[Fiware-iot] Minutes, 08 July 2011

[Martin Bauer]

Hi Ricardo, all,

I think it could be a grave mistake to completely remove the publish/subscribe aspects from WP5. I am not sure that the particular aspects relevant for IoT are taken into account by WP6 - I have only started reading the deliverable, so I don't know what is currently there. Of course, we have to see how we integrate the WP5 and WP6 enablers.

The question is also whether our data enabler will be usable stand-alone or whether it is just a kind of "helper" for the WP6 enabler.

Best regards,

Martin

------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Bauer
Senior Researcher
NEC Europe Ltd.
NEC Laboratories Europe
Software & Services Research Division
Kurfürsten-Anlage 36
D-69115 Heidelberg
Tel: +49/ (0)6221/4342-168
Fax: +49/ (0)6221/4342-155
E-Mail: Martin.Bauer at neclab.eu<mailto:Martin.Bauer at neclab.eu>
http://www.nw.neclab.eu

From: fiware-iot-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-iot-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-iot-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu]<mailto:[mailto:fiware-iot-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu]> On Behalf Of Ricardo de las Heras
Sent: Montag, 11. Juli 2011 13:29
To: Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest)
Cc: fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Subject: Re: [Fiware-iot] Minutes, 08 July 2011

Dear Lorant,

there is a misunderstanding according to the minutes, please I would like to clarify it.

When I referred to CEP and Pub/Subs/Notify, I said that we should NOT include the description of these type of technologies/assets in both wps: WP5 and WP6.
It doesn't make sense, because we are writing a unique document, and those type of technologies are already covered by WP6, indeed both are part of its core.

So, we can make references to them, because we need of course these technologies in the IoT (WP5) as well, but we should not duplicate their description in the deliverable of HLD.
Indeed Juanjo removed the paragraphs we had in the Data handling task (T5.3).

Finally, the idea I exposed is that we can use both technologies in a local scope (example of a house, monitored by sensors, intelligent ambients, etc), not as a Generic Enabler for the Fiware platform, because those assets are provided by WP6.

I hope this clarifies the comments I did by phone on Fridays' conf. call.

thanks,
best,
Ricardo.


Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest) wrote:

Dear All,

Please find under the attached link the minutes of our weekly meeting from Friday.
https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/11/243/IoT-Minutes-Telco-07082011.doc

Br,

Lorant

--
-------------------------------------
Ricardo de las Heras
Research Project Manager
E-mail:<mailto:rheras at tid.es> rheras at tid.es<mailto:rheras at tid.es>
Phone1: (+34) 983 367625
Phone2: (+34) 91 1878107 + Ext:327
Telefónica I+D<http://www.tid.es>
-------------------------------------

________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-iot/attachments/20110711/e5aeeefd/attachment.html>