Dear all, I want to share with you the latest communication from our PO in FI-Core. Overall, this confirms a positive result of the project but there are several aspects to amend. Most of the partners are not impacted by the requests from the PO and I will do myself as much of the work as I can. I will send separate messages to particular partners in private asking them for info if needed. As a first action, I have ported the bylaws to our official template and I will deliver it to the EC in a couple of minutes; this will be covering D.32.1.1 & D.32.1.2. Regards, Miguel De: Ragnar.Bergstrom at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Ragnar.Bergstrom at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 18 de mayo de 2017 19:38 Para: MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO <miguel.carrillopacheco at telefonica.com> Asunto: FI-CORE final review conclusions Dear Miguel, As reported at the end of the review meeting: · The project achieved its main objectives. Overall, the results are of very good quality, in particular in the light of the complex work and the number of participants and stakeholders, especially in the area of internet-related intelligent solutions that collect data in order to provide information or control in a wide range of potential application areas. · The project resulted in high-quality results in terms of solutions for the quick, cost-efficient, and effortless creation of innovative internet-based smart solutions. The project needs to be praised for its high-quality outputs – also following corrective actions after the interim project review. · In order to conclude the final review the following items need to be clarified: 1. Due to the ambition and the complexity of this project which is a cornerstone of the FI-PPP project, it is recommended to summarize in a synthetic document (2/3 pages) the key learnings of this project in order to benefit to future projects (project organisation, project empowerment to manage changes...). This could be an annex to the final report. 2. Taken into account that the final report is also a dissemination document, it is recommended to highlight achievements linked to business KPI such as list of GEs validated for a commercial use through a full QA, number of downloads or contributions for the most popular GEs rather than focusing on the history of all GES including abandoned GEs. 3. Orange contribution is not sufficiently detailed in several work packages/tasks, nor regarding any changes in relation to its role as WP leader. The effective role of Orange during the By Law preparation for the foundation, reported during the review meeting, is not clearly appearing. The progress report should be revised accordingly. 4. All deliverables that were submitted are approved. But several deliverables have not been submitted, see following table: STATUS OF DELIVERABLES No. Title Status (Approved/Rejected) Remarks D11.2a FIWARE Reference architecture overview Not submitted D22.3.1a Report on FIWARE Lab node performance & commercial plans (Brittany) Not submitted D22.3.1b Report on FIWARE Lab node performance & commercial plans (Brittany) Not submitted D32.1.b Governance models and governances structures definition Not submitted For these deliverables, the project should provide a detailed explanation why the corresponding deliverables were not presented and what the impact of not having them delivered are: • D11.2.1 FIWARE reference Architecture Overview was not submitted. It proved less relevant as developers typically go directly to the more concrete documents and tend not to use the more formal, high-level architecture description (e.g. FIWARE tour guide…). This is appropriate, but should be clarified with a reference to the web page and a recommendation for the foundation in terms of architecture, in total about 3 pages. • As regards to the FIWARE Lab node 'Brittany', it appears not to have been created due to the change in the interests of partner Orange. There is a lack of explanation for this - and its consequences - in the project management report. After the review it became clear that the Lab node in Brittany merged with the one called 'Lannion'. Therefore, the non-delivery of the reports 22.3.1a and b is acceptable. • The deliverable D32.1.1 Governance models and governances was due in M13, but was not contained in the set of deliverables. Since the previous versions also required updates or revision, this deliverable needs to be submitted. For these reports, a new deliverable with the legal aspects should be submitted – but one final deliverable (with both numbers on it) is sufficient. Some details need further clarification: • The Deliverable 22.2.x.1 reports that several Lab nodes delivered data that is not in line with the FIWARE Lab management assessment. This should be explained and its implications require assessment. Could you provide the required clarifications/reports by 9 June? Kind regards, Ragnar Bergström Team Leader ___________________________________________________ EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG for Communications Networks, Content and Technology Unit E3 – Next-Generation Internet Office BU31 5/69, B-1049 Bruxelles Tel: +32(0)2.295.64.15 e-mail: ragnar.bergstrom at ec.europa.eu<mailto:ragnar.bergstrom at ec.europa.eu> [rtfimage://] What should the Next Generation Internet look like? Join us<https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/next-generation-internet>, share your views and follow us on @ngi4eu<https://twitter.com/ngi4eu>! [cid:0AE6673440E6CE468A5934F077894FF3 at ec.europa.eu] Check the latest news https://www.fiware.org/ ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware/attachments/20170519/6ba6eb69/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ATT40121 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1941 bytes Desc: ATT40121 1.jpg URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware/attachments/20170519/6ba6eb69/attachment-0001.jpg>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy