From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 3 14:53:29 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:53:29 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Reminder for open spec deadline today --> FW: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7B616@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi all, Reminder: Let me remind you that the open spec deadline to contribute your content in Private Wiki pages is today. Today EOB or tomorrow morning we are going to create the WORD document OpenSpecs based on your content in the Wiki under: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework_Open_Specs We are going to proceed now with the generation assuming that the current WIKI content (link above) for your GE can be put into the deliverable open spec WORD and use the current content per GE. I have seen that often no manual update was done after the fiware-bot copy action (history tab of Wiki page per GE)... @All: Have you updated all info here? If not, please use your last chance now/today....and if you need to do so, please mail me now to notify me so that we can see if we wait for you & update your contents immediately today. Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Dienstag, 28. Januar 2014 12:24 To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines Dear all, It is time to update the Open Specs and the Open specs APIs to prepare the delivery for the EC. I will try to put all the needed info in one message. We have two different groups of GEs with different schedules: * Those who will extend their activity until M40 (August 2014) * Those who will stop the development of GEs in M36(April 2014) Those leaving on M36 are basically: * the ones who voted to leave early (see attachment) * or those who did not offer their GE under an open source license when the M30 review took place(later changes are not relevant for this) Most of you know where you are. In any cases, as there might be confusions, I will try to add a column to the GE list stating the termination date: * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqLSWp0KXaaDdEpLT0RmXzhzbXEtSTVvSE5wX3oyWXc#gid=0 Schedule for those leaving on M36: * 3/Feb/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review * Edition on PRIVATE WIKI * WPL to generate word doc for review * 4/Feb/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready * 7/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) * 13/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator * From 13 to 21, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. * 21/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC (WPL to put it together) * 28/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents Schedule for those staying until M40: * 14/Mar/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review * Edition in PRIVATE WIKI * Generate word doc for review * 17/Mar/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready * 24/Mar/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) * 31/Mar/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator * From 31/Mar to 28/April, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. (note the that Easter is in this interval) * 28/Apr/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC (WPL to put it together) * 5/May/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents You can start editing this now on : * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/OpenSpecs_v3 I am assuming that the WPL/WPAs will coordinate their WPs and resolve internally the doubts that may arise. All direct edits on the public wiki will be reverted without asking. We will prepare a submission cockpit shortly. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE Extension Vote (Dec 2013).png Type: image/png Size: 224516 bytes Desc: FI-WARE Extension Vote (Dec 2013).png URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001.txt URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 3 16:35:19 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:35:19 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] test Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7B714@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi, please ignore this test mail..... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 3 16:38:46 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:38:46 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] test2 Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7B765@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 4 14:06:12 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:06:12 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Reminder for open spec deadline today --> FW: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D722@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi all, Open specs: I assume that only SAP and UPM have contributions here and that all other partners have NOT contributed here (will do later). I will only check those two contribution partners today and proceed. Please signal otherwise now. Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Montag, 3. Februar 2014 14:53 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Reminder for open spec deadline today --> FW: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines Hi all, Reminder: Let me remind you that the open spec deadline to contribute your content in Private Wiki pages is today. Today EOB or tomorrow morning we are going to create the WORD document OpenSpecs based on your content in the Wiki under: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework_Open_Specs We are going to proceed now with the generation assuming that the current WIKI content (link above) for your GE can be put into the deliverable open spec WORD and use the current content per GE. I have seen that often no manual update was done after the fiware-bot copy action (history tab of Wiki page per GE)... @All: Have you updated all info here? If not, please use your last chance now/today....and if you need to do so, please mail me now to notify me so that we can see if we wait for you & update your contents immediately today. Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Dienstag, 28. Januar 2014 12:24 To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines Dear all, It is time to update the Open Specs and the Open specs APIs to prepare the delivery for the EC. I will try to put all the needed info in one message. We have two different groups of GEs with different schedules: * Those who will extend their activity until M40 (August 2014) * Those who will stop the development of GEs in M36(April 2014) Those leaving on M36 are basically: * the ones who voted to leave early (see attachment) * or those who did not offer their GE under an open source license when the M30 review took place(later changes are not relevant for this) Most of you know where you are. In any cases, as there might be confusions, I will try to add a column to the GE list stating the termination date: * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqLSWp0KXaaDdEpLT0RmXzhzbXEtSTVvSE5wX3oyWXc#gid=0 Schedule for those leaving on M36: * 3/Feb/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review * Edition on PRIVATE WIKI * WPL to generate word doc for review * 4/Feb/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready * 7/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) * 13/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator * From 13 to 21, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. * 21/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC (WPL to put it together) * 28/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents Schedule for those staying until M40: * 14/Mar/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for peer review * Edition in PRIVATE WIKI * Generate word doc for review * 17/Mar/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready * 24/Mar/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) * 31/Mar/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the review of the coordinator * From 31/Mar to 28/April, interactions with the coordinator to refine the docs. (note the that Easter is in this interval) * 28/Apr/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to the EC (WPL to put it together) * 5/May/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open Specs contents You can start editing this now on : * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/OpenSpecs_v3 I am assuming that the WPL/WPAs will coordinate their WPs and resolve internally the doubts that may arise. All direct edits on the public wiki will be reverted without asking. We will prepare a submission cockpit shortly. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koen.casier at intec.ugent.be Tue Feb 4 17:13:19 2014 From: koen.casier at intec.ugent.be (koen casier) Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:13:19 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Reminder for open spec deadline today --> FW: [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D722@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D722@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <52F1119F.7070702@intec.ugent.be> Dear all, From iMinds we have updated the open specifications on the wiki in regards to the release at the end of the year. I believe we had to perform no additional update now, considering that everything is still up to date? best regards, Koen On 2/4/2014 2:06 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Hi all, > > Open specs: I assume that only SAP and UPM have contributions here and > that all other partners have NOT contributed here (will do later). > > I will only check those two contribution partners today and proceed. > Please signal otherwise now. > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*Heller, Markus > *Sent:* Montag, 3. Februar 2014 14:53 > *To:* 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' > *Subject:* Reminder for open spec deadline today --> FW: [Fiware-wpl] > Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines > > Hi all, > > Reminder: Let me remind you that the open spec deadline to contribute > your content in Private Wiki pages is today. > > Today EOB or tomorrow morning we are going to create the WORD document > OpenSpecs based on your content in the Wiki under: > > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Architecture_of_Applications_and_Services_Ecosystem_and_Delivery_Framework_Open_Specs > > We are going to proceed now with the generation assuming that the > current WIKI content (link above) for your GE can be put into the > deliverable open spec WORD and use the current content per GE. I have > seen that often no manual update was done after the fiware-bot copy > action (history tab of Wiki page per GE)... > > @All: Have you updated all info here? If not, please use your last > chance now/today....and if you need to do so, please mail me now to > notify me so that we can see if we wait for you & update your contents > immediately today. > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > > [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *Miguel > Carrillo > *Sent:* Dienstag, 28. Januar 2014 12:24 > *To:* fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Cc:* fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > > *Subject:* [Fiware-wpl] Open Specs Release 3 - guidelines > > Dear all, > > It is time to update the Open Specs and the Open specs APIs to prepare > the delivery for the EC. I will try to put all the needed info in one > message. > > We have two different groups of GEs with different schedules: > > * Those who will extend their activity until M40 (August 2014) > * Those who will stop the development of GEs in M36(April 2014) > > Those leaving on M36 are basically: > > * the ones who voted to leave early (see attachment) > * or those who did not offer their GE under an open source license > when the M30 review took place(later changes are not relevant for > this) > > Most of you know where you are. In any cases, as there might be > confusions, I will try to add a column to the GE list stating the > termination date: > > * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqLSWp0KXaaDdEpLT0RmXzhzbXEtSTVvSE5wX3oyWXc#gid=0 > > > Schedule for those leaving on M36: > > * 3/Feb/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for > peer review > o Edition on PRIVATE WIKI > o WPL to generate word doc for review > * 4/Feb/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready > * 7/Feb/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) > * 13/Feb/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the > review of the coordinator > o From 13 to 21, interactions with the coordinator to refine the > docs. > * 21/Feb/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to > the EC (WPL to put it together) > * 28/Feb/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & > Open Specs contents > > Schedule for those staying until M40: > > * 14/Mar/2014 - First draft of contributions by chapter ready for > peer review > o Edition in PRIVATE WIKI > o Generate word doc for review > * 17/Mar/2014 - .docx first version of chapter ready > * 24/Mar/2014 - Comments on first draft (.docx with traced changes) > * 31/Mar/2014 - .docx second version of chapters ready for the > review of the coordinator > o From 31/Mar to 28/April, interactions with the coordinator to > refine the docs. (note the that Easter is in this interval) > * 28/Apr/2014 - Final .docx version ready for delivery + delivery to > the EC (WPL to put it together) > * 5/May/2014 - Public wiki updated 100% with new architecture & Open > Specs contents > > You can start editing this now on : > > * https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/OpenSpecs_v3 > > > I am assuming that the WPL/WPAs will coordinate their WPs and resolve > internally the doubts that may arise. > > *_All direct edits on the public wiki will be reverted without asking._* > > We will prepare a submission cockpit shortly. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail:mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter:http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-apps mailing list > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 4 17:49:59 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:49:59 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D849@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <52E6AE42.1020307@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D849@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D864@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi WP3, FYI We have submitted our contribution today within the given deadline. Thanks to all contributors today as they are UPM, SAP, ATOS, TID, iMinds. Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 17:48 To: Miguel Carrillo; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Dear Miguel, all, I can say that we have uploaded our WP3 contribution to "OpenSpecsM36" folder (with contributions from UPM, SAP, ATOS, TID, iMinds) . https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3350/D313_WP3_v1_generated.docx Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2014 20:07 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Dear all, I have just created a couple of folders for the internal reviews of both docs under the FI-WARE Private project. We will send a submission cockpit shortly and we will proceed as usual. You can see the exact location of the folder here: [cid:image001.png at 01CF21D1.40243570] Best regards, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 14060 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 4 18:27:28 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:27:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] test3 Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D955@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 4 18:49:46 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:49:46 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] test4 Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D9D2@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 5 09:11:40 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:11:40 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs References: <52E6AE42.1020307@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7D849@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7DCD0@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi, As a courtesy, here the WORD doc attached (downloadable with URL in mail below). Please check if your content is OK or if you detect some issues with it (so that a re-compiliation would be needed for major flaws). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 17:50 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: FW: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Hi WP3, FYI We have submitted our contribution today within the given deadline. Thanks to all contributors today as they are UPM, SAP, ATOS, TID, iMinds. Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 17:48 To: Miguel Carrillo; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Dear Miguel, all, I can say that we have uploaded our WP3 contribution to "OpenSpecsM36" folder (with contributions from UPM, SAP, ATOS, TID, iMinds) . https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3350/D313_WP3_v1_generated.docx Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Miguel Carrillo Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2014 20:07 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Folders for the R3 Architecture and Open Specs Dear all, I have just created a couple of folders for the internal reviews of both docs under the FI-WARE Private project. We will send a submission cockpit shortly and we will proceed as usual. You can see the exact location of the folder here: [cid:image001.png at 01CF21D1.40243570] Best regards, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 14060 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D313_WP3_v1_generated.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 8626455 bytes Desc: D313_WP3_v1_generated.docx URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 5 10:03:28 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:03:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: Testbed Implementation Cockpit V3 In-Reply-To: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486AC420E@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> References: <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486AC1291@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> <2981E9D6242FCF47ADC9B5DBA5DFD66486AC420E@DEWDFEMB11B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AC7DE6C@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi all, Reminder: please update your information in implementation cockpit now, most info is missing. Prior to that, also update the software if needed, for a R3.2. version - if applicable for you. Best wishes Markus From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Montag, 27. Januar 2014 12:12 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: Testbed Implementation Cockpit V3 Dear colleagues, there has been no changes on the implementation cockpit pages - are you not planning the deployment/expose something in the Testbed/Fi-lab? again the link: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V3_Implementation_Cockpit please provide this information in the wiki directly ASAP. Best, /Thorsten From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Sandfuchs, Thorsten Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2014 14:13 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Testbed Implementation Cockpit V3 Please let me add the following info from the wp10 telco, especially for those GE with no new implementation for V3 and how to mark this in the table. Status of the implementation cockpit for V3. SDP reported the implementation cockpit v3 page ready, as for the AP in the previous phc. This has been communicated also during the wpl/wpa phc of 20 Jan 2013. It is requested every GE owner to provide the inputs in coordination with the Testbed Team and in particular with HM. For those GEis for which there is no implementation in release 3 (whatever sprint), the last version should be in column "Release" and in the column "Planned (DoW) Date" the sentence "No new release for V3". The the whole row should be grayed out but the cell "Planned ..." that should be greened out. In addition it has been agreed to add two extra columns about availability of GEIs in FI-LAB. AP: SDP to implement two columns, both captioned with "FI-LAB availability", the first with caption "request" where the GEI owner puts the date when the GEI is available for deployment in FI-LAB, the second captioned "deployed" where the Testbed Team puts the date when the GEI is successfully deployed in FI-LAB. These two new columns have been also agreed during the wpl/wpa phc of 20 Jan 2013. -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG Send from a mobile device, please excuse the brevity. Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx -------- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht -------- Von: "Sandfuchs, Thorsten" > Datum: 23.01.2014 10:30 (GMT+01:00) An: "'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'" > Betreff: [Fiware-apps] Testbed Implementation Cockpit V3 Dear colleagues, for the current release of your software in V3, please proceed with the following link and update/introduce the according percentages in order to let the Testbed team take up your release of your V3-GE in the Testbed/FI-Lab or other environments. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/Testbed_V3_Implementation_Cockpit Best, /Thorsten -- Thorsten Sandfuchs SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Please consider the environment before printing this mail! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 11 16:30:37 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:30:37 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD0FECF@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) - UPM/SAP Store+Wirecloud+Repository (+Marketplace) (M36?) - ATOS/N.N. COMPEL + Repository + Marketplace (M36?) - ATOS/UPM/SAP/N.N. COMPEL + Store + Marketplace (M36?) Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 11 19:04:11 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:04:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: Software Delivery R3.2: Apps chapter ready for review In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD0FF8A@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD0FF8A@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD0FF98@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, FYI Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 19:04 To: Miguel Carrillo Subject: Software Delivery R3.2: Apps chapter ready for review Hi Miguel, I would like to notify you that the Apps chapter is ready for review for the software delivery R3.2. I attached this chart for you for an easy overview what we intend to deliver below. Best wishes Markus R3.2 11.02.2014 Apps - WP3 Checklist Nr. GE GEi Partner Contact/Owner Roadmap Features are planned for R3.2 Inst / Admin Guide updated UTP updated User / Progr. Guide updated Has delivered 3.2. on PRIVATE FORGE (latest available version is given) Has delivered 3.2. PUBLIC FORGE (latest available version is given) Comment Status for R3.2 checks 1 Registry Registry - SAP RI SAP Dr. Torsten Leidig NO YES YES YES 3.2.1 OK 2 Application Mashup Application Mashup - Wirecloud UPM Dr. Javier Soriano YES YES YES YES 2.3.3 Not relevant for 3.2 OK 3 Light Semantic Composition Editor Light Semantic Composition Editor - COMPEL ATOS Jesus Gorro?ogoitia Cruz, Joaquin NO NO No No 3.2.1 OK 4 Service Composition Service Composition - Ericsson Composition Engine (ECE) Ericsson Calin Curescu NO 3.2.3 OK 5 Service Mashup Service Mashup - Mashup Factory DT Horst Stein, Andreas Grothe NO 2.2.1 2.3.3 OK 6 Marketplace Marketplace - SAP RI SAP Andreas Klein YES YES YES YES 3.2.1 OK 7 Mediator Mediator TI (THALES) Marco Ughetti, Davide Cappadona, Pierre Chatel YES YES YES YES 3.2.1 3.2.1 OK 8 Revenue Settlement and Sharing System RSS Revenue Settlement and Sharing System TID Javier Lucio Ruiz-Andino YES YES YES YES Not relevant for 3.2 OK 9 Store Store - Wstore UPM Dr. Javier Soriano YES YES YES YES Not relevant for 3.2 OK 10 Business Calculator Business Calculator IMINDS Koen Casier Camille Reynders YES YES YES YES 3.2.3 OK 11 Business Modeler Business Modeler IMINDS Koen Casier Camille Reynders NO No No No 3.2.3 OK 12 Repository Repository - SAP RI SAP Andreas Klein NO NO NO NO 3.1.3 Not relevant for 3.2 since all items were moved to R3.3 OK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Thu Feb 13 09:49:02 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:49:02 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: [Fiware-wpl] Info about CeBIT event In-Reply-To: <52FC560B.3010003@tid.es> References: <3B6D242F-EC4A-4452-9C65-1C751A101F71@dfki.de> <52FC54DD.70909@tid.es> <52FC560B.3010003@tid.es> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1117D@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi all, FYI Juanjo has distributed Information about CEBIT 2014 in Hannover (1.3.2014) this morning which I would like to share with you, of course. Agenda and planned contribus from FI-WARE can be read following the given LINK. Currently, no apps chapter - wise contribution is foreseen. If you would like to start such discussion, please mail to us mailing list. Some partners may plan to attend at CEBIT on 12.3.2014, if you like I/all would be interested if you share such plans? Best wishes Markus From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2014 06:20 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Info about CeBIT event Please don't hesitate to share the info provided in my previous mail to partners in your chapters/WPs. On 13/02/14 06:15, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, This email intends to summarize the status regarding our presence at CeBIT. Please also check APs at the end of the email. As I already informed to you, this was due to a deal that the FI-Content2 project and us (FI-WARE) made with CeBIT organization. Essentially, we have been able to book a full day within the space labeled "Future talk" within CeBIT to be devoted to the FI-PPP, particularly to address promotion of the FI-WARE/FI-Lab brands (maybe also FI-Ops, this will depend very much on whether we made some deal with XiFi in this respect) as well as promotion of FI-Content2 results. "Future talk" is a new space within CeBIT intended to work as an "innovations talk shop will be hosting more than 100 lectures, live presentations, panel discussions and project demonstrations, providing an outstanding overview of current research findings and the technological standards of the future" in words of CeBIT. "Future talk" will occupy a quite relevant big space at CeBIT. You can find some maps attached to this mail. It comes with an auditorium/stages for speeches with up to 100 seats for the audience. Pricing looked rather reasonable. I'm talking by heard but I believe it was overall 12.000 ? to be shared among the two projects, which was quite reasonable given the fact that we are talking about CeBIT. We'll have to cover some additional costs such as flat screens and the like but should not go much higher. I assume this special prize comes because "Future talk" is kind of a new space within CeBIT that organizers wish to promote. The event will take place on Wednesday, March 12th. The agenda of the event is already published at CeBIT's website: http://www.cebit.de/event/future-talk/SON/56233 (You have to scroll down and then select the date) The event will be organized as: * A program of speeches given at the stage * A space with up to 7 tables to deal with face2face conversations with people who attend the speeches and then wish to get into further details with any of the contents (kind of exhibition area): * one table to provide general info about the FI-PPP, FI-WARE, FI-Lab and FI-Content2 * 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-WARE * 3 tables on topics to be covered by FI-Content2 There is a shared google doc spreadsheet where you will be able to find: * Agenda of speeches (this as per today matches what has been published by CeBIT on the website) * Description of topics per table You can find it at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoNGoA5Ii_6cdC1XRVZnVnp1TFhUcktUaUROMldKQ3c#gid=0 You should consider the agenda and contents of topics for the tables still as drafts. However: * One of the slots on the agenda, as well as tables on the exhibition area should be assigned to talk about media-related GEs, in particular those dealing with real-time multimedia stream processing and web-based advanced UI (3D and Augmented Reality). This is mostly to create a smooth transition and to better illustrate the links between FI-WARE and FI-Content2. * Given the fact that several of the winners of the FI-WARE Challenges came with quite interesting and professional applications, I'm currently considering to devote a space, both in the program of speeches and the exhibition area to testimonies from the SMEs/startups involved. This will allow us to bring the message that we are offering stuff that is actually useful for them. On the other hand, this will give this SMEs/Startup opportunity to promote their apps (win-win). I'm in conversations with some of them to cover this. Nuria (ATOS) Ogilvy and us are coordinating to produce and bring the necessary communication material (flyers, posters, etc). Some APs: * @All: I would like to know who will attend the event and could be available to provide support during the event (tables on the exhibition area) * @All: Any comments on the agenda or contents for the tables are welcome but we will need to close this quickly * @Christof: Please confirm attendance from team working on web-based advanced UI GEs (please bring Philipp on the loop) and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Sergio: Please confirm attendance from team working on real-time media stream processing and get back with some concrete proposal regarding contents of speech (already reserved slot) and the exhibition table to discuss in our next WPLs/WPAs confcall. * @Christof/Sergio: Please note that the teams covering real-time media stream processing and the team covering the web-based 3D and AR GEs may need to share slot/table on the stage as well as table on the exhibition area. I would advise that some material is produced (flyers, etc) that describe this GEs but PLEASE, I won't accept that such material comes without FI-WARE/FI-Lab branding. This is not about the GE owners selling their stuff without putting it within the overall context. I believe that is all, let's discuss over email before the WPLs/WPAs confcall. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001.txt URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 17 11:58:32 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:58:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: WP3: D2.6.3 - State of the Art Analysis --> Your input needed asap Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD132E3@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi, @all: please send your input to me (deadline was 07.2). Please mail today when you will deliver this (latest tomorrow) Best wishes Markus _____________________________________________ From: Heller, Markus Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2014 18:01 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: WP3: D2.6.3 - State of the Art Analysis --> Your input needed Hi all, I attach my proposal for the TOC / template for the upcoming deliverable "D2.6.3 State of the Art". The Idea as from WPL/WPA round is to have "executive summaries" per chapter in order to avoid excessive update while reporting about recent developments / delta w.r.t the D2.6.2 deliverable version before. The deadline for the Apps chapter input to D2.6.3 to be sent by WPL to TID is set for 14.March 2014, a bit time to go, but we can start now and try to complete this fast. With your input I will then consolidate and redistribute/add surrounding texts. Please fill in your (final) input here as indicated (red color) and return the WORD to me with your input. Deadline for your input: Friday 07. February EOB Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D2.6.3 - State of the Art Analysis Emerging Technologies - Apps Input.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 401579 bytes Desc: D2.6.3 - State of the Art Analysis Emerging Technologies - Apps Input.docx URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 17 15:33:49 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:33:49 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FI-WARE: WP3 Call In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B0694C9@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B0694C9@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD13478@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, We need to decide and commit to the "packages" that will be created as part of Release 3 from within our Apps chapter. Juanjo plans to send an e-mail to Arian on Thursday this week in order to proactively signal the consortium becoming active to provide/offer "packages", as you might know. In this week's WP3 telco on 18.02 we will as a top item discuss these packages that we commit to provide within Release 3. We can build on our discussion last week where initial candidates emerged already. Proposal: - Please prepare yourself with an opinion and decision power how/if you can commit to the effort of providing such a package. - We will discuss these packages each by each and see what we want to do. - Ideally we will decide which packages / partners / efforts per partner tomorrow and you can until Wednesday get necessary commitments from your managers if needed. Best wishes Markus -----Original Appointment----- From: Heller, Markus Sent: Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 15:24 To: Heller, Markus; 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: Joaquin Iranzo Yuste; Ughetti Marco Subject: FI-WARE: WP3 Call When: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 15:00-16:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: SAP Connect Markus Dear FI-WARE WP3 colleagues, I invite you to our new WP3 Call on Tuesdays 15-16. Please use the dial-in info below. Best wishes Markus ---- Please join me in a SAP CONNECT meeting. Web conference: https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/heller Audio Participant Code: 124 225 33 29 Country Number Blackberry Friendly / Lync Friendly (if you are running SAP Lync Quality Advisor) Android Friendly Germany, Frankfurt tel:+4969222210764 tel:+4969222210764x1242253329# tel:+4969222210764;1242253329# Germany, Munich tel:+4989710424682 tel:+4989710424682x1242253329# tel:+4989710424682;1242253329# Europe Austria, Vienna tel:+431253021750 tel:+431253021750x1242253329# tel:+431253021750;1242253329# France, Paris tel:+33170701777 tel:+33170701777x1242253329# tel:+33170701777;1242253329# Italy, Milan tel:+390236009839 tel:+390236009839x1242253329# tel:+390236009839;1242253329# Spain, Madrid tel:+34917699443 tel:+34917699443x1242253329# tel:+34917699443;1242253329# Switzerland, Zurich tel:+41434569248 tel:+41434569248x1242253329# tel:+41434569248;1242253329# UK, London tel:+442033645639 tel:+442033645639x1242253329# tel:+442033645639;1242253329# Overseas Australia, Sydney tel:+61290090688 tel:+61290090688x1242253329# tel:+61290090688;1242253329# India, Bangalore tel:+918061275055 tel:+918061275055x1242253329# tel:+918061275055;1242253329# USA, New York tel:+16464340499 tel:+16464340499x1242253329# tel:+16464340499;1242253329# If you have never attended a Connect Pro meeting before: Test your connection: https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm Get a quick overview: http://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview Adobe, the Adobe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 17 15:34:00 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:34:00 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FI-WARE: WP3 Call Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD13492@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, We need to decide and commit to the "packages" that will be created as part of Release 3 from within our Apps chapter. Juanjo plans to send an e-mail to Arian on Thursday this week in order to proactively signal the consortium becoming active to provide/offer "packages", as you might know. In this week's WP3 telco on 18.02 we will as a top item discuss these packages that we commit to provide within Release 3. We can build on our discussion last week where initial candidates emerged already. Proposal: - Please prepare yourself with an opinion and decision power how/if you can commit to the effort of providing such a package. - We will discuss these packages each by each and see what we want to do. - Ideally we will decide which packages / partners / efforts per partner tomorrow and you can until Wednesday get necessary commitments from your managers if needed. Best wishes Markus Dear FI-WARE WP3 colleagues, I invite you to our new WP3 Call on Tuesdays 15-16. Please use the dial-in info below. Best wishes Markus ---- Please join me in a SAP CONNECT meeting. Web conference: https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/heller Audio Participant Code: 124 225 33 29 Country Number Blackberry Friendly / Lync Friendly (if you are running SAP Lync Quality Advisor) Android Friendly Germany, Frankfurt tel:+4969222210764 tel:+4969222210764x1242253329# tel:+4969222210764;1242253329# Germany, Munich tel:+4989710424682 tel:+4989710424682x1242253329# tel:+4989710424682;1242253329# Europe Austria, Vienna tel:+431253021750 tel:+431253021750x1242253329# tel:+431253021750;1242253329# France, Paris tel:+33170701777 tel:+33170701777x1242253329# tel:+33170701777;1242253329# Italy, Milan tel:+390236009839 tel:+390236009839x1242253329# tel:+390236009839;1242253329# Spain, Madrid tel:+34917699443 tel:+34917699443x1242253329# tel:+34917699443;1242253329# Switzerland, Zurich tel:+41434569248 tel:+41434569248x1242253329# tel:+41434569248;1242253329# UK, London tel:+442033645639 tel:+442033645639x1242253329# tel:+442033645639;1242253329# Overseas Australia, Sydney tel:+61290090688 tel:+61290090688x1242253329# tel:+61290090688;1242253329# India, Bangalore tel:+918061275055 tel:+918061275055x1242253329# tel:+918061275055;1242253329# USA, New York tel:+16464340499 tel:+16464340499x1242253329# tel:+16464340499;1242253329# If you have never attended a Connect Pro meeting before: Test your connection: https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm Get a quick overview: http://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview Adobe, the Adobe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 5374 bytes Desc: not available URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 18 15:11:21 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:11:21 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FI-WARE: WP3 Call Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1447E@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, Please dial in to share a PPT now... We need to decide and commit to the "packages" that will be created as part of Release 3 from within our Apps chapter. Juanjo plans to send an e-mail to Arian on Thursday this week in order to proactively signal the consortium becoming active to provide/offer "packages", as you might know. In this week's WP3 telco on 18.02 we will as a top item discuss these packages that we commit to provide within Release 3. We can build on our discussion last week where initial candidates emerged already. Proposal: - Please prepare yourself with an opinion and decision power how/if you can commit to the effort of providing such a package. - We will discuss these packages each by each and see what we want to do. - Ideally we will decide which packages / partners / efforts per partner tomorrow and you can until Wednesday get necessary commitments from your managers if needed. Best wishes Markus Dear FI-WARE WP3 colleagues, I invite you to our new WP3 Call on Tuesdays 15-16. Please use the dial-in info below. Best wishes Markus ---- Please join me in a SAP CONNECT meeting. Web conference: https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/heller Audio Participant Code: 124 225 33 29 Country Number Blackberry Friendly / Lync Friendly (if you are running SAP Lync Quality Advisor) Android Friendly Germany, Frankfurt tel:+4969222210764 tel:+4969222210764x1242253329# tel:+4969222210764;1242253329# Germany, Munich tel:+4989710424682 tel:+4989710424682x1242253329# tel:+4989710424682;1242253329# Europe Austria, Vienna tel:+431253021750 tel:+431253021750x1242253329# tel:+431253021750;1242253329# France, Paris tel:+33170701777 tel:+33170701777x1242253329# tel:+33170701777;1242253329# Italy, Milan tel:+390236009839 tel:+390236009839x1242253329# tel:+390236009839;1242253329# Spain, Madrid tel:+34917699443 tel:+34917699443x1242253329# tel:+34917699443;1242253329# Switzerland, Zurich tel:+41434569248 tel:+41434569248x1242253329# tel:+41434569248;1242253329# UK, London tel:+442033645639 tel:+442033645639x1242253329# tel:+442033645639;1242253329# Overseas Australia, Sydney tel:+61290090688 tel:+61290090688x1242253329# tel:+61290090688;1242253329# India, Bangalore tel:+918061275055 tel:+918061275055x1242253329# tel:+918061275055;1242253329# USA, New York tel:+16464340499 tel:+16464340499x1242253329# tel:+16464340499;1242253329# If you have never attended a Connect Pro meeting before: Test your connection: https://sap.emea.pgiconnect.com/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm Get a quick overview: http://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview Adobe, the Adobe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 5419 bytes Desc: not available URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 18 16:35:45 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:35:45 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear WP3, In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: 1) Package 1: - Name: "Business Framework Provisioning Package" (focus is on provisioning) - Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP - Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository - Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. n Story: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... n Technically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL n Enhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. Rest is integrated. 2) Package 2: - Name: "Business Framework Consumption Package" (focus is on consumption) - Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP - Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity Management - Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that same user performs actions) n RSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per mail to mailing list. If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime latest (tomorrow). I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Packaging Planning Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) [...] Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andreas.klein at sap.com Tue Feb 18 16:40:13 2014 From: andreas.klein at sap.com (Klein, Andreas) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:40:13 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] WP3 Meeting Minutes 2014-02-18 Message-ID: <556F697ADC3400408FBBCF7C6040979D967D4C24@DEWDFEMB15B.global.corp.sap> Dear WP3 partners, please find the minutes of today's WP3 call in the docman: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/12/3428/2014_02_18_FI-WARE_WP3_Minutes.doc Best regards Andreas Andreas Klein SAP AG SAP Research Center Karlsruhe Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 D - 76131 Karlsruhe T +49-6227-7-52554 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koen.casier at intec.ugent.be Wed Feb 19 10:20:20 2014 From: koen.casier at intec.ugent.be (koen casier) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:20:20 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> Dear Markus, all, I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was traveling for the FTTH Council, where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. We will of course make a third package containing the linked business calculator and business modeler GE's, to be able to install as a single package. When and where do we have to deliver these packages? best regards, Koen On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Dear WP3, > > In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. > > I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the > coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: > > 1) Package 1: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Provisioning Package*" (focus is on > provisioning) > > -Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP > > -Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository > > -Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed > + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. > > nStory: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding > metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL > users can find/search it and use it.... > > nTechnically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". > COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL > > nEnhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. > Rest is integrated. > > 2) Package 2: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Consumption Package*" (focus is on > consumption) > > -Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP > > -Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity > Management > > -Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution > into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" > (Plan B: like package 1) > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that > same user performs actions) > > nRSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run > separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. > > Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per > mail to mailing list. > > If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, > you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until *Wednesday 19.02. > Lunchtime* latest (tomorrow). > > I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo > collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned > "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*Heller, Markus > *Sent:* Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 > *To:* 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' > *Subject:* Packaging Planning > > Hi, > > as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and > our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: > > - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of > GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It > instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package > with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. > > - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start > discussion now how this looks like. > > - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one > for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily > consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and > really demands them. > > *I.**How does a package look like / how realized?* > > "1 GE package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this > business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > "Multi-GE-Package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this > business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address > that excactly? > > *II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver > such and indicate when this will be really available:* > > A."1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) > > - SAP Repository (M36) > > - SAP Marketplace (M36) > > - SAP Registry (M36) > > - (Yours) > > - ... > > B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) > > [...] > > Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-apps mailing list > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 19 14:11:50 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:11:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Koen, fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. Please send until today asap a brief description of your new package following the example template for the other 2. I plan to send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. 1) Package 3: - Name: " " (focus is on XY) - Lead: iMinds - Used GEs: TBD - Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Story: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two together maybe n Technical details: only if needed Best wishes Markus From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of koen casier Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 To: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Dear Markus, all, I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was traveling for the FTTH Council, where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. We will of course make a third package containing the linked business calculator and business modeler GE's, to be able to install as a single package. When and where do we have to deliver these packages? best regards, Koen On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear WP3, In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: 1) Package 1: - Name: "Business Framework Provisioning Package" (focus is on provisioning) - Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP - Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository - Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. n Story: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... n Technically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL n Enhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. Rest is integrated. 2) Package 2: - Name: "Business Framework Consumption Package" (focus is on consumption) - Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP - Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity Management - Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that same user performs actions) n RSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per mail to mailing list. If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime latest (tomorrow). I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Packaging Planning Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) [...] Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koen.casier at intec.ugent.be Wed Feb 19 15:28:04 2014 From: koen.casier at intec.ugent.be (koen casier) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:28:04 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> Hi Markus, all, My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit Lead iMinds Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures TimeLine: R3.3 Comments: Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick installation of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions between the tools automated and/or relative to the server path. This will allow for the business modeling and simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business calculator as well as the business modeler both have a simplified and local storage repository for the models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if interesting. The installation in (b) allows for direct testing of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will allow for a quick link with introduction of the tool, and will be complemented with course material indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an SaaS RSS instance could be made. The installation in (c) is aimed at academic usage (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool with a local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). The recipe and integration testing will help in a quick and effortless installation here. best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Hi Koen, > > fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. > > Please send until today asap a brief description of your new package > following the example template for the other 2. I plan to send it > later today after EOB to Juanjo. > > 1) Package 3: > > -Name: " " (focus is on XY) > > -Lead: iMinds > > -Used GEs: TBD > > -Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not recipes. > Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be > offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nStory: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two > together maybe > > nTechnical details: only if needed > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *koen casier > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 > *To:* fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning > > Dear Markus, all, > > > I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was > traveling for the FTTH Council, > where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and > mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. > We will of course make a third package containing the linked business > calculator and business modeler GE's, > to be able to install as a single package. > > When and where do we have to deliver these packages? > > > best regards, > Koen > > > > On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Dear WP3, > > In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. > > I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the > coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: > > 1) Package 1: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Provisioning Package*" (focus is on > provisioning) > > -Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP > > -Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository > > -Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with > installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated > instances". > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in > package 2. > > nStory: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding > metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL > users can find/search it and use it.... > > nTechnically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to > WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service > via WDSL > > nEnhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in > USDL. Rest is integrated. > > 2) Package 2: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Consumption Package*" (focus is on > consumption) > > -Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP > > -Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, > Identity Management > > -Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the > solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated > instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that > same user performs actions) > > nRSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run > separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. > > Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions > per mail to mailing list. > > If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own > packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until > *Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime* latest (tomorrow). > > I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo > collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all > planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday > 20.02). > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*Heller, Markus > *Sent:* Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 > *To:* 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > ' > *Subject:* Packaging Planning > > Hi, > > as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging > and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: > > - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration > of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. > It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution > package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. > > - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and > start discussion now how this looks like. > > - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create > one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more > easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors > packages and really demands them. > > I.*How does a package look like / how realized?* > > "1 GE package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this > business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > "Multi-GE-Package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this > business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we > address that excactly? > > *II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver > such and indicate when this will be really available:* > > A."1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) > > - SAP Repository (M36) > > - SAP Marketplace (M36) > > - SAP Registry (M36) > > - (Yours) > > - ... > > B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) > > [...] > > Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-apps mailing list > > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 19 16:01:09 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:01:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15CF1@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Koen, Thanks so far for your package description, looks good to me. Be aware, that the proposal goes directly to Arian from Juanjo, so that we might either get the confirmations or we might even better leave it out. But I really do not know what to advise you since I do not know really how important this is played by Arian and Juanjo has not told anything about this how serious such commitment would be if given. I therefore personally would assess this as "no way back" package proposal. For example, I need the confirmation by Camille and Tanguy urgently then so that I can send this out to JH. Otherwise I mark this as "planned, pending final confirmation". --> Please can you Koen decide asap and mail me today if I should leave it out (without confirmation Camille/Tanguy), insert it marked as "pending", or leave out completely. We can say: I will delay this and send it tomorrow morning so that you have more time, but then I need to send it (unless Juanjo changes his mind). Maybe some packages can be named as candidates even later....(do not know). Best wishes Markus From: koen casier [mailto:koen.casier at intec.ugent.be] Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 15:28 To: Heller, Markus Cc: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Hi Markus, all, My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit Lead iMinds Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures TimeLine: R3.3 Comments: Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick installation of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions between the tools automated and/or relative to the server path. This will allow for the business modeling and simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business calculator as well as the business modeler both have a simplified and local storage repository for the models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if interesting. The installation in (b) allows for direct testing of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will allow for a quick link with introduction of the tool, and will be complemented with course material indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an SaaS RSS instance could be made. The installation in (c) is aimed at academic usage (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool with a local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). The recipe and integration testing will help in a quick and effortless installation here. best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Hi Koen, fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. Please send until today asap a brief description of your new package following the example template for the other 2. I plan to send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. 1) Package 3: - Name: " " (focus is on XY) - Lead: iMinds - Used GEs: TBD - Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Story: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two together maybe n Technical details: only if needed Best wishes Markus From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of koen casier Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 To: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Dear Markus, all, I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was traveling for the FTTH Council, where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. We will of course make a third package containing the linked business calculator and business modeler GE's, to be able to install as a single package. When and where do we have to deliver these packages? best regards, Koen On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear WP3, In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: 1) Package 1: - Name: "Business Framework Provisioning Package" (focus is on provisioning) - Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP - Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository - Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. n Story: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... n Technically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL n Enhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. Rest is integrated. 2) Package 2: - Name: "Business Framework Consumption Package" (focus is on consumption) - Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP - Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity Management - Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that same user performs actions) n RSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per mail to mailing list. If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime latest (tomorrow). I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Packaging Planning Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) [...] Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Wed Feb 19 17:47:32 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:47:32 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DDD@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> <5304D3D7.4010905@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DDD@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DF0@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi all aka ATOS, UPM, IMINDS (:)), Basically I got feedback from Miguel (thx MIguel!) on our plans. The addressed topics are (my own text): 1) VM images are platform dependant --> Can we do better/different to avoid this or do we go with this.... 2) SaaS-whatever is NOT packaging --> I guess this refers to IDM as Global Instance as part of package 2. Can IDM be packaged as well (since a user of the package might not like to use IDM as deployed globally by us and rather use HIS own instance of IDM-Software... Let us to have us think twice about it and decide if we need to adapt somewhere the packages 1,2,3. @ATOS, UPM, IMINDS: Please reply to me your position and if you change something. Please read my own statement before that. Deadline: Tomorrow morning. My own considerations here, but please take his notes into account. Markus: " - WM images: platform dependant is not a problem in my eyes. The dedicated instance solution approach is platform based too...? IMO that is ok in my eyes and typically not a problem to a user: he reads system requirements and decides....Recipes: ATOS thinks that they will try with recipes but have no tdone so and since it is not mandatory (and would not be correct to require this since its only a deployment technique not more) and unless they really see they can deliver -> they only commit as advised by me to VM image as this is a valid contribution ("Dedicated instance") in FI-LAB so it cannot be really rejected and works and I would rather have something that works and is delivered than otherwise. But ATOS knows that recipes are there.... - SaaS: package 2 is _not_ Saas_ really. Only one piece - the IDM - is as SaaS (as they only are available as 1 global instance), so they said that only this is possible. I get your point and this has been discussed but ultimately this team said they can only do this in such a way. The rest of the package is recipe based GEs and only IDM is to be hardwired per URL. I think that is ok - otherwise you need to urge the provider of IDM to also deliver IDM as dedicated instance or something else I guess. .- Recipes: No, this is not needed since its a deployment technique not more - its overhyped a bit since we struggle with even delivering the basics - working software. So I always vote for first have the basics (VM image e.g) and then of course if possible recipe-based (but only then)... For example, for our SAP assets, only dedicated instances are in FI-Lab with no/basic recipes, but surely this works good for us since it's only a very very simple setup in our software. " Best wishes Markus --------------- [...] ------------------ El 19/02/2014 15:28, koen casier escribi?: Hi Markus, all, My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit Lead iMinds Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures TimeLine: R3.3 Comments: Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick installation of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions between the tools automated and/or relative to the server path. This will allow for the business modeling and simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business calculator as well as the business modeler both have a simplified and local storage repository for the models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if interesting. The installation in (b) allows for direct testing of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will allow for a quick link with introduction of the tool, and will be complemented with course material indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an SaaS RSS instance could be made. The installation in (c) is aimed at academic usage (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool with a local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). The recipe and integration testing will help in a quick and effortless installation here. best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Hi Koen, fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. Please send until today asap a brief description of your new package following the example template for the other 2. I plan to send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. 1) Package 3: - Name: " " (focus is on XY) - Lead: iMinds - Used GEs: TBD - Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: * Story: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two together maybe * Technical details: only if needed Best wishes Markus From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of koen casier Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 To: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Dear Markus, all, I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was traveling for the FTTH Council, where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. We will of course make a third package containing the linked business calculator and business modeler GE's, to be able to install as a single package. When and where do we have to deliver these packages? best regards, Koen On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear WP3, In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: 1) Package 1: - Name: "Business Framework Provisioning Package" (focus is on provisioning) - Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP - Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository - Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: * Identity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. * Story: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... * Technically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL * Enhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. Rest is integrated. 2) Package 2: - Name: "Business Framework Consumption Package" (focus is on consumption) - Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP - Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity Management - Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: * Identity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that same user performs actions) * RSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per mail to mailing list. If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime latest (tomorrow). I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Packaging Planning Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) [...] Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koen.casier at intec.ugent.be Thu Feb 20 09:25:23 2014 From: koen.casier at intec.ugent.be (koen casier) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:25:23 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DF0@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> <5304D3D7.4010905@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DDD@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DF0@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <5305BBF3.1010103@intec.ugent.be> Dear Markus, The explanation you give is a little hard to understand, you would go for a VM image, perhaps for a recipe (although this is just an installation manual) and certainly not for SaaS Miguel thinks VM images are platform dependent and also dislikes SaaS. In total I believe we will provide the packaging of BEMES GE's as a VM image and a recipe, and will leave out the SaaS path. I hope this is a fair answer to your questions? best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 5:47 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Hi all aka ATOS, UPM, IMINDS (J), > > Basically I got feedback from Miguel (thx MIguel!) on our plans. The > addressed topics are (my own text): > > 1)VM images are platform dependant ?Can we do better/different to > avoid this or do we go with this.... > > 2)SaaS-whatever is NOT packaging ?I guess this refers to IDM as Global > Instance as part of package 2. Can IDM be packaged as well (since a > user of the package might not like to use IDM as deployed globally by > us and rather use HIS own instance of IDM-Software... > > Let us to have us think twice about it and decide if we need to adapt > somewhere the packages 1,2,3. > > *@ATOS, UPM, IMINDS*: Please reply to me your position and if you > change something. Please read my own statement before that. > > Deadline: Tomorrow morning. > > My own considerations here, but please take his notes into account. > > Markus: > > " > > - WM images: platform dependant is not a problem in my eyes. The > dedicated instance solution approach is platform based too...? IMO > that is ok in my eyes and typically not a problem to a user: he reads > system requirements and decides....Recipes: ATOS thinks that they will > try with recipes but have no tdone so and since it is not mandatory > (and would not be correct to require this since its only a deployment > technique not more) and unless they really see they can deliver -> > they only commit as advised by me to VM image as this is a valid > contribution ("Dedicated instance") in FI-LAB so it cannot be really > rejected and works and I would rather have something that works and is > delivered than otherwise. But ATOS knows that recipes are there.... > > - SaaS: package 2 is _/not/_ Saas_ really. Only one piece - the IDM - > is as SaaS (as they only are available as 1 global instance), so they > said that only this is possible. I get your point and this has been > discussed but ultimately this team said they can only do this in such > a way. > > The rest of the package is recipe based GEs and only IDM is to be > hardwired per URL. I think that is ok -- otherwise you need to urge > the provider of IDM to also deliver IDM as dedicated instance or > something else I guess. .- > > Recipes: No, this is not needed since its a deployment technique not > more -- its overhyped a bit since we struggle with even delivering the > basics -- working software. So I always vote for first have the basics > (VM image e.g) and then of course if possible recipe-based (but only > then)... > > For example, for our SAP assets, only dedicated instances are in > FI-Lab with no/basic recipes, but surely this works good for us since > it's only a very very simple setup in our software. > > " > > Best wishes > > Markus > > --------------- > > [...] > > ------------------ > > El 19/02/2014 15:28, koen casier escribi?: > > Hi Markus, all, > > > > My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should > still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): > > package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and > simulation toolkit > Lead iMinds > Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could > be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) > Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated > GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances > Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online > (outside of the FILAB) > Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and > integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures > TimeLine: R3.3 > Comments: > Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick > installation of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions > between the tools automated and/or relative to the server path. > This will allow for the business modeling and > simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business > calculator as well as the business modeler both have > a simplified and local storage repository for > the models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if > interesting. > The installation in (b) allows for direct > testing of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will > allow for a quick link with introduction of the tool, > and will be complemented with course material > indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an > SaaS RSS instance could be made. > The installation in (c) is aimed at academic > usage (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool > with a local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). > The recipe and integration testing will help > in a quick and effortless installation here. > > > > best regards, > Koen > > > On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Hi Koen, > > fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. > > Please send until today asap a brief description of your new > package following the example template for the other 2. I > plan to send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. > > 1) Package 3: > > -Name: " " (focus is on XY) > > -Lead: iMinds > > -Used GEs: TBD > > -Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not > recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + > integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nStory: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the > two together maybe > > nTechnical details: only if needed > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > > [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of > *koen casier > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 > *To:* fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning > > Dear Markus, all, > > > I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I > was traveling for the FTTH Council, > where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE > work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full > BEMES project. > We will of course make a third package containing the linked > business calculator and business modeler GE's, > to be able to install as a single package. > > When and where do we have to deliver these packages? > > > best regards, > Koen > > > > On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Dear WP3, > > In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps > chapter. > > I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list > to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: > > 1) Package 1: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Provisioning Package*" (focus > is on provisioning) > > -Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP > > -Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository > > -Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image > with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as > "dedicated instances". > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used > in package 2. > > nStory: User uses Store to create an offering (including > adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in > Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... > > nTechnically: The service USDL includes as metadata a > "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the > offered service via WDSL > > nEnhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata > in USDL. Rest is integrated. > > 2) Package 2: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Consumption Package*" (focus > is on consumption) > > -Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP > > -Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, > Identity Management > > -Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the > solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated > instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management integrated already and mandatory > (ensure that same user performs actions) > > nRSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would > run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS > provided. > > Please comment or add if needed to these candidate > descriptions per mail to mailing list. > > If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own > packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list > until *Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime* latest (tomorrow). > > I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. > Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail > listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week > (announced: Thursday 20.02). > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*Heller, Markus > *Sent:* Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 > *To:* 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > ' > *Subject:* Packaging Planning > > Hi, > > as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on > packaging and our discussion today. We start a > brainstorming now: > > - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical > integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in > FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a > "business sense", a solution package with identifiable > Business Value for a user of that package. > > - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per > GE and start discussion now how this looks like. > > - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to > create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our > stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized > that he favors packages and really demands them. > > I.*How does a package look like / how realized?* > > "1 GE package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance > on FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with > this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save > time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > "Multi-GE-Package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance > on FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with > this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save > time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How > do we address that excactly? > > *II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to > deliver such and indicate when this will be really available:* > > A."1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) > > - SAP Repository (M36) > > - SAP Marketplace (M36) > > - SAP Registry (M36) > > - (Yours) > > - ... > > B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) > > [...] > > Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. > > Best wishes > > Markus > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-apps mailing list > > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-apps mailing list > > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco > _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica > _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N > _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) > Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 > > e-mail:mcp at tid.es > > Follow FI-WARE on the net > > Website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > Twitter:http://twitter.com/Fiware > LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-apps mailing list > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Thu Feb 20 09:56:31 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:56:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FW: Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <5305BBF3.1010103@intec.ugent.be> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> <5304D3D7.4010905@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DDD@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15DF0@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5305BBF3.1010103@intec.ugent.be> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1658E@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi Koen, Thank you for your reaction so far. Sorry, my explanation "should" just have explained: - VM images: that I see VM Images as valid delivery way for packages - since it's the typical way to deliver stuff into FI-Lab. - Packages with(without SaaS parts: I leave it to the package teams if they insert some SaaS into a package or not. I added my personal opinion that SaaS or not-SaaS in packages is both valid depending on use case. This is also valid in my opinion for the package 3 - IDM - that a user using the package might be interested in both use cases (using THE IDM as global instance or using the IDM software and operate his own instance then). But its up to package 3 team to decide and I would like to hear what will be planned finally for IDM case there. > In total I believe we will provide the packaging of BEMES GE's as a VM image and a recipe, and will leave out the SaaS path. Ok, Koen, for package 3. @Package 2: what is your opinion/reaction? IDM? Best wishes Markus From: koen casier [mailto:koen.casier at intec.ugent.be] Sent: Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2014 09:25 To: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu; Heller, Markus Cc: tanguy coenen; Camille Reynders (Google Drive); Sofie Verbrugge Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] FW: Packaging Planning Dear Markus, The explanation you give is a little hard to understand, you would go for a VM image, perhaps for a recipe (although this is just an installation manual) and certainly not for SaaS Miguel thinks VM images are platform dependent and also dislikes SaaS. In total I believe we will provide the packaging of BEMES GE's as a VM image and a recipe, and will leave out the SaaS path. I hope this is a fair answer to your questions? best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 5:47 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Hi all aka ATOS, UPM, IMINDS (:)), Basically I got feedback from Miguel (thx MIguel!) on our plans. The addressed topics are (my own text): 1) VM images are platform dependant --> Can we do better/different to avoid this or do we go with this.... 2) SaaS-whatever is NOT packaging --> I guess this refers to IDM as Global Instance as part of package 2. Can IDM be packaged as well (since a user of the package might not like to use IDM as deployed globally by us and rather use HIS own instance of IDM-Software... Let us to have us think twice about it and decide if we need to adapt somewhere the packages 1,2,3. @ATOS, UPM, IMINDS: Please reply to me your position and if you change something. Please read my own statement before that. Deadline: Tomorrow morning. My own considerations here, but please take his notes into account. Markus: " - WM images: platform dependant is not a problem in my eyes. The dedicated instance solution approach is platform based too...? IMO that is ok in my eyes and typically not a problem to a user: he reads system requirements and decides....Recipes: ATOS thinks that they will try with recipes but have no tdone so and since it is not mandatory (and would not be correct to require this since its only a deployment technique not more) and unless they really see they can deliver -> they only commit as advised by me to VM image as this is a valid contribution ("Dedicated instance") in FI-LAB so it cannot be really rejected and works and I would rather have something that works and is delivered than otherwise. But ATOS knows that recipes are there.... - SaaS: package 2 is _not_ Saas_ really. Only one piece - the IDM - is as SaaS (as they only are available as 1 global instance), so they said that only this is possible. I get your point and this has been discussed but ultimately this team said they can only do this in such a way. The rest of the package is recipe based GEs and only IDM is to be hardwired per URL. I think that is ok - otherwise you need to urge the provider of IDM to also deliver IDM as dedicated instance or something else I guess. .- Recipes: No, this is not needed since its a deployment technique not more - its overhyped a bit since we struggle with even delivering the basics - working software. So I always vote for first have the basics (VM image e.g) and then of course if possible recipe-based (but only then)... For example, for our SAP assets, only dedicated instances are in FI-Lab with no/basic recipes, but surely this works good for us since it's only a very very simple setup in our software. " Best wishes Markus --------------- [...] ------------------ El 19/02/2014 15:28, koen casier escribi?: Hi Markus, all, My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit Lead iMinds Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures TimeLine: R3.3 Comments: Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick installation of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions between the tools automated and/or relative to the server path. This will allow for the business modeling and simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business calculator as well as the business modeler both have a simplified and local storage repository for the models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if interesting. The installation in (b) allows for direct testing of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will allow for a quick link with introduction of the tool, and will be complemented with course material indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an SaaS RSS instance could be made. The installation in (c) is aimed at academic usage (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool with a local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). The recipe and integration testing will help in a quick and effortless installation here. best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Hi Koen, fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. Please send until today asap a brief description of your new package following the example template for the other 2. I plan to send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. 1) Package 3: - Name: " " (focus is on XY) - Lead: iMinds - Used GEs: TBD - Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: * Story: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two together maybe * Technical details: only if needed Best wishes Markus From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of koen casier Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 To: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Dear Markus, all, I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was traveling for the FTTH Council, where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. We will of course make a third package containing the linked business calculator and business modeler GE's, to be able to install as a single package. When and where do we have to deliver these packages? best regards, Koen On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear WP3, In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: 1) Package 1: - Name: "Business Framework Provisioning Package" (focus is on provisioning) - Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP - Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository - Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: * Identity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. * Story: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... * Technically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL * Enhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. Rest is integrated. 2) Package 2: - Name: "Business Framework Consumption Package" (focus is on consumption) - Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP - Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity Management - Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: * Identity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that same user performs actions) * RSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per mail to mailing list. If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime latest (tomorrow). I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Packaging Planning Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) [...] Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From torsten.leidig at sap.com Thu Feb 20 16:46:30 2014 From: torsten.leidig at sap.com (Leidig, Torsten) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:46:30 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Architecture Deliverable: Review 1 of Apps Chapter Message-ID: <703F4EB81B2AD0428360BFE55A82DFBC5FCE7FCB@DEWDFEMB11C.global.corp.sap> Dear WP3 partners, We received the 1st review of the Architecture deliverable. I already incorporated the obvious changes. However, there are still some issues, which I can't solve and require each partner's attention. You may find the consolidated document on the Docman: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDF0UDNfUjZ0R01wWHFtczNUMi1weGc&usp=sharing#gid=0 Please have a careful look at your sections and change them if necessary. Best regards, Torsten Dr Torsten Leidig Development Architect - Human Computer Interaction SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe | Germany T +49 6227-7-52535 | M +49 171 978 1292 mailto:torsten.leidig at sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 24 14:42:35 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:42:35 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15CF1@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15CF1@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD17751@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi, I have added the following entry to TID's package list, but it is poending your confirmation. @ALL: Please confirm that you all want to commit to this package (see mail below)? * Package 3 * NOTE 24.02.2014: PENDING A CONFIRMATION FROM IMINDS, NOT COMMITED YET! AP on IMINDS TO CONFIRM ASAP * Name: BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit * Lead iMinds * Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) * Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances * Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) * Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 16:01 To: koen casier Cc: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen Subject: RE: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Hi Koen, Thanks so far for your package description, looks good to me. Be aware, that the proposal goes directly to Arian from Juanjo, so that we might either get the confirmations or we might even better leave it out. But I really do not know what to advise you since I do not know really how important this is played by Arian and Juanjo has not told anything about this how serious such commitment would be if given. I therefore personally would assess this as "no way back" package proposal. For example, I need the confirmation by Camille and Tanguy urgently then so that I can send this out to JH. Otherwise I mark this as "planned, pending final confirmation". --> Please can you Koen decide asap and mail me today if I should leave it out (without confirmation Camille/Tanguy), insert it marked as "pending", or leave out completely. We can say: I will delay this and send it tomorrow morning so that you have more time, but then I need to send it (unless Juanjo changes his mind). Maybe some packages can be named as candidates even later....(do not know). Best wishes Markus From: koen casier [mailto:koen.casier at intec.ugent.be] Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 15:28 To: Heller, Markus Cc: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Hi Markus, all, My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit Lead iMinds Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures TimeLine: R3.3 Comments: Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick installation of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions between the tools automated and/or relative to the server path. This will allow for the business modeling and simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business calculator as well as the business modeler both have a simplified and local storage repository for the models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if interesting. The installation in (b) allows for direct testing of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will allow for a quick link with introduction of the tool, and will be complemented with course material indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an SaaS RSS instance could be made. The installation in (c) is aimed at academic usage (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool with a local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). The recipe and integration testing will help in a quick and effortless installation here. best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Hi Koen, fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. Please send until today asap a brief description of your new package following the example template for the other 2. I plan to send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. 1) Package 3: - Name: " " (focus is on XY) - Lead: iMinds - Used GEs: TBD - Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Story: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two together maybe n Technical details: only if needed Best wishes Markus From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of koen casier Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 To: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Dear Markus, all, I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was traveling for the FTTH Council, where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. We will of course make a third package containing the linked business calculator and business modeler GE's, to be able to install as a single package. When and where do we have to deliver these packages? best regards, Koen On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear WP3, In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: 1) Package 1: - Name: "Business Framework Provisioning Package" (focus is on provisioning) - Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP - Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository - Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. n Story: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... n Technically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL n Enhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. Rest is integrated. 2) Package 2: - Name: "Business Framework Consumption Package" (focus is on consumption) - Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP - Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity Management - Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that same user performs actions) n RSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per mail to mailing list. If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime latest (tomorrow). I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Packaging Planning Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) [...] Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From koen.casier at intec.ugent.be Mon Feb 24 14:47:56 2014 From: koen.casier at intec.ugent.be (koen casier) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:47:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD17751@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15CF1@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD17751@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <530B4D8C.8040803@intec.ugent.be> Dear Markus, I would propose to remove the delivery (b) as the SaaS is not a recommended approach (as far as I understood), and in this way we keep the optimal set. best regards, Koen On 2/24/2014 2:42 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Hi, > > I have added the following entry to TID's package list, but it is > poending your confirmation. > > @ALL: Please confirm that you all want to commit to this package (see > mail below)? > > o Package 3 > + *NOTE 24.02.2014: PENDING A CONFIRMATION FROM IMINDS, NOT > COMMITED YET! **AP on IMINDS TO CONFIRM ASAP* > + Name: BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and > simulation toolkit > + Lead iMinds > + Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there > could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) > + Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + > integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances > + Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online > (outside of the FILAB) > + Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version > and integrating both GEs together with integration testing > procedures > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*Heller, Markus > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 16:01 > *To:* koen casier > *Cc:* 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille > Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen > *Subject:* RE: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning > > Hi Koen, > > Thanks so far for your package description, looks good to me. > > Be aware, that the proposal goes directly to Arian from Juanjo, so > that we might either get the confirmations or we might even better > leave it out. But I really do not know what to advise you since I do > not know really how important this is played by Arian and Juanjo has > not told anything about this how serious such commitment would be if > given. I therefore personally would assess this as "no way back" > package proposal. > > For example, I need the confirmation by Camille and Tanguy urgently > then so that I can send this out to JH. > > Otherwise I mark this as "planned, pending final confirmation". > > ?Please can you Koen decide asap and mail me today if I should leave > it out (without confirmation Camille/Tanguy), insert it marked as > "pending", or leave out completely. > > We can say: I will delay this and send it tomorrow morning so that you > have more time, but then I need to send it (unless Juanjo changes his > mind). Maybe some packages can be named as candidates even > later....(do not know). > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*koen casier [mailto:koen.casier at intec.ugent.be] > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 15:28 > *To:* Heller, Markus > *Cc:* 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille > Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning > > Hi Markus, all, > > > > My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should > still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): > > package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and > simulation toolkit > Lead iMinds > Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be > possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) > Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs > to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances > Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of > the FILAB) > Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and > integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures > TimeLine: R3.3 > Comments: > Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick installation > of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions between the tools > automated and/or relative to the server path. > This will allow for the business modeling and > simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business > calculator as well as the business modeler both have > a simplified and local storage repository for the > models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if > interesting. > The installation in (b) allows for direct testing > of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will allow for a > quick link with introduction of the tool, > and will be complemented with course material > indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an SaaS > RSS instance could be made. > The installation in (c) is aimed at academic usage > (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool with a > local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). > The recipe and integration testing will help in a > quick and effortless installation here. > > > > best regards, > Koen > > > On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Hi Koen, > > fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. > > Please send until today asap a brief description of your new > package following the example template for the other 2. I plan to > send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. > > 1) Package 3: > > -Name: " " (focus is on XY) > > -Lead: iMinds > > -Used GEs: TBD > > -Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not > recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + > integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nStory: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two > together maybe > > nTechnical details: only if needed > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > > [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of *koen > casier > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 > *To:* fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning > > Dear Markus, all, > > > I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was > traveling for the FTTH Council, > where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work > and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. > We will of course make a third package containing the linked > business calculator and business modeler GE's, > to be able to install as a single package. > > When and where do we have to deliver these packages? > > > best regards, > Koen > > > > On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: > > Dear WP3, > > In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. > > I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to > the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: > > 1) Package 1: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Provisioning Package*" (focus is > on provisioning) > > -Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP > > -Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository > > -Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with > installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as > "dedicated instances". > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in > package 2. > > nStory: User uses Store to create an offering (including > adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in > Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... > > nTechnically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to > WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered > service via WDSL > > nEnhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in > USDL. Rest is integrated. > > 2) Package 2: > > -Name: "*Business Framework Consumption Package*" (focus is on > consumption) > > -Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP > > -Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, > Identity Management > > -Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the > solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated > instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) > > -FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them > > -Timeline: TBD (Release 3) > > -Comments: > > nIdentity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure > that same user performs actions) > > nRSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run > separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. > > Please comment or add if needed to these candidate > descriptions per mail to mailing list. > > If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own > packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until > *Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime* latest (tomorrow). > > I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. > Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail > listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week > (announced: Thursday 20.02). > > Best wishes > > Markus > > *From:*Heller, Markus > *Sent:* Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 > *To:* 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > ' > *Subject:* Packaging Planning > > Hi, > > as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on > packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: > > - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical > integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab > or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business > sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value > for a user of that package. > > - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE > and start discussion now how this looks like. > > - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to > create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our > stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized > that he favors packages and really demands them. > > I.*How does a package look like / how realized?* > > "1 GE package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on > FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with > this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save > time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > "Multi-GE-Package" > > - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on > FI-LAB > > - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with > this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save > time+frustration.... > > - licensing infomation > > - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) > > - webinar stuff somehow added > > - What else? > > - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we > address that excactly? > > *II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to > deliver such and indicate when this will be really available:* > > A."1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) > > - SAP Repository (M36) > > - SAP Marketplace (M36) > > - SAP Registry (M36) > > - (Yours) > > - ... > > B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) > > [...] > > Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. > > Best wishes > > Markus > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-apps mailing list > > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 24 15:27:42 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:27:42 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning In-Reply-To: <530B4D8C.8040803@intec.ugent.be> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD14504@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <53047754.5050301@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15B15@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <5304BF74.2070008@intec.ugent.be> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD15CF1@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD17751@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> <530B4D8C.8040803@intec.ugent.be> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD17792@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Hi, ok, I can do it later Have all confirmed now and committed to it (Camille, Sofie, Tanguy)? From: koen casier [mailto:koen.casier at intec.ugent.be] Sent: Montag, 24. Februar 2014 14:48 To: Heller, Markus Cc: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Dear Markus, I would propose to remove the delivery (b) as the SaaS is not a recommended approach (as far as I understood), and in this way we keep the optimal set. best regards, Koen On 2/24/2014 2:42 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Hi, I have added the following entry to TID's package list, but it is poending your confirmation. @ALL: Please confirm that you all want to commit to this package (see mail below)? * Package 3 * NOTE 24.02.2014: PENDING A CONFIRMATION FROM IMINDS, NOT COMMITED YET! AP on IMINDS TO CONFIRM ASAP * Name: BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit * Lead iMinds * Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) * Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances * Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) * Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 16:01 To: koen casier Cc: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen Subject: RE: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Hi Koen, Thanks so far for your package description, looks good to me. Be aware, that the proposal goes directly to Arian from Juanjo, so that we might either get the confirmations or we might even better leave it out. But I really do not know what to advise you since I do not know really how important this is played by Arian and Juanjo has not told anything about this how serious such commitment would be if given. I therefore personally would assess this as "no way back" package proposal. For example, I need the confirmation by Camille and Tanguy urgently then so that I can send this out to JH. Otherwise I mark this as "planned, pending final confirmation". --> Please can you Koen decide asap and mail me today if I should leave it out (without confirmation Camille/Tanguy), insert it marked as "pending", or leave out completely. We can say: I will delay this and send it tomorrow morning so that you have more time, but then I need to send it (unless Juanjo changes his mind). Maybe some packages can be named as candidates even later....(do not know). Best wishes Markus From: koen casier [mailto:koen.casier at intec.ugent.be] Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 15:28 To: Heller, Markus Cc: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu'; Sofie Verbrugge; Camille Reynders (Google Drive); tanguy coenen Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Hi Markus, all, My first suggestion would be the following (note that this should still be checked by Camille and Tanguy): package 3 - BEMES: Integrated Multi-level business modeling and simulation toolkit Lead iMinds Used GEs: Business Modeler, Business Calculator (there could be possibilities to link to repository and/or RSS) Delivered as (a) 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offfered in FILAB as dedicated instances Delivered as (b) 1 integrated SaaS test-version online (outside of the FILAB) Delivered as (c) a recipe for setting up an own version and integrating both GEs together with integration testing procedures TimeLine: R3.3 Comments: Story: The installation in (a) allows for a quick installation of a testversion in the FiLAB with all interactions between the tools automated and/or relative to the server path. This will allow for the business modeling and simulation tools to be setup in a one step process. The business calculator as well as the business modeler both have a simplified and local storage repository for the models and possibly this could be linked to the repository if interesting. The installation in (b) allows for direct testing of the front-end and the back-end functionality. This will allow for a quick link with introduction of the tool, and will be complemented with course material indicating how the tool can be used. Possibly here the link to an SaaS RSS instance could be made. The installation in (c) is aimed at academic usage (FRAND or free licensing) and commercial offers of the tool with a local installation of the binaries (speed and privacy). The recipe and integration testing will help in a quick and effortless installation here. best regards, Koen On 2/19/2014 2:11 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Hi Koen, fine, this would have to be shipped as part of Release 3. Please send until today asap a brief description of your new package following the example template for the other 2. I plan to send it later today after EOB to Juanjo. 1) Package 3: - Name: " " (focus is on XY) - Lead: iMinds - Used GEs: TBD - Delivery: Please describe exactly, if possible. E.g.: "not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances" - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: iMinds creates them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Story: Who does what and what is the benefit of packaging the two together maybe n Technical details: only if needed Best wishes Markus From: fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-apps-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of koen casier Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 10:20 To: fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-apps] Packaging Planning Dear Markus, all, I was not able to attend the conference call yesterday as I was traveling for the FTTH Council, where I am currently presenting the business calculator GE work and mentioning at the same time our work in the full BEMES project. We will of course make a third package containing the linked business calculator and business modeler GE's, to be able to install as a single package. When and where do we have to deliver these packages? best regards, Koen On 2/18/2014 4:35 PM, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear WP3, In today's telco we have defined 2 Packages for the Apps chapter. I plan to forward this list as our chapter's package list to the coordinator on or after Wednesday 19.02 EOB: 1) Package 1: - Name: "Business Framework Provisioning Package" (focus is on provisioning) - Lead: ATOS, Partners: ATOS, UPM, SAP - Used GEs: COMPEL, Store, Marketplace, Repository - Delivery: not recipes. Delivered as 1 single VM image with installed + integrated GEs to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instances". - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management is left out here (agreed) and is used in package 2. n Story: User uses Store to create an offering (including adding metadata like WSDL link) and to publish it in Marketplace. COMPEL users can find/search it and use it.... n Technically: The service USDL includes as metadata a "link to WSDL". COMPEL relies on this and can access the offered service via WDSL n Enhancement needed in Store so that user can add metadata in USDL. Rest is integrated. 2) Package 2: - Name: "Business Framework Consumption Package" (focus is on consumption) - Lead: UPM, Partners: UPM, TID, SAP - Used GEs: Wirecloud, Store, Marketplace, Repository, RSS, Identity Management - Delivery: RECIPE-based solution that create/populates the solution into FI-LAB to be offered in FI-LAB as "dedicated instance (recipes)" (Plan B: like package 1) - FI-WARE Catalog Pages: SAP can create them - Timeline: TBD (Release 3) - Comments: n Identity Management integrated already and mandatory (ensure that same user performs actions) n RSS is only available as a "Global instance" and would run separately. The packaged GES access it via the URLS provided. Please comment or add if needed to these candidate descriptions per mail to mailing list. If other WP3 partners would like to also propose their own packages, you must do via mail to the apps mailing list until Wednesday 19.02. Lunchtime latest (tomorrow). I will send our list on or after tomorrow EOB to Juanjo. Juanjo collects it and plans to send out an official mail listing all planned "packages" in the chapters this week (announced: Thursday 20.02). Best wishes Markus From: Heller, Markus Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 16:31 To: 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Packaging Planning Hi, as in the telco, based on Juanjo's Mails from Monday on packaging and our discussion today. We start a brainstorming now: - packaging is not restricted to a low-level technical integration of GEs or technical availability of a GE in FI-Lab or else alone. It instead should be thought in a "business sense", a solution package with identifiable Business Value for a user of that package. - we try to find a uniform method to deliver packages per GE and start discussion now how this looks like. - each GE owner can ultimately decide if he would like to create one for his GEs. I recommend in light of making our stuff more easily consumable and also Arian has emphasized that he favors packages and really demands them. I. How does a package look like / how realized? "1 GE package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? "Multi-GE-Package" - A document (PDF/Flyer?) with data to link to a instance on FI-LAB - business level address to the consumer: You benefit with this business value: XY, it costs you:, yiou will save time+frustration.... - licensing infomation - contains written docu (e.g. compiled out of existing docu) - webinar stuff somehow added - What else? - Attention: What if multiple licenses are affected. How do we address that excactly? II. Who plans a package: Please add here if you intend to deliver such and indicate when this will be really available: A. "1GE-Package" Planned Packages per GE Candidates) - SAP Repository (M36) - SAP Marketplace (M36) - SAP Registry (M36) - (Yours) - ... B. "Multi-GE-Package" Planned bigger packages (candidates) [...] Please reply to the mailing list with us all in CC. Best wishes Markus _______________________________________________ Fiware-apps mailing list Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Mon Feb 24 17:51:00 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:51:00 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] Emailing: D 2 5 2 Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE - MHE - Proposal 1.docx Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD17836@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear Pierre, as discussed today in WPL WPA meeting, I propose the following tables and contents as a template for all other chapters. Goal is to have all chapter copntributions aligned while at same time achieve a fast delivery with not much further delays... Performed Changes in Apps chapter on the 3 tables (attachment WORD): - One table is taken over from the other chapters since it was better designed (Table 1). - Table 1 reports the PLANNED availability and Table 2 reports the CURRENT STATE of M30 review (which is effective/achieved/success report therefore to be taken into account). Some overalp Table1 / Table 2 but not complete since Plan vs. Execution... - Table 3 reports on support per GE 1) @ALL WP3 GE Owners: Check your GE entries here since I had to modify texts...so please doublecheck and mail corrections to me with the new contents if needed. --> Deadline: Wednesday 26.02 EOB 2) @Pierre, Miguel: What is you opinion? Piere, do you agree or dou you have further improvements or other proposals that we can use? Best wishes Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D 2 5 2 Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE - MHE - Proposal 1.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 311255 bytes Desc: D 2 5 2 Third party innovation enablement in FI-WARE - MHE - Proposal 1.docx URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 25 11:29:22 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:29:22 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] test (me again :-)) Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD1804A@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Tue Feb 25 15:54:31 2014 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:54:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-apps] FI-WARE: WP3 Call In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B0694C9@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B0694C9@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B1AD182B6@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, Reminder: Please let me note that only Joaquin from ATOS and Javier Lucio from TID attended today. All other partners seem to have decided against attending the telco today. @ALL: Please stay fresh :) and attend WP3 telcos in the coming / remaining time. Best wishes Markus -----Original Appointment----- From: Heller, Markus Sent: Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 15:24 To: Heller, Markus; 'fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: Klein, Andreas; Joaquin Iranzo Yuste; Ughetti Marco Subject: FI-WARE: WP3 Call When: Dienstag, 25. Februar 2014 15:00-16:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna. Where: SAP Connect Markus Dear FI-WARE WP3 colleagues, I invite you to our new WP3 Call on Tuesdays 15-16. Please use the dial-in info below. Best wishes Markus ---- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: