Hi Andreas, other WP3 colleagues, Andreas, thanks you for thinking with us. All, after doing my updates, as promised, I am still looking for help from the WP3 side, the side of the document authors, · to answer the questions in 1., asked by Alex and/or John, and possibly include the answers in the document · to help with the difficult comment on 2, and comments AG5 and AG6. · to do the editorial changes on 5. Author? I removed the reference in 2 towards 4, and consider it removed by that action. Andreas, Your point that 4 (and 1 and 5) do not match the guidelines is that only related to the fact that they do not contain an API? They cover a user interface, which is difficult to describe in general terms. Regards, Mathieu ________________________________ From: Klein, Andreas [mailto:andreas.klein at sap.com] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 4:15 PM To: Mathieu Hutschemaekers Cc: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-apps] WP3 Architecture Descriptions and Open Specifications Peer Review Hi Mathieu, 1. Composition Engine Open API Specification (PRELIMINARY) - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc Only two questions, they are still open, Who can answer them? I would suggest that you direct the questions to the guys who did the review. In this case it is either Alex Glikson (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com<mailto:GLIKSON at il.ibm.com>) or John Kennedy (john.m.kennedy at intel.com<mailto:john.m.kennedy at intel.com>) who can help you. 2. FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc I will update according to the editorial changes and updates. I have a problem responding to the comment The document should be focusing on GEs, rather than their specific implementations. Of course, examples might be useful when they help understanding the architecture details. But the distinction should be clear - throughout the document. You can also ask Alex and John if they have an idea how resolve this issue, but I see their point. Your Architecture Description seems partially very narrow and specific to your concrete software artifacts and screenshots of concrete implementations strengthen this impression. AG6 and AG7 are still open. 3. FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionExecution - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc I will update according the editorial comment. OK 4. FIWARE.OpenSpecification.Apps.CompositionEditor - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc The reviewer thinks this document is not needed. If I remove it should I also remove the reference to it? Where is that reference? I think the reviewers just want to tell you that the document is not needed in the form it is right now, because it does not match the guidelines. From my point of view the same is also true for Composition Engine Open API Specification and the Web Gadget Open API Specification. 5. Web Gadget Open API Specification (PRELIMINARY) - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc Editiorial changes and comments only- still open. Yes, we were promised to get the comments by end of business day. We will forward them to you as soon as we receive them. Regards Andreas From: Mathieu Hutschemaekers [mailto:mathieu.hutschemaekers at ericsson.com] Sent: Freitag, 31. August 2012 15:28 To: Klein, Andreas; 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-apps] WP3 Architecture Descriptions and Open Specifications Peer Review Hi Andreas, all, I have been looking at the comments for Composition. 1. Composition Engine Open API Specification (PRELIMINARY) - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc Only two questions, they are still open, Who can answer them? 2. FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionEditor - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc I will update according to the editorial changes and updates. I have a problem responding to the comment The document should be focusing on GEs, rather than their specific implementations. Of course, examples might be useful when they help understanding the architecture details. But the distinction should be clear - throughout the document. AG6 and AG7 are still open. 3. FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Apps.CompositionExecution - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc I will update according the editorial comment. 4. FIWARE.OpenSpecification.Apps.CompositionEditor - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc The reviewer thinks this document is not needed. If I remove it should I also remove the reference to it? Where is that reference? 5. Web Gadget Open API Specification (PRELIMINARY) - FI-WARE Forge Wiki.doc Editiorial changes and comments only- still open. Regards, Mathieu ________________________________ From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Klein, Andreas Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:44 AM To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] WP3 Architecture Descriptions and Open Specifications Peer Review Importance: High and here are the documents :) From: Klein, Andreas Sent: Donnerstag, 30. August 2012 09:43 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: Riss, Uwe Subject: WP3 Architecture Descriptions and Open Specifications Peer Review Importance: High Dear WP3 Colleagues, we have received the major part of the peer review feedback for our Architecture Descriptions and Open Specifications. Please have a close look at the documents that concern GEs you are responsible for and update them accordingly by end of this week. If a peer review for your Architecture Descriptions or Open Specifications is still missing don't worry, we expect to receive the missing parts today. Thanks & Regards Andreas Andreas Klein SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe T +49-6227-7-52554 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschaeftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdruecklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-apps/attachments/20120831/220d4659/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy