[Fiware-iot] Associations in Release 2.3 of ConfMan GE

[Tobias Jacobs]

Dear Fermin, all,

Thanks a lot for you answer. We are very glad about your decision and we are looking forward to have a working IoT Backend with association support.

We just have an association epic defined for the IoT Broker https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.Epic.IoT.Backend.IoTBroker.Associations.

Best
Tobias

From: Fermín Galán Márquez [mailto:fermin at tid.es]
Sent: Freitag, 12. April 2013 16:30
To: Tobias Jacobs
Cc: Juanjo Hierro; KEN GUNNAR ZANGELIN (kzangeli at tid.es); CARLOS RALLI UCENDO (ralli at tid.es); fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu; Martin Bauer; Salvatore Longo; Raihan Ul-Islam; thierry.nagellen at orange.com
Subject: Re: Associations in Release 2.3 of ConfMan GE

Dear Tobias,

We have been discussing internally this issue and we (TID) agree in changing the existing Technical Roadmap (table) of Configuration Manager GE to include the support of associations for R2.3. As a consequence, some of the Features in the existing R2.3 will be deferred for the future.

We will change Technical Roadmap (table) of Configuration Manager GE in the FIWARE public wiki in the next days accordingly. Is this sense, is there any feature page or trac item for thing-device associations? In positive case, could you provide the URLs, please?

We think that NEC proposal to accomplish this is ok in general, although some details needs to be polished yet. We can continue the discussion of these technical details in the NGSI mailing list.

Best regards,

------
Fermín

El 08/04/2013 11:34, Tobias Jacobs escribió:
Dear Colleagues from TID,

Could you provide us some information related to your current plans related to the releases of the Configuration Management GE?

1)
We understand that the next release of the ConfMan GE will be 2.3. How does this match with the integration plans that were discussed in the F2F meeting? We planned the integration of the WP5 components, but without the ConfMan GE no integration will be able to work.

2)
In the technical roadmap (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Internet_of_Things_%28IoT%29_Services), there is a slight mismatch between the features list in the table and what is described in the bullet points when it comes to association support.

We are concerned that there is no feature in the table on association support of the ConfMan GE. As the discussions with Juanjo last year have shown, the ability of translating between device-level and thing-level information is one of the essential abilities of the IoT Backend. The support of associations by ConfMan GE is an essential prerequisite for it.

We can also discuss this point in the phone conference this week.

Thanks and best regards
Ernoe, Martin, Raihan, Salvatore, and Tobias

________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-iot/attachments/20130412/5e397dec/attachment.html>