[Fiware-security] FIWARE - backlog review

[Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de]

Nice guess work

Von: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa [mailto:susana.gzarzosa at atosresearch.eu]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2013 10:39
An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; Steigerwald, Wolfgang
Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; ext BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel
Betreff: RE: FIWARE - backlog review

Hi,

About our issues (in case they can help to others):


·         Line 31: addressed changing FIWARE.Epic.Security.IdentityEnabler.Stork by FIWARE.Epic.Security.IdentityManagement.Stork

·         Line 195 (ticket 890): addressed... I guess the red issue was because of a "space" after the number... I don't find other reason.

·         Line 71 (ticket 2074): addressed... I guess the red issue was because of a "space" after the number...

·         Line 39 (ticket 1099): addressed... it appears empty in Excel but not in Forge. I guess it was because of a "line"empty after the Spring line...

All the other tickets are because we have in the Summary "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance" instead of "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" (although the Generic Enabler is "Context-based Security & Compliance"). So.... we need to change once more ALL THE TICKETS RELATED TO OUR GE!!
I'm going to check this with Manuel just in case after changing all of them we need to change them again to include the "-" or the "&" as it is in the Generic Enabler name...  ;-)

Best regards,
  Susana



From: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com]
Sent: miércoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 10:24
To: Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; WALLER Adrian; EGAN Richard; TRABELSI, Slim; DANGERVILLE Cyril; ext Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de
Cc: 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu'; ext BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel
Subject: RE: FIWARE - backlog review

Hi all,
I have checked the Excel table with respect to T8.2.

Following issues (lines in Excel table) are still open:

Francesco/Slim: 8, 34, 35, 36, 86, 181, 258
Susanna: 31
Adrian/Richard: 100, 148
Robert: 107
Cyril: 214
Wolfgang: 259, 260, 261, 262

Please have a look on this topics and if possible try to figure out what the issue behind could be.

Many thanks in advance
Robert

From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:48 PM
To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; DI CERBO, Francesco; GIDOIN Daniel
Cc: BISSON Pascal; 'fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu'
Subject: TR: FIWARE - backlog review
Importance: High

Dear Task leads,

This email with the last review of Manuel regarding the Wiki/Tracker update please have a look at remaining issues pointed by Manuel and take necessary steps to get them addressed/fixed.

Many thanks in advance and hoping with your support we could improve and get finally our wiki/tracker update be assessed as good enough to be finally released !!!. Our all hope !!!

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards,
Pascal

PS: Get you task members /colleagues involved whenever appropriate.
PS2: @Xavier/ Orange please interact with Daniel as SecMon GE owner to discuss and agree on your update regarding Roadmap, Wiki and Tracker ... since so far you were not so present nor visible Xavier

De : MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE [mailto:mev at tid.es]
Envoyé : mardi 26 février 2013 12:22
À : BISSON Pascal
Objet : FIWARE - backlog review

Hi Pascal,

Find attached a new review of possible errors.
The rate improved, but is far from  others chapters, around 5 - 7% rate

I had a look at the errors most of them come from the variability your team is mapping the general enablers into the reference.
For example for Security Monitoring I find:
                "Security Monitoring"
                "Security_Monitoring"
                "SecurityMonitoring"
                "Security-Monitoring"

I've found for all of them, there was some without whitespaces, which I've chosen for consistence validations.  I copy the mapping below, which I thing will help you:

To the left is the Column 12 (without spaces, which I use as key for the mapping)
To the right, the chain I look for in Column 13

        "AccessControl" = "AccessControlGE"
        "ContextbasedSecurityCompliance" = "Context-basedSecurityAndCompliance"
        "DataHandling" = "DataHandling"
        "IdentityManagement" = "IDM"
        "Optionalsecurityservices"  = "OptionalSecurityEnablers"
        "Privacy" = "Privacy"
        "SecurityMonitoring" = "SecurityMonitoring"

If hope you find acceptable this mapping.

Kind regards,
Manuel


----------------------------
Manuel Escriche Vicente
Agile Project Manager/Leader
FI-WARE Initiative
Telefónica Digital
Parque Tecnológico
C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10
47151 - Boecillo
Valladolid - Spain
Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72
Fax: +34.983.36.75.64
http://www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/>


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos
group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although
the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network,
the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and
will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial
destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente
pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional.
Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar
inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje.
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos
no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun
compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes.
Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor
no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera
danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus.
------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20130227/feea3a2a/attachment.html>