Hi Manual, I haven¡¯t counted how many words we have to add, too. I¡¯ve just used the numbers from your reports. Counting the Number of ¡°Rules Violations¡± tells how many editing we have to do. Trying to reduce those editing make simply possible to do them in time (we have 10 days). I repeat, these are the editing (sections of texts to edit, not words, to match rules) required in the wiki pages: * Apps chapter: 272 * Cloud chapter: 197 * IoT chapter: 181 * Data chapter: 282 * I2ND chapter: 192 * Security chapter: 196 * MiWi chapter: 252 Total: 1572 editing actions required in the FIWARE Forge wiki. Being able to practically make all these editing (we have 10 days, don¡¯t we?) means quality, believe me. I would ask you to use statistics to find a better set of meaningful rules, because I¡¯m sure the number of editing actions can be reduced, for instance in this way: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 20 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 15 words) ==> Overall fields (<= 250 words) Please, the statistic in your reports to do this analysis, in a way that prove to be really useful to make these changes. We want to be able to apply these editing in such a short time. We strive for quality. Gianmario Da: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Inviato: gioved¨¬ 20 marzo 2014 14:47 A: Bollano Gianmario; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: RE: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Hi Gianmario, I haven¡¯t counted how many words we have to add. The purpose is to increase quality. I believe it¡¯s worth doing it! I think Quality should be important for us!! I already informed you yesterday on my flexibility to adapt the scheme to increase quality and the procedure to follow!! The scheme may also consider differences between Epics and Features. Epics normally have wider scope, and include several features ¨C so somehow better or wider descriptions could be provided. We could also easy navigation among related items: for example, epics could include links to their features, and features include links to it epic parent. Kind regards, Manuel From: Bollano Gianmario [mailto:gianmario.bollano at telecomitalia.it] Sent: jueves, 20 de marzo de 2014 12:51 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: R: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Hi Manuel, The change in upper/lower limits in the number of words you¡¯ve proposed has this immediate effects: * Apps chapter: 272 rules violations * Cloud chapter: 197 rules violations * IoT chapter: 181 rules violations * Data chapter: 282 rules violations * I2ND chapter: 192 rules violations * Security chapter: 196 rules violations * MiWi chapter: 252 rules violations Huge numbers indeed¡. I¡¯ve got the data from your reports. The rules you propose are: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) ==> Overall fields (<= 250 words) I¡¯ve seen you¡¯ve done lot of statistics. I¡¯m sure that the number of rules violation, and the overall editing work to do, can be drastically reduced by changing a little the numbers above. For instance, when setting Description field (>= 20 words), instead of 30, the number of rules violations significantly decreases. And having 20 words instead of 30 does not really affect the value of the description. The same may apply to Rationale field (>= 15 words), instead of 20 words. Considering you are doing lot of statistics, don¡¯t you think it would better to analyse the effect of changing a little these numbers to minimize the total numbers of rules violations? In this way we¡¯ll have a meaningful common rule that also will help anyone to make these changes as quick as possible. Gianmario Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Inviato: mercoled¨¬ 19 marzo 2014 19:54 A: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu> Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] Backlog Content - Reviews - C7 - Open descriptions included Dear GE Owners, I¡¯ve just finished to implement the last criteria missing in the backlogs reviews: C7 ¨C It cares about the open descriptions of backlog items provided in the wiki. The main realization is the great variability of our descriptions (#words): Min = 0; Max = 560; Mean = 73.4; Std Dev(¦Ò) = 51.4 [cid:image001.png at 01CF444D.63EE0EB0] In order to overcome this situation I¡¯ve defined a frame to reduce this variability, which encourages descriptions in the frame 60-250 words. Obviously actual quality of descriptions can only come from you by providing meaningful and informative paragraphs. The inferior limit of the frame for the description window is implemented as follows: ==> Goal field (>= 10 words) ==> Description field (>= 30 words) ==> Rationale field (>= 20 words) I hope you find it sensible!! Current reports also provide views for each individual GEI¡¯s distribution, a good example shown below: [cid:image002.png at 01CF444D.63EE0EB0] Find updated reports at the links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3598/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140319.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3599/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140319.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3602/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140319.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3600/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140319.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3601/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140319.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3604/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140319.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.org/docman/view.php/27/3603/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140319.xlsx If anything, please, don¡¯t hesitate to let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef¨®nica Digital Parque Tecnol¨®gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol¨ªtica de env¨ªo y recepci¨®n de correo electr¨®nico en el enlace situado m¨¢s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ¨¨ necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol¨ªtica de env¨ªo y recepci¨®n de correo electr¨®nico en el enlace situado m¨¢s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ¨¨ necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-ge-owners/attachments/20140320/ad04bea7/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 15357 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-ge-owners/attachments/20140320/ad04bea7/attachment.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 24102 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-ge-owners/attachments/20140320/ad04bea7/attachment-0001.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.gif Type: image/gif Size: 677 bytes Desc: image003.gif URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-ge-owners/attachments/20140320/ad04bea7/attachment.gif> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-ge-owners/attachments/20140320/ad04bea7/attachment.jpg>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy