Dear Mentors, I have produced the version of minutes to be signed by you all. Please sign against your name at the end of the document under the approvers section when you agree to the content of the minutes and upload back the signed document. Keep in mind that since there is no check out functionality, your document may be uploaded by someone overwriting your copy. So I suggest downloading a copy when you are ready to sign and immediately upload it to avoid overwriting, in which case some of you may need to resign to a newer version and upload again. Please sign this document by the end of day today. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAHT4TkhBwz6WIGo1ey7262jGRxHmu_n/view?usp=share_link Regards, Rajiv Rajani On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:22 AM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE <rajiv at ishare.eu> wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I have not received confirmation from any of you except for one yet, if > you have finished the assessment or not. Note, that delay will cause > further delay in finishing the review. Can you make sure that scores and > comments are updated here > <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XOVhj9SZeIOZPSALDEkeuLY1OoZH4WOa9eKh_Gg0XWE/edit#gid=2026593444> for > your respective experiments by 12.00 today, I will circulate minutes for > signing at 12.30 today and forward the scores to the Selection Committee > for further approval. > > Regards, > Rajiv Rajani > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 1:13 PM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE <rajiv at ishare.eu> > wrote: > >> Dear Mentors, >> >> As discussed this morning in the call, following was discussed and action >> points are pending. Please finish this task today, so I can send PDF for >> signature and also send scores to the Selection Committee for approval. >> Please confirm to me once you have finished your tasks >> >> Scoring by mentors was seen to be inconsistent, so discussed scoring >> mechanism and agreed following for scoring KPIs/Deliverables: >> >> Scoring on scale of 1-10 - For any KPI that meets the criteria the base >> score is 8 while leaving room for experiments that outperform that criteria >> to be scored 9 or 10 depending on how much extra they perform on the said >> KPI. Below 7 is a rejection. >> >> Questions related to assessment of Communication activities related KPIs >> were raised and were clarified. >> >> AP on Mentors to re-evaluate scores they have given by end of day today >> and update the scores here >> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XOVhj9SZeIOZPSALDEkeuLY1OoZH4WOa9eKh_Gg0XWE/edit#gid=2026593444> >> along with comments justifying scores for experiments. Proper comments must >> be provided, especially incase of rejections as these comments are to be >> sent by the primary mentor to their respective experiments post approval >> from the Selection Committee. >> >> Once the sheet is updated with scores and comments, it must be copied >> into this document and all mentors must sign this document. AP on Rajiv >> to circulate PDF copy of this document for signing >> >> Once complete, the sheet will be sent to the selection committee for >> approval. >> >> Regards, >> Rajiv Rajani >> CTO >> >> iSHARE Foundation >> +31 61 796 2003 <+31617962003> >> iSHARE.eu <https://www.ishare.eu/> >> rajiv at ishare.eu >> >> <https://iSHARE.eu> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust-mentors/attachments/20230123/6abeb54f/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy