Hi Juanjo, Imran refers to the list with the contacts we are managing lately https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r9EBum7d1Zqb7kf_TJPdznhgOEF9kAquDP6zeWKbJ6g/edit?usp=sharing On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 09:07, Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote: > Dear Imran, > > Thanks for the update. > > Tuesday Jan 11 at 09:00 - 10:00 CET would collide with the weekly > meeting of the FIWARE Foundation Board of Officers I have to join. Could > it be Tuesday at 08:00am or at 10:00 (preferably at 08:00am)? > > I could also make it on Monday anytime before 10:30am CET or after 17:30 > CET. > > When you number the consortiums ... where do you get the number from? > I taking a look at the tabs "Selection Days" or "Eligibility check" in the > spreadsheet summarizing 1st OC results > <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16WxYst8WL5Dl7Qii2QH4yQqAgAzDyFuXKFJpwz-GXek/edit?usp=sharing> > but I guess none of the tabs are helping me to make such a mapping. Do you > perhaps refer to the table of section 3 in the i4Trust 1st Open Call > Provisional Results Report > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XYs7dT7A9ld3PbMHCR5mEWQFO9xX82hFsaBXL6ZS5_c/edit?usp=sharing>? > I guess so but wanted to confirm. BTW, I would suggest to add a tab > "Provisional list" with the table in that section so that we have all > information compiled in the spreadsheet. > > A couple of questions before the meeting: > > 1. Are beneficiaries of these kind of FSTP programmes funded 100% or > following the criteria of Horizon 2020 they will be funded 70% if they are > companies and only 100% if academia or non-profit? > 2. Could services of the company in conflict within consortiums no. 11 > and 14 be hired by one or several SMEs of their respective consortiums? > (even though I understand there would be the critical question that because > they will be one partner less the funding they would receive overall would > be lower). I guess so the same way as for instance one of the SMEs may > have defined budget allocated to hiring of AWS services where they would > host their experiment, right? > > Cheers, > > Juanjo > > > On 5/1/22 15:05, Imran Kamal wrote: > > Dear i4Trust partners, > > Happy New Year and I hope you had a great weekend. > > As you are aware, we have been conducting legal checks the last couple of > weeks and there are some pressing matters that need to be discussed and > voted upon. > > Next week, we have to decide on a few cases, therefore we will need a > decisive person from each partner to participate in a call. The sooner we > arrange the meeting, the better for the entire process. I suggest talking > on *Tuesday, **Jan 11 at 09:00 - 10:00 CET.* > > *Link to the meeting: **meet.google.com/oqs-fice-gxr > <http://meet.google.com/oqs-fice-gxr>* > > *At this point, to sum up, we have 3 consortium that is heading towards > possible termination (with corresponding status / reasons):* > > - *Consortium no. 2 *- few participants want to terminate the > registration. General opinion is that they don't know what they signed > up for. > - *Consortium no. 9 *- for right now they are not eligible since out > of 6 member consortium, 2 are ineligible since they are not SME/SB and 1 > member (Prodig) do not want to share documentation to confirm their SME/SB > status. So, 3 if ineligible, then left only 3 eligible members but to be > eligible as a consortium, the minimum is 4. > - *Consortium no 11 *- the leader 'Strukton Civiel Startup & Innov. > Center (WeCity)' is not SME/slightly bigger and till date, the > consortium could not solve this. Asked if they want to participate > without a grant or if the leader must be replaced with another entity from > the consortium but no feedback. > > Other issues: > > - *Consortium no. 14 *– where there is 1 large entity and the leader - > through connection with Prodig (the entity which doesn’t want to share the > documentation needed to confirm their status) – they will probably not > be able to confirm their SME/slightly bigger status. > - *Consortium no. 5* – they have already agreed that the 1 entity > which is not SME/SB will participate without funding and now, we are > waiting for confirmation from our partners. > > We need to decide how to move forward considering the current situation so > I request you to participate in the meeting. > > Best, > > Imran Kamal - Reach me at @i > <https://spaces.fundingbox.com/@davidseoanefbox/>mrank > > Deputy Project Manager > > > > We are #FundingChampions > > Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/FundingBoxAccelerator/> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/FundingBox> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-funding-box-group-s-l-/> > > This message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain, together with its attachments, confidential > information protected by law. If you have received this message by accident > or by error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it together > with the eventual attachments from your computer. Thank you. Since we have > your email address and in relation to any personal data provided by you, we > would like to inform you that the data controller is FundingBox Communities > S.L. with its registered office at Calle Titan, 8, Madrid, 28045 Spain. > FundingBox Communities S.L.., as a data controller, processes your personal > data for purposes related to the subject of this correspondence, in > accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulations. > Everyone has the right to access and correct their personal data. More > information in the Privacy Policy <https://fundingbox.com/trust/privacy/> > or at privacy at fundingbox.com. > > Do you really need to print this email? > > -- Best regards Angeles -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20220107/54b555a1/attachment-0001.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy