[Fiware-security] FI-WARE - Security Chapter - Backlog - Dashboard & Review - Requested Actions to be performed

[Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de]

Hello Pascal,

I have updated the wiki page and adapted the backlog accordingly. Please have look at
https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Materializing_Security_in_FI-WARE
https://forge.fi-ware.eu/tracker/index.php?group_id=19&atid=195


Best regards

Wolfgang

Von: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Oktober 2013 17:36
An: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich); GIDOIN Daniel; DANGERVILLE Cyril; Susana Gonzalez Zarzosa; Gulden Yilmaz; EGAN Richard; xavier.aghina at orange.com; MUSARAJ Kreshnik; CAO Phong; GASPARD Lucie; Steigerwald, Wolfgang; TRABELSI, Slim; DI CERBO, Francesco; Franz-Stefan Preiss; Alexandre Boeglin; fabrice sabatier
Cc: BISSON Pascal
Betreff: FI-WARE - Security Chapter - Backlog - Dashboard & Review - Requested Actions to be performed
Wichtigkeit: Hoch

Dear Colleagues,

Find below links to the dashboard [1] and review [2] from the snapshot taken today by Manuel and sent to me.

[1]: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2905/FIWARE.backlog.security.dashboard.20131014-0934.xlsx
[2]: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2911/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20131014-0933.xlsx


During the week, only 5 items were modified !! which as we can all agree is not good and so as to radically improved.
[cid:image001.jpg at 01CEC90A.BF0784C0]
So will ask here each of the GE owners to address more seriously and do the following.

For the Dashboard:

*         Go to your GE tab and fix the issues highlighted in red,

*         As for Security Monitoring GE I which has no content allocated for the current I will ask Daniel with support of partners (ATOS, Orange, TRT-UK, TCS ...) involved to urgently fix since leave it like this.


NB:

*         The report has now a status for each enabler implementation.

*         If there is only one implementation for a GE I implementation is marked as none (I did ask Manuel to report here "default" rather than "none"). For the GE with multiple implementation (such IdM GE) we could have the implementation named here (aka One-IDM, DigitalSelf, GCP ...)

*         For entry on the backlog you can now link to ticket to GE and even GE implementation whenever needed and when IdM GE multiple implementation do exist (eg. IdM GE)


 For the Security Review:

Please focus your effort on TC1 (C1 - sprint and release fields) since easy to fix and most importantly TC3 (C3 - backlog hierarchy) being said we still have -> 45.1% flat items !!!!


 Many thanks in advance for your cooperation and support being said it is important since our deliverables on Backlog have been rejected and so we need to significantly improve to give our next deliverable a chance to be accepted.

Best Regards,
Pascal

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20131014/170b49db/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18948 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20131014/170b49db/attachment.jpg>