Dear Thierry, dear Juanjo, After some months of experience with having a joint GE together with another project partner, we came to the conclusion that it would have many advantages to split the Things Management GE among Configuration Management and IoT Broker. The main problem is that the whole project - including the testbed, all deliverables, etc. - is built on the assumption that each GE is provided by one responsible partner. This has a lot of implications, e.g. - Compatibility issues regarding the GE licence - In all deliverables, the granularity is per GE, and it is considerable effort to work around that - At the moment the GE is shared between two partners, but in future releases it is planned that even more partners (SAP, USurrey) are going to develop further parts - and then it is really going to be messy. Technically it would be absolutely no problem to do the split, as the two GE parts have a well-defined interface between them. I do not know when exactly and how to perform such a split, but I would prefer to do it as soon as possible. Please tell me what you think about this, and of course I would also like to hear the opinion of Telefonica, our partner developing the other part of the Things Management GE. Best regards Tobias -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-iot/attachments/20121018/83f97f9d/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy