[Fiware-cloud] Fw: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: 2nd review report (month 9)

[Alex Glikson]

FYI, see attached.
We might need to make some enhancements to our deliverables based on the 
EU comments below.

Regards,
Alex

----- Forwarded by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM on 14/05/2012 07:38 AM -----

From:   Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>
To:     "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>, 
"fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>, 
Date:   14/05/2012 07:16 AM
Subject:        [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: 2nd review report (month 9)
Sent by:        fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu



Hi all,

  The EC has sent a review report on the activities carried out, as well 
as the deliverables due, before end of month 9.   I have to confess that 
this has been a nice surprise (among other things, because it will help us 
to better focus our 1st year review by June 21-22)

  I haven't had time to read it completely, just a quick reading of the 
overall assessment.   D2.3a, D2.4a, and D11.4a have been rejected and have 
to be re-submitted once detailed comments provided by the reviewers are 
addressed.   The rest of deliverables are accepted though D.2.1.1 and 
D.1.3.1 with some reservations.   The reviewers applaud the quality of the 
testbed design as documented in deliverable D10.1a.

  Regarding D2.3a and D2.4a, the following is said in the overall 
assessment:
While much of the material produced for the key deliverable D2.3a is of 
good to very good quality, the level of quality is not consistent, with 
several major issues affecting deliverables D2.3a and D2.4a to the degree 
that remedial attention is required before they can be accepted. 

  while regarding D11.4, the following is said in the overall assessment 
(probably we need to read the detailed comments to understand it better):
deliverable D11.4a is also rejected due to a lack of clarity on how 
standardisation contributions will be properly aligned with one another

  Overall, the project is scored in the lower scale of acceptable progress 
so, definitively, we all have to devote the necessary resources to improve 
that score.   I believe it is feasible if we carefully review the 
recommendations made in the review and implement the necessary remedy 
actions.    Fortunately, some actions that have been already planned 
(e.g., educational sessions with the UC projects, dedicated team covering 
management of UC tickets, ...) are in this direction, but we will have to 
add some more.

  Please distribute among the members of your Chapter teams.

  Best regards,

-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es
email: jhierro at tid.es
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



-------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: 
FI-WARE: 2nd review report (month 9)
Date: 
Sun, 13 May 2012 16:47:06 +0200
From: 
Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>
To: 
JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO <jimenez at tid.es>, JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA 
<jhierro at tid.es>
CC: 
Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu <Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu>, 
Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu <Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu>, 
bel.piet1 at gmail.com <bel.piet1 at gmail.com>, renaud.difrancesco at eu.sony.com 
<renaud.difrancesco at eu.sony.com>, rdifrancesco at ymail.com 
<rdifrancesco at ymail.com>, dgr at whitestein.com <dgr at whitestein.com>, 
msli at icfocus.co.uk <msli at icfocus.co.uk>, 
irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com <irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com>


Dear Jose, Juanjo,
 
Please find enclosed the outcome of the second FI-WARE review. No paper 
version will follow.
 
Please distribute the review report to the partners in the consortium.
 
Please acknowledge the receipt of this e-mail.
 
This is an informal notification. The formal submission will follow soon 
and will not be different.
 
Best regards,
Arian Zwegers
 


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar 
nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace 
situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and 
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-wpl mailing list
Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-cloud/attachments/20120514/386e75b0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FI-WARE Review 2 Report.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 148584 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-cloud/attachments/20120514/386e75b0/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Cover FI-WARE review 2 report.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 33689 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-cloud/attachments/20120514/386e75b0/attachment-0001.obj>