[Fiware-security] FI-WARE Security - Outcomes of today's audio with CA regarding Security AT contrib to D2.3 (some work needed)

[TRABELSI, Slim]

Hi Pascal,

On the Data Handling GE we made the modifications according to Juanjo's comments. What kind of modifications are expected ?
I really do not undestand this decision ! Please can you explain give us more details about this ?

thank you
best
Slim

________________________________
From: BISSON Pascal [pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:11 PM
To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); gabor.marton at nsn.com; norbert.goetze at nsn.com; TRABELSI, Slim; DI CERBO, Francesco; GASPARD Lucie; Alexandre Boeglin; osb at zurich.ibm.com; anj at zurich.ibm.com; antonio.garcia at atosorigin.com; Antonio Garcia Vazquez; LELEU Philippe; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de
Cc: GIDOIN Daniel; BISSON Pascal; Pedro Soria Rodriguez; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: FI-WARE Security - Outcomes of today's audio with CA regarding Security AT contrib to D2.3 (some work needed)

Dear Task leads/GE owners,

This just to let you know that this morning I had an audio conference with Juanjo were discussed the readiness of our GEs description for publication in the context of D2.3 and according to latest version available on FI-WARE Private wiki (https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3) aka the place where we are supposed to upload our GE description from our FI-WARE Security Private Wiki.

Here are what we discussed and agreed:

 *   We will proceed with publishing the contents linked to the Security Monitoring GE because despite some additional comments may come after a second review, it's worth publishing the current contents and we can deal with new comments by end of March (but without the pressure of delivery dates)
 *   We will proceed with publishing the contents linked to the Identity Management GE provided that the owner commits to translate the figures to FMC format by end of this week.   As with the previous case, despite some additional comments may come after a second review, it's worth publishing the current contents and we can deal with new comments by end of March (but without the pressure of delivery dates)
 *   We will publish the Privacy GE
 *   We won't publish the rest pending on response regarding how the comments initially provided by Juanjo were addressed (please refer here to email I forwarded you from Juanjo - 21 février 2012 05:07 - on the topic ).   Apparently, comments were not addressed for some of the GEs, if not all, and even the history of the Wiki pages reflect that. In order not to delay any longer the publishing of our Security Chapter contrib. to D2.3 I will ask:
o    Antonio as to check and address Juanjo’s comments on Context-based security and compliance comments this  no later than by tomorrow EOB,
o    Same for Slim or Francesco regarding Data Handling GE although after a quick scan I noticed they had already implemented a number of Juanjo’s comments.
o    Slim/Francesco, Alexandre, Philippe/Lucie to do the same for what concerns Optional Security GEs

Please Antonio, Slim/Francesco, Alexandre, Philippe/Lucie please acknowledge receipt of this email and confirm you would be addressing comments according the set deadline (i.e. by tomorrow EOB at the latest – hope earlier - let me know once done) to close our work on D2.3 and have our specifications be published also redirect our effort on our Security contrib. to D2.4.

Hearing from you,

Best Regards,

Pascal

PS: Don’t forget to stick to suggested table of content if not done already and follow instructions provided at https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Instructions_on_how_to_develop_FI-WARE_Chapter_Architecture_Descriptions
PS2: As announced will call for an audio conference tomorrow. Will provide you with details in a separate email.