Hi all, Under leadership of Juan Barreno we have to deliver the WP3 part of D.11.1.3: FI-WARE Market and Competition Analysis. D11.1.3 goes hand in hand with the D11.2.3 Exploitation Plan where we also have to contribute. I attach the current WORD draft of the deliverable and explain the approach (attachment): A) Table of Contents: Please check the attached WORD, I have structured our WP3 contributions to D11.1.3 like this: We need to deliver the WP3 part there, where we contribute the complete section 4.3 "Economy of Internet Application". Please check also the COMMENTS and the chapters 4.4ff where I (will be deleted) later copy/pasted possible texts from SOTA, Market Study, or Exploitation Plan deliverables which might be helpful for you (or not). [cid:image005.png at 01CF5E51.BAAC9C30] B) Needed Contributions: · The sections on "3.4.1 Market Structures" and "3.4.2 Vertical Markets" are requested by Juan and reviewers - and they will be collectively written by us all. · For this to happen, we will in each subsection simply report along the "usage scenarios" concept that we have introduced in our last D11.2.2 "Exploitation Plan". Reason behind is that this allows this way to have more targeted areas/partial market where we can write about: "These building blocks are described along four key usage scenarios (see D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan). In the following, the analysis is structured according to these key usage scenarios which address different partial markets. 1. Exploring new business models with the Business Framework (@ UPM, SAP, iMinds, TID) 2. Revenue sharing (@TID) 3. Supporting service composition and crowd-sourcing (@ATOS, UPM, EAB, DT) 4. Supporting Interoperability with Mediation (@TI, THALES)" C) Teams/Authors: · per usage scenario, we contribute in the teams as marked above in the YELLOW marking. D) Deadlines for D11.1.3: · "Wave 1" - only for M36 leaving partners (SAP, iminds, DT) --> Juan did not set a deadline, so I neded to set one. I set it to 28.April EOB so that we need to deliver this week the contents or on Monday next week. · "Wave 2" - for all others staying longer --> Juan did not set a deadline E) Your Action Items: · @SAP, iMinds, DT: Please proceed and contribute your part of the work, please reach out to your coauthors for this to happen. o Only wave 1 partners need to contribute NOW (SAP, iMinds, DT), the others can deliver later if they wish according to Juan. o I see a dilemma that e.g. for usage scenario 1 and 2, wave 1 partners need to deliver with wave 2 partners so how to ensure that they fit together. o To solve this dilemma, the wave 1 partners must write useful (!) section NOW and contact your wave2 co-authors NOW to align/agree that your wave 1 contribution works together with their wave 2 contributions. I will also try to ensure this - but I will leave in 2 weeks so I recommend to organize this between you also to be on the safe side here. Please signal if you have difficulties here, so that I can try to help. o Wave 1 authors will deliver until deadline (28.4.) and the parts are delivered to TID as "internal deliverable" to get a small contribution certificate that we have delivered. · @ALL OTHERS: o Please contact your wave 1 co-authors on your own align/agree with your co-authors NOW that your wave 2 contribution works together with the wave 1 contributions. I will also try to ensure this - but I will leave in 2 weeks so I recommend to organize this between you also to be on the safe side here. Please signal if you have difficulties here, so that I can try to help. Orga Telco possible: If many wish, we can organize a telco tomorrow on this topic to make sure that no questions remain. Please signal your interest... Best wishes Markus --------- Hi Markus The 28th is Ok for me Best Juan Juan Bareño Research & Innovation Account Executive European Union Institutions-Iberia T. +34 912 148 859 M. +34 625 598 216 juan.bareno at atos.net<mailto:juan.bareno at atos.net> Albarracín, 25 28037 Madrid - Spain atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CF21D2.D8BA98F0] From: Heller, Markus [mailto:markus.heller at sap.com] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 3:38 PM To: Bareno Guerenabarrena, Juan Subject: RE: WP11 Tasks for partners leaving on M36 Hi Juan, What is the deadline date for the Exploitation Plan and for the Market analysis to be delivered to you, I have not found a given deadline below, sorry? I guess you do not need to carry out checks but just more or less, if the format etc appropriate, collect our plan and check it and then together with TID issue the "internal deliverable certificate" then for this contribution. So would a deadline Monday 28.04. ok you? Best Markus From: Bareno Guerenabarrena, Juan [mailto:juan.bareno at atos.net] Sent: Dienstag, 8. April 2014 20:09 To: fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; Heller, Markus; Amon, Peter (p.amon at siemens.com<mailto:p.amon at siemens.com>); Bettina.Lehmann at telekom.de<mailto:Bettina.Lehmann at telekom.de>; Hans.Einsiedler at telekom.de<mailto:Hans.Einsiedler at telekom.de>; Banniza, Thomas-Rolf (Thomas-Rolf (thomas-rolf.banniza at alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:thomas-rolf.banniza at alcatel-lucent.com>); Wuenstel, Klaus (Klaus (klaus.wuenstel at alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:klaus.wuenstel at alcatel-lucent.com>); Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich (robert.seidl at nsn.com<mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com>); koen.casier at intec.ugent.be<mailto:koen.casier at intec.ugent.be> Cc: lindsay.frost at neclab.eu<mailto:lindsay.frost at neclab.eu>; De-Lama Sanchez, Nuria; mcp at tid.es<mailto:mcp at tid.es> Subject: WP11 Tasks for partners leaving on M36 Dear Colleagues I need your contributions to WP11 deliverables before you leave the project on M36. My colleague Lindsay Frost from NEC, in cc, should demand your contributions for standardization deliverable. Basically I need the following: · Individual exploitation plans, from the partners in the list below, following the instructions defined in each individual partner profile, see Annex 1- D11.2.3 attached. · All the individual exploitation plans should be described in the Annex 1 of the D11.2.3 · Just additional/significative info that should be consider as confidential could be delivered in a confidential basis to Arian (Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>) · We will make a follow-up in the next WPL meetings [cid:image005.jpg at 01CF57F7.E6EEEBF0] [cid:image006.jpg at 01CF57F7.E6EEEBF0] · WP3 contribution, as SAP leads it, regarding D11.1.3- Apps - Market Analysis (state of art, competitors, similar solutions in the market, potential added value, potential business models...) and D11.2.3- FI WARE Apps building block Exploitation (added value, business model selected, FI-Lab modus operandi.....)- SEE Initial draft TOCs attached and add or provide reference documents to complete · Please take into account the following recommendations for the next review, some contribution (reference text, studies, references...) for the following recommendations for the review, will be very welcome and appreciated: D11.1.3- Market Analysis · Analysis of last review recommendations analysis · Continue to analyze ICT Market situation in relation with GEs · The exploitation of FI technologies in the three main market sectors of Smart Cities, Smart Business, and Smart Home needs to be deepened · The perspectives of the demand side are comparatively lacking even for the main verticals identified, e.g. business related services and manufacturing · The policy and regulatory analysis in relation to the specific themes (Data protection, Cloud Computing, FI-LAB modus operandi) D11.2.3- Exploitation Plan · FI-LAB Modus Operandi, Financing and Business model definition is needed and even how this vehicle is to be created in the first instance is totally opaque and uncertain. · To define the extent of collaboration with the EIT ICT lab · The potential policy issues and impact on the specific exploitation activities of FI-WARE partners and the evolution of the FI LAB should be more specifically identified and described · At a detailed level, the document is less concrete in the examples and scenario descriptions provided in the Apps market sections. Some statements might be (even) more convincing if backed up by survey results; e.g. the business opportunity of the M2M market · Individual exploitation plans, from the partners in the list below, following the instructions defined in each individual partner profile, see Annex 1- D11.2.3 attached. D11.4.3- Standardization · A Standardization Global Picture is required, as an effective means to enable market uptake of FI WARE results Juan Bareño Research & Innovation Account Executive European Union Institutions-Iberia T. +34 912 148 859 M. +34 625 598 216 juan.bareno at atos.net<mailto:juan.bareno at atos.net> Albarracín, 25 28037 Madrid - Spain atos.net [cid:image007.jpg at 01CF57F7.E6EEEBF0] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 8372932 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-apps/attachments/20140422/d3ca4a76/attachment.bin>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy