Hi Juanjo, The agenda is not entirely clear to me. Will it be in the first slot "i4Trust motivation and vision, major achievements, path ahead", when we will present the execution and achievements of WP1? Also, devoting as much time on WP5 that just started, and where the PEDR hasn't been submitted yet, as other WPs after 18 months of execution, I think is too much. Most of the tasks under this WP have not started yet and the ones that started are delayed, i am afraid we will end the meeting with a negative feeling. Best *Rosa Villaronga* - Reach me at @rosavi <https://spaces.fundingbox.com/@rosavi> Project Manager We are *#FundingChampions* Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/FundingBoxAccelerator/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/FundingBox> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-funding-box-group-s-l-/> This message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain, together with its attachments, confidential information protected by law. If you have received this message by accident or by error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it together with the eventual attachments from your computer. Thank you. Since we have your email address and in relation to any personal data provided by you, we would like to inform you that the data controller is FundingBox Research A/S. with its registered office in Odense, Denmark. FundingBox Research A/S, as a data controller, processes your personal data for purposes related to the subject of this correspondence, in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulations. Everyone has the right to access and correct their personal data. More information in the Privacy Policy <https://fundingbox.com/trust/privacy/> or at privacy at fundingbox.com. Do you really need to print this email? On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:56 AM Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have defined a draft agenda for the i4Trust midterm review > <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19989rdE3cr60UAF4UIz1gzGxTeTECcdYv0y0-NmdSgo/edit?usp=sharing> > for your revision > > Considering all the constrains that the PO provided, I believe there are > not that many different options :-) We may discuss what is the right > order or duration but the topics to cover are the following: > > - i4Trust motivation and vision, major achievements, path ahead > (question mark is whether to add i4Trust demo or not, see comments below) > - i4Trust Open Calls - 1st Open Call and preparation of 2nd Open Call > - i4Trust Ecosystem building activities > - i4Trust mentoring of experiments from 1st Open Call > - i4Trust Exploitation and Sustainability Plans > - Numbers (efforts & costs) > > and I believe we should not plan less of 20 minutes presentation + 10 > minutes Q&A for any of them, with the exception of the presentation on > numbers which I guess we can perform faster. > > I have proposed two agenda options: > > - Option A: Gives more time to the presentation on Ecosystem Building > (30 minutes presentation +10 minutes Q&A), a bit more than with the rest. > In this option, we would give some hints about the technology as part of > the initial presentation. > - Option B: Reduces time for lunch and gives another 10 minutes to > initial presentation so that we can run a demo of i4Trust (which could make > sense if we want to emphasize the message we are talking about software > that works) > > In both options: > > - I have decided not to book a specific slot to talk about the i4Trust > technology because, otherwise, following PO constrains (30 minutes of > discussion with reviewers after each presentation) we would struggle with > the time, I'm afraid. > - the order I have chosen is because we managed to have a positive > result with the 1st Open Call so I thought we would keep things in a rather > good mood if after the first presentation, where we should already be able > to highlight achievements, we elaborate on results of the Open Call. > > Anyways, your feedback is more than welcome. > > Please try to provide it along the day. I have sent to Rosa, Rajiv and > Angeles an invite of half an hour for tomorrow, right before the DACP > meeting, so that we can close the agenda (unless they give me an explicit > positive answer in response to this mail). > > If you want to make a different proposal, please duplicate the tab of > option B, rename it as option C and play with times. Note that you only > need to play with the duration (cells in yellow) > > Cheers, > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Technology Officer > juanjose.hierro at fiware.org > www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro > Twitter: @fiware <https://twitter.com/fiware> @JuanjoHierro > <https://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro> > > > > > > > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: IMPORTANT Fwd: i4Trust, 951975 - midterm review, 18 May 2022 - > preparations > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 06:51:25 +0200 > From: Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> > <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> > To: i4trust at lists.fiware.org > > Hi everyone, > > I received this mail from our PO last week while I was on holiday so I > couldn't forward it to you at that moment. > > Main urgent matter is that we have to propose a draft for the agenda of > the review on May 18th by May 22nd (this Friday). > > I will come with a proposal before 14:00 today so that we can close a > proposal between today and tomorrow and send it on Friday as requested. > > Any input you may want to send to me in the meantime is welcome. > > Cheers, > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Technology Officer > juanjose.hierro at fiware.org > www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro > Twitter: @fiware <https://twitter.com/fiware> @JuanjoHierro > <https://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro> > > > > > > > > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: i4Trust, 951975 - midterm review, 18 May 2022 - preparations > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:25:24 +0000 > From: NAGY Annamaria <Annamaria.NAGY at ec.europa.eu> > <Annamaria.NAGY at ec.europa.eu> > To: Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> > <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> > CC: cnect-h2020-951975 at ec.europa.eu <cnect-h2020-951975 at ec.europa.eu> > <cnect-h2020-951975 at ec.europa.eu> > > Dear Juanjo, > > > > Please find below further information and guides on the upcoming midterm > review and reporting. > > > > *Review meeting, test meeting* > > The review meeting will take place on *18 May 2022*, via video-conference > between *9.30-17.00*. During this review the consortium will report on > the achievements of the first reporting period. I let you choose the > platform that suits the consortium best, so you will need to send out the > calendar invitations for the review and for the test meeting as well to all > participants, including me and the reviewers. > > > > Please organise a *30 min test meeting* at the start of the rehearsal, on *17 > May* in the morning, when I can join in with the two reviewing experts to > test features (presenting, chat function, connection quality), to agree on > meeting rules (raising hands, chat, Q&A, etc.) and also to introduce > ourselves. It is very important that all review participants attend this > technical test. > > > > *Agenda, participants, presentations* > > I would like to ask you to send me the *draft agenda* as soon as ready, > but not later than *22 April*. After we finalise it, I will forward it to > the reviewers. > > > > When planning the meeting, you can follow the work packages or propose any > other structure that you find best to demonstrate the achievements of the > project. > > Please include also: > > - 5-10-minute slots after each presentation for questions and > discussion with the reviewers. (During presentations the chat function > could be used by reviewers to ask questions.) > - a 30-minute break at the end of all presentations, when I can have a > closed meeting with the reviewers > - 15 minutes for feedback from the reviewers to the consortium and > wrap-up > - 30 minutes in the very end dedicated to filling in the innovation > questionnaire > > > > Regarding participants, all should have an active role in the review > meeting. > > > > Please gather* all presentations* of the review and share them with me > and the reviewers the *day before the meeting*. The slides are part of > the review material. > > > > *Periodic Report* > > The Periodic Report, consisting of a technical and a financial part, > should be submitted via the Portal by *31 May 2022* (within 60 days after > the end of the reporting period). > > > > To facilitate the reviewing experts’ work, please send me a * draft* > version of the *Technical Report* one week before the review, by * 11 May* > . > > > > The technical report consists of two parts. > > - Part A – contains the cover page, a publishable summary and the > answers to the questionnaire covering issues related to the project > implementation and the economic and social impact. Part A is based on the > information entered by the participants through the periodic and continuous > reporting modules of the Portal. > - Part B – the narrative part that includes explanations of the work > carried out by the beneficiaries during the reporting period and an > overview of the progress towards the project objectives, justifying the > differences, if any, between the work expected under Annex I of the Grant > Agreement (Description of the Action) and the work actually done. Part B > needs to be uploaded in the system in PDF format. > > > > *Innovation questionnaire* > > We collect information on innovative ideas and organisations in our > projects via a questionnaire to be filled in at the end of reviews. You > have received an information letter about that and the template via the > Portal. Pavel Smrz will be your designated "innovation expert" in addition > to his task as a technical expert and he will fill out and submit the > online form after the review meeting. > > As indicated in the innovation information letter, please provide me by *11 > May* with: > > - the title of each innovation being developed in the project (20 to > 200 characters) > - a description of each innovation (50 to 500 characters) > > As preparation for this exercise, the consortium should reflect on each > question for each of these innovations. It is recommended that key partners > for each of these innovations are present at the meeting. > > > > *Further guidance* > > > > Technical report template with explanations (Part A and Part B): > > > http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/gm/reporting/h2020-tmpl-periodic-rep_en.pdf > > > > Online Manual, Reports & payment requests: > > > https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grant-management/reports_en.htm > > > > On-line Manual, Periodic reports: > > > https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grant-management/reports/periodic-reports_en.htm > > > > Guidance on H2020 periodic reporting electronic submission: > > > https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/funding-tenders-opportunities/display/IT/Periodic+Reporting > > > > Guidance on the technical report submission: > > > https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/funding-tenders-opportunities/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=8913035#Reportingprocess%E2%80%94general-B.CompletingyourcontributiontotheTechnicalPartofthePeriodicReport > > > > Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. > > Many thanks and best regards, > > > > Annamaria > > > > > > *Annam**ária Nagy* > > > > *European Commission* > DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology > Unit G1 - Data Policy and Innovation > > EUROFORUM 1/294 > > 10, rue Robert Stumper, L-2557 Luxembourg > Tel.: +352-4301-33850 > annamaria.nagy at ec.europa.eu > > __________________________________________________________________________________________ > > You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the > following links: > - > https://fiware-legal.readthedocs.io/en/latest/PersonalDataProtectionPolicy.html > - https://fiware-legal.readthedocs.io/en/latest/FIWARECookiesPolicy.html > > > i4trust mailing list > i4trust at lists.fiware.org > > To unsubscribe from i4trust mailing list, go to the information page of > the list at: > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/i4trust > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20220421/f8dd7009/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20220421/f8dd7009/attachment-0001.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3898 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20220421/f8dd7009/attachment-0001.gif>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy