermore it is expected that we have a stand, but they mentioned explicitly that they expect demos and more active participation from the colleagues, since it was clear that in the last edition we failed to send technical people to show ?GE in practice?. Still I think it was useful and some good connections were established, besides the fact that the EC and all the attendees got a good impression of us. This I very important to convince people, to get credibility in the community.
I agree that if we look at potential commercial customers, this is not our community, but we cannot forget that the immediate responsibility of FI-WARE and the follow up projects is based on supporting SMEs and accelerators.
Check the attachments I sent in my previous e-mails and please, read the e-mail below (already forwarded) and come back with answers to the important points.
One essential thing for me is knowing which resources we can count on for demos and stand, taking into consideration that the previous week there will be the Campus party.
There is a Steering Board tomorrow and a DWG teleconference in few days. No position from FI-WARE?
Thanks in advance, Nuria
From: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:55 PM
To: fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org)
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
Importance: High
Dear colleagues from PCC
CC: Comms
Following my previous e-mail let me update you on some discussions happening in the Organizing committee of ECFI2, the FI PPP event that will be organized in September 2014 in Munich.
I am part of this OC in order to represent FI-WARE in the discussions and help in the organization; today I had my first long teleconference with them and I can already share some information with you.
Let me attach:
? Concept of the event
? Current version of the programme
? Budget (please, keep it confidential)
All this was defined before I joined the OC. Now, I have ?voice? in the group, and I would like to circulate some questions for which I would like to get a commonly agreed position:
? Are we in favor of having a fee? This will probably be defined depending on the typology of organization or may be related to the attendance to different parts to ensure that this is not a barrier for SMEs. IMHO there should be a not-too-high fee to ensure that we avoid the no-shows, as it happened in ECFI1
? As in ECFI1, FI-WARE is expected to contribute financially to the event. As you can see in the budget, the expected figure is 15.000 euro approx.
? Check the current agenda. In the discussion today we talked about the possibility of including a slot devoted to FI-WARE and FI-LAB (FI-OPS?) before the Phase 3 session. The programme is so compressed that it is difficult to figure out how to accommodate more contents, but of course it is important that FI-WARE increases its visibility. Think on how to link this with winners of the next Campus Party and practical examples on how to successfully use FI-LAB.
? It is also expected that FI-WARE sets up a booth, as in ECFI1, but we should focus on running demos
Please, send your comments and suggestions as soon as possible to me and not later than next week. I will inform the OC and will speed up the integration of our ideas into the process.
Best regards,
Nuria de Lama
Research & Innovation
Representative to the European Commission
M +34 680645692
T +34 91214 9321
F +34 91754 3252
nuria.delama at atos.net
Albarrac?n 25
28037 Madrid
Spain
www.atosresearch.eu
es.atos.net
[cid:image002.png at 01CF692B.73A04FF0]
IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net
The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 159 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 958 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
From jhierro at tid.es Tue May 6 13:35:52 2014
From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro)
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 13:35:52 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Members of the jury for second round of FI-WARE
Challenges (Smart Society and FI-WARE Excellence challenges)
Message-ID: <5368C918.7070705@tid.es>
Hi all,
Please note that this mail will translate into your involvement as member of the jury of the FI-WARE Challenges, so please read it carefully.
As you know, there were two FI-WARE challenges that were launched in February targeted to select the best Smart Society applications (applications pursuing societal benefits) and the best applications which make use of FI-WARE technologies.
Selection of good applications in the first two FI-WARE Challenges launched last year (Smart Cities and Smart Business) has been instrumental in spreading the word that FI-WARE technologies can really made impact. Therefore, we should spend the necessary resources to carry out a good selection process.
As in the first two FI-WARE Challenges, the selection process will be carried out in two phases. The first one will end up selecting the 20 best applicants who submit a proposal. Applicants submitted their proposals last April 24 and now we have to carry out the selection of the best 20 applicants who will go to the finals which will be run in the Campus Party Europe event that will take place second week of September.
300 applicants submitted a proposal to the Smart Society challenge while 126 applicants submitted a proposal to the Smart Society challenge (bear in mind, though that all people from the thematic challenges that will get a score 7 or higher will qualify to be one of the 20 finalists of the FI-WARE Excellence challenge, therefore we don't need to select 20)
We need volunteers for being members of the jury of the first phase of the Smart Society and FI-WARE Excellence challenges. This time, we don't have to carry out this evaluation during the Christmas holidays as with the first two FI-WARE Challenges :-) but we need to get it solved during May. Therefore, unless a rather good excuse, we count that all WPLs will become part of the jury, namely:
* Alex Glikson
* Sergio Garc?a
* Thierry Nagellen
* Pier Garino
* Pascal Bisson
* Christof Marti
* Stefano de Panfilis
* Davide Dalle Carbonare
* myself
I would also like to invite:
* Javier Soriano
* Philipp Slusallek
* someone from Kurento
* Thomas Bohnert
* Francisco Romero
* Ferm?n Gal?n
* Carlos Ralli (if he is available, since he is in paternity leaving until May 12)
There will be another two jury members proposed by Futura.
I will forward an invitation to the whole FI-WARE consortia looking for additional volunteers (the more we have, the less work each of us will have :-)
Best regards,
-- Juanjo
-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es
email: jhierro at tid.es
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro
FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
and Chief Architect
FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman
You can follow FI-WARE at:
website: http://www.fi-ware.eu
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware
linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Tue May 6 14:54:05 2014
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 12:54:05 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept,
programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE
NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098A45@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
<24180_1399362840_53689518_24180_1044_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C5136@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
<79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098A45@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Message-ID: <18859_1399380847_5368DB6E_18859_2266_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C64A7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Hi Nuria, all,
I think that each WPL/WPA has to discuss this point to come with a proposal for very short and precise demos and also an idea of which partners could manage it in Munich. We know very well that the same partners are always doing communication but in this case we need also some GEis owners who could do some marketing and provide a larger vision that the use of their own GEi, at least provide a vision for the technical chapter or for a subset of GEs of a technical chapter (I have in mind WP6 with many GEs so not sure it is easy for a developer to cover everything)
We had in Brussels some 3rd parties and industrials who were interested in targeted technical subjects so from my point of view it is better to have ?several? small demos focusing on technical demo of a subset of GEs.
This point will be discuss tomorrow during the IoT weekly meeting.
BR
Thierry
De : De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria [mailto:nuria.delama at atos.net]
Envoy? : mardi 6 mai 2014 13:04
? : NAGELLEN Thierry IMT/OLPS; fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc : fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : RE: [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Thanks for your answer Thierry and thanks to Philipp for his comments.
CEBIT is clearly one of the major targets for 2015 and some info has been circulated already in the DWG about that.
However, those events that are targeting ?real potential customers? are compatible with the other ones. And I think there is no choice for us. Since it is a FI PPP event, FI-WARE has to be present and contribute, not only in terms of contents, but also financially (something stated by the EC too). There is no other way.
The problem I see is that no one in the project reacts early enough for us to have good visibility. I try for FI-WARE to be present everywhere but then, I cannot always propose sessions myself, a booth, demo whatever without the commitment of having people and resources to prepare it.
For this specific case FI-WARE appears in one of the speeches, since Juanjo was invited for that purpose. But it we are going t pay for it, the idea would be at least to maximize the opportunities for us and be more active. In this case I only said that FI-WARE would go for a booth, but could not provide specific elements since I know that there will be Campus Party just before ECFI2 and I do not want to commit to something I cannot guarantee.
Let me clarify that the idea is that this event is more industrial, targeting around 500 people max (not sure if this is feasible, but it will be the ambition) and will also involve SMEs as an opportunity for accelerators to communicate their calls.
This is what has been proposed to the Steering Board today:
The event would be organized in three parts: Core conference day 1
Networking session/dinner day 1 (evening), and
Techno Brunch in BMW day 2
The project contributions are towards the fixed costs. The networking session is expected to be self-financing and the Techno Brunch has some fixed costs (but sponsorship from BMW is being sought).
And based on the three financial scenarios suggested, most projects are in favor of this one:
500 paying participants, total budget: ?231k, participant registration fee as below,
FI-PPP project contributions: phase-2 projects (6x ?10k), phase-3 accelerator projects (16x ?2k), and CONCORD (?47k)
1. Participation fee for conference on day 1 (not incl. VAT): 96 ?
2. Participation fee for networking session/dinner on day 1 (not incl. VAT): 127 ?
3. Participation fee for Techno Brunch (not incl. VAT): 53 ?
Numbers will be worked out a bit more, but the scenario has such has just been approved by the FI PPP SB.
I hope it helps. Nuria
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:54 AM
To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: RE: [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Hi Nuria,
I have transferred your email to the IoT team pushing for a light demo showing IoT GEs. I am in favor of light demos, not a complete one as we used for reviews, more something demonstrating that we have something running well in the different technical chapters.
I also answer your email to launch the discussion between FI-WARE partners because we missed the point from your first alert.
BR
Thierry
De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Envoy? : lundi 5 mai 2014 19:21
? : fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc : fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Importance : Haute
Dear all,
I have sent this e-mail already two times.
I really need feedback from FI-WARE. In fact, the agenda was circulated to the SB of the FI PPP as it was because there was no answer from us to increase our visibility.
It is important that you provide your views on this, since FI-WARE will have to face another big payment to contribute to the organization of ECFI2. Furthermore it is expected that we have a stand, but they mentioned explicitly that they expect demos and more active participation from the colleagues, since it was clear that in the last edition we failed to send technical people to show ?GE in practice?. Still I think it was useful and some good connections were established, besides the fact that the EC and all the attendees got a good impression of us. This I very important to convince people, to get credibility in the community.
I agree that if we look at potential commercial customers, this is not our community, but we cannot forget that the immediate responsibility of FI-WARE and the follow up projects is based on supporting SMEs and accelerators.
Check the attachments I sent in my previous e-mails and please, read the e-mail below (already forwarded) and come back with answers to the important points.
One essential thing for me is knowing which resources we can count on for demos and stand, taking into consideration that the previous week there will be the Campus party.
There is a Steering Board tomorrow and a DWG teleconference in few days. No position from FI-WARE?
Thanks in advance, Nuria
From: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:55 PM
To: fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org)
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
Importance: High
Dear colleagues from PCC
CC: Comms
Following my previous e-mail let me update you on some discussions happening in the Organizing committee of ECFI2, the FI PPP event that will be organized in September 2014 in Munich.
I am part of this OC in order to represent FI-WARE in the discussions and help in the organization; today I had my first long teleconference with them and I can already share some information with you.
Let me attach:
? Concept of the event
? Current version of the programme
? Budget (please, keep it confidential)
All this was defined before I joined the OC. Now, I have ?voice? in the group, and I would like to circulate some questions for which I would like to get a commonly agreed position:
? Are we in favor of having a fee? This will probably be defined depending on the typology of organization or may be related to the attendance to different parts to ensure that this is not a barrier for SMEs. IMHO there should be a not-too-high fee to ensure that we avoid the no-shows, as it happened in ECFI1
? As in ECFI1, FI-WARE is expected to contribute financially to the event. As you can see in the budget, the expected figure is 15.000 euro approx.
? Check the current agenda. In the discussion today we talked about the possibility of including a slot devoted to FI-WARE and FI-LAB (FI-OPS?) before the Phase 3 session. The programme is so compressed that it is difficult to figure out how to accommodate more contents, but of course it is important that FI-WARE increases its visibility. Think on how to link this with winners of the next Campus Party and practical examples on how to successfully use FI-LAB.
? It is also expected that FI-WARE sets up a booth, as in ECFI1, but we should focus on running demos
Please, send your comments and suggestions as soon as possible to me and not later than next week. I will inform the OC and will speed up the integration of our ideas into the process.
Best regards,
Nuria de Lama
Research & Innovation
Representative to the European Commission
M +34 680645692
T +34 91214 9321
F +34 91754 3252
nuria.delama at atos.net
Albarrac?n 25
28037 Madrid
Spain
www.atosresearch.eu
es.atos.net
[cid:image002.png at 01CF693A.1AE33030]
IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net
The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 159 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 958 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
From nuria.delama at atos.net Tue May 6 15:27:50 2014
From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 13:27:50 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept,
programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE
NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
In-Reply-To: <18859_1399380847_5368DB6E_18859_2266_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C64A7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
<24180_1399362840_53689518_24180_1044_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C5136@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
<79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098A45@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
<18859_1399380847_5368DB6E_18859_2266_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C64A7@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098CF5@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
That is great Thierry. I fully agree with that.
Now, let me take advantage to tell you that I had an exchange of mails today with XIFI and they will propose a session to be jointly organized with us. This will allow us to have a bit more of visibility.
It is independent on the demos and the booth. They committed to send a description to me today. Then, we will have to provide the Organizing Committee with an agreed version tomorrow or Thursday maximum. Being that the case I would suggest you to share your ideas on which topics an what kind of structure we would like for such a workshop, in case we finally succeed.
Thanks!! Nuria
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 2:54 PM
To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: RE: [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Hi Nuria, all,
I think that each WPL/WPA has to discuss this point to come with a proposal for very short and precise demos and also an idea of which partners could manage it in Munich. We know very well that the same partners are always doing communication but in this case we need also some GEis owners who could do some marketing and provide a larger vision that the use of their own GEi, at least provide a vision for the technical chapter or for a subset of GEs of a technical chapter (I have in mind WP6 with many GEs so not sure it is easy for a developer to cover everything)
We had in Brussels some 3rd parties and industrials who were interested in targeted technical subjects so from my point of view it is better to have ?several? small demos focusing on technical demo of a subset of GEs.
This point will be discuss tomorrow during the IoT weekly meeting.
BR
Thierry
De : De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria [mailto:nuria.delama at atos.net]
Envoy? : mardi 6 mai 2014 13:04
? : NAGELLEN Thierry IMT/OLPS; fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc : fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : RE: [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Thanks for your answer Thierry and thanks to Philipp for his comments.
CEBIT is clearly one of the major targets for 2015 and some info has been circulated already in the DWG about that.
However, those events that are targeting ?real potential customers? are compatible with the other ones. And I think there is no choice for us. Since it is a FI PPP event, FI-WARE has to be present and contribute, not only in terms of contents, but also financially (something stated by the EC too). There is no other way.
The problem I see is that no one in the project reacts early enough for us to have good visibility. I try for FI-WARE to be present everywhere but then, I cannot always propose sessions myself, a booth, demo whatever without the commitment of having people and resources to prepare it.
For this specific case FI-WARE appears in one of the speeches, since Juanjo was invited for that purpose. But it we are going t pay for it, the idea would be at least to maximize the opportunities for us and be more active. In this case I only said that FI-WARE would go for a booth, but could not provide specific elements since I know that there will be Campus Party just before ECFI2 and I do not want to commit to something I cannot guarantee.
Let me clarify that the idea is that this event is more industrial, targeting around 500 people max (not sure if this is feasible, but it will be the ambition) and will also involve SMEs as an opportunity for accelerators to communicate their calls.
This is what has been proposed to the Steering Board today:
The event would be organized in three parts: Core conference day 1
Networking session/dinner day 1 (evening), and
Techno Brunch in BMW day 2
The project contributions are towards the fixed costs. The networking session is expected to be self-financing and the Techno Brunch has some fixed costs (but sponsorship from BMW is being sought).
And based on the three financial scenarios suggested, most projects are in favor of this one:
500 paying participants, total budget: ?231k, participant registration fee as below,
FI-PPP project contributions: phase-2 projects (6x ?10k), phase-3 accelerator projects (16x ?2k), and CONCORD (?47k)
1. Participation fee for conference on day 1 (not incl. VAT): 96 ?
2. Participation fee for networking session/dinner on day 1 (not incl. VAT): 127 ?
3. Participation fee for Techno Brunch (not incl. VAT): 53 ?
Numbers will be worked out a bit more, but the scenario has such has just been approved by the FI PPP SB.
I hope it helps. Nuria
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:54 AM
To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: RE: [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Hi Nuria,
I have transferred your email to the IoT team pushing for a light demo showing IoT GEs. I am in favor of light demos, not a complete one as we used for reviews, more something demonstrating that we have something running well in the different technical chapters.
I also answer your email to launch the discussion between FI-WARE partners because we missed the point from your first alert.
BR
Thierry
De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Envoy? : lundi 5 mai 2014 19:21
? : fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc : fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Importance : Haute
Dear all,
I have sent this e-mail already two times.
I really need feedback from FI-WARE. In fact, the agenda was circulated to the SB of the FI PPP as it was because there was no answer from us to increase our visibility.
It is important that you provide your views on this, since FI-WARE will have to face another big payment to contribute to the organization of ECFI2. Furthermore it is expected that we have a stand, but they mentioned explicitly that they expect demos and more active participation from the colleagues, since it was clear that in the last edition we failed to send technical people to show ?GE in practice?. Still I think it was useful and some good connections were established, besides the fact that the EC and all the attendees got a good impression of us. This I very important to convince people, to get credibility in the community.
I agree that if we look at potential commercial customers, this is not our community, but we cannot forget that the immediate responsibility of FI-WARE and the follow up projects is based on supporting SMEs and accelerators.
Check the attachments I sent in my previous e-mails and please, read the e-mail below (already forwarded) and come back with answers to the important points.
One essential thing for me is knowing which resources we can count on for demos and stand, taking into consideration that the previous week there will be the Campus party.
There is a Steering Board tomorrow and a DWG teleconference in few days. No position from FI-WARE?
Thanks in advance, Nuria
From: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:55 PM
To: fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org)
Cc: fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
Importance: High
Dear colleagues from PCC
CC: Comms
Following my previous e-mail let me update you on some discussions happening in the Organizing committee of ECFI2, the FI PPP event that will be organized in September 2014 in Munich.
I am part of this OC in order to represent FI-WARE in the discussions and help in the organization; today I had my first long teleconference with them and I can already share some information with you.
Let me attach:
? Concept of the event
? Current version of the programme
? Budget (please, keep it confidential)
All this was defined before I joined the OC. Now, I have ?voice? in the group, and I would like to circulate some questions for which I would like to get a commonly agreed position:
? Are we in favor of having a fee? This will probably be defined depending on the typology of organization or may be related to the attendance to different parts to ensure that this is not a barrier for SMEs. IMHO there should be a not-too-high fee to ensure that we avoid the no-shows, as it happened in ECFI1
? As in ECFI1, FI-WARE is expected to contribute financially to the event. As you can see in the budget, the expected figure is 15.000 euro approx.
? Check the current agenda. In the discussion today we talked about the possibility of including a slot devoted to FI-WARE and FI-LAB (FI-OPS?) before the Phase 3 session. The programme is so compressed that it is difficult to figure out how to accommodate more contents, but of course it is important that FI-WARE increases its visibility. Think on how to link this with winners of the next Campus Party and practical examples on how to successfully use FI-LAB.
? It is also expected that FI-WARE sets up a booth, as in ECFI1, but we should focus on running demos
Please, send your comments and suggestions as soon as possible to me and not later than next week. I will inform the OC and will speed up the integration of our ideas into the process.
Best regards,
Nuria de Lama
Research & Innovation
Representative to the European Commission
M +34 680645692
T +34 91214 9321
F +34 91754 3252
nuria.delama at atos.net
Albarrac?n 25
28037 Madrid
Spain
www.atosresearch.eu
es.atos.net
[cid:image002.png at 01CF693B.79974F20]
IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail address nuria.delama at atos.net
The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 159 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 958 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue May 6 20:01:46 2014
From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 20:01:46 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Members of the jury for second round of FI-WARE
Challenges (Smart Society and FI-WARE Excellence challenges)
In-Reply-To: <5368C918.7070705@tid.es>
References: <5368C918.7070705@tid.es>
Message-ID:
dear juanjo,
happy to participate again as the previous experience, although heavy
enough, was quite interestings!
btw, i guess there is a problem with the following paragraph:
> 300 applicants submitted a proposal to the Smart Society challenge while
> 126 applicants submitted a proposal to the Smart Society challenge (bear in
> mind, though that all people from the thematic challenges that will get a
> score 7 or higher will qualify to be one of the 20 finalists of the FI-WARE
> Excellence challenge, therefore we don't need to select 20)
>
"smart society challenge" two times ....
ciao,
stefano
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From philipp.slusallek at dfki.de Wed May 7 07:12:39 2014
From: philipp.slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek)
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 07:12:39 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-wpa] [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept,
programme and budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098A45@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098293@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> <24180_1399362840_53689518_24180_1044_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C5136@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
<79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB098A45@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Message-ID: <5369C0C7.9030203@dfki.de>
Hi Nuria,
Just want to point out that WE ARE THE FI-PPP and WE are making those
choices. These should be choices that we can actually stand behind. Your
wording does not sound like this and that is what I hear from others as
well. Paying a quarter million (!) Euros for such an event when there
are (apparently better) options available seems excessive to me at least.
Anyway, that looks like spilled milk. Let's focus on making the
apparently already chosen event the best success we can!
Could someone forward the bigger story behind the event and what the
target audience is (industry, press, politics, etc.). I have not seen
this info yet (apparently only send to other lists, I am not on) and it
would be important to make the right choices what and how to present
from a WP13 point of view.
Best,
Philipp
Am 06.05.2014 13:03, schrieb De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria:
> Thanks for your answer Thierry and thanks to Philipp for his comments.
>
> CEBIT is clearly one of the major targets for 2015 and some info has
> been circulated already in the DWG about that.
>
> However, those events that are targeting ?real potential customers? are
> compatible with the other ones. And I think there is no choice for us.
> Since it is a FI PPP event, FI-WARE has to be present and contribute,
> not only in terms of contents, but also financially (something stated by
> the EC too). There is no other way.
>
> The problem I see is that no one in the project reacts early enough for
> us to have good visibility. I try for FI-WARE to be present everywhere
> but then, I cannot always propose sessions myself, a booth, demo
> whatever without the commitment of having people and resources to
> prepare it.
>
> For this specific case FI-WARE appears in one of the speeches, since
> Juanjo was invited for that purpose. But it we are going t pay for it,
> the idea would be at least to maximize the opportunities for us and be
> more active. In this case I only said that FI-WARE would go for a booth,
> but could not provide specific elements since I know that there will be
> Campus Party just before ECFI2 and I do not want to commit to something
> I cannot guarantee.
>
> Let me clarify that the idea is that this event is more industrial,
> targeting around 500 people max (not sure if this is feasible, but it
> will be the ambition) and will also involve SMEs as an opportunity for
> accelerators to communicate their calls.
>
> This is what has been proposed to the Steering Board today:
>
> The event would be organized in three parts: Core conference day 1
>
> Networking session/dinner day 1 (evening), and
>
> Techno Brunch in BMW day 2
>
> The project contributions are towards the fixed costs. The networking
> session is expected to be self-financing and the Techno Brunch has some
> fixed costs (but sponsorship from BMW is being sought).
>
> And based on the three financial scenarios suggested, most projects are
> in favor of this one:
>
> 500 paying participants, total budget: ?231k, participant
> registration fee as below,
>
> FI-PPP project contributions: phase-2 projects (6x ?10k), phase-3
> accelerator projects (16x ?2k), and CONCORD (?47k)
>
> 1. Participation fee for conference on day 1 (not incl. VAT): 96 ?
>
> 2. Participation fee for networking session/dinner on day 1 (not incl.
> VAT): 127 ?
>
> 3. Participation fee for Techno Brunch (not incl. VAT): 53 ?
>
> Numbers will be worked out a bit more, but the scenario has such has
> just been approved by the FI PPP SB.
>
> I hope it helps. Nuria
>
> *From:*thierry.nagellen at orange.com [mailto:thierry.nagellen at orange.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:54 AM
> *To:* De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org);
> fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
> *Cc:* fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
> *Subject:* RE: [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and
> budget (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
>
> Hi Nuria,
>
> I have transferred your email to the IoT team pushing for a light demo
> showing IoT GEs. I am in favor of light demos, not a complete one as we
> used for reviews, more something demonstrating that we have something
> running well in the different technical chapters.
>
> I also answer your email to launch the discussion between FI-WARE
> partners because we missed the point from your first alert.
>
> BR
>
> Thierry
>
> *De :*fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org
>
> [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *De la part de* De-Lama
> Sanchez, Nuria
> *Envoy? :* lundi 5 mai 2014 19:21
> *? :* fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org
> ); fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
> ; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
>
> *Cc :* fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
>
> *Objet :* [Fiware-pcc] Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
> (URGENT FEEDBACK FROM FI-WARE NEEDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
> *Importance :* Haute
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have sent this e-mail already two times.
>
> *_I really need feedback from FI-WARE_*. In fact, the agenda was
> circulated to the SB of the FI PPP as it was because there was no answer
> from us to increase our visibility.
>
> It is important that you provide your views on this, since FI-WARE will
> have to face another big payment to contribute to the organization of
> ECFI2. Furthermore it is expected that we have a stand, but they
> mentioned explicitly that they expect demos and more active
> participation from the colleagues, since it was clear that in the last
> edition we failed to send technical people to show ?GE in practice?.
> Still I think it was useful and some good connections were established,
> besides the fact that the EC and all the attendees got a good impression
> of us. This I very important to convince people, to get credibility in
> the community.
>
> I agree that if we look at potential commercial customers, this is not
> our community, but we cannot forget that the immediate responsibility of
> FI-WARE and the follow up projects is based on supporting SMEs and
> accelerators.
>
> Check the attachments I sent in my previous e-mails and please, read the
> e-mail below (already forwarded) and come back with answers to the
> important points.
>
> *_One essential thing for me is knowing which resources we can count on
> for demos and stand, taking into consideration that the previous week
> there will be the Campus party_*.
>
> There is a Steering Board tomorrow and a DWG teleconference in few days.
> No position from FI-WARE?
>
> Thanks in advance, Nuria
>
> *From:*De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:55 PM
> *To:* fiware-pcc (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.org
> )
> *Cc:* fiware-comms at lists.fi-ware.org
> *Subject:* Updates on ECFI2_Concept, programme and budget
> *Importance:* High
>
> Dear colleagues from PCC
>
> CC: Comms
>
> Following my previous e-mail let me update you on some discussions
> happening in the Organizing committee of ECFI2, the FI PPP event that
> will be organized in September 2014 in Munich.
>
> I am part of this OC in order to represent FI-WARE in the discussions
> and help in the organization; today I had my first long teleconference
> with them and I can already share some information with you.
>
> Let me attach:
>
> ?Concept of the event
>
> ?Current version of the programme
>
> ?Budget (please, keep it confidential)
>
> All this was defined before I joined the OC. Now, I have ?voice? in the
> group, and I would like to circulate some questions for which I would
> like to get a commonly agreed position:
>
> ?Are we in favor of *having a fee?* This will probably be defined
> depending on the typology of organization or may be related to the
> attendance to different parts to ensure that this is not a barrier for
> SMEs. IMHO there should be a not-too-high fee to ensure that we avoid
> the no-shows, as it happened in ECFI1
>
> ?As in ECFI1, FI-WARE is expected to contribute financially to the
> event. As you can see in the budget*, the expected figure is 15.000 euro
> approx*.
>
> ?*Check the current agenda*. In the discussion today we talked about the
> possibility of including a slot devoted to FI-WARE and FI-LAB (FI-OPS?)
> before the Phase 3 session. The programme is so compressed that it is
> difficult to figure out how to accommodate more contents, but of course
> it is important that FI-WARE increases its visibility. Think on how to
> link this with winners of the next Campus Party and practical examples
> on how to successfully use FI-LAB.
>
> ?It is also expected that FI-WARE sets up a booth, as in ECFI1, but we
> should focus on running demos
>
> Please, send your comments and suggestions as soon as possible to me and
> not later than next week. I will inform the OC and will speed up the
> integration of our ideas into the process.
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Nuria de Lama*
>
> Research & Innovation
>
> Representative to the European Commission
>
> M +34 680645692
>
> T +34 91214 9321
>
> F +34 91754 3252
>
> nuria.delama at atos.net
>
> Albarrac?n 25
>
> 28037 Madrid
>
> Spain
>
> www.atosresearch.eu
>
> es.atos.net
>
> *IMPORTANT - MAIL ADDRESS CHANGE - From now on, please use only mail
> address nuria.delama at atos.net *
>
> *The former @atosresearch.eu address will be cancelled soon*
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
>
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
>
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-wpa mailing list
> Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpa
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern
Gesch?ftsf?hrung:
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313)
USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: philipp_slusallek.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed May 7 08:32:24 2014
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 06:32:24 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Members of the jury for second round of FI-WARE
Challenges (Smart Society and FI-WARE Excellence challenges)
In-Reply-To:
References: <5368C918.7070705@tid.es>
Message-ID: <24678_1399444346_5369D37A_24678_465_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C6717@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Hi Juanjo,
Happy also to participate to the evaluation and to see if new innovative or very well structured ideas emerge.
BR
Thierry
De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de stefano de panfilis
Envoy? : mardi 6 mai 2014 20:02
? : Juanjo Hierro
Cc : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] Members of the jury for second round of FI-WARE Challenges (Smart Society and FI-WARE Excellence challenges)
dear juanjo,
happy to participate again as the previous experience, although heavy enough, was quite interestings!
btw, i guess there is a problem with the following paragraph:
300 applicants submitted a proposal to the Smart Society challenge while 126 applicants submitted a proposal to the Smart Society challenge (bear in mind, though that all people from the thematic challenges that will get a score 7 or higher will qualify to be one of the 20 finalists of the FI-WARE Excellence challenge, therefore we don't need to select 20)
"smart society challenge" two times ....
ciao,
stefano
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Thu May 8 11:14:42 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 09:14:42 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Agile Dynamic: Planning sprint 3.4.2 - Finished -
Outcome
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE361FD@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
Yesterday was deadline for planning sprint 3.4.2.
Find below the outcome:
Apps:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3909/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
[cid:image001.png at 01CF6AA0.C2F7E010]
Alessandra (Welcome to FI-WARE!!), Business Calculator and Business Modeler haven't scheduled any backlog item for this month, given iMinds didn't report any activity on them last month, I change their status to on-hold, unless you react to it.
Cloud:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3910/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
[cid:image002.png at 01CF6AA1.8F6DF260]
Alex, unless you oppose it, I change the following GEI's status to on-hold:
Cloud Proxy, Object Storage, Cloud Portal, Pegasus, and Sagitta
IoT:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3911/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
[cid:image003.png at 01CF6AA3.87886470]
Thierry, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI's status to on-hold:
Backend Template Handler, OpenMTC, GPA-COAP, GPA-EPCGE, GPA-ZPA,
Data:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3912/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
[cid:image004.png at 01CF6AA4.0261FA30]
Sergio, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI's status to on-hold:
Codoan, LOCS, Query Broker, MetadataProcessor, Context Awareness Platform, Unstructured Data Analysis
I2ND:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3913/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
[cid:image005.png at 01CF6AA4.DAC35950]
Pier, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI's status to on-hold:
Cloud Edge, S3C
Security:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3914/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
[cid:image006.png at 01CF6AA6.FCE8E2F0]
Pascal, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI's status to on-hold:
THA, PPL, IDM-KeyRock, OSE-CBS, OSE-DB Anonymizer, Preserving Authentication, SM-6 Low Fuzzer, SM-Attach Paths Engine, SM-Ovaldroid, SM-Remediation App, SM-Scored Attack Paths, SM-Visualization Framework
MiWi:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3915/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
[cid:image007.png at 01CF6AA7.EFB25C00]
Christof, I didn't record any activity last month on your chapter. So, I move to on-hold all of them with nothing scheduled for this sprint: 2D-3D, 2D-UI, Augmented Reality, Cloud Rendering, DaaS, GIS Data Provider, Interface Designer, Real/Virtual Interaction, Synchronization and Virtual Characters.
Reviews:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3902/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140508.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3903/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140508.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3904/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140508.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3905/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140508.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3906/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140508.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3907/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140508.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3908/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140508.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11134 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12866 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12401 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11836 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11598 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12306 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12464 bytes
Desc: image007.png
URL:
From toni at playsign.net Fri May 9 11:15:05 2014
From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo)
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 12:15:05 +0300
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware-ge-owners] Agile Dynamic: Planning sprint
3.4.2 - Finished - Outcome
In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE361FD@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE361FD@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Message-ID:
Regarding 3DUI-WebTundra, as we've discussed earlier, we are still planning
and preparing a new release (2.0) for the fi-ware 3.4 release. It will
require document updates too (the API changes). However most of the
development is happening outside fi-ware now (as fi-ware funding was used
in original schedule) with milestones scheduled to different dates etc. so
we're not using the fi-ware tracker for that work.
Whether it is then best to mark it as being on-hold or what I'm sure you
can decide best. Just a note in case it would seem strange then that a
major new release comes for a thing that has been on-hold.
Cheers,
~Toni
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:14 PM, MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE wrote:
> Dear Partners,
>
>
>
> Yesterday was deadline for planning sprint 3.4.2.
>
>
>
> Find below the outcome:
>
> *Apps:*
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3909/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
>
> Alessandra (Welcome to FI-WARE!!), Business Calculator and Business
> Modeler haven?t scheduled any backlog item for this month, given iMinds
> didn?t report any activity on them last month, I change their status to
> on-hold, unless you react to it.
>
>
>
> *Cloud:*
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3910/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
>
> Alex, unless you oppose it, I change the following GEI?s status to on-hold:
>
> Cloud Proxy, Object Storage, Cloud Portal, Pegasus, and Sagitta
>
>
>
> *IoT:*
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3911/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
>
> Thierry, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI?s status to
> on-hold:
>
> Backend Template Handler, OpenMTC, GPA-COAP, GPA-EPCGE, GPA-ZPA,
>
>
>
> *Data:*
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3912/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
>
> Sergio, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI?s status to
> on-hold:
>
> Codoan, LOCS, Query Broker, MetadataProcessor, Context Awareness Platform,
> Unstructured Data Analysis
>
>
>
> *I2ND:*
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3913/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
>
> Pier, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI?s status to
> on-hold:
>
> Cloud Edge, S3C
>
>
>
> *Security:*
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3914/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
>
> Pascal, unless you oppose to it, I change the following GEI?s status to
> on-hold:
>
> THA, PPL, IDM-KeyRock, OSE-CBS, OSE-DB Anonymizer, Preserving
> Authentication, SM-6 Low Fuzzer, SM-Attach Paths Engine, SM-Ovaldroid,
> SM-Remediation App, SM-Scored Attack Paths, SM-Visualization Framework
>
>
>
> *MiWi:*
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3915/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140508.xlsx
>
> Christof, I didn?t record any activity last month on your chapter. So, I
> move to on-hold all of them with nothing scheduled for this sprint: 2D-3D,
> 2D-UI, Augmented Reality, Cloud Rendering, DaaS, GIS Data Provider,
> Interface Designer, Real/Virtual Interaction, Synchronization and Virtual
> Characters.
>
>
>
>
>
> Reviews:
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3902/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140508.xlsx
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3903/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140508.xlsx
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3904/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140508.xlsx
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3905/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140508.xlsx
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3906/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140508.xlsx
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3907/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140508.xlsx
>
>
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3908/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140508.xlsx
>
>
>
>
>
> If anything, please, don?t hesitate to let me know.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Manuel
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------
>
> Manuel Escriche Vicente
> Agile Project Manager/Leader
>
> FI-WARE Initiative
> Telef?nica Digital
>
> Parque Tecnol?gico
>
> C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
> 47151 - Boecillo
> Valladolid - Spain
> Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
> Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
> http://www.tid.es
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace
> situado m?s abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-ge-owners mailing list
> Fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-ge-owners
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12866 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11598 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12464 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12401 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11134 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From mev at tid.es Mon May 12 09:27:49 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 07:27:49 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog: Effort - please, check your team
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE366CE@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
I've been prepared a report on the backlog's effort as announced in previous months.
It's been done by crossing effort reported with backlog items addressed.
Although I tried my best in getting each entity's team, I have doubts on it being completely right. So please, check your entity team is formed properly, with no errors. It's pretty important. Therefore, I'd appreciate you go to your entity's tab and send me an email confirming it's alright. No feedback will be understood as being correct.
This report is quite basic now. I'll be adding some graphs to easy quick understanding next weeks. Additionally I'll be adding views at chapter level and project levels.
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3916/FIWARE.backlog.effort.20140512.xlsx
Thanks for cooperation!!
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it Mon May 12 10:12:11 2014
From: davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it (Davide Dalle Carbonare)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:12:11 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] [Fiware] Training material review
In-Reply-To: <535FC37C.8060001@eng.it>
References: <535FC37C.8060001@eng.it>
Message-ID: <5370825B.5030302@eng.it>
Dear partners,
as you probably already noticed, we're experiencing some problems
in uploading courses
in the eLearning platform, I apologize for that. The solution is found
and we're working on it.
It's possible that today the platform will be off-line for short period
of time, anyway, all the changes
that you can save, will not be lost.
BR
Davide
On 29/04/2014 17:21, Davide Dalle Carbonare wrote:
> Dear partners,
> as you should already know I'm proceeding with a review of the
> training material published
> in the eLearning platform http://edu.fi-ware.org
>
> I keep track of this review (with priority to partners leaving at M36)
> using this shared dashboard
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AopQnlLhngy9dHVla1kyTnNXTTdWVTd6WW55LUk4TlE#gid=2
>
> where you can also find my notes and comments for the most relevant
> aspects.
> I've also identified a number of small differences in the publication
> of the courses and in order to have
> a more homogeneous situation we (E-IIS) can proceed directly to fix
> those minor issues.
> For the partners that used the SCORM player for creating the course,
> again, we (E-IIS) can help
> to update the package for adopting the new theme.
>
> Don't forget to check the how-to page, that is continuously updated to
> simplify the implementation
> of the notes from the review
> https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_create_a_SCORM_course
>
>
> @GE-Owners and @Course-authors,
> if you publish some new or updated contents, I kindly ask you to drop
> a comment in the dashboard
> so that it's easier for me to be notified and follow your changes.
> Please include your name in the comment.
>
> thank you for your collaboration and
> Kind Regards,
> Davide
>
> ps. my apologize for multiple posting.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware mailing list
> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.org
> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware
>
>
From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon May 12 16:58:35 2014
From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:58:35 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
Message-ID:
dear all,
attached the catalogue status as per today.
ciao,
stefano
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Testbed_catalogue_publication_status.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 139623 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From markus.heller at sap.com Mon May 12 18:20:57 2014
From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:20:57 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE277F2@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Hi Stefano,
What would this mean e.g. for our SAP GES? You have marked ?Creating Instances? as red: What would be the needed fix for e.g. Marketplace in WP3?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis
Sent: Montag, 12. Mai 2014 16:59
To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
dear all,
attached the catalogue status as per today.
ciao,
stefano
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mcp at tid.es Tue May 13 12:11:55 2014
From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 12:11:55 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
Message-ID: <5371EFEB.8000309@tid.es>
Dear all,
As agreed yesterday [1], I send you dedicated message to start the
creation of a demo per chapter.
Apart from the Live Demo that we have now, it was agreed to create a
live demo per chapter. This implies internal discussion in each WP and a
proposal for general discussion.
Each WPL must discuss this internally in his/her WP and come back to us
with a proposal.
We will follow up in next Monday's call , where I would expect to have a
rough idea of what each WP intends to offer.
Best regards,
Miguel
[1]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UOjvZevEofePjVLKjxwBH8mU2Lus9w9J0DJTM8E5exs
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue May 13 12:33:45 2014
From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:33:45 +0300
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
In-Reply-To: <5371EFEB.8000309@tid.es>
References: <5371EFEB.8000309@tid.es>
Message-ID:
Can you, please, elaborate a bit more on the events and the expected demos
(coverage of GEs, format, duration)? We already have per-GE demo's (as
part of the education materials), and the project-wide demo - what would
be the benefit to do it at the chapter granularity? Are we going to have
separate per-chapter demo stands at some of those events?
Also, do we have coverage for all the partners leaving at M36 to ensure
proper contributions to the demos?
Sorry if this has been discussed already - I am attending the OpenStack
Summit at Atlanta this week, so couldn't join the call yesterday.
Thanks,
Alex
====================================================================================================
Alex Glikson
Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab
http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html |
http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml
Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile:
+972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112
From: Miguel Carrillo
To: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org" ,
"fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org" ,
Date: 13/05/2014 01:12 PM
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org
Dear all,
As agreed yesterday [1], I send you dedicated message to start the
creation of a demo per chapter.
Apart from the Live Demo that we have now, it was agreed to create a
live demo per chapter. This implies internal discussion in each WP and a
proposal for general discussion.
Each WPL must discuss this internally in his/her WP and come back to us
with a proposal.
We will follow up in next Monday's call , where I would expect to have a
rough idea of what each WP intends to offer.
Best regards,
Miguel
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UOjvZevEofePjVLKjxwBH8mU2Lus9w9J0DJTM8E5exs
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace
situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-wpl mailing list
Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From markus.heller at sap.com Tue May 13 12:41:06 2014
From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:41:06 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE27FCE@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Hi Stefano,
How do you organize do tell the GE owners for their results of your check what to improve when you set them to ?red? for an entry (e.g. ?creating instances?)?
What needs to be done in such cases exactly ? as this surely varies from GE to GE heavily, what do you miss?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis
Sent: Montag, 12. Mai 2014 16:59
To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
dear all,
attached the catalogue status as per today.
ciao,
stefano
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From depa at eng.it Tue May 13 12:52:22 2014
From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:52:22 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: RE: current catalogue status
In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE27FCE@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
References:
<393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE27FCE@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Message-ID: <2113092951-1399978341-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-174658076-@b13.c7.bise7.blackberry>
Dear Markus,
I was preparing the answer, already some hours ago, and the network dropped. It is difficult to now from the mobile. As soon as i can i'll send the answer.
Ciao
Stefano
Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone!
-----Original Message-----
From: "Heller, Markus"
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:41:06
To: stefano de panfilis
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
Hi Stefano,
How do you organize do tell the GE owners for their results of your check what to improve when you set them to ?red? for an entry (e.g. ?creating instances?)?
What needs to be done in such cases exactly ? as this surely varies from GE to GE heavily, what do you miss?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis
Sent: Montag, 12. Mai 2014 16:59
To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
dear all,
attached the catalogue status as per today.
ciao,
stefano
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mcp at tid.es Tue May 13 13:00:34 2014
From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:00:34 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
In-Reply-To:
References: <5371EFEB.8000309@tid.es>
Message-ID: <5371FB52.4030203@tid.es>
Inline
El 13/05/2014 12:33, Alex Glikson escribi?:
Can you, please, elaborate a bit more on the events and the expected demos (coverage of GEs, format, duration)?
I have no idea. It seems that there will be a few in the coming months. A FIA event was mentioned
I do not think that the purpose of the demo is to cover each and every GE. You can have a selection of them (nothing precludes from mentioning others when you talk "this demo could be extended doing this or that with GE x"). The format should be similar to the Live Demo we have now and the duration cannot be too long, I would advocate to have something ranging from 10 to 20 minutes.
The most important events in the near future I am aware of are:
* Future Internet Forum (FIF) 16/17 June (this is too early)
* Chambers of Commerce Brussels( mid June?)
* Campus Party Mexico - last week of June?
* Campus Party Madrid 8-13 September
* ECFI 2 Munich 17-18 September
* TechCrunch Disrupt Europe, London, 20-21 October
There may be more and the dates may have mistakes, but this is the info I have up to now. I do not know if end of June is a bit tight, I do not know what Juanjo thinks.
We already have per-GE demo's (as part of the education materials), and the project-wide demo - what would be the benefit to do it at the chapter granularity?
Well, this was agreed in the WPL confcall (proposed by Thierry) and no one opposed it, in fact the reaction was positive.
Are we going to have separate per-chapter demo stands at some of those events?
I guess not!
Also, do we have coverage for all the partners leaving at M36 to ensure proper contributions to the demos?
I would not expect a extreme commitment from those who have their people in other projects already. We would get "best effort support" in most cases. I would tend not to encourage them to join such demos. In fact, they theoretically are not going to contribute further work and if you think about it, they cannot report any effort after M36.
Sorry if this has been discussed already - I am attending the OpenStack Summit at Atlanta this week, so couldn't join the call yesterday.
Thanks,
Alex
====================================================================================================
Alex Glikson
Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab
http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml
Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112
From: Miguel Carrillo
To: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org" , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org" ,
Date: 13/05/2014 01:12 PM
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org
________________________________
Dear all,
As agreed yesterday [1], I send you dedicated message to start the
creation of a demo per chapter.
Apart from the Live Demo that we have now, it was agreed to create a
live demo per chapter. This implies internal discussion in each WP and a
proposal for general discussion.
Each WPL must discuss this internally in his/her WP and come back to us
with a proposal.
We will follow up in next Monday's call , where I would expect to have a
rough idea of what each WP intends to offer.
Best regards,
Miguel
[1]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UOjvZevEofePjVLKjxwBH8mU2Lus9w9J0DJTM8E5exs
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-wpl mailing list
Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From markus.heller at sap.com Tue May 13 13:09:26 2014
From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 11:09:26 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
In-Reply-To: <2113092951-1399978341-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-174658076-@b13.c7.bise7.blackberry>
References:
<393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE27FCE@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
<2113092951-1399978341-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-174658076-@b13.c7.bise7.blackberry>
Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE280D7@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Hi Stefano,
ok, thx for your notice - let?s wait until you get a laptop with keyboard ?
I can BTW give you more context why I ask (because I tried to identify this for myself). Here is my line of thought:
For Marketplace GE, we have ?red? in tab ?creating instance?:
As far as I can see, the text on the tab ?creating instances? is identical in all or at least most GES (as we all agreed on them earlier).
As it is a standardized text, only the name of the image (in YELLOW, here ?marketplace-ri?) is different in each GE:
> Click on the "Images" option at the left, then "Launch" selecting the row with the name marketplace-ri
This image is available in the FI-Lab with the name ?marketplace-image-R2.3?, so the user can find our image there according to the tab ?creating instances? where this name is listed.
What would be missing, the version number ?-r2.3? or so?
Best
Markus
From: depa at eng.it [mailto:depa at eng.it]
Sent: Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 12:52
To: Heller, Markus
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: R: RE: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
Dear Markus,
I was preparing the answer, already some hours ago, and the network dropped. It is difficult to now from the mobile. As soon as i can i'll send the answer.
Ciao
Stefano
Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone!
________________________________
From: "Heller, Markus" >
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:41:06 +0000
To: stefano de panfilis>
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
Hi Stefano,
How do you organize do tell the GE owners for their results of your check what to improve when you set them to ?red? for an entry (e.g. ?creating instances?)?
What needs to be done in such cases exactly ? as this surely varies from GE to GE heavily, what do you miss?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis
Sent: Montag, 12. Mai 2014 16:59
To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] current catalogue status
dear all,
attached the catalogue status as per today.
ciao,
stefano
--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy
tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
skype: depa01
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Tue May 13 15:35:44 2014
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:35:44 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
In-Reply-To: <5371FB52.4030203@tid.es>
References: <5371EFEB.8000309@tid.es>
<5371FB52.4030203@tid.es>
Message-ID: <27847_1399988145_53721FB1_27847_583_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C9518@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Hi all,
The main point comes with the ECFI2 preparation because it is expected to have a FI-WARE booth with concrete demos while in ECFI (beginning of April) we did not have any demo and the UC projects have their own demos.
So the point is to have some short demos to demonstrate in this kind of event that we have real running softwares and also that we are progressing on packaging. The demo we used for the review is too long to be use in a stand during 3 or 5 mn. (the time you can attract someone and push him to go on FI-Lab to do more)
Juanjo has proposed to use some of the demos with Smart Cities data that we can have for the hackatons but based on the EC comments, we do not have to focus only on Smart Cities, it is also good to have a short demo per chapter which could involve 2,3 or 4 GEs. More than that will be difficult to keep the 3 or 5 mn for the demo. I would say that the point is not to show specifically a demo per chapter but it is easier to prepare that per chapter for the integration work first, and for the presentation on the stand also (anyone from the chapter should be able to explain how 2 or 3 GEs from his chapter are working together)
One of the ideas I will investigate is also to have this short demo synchronized with a UC project phase 2. Typically in IoT we have interactions with FiT-Man and FI-Star so showing the GEs part they have integrated is also a good example of collaboration and how our GEs are useful for an application domain.
BR
Thierry
De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Miguel Carrillo
Envoy? : mardi 13 mai 2014 13:01
? : Alex Glikson
Cc : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
Inline
El 13/05/2014 12:33, Alex Glikson escribi?:
Can you, please, elaborate a bit more on the events and the expected demos (coverage of GEs, format, duration)?
I have no idea. It seems that there will be a few in the coming months. A FIA event was mentioned
I do not think that the purpose of the demo is to cover each and every GE. You can have a selection of them (nothing precludes from mentioning others when you talk "this demo could be extended doing this or that with GE x"). The format should be similar to the Live Demo we have now and the duration cannot be too long, I would advocate to have something ranging from 10 to 20 minutes.
The most important events in the near future I am aware of are:
* Future Internet Forum (FIF) 16/17 June (this is too early)
* Chambers of Commerce Brussels( mid June?)
* Campus Party Mexico - last week of June?
* Campus Party Madrid 8-13 September
* ECFI 2 Munich 17-18 September
* TechCrunch Disrupt Europe, London, 20-21 October
There may be more and the dates may have mistakes, but this is the info I have up to now. I do not know if end of June is a bit tight, I do not know what Juanjo thinks.
We already have per-GE demo's (as part of the education materials), and the project-wide demo - what would be the benefit to do it at the chapter granularity?
Well, this was agreed in the WPL confcall (proposed by Thierry) and no one opposed it, in fact the reaction was positive.
Are we going to have separate per-chapter demo stands at some of those events?
I guess not!
Also, do we have coverage for all the partners leaving at M36 to ensure proper contributions to the demos?
I would not expect a extreme commitment from those who have their people in other projects already. We would get "best effort support" in most cases. I would tend not to encourage them to join such demos. In fact, they theoretically are not going to contribute further work and if you think about it, they cannot report any effort after M36.
Sorry if this has been discussed already - I am attending the OpenStack Summit at Atlanta this week, so couldn't join the call yesterday.
Thanks,
Alex
====================================================================================================
Alex Glikson
Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab
http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml
Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112
From: Miguel Carrillo
To: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org" , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org" ,
Date: 13/05/2014 01:12 PM
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org
________________________________
Dear all,
As agreed yesterday [1], I send you dedicated message to start the
creation of a demo per chapter.
Apart from the Live Demo that we have now, it was agreed to create a
live demo per chapter. This implies internal discussion in each WP and a
proposal for general discussion.
Each WPL must discuss this internally in his/her WP and come back to us
with a proposal.
We will follow up in next Monday's call , where I would expect to have a
rough idea of what each WP intends to offer.
Best regards,
Miguel
[1]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UOjvZevEofePjVLKjxwBH8mU2Lus9w9J0DJTM8E5exs
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-wpl mailing list
Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mcp at tid.es Tue May 13 15:47:55 2014
From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:47:55 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
In-Reply-To: <27847_1399988145_53721FB1_27847_583_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C9518@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <5371EFEB.8000309@tid.es>
<5371FB52.4030203@tid.es>
<27847_1399988145_53721FB1_27847_583_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C9518@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Message-ID: <5372228B.309@tid.es>
Hi,
I understand much better now. Thanks, Thierry.
If the approach is to have a demo for a stand, the time indicated by Thierry looks about right to me.
BR
Miguel
El 13/05/2014 15:35, thierry.nagellen at orange.com escribi?:
Hi all,
The main point comes with the ECFI2 preparation because it is expected to have a FI-WARE booth with concrete demos while in ECFI (beginning of April) we did not have any demo and the UC projects have their own demos.
So the point is to have some short demos to demonstrate in this kind of event that we have real running softwares and also that we are progressing on packaging. The demo we used for the review is too long to be use in a stand during 3 or 5 mn. (the time you can attract someone and push him to go on FI-Lab to do more)
Juanjo has proposed to use some of the demos with Smart Cities data that we can have for the hackatons but based on the EC comments, we do not have to focus only on Smart Cities, it is also good to have a short demo per chapter which could involve 2,3 or 4 GEs. More than that will be difficult to keep the 3 or 5 mn for the demo. I would say that the point is not to show specifically a demo per chapter but it is easier to prepare that per chapter for the integration work first, and for the presentation on the stand also (anyone from the chapter should be able to explain how 2 or 3 GEs from his chapter are working together)
One of the ideas I will investigate is also to have this short demo synchronized with a UC project phase 2. Typically in IoT we have interactions with FiT-Man and FI-Star so showing the GEs part they have integrated is also a good example of collaboration and how our GEs are useful for an application domain.
BR
Thierry
De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Miguel Carrillo
Envoy? : mardi 13 mai 2014 13:01
? : Alex Glikson
Cc : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
Inline
El 13/05/2014 12:33, Alex Glikson escribi?:
Can you, please, elaborate a bit more on the events and the expected demos (coverage of GEs, format, duration)?
I have no idea. It seems that there will be a few in the coming months. A FIA event was mentioned
I do not think that the purpose of the demo is to cover each and every GE. You can have a selection of them (nothing precludes from mentioning others when you talk "this demo could be extended doing this or that with GE x"). The format should be similar to the Live Demo we have now and the duration cannot be too long, I would advocate to have something ranging from 10 to 20 minutes.
The most important events in the near future I am aware of are:
* Future Internet Forum (FIF) 16/17 June (this is too early)
* Chambers of Commerce Brussels( mid June?)
* Campus Party Mexico - last week of June?
* Campus Party Madrid 8-13 September
* ECFI 2 Munich 17-18 September
* TechCrunch Disrupt Europe, London, 20-21 October
There may be more and the dates may have mistakes, but this is the info I have up to now. I do not know if end of June is a bit tight, I do not know what Juanjo thinks.
We already have per-GE demo's (as part of the education materials), and the project-wide demo - what would be the benefit to do it at the chapter granularity?
Well, this was agreed in the WPL confcall (proposed by Thierry) and no one opposed it, in fact the reaction was positive.
Are we going to have separate per-chapter demo stands at some of those events?
I guess not!
Also, do we have coverage for all the partners leaving at M36 to ensure proper contributions to the demos?
I would not expect a extreme commitment from those who have their people in other projects already. We would get "best effort support" in most cases. I would tend not to encourage them to join such demos. In fact, they theoretically are not going to contribute further work and if you think about it, they cannot report any effort after M36.
Sorry if this has been discussed already - I am attending the OpenStack Summit at Atlanta this week, so couldn't join the call yesterday.
Thanks,
Alex
====================================================================================================
Alex Glikson
Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab
http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml
Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112
From: Miguel Carrillo
To: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org" , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org" ,
Date: 13/05/2014 01:12 PM
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demos per chapter
Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org
________________________________
Dear all,
As agreed yesterday [1], I send you dedicated message to start the
creation of a demo per chapter.
Apart from the Live Demo that we have now, it was agreed to create a
live demo per chapter. This implies internal discussion in each WP and a
proposal for general discussion.
Each WPL must discuss this internally in his/her WP and come back to us
with a proposal.
We will follow up in next Monday's call , where I would expect to have a
rough idea of what each WP intends to offer.
Best regards,
Miguel
[1]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UOjvZevEofePjVLKjxwBH8mU2Lus9w9J0DJTM8E5exs
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-wpl mailing list
Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wpl
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco
_/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9
_/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N
_/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain)
Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77
e-mail: mcp at tid.es
Follow FI-WARE on the net
Website: http://www.fi-ware.org
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
----------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed May 14 10:11:33 2014
From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com)
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 08:11:33 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] New version of SMEs presentation
Message-ID: <19400_1400055094_53732535_19400_6559_2_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C1C97AF@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Dear all,
I have updated the presentation done in April for French SMEs in Brittany including description of Accelerators, links to use case scenario from UC project phase 1 (potential materials for SMEs to have ideas)
Again, the GEs part has to be adapted with the one you are familiar with.
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/7/3925/FIPPP-SMEsInvolvementPresentation-Brittany-May2014.pptx
BR
Thierry Nagellen
Program Manager Future Internet
Orange Labs Networks & Carriers
905 rue Albert Einstein
06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
+33 492 94 52 84
+33 679 85 08 44
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Thu May 15 18:25:29 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 16:25:29 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3728F@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
Find linked the partner's effort report with graphs:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3933/FIWARE.backlog.effort.20140515.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Fri May 16 12:40:19 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:40:19 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs - missing data
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE374FF@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
I've commented with Javier de Pedro about the deviations found.
He mainly refers to the lack of effort data, which are due by 22nd May.
Therefore, I'd appreciate having your cooperation by providing the data so that we can have an accurate status of the effort by the end of the May.
Kind regards,
Manuel
From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Sent: jueves, 15 de mayo de 2014 18:25
To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Dear Partners,
Find linked the partner's effort report with graphs:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3933/FIWARE.backlog.effort.20140515.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From markus.heller at sap.com Fri May 16 14:39:37 2014
From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:39:37 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3728F@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3728F@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CBF8@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Hi Manuel,
Thank you for your example XLS.
I have for now one question: We have not reported M34-M36 figures yet to Javier/TID from SAP, so you might not have full data until M36.
So I guess this is only an example, right?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2014 18:25
To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Dear Partners,
Find linked the partner's effort report with graphs:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3933/FIWARE.backlog.effort.20140515.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From markus.heller at sap.com Fri May 16 14:42:50 2014
From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:42:50 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CBF8@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3728F@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
<393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CBF8@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CC11@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Hi Manuel,
Can you change "Team" in something like "Backlog editors" or so? For example, our dev team is more than these colleagues....but not all enter tickets.
Best
Markus
[cid:image001.png at 01CF7115.1BBE9340]
From: Heller, Markus
Sent: Freitag, 16. Mai 2014 14:40
To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: RE: Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Hi Manuel,
Thank you for your example XLS.
I have for now one question: We have not reported M34-M36 figures yet to Javier/TID from SAP, so you might not have full data until M36.
So I guess this is only an example, right?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2014 18:25
To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Dear Partners,
Find linked the partner's effort report with graphs:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3933/FIWARE.backlog.effort.20140515.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 23031 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
From markus.heller at sap.com Fri May 16 14:44:53 2014
From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:44:53 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3728F@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CC46@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Hi all,
this topic is solved, since Manuel had sent an email on this before today which I did not read until now.
Best
Markus
From: Heller, Markus
Sent: Freitag, 16. Mai 2014 14:40
To: 'MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE'; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: RE: Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Hi Manuel,
Thank you for your example XLS.
I have for now one question: We have not reported M34-M36 figures yet to Javier/TID from SAP, so you might not have full data until M36.
So I guess this is only an example, right?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2014 18:25
To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Dear Partners,
Find linked the partner's effort report with graphs:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3933/FIWARE.backlog.effort.20140515.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Fri May 16 14:51:34 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 12:51:34 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CC11@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3728F@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
<393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CBF8@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
<393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AE2CC11@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap>
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE37607@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Hi Markus,
It can be changed but its main function is for you/partners to check entities' membership, since entities' ownership of backlog items is done based on the team list.
Kind regards,
Manuel
From: Heller, Markus [mailto:markus.heller at sap.com]
Sent: viernes, 16 de mayo de 2014 14:43
To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; FI-WARE WPA (fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org)
Subject: RE: Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Hi Manuel,
Can you change "Team" in something like "Backlog editors" or so? For example, our dev team is more than these colleagues....but not all enter tickets.
Best
Markus
[cid:image001.png at 01CF7116.4731A9D0]
From: Heller, Markus
Sent: Freitag, 16. Mai 2014 14:40
To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: RE: Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Hi Manuel,
Thank you for your example XLS.
I have for now one question: We have not reported M34-M36 figures yet to Javier/TID from SAP, so you might not have full data until M36.
So I guess this is only an example, right?
Best
Markus
From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE
Sent: Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2014 18:25
To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.org
Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog : Effort report with graphs
Dear Partners,
Find linked the partner's effort report with graphs:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3933/FIWARE.backlog.effort.20140515.xlsx
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 23031 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon May 19 08:22:55 2014
From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 08:22:55 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] WPL weekly call
Message-ID:
Dear Miguel and All,
I have to attend an internal meeting, and unfortunately cannot join the weekly WPL/WPA call today.
I'll check the minutes as soon as possible, but in case of urgent topics to be addressed concerning I2ND chapter please let me know via mail, thanks.
BR
Pier
------------------------------------------------------------------
Telecom Italia
Pierangelo Garino
Innovation - Research & Prototyping
Via G. Reiss Romoli 274, I-10148 TORINO
Tel: +39 011 228 7142
Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
[rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 677 bytes
Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg
URL:
From mev at tid.es Mon May 19 09:14:34 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:14:34 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Delivery Awareness - D3.1.3 Delivered
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3773C@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
Congratulations to Markus and partners cooperating on D3.1.3, which was delivered on Friday!!
[cid:image001.png at 01CF7341.68520D30]
Please, have an update of the Delivery Dashboard at the link below:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3938/FIWARE.DeliveryAwareness.20140519.xlsx
As you see there are many deliverables pending, but D10.1.3 deserves special attention since it's pending since October, additionally it had a specific comment for delivery in the last EC for end of April.
[cid:image002.png at 01CF7342.30B4BA20]
[cid:image003.png at 01CF7342.BDD432F0]
Thanks all for cooperation!!
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2998 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9953 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2448 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL:
From mev at tid.es Mon May 19 09:29:30 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:29:30 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Please, update dashboard for open specifications
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE37775@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Mon May 19 09:52:40 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:52:40 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content: updated dashboards and reviews
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3779B@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear Partners,
Find below updated reports of the backlog:
Dashboards:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3939/FIWARE.backlog.apps.dashboard.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3940/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.dashboard.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3941/FIWARE.backlog.iot.dashboard.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3942/FIWARE.backlog.data.dashboard.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3943/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.dashboard.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3944/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3945/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.dashboard.20140519.xlsx
Reviews:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3946/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3947/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3948/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3949/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3950/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3951/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140519.xlsx
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3952/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140519.xlsx
There're a number of issues pending. I'd appreciate having reaction by the corresponding GE owners.
Count on me for any support!!
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From nuria.delama at atos.net Mon May 19 17:00:08 2014
From: nuria.delama at atos.net (De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 15:00:08 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Call for papers deadline extended_Smart City Expo
Message-ID: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB0B16ED@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Since last year we attended the Smart City expo and it seemed a good place to promote FI-WARE results I forward this opportunity to all of you. It should be relevant for us, especially taking into consideration our special focus on smart cites as exploitation channel?
From: SMART CITY EXPO 2014 [mailto:smartcityexpo.ventas at firabarcelona.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:46 PM
To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Subject: Call for papers deadline extended
Si no puede ver este e-mail haga clic aqu?
[Smart City Expo]
Gran Via Venue
18 - 20 Nov 2014
[Foto 1]
Call for papers, deadline extended!
In response to requests from the sector, we have extended the deadline for submissions.
Become a speaker at the Smart City Expo World Congress 2014.
We are looking for speakers with significant contributions and innovative initiatives to share within the framework of Smart Cities.
New deadline: 01 June 2014, 23h59m CET.
Submit your presentation proposal here
Some of our most highlighted sessions on 2013?
[Foto 1]
TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION PLENARY: CITY INTEGRATED VISIONS
A city without participation, inclusion and innovation it is not a Smart City.
Cities are from their beginning a technological system that people share. While we live in the era of technological innovation development and the advent of information and communication technologies, this new layer has to be included in the cities realities, and we need to make information as essential as roads or energy supply.
Session
[Foto 1]
BUILT ENVIRONMENT PLENARY: THE FUTURE OF URBAN SUSTAINABILITY
Cities have to move to a holistic dimensional approach that led to the idea of Smart Cities.
While it is not possible to answer to the growth of urbanization by adding more infrastructures, there is the need to find innovative and sustainable strategies to tackle cities challenges. It is necessary to integrate geographical planning and architecture with ICTs, energy, transportation, waste and other urban services while concerning with quality of life issues such as equality and civic engagement.
Session
Are you interested in being part of the next edition?
Contact our team and we'll give you all the details
Take part in the World Smart Cities Awards!
If your city, project or initiative contributes to smart city development, prepare your candidature now.
New Deadline: 1 June 2014, 23h59m CET
Submit your proposal
here!
smartcityexpo.visitantes at firabarcelona.com
902 233 200
smartcityexpo.com
[Linkedin][youtube][Twitter][Facebook][pinterest]
[Fira de Barcelona]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mev at tid.es Wed May 21 16:03:15 2014
From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:03:15 +0000
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog - Effort report for WP Leaders
Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BDAE3805F@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Dear WP Leaders,
In order to easy understanding of effort provision from the Technical WP point of view, find a dedicated report linked below:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3960/FIWARE.backlog.effort.leaders.20140521.xlsx
It complements the partners report already shared last week:
https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3959/FIWARE.backlog.effort.partners.20140521.xlsx
According to the data received on Friday, our current deviation in the Technical WP is -10% (more partner's reports are expected until the end of the month).
The biggest contributions to this deviation (weights) belong to Cloud chapter, which is quite ahead (+17%) in reporting resources, are MiWi chapter, which is quite behind (-36%).
I think these deviations should be further explored.
Obviously, each chapter has all backlog items reported in the tracker, mapped to effort their corresponding effort reported. If you noticed anything wrong, please, let me know.
If you need any support from me to understand the reports, please, let me know.
[cid:image001.png at 01CF750C.8BC080E0]
If anything, please, don't hesitate to let me know.
Kind regards,
Manuel
----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telef?nica Digital
Parque Tecnol?gico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 51475 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Thu May 22 12:36:06 2014
From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 13:36:06 +0300
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] upcoming events & demos?
Message-ID:
Dear Juanjo, all,
There have been several discussions recently on participation in events,
as well as showing WP-level demo's at some of these events..
Can someone clarify which events are expected till the end of the project,
and which of them are likely to include demos (potentially requiring
presence from each WP)? I would like to have a WP-level discussion on this
(what demos do we need, who should attend which event, etc), but I am
missing the basic inputs (and the bigger picture).
Thanks,
Alex
P.S. Not sure whether this has been discussed at one of the WPL/WPA
interlocks I've missed.. In any case, I didn't find the missing info in
the minutes.
====================================================================================================
Alex Glikson
Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab
http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html |
http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml
Email: glikson at il.ibm.com | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile:
+972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Thu May 22 21:08:48 2014
From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:08:48 +0200
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] R: Call for papers deadline extended_Smart City Expo
In-Reply-To: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB0B16ED@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
References: <79C5DE4D25832A49BAACBC6E798E3FDB0B16ED@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net>
Message-ID:
Hi Nuria and All,
It?s probably too early now to prepare a paper reporting the results of the developments by the smart cities within FI-WARE. However, it seems there is a possibility to submit an abstract, then I?d be in favour to exploit this opportunity, by claiming that FI-WARE will present the outcomes of smart cities activity.
I believe that by the time we have to provide a final version, there will be enough material to prepare a technically sound paper/presentation (BTW, it is not clear if a paper is strictly required or also slides-only are accepted, templates are provided for both).
BR
Pier
Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] Per conto di De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Inviato: luned? 19 maggio 2014 17:00
A: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.org
Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Call for papers deadline extended_Smart City Expo
Since last year we attended the Smart City expo and it seemed a good place to promote FI-WARE results I forward this opportunity to all of you. It should be relevant for us, especially taking into consideration our special focus on smart cites as exploitation channel?
From: SMART CITY EXPO 2014 [mailto:smartcityexpo.ventas at firabarcelona.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:46 PM
To: De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria
Subject: Call for papers deadline extended
Si no puede ver este e-mail haga clic aqu?
[Smart City Expo]
Gran Via Venue
18 - 20 Nov 2014
[Foto 1]