Hello Alexandre, Ok, thanks for this clarification, as long as the service is accessible according to FI-WARE terms and we are compliant with WP10 (Testbed) requests, this should be ok. Best, Francesco > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Boeglin [mailto:alexandre.boeglin at inria.fr] > Sent: mercredi 8 février 2012 13:29 > To: DI CERBO, Francesco > Cc: Jean-Yves Marion; GASPARD Lucie; LELEU Philippe > (philippe.leleu at thalesgroup.com); BISSON Pascal; TRABELSI, Slim; Guillaume > BONFANTE (Guillaume.Bonfante at loria.fr); Fabrice SABATIER > Subject: Re: URGENT: important FI-WARE T8.4 request > > Le lundi 06 février 2012 à 11:42, DI CERBO, Francesco a écrit: > > @INRIA: during the last GA in Madrid, a number of questions were > > raised about your diagrams; in particular, I was wondering if they > > were depicting correctly the deployment scenario that you are > > proposing for FI-WARE (e.g., an "agent" to be deployed on the testbed, > > and your "real" malware services in your premises) . I kindly ask to > > Alexandre to let us have a clarification on this point, and in case to > > update your diagrams and to upload them on the wiki page. > > Hello, > > I discussed with Guillaume and Fabrice about this, and it appears there > was a misunderstanding. > > The malware detection service will be provided as a SOAP WebService, > deployed in our premises and accessible remotely. > > The only client they will provide will be a Java sample client that will > connect to the WebService, but its main purpose will be to be a demo on > how to interact with the WebService. > > > Best regards, > Alex > > * PGP - S/MIME Signed: 08/02/2012 at 13:29:19 > * Alexandre BOEGLIN <alexandre.boeglin at inria.fr> > * Issuer: TERENA
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy