From aljosa.pasic at atos.net Mon Feb 3 14:39:04 2014 From: aljosa.pasic at atos.net (Pasic, Aljosa) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:39:04 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] dissemination opportunity for eID GE In-Reply-To: <43BF7859D21B6A438421CA811E89D15C017B84@DEERLM99EX6MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> References: <43BF7859D21B6A438421CA811E89D15C017B84@DEERLM99EX6MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Message-ID: <7466B5FF8C53564BA9DF0D8E310C2EAE019CD7@DEERLM99EX5MSX.ww931.my-it-solutions.net> Dear colleagues, I am involved in the program committee of two co-located events, namely Annual Privacy Forum (http://privacyforum.eu/) and Cybersecurity and privacy Forum (https://www.cspforum.eu/2014/calls). Both events are supported by EU and ENISA. I am planning to organize a session there on "Economics of eID" with four or five speakers and I would like to invite you to present some of FI-WARE work on generic enablers for authentication and authorization. The exact date would be between 20 and 22nd of May (probably 21st), but I would like to check your availability Let me know if you are interested. Best regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Feb 10 15:31:24 2014 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:31:24 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Security Chapter - Minutes of last Friday now uploaded ! Message-ID: <30988_1392042689_52F8E2C1_30988_43_1_37aedacd-c2c8-4deb-b2ec-e3a187b20d74@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Dear All, Please check Minutes at https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/19/3374/FI-WARE_WP8_Minutes_2014-02-07v2.doc Counting on you to carefully go through and perform Action Items expected. As for the rest please stay tuned. Keep you posted. Regards, Pascal [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Wed Feb 12 13:20:21 2014 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:20:21 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301B8E9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301B8E9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <32469_1392207628_52FB670B_32469_5067_1_04186033-c73d-4cda-be4e-a09952b4269b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Dear Manuel, First thanks for the spreadsheet you created ! Second here are my comments regarding Security Chapter: 1. Identity Management GCP (DT) Criteria 1: I was told that DT would leave on M36 so you have to correct & replace M40 by M36. 2. There is no planned release for R3 of Android Flow Monitoring from (INRIA). As such this GE should not appear since delivery already by end of R2. 3. There is no planned release for R3 of Secure Storage Service (TCS). As such this GE should not appear since delivery already by end of R2. As for the rest I'm assuming that when Criteria 2 is marked unknown and Criterai 3 is set (R3.3). Criteria 3 applies. Please confirm or clarify ... Best Regards, Pascal PS: I put Security team in cc for their information also in case I would have missed something. [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Envoy? : lundi 10 f?vrier 2014 17:28 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation Dear Partners, In order to try applying the criteria to identify when GEI's are finishing their activities, I've created this spreadsheet with the evidence collected. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lixgg8HuqeSrgOTh-n72zHPx0c8inlnQaH6_FBivmpo/edit?usp=sharing Since I may well have made mistakes on collecting and organising the evidence or when interpreting the criteria given, before going step forward to concluding when, I'd appreciate having feedback to consolidate evidence and interpretation. At first I appreciated three criteria to be relevant, although from last email by Juanjo, I'd say criteria 2 and 3 are the key ones. However, I share all three bellow: Criteria #1: Vote on project extension. ==> There're a few partners who marked option 1 and 2, since prevalence is unknown to me - they are marked as unknown. Fraunhofer and Siemens's enablers have "unknown" entries for that reason Criteria #2: Open Source ==> I've collected the input from Column O in the spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdEd6bGhLQWtNai1jeGN5UnJMeEdxZ0E&usp=drive_web#gid=8. Then, I understood from Juanjo's email that Proprietary GEI's finish their development and packaging on R3.2, except Thales. Additionally, GEIs to be delivered as Open Source can finish their contribution on R3.3; Be aware that there're some differences on the kind of activities GEI's can do according to whether they were declared already as Open Source by the end of November 2013 or just they were planned to be Open Source. Criteria #3 : EC directions ==> Applies to Thales whose developments continue. Then, as an example, applying the evidence collected on Summary sheet to Apps chapter, it seems to me that Mediator, Service Mashup, Business Calculator and Business Modeler should have finished their activities on R3.2 I hope it's useful. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Wed Feb 12 15:00:19 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:00:19 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation In-Reply-To: <32469_1392207628_52FB670B_32469_5067_1_04186033-c73d-4cda-be4e-a09952b4269b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301B8E9@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <32469_1392207628_52FB670B_32469_5067_1_04186033-c73d-4cda-be4e-a09952b4269b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BA301C494@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Thanks Pascal!! Your feedback is much appreciated!! Find updated the spreadsheet accordingly. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lixgg8HuqeSrgOTh-n72zHPx0c8inlnQaH6_FBivmpo/edit?usp=sharing Flowoid is holding documentation activity according to the backlog. Therefore, there's need of further clarification on this GEI. [cid:image001.png at 01CF2802.D3272F80] Your assumption is right. I found Thales to be an exception where it prevailed continuing development according to Criteria 3. Kind regards, Manuel From: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 12 de febrero de 2014 13:20 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; Fabrice SABATIER; Guillaume Bonfante (Guillaume.Bonfante at loria.fr); GASPARD Lucie; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation Importance: High Dear Manuel, First thanks for the spreadsheet you created ! Second here are my comments regarding Security Chapter: 1. Identity Management GCP (DT) Criteria 1: I was told that DT would leave on M36 so you have to correct & replace M40 by M36. 2. There is no planned release for R3 of Android Flow Monitoring from (INRIA). As such this GE should not appear since delivery already by end of R2. 3. There is no planned release for R3 of Secure Storage Service (TCS). As such this GE should not appear since delivery already by end of R2. As for the rest I'm assuming that when Criteria 2 is marked unknown and Criterai 3 is set (R3.3). Criteria 3 applies. Please confirm or clarify ... Best Regards, Pascal PS: I put Security team in cc for their information also in case I would have missed something. [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Envoy? : lundi 10 f?vrier 2014 17:28 ? : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] Aplying criteria on finishing cooperation Dear Partners, In order to try applying the criteria to identify when GEI's are finishing their activities, I've created this spreadsheet with the evidence collected. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lixgg8HuqeSrgOTh-n72zHPx0c8inlnQaH6_FBivmpo/edit?usp=sharing Since I may well have made mistakes on collecting and organising the evidence or when interpreting the criteria given, before going step forward to concluding when, I'd appreciate having feedback to consolidate evidence and interpretation. At first I appreciated three criteria to be relevant, although from last email by Juanjo, I'd say criteria 2 and 3 are the key ones. However, I share all three bellow: Criteria #1: Vote on project extension. ==> There're a few partners who marked option 1 and 2, since prevalence is unknown to me - they are marked as unknown. Fraunhofer and Siemens's enablers have "unknown" entries for that reason Criteria #2: Open Source ==> I've collected the input from Column O in the spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqGGeaQGro3fdEd6bGhLQWtNai1jeGN5UnJMeEdxZ0E&usp=drive_web#gid=8. Then, I understood from Juanjo's email that Proprietary GEI's finish their development and packaging on R3.2, except Thales. Additionally, GEIs to be delivered as Open Source can finish their contribution on R3.3; Be aware that there're some differences on the kind of activities GEI's can do according to whether they were declared already as Open Source by the end of November 2013 or just they were planned to be Open Source. Criteria #3 : EC directions ==> Applies to Thales whose developments continue. Then, as an example, applying the evidence collected on Summary sheet to Apps chapter, it seems to me that Mediator, Service Mashup, Business Calculator and Business Modeler should have finished their activities on R3.2 I hope it's useful. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 13904 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From xavier.aghina at orange.com Fri Feb 14 08:53:13 2014 From: xavier.aghina at orange.com (xavier.aghina at orange.com) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:53:13 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] Weekly audio conf Message-ID: <1327_1392364394_52FDCB6A_1327_18121_1_81FF741594681345A3FBB024B01054B90714EABC@PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> I would be traveling for the Phone Call this morning, I still have to solve a problem on the "Unit Testing" for review in progress with D.GIDOIN. Good meeting you, leave next week (school holidays), but available by email. A soon. BRGDS. [Description?: http://www.francetelecom.com/sirius/logos_mail/orange_logo.gif] Xavier Aghina Orange/IMT/OLPS/ASE/SEC Ing?nieur de Recherche en S?curit? t?l. 01 45 29 81 59 xavier.aghina at orange.com _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1264 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From susana.gzarzosa at atos.net Tue Feb 18 12:49:12 2014 From: susana.gzarzosa at atos.net (Gonzalez Zarzosa, Susana) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:49:12 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Dear Manuel, I'd like to confirm with you before changing the items in the Backlog, one of the issues that is present in all the Security Monitoring items. It's the following: [Reference.5]: Test for reference - 4th field: GE-GEI keyword And for example: SM-ServiceLevelSIEM - FIWARE.Feature.Security.SecurityMonitoring.ServiceLevelSIEM.Enhancements Does it mean that we should add in each item included in the Security Monitoring GE the reference "SM-" before the name of the component (for example FIWARE.Feature.Security.SecurityMonitoring.SM-ServiceLevelSIEM.Enhancements)? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Susana From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:49 AM To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Partners, Let me share the backlog reviews with you again. Last couple of months works were focused on upgrading the backlog dashboards first and then the reviews lately. The approach followed for the reviews is similar to the dashboards: product-owner focused Backlog reviews aren't finished yet since I'm still working on re-implementing some criteria. However, some others criteria are available and able to identify some errors/issues, which I though you may well want to fix. Find links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3401/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140213.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3402/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140213.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3405/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140213.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3403/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140213.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3404/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140213.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3407/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140213.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3406/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140213.xlsx If you required clarifications or some additional support, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mev at tid.es Tue Feb 18 15:35:04 2014 From: mev at tid.es (MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:35:04 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-security] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) In-Reply-To: References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB21CA9ED@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90BB31A02E5@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Dear Susana, It would go to: FIWARE.Feature.Security.SM-ServiceLevelSIEM.Enhancements. So you need to transform 'SecurityMonitoring.' Into 'SM-' -> FIWARE.Feature.Security.SecurityMonitoring.ServiceLevelSIEM.Enhancements If you want to try one to check it; let me know to send you an updated review. Kind regards, Manuel From: Gonzalez Zarzosa, Susana [mailto:susana.gzarzosa at atos.net] Sent: martes, 18 de febrero de 2014 12:49 To: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Cc: fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Manuel, I'd like to confirm with you before changing the items in the Backlog, one of the issues that is present in all the Security Monitoring items. It's the following: [Reference.5]: Test for reference - 4th field: GE-GEI keyword And for example: SM-ServiceLevelSIEM - FIWARE.Feature.Security.SecurityMonitoring.ServiceLevelSIEM.Enhancements Does it mean that we should add in each item included in the Security Monitoring GE the reference "SM-" before the name of the component (for example FIWARE.Feature.Security.SecurityMonitoring.SM-ServiceLevelSIEM.Enhancements)? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Susana From: fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ge-owners-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:49 AM To: fiware-ge-owners at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-ge-owners] Backlog content - Reviews (back again) Dear Partners, Let me share the backlog reviews with you again. Last couple of months works were focused on upgrading the backlog dashboards first and then the reviews lately. The approach followed for the reviews is similar to the dashboards: product-owner focused Backlog reviews aren't finished yet since I'm still working on re-implementing some criteria. However, some others criteria are available and able to identify some errors/issues, which I though you may well want to fix. Find links below: Apps: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3401/FIWARE.backlog.apps.review.20140213.xlsx Cloud: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3402/FIWARE.backlog.cloud.review.20140213.xlsx IoT: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3405/FIWARE.backlog.iot.review.20140213.xlsx Data: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3403/FIWARE.backlog.data.review.20140213.xlsx I2ND: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3404/FIWARE.backlog.i2nd.review.20140213.xlsx Security: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3407/FIWARE.backlog.security.review.20140213.xlsx MiWi: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3406/FIWARE.backlog.miwi.review.20140213.xlsx If you required clarifications or some additional support, please, don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel.gidoin at thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 20 15:25:46 2014 From: daniel.gidoin at thalesgroup.com (GIDOIN Daniel) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:46 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE - SECURITY - Audio coference of this Friday cancelled Message-ID: <22361_1392906347_5306106B_22361_18708_1_b593561a-565c-4e4d-8c83-7baf9b1eefde@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Dear All, This just to let you know that our audio conference of this Friday (21/02) is cancelled. Please use that time to work on action items as reported in the minutes of last audio also the one that came in this week : https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/19/3424/FI-WARE_WP8_Minutes_2014-02-14.doc Best regards daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From FRP at zurich.ibm.com Thu Feb 27 18:37:38 2014 From: FRP at zurich.ibm.com (Franz-Stefan Preiss) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:37:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] Your peer review of WP3 D313 (Open Specs) In-Reply-To: <5405_1393414446_530DD12E_5405_5363_1_e85e88cc-2c93-40ba-bb74-403375f3734b@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> References: <7022_1393329193_530C8429_7022_16065_1_eb200c75-eb5b-45b8-9ac4-9f68ce904f08@THSONEA01HUB06P.one.grp> <530DBCAC.1090507@zurich.ibm.com> <5405_1393414446_530DD12E_5405_5363_1_e85e88cc-2c93-40ba-bb74-403375f3734b@THSONEA01HUB05P.one.grp> Message-ID: Dear Robert, Dear Wolfgang, Dear Pascal, Dear all, >> As for other partners to get involved in the peer review I suggested already NSN and DT colleagues to get involved. >> Please contact them and organize the work with them in a timely manner since we are already beyond schedule and >> SAP is awaiting for this peer review. as Anja already wrote: given the large amount of the document with 369/404 pages - measured with OpenOffice/LibreOffice - we suggest to use the same approach as last year, namely assigning different reviewers per Section. In particular, we propose the following chapter distribution (according to OpenOffice page numbers) for review of the Apps OpenSpecs. ============================================================= GEs from 1st Wave Deadline: as soon as possible ============================================================= IBM (81 pages): Marketplace, 62 pages (pp.30-91) Mediator/SETHA2, 19 pages (pp.110-128) DT (40 pages): Registry, 18 pages (pp.92-109) Repository, 22 pages (pp.8-29) NSN (44 pages): Service Mashup, 16 pages (pp.129-144) Business Calculator, 16 pages (pp. 352-367) Business Modeler, 12 pages (pp. 340-351) ============================================================= GEs from 2nd Wave Deadline: end of March according to Review Cockpit ============================================================= IBM (?? pages): Mediator/Mediator, ???? pages (not available yet) Revenue Settlement and Sharing System, 20 pages (pp.320-339) DT (91 pages): Application Mashup, 69 pages (pp.145-213) Light Semantic Composition Editor, 22 pages (pp.240-261) NSN (74 pages): Service Composition, 26 pages (pp.214-239) Store, 58 pages (pp.262-319) ============================================================= So, Robert and Wolfgang, would you be available to support us in the review? For now, 1st Wave seems to be important. Possibly, the second wave might also be done by a different set of partners... Let's discuss tomorrow in the FI-WARE call. Best Regards, Franz-Stefan From: BISSON Pascal To: Anja Lehmann , "'Franz-Stefan Preiss'" Cc: Michael Osborne , GIDOIN Daniel , "Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de" , "Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich) (gerald.meyer at nsn.com)" , "DI CERBO, Francesco" , "'TRABELSI, Slim'" , "pascal.bisson at noos.fr" , BISSON Pascal Date: 26.02.2014 12:34 Subject: RE: Your peer review of WP3 D313 (Open Specs) Dear Anja, Thanks for your email. Meanwhile, I'm a bit surprised to hear that the peer review has not started yet since I let you and Franz-Stefan known once week ago ... (in fact at last audio conf 14/02/2014 - See minutes/AP on IBM on this). Now in view of the situation I would appreciate if you could perform this review the sooner the better. As for what to review, you have to review the document indicated in my previous email. This document is the one generated by WP3 and encompasses all GEs that need to be peer-reviewed. As for other partners to get involved in the peer review I suggested already NSN and DT colleagues to get involved. Please contact them and organize the work with them in a timely manner since we are already beyond schedule and SAP is awaiting for this peer review. Hope I have answered. Best Regards, Pascal [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] -----Message d'origine----- De : Anja Lehmann [mailto:anj at zurich.ibm.com] Envoy? : mercredi 26 f?vrier 2014 11:07 ? : BISSON Pascal; 'Franz-Stefan Preiss' Cc : Michael Osborne; GIDOIN Daniel; Wolfgang.Steigerwald at telekom.de; Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich) (gerald.meyer at nsn.com); DI CERBO, Francesco; 'TRABELSI, Slim'; pascal.bisson at noos.fr Objet : Re: Your peer review of WP3 D313 (Open Specs) Dear Pascal, thanks for letting us know that the deliverable is ready for the internal review now. Given the large amount of almost 400 pages we would suggest to use the same approach as last year, namely assigning different reviewers per Section. Could you please suggest such a work split among the partners of WP8? Also, can you confirm that the review should only cover those GEs/Sections which are part of the 1st Wave as indicated in the peer-review cockpit [1]? This would be the following sections: Marketplace Mediator Registry Repository Service Composition? (unclear, no wave assigned) Service Mashup Business Calculator Business Modeler We will be able to provide a review of 1-2 sections by mid next week, as Franz-Stefan is currently not in the office. Best regards, Anja [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VFZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing#gid=0 Am 2/25/2014 12:53 PM, schrieb BISSON Pascal: > Dear Franz-Stefan, > > I've just checked the Peer review cockpit > (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnxxmzdEZ1WtdDNDQms5d3VF > ZElaUlhtcEpINWl6YWc&usp=sharing#gid=0) > for GE Open Specs R3 of Apps Chapter (aka: > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3350/D313_WP3_v1_generated > .docx) > > Unfortunately I couldn't find there your peer review. So could you > please upload it asap. > > In case it would not be complete please upload what you have reviewed > already and inform me regarding what remains. In case you need support > to complete this review please contact NSN/DT) colleagues in cc to > give you an hand on this. This not to delay too much your review to > reach WP3 Lead (SAP/Markus) who is awaiting for it. > > Many thanks in advance for your cooperation and support. > > Hearing from you. > > Regards, > > Pascal > > [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@] > -- Dr. Anja Lehmann IBM Research Zurich www.zurich.ibm.com/~anj tel: +41 44 724 8351 fax: +41 44 724 8953 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From daniel.gidoin at thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 27 18:50:56 2014 From: daniel.gidoin at thalesgroup.com (GIDOIN Daniel) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:50:56 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE Security - Architecture - Peer review Message-ID: <3449_1393523472_530F7B0D_3449_884_1_cccb87b6-3b94-43d2-9e78-b25e94a39e40@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Dear all, Please, by Monday evening at the latest, take into account the comments of the reviewers, with the objective to deliver a new R3 the next week. Let us know when you have completed. The changes shall be provided on the private wiki: https://forge.fi-ware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Security_Architecture Warning: Concerning the Context-based security & compliance GE and the Data Handling Ge, it is the R2 which has been reviewed. In this case, take into account the only comments applicables. Best regards Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: D233_WP8_V1_generated_reviewed_WP13.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 3501570 bytes Desc: D233_WP8_V1_generated_reviewed_WP13.docx URL: