[Fiware-ge-owners] installation of GEs as eat-your-own-dogfood - please report to me

[Sandfuchs, Thorsten]

Dear colleagues,

as most of you know in the M30 review the reviewers requested us to do installation of GEs in a "eat your own dog-food" style within the consortium. E.g. a company A will install and test the installation and admin guides of company B and gives direct feedback. This would help to raise the level of completeness of the installation and admin guides and the related software and would basically enable us to have something like the famous "lutz report" on our own.

With the latest review report the reviewers requested to persist the results of this information in the upcoming 10.5.3 deliverable (which is reporting on validation of the Testbed - therefore such kind of internal "validation" of installation guides would be part) - I copied the text below.



Please act accordingly and

a)      Try to install a GE of another company following their installation guides and downloading their software

b)      Please document your effort shortly on the page

a.       https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/testbed/index.php/The_internal_Installation_and_usage_Test_Cockpit

b.      It should incorporate

                                                               i.      Your Company name/or contact

                                                             ii.      The GE which you try to install and test

                                                            iii.      The result of your test

                                                           iv.      Information of the result of your test in the "style" of Lutz Schubert

(for the sake of simplicity I copied two of the examples Lutz gave us on the wiki page and a template to ease this up mor)

c)       Please provide direct feedback to the Guide to the respective party, if you find errors

d)      As a "tested" GE-owner you can as well comment on the wiki page above and introduce a paragraph



It should be in the interest of every GE to be internally tested by "somebody" other that yourself and have a proper representation of this test on the above page in the testbed-wiki, as the reviewers will clearly monitor this as part of the 10.5.3 deliverable.

ð  Therefore - even if you can't provide a test of another component, please try to proactively find somebody within the consortium of another company to test your GE and let him report on this page!



Thanks for any support in this,



                                                                              /Thorsten



As reference

1.       The text of the review report which implies to do this

Obviously, hardly any of the documentation can claim completeness in the remaining time, but should at least cover all known grounds. To this end, extensive and directed installation and usage tests should be performed - not only through the Use Case projects, but also within the consortium. For example, partners not involved in the development of a specific Generic Enabler can verify it through installation and testing. The according results and findings should be incorporated in the forthcoming Release 3 and the validation reporting of deliverable D10.5.3.

2.       the original "Lutz report" is attached and our "answer" was the following:

                https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FVDmcUqamhfMhCDundzcrGwrLBYWF8xePUyic5Axr6A/edit?pli=1



--



Thorsten Sandfuchs



SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany | www.sap.com<http://www.sap.com/>





Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx



Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank.



This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.



Please consider the environment before printing this mail!





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-ge-owners/attachments/20140402/4a441368/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FiWare_PPP_Evaluation v02.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 985876 bytes
Desc: FiWare_PPP_Evaluation v02.pdf
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-ge-owners/attachments/20140402/4a441368/attachment.pdf>