[Fiware-cloud] [Fiware] Fwd: FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & Review report

[FERNANDO LOPEZ AGUILAR]

Alex, sincerely, I do not understand the comments from the reviewers and if it is sounds like I
can imagine I was surprised why the rest of the FIWARE consortium has not rejected also these
deliverables.

Fernando López Aguilar
Cloud Computing
fla at tid dot es
+34 914 832 729
Telefónica I+D (R&D)
Ronda de la Comunicación s/n
Distrito C, Edificio Oeste 1, Planta 5
28043 Madrid, Spain

[cid:65E3CA3A-3DFE-41B6-8F69-2AD965EA42FA at hi.inet]



Follow FI-WARE on the net

        Website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu<http://www.fi-ware.eu/>
        Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
        Twitter:  http://twitter.com/Fiware
        LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



El 12/03/2013, a las 14:33, Alex Glikson <GLIKSON at il.ibm.com<mailto:GLIKSON at il.ibm.com>>
 escribió:

Yep. We need to assess the reasons for the rejection (attaching below the corresponding text) and make sure our M24 deliverables are addressing the concerns of the reviewers.
Please, notice that as stated in the report:
"None of the deliverables requires resubmission, as the next iterative version is due in
the next review period. As this is an interim review, no cost assessments are given."

Alex


D4.1.1b GE Open Specification
Although some improvements to the structure and the format have been made, the deliverable
still does not provide sufficient ground for practical implementation by software developers.
A lot of information is taken from the FI-WARE Architecture deliverable, but that does not
help much in making the deliverable more practical. The main goal of the document, namely
to facilitate usage and integration of GE implementations, as well as to support the
development of compliant implementations of GEs by third parties, is still not achieved.
For the next version, a lower level of abstraction is required, with more substantive content
on practical usage scenarios; the scenarios should be illustrated with formalizations or
diagrams. Incorporation of feedback from software developers, especially those in the Use
Case projects, should be demonstrated.
As a minor comment, the document would benefit from stylistic improvements, such as use
of a common glossary.
Deliverable D4.1.1b is rejected. No submission is required.

D4.5.1 Unit Testing Plan and Report
The document does not constitute a real test plan as it does not explain how the tests will be
carried out. It provides little or no information on the features to be tested, roles and
responsibilities, prerequisites to begin testing, assumptions, what to do after a test is
successfully carried out, what to do if a test fails, glossary and other relevant information for
test plans. Test coverage concerning what requirements will be verified during what
stages/releases is also not specified.
The test cases are not sufficiently defined in terms of specifying the set of conditions or
variables under which a tester will determine whether the GE is working correctly or not.
Also unclear are the input data, expected results and actual results.
The relation between the tests and the listed test features to be tested listed is not always clear
(e.g. testing the creation of a child container that is not a CDMI container).
All the tests are positive. As such, they do not provoke anomalous behaviour in order to
reveal the presence of defects.
Deliverable D4.5.1 is rejected. No submission is required.



====================================================================================================
Alex Glikson
Manager, Cloud Operating System Technologies, IBM Haifa Research Lab
http://w3.haifa.ibm.com/dept/stt/cloud_sys.html | http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/stt/cloud_sys.shtml
Email: glikson at il.ibm.com<mailto:glikson at il.ibm.com> | Phone: +972-4-8281085 | Mobile: +972-54-6466667 | Fax: +972-4-8296112




From:        FERNANDO LOPEZ AGUILAR <fla at tid.es<mailto:fla at tid.es>>
To:        Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL,
Cc:        "fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu>" <fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-cloud at lists.fi-ware.eu>>
Date:        12/03/2013 02:55 PM
Subject:        Fwd: [Fiware] Fwd: FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & Review        report
________________________________



Dear Alex,

I think that we have to discuss it internally due to they are rejected two of our documents.

Fernando López Aguilar
Cloud Computing
fla at tid dot es
+34 914 832 729
Telefónica I+D (R&D)
Ronda de la Comunicación s/n
Distrito C, Edificio Oeste 1, Planta 5
28043 Madrid, Spain



Follow FI-WARE on the net

                Website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu<http://www.fi-ware.eu/>
                Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
                Twitter:  http://twitter.com/Fiware
                LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



Inicio del mensaje reenviado:

De: Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>>
Asunto: [Fiware] Fwd: FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & Review report
Fecha: 12 de marzo de 2013 12:13:35 GMT+01:00
Para: "fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>" <fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>>, "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>" <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>>, "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>" <fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>>

Dear partners,

 I forward to you without even reading it yet to avoid any delay.

 I'll come to this after I read it carefully.

 Best regards,

-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro<http://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro>

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
and Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
 website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu<http://www.fi-ware.eu/>
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
 twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
        FI-WARE 4th Review meeting: Outcome Letter & Review report
Date:
        Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:43:05 +0000
From:
        <Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu><mailto:Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu>
To:
        <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
CC:
        <CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu><mailto:CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu>, <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu><mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>, <mcp at tid.es><mailto:mcp at tid.es>, <subsidies at tid.es><mailto:subsidies at tid.es>, <msli at icfocus.co.uk><mailto:msli at icfocus.co.uk>, <irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com><mailto:irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com>, <dgr at whitestein.com><mailto:dgr at whitestein.com>, <rdifrancesco at ymail.com><mailto:rdifrancesco at ymail.com>



Dear Mr Hierro,


Please find attached a scanned copy of the outcome letter and review report of project 285248 FI-WARE.


Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.


Many thanks in advance


Best regards,


Vanessa Vanhumbeeck
European Commission
DG CONNECT
Unit E3 – Net Innovation


Tel.: +32 2 296 49 39
Email: vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu<mailto:vanessa.vanhumbeeck at ec.europa.eu>






________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware mailing list
Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu>
https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx[attachment "PastedGraphic-1.tiff" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "FI-WARE Review 4 Report.pdf.pdf" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "Outcome FI-WARE review 4 report.pdf.pdf" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM]


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-cloud/attachments/20130312/1fec12af/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 66394 bytes
Desc: PastedGraphic-1.tiff
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-cloud/attachments/20130312/1fec12af/attachment.tiff>