Hi Rosa and Juanjo, Can we please close this today and submit it today? Regards, Rajiv Rajani On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 8:44 AM Rosa Villaronga < rosa.villaronga at fundingbox.com> wrote: > Dear Juanjo and Rajiv, > > thanks for the suggestion, as I have mentioned in the document I have to > check internally what FBOX can offer to the DIH beyond the project, I need > a couple of days > > best, > > *Rosa Villaronga* - Reach me at @rosavi > <https://spaces.fundingbox.com/@rosavi> > > Project Manager > > <https://fundingbox.com/> > > We are #FundingChampions > > Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/FundingBoxAccelerator/> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/FundingBox> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-funding-box-group-s-l-/> > > This message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain, together with its attachments, confidential > information protected by law. If you have received this message by accident > or by error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it together > with the eventual attachments from your computer. Thank you. Since we have > your email address, we would like to inform you that the data controllers > are all entities in FundingBox Capital Group > <https://fundingbox.com/trust/company/> as joint controllers > <https://fundingbox.com/trust/jointcontrollers/>. Joint controllers > process your personal data for purposes related to the subject of this > correspondence, in accordance with the provisions of the GDPR. Everyone has > the right to access and correct their personal data. More information can > be found in the information clause > <https://fundingbox.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/FBOX_information-clause_-general-communication_art.14.pdf> > or in the Privacy Policy <https://fundingbox.com/trust/privacy/>. In case > of privacy-related questions, you can contact us at privacy at fundingbox.com > . > > Do you really need to print this email? > > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 05:18, Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> > wrote: > >> >> Great. >> >> @Rosa: please provide something for section 2.4.3 which can work not >> only beyond the project duration but also for DIHs which may approach us >> now but are not involved in any experiment selected through the 2nd Open >> Call. If you cannot commit anything, that is fine: we will drop out the >> entire section. If you allow me to make a proposal, I believe FundingBox >> may offer partnering with DIHs that are willing to develop proposals >> towards EU open calls that contemplate cascade funding for the selection of >> pioneer experiments using i4Trust building blocks, FundingBox taking care >> of managing the cascade funding. Those DIHs participating in the original >> consortia of the mentioned projects and designing the challenges for the >> open calls to publish and helping to mentor and bring support, since they >> will have LEBDS in their staff, to selected pioneers experiments (very much >> along the lines how DIH^2 works). You could make a reference to the >> methodology described in chapter 6. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Juanjo >> >> >> On 1/2/23 14:45, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote: >> >> Thank you Juanjo for updating the deliverable. I have reviewed and >> accepted your suggestions. Only open point is for @Rosa Villaronga >> <rosa.villaronga at fundingbox.com> to provide the input as you already >> pointed out. Once she provides I think the document is good to go for >> submission. >> >> Regards, >> Rajiv Rajani >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 7:34 AM Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rajiv, >>> >>> The review process took longer than expected because still there were >>> changes needed to transform this deliverable into the basis for an >>> Onboarding Kit for DIHs that may work not just along the duration of the >>> project but beyond. You may remember that was the most important reason >>> that justifies creation of this new version of the deliverable. >>> >>> Now I have produced a version >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m9j9kUES2JHg076aJXR73pVprX9nwI7FmR6GgujN2GQ/edit?usp=sharing> >>> that, to my taste, is ready for submission if all suggested edits are >>> accepted. Major changes: >>> >>> - I produced quite a number of suggestions here and there to allow >>> this DIH Onboarding Kit becomes "atemporal", that is, can work beyond >>> duration of the project. I keep them as suggested edits so that you can >>> perform a very final review. >>> - I make some major re-structuring of the document which I have >>> implemented already rather than keeping as suggested edits (because >>> otherwise the document would show to many changes): >>> - I dropped the contents related to definition of KPIs for the >>> Ambassador Programme since they are already covered in another deliverable >>> and including them here would make that part obsolete once the current >>> project ends >>> - I added opportunities of collaboration with i4Trust core >>> partners as a section within the chapter on the role of DIHs, rather than >>> in the chapter where it was before. >>> - I moved the section describing the i4Trust Community platform >>> into a new chapter, leaving the chapter on the role of DIHs very clean and >>> focused on that, the role of DIHs >>> - I moved the chapter on open calls to the end >>> - I change the wording of the chapter on open calls to make it >>> generic. I have accepted all my changes so that you have a clean section >>> to review. >>> >>> @Rajiv: please review remaining suggested edits to confirm you are ok >>> with those changes. >>> >>> @Rajiv: please review contents of the section on collaboration >>> opportunity with iSHARE >>> >>> @Rosa: please review contents fo the section on collaboration >>> opportunity with FundingBox. As already commented by Rajiv, the existing >>> text taken from the goodbye letter to consortium that finalized their >>> experiments during the first i4Trust mentoring program (open call 1) >>> doesn't look as valid beyond duration of the current project. >>> >>> @All: please review contents of the generic open call chapter I have >>> produced. >>> >>> I'm this week in Arizona so bear in mind I won't be able to react >>> until your night. However, I don't see why we shouldn't be able to >>> finalize the deliverable between today and tomorrow and submit it. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Juanjo >>> >>> >>> On 31/1/23 09:06, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote: >>> >>> Hi Juanjo, >>> >>> As has been discussed yesterday, can you either finish the deliverable >>> D1.7 or send extension request to PO. I still see that this deliverable has >>> not been worked upon. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rajiv Rajani >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 6:03 PM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE <rajiv at ishare.eu> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Juanjo, >>>> >>>> Thank you for the review and comments. I have gone through them. There >>>> are still some open comments if you can have a look at them. On section 4, >>>> I have added comments and shared with you my rationale of having that >>>> section. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:52 PM Juanjo Hierro < >>>> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Rajiv, >>>>> >>>>> I have conducted a careful revision of D4.1. >>>>> >>>>> In general, the document is well structured, with a lot of details >>>>> which helps the reader to understand what happened. Very good in that >>>>> respect. >>>>> >>>>> However, it was a surprise to find that there were several parts of >>>>> the document which apparently were copy and paste of communications of the >>>>> experiments or global coordination meeting minutes. As a consequence, the >>>>> tone used (e.g., "during the workshop ... your experiment ..." or "... >>>>> Juanjo tends to think that we should run it virtually ..."). Thanks god I >>>>> decided to go for this careful review instead of taking as granted >>>>> everything was ok (and it seemed from a high level review). >>>>> >>>>> The decisions on verb tense to use were sometimes rather strange. I >>>>> found inconsistencies in the verb tense being used when describing a stage >>>>> and what happened during the stage. Thus, stage 0, 1 and 2 were described >>>>> in present tense (a bit strange) while the description of stage 3 was in >>>>> past tense. I then have changed them all to be past tense since this is a >>>>> report of something that happened, this way also making them consistent). >>>>> It was strange that a future tense was used in some cases referring to >>>>> things that took place in the past (overall, when the date was given, e.g., >>>>> "The Welcome event will take place virtually ... until January 28th >>>>> 2022"). I moved them also to past tense. Bottom line, I tried to do my >>>>> best to leave things as harmonized and meaningful as possible but took >>>>> quite some time and rather detailed review. >>>>> >>>>> Besides, that lot of suggested edits here and there. >>>>> >>>>> Please review the suggested edits and produce a clean version we can >>>>> submit. >>>>> >>>>> I will take care of D1.7 tonight. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Juanjo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 23/1/23 11:35, Juanjo Hierro wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> As explained on whatsapp, review of the Playbook kept me busy all >>>>> the time I had booked for reviews during the weekend. Now deliverables 1.7 >>>>> and 4.1 are top priority. >>>>> >>>>> I'm currently on D4.1 as you explained to me that is a longer >>>>> hanging fruit. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Juanjo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 23/1/23 10:37, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Juanjo, >>>>> >>>>> It's been days and no updates from your end are still part of the >>>>> document. Can you finish the updates today as we had discussed. I would >>>>> like that these deliverables are submitted today itself. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:36 PM Juanjo Hierro < >>>>> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I plan to finalize my final review tonight. Unfortunately, I >>>>>> couldn't spend the time I was planning during the weekend and yesterday and >>>>>> today got very busy. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Juanjo >>>>>> On 17/1/23 09:32, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear Partners, >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you please finish your part in D4.1 and D1.7 deliverables. As was >>>>>> discussed last Friday, I was expecting updates in D1.7 but I do not see any >>>>>> updates. >>>>>> For D4.1 there are only a few comments, if you can close them, we can >>>>>> prepare that deliverable for submission. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 10:24 AM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE < >>>>>> rajiv at ishare.eu> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Partners, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have not seen a single edit in any of these deliverables from any >>>>>>> of you. Can you please make sure that you finish the deliverables today so >>>>>>> we can submit them asap? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Especially, D1.7 has quite some edits pending and have been tagged >>>>>>> to relevant people, please look into it >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:29 PM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE < >>>>>>> rajiv at ishare.eu> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Partners, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As have been sent earlier following deliverables have been shared >>>>>>>> for your contribution and review many times. Given that the deadline was >>>>>>>> already the end of December, can we please expedite its finalisation? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> D1.4 - Train the Trainers Program >>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HS86OinRd5SU4gpncqpXD5uooXhbIR4UDeEm30g4wKs/edit#slide=id.p> >>>>>>>> - I see some contribution is still pending, can you finish the same at >>>>>>>> earliest? >>>>>>>> D1.7 - i4Trust Onboarding Kit >>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m9j9kUES2JHg076aJXR73pVprX9nwI7FmR6GgujN2GQ/edit#heading=h.xwd6v0nwb2xe> >>>>>>>> - I have updated the document as per our last discussion for my part, >>>>>>>> remaining contributions are pending >>>>>>>> D4.1 - Report on B2B Data Sharing Mentoring Program >>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WG8KEXu1cigQP-VfoIuAcB1YTh-yIk5A_LpC_rAAbxs/edit#heading=h.xwd6v0nwb2xe> - >>>>>>>> I see mostly the content is updated, however, still some of the items are >>>>>>>> pending. Can you finish and review the document? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>>>>>> CTO >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> iSHARE Foundation >>>>>>>> +31 61 796 2003 <+31617962003> >>>>>>>> iSHARE.eu <https://www.ishare.eu/> >>>>>>>> rajiv at ishare.eu >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://iSHARE.eu> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20230203/b6af862b/attachment-0001.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy