[Fiware-cloud] Cloud HLDesc update

Edmonds, AndrewX andrewx.edmonds at intel.com
Tue Jun 21 10:45:17 CEST 2011


What Alex says is fine for me and makes sense with the DoW just like TCloud
within T4.4.

 

Andy

 

PS: the diagram I sent was simply an edit of the existing one, with the only
difference being a) a split between user and service-provider and the
inclusion of OCCI (as requested by Alex).

 

From: fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu
[mailto:fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Alex Glikson
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 10:06 PM
To: fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: Re: [Fiware-cloud] Cloud HLDesc update

 

I think we can assume TCloud for IaaS Service Management, and OCCI for IaaS
Resource Management -- at least for now. 
Naturally, the "Interfaces" section should cover interfaces of all the GEs. 

Regards, 
Alex 



From:        FERNANDO LOPEZ AGUILAR <fla at tid.es> 
To:        Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL 
Cc:        "fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu> 
Date:        20/06/2011 11:54 PM 
Subject:        Re: [Fiware-cloud] Cloud HLDesc update 

  _____  




Dear Alex, 

In the same way, I think that the Dow in the "IaaS Service Management" GE
only talk about TCloud and OVF. 

I am not talking about the interface defined in the "IaaS Resource
Management" only talking about the "IaaS Service Management". 

Regarding a new version of the Andy's diagram, let me some time in order to
finalize a new version of the HLDesc 
and I send you a new version of the Andy's diagram. 

And finally, I do not have any problem to share the the source files of the
various diagrams but we have to 
check if all of you have the same applications to read them. 

BR, 

Fernando López Aguilar 
Cloud Computing 
fla at tid dot es 
+34 914 832 729 
Telefónica I+D (R&D) 
Ronda de la Comunicación s/n 
Distrito C, Edificio Oeste 1, Planta 5 
28050 Madrid, Spain 



El 20/06/2011, a las 22:03, Alex Glikson escribió: 

Dear Fernando, 

I think it is mentioned in the DoW that what we call now the "IaaS Resource
Management" GE will expose OCCI interface. 
I am not up-to-speed with the details of the different standard interfaces
to have a strong opinion (yet). 

If you have some objections to Andy's diagram -- can you propose your own
version, which incorporates OCCI on top of IaaS Resource Management? 
BTW, it could be helpful to share the source files of the various diagrams
in the document.. 

Thanks, 
Alex 



From:        FERNANDO LOPEZ AGUILAR < <mailto:fla at tid.es> fla at tid.es> 
To:        "Edmonds, AndrewX" < <mailto:andrewx.edmonds at intel.com>
andrewx.edmonds at intel.com> 
Cc:        Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, "
<mailto:fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu> fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu" <
<mailto:fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu> fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu> 
Date:        20/06/2011 10:50 PM 
Subject:        Re: [Fiware-cloud] Cloud HLDesc update 

  _____  




Upps, 

Here we have a strong opinion about the diagram that you send today. Firstly
we want to know what is the meaning of the different box here (PaaS and
IaaS), if we consider them like the different GE that we are working on. And
making the association between PaaS and PaaS Management, we have not planned
to offer OCCI to the Portal/Toolkit/Script in the PaaS Management. 

The same in the IaaS Service Management, if the association is between IaaS
and IaaS Service Management, we have not planned to offer OCCI interface to
the upper layer (PaaS Management  and Portal/Script/Toolkit) too. If the
IaaS is related to the IaaS Resource Management I cannot comment anything
there maybe Alex could give you some more comments. 

In case of CDMI, ok, we planned to offer CDMI to the IaaS Service Management
in order to take control over Object Storage and to deal with the Cloud
Storage. We can extend this functionality to the upper layer if we want to
offer a service in the PaaS in order to access the data in the Cloud. In
that case we could see an extension of IaaS Service Management to use the
CDMI to the upper layer. But the PaaS Management itself is not offering CDMI
to the upper layer due to it is only need to define the applications and the
platform to manage them through the Application Description. 

Fernando López Aguilar 
Cloud Computing 
fla at tid dot es 
+34 914 832 729 
Telefónica I+D (R&D) 
Ronda de la Comunicación s/n 
Distrito C, Edificio Oeste 1, Planta 5 
28050 Madrid, Spain 



El 20/06/2011, a las 19:13, Edmonds, AndrewX escribió: 

Attached is a possible replacement image related to an open comment (#51)
assigned to me. Alex can you merge it with the next rev. of the doc? 
 
Andy 
 
From:  <mailto:fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu>
fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [
<mailto:fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu>
mailto:fiware-cloud-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf OfAlex Glikson
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:57 PM
To:  <mailto:fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu> fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-cloud] Cloud HLDesc update 
 
All, 

Thanks to everyone who reviewed the document. Please, see a new integrated
draft at
https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/107/FIWARE+HLDesc+Cloud+v0.5.doc
(sorry for the delay). Few things for your attention: 
1.        I've reviewed all the comments, added some new comments and added
"STATUS" within the text of each of them (after an initial cleanup and
consolidation). 

*	For those marked "Closed" -- the authors of the comments are
requested to indicate whether they still think that something needs to be
done (otherwise the comment will be deleted in the next revision). 
*	For those marked "Open", I've also assigned an "OWNER". The owners
are requests to address the comments ASAP and send the updates to the list
(if possible -- by the EOD Monday).

2.        I've replaced the architecture diagrams with a new one, and made
few changes to the GEs -- please, review. 

I am going to make another round of reviewing the document on Sunday, and
plan to send more comments -- stay tuned :-) 

Regards, 
Alex 
<apiFIware.png><smime.p7s><ATT00001..txt><ATT00002..txt> 



  _____  

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
 <http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx>
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx 
<ATT00001..txt> 



  _____  

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
 <http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx>
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-cloud/attachments/20110621/1940fb25/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-cloud/attachments/20110621/1940fb25/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Ireland Limited (Branch)
Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland
Registered Number: E902934

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


More information about the Old-Fiware-cloud mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy