[I4trust] i4Trust - Status / Issues with legal check and urgent decision required

Angeles Tejado angeles.tejado at fiware.org
Fri Jan 7 10:24:18 CET 2022


Hi Juanjo, Imran refers to the list with the contacts we are managing lately
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r9EBum7d1Zqb7kf_TJPdznhgOEF9kAquDP6zeWKbJ6g/edit?usp=sharing

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 09:07, Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org>
wrote:

> Dear Imran,
>
>   Thanks for the update.
>
>   Tuesday Jan 11 at 09:00 - 10:00 CET would collide with the weekly
> meeting of the FIWARE Foundation Board of Officers I have to join.   Could
> it be Tuesday at 08:00am or at 10:00 (preferably at 08:00am)?
>
>   I could also make it on Monday anytime before 10:30am CET or after 17:30
> CET.
>
>   When you number the consortiums ... where do you get the number from?
> I taking a look at the tabs "Selection Days" or "Eligibility check" in the
> spreadsheet summarizing 1st OC results
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16WxYst8WL5Dl7Qii2QH4yQqAgAzDyFuXKFJpwz-GXek/edit?usp=sharing>
> but I guess none of the tabs are helping me to make such a mapping.  Do you
> perhaps refer to the table of section 3 in the i4Trust 1st Open Call
> Provisional Results Report
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XYs7dT7A9ld3PbMHCR5mEWQFO9xX82hFsaBXL6ZS5_c/edit?usp=sharing>?
> I guess so but wanted to confirm.   BTW, I would suggest to add a tab
> "Provisional list" with the table in that section so that we have all
> information compiled in the spreadsheet.
>
>   A couple of questions before the meeting:
>
>    1. Are beneficiaries of these kind of FSTP programmes funded 100% or
>    following the criteria of Horizon 2020 they will be funded 70% if they are
>    companies and only 100% if academia or non-profit?
>    2. Could services of the company in conflict within consortiums no. 11
>    and 14 be hired by one or several SMEs of their respective consortiums?
>    (even though I understand there would be the critical question that because
>    they will be one partner less the funding they would receive overall would
>    be lower).   I guess so the same way as for instance one of the SMEs may
>    have defined budget allocated to hiring of AWS services where they would
>    host their experiment, right?
>
>   Cheers,
>
>   Juanjo
>
>
> On 5/1/22 15:05, Imran Kamal wrote:
>
> Dear i4Trust partners,
>
> Happy New Year and I hope you had a great weekend.
>
> As you are aware, we have been conducting legal checks the last couple of
> weeks and there are some pressing matters that need to be discussed and
> voted upon.
>
> Next week, we have to decide on a few cases, therefore we will need a
> decisive person from each partner to participate in a call. The sooner we
> arrange the meeting, the better for the entire process. I suggest talking
> on *Tuesday, **Jan 11 at 09:00 - 10:00 CET.*
>
> *Link to the meeting:  **meet.google.com/oqs-fice-gxr
> <http://meet.google.com/oqs-fice-gxr>*
>
> *At this point, to sum up, we have 3 consortium that is heading towards
> possible termination (with corresponding status / reasons):*
>
>    - *Consortium no. 2 *- few participants want to terminate the
>    registration. General opinion is that they don't know what they signed
>    up for.
>    - *Consortium no. 9 *- for right now they are not eligible since out
>    of 6 member consortium, 2 are ineligible since they are not SME/SB and 1
>    member (Prodig) do not want to share documentation to confirm their SME/SB
>    status. So, 3 if ineligible, then left only 3 eligible members but to be
>    eligible as a consortium, the minimum is 4.
>    - *Consortium no 11 *- the leader 'Strukton Civiel Startup & Innov.
>    Center (WeCity)' is not SME/slightly bigger and till date, the
>    consortium could not solve this. Asked if they want to participate
>    without a grant or if the leader must be replaced with another entity from
>    the consortium but no feedback.
>
> Other issues:
>
>    - *Consortium no. 14 *– where there is 1 large entity and the leader -
>    through connection with Prodig (the entity which doesn’t want to share the
>    documentation needed to confirm their status) – they will probably not
>    be able to confirm their SME/slightly bigger status.
>    - *Consortium no. 5* – they have already agreed that the 1 entity
>    which is not SME/SB will participate without funding and now, we are
>    waiting for confirmation from our partners.
>
> We need to decide how to move forward considering the current situation so
> I request you to participate in the meeting.
>
> Best,
>
> Imran Kamal - Reach me at @i
> <https://spaces.fundingbox.com/@davidseoanefbox/>mrank
>
> Deputy Project Manager
>
>
>
> We are #FundingChampions
>
> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/FundingBoxAccelerator/> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/FundingBox> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-funding-box-group-s-l-/>
>
> This message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain, together with its attachments, confidential
> information protected by law. If you have received this message by accident
> or by error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it together
> with the eventual attachments from your computer. Thank you. Since we have
> your email address and in relation to any personal data provided by you, we
> would like to inform you that the data controller is FundingBox Communities
> S.L.  with its registered office at Calle Titan, 8, Madrid, 28045  Spain.
> FundingBox Communities S.L.., as a data controller, processes your personal
> data for purposes related to the subject of this correspondence, in
> accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulations.
> Everyone has the right to access and correct their personal data. More
> information in the Privacy Policy <https://fundingbox.com/trust/privacy/>
> or at privacy at fundingbox.com.
>
> Do you really need to print this email?
>
>

-- 
Best regards
Angeles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20220107/54b555a1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the I4trust mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy