From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Fri Feb 1 17:57:58 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:57:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE - Security - Technical Roadmap and Tracker update Message-ID: <26133_1359737880_510BF418_26133_18414_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E0F6C500@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Dear All, As per WP8 audio conf of today don't forget to close work regarding deliverables due end of January : 1. Update of the Technical Roadmap 2. Update of the Tracker Work was requested to be finalized by EOB today (1/02/2013) or at the latest next Monday EOB (04/02/2013). Regarding instructions to deal with Global EPICS selected from Rome meeting I requested instructions from Juanjo. Will forward them to you once received. So stay tuned ! Best Regards, Pascal PB: Have a nice WE !! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Feb 6 13:58:35 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:58:35 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: Status of backlog & roadmap Message-ID: <27010_1360155720_51125448_27010_4235_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E10F40BF@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> FYI Security Chapter Contrib to update of both Technical Roadmap & Wiki/Tracker will be soon under TID review. Keep you posted of the outcomes. Best Regards, PS: As soon as we receive instructions to deal with Global cross-chapter EPICs will let you know for the ones who own such EPICS to follow instructions and proceed the way desired. De : BISSON Pascal Envoy? : mercredi 6 f?vrier 2013 13:54 ? : Miguel Carrillo Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: Status of backlog & roadmap Importance : Haute Dear Miguel, I performed a check with Daniel and colleagues through our audio conf last Friday and I must say it was almost complete by last Friday. And according to what I requested and last information I saw coming, everything should be settled from our side except for what concerns Global cross chapter EPICS we discussed and agree in Rome and for which we were asked by Juanjo (as other chapters) to wait for further instructions . So apart from these Global cross chapter EPICS we are ready for your review that we can only welcome. So please proceed and let me/us know. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : Miguel Carrillo [mailto:mcp at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 6 f?vrier 2013 12:21 ? : GIDOIN Daniel; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Objet : Status of backlog & roadmap Chers Pascal et Daniel, I am going to perform a check in all chapters to see how the backlog looks. I would like to have your view first. This is why I would like to have a brief update of the situation of your chapter, particularly asking for concrete pieces of info: 1) Are the backlog items up to date? * 1.a.- wiki * 1.b.- tracker (both sychronised, of course!) 2) Is the roadmap of your chapter completely updated? (http://wiki.fi-ware.eu/FI-WARE_Technical_Roadmap) Thanks in advance, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 7 12:50:07 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:50:07 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE WP8 - Weekly audio conference of tomorrow (this Friday) cancelled Message-ID: <23860_1360238014_511395BE_23860_9593_1_1c254ed7-6e0b-41ed-a482-92384ba184a9@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Dear All, This email to let you know that our audio conference of tomorrow is cancelled. Regarding assessment by TID of our Chapter Technical Roadmap and Wiki/Tracker will keep you posted as soon as I receive the assessment or additional instructions (still pending for what concerns Global EPICS). So please stay tune. As for the rest please work on action items as per last minutes audio conf and concentrate on work that needs to be done for next milestones and deliverables as also announced in the last minutes. Talk with you all next Friday with more items on our Agenda also progress to be reported by all on pending action items. Best Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 7 12:50:37 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:50:37 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] =?utf-8?q?Annul=C3=A9=3A_FI-WARE_WP8_Weekly_aud?= =?utf-8?q?io_conf?= Message-ID: <29604_1360238044_511395DB_29604_1463_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E1129D14@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Quand : vendredi 8 f?vrier 2013 10:00-12:00 (GMT+01:00) Bruxelles, Copenhague, Madrid, Paris. Emplacement : Meeting Room Number: 391581 Remarque : le d?calage GMT ci-dessus ne tient pas compte des r?glages de l'heure d'?t?. *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Liste des num?ros LocalConnect: Australia Australia Toll Free 1800 005 574 Australia Sydney +61 (0) 282 239 767 Austria Vienna +43 (0) 2682 205 6609 Belgium Brussels +32 (0) 2 789 8678 Denmark Copenhagen +45 3271 4340 Finland Helsinki +358 (0) 923 142 830 France Lyon +33 (0) 426 840 285 France Marseille +33 (0) 488 915 385 France Paris +33 (0) 170 994 816 Germany Berlin +49 (0) 3072 616 7342 Germany D?sseldorf +49 (0) 2115 407 3902 Germany Frankfurt +49 (0) 6971 044 5635 Germany Hamburg +49 (0) 4080 902 0684 Germany Munich +49 (0) 8924 443 2893 Germany Stuttgart +49 (0) 7111 856 2130 Greece Greece Toll Free 0080 012 6344 Hong Kong Hong Kong +852 301 145 59 Hungary Budapest +36 (06) 1-889-3286 Ireland Dublin +353 (0) 14 860 780 Israel Israel Toll Free 1809 245 981 Italy Milan +39 0 230 413 017 Italy Rome +39 0 645 217 056 Italy Turin +39 0 112 179 2159 Japan Japan Toll Free 005 311 212 65 Japan Tokyo +81 (0) 357 675 025 Korea, Republic Of Seoul +82 (0) 234 831 224 Luxembourg Luxemburg City +352 2700 41 42 Malaysia Kuala Lumpur +60 (0) 377 124 640 Netherlands Amsterdam +31 (0) 207 948 529 New Zealand Auckland +64 (0) 9 919 2428 Norway Oslo +47 2153 3919 Poland Poland Toll Free 0080 0121 1304 Portugal Portugal Toll Free 800 814 183 Russia Russia Toll Free 81080 02209 4011 Singapore Singapore +65 6622 1068 Spain Barcelona +34 93 492 3235 Spain Madrid +34 91 788 9908 Sweden Stockholm +46 (0) 850 520 145 Switzerland Geneva +41 (0) 225 927 428 United Kingdom Birmingham +44 (0) 121 260 4686 United Kingdom London +44 (0) 207 153 9902 United Kingdom Manchester +44 (0) 161 250 0679 United States USA & Canada Toll Free 1888 249 0050 United States USA Toll +1 954 334 1559 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 4239 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Feb 11 17:23:04 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:23:04 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] Format of Sprints and Releases Message-ID: <51191AE8.8090006@tid.es> Dear all, The format of the Release and sprint ID is fixed and clearly especified in http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering) I realised that there is a wrong format in one of my comments ("FI-WARE.Release.x.y" is the only valid format"). Obviously, it is not hyphenated, the right one is FIWARE.Release.x.y (see the reference on http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Releases_and_Sprints_numbering) What we have now is this (applying a filter to the Release ID on excel it is easy to assess the situation): [cid:part1.06020307.04070203 at tid.es] I hope it helps. Thanks, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: iabieeee.png Type: image/png Size: 10319 bytes Desc: not available URL: From xavier.aghina at orange.com Thu Feb 14 15:49:38 2013 From: xavier.aghina at orange.com (xavier.aghina at orange.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:49:38 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE WP8 - Weekly audio conference Friday Message-ID: <28733_1360853379_511CF983_28733_406_5_81FF741594681345A3FBB024B01054B9085D10@PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> This email to inform you that I will not attend the audio conference of tomorrow. Good phone call, I will be attentive to the minutes (Wiki). Xavier. [http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/orange_logo.gif] Xavier Aghina FT/OLNC/OLPS/ASE/SEC Ing?nieur de Recherche en S?curit? t?l. 01 45 29 81 59 xavier.aghina at orange.com _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1264 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 14 17:47:34 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:47:34 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE WP8 Audio conf of tomorrow - Reminder Message-ID: <18779_1360860453_511D1525_18779_543_2_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E13E3417@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Dear All, Just to confirm our audio conf of tomorrow (15/02/2013) starting at 10am. On the Agenda: * Technical Roadmap & Wiki/Tracker update, * Review of progress on Action Items as per last audio 25/01/2013 * Report on FI-PPP Nego held in Brussels on February 4 & 5 with UC Projects * Other topics Talk with you tomorrow. Best Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert.seidl at nsn.com Fri Feb 15 10:47:23 2013 From: robert.seidl at nsn.com (Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:47:23 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FW: [Fiware-administrative] Fwd: RE: About Financial assessment of the FI-WARE Grant Agreement for reporting period P1 from 01/05/2011 to 30/04/2012 Message-ID: Hi all, as requested in our audio conference. Please see below. Greetings Robert From: fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-administrative-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext Juanjo Hierro Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 10:22 AM To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-administrative at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-administrative] Fwd: RE: About Financial assessment of the FI-WARE Grant Agreement for reporting period P1 from 01/05/2011 to 30/04/2012 Hi, Some responses from our PO regarding questions we made to him that were relevant to share. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: About Financial assessment of the FI-WARE Grant Agreement for reporting period P1 from 01/05/2011 to 30/04/2012 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:51:50 +0000 From: To: CC: , Dear Juanjo, 1) Yes 2) The temporary rejected costs may (or actually: should) be resubmitted in the second reporting period. As always, (re-)submission does not necessarily mean acceptance. Costs were and are subject to review. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 6:49 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: Jose Jimenez; subsidies at tid.es Subject: About Financial assessment of the FI-WARE Grant Agreement for reporting period P1 from 01/05/2011 to 30/04/2012 Dear Arian, Several partners are asking and we would like to know what is the answer to the following questions: 1. Some of the rejected costs for the first report are marked as "definitive". We understand, though, that the funding that is not consumed in the first reporting period because of that is not lost and can be claimed as a result of work actually performed in the next reporting periods. Please confirm that our understanding is correct. 2. Regarding the ?temporary? rejected costs, our understanding is that after the M18 interim review (that demonstrated the hard work carried out to get back again on track) these temporary rejected costs will be automatically recognized in the report period P2, additionally to the ones corresponding to accepted costs for that period. This would be the interpretation of the sentences in the ?1201342.pdf? file where there is a sentence for each partner that says ?Please note that a total of xxx.xxx ? may be resubmitted as adjustment in the next reporting period.?. May you confirm ? Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 18 09:15:28 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:15:28 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] Minutes of last audio conf 15/02/2013 Message-ID: <7035_1361175565_5121E40D_7035_6495_1_4164c272-5b63-4aef-8fd8-779db5f36a60@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Dear All, This email just to let you that minutes of our last audio conf have been now uploaded on the repository. You can access them at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/19/1876/FI-WARE_WP8_Minutes_15_02_2013.doc Please have a careful look and perform actions as requested especially regarding milestones and deliverables which are ours and stated in these minutes. Starting first here with (FI-WARE Architecture) due end of this month but also FI-WARE GE Open Spec & FI-WARE Software, guides plus unit testing plans and reports . Counting on you all to help us to meet the next milestones for what concerns Security Chapter deliverables and others. Best Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 10:14:58 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:14:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Message-ID: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tracker_report-2013-02-24_review.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 62203 bytes Desc: tracker_report-2013-02-24_review.xlsx URL: From robert.seidl at nsn.com Mon Feb 25 11:21:12 2013 From: robert.seidl at nsn.com (Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:21:12 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Message-ID: Hi Pascal, Many thanks for the email and the attached Excel. I had a look at the Excel, but I have to say, that it is nearly impossible to get the reason why it is marked in red and therefore it isn't much of use for me. There is no reasoning mentioned (at least I couldn't find it). Could this be provided or at least explained? Please take into account that most of us are no Agile experts. Btw, most of the issues assigned to me should be solved already since I was working on the topics independently this morning. Greetings Robert From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext BISSON Pascal Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:15 AM To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From denis.butin at inria.fr Mon Feb 25 11:27:43 2013 From: denis.butin at inria.fr (Denis Butin) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:27:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <112405173.4303621.1361788063399.JavaMail.root@inria.fr> Hi all, I have the same issue with the spreadsheet: the issues are not included and I therefore do not know what is wrong with the tickets. Details would be needed. Regards, Denis ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Seidl (NSN - DE/Munich)" > To: "ext BISSON Pascal" , > fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu > Cc: "MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE" > Sent: Monday, 25 February, 2013 11:21:12 AM > Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review > before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] > Hi Pascal, > Many thanks for the email and the attached Excel. > I had a look at the Excel, but I have to say, that it is nearly > impossible to get the reason why it is marked in red and therefore > it isn?t much of use for me. > There is no reasoning mentioned (at least I couldn?t find it). > Could this be provided or at least explained? > Please take into account that most of us are no Agile experts. > Btw, most of the issues assigned to me should be solved already since > I was working on the topics independently this morning. > Greetings > Robert From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 11:57:53 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:57:53 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Message-ID: <28249_1361790115_512B44A3_28249_675_5_92cba42b-3a8a-4088-a1d9-972fe0d68b46@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Dear Robert, Dear Denis, Unfortunately Manuel didn't provide me with the details for each of the issues. So yes I must confess it may be not be so obvious but with some effort you may get aware of/notice the issues and get it corrected. And Yes Robert since you were working this morning on the Wiki/Tracker you may have already corrected some the issues. Counting on you all and please refer to the guidelines as it may help you to understand why It is not ok. Of course ultimately you also go to Manuel please try to the effort requested first. Best Regards, Pascal De : Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 11:21 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hi Pascal, Many thanks for the email and the attached Excel. I had a look at the Excel, but I have to say, that it is nearly impossible to get the reason why it is marked in red and therefore it isn't much of use for me. There is no reasoning mentioned (at least I couldn't find it). Could this be provided or at least explained? Please take into account that most of us are no Agile experts. Btw, most of the issues assigned to me should be solved already since I was working on the topics independently this morning. Greetings Robert From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext BISSON Pascal Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:15 AM To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 12:21:04 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:21:04 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551E8F1A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <28249_1361790115_512B44A3_28249_675_5_92cba42b-3a8a-4088-a1d9-972fe0d68b46@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551E8F1A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <28252_1361791264_512B4920_28252_1262_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E16AF162@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Dear Manuel, I suggest people from my team to proceed like this for this final (I hope) round: For the issues we understand and can fix we will, for the ones we don't understand we will be back to your for either clarification or justification. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:08 ? : BISSON Pascal; Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Partners, Let me clarify the spreadsheet is meant to help us fix inconsistencies. If you don't see anything wrong in any specific red-marked cell, please, mark it in blue - when you're finished please, send it to me as feedback. It will help me understand better what is going on behind. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 11:58 To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; BISSON Pascal Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Robert, Dear Denis, Unfortunately Manuel didn't provide me with the details for each of the issues. So yes I must confess it may be not be so obvious but with some effort you may get aware of/notice the issues and get it corrected. And Yes Robert since you were working this morning on the Wiki/Tracker you may have already corrected some the issues. Counting on you all and please refer to the guidelines as it may help you to understand why It is not ok. Of course ultimately you also go to Manuel please try to the effort requested first. Best Regards, Pascal De : Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 11:21 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hi Pascal, Many thanks for the email and the attached Excel. I had a look at the Excel, but I have to say, that it is nearly impossible to get the reason why it is marked in red and therefore it isn't much of use for me. There is no reasoning mentioned (at least I couldn't find it). Could this be provided or at least explained? Please take into account that most of us are no Agile experts. Btw, most of the issues assigned to me should be solved already since I was working on the topics independently this morning. Greetings Robert From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext BISSON Pascal Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:15 AM To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu Mon Feb 25 12:23:11 2013 From: susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu (Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:23:11 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Message-ID: Hi, I think most of the red issues are due to "white spaces" in the Summary (reference) field. So, for instance instead of: FIWARE.Feature.Security.Context-based security and compliance.USDL-SEC Specifications it should be: FIWARE.Feature.Security.Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance.USDL-SECSpecifications I hope this help... Best regards, Susana From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 11:58 To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Robert, Dear Denis, Unfortunately Manuel didn't provide me with the details for each of the issues. So yes I must confess it may be not be so obvious but with some effort you may get aware of/notice the issues and get it corrected. And Yes Robert since you were working this morning on the Wiki/Tracker you may have already corrected some the issues. Counting on you all and please refer to the guidelines as it may help you to understand why It is not ok. Of course ultimately you also go to Manuel please try to the effort requested first. Best Regards, Pascal De : Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 11:21 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hi Pascal, Many thanks for the email and the attached Excel. I had a look at the Excel, but I have to say, that it is nearly impossible to get the reason why it is marked in red and therefore it isn't much of use for me. There is no reasoning mentioned (at least I couldn't find it). Could this be provided or at least explained? Please take into account that most of us are no Agile experts. Btw, most of the issues assigned to me should be solved already since I was working on the topics independently this morning. Greetings Robert From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of ext BISSON Pascal Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:15 AM To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com Mon Feb 25 12:37:31 2013 From: francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com (DI CERBO, Francesco) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:37:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Message-ID: <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 13:01:57 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:01:57 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE / Security Chapter / Technical Roadmap Update for V2 / Please state features per minor Releases 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3 Message-ID: <21726_1361793831_512B5327_21726_209_1_7b96076f-7c80-4a28-8d7d-f849bfa0e8bf@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> Dear Task leads, As per decision taken this morning (at the WPL/WPA audio conf) to answer a demand from our PO I would ask you to proceed with the following change at the level of the Technical Roadmap of Security Chapter for 2nd Major Release: * For each GE(s)' features planned for Second Major Release in your task please state the features that will go in the 3 subsequent minor releases aka: Release 2.1, Release 2.2 and Release 2.3. o To have it done right please have a look at what has been be done by Cloud Hosting Chapter since already done there (see http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Cloud_Hosting) Counting on you as Task leads to get it done asap (preferably by EOB tomorrow or Wednesday Lunch time at the latest) not to delay any longer the delivery of our deliverable. Please drop me an email once done. Many thanks in advance for your cooperation and support. Best Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert.seidl at nsn.com Mon Feb 25 13:11:01 2013 From: robert.seidl at nsn.com (Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:11:01 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE / Security Chapter / Technical Roadmap Update for V2 / Please state features per minor Releases 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3 In-Reply-To: <21726_1361793831_512B5327_21726_209_1_7b96076f-7c80-4a28-8d7d-f849bfa0e8bf@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> References: <21726_1361793831_512B5327_21726_209_1_7b96076f-7c80-4a28-8d7d-f849bfa0e8bf@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> Message-ID: Hi Pascal, I don't understand this request. For every feature on the WIKI, there is a related ticket at the tracker. In each ticket there is exactly stated which sprint and release it is meant for. Why do we have to provide this information again at another place. Is this project more about formalistic issues or about content to deliver? Greetings Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:02 PM To: GIDOIN Daniel; Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: FI-WARE / Security Chapter / Technical Roadmap Update for V2 / Please state features per minor Releases 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3 Importance: High Dear Task leads, As per decision taken this morning (at the WPL/WPA audio conf) to answer a demand from our PO I would ask you to proceed with the following change at the level of the Technical Roadmap of Security Chapter for 2nd Major Release: * For each GE(s)' features planned for Second Major Release in your task please state the features that will go in the 3 subsequent minor releases aka: Release 2.1, Release 2.2 and Release 2.3. o To have it done right please have a look at what has been be done by Cloud Hosting Chapter since already done there (see http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Cloud_Hosting) Counting on you as Task leads to get it done asap (preferably by EOB tomorrow or Wednesday Lunch time at the latest) not to delay any longer the delivery of our deliverable. Please drop me an email once done. Many thanks in advance for your cooperation and support. Best Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 13:20:13 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:20:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Dear Francesco, Dear All, Just a quick follow-up of what we agreed on the topic at the part 1 of our WPL/WPA audio conf of today. First it was decided to relax the constraints regarding the check of the Wiki/Tracker to only concentrate and what would need to be corrected from a content point of view and not form point of view. As such it was decided to relax some of the constraints and especially the one related having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field which was disputed by a number of you (with all good reasons) and causes a number of issues to be reported to us. So please consider it now no more as an issue. As per agreement: 1. it was decided to let's today to fix the other issues at the level of our Chapter 2. for Manuel to provide us tomorrow with a new (it is hoped final) review of Wiki/Tracker update. So let's work that way and avoid waste of time correcting issues which are not and concentrating on the real issues. @Task leads (Danie, Robert, Susanna,Francesco) please also address my previous email regarding stating features that will go into each of the minor releases of V2 aka Releases 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3 as this one is important to be addressed since adding in terms clarification and also answering a demand of our Project Officer. Thanks in advance to you All. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:38 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 13:25:20 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:25:20 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE / Security Chapter / Technical Roadmap Update for V2 / Please state features per minor Releases 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3 In-Reply-To: References: <21726_1361793831_512B5327_21726_209_1_7b96076f-7c80-4a28-8d7d-f849bfa0e8bf@THSONEA01HUB02P.one.grp> Message-ID: <28252_1361795367_512B5927_28252_2098_3_47057471-36ce-44f8-81bd-6e0aa492511a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Dear Robert, This request is there to answer a formal demand of our PO and also to align content of our Roadmap with content of the other Chapter which is more precise (at least the way things are reported on the technical roadmap). Since information is already there it shouldn't take you too much to get this demand be answered the way it is expected. And this one compare to white space demand I disputed is really not about cosmetics it is about an improvement requested by our PO and alignment to what did the other Chapters. Hope I have clarified. Best Regards, Pascal De : Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 13:11 ? : BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel; Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: FI-WARE / Security Chapter / Technical Roadmap Update for V2 / Please state features per minor Releases 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3 Hi Pascal, I don't understand this request. For every feature on the WIKI, there is a related ticket at the tracker. In each ticket there is exactly stated which sprint and release it is meant for. Why do we have to provide this information again at another place. Is this project more about formalistic issues or about content to deliver? Greetings Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 1:02 PM To: GIDOIN Daniel; Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: FI-WARE / Security Chapter / Technical Roadmap Update for V2 / Please state features per minor Releases 2.1, 2.2 & 2.3 Importance: High Dear Task leads, As per decision taken this morning (at the WPL/WPA audio conf) to answer a demand from our PO I would ask you to proceed with the following change at the level of the Technical Roadmap of Security Chapter for 2nd Major Release: ? For each GE(s)' features planned for Second Major Release in your task please state the features that will go in the 3 subsequent minor releases aka: Release 2.1, Release 2.2 and Release 2.3. o To have it done right please have a look at what has been be done by Cloud Hosting Chapter since already done there (see http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Cloud_Hosting) Counting on you as Task leads to get it done asap (preferably by EOB tomorrow or Wednesday Lunch time at the latest) not to delay any longer the delivery of our deliverable. Please drop me an email once done. Many thanks in advance for your cooperation and support. Best Regards, Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com Mon Feb 25 18:25:32 2013 From: francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com (DI CERBO, Francesco) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:25:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> Hello Pascal, Please find a list of corrective actions that were undertook on our side. Best, Francesco From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 13:20 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); BISSON Pascal Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Francesco, Dear All, Just a quick follow-up of what we agreed on the topic at the part 1 of our WPL/WPA audio conf of today. First it was decided to relax the constraints regarding the check of the Wiki/Tracker to only concentrate and what would need to be corrected from a content point of view and not form point of view. As such it was decided to relax some of the constraints and especially the one related having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field which was disputed by a number of you (with all good reasons) and causes a number of issues to be reported to us. So please consider it now no more as an issue. As per agreement: 1. it was decided to let's today to fix the other issues at the level of our Chapter 2. for Manuel to provide us tomorrow with a new (it is hoped final) review of Wiki/Tracker update. So let's work that way and avoid waste of time correcting issues which are not and concentrating on the real issues. @Task leads (Danie, Robert, Susanna,Francesco) please also address my previous email regarding stating features that will go into each of the minor releases of V2 aka Releases 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3 as this one is important to be addressed since adding in terms clarification and also answering a demand of our Project Officer. Thanks in advance to you All. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:38 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SAP_tracker_report-2013-02-24_review.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 70208 bytes Desc: SAP_tracker_report-2013-02-24_review.xlsx URL: From Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 18:33:40 2013 From: Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com (EGAN Richard) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:33:40 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <7C80A1EAA66A4F45BA3A574774382B9BA90A7A3DEA@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> Francesco, I did not read all of your spreadsheet but something caught my eye - you had some red marks for "Closed" items and so did we. We concluded that there wasn't a "closed date" for the item. We re-opened the item in the tracker and then closed it again - and a Close data now appeared in the tracker. I am not sure if this is the answer but it looks possible Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of DI CERBO, Francesco Sent: 25 February 2013 17:26 To: BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Please find a list of corrective actions that were undertook on our side. Best, Francesco From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 13:20 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); BISSON Pascal Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Francesco, Dear All, Just a quick follow-up of what we agreed on the topic at the part 1 of our WPL/WPA audio conf of today. First it was decided to relax the constraints regarding the check of the Wiki/Tracker to only concentrate and what would need to be corrected from a content point of view and not form point of view. As such it was decided to relax some of the constraints and especially the one related having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field which was disputed by a number of you (with all good reasons) and causes a number of issues to be reported to us. So please consider it now no more as an issue. As per agreement: 1. it was decided to let's today to fix the other issues at the level of our Chapter 2. for Manuel to provide us tomorrow with a new (it is hoped final) review of Wiki/Tracker update. So let's work that way and avoid waste of time correcting issues which are not and concentrating on the real issues. @Task leads (Danie, Robert, Susanna,Francesco) please also address my previous email regarding stating features that will go into each of the minor releases of V2 aka Releases 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3 as this one is important to be addressed since adding in terms clarification and also answering a demand of our Project Officer. Thanks in advance to you All. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:38 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 19:45:25 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:45:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <3797_1361817926_512BB145_3797_925_1_CBBCD6C304123F4AB23FAAE3055C8C0E0206E16E573E@THSONEA01CMS04P.one.grp> Thanks Francesco for your work and reporting. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 18:26 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Please find a list of corrective actions that were undertook on our side. Best, Francesco From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 13:20 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); BISSON Pascal Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Francesco, Dear All, Just a quick follow-up of what we agreed on the topic at the part 1 of our WPL/WPA audio conf of today. First it was decided to relax the constraints regarding the check of the Wiki/Tracker to only concentrate and what would need to be corrected from a content point of view and not form point of view. As such it was decided to relax some of the constraints and especially the one related having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field which was disputed by a number of you (with all good reasons) and causes a number of issues to be reported to us. So please consider it now no more as an issue. As per agreement: 1. it was decided to let's today to fix the other issues at the level of our Chapter 2. for Manuel to provide us tomorrow with a new (it is hoped final) review of Wiki/Tracker update. So let's work that way and avoid waste of time correcting issues which are not and concentrating on the real issues. @Task leads (Danie, Robert, Susanna,Francesco) please also address my previous email regarding stating features that will go into each of the minor releases of V2 aka Releases 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3 as this one is important to be addressed since adding in terms clarification and also answering a demand of our Project Officer. Thanks in advance to you All. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:38 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 19:45:25 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:45:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <7C80A1EAA66A4F45BA3A574774382B9BA90A7A3DEA@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <7C80A1EAA66A4F45BA3A574774382B9BA90A7A3DEA@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> Message-ID: <3797_1361817927_512BB147_3797_926_1_679264ee-b9a7-44a8-8f33-57bbb61e45a8@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Yes indeed it was the reason why. So thanks for your feedback an d sharing. Regards, Pascal De : EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 18:34 ? : 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc : 'MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE' Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Francesco, I did not read all of your spreadsheet but something caught my eye - you had some red marks for "Closed" items and so did we. We concluded that there wasn't a "closed date" for the item. We re-opened the item in the tracker and then closed it again - and a Close data now appeared in the tracker. I am not sure if this is the answer but it looks possible Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of DI CERBO, Francesco Sent: 25 February 2013 17:26 To: BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Please find a list of corrective actions that were undertook on our side. Best, Francesco From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 13:20 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); BISSON Pascal Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Francesco, Dear All, Just a quick follow-up of what we agreed on the topic at the part 1 of our WPL/WPA audio conf of today. First it was decided to relax the constraints regarding the check of the Wiki/Tracker to only concentrate and what would need to be corrected from a content point of view and not form point of view. As such it was decided to relax some of the constraints and especially the one related having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field which was disputed by a number of you (with all good reasons) and causes a number of issues to be reported to us. So please consider it now no more as an issue. As per agreement: 1. it was decided to let's today to fix the other issues at the level of our Chapter 2. for Manuel to provide us tomorrow with a new (it is hoped final) review of Wiki/Tracker update. So let's work that way and avoid waste of time correcting issues which are not and concentrating on the real issues. @Task leads (Danie, Robert, Susanna,Francesco) please also address my previous email regarding stating features that will go into each of the minor releases of V2 aka Releases 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3 as this one is important to be addressed since adding in terms clarification and also answering a demand of our Project Officer. Thanks in advance to you All. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:38 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 25 20:36:10 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:36:10 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 [REMINDER] Message-ID: <3797_1361820981_512BBD35_3797_1718_1_f0092335-73d0-457b-82cf-04a0601dfa80@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Dear All, Just to remind you that First draft of Security Chapter contributions to FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 is expected to be ready for review by end of February. As such we would review this First draft of our contributions per each of the Tasks and attached GE(s) at our weekly audio conf of Friday March 1st. Please each of the task leads take necessary steps to be in a position to have first draft ready on (private wiki) to be presented on Friday. Just to remind you that: 1. Architecture description already released is the one on the public wiki available at: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Security_Architecture 2. First draft of Security Chapter contributions to FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 is aiming at getting it completed for what concerns second release of existing GEs or new GEs (and their targeted features) as stated in the technical roadmap which was already updated (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Security). a. NB1: For those of you who were involved in FI-WARE Architecture for Release 1 you should be familiar with what to and how to contribute. For those of you who were not involved please don't hesitate to refer to what was done for V1 (see 1)) and interact Task lead to which your GE is attached. b. NB2: regarding Architecture description of each of the GEs please check your conform to the template which was the one used for V1 (i.e.. 1- Overview & Architecture, 2-Basic concepts, 3- Main Interactions, 4- Basic Design Principles) As for the next steps (assuming we would have delivered first set of contribs. by end of this week) here they are as discussed this morning with CA and other WPL/WPA colleagues: * Comments on first draft due by March 8th * Second draft of chapters ready for peer review: March 15th * Comments on second draft due by March 22th * Final version: April 5th Hope it helps to clarify. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Will let you know in case of further instructions would be provided by Juanjo to Chapters' lead. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com Tue Feb 26 10:54:45 2013 From: francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com (DI CERBO, Francesco) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:54:45 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551E92B3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <7C80A1EAA66A4F45BA3A574774382B9BA90A7A3DEA@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551E92B3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607068ABD@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> Hello, Thanks a lot Richard for sharing this piece of information, and for Manuel to confirm it. Indeed, it is clearly a system fault, but bad things happen... @Pascal, please find the list of modifications, taking into account Richard's suggestion. @Manuel, there are then just 2 tickets that I would manage, for which I would request a clarification to you. Best regards, Francesco From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 19:03 To: EGAN Richard; DI CERBO, Francesco; BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Good point Egan!! It is the cause of that inconsistency! From: EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 18:34 To: 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Francesco, I did not read all of your spreadsheet but something caught my eye - you had some red marks for "Closed" items and so did we. We concluded that there wasn't a "closed date" for the item. We re-opened the item in the tracker and then closed it again - and a Close data now appeared in the tracker. I am not sure if this is the answer but it looks possible Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of DI CERBO, Francesco Sent: 25 February 2013 17:26 To: BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Please find a list of corrective actions that were undertook on our side. Best, Francesco From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 13:20 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); BISSON Pascal Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Francesco, Dear All, Just a quick follow-up of what we agreed on the topic at the part 1 of our WPL/WPA audio conf of today. First it was decided to relax the constraints regarding the check of the Wiki/Tracker to only concentrate and what would need to be corrected from a content point of view and not form point of view. As such it was decided to relax some of the constraints and especially the one related having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field which was disputed by a number of you (with all good reasons) and causes a number of issues to be reported to us. So please consider it now no more as an issue. As per agreement: 1. it was decided to let's today to fix the other issues at the level of our Chapter 2. for Manuel to provide us tomorrow with a new (it is hoped final) review of Wiki/Tracker update. So let's work that way and avoid waste of time correcting issues which are not and concentrating on the real issues. @Task leads (Danie, Robert, Susanna,Francesco) please also address my previous email regarding stating features that will go into each of the minor releases of V2 aka Releases 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3 as this one is important to be addressed since adding in terms clarification and also answering a demand of our Project Officer. Thanks in advance to you All. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:38 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SAP_tracker_report-2013-02-24_review.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 70233 bytes Desc: SAP_tracker_report-2013-02-24_review.xlsx URL: From susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu Tue Feb 26 13:33:45 2013 From: susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu (Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:33:45 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 [REMINDER] Message-ID: Hi Pascal, Could you please tell us where exactly should we add our contributions in private wiki? https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.ph p/FiwareDeliverableD2.3Security is almost empty... and the same for security wiki: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/security/index.php/Deliv erable_%22D2.3_FIWARE_Architecture%22_-_Security_Contrib Thank you very much! Regards, Susana From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 20:36 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 [REMINDER] Dear All, Just to remind you that First draft of Security Chapter contributions to FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 is expected to be ready for review by end of February. As such we would review this First draft of our contributions per each of the Tasks and attached GE(s) at our weekly audio conf of Friday March 1st. Please each of the task leads take necessary steps to be in a positio dy on (private wiki) to be presented on Friday. Just to remind you that: 1. Architecture description already released is the one on the public wiki available at: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Security _Architecture 2. First draft of Security Chapter contributions to FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 is aiming at getting it completed for what concerns second release of existing GEs or new GEs (and their targeted features) as stated in the technical roadmap which was already updated (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap _of_Security ). a. NB1: For those of you who were involved in FI-WARE Architecture for Release 1 you should be familiar with what to and how to contribute. For those of you who were not involved please don't hesitate to refer to what was done for V1 (see 1)) and interact Task lead to which your GE is attached. b. NB2: regarding Architecture description of each of the GEs please check your conform to the template which was the one used for V1 (i.e.. 1- Overview & Architecture, 2-Basic concepts, 3- Main Interactions, 4- Basic Design Principles) As for the next steps (assuming we would have delivered fir d of this week) here they are as discussed this morning with CA and other WPL/WPA colleagues: * Comments on first draft due by March 8th * Second draft of chapters ready for peer review: March 15th * Comments on second draft due by March 22th * Final version: April 5th Hope it helps to clarify. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Will let you know in case of further instructions would be provided b 7; lead. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Feb 26 14:46:43 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:46:43 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] In-Reply-To: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607068ABD@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> References: <15277_1361783937_512B2C80_15277_195_1_97382525-46dd-48d6-9d12-59015b18969a@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5BB0@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <28252_1361795048_512B57E7_28252_1969_1_d070e828-7512-435c-89e3-e46b94d1aef7@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <71C0C7C7A712EE4CA636EDFD663B4E2704A0BD5C8B@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> <7C80A1EAA66A4F45BA3A574774382B9BA90A7A3DEA@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551E92B3@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607068ABD@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <16068_1361886407_512CBCC6_16068_106_1_b529f141-c420-4085-a3d0-e5d76e81e166@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Ok Thanks Francesco ! De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 10:55 ? : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; EGAN Richard; BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc : TRABELSI, Slim Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello, Thanks a lot Richard for sharing this piece of information, and for Manuel to confirm it. Indeed, it is clearly a system fault, but bad things happen... @Pascal, please find the list of modifications, taking into account Richard's suggestion. @Manuel, there are then just 2 tickets that I would manage, for which I would request a clarification to you. Best regards, Francesco From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 19:03 To: EGAN Richard; DI CERBO, Francesco; BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Good point Egan!! It is the cause of that inconsistency! From: EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 18:34 To: 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Francesco, I did not read all of your spreadsheet but something caught my eye - you had some red marks for "Closed" items and so did we. We concluded that there wasn't a "closed date" for the item. We re-opened the item in the tracker and then closed it again - and a Close data now appeared in the tracker. I am not sure if this is the answer but it looks possible Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of DI CERBO, Francesco Sent: 25 February 2013 17:26 To: BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Please find a list of corrective actions that were undertook on our side. Best, Francesco From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 13:20 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es); BISSON Pascal Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Dear Francesco, Dear All, Just a quick follow-up of what we agreed on the topic at the part 1 of our WPL/WPA audio conf of today. First it was decided to relax the constraints regarding the check of the Wiki/Tracker to only concentrate and what would need to be corrected from a content point of view and not form point of view. As such it was decided to relax some of the constraints and especially the one related having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field which was disputed by a number of you (with all good reasons) and causes a number of issues to be reported to us. So please consider it now no more as an issue. As per agreement: 1. it was decided to let's today to fix the other issues at the level of our Chapter 2. for Manuel to provide us tomorrow with a new (it is hoped final) review of Wiki/Tracker update. So let's work that way and avoid waste of time correcting issues which are not and concentrating on the real issues. @Task leads (Danie, Robert, Susanna,Francesco) please also address my previous email regarding stating features that will go into each of the minor releases of V2 aka Releases 2.1, 2.2, & 2.3 as this one is important to be addressed since adding in terms clarification and also answering a demand of our Project Officer. Thanks in advance to you All. Best Regards, Pascal De : DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Envoy? : lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 12:38 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Miguel Carrillo (mcp at tid.es) Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Hello Pascal, Manuel, First of all, @Manuel : welcome aboard ! Now, the bad news: I have serious problems in understanding the reported issues. As others already pointed out, in many cases it is hard to understand why they are marked in red. I welcome the news reported in Manuel's introduction email, about the future adaptation/improvement/extension of our support tools to improve our processes. Clearly, reviewing our elements for Miguel has been surely painful in these months, but also on our side, maintaining them wasn't always easy. A comment on the assumption on white spaces: as we passed 2 internal reviews in these days, but also an external review 6 months ago, maybe it could be acceptable for the time being to leave blanks in our wiki + tracker. The rationale is: if we modify the entries in the wiki, we also have to modify *all* links in *all* tracker items. If this is really necessary, fine, but in case let's take this decision well aware of the required effort to implement it, and let's modify the guidelines to explicitly forbid this situation. Best, Francesco From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lundi 25 f?vrier 2013 10:15 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? [URGENT: Fix last issues reported] Importance: High Dear All, Find the last review performed b y Manuel (in replacement of Miguel and as now appointed Agile Project Manager of FI-WARE). I'd like here each of you to check and correct your issues. Please try to get it done the sooner the better and by end of business today. On my side I will perform a check by EOB as well. Counting on you all to proceed according to the set deadline. I'd like also here to remember Task list that I'm counting on them to check and align the content of the Wiki vs the Tracker and drop me a short report once done. This by today ... (as well the sooner the better ....). Counting on you (especially GE owners) and hearing from the Tasks leads. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : dimanche 24 f?vrier 2013 13:26 ? : BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; GIDOIN Daniel Objet : RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Pascal, Thanks for your answer! I could check the 1st part about sprints and releases has just a few mistakes. However, the second part has many - overall related to having white spaces in the Summary (reference) field - I didn't see them in any other chapter so I'm assuming it's not allowed. I got 266 records from backlog; around 75% had some mistake. Please, find the report attached. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: viernes, 22 de febrero de 2013 18:03 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Importance: High Dear Manuel, Thanks for your email. Well from my Security Chapter side I was lucky enough to discuss with Miguel about its review since we were both attending a project (aka Infinity) meeting in Madrid. It was really helpful form my side since I got a better understanding on how to instruct my team members and also perform the check from my side. As a result and based on instructions I provided to my team also work I did on my side I would say that most of the issues have been addressed regarding the wiki/tracker update and that alignment was checked for what concerns SecMong Ge. As for other GE and especially IdM which was misaligned and check is ongoing and if not finalized today would be finalized by Monday Lunch time (as per request I formulated to GE owners/Task leads). In the meantime I must inform you that one of the partners in WP8 (aka ORANGE) was facing issues contributing to Wiki/Tracker update as we requested. So not so sure they would deliver as expected (in the meantime I agree we can't wait any longer for their input without penalizing the Chapter and the consortium/Project). Hope this report is helpful to you and that you can confirm we did show good progress and are close to get our chapter ready for delivery. Hearing from you. Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : vendredi 22 f?vrier 2013 14:41 ? : Fasse, Axel; 'Alex Glikson' (GLIKSON at il.ibm.com); thierry.nagellen at orange.com; SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it; BISSON Pascal Cc : JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO Objet : FI-WARE: Backlog final review before delivery - are you ready? Dear Partners, As you know we want to deliver backlog's associated deliverables early next week. Miguel has been working with you these weeks, I've tried to get myself up and ready to continue with the "challenge". We know we cannot have a fully-consistent backlog this time from the process followed, so an effort from all of us is necessary. Next time we're improving process and tools. I'm doing a final review over the weekend in order to assess whether to detach and reject any chapter on Monday's meeting. I'd appreciate having your feedback as whether you consider your backlog is ready for delivery, or any other helpful input. If anything, please, let me know. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Feb 26 19:48:03 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:48:03 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] TR: FIWARE - backlog review Message-ID: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tracker_report-2013-02-26 - review.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 63750 bytes Desc: tracker_report-2013-02-26 - review.xlsx URL: From Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Tue Feb 26 20:50:39 2013 From: Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de (Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:50:39 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: Hello Pascal, I checked the spread sheet and found one issue, but I don't know why the other points are in red. For the future it would be better to say what is wrong instead to say there is something wrong. I'm sure the effort to find what is wrong was higher than to change something, especially if you don't find the issue. For the future I hope the way issues are reported are more clear, otherwise I think about to vote for leaving the project. There are cost cuttings, unclear communication in conjunction with the high efforts to manage EU-Projects. May be you can discuss this on your next management calls. Best regards Wolfgang Von: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von BISSON Pascal Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 19:48 An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Betreff: [Fiware-security] TR: FIWARE - backlog review Wichtigkeit: Hoch Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Feb 27 08:36:52 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:36:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 [REMINDER] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <813_1361950617_512DB799_813_829_1_c973da37-5a53-41a7-a96c-87fc2e86e89a@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> Dear Susana, Dear ALL, According to my understanding and despite additional instructions I requested from Juanjo here are my recommendations on how to proceed: ? First you should assume the Table of Content of FI-WARE Architecture description should follow the one defined for V1 even (so please have a look at what was done for V1 and re-use it for V2) o See for V1: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Security_Architecture ? In case you'd like to change Introduction or Architecture Overview at Chapter level please drop an email to Daniel (cc me) since as Security Architect he will address suggested changes at Sec Chapter level for what concerns Architecture Description. ? Concentrate on Architecture Description of GEs either for update of existing ones or new ones as per statements in Technical Roadmap V2. Regarding Architecture Description of GEs please follow the same template as for V1 so 1-Overview, 2-Basic concepts, 3-Main interactions, 4-Basic design principles (and obviously not 5-Open Specifications since to be added later). ? And now for changes/add-ons: o For minor changes compare to V1 to save time would suggest to make them directly on the Public wiki (since at the end content would be moved there - but here please proceed cautiously !! -) of course you could also prefer to put a copy of what is one public wiki, and edit it for requested update ... o For major changes I would suggest to first upload on the private Wiki for peer review (first on security Chapter Private Wiki see link below - in case a shared space on private wiki for this deliverable would be created by Juanjo will let you know ...) https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/security/index.php/Deliverable_%22D2.3_FIWARE_Architecture%22_-_Security_Contrib Hope I have answered and yes each of the GEs' owners for V2 please upload your draft contributions on the Security private wiki. Thanks for your cooperation and support. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Apologize for my late answer but I was in a meeting the whole day ... De : Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa [mailto:susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 13:34 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 [REMINDER] Hi Pascal, Could you please tell us where exactly should we add our contributions in private wiki? https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FiwareDeliverableD2.3Security is almost empty... and the same for security wiki: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/security/index.php/Deliverable_%22D2.3_FIWARE_Architecture%22_-_Security_Contrib Thank you very much! Regards, Susana From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: lunes, 25 de febrero de 2013 20:36 To: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 [REMINDER] Dear All, Just to remind you that First draft of Security Chapter contributions to FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 is expected to be ready for review by end of February. As such we would review this First draft of our contributions per each of the Tasks and attached GE(s) at our weekly audio conf of Friday March 1st. Please each of the task leads take necessary steps to be in a positio dy on (private wiki) to be presented on Friday. Just to remind you that: 1. Architecture description already released is the one on the public wiki available at: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Security_Architecture 2. First draft of Security Chapter contributions to FI-WARE Architecture for Release 2 is aiming at getting it completed for what concerns second release of existing GEs or new GEs (and their targeted features) as stated in the technical roadmap which was already updated (http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Security). a. NB1: For those of you who were involved in FI-WARE Architecture for Release 1 you should be familiar with what to and how to contribute. For those of you who were not involved please don't hesitate to refer to what was done for V1 (see 1)) and interact Task lead to which your GE is attached. b. NB2: regarding Architecture description of each of the GEs please check your conform to the template which was the one used for V1 (i.e.. 1- Overview & Architecture, 2-Basic concepts, 3- Main Interactions, 4- Basic Design Principles) As for the next steps (assuming we would have delivered fir d of this week) here they are as discussed this morning with CA and other WPL/WPA colleagues: * Comments on first draft due by March 8th * Second draft of chapters ready for peer review: March 15th * Comments on second draft due by March 22th * Final version: April 5th Hope it helps to clarify. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Will let you know in case of further instructions would be provided b 7; lead. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Feb 27 08:42:31 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:42:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: <29583_1361951175_512DB9C7_29583_285_1_ca2314d9-2709-4843-a745-23ddd22581f6@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> Dear Wolfgang, Yes I understand and also support we need better explanations and hearing we have to go through the guidelines to find why the issues is definitely not we/I were expecting (of course we can find by chance if any but it is very efficient and for me we should focus on content first and second the form but not putting too much constraints and also targeting some automated correction of minor issues ...). Hope support here delivered by TID with Manuel joining the project to support in those Agile aspects will help us from that perspective. Also lessons learnt form the Wiki/Tracker update should be capitalized to avoid the problems for next update ... Best Regards, Pascal PS: I put in cc Manuel, Miguel and Juanjo for information also actions for further improvements as requested based on experience we gained here. De : Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de [mailto:Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 20:51 ? : BISSON Pascal; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : AW: FIWARE - backlog review Hello Pascal, I checked the spread sheet and found one issue, but I don't know why the other points are in red. For the future it would be better to say what is wrong instead to say there is something wrong. I'm sure the effort to find what is wrong was higher than to change something, especially if you don't find the issue. For the future I hope the way issues are reported are more clear, otherwise I think about to vote for leaving the project. There are cost cuttings, unclear communication in conjunction with the high efforts to manage EU-Projects. May be you can discuss this on your next management calls. Best regards Wolfgang Von: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von BISSON Pascal Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 19:48 An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Betreff: [Fiware-security] TR: FIWARE - backlog review Wichtigkeit: Hoch Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert.seidl at nsn.com Wed Feb 27 10:23:50 2013 From: robert.seidl at nsn.com (Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:23:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tracker_report-2013-02-26 - review.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 63750 bytes Desc: tracker_report-2013-02-26 - review.xlsx URL: From susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu Wed Feb 27 10:38:55 2013 From: susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu (Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:38:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: Hi, About our issues (in case they can help to others): ? Line 31: addressed changing FIWARE.Epic.Security.IdentityEnabler.Stork by FIWARE.Epic.Security.IdentityManagement.Stork ? Line 195 (ticket 890): addressed... I guess the red issue was because of a "space" after the number... I don't find other reason. ? Line 71 (ticket 2074): addressed... I guess the red issue was because of a "space" after the number... ? Line 39 (ticket 1099): addressed... it appears empty in Excel but not in Forge. I guess it was because of a "line"empty after the Spring line... All the other tickets are because we have in the Summary "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" instead of "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" (although the Generic Enabler is "Context-based Security & Compliance"). So.... we need to change once more ALL THE TICKETS RELATED TO OUR GE!! I'm going to check this with Manuel just in case after changing all of them we need to change them again to include the "-" or the "&" as it is in the Generic Enabler name... ;-) Best regards, Susana From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 10:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu'; ext BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com Wed Feb 27 11:51:48 2013 From: Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com (EGAN Richard) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:51:48 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> Robert, we have fixed 100 and 148 (the naming of the work items did not position them in the IDM GE) BTW, for IDM I see a lot of Features in the "Materialising" part of the wiki but they are not in the "Technical Roadmap" section. In fact, there is a big lack of Features in the IDM Technical Roadmap - it is not part of Manuel's review but it is an important point. Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: 27 February 2013 09:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert.seidl at nsn.com Wed Feb 27 12:10:58 2013 From: robert.seidl at nsn.com (Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:10:58 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> Message-ID: Hi Richard, Many thanks for the hint. Could you copy me the links of both parts, so that I can check it? As always the WIKI makes me quite confusing :( Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:52 AM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, we have fixed 100 and 148 (the naming of the work items did not position them in the IDM GE) BTW, for IDM I see a lot of Features in the "Materialising" part of the wiki but they are not in the "Technical Roadmap" section. In fact, there is a big lack of Features in the IDM Technical Roadmap - it is not part of Manuel's review but it is an important point. Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: 27 February 2013 09:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com Wed Feb 27 12:15:08 2013 From: Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com (EGAN Richard) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:15:08 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> Message-ID: <07db536e-4119-4840-89a2-edb3a9fb61b8@THSONEP02MSG03P.one-02-priv.grp> Robert, Technical Roadmap: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Security#Second_Major_Release_.283Q_2013.29 Materalising: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Materializing_Security_in_FI-WARE Richard From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: 27 February 2013 11:11 To: EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Richard, Many thanks for the hint. Could you copy me the links of both parts, so that I can check it? As always the WIKI makes me quite confusing :( Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:52 AM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, we have fixed 100 and 148 (the naming of the work items did not position them in the IDM GE) BTW, for IDM I see a lot of Features in the "Materialising" part of the wiki but they are not in the "Technical Roadmap" section. In fact, there is a big lack of Features in the IDM Technical Roadmap - it is not part of Manuel's review but it is an important point. Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: 27 February 2013 09:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robert.seidl at nsn.com Wed Feb 27 12:30:31 2013 From: robert.seidl at nsn.com (Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:30:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <07db536e-4119-4840-89a2-edb3a9fb61b8@THSONEP02MSG03P.one-02-priv.grp> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> <07db536e-4119-4840-89a2-edb3a9fb61b8@THSONEP02MSG03P.one-02-priv.grp> Message-ID: Hi Pascal, Richard touched a valid point. Indeed there is a big mismatch between both WIKI pages. Maybe not only for IDM. How should we handle this? Should we copy all relevant FEATURES, EPICS, ... from the "Materializing" to the "Roadmap of Security" in order to align both pages? So far we kept the "Materializing" pages as reference. Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:15 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, Technical Roadmap: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Security#Second_Major_Release_.283Q_2013.29 Materalising: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Materializing_Security_in_FI-WARE Richard From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: 27 February 2013 11:11 To: EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Richard, Many thanks for the hint. Could you copy me the links of both parts, so that I can check it? As always the WIKI makes me quite confusing :( Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:52 AM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, we have fixed 100 and 148 (the naming of the work items did not position them in the IDM GE) BTW, for IDM I see a lot of Features in the "Materialising" part of the wiki but they are not in the "Technical Roadmap" section. In fact, there is a big lack of Features in the IDM Technical Roadmap - it is not part of Manuel's review but it is an important point. Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: 27 February 2013 09:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Wed Feb 27 13:45:28 2013 From: Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de (Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:45:28 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: Nice guess work Von: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa [mailto:susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013 10:39 An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; Steigerwald, Wolfgang Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; ext BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Betreff: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Hi, About our issues (in case they can help to others): ? Line 31: addressed changing FIWARE.Epic.Security.IdentityEnabler.Stork by FIWARE.Epic.Security.IdentityManagement.Stork ? Line 195 (ticket 890): addressed... I guess the red issue was because of a "space" after the number... I don't find other reason. ? Line 71 (ticket 2074): addressed... I guess the red issue was because of a "space" after the number... ? Line 39 (ticket 1099): addressed... it appears empty in Excel but not in Forge. I guess it was because of a "line"empty after the Spring line... All the other tickets are because we have in the Summary "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" instead of "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" (although the Generic Enabler is "Context-based Security & Compliance"). So.... we need to change once more ALL THE TICKETS RELATED TO OUR GE!! I'm going to check this with Manuel just in case after changing all of them we need to change them again to include the "-" or the "&" as it is in the Generic Enabler name... ;-) Best regards, Susana From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 10:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu'; ext BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com Wed Feb 27 14:46:44 2013 From: francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com (DI CERBO, Francesco) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:46:44 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> <07db536e-4119-4840-89a2-edb3a9fb61b8@THSONEP02MSG03P.one-02-priv.grp> Message-ID: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607069F11@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> Hello Robert, Richard, Pascal Sorry, maybe a na?ve question : shouldn't *only* epics and features (listed on "materializing security") being considered for a release, be part of the roadmap wiki page for that release? Francesco From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 12:31 To: ext EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Richard touched a valid point. Indeed there is a big mismatch between both WIKI pages. Maybe not only for IDM. How should we handle this? Should we copy all relevant FEATURES, EPICS, ... from the "Materializing" to the "Roadmap of Security" in order to align both pages? So far we kept the "Materializing" pages as reference. Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:15 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, Technical Roadmap: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Security#Second_Major_Release_.283Q_2013.29 Materalising: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Materializing_Security_in_FI-WARE Richard From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: 27 February 2013 11:11 To: EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Richard, Many thanks for the hint. Could you copy me the links of both parts, so that I can check it? As always the WIKI makes me quite confusing :( Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:52 AM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, we have fixed 100 and 148 (the naming of the work items did not position them in the IDM GE) BTW, for IDM I see a lot of Features in the "Materialising" part of the wiki but they are not in the "Technical Roadmap" section. In fact, there is a big lack of Features in the IDM Technical Roadmap - it is not part of Manuel's review but it is an important point. Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: 27 February 2013 09:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com Wed Feb 27 14:58:25 2013 From: Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com (EGAN Richard) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:58:25 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607069F11@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> <07db536e-4119-4840-89a2-edb3a9fb61b8@THSONEP02MSG03P.one-02-priv.grp> <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607069F11@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <53d05d25-f030-482f-9b25-d99940aed7fe@THSONEP02MSG01P.one-02-priv.grp> Francesco, my understanding is the Technical Roadmap is focussed on Release 2 (and hence will contain a subset of epics/features from the Materialising wiki page) - so I agree with what you have stated below. My observation for Robert was that it did not seem that IDM had been updated with Release 2 info yet in the Technical Roadmap (but I am not totally familiar with the GE). Most of the other GEs have been updated (judged on the basis that owners have identified which feature is in each release (2.1, 2.2, 2.3)). Richard From: DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Sent: 27 February 2013 13:47 To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; WALLER Adrian; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hello Robert, Richard, Pascal Sorry, maybe a na?ve question : shouldn't *only* epics and features (listed on "materializing security") being considered for a release, be part of the roadmap wiki page for that release? Francesco From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 12:31 To: ext EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Richard touched a valid point. Indeed there is a big mismatch between both WIKI pages. Maybe not only for IDM. How should we handle this? Should we copy all relevant FEATURES, EPICS, ... from the "Materializing" to the "Roadmap of Security" in order to align both pages? So far we kept the "Materializing" pages as reference. Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:15 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, Technical Roadmap: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Security#Second_Major_Release_.283Q_2013.29 Materalising: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Materializing_Security_in_FI-WARE Richard From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: 27 February 2013 11:11 To: EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Richard, Many thanks for the hint. Could you copy me the links of both parts, so that I can check it? As always the WIKI makes me quite confusing :( Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:52 AM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, we have fixed 100 and 148 (the naming of the work items did not position them in the IDM GE) BTW, for IDM I see a lot of Features in the "Materialising" part of the wiki but they are not in the "Technical Roadmap" section. In fact, there is a big lack of Features in the IDM Technical Roadmap - it is not part of Manuel's review but it is an important point. Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: 27 February 2013 09:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com Wed Feb 27 15:11:19 2013 From: francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com (DI CERBO, Francesco) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:11:19 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <53d05d25-f030-482f-9b25-d99940aed7fe@THSONEP02MSG01P.one-02-priv.grp> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <74a1da17-67d4-47c6-9e0f-ca5a758c4fa3@THSONEP02MSG04P.one-02-priv.grp> <07db536e-4119-4840-89a2-edb3a9fb61b8@THSONEP02MSG03P.one-02-priv.grp> <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607069F11@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> <53d05d25-f030-482f-9b25-d99940aed7fe@THSONEP02MSG01P.one-02-priv.grp> Message-ID: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E607069FAA@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> Thanks Richard, Now I understand better the context, and it's clearer for me. Best, francesco From: EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 14:58 To: DI CERBO, Francesco; 'Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)'; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; WALLER Adrian; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Francesco, my understanding is the Technical Roadmap is focussed on Release 2 (and hence will contain a subset of epics/features from the Materialising wiki page) - so I agree with what you have stated below. My observation for Robert was that it did not seem that IDM had been updated with Release 2 info yet in the Technical Roadmap (but I am not totally familiar with the GE). Most of the other GEs have been updated (judged on the basis that owners have identified which feature is in each release (2.1, 2.2, 2.3)). Richard From: DI CERBO, Francesco [mailto:francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com] Sent: 27 February 2013 13:47 To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; WALLER Adrian; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hello Robert, Richard, Pascal Sorry, maybe a na?ve question : shouldn't *only* epics and features (listed on "materializing security") being considered for a release, be part of the roadmap wiki page for that release? Francesco From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 12:31 To: ext EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Richard touched a valid point. Indeed there is a big mismatch between both WIKI pages. Maybe not only for IDM. How should we handle this? Should we copy all relevant FEATURES, EPICS, ... from the "Materializing" to the "Roadmap of Security" in order to align both pages? So far we kept the "Materializing" pages as reference. Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:15 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, Technical Roadmap: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Roadmap_of_Security#Second_Major_Release_.283Q_2013.29 Materalising: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Materializing_Security_in_FI-WARE Richard From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com] Sent: 27 February 2013 11:11 To: EGAN Richard; 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi Richard, Many thanks for the hint. Could you copy me the links of both parts, so that I can check it? As always the WIKI makes me quite confusing :( Greetings Robert From: ext EGAN Richard [mailto:Richard.Egan at uk.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:52 AM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); 'Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa'; 'DI CERBO, Francesco'; WALLER Adrian; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; DANGERVILLE Cyril; 'ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de' Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: RE: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Robert, we have fixed 100 and 148 (the naming of the work items did not position them in the IDM GE) BTW, for IDM I see a lot of Features in the "Materialising" part of the wiki but they are not in the "Technical Roadmap" section. In fact, there is a big lack of Features in the IDM Technical Roadmap - it is not part of Manuel's review but it is an important point. Richard From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: 27 February 2013 09:24 To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Hi all, I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2. Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open: Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258 Susanna: 31 Adrian/Richard: 100, 148 Robert: 107 Cyril: 214 Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262 Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be. Many thanks in advance Robert From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com Thu Feb 28 10:02:04 2013 From: francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com (DI CERBO, Francesco) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:02:04 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EAC1B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <29583_1361951175_512DB9C7_29583_285_1_ca2314d9-2709-4843-a745-23ddd22581f6@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EAC1B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <6D11E010ED8E5B4B9D42045AC71F37E60706A992@DEWDFEMB18B.global.corp.sap> Hello Manuel, First of all, thank you for this very welcomed update. I saw in your document that all links to URLs beginning with http://wiki.fi-ware.eu/ were marked as mistake. Indeed, I introduced them, as was some time ago it was recommended to use the mentioned URL schema as a shortcut for the longer https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/. Anyway, also for @Pascal, now the URLs are consistent with the rest of the chapter. Best regards, Francesco From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Sent: mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 20:33 To: BISSON Pascal; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Dear Pascal, Today, I've been able to enrich the input for easy mutual understanding. Please, have a look at the spreadsheet, and let's see whether we can fix the issues. Kind regards, Manuel From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 14:33 To: 'BISSON Pascal'; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Dear Wolfgang, Let me clarify I did the spreadsheet thinking on how to help focus on finding the errors. I assumed all partners knew and were applying some naming rules. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 And then, the day to day work didn't allow it. Some partners with only this help on focus were able to fix many errors. Cloud chapter has moved from 80% to 5% in a couple of days. I understand some more input may be helpful. But we're working with little time, Most red marked issues as easy to identify if you are willing to have just a look. Anyway, I'm improving on my side the report and I'm already including a line below each red KO giving additional input - after 4 o 5 error you find almost all errors are very similar. Please, send me the first error you don't understand and I'll give you quick feedback. Thanks for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 8:43 To: Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Wolfgang, Yes I understand and also support we need better explanations and hearing we have to go through the guidelines to find why the issues is definitely not we/I were expecting (of course we can find by chance if any but it is very efficient and for me we should focus on content first and second the form but not putting too much constraints and also targeting some automated correction of minor issues ...). Hope support here delivered by TID with Manuel joining the project to support in those Agile aspects will help us from that perspective. Also lessons learnt form the Wiki/Tracker update should be capitalized to avoid the problems for next update ... Best Regards, Pascal PS: I put in cc Manuel, Miguel and Juanjo for information also actions for further improvements as requested based on experience we gained here. De : Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de [mailto:Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 20:51 ? : BISSON Pascal; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : AW: FIWARE - backlog review Hello Pascal, I checked the spread sheet and found one issue, but I don't know why the other points are in red. For the future it would be better to say what is wrong instead to say there is something wrong. I'm sure the effort to find what is wrong was higher than to change something, especially if you don't find the issue. For the future I hope the way issues are reported are more clear, otherwise I think about to vote for leaving the project. There are cost cuttings, unclear communication in conjunction with the high efforts to manage EU-Projects. May be you can discuss this on your next management calls. Best regards Wolfgang Von: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von BISSON Pascal Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 19:48 An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Betreff: [Fiware-security] TR: FIWARE - backlog review Wichtigkeit: Hoch Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 28 13:53:09 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:53:09 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EAC1B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <29583_1361951175_512DB9C7_29583_285_1_ca2314d9-2709-4843-a745-23ddd22581f6@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EAC1B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <28619_1362056117_512F53B5_28619_3787_2_703d5e9e-a636-46a4-8ece-6e7a72047fdf@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Thanks Manuel. Indeed it can only help in our understanding and so us fixing the issues. So please anyone owner of a GE having still issues in view of this report please get them fixed by end of the day. I will perform a check on my side tonight and of course we will discuss this at our WP8 audio conf (hoping at that we could finally close being said for me the bulk of the work should now be reviewing draft contrib. to Architecture description for Release 2). Best Regards, Pascal De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 20:33 ? : BISSON Pascal; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Objet : RE: FIWARE - backlog review Dear Pascal, Today, I've been able to enrich the input for easy mutual understanding. Please, have a look at the spreadsheet, and let's see whether we can fix the issues. Kind regards, Manuel From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 14:33 To: 'BISSON Pascal'; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Dear Wolfgang, Let me clarify I did the spreadsheet thinking on how to help focus on finding the errors. I assumed all partners knew and were applying some naming rules. http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 And then, the day to day work didn't allow it. Some partners with only this help on focus were able to fix many errors. Cloud chapter has moved from 80% to 5% in a couple of days. I understand some more input may be helpful. But we're working with little time, Most red marked issues as easy to identify if you are willing to have just a look. Anyway, I'm improving on my side the report and I'm already including a line below each red KO giving additional input - after 4 o 5 error you find almost all errors are very similar. Please, send me the first error you don't understand and I'll give you quick feedback. Thanks for cooperation! Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 8:43 To: Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review Importance: High Dear Wolfgang, Yes I understand and also support we need better explanations and hearing we have to go through the guidelines to find why the issues is definitely not we/I were expecting (of course we can find by chance if any but it is very efficient and for me we should focus on content first and second the form but not putting too much constraints and also targeting some automated correction of minor issues ...). Hope support here delivered by TID with Manuel joining the project to support in those Agile aspects will help us from that perspective. Also lessons learnt form the Wiki/Tracker update should be capitalized to avoid the problems for next update ... Best Regards, Pascal PS: I put in cc Manuel, Miguel and Juanjo for information also actions for further improvements as requested based on experience we gained here. De : Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de [mailto:Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 20:51 ? : BISSON Pascal; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : AW: FIWARE - backlog review Hello Pascal, I checked the spread sheet and found one issue, but I don't know why the other points are in red. For the future it would be better to say what is wrong instead to say there is something wrong. I'm sure the effort to find what is wrong was higher than to change something, especially if you don't find the issue. For the future I hope the way issues are reported are more clear, otherwise I think about to vote for leaving the project. There are cost cuttings, unclear communication in conjunction with the high efforts to manage EU-Projects. May be you can discuss this on your next management calls. Best regards Wolfgang Von: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von BISSON Pascal Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 19:48 An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' Betreff: [Fiware-security] TR: FIWARE - backlog review Wichtigkeit: Hoch Dear Task leads, This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 ? : BISSON Pascal Objet : FIWARE - backlog review Hi Pascal, Find attached a new review of possible errors. The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. For example for Security Monitoring I find: "Security Monitoring" "Security_Monitoring" "SecurityMonitoring" "Security-Monitoring" I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" "Privacy" = "Privacy" "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" If hope you find acceptable this mapping. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alexandre.boeglin at inria.fr Thu Feb 28 14:56:18 2013 From: alexandre.boeglin at inria.fr (Alexandre Boeglin) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:56:18 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <28619_1362056117_512F53B5_28619_3787_2_703d5e9e-a636-46a4-8ece-6e7a72047fdf@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <29583_1361951175_512DB9C7_29583_285_1_ca2314d9-2709-4843-a745-23ddd22581f6@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EAC1B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <28619_1362056117_512F53B5_28619_3787_2_703d5e9e-a636-46a4-8ece-6e7a72047fdf@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> Message-ID: <20130228135617.GI15643@inria.fr> Sorry, but it seems that the email from Manuel you're referring to has not reached the fiware-security mailing list, and I'm unable to check this updated spreadsheet. Could you please forward it to me ? or to the mailing list? Best regards, Alex Le jeudi 28 f?vrier 2013 ? 13:53, BISSON Pascal a ?crit: > Thanks Manuel. Indeed it can only help in our understanding and so us fixing the issues. > > So please anyone owner of a GE having still issues in view of this report please get them fixed by end of the day. > > I will perform a check on my side tonight and of course we will discuss this at our WP8 audio conf (hoping at that we could finally close being said for me the bulk of the work should now be reviewing draft contrib. to Architecture description for Release 2). > > Best Regards, > Pascal > > De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] > Envoy? : mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 20:33 > ? : BISSON Pascal; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > Objet : RE: FIWARE - backlog review > > Dear Pascal, > > Today, I've been able to enrich the input for easy mutual understanding. > Please, have a look at the spreadsheet, and let's see whether we can fix the issues. > > Kind regards, > Manuel > > From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE > Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 14:33 > To: 'BISSON Pascal'; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review > > Dear Wolfgang, > > Let me clarify I did the spreadsheet thinking on how to help focus on finding the errors. > I assumed all partners knew and were applying some naming rules. > http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 > > And then, the day to day work didn't allow it. > Some partners with only this help on focus were able to fix many errors. Cloud chapter has moved from 80% to 5% in a couple of days. > > I understand some more input may be helpful. But we're working with little time, > Most red marked issues as easy to identify if you are willing to have just a look. > Anyway, I'm improving on my side the report and I'm already including a line below each red KO giving additional input - after 4 o 5 error you find almost all errors are very similar. > > Please, send me the first error you don't understand and I'll give you quick feedback. > > Thanks for cooperation! > Kind regards, > Manuel > > > > > > From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] > Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 8:43 > To: Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review > Importance: High > > Dear Wolfgang, > > Yes I understand and also support we need better explanations and hearing we have to go through the guidelines to find why the issues is definitely not we/I were expecting (of course we can find by chance if any but it is very efficient and for me we should focus on content first and second the form but not putting too much constraints and also targeting some automated correction of minor issues ...). > > Hope support here delivered by TID with Manuel joining the project to support in those Agile aspects will help us from that perspective. Also lessons learnt form the Wiki/Tracker update should be capitalized to avoid the problems for next update ... > > Best Regards, > Pascal > > PS: I put in cc Manuel, Miguel and Juanjo for information also actions for further improvements as requested based on experience we gained here. > > De : Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de [mailto:Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de] > Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 20:51 > ? : BISSON Pascal; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu > Objet : AW: FIWARE - backlog review > > Hello Pascal, > > I checked the spread sheet and found one issue, but I don't know why the other points are in red. For the future it would be better to say what is wrong instead to say there is something wrong. I'm sure the effort to find what is wrong was higher than to change something, especially if you don't find the issue. For the future I hope the way issues are reported are more clear, otherwise I think about to vote for leaving the project. There are cost cuttings, unclear communication in conjunction with the high efforts to manage EU-Projects. May be you can discuss this on your next management calls. > > Best regards > > Wolfgang > > > Von: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von BISSON Pascal > Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 19:48 > An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' > Betreff: [Fiware-security] TR: FIWARE - backlog review > Wichtigkeit: Hoch > > Dear Task leads, > > This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. > > Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > Pascal > > PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. > PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier > > De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] > Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 > ? : BISSON Pascal > Objet : FIWARE - backlog review > > Hi Pascal, > > Find attached a new review of possible errors. > The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate > > I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. > For example for Security Monitoring I find: > "Security Monitoring" > "Security_Monitoring" > "SecurityMonitoring" > "Security-Monitoring" > > I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: > > To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) > To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 > > "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" > "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" > "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" > "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" > "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" > "Privacy" = "Privacy" > "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" > > If hope you find acceptable this mapping. > > Kind regards, > Manuel > > > ---------------------------- > Manuel Escriche Vicente > Agile Project Manager/Leader > FI-WARE Initiative > Telef?nica Digital > Parque Tecnol?gico > C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 > 47151 - Boecillo > Valladolid - Spain > Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 > Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 > http://www.tid.es > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-security mailing list > Fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-security -- Alexandre Boeglin Madynes project-team ? http://madynes.loria.fr/ Inria ? http://www.inria.fr/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3058 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 28 14:59:29 2013 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:59:29 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review In-Reply-To: <20130228135617.GI15643@inria.fr> References: <27930_1361904486_512D0365_27930_258_1_f0827826-ee6e-409b-9d2d-0b6ddef13b15@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> <29583_1361951175_512DB9C7_29583_285_1_ca2314d9-2709-4843-a745-23ddd22581f6@THSONEA01HUB03P.one.grp> <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B551EAC1B@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <28619_1362056117_512F53B5_28619_3787_2_703d5e9e-a636-46a4-8ece-6e7a72047fdf@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <20130228135617.GI15643@inria.fr> Message-ID: <31799_1362059972_512F62C3_31799_3297_1_fc99271b-1382-4f42-8a98-8c614870dd45@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Here it is. -----Message d'origine----- De?: Alexandre Boeglin [mailto:alexandre.boeglin at inria.fr] Envoy??: jeudi 28 f?vrier 2013 14:56 ??: BISSON Pascal Cc?: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: Re: [Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review Sorry, but it seems that the email from Manuel you're referring to has not reached the fiware-security mailing list, and I'm unable to check this updated spreadsheet. Could you please forward it to me ? or to the mailing list? Best regards, Alex Le jeudi 28 f?vrier 2013 ? 13:53, BISSON Pascal a ?crit: > Thanks Manuel. Indeed it can only help in our understanding and so us fixing the issues. > > So please anyone owner of a GE having still issues in view of this report please get them fixed by end of the day. > > I will perform a check on my side tonight and of course we will discuss this at our WP8 audio conf (hoping at that we could finally close being said for me the bulk of the work should now be reviewing draft contrib. to Architecture description for Release 2). > > Best Regards, > Pascal > > De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] > Envoy? : mercredi 27 f?vrier 2013 20:33 > ? : BISSON Pascal; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > Objet : RE: FIWARE - backlog review > > Dear Pascal, > > Today, I've been able to enrich the input for easy mutual understanding. > Please, have a look at the spreadsheet, and let's see whether we can fix the issues. > > Kind regards, > Manuel > > From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE > Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 14:33 > To: 'BISSON Pascal'; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review > > Dear Wolfgang, > > Let me clarify I did the spreadsheet thinking on how to help focus on finding the errors. > I assumed all partners knew and were applying some naming rules. > http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 > > And then, the day to day work didn't allow it. > Some partners with only this help on focus were able to fix many errors. Cloud chapter has moved from 80% to 5% in a couple of days. > > I understand some more input may be helpful. But we're working with little time, > Most red marked issues as easy to identify if you are willing to have just a look. > Anyway, I'm improving on my side the report and I'm already including a line below each red KO giving additional input - after 4 o 5 error you find almost all errors are very similar. > > Please, send me the first error you don't understand and I'll give you quick feedback. > > Thanks for cooperation! > Kind regards, > Manuel > > > > > > From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] > Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 8:43 > To: Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE; MIGUEL CARRILLO PACHECO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review > Importance: High > > Dear Wolfgang, > > Yes I understand and also support we need better explanations and hearing we have to go through the guidelines to find why the issues is definitely not we/I were expecting (of course we can find by chance if any but it is very efficient and for me we should focus on content first and second the form but not putting too much constraints and also targeting some automated correction of minor issues ...). > > Hope support here delivered by TID with Manuel joining the project to support in those Agile aspects will help us from that perspective. Also lessons learnt form the Wiki/Tracker update should be capitalized to avoid the problems for next update ... > > Best Regards, > Pascal > > PS: I put in cc Manuel, Miguel and Juanjo for information also actions for further improvements as requested based on experience we gained here. > > De : Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de [mailto:Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de] > Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 20:51 > ? : BISSON Pascal; robert.seidl at nsn.com; susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu; francesco.di.cerbo at sap.com; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu > Objet : AW: FIWARE - backlog review > > Hello Pascal, > > I checked the spread sheet and found one issue, but I don't know why the other points are in red. For the future it would be better to say what is wrong instead to say there is something wrong. I'm sure the effort to find what is wrong was higher than to change something, especially if you don't find the issue. For the future I hope the way issues are reported are more clear, otherwise I think about to vote for leaving the project. There are cost cuttings, unclear communication in conjunction with the high efforts to manage EU-Projects. May be you can discuss this on your next management calls. > > Best regards > > Wolfgang > > > Von: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Im Auftrag von BISSON Pascal > Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 19:48 > An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel > Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu' > Betreff: [Fiware-security] TR: FIWARE - backlog review > Wichtigkeit: Hoch > > Dear Task leads, > > This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed. > > Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!! > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > Pascal > > PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate. > PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier > > De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es] > Envoy? : mardi 26 f?vrier 2013 12:22 > ? : BISSON Pascal > Objet : FIWARE - backlog review > > Hi Pascal, > > Find attached a new review of possible errors. > The rate improved, but is far from others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate > > I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference. > For example for Security Monitoring I find: > "Security Monitoring" > "Security_Monitoring" > "SecurityMonitoring" > "Security-Monitoring" > > I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations. I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you: > > To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping) > To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13 > > "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE" > "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" > "DataHandling" = "DataHandling" > "IdentityManagement" = "IDM" > "Optionalsecurityservices" = "OptionalSecurityEnablers" > "Privacy" = "Privacy" > "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring" > > If hope you find acceptable this mapping. > > Kind regards, > Manuel > > > ---------------------------- > Manuel Escriche Vicente > Agile Project Manager/Leader > FI-WARE Initiative > Telef?nica Digital > Parque Tecnol?gico > C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 > 47151 - Boecillo > Valladolid - Spain > Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 > Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 > http://www.tid.es > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-security mailing list > Fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-security -- Alexandre Boeglin Madynes project-team ? http://madynes.loria.fr/ Inria ? http://www.inria.fr/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Security-tracker_report-2013-02-27 - debug.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 22283 bytes Desc: Security-tracker_report-2013-02-27 - debug.xlsx URL: