Hello all, Just to complement what Slim said : there were 2 webminars in parallel to mine, plus at least 1 starting immediately after, and that was overlapping with the other 2... It seems that for the 2nd round, we could consider to organize some doodle to allow the audience not to make choices among our webminars. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of TRABELSI, Slim Sent: lundi 19 novembre 2012 15:01 To: BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] Webinar - Data Handling GE Hi Pascal, The current webinar for DB anonymizer presented by Francsco (from 14:30 to 15) we have 0 attendee ! I think that there is a lack, of interest, communication or whatever ! I hope that the second session will be more attractive ! Again we had initially several subscribers to the session, and no one was present ! Best Slim From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lundi 19 novembre 2012 14:57 To: TRABELSI, Slim; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: BISSON Pascal; Juanjo Hierro; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: Webinar - Data Handling GE Importance: High Dear Slim, I sincerely regret what has happened to the first Data Handling GE webinar you organized. Being said the dates of the webinars are shared between us (FI-WARE Chapters) and UC projects this is something that could have been avoided through a better organization of the Webinars (avoiding webinars dates/timeslots clashes just to mention one ...) and also asking registered attendees to be committed to attend the webinars they registered to. In the meantime it is also true that those webinars were also asked to be organized with some time constraints (especially with respect to the two weeks to have them done). In the meantime I can also understand the rationale (to get these webinars phase 1 to take place before the EC review meeting for us to argue ...). So yes let's try to avoid such a clash for the second series of webinars this with full support of Juanjo (that I put in cc of this email for him to first be aware and second take action also on his side for such an issue no to re-occur ... ). This independently of actions we could also take from our Security Chapter side. Best Regards, Pascal PS: @Juanjo please report us and also WP/WPA and you plans to avoid such a situation a next webinars week (useless to say this is something we definitely need to avoid ...) De : fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de TRABELSI, Slim Envoyé : lundi 19 novembre 2012 11:30 À : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-security] Webinar - Data Handling GE Hi Pascal, We just finished our first webinar for the Data Handling GE. One the 8 attendees announced, only 2 were present. Not pat 100% present because we just discovered that another webinar was starting at 11 ... so they were switching between the two. It a pity to have such few attendees ! of course we didn't get any feedback. I hope that the next session will be more attractive. Best Slim ===================================== Dr Slim Trabelsi Senior Researcher Security & Trust SAP Labs France 805, Av du Docteur Maurice Donat 06250 Mougins, France T +33 4 92 28 63 45 M +33 6 11 99 85 79 www.sap.com<http://www.sap.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20121119/82c43681/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy