Hi Koen, Please find attached our contribution. In some points we refer to the business model instead of referring to individual GEs. I think that it is a reasonable approach. Best regards, Javier 2013/9/26 koen casier <koen.casier at intec.ugent.be> > Dear all, > > > I have taken the input from Javier and made up a first 2 slides for T3.3. > You can find the input in attachment, > This is only input from iMinds and I would need the following information > from all T3.3. partners to complete this: > 1 - input on dissemination and standardization: did you attend the opendo > you plan or did you write papers, setup sites, contribute to a standard, > etc. > 2 - input on the planning: what did you do in the last period (deliver for > 3.1) and what are you planning to do in the next period (3.2 and 3.3). > Additional note: identify in both point 1 and 2 (in color or sentence) > which aspects have not yet been fully covered (i.e. what is planned --> > colored red now) > Try to be concise and bundle where possible into one sentence. > > > best regards, > Koen Casier (iMinds) > > > On 9/25/2013 8:34 PM, Javier Soriano (FI-UPM) wrote: > > Dear T3.1 colleagues, > > Regarding this action point from Markus: > > > >> 2) >> @TaskLeads: Please prepare 1-2 PPT slides (free layout) describing work >> from perspective of your WP3 task with focus on “since Review” so to say: >> results/success, current activities in your task, planned steps until end >> of projects. Please collect/compile from your task partners, if needed. >> Please identify open issues / blockers as well. The aim is to gain a >> common understanding where we are and about the remaining time. >> >> >> >> T3.1: UPM >> >> T3.2: SAP >> >> T3.3: IMinds >> >> > > I am attaching a PPT with the input from UPM, which could be used as an > example (or counterexample :-). Please send me your own input to each and > every section in those slides asap, so that I can compile it before our > weekly telco tomorrow (when possible). > > All of us were aware of this action point, but please accept my > apologies for making this specific request at very short notice. Hope you > find helpful our own input. > > As mentioned by Markus, Amendment 5 DOW WP3 should be considered when > providing your input to be confident that we are covering what was promised > in the DoW, which as you know represents our contract with the EC. > > According to that document, EAB, DT, THALES, TI, ATOS and UDE should > provide input for T3.1. Nevertheless, I am quite sure that there is a > mistake in the list of partners assigned to T3.1 in the DoW :-/ > > Best regards, > Javier > > >> >> >> >> FYI I have attached the Amendment 5 DOW WP3 part with task description >> and the deliverables overview in this mail for your help. >> >> * * >> >> As always, please contact me for any questions/Clarifications if needed. >> >> >> >> Best wishes >> >> Markus >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-apps mailing list >> Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps >> >> > > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-apps mailing listFiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.euhttps://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-apps mailing list > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps > > -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-apps/attachments/20130927/0da34ad2/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: T3.3. progress report.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 64369 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-apps/attachments/20130927/0da34ad2/attachment.pptx>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy